TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDespicableMe Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by TheDespicableMe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The problem with Hillary is that she is probably one of the worst candidates to ever run for one of the major parties. Her lead is mostly explained by a couple of facts: she is married to an immensely popular president; she was smart to build connections and to try establish her as the only viable democratic candidate; she has name recognition. However, she still has no policies or an overarching campaign theme. As much as I dislike Sanders (for policy reasons), I gotta admit that he has been a …
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:43 AM

Hillary is going to win, not because of her merits but because current demographic trends favor the Democratic Party, regardless of the nominee. If the GOP doesn't do anything to reach out to minority voters (especially Hispanics), they don't stand a chance in the general election - where turnout is much higher than in local elections (which saw the GOP trouncing the Democrats since 2008). Hillary's advantage has also been a product of the fact that she has stood as the new nominee since she los…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:28 PM
1

I second most comments that mentioned that unexplained does not equal discrimination. Moreover, these studies control for variables that social scientists have observed and that they have found to be associated with higher pay (time in the labor force, nature of the profession, weekly hours, union membership, education). However, there might be variables that influence pay that social scientists have not managed to observe and quantify. Also, discrimination is ASSUMED, since it is really hard to…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:50 AM

I feel bad that Hillary is likely going to win. She already has the Democratic nomination. Let's be honest, Bernie Sanders stands no chance (and I would not vote for him, but mainly because I disagree with his policies). With the demographic changes, Republicans are fucked, they can only count with a handful of electoral votes, so they need to overperform in key swing states. Also, demographic changes are turning some states that were solid Republican into battlegrounds. Finally, Republicans hav…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:19 AM

This is Emma's likely future: she will get hired by a feminist organization, write a book about her, which will probably be a mix of rape-culture blaming and "victim" self-help, then she will probably get a column at Salon, the Guardian, or other asinine media outlet, and will cap that off with graduate degree in Gender Studies from another Ivy. It will probably go something like this, not exactly in this order.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:17 AM
4

It is not enough to have a female character. If it doesn't quote Andrea Dworkin, walks around with a shirt reading "Teach Men not to Rape"/"I bath in male tears", or is not a gender studies major fighting the patriarchy, it is not good enough. They don't give a fuck about characters, they want to see themselves portrayed on the screen.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:10 PM
1

I think one major problem with these polls is that they do not break down by "feminist type". People like Christina Hoff Sommers or Wendy Mcelroy would definitely say "yes" to the question "are you a feminist?". Also, I do believe that many (don't know how much) people who answer affirmatively to the same question do not necessarily espouse "gender feminism". It would be nice to see if it was possible to break it down. Gender feminism is not big, it is just extremely vocal and it managed to infi…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:04 PM

I date one. We just mutually decided not to talk about politics. It has been working
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:06 AM
2

I don't know how the first point could be moot. Let's say that out of every 10 players, 1 can reach grandmaster level (regardless of sex). Then, assume that of all people that start playing chess competitively, 90% are male and 10% are female. Also, assume that the dropouts even themselves, proportionately, across time. Thus, by the time people start to reach GM level, you will have many more male GMs then female GMs. Regarding the second point: it is not a justification, it is simple an explana…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:50 PM

I read an article some time ago that tried to explore this. The author made, basically, two arguments (if I am not wrong he only analyzed Chess clubs in Germany and Austria, so it is kinda hard to extrapolate the results: First, there are much more boys playing chess than girls. Therefore, just by the sheer force of numbers, even if the number of potential chess geniuses are the same for men and women, you have a field overwhelmingly male represented; second, it is a well-known statistical fact …
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:22 PM
12

I have tried to argue that with feminists in the past, but it is futile. Patriarchal "theory" is a one-fits-all explanation. If we point that it is not gender market discrimination, they will say that patriarchy discriminates against women by telling them to quit work to take care of the kids; or that STEM departments are a cesspool of misoginy; or that teachers do not foster girls' sciences and math abilities. It never ends. Though it is always nice when you see it disproven once again
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter