TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheContrariant Archive

View 2 posts and 26 comments by TheContrariant on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Non-binary. The answer is : a bit of both. Some part is indeed rooted biologically and does not change. And some other parts do change.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 09:30 PM
1

⚫<<How about the ideology that some men are mindless sex robots that can be controlled by feminine seduction? >> Being a sex robot does not necessarily mean being mindless. And when it comes to sex, yes, some women can choose to make some men want to have sex. The part you are missing, and I draw you attention on this, is : just because the choice originated from the woman, it does not mean that the man does not want it. Indeed, he wants it. And so both are winning, nobody is losing. Life is per…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 08:53 PM
3

FAIL Again, buy yourself new eyes. It wasn't me who said "mental disability" For fuck sake, can you stay focus and stop being wrong? You really have a natural talent for being wrong all the time... hahaha
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 08:21 PM
5

And here you are, proving him right. You still did not come up wit a reasonable point about the topic. All you are able to do is "ad hominem" arguments, attacking us as persons (instead of attacking the content of the message). This says it all.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 07:49 PM
1

⚫<<Honestly I can't even read your comments anymore, the formatting alone is eye gore.>> Oh, you don't like how I perfectly articulate my replies, answering your points one bye one? Something you don't do, for obvious reasons (you can't answer my questions because it would uncover how wrong you are) ⚫<<Feminists are angry at you because you perpetuate sexists ideologies>> What ideologies? The truth? Yeah ok, they are mad at the truth. Just like in the title of my post : they are mad at the Unive…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 07:45 PM
2

Hahahaha she is so TRIGGERED it's becoming a pleasure to see her loosing her ground. Unbelievable
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 05:37 PM
1

⚫<<Be Feminine: you're using your body to control men through sex>> And what's wrong with that? Femininity does not necessarily have something to do with sex, but even if it did, what's wrong with it? Feminine is the adjective of Female Masculine is the adjective of Male Yes, it is related to gender, it is related to sex. There is nothing wrong about being a woman, nothing wrong about being feminine, nothing wrong about using your powers (sex or not). ⚫<<Be Masculine: clearly you want to be a ma…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 05:31 PM
1

FAIL In English, if you say "Women are..." you refer to all women in general. In order to refer to a subset only there need to be a quantifier or anything that specifies the subgroup, such as "Some women are..." or "Green-eyed women are..." or "Angry feminists women are...". So when you say that I said "Women are jealous of men", you are wrong. That sentence is referring to all women in general, and that is not what I said. So you are wrong. That's just English language, darling. Boom. Done.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 04:57 PM
1

FAIL AGAIN I never said "women" are jealous. I said "angry feminist women" are jealous. Only those ones. What is your native language? It seems you have difficulties understanding... Oh by the way, you haven't answered the question :) Hahaha you tried to dodge the question... maybe because there is no good answer 😘 I told you so...
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 02:09 PM
2

⚫<<Being angry is a completely different emotion to bring jealous.>> And what are you angry about? Angry about not being able to do what men do? And what is it exactly, that men can do and that women cannot? ⚫ <<you projecting your feelings onto others>> said the girl who repeatedly claimed that I said things I never said. So much for "not projecting onto others"
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 01:43 PM
2

It is a very good question, indeed I am not covering them in my post (not talking about them). I am happy to hear your thoughts on this
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 01:39 PM
1

⚫<<No woman is jealous of a man>> HAhaha, my post is about Angry feminists, that are Mad for not being Men, and so, let me quote you again, pay attention to the words highlighted in bold : <<I am mad because my daughter will have to grow up dealing with this instead of just doing whatever the fuck she wants like my son gets to do. I am angry>>. Perfect match with the title of my post 😂 ⚫<<you proved yourself wrong on that many comments ago.>> Nope, sorry, just saying so doesn't make it so. As a …
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 12:48 PM
2

⚫<<I'm mad because women are getting raped and murdered while you prance around saying they are jealous of men.>> NO-no. Wrong. I never said all women are jealous of men. You failed, right here :) ⚫<<I'm mad because I am sick of seeing women being treated as a second class and stepped on by people like you.>> Cool story bro. Maybe the reason why you perceive the way they are treated as "second class" is precisely because you see the world through masculine glasses, instead of seeing the world th…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 12:03 PM
1

No-no. You are making erroneous assumptions because you are blinded by your hate and by your frustration haha. Poor girl... You are triggered by what I say because deep down you know it is true :) that's why it makes you so mad. Whoops
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 11:11 AM
3

You nailed it. In my post I explain how some angry feminists women are deep down simply mad because they are not men themselves. They are jealous of men instead of enjoying and embracing being fully a woman. I even got lucky with an angry feminist biting on my hook on my post haha, come and join me proving her wrong (link). She says "this shitty subreddit disagree with you", poor frustrated girl...
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 11:08 AM
1

⚫<<All the comments here are people disagreeing with you.>> What comments? There are only 2 commentators as of now: you (with false claims), and the other guy was such a fake that even his entire account got deleted. So? ⚫<< in-between a load of other incoherent babble.>> Which part is not coherent? Do you realise that so far, you have been wrong on every single of your comments. And I am not just claiming this out of thin air no: I have debunked each of them with a precise demonstration. ⚫<<you…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 11:00 AM
1

How about you stop being wrong saying things that are false. Start by stopping saying that I said things I never said, and things will become much easier for you.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 10:30 AM
23

Hahahaha, I love it
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 10:27 AM
1

⚫<<Female boxers are not jealous of male boxers>> I never said they were. What's your point? ⚫<<you [...] say you know better than them what they think and feel.>> I never said I know better. I'm pretty sure most of the Angry masculine feminists I refer to already know very well that they are jealous of men. I never said I know better than them. ⚫<<Enjoy life being a misogynistic pig>> Nope, not misogynistic at all. I love women, and particularly feminine women. You on the other side seem to hav…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 10:02 AM
5

Awww... are you drunk? Or retarded? You are so wrong, you are being cute. I never said all masculine women are jealous. I am not referring to every masculin women in my post. Instead, I am referring to the "angry" feminists ones (see the post fucking title?). This is a subset of the masculine women, not all of them.Some women are masculine and are not jealous of men. I never said the contrary. That's perfectly fine. I picked a female boxer (masculine) as an answer to your question on purpose pre…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/21 09:04 AM
3

Women are people. Each woman is an individual. Each individual can be powerful in a variety of ways. Franchon Crews Dezurn is very powerful. It has nothing to do with sex. Done.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 10:37 PM
4

Absolutely yes. Do you have any actual argument? Because your reply is empty.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 08:52 PM
3

⚫<< You say women only have power if they are feminine >> Nope, didn't say that.I said women can be more powerful than men. And then I continue by giving an example. ⚫<<Therefore womens only power is through a specific kind of sexual manipulation.>> Dude, is English your native language? Where in my post do you see the word "only" for fuck sake? If you can't copy paste then take one fucking minute and type it by hand. Truth is: I didn't say that.Furthermore, don't forget seduction is not necessa…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 08:16 PM
4

Where did you read the word "only"? As I said, try to copy paste the sentence. And you will see that you are wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 07:54 PM
5

Nope. Which sentence in my post makes you think that? Copy paste such sentence, if there is one. (And you will either realise that you are wrong, or that you don't understand English) I think you are confusing women (individual beings) with femininity (an array of characteristics that everyone possesses to some variable extent, even men). A man can be very feminine, and there is nothing wrong with that. A woman can be very masculine, and there is nothing wrong with that. What is wrong if for som…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 06:32 PM
2

I guess we need to teach pupils at school that only "you" can choose to victimise yourself. And what other people do (as long as what they do is the result of a freedom that you possess as well) can never make you a victim. An "accident" of unlucky events, at worse, but not a victim.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 05:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter