TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDarkHorse83 Archive

View 2 posts and 176 comments by TheDarkHorse83 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

At one point in time (nearing the end of segregation) this would have been acceptable. I take this as a sign (literally) that perhaps we're starting to near the end of the thought process that segregates men from families.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:23 PM
14

Sadly, most students will end up having a class or professor that will push this political agenda. Mine was my sophomore year of college, it was supposed to be a lit class, it turned into Man Hating 101.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:31 PM
32

I think it needs to be understood that he should have a lawyer before the cops return. Get in front of this the way you did with her brother's threats. Talk to that lawyer, keep his card on you at all times, speed dial that guy, he will answer all of your questions regarding rape kits, witness testimony, and how to prove your innocence in all of this. And when the cops return, call that lawyer right away. If you hear someone at the door say "[Reddit] County Police", you call your lawyer. I know …
/r/MensRights25/10/13 12:45 PM
2

I'm glad that this got air time. Even if it was faked (and I'm not saying that it is) this kind of thing can happen and should be noted.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:13 PM
25

"referred to male bonding in steakhouses or at barbecues as examples of a culture of male-dominant consumption of meat and women" Ok, assuming that there is male bonding happening at your local steakhouse (I've only gone there on dates with women, but whatever) is that such a bad thing? Is it a problem that men want to gather around a grill (ok, that happens) and hang out the way friends do? Are we afraid of a community where the men know and like each other? And how exactly did we make the leap…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:05 PM
8

should we be pushing people to play a game they have no real chance in? College sports is filled with people who will never be pros. High school sports have tons of people who will never play in college. The idea of the sport is not to play in the pros, or to get paid millions to do it, it's to do something you love, throw yourself in so completely that you know every aspect of it, and have the time of your life. Gender plays no roll in this.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:42 PM
3

As a guy in a long term relationship that gets turned down regularly (I have a higher libido then she does) these things go through your mind after a while. Eventually you talk about things the way you would in a healthy relationship and you ask (most) of these questions. You also have to reword them.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:05 PM
3

I thought that bankruptcy didn't end child support payments?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:09 PM
1

WHY ARE THE SHOUTING?!
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:10 PM
3

I'm not sure how you got to those statistics I don't think that he intended them as true statistics, just a view of the sampling. (3 women) If he is serious (I doubt it) then this IS a dangerous slope. We've seen this recently in certain studies done by feminist groups, where a wild claim is made based on a sampling of 60 people. It's not something that I support, but as I said, I don't think that he was serious, so I'm not going to get up in arms about it.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:09 PM
2

I don't think that it's a useless word, though I do think that it is a movement without a concise goal. With suffrage women had a clear goal, the right to vote. Then they wanted to be a part of the workforce. Now feminism claims that it is fighting for equality. Society has made great strides in this area, in certain places we've fallen short, in others we've gone too far. It's gotten to the point where people are contorting statistics to give the movement a focus (women make x to men's y, x wom…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:04 PM
5

I'm so disappointed that this sub was empty, but really happy that it exists.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:40 PM
4

I understand that she is not allowed on the property, but does she have to keep a certain distance from the school? If you see her loitering nearby (as I'm sure she did if she keeps running up and yelling at teachers) can you call the cops to take her away? Or does she have to actually set foot on school property?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:39 PM
9

“It’s fun,” reports one young female commuter, “and it smells better.” From page three of the article. For those that choose to down vote.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:54 PM
2

^ This is the FBI's definition, I'm sure that many jurisdictions would change their definition the moment that the FBI changed theirs. (Something that I hope happens very soon.) Sadly, it would be labeled a 'sexual assault'. Depending on jurisdiction this crime may carry a lighter sentence than Rape.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 08:10 PM
4

turn the tables on the media The only reason for the money is to do exactly this. Media outlets won't care who they hurt, so long as their bottom line isn't damaged. But, if you make the punishment for publishing lies more severe than their gains for those lies, that's when it will stop, and not before.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:41 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Wilde#Trials
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:39 PM
1

But my question is 'Why?' Why would the press need unfettered and immediate access to a player? Why do they need to talk to these people while they're half dressed or taking off their pads? While they're still sweating and smell like hell? There's no need. They'll be able to answer your questions in twenty minutes, so why would anyone ever add that to a contract? What good does it do?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:12 PM
1

What I said was that reporters shouldn't be in the locker room. Period. Doesn't matter if that person is a man or woman, they shouldn't be there. These athletes just worked their asses off for several hours, give them some time to shower and dress before you put them on TV or grill them with questions.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:37 PM
1

It's at the end of the article. Despite the fact that I don't think reporters belong in a locker room at all, and if they are, why aren't male reporters in women's locker rooms? I have no real issue with the article. Though, I do also think that it serves no significant purpose. It feels more like a piece that they'd publish on a really slow day.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:54 PM
1

I hope that her intent is to either screw with the women who do contact her, or somehow track down their boyfriends/spouses and tell them what their ladies are up to.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:44 PM
10

None of that. No one gender is good or evil. Some people are just plain evil.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:01 PM
2

She put up an ad on Craigslist right after Your girlfriend or the guard?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:59 AM
12

female condoms F-condom He was going for an abbreviation.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:32 PM
0

That is actually why I would be upset with a lack of a male equivalent to that story, people don't notice/know/care that the same things that can have a negative impact on women can have a negative impact on men. Do you (as in the people who wrote the original story) think that porn/magazines/movies/all media push onto you what they think the perfect female for should look like? Yes it does. Is that fair? No. But I also think that porn/magazines/movies/all media push onto us what the perfect man…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:24 PM
1

It IS really hard to speculate on this, that is why I have to up-vote you. There is never any mention of one, I'm not sure who's oversight that is, the people writing the original story, or the ones reporting on it. In either case, as I said, if they had planned on or had one in the works, then I'd have no problem with it and would think the entire thing an unfortunate incident. But, if there were no plans to do a male counter story, then I take issue with the cover itself.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:36 AM
3

Also, until Paternity it proven, try to keep your name off of the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:37 PM
–

If I had heard anywhere in any of the articles or posts about this cover that they had planned next month's to be all men's penises, then I'd have no problem with it. But it never occurred to anyone that a man might have a false body image because of porn as well. (One of their excuses for doing the cover in the first place.) Since no ever bothered to get the guys on campus to do a counter piece, then I find it to be terribly one sided, and frankly closed minded to male body image issues.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:26 PM
2

To me it's awesome to see the prosecutor fighting for the man who was expelled from college with no real proof of misdeeds. I also have no doubt in my mind that if they had definitive proof that Wells did something wrong, then he'd have been put on trial and be in jail by now.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:20 PM
0

Yes, someone being drugged is not very common. But, since we have the ability to detect the drugs in a drink, let's put this shit on the market, sell straws by the pack, but let's also not forget to keep an eye on our drinks. Seriously people, watch your stuff, you never know who's taking your credit card, and who's dropping what in your glass. Between diligence and detection, the few confirmed cases should be preventable.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:37 PM
1

Let's start with one basic understanding. Women are allowed to be attracted to men. Men are allowed to be attracted to women. (There are many other permutations, but for simplicity's sake, let's just keep going.) As part of this, it's ok to want to (and not want to) have sex with a person, as long as you handle your own emotions and actions in a respectable manner. Some parts of modern feminism (not all of it) think that you should not be sexually attracted to women as that objectifies them, I r…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:31 PM
1

Wanting women to be this way is sexist. Assuming that men want women to be this way is sexist. This is not what I believe that the MR community is about and if this is the kind of shit that I can expect to find here, then you can unsubscribe me right now.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:50 PM
2

Not sure if OP is joking or is a troll. Edit: I read OP's other comments.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:42 PM
14

Or perhaps grown men are less likely to seek help on their own and thus their mental illness will go undiagnosed. Also, I think that we are giving too many kids drugs for ADD/ADHD and that many of them are just high energy or they do not fall into the teacher's teaching style. Perhaps they'd do better in a different class.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:22 PM
1

They're welcomed to participate in that manner. However, the concept of not shaving your face is that everyone can see it. Most women do not work or live in an environment where they would be showing off their legs or armpits, so it would be more of a quiet support. I'm not saying don't do it, by all means go ahead, but it might be better to wear something that made it more pronounced. Perhaps since breast cancer has adopted pink we can take blue or brown? (bad prostate joke, I know) A way to in…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:29 PM
–

April 5, 2011. It's not like they're setting it up to be on International Men's Day. The White House is trying to raise awareness of an issue. We're doing that with no-shave November. Everyone has something that theywant to bring to everyone's attention, and this diserves some. The US government's site on AIDS clearly states that men are most at risk, so they're trying to bring attention to women facing AIDS as well. Similar to how we try to raise awareness that men can suffer from breast cancer…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:24 PM
2

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance The federal government has defined "federal financial assistance" as any school where any one of their students is recieving federal financial aid. So the school doesn't have to take money from the fed directly, if a student takes money from the fed and gives it to …
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:41 PM
1

Clearly they have found a target audience. There is also another demigraphic that, when surprised with certain body hair, will find it unwanted, and thus the mood is dead.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:04 PM
2

I think that the more appropriate response is to run your hands over her legs and comment on how silky smooth they are. She clearly went through some effort in an attempt to be even the slightest bit more attractive to you, appreciate that. Later on you can tell her how you feel about leg shaving, but in that moment she basically wants you to grab her leg and give her a complement. (Or at least that's been my experiances. YMMV)
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:00 PM
1

Certain professionals may not be needed just yet, but a good mentor is. I suggest talking to certain teachers in your school, maybe the guidance counciler, see how receptive they are to your thinking, you may be able to find someone that can help you on a more personal level then a few paragraphs on the internet.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:48 PM
21

I would think that a man's right to be attracted to whomever he pleases would be a men's rights issue. I'm not going to argue if women want to fight for it (just as I wouldn't argue if women wanted a more biologically neutral definition of rape), but I would think that since it's about a man's right to choose his partner, then MR should be all for it!
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:45 PM
46

the first openly gay US senator That's a feminist issue? I always thought that it was a gay rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:37 PM
2

I agree that hiring a new person would be a quick resolution to the problem, but what if that means that he has to fire someone to be able to afford it? Wouldn't he essentually be firing that person because they are Muslim? Wouldn't that get him into even more legal trouble? I think that the government telling a shop that they must hire someone new to cut women's hair would undue stress on the employer.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:09 PM
2

So the oven mits suggestion won't work. I just wanted to make sure. I hope that his religious beliefs are protected. I do have another question, though, if you don't mind. I have a jewish friend who follows the same rule, though he said that he is permitted to shake hands with a woman if she initiates (this came up particularly after a job interview with a woman). Does Islam also have such exemptions? If the courts order him to cut women's hair, would his religion forgive him for doing so, or wo…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:54 PM
1

I completely agree, there are many other people who are attacked and abused that do not go on to commit crimes of this sort.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:06 PM
–

Does that apply if there is clothing/fabric inbetween? Such as shaking hands with gloves on? Could this be extended to a over the clothes leg grab? (Not like grabbing a random woman on the street, but like on a date, riding in a car.)
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:30 PM
3

So much I don't know about Islam. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:43 PM
6

I, too, believe in allying MR with the feminists who lean towards egalitarian positions and alienating those that take the extreme views that were seen in the videos above. I look forward to a time when both groups are obsolete and spend all of their time discussing the fringe topics and not the major ones.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:54 PM
3

To me this is religious rights vs hurt feelings. A quick google maps search of the area shows no less than ten other barbers/salons with in one mile of the Terminal Barber Shop, leaving this woman with no shortage of choices. I weigh that against the barber's right to practice his religion, and the law's of that religion state that he cannot cut a woman's hair if she is not married to or related to him. And I think that forcing him to hire someone new (that would not be bound by the same laws) w…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:38 PM
6

Closer to forcing a jew to eat a pork chop. He's not missing much (baccon is different), it's against his religous views, only devout still hold to those, he should have the right to practice he sees fit (so long as it is not causing physical harm to another person or their property).
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:54 PM
8

Sadly Faith McGregor brought sex into it, and so did the author of the article. Not a single direct quote from the barber, several from Faith. Only a quick mention of his religious beliefs and how they'd be trampled if he was forced to cut women's hair. No talk about how people of faith have to bend to Faith's will so they don't offend her. No. I'd be irritated if I were in her shoes, but I'd just move on to the next place, somewhere that was trained and good at cutting hair styles for my gender…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:53 PM
2

gym != male place The only time that I have seen a gym be sex exclusive is in women-only gyms. The others accept both sexes, the two that I attend (one at work and a Planet Fitness near home) are fairly balanced in male-to-female ratio, swinging one way or the other depending on time of day and if there are classes at the time.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:46 PM
2

I'm not sure if he can't touch or if he can't cut the hair of a woman that he isn't related to. The article says cut, but that's not a direct quote, so I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:39 PM
9

I just want to point out that this type of thing is not common, and certainly not as common as it can seem reading this sub. That being said, make sure you trust someone before you have sex with them. Between false rape accusations and VERY rare cases like you see here, it's just not worth a one-night-stand.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:41 PM
44

After reading through the rest of the comments I was starting to think that I was the only one to pick up on that.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:44 PM
4

It was one of the white guys that turns out to have a bunch of drugs (Meryl, Darel brings it up when T-Dog got a blood infection in season 2).
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:25 PM
1

This is exactly the kind of thing I was thinking about. Or just a backpack with a laptop and some college books.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:53 PM
6

I would suggest a laptop or something of sufficient value that you would not wish to leave outside of your sight. Ninja Edit: Karlthepagan has already suggested the addition of electronics.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:44 PM
2

Ah. Depending on the amount of time you spend on the PC, this could range anywhere from a resonable problem that must be discussed to totally blown out of proportion. I don't know your relationship so I will not comment on that. What I will comment on is that destroying the PC like that is not something that a reasonable person does. I'm glad that she's seeing a counselor, I hope that it's helping as much as it should. (I've seen friends go to good ones and really shitty ones. The good ones lead…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:09 PM
19

She left. That's when you change the locks and the security codes for the front door. I'm working on my issues What did you destroy?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:16 PM
3

[29 yo, male, I hate how the term "man up" is used] Keep your business. If it's profitable, then rock that shit. If it's not enough to pay all of your bills, then it's time for a day job! (But keep the business growing in your off time.) Family and loved ones are there to prop you up emotionally. If they're proping you up financially, then you need to change something. If they're dragging you down, you need to cut them loose. Move out. It's time to be on your own and not let someone dictate how …
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:00 PM
4

I'm willing to bet that your name will also be "resubmitted" about a month after you pay to have it taken off as well.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:44 AM
1

Don't you think that Big Bird has been through enough? Seriously, though, great idea!
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:14 AM
4

As a person without kids, I can understand treating these spots as "disabled parking overflow."
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:04 AM
7

My SO works. She works rather hard, she's been saving up money to go to grad school (her first interview is tomorrow!) I already have a graduate degree and she encourages me to go farther, as I do with her. I do almost all of the cooking, she does most of the cleaning, and I do all of the handyman work, though she helps when she's awake (night shift sucks). We both plan on working after kids come along and we're trying to find ways to make it work such that the kids spend more time with us than …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:53 PM
7

Were you ever given the option?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:47 PM
1

Maybe we can put in banner adds for items related to what you're looking at. For instance, looking at guacamole mix? Here's an add for avocados. Looking at Peanutbutter? Here's jelly.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:12 PM
2

... Why would you give CPR to someone who's still standing? It only works for when your breathing and heart stop. At which point you'd be on the ground.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:50 PM
1

Does your school have a "Zero Tolerance" rule? One where if a student is even accused (not convicted, accused) of sexual assault, then they'd be tossed out? If so, then I'd write the school board ask them why the perpetrator (the girl in this case) of sexual harassment has been left un-punished. Sexual Harassment definition: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment. …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:26 PM
38

From the linked-linked crime report The sexual predator in this latest incident is described as white, 5-foot-7 to 6-feet tall, 30 to 40 years old, with a thin build and clean shaven. It doesn't even sound like the attacker was a student. So, why are we sending students to a manidory class indoctrination?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:18 PM
2

The double stream, and the slight splatter that can sometimes split off from the stream. And I, too, am a rim cleaner. It's just polite to clean up your own mess.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:53 PM
2

A typical male restroom has eurinals, since this is a unisex restroom and this little flier went up, then I'm assuming that this restroom has no such offering.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:51 PM
1

Piss on ALL the seats!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:48 PM
7

Because the people who post this fliers are lazy.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:42 PM
5

Dude, Chick-fil-a = awesome chicken. Don't go dragging my dinner through your polotics.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:36 PM
1

In an empty room, the voice of a leader means nothing.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:23 PM
4

He's not saying that it's right to do it, he's saying that it's natural for the kid to want the kiss. That's why it's on the adult to put the breaks on and stop it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:11 PM
3

law school You're doing something very right. Just don't be seduced by the Dark Side.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:29 PM
1

Extra hot suace. I'm going full Bundy on this one!
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:17 PM
3

As a man who's had to clean women's rooms before, those places are far nastier than men's. There must be a better option. Like shitting in the woods.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:10 PM
3

Besides, he's prepping for the regional Battle Shits competition and needs to practice against both men and women.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:08 PM
23

I was with you until here To say that Harry Crouch is the most authoritative voice raised in this country on behalf of men’s rights would not be encouraging I think that he did rather well in the interview. It would appear that the interviewer has not established any grounds for this statement. That makes it seem that he's making a pointless attack on a good person who's trying to defend abused men, perhaps in an attampt to discredit him in some small way.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:59 PM
–

It certainly seems that the majority of popular posts are the way that you had described. However, there are a lot of posts that I have read on /r/relationships (sorry, but I didn't go through the whole of the linked post) that are rather balanced. Personally, I try to contribute a balanced perspective as often as I can. I also toss my up/down votes to the people who I think are giving the best advice possible.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:38 PM
2

Ms-Super, we all feel sympathy for OP and the situation that he has found himself in, not only with the false accusation, but then to be cornered in his own house with his accuser. It's terrible. I want to say thank you for seeing that false accusation demeans real rape/sexual assault cases. If your apology is given in the same sympathy that we all feel, then I'm sure that it will be appreciated; if it an apology on her behalf, then I'm sure OP would say "thank you so much, but there is no need …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:57 PM
1

It's going to be his issue, too, if he stays in that situation.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:03 PM
17

But if we seat them in the front then women have to pass them on the way to our seets and that's just too imposing and creepy! What if we had different bus lines, one for women only and one for all genders, that way women don't have to ride a bus with guys unless they want to! (Those brave souls.)
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:25 PM
1

Sadly, yes. But let's be fair about something here, she's drunk, a stranger, and has done nothing to gain one's trust. I'd not trust a stranger (even a fellow MRA) with my financial and legal future, so what makes her so much more trustworthy? And just to be clear, it could also be restated as "Nope, sorry, you're drunk and I don't trust you enough to not fold to your friends' slut shaming and claim rape tomorrow morning when you're sober."
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:06 PM
39

I would really love it if I never had to sit next to another dude on the bus ever again Did she just imply that guys should sit in a separate part of the bus? Perhaps if all the guys were seated in the back she would feel more comfortable.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:42 PM
17

Unless it's a guy's feeling of embarassment because they airline implied he might be a rapist and child molester. Then his feelings mean nothing.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:36 PM
1

I was with them all the way to the end. If you're going to be a grown up in polite society, then "dumping" is not something a person does (regardless of either party's sex). Its when you start having different rules for men and women that I start to think that this person and I would not see eye-to-eye on many topics. Edit: I would also like more clarification on the meaning behind his rule #37. And the full text for #35.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:54 PM
2

I now know that I am not ready for children, thank you. I know this because when I read this story I raged too hard at this. I don't think taht I'd have held my composure as well as you did and this I would have been setting a bad example for my children. At the very least people like this should be jailed. Bring her up on harassment charges. On a separate note, has anyone watched 'Guys with Kids' and do they cover situations like this? From eveything I've seen a read it is supposed to be a come…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:17 AM
29

The doctor, too. It's the only way that they'll stop.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 05:36 PM
4

The pill itself, for me, was taken when I started dating a woman that treated me like an equal. She helped me realize that I'm more than a provider and protector as I've been raised to believe. My eyes started opening to the fact that it is assumed that we will throw ourselves infront of a bullet or on an attacker for a stranger simply because it's a woman being attacked. Or that we MUST be the bread winners, and if we aren't, then we aren't worth a woman's time, but she's inherently done her jo…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:43 PM
8

The Equality and Human Rights Commission said single sex rules should be “the exception”. No, they should be banned. It is just another way to separate fathers from their children. I truely wish that I lived closer so I could sit in a chair outside with a sign reading "Fathers are partents too".
/r/MensRights10/08/12 12:20 PM
1

Not sure if r/SRS or Sarcasm....
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:54 PM
7

I also really liked this one.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:53 PM
–

Seriously, guys, down-voting rightsbot?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:11 PM
3

A personalized cell filled with swag?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:34 PM
2

Thank you. I needed a laugh.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:39 PM
5

Damn. You totally skipped over books and verbal tradition. Oh well.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:30 PM
5

Don't forget about the radio shows! The only parent approved show is Little Orphan Annie! And even that has to be monitored.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:40 PM
4

As a man I feel much safer carrying a knife. I'm not going to attack anyone with it (though I'm sure that if a cop knew, that's what they'd assume) and I know how to use it. Self defense has been the bulk of my learning, every martial arts class I've taken starts with either "when someone grabs you" or "when someone punches you" or "when someone swings a weapon at you". So I ask, if as a man (6'4, 215lb) I feel the desire/need to carry a knife when I can, then why should a woman be entitled to f…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:34 PM
17

This is deer propaganda! I drive at the posted speed limits, if you want it safer to cross there, then you should fight for slower speed limits.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:28 PM
32

These are the things that we should read, write, and get pissed off about. It's things like this that bring about a MR subreddit. Stay, get angry, and stand up for yourself and other men in a world that views us all as preditors and villians.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:25 PM
2

Small butt == lack of squats/deadlifts. Men and women can do these to improve the shape of their butt. The opposite sex will be impressed and want to give said butt a squeeze.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:43 PM
8

Ooh, I didn't know that. Very well, this might be a total fraud. Carry on, good redditors, there's nothing to see here!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:02 PM
27

I'm agreeing that it is a trolled cubicle. I will concede that the photo may have been taken by OP. Edit: Tineye came up with 0 similar results.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:38 PM
12

Are we going to enforce quotas limiting the number of women in Nursing? or Education?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:11 PM
9

Why did you put in your two cents? From the looks of it, this was an open discussion and that's what an open discussion is for, so other people can contribute.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:45 AM
13

I'm sure that there are oh so many men who'd love to have their kids back. That's not to mention the child support. Ooops, knee jerk reaction. But that just left my mind full of fuck.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:41 AM
25

Justice and equality would be firing her (not letting her retire), arresting her, and then having her register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:19 PM
4

As a man, I'd like to be on that mailing list as well.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:32 PM
30

In what legal sense does a third grader have the maturity to consent to a search? None. And lets not forget that even after the age of 18 we still hire persons of the same sex as the student/flight passenger/stadium goer to perform the search. This is clearly a violation of the childs rights and should be treated as child molestation and illegal search, since it was performed without the consent of the parent and without the parent present.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:13 PM
14

The idea is that fathers can be amazing, loving people. It's a pro-father statement, not an anti-anti-father message.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 07:51 PM
–

I would love to see the wording of the Ammendment. Does this mean that oral and anal sex are outlawed? What about the use of a condom? Masturbation? Are we going back to saying that sex is only for reproduction again? Also, if you could link back to the original, I'd love to read the comments.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:29 PM
14

I seriously think that someone should write a book for men that explains the exact same thing for us. Wait, that's called a harim. Anyway, do you think that CNN would view it in a positive (or neutral) light? Or would the attack the writer?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:05 PM
2

Oh, thank you! I learned something new today.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:11 PM
3

The problem is that he could loose his job from the very accusation that he did anything. He can only go to jail if he can't prove innocence. (Innocent until proven guilty doesn't exist in sexual harassment cases anymore.)
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:40 PM
7

I can't believe that they named the victim. It it was a female student I doubt that they ever would have. Also, where's rights bot? It's been down so much I'm starting to think we should have our own.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:11 PM
2

They didn't even report what made them think it was a false report. I'd like to hear that she was on camera outside of a bar or on a bank's surveilance or something and that nothing happened to her. Of course I'd also like to see her arrested for filing a false police report, but that'll never happen.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:34 AM
2

/s?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:43 PM
1

Filing a false police report. Fraud. Extortion.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:25 PM
1

It's too obvious opening your app for that. But reaching into your pocket can seem like a perfectly normal motion.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:24 PM
12

In another discussion yesterday CMOS222 suggested that the poster record everything, fill out an affidavit attesting to what they had witnessed, and have it notorized before any claims can be made by the accusor. I would suggest that you do the same with both what you had witnessed and have your friend fill one out as well. I would also make record of any instance where you may have heard her mention having him locked up. Also, try to keep friendly with your sister, don't try to convince her tha…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:34 PM
2

You're right, the part that I didn't agree with ws that the first line of the article read "Among the dead were 40 women and children" but doesn't take the men into account for several more paragraphs. And the article ended almost immediately. I seriously think that it was someone in an office here in the states and their source of information was either a police report or watching the local tv. There are no interviews and half of it describes another attack two weeks ago. Besides the issue brou…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:19 PM
17

Didn't you know that the only way to properly raise children is in a state controlled school and/or daycare? Serisouly, you silly man, why would anyone want to stay at home and raise their kids? /s
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:45 PM
33

Actually the article states that 108 people died in Houla, an event that happened two weeks ago. The article itself if about the town of Quebier where "at least 78 people" died, 40 of whom were women and children, meaning that the remaining 38 were men. The whole thing is written in a very confusin way, almost as if the author had no hard facts and is just using the attack two weeks ago as filler. Now, I'm with you that the headline is utter bullshit, and that the lives of the men should not be …
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:07 PM
7

I see my sister do this to my parents and she's 27! What makes it worse is that when I'm around I don't go for this shit anymore.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:55 AM
1

The article wasn't very clear about that whole part of it. I had initially reacted the same way, in thinking that his trying to get around the legal system. This article helped clear things up for me.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:07 PM
2

He's not asking that the police and judiciary systems back off, he's asking the union for the right to fire teachers who are accused of these crimes. As we've seen and read in many stories here, people can lose their jobs at the mear implication of any type of sex crime, even if they are found not guilty later on and even if the accuser comes out and says that the whole thing was fabricated. That is not the case with NY schools. An arbitrator has to come to the conclusion (after their own invest…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:15 PM
1

Thank you. I was very amused by your villain-like reaction and I'm still chuckling cackling. Have a second upvote.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:41 PM
10

Many Americans lack financial planning skills As evidenced by the large number of people with big debts that they can't pay off. Many politicians lack financial planning skills As evidenced by the large debt that the county has that it can't pay off.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:49 AM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:31 PM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:06 PM
5

I think the author was hinting that boys are more likely to be misdiagnosed with hyperactivity.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:46 PM
1

That's the exact reason why I worded my response the way I did. I now feel sad that I have to so carefully pick my words in fear of them being misconstrewed to mean something else.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:05 PM
–

Oh, I agree with you, and I think that it would be a great win for human rights if the name of the accused was withheld from the media, and they were not allowed to publish it, if found through other methods. Of course this would be for all crimes.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 07:56 PM
3

This is taking place in South Africa, their laws may be different then ours in respect to the accused and publishing their name. For instance, thier constitution (aparently) protects people's dignity.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 07:44 PM
1

Mine was very similar, I was picturing him like this. Context: that's the Alamo
/r/MensRights25/05/12 04:19 PM
2

You mention nothing of adoption in the article. I was curious on your views there. If the mother wants to give the child up, but the father wants it. If both future parents want to adopt. If the mother dies while the father has partial custody. I've read a great number of stories here on /MR about fathers that want their kids but they're taken away in favor of someone else adopting them or they're given to the parents of the mother when the mother dies. I'll save shared custody (as a default rul…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:17 PM
1

'06 Lit class was filled with feminist brainwashing (the extreme version)
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:56 PM
3

I really like your friend! Just to give perspective: Here in Baltimore, at Orioles games they check all bags (women's included), but no pat-downs for anyone. At the Ravens' games, though, they have separate lines for men and women so you can be groped by someone of the same sex as you, then they go through your bags.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:14 PM
10

I'm not sure how you handled that so well, even reading it I got very upset. I'm sure I would have ended up missing the movie. I'm also starting to see a pattern where men are treated like this until they get angry and raise a stink, at which point people think that they are a "typical agressive male" and that just (in their minds) validates this behavior. I can only hope that I'd act like OP and not give them any reason to feel so self-rightously validated.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:25 PM
20

In the US there are a number of places that all bags are searched, including women's purses. Many of those places are stadiums and the like. I think that OPs problem was less that a woman was going through his bag and more that his bag was the only one searched while women, who were carrying bags just as large or bigger, went through without even a cursory look. They searched him simply based on his sex.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:20 PM
25

It's because there are members here, myself included, that believe that equality is the end-goal, and stories like this one underscore that both sexes must work hard to get ahead.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:15 PM
1

Superior Police Sgt. William Lear said there’s no law against spray painting a vehicle in one’s own yard. What if the husband got that vehicle in the divorce? Could the cops do something at that point? Should he take it back to family court? Has anyone here been in a similar situation?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:57 PM
5

I have been searching for this document. Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:51 AM
2

I do like that Advice Animals seemed very supportive of the father/author of the comic. The top comments were very much in his favor.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:09 PM
7

I think the fact that it is a cross post from /r/funny speaks volumes. Even if she was arrested and convicted of vandalism and theft, the fact is that people view this as comical behavior. The point of posting it here is to point out what most of the posts here point out, that if you switch the sexes then society would flip its shit. But, because it was a woman trashing a man's stuff, then it's something funny to be passed around and laughed at.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:39 AM
1

Do this, but don't buy the original first. Print your own.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:41 PM
0

Because the government is against gender and race descrimination. Unless you're a white male, then people can shit on you and you're not allowed to complain.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:57 PM
3

Being the end of the semester you may only get a couple of chances, but having been in a lit class that acted like a women's issues class when I was in college, it'll come up again.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:59 PM
4

This is true, and a very viable option, unless the owner of the company can face a law suit because customers are harassing them, then you're screwed. (I have no legal examples, but if they exist, then I'm sure someone here will find one.)
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:54 PM
3

Oh, I don't advocate jailing a person for a crime that they may or may not have commited. I think like anything else, the crime of a false accusation/false police report should have a proper trial and require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In other words, if the accused man is set free because they had no proff of rape and there is no proff that she lied, then nothing happens. But if it's obvious that she lied (through DNA testing, witness testimony that she made it up, proof that he was in an…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:38 PM
3

Filing a false police report is a crime in the US, is it not that way in the UK? I know that if it were here and I was that guy, I'd be screaming to have her arrested and jailed. Of course, here in the states, my name would also be smeared all over headlines before the judge let me loose and I'd have been fired/expelled/dis-owned.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:03 PM
1

It started with the rape prevention tips for guys that basically stated that men are the only ones who can prevent rape because they're the only ones who rape. The entire thing ignores that men are raped as well and is sexist propaganda that is geared towards making men feel like we're all attackers and making women feel like every man could (and would) rape them. This is a satiricle rebuttle and is (with the exception of 7 and 9) gender neutral. With 7 and 9 being geared towards women offenders…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:49 PM
8

Every time I hear that argument two things come to mind right away. They don't follow our laws, unless you want us to send oh so many men to war then are already there. (I guess that's a possability.) And second, I'm reminded of 'Date Night' Wendy: You have no idea what it is like to be a teenage girl having your first period under Taliban rule. Phil Foster: That is true. And neither do you.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:59 PM
1

Interesting. In my time at uni every professor I had was so strongly on the left that CNN started to seem neutral. Having grown up in a right leaning family this drove me up the wall. Thankfully I'm out of that situation and have developed my own opinions on the matter, opinions that I will not force on you in this setting.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:51 PM
2

That very well may be. But look at it from another angle, a racist joke is improper, a sexist joke that pokes at women is improper, so what makes this acceptible? (Answer: Nothing.)
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:37 PM
3

Interesting perspective. I had actually read the former to imply that only men can be rapists. In either case, yes, that sign is improper. I do agree with you on the message of the latter.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:35 PM
1

I was trained, from my teen years on, to not play/laugh with little kids because of this kind of crap. Now that I realize what exactly it was and how incredibly sexist it is, I can't even play peek-a-boo with a kid without that feeling.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:44 PM
1

Actually the parties were originally along the same lines as they are in other places around the world. During the American Civil War Republicans wanted to expand Washington's power and Democrats voted against federal funding for a large number of projects (including the transcontinental railroad). It wasn't until sometime in the late 1800s and early 1900s that the parties switched roles and started representing something close to the sides that they do now. Edit: An interesting read on the matt…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:13 AM
17

I am all for a man being allowed to have the same choices that a woman has. I think it's apalling that a woman can sneak away with a condom and use it to impregnate herself. Same goes for ending birth control without discussion in a supposedly trusting LTR. HOWEVER, this man drugged a woman without her knowledge. THAT is unacceptible. Giving any type of drug to any person without their knowledge or consent is a horrible thing to do. Now, I know that there will be a number of responses talking ab…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:45 PM
29

It is an interesting circlejerk that's happening all over reddit. Find article on reddit. Post article on FB. Post picture of people's reactions on FB to article on reddit. Karmagasm. (5. ??? 6. Profit)
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:09 PM
1

They said that she had slapped and scratched her ex. I can only ASSUME that he still had the markings on him and that she showed no signs of having been assaulted. I do find it interesting that they didn't name the woman, though I believe her last name is Marshall because they slipped up and used it at one point.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:41 AM
3

Icaz, thank you for your post, it's always wonderful to know that there are women joining our community for reasons other than trolling. I would like to point out one thing, however, in your post you identify yourself as a girl and the women who try to train men as ladies. I beg to differ, ladies treat men with the respect that they receive (I say it this way because I believe that people should have the right to defend themselves), where girls attempt to train their men to be someone else. You …
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:45 AM
8

But the products are REALLY SOFT.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:25 PM
1

^ My point.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:22 PM
4

Thus the reason why people get into and stay in the "friend zone".
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:34 PM
16

I have a sister. This tactic is confirmed.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:34 PM
6

That's where this whole thing started.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:31 PM
1

True article or fantisizing? If it's a real article, please link to it.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:49 PM
–

Oh, I agree. I hate censors that ban everyone with a different opinion. But people have to realize that what they say will be criticized and possibly attacked, and that they may have to defend their perspective. Of course, I also know that a great number of members of MR use logic in coming to their conclusions.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 02:44 PM
6

It is an open internet forum where anyone can contribute. Think of it as standing on a street corner and shouting your ideas and feelings on a topic. Anyone can come up and get in your face about it and force you to defend yourself. You should never assume you're safe here. That being said, certain 'street corners' leave you surrounded by more like minded people than others. Welcome to the neighborhood.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:38 PM
1

His point is that people find it funny/justified/acceptable. Which is an unacceptable way for society to view anyone destroying private property, no matter the offender's and offended's sex, race, or age.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:16 PM
1

The part of that song that I hate so much is she keeps saying "Right now he's probobly..." doing whatever. But she doesn't really know what he's doing. He might be playing pool with the boys or having a beer with his work buddies. She never states proof of cheating.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter