TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheComputerLovesYou Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by TheComputerLovesYou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/01/austerity-cuts-2015-12-billion-britain-protest Pretty sure the austerity cuts are unpopular as fuck. This is another shitty one. That's what you get when you elect a Conservative government.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:14 PM
1

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/01/austerity-cuts-2015-12-billion-britain-protest Doubt anyone is coming through the bloodbath unscathed. But hey no, it's clearly a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:13 PM
1

Additionally, we have innocent until proven guilty in our society. I understand that an individual can be guilty of a crime, but not be convicted because the prosecution cannot prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. We do not know if Mr. Adams raped this woman, however as the criminal justice system has decided that he has not, it is not justified to presume that he is a rapist. If he did not rape anyone and was accused of it, that's a false accusation. I mean do you even read the words you …
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:55 AM
1

Sorry, he was sentenced for 18, in prison for 10. Impressed you actually opened the article you linked to though! It must be cool for that link to turn purple.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:24 AM
1

Okay, I see we need to take this slowly. Three men were accused of rape. Two were convicted. The third was acquitted in a hung jury. The defense in the case where the man was acquitted took a different approach, and called a witness the other two defense attorneys did not. The mistrial was called because the witness was not called in the other two trials. At that point, the state had the ability to call for a retrial, or to let him go. Seeing as how 18 years passed, the state decided that there …
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:17 AM
1

Ah yes, "falsely accused". A hung jury, why that's enough to determine that someone was falsely accused, and attack the person who accused them. That's exactly how it works! I don't give two figs about your "support movement". It's the fact that your support looks a fuckton like an angry lynch mob that gives me pause. Hilariously, that's exactly what you whine that "feminists do" - instead of supporting rape victims, they form an angry lynch mob to go attack the accused rapists before conviction…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:59 AM
2

Ah, I was wondering why a flood of morons who hadn't read the article was streaming into the Uplifting News story, starting about three hours ago. Despite the tag you drooling idiots have put on the story, there is no evidence there was a false accusation here. The prosecution for this man did not call a witness that the other prosecution in the case of a different man accused did. For that man, the jury was hung, meaning that despite the testimony, at least some jurors voted to convict. The rul…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:49 AM
1

I guess there may be somethong on AltTRP ... But worked out by a dozen people in a few months... Not a few hundered thousand people over a couple of decades of evidence accumulation and analysis. So TRP is the ultimate culmination of what happens when you confuse anecdote with evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 07:18 PM
1

Sympathetic in that they advocate outright murder only occasionally, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 07:16 PM
3

I have a question. You are afflicted with a medical condition that inflicts crippling, damaging, destructive agony. Chronic pain, flares, it makes your life miserable and desperate. The doctor diagnoses you, and tells you you have a fairly common condition. There's two medicines that will cure it. The first medicine alleviates the symptoms almost completely, but has a side effect. It turns your skin purple. For most, it will slowly change back to your normal skin tone, but for some people they'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 07:14 AM
1

I wonder if this POS sub will acknowledge this story was false?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:52 PM
1

Mmmm, so despite the upvotes on the story, and despite the people who share this forum's interests, we're claiming that both of those mean nothing, because you... feel differently? 'kay
/r/MensRights13/10/14 04:05 PM
1

The upvotes on the story indicate you're a minority. Actually the places this story is being upvoted is fascinating. Besides here, we have /r/WhiteRights, /r/conservative, /r/Republican, /r/TumblrinAction... it's really quite the cross section of Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:26 PM
3

Well the National Review is an ultra-right wing site that attacks gay marriage, non-Christians, environmentalists, trans people, basically anything that falls outside of their extremely narrow worldview. In other words, heavily upvoted on /r/MensRights, a publication almost designed for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:18 PM
2

It's also to avoid drawing unnecessary distinctions between students. Imagine the teacher said "come on whites and blacks" or "come on Jews and non-Jews" or "Come on, talls and shorts". It's... inclusive... kind of. Tell me you wouldn't be wigged out by a teacher who referred to the class as "Whites and Blacks" and I'll call you a liar.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:11 PM
4

http://www.snopes.com/politics/education/purplepenguins.asp
/r/MensRights11/10/14 09:46 PM
9

http://www.snopes.com/politics/education/purplepenguins.asp
/r/MensRights11/10/14 09:46 PM
2

Nobody intends to go out and be fooled by a transsexual partner who doesn't disclose. Like cheating, I doubt many people can predict how they might respond (revulsion? anger? numbness?) at the moment they're confronted with the reality of it. Some can be violent, and we don't have to approve of that to recognize that it's likely. Well I still think the term "fooled" is fucking stupid as shit here. Oh no, you had sex with a woman, your life is terrible. So, we are in agreement in one thing at lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 08:22 PM
2

And you move back to shaking your fists and yelling, rather than focusing on the fact that the people at fault are the potential murders, that there is nothing natural about murder, and that if people are trying to commit it then you should use whatever force necessary to stop them, up to and including lethal. Is that a good summary of what is occurring here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 05:11 PM
2

This shows a demented conception of male nature and is going to lead to the imminent murders of many transgenders if it becomes common You think all that emotional hyperventilating changes the reality that if transgender MTFs go around operating under the assumption that they won't be strongly up their chances of being killed for duping men into having sex with them changes reality? What does your condemnation of reality matter? It doesn't change anything. If you encourage MTF transgenders to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 04:13 PM
0

Some men will rob convenience stores, therefore everyone who opens a convenience store has done something immoral and wrong that makes them deserving of robbery? It's just a fact of life that generic people will rob convenience stores, so that's why you should never consider opening one? I wouldn't call that "Logic". Frankly, if that was done for a political purpose, I'd call that terrorism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 03:50 PM
2

If women can't compete with Fallon Fox, why did she get her ass thoroughly kicked the one time she fought a high-tier fighter? Also, with your vast knowledge of sport fights, how often do orbitals get broken, and how often do minor concussions occur?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 03:07 PM
0

Ah, generic men who don't include you, of course, will kill the niggers who don't stay in their place. I get it. Is there something inherently fucked up about these "generic men"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 02:58 PM
-1

Ah I see. You won't kill anyone. They'll just "be killed" by "some people" who have nothing to do with you, and that's just the way it is. I think the problem here are all the murderers you apparently know of, yes? (also this has strong parallels to "those uppity niggers gonna be killed if they ride in the front of the bus, just the way it is around here") One of the strongest possible condemnations of a society I can imagine is that that society murders people for who they are, and the rest of …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 02:13 PM
2

Everything could possibly provide an advantage. I mean not being blind is clearly an advantage in MMA (heh), banning all fighters who have vision seems silly. Similarly, I can find photos too! http://s.ndtvimg.com/images/stories/dydek_300.jpg http://www.strongatall.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Bianca-Elena-Blanaru-630x776.jpg http://media.tsn.s3.amazonaws.com/35801_ANW_BKW_captains_101209_big.jpg What is a fair limit to set for women basketball players? I should note all of these outperformed …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 02:11 PM
0

Are you literally threatening to murder people? Because dude, even the KKK has backed off from that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 07:03 AM
3

Perhaps I am. Surely you can make a better argument that I can grasp, right? I asked you to back your statement up. Surely if she has an unfair advantage it will of course be displayed as an unusual number of wins, a climb of the team to the top division, status as a top scorer, etc., right? You won't have to resort to showing off pictures and going "LOL" like a typical 4chan user, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 02:10 AM
1

How well did her team do? How well did she do as a player? Answer that and you may kill your own claim. We shall ignore, for a second, that MMA has weight classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 01:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter