TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDwiin Archive

View 4 posts and 958 comments by TheDwiin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

What was the response to that last comment that got cut off? Edit: found the comment. "The right to an abortion" is the response.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:16 PM
5

That's why whenever anyone uses that term, I correct it to the proper term, oligarchy.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 01:13 PM
13

Most men who suffer from Sexual Violence do so at the hands of women according to the CDC's NISVS 2016 report. However feminists petitioned the CDC to stop calling such violence rape, so they renamed it "Made to Penetrate." And while MtP isn't as physically traumatizing as "rape" is, psychologists have released many reports identifying it as just as psychologically traumatizing as "rape." So I'll call it what it is. Made to Penetrate is rape, and most people who rape men are women. (By the way, …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:16 AM
15

This is what I'm talking about, you're advocating feminism in a MRA space. If I went to a feminist subreddit and started saying we should stop treating domestic violence as a gendered crime because men are victims of IPV more than women are, which is a fact, I'd be banned. Yet here you are on a men's rights forum advocating for feminist ideologies, (because the idea of a femicide is only spouted by feminists, which is funny because men and boys make up 80% of homicide victims and that doesn't ev…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:10 AM
12

You didn't answer their question he asked first. You're trying to deflect it into a "but women" argument. You know how a lot of feminists complain about MRAs going into their spaces trying to advocate for men and how it's toxic? This is what you're doing right now.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:31 AM
8

"and? It's apex fallacy anyway to attribute the actions of the ultra wealthy to the actions of the entire group. You use the word patriarchy when in reality it is an oligarchy. We can argue about the sexism behind venture capitalists but it's useless anyways because venture capitalism shouldn't be a thing. They'll tell you they are risking their wealth, but they're not risking their livelihood. If every business they invest in busts they still live in a mansion."
/r/MensRights14/07/26 03:38 AM
26

Looking through the comments "my ex was suicidal when I met him [as a patient] in the mental hospital..." The mental hospital is not where you find love...
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:33 PM
7

Due process doesn't need private Internet posts, and it's already illegal to slander someone.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 06:13 PM
1

Playing the "who has it worse" game gets us no where. Regardless of if the study takes into account inequalities men face, it holds true my original statement, when a society has less disadvantages for women, the women are wonderful effect decreases. The thing is is I'm not trying to refute any of the issues you are bringing up. However, you seem interested in proving me wrong like I'm attacking you. You specifically asked me how one could advocate for both men's rights and women's rights and I …
/r/MensRights07/07/26 04:56 PM
1

2018 Study showing that the Women are Wonderful Effect decreases in more gender egalitarian societies.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 08:59 AM
1

the fact that we don't have a wage gap What did I say about dismissing the concerns of other people just because you don't see it. On top of this your "source" is a decades-old quote from an oligarch, someone who believed in essentially what trickle-down economics is. Give me a second. I'll get the sources for the woman is wonderful effect lessening in countries where the quality is more equal.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 08:52 AM
2

So first things first, and this is something that a lot of feminists do more so than mras but mras are also guilty of it, and that is to understand that just because you're side at a disadvantage does not mean the other people aren't. This goes into dismissing/belittling missandry/ misogyny. This goes into the dismissing or downplaying the significance of some of the complaints, such as when feminists say that men can't be raped or when mras say that the Wage Gap isn't real. Basically playing th…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 07:54 AM
2

Charged or convicted? Because she was formally charged with murder.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 05:35 AM
3

Geez... Her mother has had (and currently has) a protective order against her prior to Australian CPS got tipped off that he may be neglected, yet they let her keep him... While she needs to locked away in a prison or mental institution for decades, this is just proof that CPS, regardless of country, are useless to protecting the kids that actually need help while harassing the families where the kids don't need help.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 05:33 AM
11

No, the "took a risk" excuse doesn't fly after their first 10 million, because even if Elon musk lost 99.9999% of his wealth, he would still have more wealth than most people in the world. That's not a "risk"
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:17 AM
4

Mostly unethical behavior, because you're not going to convince me that someone who makes a billion dollars in a year works over 66,000 times harder than someone who works minimum wage.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:12 AM
6

Doesn't matter that they grew their wealth, they still inherited their starting wealth, which would disqualify them.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:04 AM
10

Interesting and false. It says it excludes inherited wealth, but I know of 7 of those men, and all of them wouldn't be rich if they weren't born rich. Jeff Bezos was only able to get started because of his daddy's money, same with Elon, same with Buffet... Just because they grew their wealth doesn't mean they started from scratch, no, they most certainly inherited their wealth.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:01 AM
4

The premise that both men and women can be disadvantaged in different situations, or the premise that recognizing both makes you both feminist and an MRA?
/r/MensRights06/07/26 03:16 AM
10

Women rely on their partner for emotional support just as much as men do, yet when men do it, it's demonized. Also, there are way more issues than suicide, such a homelessness, genital mutilation, labor exploitation, financial exploitation, family court disparity, prison sentencing gap, etc. all of which are talked about on here.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:13 AM
14

No. I'm against using payment processors as censorship. Payment processors should not have that kind of power, and we shouldn't try to demand that they do.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 03:06 AM
4

Sanderson didn't start off self published though, he started off publishing through Tor to get his name out there, then he made his own publishing company.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:42 PM
1

There's the hornification of books definitely, but as far as books being slop, that is a matter of opinion, and some books that some call slop are actually really good.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:40 PM
47

Alopecia treatment is primarily privately funded... They're complaining about the equivalent of women at Starbucks aren't being paid as high as men at Microsoft...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 08:22 AM
21

You know what's really funny that most of the biologists in the world are women, but why isn't biology included in STEM when discussions of gender equality comes up?
/r/MensRights14/06/26 12:08 AM
2

You forgot that they also only care about violence when it happens to women from men. You don't see fringe movements in the feminist community talking about the need to lower DV rates for lesbians. Like I said, they've done some good for all the bad they do. But we shouldn't excuse the bad they do.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:23 AM
-2

Neither were the Black Panthers armed protests instrumental in the Civil Rights Movement, but they did contribute to the overall movement even a little. Enough to show that violence is an option. And that's not what I said asshole. I said they tend to ignore the violent side of the fight. You want to liken all feminists to the extremists who firebombed empty buildings, but the fact is they were a small fringe faction of feminists. Heck, there were more feminists who sent bomb threats to Erin Pri…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:40 PM
-4

Is feminism only a good thing? No. No it's not. Is feminism only a bad thing? No. No it's not. Just like many things in life, the movement is complex. It has done some good things despite the bad it's done.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:50 AM
-7

Kinda weak, but not wrong. The women are wonderful effect even makes it worse considering we don't consider criminals as severe when they are women.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:58 AM
-28

To be fair, history likes to pretend positive social change never involves bloodshed. Look at the union wars that were fought in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that resulted in a lot of our labor laws being written the way they were. I'm not saying you're wrong btw, I'm simply saying history books wash the blood out of them, and it isn't unique to feminists. Edit: I love that pointing out that the peace washing of history isn't unique to feminism deserves down votes here, especially sinc…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 02:49 AM
19

But, IIRC, getting an Uber doesn't require you to submit ID info, so if you created an account and said you were a woman, you could still request a woman using this feature.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 03:41 AM
5

Not so much. While it is true that full decriminalization and legalization does lead to more trafficking being reported, we don't truly know if that is because there is an actual increase in trafficking or because the SWers or their clients don't feel fear in reporting it when they see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:00 AM
4

Not to mention that legalizing it would save the state money on enforcement, help destigmatize the profession, allow SWers to get proper healthcare, and while it would cost states to maintain regulations to help alleviate abuse in the profession, the taxes they'd collect, both by taxing the businesses as well as the income tax from the SWers, would more than pay for it. Look at the effects of legalizing Marijuana for recreational use in states like California and Colorado
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:32 AM
6

Being disagreeable is the most common dating problem amongst men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 03:51 AM
3

Your point? I never said that you said the agreeableness had to be towards their partner, just that you are the linking it to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 03:35 AM
5

Ok, first of all, I'm not dismissing it, I was wondering if there was more recent data to show that this still holds up. Second of all, I'm not the one linking agreeableness to dating, you are, that's the entire premise of this post. As for research to back the belief that men and women have changed, especially when it comes to their romantic partners, I believe the book Labor of Love: The Invention of Dating by Moira Weigel shows how that has evolved in the small interim between your paper and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 03:24 AM
6

This is a 15 year old paper that quotes a lot of research that is 25 or 32 years old, especially the part about agreeableness. Is there anything more recent to indicate this holds up modernly? The reason I ask is because back in the 90s and 00s, dating culture wasn't as bad as it is today, and as such, things may have changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:52 AM
30

Because the Gender Equality index is trash. It stops measuring when women are equal to men, so if men are disadvantaged in the category that is being measured it is treated as if it was truly equal. What's worse there is one category where if men and women are equal, it still treats women as disadvantaged. Life expectancy. If a country has a life expectancy of 90 for men and 92 for women, Even though both are well above the worldwide average, it would see as a disadvantage for women because wome…
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:00 AM
2

Women have a lot of social power and men who are not misogynistic are wary of that power they hold to the point where multiple studies have shown men are afraid to be alone with women colleagues.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:40 PM
12

"no true scotsman" The fact is, regardless of if "most" feminists don't hate men, they tolerate those that do. Also, both in Spain and in Italy when there was a billboard campaign to advertise that men can be abused as well, there were multiple feminist organizations, dozens even, that petition to remove such billboards. Not to mention the protests behind the red pill documentary which was done by a radical feminist who was trying to prove that MRAs are BS, but decided to give us a chance and fo…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:01 PM
2

The fun part is, all they need to do is parody. They can have women's and enbys only hours if they also have men's only hours in comparable ways. In this case, if they made Tues and Thurs 10-11AM men's only, they wouldn't be in violation of Title IX
/r/MensRights22/04/26 02:16 AM
3

Don't you know that women can't molest children? It must've been a man!
/r/MensRights21/04/26 11:06 AM
11

Yeah, let's check in how [the increased number of police worn body cams is] working out for them. As intended. The footage shows she is an active danger to another being, a child no less, and the police officers attempted to order her to drop the knife, but she refused. So they shot her, and since it was caught on film, no one can claim she wasn't a threat. I didn't understand how this is being spun for "police didn't need body cams."
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/26 09:06 PM
4

Eh, but the examples of specific actions aren't exclusive to women who are victims, so if someone sodomizes a man, or excessively mutilates his corpse, would they be charged with femicide? If my ex followed through with her threat of "chopping it off and making me choke to death on it" would she be convicted of femicide even though legally I'm a man? Edited to add: to reiterate and specify, tracking it is fine, but punishing it harsher than you would if the victim was male under identical circum…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 12:43 PM
3

As a veteran of the US Navy, there are 6 things I would like to say on this matter. 1: Most MRAs, including me, want full abolition of the draft. 2: It's mostly a common myth that men's voting rights are tied to the draft, in the US at least. This is a common myth because when you go to register to vote after your 18th birthday, you do so at the post office, and that's also where you sign up for the draft, so you just killed two birds with one stone. (Edit:) This is how it works prior to the int…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 03:25 AM
135

I just don't understand feminists who try to claim femicide laws that punish homicide more harshly if the victim is a woman is any form of equality. It is literally, literally, putting the value of women over the value of men. I can understand recognizing it as a statistic, but if you make special laws against it, that isn't equality. If there is sexual violence found, punish it as an additional charge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 09:49 PM
11

https://youtu.be/3WMuzhQXJoY Here you go
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 08:32 AM
42

What gets me the most about the red pill documentary is that it was a radical feminist trying to prove that MRAs are shite, but when she actually started to listen instead of just think about counters, she realized that men are going through a lot of struggles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 06:29 AM
1

I would also like to point out in the song it's never actually confirmed he cheated on her. Every time she sings about what he's doing to cheat on her, she includes the word "probably." Edit: But I also want to point out it isn't only women who sing about and glorify DV and Murder. In Garth Brooks' song The Thunder Roles, the extended version of the song includes a verse where the wife grabs a gun from the dresser drawer, and "this will be the last night she wonders where he's been." Garth Brook…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 03:08 AM
10

You keep falling for the Apex Fallacy. You see a small group of rich men on top, men who have inherited their wealth and use it to control both men and women below them so their wealth grows, and you are applying that to all men. On top of that, you are also excluding any women who are in power when doing so, and you are excluding how women in general shape our society acting like our society is only shaped by men. And yes, our entire society has women influencing it whether directly or indirect…
/r/MensRights31/03/26 02:24 AM
1

Nah, just comparing different gender gaps, not saying one justifies the other.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 07:03 AM
1

Basically, yes. Men live significantly shorter lives after retirement compared to women.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 06:44 AM
2

Simple, in every country men have a lower life expectancy than women. Some by a few months, some by more than a decade, globally it's about 5 years. Also, in every country, you cannot receive retirement benefits until a certain age, and there isn't a single country where men are eligible for retirement benefits younger than women, though there are about a dozen countries where women are eligible for retirement at younger ages than men. So if you take the life expectancy age and subtract the age …
/r/MensRights22/03/26 05:39 AM
0

The gender pay gap is not made up, but it is more complex than "same work, different pay" and has more to do with society's perceived gender roles than any other factor. To be clear, it is not companies specifically paying female employees at the same job level less than male employees, however, companies are less likely to give promotions and meritorious raises to women compared to men, specifically because of the idea that once a woman settles down starts having family, she's going to take a s…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 11:49 AM
42

It's all about effort. Both men and women want the perfect someone who will not only love them back, but put in effort into the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 06:55 AM
1

To which I rebut "That may explain College, but what about high school and before. Every level boys and men are falling behind, not just college." The big thing is to not disagree with their assertion but to challenge the world view without directly contradicting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:33 AM
1

Whenever I hear the "men are smarter" remark, I always rebut with "then why are boys and men falling behind in every level of education?" It's a serious problem, and it isn't being treated as one because of the apex fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:33 AM
0

No, the only reason why I say you didn't read my full comment is because of the last sentence on my comment, because you said it's not going to happen anytime soon. In the last sentence on my comment literally acknowledges that it's not a short-term solution but a long-term goal.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:52 AM
0

But here's my question for you, why should I read your sources when you don't even read my entire comment?
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:38 AM
1

What's your words when it comes to a solution that doesn't disadvantage women? "It doesn't exist"? Same when it comes to eliminating bias without a third party. By the way, how Reddit has implemented their private profile system is laughable. If you truly wanted to see my post history, you could go to my profile, click search and hit enter and it will show it to you. If you really want to see how active I am in r/mensrights or r/leftwingmaleadvocates You could go to those individual subreddits a…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:26 AM
1

So me asking people to provide what OP explicitly asked for makes me a brigadier? That's laughable. As far as the biases of teachers go, making grading anonymous is the easiest way to bypass that, and with the move of adding technology to learning environments, it's going to be easier to do. The problem is that there is never going to be a true way to eliminate human bias, as everyone is biased. I'm biased. You're biased. Everyone is biased.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:17 AM
1

Actually I'm quite active on this sub, and have been subscribed to it for years. I also participate in different male subs as well. Also: you're also someone who didn't read the full post. OP explicitly asked for a solution that didn't disadvantage women. I do agree we need more male teachers, and one of the ways to do that is to destigmatize men who want to be involved in early childcare work.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:08 AM
0

Did you stop reading there? Because I explained that if we eliminated the need for financial support then neither gender would need it, which is what my solution is.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:04 AM
6

What numbers? Provide your source.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:19 PM
6

Well, that assertion isn't true, they are having children, but at a lesser rate. Also, children of conservatives aren't going to always be conservative either. And I still reject the notion that heritage plays a more impactful role in personal politics than environment does, as you, nor op, have provided a source, even though I provided a rock solid argument that environment plays a bigger role as Texas, Utah and Florida all voted for that Democrat FDR back during the depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:48 PM
4

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:36 PM
1

So far you're the only one who's responded. I have asked this to at least two different people. And you didn't read the post then... You only read the title... That's still a reading comprehension issue on your end...
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:18 AM
0

Then why respond to a post asking for one? You're the one who's lacking in reading comprehension here. Edit: Not to mention I have provided one.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:08 AM
3

Post: What is a solution to this problem we know is happening? You: Here are the causes for the problem. Me: Ok, so can you answer the question asked in the post? You: HOW DARE YOU ASK ME TO ACTUALLY RESPOND TO THE POST IN A CONSTRUCTIVE WAY INSTEAD OF MY ZERO SUM RHETORIC!!!! This conversation so far. I'm only asking you to respond to the post as the post asked. I even provided an answer both in my own comment as well as a reply to you.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:02 AM
-2

And that right there is zero sum thinking. The idea that one getting more means the other is getting less is fallacious, and honestly, goes against what was asked by this post in the first place. This post asked for a solution of how to solve the education gap without disadvantaging girls and women. Edit: schools don't grade on a scale that always fails the bottom X amount of people... They grade on a scale of understanding this curriculum, and as such, if they've done the research into how they…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 10:50 AM
-1

K, cool, these are the causes, given this, what policies can we enact that would help boys and men catch up without disadvantaging women, as the post asked?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:39 AM
0

Yes, I'm well aware of what caused the problem, albeit you are saying it's malice when that may not have been the intention. However, the post was asking for a solution to the problem, specifically a solution that doesn't also disadvantage women, which I have provided on both a K-12/primary school level as well as a college level.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:52 AM
0

One of the bigger issues is how we see boys and men falling behind as an individualistic failure instead of a systemic failure, One of the big things we can start doing is putting actual research into why boys and men are falling behind instead of just blaming boys and men for being slow or dense. Using this research, we might be able to find a conductive learning environment for people of all genders rather than catering to what works for girls and women. Another thing to consider though is tha…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:41 AM
5

Oh, I'm not saying that being raised by parents who are of a certain political or religious mind doesn't play a role in how you may vote in the future, I'm just saying that it isn't the strongest indicator because if the environment gets hospitable enough, people will vote for someone promising a better future who actually has solutions. I believe the saying goes along the lines of something like: One cannot be patriotic on an empty stomach. I'm not saying either political party is more patrioti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 05:04 AM
12

I asked for a source so I want a source. Also, that is not proof that it's hereditary rather than environmental... Different political parties tend to cater to different demographics Edit: voice dictation failed me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:59 AM
16

I would like a source for the claim that political alignment is hereditary more than environmental. The reason why I'm asking this is because Texas, Utah, California, Michigan, New York; these are all states that voted for liberal presidential candidate FDR during the 1932 election.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:45 AM
35

One of the comments that replied to that comment PMO so fucking much "Men make up 94% of the prison population so..." This literally mirrors white supremacist rhetoric used to justify hate against racial minorities. We have no problem finding issues with the racial sentencing gap, but when it comes to recognizing the gender sentencing gap suddenly everyone is blind to it.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:37 AM
2

Yes, that's one of the issues with advocacy when it comes to getting rid of toxic masculinity on a macro level is that most people just stop right there and they don't actually take a look into what is the root cause for this toxic masculinity, and a lot of the times it's because that is the behavior that gets rewarded and healthy masculinity tends to get shamed or shunned on a individual level, and they refuse to acknowledge that women participate in that shaming and shunning as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 08:03 AM
3

I do say
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:44 PM
1

Yes you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:41 PM
4

"Gay men don't break up as often as lesbians because they don't get into relationships." "Well, no, there are just as many marriages between gay men as there are between lesbian women, and women still initiate divorce in same-sex marriages at almost three times the rate that men do." "There isn't any harm in breaking up or divorcing peacefully." Way to move the goal post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:34 PM
6

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/marriage-obergefell-press-release/?hl=en-US#:~:text=More%20than%20half%20(53%25),%2Dsex%20couples%20(33%25). There are just as many homosexual marriages between men and women, yet: https://www.simpsonlaw.net/blog/2021/06/rate-of-divorce-for-gay-men-lower-than-for-lesbians/?hl=en-US#:~:text=The%20reasons%20given%20for%20choosing,choose%20to%20end%20their%20marriages. Divorce rate for lesbian marriages is way higher, and generally for the same reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:21 PM
–

Paternity fraud is not only harmful to men, but children as well. 99.9% of all DNA is shared by most humans according to your logic, but that .1% can determine if the child can develop MS, PKU, SMA, etc. and early detection of these conditions can be critical as treating early can prevent permanent damage in some cases, such as the case with SMA. Also, the idea of not wanting to raise someone genetically related to you isn't exclusive to men. There are real fears with pregnant women that their b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:20 PM
31

Honestly if we just got rid of all gender specific laws and policies in the first place, it wouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 12:35 PM
–

I disagree. We should not have criminal charges brought unless proof is provided that she attempted to defraud a man into thinking he was the biological father when she knew for certain he wasn't the father. We should not be advocating "Guilty until proven innocent." Now, as far as civil liability goes, voluntary child support before a paternity test is performed isn't something that should be recoverable, however, I am of the thought process that paternity tests need to be conducted before any …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:15 PM
40

Do you not see the difference though? You had to go onto a website most don't know exist to see that. The misandrists are using mainstream social media.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 04:30 AM
2

Maybe. Get sober or leave Could also be a reason why she left. Unfortunately, alcoholism and other substance abuse disorders can be real bad.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:02 PM
5

I just want to point out that after she was found she was arrested. She was an alcoholic who was fired from her veterinarian job for drinking on the job, she was arrested for a DWI in 2001, and she was released on bail, and she had a November 2001 court date that she never showed up for. The judge issued an arrest warrant for her, and after she was found, the warrant got served and she got arrested. She is now currently out on bond again. https://youtu.be/gzm_hPqcU6c Now, I'm not a lawyer, nor a…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:46 AM
6

While you are correct that both sides of the gender binary do have a bias that is more agreeable with women than men, men typically are less likely to just blindly support women that they directly disagree with. One example of this, albeit anecdotal, Don't forget if it was on trueoffmychest or aitah, there was a woman who was talking about how she got into an argument with her boyfriend about Dungeon Crawler Carl because in the book, the Main Character mentioned getting his girlfriend an applian…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:03 AM
56

They do have an argument for this: "We don't want men to be conscripted either!" Except there aren't protests that happen in countries that are conscripting men, and not women, but there are protests when they suggest women should be conscripted too.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:59 PM
6

The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. It's quite literally a gender bend of standard incel rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:35 AM
8

They want men who are pleasant, emotionally available, and suitably untraumatized. Translation: they want men who are attractive, and who will be willing to put forth emotional labor for them, while at the same time not putting too much emotional labor on them. She also specifically only wants men who are vetted by other women. She then later goes on to say that while men are over represented on dating apps, women struggle to find find dates on those apps because there aren't enough "suitable me…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 04:23 AM
1

Our findings demonstrated that trans people reported consistently more discrimination and violence than cisgender LGB people throughout Europe, irrespective of the countries’ rankings of LGBTQ+ rights. Trans men may experience "less" violence than Trans women, BUT THEY STILL EXPERIENCE MORE VIOLENCE THAN CIS-GAY-MEN. That does not make them more "welcome" in our society. And to be clear, I didn't ask for a source for which transgender gender identity experiences more violence, I asked for a sour…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 04:01 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/FTMMen/s/XfaB2LgPvO Just as violence against cis-men goes ignored, violence against trans-men goes ignored too. Can you provide me an actual fucking source to back your claim?
/r/MensRights26/02/26 03:42 AM
23

I certainly hope she doesn't get allowed bail again.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 03:30 AM
1

Ignoring your identity ≠ welcoming your identity.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:48 AM
2

Can you back that claim? I have seen a dozen and a half PSAs having to remind people that trans men even exist, and that trans bills will affect them too. Ignoring your identity ≠ welcoming your identity.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 05:19 AM
6

I honestly believe that LLMs should be filtered to recognize abuse like that, and provide gender-neutral care for it. But I do want to point out that the LLMs are only echoing what is fed to them. They're shuffling it and paraphrasing it, but they're simply echoing it, so if they're fed a lot of different resources online that specifically ignore male victims of IPV/SV, then they're going to regurgitate similar sentiments.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 07:11 AM
9

Guarantee these are the same people who say that child rapist who received 50 years for raping 4 boys should walk free because "women get overly punished" for sexual crimes, or worse, "women can't rape men/boys" Edit: autocorrect bit me.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 01:47 PM
44

You forgot that trans spaces also didn't recognize this as misandry, instead calling it trans-misogyny and when trans men started saying their struggles were trans-misandry, the mods of trans subreddit flipped their shit because "misandry isn't real," then flipped their shit more when they called it Trans-Androphobia. Now I'm not going to say trans-misogyny doesn't exist, it does, but it would be significantly weaker if we didn't have societal misandry telling us that cis men are sexual predator…
/r/MensRights21/02/26 06:56 PM
33

Promote men's accountability for gender equality I.E. they don't want to fix any of the issues men face, only women face. With this attitude they're not gonna solve much because a lot of issues women face are caused by inequality against men. Social and systemic misandry helps cause social and systemic misogyny and vice versa.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:33 AM
26

Misandry isn't less dangerous than misogyny, it's just that the dangers are different, and because they're different, "they don't count." Systemic and societal misandry is responsible for the sentencing gap, homelessness gap, workplace injury and death gap, life expectancy gap, and suicide gap; and this is not an exhaustive list. It is primarily perpetuated by the oligarchy, however, it is upheld by society as a whole much like misogyny is.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:43 AM
1

While I do agree soldiers defend our freedom and protect our lives... I can understand why people, especially Americans, say cops don't, because cops generally tend to be violent and escalate situations, and even the courts say their job isn't to protect and serve. For every cop murdered by a criminal, there are 20-30 civilians murdered by cops. While some of those are justified, the fact that there are unjustified ones at all shows they aren't off their mark by saying cops aren't to be trusted.…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 08:18 PM
5

I also want to point out that older data is skewed a little bit because all self-harm was considered a suicide attempt even when that was not the goal. Now they differentiate more, but when this originally was coined, any self harm was considered an attempt.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 10:36 PM
11

Health and biology fields to be more specific, both of which are sciences represented by the S.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:17 AM
7

Then don't talk about behaviors that men have as if it's only men that have them on a gender debate subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:42 AM
5

You are complaining about an argument men make as if only men make it, which women make too when it benefits them, such as my real world examples I have gave. And the reason I commented is that it's a pet peeve of mine when people act like it's only men who spread these gender stereotypes when women spread them too. To put it in the metaphor from your original comment: they can lay in the bed they continue making Women are making the bed too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:40 AM
4

So your response isn't in good faith. To be clear, you're mad at men for using "Argument XYZ" while ignoring the fact that women use "Argument XYZ" when it benefits them. That's my entire point here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:18 AM
8

You hear it all the time whenever men complain about societal issues affecting them. "Who set the system up?" As if women had 0 say in how our society is or has been set up, especially modernly when men are complaining about issues that have only existed for the past 150 or so years, about the same time as the women's suffrage movement started. (Correlation not causation) To keep it on topic though, women have no issue using "but women are more emotionally intelligent than men" as a reason why t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:05 AM
6

This is a pet peeve of mine when blue pills act like women didn't help shape society. Women did help shape our society and gender roles in our society in both good and bad ways. And yes, they helped shape this paradigm of "logical vs emotional" when it comes to the expected gender roles of the binary, as if people can't be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:29 AM
5

Isn't this the study where the men who were circumcised also got sex Ed and the control group didn't, and they didn't control for the sex Ed variable so the decrease in HIV could be from more comprehensive sex Ed instead of circumcision?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 04:00 AM
–

Yep. This. There are toxic trans people I unfortunately get to see on discord. I have them ignored, but they're a small part of a community I am part of and they don't bother me specifically. No group is immune from being toxic, and as such, no group should be immune for criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:56 PM
1

Because they defined what is and isn't healthy for men to feel, and if you feel offended by that then you're not feeling healthy feelings
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:59 AM
11

As far as Fujo goes, why is it misogynistic for men to fetishize lesbian relationships, but not misandristic for women to fetishize gay men in relationships?
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:44 AM
36

Didn't even read the article or comment, huh... Nowhere are they denying the existence of rampant misogyny, only stating that systemic and societal levels of misandry exists, which it does exist regardless of how much you want to ignore it. This is not an airport, you don't need to announce your departure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 03:08 AM
5

So the solution is what? More 3rd spaces in the public eye? I can agree that it will solve the loneliness epidemic (which is more than just males,) and can help the lonely type find friends outside of those circles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 03:05 AM
4

I can do without the other political commentary, but good watch.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 07:19 AM
5

What's frustrating is people were up in arms when news dropped of Utah changing its statutory rape laws to protect the 18 year old grandchild of the president of the state Senate... Until it was revealed it was his granddaughter who was the rapist, then suddenly radio silence.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 04:37 AM
7

Fair. I agree it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 06:34 AM
10

I want to point out the men who got the shot, and the men who want the shot say they are willing to accept the side effects, it's that the FDA won't approve of it because of the side effects regardless of what men say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 05:31 AM
14

Ok, question, do you think a paper abortion for male rape victims should be allowed? Because right now there are rape victims forced to pay child support even though they didn't even consent to the sex in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 05:27 AM
3

I turn the strawman around on them. "I'm not anti feminist as I truly do believe in gender equality, however a large number of misandrists call themselves feminists and most other feminists don't call them out on their sexism, and even those that aren't sexist against men allow those that are to advocate for policies that not only negatively affect men, but erase the victimhood of women as well. That's why I critique the feminist movement."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 05:02 AM
18

But don't rape arrests only account for 1% of all rapes? With such a small sample size of rapists, isn't it too low to assume all match that very small sample. I mean if you look at CDC data you find that women make up closer to 35% of rapists and sexual assaulters. The CDC also measures all nonconsensual sexual violence including a form of rape cis-women can't be victims of called "made to penetrate" where the victim's penis is enveloped by their rapist, which is still rape no matter how you tr…
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:14 PM
3

But misandry never kills, it's only a reaction to misogyny. You're mistaken. (/s in case you needed it \)
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:36 AM
3

So the funniest part about this is that there are more misandrists talking about The male loneliness epidemic. Then there are men who are talking about the male loneliness epidemic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 08:33 AM
1

Let's say that you ran a bakery, and let's say that you were charging a 10% head on all of your products, meaning that you charged 110% after the cost of ingredients. And let's say that the rest of your bills are covered by about half that 10%. For example, if it took you $10 to bake a dozen cookies, you would be selling that dozen cookies for $11, and you had enough business that of that extra dollar that you didn't spend on ingredients. You get to keep $0.50 in your pocket and the other $0.50 …
/r/MensRights17/12/25 08:57 AM
1

But you said it yourself in this comment, it isn't the reduction of taxes themselves that drive the prices down, it's competition, and when the ultra wealthy have a free market, they will sell at a loss until they have no competition then jack up prices even higher than before to make up the losses, and never lower them again. It happened with Amazon and Diapers.com as well as a few other websites. It has happened numerous times with Walmart and local businesses. Link to this happening this year…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:56 AM
0

Question: who benefits from businesses getting lower taxes? Spoiler, in a free market, it isn't the workers nor is it the customer.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:15 AM
7

Maybe you should learn to read because it's not a non-profit. It's a Not-for-profit. But my reason still stands anyways because In Australia, corporations who donate to charity get a bigger tax break if the charity has more than 90% of their donations, go towards their cause, which Youturn keeps at barely above 90%. So their need to reduce men's wages instead of increasing women's wages in in order to keep contribution to the cause is still more of a symptom of capitalism than anything else, bec…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:36 AM
35

Was the actual company paying women less for doing the same work as the men? If so, why not give women a raise... Wait you mean to say they're doing this to pad their profit margins for their investors and increase their executive bonuses? No... Capitalism is the best though!
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:54 AM
2

I feel it's inhumane to mandate it specifically with the amount of innocent people behind bars for rape. If false accusations never resulted in convictions, I could see it as less inhumane, but considering that 2-8% of the people convicted for rape are falsely convicted, that would mean innocent people would be permanently and irreversibly punished for a crime they did not commit. Also, since this is a gender rights debate sub, gotta bring up the fact that when people talk about castration as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 01:24 AM
28

They specifically want pre civil rights movement levels of segregation where men are treated as second class or even third class humans. Bet you that they want it made illegal for men to not use the male only carriage on the tube, and if women's only carriage are full, men should be forced to leave one of their carriages to accommodate a singular woman more.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 12:40 AM
1

But you get my point though. While you are absolutely correct that his knowledge provided value that other people took advantage of, it doesn't change that most of his power came from the social dynamics of who he was rather than what he can do physically. His power was directly derived from the power we gave him as a social species. Which is why I use the term social power. Heck, if you really get into it, social power is more influential than physical power in our current society, as money is …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:21 PM
2

And? My point still stands that ignoring all aspects of humanity other than physical power is reductive. Because in reality a gun is just like a wheelchair for someone who is not physically able to handle a sword or bow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:58 AM
2

That argument doesn't work... Because he didn't create his wheelchairs, others did, which was my entire point. He was a man of great influence due to the social power he had over people despite him lacking physical power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:35 AM
3

Stephen Hawking was wheelchair bound for almost 55 years before he passed. At the time he was diagnosed with ALS, there was a life expectancy of 2 years with the disease. He lived for 55 years with the disease, most of which he was bound to his wheelchair unable to even move his head. The only amount of power he had was social power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:05 AM
10

It's a big "what if" scenario. It literally is "if men wanted to, they could, so be happy they don't." It's misogynistic, and it ignores all the other aspects of humanity other than physical power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:19 AM
6

What annoys me specifically here is they're attacking the man by saying that "even if he were drunk that doesn't excuse his actions." It's ironic because these are the same people who cry rape when the only reason a woman couldn't consent is that she was drunk, yet here they are attacking a Victim of Sexual Violence, (because revenge porn is sexual violence.) Even if what Olivia (name of the Door Dash girl) said is 100% true, (which I'm convinced it's not as passed out drunk seems way more likel…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:56 AM
1

A: the loneliness epidemic has a lot of different reasons, and extends past romantic relationships. B: men and women are about equally as lonely, however the reason men are feeling this epidemic worse is our society no longer encourages men to build up a support network similar to a woman's so even though women rely on their romantic partners just as much as men do, so when a woman feels lonely, she is more likely to seek emotional support outside of her romantic relationship than a man who feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:54 AM
32

I want to talk to someone who literally said this, so I asked them why is it that men are more reluctant to get married than women if marriage only benefits men, and they'd said internalized misogyny, I told them I'm holding them to an actual answer, but they just went on a rant.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 05:09 AM
12

Yep, the actual way to decrease divorce rate is to de-incentivize it by limiting alimony and making custody 50/50 by default when no abuse is present. When Kentucky did this in 2018, divorce rate fell by 25% as the financial benefit from divorce is no longer there.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 09:22 PM
64

Here's the thing. When women complain about problems they face, and men chime in with "we face it too/more" (more in the case of mental health) they get called toxic. This article is the equivalent to a man saying "we face it too." That's why we call it out as toxic, because it's toxic when a man does it doesn't make it less toxic when a woman does it, and it's actually misogynistic to not hold women to the same standard as men when it comes to toxic behaviors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/25 03:41 AM
5

"men finally have to queue for the loo thanks to the release of a movie that targets men!" Has she ever been to a sports stadium? Most men spend much of halftime at a footie game waiting for the loo.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 01:31 AM
148

It's the "were always joking around like that" that makes me think that it's more one sided than she thinks.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/25 03:26 AM
3

I don't believe this video really fits here that well because: A: it isn't explicitly about an issue that affects men. Yes she does mention the double standard of how male sexuality is demonized while female sexuality is glorified, she's doing it in a way that's trying to control women rather than advocate for men. I do like how she talks about how feminists dogpile on women who try to resist the narrative they are painting, which is a very real problem with the feminist movement, especially whe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 12:25 PM
17

I think 3 could've been phrased differently for sure, OP's prejudice surely showed there. But I still get the double standard. Calling out the toxicity of wanting men to fulfill traditional gender roles while also calling men sexist for expecting women to fulfill traditional gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:00 AM
2

No, Senator Stuart Adams is an old man, but he changed the laws specifically to help his granddaughter who was facing 25 to life from a first degree felony charge.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 08:43 AM
3

SAPR was training not to risk it if she had one drink when I was in, back when I joined in '12. But then again, I was told that if I slept with my at the time 17 year old girlfriend I could go to prison too, even though I was only 18 and neither the UCMJ nor local laws prevented it. The thing they do is specifically train CYA over all else.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:57 PM
2

Utah statutory rape laws are weird. If a minor is 16-17 it's only a crime to sleep with them if you know or should be able to reasonably guess their age and you are older than 7 years. If you don't know and cannot reasonably guess their age, that limit increases to 10 years. 14 and 15 year olds it's a flat 4 years. It is a crime no matter what to statutorily rape someone under the age of 14, however minors get charged with a lesser crime if the victim is 12 or 13 depending on the exact ages. The…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 02:17 AM
12

Completely agree.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:17 PM
44

The article I posted is the first reporting by a news station with the gender of the rapist, and it was posted yesterday. Every other news report before it specifically did not mention gender
/r/MensRights14/08/25 02:53 PM
37

While, you are absolutely correct that this also protects 18-Year-Old men who would statutorily rape 13-year-old girls while still in high school, the fact of the matter is:he changed the law for the worst to protect his granddaughter, a woman who raped a 13-year-old boy; and radical feminists are already calling out the Injustice of this, using it to further justify their misandry Edit: this is further compounded by the fact that it wasn't until yesterday that any news site even reported on the…
/r/MensRights14/08/25 01:33 PM
4

Another reason why circumcision isn't happening unless it's medically necessary; most insurance companies aren't covering neonatal circumcision so parents would have to pay out of pocket to do that.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 05:46 AM
9

I also want to point out that to society if a man is not straight he is gay. There is no in between. If a man says they're bi/pan/demi/ace, he really just likes guys but is too afraid to fully commit. Same with women who come out as bi/pan/demi/ace, they're straight but wanting to be quirky. Gods I hate biphobia. Edit: you know, for an aspiring writer, I sure do suck at getting my "there/their/they're"s correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 04:07 AM
1

Considering that this post specifically talks about looks, I will say that I believe it's less about women being perceived as prettier and more about how our society treats rejecting someone based on looks, specifically the double standard of "women shouldn't settle for anything less than her goal man" and "if a man rejects women based off of looks, he's a shallow misogynistic pig." Or to call it what it is "men being demonized for a behavior that is societally acceptable for women to have." In …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 07:40 AM
4

VAWG being stuff that men go through as well, and in some instances, more than women do, but still being treated as the perpetrators of violence when men are actually the victims.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 04:22 PM
5

All politicians only see citizens as statistics. All citizens regardless of demographics. The top two numbers they care about are the polls and their bank account.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:56 AM
5

He had a little more than a pint of wine at 28 proof, which is a valid proof for wine, and it was the total equivalent of 4.4 drinks. 4.4 drinks over the course of let's say 2 hours is not that much alcohol for a man especially if he regularly drinks.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:34 PM
1

The orgasm gap is smaller than it seems due to women not realizing their smaller orgasms are still orgasms thanks to a few factors: media/porn only portraying the most intense of orgasms, the fact that most women don't have any sort of discharge from their orgasms, lack of refractory period, and most women don't get a huge energy crash after an orgasm, the last two combined meaning that a woman having an orgasm doesn't always mean the end of the sex. Most women, upwards of 80%, have orgasms just…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 06:40 PM
2

Yet this is something rare and a phenomenon and it doesn't need to be studied as this is once again rare /s
/r/MensRights13/05/25 12:21 PM
9

Another issue some aren't talking about is how even in these Skillet professions the compensation just isn't there. We're suffering in a recession where the cost of living keeps going up and up and wages have stagnated. Why would we take a lower paying apprenticeship over a "non skilled" job that pays more?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 02:11 PM
81

Keep in mind that the UN only considers gender inequality when a woman is disadvantaged. When men are disadvantaged it's not counted towards that statistic. What's even more messed up is they consider it a disadvantage if women do not live longer than the current difference in life expectancy... That means a country could truly be equal down to the life expectancy, and have a life expectancy greater than the global averages for both sides of the gender binary, and the UN will still consider that…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 06:50 AM
2

OP is not representing the argument made in the article l. Although the game was claimed to be “adult’s only”, the minimum sign up age on Steam is just 13 – making it easy for children to bypass the age verification for the game’s download.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:24 AM
5

The first sentence refers to the minimum age to open a Steam account, as Steam only has an honor system for age restriction. In the article they elaborate on the issue. Although the game was claimed to be “adult’s only”, the minimum sign up age on Steam is just 13 – making it easy for children to bypass the age verification for the game’s download.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:58 AM
3

This is a discussion that gets brought up on a discord server for an NSFW game I enjoy playing, and the question that is always asked is what I'm going to ask here. Why are we spending so much time and energy fighting for the rights of digital women when real women are actively having their rights stripped away? The funniest part about this is that there was this huge backlash for this specific game but this game is not even the worst game that's on steam. The next paragraph I'm going to spoiler…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:12 AM
2

The original Dragon Ball existed before TV age ratings in America, since it was made in the 80s. Dragon Ball Z and beyond is TV-14, same as MHA and Gurren Lagann. And the reason why I bring up American rating systems is because that's what Netflix uses to set parental controls. Because believe it or not you can set parental controls on a profile, and lock other profiles behind PINs so that your children can't access them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:46 PM
4

Ok, Crayon Shin-Chan is from the 90s, so I'm going to point at the inuendos in American cartoons, such as Johnny Bravo, Cow and Chicken, and Rugrats. Name me a few pervy shonens, and we can go over the TV rating together, because most shonens I know of are TV-14.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:13 PM
4

Genuine question: how many TV G or TV Y rated animes out there sexualize their characters? How many animes are there targeting children and have overly sexualized characters? The reason I ask is because animes made for teenagers and adults aren't "aimed at a child audience."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:56 PM
7

But not all anime does that, and the ones that do generally get rated TV-MA anyways. I can agree to more enforcement of rating systems, but I do not agree for the outright removal of it especially when you could just find it elsewhere without even needing a subscription service. I know that least four websites where you could find almost every anime you can think of to stream that doesn't require as much as a single piece of PII. Not to mention that there are plenty of sites outside of Netflix a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 09:45 AM
1

OP just copied and pasted the summary on the website twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:03 AM
30

They're dishonest about the reasonings. They notably don't care about reality television or live action movies that sexualize actual women. Heck there are a lot of shows on Netflix and Amazon prime that are live action and feature sex scenes spicier than any anime on the platform. They notably are also not attacking the adult film industry, including the hentai (anime porn) industry. Do some demonize it? Sure. But they're not the ones who are calling for OF or PH to be shut down, it's conservati…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 07:58 AM
–

I can't speak on the exact ratio of misandrists to non-misandrists exist in the current feminist movement, but I can say with confidence that the misandrists are very loud about their misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:52 AM
–

I think he was more eluding to the fact that radfems, specifically those that are also misandrists, have moved the goalposts so much on what should be considered misogyny that simply being born with a penis proves you are a misogynist until you bend the knee to their societal paradigm.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:39 AM
5

Oh, I'm aware. And you're correct, men are harmed by the media when they lump men as one homogenous group.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 02:31 AM
6

The biggest thing to remember, and this is for anything related to any form of civil movement, who benefits the most out of this and if anyone harmee for doing this. Spreading awareness that when get catcalled more than men and it's harmful to their psyche, no one is harmed. Implementing a curfew for men so that women can enjoy nightlife in peace? Men are harmed.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 07:55 PM
2

You went overboard with the last one. The ad hominem
/r/MensRights18/03/25 02:52 AM
24

Finally an article I can use to show what I mean when I say the gender wage gap is an issue caused by family choices and paradigms caused by gender roles affecting both men and women. Granted, he didn't specify that men who have children make more than men who don't, but that can be logically explained.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 02:37 AM
0

Ever hear the term "Mini-Orgasm" before? Those are orgasms. They're not as intense as the big ones that make you feel all wobbly, but they physically do the same thing to your body as a normal orgasm does, just less intense. Believe it or not, men experience intense orgasms from time to time too, but they usually don't confuse the lesser versions as a "mini" version because unlike women, men have an ejaculate and a mandatory refractory period between orgasms as a punctuation to make it clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:11 PM
10

Most smut is written for and read by women. Most sex toys are designed for women's masturbation. Yes, women masturbate for their own pleasure. Yes, women initiate sex because they are horny. Yes, women can, and often do, experience sexual pleasure. No, women aren't brainwashed into thinking sex is good. It's true that women's orgasms aren't as intense as men's are, but they do experience them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 05:18 AM
22

No, most men know women experience sexual pleasure. Even if you've never pleasured a woman before, there is plenty of easily Googleable evidence that shows that women experience sexual pleasure. So many sex toys made specifically for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:39 AM
10

While you are correct, the DA still thought they had enough evidence to convict. Even if she doesn't counter sue, this evidence can be used against him if he sues, and her lawyers job is only to convince the judge or the "just enough" jurors to go against him. Suing may not be in his best interest even though he has provable damages, however if she continues to disparage his name, a C&D would probably put a stop to that.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:45 PM
25

On top of the upfront cost, OP would also have to prove without a reasonable doubt that she did intentionally lie to screw over his life. The DA failed to get a conviction because of a lack of evidence, but if OP had proof of the opposite, the DA would've dropped the charges long before trial as all evidence needs to be part of the trial before they even move to go forward with jury selection.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 03:53 PM
2

I properly call it out as victim blaming. Saying it's a man's fault he is a victim of our oppressive society because men are in charge is the same as saying it's a woman's fault she was harassed because she wore revealing clothing.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:41 AM
4

The fact is, someone can lose attraction for any variety of reasons, and even being forthwith with the reason why, some people don't take rejection well. When I was in the Navy, I had a buddy of mine who dumped a girl for literally giving him gonorrhea, and she still spread rumors about him only dating women to sleep with them. They flirted for a month and a half before they even had sex, and still dated for a week and a half later beforenhis diagnosis, and she still accused him of only wanting …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:01 AM
11

Then you provide an answer. If the mother is in prison, who will take care of the child? Also, Volleyballbeach did provide you with an answer
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:28 AM
14

If the parents of the father don't want him, nor any other family member, then CPS should take the child as they would if a single father was arrested for pedophilia. Your obvious obtuse trolling isn't gonna work.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 03:47 AM
31

Anyone but an actual pedophile? I honestly don't get how hard of a concept that is for people to understand.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 03:41 AM
13

That's why I started calling them Radical Feminists. It still includes them with their self identified label of feminist, but at the same time designates their way of thinking is more extreme especially with the calls to violence. I have feminist friends who agree that misandry that the radical feminists spout isn't the way to gender equality as it only further divides the gender binary. They agree that we need more DV shelters that openly advertise they allow male victims to come to help destig…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 04:53 AM
6

Correction: they first noticed it was only happening to black baby boys, then, to try to throw them off her scent, she allegedly did it to one white baby boy and one black baby girl... Absolutely disgusting, if found guilty, she deserves life in prison since Virginia doesn't have the death penalty anymore. I know that even if she is found guilty, she probably will only get time served, but if guilty, she deserves life.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 01:05 PM
7

My biggest thing with this is pointing out that living with a known pedophile is never in the best interests of the child, and they should be taken from their pedophilic mothers. So much pearl clutching when you point out their mothers are pedophiles because "women can't be pedos."
/r/MensRights02/01/25 07:13 PM
-1

That's the funny part... My comment wasn't even about Trump... It was about the head of DOGE
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:25 PM
-23

Especially with such a manchild running the country through his orange faced puppet.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 01:06 PM
1

And if that happens, I'll eat my shoe. But there is one stark difference that Harris doesn't share with Hitler that Trump does. Publically blaming a people for the problems in the country. Hitler blamed Jews, and Trump blames immigrants. But you're going to find ways to explain why that isn't that big of a deal. So let's just agree that neither of us is convincing the other and walk away.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:49 AM
1

I believe you missed my point with that comment though. The original post implies Hitler was thought of as a mass murderer before he rose to power and given unchecked authority. He was not. While the Nazi party was seen as a radical right wing party for the time, they gave the Germans hope, hope that they could stabilize they starving country, hope that they could restore Germany to its former glory. This is why they elected President Paul von Hindenburg into office, who as you probably know, is…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:40 AM
5

Rapid responses is because I'm bored and online, and it's not that I don't know these answers, it's that I want you to state them, that way you can't argue against them when I use them against you. The genocides that you said the dems are complacent in have existed long before Trump took office, yet Trump didn't do anything about them either. The Dems are far from perfect, but compared to Trump, well it's like comparing a beat up chevette that's able to take you from A to B, and a rusted out cha…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 04:05 PM
2

There are three genocides that I'm aware of right now, The Palestinian genocide, the Tibetan genocide, and the Myanmar genocide. I just want to know which one you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 02:37 PM
1

Oh I'm not denying any genocides that are happening right now, I want to make sure we're on the same page of which genocides were talking about though. So please answer my question. There are three modern genocides that I'm aware of, I'm just want to know which ones you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 02:31 PM
4

Question for you, what "genocide through a client state" are the Dems engaging in? Edited to add: to be clear, I'm not denying that Democrats are complacent in genocide, nor am I denying the existence of genocide, I simply want u/xaliadouri to state which one he is talking about so that I can ask him what Trump has promised to do about it/did about it when he was in office, as I only know of 1 genocide that didn't start before his inauguration in 2017.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 02:19 PM
2

Simple, you have too have some semblance of due process or you can lose the faith if the people you're governing. Now answer my question.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:11 PM
2

Oh, please do tell, who in America is using the legaal system to silence their political opposition?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:06 PM
4

Oh you're referring to the addendum to DOD directive 5240.01, because you believe the conspiracy theory that it allows The Secretary of Defense to use lethal force against peaceful protesters. You're a crackpot conspiracy theorist... Got it.... Here is a Military.com article that goes into detail on why this is false. But I'm going to go ahead and give the debunking in this comment anyways. First let me get the conspiracy theory claim: The conspiracy theory claims that Kamala Harris signed the a…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:32 AM
1

You need to look at who signed bill 5240. H. R. Bill 5240, the "Protect Peaceful Protests" Act? The one introduced in August of 2023 by a Democratic representative from California, Which got referred to a subcommittee and never heard from again? What of it? Edit: there's also a Senate bill 5240, But it's in a similar state, referred to a subcommittee and never heard from again. Edit 2: I'm genuinely confused of what your point is, because obviously I'm not finding this supposed bill that you're …
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:29 AM
-3

Still not an excuse to threaten military force against your political opposition. You're not refuting it, you're trying to contextualize it, but there is no context in which using military force to suppress those who politically opposed you as a preemptive measure "for security" is justified. If a riot were to break out due to political violence in a city, then, and only then, would it be appropriate to call in the national guard, after the riot or threats are made. Not as a preemptive measure l…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:08 AM
-7

Prove what exactly? I can get you a video of him saying he wants to use the military to silence his opposition, and articles about the chief of staff saying he idolized Hitler and his generals, which I've already said you can dismiss as Hearsay if you want. But I want to know exactly what you want me to provide proof of. Edit: misspelled a word.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:43 AM
-15

I want to touch on your dismissal of comparing Trump to Hitler. He has gone on the record saying he wants to use the United States military to silence his political opposition. In private conversations with his former chief of staff, he apparently idolizes Hitler even going so far as to say that he wished he had Hitler's generals. You can dismiss that last paragraph as hearsay all you want, and claim he's "just a business man and politician" but before Hitler rose to power and committed genocide…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:27 AM
1

The biggest issue about the gender wage gap is that the people who want to see it magically fixed don't want to actually explore the reasons behind it and fix them because they tend to discover that traditional gender roles affecteing both men and women are one of the larger causes, and in order to actually fix it, they have to help men overcome these difficulties too. According to the US DOL, the hourly median wage of unmarried men is lower than married men of the same age and experience in fie…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:18 PM
3

So is Christelle Wieder going to do anything about girls dominating in the classroom at the expense of boys? Is she going to investigate why boys in every year are falling behind compared to girls? Or is she just going to ignore it or even blame the boys for their poor performance?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:08 AM
3

Want to point out that Trump's financial plan is not that great. His plan to increase tariffs will only put a stronger burden on the consumers and small businesses increasing the strength of the monopolies these megacorps already have.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:49 AM
2

Simply put, one of the big things I always point out when women bring up the "why don't men fight their own battles?" Argument is that men do fight for their own rights, but they're resisted every step of the way from radical feminists. For example, there have been way too many times when college age men try to start up a men's center on their campuses to provide a safe space for men as well as provide resources and spread awareness of male victims of DV / SV. Every. Single. Time. Radical femini…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:15 AM
1

One girl posted an ick where a man cried after his mother died. Another for doing cartwheels with his daughter. A third for meal prepping his lunches for work ahead of time after she complained about being asked to make him lunch, taking her feelings into account. Another for being left handed. Another still for being excited when he found out his wife is pregnant. You can dismiss these icks as weird, but men practicing healthy masculinity is still being showed off on social media as an ick, reg…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:07 PM
47

The movie is decent but I do agree that it's basically just the movie equivalent of "We Didn't Start the Fire"
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:07 PM
4

Don't put words into my mouth, me showing that a statistic that shows women who lead countries tend to be more militaristicly aggressive than men who lead countries proves this "if women ruled the world there'd be no war" opinion most likely false. And no, I'm not saying men are better because of this statistic either. I'm simply stating that women aren't as good as the "women is good" effect paints them to be. Even in the article they go on to explain that these queens were not seen as aggressi…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:05 AM
3

It proves the false dichotomy that men are the more aggressive gender, and the widely spread feminist opinion that "if women ruled the world there'd be no war." Because even when you remove defensive wars from both sides, women who rule still start more wars comparitively. To be honest though, I'd rather point at the NISVS which shows that women perpetrate DV/IPV at about an equal rate to men.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 02:46 AM
33

The person claimed that after being arrested. But witnesses at the scene only heard the man say "stay off of her" after he struck the firefighter, including the cop who was helping with the CPR prior to the attack. The news can only report the facts present, so if the man insists he only did it "because he could care for her better" then that's what the news reports. News sources from the day of the incident state that it is unknown why he did it. He was still convicted of battery. Edited to add…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:23 AM
47

https://www.cbs58.com/news/west-allis-firefighter-recognized-for-continuing-cpr-on-woman-while-being-attacked There you go. Personally I agree with you, CPR and groping look nothing alike, especially if it's modern CPR without the mouth to mouth. But unfortunately for everyone above average intelligence there's someone below it.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:09 AM
63

Right? The only real issue is that the admins are being sued for not being able to refusing to police their groups allowing libel to exist in them.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 05:55 AM
0

I didn't say mutual abuse, I said reciprocal abuse. Abuse in the response to abuse. Abuse where both members are abusive towards each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:44 AM
2

Actually it's kinda ironic but setting a rule where a man can be expelled without a criminal conviction while requiring a criminal conviction if a woman is accused is against Title IX. Universities are getting in trouble for this sex based discrimination in civil court because of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:41 PM
2

She was the only one who showed up to the trial. Jennifer Grey also accused him of jealousy and such but chose not to get involved with the trial.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:35 PM
4

Yes. It was reciprocal abuse with Heard as the primary instigator.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:23 PM
2

At most it was reciprocal abuse with Heard as the primary instigator. Most of his exes say he was never physically abusive and even the 2 that have said it wasn't to the extent of Heard's accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:21 PM
–

I've already said my stance on sex workers on a previous post. On how it should be legalized and regulated which removes a lot of the risk for victimization of sex workers. But this one is more specifically about "should a man hire sex workers when they aren't in a relationship. If a man does not want a romantic relationship, hiring sex workers is just beneficial for everyone. If he does want an actual relationship but wants to make sure sex is on the table, he needs to find someone with a simil…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:48 PM
1

But you missed the point... Someone can be here and still not subscribe to pill theory as a type to classify personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 02:29 PM
1

I disagree with making every question requiring an answer. I actually had to look up a couple of the "personality type" responses because I honestly didn't know about them, but even though I'm on the subeeddit that I don't even subscribe fully to pill theory, and I hate being forced to choose that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:12 AM
1

I'm in the camp of requiring age of 21 for sex work. I feel that age of 21 should be the age of majority anyways, with an expectation of getting an associate's degree, since so many jobs out there want an associate's degree anyways. I'm also in the camp of legalizing and regulating sex work. This includes regular health checkups for sex workers, education of safe sex for sex workers, enforcement of safe sex consent for clients, and discourages drug use. This also helps alleviate one of the probl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:02 AM
3

While I agree with your notion that there is no definitive way to approach women, I do have to point out the contradiction between points two and three. There is a bit of overlap between what some women choose to identify as heavy handed and others would identify as too passive. Using your example, and I've known these people IRL when I was in the Navy, there are women out there who think exchanging numbers after shooting the shit over a few games of pool is too heavy handed, and others who thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 06:59 AM
1

On top of this, I would also make it socially unacceptable for women to protest when men try to fight for their rights when it doesn't directly impact women's rights. And no, women suffering the consequences of their choice to abuse men does not count as infringing on women's rights. One of the big radical feminist talking points is that "men" are the people who messed up our society, and so if men want the society be better for them, they need to fight for it themselves and to stop asking femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 04:57 AM
1

Oh? Because the woman who started the movement is known as a hypergamous self described "relationship guru" and a lot of her followers use , her philosophies on their already present relationships which are already has emotional attachment. Not to mention that some of the ideologies behind it include stuff specific to dating financially stable, and older partners who will "treat them right," and basically expecting a tradmasc boyfriend/husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 12:53 PM
32

Yeah the 4b movement is just as influential in Korea as MGTOW is influential in America. No kidding on that.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:27 PM
1

I mean, they do exist, they just don't go as viral probably to sexism of how we watch these videos. Here are a few examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U79_I8GozFw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bSdesspko8 - Granted he was not arrested for being entitled, but he called the cops in a very entitled way https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpwDDA5ujAY - this wasn't an arrest, just a detainment and escort off property, but I feel this still counts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDrIY1tLiug So the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 02:08 PM
1

Both genders are getting incredibly entitled, however both genders will see their gender's entitlements as justified and the other gender's as not. They're biased, much as you are especially with your language dehumanizing men. It's men, not males. Calling men males makes you no better than the incels who refer to women as females.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:34 AM
2

I want to correct OP on their claim that "Video games is documented as the worst hobby women think their partner can have." There was a survey and it's actually 3rd worst. The worst is clubbing and both men and women agree that it's the worst hobby their partner can have.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:09 PM
–

While I do agree with the first part of your statement, I disagree with the second. While it is true that there are more men who like younger women than there are women who like younger men, the latter still has numbers far from zero. I know this is anecdotal, but when my step mom was in her forties, She and her girlfriends had a movie night where they went and saw New Moon in theaters. And then went to the bar afterwards, and she felt disgusted with her friends, also in their 40s, when they sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 09:42 AM
2

When they claim male privilege exists and that all men have it even if they don't realize it because it's hard to see your own privilege, which is true, there are some things in life that are easier if you are a man. But when you start talking about female privilege they have a conniption saying that any perceived privileges a woman face are from systemic sexism against them and is only an example of "benevolent sexism" even when the example you provide is really due to systemic sexism against m…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:09 AM
12

This. 1000 times this. So many people out there, men women and non-binary folk alike, who don't understand this, and while the physical damage from sexual violence can heal relatively quickly, it's the psychological damage that lasts decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 10:28 AM
5

I thought he was going to say that asking your spouse or partner for sex multiple times, and breaking up with them because of the refusal doesn't count as sexual assault (which in my opinion isn't sexual assault as long as you didn't force yourself in them anyways, because the difference in sex drives is a valid reason to break up) but he legit went full on "Your boss shouldn't get in trouble demanding sexual favors" like WTF?! That IS sexual assault...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 10:21 AM
1

I do feel bad about all the sexual harassment, both online and in person, woven have to deal with. No one deserves to open up a DM and immediately see a picture of genitalia, or get constant invasive comments on how good some stranger is in bed. The gender ratios are so skewed too, so much so that women are more likely to get harassed by women than men are to get harassed by women. Edited to add something unrelated: I'm tired of reddit getting rid of my custom user flair. I don't identify as a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 07:01 AM
2

I wonder how much the government is taking from that $16,000...
/r/MensRights09/09/24 07:18 AM
0

Yeah.... Yeah... "Grass is greener over there..." We get it... You can't see both perspectives because your blinded by the shit in your yard you ignore the shit in your neighbor's yard thinking they have it better when in reality, only the rich people don't have yards covered in shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:10 PM
6

They treat both men and women like dirt. In Mumbai, there was a infamous case where a 15 year old girl raped her 13 year old brother and got pregnant, and they arrested the boy for raping a child even though he was younger.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 04:11 AM
1

Hugh Jackman He was almost fired as wolverine for being too nice and has done a lot of charity work.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:40 AM
3

Yeah... And women were oppressed for all that time too... Now that those oppressions are being lifted, the dynamic needs to change.... You can't have your cake on display after having already eaten it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:17 AM
1

Fair. And sorry, just annoyed of someone arguing in circles
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 05:37 PM
2

I'm not. Can't diagnose the dead. I'm simply pointing out the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 04:11 PM
2

You... You do realize that you don't have to be trans to struggle with gender dysphoria... Right? And that Cis People suffer from gender dysphoria as well. You did know that, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:47 PM
2

So you're ignoring the part where I said she was a TERF... She didn't voluntarily reveal she had gender dysphoria, because she didn't believe that transgender people were the gender they identified as...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:35 PM
4

trying to hold two gender identities in her mind. Not two identities, two gender identities. Meaning she was struggling to come to terms with her gender dysphoria that creating Self Made Man caused her. Also side note: despite being Lesbian and Feminist, she was otherwise right wing aligned, and was a TERF, which added onto this struggle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:21 PM
7

Don't have to think it... She has stated in her second book, Voluntary Madness, that her life living as Ned "fractured her mind."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:15 PM
6

I mean, it left her so emotionally scarred that she ended up committing suicide... Unless you're going to accuse that of overselling it too... Edited to add: it could be noted that the paradigm shift she experienced from going from a belief system that "all women are oppressed, all men have it better, and feminism is the way forward" to one where "men are oppressed too, and feminism has flaws in it" could have contributed to it. Both the Mens Rights and Feminist movements have a large population…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:52 PM
-1

NAACP actually investigated Kamala in 2008 and found she is more lenient on black men than other DAs, especially for nonviolent crimes. But keep spouting propaganda bullshit. And here is the fact. While Kamala did defend the governor and provide legal documents which stonewalled the 2011 ruling, she PUBLICALLY said that if it were up to her, she'd be complying as much as possible. But you're going to ignore that because of your own propaganda fueled hate boner.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:27 PM
-1

Ok, so her being bound by California's governor as the AG has nothing to do with her work as San Fran's DA. Also, the GOVERNOR was the one stonewalling the 2011 order, threatening to fire Kamala if she didn't comply. Once again, when Reagan was governor, he basically worked to make sure California government gave a lot of their power to him, including giving him the influence to fire other elected officials. Not their legislation, but the other elected members of the executive branch. And the fi…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:02 PM
5

The issue is they're equating those in power being men to men being in power. Classic blunder
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:34 AM
-3

False, her incarceration rate was lower than the DAs who preceded her. Out of 1900 Marijuana convictions when she was the DA, only 45 of them ended in prison sentences compared to her predecessor who had similar number of convictions, but triple the incarceration rate of 135 marijuana possessors who went to prison in the same amount of years. In fact, despite San Francisco being number three and four in population when Kamala Harris was the DA, The incarceration rate for nonviolent offenses in S…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 09:52 AM
2

Yes you can, but honestly, refusing to play is the best approach. It's a relationship, if I wanted to play games, I'd just get on my Xbox.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 12:17 PM
–

The only woman I've ever called a creep is someone who has legitimately stalked me when I lived and worked in different counties. She followed me home one day which is surprising because I took public transport and took me 4 hours to get home. She then knocked on my door letting me know she thought I was cute. I was incredibly uncomfortable. She did end up yelling at me at work 2 weeks later when I was avoiding her because she stalked me and when she asked why I said it was kinda creepy she foll…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:07 AM
1

Eh, I ain't a microbiologist as you are :-P I just remember crossover from High School Biology so when it's explained how it can happen, it kinda stuck. I'm one of those people who just sponges up knowledge, but isn't really a qualified expert on anything but nuclear reactor theory.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 03:27 AM
2

I didn't mention SRY. I know that the SRY alone cannot make male genitalia alone. I said she was missing the gene that did that. Regardless, she was born a woman, assigned female at birth, and raised as a woman. Her birth certificate says as much, socially she is a woman, and for the Olympics, this qualifies her as a woman. Doesn't change the fact that TERFs are using this to attack transwomen as well as cismen.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 03:18 AM
0

She has DSD, and the way it is displaying in her is, she has female genitalia but has high testosterone. Sure she is XY, but the gene that forms male genitalia is missing. Being born male is not JUST having a Y chromosome, but also having the gene commonly found in the Y chromosome that allows the fetus to develope male genitalia. A gene that rarely crosses over the the X chromosome If you want to read over how this can happen, here is a wikipedia article. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromos…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 02:40 AM
2

Who?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:34 AM
20

She's not trans. She comes from a country where you can't legally be trans. She just has a weird condition that increases testosterone. Yet because of this, it's obviously men's fault. This is a form of discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:33 AM
–

I wonder how much that data is skewed by the fact that abuse is a heavily underreported crime. I disagree with you on this one. While the ideal raising of a child is between two people in a healthy marriage and romantic relationship, the parents divorcing is preferable over kids learning it's normal for spouses to despise each other, and no matter how well you think you're good at hiding it, kids notice. But we're also not accounting for the reasons for divorce with those statistics. A lot of di…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:22 AM
0

When celebrities publicly have issues with each other, it's a marketing tactic to advertise each other. Doesn't matter if it's real, if it's public, it's an advertisement. As for the other one, the US government did directly create laws that primarily only affected women, and it's perfectly fine that the US government gets called out, but blaming it on allen is wrong.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:50 AM
1

I've never claimed that. I'm not the person you originally replied to. I honestly believe it's more of a correlation versus causation fallacy confusion. Basically because the internet is getting bigger and bigger, it's a lot easier to expose misogynists, it's a lot easier to access extreme forms of pornography, and it gives people, both men and women, a platform to come forward about the sexual violence they've been subjected to. So since: A: porn has become more accessible and extreme B: it's e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 09:49 AM
1

Yes, Roe v Wade was about medical privacy. Specifically under the due process clause of the 14th amendment, basically saying suspicion alone isn't enough to get a warrant for medical records, you have to have proof of a crime outside of that, and no, suddenly not being pregnant isn't proof of a crime. And yes, it is more than abortion. Roe v Wade was used in many lawsuits involving medical privacy, not just abortion cases. One specific one that came to mind with the New York case where someone w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 09:21 AM
-2

Roe v. Wade was judicial activist hogwash, and they were right to overrule it. This is bit of a misinterpretation of what Roe v Wade was actually about. While the lawsuit was about abortion, the ruling was not. The ruling was basically that the government has no right to a patient's medical records to discover if they're doing anything wrong and against the law. The ruling didn't actually stop states from making abortion bans, simply made it where they couldn't criminally prosecute any woman who…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:03 AM
8

Can confirm women have gotten kinkier as well. But I'm not gonna claim it's pornography's sole fault more than just general Internet making the equipment for kinks more accessible for both men and women. Kinda also how the LGBTQ+ and furry communities have grown as the internet had with knowledge and info for both communities being more and more accessible to those questioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:50 AM
-2

Do... Do you know the definition of the word stereotype? Most stereotypes start with truth, and then get exaggerated. Things can be simultaneously true and a negative stereotype. Still makes it a rule 10 violation.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 02:49 AM
-13

It's a violation of rule 10 because the mods said it did. Negative stereotypes is not a "general traits" no matter how OP generalizes it. I'll concede the point on rule 1. The big difference though and you can not like it, it's fine, is that Violations of rule 10 risk this subreddit being shut down. Like it or not, reddit admins hate when men talk about actual disadvantages, and as such the Mods here must police this sub with stricter guidelines or we may be shut down. Complaints about negative …
/r/MensRights15/07/24 08:02 PM
-28

Your original post is in violations of rule 1 and 10. Regardless if the mod was rude to you, violations of rule 10 risk us getting shut down. If you really want to talk about it, you can do so on other subs such as purplepillsebate, just don't be surprised when your worldview gets challenged. Edit: And before anyone says that place isn't kind to us, there is literally a post very similar to what OP here basically said in his original rule breaking post. Edit 2: I concede the point in the 1, stil…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:45 PM
2

Men generally don't opt out if they are living with the mother of their child. But those women are more likely to take unpaid maternity leave, at least a few weeks of it, while also having a man to help with the child. Poverty and lack of government enforced workers benefits is the primary issue, not gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:09 PM
4

Most companies offer maternity leave. Furthermore, paternity leave for fathers makes it easier on new mothers as well, as their partner is home to help them. It's not like giving men benefits takes away from the benefits women get. It isn't a zero sum game. We can have both.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:57 PM
2

Men can, but it makes it easier if they didn't have to do so mentally and/or physically drained from working 40+ hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:50 PM
3

Lots of places do but the uptake is abysmal. Then it's not equitable. Even if it was equal, a lot of places don't pay out Maternity Leave at 100% pay, and most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, so taking the hit on the wife's pay is going to be tough, taking it on both would be damn hard. They dont have days off? Not all companies offer PTO and even then most only 2-3 weeks per year, so they may only have a week and a half if they start saving it as soon as the wife is pregnant. It's no…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:44 PM
6

Not wrong, however, not right either. There was a study done in 2013 using 2010 census data that shown some interesting things. I would link the study, but I still can't find it again though I used it for a college paper on the gender gap. One thing it showed is most industries start paying men and women the same with the exception of industries that require post graduate degrees. Second, it showed that the gap increased with time in industry with the exception of 15 years, which they narrowed s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:00 PM
2

Their post is vaguely worded because they later use the term "men as a group" Implying this group is different from the original grouping.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:09 PM
4

Yeah it's absolutely wild... Especially right after the man versus bear thing.... Turns out they're perfectly fine being with a man as long as he's hot even though he could be a psycho killer...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 02:31 PM
2

Oh I am not defending him, I agree. He'd probably do the deed if the opportunity arose. I simply said he wasn't convicted, which he hasn't been arrested. Edited to add: Iirc, The crime he actually committed was not found out until the Statue of limitations for the crime expired. So legally he's in the clear. Doesn't make them any less of a shitstained scumbag Just like legally Ryan Haywood is in the clear. That doesn't change the fact that he's openly targeted mentally vulnerable 18-year-olds to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 02:20 PM
9

You ever hear the feminist talking point "every woman knows a sv victim, why doesnt every man knows an abuser"? While yes, there are a vocal minority of men who will defend non-convicted people like Dr. Disrespect, especially with internet personalities and their fan bases. But there are more men who have a similar mindset to me who will drop such people if there is proof, as I did with my favorite internet personality at the time Ryan Haywood. Hell, there are many men who will drop decades of f…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 05:00 AM
2

This is part of societal gender roles assigned to either gender. Specifically how men are supposed to be seen as the providers compared to women who are supposed to be the home carers. While we having the past century attacked that second gender role, and other gender roles that mostly negatively affect women, We do not do the same when it comes to the gender roles that negatively affect men. As such it's part of this illusion of masculinity that men should make more than their partners, and thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 08:03 AM
4

I disagree. The ones who make fun of men are louder just like the men who insult and disgrace women are louder. Vocal minorities of groups are called vocal for a reason. People do suck though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:49 PM
2

If that is the first message he sent, I agree he is too timid, however, it very well may not be the first message sent. However, she on the other hand, reads like a bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:48 AM
4

If local laws were unable to supersede those in broader jurisdictions, there wouldn't BE local laws. Please go back to fourth grade. When it comes to laws about rights, the law that grants the most rights applies regardless of if it's local or broader. When it's a law about restriction, the strictest law applies. But judges don't have a duty to enforce them equally.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:38 AM
2

The reason marriages fail is because people change. One example could be one or both are tired of the minor annoyances that are building up in a relationship causing the love they once felt to turn into resentment. Another example is two adults just realize that they're no longer romantically compatible, and amicably divorce. Another still is there are direct conflicts of how to do certain things that you didn't think about before getting married, such as how to do certain chores, the importance…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:03 AM
3

You are correct. The two biggest problems with feminism as I see it are as follows: Feminists misappropriate blame, blaming all men for what a few do, specifically when it comes to stuff like the wage gap. The wage gap is real, but it is a lot more complex than simply "men are paid more for the same work," and it is not the fault of men who are barely making ends meet. I can go on a rant on how gender roles are a large part of it, bringing up examples, but this isn't the point of my comment righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:27 AM
3

You missed the point of the comment. He explained what the word's origin, which yes, did originate from women having children with men not her husband/boyfriend. However, even modernly, it is seen as an insult basically saying that the man or woman is being cheated on, and the victim is made into a cuckee, or got cucked, and is a way to degrade the victim of the cheater. This is still the case even if no children are involved. You are correct that consensual cucking is a kink that shouldn't be k…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:53 PM
7

Every time a woman's issue is talked about, it turns into a conversation of "what about men." But this isn't a post about a woman's issue, this is a post about how men are to conform to a societal standard where we are seen as evil just for being born with a penis. (For the majority of us at least, transmen are still men even though they were assigned differently at birth.)
/r/MensRights17/06/24 01:04 PM
3

Just an aside, as a child free man who has been turned down several second dates because I don't want children, I've come to the conclusion that child free people are extremely rare outside of same sex relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 04:47 PM
1

Not what they said but ok. And even historically, women have been just as capable of violence as men when given the opportunity. In Europe when a Queen was the primary monarch of a kingdom, she was about 1.4 times as likely to go to war than kings. Even modernly, Mexico just voted in a woman as president! That's awesome! EXCEPT 34 of her opponents were assassinated during the election season. THIRTY FUCKING FOUR But you will say those are the exceptions not the rule, because our society treats v…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 09:33 PM
1

While we live in a society where our economy is reliant on slaves, and most legal slaves are men, finance bros will always be harsh on men. It's time we abolish penal labor.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:59 AM
0

I think you've misread my post. I said women are less likely to commit crimes out of desperation... Women are just as capable of violence as men, they are just less likely to be put in a desperate situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:58 PM
1

Poor women don't kill/rape/steal that much Women are just as capable of violence as men, but women are more likely than men to be accepted for government assistance, so less likely to commit crimes out of desperation. However, women do commit ~35-40% of sexual crimes according to the CDC NISVS, a victimization survey where men who make up ~40% of victims identify women as perps over 90% of the time and women who are victims identify women as the perp about 12% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:51 PM
6

It wouldn't work, at least not the way you'd think it would, especially when you realize that femcels aren't actually happy. Yes women who have chosen to be single are happier in average, but single women who aren't single by choice are quite catty. No, assuming that this is a biological thing rather than a government forced thing, our society would evolve into a form of harem based where men are propped up in a proverbial pedestal, not allowed to work for the safety of our species, and be basic…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:14 PM
0

TLDR It's because of the Zero Sum Fallacy. For many different oppressed people, Fighting for equal rights with their oppressors has been an "us versus them" situation, because of the hostility to changing the status quo. And this includes the first two waves of feminism. On top of that third wave feminism is more about recognizing perceived injustices in our society still, and they have spun this narrative that all men are oppressors, or would be if given the chance. And this in itself is an Ape…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 05:23 AM
6

I just want to give a little bit of a history lesson here. Men pursuing women instead of the other way around is not a biological thing, it's a societal thing. Modern dating is unique to this world, and his only really existed for about a hundred or so years. Prior to this, women were treated like property, and men didn't directly seek the women themselves, but appealed to her family, mainly the patriarch who has control over who married her. And such societal expectations still exist to this da…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 09:12 AM
4

Ah, gotcha, gotcha. My bad. It's also brings some interesting data to it, but I have been looking at the data anyway, and have found a different source I trust more that states men are only victims of IPV about 46% of the time. CDC NISVS But that is more of a combination collection of data over various studies for more than a decade vs OP's study which was one survey; which is why I trust the CDC Report more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 02:44 PM
6

It's a direct peer reviewed study published on NIH.gov ... How is it "objectively false"? Read the parent comment wrong. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 02:29 PM
6

If she is willing to put in the effort to repair the relationship, it can be repaired, but both parties of the relationship need to choose to repair it. Everyone in a healthy LTR will say the same thing, "Love isn't an emotion, it's a choice, and it's a chore." The issue is, some people, including women who say things like "if men paid attention, they'd know;" will stay in a relationship they aren't willing to put the work into until is isn't convenient to stay in the relationship anymore, wheth…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:55 PM
2

The sprinkle sprinkle and the drizzle drizzle movements are people who are seeing dating as an adversarial competition instead of a cooperative endeavor like people should see. Both groups are immature and shouldn't be dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:33 AM
–

I would also like to point out that a large part of this is because, how do I phrase it without sounding as offensive as possible... Vocal feminists have discouraged traditional ways of men pursuing women, and a lot of men, especially younger men, and teenage boys, have listened. In the baby boomer generation, as well as generation X, most marriages started off they're dating relationships at either school or work. However, now it is not appropriate for a man to approach a woman when she is enga…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:12 AM
5

I agree we should, But the point behind her parody is valid. The fact that her story is completely believable is something that's wrong with our society. As far as I know though, The only time a donor was ever forced to pay child support was when they didn't go through official channels for the donation, and when the mother wanted to go on to welfare, since she knew who the biological father was, the state mandated that he paid child support so that she could get the support she needed.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:10 AM
1

Tit for tat. I'll provide a source when you provide a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 01:56 AM
1

But that's ignoring DV victims who are pushed so far to the point that suicide is the way out, which is overwhelmingly men victims. And suicides suspected to be linked to DV outnumber the murders.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 01:48 AM
4

<image> This poster, and yes, this was a real poster back in 2007. Like I said, it was up for a couple of weeks before the college took it down due to people pointing out the massive double standard it perpetuated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 06:15 PM
13

I have no issues with the rules and guidelines modern society wants to impose on consent when it comes to sexual violence. However, a lot of misandristic women do not think that the same rules and guidelines that apply to men should apply to women. I'm pretty sure everyone on the subreddit has seen the consent poster that pointed out the glaringly obvious double standard when it comes to consent-based sexual violence. Granted that university only had it up for a couple of weeks, but it is still …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 04:53 AM
1

I think it's a conviction rate confirmation loop. Men are seen as more likely to commit the crimes because they are convicted of the crimes more often, and Men are convicted the crimes more often because they seem like they're committing the crimes more often. Meanwhile women who are committing the crimes may not always get convicted, and even if their story makes news, It will generally be treated as a one-off isolated incident instead of the systemic issue that it would be treated as if they w…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:48 PM
2

I provided CDC stats that say otherwise. NISVS, look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:31 PM
4

Not committing or not being convicted? There is a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:11 AM
11

Where's your evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:52 AM
3

And pretty much no one would argue that women are just as violent or sexually aggressive as men. But they are. according to the NISVS, more than 30% of perps of sexual violence are women, and more than 40% of perps of domestic violence are women. (Calculating from the percentages of men victims who identify a woman as their abuser, as well as women victims who identify women as their abuser.) And this violent behavior extends past people they know. There are plenty of news articles that get pull…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:32 AM
12

Offmychest has a blanket ban on anyone who participates in a subreddit they deem as a "hate subreddit" One of the mods is a bot that will automatically ban you If it detects that you participate in subreddits they are against. It technically goes against the Reddit site terms, but since Reddit also disagrees with those subreddits, they do nothing about it. Oh and the bot is directly called misandrybot.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:38 AM
1

First dates should be pay your own way, or discussed who will pay in advance. But she invests so much in how she looks. Makeup is expensive! Men invest plenty into how they look, and unless the man insists on you wearing makeup, or all of your pictures feature heavy distinct makeup, they probably wouldn't even notice. But she is taking time out of her schedule. So her time is worth more than his? He's also taking time out of his schedule to go on a date. But here is my kicker of why first dates …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 04:57 AM
1

You are right, most men will go by looks on a first date. But a large majority of first dates never lead to an LTR which is the thing I was talking about. But please do answer my question. "How does the spelling a stereotype on men qualify as 'attacking women'?"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:40 AM
1

I have read a study that indicates that most men look for more than just physical appeal when looking for a partner. Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming men don't take looks into consideration, but according to the study, most will not go on more than a few dates if she has a personality that clashes with his. But I do have a genuine question, how is dispelling a misconception about men equate to "evidence against women"? Gender equality is not a 0 sum game, we can dispel negative stereotypes a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:39 AM
1

Do you have empirical evidence in the form of a peer reviewed study that shows most men will go after looks alone, or are you basing your assumption off of a negative stereotype?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 06:10 AM
3

Red pill and blue pill is not men vs women, not really anyway. It's whether or not you have views that conform to the greater current societal paradigm of gender issues. Blue pill being conforming, and red pill is nonconformity. The main reason it specifically looks like it's men vs women is that our society as a whole, not everyone in it, is currently pushing this "women are good and can't be bad" agenda. Where even if a woman does commit atrocious crimes, they are treated as isolated incidents…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:22 AM
5

I didn't say "get older." I said "mature." There are a bunch of men who are stuck in high school when it comes to their state of mind. Edited to add: this stuck in high school mentality is not exclusive to men either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:09 AM
14

If you're in a committed relationship and you are still looking for someone better, then your heart is not in it. But let's not pretend that admiring models for their looks is the same as yearning to be in a relationship with them. Especially since men tend to choose based on more than looks as they mature. This goes double if the man dated a woman who, towards the end of the relationship, actively worked to make his life harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:32 AM
1

So are yours, yet I'm not implicitly denying and dismissing them
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:51 AM
1

Yes... See I can do this game too... You offer no rebuttals just dismissals on a debate tagged post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 11:48 PM
2

I have said many truths in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:30 PM
1

I disagree. Women picking up a movement similar to the 4B movement, while calling it such, is appropriate considering that women's rights in the US are actively being attacked. Abortion was made a states issue and losing access to such reproductive care is something to stand up for. Men do not have such rights, but the proper thing isn't to take away rights granted to others, it's to make equivalent rights available to everyone. And before people come at me for saying it, no, men do not have bod…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:03 PM
1

The only part I've ever really comment on is when people use false or exaggerates statistics. According to the CDC's NISVS, 1 in 2 women have been or will be a victim of sexual violence involving physical contact some time in their life. However, some misandrists treat this as if every other man is an abuser and that 1 in 2 statistic happens daily. It doesn't. Women interact with thousands of men a year who don't do anything to them, and 80% of SV happens with non-strangers, 10% of women report …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:52 PM
0

Reminder. It's not sexual harassment if she finds you attractive. /j but it does happen
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:28 PM
1

While I agree with you for the most part, not every father who doesn't see their children are abusive, deadbeats or dead. Parental alienation is a thing, and 3/4 victims of it are fathers. As someone from a family where my mom used "going to live with your father instead of me" as a threat to get me and my siblings to behave is an example on how it can mess with not only the relationship, but the child's mental well-being as a whole. And don't forget that the reason why "single mother" household…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 04:24 AM
–

Yes, and OOP developed feelings for her, and she didn't consider it until he asked for something more formal and serious. She turned him down, while she was conflicted with her feelings in him, then when he moved on after she turned him down, she realized she did want something more serious, and got upset she was too late. The problem is, she's taking it out on him like it's his fault she rejected him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:40 AM
1

My guess is OP meant to compare change in life expectancy caused by marriage. I.E. marriage positively affects everybody, but lesbians it affects the least, and gay men the most. Turns out that married people are, on average, happier than single people, and surprise surprise, happiness affects health risk factors. It also tracks with this considering that the divorce rate of lesbian couples is statistically equivalent to straight couples, but gay men have a significantly decreased divorce rate, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:10 AM
5

Most households where women are the sole earner are usually those where the man is disabled, but the survey doesn't account for that, and they treat time when they're unable to do housework as leisure even though they're probably but enjoying being unable to do anything.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:09 PM
9

I down voted the post because OP is not a good faith arguer. Whenever someone brings up a good point and gives an opinion on the form of a reflective question for OP to think about, they respond with "you can look it up in the survey I linked" instead of showing introspection even though OP specifically asked for opinions.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:05 PM
6

It depends on the methodology. The questions for the BLS for example, which Pew uses, doesn't ask "How many hours per week do you spend on household cores?" They ask "how many hours do you spend doing laundry?" "How many hours dishes?" "How many hours cleaning?" Etc etc, and then they specifically choose what they define as household chores and add up the totals.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:00 PM
19

It doesn't list what is considered caregiving and housework and what isn't in the article you shared. For example, if a man mows the lawn, it does maintenance on the house or reconstruction, or does car maintenance, did that count? What about running errands outside the house such as buying groceries or taking the kids to school or extra curriculars. Did that count as caregiving? Did it count as caregiving to play with the kids?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 09:44 PM
1

And you are correct on both accounts. In order from best to worst when it comes to parental situation is: Happily joined couple, does NOT need to be marriage, where if there are conflicts, they are either brief with the couple working through them, and/or the couple handle them out of sight of the children. Preferably the parents have two separate nonabusive parenting styles that don't counteract each other too much. (I.E. one parent tries to teach life experiences while protecting them from the…
/r/MensRights24/04/24 09:44 PM
1

There still is a slight difference. While you can file for divorce if you are in a common law marriage, it's not a requirement. Still though, check local laws as it may differ from location to location.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:47 AM
2

The only benefit of marriage for men is that if you have a kid together, and you separate, you have a more solid ground for partial custody of the child. A lot of states give defacto custody to the woman if she wasn't married even if the father is present.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:37 AM
2

Eh, 18 is the age of majority in western society, and 18 year old can already consent to permanent cosmetic body altering procedures
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:07 AM
2

Honestly, I would bring up for profit prisons, and how our economy still partially relies on the slave labor that prisoners supply, and say that women are too fragile for prison, siting feminist sources that say this, meaning that in order to fulfill this need for slave labor, they need to make more arrests, and that petty things get harsher sentences than necessary in a justice system that focuses on exploitation of prisoners rather than rehabilitation, and it's one of the main reasons why the …
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:03 AM
3

Good arguments. Only critique is in number 3, I would note that men are more likely to get arrested charged and convicted for violence causing a self fulfilling loop.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:57 AM
3

Both sides are misandrist. Just because the right is more misogynistic doesn't mean they aren't misandristic as well. You can be both.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:26 PM
3

Power to stop it? Maybe, even if the bill passes, it will go to the SCOTUS and the primary argument would be a violation of the first amendment. Power to make it a paid app? No. As far as misinformation, it holds no more misinformation than any other social media platform when comparing percentages. Hell, at this point, I'd say Twitter has more.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 03:19 AM
5

Simple. It's an election year and thousands, if not millions, of users are calling in telling their reps not to ban TikTok.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 03:15 AM
11

It would just be posted on the social media that fills that void. Also, doubt the bill will actually pass.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:52 AM
15

You know how feminists say that we (MRAs)only bring up men as victims of sexual violence in response to women talking about women victims? We are talking about male victims in a space about male victims on a post about Vanity Fair sexualizing a minor teenaged boy, and you are upset we're talking about male victims rather than female victims. Yes girls who are victims of this exist, and there are spaces dedicated specifically to taking about that. This isn't one of them, and we are by no means gl…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:55 PM
7

Yes he was, it doesn't change the statement.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:48 PM
0

I agree, there are plenty of good reasons to hate on Christians than to manufacture reasons.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:15 PM
2

And that's the issue. If we don't do it by earning potential, then men who are cheated on by women who are purposefully underemployed get screwed over. The only compromisable option would be to have it based off of earning potential but then have the person who's being affected by that earning potential proved to the court that they cannot actually get a job that is at that earning potential.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 11:50 AM
20

But at the same time, if you mention it, they'll call you a disgusting creep.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 10:01 AM
6

Which is why I say 5 years max with it lowering by 20% per year. And it should be determined by earning potential. If someone has a master's degree but chooses to be SAH, it should be determined by what they could be earning with that degree, unless they are on government disability.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:48 AM
0

1: Patriarchy A male dominated Oligarchy that oppresses everyone below them exists. Calling it a Patriarchy and then attributing it to every man is an Apex Fallacy. 2: Rape Culture Rape Culture does exist where both men and women are victims. Male victims however are largely victim blamed or ignored. 3: Systemic Misogyny Systemic Misogyny does exist in the world, but is largely addressed in western nations. Systemic Misandry exists in all countries and goes largely ignored. 4: Male Domination Th…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:09 AM
32

Giving this another test. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnnbP7pCIvQ Edit: So I went to your previous posts, in you comment history, and the links are NOT dead, however, the hyperlinks are not being properly stored. You posted a link to "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H4prE95LE0" but the website is sending you to "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h4pre95le0" which is a dead link. did you spot the difference? Lower case characters. IDK why your links are doing this btw, because even the link p…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:50 AM
24

Correct me if I'm wrong but, doesn't the movie show that a society that caters to primarily women is just as bad as a society that caters to primarily men? Wasn't that the whole point of the "I'm Just Ken," was that Ken was tired of being defined as "Barbie's boyfriend" instead of being defined as "just Ken."
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:47 AM
3

I would change the third question to include "when men are not" because there are a couple of countries out there that do have conscription for women, but it's usually because their population is so low that they need women to be soldiers as well or else they wouldn't have a big enough of a standing army.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 08:52 AM
11

So you're saying I'm good because my parents insisted on me getting it when I was 15, Even though our insurance wouldn't cover it. Heck they only paid a few hundred dollars because the health department covered most of it. Most insurances do cover it for men now though, specifically pubescent boys, but I got vaccinated back in 2010 when insurance only covered it for girls. Now of course I'm talking the USA.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 04:56 AM
9

The statistics they use are decades old, so no, they shouldn't be trusted. In reality it's closer to 1 in 2 women and 1 in 3 men according to the CDC NISVS, and they include Rape, Made to Penetrate, Sexual Coercion, and unwanted sexual physical contact. The idea that men and women are victimized at the same rates is out there and possible, but almost impossible to prove due to underreporting of such crimes from both sides of the gender binary.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 09:03 PM
10

That's the FBI Definition. The CDC first made it to where Rape and MTP were reported as one and people backlashes. Then they started reporting it separately using the FBI definition
/r/MensRights31/12/23 09:31 AM
9

And most people agree with you, as men averages are still between "neutral" and "somewhat unimportant" and women averages are solidly at "somewhat unimportant" on a 7 point Likert scale. Also: saying "I never claimed that" on something that can be implied from your words doesn't work here. You harped on a "negative behavior men show" but didn't explicitly say women also show that behavior, you are implying they don't.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:48 PM
16

I find it funny you harp up on the body count thing like it's a unique thing that men care about. It's not. https://datepsychology.com/body-count-and-sexual-double-standards/ While men do care about body count more than women do, women do care about it, though it's a minority thing on both men and women's side. On a Likert scale of 7 where 1 is low importance and 7 is high importance, with 4 being the middle, men rated 3.61 and women rated 2.98 on average on how important their partners previous…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:15 PM
16

For a lot of feminists, they do see it as an "us vs them" "zero sum game" situation. Keep in mind, even though fathers are victims of parental alienation more than twice over, there is currently a movement to rebrand it as "Child and Mother Sabotage" as if moms are the parent more likely to be a victim of it. They claim that Parental Alienation is too generic and allows abusive fathers to use it to undermine the legitimate concerns of abuse the mother proposed, while the more preferable CAMS all…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:39 AM
33

I posted a comment on a feminist's video on TikTok where he was talking about men's rights, not even feminism, and I posted the CDC statistic that 40% of IPV victims are men, and I want our society to stop treating it like a gendered crime, and a lot of feminists were trying to say I'm erasing women victims, and I'm like "how is acknowledging men as victims erasing women victims?" They just blocked me when they realized that I was correct that it doesn't. Someone also tried to claim that 95% of …
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:20 AM
2

Assuming I had free reign in the policies I placed, I would specifically codefy sexual violence, and intimate partner violence to be gender neutral. I would also get rid of for profit prisons, instead elect for a prison system that focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment, and start an audit program on prisons to make sure that funding that is going into them is being spent appropriately, and that corners aren't being cut and the extra money pocketed by greedy assholes. I would also rewo…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:11 PM
1

I never said Europe was a magical Utopia, I said I align with their labor parties, which have fought for, successfully might I add, for adding further rights for workers. Including Germany, where it is illegal to make your employees work more than 48 hours in a single week. As someone who was required to work 92 hours in a week before, I am envious. Also, just looked it up, and the leader of the EU is elected from the delegates each country sends, so yes, they are elected. Just because it's not …
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:47 AM
-2

When I say Europe I'm not talking about the UK. I'm well aware just how corrupt your guys's government is. You guys are like the Puerto Rico of Europe, technically part of the larger whole, but has no political say over the laws governing the whole. The only difference is that you guys specifically chose to exclude yourself from the EU.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:11 AM
-1

Yes, but do your left wing parties still fight for corporate rights more than worker's rights? Because Dems are socially left, but fiscally right.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:09 AM
11

I have to correct one thing. Democrats are on the right when you compare them to the rest of the world. I would politically align myself with most European countries' labor parties. I want stronger codefied workers rights, like mandatory PTO, mandatory holiday pay if you don't work, and double pay on holidays if you do work, both Maternity and Paternity leave, enforced on call pay, actual pensions, and honestly I want to remove health insurance from employers so I no longer need to stick to my d…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:28 AM
2

There's an idea within feminism that if you support a mother who has survived DV and her children have survived DV then the children will be safe because of the support to the mother. There are so many people falling through the cracks because of the philosophy. Yes. Erin Pizzey, whom I've mentioned in another comment, directly stated this. I also thought I'd give you the CDC website which shows statistics for male victims from the National Intimate Partner, Sexual Violence, and Stalking Survey …
/r/MensRights08/12/23 11:02 PM
2

As a child victim of sexual violence, I had repressed the memories for probably a decade and a half. Since they have been resurfaced, I have been in therapy, and got a proper diagnosis of PTSD. And while I've been having trouble finding the therapist that works for me, most are understanding and willing to work with me. The discrimination was when I was looking for support groups. I reached out to my insurance, and a support group they suggested barred me from entry because I'm a man. I have sou…
/r/MensRights08/12/23 10:58 PM
4

Well, to be fair, I'm leftist and an advocate for women's rights as well. My bias is for men's rights though since I'm a victim of violence. Which is why I tend to specify the misandristic feminists as Radical Feminists, harping on the radical part. But I don't consider myself a feminist in the same way that Cassie Jaye doesn't even though she still advocates for women as well. But yes, I did assume and I apologize. Most people when they refer to MRAs as "people who complain only when others are…
/r/MensRights08/12/23 06:56 PM
9

What other people haven't brought up is that when feminists do realize that men have issues, and start advocating for them, other more radical feminists push to have them exiled from the feminist movement. Two prime examples are Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first women's DV shelter, and Cassie Jaye, a feminist who wanted to make a documentary about the Men's Rights Movement to prove that we are all misogynistic and realizing that our points are actually valid, and had her mind changed. This d…
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:21 PM
2

I'm a victim of child sexual abuse, and boys and men who are victims of violence, especially IPV, need to be taken seriously in our society and not victim blamed. Acknowledging issues that men face does not erase issues that women face. Just because men are arrested for violence more than women does not mean men are more violent than women. We acknowledge that Black Americans, especially black men, are disproportionately punished by the law for the crimes they commit, while white men get off eas…
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:12 PM
2

29 and manufacturing. Essentially I run multimillion dollar machines to assemble pressure sensors.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 12:51 PM
3

You missed the part where the left wants to tax rich people proportional to their wealth, where the right wants to give them even more money for them to hoard.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 08:41 AM
0

Simple. The left is closer to workers rights which I feel is more important than most of the issues right now. In America we truly need a labor party, becauze right now the class divide is much wider than any other divide and we are in a hidden depression where the average American has less spending power now than in the 1930s as inflation has gotten so bad that in most municipalities people would have to work 80+ hours a week at minimum wage to make ends meet. And we blame this inflation based …
/r/MensRights27/11/23 08:38 AM
36

Yes, but every year there are more deaths from MGM than FGM because of how vastly more it happens. Just because it's 100x more likely from FGM doesn't really apply when MGM is performed 10000x as often.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:47 PM
5

Even still, you can report the actual numbers instead of making it exclusively about women. Such as 67% of sexual violence victims are women and 33% are men, and how men make up 48% of the domestic violence victims. Also, a 4% margin isn't significant enough to call it a gendered problem even if "technically" women are victims more. We really should be treating it as a gender neutral problem. Oh, and my source for both statistics is the CDC's NISVS
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:39 PM
8

She also claimed that men don't get body shamed, when she herself is gone on camera shaming men's bodies.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 01:23 AM
13

I always correct them at what is oppressing people: The Oligarchy. Only two have asked why the correction, and I stated that "The Patriarchy" implies that all men are oppressing women, which we aren't. Only the rich are oppressing women, and they are also oppressing men in different but not insignificant ways. One of them asked how men are oppressed, to which I responded with examples. How our society refuses to acknowledge men as victims of violence. How our society doesn't invest nearly as muc…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:57 AM
2

They earned 82% of what men did? Is that total or based off of median salary? Does it account for hours worked?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:09 AM
1

I personally have no issues with sex work, nor do I have an issue with people who partake with it as long as major crimes aren't being committed. No rapes, underrage, beatings or murders. This extends to prostitution as well, which I think shouldn't be a crime outside of bodily harm of course. What I take issue with is women who abhor men who consume perfectly legal sex work while also generating said content. There was a woman whom has since deleted all her accounts who on TikTok regularly bash…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 07:37 AM
7

Unfortunately, we haven't really been in a fight "to defend our country" since WW2. All of the cold war era wars were us fighting in proxy wars. And the Middle East wars was a fight for their oil, and often enough wasn't even against an actual state but a terrorist org that wouldn't stand a chance at actual war if they put on a uniform to face us head on. And as soon as it's more financially reasonable, they will take you out of the war, if you survive, and then blame you for not winning.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 11:45 PM
5

I was about to say something similar. Our battle is a long battle with small victories that is being actively resisted by other special interest groups. The issue is even if we did get a big victory, the news wouldn't report it because it wouldn't sell. I'm talking about something as big as the country banning circumcision or something along those lines where they couldn't spin it on being a negative thing towards women.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 08:26 AM
4

The problem with our structure is that each instance needs to be fought, and it takes money to fight such laws, most of people not having such money.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 08:23 AM
15

This reminds me of the rant some feminists go on when they complain that a man can re wear outfits to big events but women can't. Men don't care if that same fancy dress is worn to every event you attend.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 01:48 AM
0

Explain your reasoning for four. Like I get 3 years because that's a senior dating a freshman, but why 4?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 06:42 AM
6

Not all states have those laws, and some only have those laws if there was an established relationship before the older one became an adult.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:52 AM
13

That's Emily Horowitz, sociologist who wrote a book to include stories like Henry's in it, to encourage people to approach sex crimes with logic and reason rather than emotions and rage, who is actually advocating for Henry to not be given such a harsh sentence for unknowingly committing statutory rape.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:50 AM
2

They don't reveal the minor's gender in the article. The picture shown is of Emily Horowitz, the sociologist who is calling for sex crimes to be looked at with reason instead of emotions. She's the one advocating for fairer treatment to people like Henry who did nothing wrong, yet is branded as one of the worst criminals there are.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:42 AM
-1

The first recorded use of singular they/them for those of unknown gender dates back centuries. It appeared in writing in 1375 fiction called William and the Werewolf. The Oxford English Dictionary FORMALIZED it in 1998 for use when the subjects gender is unknown or irrelevant, as they not only included the singular definition, but also started using it and its definitions for other words. So on an informal basis it's centuries old, but it was formalized about 25 years ago. Just because you are u…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:07 AM
-9

As they are required to by law.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:34 AM
3

Laws require that minors remain anonymous, so they referred to the minor as if they didn't know their gender, and they/them pronouns is the correct way to do that.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:33 AM
-2

Laws require that minors remain anonymous in such articles, so they only report them as a person of unknown gender, which is, both formally and informally, done with they/them pronouns, and has been for decades.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:31 AM
12

I always find it ironic that we demonize people if they attribute a woman's worth to sex, but we casually demonize men for their lack of. Same with looks. And by we I mean society in general, not the people here on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 05:16 PM
3

I agree. The cheating partner should get the short end of the divorce.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 05:03 PM
4

I don't mind the idea that adultery isn't considered a crime. It should be a reason for divorce, but you shouldn't serve jail time or pay a fine for it. Both men and women who sleep with others behind their spouse's back should get the short end of a divorce, and the same goes for spouses who coerce their SO into an open relationship.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 05:00 PM
0

I'm gonna get down voted for this, but I disagree with the 12 year sentence. She was 15 when the crime was committed, I don't think any child under 16 should receive more than 5 years unless they committed premeditated murder or mass murder. Also, I believe that crimes that call into question the accused's mental health should have a psych eval before sentencing and after the sentence is served to make sure the reformed can enter society.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:31 AM
11

Where have all the good men gone? Why won't good men ask me out?!
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:13 PM
4

If it's their only income, it isn't a gift anymore.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:07 AM
2

I thought they checked IDs now and don't let you post unless you have a verified account.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:06 AM
2

I don't think about the Roman empire specifically, but I do think about stuff adjacent to the Roman empire, like how Julius Caesar messed up the calendar when he added January and February to it.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:53 PM
8

I disagree that this is "woke against woke" because there is nothing woke against sexist dress codes regardless of who they disadvantage.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:41 AM
13

As a country where women outrank men in college applicants, enrollments, and graduations, why do women still need special scholarships to help them? To be clear, I am not saying to get rid of the scholarships, just open them up to all applicants regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 07:38 AM
3

No go. Abuser was Bio-mom. How would these tests stop bio parents from abusing their children. Edited to add: Unless your suggestion is a complete stopping fascism where people aren't allowed to have kids unless they get a license from the government, which has problems in its own merit, it's not going to stop people like the women in this 2017 article.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:29 AM
51

And they'll probably be locked up for life. The point of this post isn't "LGBTQ+ are abusive." It's "despite being convicted of such a heinous crime, these women only spent only a year in jail after beating their sons so bad one suffered 2 strokes." So why should child abusers spend so little time in jail?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 12:30 AM
5

Same here. But different cultures do different things.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:42 AM
6

If an adult makes an informed decision, that's on them.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 06:09 PM
9

Only when done to a child. If an adult makes an informed decision, that's on them.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:55 AM
1

They explain that in the article that they got the "attractiveness scores" by giving pictures of the students to be graded.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 01:33 PM
3

It would be interesting to see if this trend applies across the board regardless of the teacher is attracted to women. The reason I say this is to see if it is "only those creepy teachers," as my friend who originally told me about this finding said, or if it applies to cishet women teachers as well.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 01:31 PM
10

Just curious. How many of those did the young woman reach out for professional help or emergency services and still decided to follow through?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:07 AM
6

That is... Sad. But at least she got more than a decade behind bars by sentencing. What's disgusting is the women who argue for her freedom. Edited to add: yes she was sentenced to life, but 17 years is the minimum, meaning that unless there is a change, (which feminists are trying to do,) she won't be eligible for parole until she served 17 years.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 08:54 PM
14

I agree with you for the most part, if there was a way to identify abusers regardless of gender or abuse type, I'd like that too. However, the issue is how underreported it is, and what you go by. A simple accusation shouldn't ruin someone's life, it should be proved so a vindictive ex can't ruin the dating pool for someone, and it's hard as hell to prove especially since it's severely underreported. Also, sexual abuse and physical abuse are far easier to prove over the non physical forms of abu…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:05 AM
28

So why are you acting like I have said that?
/r/MensRights07/05/23 07:13 PM
26

When have I said that?
/r/MensRights07/05/23 07:09 PM
63

The difference is when men have such an opinion, other men will step in and tell him he's wrong. But when women have such an opinion, they either stay silent if they disagree with it, or they fully support her if they don't disagree. Our society as it currently stands does not except Men being sexist, but fully embraces women who are.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 07:00 PM
120

Legitimately had a RadFem tell me this week that most men are abusive assholes who deserve to die.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:43 PM
4

(Not so) Fun Fact: inmate on inmate sexual violence per Capita is higher in female prisons than it is in male prisons.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 06:35 AM
60

And good saw blades.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:09 AM
0

But the two companies I provided offer different hourly wages for different jobs, meaning that they pay different skills different wages, and there are plenty of companies just like them. The only difference is that the profits for their work go back to the workers instead of to people who don't work for that profit that are called shareholders. You see, we still have redistribution in capitalism. It's just not going to the pockets of people who need it, it's going into Dragon Hordes of people w…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:13 PM
-3

This creates a class based system of inequality in which a subordinate class of people has to work to produce a surplus of resources to give to the entitled class. Bro... you seriously just described capitalism...
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:48 PM
3

That's the decades of indoctrination and brainwashing for you. The funny part is, I never directly spoke out against capitalism. I just corrected someone's false misconception. Oh no, he merely corrected a misconception and spoke out against daddy Bezos, that's frightening my world view.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:17 PM
6

These companies exist, I already provided 2 real world examples and they pay an hourly wage, and the bonuses you get based off of the profits are based off of how much money you made during that time. So you put in more hours, you get paid more. They also pay different wages for different jobs. Truck drivers make twice as much as a cashier in my state. Same company. Maybe if you actually looked at my examples, you could've not made a fool of yourself.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 11:35 AM
2

Where did I say the compensation was equal regardless of effort?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 11:20 AM
0

a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole instead of a few individuals. This is the definition of socialism. On a company level it is just as I've said where the profits go to the employees rather than to shareholders and CEOs. Essentially, everyone is sharing the profits, yes, but they are also sharing the risk as well, as losses will lead to everyone ge…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 11:17 AM
-11

That's not socialism. Socialism is workers owning the means of production. Kinda like WinCo or Publix. Essentially instead of profits of a company going to shareholders and CEOs, it goes to the employees. That's what socialism is.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 11:05 AM
4

No, she didn't. She cheated on her soon to be ex with him while he was residing over their divorce case.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:31 PM
12

It's her ex-husband who is the named father on the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:26 PM
-3

While you're not wrong, The issue is when you take these traits to their extremes and make them the defining trait of the gender. It leads to negative stereotypes that they could use to demonize all men. Negative stereotypes that are often false. Men don't cry Negative stereotype example: men are incapable of complex sad emotions, and as such, it's fine to emotionally abuse them since they wouldn't understand it. They won't care. Men don't show emotions Negative stereotype example: men are poor …
/r/MensRights07/04/23 12:20 PM
4

That's because the vocal feminists don't want women held accountable for their own mistakes. It's the hyperextension of the "women are good" effect to where they see that women can only have good qualities. It's also why, until women are held accountable for the violence the inflict on men, and we as a society stop excusing their actions as "trauma" or such, we will not see actual gender equality. Edited to add: for any feminists who disagree with these statements, where are the feminists who ar…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:15 AM
1

The thing I absolutely hate is that when people hear toxic masculinity they're conflating it to all masculinity being toxic. Toxic masculinity as a term started off as the toxic ideals of what it is to be masculine. Men don't cry Men don't show emotions Men are aggressive and confrontational Etc etc. These ideologies and societal expectations need to cease to be. But they're applying the term, and the war, to all masculine traits, and by extension, to all men and all boys. And it's causing more …
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:55 AM
12

I believe you, it's rough. That's why I record my phone calls. Impossible to do unless you live in a one party consent state like I do.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 07:27 PM
18

Oh yeah I believe it. One of the biggest things that our oligarchs don't want us to know is our own rights. That includes their police forces, the employers out there who will tell you you can't discuss salary with other employees, and in this case officers of the military who don't want enlisted to know that just because you're accused of something doesn't mean you have to admit to it.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 06:59 PM
90

I wouldn't have accepted NJP. I would have plead not guilty and gotten court martialed. That way I could've defended myself. For those not in the military, NJP stands for Non-Judicial Punishment. It's a way to be punished for messing up with taking a lighter sentence, as you don't need to involve the NCIS or other branches' equivalent. BUT, The only reason why it happens like that is the service member being punished plead guilty. They admit they did what they are accused of. For something petty…
/r/MensRights02/04/23 02:13 PM
3

There is a trend going on with single mothers that say if you want to go on a first date with them, that not only do you have to pay for their night out, (meal, drinks, movie/concert tickets,) but you also have to pay for the babysitting of their child. I take this as the red flag it is and swipe left or unmatch because she let me know right off the bat she expects the financial abuse me.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:34 AM
1

Depends on if he's in the picture, and if he's caring for the young infant. If so, then mommy and daddy asked the hurt.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 08:20 PM
20

Dumbass. No. I'm saying it's not OK. Don't put words into mouth. Why would causing undue pain on neonatal infants for a cosmetic surgery ever be OK?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:49 AM
29

Yes, because most circumcisions performed in the US and Canada are performed in the first week of birth. An infant's eyes aren't fully developed until later. They can't even see the face of the doctor who did the operation. Only that it hurts and mother allowed this hurt.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:39 AM
34

84% of which were neonatal infants would didn't even have fully developed eyes yet.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:30 AM
6

This is domestic violence against her ex husband. It's called Corrolary Victims, non partners killed from IPV violence.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:17 AM
9

I'm aware. I was arguing with a misandrist who kept saying men can't be victims of DV and she I kept asking for reasons why and then refuting them, she snapped and said "Women can never commit DV as it relies on the patriarchal power structure." Then I asked what about the lesbian victims of DV, and that's when she said that lesbians cannot be victims. I asked her why and she replied women cannot commit DV, and held firm to that whenever I tried to provide examples of women abusing women.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:11 AM
19

I was once told that lesbians don't experience DV. I told them they were erasing victims based off of their identity and were basically a bad person.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:26 AM
13

I would actually reverse the question. What government given rights do men have that women don't? Then refute all of the answers with either the actual law are men's rights issues. For example, frequency answers and how I rebut them: Women cant feel safe being alone in public at night. A: not a government granted right, B: violent crimes against women get reported more than violent crimes against men despite crimes against men being more prevalent. It is media fear mongering. But men commit thos…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:12 PM
3

"how does [friends name] calling me a N----- make me misogynistic? Racist b----..."
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:53 AM
10

The proper word you are looking for is Statutory Rape
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:54 PM
32

The $30/hour average is a lie btw. I work in manufacturing, am one of the higher paid People iny department, and I still make less than 20.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:08 AM
7

As someone who works in manufacturing I'm going to tell you right now that that $30 an hour average wage is heavily inflated.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:00 AM
8

There is more to it than that. Suicide attempts aren't actively tracked like completed suicides, and any form of self harm, accidental or intentional, was looked at when they came up with the statistic.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:33 AM
24

Find me a post from this subreddit that has the original poster advocating for, and getting support for, something that directly limits the rights of women without being a direct consequence of a woman's actions.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:30 AM
36

Correct we should be blaming society in general not just women. Women do makeup half of society though, so at the very least they are half to blame.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:40 AM
2

Yep, and getting the snip isn't just or choice, doctors can refuse to perform the procedure. Also, what use is a rubber if a woman takes a man and refuses to use a rubber with the intent to get pregnant? Is it a common occurrence? no. However there have been a few cases that have been heard about it and every case they rule in favor of the rapist.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:37 PM
3

But men don't have reproductive rights. We don't.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 11:08 AM
4

I hope she's the one who gets sued for malpractice when it gets realized that she's turning down nursing candidates based off of anything but performance for such an important role. And as I've been told through my boss in my industry, attendance and experience counts as performance.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:50 AM
4

The fact that OP is a woman herself does help though, they're more likely to take her seriously.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:49 AM
2

Oh look, someone who can't READ. I only provided the statistic that single mothers abuse their children more than single fathers. It's a statistic. It's not bashing. But no, you went onto a men's subreddit basically spouting your toxic femininity ideals, saying men aren't as nurturing as women, which is blatantly false.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 07:45 PM
63

It got removed because the AITA mods are cowards at being called sexist hypocrites.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:23 PM
9

So let me get this straight, as soon as we bring up a point counter to yours, you result to insults instead of facts. Even if you insulted while providing substance to your argument, it would be fine, but you didn't even provide any substance. Many men on this subreddit have daughters they lost the right to see because of the biased court system that would rather a child go to a MURDERER than a loving father. So yes, continue to attack when we only ask you to back your claims that "mothers are b…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:14 PM
5

I'm aware. I was asking the guy who was making excuses for the biased legal system.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:02 PM
36

Single mothers are more likely to abuse their children than single fathers, even when you look at percentages instead of just raw numbers. Can you explain the reason why that is?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 06:52 AM
1

I believe the cops should investigate crimes against all alleged victims, however, punish false accusers, those proven false. At the same time we shouldn't be dragging people's name through the mud based off an accusation alone. And I'm saying that false accusations distracts the police from investigating the crimes against actual victims, and then turns them jaded for when actual victims come forth.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:16 PM
4

What they don't understand is that their false accusations are making it harder for actual victims to get justice. And it does it by doing two things, it distracts the police with these false accusations, taking resources away from actual victims who need them. On top of that it also makes it less believable for actual victims who have just as much evidence.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:10 PM
18

To which I say "and when it is women who commit them, do they make the news? Do they get prosecuted and locked up quickly? No, they don't, and you know it."
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:10 AM
52

Quite the opposite actually, men are the majority victims of violent crimes. Yeah we don't care unless it happens to a woman, because men are unworthy victims. It's more dangerous to walk alone at night as a man than a woman.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 06:59 AM
89

"women and girls are afraid to walk the streets" yeah, because of fear mongering.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:40 AM
4

Toxic feminity exists as well. Toxic masculinity is the toxic ideology of what it means to be masculine. Toxic femininity is the toxic ideology of what it needs to be feminine. Both exist.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 06:36 AM
2

Toxic masculinity, that is the toxic ideology of what it is to be masculine, is perpetuated by women just as much as men. Any woman who won't date a guy who is open about his feelings, or will use his openness against him, is perpetuating this toxic ideology. On top of that, any woman who refuses to acknowledge that women need to help men with mental health issues, not directly help, but advocate for it too, are essentially saying it's not a problem they care about so it's not a problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:51 AM
-2

Without definitive proof he's in the right, he won't win his lawsuit, and society will just see him as bullying and autistic girl. I don't agree that it's right that this is the how society works but it's currently how society works.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:20 PM
-14

Read my second comment.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:50 PM
-12

No you misunderstand. If neither party can prove whether he definitively did or did not perform the crime, then it's baseless accusations on either side. He said vs she said. It's obvious she doesn't have definitive proof or he would be in jail. HOWEVER! Defamation laws require those that have been wronged PROVE that what was said is definitively false. If he doesn't have proof, Society will only see it was him bullying her, and it will harm his reputation more than it will help it, especially s…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:41 PM
-43

If he's able to prove his innocence, then good on him, otherwise, society will just see him bullying someone who didn't have proof he did it, and he will be criticized for doing so, and it will harm those false accused. I honestly think this is more of a stunt to stay relavant than anything else. Bad publicity is still publicity and all that. Been a couple decades since his name was a household name, and while most still know of the backstreet boys it's not like they're a hugely popular band now…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 01:59 PM
27

No, where did I ever say she should get punished without due process? But we can believe the alleged victim of sexual misconduct, and support and rant with him. The original comment that you replied to only assumed that he was telling the truth, but did not call for her to be punished without due process. Don't mistake the two.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:36 AM
43

Didn't feminists say this when Johnny sued Amber? Now that it is settled and he has won, will feminists finally admit that she is abusive? Until all feminists agree that Amber is abusive, and stop victim blaming Johnny, you cannot use this argument.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:18 AM
6

Even if he wins, unless there is public outcry about it, Google will try and probably succeed in running a smear campaign against him. Just like that McDonald's woman who sued because she had third degree burns from boiling hot coffee.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 05:03 AM
11

Your dropped this \ (If you put two in a row, it will turn out fine. ¯⁠\\_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ turns into ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ )
/r/MensRights29/01/23 04:49 AM
1

I woulda responded with bringing up female teachers who rape their students. See her squirm at me bringing up female predators, and conclude that women need to be taught not to be rapists too.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 06:40 PM
1

Actually they look more masculine than feminine.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:57 PM
34

The misconception that vasectomies are easily reversible is also common, although I suspect it's not really that they don't know, but rather that they don't care. This is the biggest thing, and when I encounter these women elsewhere I attempt to educate them rather than become inflammatory. Some are receptive to the idea. The funny thing is is that as a society if we truly did give a vasectomy to every pubescent boy, it would hurt women just as much as men, but the type of people who aren't rece…
/r/MensRights21/01/23 04:47 AM
2

"If society were structures to give men what they want, why are most homeless people men?" Poke holes in their logic, then follow up with the truth, society is hard on both sides of the gender binary, and I would then link to the Amazon page for Self Made Man by Norah Vincent. They would probably then use the fallacy saying men created our society the way it was, and therefore the fault of men, to which I would respond that it's our duty as a society to make life better for everyone, not just ce…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:07 AM
19

So on r/recap we were discussing this and it seems like there isn't a blacklist of subs mentioned, but a white list, as some innocent subs about videogames we're also omitted. I'd link to the post, but I didn't actually participate...
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:08 PM
2

Here you go, though there are other studies that suggest otherwise. You can always go onto scholar.google.com to search for more, and I highly encourage people to do their own research. https://childprotectionresource.online/mothers-are-more-likely-to-abuse-children-than-fathers-fact/
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:59 AM
8

Oh I agree. Don't get me wrong. I was just providing the sad statistic
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:33 AM
26

Statistically women do kill their own children more than men, and media tries to spin it as abuse men bring even though most of the time it isn't. It's a sad statistic.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:29 AM
3

Gym isn't a replacement for therapy. This is true. However I do take issue with what you are saying about therapy not working for men. It's just inherently wrong. You are right that men are taught the toxic trait of internalizing your troubles until it boils over, however with the proper support, that covers most men. If someone needs further therapy, they may have an issue that is undiagnosed. And therapists aren't there to diagnose you, but treat you. And they can't properly treat men if they …
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:33 PM
228

2 years... How much would a man have gotten if they directly neglected their child like this?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 01:26 PM
24

I always ask the same thing to women who acknowledge some of the problem but not all. "Do you think women can sexually assault, rape, or otherwise abuse men?" If they answer anything other than the affirmative, either by denying it, victim blaming, or dodging the question, I reply with the same thing: "Then you are one of the reasons that our society won't see gender equality anytime soon."
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:05 AM
13

He has been arrested by police on suspicion of raping and sexual assaulting me and I’m waiting to see whether he will be charged. What kinda victim talks like this?
/r/MensRights15/11/22 12:26 PM
0

Genuine question: If police are called out to a domestic disturbance, and they find a man with his face bloodied in the fetal position as his girlfriend struck him with a baseball bat, should they arrest the girlfriend? If so, how long of a sentence should she get? Should it be equal to a man who beats his girlfriend?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 08:35 PM
20

The one that encourages men to talk about issues is the first one, the other one is the one where women say "kill all men," "men can't be raped," and "yes all men are predators."
/r/MensRights05/11/22 08:27 PM
11

Got the vid from their website. Warning, it can be upsetting to some. https://youtu.be/Dz9QhelfvdI
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:33 AM
39

Nowadays, to avoid controversy while trying to pass them, they do the opposite, they give tax credit to families, paying full tax is therefore a disguised bachelor tax. So unless they give the same tax credit to single childless women, this bachelor tax, which when explicit was before women could really work, will be applied to both genders equally. We can argue the ethics of such a tax but it's not being applied to men unfairly.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:02 AM
8

This is a prime example of toxic feminity. They expect every women to follow outdated gender protocols as they expect men to do so as well. This is both Misandry and Misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:23 AM
-5

There are toxic ideologies of masculinity perpetuated by both men and women, and these ideologies are one of the reasons men struggle to be seen as victims of violence. This is what toxic masculinity should be defined as.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 10:42 AM
2

No, but when a woman cheats, they still blame the husband rather than her. That's what I meant.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:20 AM
34

Because it's socially acceptable for women to give up and find an "upgrade" when their partner upsets them, but when a woman upsets a man by, say, cheating on him with his brother, the man is encouraged to stay in the relationship to figure out what he did wrong to cause her to exhibit that behavior. Now obviously not everyone thinks this way, but the misandrists who are vocal about it tend to push this.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 06:38 AM
3

I wonder if it does go up relatively recently since the idea of young adults having one night stands or other forms of anonymous sex has been on an increase since the 60s.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:09 AM
7

First, they point out, women are much less likely to be convicted of violent crimes than men. Ok, but what are the stats on women committing these crimes and getting out of conviction, or not even being charged because their victim was a male? If take is included against men, how many women force themselves on men against their consent?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:56 AM
1

Not really... What else can you infer from it?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:03 PM
27

So the feminist who wrote this drivel thinks men only think of sex and hate? Wow...
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:35 PM
7

Charged means they simply got accused of the crime. Conviction is when they are found guilty by a court of law. Sentencing is after conviction, and judges can give reduced sentencing as they do please, as what happened to Brock Turner, a rapist who only got 6 months in jail because he was from a rich family.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:41 PM
132

Women have standards = good. Men have standards = misogynistic pigs. This is the reason why more and more men are choosing to be single long term. While I'm not saying women shouldn't have standards, expecting men to meet your standards while you say their standards for women are sexist is one of the issues with feminism.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:06 AM
3

Currently, sure, but a couple generations down the line where society encourages men to take paternity leave, can change that. But there is a second benefit to women Paternity leave for men has, and that's to take pressure of early childcare off the mother and help her recover from the ordeal of pregnancy.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:58 AM
15

I've said it before and I'll say it again. One way to decrease this pay gap is to give men paternity leave equal to women's maternity leave. Even though companies can't use the time you took off against you, being gone 6+ weeks will affect your performance which can cause you to be passed up on raises, bonuses, and even promotions. By giving men paternity leave as well, not only will it allow men to bond with their new borns, it will also equal the playing field in the workplace.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:56 AM
37

It's because he wasn't not fully deprogrammed from his old Radfem bipoc identity political bs they've all been indoctrined with. Now don't get me wrong, systemic racism does exist, and it's negative effects affect white people the least, but the true issue with our society is less of a demographic issue and more of a class/income issue. A lot of these racial and gender identity politic issues are a distraction from the real issues that are preventing our society from becoming more Utopic. (True …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:54 PM
19

If a woman says no, and then is asked again, it's coersion, a form of SA and SV. So why does a man "need to be firm" about it. Both times he was uncomfortable, and an unwilling participant. Both times he said no, and she should've left it at that. Considering he started avoiding her, he is clearly traumatized by it to some degree.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:50 AM
3

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/politics/2014/09/02/arizona-statutory-rape-victim-forced-pay-child-support/14951737/
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:08 PM
2

Some Radfem Femcells on Tumblr.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:31 PM
5

Nope. Most recent case was 2015
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:05 PM
8

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1996-12-22-9612220045-story.html There you go.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:28 PM
24

They brushed passed it, ignoring it because they didn't have a counter argument, and couldn't ignore the news article or dispute it.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:22 AM
38

Thanks, and I'm well aware. They were asking for specific examples and not statistics because you know "every woman knows an abuse victims, but not every man knows an abuser" or some bullshit like that.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:08 AM
124

I'm not kidding. Same radfems then listed off a bunch of things that were basically feminist propaganda including DV and, you guessed it, SV. I replied to each with proof that we don't have those rights, and for the Sexual Violence one, I replied "A 15 year old boy..."
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:14 AM
308

I had someone say full reproductive rights. I responded with "A 15 year old boy was raped by his 34 year old neighbor, and a baby resulted of that rape. When he turned 18 the court not only didn't charge her for the rape of a child, but forced him to pay child support backdated to when he himself was still legally a child."
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:08 AM
3

That's why I'm happy that a whale in my RuneScape clan leaks the OF of several known internet celebs.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/22 01:22 PM
22

No joke. There was a local news story about a mother who intentionally killed her kids by leaving them in the garage with the car on because she was losing custody. She went to jail for the trial, then got convicted and sentenced to time served + probation. Absolutely sickening.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:13 AM
22

Yeah, this. One bad man, which should be called out, will sexually harrass/sexually assault multiple women. Doesn't make them all bad.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:42 PM
9

2nd wave feminism took place during the 60s and 70s and wasn't solely based on reproductive rights, but also a wide variety of topics including but not limited to Marital Rape, Domestic Violence, Education, and Custody and Divorce law. Now let's discuss these issues and what they gave us. Marital rape and domestic violence, two big topics of the Men's Rights Movement, as men are usually excluded as victims and women are excluded as perpetrators. They opened up Women's DV shelters which men were …
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:39 PM
1

Recently Spain passed a sexual violence law that's gender neutral and about consent rather than actions taken. I think all countries should have such laws, and enforce such laws equally.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:48 AM
8

One of the big things men's rights fights for is women to be held accountable for the crimes and abuse they commit and to be punished to the same severity that a man would be punished. Just because the victim is is a teen girl doesn't negate the fact that because she's a woman, her abuser got let off with perverbial slap on the wrists compared to what a man would've gotten.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:35 AM
1

Explain his side of it, look for alternatives such as those suggested. Look for a compromise that satisfies both him and his wife.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:27 AM
1

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. Responding to negativity with more negativity only leads to further animosity, and it's not healthy for a relationship, romantic in nature or otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:17 AM
3

I at least like that the commenters are saying she is an asshole as well. It's not blindly saying he is at fault, and I agree with the comment that says he is 30% the problem of this issue. He's retaliating, and the retaliation is the issue he has against him. I do disagree with it being considered financial abuse though, because he's not controlling her finances. If he was he wanted to even asked. She has her own finances, and currently does not need as much of his support as she previously did…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:57 AM
42

Her co-conspirator caved and admitted guilt after a prolonged interrogation.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:24 AM
27

Not sexual harrassment, but harrassment based on sex. Different thing.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:01 PM
9

This might lead to those laws being put into place, as this case can be used as a precedent for such laws to be made. However, I don't think this law would be created until male BC/implants gets made, and men started to be demonized and accused of stop taking it on purpose with the intent of getting girls pregnant.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:06 PM
9

She failed, but bluffed and said she was pregnant even though she wasn't, and when he asked, she admitted to poking holes in her condoms that he used.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:55 AM
14

Later in the same cross examination, she admits she disregarded evidence when making the determination Turd Heard was abused because she disagreed with it I also like how she made a big deal of representing men, but never in hetero relationships.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:20 AM
12

So its worth noting all vasectomies can reversed Wrong... A full vasectomy cannot be reversed. Only the newer ones they did. but that isn't a guarantee there wont be issues. This is correct, because even if he had it reversed within a year, there is still a 27% chance he won't be able to get a girl pregnant naturally and well have to rely on in vitro. And that chance only goes up the longer between the vasectomy and the reversal.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:08 AM
35

I have no problem with circumcision. I have problems with the routine and systemic circumcision of minors before they can consent to the procedure as adults.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:54 AM
1

Porn, strippers, prostitutes, BDSM or other dominating sex has nothing to do with oppressing women... Besides, I thought having an OF and working as a Sex Worker was empowering! How should a woman who wants that empowerment support herself if men aren't allowed to partake and she isn't into servicing other women?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:06 AM
7

It's getting better. I once had a comment on a sub where I said men don't have reproductive rights get replies and didn't get down voted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 09:03 PM
3

That's true
/r/MensRights04/04/22 02:45 AM
2

Does Texas have such laws? I could be wrong, but it was mentioned in the thread that Texas doesn't actually have those laws.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:55 PM
7

Well, considering it's Texas, she can't get an abortion easily because of their new, highly contraversal law, but in other jurisdictions abortion is an option, and that can be done without the father's consent, removing both parents from any parental rights. Then there is the fact that there are adoption centers and no questions asked safe haven drop off locations, etc, etc... There are plenty of options for women to get out of all parental responsibilities, and force the father to also lose his…
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:52 PM
8

To be fair they did have valid reasons to lock it, and posts on r/legaladvice get locked after 12 hours automatically anyways.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:25 PM
19

Financial rights on who owes who after a custody battle has nothing to do with the fact that men have no reproductive rights. He didn't want to be a father. He always used a condom. She tampered with said condom. He is now forced to be a father, even if it's only financial responsibility.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:20 PM
3

Yes, it's a normal Reddit link, but at the time posting it, the thread is locked as all relavant legal advice has been given.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 02:44 PM
2

I have read through the first few top comments and while they were excellent on what they said, I wanted to emphasize a few of the points that are specific to what I want our society to recognize and address. I do want to say that I will be touching on sexual violence a little bit, and in my opinion the only acceptable amount of sexual violence victims is zero regardless of gender. Violence perpetrated by women. Women are just as capable of violence as men are, but our society doesn't recognize …
/r/MensRights02/04/22 07:34 AM
1

On top of what others have said, if you can afford it, start setting money aside now incase she does seek child support. Even if it isn't for a few years, they can and will seek support from the child's day of birth, not just from when the court ordered it. It's redicilous I know.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 09:27 PM
17

in many places women cannon get sterilized without their male partner agreeing In those same places, neither can men without their female partner agreeing.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:43 PM
1

That only furthers my belief because that it's staged. Chris Rock makes an uncouth joke playing off of one of Jada's biggest insecurities. Will laughing initially until he "realizes" what the joke is about. A stage slap that looks like it wasn't meant to actually hurt. Both parties involved apologizing. It's not even the first time Chris Rock joked about her in the first place, and he's made even more offensive, and racist, jokes than that, so why this joke in particular? And the biggest reason …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:07 AM
1

Honestly it's because of this that I think it was staged. Two actors who have played in comedies before, one of which is an active comedian, and he's not even pressing charges... It smells of staged controversy for public view...
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:54 PM
13

"Ad Hominem: you're attacking my character because you have no good refute to my argument."
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:00 AM
2

Use the > character at the beginning of a line. And no, we were properly dating for about 7 months while we were both in the Navy. She had an apartment because she had a kid.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:51 AM
46

I had this happen with my last partner. What do you mean no? You must think I'm suddenly ugly. Did you suddenly turn full gay? Are you unable to get it up? All men want sex! I just left and slept her guest room instead. But the next time she said no, I asked the same questions, rapid fire switching gender specific questions appropriately, and I did stop, and she got upset because this is the first time I resisted her telling me no, so I said No means no, and your consent is important, and I resp…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:44 PM
2

I'm exempt. I'm a veteran who is class 4 obese. Even if they wanted to recall me, I would spend 6-9 months in boot just to healthily lose weight
/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:14 PM
29

Which violates antidisceimination laws in California btw, but the people who oversee it don't care because of their own sexist ways.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 05:55 AM
15

It's sad we live in a society where women are FORCED to make this choice [to kill "abusers" while they sleep.] If they are asleep, you have the opportunity to leave unless he literally has you locked inside the house with him.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:05 AM
0

No, I'm picking 2-3 things. The other being that the Matrix resets when the code from The One combines with the mainframe, and that The One is the irregular code. Now if Neo is human, how can he be a collection of irregular code? and in the 3rd movie, why didn't the Matrix reset when he first jacked into the mainframe? Why did it wait until he lost the fight with Agent Smith?
/r/MensRights23/12/21 09:43 PM
0

I did... He learned how to hack the system, but he isn't the one. The Oracle directly tells him he isn't the one.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 09:31 PM
0

Neo wasn't The One... They even said so in the first movie.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:59 PM
43

13 year old actually, back in the 80s I believe. There's also been a couple other cases that made the news.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:00 PM
2

Calling Transpeople mentally ill and refusing to refer to them as their preferred gender and insisting they are what they were assigned at birth is the definition of transphobia.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 03:16 AM
1

So you are transphobic, got it.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 01:07 AM
2

Yes, but transwomen we're women who were assigned male at birth, and transmen are men who were assigned female at birth. So in the eyes of TERFs, transmen are just women who are delusional to think they are inferior men, and transwomen are perverted men who call themselves women to gain access to private spaces meant for true women. (These aren't my beliefs, I'm just giving the beliefs of a straw woman TERF)
/r/MensRights07/11/21 01:51 PM
13

I think you mean transwomen, but other than that, I agree.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 11:00 AM
61

I was having this argument with straw kids and straw men on another social media platform, and I said something that completely shut down the argument. If we hold statutory rape victims liable for child support when their rapist gets pregnant from the action, then we should hold statutory rape victims accountable when they lie about their age.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 01:13 PM
14

They're lucky Adam didn't have a panic attack, he already feels survival guilt because one of the women he mentored on the voice was murdered during a concert.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 03:06 AM
18

yeah, we need to reform the entire legal system, including Police, both Criminal and Civil Courts (this includes family court,) as well as a refocus on prisons to A: outlaw for profit prisons, and B: put a focus on rehabilitating prisoners instead of just using it as a punishment, and have social programs outside of prison to help recently reformed prisoners phase back into civilian life. There are some local programs like that, but IIRC there is no federal program, and most red states just rele…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 02:20 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:21 AM
2

Yeah, I don't know either.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:21 AM
3

In the old language? Maybe. I'm not an expert. But in modern English no.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:48 PM
3

I'm Norse Pagan, a worshiper of Hel. Don't worry, I'm not racist with it, as I acknowledge that the Vikingr weren't homogeneous. There were African and Byzantine Vikings.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:11 PM
18

Honestly, if you needed a picture, i.would use a cartoon of an old lady smacking her husband with a rolling pin. It shows that people think it's funny, then when you call it out as abuse, they will feel other feelings because they just laughed at abuse. I said other feelings because good people would feel guilty, but then there are those who would get angry or try to justify it, but abuse is abuse.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 09:01 AM
27

Yep, because r/mensrights isn't feminist approved, u/misandrybot automatically bans people from the subs they're a mod of for participating in non-feminist approved subs about gender rights.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 06:56 AM
3

You posted a chart that isn't relavent to the discussion as it didn't directly compare number of men killed to number of women killed in workplace related incidents. It only showed percentage of workplace fatalities per gender for a specific type of fatality, which is useful in of itself, but irrelevant to the conversation. The fatal injury rate for men is 5.7 compared to 0.7 for women when compared to how many combined hours the entire demographic worked, so this is about the rate for 100,000 f…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 11:44 AM
6

Nope, some of them have male genetalia and are though to be full males until puberty, when their male genetalia doesn't develop. (Also corrected my Swype fail on my previous comment)
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:23 PM
13

That's why I said viable births. And this specific defect happens with sperm. Specifically genes crossing over between the chromosome pairs.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:34 PM
9

No, that is something else. The person all has the SRY gene, but, depending on the type of AIS, doesn't develop male genitalia.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:32 PM
94

Fun fact. The SRY gene that causes males to diverge from female development is only commonly found in the Y-chromosome. It is quite rare, less than 1% of viable births, for that gene to cross over to the X-chromosome resulting in a natural born male with XX chromosomes or even more rare, a natural born female with XY chromosomes. Both cases are syndromes that cause infertility among other health complications.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:43 PM
17

Menslib is for issues that feminism allows men to complain about.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:05 PM
2

There was no evidence for the one victim he admitted to. Then when more stepped forward, some with evidence, they used his admission against him against the agreement.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 11:22 PM
5

To be fair, the Cosby case isn't because there's no evidence, but because they made the whole cases based on evidence they promised not to use, his admission, denying him his rights. If another victim were to come forth and provide evidence, AND they didn't use the evidence from the case he was aquitted of, he can still end up in jail.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:59 PM
3

I'm sure she only thinks this when women are the acussers and men the acused. If a man accused a woman of said violence, I bet she would demand that he prove it without a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:55 PM
7

Paranoia led by fear mongering. Men are victims of random acts of violence (untargeted mug/assault/murder/rape by a stranger) more than women are, yet when are the ones who always talk about being scared to walk alone at night. The reason? Fear mongering. We tell girls from a very young age that solely because they are girls, they will eventually be the target of such harassment.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 06:23 AM
3

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/25/upshot/the-problem-for-women-is-not-winning-its-deciding-to-run.html
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:54 PM
4

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/25/upshot/the-problem-for-women-is-not-winning-its-deciding-to-run.html
/r/MensRights21/09/21 09:53 PM
11

You are correct on this, but the big issue is that feminists across the world have resisted ending male only drafts and compulsory service. Maybe if it applied to women as well, they would stand with you to end it instead of going along the lines of "it doesn't disadvantage us so let's keep it."
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:56 PM
18

The ratio of women in office is the same as the ratio of women who run for office. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/25/upshot/the-problem-for-women-is-not-winning-its-deciding-to-run.html
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:52 PM
23

Didn't they also vote to keep forced conscription for men? When it's women's issues, men better not have an opinion, but when it's men's issues, everyone should get a vote!
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:45 PM
0

Agree to disagree. You're not changing my mind because female aupremacists also call themselves egalitarians while they think all men are actively oppressing them. This discourse of which group is right and which group is wrong is exactly what the oppressive elite class wants. They want us lower class people to continue fighting among ourselves, so that we don't recognize that they're the ones bleeding us dry and causing the most issues in our government in order to keep their power. Eta: Don't …
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:06 AM
1

This is why I prefer to label them in 3 groups Feminist: the rational equality wanter, even if they only fight for women's rights, they will at least acknowledge that men are also oppressed by our "patriarchal society," which is more of an oligarchy than a patriarchy but semantics. And they won't argue against men standing up for rights were men suffer injustices. I can tolerate and even befriend these types. Radfems: Radical Feminists who think that all men are oppressing all women and that men…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:06 AM
1

Not combined, but every individual in the 99%.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:28 PM
7

Others are claiming it Forbes Article from 2020 claiming he has $2.1 billion in wealth. Bloomberg article from this year claiming he's worth $2.3 billion in wealth. He claims $10 billion but I trust the other sources around $2 billion. And in 2016, those same sources I listed had him valued at $3.7 billion. If you want to further dispute this provide first party sources.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 01:25 PM
10

Yes. You take any American who isn't in the top 1% and he has more money than they do. He wealth is measured in billions. Hell, I'm sure he had more than the bottom 90% combined. And that's after losing billions when he became president. He lost more than half of his wealth in the past 5 years, yet he is still more wealthy than you and I will ever be.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 12:05 PM
27

Yes, but he still has more money than 99% of Americans. He is a buffoon, but you arguing he isn't a good example of apex fallacy puts you on his level of intelligence. ad hominem
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:52 AM
37

A kick in The nuts should be class A misdemeanor sexual assault. Cutting off part of a man's genitals without his consent should be a class B or class A felony for maiming.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:05 AM
7

If he was in a high position he should have some money.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:55 AM
17

And the most tragic part is, at least in America, we have no need for there to be homeless people. We don't have a deficit of empty dwellings, we never constantly had a deficit of empty jobs, except an extreme cases. We just have a deficit of caring about the fellow man.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:11 PM
16

Yes, contacting a lawyer would be a good idea OP. Just make sure you have it covered, and possibly see about filing a police report Incase she harasses you. I would definitely talk to a lawyer and possibly retain them if you can afford it.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:42 AM
28

The fun part about radfems is they absolutely refuse to acknowledge that the gender pay gap is caused by gender roles and isn't just "greedy men paying women less because they can." I brought up that giving men paid paternity leave (as well as women getting paid maternity leave) can help reduce the gender pay gap, and they argued that "anything that can help a man can never help womankind." (Actual quote I received.)
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:10 AM
4

If it was, I wouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:27 PM
1

And what I'm saying is it doesn't matter the type of sexual assault, sexual assault is still sexual assault, and should be treated with full severity and punishment regardless of terminology.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:04 PM
5

Ok, and how does Australian government data disprove/apply to America? The CDC is an American organization that reports what is reported to them. Australia is also known for downplaying abuse by women especially on males.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 09:58 PM
-5

Did you even go to my source? I linked the direct report from the CDC where they have a graph that shows SIDE BY SIDE that "1in5 women have reported being raped in there lifetime and 1in14 have reported being made to penetrate in their lifetime." ON THE SAME PICTURE. So tell me again how the CDC is doing this so they can ignore male victims?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 02:16 PM
26

They directly compare rape with made to penetrate... https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nisvs/2015NISVSdatabrief.html I don't know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 01:53 PM
141

The CDC doesn't really sugarcoat which is why I like them as a source for DV, IPV, and SV.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 09:36 AM
7

The thing is, menslib is the feminism approved men's rights subreddit. So basically, anything that they can blame on men. Oh, you think it's unfair to be drafted? That's because of men. Oh, you think women can rape you? Women can't rape you silly 😜 banned
/r/MensRights05/08/21 10:07 PM
7

I disagree. Male and Female refer to your biological sex, not your gender identity or gender expression. While your gender identity doesn't have to match your biological sex, it is important to acknowledge the distinction for medical reasons, as there are certain medical risks associated with each biology. For example, transwomen are infinitely more likely to get prostate cancer than ciswomen. The people who refer to one's gender identity as male or female as if we are a different species, are g…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:22 PM
12

No, Facebook and Twitter didn't start banning Trump Supporters until after the capital hill occupation riot, which happened long after the 2020 election. Conservatives have been saying that they have been censored even though they dominates Facebook and Twitter spaces up until that point. As far as the other claim, Joe Biden did vote to enact the Violence Against Women Act which was aimed to help reduce DV and SV against women, which in turn lead to a lot of sexist policies against men to be ena…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:21 AM
2

You're preaching to the choir bud. I'm aware of how safe nuclear is, or more specifically I'm aware of how much death big oil actually swipes under the rug. The issue is convincing the masses. As I've said Chernobyl cannot happen with a modern reactor, Three Mile Island cannot happen with a modern reactor, Fukushima probably can't happen at the modern reactor either (I'm not gonna say this a definite because I'm don't know for sure.) I'm saying there's going to be opposition, because the oil com…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:21 AM
3

It's green in a way that it doesn't create greenhouse gasses. But the issue with fission reactors isn't their waste, it's the chance of catastrophic failure caused by human stupidity/corporate corner cutting, which is why we will always have an opposition to going fully nuclear no matter how safe the reactors actually are. People will always point to Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima as examples of why nuclear is bad, even though the first two have had their issues designed to the poin…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:04 AM
1

I agree, it's a stopgap between fossils fuel powerplants and fully green energy.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:09 AM
4

Ah, but there another option that better than fossil fuels and will fill the gap.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:51 PM
27

1 3 5 6 7 aren't valid solutions. 1 should be rephrased to "stop burning fossil fuels." 3 should clarify how to be energy efficient. 5 the UK is smol compared to the rest of the world. If planting trees could save us, which it might, we would need to plant a Forrest the size of Spain or Germany as a whole. 6 while meat (which is gassy while alive) does make us gassy, and methane is a greenhouse gas; not everyone can afford to live a lifestyle without meat. 7 empowering women will not do anything…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:15 AM
4

I find it ironic that the mod locked it due to the "graceless generalization of women."
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:26 PM
0

I actually disagree because all love is conditional. It's just that love for women children and dogs usually have easier conditions to meet. How much would you love a woman if she kept cheating on you? Probably not, so a condition of your love is that she is faithful to you. There are plenty of examples of parents not loving their children, where they abuse them, or disown them for one reason or another.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:18 PM
1

That is the logo for Intermountain Health, which is a chain of hospitals in the state of Utah. As others have said, it's a maternity ward.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 02:26 PM
1

When I had a concussion, they told me to come back if my head pain gets worse or persists longer than 3 more days. They gave me 800mg Motrin, a pill for my nausea, and sent me home, and I was out of there in less than 2 hours, and had to take a drug test for workman's comp. Was told to only follow up if I still didn't feel well. Here is the thing, American Healthcare is EXPENSIVE AS FUCK. We don't know if they discussed whether or not it was worth going back to the doctor, he might have been aga…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 05:15 AM
1

I'm surprised she had no idea about what concussion meant and its effects. Didn't even bother looking up on the internet Some people aren't smart enough to put two and two together. I agree that she should've taken him to get medical help when she noticed the change in personality after he should've recovered from the misdiagnosed concussion. Didn't bother to let the doctor know what was the cause behind his concussion I'm sure they gave the true story. He fell down the stairs in an accident. It…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 05:27 PM
1

I actually agree with the top comment. The one that explained each step of it. Here's the thing, OP probably didn't put 2 and 2 together. She took him to the hospital, and the diagnosis was "just a concussion." It wasn't until a year later that the brain damage was found. Although to be completely fair, the sudden change in personality should have alarmed her to his condition, it shouldn't have taken a year, and a fainting spell, for them to explore this further. So while OP is mostly at fault h…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:37 PM
3

Another story about a female teacher "having sex" with minor students with the title not calling what it is: rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/21 11:46 AM
1

Man, I wish there was a legal free copy of this study I can read.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 11:00 AM
4

Yeah it looks deceptive because they do actually talk about some issues that men face in a way that it appears they want to correct them. But the big issue comes with certain things that would detriment women. For example they may talk about masculinity, and how it's not always toxic, but then when it comes to abuse from women that men face, they'll downplay it or outright say that you're lying about it and it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:28 PM
42

You would be correct. r/menslib is the "proper men's rights subreddit" run by feminists who don't want men to have equal rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:21 PM
10

in the US, a felony, violent or not, bars all citizens from voting This is state specific and most states give voting rights back after the full term (prison, parole and/or probation) has been served. Some states even give it back as soon as they're out of prison.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:19 AM
3

Checked the first post Women are disproportionately affected by COVID No they're not. Men die more. It's like they're parrotting Hillary Clinton when she claimed women are the primary victims of War.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 04:38 PM
2

No, he's just commenting how on the picture, there is no baby changing station.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 06:45 PM
12

He can only sue for defemation if he has actual damages. If he was fired, even if he is rehired he might lose his pension. His wife could've distrusted him, and possibly filed for divorce. The fact that a lawyer took this case means that somehow his life was affected by this accusation, so you could claim innocent until proven guilty all you want about her, but she isn't going to criminal court she's going to civil court, because he has actual damages. Keep in mind that unless he has proof that …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 01:50 AM
3

Hell, you go out and drink after work with coworkers sometime Honestly I haven't seen this a lot in the rest of America, it might be a Hawaiian thing that happened because of cultural mixing because I know in a couple Eastern Asian countries it's quite popular.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:29 PM
7

That's actually where I went to register to vote.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 04:01 PM
15

Although a little misleading. There is nothing as a direct punishment that says you can't vote, just that you may be charged with a crime if you don't and in a lot of states, criminals can't vote, but it isn't directly a punishment of not signing up for the draft. The reason why this myth came to be that it's one of the direct punishments, is that in ye olden days prior to this data superhighway we call the internet, you actually had to go to the post office to register to vote, and if you were …
/r/MensRights03/04/21 02:12 PM
0

I mean, it's probably a bot with stolen pics, but even if it wasn't, it's just as bad as sending an unsolicited dick pic.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/21 10:09 AM
1

No, there is an above the books solution. You have to stricten the entire working environment for everyone. Make everyone follow the letter of the rules. It's a very scorched earth policy though, as you would be burning good employees as well. It's only a "hostile work environment" if she can prove she's targeted.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 01:41 PM
2

Just do it in an above the books way.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 01:16 AM
1

The LGBT+ community really loves to.hate the other members of it. Biphobia, homophobia, and transphobia is rampant in the community. It kinda disgusts me.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:16 AM
14

Well it isn't directly for domestic violence, Victim Support, one of the charities the money is going to instead, is a charity that helps victims of any crime, and that should include domestic violence victims. Edit: I am a dummy.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 01:52 PM
61

Not only was she slandered, but people were saying that she was going to bomb public places. They were essentially calling her a terrorist in order to intimidate her to lose her ideologies.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 01:50 PM
15

Bringing women down instead of raising men up. No, they are raising men up, by donating to two charities that provide shelter for those escaping bad situations regardless of gender, instead of a charity that specifically only caters to women. Edit: I'm sure that they warned the biased charity to fix the issue before pulling the funding, but that won't be reported because "Money gets pulled unjustly from women's charity" is a better headline than "Money gets pulled from charity for failing to cea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/21 01:44 PM
1

I agree with you, which makes a woman being hired on actual merit that much less believable when they are actually qualified for the position. And it's usually not the coworkers or bosses questioning them, it's the customers they have to work directly with.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 05:38 PM
1

You know I think the main reason why all these TED talks are getting more down votes than up votes, is mainly because there are nine videos that probably cover maybe two or three actual topics. It's really funny how I don't really hear many feminists actually talking about one of the issues that is plaguing women in the workforce, (hint it's not the wage gap.) Women in higher technical positions have their competency doubted a lot more than men in the same position. This is mostly anecdotal thou…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 05:01 PM
30

In the US they are protected too, HOWEVER, judge and court prejudices still exist. Legally, the anti-discrimination laws we have don't specify specific status of the protected classes except for one: age discrimination, it only applies to those above 40.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:21 AM
0

I'm going to add on to this. She is a bit of an idealist when it comes to pushing for her bills. In the original text of the green new deal, if it passed unedited, it would've forced our country to enact all it's policies within a year, and the government would be too slow to enact the proper regulations that would've prevented the college tuition levels of inflation due to the government now paying for healthcare, housing, and education. While I do agree that all of those points we should work …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 09:36 AM
2

You do realize that "Sexual victimization by inmates" means that women are preying on other women since you don't mix genders in the prison system. Yes, I have not been talking about perpetrators, only the victims. If we talk about perps, then even the 2010 study where "Made to Penetrate" added says that men assaulted men more than women assaulted men. I have read the full document, and was pointing to figure one because it directly compared sexual assault in prison as a percentage for both men …
/r/MensRights06/02/21 01:48 PM
2

That doesn't dwarf the victimization scales. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/#!po=2.38095 If you scroll down to figure 1, you can see women in prison are victimized at a higher rate than men, but our prison populations aren't large enough to make a large dip in the overall population. This is also in the US and the teacher in the UK so... Might be a moot point anyway.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 11:53 AM
39

I mean if he had proof of studies that sex crimes against men dwarf those against women, he might have a case, but the studies I've read say that men and women are raped/assaulted at similar rates. (Although that number may be wrong as well because all sex crimes are underreported.) The problem, and why it's a huge Men's Rights issue, is that our society just doesn't believe men can be victims of such a crime.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 11:04 AM
56

He meant men under the age of 21. Because you could fight for your country at 18, but you couldn't vote until 21. That's how it was for WWI, in the US at least.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 04:24 PM
101

I think she summed it up quite nicely at the end. Men are facing these issues. What about women? We do talk about women, but can we talk about men?
/r/MensRights27/01/21 04:23 PM
4

I would be happy to oblige. First, most of us want it acknowledged that men can be victims of violence and women can be perpetrators of said violence; whether it be domestic violence, actual assault, or sexual violence. We also don't want to be victim blamed when we come forward. How can a man be a victim of domestic abuse, he's stronger than his wife/partner. If he really didn't want to have sex, he would have physically removed her off of him. Stuff like that is victim blaming. Along with this…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 07:23 PM
5

Thank you for being level-headed and open-minded, and I'm sorry about the amount of abuse both you and your partner have gotten for you posting a very valid point and opinion. Because you are correct, People training other people as human beings regardless of their gender should be the standard not something to celebrate. One of the issues with the men's right movement is that we do have misogynists in it. And I'm not going to claim that they are not proper men's rights advocates, because I don'…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 10:20 AM
2

In a house animals obviously live in. SHE EVEN POURED GLITTER DIRECTLY INTO THE CAT'S WATER BOWL.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 02:24 PM
3

She didn't even do it to her ex-boyfriend's house, she did it to his brother's house. A mutual friend confirmed it wasn't even get ex's house. She trashed a house for no reason. ALSO: The mutual has stated that she had also cheated on him, AND showed a pic of her mugshot when she was arrested in July of last year. This may be a "harmless" way to have revenge, but she is a trash person. Edit 2: there have been multiple mutuals who have confirmed this. They also confirmed that THE CAT WAS HOME.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 01:54 PM
9

I love how it directly states that the Department of Education was threatening to enforce Title IX guidelines when it was women who were the primary people behind, but now that it's men, they're suddenly unenforceable guidelines. At least that's how I interpreted this specific paragraph: Much of the material is not new to people who follow Title IX complaints and resolutions, and the document explicitly tells institutions that it does not have “the force and effect of law” and is “not meant to b…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:28 AM
67

We still find him guilty because otherwise we would have to admit we are wrong, however we are being forced to pay him, and withdraw all punishment we have deemed to inflict upon him. Did I miss anything?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 03:59 AM
55

I'll say it like it is. They want men to understand that women have standards based on looks and that men may not meet those standards, but if men who do meet those standards have standards based on looks, they're misogynistic and in the wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/20 04:08 AM
10

I have to disagree with this one, it screams to me like annoying little brother wanting to play this game, an older sister not wanting to but being forced to by parents. Could also be what was supposed to be a prank that he overreacted to.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 01:07 PM
12

To top it off, when it comes to life expectancy, they considered it inequality if the gap is shorter than the world gap, so if men only live one year less than women, that's patriarchy and oppression for women.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 01:39 PM
6

Victim Blaming. Blatant.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 03:57 AM
-2

Tictoc is 10 times longer than Vine
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 07:43 PM
20

Saying that you are fine after your circumcision and using it as an excuse to continue the mass mutilation of neonatal genitals invalidates all of the infants who have died due to complications surrounding theirs. I'm not against circumcision as a whole, just the regular circumcision of infants.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:23 PM
14

Not to mention the link in normal circumcisions to SIDS.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:10 PM
22

Survivor bias. Circumcisions have been linked to baby boys dying of SIDS. It's like saying that you rode in the back of a pickup truck and survived.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:09 PM
6

I mean, yeah, HR can't fire you for the sexual harrassment/sexual assault alligation, but you just allowed them to fire you for breaking their personal recording device policy. It's really a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 09:11 AM
16

They make actual bodycams that are A: more subtle and B: last longer battery wise. The problem is most jobs have policies against having personal recording devices while at work.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 06:19 AM
5

He's still alive. So aggravated assault and attempted murder.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 01:09 PM
6

"A new gender inequality study found that women are more oppressed in 43 countries." Hard stop there, don't mention men at all, or total number of countries.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:10 PM
31

I've had a woman psy who actually victim blamed me when I opened up I was sexually assaulted by a woman.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:03 PM
1

No.... 2 states don't remove the right to vote for felonies at all, 14 states and DC give it back automatically when the felon is not in prison, 3 allow felons to vote on probation but not parole. Delaware allows felons serving time in Jail to vote, but not those in prison, on parole, or probation. In fact there are only 2 states that don't give the right to vote back automatically and you have to petition the government for it.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 03:02 AM
5

You did assault her by your own accord. Moving forward, when she moves out, make sure that she didn't take anything out yours or destroy anything. She did damage the property though, hold her accountable for that, and that alone.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 01:50 PM
6

the fact it was 4 other dudes slows how lonely she was This argument is what pisses me off. A) it was drunken party sex, it's not like she was in a relationship with five guys at once over the course of several months. B) Even if it was relationship with five guy at once over several months, if you're lonely or polyamorous, you should leave the person you're supposedly dating, or be open about your polyamory and accept your consequences.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 04:55 PM
1

The selective service is the official name of the draft. Every male whose a US Citizen or an immigrant has to sign up for it if they are between the ages of 18 and 25. There are some consequences for not signing up for the draft, but losing the right to vote isn't specifically one of them.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:21 PM
54

I don't think she makes judgements larger than the pool. I saw one episode where she wanted to hold the defendant accountable for destroying a vehicle, but even after the bluebook value was determined the plaintiff only got like 5k
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:44 AM
9

As someone who was molested around her age by a family member, my parents' wrath is what they used to keep me quiet. So the fear of parental anger is a true thing that might make her claim it was a joke. I'm just saying I'm going to need more evidence to be convinced that this was a false accusation. Regardless, what they did to the man was still unjustified and they should go to jail for murder because they denied him due process.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 01:34 PM
5

Age of consent in california is 18. Even if there's an exception due to age gap, I doubt it's as long as 30 years, which is the difference in age between them. This is clear cut statutory rape.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:59 PM
-13

My but was referring to the confusion about the rape. Considering they left him alive and he died due to his injuries, it seems they had the intent to make him feel for his crimes than intent to kill him, sodomizing him with a pipe makes more sense than alternative way they could've raped him.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:54 PM
-19

Not sure if this is a false accusation as it was a little kid, and the Russian police are, less reputable than the US police, so unless they found the teen or adult that put the kid up to lying, I doubt that it was a lie. It's possible the little girl saw the rage cause by telling her parents and thought it wasn't as big of a deal than it was (or that it was her fault they were mad.) What they probably need to do is get a child psychologist to talk to her about it to get to the bottom of whether…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:34 PM
12

Considering it said "with the same pipe" I think they translated it wrong and that he was sodomized instead of raped. Still a sexual crime, but...
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:23 PM
311

She was an accomplice. And she's facing 20 years.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:17 PM
72

I think they're talking about Duneava, the mother of the 3 year old.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:16 PM
45

Erase half the skirt on both figures. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:26 AM
170

She disobeyed her own sexist rule by bringing her son in.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:25 AM
2

I'm well aware the offices probably don't care, I'm offering the advice so that if she tries to claim he isn't spending it on the kiddos, or that the kiddos don't cost that much, he can claim otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 02:34 PM
5

Yes, but they may just send an envelope full of cash which is a no go. Honestly checks would be easier for both parties.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 11:00 AM
10

I don't disagree. But people can be persistent.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:46 AM
134

Gonna tag OP in this reply so the see this. u/clearagony Don't let her fall behind on the Child support. Find what laws there are for that and file complaints appropriately. You could ask your attorney about this, they should know better. I don't care if you actually need the money or not. If you don't, good, to the college fund. Allowing her to not pay will establish a precedent that it's unimportant to you, and can be used as evidence against you when she eventually appeals to have the child s…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:27 AM
25

Ok, both teens. Then yes, this is a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 04:51 PM
26

No offense in asking, but how old was the girl in the second one?
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:20 PM
1

I'm aware this is in the UK. If this were in the US I would check with a larger to see if it's a title IX violation. Title IX works both ways.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:30 PM
4

And would be encouraged to by the restaurant/bar they're at.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 04:58 PM
8

I'm sorry that happens to you, I was molested as well and it's rough.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/20 03:10 AM
5

Regardless if you feel it should be called sexual assault, it is. Please at least call it harassment.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 03:57 PM
2

Common gaslighting behavior. "I'm not doing X, you are!"
/r/MensRights21/08/20 03:28 AM
4

I did. Read the title.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:58 AM
3

You might have another growth spurt. It's possible.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:59 AM
6

That's awesome. I'm a big fan and have been since around part 60.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 06:28 AM
4

Whoa, is that really you?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 06:26 AM
2

Reminds me of one of my favorite Winston Churchill quotes. He would probably be labeled worse than Trump by feminists if he were around and practicing politics today. Probably would've had some successful sexual harassment cases against him as well, but he took no shit. The quote is as follows, when accused of being disgustingly drunk by a woman, he replied "and you are ugly, but when I awake in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly."
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:21 AM
18

Why is it acceptable to label someone who is the literal average height in America for men "short"?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 02:18 AM
4

So, in your opinion, should a rapist be forced to get an abortion if she probably raped a man?
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:01 AM
1

This isn't really false by the letter of the law though. The judges made their verdict on the case not because she couldn't consent, but because they realised he couldn't either.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:23 AM
2

The issue it's she wants someone perfect, and had been told her entire life never to settle for less. A perfect man, a perfect woman, a perfect partner, a perfect human, these just don't exist.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:15 AM
128

Not only that, but even if the father is 12, as soon as he turns 18 he can be on the hook for 6 years of back child support. It's funny when feminists complain that women have less rights than men in America
/r/MensRights13/08/20 11:57 AM
18

I feel it's more of like, when men say there argument, it's sexist, but when a woman says it, it magically makes sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 02:53 AM
1

If you want further proof, what happened to that girl who said that she was the mother of Justin Bieber's child?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:57 AM
2

The issue is he's against a rich woman.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:55 AM
3

I disagree with getting rid of a jury for convictions, but I can get behind having a panel of judges for sentencing. Having it as someone's specific job to determine whether someone is guilty or not is a rocky road, even if you have a panel decide this. We already have a problem with false convictions in our country, we don't need to open the door to more. Phoenix Wright is fictional for a reason.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 09:02 AM
3

So what I'm hearing is that we need to reform our justice system that allows the judges to overrule the minimum sentence for a crime.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:38 AM
3

No I'm talking about stuff like what happened with Brock Turner, he was convicted and suggested to have a 2-5 year sentence. The judge overruled that and gave him a 6-month sentence.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:25 AM
6

Oh I was never talking about getting better lawyers and expert witnesses and stuff like that. I'm talking about actual convictions getting off with less time because someone is rich. Realistically this will never be solved, but if we were able to somehow get rid of lobbying, then there might be a chance.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:15 AM
6

I don't disagree, I'm just saying our justice system in the US needs a major reform to fix both issues.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 07:21 AM
4

This happened to an ex co-worker of mine. She had to quit so she could make the court dates, my boss can be a dick sometimes.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 02:42 AM
27

The system favors women and the rich. I can name two cases of men who were convicted of sexual crimes and got less than a year because they or their family had money. This is not to undermine mensrights. This is just stating a fact. I can probably find dozens of women who've committed sexual crimes and didn't get a day in jail, but to say it only favors them would be a lie.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 02:39 AM
0

Keep in mind since she also said it was above the knee and had a 5.5 inch, she is also height shaming shot men.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 08:28 PM
11

More like "Women are more virtuous than men because they can afford to take jobs that don't pay them."
/r/MensRights24/07/20 10:44 AM
3

I haven't but I'm not commenting in their bubble since I don't want r/mensrights banned for brigading.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 05:28 AM
5

Right? Men are actually more likely to get breast cancer than have that issue, and men only make up 0.1% of breast cancer patients.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 04:49 AM
5

Get a lawyer and DNA test now.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 03:45 AM
0

It is never just one relatively minor act that causes the level of psychological issues in a pet. I have never claimed it was. The only thing I have claimed about the throw is that it could be damaging to the cats mind. It wants some love from the owner and they literally throw it away.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 03:06 AM
-2

It's only what we see on camera. Imagine what she does off camera when her cat slightly annoys her. It just shows a pattern of abusive behavior is all, which can lead to a cat being more timid, like my mom's cat, or a cat being more aggressive to the point they will attack human strangers.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 02:52 AM
2

It's not the act of them falling that's the issue, it's the throwing. Just because they are physically fine doesn't mean they are mentally. I used to abuse my parents cats when I was a little brat (I was 6 and the behaviors were taught,) and they never grew out of their distrust for humans. One of the cats only trusts my mom now.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 02:44 AM
38

"interest of the child" trumps paternity.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 06:11 PM
3

Every state can restore your right to vote when you sentence is served, 2 of them never restrict your right to vote, 38 restore it automatically, and the remaining 10 have special laws considering felons. There is no universal law concerning a felon's right to vote. Edit: corrected myself.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:31 AM
11

Good post, but I have to correct one thing. In the US at least, not being able to vote is not one of the punishments of refusing to sign up for the selective service. The full list of punishments can be found here, here and here. The second link provided lists that you may lose certain benefits, but doesn't expand upon it, the first link states what those benefits are, and nowhere does it state you cannot vote in federal elections.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 12:44 PM
3

It's becoming more and more common for women to be charged of sex crimes they've committed. It's a good thing.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:36 PM
9

Montana code doesn't have "Rape" in it. She got convicted of the equivalent: "Sexual Intercourse Without Consent," 20 years in a psychiatric ward, and is now a tier two sex offender. Edited to add the sauce Also, as the article states, she wasn't originally charged with it, but the charges were added after the fact.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 06:02 AM
2

I think OP was referring to her friends which are probably hanging up on the poor husband
/r/MensRights18/06/20 08:20 AM
2

Oh, no worries. Honestly .3 % isn't that big. I was providing a bit more context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/20 12:55 PM
7

I would add that of the 9.7% of people, 6.47% (two thirds) have been accused of child abuse while the remaining 3.23% (one third) were accused of either domestic abuse or sexual abuse. Also, in the full results, it said men were victims 76.9% of the time bringing the number closer to 14.9% This is from the same source located in the original post.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 03:01 AM
97

Don't post this there though, it's a repost.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/20 02:41 AM
1

Buh bye troll.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 09:01 AM
1

No, you're a troll. You believe that basic human rights is a western construct. It's not. CHINA IS ON THE UN BOARD FOR HUMAN RIGHTS for Josh's sake.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:57 AM
0

Yeah, you're a troll. I'm done talking to you.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:53 AM
1

Are you suggesting that basic human rights, such as not being raped or sexually assaulted, shouldn't be universally applied to the entire world? Rape isn't only illegal in western societies, it's also illegal in most of Asia and Africa as well. Also, you asked a fucking question They answered your fucking question, why are you upset that they answered your question?
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:13 AM
-1

Considering we don't know the rate of false convictions based on race, comparing it to the criminal population wouldn't make sense.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:41 AM
1

True, but you asked. Her death is what they were actively protesting in Louisville
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:26 AM
-2

You asked if a society has legalized rape, he provided one where it's a grey area, you immediately jumped into making it about race.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:16 AM
4

32% of police brutality killings in America are black. Only 13.4% of the population is black. 52% of the killings are white, but white people make up 76% of the population. While no one is crying that by raw numbers white people are killed more, black people are killed in higher numbers compared to population. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080222/
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:05 AM
1

March. A woman was shot by the cops in March.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:01 AM
3

Huh, I thought the homeless population was higher.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:29 AM
3

So those are the minimums, but she could be making more.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:25 AM
20

Troll account. Satire is at least funny.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:46 AM
5

That is true as well. The mods on this sub aren't very active. There was a solid amount of time recently you couldn't tell this from r/pussypass
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 03:02 AM
8

Bringing up politics in general can cause that, especially on reddit, and both sides of the political will devolve into vitriol fairly rapidly and effortlessly on any sub that isn't truly leaning one way or another.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 02:57 AM
14

In all reality, most of the "manosphere" on reddit seems right leaning because feminism is seen as left leaning and being the antithesis to feminism "automatically makes you right wing." In reality, we're more diverse than that, but seem right wing compared to the feminists that are so far left they're basically authoritarian.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 02:46 AM
5

I think I know the message the director wanted to send with the HR scene. They implied that because the boss is sleeping with their assistant, they are using the power to force her into a relationship and the boss is raping her. This isn't the case of course, but that's what the director wanted to imply, and then show that men don't care when other men are raping women. The fact of the matter is, some women sleep their way up the ladder. It may not be as common now, but it was common enough it b…
/r/MensRights20/05/20 11:49 AM
1

If a person takes their spouse's last name, it becomes their family name. Family name is specifically the name that denotes your family. A maiden name, denotes what family you were born into. If a man gives up their family name when they get married, their old family name becomes their maiden name. Maiden was not a gendered term. Ships go on their maiden voyage. Maiden used to mean original, but until maiden names existed, it had nothing to do with unmarried women.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 10:19 AM
3

I'm circumcised and I don't use lotion.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:54 AM
2

It may seem embarrassing to talk to a doctor, but the sooner you do the better. I recently had an embarrassing medical thing, but doctors are trained professionals. Talk to your general practitioner, and if they recommend a specialist, talk to them. They may have you drop trou and it may be embarrassing, but when they help you, you will be much better.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:47 AM
5

That is actually surprising that a MSM source didn't name a male victim AND named a female perp. I would say it's possible because they see the homosexuals as the "more oppressed party" in this crime, but still surprising none the less.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:39 AM
3

Doesn't mean it isn't both.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:36 AM
10

Oh yeah, back in the 60s there was a victim of a botched infant circumcision where the parents decided just to have him turned into a girl and raised him as a girl. When the truth came out he transitioned back to a man before ultimately committing suicide. Edit: his name was David Reimer. Also, I want to make it clear, I'm not against trans individuals out there who truly have gender dysphoria. But to allow (or force) someone under 18 to transition is child abuse. My mind will not change on this…
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:13 AM
1

The "one party" being recorded that is consenting is the person recording it, as in, the person consenting being recorded must be present. Also keep in mind that this is usually irrelevant when you are in a public space.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 02:54 AM
4

They won't. "She's trying her hardest" they'll say. "It's a very stressful job" they'll say. "Women are still better leaders" they'll say.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:04 AM
3

No worries, you have valid points.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:48 AM
7

I mean real men's issues, but my speech detection must've skipped the issues part. I fixed it.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:46 AM
17

At least she is calling what it is. Mutilation.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:48 AM
21

Menslib is what feminism sees as "the appropriate way to talk about men's issues." It's not a sub for actual men's issues, just feminists, and what they believe are our issues. Edit: corrected it.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 02:46 AM
1

Nice way to objectify men there. He's not his mother's possession! /s Honestly I never got the reason feminists got upset about women being called someone's daughter/sister/wife/mother. It's just stating who they're survived by, of they die.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 10:43 AM
3

I agree. It should allow estate holders to sue those slandering the dead. That way, we don't have people slandering celebrities more than a decade after they've died and almost two decades since they've been acquitted of charges against them.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 10:33 AM
2

We're just waiting for Heard to eventually go to jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 01:17 PM
1

I like how everyone is treating this as she turned lesbian. Does anyone have any proof of that? Her husband was the one who filed, but they were separated before that.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 02:43 AM
22

Or, more accurately, they don't actually track attempts, but intentional self harm, and any intentional self harm is treated as an attempt. Edit: sauce under the subject suicide attempts: In the U.S., no complete count of suicide attempt data are available. The CDC gathers data from hospitals on non-fatal injuries from self-harm as well as survey data.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:01 AM
5

Probably, just like the MeToo Movement was used as a political tool for the left. I'm all for due process for Biden, but considering how they reacted when Kavanaugh was accused vs Biden makes it clear on their actual opinion of the movement.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 04:04 PM
3

Especially infants less than 2 weeks old.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 12:27 PM
2

I would really love to find out what happens about this appeal. If it gets shot down, that's a federal legal precedent that makes it illegal not to cross-examine an accuser in a Title IX case
/r/MensRights30/04/20 02:58 AM
0

Because you're acting like one by arguing every point to make it seem like it's a larger issue than it is?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:59 PM
0

Wait so you're saying that the biggest causings of the earnings gap is because women choose to have less work after familial changes, a statistic that has been steadily lowering since the feminist movement in the '70s? The main thing is it isn't a employer based issue like feminists want us to believe. Women are not being paid less for the same experience same job. It's a societal issue as a whole. Men are still expected to be the breadwinners of the houses, women do not want to be dating men wh…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:54 PM
1

But you're giving a different percentage because of this, even though most sources for the earnings gap use median, making it seem bigger than it actually is. It's misleading. I don't think we should be using the mean because the outliers, the 1%, aren't exactly a good example of gender differences, considering that most people who are in the top 1% either inherited it, or were in the right business at the right time. Considering that most college students are women, and most degrees are being e…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:35 PM
2

Then explain to me why you insist on using mean income when every other economic analyst uses median income?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:20 PM
3

Well they were being sued for wage inequity. After this came out though they changed the goal posts, and so the Google was hiring women at lower levels than men, for similar work experience. I believe Google analyzed this and found this to be false, but I'm not too sure off the top my head
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:07 PM
4

No, by your own sources, it's 80% You used Mean income instead of Median income, while every other source focuses on median income. The difference is that the Mean income puts heavy emphasis on the top earners and it doesn't really reflect what is average. I'll give a small scale example. Say you have 10 workers, one of which is a CEO. They are paid, from smallest to largest, 20,000; 30,000; 30,000; 40,000; 40,000; 40,000; 50,000; 50,000; 80,000 and 2,500,000. The mean income between these worke…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:06 PM
6

It's between 200-300. Not a joke.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:49 PM
6

Funny thing is, when they called for Google to find out if they were paying women less, they found out they were paying women me, and gave the men a raise.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:44 PM
8

It depends on whether or not there are multiple toilets in the room. If there's only one, it might be a law to do this where you are.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:25 AM
1

That's not why, it's more suited for r/iamatotalpieceofshit ETA: https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/g5w496/im_so_sorry_that_male_suicide_seems_selfish_to_you/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:16 PM
1

I love how they blame millenials when it's the Zoomers who made the meme blow up.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 01:18 PM
8

Another, more recent, post to prove that this is true. A father asks if he is an asshole because he wants to withdraw child support after his kids are 18 and the mother is calling him one because she needs the money for a mortgage payment. Note that most of the verdicts say NTA but all of the top rated ones say YTA, showing that while they aren't directly judging, they are actively silencing the NTA votes while promoting the YTA votes.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:45 PM
26

I'm gonna need a source for that.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:38 PM
1

I hope the video takes a more normal stance on men's rights than that description reads.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:55 PM
1

They did remove the validation post rule and now have a new sub that filters the tough decisions so they're more accessible.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:42 PM
5

Exactly. Essentially the people needing a mediation are under contract to agree to abide by what Judge Judy rules. It's not like the loser actually loses any money either, as they're both paid to be on the show.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:32 PM
5

I think Megan Kelly nails it in the head at the end the issue with the MeToo movement.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:08 PM
3

Right, but she's an arbitrator, not a civil court judge. there's a bit of a difference.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:06 PM
29

But she's more qualified on this specific matter than most family judges because she has been the judge for 20,000 family cases before retiring as a judge and becoming an arbitrator for this TV show.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:01 PM
1

Probably this comment
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:10 AM
4

I believe you replied to the wrong parent comment. I do agree with the anti violence rules though.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 08:55 AM
1

They have to prove it was intentional. But recklass endangerment, reckless driving, this might also be classified as a hit and run since she technically left the scene of the accident before returning. But if the legal system does anything, it probably will just be a license suspension.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/20 02:45 AM
5

They're not. Also, they started holding meetings in saunas, even though the previous PM said it was too informal.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:29 PM
11

So I disagree with that sub, but that top comment is hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:42 PM
1

Ironic that this is popping up after a study had shown that women are more likely to fall asleep before men after PiV.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:54 AM
1

Oh, I completely agree. It's like when our day isn't taken seriously because "every day is men's day." No it's not.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:39 PM
2

The whole, "we need our own space" "well do so we" "every space is your space" argument.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:17 PM
1

Ah, like Titania
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:06 PM
6

Or Donald Trump or Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:02 PM
1

This doesn't mean she isn't sarcastic about it. This is a prime example of Poe's Law here.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:00 PM
17

I'm trying to figure out what menslib it. Is it "feminists for men's rights"? That's what it seems like. They have had a few posts about some of the injustices that more sane feminists can't argue (suicide rate, workplace mortality rate, etc.) But I notice they censor anything that involves female perpetrated violence.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:15 AM
8

Well, the article was written as if the police have already decided to pursue it, but they haven't.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 06:13 AM
6

Maximum penalities usually are way what gets sentenced unless you broke bribe the judge or are a woman. Edit: Holy shit I was drunk when I wrote this.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:19 PM
1

But there is no voting restrictions. It's a misconception.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 01:43 AM
16

Men don't have to register for the draft in order to vote. https://www.sss.gov/register/benefits-and-repercussions/ It's a felony not to, but Virginia is the only state that doesn't allow ex-felons the right to vote after their sentence is complete.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 07:26 AM
2

I'm not saying it is, I was only validating the post.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:40 PM
5

The tweet is real, it's in her chain claiming the bill is 1119 pages long. Rachel was tweeting about the draft. The final bill is 1404 pages long. The bill is called the "Take Responsibility for Workers and Families Act" which this is a PDF from house.gov (Google links directly to the PDF.) The page in the screen shot is similar to page 761 and isn't doctored in the tweet or in this post, just the of the draft of the bill. Edit: the first bill I found was a draft of the bill. HOWEVER I found it …
/r/MensRights24/03/20 06:20 AM
5

My favorite comment is the one saying that the needs of the child come before the needs of the parent when talking about him excluding himself from the child, and it was downvoted.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 08:22 PM
14

Well, you won't have abs with diet alone. You do need to exercise them, but yeah, obtaining the 12% body fat to have them constantly is a diet thing.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:46 PM
1

Yay Utah, though I doubt she will see jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/20 02:16 PM
1

Don't it's the sun in general but a feminist way cry.. Essentially got shared in the feminist groups and they hiveminded it so it would be their outcome.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:39 PM
58

It's called a dependippopotamus. It's an actual military slang for a spouse (dependent) who does nothing but lay/sit around all day eating. Since military get paid extra money to feed their family and pay their rent, they don't have to work to help with family resources. Dependippopotamuses are usually female since most service members are male, and most female service members husbands don't like idle hands. So only about a quarter the ratio making up maybe 5% of them are male. Be lucky if you h…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 01:43 AM
1

Why should I respond to someone who defined what a vocal minority is, then gave a few cherry picked examples of anti-male sentiment within the feminist movement, completely missing the entire point of my comment addressing that this "us vs them" mentality is toxic on both sides. Edit: really, you're going to result to petty name calling but too coward to leave the comment up?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:58 PM
-10

Most feminism is about raising awareness of disadvantages women face and moving for society to right them. It's just the vocal minority that it's anti men. Similar to how there Men's Rights movement is about raising awareness of disadvantages men face and moving for society to correct them. It's the "Us vs Them" mentality that is toxic, both from OP and the Twitter Account comment. Not Mark though, Marky Mark has his head on straight.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:02 PM
0

There was a really delete happy mod on that thread. Anything remotely related to talking about international men's day got removed by them.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:31 PM
0

I disagree. We don't need the sun to be up that late.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:29 PM
0

As well as show hated to cishets.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/20 06:45 AM
2

Puberty talks were separate in my elementary school, but in Jr. High and High School they didn't separate us for sex ed. Unfortunately they didn't talk much about the action itself because I'm in an "Abstinence education" state.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 03:25 AM
-2

Only if they do it through threatening their life or statutory rape. Even then they don't receive nearly the same punishment.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:36 AM
5

Ditto
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:34 AM
1

I thought we were quarantined from r/all for being a hate subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:10 AM
4

I disagree about this being white knighting. The Men's Rights Movement isn't about women suffering the same disadvantages as men. It's about spreading awareness of the disadvantages men face that society largely ignores because we're men, and working towards righting them. Just like how most feminists will argue that is exactly what feminism is but for women. The issue is that both groups have vocal minorities that make it seem like both movements have an "us vs them" mentality to them and this …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:10 AM
18

Also r/floridaman
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/20 03:04 AM
1

I get that this is an echo of the same argument women use when discussing male privilege, a "/s" was really needed for this comment.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:32 AM
1

Does the woman who sexually assaulted me count?
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:33 PM
2

False accusations / Due Process Female on male violence including sexual violence Medical research into things that affect more men than women. Child Custody / family and divorce court. Circumcision: Lack of bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:29 PM
2

So Northern Ireland isn't a proper country is what you're saying?
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:36 PM
1

They are a country that still resides in the great British Isles.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:35 PM
1

I don't get the reference...
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:28 PM
2

There are 5 countries in the Great British Isles. Ireland, Northern Ireland, Whales, Scotland and England.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:07 PM
5

Just go to Ireland. (Or is it Scotland) one of those British countries, there are plenty of redheads there.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:48 AM
2

I think he was referring to the 10x more cases which isn't true, 1 in 8 women will get breast cancer vs 1 in 7 men will get prostate cancer. A bit more, and more men due from prostate cancer than women from breast cancer, but it isn't 10 fold like OP claimed.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:56 PM
10

While you have a point that it happens, there isn't a concrete statistic of how often it happens. To try to explain it as a leading cause for "the wage gap" would be wrong. In reality, the "gap" is primarily there for 3 reasons; average hours worked, age, and marital/dependant status. Younger women actually out earn younger men on an hourly basis, but men out earn women because they work longer hours. Also the more time you spend at work the more you get raises and the more you get paid hourly. …
/r/MensRights24/02/20 10:41 AM
2

Haha that guy who just Renee erased the genders in any hate comment is hilarious. That entire community belongs on r/selfawarewolves Edit: might help if I spell it correct.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:40 AM
2

I'm sorry, but a can't trust a source that only reports one specific crime. They are obviously biased. That source also doesn't report where they get there information. "If you look for the light, you will often find it, but if you look for the dark, it's all you will ever see."
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:30 AM
1

The article never actually sources that. Anyone can claim anything, but without proof to back it up, it's worked.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:11 AM
2

Where are you getting 61% the article sources 38%. They have no proof of the 61% claim.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:08 AM
0

Staggering yes, but less so when you use the raw numbers. 79 vs 16 doesn't have the same ring as 38% vs 4%. It may not "gloss over" the statistic, but they sure are misleading it.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:45 AM
3

I wrote this as a reply that got buried, so I thought I would post it as a top comment as well because some people might like raw data vis misleading percentages. Just here to point out their graph doesn't prove the article wrong, however it is extremely misleading. I will be simplifying "partner or ex partner" to "SO" for the sake of not typing that phrase over and over again. The article is focusing on women who died at the hands of their SO. It shows that 208 women were killed total between a…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:32 AM
1

No, both the title and the graph state that it's deals with partners and ex partners. I was the one who simplified. For that, I am sorry I confused you.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:29 AM
1

No, sorry, the graph does state "partner or ex partner" I simplified it to SO.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:24 AM
3

Not the same guy. Just here to point out their graph doesn't prove the article wrong, however it is extremely misleading. I will be simplifying "partner or ex partner" to "SO" for the sake of not typing that phrase over and over again. The article is focusing on women who died at the hands of their SO. It shows that 208 women were killed total between all different lines of suspects last year; 38% of which, or about 79 women total, were killed by their SO, who they suspect are male. They compare…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:20 AM
4

r/suspiciouslyspecific
/r/MensRights12/02/20 04:05 AM
12

I'm willing to bet that if the genders were reversed he would've gotten 2nd degree murder minimum, instead she gets a relative slap in the wrists then complained that it hurt. What's more is a guarantee you, that there are feminists calling for her immediate release.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 07:39 AM
21

Or even r/mensrights
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/20 07:32 AM
13

You're partially correct. Essentially they are implying that women's unrealistic beauty standards come from men, and use it as a (one of their) rallying cry to get women to stand up against the (women centric) patriarchy that's oppressing them. Essentially it's a men's rights issue because they're incorrectly assigning blame on men, instead of actually trying to change it through other means. They're blaming us when it's not our fault.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:14 AM
8

Agreed. She's quite pretty, too bad she has the stupid.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:09 AM
12

I find it ironic that you call us blind yet you don't see her over the ear headphones she's wearing.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:29 PM
1

Only because consent is only honored if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:59 AM
1

Regret should not be a reason to withdraw consent. If you consented to completion, then regret doing it, just love with it.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 11:59 PM
11

That women needs to be charged with witness tampering. Also, its bullshit that Cindy withdrew her consent after she found out other women were accusing him. WTF!
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:20 PM
7

If this was AITA then the verdict would be a hard ESH.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 12:09 PM
26

They hide it behind an ad, wtf.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:42 AM
15

Semi serious question. Why do you even come here?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:04 PM
31

Thank you for saying it. For those of you who are unaware, the Apex Fallacy is essentially assuming that since a few people in a demographic are powerful, that means everyone in that demographic is powerful. In this case, white people.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:56 PM
7

That's not Mr. Wright...
/r/MensRights02/01/20 12:07 PM
4

It's specifically the toxic side of Feminism, the same side that say that men consent simply by producing sperm.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 11:38 PM
22

Isn't this technically involuntary pornography?
/r/MensRights25/12/19 02:05 AM
7

I'm in favor of all of those. Are you aware that 40% of men who identified as victims of sexual violence reported women being those that sexually assaulted them. Male victims of rape are even more severely underreported because they think no one will take them seriously. Sauce Edit: looking through your post history, you're a troll who comes here to stir up outrage.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:59 AM
1

I'm not saying they won't milk it, but when a ween system is in effect, they might get remarried and end it early.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 03:15 AM
1

That's why I said if.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:23 PM
6

Well, the idea of alimony is so people aren't left in the cold is they didn't have a job prior to the divorce. It's so they can build up the experience necessary to make enough money to live off of. Most of the stay at home individuals are women, which is why I say women in my original comments. I do believe if a man is a stay at home dad and gets divorced, she needs to pay him alimony. However, if they were both employed and making within 20% of each other, I feel no alimony should be needed.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:00 PM
6

Eh, I disagree, 5 years allows a woman to get situated again, and become independent. However if she remarries, it should stop the moment she remarries, as she had someone else to support her.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:54 PM
54

I agree that it should be temporary and Max 5 years. It should also be a ween thing as well. 100% the first year, and then the next 4 years drop it by 20% of the total so that she doesn't suddenly lose that huge lot of income. This will also allow her to ween off of her lifestyle as well.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:39 AM
1

So you're saying it's fine if a 25 year old has sex with a 15 year old then?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/19 06:45 AM
1

You do realize I'm talking about scenarios where there is a significant difference in age. At least 3+ years when it comes to the later years of childhood.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/19 06:44 AM
1

I mean I also said I said it is just is severe (for someone who has a significant difference in age to have sex with someone under 16), not that blanket punishments should be given. HOWEVER child sexual abuse shouldn't have the gender of perpetrator nor gender of child differentiate the "case by case" basis. A woman manipulating a boy should be treated the same as a man manipulating a girl. An adult manipulating a child has long lasting psychological damage, that may take decades to surface.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/19 03:19 AM
-2

17yr old You haven't read my other comments have you. I define a child as those under 16. And the older person is significantly older Edit: Also, I'm speaking on more of a psychological perspective than anything. I'm fully aware that a prepubescent child's body may be more damaged, but from a psychological standpoint, being taken advantage of in such a way may damage the mind the same whether or not they're going through puberty.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 10:22 PM
2

Sure, a 15 year old can drive (with supervision) but isn't allowed to see movies such as Boyhood without parents permission. A movie where you literally have to be older than the main character to watch it, because it contains language that eludes to sexual content. Our society says that 15 years old is too young to watch a movie where a woman exposes her chest, yet your defending someone who is arguing for their right to sleep with someone who is twice their age because they can "produce sperm"…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 08:04 PM
2

I said it is just is severe, not that blanket punishments should be given. HOWEVER child sexual abuse shouldn't have the gender of perpetrator nor gender of child differentiate the "case by case" basis. A woman manipulating a boy should be treated the same as a man manipulating a girl. An adult manipulating a child has long lasting psychological damage, that may take decades to surface. Abuse on young minds isn't always apparent, so the statement "Not every kid getting fucked by their teacher is…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 07:49 PM
3

Simple, they have lived 20% longer, with their hormones, and are less naive. Oh, also, they're allowed to buy porn.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 07:37 PM
5

Yeah, you're part of the problem. The whole "congrats on being a victim" is a stigma that male victims, <sup>(such as myself\</sup>) have been trying to dispell for years now. Also, Sexual Violence, as defined by RAINN is as follows: The term "sexual violence" is an all-encompassing, non-legal term that refers to crimes like sexual assault, rape, and sexual abuse. This constitutes as "Child Sexual Abuse" and, as such, is sexual violence. You're really not even using the "erection = consent" argu…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 07:06 PM
3

Would you say the same if it was a fifteen-year-old girl who was psychologically manipulated by someone with power over them? Sexual violence is wrong no matter who the victim is.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 06:41 PM
-7

Yes. 15 year olds may be a bit more mature than 8 year olds, but their brains are still not mature enough to make that decision. Most of the adults who manipulate minors in such a way are in positions of power to them. Being taken advantage of someone whose in power is psychologically damaging, especially when it's someone you've trusted.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 06:00 PM
-1

I'm saying knowingly having sex with someone under the age of 16, when you are older than 18, should be treated the same in the eyes of the law.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 05:35 PM
4

Nope, but English does.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 05:08 PM
20

Honestly adults who knowingly molest children, regardless of puberty status, are monsters and should be behind bars. Anyone under the age of 16 is a child. It's honestly semantics, and really isn't a good position to argue considering how sensitive the subject is.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 05:01 PM
229

And they're pedophiles. child molesters. Edit: why must everybody be a dictionary on here. Regardless of the actual definition, they're still monsters who belong behind bars.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 03:22 PM
15

Plenty of women can handle debate. Most feminists cannot however.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:57 AM
5

Please report anyone being derogatory or creepy for you being a girl in this sub. This sub isn't about that, it's about promoting awareness of the inequalities men face and how feminism tries to ignore it. This sub is somewhat anti-feminism but it isn't misogynistic
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:37 AM
0

Not saying you were defending it, however whenever cases like these pop up, there are people who say the assault was preemptive self defense and justified. But you provided no context to state whether or not you felt this was justified in this case, just that using boiling water is justifiable for self defense.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:37 PM
52

Hate people who try to defend "preemptive self defense." Self defense is only a defense if you or someone else is in immediate danger. You have people defending women because she murdered her SO in their sleep and people are calling that self defense. "She feared for her life so it counts!" No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:25 AM
8

Don't blame OP here on r/mensrights they just shared it. Blame OP from the other subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:17 AM
9

I still can't wrap my head around how they can possibly justify rewarding false accusations. I get that in their eyes they are compensating victims, but they don't seem to pursue when it's found out the accuser lied.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:55 AM
1

:) :) :)
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:45 AM
5

I absolutely hate the "you must watch/read/play it because of the representation" rhetoric. Characters aren't automatically better because they meet a representation quota. Well written characters that happen to be diverse are better than characters that are written as diverse, a prime example is Emma Knight from Lazarus Codex. She is a fantastic woman of color character, but it's because of her personality and actions, not because she's a woman of color.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 07:30 AM
2

Women are seen as needed at home for family rearing and whatnot so judges are more lenient on sentencing, perfering to dole out community service/probation for women who should be locked up. Mind you, this isn't women who are on trial, no these women have been convicted of a crime, a guilty verdict, and they get 0 prison time.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 07:19 PM
2

Ironic that this is coming out at the same time that scar Jo is upset she's a sex symbol. I get they don't consider it the same thing, but women watch movies with sex symbols for male leads all the time, then turn around and say it's unfair we do the same. They don't want equity, they want equaliREEEE
/r/MensRights15/11/19 10:58 PM
15

The article she posted is real... Unfortunately.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/19 08:55 PM
1

Original post was deleted, probably by a mod of the subreddit if it wasn't a male friendly subreddit. visited the actual deleted post, it probably wasn't a mod as they didn't lock it when they deleted it, so it was probably the poster.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:50 AM
10

Here's the thing, they only destroyed evidence and denied because the story got big for the wrong reason. I have no doubt that the autistic kid was crossing lines, but he was 6 and has a developmental disability, he doesn't know what he's done wrong. However, the current way radical feminism is going, they probably want you to be assumed to be a criminal if you are born male.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 02:54 AM
1

Usually when a judge rules a 50/50 split in a marital home, they sell the house, settle the mortgage, and split the remaining equity 50/50. It only makes sense that if one party wants to live there they have to buy the other party's share. But it would be unfair for her to pay half of it upfront, so she would pay in monthly installments. In layman's terms, it sounds like rent so why not call it that?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 07:24 PM
3

The issue with the EU law is that time and time again it's turned a blind eye to discrimination when it happens to a "privileged" party.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:53 AM
11

Exactly, even if the relationship was truly consensual, and he was able to keep it completely professional, there will always be the stink behind the relationship, it really is just a conflict of interest. "Did he give her a raise because she deserved it?" "Did she really want to be in a relationship with him?" A couple examples I can think of.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:16 AM
2

It's probably not rent, per se, it's possibly the Court ruled a 50/50 on the house and if she wants to keep the house, she needs to buy his half from him.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:22 AM
12

But if the man tells his wife to quit her job, raise the kids and he'll work, you got to agree it is kind of fucked that he can just change his mind any day after she hasn't worked for a decade and say I divorce you find work tomorrow. This may be true for relationships that end suddenly with the man wanting it to be over, but she knew it was a sinking ship, and more importantly, she was the one who filed for divorce, and Texas is good at being a 50/50 state as well. We also don't know the Dynam…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:07 AM
14

This is why I say that child support should me retroactive unless there's a big expense. The parent with the child should have to record what they spend on their child and then submit that to the other parent to receive support. It shouldn't be a set dollar amount each month because expenses vary month to month.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 04:39 PM
5

That was unjust as well. Revealing a Congress members genitals to the general public shouldn't be a way to get them to resign.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:55 AM
14

I love that it's justice when men get held accountable for their sexual promiscuity, but when a woman is held accountable it's a "misogynistic double standard." The only thing that she was treated differently on is that her nudes were leaked which is unjust, but she was still probably in the wrong.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 07:57 AM
2

You have a good point.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:06 PM
2

Joined. I really hope we can have a positive space for men that doesn't get shut down for "excluding" women.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:01 PM
106

I find it funny that most feminist don't see the victim blaming aspect of this practice. But it doesn't harm women so they don't care.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:47 PM
2

I was trying my hardest to get it right, but I guess I just can't taste the nuances of milk
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 11:32 AM
3

I rarely ever drink white milk myself, so white milk, regardless of the fat content, feels thin when you compare it to chocolate milk like I normally drink milk. Even chocolate milk made with skim milk seems thicker (to me at least) than plain whole milk. Also, store bought chocolate milk is way too thick, I prefer mixing my own powder in.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 07:47 AM
2

My parents said it was a creamier taste, and that whole milk is thicker, but I can't taste it unless the whole milk is whipped a little. I can taste it then, but when it's poured straight from the jug I cannot.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 07:39 AM
4

No, I mean I literally cannot. When my family didn't believe me, we all did a blind taste test consisting of Whole, 2%, 1% and Skim. Out of my family, I'm the only one who got all 4 wrong and even thought that 1% was the Whole milk and the Whole milk was skim. My brother confused Whole and 2% but got the others, and my mom and stepdad got all 4 right.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 06:27 AM
-8

I literally can't tell the difference so I drink skim anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 06:22 AM
26

Well, you attacked the subreddit. As male victim of female-on-male sexual violence, where I was sexually assaulted and almost raped by a woman, it's hard when even those who are meant to be professionals don't take your lack of consent seriously because "you had an erection so you were obviously enjoying it" despite me being mostly unconscious.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 11:40 PM
-1

I wasn't doubting the memes authenticity I was just saying it was a crap meme in my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/19 12:02 PM
28

To be fair it is a reaction image and not very popular of one. So I would say it is a poor meme format IMHO.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/19 07:03 AM
-4

To be fair it is a reaction image and not very popular of one. So I would say it is a poor meme format.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/19 07:03 AM
-6

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this article satirical? It seems like people are missing this...
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:31 PM
7

Anti-Semitism is defined as "hostility or prejudice against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group"
/r/MensRights10/10/19 01:00 PM
17

While all Abrahamic religions are Semite religions, including Christianity; anti-Semitism is specifically hate towards Jewish people.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:11 AM
1

While this may be true, you know as well as I do that there are plenty of people do share this exact ideal unironically
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:06 PM
1

While job choice does play a factor into the Wage Gap, it's a relatively small factor. The main factor is hours worked, part-time versus full-time. As of right now when you compare the average yearly salary of a woman to the average yearly salary of a man, a woman makes 78% of what a man does. However, when you only take into account workers who work full time, then a woman makes 95% of what a man does. Another thing to point out, is regardless of how many hours worked, if you only take the mill…
/r/MensRights09/10/19 11:44 AM
2

I would like to point out that for a post with almost 200 comments, the karma on it is still in the single digits.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 11:34 AM
1

You mean the facts that are being twisted to fit the narritive of the author? As someone who has read the article, I can assure you that is the case.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:54 AM
3

More like r/pussypass She was arrested yes, but was charged with domestic battery, and was let out of jail. She potentially took his ability to reproduce, and she might see a couple years behind bars, but not for assaulting him, no, because she violated parole.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/19 04:43 PM
1

Okay so this isn't just something that was a study performed on multiple banks across the country, this is specifically an E Bank which is only electronic transfers other than ATMs, I'm not even sure if they have actual branches. As such it probably appeals to a younger clientele, those that aren't in good financial habits yet. If this was coming from Intuit, using their Mint app, I'd be more inclined to believe that this is widespread enough to be an actual issue.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 07:40 AM
1

I've decided to post my reply as a top level comment.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 07:27 AM
1

I've decided to make this a top level comment because of how long it is. I'm also quoting foxglove333's comment in this sub so you know what I'm responding to, and so that they don't change it. Keep in mind this is a reply to foxglove333. u/foxglove333 said Hey I’m the one who wrote that and nope I definitely don’t think men have it easy, I honor and respect the fact that historically men have died and suffered every bit as much as women. Also I think it’s just in a different way, of course as a…
/r/MensRights01/10/19 07:02 AM
3

Not to mention he can request the university to rescind their expulsion under Title IX, which will be a good PR move in the university. If they fail to admit wrong doing, then he should sue.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:16 PM
9

Observed would be a good word as well. Outpatient or inpatient, doesn't matter, he was observed.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:29 PM
1

The big thing is OP, you're still a feminist, and that isn't a bad thing. The Anti-Feminists on this subreddit only hate the feminists that don't acknowledge that most of the vocal minority is similar to the extremist that turned you away from this community. Most feminists want equal rights between genders. Some don't recognize that men could possibly have it worse. I'm glad you do!
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:28 PM
14

Fun fact, while I do live in America, I was born in England and moved to America when I was 10. (Was an USAF brat and my dad was stationed in Mildenhall when I was born.)
/r/MensRights25/09/19 09:10 AM
25

This has to be one of the most British articles I have ever read.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:45 AM
1

So it's like not drinking your milk in Utah, technically illegal but not enforced so functionally legal.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:53 PM
4

I got into an argument about whether men were victims of rape as often as women (they are) and the person I was arguing with was trying to say I was downplaying the severity women suffer sexual violence on, and I was like no, I'm just trying to dispell this myth that men can't be victims. She used RAINN.org to argue the point that 1 in 6 women are or will be victims of sexual violence in their life times when only 1 in 33 men will. One thing I love about RAINN is that they source their claims, a…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 09:30 AM
2

No worries lol. It's late for me so I'm tired too.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/19 07:38 PM
4

Autocorrect
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/19 07:20 PM
18

There's an article circulating around where some women are complaining that the reason marriage is on a decline is because most men aren't making enough money to be eligible suitors. Edit: damn autocorrect.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/19 06:32 PM
16

Women: it's unfair that men make on average 25% more than women! Also women: it's unfair that STEM fields are primarily men, we need more women in STEM fields! Still also women: it's unfair that I can't find a husband that makes more than me! All my money should be me money!
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:10 PM
3

That is the issue I agree. Women are never horny, and men cannot not consent when women approach them. /s if you really needed it
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:38 PM
8

The way I see it, I can see where people talk about those voluntarily intoxicated can't consent. But men who are also voluntarily intoxicated shouldn't be able to consent either, and if two people who can't consent (because they're both voluntarily intoxicated) have sex, then it should be realized as it has been the past 500 years: a drunken mistake, not rape.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:50 AM
6

She saw the guy changing, then took her phone out of her purse just to snap a picture.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 11:48 AM
2

Most people do, but allot of people don't like moist fluids.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:06 PM
0

I'm bi so yeah lol
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:05 PM
2

Did they talk about snowballing in Clerks?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:12 PM
2

Yep, definitely, but I am willing to eat a vaginal creampie.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:09 PM
7

Lol fair enough
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:59 AM
21

DO NOT CLICK THE SPOILER UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO KNOW MY KINK. THIS KINK SOME FIND DISGUSTING. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! It's called snowballing. It is when your partner gives you a blowjob and then instead of spitting and swallowing, they make out with you. Essentially I love the taste of my own cum.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:37 AM
28

This is probably a BDSM thing and they are probably getting off on the humiliation. I try not to kink-shame as my kinks can be.... Outlandish....
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:42 AM
11

Cosmopolitan, and around the same time they came out with an article condemning people for doing it to women.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:16 AM
10

If an automated chess board is a "male targeted ad" then sure.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:26 AM
2

I mean how many dating sites are named after Roman gods? OKCupid was the site.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:56 AM
4

I once did a project for a college level English class, and for online dating profiles on a certain website that is named after a Roman God, and I created a Jane Doe and a John Doe to see how far you have to go to register a profile. I shit you not, it only asked for income from one gender. You can guess which one that was. I posted videos in my presentation, along with facts like how over saturated men are on the sites and how women on the sites have a buyer's market. Got a B.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:41 PM
3

I have addressed this in my other comment. The vocal minority of feminists usually are misandrists that use the guise of feminism to push their ideals.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 08:44 AM
3

I'm well aware. I too yearn for true gender equality!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 08:16 AM
8

Well, the vocal minorities of groups are essentially the faces of them. If a woman calls herself a feminist or says she believes in their ideals, most people jump to the last feminist they know they encountered and more often than not, it's a misandrist who uses the guise of feminism to push her ideals. Same goes for most political groups. When a Conservative think about Liberals, they think about the millennials who want "free college" and when Liberals think about Conservatives, they think abo…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 06:40 AM
8

This is true, only the vocal minority of feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 06:16 AM
6

It depends on where you are. Age or Consent laws vary region to region and differ across countries, and can even be different depending on the gender of the child. For example: in Utah the age of consent for boys is 18, but the age of consent for girls is 16 as long as their partner is no more than 10 years older than them. But in Florida it's 16 across the board with no age restriction, and some regions of Japan it's as low as 13.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 06:12 AM
3

I was about to say this. Google only searches for words in any order, and shows results based on web traffic. If you want a phase you gotta put the quotes. Also, when concerning men being victims, they usually refer to us a males instead of men. Good ol' news sites demasculinizing victims.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 09:51 PM
1

Aww, the video is gone
/r/MensRights17/08/19 09:20 PM
5

Maybe with her $6k demand it was in person. But she had another person message him demanding more money (probably her with a different account)
/r/MensRights15/08/19 08:15 PM
0

r/subsifellfor
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/19 07:07 PM
28

Belongs on r/quityourbullshit
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/19 12:34 PM
2

Awkward kiss that she is trying to play off as one of those french mwah mwah greetings.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:21 AM
7

They could just walk in to any old bar and get laid. No joke but the reason I stopped using tinder is that a woman matched me to say, and I quote, "you look like such a fucking creep, I bet you're just looking for a cheap lay." I responded "I'm a veteran, depending on the city I'm in I can go to a bar and walk out drunk with a wet dick and not a dime poorer." It's true. She responded with an insult and unmatched me. It was surreal, this was in 2014 when the tide started to shift in the dating en…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:30 AM
1

Damned if you do....
/r/MensRights01/08/19 09:49 AM
1

Translation?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 04:12 PM
1

In America it's called a learner's permit test.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 04:10 PM
2

I mean another reason is that male comics don't tell stories/jokes only relatable to men, meanwhile I've seen maybe 3 stand up routines where a woman hasn't made "being a woman" part of understanding half the jokes.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 09:30 PM
5

The main reason is that they could possibly be sued for slander (even if it's true)
/r/MensRights28/07/19 08:07 PM
2

I'll give it a watch with my YouTube premium account. Enjoy some revenue
/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:59 PM
181

It's possible. Sex somnia I think
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:38 PM
3

"The woman had erect nipples and a wet vagina, she obviously wanted it." The argument for victim blaming with roles reversed. Arousal does not equal consent.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 12:08 PM
5

For some rapists it is about dominance, and breaking the other person. Some, not all. Some rapists are just horny, and that goes for both sides of the gender argument.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:46 PM
2

The vocal minority gives feminism a bad name, and that's why I'm sticking to my original comment. Sure most feminists want true equality, but their voices are drowned out by the radicals screeching how all men should die. The reason why feminism is criticized as such is because not enough sane feminists raise their voices against those radicals, such as those praising that college girl who created that sexist chair.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 12:31 PM
6

I don't disagree, I will add though the vocal minority of feminists are what people think of when they think of feminists. I am aware that feminism in nature, and most of the people would consider themselves feminists do yearn for true equality.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 12:22 PM
31

I love it when feminists use the "it isn't about sex it's about power and dominance" argument (which I believe is sometimes the case) but when I start bringing up that women can rape men because it's a power and dominance thing, they backpedal saying that "women wouldn't enjoy the sex without a participating partner so a woman wouldn't rape a man."
/r/MensRights25/07/19 07:15 AM
1

Idk, I could be wrong. Could've been a different Court ruling, and I think it was due to women sexually assaulting underaged teenaged boys and getting away with it because of the law not preventing it. It was just an article from like 2 years ago I read.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:01 AM
6

Don't you know that if a man is drunk he is accountable for all his actions even if he is drugged against his will, but if a woman as a sip of beer she is excused for anything she does for 24 hours? /s if you needed it
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:46 PM
3

The damage you have done goes far beyond the 19 days (the ex-spouse) spent in jail for a crime he didn’t commit … This part right here is why. Not only does it make it hard for real victims to come forth, it also shatters a delicate trust in the man she falsely accused, meaning he might not get back into the dating game, and even if he does, he will be reluctant to trust. It's also more far reaching than that one man though, birthrates in first world countries are dropping, and creating a hostil…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:50 AM
2

If I remember correctly, at least now, any sexual assault can be considered rape regardless of the perpetrator or victim, as well as added a mandatory minimum prison sentence for such crimes. But iirc the reason why the rape itself was defined vaguely prior to the case is California playing Legalese Semantics to try to appeal a SCOTUS ruling, without actually making it where men could be raped by women. E: I could be wrong. Idk, that's just what I read on an article I cannot find anymore.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:27 AM
-2

Wooshed is more like it. As someone who loves r/atetheonion it annoys me when people think parody social media accounts count as news websites.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:08 AM
5

California loves to shit on men when it comes to discrimination against them. It's also why Brock Turner wasn't tried for rape since he didn't "penetrate the victims genitalia with their own genitalia."
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:46 AM
2

A little bit of context to hopefully give you a bit of comfort. Companies such as Lyft have policies to believe one party over the other when it comes to things like this. However, they themselves likely wouldn't take it to the police as that would be the driver's responsibility to press charges as you have the right to face your accuser and Lyft isn't that entity. Even if the driver claims were true, they would have to provide some evidence against you to even get you arrested in the first plac…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:21 PM
1

Depends on the case but for the most part I agree with you.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter