| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Legos are greatIt was always leaning heavily that way but jeez... Why does every single sub like this turn into some sexist / racist cesspool. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 19/04/21 07:18 PM |
| -5 | wamen.Yeah, any sub like this always turns more and more extreme until only pathetic and bitter people remain jerking each other off. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 21/04/20 01:00 AM |
| 59 | Ok... but why would it matter tf! | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/04/20 03:44 AM |
| 2 | Next time try supporting your own?God-Tier. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/02/20 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Couldn't be more true.You're ridiculous. And you only help prove my point, while you only damage your own supposed cause. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/19 09:36 AM |
| 1 | Couldn't be more true.As I've said to somebody else, I was using a simile. Not saying that this sub in particular was overrun by politcally right people. Can see how it could be read otherwise though. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/19 01:57 AM |
| 0 | Couldn't be more true.I hate to think that this is the bastion some people facing real men-sided gender issues have. Scouring some of the top posts seem to have people facing actual issues but are given only antagonising snapshots to express their issue to. So many other people just want to hate somebody rather than actually try to discuss or care beyond the hate. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 11:59 PM |
| 1 | Couldn't be more true.It isn't about avoiding asserting something, it's saying it's based on one post. But okay, I'll have a minute think and give a more definitive statement. I think the subsection of people in this sub which uses 'men's right' as a cover for shitting on a blanket term such as 'Feminism', which sits at a 84% upvoted (as of now) even after reaching a wider audience shows some representation of a subreddit. Looking at the top page seems to be the epitome of low hanging fruit to shit on that blanket te… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 11:54 PM |
| 1 | Couldn't be more true.Saw your edit afterwards and all it does is continue to put words in my mouth. The same words I just explained were wrong a minute ago. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 10:38 PM |
| -8 | Couldn't be more true.I said it had the feeling of, based on this post. Your reading comprehension needs some work. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 10:33 PM |
| -9 | Couldn't be more true.I didn't say being anti-feminist meant somebody was far right. I said it was similar to a subreddit's original intention being dominated by a crowd without the original intention. So I would say you have no idea what you are talking about. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 10:32 PM |
| -9 | Couldn't be more true.Yeah, I just saw this on r/all wtf is this? Has the feeling of one of those subreddits originally for a country or political area that has being taken over by far right people. EDIT: As in, people with a different intent than the original. Not actually far right in this particular case. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/19 10:21 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter