TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDemonClown Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by TheDemonClown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Doubtful - it'd kill their business. A lot of nightclubs & bars tend to skew towards allowing more women in than men, meaning that most people leaving clubs & bars are women, so yellow cabs'd be cutting out 1/2 to 2/3rds of their market just to be spiteful. A more sensible move would be to simply not give a shit and let the pink cabs have their niche. If women feel unsafe, they can either take the pink cab or they can double/triple up in a yellow cab to make it a 3-on-1 fight if the driver does …
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:50 AM
1

Honestly, if either were being truly sensible, they'd have the same viewpoint & none of this would be a problem. Essentially both sides are constantly getting into pissing contests & nothing more. The problem overall is to teach people to stop being such fucking assholes, period. Gender is irrelevant to anything, the same as race - it's just what we are. Don't try to hold people down, don't try to extort them, don't physically or emotionally brutalize them...just fucking be cool about shit.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:29 AM
1

I'm really starting to understand why chicks view guys who identify as MRAs the way we view the crazy bitches who identify as feminist.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:54 AM
1

Hahaha...it appears that the downvote brigade hates us for not immediately jumping on the bandwagon. I'm all for equality, but if there really are a lot of women being assaulted, so much so that someone feels the creation of a girls-only cab service is necessary, maybe the problem isn't the sudden appearance of girls-only cabs.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:41 AM
-5

Because your premise is bullshit. I'm not just saying mine is better - I'm providing the reasonable basis for my opinion while pointing out the flaws in yours. And all you're doing is "lol'ing" and not really discussing anything.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:48 AM
-6

How am I off the mark? For my opinion to have been irrelevant, I'd have had to be championing the Australian government forcing men to walk from the clubs on threat of arrest while women got to use cabs. Only then would your strawman argument accusing me of supporting racism be even a little bit valid. Men still have plenty of options - take another cab, take a train, take a bus, use their own car, or motorcycle, or bicycle, or walk. Hell, a man can unicycle home from the club if he so chooses. …
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:18 AM
0

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:27 AM
-10

That's so fucking off the mark, it's staggering.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:22 AM
-1

Unfortunately, in practice most men-only services and spaces get shot down because "they have to be inclusive of women". When it comes to men-only services, free market is not an absolute anymore and comparisons are made with "für Juden verboten" signs on German shops during WW2. We both know very well that if cab drivers started refusing female passengers because of the video I posted above, feminists would raise hell and get their way in court. In the U.S., I know for sure it would get shot do…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:07 AM
2

Yes. It's called "free market" for a reason. If people think the service is wrong, they don't have to patronize it - it's that damn simple. It's still a Band-Aid on a tumor either way, but if it helps people feel safer, go for it.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:47 AM
-10

So? If that's a serious problem in Australia (drivers assaulting women/men assaulting female drivers) & someone's going to make money in fixing it, good. This isn't infringing on a man's rights in the sense of political or financial oppression - just take one of the other 500 fucking cabs in the city. EDIT: Getting downvoted for stating an obvious truth? Sorry, I'll switch it up for karma: YEAH, FUCK THOSE BITCHES WANTING PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT BECAUSE WE HAVE IT WORSE ALWAYS! /s
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:26 AM
2

Yeah, because only having $152 million dollars is damn near poverty.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:04 PM
1

How? If one parent's able to provide more of the child's material needs - which is all the gov't. seems to give a fuck about - then how is this insane?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:55 PM
3

only people in the top 5% earnings category can really afford to have one spouse not work. Pretty much everybody else needs both incomes just to make ends meet; especially if there are kids involved. Not really. Several of my friends are single-income families, some with multiple kids, and they do just fine on less than $40k a year. Or is $30-40k now in the top 5%?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:10 PM
0

Please to be showing me where women are married at gunpoint in the US, forcibly impregnated and made to care for their rape babies. Todd Akin's district?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:05 PM
1

Actually, in my old school, they'd have just had to wait in the parking lot for 2 hrs. while the cops searched the place & then be let go.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:55 PM
6

Plot twist: the bomber was a squirrel
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:03 AM
2

Yeah, label & studio execs thinking they know better than the talent seems to be the biggest reason shit fails. Katy Perry's been in the music industry for over a decade, but only known for like, 4 or 5 years.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:37 AM
4

Yep, she's crazy serious about music. She actually had an album or two after her gospel stuff & prior to "One Of The Boys" that sounded more like Alanis Morrisette than her current sound, but it never got released. Her label kept her in limbo for a long time because they didn't fully trust that her stuff would sell, but they also didn't want to let her go & have some other label get rich if she did.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:48 PM
3

People often cite her short lived marriage to Russell Brand as a sign of her being a superficial person with no sense of commitment, but look a little closer and you'll find the issue there was that Brand called it off after they argued over whether or not to start a family. Pretty much. If you watch that movie "Part Of Me" that followed her for a year on tour, you'll see that she was actually flying back & forth between where her tour was & where he was to spend her days off with him precisely …
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:45 PM
1

Torture buys me time to figure a way out. If there was no game & it was just, say, him castrating me with a Coke bottle, then yes, I'd ask for death.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:21 PM
1

This is my opinion, not objective fact. Ask the rape victims that.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:20 PM
2

Wow, someone thanking me for that view? The last time I said that on Reddit, it had an effect much the same as kicking a pit bull in the nuts. I wouldn't necessarily say that anything is worse than murder. Thievery & getting your ass kicked, as far as I'm concerned, are not all that bad. Like, if someone pistol-whips you during a mugging or something, you'll live. But the 3 biggest crimes to me are rape, torture, and murder. When you consider the long-lasting physical, mental, & emotional trauma…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:54 AM
0

I see murder as less severe because, in a way, your suffering's over at that point. Rape victims, however, have to keep on living & a lot of them are never the same afterwards because of the trauma of the experience. It's a torturous thing to do to someone.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:51 AM
0

Yeah, the Catholic priest way only gets you by for 30 yrs., at which point all your partners turn 38 & start squealing to the press.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:47 PM
1

Submissives are fine, I was just confused as to how the hell the rest of it made sense.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:26 PM
1

girlfag - biologically a girl but considers herself a homosexual boy (don't ask me how it works, I just explain the insanity). This one is really where I get hung up. If you're gender is fluid, why would you consider yourself a homosexual boy? That's literally assigning yourself a gender/sexual role. She could easily have just said "pansexual submissive" and said the same thing, because the 2 things in the middle contradict.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:25 PM
3

Pansexual genderfluid girlfag sub Can someone explain to me WTF that means? "Sub" means "submissive" in the BDSM sense, I'm guessing, but seriously...wat?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:45 AM
3

What is a gay homosexual? Is that a double-negative way of referring to straight people?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:45 AM
2

I actually had no idea of this.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:14 AM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:08 AM
1

A guy who slaps his secretary's ass & keeps qualified women down just because they're women has control over his sexism. Me being attracted to women instead of dudes isn't something I can stop being, it's just how I am.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:03 AM
1

Yeah, sexual attraction isn't really sexism to me, because it's not something we have control over.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:02 PM
1

How is heterosexuality "technically sexism"?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:59 PM
1

Please enlighten me as to how losing your life doesn't make you a victim of war? I already did.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:20 PM
1

Yup. What people often fail to recognize is that there's a big difference between dying while fighting a war & being a victim of war. For most of human history, in more places than not, women have been subtly discouraged from military service & learning to be self-reliant at all, if not actively forbidden from those pursuits. The amount of women that went to work in factories & even entering the military in non-combat roles during WW2 was significant because it was virtually unprecedented. Men a…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:38 PM
-3

Only if he gets tetanus from it.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:46 PM
-24

To me, that's exactly why it's so funny, hahaha...I'm a horrible person. On the upside, though, at least he didn't pick that day to go commando.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:12 PM
2

