TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheEnchantedHunters Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by TheEnchantedHunters on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Well in the circles I’ve always been around, the overwhelming majority of women come across fine. And even in broader society, I would definitely push back against any suggestion that men are somehow less shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 11:48 PM
4

Unless you’re chasing bimbos, most good women are not looking for the type of stereotypical alpha/chad/equivalent cringy term that you seem to be describing. Unless taking basic care of one’s hygiene/health and having baseline social skills qualify one as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 11:10 PM
1

well seeing as their primary job is curing & treating illness, I see no reason to vilify them for this. It's not like people are getting hooked on & ruined by overprescribed antidepressants.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 01:53 PM
6

Fair enough, at least that sounds a lot better than what I see on mgtow, where I constantly see the same regurgitated narrative about how all the power in society is controlled by women, who use it to subjugate and exploit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:06 PM
33

LMAO How about this explanation instead: the majority of men with normal family lives don't feel the need to join an online community centered around bitterness and victimhood
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:53 PM
2

The only reason it's acceptable is because it's a woman doing that to men. If it was the other way around, people would be furious. wait... doing what? selling bathwater and pic/video content? What makes you think anyone would be furious at a guy who could make money by selling his bathwater to women? Since men's happiness or lack thereof are not cared for in this gynocentric society even if you could argue our society is more attentive to women, that would be a consequence of men being ruled by…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 03:16 AM
1

Not the close ones, no. Like if my mother fell terminally ill, I wouldn’t drop her for any reason. I don’t get much materially out of most of my friendships but I’d still go out of my way to help them to a reasonable degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 06:53 PM
3

Except most people, certainly the ones in my life, are not at all reducible to that kind of mechanical attitude. But whatever works for you dude
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 06:50 PM
2

What a miserable sod you must be
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 06:46 PM
2

Sounds like you have issues forming healthy friendships. But most people have friendships based only on a mutual enjoyment of company, without any expectations beyond that. Like many, I’ve gone out of my way to help people I wasn’t even well acquainted with, just because I was in a good position to do so. Seriously, what kind of crowd are you hanging around if everyone seems willing to fuck you over the moment they can gain something from it. I’ve hung out with junkies who were more ethical than…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:44 PM
2

Women make tons of money exploiting mens' sexuality, from the Belle Delphine types who sell their bathwater to the girls on the street corner. Oh please, like men are the victims here. Poor guys paying a desperate hooker for sex, right? The men are the ones unable to control their lust. If some women are willing to sacrifice dignity and social acceptance to profit from that, it's their prerogative. It's not like they're the one's primarily responsible for sexual violence and sex trafficking. Wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 02:41 PM
2

but what I'm saying is that there have always been some women and men who have had unscrupulous behavior like that. Neither group is more guilty than the other, they just tend to exhibit their dishonesty in different ways. For instance, there are more men who will cheat on their wife as soon as a more attractive woman shows interest, as there are women who would leave their husband for a wealthier guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 02:34 PM
5

I'm a man and I absolutely would want my partner to contribute to an equal degree. And it's exactly the same in my social circle, where all the married couples I see are both highly educated and working in a serious career. It's not exactly a surprise that these marriages are also far more stable than the unequal marriages that result when women are taught to find a man that will provide for them and men try to find the hottest woman they can snag (both at the expense of more/equally important t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 08:42 PM
1

What can you do to stop this? It is the way of the world. People use and take advantage of others to get what they want. People back stab co-workers, lie to their friends, steal from each other Sure, experiencing a little of that is inevitable. But you choose your friends/partners and it's quite easy to root out people with clear character flaws early on. In my current social circle I've never seen any instances of major drama like cheating, backstabbing, etc. And it's not a surprise because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 08:35 PM
2

Women string guys along for everything else and for twice as long, no we don't feel bad for it. Uh, if we're just focusing on the part of the population that's scummy, well there are just as many men who show the equivalent behavior. But normal/healthy people can see the red flags of a gold digger/cheater/walking disaster pretty quickly. Anyone who finds themselves consistently encountering/dating women like this should look inwards and reflect on why they keep picking partners of reprehensible …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 07:39 PM
8

It is no different than a woman stringing along guys she has no intention of sleeping with for attention, validation, free rides, money, emotional tampons etc. No... it's not any different. They're both appalling behaviors that most people would not recognize as normal or acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 07:34 PM
1

sure, statistically most relationships are not equal. And that becomes more prevalent as you go down in social class/education. Among well educated people, especially younger generations, it's very common for both partners to contribute equally or even women to be the breadwinners. I can count on one hand the number of relationships I've seen in silicon valley where the man was the sole provider and the wife was a stay at home mother. Most of the relevant statistics will be things like the huge …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:28 PM
1

again, 'scientific' means little without context. And a statistic about breadwinners is hardly scientific on its own. Those statistics are rooted in a historical model that's becoming more obsolete each year. And again, just because more men are willing to sacrifice equality in a marriage in order to punch above their weight in the looks department, doesn't make their love more unconditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 12:42 PM
1

you think men are like puppies that are willing to unconditionally love anyone who will return it? That so wrong. First of all, most men hardly seem to know a difference between love and lust-- they 'love' whoever is most attractive to them and then get mad when their attention/money/whatever isn't a currency of exchange for sex. Secondly, the fact that you think most relationships are based on a male as the provider tells me you haven't seen many healthy relationships yourself, especially outsi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 11:19 AM
1

So when you point at a rattlesnake, and say, "Watch out for the venomous bite.", you aren't making a statistical claim. You are just saying that they CAN AND WILL use that venom to fuck you up. Just like men can and will get away with rape charges all the time. For instance: Women cannot love the same as men. Women love you so long as you provide something - be it status, resources, or safety. Men love unconditionally. They will do everything for the one they love. This most often rears its head…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 12:35 AM
1

Not sure which main points you’re talking about. Definitely some of them are well supported. But other seemingly central points, like women being mostly spermjacking gold diggers or female on male rape being as prevalent as vice versa, are clearly not factual. I’m talking about the actual atmosphere of the sub where any popular thread is full of petty woman bashing like the examples I just gave, and not a reasoned discussion like you seem to suggest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 12:01 AM
1

The same can be said because you can always cite statistics that support your narrative. Even accurate statistics occur in a larger context which can be ignored or warped. And saying 78 cents per dollar suggests lesser pay for the same job.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 11:37 PM
1

okay, so you do think the world really is like that. lol. mgtow "statistics" are even less accurate than feminist "statistics" like women only making 78 cents per dollar a man makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 12:44 PM
1

Want me to spoonfeed it to you? Mgtow revolves around a distorted worldview where men are victims of golddigging, spermjacking women. The ubiquity of this is what supposedly prevents them from asserting their superior qualities. It’s becoming such a cult that I wouldn’t expect you to have an issue with that worldview anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 12:23 AM
1

Ok whacko
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 12:06 AM
1

No, I listed a bunch of examples which is way more than you offered. If I have to explain why a subreddit filled with that content is toxic, then there’s no point trying to talk sense into you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 11:34 PM
1

no one's 'worshipping pussy' anywhere in this thread. 99.9% of the time I see MGTOW comments accusing someone of whiteknighting, the OP is literally just acknowledging a clear problem. Criticize someone for defending sexual assault? "whiteknight"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 04:46 PM
3

The people in MGTOW are even more bitter than 95% of feminists. At least with feminism, most of the community is not of the radical bra-burning type. The same can't be said of MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 02:55 PM
0

I disagree, my apologies. Anything less than abject worshipping is "hate". so spending every thread talking about how all women are useless, entitled gold-diggers and men are the logical masterrace is just not worshipping women. mgtow is full of the most bitter losers. You all sound like 1st graders arguing over which gender is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 02:54 PM
1

You're really reaching to excuse their behavior. I used to sub to communities like that and I'm still on board with the substance of some of their overarching ideas, but it's obvious how misogynistic those places are. Let's look at the top posts of today, shall we?: Men are something else. Without men, where would the world be? "There's a tribe in Africa run by women they still having invented the wheel" "Woman power! ....pathetic" "If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 02:50 PM
0

misread your comment-- nvm, yeah I'm in complete agreement with you. I unsubbed recently because of how blatantly it's become a misogynistic MRA echochamber.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/19 01:23 PM
3

if the roles were reversed you'd still be saying that. no, if she tried to run him over with a car, I'd completely understand him trying to disarm her. Why do you people always have to shoehorn every story into your narrative, even when they clearly don't fit
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/19 12:59 PM
1

I'm not saying they're children. It's not a binary of mature adult/child. Someone who is 75 generally has a more mature outlook than someone who is 40. It's a spectrum where people of similar ages tend to have gone through similar maturational milestones. Sure, a lot of major milestones are clustered around certain ages, and we can argue where those usually are, but they still continue to occur into older age. Unless the 95 year old had some developmental abnormalities, they will have such a dif…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 01:21 PM
2

Nothing much happens after 25? lots of people are in school until 21/22, and that’s if they don’t do any grad school. So even in that case, you really think 3 years of experience outside of school gives you the same maturity as someone who may have already made a career for themselves, earned financial stability, and potentially even had kids/a former marriage/etc? Hell, these days lots of people don’t start dating until pretty late and it takes a bit of that to even learn how to maintain a heal…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 12:17 PM
3

Except even if it were the same people making both those statements, it’s probably the younger and more naive version speaking in the stupid spongebob voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 01:51 AM
4

The reason they are sometimes called creeps is because even if they can attract a younger woman, why do they want someone who is far less likely to have similar life experience and maturity? Many times it’s some combination of physical attraction mixed with control— it’s rarely a relationships of equals, and the women (or men if the roles were reversed) arguing against that are usually fooling themselves. If two people of different age groups happen to click and can form an equal partnership, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 01:50 AM
3

how about carli lloyd's extra time goal for the 13th? was that not over the top and ridiculous coming from a world cup champion? this sort of thing really casts a bad light on the women's game more generally.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 07:19 PM
11

okay, so anyone who disapproves of highly unsportsmanlike behavior is a hater. grow up.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 06:29 PM
57

Eh, the US womens team has a lot of things that bothers me. Like the way they staunchly defended Hope Solo in the midst of her domestic violence charges. And just the general attitude too sort of bothers me. Like the way they rubbed it into the faces of the thailand team after beating them 13-0. Anyone who follows the sport would recognize it’s pretty disgusting behavior from a team that’s the best in the world against a team of part timers at their first world cup (again, my issue isn’t the sco…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 05:48 PM
0

your the one getting down voted to hell. ah, yes, the overwhelming downvotes from incels and mra's clearly indicates you're superior logic. What a logical justification!!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 09:08 PM
1

Yes, I agree that’s a problem. But I also think we can recognize how rape affects men too, while still acknowledging that it’s a more widespread problem for women. That understanding doesn’t diminish the trauma a male victim faces— I’m talking about scale and not individual severity. The problem is that the rhetoric on one side is usually complete condescension when it comes to men’s issues, and on the other, skepticism to the point of delusion that women could possibly it worse for anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 07:07 PM
0

Holy shit lol. All my comments are is reasoning. You’re the troll if you’re that biased that things only qualify as logic if they support your own world view. Congrats on the dumbest take of this whole comment chain.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:52 PM
-1

It applies because I’m saying the fact that a service is gendered doesn’t make it sexist or wrong, in and of itself. If this is about an existing service suddenly denying service to half its former customers, then yes I find this slightly problematic. But if this is a new service being created that’s simply not open to everyone, there’s nothing wrong with it. That’s a separate point from the first one though.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:51 PM
0

I’m not in the mood to quibble over numbers in a discussion that never gets anywhere. Much more often than the fake accusations are the cases that go unreported and the many cases that are simply very uncomfortable without crossing into assault territory. And the testimony of my friends means more to me than misogynistic echo chambers on reddit. Lastly, yes the numbers are likely very low from an absolute perspective. But as I said elsewhere, if I had a one in a million chance of winning the lot…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:49 PM
1

If I had a one in a million chance of winning the lottery, you bet I’d be playing it. And whether or not a small fraction of those cases could be disputed is a distraction from the fact that there very clearly is an issue here, which is apparent to anyone who isn’t driven by a gendered dogma.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:39 PM
1

If a guy wants to create a men only rideshare service, I’m fine with that but gl finding business since there’s no motive for most men to use such a thing. Would you argue that men should be able to strip search women, and vice versa? Would it be sexist to suggest people should only be allowed to be strip searched by someone of the same gender (obviously only in extreme situations where thats required btw)?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:29 PM
1

Sorry but how does that statement imply that those things therefore happen in most cases? Reading comprehension skills are needed by both of you guys. And I already posted one link with compiled findings for uber assaults. That’s enough to validate women for feeling uncomfortable with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:26 PM
1

How did my logic imply that? And yes there are crazy statistics, look at my other comment citing over 100 sexual assaults associated with uber alone. And presumably this service comes with increased security for women in ways other than who they share the ride with. E.g. more female drivers and/or more strict screening/training of drivers
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:20 PM
2

How in the world did you get that from any of what I said. I never said any such thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 06:00 PM
-12

No, not everything is part of an anti male conspiracy. You’re warping every little issue to fit your narrative. Riding cabs late at night is definitely a scary thing for a lot of women and not for men. That’s just a fact even if you want to start pointing out the one in a million cases that are somehow supposed to make me believe that guys like me actually do worry when calling a late uber. Having a service that would make this safer for women does very little to reduce your own rights as a man.…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 05:59 PM
-3

So you’re saying the fact that men no longer have designated male only spaces is the reason that women need to worry about being robbed or raped? Mhm..
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 05:55 PM
-1

what do cabs have to do with male-only spaces
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 05:51 PM
-11

It discriminates based on sex. It's sexist. well clearly there are many legitimate reasons then to be sexist, if that's your definition. I think most people would not label every single process that treats men and women according to their very different needs, sexist. Also, a woman can absolutely rape or rob another woman. oh give me a break, how often do women rape other women? Name ONE incident of that happening in a ride sharing service, like fucking hell get a grip.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 05:49 PM
-17

I don’t see what’s wrong with this idea. Not like men have to worry about being raped by their driver. Less chance of being robbed too since women are more likely to be seen as an easier target. The photo is ridiculous too— really makes it out to be like a frivolous makeup cab.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 04:50 PM
2

I don't think that's usually a big factor for men as long as they're still taller. I actually think tall looks cooler and the last person I dated was my height (5'11). There's more uniformity of opinion around weight but even that varies a good amount (skinny being out of fashion with the whole 'thick' obsession these days..)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 12:35 PM
5

Yep, this sounds pretty much on the money. Also, desperate guys going down the gay for pay route is a lot more common than a lot of people realize-- it's just less visible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 01:53 AM
3

Humans aren’t governed by pure instinct and complex emotions like shame over promiscuity can’t be reduced to biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:45 PM
4

Yeah that reason is called culture, not biology. Raise them without that societal conditioning and that won’t happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 03:19 PM
1

I think it's tricky to properly answer because most people would preface their answers with something like: "apart from the tiny minority of people that are asexual...". But asexuality isn't a very concrete term and a lot of people who think they might be on that spectrum aren't sure. Just the fact of being able to be happy without the need or desire for sex can cause people to question if they're asexual. I'm a 25 year old guy and I consider myself very straight but also somewhat asexual. Like,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 02:30 PM
1

porn is just a dopamine hit for most people but absolutely not a deep, fulfilling force-- often quite the opposite. And when guys think that having 'real sex' in the context of a relationship is what they really need to satisfy that deeper fulfillment, they often don't realize that actually it many times is instead more closely tied to the caretaking instinct. At least, that seems to be what the original commenter was suggesting, and it sounds like a plausible and relatable theory to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 02:19 PM
3

we live in a society but really though, humans can't be reduced to their biological instincts-- even if we had a better grasp on what those instincts are (as opposed to coming up with faux scientific evolutionary explanations that reinforce our own world views). Females take pride and are happier when they withhold it. how many women do you know that are proud virgins? There is a lot of shame and isolation in being an older virgin for people of both sexes, in the western world at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 02:11 PM
1

incel alert
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/19 03:26 AM
2

Cheese/milk/eggs have no inherent issues for me. Just as long as there aren’t clearly inhumane farming practices.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 02:09 PM
3

Alright I guess that’s consistent then. Still, I’d rather see killing animals for food as justifiable in situations where it’s necessary or much more expedient to the alternative but an immoral act in others. I eat meat, so yes, I consider myself immoral in that way and would ideally like to stop at some point. Humans have the ability to move past base instincts and think philosophically, unlike lions. Given that animals provide so much value to the world in many ways, clearly the hypothetical s…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 01:51 PM
1

Where does it say “have at them”? And lol what do lions have to do with anything? Just because all living beings need to eat doesn’t mean eating or being eaten is their only value.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 01:40 PM
-2

Sure you can formulate arguments to make the distinction but you can do that in either direction. The reason you make those specific choices is to maintain a framework that favors you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 01:39 PM
2

Well if you’re not a Christian there’s no reason to believe the first premise. But I think even if you are Christian, there’s nothing saying animals are nothing more than food. Clearly the bible values them beyond that given the way they seem appreciated across several obvious stories. It doesn’t say god created the animals so man can have food; they’re individual works of love just like the universe and man; even if you could argue that man is a step above, that doesnt give him the right to des…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 01:34 PM
2

How about you tell me why it’s wrong to kill a fetus (‘human life’), and not wrong to kill a cow? And I would say killing of all living species is usually wrong, but sometimes that wrong is outweighed by the benefit the death would provide. A fetus is not the same to me as a human life until it’s old enough to survive (which isn’t necessarily delivery date but rather the date they’d be able to first survive if born prematurely) OR it can feel pain or consciousness. Now, that point is debatable a…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 01:03 PM
3

Which is why people use that argument only to defend abortion up to the minimum point where a prematurely born baby could live... it is a good argument.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 12:58 PM
1

Not purely. The philosophical question often ties into facts about the schedule of physiological development of the fetus. But sure, science does not ultimately decide anything on its own.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 12:48 PM
-3

They don’t because that would force dudes to stop jerking off, which is “clearly” unthinkable.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 12:46 PM
0

It is because it points to a weird way prioritization of fetuses over considerations of quality of life of the potential child as well as the mother.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 12:45 PM
0

YeahI don’t trust the adoption system to be able to handle the additional load if abortion were suddenly outlawed. It’s hardly a great system as it is, rife with bias and abuse
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/19 01:35 AM
-5

Because the collective pain of raising a child thats unwanted and/or unable to be well supported by the resources at one’s disposal outweighs the pain of a quick abortion for an unsentient mass of cells
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 11:53 PM
0

Raping a kid is objectively wrong, not just subjectively so.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 11:51 PM
0

Well that’s a statement that the overwhelming majority of academic philosophers would disagree with.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 11:50 PM
7

there is no reason to attend college on any campus other than online Lol
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/19 01:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter