TheDeathofaParty Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Why Feminists And Liberals Are Misrepresenting The Hobby Lobby Decision Well the system that the United States has chosen is health care provided by employers. You and I are both fully aware that a woman working for Hobby Lobby could not afford to pay for something as expensive as, for example, an IUD. Hobby Lobby should not have to pay for it, I believe the government should provide health care instead. But by the standards of our current system, the Hobby Lobby decision disproportionately hurts women who seek birth control.	/r/MensRights	19/07/14 12:16 AM
1	Why Feminists And Liberals Are Misrepresenting The Hobby Lobby Decision But you're willing to sacrifice the civil liberty to have a private decision made between a woman and her doctor so that somebody's boss can impose their religious values upon their employees? When your choices are made by other peoples' religion, isn't that the opposite of religious freedom?	/r/MensRights	07/07/14 05:37 PM
1	Why Feminists And Liberals Are Misrepresenting The Hobby Lobby Decision That's bullshit and you know it. This case was not about "religious freedom." If the owner of the company were a Muslim trying to force women to wear a Hijab during work hours, SCOTUS would have had none of it. What about their religious freedom to be offended when a woman does not cover herself in public? This case is about preserving white, christian America. Even SCOTUS knows this is bullshit, that's why they claim that this case cannot be used as precedent. They did the same thing with Bush …	/r/MensRights	07/07/14 02:42 PM
1	Why Feminists And Liberals Are Misrepresenting The Hobby Lobby Decision When they violate the religious freedoms of individuals, you're damn right I'm against religious freedoms for corporations.	/r/MensRights	07/07/14 01:07 PM
1	Why Feminists And Liberals Are Misrepresenting The Hobby Lobby Decision A story out of nothing? This decision is hugely impactful. It is fundamentally wrong to allow a corporate entity to deny medical care to its employees. In theory, a scientologist business owner could den a person access to anxiety and depression medication, or therapy for that matter. And why stop at medical care? A Muslim owner can claim that they are offended by women not wearing a burka on the job. I normally hate the slippery slope argument, and obviously the supreme court is going to ignore…	/r/MensRights	07/07/14 12:07 PM
1	Rape culture? Or, you know, Steubenville, Ohio.	/r/MensRights	24/04/14 11:34 PM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter