TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDesertBoy Archive

View 2 posts and 33 comments by TheDesertBoy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

I don't have the time to look for them, but I feel like if this is the case statistics should show this. If there are significant more male to female transitions than female to male transitions, I'd suggest that's at least a decent suggestion you're onto something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/21 02:45 PM
1

Yup. Bad, and scary. I wonder if it's ever been applied to such a large group of people though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 08:16 AM
3

Thanks, but I already do all of your advice! What I have found is that some people just are so, well, radicalised that if you disagree that's just that they don't want to talk to you. Refer to my other comment on this thread, I've had recent experience of someone totally refusing to talk anymore after I simply challenged a point in the most polite way possible...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 02:28 PM
5

Oh I agree. But, sometimes it unavoidably comes up. I'm in the UK so this Sarah Everard thing was huge recently. And, from my experience at uni, because I didn't tow the line and agree, my neighbour in halls now refuses to talk to me! We didn't even have any kind of heated debate or anything, she's just that single minded. I certainly don't start conversations on it myself, but I don't like nodding along to something I disagree with. Being principled is bad for friendships!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 02:25 PM
10

True; however, a lot of people embody those ideas so much that to disagree with them is unacceptable. That's not hyperbole, I've experienced it personally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 01:48 PM
2

True; however, a lot of people embody those ideas so much that to disagree with them is unacceptable. That's not hyperbole, I've experienced it personally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 01:48 PM
30

Can I ask your situation though? How old are you, what's your relationship status? The reason I ask, if I applied what you said - and I really, REALLY want to - I would have no one left. I'm an 18 year old guy at uni, and with the exception of a single one every girl, and a lot of guys, are very outwardly feminist. If I stopped bothering with them I would have precious few friends and no chance at a relationship. I've already lost one male friend who I told my thoughts to, turns out he was more …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 10:24 AM
7

This kind of story just makes me so sad. That poor guy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/21 12:02 AM
3

Yep. Remember the Panama papers? Barely, right? Well that's because you're not supposed to remember them - media are controlled by those who want to cover that up. I agree, I'm not suggesting some grand illuminati idea (though it wouldn't surprise me if the wallstreet elite are very organised over defending their wealth); I suspect there's probably a large web of favours and stuff, and if someone exhausts all their favours that's that. This is probably the most conspiratorial post I've ever writ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/21 01:33 AM
3

I feel like Harvey Weinstein and others are probably used to keep the plebes at bay - "look, see? Rich people can face the law too!" It wouldn't surprise me if there's a certain critical mass of attention a rich person can get that makes the elites decide another example is needed to be made. Scapegoats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/21 12:41 AM
2

I feel like "wife" should be expanded a little, otherwise one might have trouble getting a wife 🤔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/21 11:26 AM
9

It makes me so sad. I passionately despise Boris Johnson and all the shit his party has done. They have destroyed this country in so many ways. It should be EASY to make a strong opposition to such twats. And yet Labour just doesn't. They're too busy infighting and espousing woke views in an attempt to appeal to people to actually focus on what they should be: an economically left wing alternative to the Tory twats.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 12:12 PM
8

I mean... that's true. It's just infinitely worse for those husbands brothers and sons.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:32 PM
-2

BBC? Left? Perhaps in the scope of being "woke", but on the whole, no. They are most certainly right leaning - or at least, government leaning, therefore right wing at the moment. They parrot what the government says with no critical analysis or pointing out the flaws of it, while singing their praises.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:31 PM
-5

Far better than the far right torygraph. The guardian pushes social left woke stuff far too much, but they are much more factual than the right wing alternatives for most things.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:29 PM
-1

That's a tad harsh. The torygraph and the mail spit out far more disgusting propaganda. People are getting sick and tired of them because that's what the government wants - Cummings wrote in 2004 how discrediting the BBC is key to shift UK politics further to the right. The "rival broadcaster" is an attempt at a Fox News style programme in the UK. Disgusting idea. The BBC is bad, the alternatives are completely shit.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:43 PM
3

That is true, but I think it's part of a much wider media issue, so worth highlighting. I realise I am rather preaching to the choir here though. Media issues are almost impossible to address, just like the egregious right wing bias of all of Murdoch's crap in the UK, and even the BBC to an extent.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 02:24 PM
15

The BBC have not ran any articles headlining male suicide in the UK since this latest dataset came out - there was one article previously, stating that women's suicide was the highest in 20 years. That is true, but so is men's - if they weren't biased it would've been just "suicide is the highest in 20 years".
/r/MensRights06/09/20 12:55 PM
8

"this deflection technique is usually indicative of many personal issues" Projection better than trump ahaha!
/r/MensRights11/08/20 08:24 PM
5

Nah. The prime minister role was established in 1721 and since then the monarchs have had less and less and less and less power - arguably you could go as far back as to the creation of parliament and the Magna Carta, though he monarch was still powerful then. Queen Anne was the last one to veto a bill in the early 1700s I believe. Technically the current monarch still could veto bills, dissolve the government (please Lizzy please I beg you) or declare war, but this would create a constitutional…
/r/MensRights09/08/20 08:20 AM
5

Barely any. Tiny bit more than Lizzy, but still nothing significant - she never vetoed any bills, for example. It could be argued she blocked a prime minister from obtaining power, but a lot of that was his own decision - he didn't want to work with her. Victoria was still essentially just a figurehead, with a few, small powers that Lizzy doesn't have.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 08:05 AM
0

I mean let's be real here they have basically no power at all, and it's just a coincidence that we've happened to have some long living women as Queen. This is a total non issue
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:34 AM
8

The difference of course being it's been generally upvoted here but Downvoted onto oblivion over there.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 05:32 PM
-1

She's Shadow minister, i.e. on the opposition. It really is a shame, because the Tory party under Boris is destroying this country and we need labour to replace them, but they always come with a bit of baggage...
/r/MensRights19/07/20 09:15 AM
9

As a guy in the UK about to start an engineering degree, the amount of women only scholarships pisses me off. My dad's a doctor, which means that I don't qualify for any means tested scholarships - despite my parents not helping me at uni - because of his income. For a guy, that means tough shit, no other scholarships. But I have found no less than 3 seperate schemes that pay a woman's entire £9250 course cost, AND give a £1-4k living costs grant. It's actually insane - even if I could get a mea…
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:19 PM
8

In the UK, legally, it is. Penetration by a penis.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:48 PM
1

Any number of senior officials at the university could have been responsible for deciding on a quota. All I'm saying is that you don't have any evidence the rector had anything to do with it - you don't seriously believe they would be capable enough to deal with every single small decision at their university - so you shouldn't accuse him and demand his firing.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 07:31 AM
3

In all fairness to the rector though, chances are this was a jumped up hiring policy decided by the recruitment branch when told of a women quota they had to meet...
/r/MensRights08/07/20 12:02 AM
2

Inventing a lie in a self post is surely one less hoop to go through than faking a social media message though? Regardless, you can take my word that it's the truth and if you still don't believe, up to you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights27/06/20 07:26 PM
2

Or, perhaps, I've taken it out of context to protect the identity of my friend? And I would suggest it is a catalyst for discussion as it sums up quite a widely accepted viewpoint quite well.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:27 PM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights27/06/20 01:46 PM
16

Yeah, I suppose you have a point. The counterpoint of course is that the understanding of friends and family might be lacking enough for the man to increase the difficulty of working through it. That is somewhat ironic isn't it, that this culture that's been propogated actually makes it worse - it's like although rape is talked about more openly, it has almost become MORE stigmatised because of how it's portrayed as basically worse than murder. Victimisation culture really pisses me off though, …
/r/MensRights27/06/20 12:01 PM
0

I don't understand, why is that ignorant garbage?
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter