TheEnglish1 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Younger women are just more attractive. Understandable, all the best.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 07:33 AM
-1	Younger women are just more attractive. I mean this genuinely, but if you are going to do well in this subreddit or in debates in general, you might want to be able to differentiate between an actual claim and a statement made/used to test ones logic and worldview consistency. For example me saying "what if you personally had done 'X' crime", in a conversation about if 'X' crime shouldn't or shouldn't be classed as a crime. Doesn't actually mean i have claimed you have done 'X' crime. I genuinely don't even know where to go from here,…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 07:28 AM
0	Younger women are just more attractive. Yes, attraction doesn't equal action, but there is also nothing wrong with action within two consenting adults regardless of how it makes you feel. That’s why in all the action movies you usually see a younger buff dude, right? Well typically depends on the movie, although personally say it definitely leans more in the older, rugged, experienced, buff male lead. But genuine question why do you think this is a good rebuttal? Do you agree men and women aren't the same and thus typically have diffe…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 07:04 AM
7	Younger women are just more attractive. Great, well OP mostly disagree with you. He believes attraction is the main reason and not "usually is an element of the older person enjoying the power deferential". Thus he made a post to debate that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 06:54 AM
-1	Younger women are just more attractive. Sorry to break your circle jerk here, but what if I said the only reason you actually found younger men much more attractive is because you are a deviant, who is actually attracted to the potential to control and manipulate them?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 06:47 AM
5	Younger women are just more attractive. People like you is exactly why people like OP make posts like this. Even after being told a fact, your brain simply refuses to accept it because of how it makes you feel or something. So much so, that you create some strawman to justify your delusion.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 06:38 AM
5	Younger women are just more attractive. I'd imagine OPs post is more for the subset of very vocal women who reapeadtly say things like " The ONLY/MAIN reason why men go for younger women is to control them"	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 06:33 AM
3	Young women (18-24) dont want older men 35+ No it’s not about surface level things like music and tv shows. My partner and I talk about those things but where we really bond is discussing huge life experiences that can only happen at a certain age range togeth Such as? Because like you said maybe everyone bonds different. But I swear its only on a reddit that some super deep frevious conversation on shared experiences is what keeps relationships going. The reason I brought up the foreigner/migrant thing is because I have first hand experi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/26 06:01 AM
3	Young women (18-24) dont want older men 35+ I am not entirely sure what your argument even is in this case. Most relationships are also heterosexual and between partners that share the same race. It sure as shit doesn't invalidate homosexual/interracial relationships. I say this as some one who find the poster you responded to relationship concerning, but your counter is just completely flawed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 11:14 PM
3	Young women (18-24) dont want older men 35+ Genuine question, would you advise someone else, or even you personally, presumably not date a foreigner/migrant because they haven't grown up with the shows you've watched and listened tonthe same music then?	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 10:58 PM
0	Going younger makes sense if you want to be a father Well this is clearly going no where, no one said it was the only interest, its simply a very important and driving interest. I am sorry but choosing traits and characteristics that appeal to you in a partner isn't objectifying, on the contrary, it is the very essence of dating itself. I am not objectifying someone if i chose the fact they are career focused, or financially secure, or love the doors, or are a certain height or a certain body type or any traits/characteristics that i so ever wish.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/02/26 09:22 PM
0	Going younger makes sense if you want to be a father Mam, firstly, the age range is 18-25. So sure you can hyperfixate on the 18, presumably to make your argument but it's not the only age in that range. That said, I still don't a problem with someone "very naive and inexperienced" selecting a partner that is more mature and has experience. But secondly, i am just glad we've moved on from you borderline asinine claim that specifically selecting traits and characteristics in your partners is objectifying.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/02/26 04:55 PM
1	Going younger makes sense if you want to be a father I am not sure how it's objectifying them to realise and accept that 18-25 are some of the most fertile and prime years of a woman. If a woman wanted a mature, masculine and financially stable partner, is she objectifying men if she chose men in age ranges more likely to have those traits? Because I am not sure where you rationale takes you other than the conclusion, that selecting traits and characteristics in your partners i.e the act of dating in itself is objectifying. Which is a just a meani…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/02/26 10:10 AM
–	The feminist narrative of 30+ men’s preference for younger (18-25) women being due to their inability to get women their age is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard So just to steel-man your argument in line with OPs post. If someone contested the idea that white men only or typically go for Asian women due to being submissive and traditional. It is in-fact reasonable to assert that because "this is straight from the horses mouth" and there are some white men who have said this, but none of that means genuine affection doesn't factor in as two things can be true. Do i have this right? This would be directly synonymous to this post afterall.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/02/26 06:50 PM
–	The feminist narrative of 30+ men’s preference for younger (18-25) women being due to their inability to get women their age is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard Saying this comes straight from the horses mouth seems bizarre and dishonest. Why? I can find comments of people who typically date partners of another race for example, who claim they do so for reasons that can quite clearly be seen to be fetishisation or racial inferiority/superiority. I dont you think would find it fair or reasonable if I or anyone claimed thus, this was "straight from the horses mouth", so bigotry or hatred against such relationships was justified. Then again, i don't know, …	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/02/26 05:38 PM
-8	The feminist narrative of 30+ men’s preference for younger (18-25) women being due to their inability to get women their age is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard Your comments like a distortion of what I have read. Everytime this topic comes up the distinction of "some men" is rarely ever made, in fact typically, the overwhelmingly mainly used qualifier is "the only reason".	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/02/26 05:28 PM
1	The narrative that small age gaps (like 18 & 24) are "predatory" is a recent moral panic based on flawed arguments. You just keep making these silly statements and think you have done something without actually using your brain. Last time I checked, it was conventional wisdom that every 18 year old is entitled to the bodily autonomy to determine what to do with it, this include who they choose to date. So what on earth are you talking about. You can cry yourself to cowsbcome and it won't change that "conventional wisdom". We typically dont torlerate bigots in the real world. Yeah, because the only reason some…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/25 05:55 PM
1	The narrative that small age gaps (like 18 & 24) are "predatory" is a recent moral panic based on flawed arguments. Yeah, because some clown online gets to decide what is normal to eveyone else and what type of life is nice. Here is a suggestion, go outside and touch wood and realise no one gives a shit about what you deem normal and the world doesn't revolve around you and your opinions.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/25 07:37 PM
1	The narrative that small age gaps (like 18 & 24) are "predatory" is a recent moral panic based on flawed arguments. Maybe you were just a mentally stunted 18 year old? Because i was also 18 once and I had sex who ever and however i wanted. That's what it means to enter adulthood.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/25 11:13 AM
–	Why do high-body-count women get the most offended when men prefer low body count? Agreed, but we both know half the women that scream misogyny or insecurity, when men state a body count preference, have also disqualified men using the same premise/hyprocrisy on other preferences important to them. I, for one, will always call it out. You or anyone can label me a incel or any "-ist" , I couldn't care less.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/25 10:27 AM
–	Why do high-body-count women get the most offended when men prefer low body count? Thats nice for you love. Unfortunately, we dont live in that fairy tale, where you are representive of your gender dating preferences. That's like me saying that because some men dont care about bodycount, that must be what men want. So as long as those double standards exist, I also dgaf, i will call a spade a spade. I will agree with you that everyone needs to be kind and pleasant regardless of their dating preferences that said.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/25 10:17 AM
–	Why do high-body-count women get the most offended when men prefer low body count? Women typically like men Taller, Richer, With more status etc than them. Yet i have a feeling you wouldn't think it makes perfect sense for a man to get upset if he didn't meet those standards. OP is right, it certainly feels like women can have all and any standards/preferences that disqualify men. The same for some bizzare reason isnt true for men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/25 10:02 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Again, I didn't discredit your arguments due to you being dishonest. I discredited your arguments directly then I accused you of being dishonest. I already conceded that this was the closest to an actual fallacy from the list you brought up. Moving goals post? In what way have goals post been moved? Toxic atmosphere? If you don't want a Toxic atmosphere, don't be dishonest in your arguments, don't continually strawman my arguments. You can't expect to continually do these things an not expect a …	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 08:41 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons No, the reason i called you that is because you continually displayed those characteristics not to discredit your argument. That is a fact. For the 3rd time a personal insult isnt an ad homiem, it becomes an ad hominem if i never address your points. This literally the most basic understanding of the fallacy. A simple google search tells you the same. I attacked your arguments then I personally insulted you. No, i observed how you argued and noticed the patterns and predicted an outcome based on…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 07:45 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons A person insult isn't an ad homiem regardless of what you say, especially when i still engaged in your arguments and didn't discredit them because of said insult. Is probably the closest to fallacy you've got but still not a fallacy because this was based on actions and statements you've continually engaged and uttered. It's observing patterns in how you argue. Please provide an example of said loaded question? That is is not appeal to riducle means. An appeal to ridicule is a logical fallacy wh…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 07:16 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Are you able to critically think? I have repeatedly engaged in your arguments😂. An ad hominem is not simply a personal attack. An ad hominem is when someone says "you are wrong because you are a dishonest fuck." Insulting someone is not automatically an ad hominem. This is literally the most basic understanding of the fallacy. This is beyond stupid.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 06:50 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Calling you a dishonest fuck, isn't an ad homiem. It would be an ad homiem if I discounted your statements and arguments due to you being dishonest. Shockingly, I have actually indulged them regardless of you being a dishonest fuck. You literally have no idea how fallacies work and it show very clearly. Please try again you dishonest fuck.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 06:44 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Please present your case, you dishonest fuck. Why is this so hard???	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 06:36 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons We already established you aren't, but indulge me. Can you name one, just one fallacy i have committed. I wont respond to anything else you say until you do this. Although, I already know this will be some nonsense on how I "implied" something and not my actual words. Because you are a dishonest fuck. Please present your case, you dishonest fuck.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 06:28 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons You can't just make absolute true statements and retreat to "Hyperbole" when called out on it. Again, how old are you? Do you understand how debates work? This is all incredibly stupid. Either say what you mean or don't say anything all. I am willing to bet you at best 15/16. You certainly have the logically comprehension of one. Although, I will be honest that's probably unfair to 15/16 years olds.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 09:23 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons sdsd	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 08:51 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons xcs	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 08:36 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons My own definitions? You realise I got that off a Google search just as you did your definition?. Take the L? What are you a child? God this actually makes so much sense now, how old you?? I "hyperfixate" on the word because believe it or not, words have meaning and how you are using "always is in no way how any wan honest or rational use it. The fact youvare even trying to argue is frankly absurd. The pattern and the facts are strong enough for me to confidently say that there won’t be any insta…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 01:49 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Non establish meaning? What does this even? What non establish meanings have I used? I didn't point out the logical flaw in your argument when you said something was "Always" the case? I didn't point logical flaw in your argument when you couldn't understand whilst me saying something wasn't ideal, Wasn't me in no way shape or form in support of your argument?? I am happy to address that, you calmed an 18 and 40 year old have "infinite" differences. I asked you to expand on those differences bec…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/04/25 12:39 AM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons This like some racist saying it an insult to call them a racist due to them clearly saying racist shit and that was a sign you lost the argument😂. Speaking to you as been a revelation, honestly. I have called you dishonest and a narcissist because you constantly express signs and opinions of one. You haven't logically done anything, you keep making illogical statement like the "Always" thing and something about me saying something was not ideal but still in line with my original point somehow su…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 11:24 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons I am perfectly calm, i just haven't had to deal with this level of stupidity in a long time. Your pathetic attempts to antagonise me are futile. Either have an honest conversation like a normal person or don't. You have been repeatedly been nothing but dishonest and narcissistic. Seeing as I was a once 18 and had relationships with older women, telling me what 18 year olds can and cant understand is silly. Secondly there are many 18 year olds who didn't have a problem and are perfectly happy wit…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 10:50 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Mam a long distance relationship is also not ideal doesn't mean it isn't ethical or shouldn be frowned on. Are you a child? Do you have any capacity to critically think?? So you going to ignore the rest my words where I verbatim say as long as both parties have an understanding of said problems then it all good. Which as been my stance from the start. Is it possible to get any honest conversation from you???	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 10:32 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Yh i am done with this, why the fuck is it so hard for you to be honest. I didn't express the same views??? Is a 40 and 18 year old relationship ideal for a typical relationships? Realistically, No. But what if that's what she wants? What if she doesn't want something typical? What she wants something short term? There might be a myriad of reasons that said daughter is privy to and as long as she understands any potential pitfalls is ultimately her choice. Welcome to the 21st century and somethi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 10:15 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons My point was age gap have problems, some typical to age gap relationships, some just like any other relationships but aslong as both parties are aware of said problems there is nothing "unethical" about them. In addition you claimed it "Always" lead to a certain outcome. I tried to get clarification from you, funny enough so as to not strawman you, and yet you still used the same word "always". I pressed you on how dishonest and illogical that was. Then you switched to some nonsense about how pe…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 10:00 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons No don't what I implied, but I do what I said verbatim, you probably showed have asked me to clarify my statements rather than strawman me be when you verbatim say You keep reducing this to “people should be forbidden”, or “no one can consent”, which is a strawman. It’s not what I said. I haven’t argued for banning adults private choices, I’m arguing for honest and critical awareness of dating dynamics that are documented to affect vulnerability and consent. I have no clue what you are on about.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 09:39 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons So let me gets this right you accused me of making strawman arguments, but no acknowledgement I never made the argument you put in quotations? Do you understand what quotation marks are? Or is this one those things neruo typical people know?? Do you see why I keep on accusing you of being a dishonest interlocuter and intellectual dishonesty. You made some assumption I never utterd and now that must be my position. You are right about one thing, this conversation has run it course. Come back when…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 09:23 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons I will make this easy for you, before I answer any of your other points. Prove your intellectual honesty and show me where i said You keep reducing this to “people should be forbidden”, or “no one can consent”, which is a strawman. It’s not what I said. I haven’t argued for banning adults private choices, I’m arguing for honest and critical awareness of dating dynamics that are documented to affect vulnerability and consent. Because I haven't once said anything about consent and the closest thin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 08:52 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons I have repeatedly challenged your points. Your original point being age gap "ALWAYS" had a certain outcome. I challenged that then you accused me of "nitpicking" presumably when your intellectual dishonesty dawned on you. But not before first reaffirming the statement in you first reply of course. You brought up the points that age gap relationships had rates of "higher risks for all sorts of negative outcomes for the younger partner" which i counted with as whilst factually correct, it is down …	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 08:17 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Yes, yes, everyone is triggered when they dare challenge your points. Its not an ad homiem when it's an accurate reflection of your views and statements. What arguments have I made that cant hold their own? Lets start with that. It would also be nice if you pointed out where I argued you're trying to make something illegal or forbidden. Although let's be real, you audibly expose your thoughts on the matter so you garner social pressure does making it socially forbidden at the very least. What wo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 07:23 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons This is like arguing saying black people are more likely to commit certain crimes is somehow equal to black people "Always" commit said crime. That in addition, it's even "nitpicking" to point out the clear difference, how absurd. Your intellectual prowess is servely lacking. If you think in any way or form, I would restrict the actions of my supposed 18 year old child, you are certainly deluded. At 18 I fully pushed the limits of my newly found independence and that includes sexually. Will i wa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 06:56 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons Jesus for someone telling the OP about arguing in their feels, you don't seem to be doing any better. Where is the evidence for this? Like you do understand what the statement "always" means right? You just sound like a dishonest interlocuter.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 05:21 PM
1	Most men who date a younger woman are not doing it for nefarious reasons ALWAYS Just to clarify, do you think what you described is the granted outcome of women who engage in age gaps? Because thats sounds dishonest.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/04/25 05:17 PM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Oh my God, was i actually right??? You were mentally stunted, make so much sense now. Why do you think your mental growth should be representative of everyone else?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 07:31 PM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Lol kid? Why do i have this feeling you were one of those growth stunted people that had trouble doing any and everything, even communicating with your peers, and have now decided that was the " Norm". It obviously couldn't be that you were clearly mentally underdeveloped for your age. It would certainly track, people like you always think because you couldn't do x,y and z at a certain time or age means everyone else probably can't aswell. That why you think you can only get a "connection" at a …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 02:05 PM
2	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Ok and if I get 30 and nothing changes what then... If you are presumably over 30 and your brain genuinely can't genuinely comprehend other people are autonomous and not everyone requires the same feelings and "connection" you do, that is frankly beyond idiotic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 11:11 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. It’s not a daily topic for women to complain about men under 6 feet. This is the nonsense I was referring to. I genuinely believe after spending much time on this forum that most men hate most women, most men want women who are 18-25 Some of these are sort of true but doesn't necessarily mean its all doom and gloom. I don't believe most men hate most women even on this subreddit. There certainly are lot men that would fit in that category but to say most is probably a bit dishonest. You just nat…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 08:47 AM
3	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. I personally don't have a problem with giving people advice and warnings about the potential dangers of an age gap relationship. Although as someone of mixed racial background, I also have seen first hand and second people trying to give "advice" and "warnings" to people based on religion and race. Especially when they start using "stats" and "facts". I guess my point is often times you have no way of knowing if the "advice" is genuine or someone with ulterior motives as both genuine and dishone…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 08:17 AM
3	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. You got the part i was in an age gap relationship around 18/19 right? This might surprise you, but you need to understand that whatever "connection" you think needs to be had is entirely yours. Now will there be people who agree with your prefrences, absolutely. But you dont speak for me and others and never will. Like how old are you? Why am I having to explain something this fucking rudimentary and basic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 09:36 PM
11	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. It's crazy isn't it. I dare these people to say a Syrian refugee who grew in a war torn country couldn't date a native woman in the country he was currently residing in. I wouldn't hold my breath though.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 05:46 PM
14	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. If that is your genuine reason thats fine, I personally don't see a problem with it. Abuse can occur in every relationship, even more so if there is an age gap and there is nothing wrong with warning about it necessarily. The problem is I noticed a lot of women use that cover to justify their bigotry. Some are open about it and some aren't. It practically impossible to figure out those who aren't. I will give you an example, I had the unfortunate experience of coming across a fauxmoi thread, whi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 05:17 PM
3	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. So you agree what you infact said earlier was basically nonsense? Do i think this a misogynistic forum? No Are misogynistic comments and commenters? Absolutely Likewise, do i think this a misandrist forum? No Are there misandrist comments and commenters? Absolutely Do people like you always view the world so black and white? Where there is absolutely no space for any form of nuance? It's all genuinely baffling.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 04:45 PM
2	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. It's not a daily topic on femecel or misandrist forums to disparage men mentally and physically? Like you genuinely think this doesn't happen?? Why do I even bother... Some of you men/women are so far up your own biases, it basically impossible to get any honest conversations.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 04:30 PM
9	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Yes, I was also 18 not too long ago. I also was in an age relationship with a woman in her late 20s. If you seemingly can't connect with people of different ages, then It sounds like a you problem. I have no problem connecting with people older and younger than me. Obviously the connection won't be the same and difference can be apparent, although its very dependent on the said individuals. I personally find said difference can be very engaging, useful and even helpful in a lot of cases. That sa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 04:25 PM
26	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. I will be brutally honest, i genuinely couldn't give a flying fuck what another human, an absolute stranger at that, thinks is "gross"," icky" or "weird". That's said everyone is entitled to their opinions, even you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 04:05 PM
5	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. I am sorry, I don't see how that follows. I could also find you some disgusting thing a woman has said about men. Doesn't somehow mean her and the women who think like her are representative of a whole gender. For instance, not to be cliche, but some women verbal state a man under 6 foot also aren't male humans. Doesn't somehow mean women with height preferences need to be attacked.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 03:42 PM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Apparently stating facts is an insults. You verbatim said i said something, i have repeatedly asked you to show me where I said it. Instead of doing this or simply admitting you cant, you have played a game of dodging the question and mental gymnastics like your life would somehow be forfeit if you simply admitted I never said the thing you claimed I did. Then I am somehow in the wrong and even "insulting" you for pointing out your flaws. Classic narcissistic behaviour, yes everyone else but you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 12:44 PM
2	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. People like you genuinely scare me, like why is it so hard to simply admit you were incorrect. Like why is your ego and pride this insecure. I know this is a meaningless online conversation at the end of the day but dishonest interlocuters, like yourself, who apparently would rather die than just admit they were incorrect baffles my mind. Its genuinely tragic, its worst when I think of any young and impressionable people who you associate with and incorporate your logical process into their live…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 10:44 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. This is literally not hard, you used a perfect analogy with alcohol. Drinking alcohol might be unsuitable because of the increased risk of alcohol poisoning amongst other things. But says nothing of if the person is saying one shouldn't or cant drink alcohol. Again for the 4th time, have i said you said they shouldn't or cant date. I will hold your feet to the fire on this regardless of your dishonest and pathetic attempt to escape. Please answer the question.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 10:16 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Ignoring the random sarcasm. Again, for the 3rd time. Have i said, you said they shouldn't or cant date?	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 10:03 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Ignoring the random sacarsm. Again, for the 3rd time. Have i said, you said they shouldn't or cant date?	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 10:02 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. Are you ok... Would you not to need to show where I said, you said they shouldn't date? Like this just seems silly now. Am I being trolled??	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 09:37 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. The issue isn't Leo dates under 25s but that those women are half his age and do not have access to the resources he does. This adds an element of increased risk vs a relationship where both people are at equal resource levels. If you noticed, i am responding to that exact part of your comment. You evidently think it's an issue and not ideal. Now show me where I said you said anything of those things? I asked if you would advocate for something based on your things you had said.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 09:25 AM
1	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. That all seems well and good, but clearly in the Leo's case for instance, the women have presumably judged the risk and determined them "suitable". But you and others obviously disagree.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 08:48 AM
3	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. So it's a clutch to justify their bigotry and get one over on men?	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 08:38 AM
25	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. I genuinely think this is one of the things red pill guys mostly have right, it stops at sex because it directly disadvantages older women over 30, who obviously make up the majority of female dating population. It drives at their worst fears and insecurities. Which is also made worse by them constantly being told by a lot of red pill guys, they've "hit the wall", are old and unattractive.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 08:37 AM
2	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. By this reasoning, would advocate for people with more resources not to date people with less? Also at what point do you decide the differences in resources means they shouldn't date? I mean it seems a bit silly but you can advocate whatever you want i suppose.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 08:23 AM
5	Many women are against men aged 30+ dating below 25 years old women because apparently the brain doesn't stop developing till you are 25. This is a total myth that has no scientific backing at all and it shows that only red pillars aren't the only ones to promote fake science. What i find interesting about this whole thing is that it's never an actual neuroscientist or an expert in the field who thinks a 22 year old cant date a 30 year old. But someone whose read up on their findings or someone just happen to have heard it from someone else. I believe there is a reason for that. The actual neuroscientists know they can't quantify what the difference in an 18 and 25 year old brain means in the real terms, yet anyway. I genuinely believe most of the people who use this …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 08:10 AM
–	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics Fairs, I will take your word for it. Although it looks quite evident we might be using "Older" differently, as i use it in terms of being older than who ever is being referenced. One does suspect this usage of yours might have come about due to realising he is in fact with a younger woman, albeit not 20 something younger. Also why is his divorce irrelevant? I bet you wouldn't be saying that if this was a 45 year old man divorcing a 26 year old woman and they had been married for 5 years. The ave…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 04:26 PM
3	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics What, It is assumptions to tell you how some guys operate? Whilst acknowledging i dont know if it applies to the men you are speaking about has i obviously didn't know them? That is ridiculous response.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 03:51 PM
–	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics who funny enough has a preference for older women Does he? He might have been married to one for a long time but doesn't necessarily mean he preferred older women. Either way they are divorced now and using the logic i have seen used on this site so many times, "It was because their ages weren't compatible and they were at different life stages", maybe she manipulated him and he has finally seen her for who she was or whatever nonsense used to justify ones bigotry in this subreddit. For the men …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 10:08 AM
6	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics I always love when this debate pops up and it eventually leads to schrodingers 21 year old, who isnt attracted to older men, wouldn't give an older guy any consideration and is basically a unattainable dream for older men. Yet somehow, the 21 year old needs to be protected because older men like to go for them because of how easy it is to manipulate them and get in relationships with them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 05:19 AM
0	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics Yes, as opposed to a lot of your high school class mates, women in their 20s and early 30s who dated men in age ranges, you would subjectively deem age appropriate, who evidently never get traumatised.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 05:07 AM
5	Men of all ages prefer women between 18-30 simply because it is their physical prime, absolutely nothing to do with manipulation or power dynamics I will be honest he does seem to have a point. Obviously, i don't really know the guys you are talking about and their intentions but I sure know we live in a world where guys chase women for months, even years, wanting them to give them a chance and as soon has they get to have sex, bounce. It's an activity that requires little to no effort. These men most certainly are messaging other women, who just like you ignore them but additionally other women who don't. It does seem borderline delusiona…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/24 04:48 AM
2	There is nothing wrong with not being selected by women What is this 😂, my entire point is effectively 'actions speak louder than words typically' yet here you are, playing some absolutely bizzare metal gymnastics and making that statement seem like some unreasonable and ill contrived assertion. This is genuinely laughable and illogical in every conceivable way. It is like you just hear what you want then respond with something uncorrelated to feel better about yourself, I am genuinely baffled.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/09/24 09:08 PM
5	There is nothing wrong with not being selected by women Well this a new one, "Ego" and "Nuance" have become buzzwords that have some negative insinuation about them now? Lord help us. I'm not trying to make this more complicated. When people tell you their lived experience you should listen. Listen, someone telling you what they like isn't necessarily "lived" experince. I can tell you things I like or would like without once experiencing it in my life. Actual lived experience is well, lived experience. Someone's dating history and type of mate they t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/09/24 08:36 PM
4	There is nothing wrong with not being selected by women Well now, you could have a normal conversation like a compassionate and reasonable person you claimed to be from username or you could just make random shit up that wasn't said to suit your ego. It's like you completely missed the part where I acknowledged it can be nuanced, but go off I guess.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/09/24 08:13 PM
–	There is nothing wrong with not being selected by women Her dating history and men she actually responds to? Practically every women that's ever been with an abusive shit head would probably tell you how she probably likes men that treat her right and a plethora of things the shit is most certainly not. Which to you is proof. Now don't get me wrong I understand it can be nuanced but simply saying that what a woman says she likes is proof and indicative of what she actually likes seem misguided. Her dating history and men she's actually respond to wil…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/09/24 08:03 PM
2	The people who claim most women "like bad men" are lying to you. Ignore the liars' tiny sample size, American-bubble "studies" which "prove women like bad men" and just look at it from a women's self-interest perspective. Bad men will hurt them and make their lives worse. We are assuming there is a correlation in order to answer the question as to why. There is no assumption the the pure data quite literally shows there is a correlation at its base form, I don't even know how you can even question this. Lastly the question wasn't why it was IF. Your claim "Delta group commits the most crime in relation to other groups" would never be approved as a research paper because it is too vague. Studies are approved based on the question they pose and this specific questi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/08/24 02:01 AM
2	The people who claim most women "like bad men" are lying to you. Ignore the liars' tiny sample size, American-bubble "studies" which "prove women like bad men" and just look at it from a women's self-interest perspective. Bad men will hurt them and make their lives worse. I am confused isn't that the study we have been talking about, are there two studies that I have missed? Again, that study clearly shows a positive correlation between criminality and sexual success at its base form. It quite clearly support the red pill person posted, well at least at its base value. The researcher propose a "Cheater" method that could explain their findings amongst OTHER hypotheses, but the study can in no way verify or falsify that hypothesis. What it can verfy at base value …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/08/24 06:00 PM
3	The people who claim most women "like bad men" are lying to you. Ignore the liars' tiny sample size, American-bubble "studies" which "prove women like bad men" and just look at it from a women's self-interest perspective. Bad men will hurt them and make their lives worse. So you agree. This study does not prove nor support that women are attracted to criminality? You have got to be joking, I guess i was right you are just a dishonest interlocutor. But I will try this one more time. Mam, I don't know what other way this can be spelled out for you. The study quite literally prove criminality has a positive correlation for sexual success in its base form. What you are arguing for is that there are external/internal factors than just simply criminality I.e "Cheater" …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/08/24 02:13 PM
3	The people who claim most women "like bad men" are lying to you. Ignore the liars' tiny sample size, American-bubble "studies" which "prove women like bad men" and just look at it from a women's self-interest perspective. Bad men will hurt them and make their lives worse. Good lord, my faith in the sub reddit just somehow gets lower everyday. How are you failing to understand something as simple as, it's evidenced that women seem to be attracted to criminality, we don't fully know why, but ONE out of many reasons could be because criminals could be using the "Cheater" method. This is simply an hypothesis, amongst MANY, that isn't studied as it goes beyond the scope of the study. The only thing the study is certain about is criminality has a positive correlation w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/08/24 08:03 AM
1	The overwhelming majority of people bitching about or even paying attention to “age gap” relationships are undesirable women and virtue signaling men It’s not like you’ll listen to anyone your own age anyway so I literally take no offense to that You literally have no clue how old I am you clown. This is what happens when narcissist converse with people, they believe they know it all. Please could actually try to make sense and not just make a baseless statement. Why would an 18 year old dating a 35 year old be carrying the weight of a 35 year old life? What does this even mean. Why would she not be able to enjoy her younger years? What if sh…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/08/24 11:29 PM
1	The overwhelming majority of people bitching about or even paying attention to “age gap” relationships are undesirable women and virtue signaling men We can certainly agree your opinion is mostly irrelevant as it is yours and yours only. So by your own admission even relationships that presumably having what ever you consider what couple should go for also overwhelmingly fail? So what was the point in all that prior exactly? If it develops into something more then that 35 year old is more in tune with an 18 year old than women his age.? If that’s the case, how could he possibly be developing the same as his peers? I’m stating it as a fact and…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/08/24 09:56 PM
-1	The overwhelming majority of people bitching about or even paying attention to “age gap” relationships are undesirable women and virtue signaling men So you’re upset Upset? All I asked you was a simple question that you have yet to answer. Your question isn’t genuine and if you don’t want a different opinion then don’t post about it on the internet. Again. This is not something I hear anything about unless a man brings it up here or a woman asks about on another sub. Sir/Madam, Its definitely too late in the day for these mental gymnastics. Again, I asked you a simple question literally to get your full opinion and instead of just answering w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/08/24 06:14 PM
1	The overwhelming majority of people bitching about or even paying attention to “age gap” relationships are undesirable women and virtue signaling men Genuine question, but if two people of a similar age got together simply based on their attractiveness, and only care about how they can physically gratify each other, do you think that is a problem and why? Because I am absolutely baffled why you think your values or goals in a relationship are somehow relevant to others. So much so that if they weren't aligned with yours, it's a "problem." It sounds absolutely conceited. Like your valves are yours and yours only. You don't get to decide whats …	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/08/24 06:19 AM
1	I will tell you exactly how your age gap relationship will go Lesbian marriages? Interracial marriages?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/24 09:11 PM
1	I will tell you exactly how your age gap relationship will go A lot of non typical relationships are also more likely to fail. Would that imply they are also not healthy?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/24 01:43 PM
2	I will tell you exactly how your age gap relationship will go How is this scenario any different from similar age relationships. You act like we don't live in a world where something 50+% of marriages don't end in divorce anyway with a lot of them just as you described, just without the ages. Maybe men and women shouldn't even get in relationships following your logic, I guess?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/07/24 01:40 PM
1	Blue Pillers and Women reveal some truths when they criticize Age Gap Relationships and Passport Bros This is asinine, by this logic you would describe every rich or famous person who is in a relationship with someone not on the same level as a predator. It is the antithesis of a logical conclusion, how absurd.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/05/24 04:12 PM
4	Women have so many options that it's hard to sympathize with those who say they can't find a man. Almost certainly she either got older, gained weight or now has kids. Maybe all three tbh.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/03/24 07:59 AM
–	Women hate age gap relationships because they are scared of being tossed aside in favour of young women The obvious answer in this case going with OPs line of reasoning would be future proofing and to ensure she doesn't have to compete with a 28 at 40. That said I dont necessarily take OP's general argument at face value, I think its most likely an equally mixed batch of women who are indeed jealous and those who have genuine concerns.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/12/23 10:51 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? You seem to be missing my point. EVERY 18 CAN and I would say at least half ARE fully functional adults or making adults decisions. This in effect means they effectively are. You seem to be hyper focusing on the ones who cant because either they don't want to or other reasons. Again claiming something is the "Truth" simply because you think it is or because you had a different experience. Doesn't make it so. I personally feel that 18 is too young to join the military. Especially when those same …	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/09/23 02:46 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? An 18 year old having the same life experience as a 30 year old is usually never on purpose. Even 18 year olds in the military, despite going into a career field that’s high risk, still need a LOT of oversight and instruction. You really need to stop doing this, Its starting to get infuriating. What ever experiences the 18 year has gone through on purpose or other wise is only known to the 18 year old. There are 18 year olds who have willing got pregnant started a family and are working or livin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/09/23 01:44 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? Apologies for assuming you were female and my condolences for what happened to you. But as harsh as this might be to say, nothing in what you said can truly be attributed to the age gap. It appears you just were unlucky to have run into a manipulative partner. The fact is the type of manipulation you experinceed is neither unheard of or unusual. This is true and common in couples of the SAME age whether be 18,24,35, or even 50. The fact is being able to clearly define your boundaries and stand u…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 04:34 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? An 18 year old and a 30 year old have very little actually in common. Experience, life goals, values, it’s all going to be different. Wow this is actually kind of funny to see. You do realise that people were and are using this very same argument against your type of relationships??? There are literally 18-50yrs old who work in the same work place, live on their own, have the same hobbies and interest, life goals, values this is a fact. EVERY relationship is individualistic in natue i,e most of …	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 03:13 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? Someone from mainland China and someone from the US will most likely still have similar cultural references for some things. They will know a lot of the same music, have similar taste, the other things are simply family dynamic and social references that can be learned. And this cant be true for people in an age gap relationships?. Was it meant to be a counter because it hasnt done that. But rather, its supports my point. But it’s also why most people still date within their socioeconomic backgr…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 02:06 PM
2	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? In what way are my arguments in bad faith? I am specifically referring to your arguments where you verbatim say: "why would a man want to date someone who doesn’t have the same cultural references" "doesn’t understand certain things because she hasn’t experienced it yet " "has vastly different interests and goals" Its not my fault the flaws in your arguments were exposed. I mean your arguments are filled with inconsistencies that become apparent when applied to other types of relationship you do…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 01:35 PM
2	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? By the bulk of your arguments interracial, inter cultural/country relationships etc should also be on your chopping block. Is that a position you also hold?	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 12:20 PM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? What does this question even mean. Its seems devoid of facts, reality and common sense. You seriously don't think a 30yr old and 18yr old can have things in common? Like what.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 08:28 AM
1	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? A 23 year old claiming she didn't have much experience sounds wild but I don't know the exact details of supposed "manipulation". But I am willing to bet the same "manipulation" is evident in relationship of people of the same age. So the question becomes how do you justify blaming it on the age gap? Or should we also have issues with all same age relationships because the same "manipulation" could and has probably occurred to some select few.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 08:23 AM
0	Why should a man not date younger women given the opportunity? Why is every age gap argument so ill and unsoundly thought out? There is literally nothing in this should imply the age gap was the problem. This sounds like an idiot who knew a situation before hand and still got mad at it. This could and DOES happen to two 20 year olds, where one is working and the other is still studying. I don't understand how something so obvious is lost on you. Literally nearly 50% of all marriages and probably a lot more of all relationships fail. But as soon as an age ga…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/09/23 08:06 AM
1	Why be angry at women over their attraction? Just going in circles at this point. Like I said you are just all using improvised visions of each other arguments. "Going for the top 5 percent is bad idea because you are going to pumped, dumped and used by Chad's. It's best to protect and warn these women before they get emotionally destroyed by their choices". You all just sound as ridiculous to me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/09/23 08:56 PM
1	Why be angry at women over their attraction? How is that any different from "idk I don't think it's shallow to think someone in their 20s is more attractive than someone in their 40s, as long as you're not shitting on the people you're not attracted to on both sides". But you basically do find it not only shallow but "creepy". That said we can both agree with that last bit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/09/23 08:27 PM
–	Why be angry at women over their attraction? Hang in both cases the attraction and action is being commented on. Men are also being told what they fin d attractive, something they cannot control, is selfish and shallow. I am not sure what the difference is exactly that you seem to be alluding to. Both want what they consider "best" but are being told its wrong and shallow. Do you understand my confusion now? Thats what I find utterly amusing about this subreddit, it's both sexes going after each other with improvised copies of the same arg…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/09/23 05:10 PM
–	Why be angry at women over their attraction? Fair enough seems consistent, I was just curious what your answer would be especially after calling 40-year-olds that go for 21-year-old "creeps". The repercussions in this case being people like you regarding them as creeps. But conversely this puts your entire post in question as the the "anger" you spoke of could also be argued to be repercussions. Which both you and them are entitled to, even though I think both are equally bizarre.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/09/23 04:57 PM
–	Why be angry at women over their attraction? Tbh I think he just wants to simply know your answer to the question and so would I. Should one control their biological desires or give in to them? But presume you yourself are stuggling to answer because both options aren't in line with your views.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/09/23 04:44 PM
-1	Listening to older women is actually beneficial to younger women when it comes to dating So at least two romantic interest already and I am sure there were probably more. You notice how i didn't even actually ask if you had exs and just assumed it? Why? Because that is inherently the state of female dating. Always having options to exercise, even if like you stated they turned out to be bad options. A ridiculous amount of average/below average women don't even get that option to explore are lonely not by choice. That is what am calling you out on. The fact is you can always go on da…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/23 08:57 PM
-2	Listening to older women is actually beneficial to younger women when it comes to dating I never had orbiters to cut out. How did you meet your Ex or Exs? A lot of women are basically invisible to men. You just don’t think about us because we are invisible to you. The irony when this is what most men say and experience in life. But I guess if I get desperate enough I’m sure I can find some fat guy holding a fish on his Tinder profile that is willing to come over and have 15 minutes worth of disappointing sex with me. Man oh man. Us average/below average women are living the high lif…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/23 08:00 PM
-1	Listening to older women is actually beneficial to younger women when it comes to dating Isn't it possible you never bothered to keep your orbiters or even outright cut them out of your life because at the end of the day. You know you can make a dating profile in 5 mins and have more options than 5 average males ever had and ever will, combined. So to say you don't have a shit ton of options is almost satire.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/23 07:19 PM
1	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. Your rebuttal was basically ad populum and i wont believe anything that differs from my what i want to be true? Do you understand how illogical that comment is, so you decide on whats true and nothing will displace you from that? I am really hoping you aren't in a position to influence people in your day to day life, god forbid kids because thinking like that is what gets you bigotry and ignorance. I just cant understand how that is something a rational person concludes. But regardless it is you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 09:20 PM
1	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. See sounds like you are just being dishonest because you don't have an adequate rebuttal. You do realise this comment chain quite literally came about from an hypothetical question asked to someone on who he would prefer if he his 19 year old daughter to date... He answered and so did I. It wasn't based on what most people do or behave in general. That was something you smuggled and even after i shut it down, you are pretending like it was the original topic of discussion. I am sorry I don't dea…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 09:06 PM
1	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. You are free to believe or not believe what ever you wish. I actually believe in the principle of free will and individual rights of other human beings enough to respect their decisions. I don't simply chose when to apply and disregard them like so many people do with age gap relationships topics. I neither know what most people want or would do in that situation and frankly neither care. I don't base my values and decisions on ad populum concepts and frankly pray to the God, that I don't believ…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 08:55 PM
-2	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. You asked him a scenario where if his hypothetical daughter was dating a 19 year old classmate or a 35 year old man, what he would prefer. He rebutted with he would go along with her choice because he hopes he taught her well enough to decide on her own free will about what she wants in a relationship. At least Something to the effective. How is that not an answer? Again you simply didn't like it even though its the most realistic as he knows nothing about the two choices other than their age...	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 08:40 PM
3	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. I suppose you are both cut from the same feather then. Funny how that works. It not a virtuous answer, it's literally the most logically and realistic answer. I know nothing about the hypothetically 19yrs or 35yr old but presumably under your logic the 19yr old is the best choice because he is younger? I am sorry that simply doesn't follow. I would do the exactly same thing regardless of whom she picks I.e vet to make sure the person is actually of decent character and inform my daughters of the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 08:32 PM
0	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. He literally answered your incredibly broad question with the only logically answer. I fail to see how he tried to derial the conversation. It sounds like you just didn't like the answer.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 08:10 PM
4	Women arbitrarily choose 25 as the age they're comfortable with any age gap, because they know that's the point when women's value starts to decline. It's not a moral superiority issue, it's their own fear of being replaced as they age. I mean that's kind of a ridiculous assertion because you've set up a scenario where regardless of what he picks, he is being dishonest. Unless of course he picks what you wanted him to. I don't see how saying he would leave it to his daughter is not an answer to the ridiculously broad question.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/23 07:16 PM
0	How is it that more women are in relationships than men? I am not familiar with that particular stat but is that just married couple or just people in a relationship.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/08/23 11:08 AM
3	I will never get the whole “younger woman, older man” dynamic as a younger woman myself. Tbf I honestly don't see how that follows... By labeling one self "Homosexual" you are inadvertently stating to already like the very thing you presumably are about to critique. Following your logic it would amount to "as a young woman who likes older men, I don't get..." dynamic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/08/23 02:50 PM
4	Many young people nowadays say dating is more trouble than it's worth ‘Men have multiple girlfriends and women are sharing men unknowingly’ aka 50% of men would have to be cheats. I mean it happens but I hope to god it’s not that high I would hope so too. Women happily share the top men knowingly, anyone who has been outside knows this isn’t true, women who actually like a man are generally quite possessive. See I don't know about this one. A lot of women are possessive sure but from what have seen and heard from women a surprising minority would probably be ok wi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/23 07:22 PM
5	Many young people nowadays say dating is more trouble than it's worth Honestly have no clue. There were a lot of theories ranging from just that i.e men have multiple gfs and women sharing men unknowingly, girls happy to share the top men knowingly, young women dating outside specified survey age range, bi sexual relationships and lastly heterosexual sexual relationships where the man doesn't consider it an actual "relationship" but the woman does. In my opinion its probably a bit of everything. It was a good read of the comments tbh and relatively recent. I'd say…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/23 06:33 PM
11	Many young people nowadays say dating is more trouble than it's worth That actually isn't true. There was a survey not too long ago posted on this very subbreddit. That showed 60% of young women in a certain age range said they where in a relationship. Whilst only 30 something percent of men in the same age range said they were. Now you can argue what ever reason you wish for that discenpency and some might be valid but the stats are available.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/04/23 05:46 PM
3	Do very attractive men have a hard time respecting women because they know first hand how easy it is to get most woman to cheat with him? Your right, it's is subjective but I do believe some elements of loose "objectivety" can still be achieved even in subjective matters. I feel confident to say if some sort of survey was done, a majority of women I.e the market/taget group, wouldn't regard him as a chad. Even accounting and removing for any preconceived bias they might have against his character. But at the end of the day all this is just meaningless schematics. Tate seats at the table with the chads and honestly almost certainly…	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/04/23 06:52 AM
2	Do very attractive men have a hard time respecting women because they know first hand how easy it is to get most woman to cheat with him? I mean it doesn't have to be something out in the open, a bribe under the table but wildly suspected by the common folk would work. Which is ironic because in a lot of sports when a "bad" player keeps starting there is always conspiracy or rumours that he is paying or blackmailing the coach to get into the team or play a game lol. The same would apply here. But your second point is kinda irrelevant, it doesn't matter if Tyrone sucks as the entire premise was Tyrone simply being in the NBA. I wou…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/23 07:23 PM
5	Do very attractive men have a hard time respecting women because they know first hand how easy it is to get most woman to cheat with him? I didn't even want to respond but I'm bored so fuck it. Even ignoring the irrelevance of this entire convo as I already stated. It doesn't really matter, if it gets the same result from my first reply. But your analogy is just plain wrong. Let's use the basketball one. Basketballers in NBA are normally regarded for their height, skills, strength and athletism, etc. They tend to stand head above shoulders in every single one of those categories compared to the average male. An actually analogous …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/23 06:00 PM
5	Do very attractive men have a hard time respecting women because they know first hand how easy it is to get most woman to cheat with him? Lol i like how you go on some crusade, basically saying the very thing I already acknowledged in my own comment but think you've done something. That's actually so strange but I assume you just wanted to drop "Hater" and feel like you've accomplished something.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/23 04:27 PM
8	Do very attractive men have a hard time respecting women because they know first hand how easy it is to get most woman to cheat with him? Tate is not a chad, he is just a rich dude that can throw money at his OF/insta model girls. Same with Myron, if they had no money they wouldn't even be brought into the chad conversation by anyone. But then again does it even matter if its due to money alone if it gets the same results really.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/23 11:01 AM
1	Okla. teacher, wife of police chief arrested for sexually abusing teen (The comments section is very interesting...) Fair enough. I think you very eloquently expressed your views in a way I can certainly agree with you on.	/r/MensRights	16/04/23 04:31 PM
-28	Okla. teacher, wife of police chief arrested for sexually abusing teen (The comments section is very interesting...) I guess my first question is and you know this commentor is female? But more importantly even if said commentor is a woman, in your honest opinion, is that how you thing an average woman would feel about this case or is that an outliner like in all things?	/r/MensRights	16/04/23 04:11 PM
-46	Okla. teacher, wife of police chief arrested for sexually abusing teen (The comments section is very interesting...) I mean I know subs like these tend to be an echo chamber but come on. Really? You really think women are saying she is the victim, when it's a teenage boy involved? I don't even think radical feminists would make that claim.	/r/MensRights	16/04/23 04:03 PM
2	You should "choose better" aswell Wait what? Wasn't there literally a post on this very sub reddit that proves your first point to be false? It's literally one of the top post this year. I am just going to simply assume you simply didn't know about it and have an habit of ignorantly pretending to know what you are talking about. Not some attempt at deception.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/23 11:08 AM
2	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). I must admit i haven't really seen a woman do one of these an get 2/5. But taking you at your word, your results don't look too bad then. Yes, its certainly not an absolute source to be used in an argument but still has some useful purpose for creating at least a working baseline.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 09:20 PM
13	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). Isn't their some female delusion calculator that even tells people this i.e what percentage of population your type is. u/Stunning-Potato-1984 could you use this and honestly state what your results were, I am curious. This wouldn't even take into account the "Handsome" which will drastically reduce the numbers even further.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 06:19 PM
1	The rise of Andrew Tate is sad, but not surprising As for where you get that I am a serial cheater - yes - I have been. Just as all people are some combination of serial liars, red light runners, anger-outbursters, adulterers in their minds, flirters, eye-rollers, ignorers, or a doers of a gazillion other examples of doings-wrong. You need to stop doing this it partly what I mean about no remorse. People doing being "serial x" has no bearing on you being a "serial y". Accept you done something without trying to deflect or justify. Especially in …	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/23 11:23 PM
3	Being labeled as husband material is insult for most guys Other than in this case it clearly is not. It's actually funny how when presented with evidence contradicting your world view you simply chose to ignore and disregard it. This coming from a guy that actually believes in AF/BB, I'm just not dumb enough to think it applies to every single female. I wouldn't even say most tbh but that's another discussion.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/23 02:56 PM
3	The rise of Andrew Tate is sad, but not surprising This might come as a personal attack but you genuinely don't even sound a bit remorseful from what i just read. You seem to have just justified your cheating as "no-one is perfect". Genuinely feel sorry for the girl if she gets back with you as your mindset is that of a serial cheater, you are almost certainly going to cheat again. Also a bit confusing because it sounds like you are saying she's moved on whilst you've struggled to do so, but in the same breath you still call her your girlfriend.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/23 01:15 PM
1	Found out my (f23) bf (m26) was into red pill I had a quick glimpse at at your profile and noticed something that might be related or just be a coincidence. It was your post about a year ago detailing your loss of attraction for your bf, amongst other things. The word "clingy" stood out to me when compared to your above text of purposely leaving you on read when he started his new job a year ago. It's possible he picked up on your doubts and hesitations and implemented some red pill tactics. I know one of the tactics they advocate is ignori…	/r/ExRedPill	04/12/22 07:26 PM