Because then what would Maury Povich do to earn a living?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:23 PM
0

No. No, they haven't. They open up a men's shelter - big fucking whoop. I've actually lived at a Salvation Army shelter and it was horrible; they're assholes.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:35 AM
1

Not that I can see. If anything, the rapes there are so prevalent because men aren't being checked at all.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:13 PM
2

Seems to me like men's rights in India are just fine. Are you talking about here in the Western world? Our woes can be avoided with forethought & common sense, for the most part, but women over there are being raped, killed, and oppressed in earnest.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:04 PM
2

Could've just said that instead, hahaha
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:11 AM
4

If there are valid points being discussed, I don't give a fuck if it's on /r/AdviceAnimals or in the stock room of a BBQ restaurant. Where a debate takes place is almost irrelevant, as is the character of those discussing the topic, if it's raising any good points.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:24 AM
3

I'm waiting for the first scientific or technological breakthrough from the women's studies. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:38 AM
3

I agree. Technically, mathematics & science are considered liberal arts studies, so I wouldn't say that all liberal arts degrees are shit. But someone calling promoting STEM degrees a "circle jerk" when the discussion is about women's studies, well...fuck...I don't even know anymore.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:40 AM
14

Why? Science, technology, engineering, & mathematics gets shit done.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:55 PM
-5

I wasn't saying it's deserved. Theft is usually a nonviolent crime that the victims are either compensated for with money or given their stolen property back, if possible. Under those conditions, I would say that cutting someone's arm off, while arguably an effective deterrent, is 100% undeserved. Your Twinkies, your TV, your car, your apples - these are not worth functionally crippling another human being for the rest of their life. At most, make them pay restitution equal to the value of the t…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:27 PM
-5

Ohhh. I didn't even notice that. Not sure why I'm being downvoted...the guy asked why women default to that excuse & I answered the question. I also put in my opinion that I have zero sympathy for rapists & other violent abusers who meet a grisly fate. Yeah, it sucks for them, and I'm not necessarily saying it's right, but I'm not going to feel bad for people who inflict harm on others & then, when their victim fights back with extreme prejudice, try to cry excessive force or whatever. That's no…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:35 AM
-7

I didn't downvote him - all I did was leave the comment.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:27 AM
-15

1.) I didn't say it wasn't worse. I said I don't have sympathy for people who rape people and then get their dicks cut off or otherwise maimed. I don't have sympathy for anyone who puts themselves into a wholly stupid, wrong situation & inevitably horrible shit happens to them. Don't want your dick cut off or an eye gouged out? Then don't fucking rape someone. 2.) It's the same in the sense that it's a symbol of sexuality & gender identity. A vagina is the same thing, obviously, but the phrase "…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:32 AM
-42

They default to it because they know it's the quickest way to gain sympathy & create prejudice against someone they don't like. And you're right - it's not an excuse to maim innocent people. However, for women who were raped & tormented by the "victim" of such violence, I have no sympathy for the latter. Don't want your dick cut off? Don't be a bullying asshole, let alone one so severe that you break someone's sanity. I'd say the same goes for female abusers, too, but I've never heard of a guy b…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:38 AM
11

Did you not see the username?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:34 PM
2

An online friend was talking about this earlier like, "How the fuck is a man going to say he was sexually harassed?" My response: "Men can be harassed - it's called 'not wanting to hook up with a car full of chicks who're all totally comfortable with fucking someone they just met". Because that's pretty groddy, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:10 PM
7

/u/DoctorStorm already tore your entire argument apart, so I just wanted to ask this: what's so bad about how the guy talks in this video? Maybe it's just me having spent most of the last 15 years in the south where people can take 6 minutes to order a single sandwich at Subway, but I didn't think he was a "slow talker" at all. Moreover, talking "slow" allows pretty much any audience to grasp what he's saying better, which I hardly see to be a problem.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 11:35 AM
0

Yes, that does suck. Casey Anthony, for example, should've never become the public circus it became because it almost got her convicted. Mountain of circumstantial evidence doesn't = smoking gun. Now, if she'd posted video on Twitter like, "LOL buryin my dead baby", that's different...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:55 AM
1

Reuters was simply reporting the story. They said their policy was to not name the victim, after all. In cases where reasonable doubt isn't so laughably absent, however, I can see why there might be an issue between not naming victims & not naming the accused, though. This wasn't the justice system - this was a news agency. Though, given how I said that I'd like to see them all suffer the Prometheus treatment, I'm not exactly patient with the justice system, either XD
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:46 AM
3

It's not personal opinion - they are on camera & on record as having done all the things they're accused of and there is no mystery as to the context of said actions. This isn't like someone up for murder where the prosecution says, "We have video of you committing the crime!" and then they show something that could very easily be either cold-blooded murder or self-defense. I get what point you're trying to make, I simply don't give a shit when it's a bunch of degenerate assholes from Smalltown,…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:39 AM
-1

This isn't me thinking someone is guilty or innocent - this is simple logic & reason telling me that these idiots are guilty. And it's a damn good thing that I'm not in charge of the court system for these motherfuckers, because I'd have 'em both chained to rocks while vultures ate their damn livers.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:26 AM
8

Maybe the court officials have to treat them that way, but I don't. A mountain of indisputable evidence means you're fucking guilty, period. In most trials, where there's reasonable doubt, I wholeheartedly agree in following procedure to the letter. But this is the very definition of an open-and-shut case.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:39 PM
15

In this particular case, I don't give a fuck. There's no real "alleged" shit to be seen here - these guys were all on video from multiple people & talked about their crimes on Facebook & Twitter as it was all happening. They're guilty, they're shitty human beings, so fuck their privacy. They clearly didn't give a shit when they dragged a drunk girl from party to party, humiliating & violating her repeatedly.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:04 PM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:03 PM
7

I honestly can't equate "feminism" with equality, mostly for semantic reasons. If you want equality, you're an egalitarian. Feminism over the last 20 years seems more concerned with getting preference than getting true equality.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:03 AM
1

From what I'm seeing, it's a little of both. "Am I way off base here?" Yes, in the sense that you come off like a complete asshole. I believe you when you say you were joking & believe that the picture was meant to, at best, be "jokingly serious", but the way you talk about it sounds like you were trying to counter her argument, failed & are trying to cover up with the old "Sheesh, lighten up, I was totes kidding!" excuse. If someone did that to you when you were talking about men's rights, howe…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:46 PM
-1

That's what I was thinking. It says "midshipmen", but that's not actually gender-specific - it's just a rank title that both males & females have. Unfortunately, despite the fact that it's technically sexist, you could actually make a case for men being singled out since, as far as reported rapes go, there have been a lot more female victims than male ones. Hell, it's actually been said that female soldiers sometimes have less to fear from al Qaeda than from their bunkmates.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:37 PM
1

Yeah. If she can heal my sickness and wants to take me to bed, I see absolutely zero problem with that.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:39 AM
1

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/01/inside-anonymous-hacking-file-steubenville-rape-crew/60502/
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:14 AM
5

Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:51 PM
5

They recorded the entire night. Their faces & voices were on video bragging about raping the girl, carrying her from party to party when she was passed out, urinating on her, etc. I'm all for due process, but this is pretty fucking open and shut.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:38 PM
41

Considering they identified themselves in video on Twitter, Facebook, etc. during the entire night that they dragged a drunk, unconscious 15-year-old girl from party to party, urinated on her & raped her along with innumerable other people, I'm not exactly shedding tears over this. Honestly, this isn't trial-by-media at all - these assholes are guilty as shit, period. If a bunch of girls did the same thing, sure, name them. But, so far, this isn't a case of innocent men's names being dragged thr…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:51 PM
1

That's a double standard - I don't hold to those. The way I see it is this: if you're doing your job properly and, obviously, maintain a level of respect in your approach, why shouldn't you put out feelers if someone interests you? Work isn't some magical realm where humans stop being humans - if you find a guy or girl you're interested in, go for it.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:30 AM
1

Huh...in all honesty, so long as they did their job and didn't consider the offer of a date to be like, recompense for a fuck-up of theirs, I wouldn't really have a problem with it, personally. I'm kind of maladjusted socially, though, so I had no idea that was even a taboo.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:04 PM
5

“We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off.” How ironic that that quote from "Fight Club" applies to the modern woman.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:22 AM
1

I did get hit on by a nurse while getting an electrocardiogram this summer which was incredibly inappropriate in my opinion. How's that inappropriate, exactly?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:05 AM
0

So female mental health education & support should just go fuck itself?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:01 AM
2

Men put it up, women put it down - that way, everyone suffers. EQUALITY, BITCHES.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:12 PM
0

I fail to see how exactly the guy in the story's like me. Any time I've ever had a project, even when I focus on little details, I've always finished early or on time. Hell, I once turned in a 5-page paper by writing it entirely during the class it was due at the end of, hahaha
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:00 AM
-3

No, but in this day and age, a single typo basically negates your entire message. It's an ad hominem attack, to be sure, but answer me this: without looking at the original comment, what do you remember most about what he said - the actual message, or the fact that he fucked up spelling the word "lose"?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:30 PM
-1

I don't what, exactly?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:37 PM
-5

When the medium is text, clarity & accuracy often go hand in hand with expressing your ideas & being logical. Also, I type 100 WPM and have a physical keyboard as opposed to a touchscreen, so maybe that's part of why I don't have a problem, heh
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:05 PM
-16

Easy - turn the machine helper off & spell correctly on your own. I've had witnesses that can verify that I maintain perfect punctuation & spelling after 20 shots of Jack Daniels, so anyone should be able to do so perfectly sober. The Internet has millions of examples of auto-correct/T9/Swype/predictive text fucking things up and only a handful of anecdotal examples where they've gotten it right, so do the smart thing & just type without flawed computer assistance.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:54 AM
7

This is only justice if the 3 guys she accused would've only had to have faced 2 years in prison combined. Since they likely would've had to have spent 20+ years in prison each, this is basically a slap on the fuckin' wrist. She likely won't even have to pay any of them back for police time, court time, distress on the part of the accused, won't have to go door to door telling people what she's done, nothing. She basically just gets grounded for a while. Bitches like this sicken me.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:26 PM
3

Exactly. It's a double standard. Older guy sings a "sexually charged" song to a nearly-legal teenage girl - a girl who, given how virginity loss is happening younger & younger w/ each generation, may well have fucked at least one guy already - and he's a creep. But when a female does it to underage boys, she's lauded as a positive symbol of sexuality.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:47 PM
9

What 16-year-old? Demi Lovato was born in 1992, which makes her 20 years old, maybe 19.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:36 AM
1

Thank fuck that I'm already pro-choice!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:11 AM
0

I seriously just want to punch that guy in the fucking face.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:03 AM
1

Ah, okay.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:28 AM
1

What's MRM & who is this chick?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:50 AM
3

Suggestive-eyebrow-raising smiley, hahaha
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:10 PM
1

Damn right, he would...lucky bastard /:)
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:18 AM
1

So was I.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 11:30 PM
1

I LOL'd
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:00 AM
2

Okay, your summary of the events is just a wee bit melodramatic. Getting knocked out for what sounds like it was probably less than 20 minutes isn't "grievous bodily harm". Grievous bodily harm is a car accident or a shotgun blast from 15 ft., not getting a punch to your glass jaw in a hotel hallway. "Left for dead"? Really? Being left for dead is when you're traumatized severely, enough to put you into several hours of unconsciousness, and completely alone & isolated from any outside assistance…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter