TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDoodAbides_1 Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by TheDoodAbides_1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I get turned on so much by voice and humour, No, you got turned on by guys who were already sufficiently-good looking to begin with, who also happened to have a great voice/sense of humor.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:37 AM
1

As one of my best guy friends always says, “I only want her submissive in bed.” Spoken like a true beta male. A true high-value alpha would never tolerate being dominated by a woman in ANY context. That's loser talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:34 AM
1

Theirs average looking and ugly men with beautiful women hell my sisters even date ugly no style men and they are obsessed with these guys LOL completely wrong. In situations like this, the men are either much more attractive than you give them credit for, or your sisters simply aren't that attractive (no offense). No attractive woman in the real world would EVER date or have sex with an ugly man without significant money or status to compensate. This is the biggest lie put out by modern-day dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:31 AM
1

What's the benefit of being with someone who makes the same amount of money as you? I could care less how much she makes so long as she's hot, cool, gives me good sex, and is fun to hang out with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:28 AM
1

High n-count is highly predictive of future infidelity/mental issues, which in turn makes for a poor long-term partner. Smart people know that past performance is the greatest indicator of future performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:27 AM
1

Nothing about the OKC study is flawed. Can you name a specific thing about it you disagree with or you think is invalid?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:25 AM
1

Wrong, it absolutely works for good looking men. I cold approach and get numbers and dates quite often from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:00 AM
1

I find it strange that you think being attracted to each other, or having sex, would make male/female friendships impossible. Why? I've tried it before and it simply doesn't work. The sexual tension is way too strong when one party has sexual feelings for the other, and the other doesn't reciprocate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:34 AM
1

if it doesn't turn into a relationship most stay even tighter friends afterwards. Yeah, no. This is extremely rare and precisely the reason most women DON'T want to engage in FWB with men they are already good friends with. The social risk of a FWB not working out is extremely high in a tight-knit circle of friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:33 AM
1

So many tinder profiles read ‘tired of hookups’ ‘where are the good guys’ ‘why is it so hard to find love’. It’s obvious these girls have been having their cooch’s smashed tirelessly by random Tinder guys for the last few years. LOL you realize these are the easiest women to hook up with, right? Whenever a woman puts "not looking for hookups" on her profile, I know she's 1000% more likely to want to hook up than those who don't. Women say this stuff because they know deep-down they are most susc…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:24 AM
1

Wrong. Being friends with a woman you are sexually attracted to is incredibly beta and weak. If there's no physical attraction, then it's OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:13 AM
1

Completely and utterly inaccurate, given that there is scientific proof showing that women are widely attracted to the same collection of physical traits and genetic markers (height, race, certain facial features, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:12 AM
1

Go outside and look at couples, the man is usually uglier. LOL laughably false. Women very rarely date down in looks. Try living in the real world some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:06 AM
1

Women don't give a shit about personality unless he first passes the looks filter. No sexual attraction = no next date.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:52 AM
1

That's great, some men are perfectly entitled to being delusional, gullible idiots who make awful life decisions. Doesn't mean the rest of us have to be similarly dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:35 AM
1

Obviously, yes. The problem is that these high-value men are unbelievably rare. As in <1% of the population rare. In addition, these men rotate women and refuse to commit to anything but 9/10 Stacies when they're done playing the field.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:27 AM
1

Damn dude, what kind of job do you work at?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 08:18 PM
1

Lol my experience is normal for normal people. People who spend their lives on the internet instead of interacting with people may have a different opinion. LOL the dude just crushed you with legit stats and peer-reviewed studies and all you can do is make up straw mans and ad-hominem attacks. That's when you know you're fucked. My man, just leave already. You're out of your depth and are clearly embarrassing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 08:10 PM
1

Because i know ugly guys who get laid. Assuming this isn't a outright lie, I guarantee they are much better-looking than you'll admit to as it would kill your argument. Every time I see pictures of supposedly "ugly" men with women, it's either because he has money, the guy is more attractive than is claimed, or the girl is much uglier/the couple is looksmatched. I cant look at a guy and immediately tell if he gets girls or not. However i can tell from seeing how he interacts with women. Thats th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 08:05 PM
1

So you OPENLY ADMIT you're above-average in looks with good fashion and style, but of course, the ONLY reason you have any success is because of your "sOcIaL sKiLlzzz". Laughable. You can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:56 PM
1

You guys here sometimes get women very wrong. If you are able to mentally stimulate a woman, then you can take it further in the direction you want. Learning how to do that is more important than looks or money. LOL yeah, this is why no one here takes you seriously. To suggest that social skills is more important than looks or money is the biggest load of horseshit ever posted on this forum and evidence you do NOT live in the real world or get casual, regular sex with prime, ATTRACTIVE females. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:54 PM
1

Women don't even know what they are attracted to. This is why you never take dating advice from a woman. You observe their actions, NOT listen to their words.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:48 PM
1

"One of my friends is a self admitted 4/10 and he gets more girls than any pretty boy who is socially inept." Self-rating is wildly inaccurate due to inherent attribution bias. Your friend is much more likely a 6, maybe 7/10 and/or the girls he's going for are ugly. Still doesn't disprove looks, status, dominance as being all that matters in attraction. "All you need to do is learn to talk, get good with the language that you use, learn how to be witty and quick on your feet. getting a dapper lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:42 PM
1

Spoken like a true beta lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:33 PM
1

This is what women really don't get. High-value men and chads don't commit to monogamous relationships - they maintain rotations. They have their fill and pump and dump these chicks after a few months, who then go online, talk about how all men are trash, and take out their frustrations on incels and average-looking men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:22 PM
2

But it's true though. Women only want the best looking men on dating apps and social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:15 PM
0

LOL wrong. It's literally the EXACT opposite. Promiscuity is strongly linked to infidelity and future promiscuity further down the line. You don't just stop being a slut because you were a slut in the past. It's part of your ingrained behavior. Past performance is the greatest indicator or future performance. I would NEVER commit to a high-n/promiscuous women. I use them for sex, pump and dump, and move on to the next. If I'm going to commit the rest of my life to a single woman, I'll damn well …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:06 PM
1

You have a vagina and don't know shit about the psychology of being a man, so either STFU or make a constructive post.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:03 PM
1

There's no pseudo-science, just proven facts that you personally disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:03 PM
1

Women don't enjoy sex on a purely physical basis. They simply enjoy being validated by attractive men or men with high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:01 PM
1

Wrong. It's been proving that promiscuity greatly reduces the ability to pair bond and emotionally empathize with your partner. But please, keep being stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:00 PM
1

I can assure you that you aren't the slightest bit attractive and you wouldn't even crack the bottom of my rotation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:59 PM
1

LOL only beta losers are insecure about stuff. I have literally nothing to be insecure about, what should I be?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:56 PM
1

The only difference between a friend and a lover is sexual access. That's it. If you gave your prime commodity away for less, to someone else, that implicitly places less value on me as a man. Call it what you will, but that's how we men value women. Take it or leave it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:49 PM
1

She didn't choose him, she settled after realizing Chad wouldn't keep her around for longer than a 2 am booty call. That's the whole crux of the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:44 PM
1

LOL you're such a stupid beta it's not even funny. It has NOTHING to do with insecurity. Any intelligent decision-maker knows that the past is the greatest indicator of future performance. If you had tons of sex at 19 years old, you're equally like have tons of sex at 28, which means you're a far greater risk for promiscuity/cheating/STD's, etc. If I'm going to devote my time/resources to someone for the rest of my life, I want a good, decent woman ,not someone who was the town whore who fucked …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:40 PM
1

Any intelligent decision-maker knows that the past is the greatest indicator of future performance. If you had tons of sex at 19 years old, you're equally like have tons of sex at 28, which means you're a far greater risk for promiscuity/cheating/STD's, etc. If I'm going to devote my time/resources to someone for the rest of my life, I want a good, decent woman ,not someone who was the town whore who fucked half the football team when she was 20 years old. And this is coming from a legit top 10%…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:39 PM
1

You do realize that women only go for the best looking men on social media and dating apps, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:14 PM
1

No not really. Very rarely do you hear this unless the guy has significant money or social status. And even then, the woman doesn't really love the guy - she merely tolerates him for resources/access to greater opportunities due to his social circle, etc. How many times have you seen legit attractive women with fat, broke, ugly men with zero status or money 3-4 points below them in looks? That's right, like never.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:13 PM
1

Myself, I'm 5'9", overweight, and I wear thick glasses, and I've never had any trouble meeting women. Occasionally scoring a fat, broke 4/10 landwhale doesn't qualify you for being a supreme Chad slayer LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 04:06 PM
–

Then how is it that there are still Chads on dating apps getting tons of matches, despite these disadvantages? Are they just so good looking in real life that if offsets any drawbacks you get with photos?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:52 PM
–

because personality can makeup for lack of looks in person lol no they don't. A 2/10 fat, balding Indian janitor isn't going to be dating 8/10 Stacies all because of his great "Personality".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:49 PM
–

Agree, but you still need to meet the initial looks threshold. No baseline physical attraction = No PIV.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter