TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheEthnicityOfASpoon Archive

View 25 posts and 188 comments by TheEthnicityOfASpoon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
784

DiscriminationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:39 PM
737

DiscriminationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:18 AM
430

TheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/PussyPass17/05/21 07:26 PM
318

FeminismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:51 PM
249

Social IssuesTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:09 PM
171

Social IssuesTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:19 PM
128

FeminismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights12/06/21 03:04 PM
123

FeminismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:51 PM
105

FeminismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights04/11/21 10:23 PM
102

HealthTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:33 AM
97

TheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/PussyPass13/05/21 09:59 PM
96

DiscriminationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights20/11/21 06:34 PM
60

Legal RightsTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:10 PM
57

HumourTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:59 PM
52

HealthTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:20 AM
48

IntactivismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:55 PM
46

DiscriminationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights13/04/22 05:35 PM
42

False AccusationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:37 PM
37

DiscriminationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:57 PM
36

ProgressTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:42 PM
33

IntactivismTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights02/08/21 11:02 PM
29

False AccusationTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights04/04/22 06:47 PM
13

ProgressTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights21/05/21 11:03 PM
1

Marriage/ChildrenTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:59 PM
0

Social IssuesTheEthnicityOfASpoon/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

That’s a very interesting angle, and a very creative insight into the issue.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:32 AM
17

All hell broke loose of course, and he was made to grovel and backtrack. Meanwhile, the BBC website has endless articles about how men are not "emotional enough"; which of course must mean that women are more emotional than men... So when it suits women, they are no more emotional than men; but when it's "men-bashing" time, then suddenly men are not as emotional as women are. https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=site:bbc.co.uk+men+emotions&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Seven ways to combat m…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 05:41 PM
1

💕💕💕💕 Love you too honey-pie! Big kiss. 😘
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:44 PM
1

Yap, yap, yap... You just can't help yourself can you? 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:40 PM
1

Calm down dear! Calm down!
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:54 PM
1

That took you nearly two weeks to come-up with a clever, sophisticated and devastating counter-point to my comment. Bravo! 💪🏾
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:05 PM
20

Another women pontificating about men — not worth 10 seconds of my time.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:36 AM
10

This is a really excellent article. It throws up so many facts and points-of-view I had not heard of or considered.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:33 PM
1

...a vagina though I doubt you’ve ever seen one in your life I did once!
/r/MensRights26/03/22 10:54 PM
1

Can you define "woman" for me? Apparently the "female" U.S. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson says only a "biologist" can do that.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:09 PM
1

Logic dictates that as a woman yes I do know what women look for in men "Logic" LOL. If you want to catch a fish, do you ask a fish or a fisherman? Sorry — "fisher-person". 🤪
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:06 PM
1

There you go... natter, natter, natter. See? 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:47 PM
1

LOL. Like I (a man) am going to listen to what you (a women) tell me what women look for in a man. 🤪
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:44 PM
2

Such behaviour is not “toxic“. It’s normal masculine behaviour, that has developed for evolutionary reasons. Women spend half the lives pouring out their “troubles” to other women. They can natter on for hours. And yet women have a much higher rate of depression and mental issues than men do. All this “talking”, doesn’t do them much good does it? Men need to understand their place in the world, and they need to study philosophy and human behaviour. And they need to work out regularly in the gym,…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:12 PM
8

Thanks. Spot on.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:51 AM
19

Yes, fuck off Childline with your "toxic masculinity" crap. Translation: "We say we care about boys, but don't forget lads, you are all sickos with your 'toxic masculinity'".
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:50 AM
2

True, good points to remember. I’m not sure if it really would be possible for her to file sexual assault charges on the basis of him looking at her T-shirt. It’s an interesting consideration.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:09 PM
59

You absolutely should do this — it's the only way these women will learn. In the UK, and much of the USA I think, there is NO statute of limitations of sexual abuse charges, and we have case of women pressing charges 40 years after an "incident". Obviously, she did not sexually abuse you — but it was straight assault. And you were clearly in no mind at the time to make the correct decision to have her charged. Good luck whatever you decide!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:59 AM
0

True. It should be "proto-vagina".
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:49 PM
6

Naff off back to TikTok you twat.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:58 PM
8

This is a very interesting insight, into the total delusion that a good percentage of women are capable of. This woman really believes that she is innocent, and has created a fantasy world for herself. But we can see, reality has come in hard.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 04:58 PM
2

Note that when a man wants to transition to female, and have the relevant genital surgery, the foreskin plays a very important role in creating a vagina.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:06 PM
29

Hmmm... that's weird; normally the BBC goes crazy when women are excluded from anything important or significant. I wonder why? Well, here is our resident expert of toxic feminism, Mr Bill Burr PhD, to explain: https://youtu.be/FjLT-xI8\_MA?t=242
/r/MensRights27/02/22 11:50 PM
30

You can read the report here. Note there are many sections: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publication-html/a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-police-and-crown-prosecution-services-response-to-rape-phase-one/#police-decisions-to-take-no-further-action You can see that a huge percentage of the cases do not proceed because the “complainant“ will not give any evidence, and does not want the case to go any further. This particular section is very revealing. Note that they do not con…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 11:21 AM
11

Exactly. And the “problem“ that the radical feminists perceive, is that English juries refuse to simply believe a woman’s testimony over a man’s. The majority of English rape cases, are simply “she said/he said“, swimming in large amounts of alcohol. Beware. This is the thin end, of a very thick wedge.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 11:01 AM
50

Government spokesman: “…focusing on the alleged suspects rather than complainants' credibility” Translation: #beleiveallwomen OP is exactly correct, this is the first step towards removing jury trials, and replacing them with “specially trained rape judges”. And who will do that training? Well, we know the answer to that, it will be hard-line radical feminists, and the result will be all men will be presumed guilty, unless they can prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 10:57 AM
10

You had your foreskin amputated for one of four reasons: You had a medical condition that meant you could not retract your foreskin, or your foreskin was permanently retracted behind glands of your penis. So when you underwent a circumcision; afterwards you would be able to have sex, and of course it would feel great compared to what was going on before. You had recurring infections of the foreskin. This would’ve made sex very painful or impossible. Of course, once you were circumcised, sex woul…
/r/MensRights19/02/22 08:14 PM
1

See the video above!
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:55 PM
5

Here he is complaining about a joke: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10481973/Calls-police-probe-Jimmy-Carr-Holocaust-joke.html
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:01 PM
6

Everything you have written is total drivel. Hacking of chunks of children’s genitals is daemonic, no matter the sex of the child.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 02:20 PM
1

It's like in some Nordic countries, where they give both men and women paternity leave. But strangely, the men mainly seem to take their leave during the football season...
/r/MensRights07/02/22 01:01 AM
1

Didn’t look like tens of thousands, and it was supposedly stopped by 2010 Sure. LOL. Hmmmm... I smell a p**o. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment\_data/file/1051731/\_HC\_1059\_\_-\_Child\_sexual\_exploitation\_by\_organised\_networks.pdf 2.1. In November 2010, five men were convicted of sexual offences against girls aged between 12 and 16 in Rotherham and jailed for between 4 and 11 years. 2.2. In the same month, 11 men were convicted of offence…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:23 PM
43

In a few months, I will issue this police force with a Freedom of Information demand, to ask how much they have spent on this venture, and how many men they have caught making naughty suggestions to the ladies.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:48 AM
42

Meanwhile, tens of thousands of girls who have fallen prey to Muslim sex-abuse gangs from Pakistan on the streets of the UK will be ignored in case of "racism".
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:47 AM
6

Illegal in the UK under the Equality Act 2010.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:12 AM
25

Exactly. These men are deeply mentally ill, and/or evil. The idea that playing with a pram when they were six, will stop them murdering a woman when they are 30 is bizarre.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:07 PM
7

And yet today, an English jury took the extordinary step of sending a note to the judge, questioning why a sexual assult case was even prosecuted in the first place: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sb61ed/uk\_jury\_question\_why\_sexual\_assult\_case\_against/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:56 PM
13

This is very significant development, as it's very rare for a jury to issue such a statment, and clearly shows that the jury think the prosecution was unfair and unwarrented. I hope we see more of this action by juries. And it is yet another case of the Crown Prosecution Service scraping the barrel to try and increase the prosecution rates against men. Of course as they increase the prosecution rates, the conviction rates drop, as the jurors are not fools, and are not going to blindly #believeal…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:44 PM
19

In the UK it is illegal under the Equality Act of 2010 to discriminate against anyone on the grounds of their sex. So the AA have to tread a very fine line between satisfying the Twitter mob, and abiding by the law. This is what the AA said: 'Replying to her letter, Mr King, said "the safety of women, and all vulnerable customers, is 100% at the top" of its priorities.' 'He said the AA had "reminded staff" of its "vulnerable customer processes and procedures", and said if there was a breakdown i…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:09 PM
1

I suspect the reason that this bill will not pass, is that it specifically covers _all_ sex/genders, not just females. The is so much hate against men, both on and offline, that this would result in multiple prosecutions for hate against men; and that goes against the narrative that as a society we should only care about hate against women.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 08:12 PM
1

Your comment has been deemed “hate speech” by the Central Committee for the Preservation of Political Harmony [CCPPH]. You have been sentenced to 7 years in a “re-training camp”. There is no appeal.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 02:20 PM
4

https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/sexual-health/how-to-keep-a-penis-clean/ That it good advice. Thank you. But it's worth noting, the the NHS (National Health Service, UK), performs genital mutilation ("circumcision") on infant boys if the parents request it for "religious" reasons. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:42 PM
23

Plenty of studies show no loss of sensation from adult circumcision LOL. Next you'll be telling us that someone stole $10,000 from your bank account — but that doesn't mean that you have lost any money.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:08 PM
116

Here is a list of all the boys. There were zero teenage girls murdered in London in 2021: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/teenage-murders-london-record-homicides-knife-crime-2021-met-police-b974430.html The BBC website is littered with "women" this and "girls" that. And every subject is twisted to give the "female" angle. Just think for one moment if all, or even a majority, of those killed had been female teenagers. Do you think that the BBC would not mention the sex/gender of the majorit…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:45 PM
3

Just remember there was no such thing as a “botched” circumcision — just as there is no such thing as a botched rape.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 08:30 PM
2

u/MiddleReasonable647 is Brian J. Morris: https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Brian_J._Morris
/r/MensRights09/12/21 08:27 PM
3

u/MiddleReasonable647 — found the circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:13 PM
35

She is the very definition of the phrase “Bunny Boiler”. And just remember folks we need to “…believe all women”: ”…she then accused Mr Mohammed of raping her on several occasions, giving detailed and convincing accounts to investigators.” Under UK sentencing law, she’ll be out in five years.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:22 AM
19

I'm posting this to r/mensrights, as testosterone often has negative connotations in regards to mens' behaviour etc. In fact, it's a vital hormone, that when in balance, has made a vast contribution to mankind... (ops, I meant humankind).
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:36 AM
1

James Bond — LOL. He has become totally woke and under the thumb of mad feminist support actresses.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 08:08 PM
6

Well done! Here is some more ammo: Theodor Herzl, the founder of the home of the Jewish people — Israel, refused to have his son, Hans, subject to male genital mutilation ("circumcision") because he considered in barbaric and deeply damaging to the child. Herzl is buried atop Mount Herzl in Jerusalem, a sacred place, that also houses the Holocaust Memorial & Museum. The great Jewish sage Maimonides, said that the "foremost " reason for male genital mutilation was to damage female sexual response…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 07:34 PM
1

Now you are starting to understand! 🥰
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:49 PM
1

” 'When seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea.” — Eric Cantona
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:20 AM
1

Think of it as a Zen Koan. It may take you many lives to realise. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:14 PM
2

Have another read of my comment, then a good think, then see if you get it. The folks who upvoted my comment got it. Don't overthink it though. It's a simple question.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:01 PM
9

“There’s nothing more frightening today in America than an angry Black man” “There is nothing more frightening today in America than an angry Jew” Would you be writing the same comment?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:17 AM
2

To be fair, she holds-up pretty well; and of course she is faster than 99% of men on this planet — including me!
/r/MensRights19/11/21 08:16 PM
25

"Sentencing Webster, Judge Suzanne Goddard QC told her: 'Blackmail is a very serious offence which the criminal justice system deals with very seriously." "Seriously" as in 18 months probation. LOL
/r/MensRights09/11/21 05:36 PM
3

However even there its going to be driven by men taking greater risks. Hmmmmm… so I guess that the statistical increase in rape is due to women “taking greater risks” by walking alone at night? 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:25 PM
7

eh... do you think that for one tiny moment, if it had been the man that had been reported as having a knife to his wife's throat, and the police entered the apartment and she was attacking him, that the police would have shot her LOL?
/r/MensRights04/11/21 10:30 PM
72

Men in the UK are 4 times more likely to be murdered or assaulted than women. This is another example of a lying BBC headline. I will complain, and see if they change it.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 10:24 PM
31

And that she had been in therapy for 2 years?? WTF — so what?
/r/MensRights03/11/21 03:53 PM
3

The research itself is worth a read. Note, that the author quite rightly includes “anger” as an “emotion”. But then if a man was to exhibit his emotions by crying or being depressed, this would be accepted as good by the feminists. But if he was to rightly express his emotions by anger, then this is “toxic masculinity”. Female “emotions” = Good Male “emotions” = Bad
/r/MensRights01/11/21 10:44 AM
3

The frightening thing about this woman being found guilty of murdering her husband, is that 2 out of the 12 jurors voted for her innocence! Even though she was on video by the police, boasting to them about stabbing her husband. And when they told her he was dead, she said "good". Those 2 jurors had most likely swallowed the Kool-Aid about her husband "abusing" her. But it's a sad harbinger of things to come.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:03 PM
1

It does matter, french intellectuals and french feminists are two different things. Well, they're both dirty pedophiles — we know that! LOL
/r/MensRights28/10/21 03:43 PM
1

The only thing they all have in common is being post structuralists TIL of: "Post structuralist pedophiles". Nice.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 03:43 PM
1

She just didn’t think to aid all potential victims in the equation. LOL. Just reverse the genders and you’ll realise the truth.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 06:56 AM
10

Well, that totally taught me a lesson about my own assumptions and prejudices. Lesson learnt.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 08:04 PM
2

Thanks. Corrected.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 12:40 PM
14

The law commission in the UK is looking into proposals to make misogyny illegal. But not misandry of course. That will literally result in hatred of men become legal.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 06:50 AM
76

And of course J. K. Rowling, who her publishers asked that she use two initials rather than her full name, anticipating the possibility of the target audience of young boys not wanting to read a book written by a woman.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:56 PM
4

Used you as emotional tampon and to fill gaps in her schedule Owwwww! That hurt — but it's the truth. Take a long read of the sidebar in r/TheRedPill and get start becoming the real man you really are. The good news is that you are young, and all this great information for men is available on the internet, bypassing the feminised nonsense that has infected the mass-media and men everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 11:40 AM
1

Take all this with a pinch of salt, and pop-over to https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/ and make your own mind up.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:21 PM
7

> My counselor is a woman. I’m more comfortable talking to her than any of the men I’ve seen. That's good news — it's great you have found someone to help you and I wish you all the best. I wonder: is she younger or older? Because the young ones are now being taught at college, that masculinity is a mental illness; and all the world's troubles, including men's, is the fault of toxic masculinity and the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:18 PM
4

Charlotte Proudman (sorry, that should be "Proudperson" 🙄), is the mad hag that wet her panties when some lawyer on Linkin said she looked attractive. Say no more.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:10 PM
3

Just go straight to the police.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 06:11 PM
1

Found the child sex-abuser: u/Some_Map8313
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:03 PM
1

So you would be happy with 14 year old African girls having the "choice" to have a chunk of their genitals amputated for "reasons"?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:02 PM
1

> Why do you say this? Because it's true. Have a Google (being careful to exclude man-hating feminist sites), and you will see.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:00 PM
13

Many thanks for your insightful post. The history of female and male genital mutilation in Kenya is fascinating, you can read an outline here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_against_female_genital_mutilation_in_colonial_Kenya Originally, the British colonists and missionaries were horrified by both male and female genital mutilation, and they proposed banning both. But then it was pointed-out by other establishment figures in Britain, that male genital mutilation ("circumcision") was pra…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:10 PM
20

Exactly. Things are changing for sure. You can see it on Reddit. 8 years ago when I started posting anti-MGM posts and comments on Reddit, things were generally hostile. But now, even posts on r/science are pretty much 90% pro-intact.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:25 PM
1

TL;DR: Women try to act like men and fail.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 09:54 AM
1

Oh yeah. Thanks. Corrected. 🥴
/r/MensRights08/10/21 09:42 AM
32

I came here to say exactly this. Thank you. She is also an example of a crazy intellectual, who just can’t understand why everyone is not as barking mad as she is.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:13 AM
4

It’s an interesting discussion. The exactitude of the language is very important. The article is about a so-called “medical” procedure, and implying it can be “botched” gives validity to this “medical” procedure. ie: It implies the “medical” procedure can be done correctly. But of course it’s not a medical procedure in the first place, it’s child sex abuse and male genital mutilation. There are of course a tiny number of cases, where a true medical circumcision is required, but this article is n…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:48 PM
1

You make good points, which I agree with. Can you tell me what is “discrimination” is that women face in STEM? note that all the stats for the S in STEM, science, exclude the life sciences such as biology and medicine. Why is that? It’s because there are far more women in these sectors than men. And how come they can overcome this “discrimination“ in those sectors and not in others?
/r/MensRights06/10/21 09:10 AM
5

I’m not sure about that. Even the title of the whole piece is deliberately misleading. Every single circumcision is “botched”.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 09:04 AM
2

I think it’s wonderful you are studying those subjects, my sister has a first in physics and astrophysics from a top university. And I think it’s a human right, that all genders are treated equally, and are given the same opportunities and expectations. And they should not even be a subtle inference that some studies are for men and some for women. But at the same time, we should not be looking for equality of outcome. People should naturally gravitate towards subjects that interest them. And th…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 09:00 AM
14

Interesting read, and my heart goes out to this man. Interesting to note, that nowhere in the article, does he describe or even acknowledge the multiple functions of the foreskin; nor that "circumcision" is simply male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 11:55 PM
9

Don't bet on it. When the Law Commission was "reviewing" the situation and asking for "consultations", they had a number of questions on their website, one of which was: Do you think that gender/sex should be a hate crime? For females and males For females only So no option for men only!
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:06 PM
3

You are totally welcome here! And it’s great to see you are studying a STEM subject at Masters level. I can deduce that you are not studying a life science, as at all levels, the majority of students are female. And the same goes for being a medical doctor. One may ask the question: “Why is it that women can do so well in sciences that are related to living things, but don’t seem to choose sciences that are based on objects or solely mental processes?” And why, does the “S” in STEM, not include …
/r/MensRights05/10/21 07:27 AM
20

Let's be clear, this woman — Harriet Harman — literally supported and campaigned for the legalisation of sex between adults and children, the lowering of the age of consent to 14 years old, and a "special provision" for sex with children over 10 years old if they "consent". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet\_Harman#Paedophile\_Information\_Exchange\_allegations\_and\_response
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:43 PM
5

Exact-a-mundo.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:38 PM
1

Notice how this article is tucked-away on an obscure part of the BBC website: UK > England > Local News > Regions > Leicester And you can only find it if you enter a Leicester post code! Plus, the headline says "...threats made"; not that she threatened her victim with an acid attac. Can you imagine, if for one tiny moment this had been a male MP, especially a Conservative one. But it's a Labour women, so it has to be hidden.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:25 PM
1

OK then: ”The vast majority of rapes are committed by someone who knows the victim, not strangers on the street in the dead of night. That’s just a fact“ Happy? 🙄
/r/MensRights27/09/21 12:07 PM
8

The idea that PR and marketing is mainly staffed my men from the "patriarchy" is just plain daft. I used to work in that biz, and it was stuffed with 70% women, 20% gay men, and 10% straight men.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:49 PM
26

TL:DR: Women tries to act like a man, and it gives her a headache.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:40 PM
14

Your "feelings" didn't like what she wrote, so you decided to not believe what was literally in front of your eyes. And that my friends, is the basis of so many false rape and sexual abuse allegations.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:39 PM
2

RemindMe! One Year "It's time for Pearl-clutching".
/r/MensRights25/09/21 09:45 PM
1

> How is that remotely victim blaming? I’m not saying male victims kill themselves or deserve to be killed. I’m saying the majority of people doing the killing of both men and women are men. That’s just a fact. The majority of women who are raped, are young, out alone at night, and wearing short skirts. That's just a fact.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 08:02 PM
1

Blaming the victims eh? I guess you think that Sabina Nessa deserved to be murdered because she was wearing a dress.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 09:05 PM
10

Meanwhile, THREE times as many males as females are murdered in the UK; and in 2020, there was a 20% increase in the number of male victims, and a 16% decrease in the number of female victims: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/homicideinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:54 PM
42

From Wikipedia: "In 2010, Singh began research at the University of Sydney Faculty of Law,[36] and in 2012 was awarded a doctorate for her thesis Offending Women: Toward a Greater Understanding of Women's Pathways Into and Out of Crime in Australia. It outlines "five major pathways that led [female prisoners] to crime: unstable upbringings, sexual and physical abuse, drug use, economic marginality and mental illness".[37] An edited version was released as a self-published e-book in 2016.[20] Thi…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 03:45 PM
0

Have to agree with you on this one. You are exposing the woman (and yourself) to possible STDs, and the woman to possible pregnancy. Abortions cost time and money, and come with a medical risk; and that's nothing compared to the time, money and risk of pregnancy and having a child. And don't forget the 18 years of child support you will be liable for! But a warning to men: ensure that your condoms cannot be tampered with (pinholes etc), and be sure to dispose of used condoms fully (eg: flush dow…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 03:37 PM
0

Totally agree, this is the correct analysis. I think as far as national teams are concerned, they should be paid equal, because they are representing the country. And this can possibly be used as a pump primer, to increase interest in women’s football. But on this basis, should not youth Teams not be paid the same as the adult teams? Otherwise it’s discrimination based on age. And the same goes for any Paralympic team.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:09 AM
1

You don’t actually need permission from anybody, it’s not like you need to apply to a government body. Rather, you just need to go through a certain procedure, of considering the request for flexible time etc, and then giving a considered reply as to why you can’t or cannot grant that. Then there needs to be the possibility of an appeal to a senior manager etc. You need to do the right thing, with the right paperwork, in the right order, and then you can pretty much do whatever you want.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:57 AM
1

Reason number five: “…they idolise women” Well, not you fish-face.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:13 AM
1

You make a good point. But it’s not so much that one needs permission, but more that you have to go through a certain procedure. It’s just a massive bureaucracy, because if you go through the procedure correctly, then you can pretty much do whatever you want.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:02 AM
9

Taking a close read of the case, and having had personal experience of such matters in the UK as an employer, this is relevant: "Here, Mrs Thompson resented that flexible working appeared not to be considered properly (as in our finding it was not), and felt that this was an injustice because of her sex, which it was." UK employment law is very strict, and it must be followed to the letter: The issue here is that the request was not "considered properly". That makes the employer automatically at…
/r/MensRights06/09/21 05:10 PM
16

Very insightful and thought out comment, thank you. Think about the woman claiming Aziz Ansari was her rapist because he was famous. A good example of this is Monica Lewinsky. In her own autobiography, she writes how she deliberately wore a G string in the oval office, in order to entice President Bill Clinton, a married man. They went on to have sex together numerous times. She was a 22-year-old, well-educated intern. And yet she claimed, that because of the “power imbalance“ between them, that…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:02 AM
5

Not sure if you're really young and immature or mentally disabled. Most likely all three... 😋
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:01 PM
1

One of the women is black. Can you imagine for one tiny moment what would have happened if it was a drunk white man "joking around" with a black female politician, and stealing her hat?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:19 AM
2

Except of course that all the Muslim countries that treat women like shit, will be given a free pass by the feminists because “reasons”.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:03 AM
5

Exactly, WTF has this got to do with anything?: ”When Young confronted her fiance about a dating app she found on his phone, he physically assaulted her, Judge Kate Traill said”. If an alledged rape victim’s previous sexual history is not applicable in court, then why is this allowed in court? And note it’s a female judge (I’m assuming her gender of course 🙄).
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:44 AM
4

Totally is a clown world. And the weird thing is — you could be exactly right — it would put folks in a real dilemma. We know of course that no-one cares about boys as such.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:40 PM
27

Have to agree with you. Some good friends of mine — a great mother and father — had their little daughter circumcised, and the little girl is really happy with that. Should be a choice for the parents for sure.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:35 PM
14

Note that male genital mutilation amputates the most sensitive part of the penis — the foreskin. And this foreskin plays a very important part in creating a vagina (as far as is possible) for a man transitioning to a woman. So MGM/circumcision is "transphobia".
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:33 PM
25

“Such is the extent of girls’ lead over boys that one wonders if they just might be cleverer,” Smithers said in his report “Such is the extent of white pupils’ lead over blacks that one wonders if they just might be cleverer,” Smithers said in his report How does that sound? Would he be “allowed” to even think that?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:07 AM
2

Did you just assume the gender of my next victim? 🤔
/r/MensRights03/08/21 08:13 PM
1

Translation: Women lie whenever it suits them, even if it means the death of a 14 year old boy. So they have no trouble lying and making false rape accusations. But of course the poor little weak women are never responsible for their actions — it's always the fault raaaaaacism and the cis white hetero capitalist transphobic patriarchy. 😘 #believeallwomen — until that slogan is no longer political useful in any given case, and then you can just change your mind as you fancy. CONFIRMED: Feminists …
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:29 PM
1

White people lie Translation: Women lie whenever it suits them, even if it means the death of a 14 year old boy. So they have no trouble lying and making false rape accusations. #believeallwomen — until that slogan is no longer political useful in any given case, and then you can just change your mind as you fancy. CONFIRMED: Feminists make shit up as they go along.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:26 PM
3

(Which till didn’t actually do)... a white woman accused him CONFIRMED: Women lie and make a false allegations — even when they know the result will be the horrendous death of a 14 year old boy. But it's a male — so who cares eh? #believeallwomen — until that slogan is no longer political useful in any given case, and then you can just change your mind as you fancy. CONFIRMED: Feminists make shit up as they go along.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:35 PM
4

Emmitt Till’s death was due to women making false allegations.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:00 AM
3

preying on women at parties and team events Translation: Man hits on a woman at a party, but she does not find him attractive, so he is "preying" on her and is a "creep". Brad Pitt hits on the same women at a party, so she immediately takes him to the toilet, locks the door, and drops to her knees.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 11:19 PM
26

yeah it's kinda scary that a predator can still succeed after multiple people make an accusation of such... but boys will be boys I guess Guess you must be right: A white women accuses a 14 year old black boy of "flirting" with her, so her relatives kidnap him, beat and mutilate him, and then murder him. #believeallwomen #boyswillbeboys https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till
/r/MensRights01/08/21 11:14 PM
9

How prevalent is Smegma in Norway? LOL. Smegma is a natural substance produced by male and female genitalia to lubricate their skin folds, and help with sexual intercourse. And yes, if you don't wash properly, your skin (anywhere) may well get infected. But let's just "solve" this "problem" by "circumcising" little girls and boys. 🤡🔫 Many Norwegian’s have terrifyingly warped and hardly functional members. A bit like your brain eh? 🧠🤪
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:00 PM
12

Who do you think is going to post about having a medical issue with their penis? Men who have never had an issue; or men who have? In non-genital mutilating societies such as Norway, where correct penis and foreskin care is taught from a young age, and medical personal understand male genitals, fewer that 1 in every 17,000 men and boys ever require a true medical circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:51 PM
90

And she’ll be out on “release” in a year and a half.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:44 AM
-14

Honestly, just find a hot young girl on a sugar daddy website. Have lots of fun for a year or two, then pull the plug on her, and just find another one. Repeat.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:14 PM
4

Thank God Almighty, that us here in the UK have left the EU, and thus will not be paying one tiny penny to the EU "budget" of €9.9 million ($11.6) for this daffy, evil "project".
/r/MensRights21/07/21 01:18 PM
2

That is an interesting point thank you. In the early 1900s in the UK, only men were on juries. But they kept letting so many obviously guilty women off serious crimes such as murder, and embezzlement, that the government allowed women to be on juries. And the result was, far more women were convicted.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:33 AM
1

🥱
/r/MensRights19/07/21 03:24 PM
1

That was really limp — can you try again?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:22 PM
1

Yeah — "sorry" about making fun of your mental health issues. LOL. Not. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:10 PM
1

er... women can have a penis. But I guess you didn't know that because you are a cis transphobic bigot.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:47 PM
1

Confirmed: your diagnosis of projection disorder.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:27 PM
1

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PROJECTION DIAGNOSIS: https://www.healthline.com/health/projection-psychology
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:04 PM
2

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PSYCHOSIS DIAGNOSIS: https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/psychosis/treatment/
/r/MensRights17/07/21 03:47 PM
5

I’ve called an ambulance, the folks in the whitecoats will be here soon, so hang on.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:43 AM
4

This is an excellent posting thank you. I have long used “facilitated communication“ as an example of false rape and sexual abuse allegations. This is because the false allegations are not even direct! Rather, they are false allegations via proxy. i.e.: the false allegations I’m not made by the person who has supposedly been abused, but by the person who is “facilitating” their communications. This is a clear illustration of how deep the mental illness and evil of false rape and sexual abuse all…
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:38 AM
5

Confirmed: your female mental health is bad.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:34 AM
2

Many thanks for your considered reply, and it seems you have a medical and/or science background? I don't think I've been clear about the point I am making; so here goes: A simple Google search shows that MRI scans are very safe for infants; and much research is done with infants using MRI to track their brain development etc. So this is accepted ethically. But I don't think that for one tiny moment, that if this doctor applied to the relevant ethics authorities to conduct research on infants su…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:45 PM
4

I do understand where you are coming from, and I hope your are not just not "pro-circumcision"; but rather you are utterly opposed with every fibre of your being to infant boys having their penises mutilated for no medical reason. Note that the baby was in the MRI scanner when he was mutilated by the "doctor". So a questionnaire would not work in the way you describe. But I would suggest that your argument seems to reveal a deep-seated blindness to what is going on, which is most likely a result…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 10:32 PM
11

In one sense you make some valid points; but it good to note that MRI is considered extremely safe, even for pregnant women: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_of_magnetic_resonance_imaging And yet male genital mutilation (so-called "circumcision") is not even a medical experiment (ethical or unethical); rather, it is a straight forward mutilation of the penis for no medical reason whatsoever. So this MRI scan pales in significant. Each and every time a doctor performs male genital mutilation,…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 10:07 PM
1

Confirmed: You are a dork.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:59 PM
1

As I said in my post: ”And if you believe they have changed in anyway, you are a dork” Why would they change? What “magic” did the BBC do to ensure that their journalists and employees now reflect the political views of the British population? Nothing is the answer — they are just a bit better at hiding it. Have a think for a minute: why is it that the most left-wing paper and media outlet in the UK — The Guardian — is where most media companies, including the BBC, do almost all of their job adv…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:27 AM
3

Absolutely, that is the truth. The Guardian is known as the “media” paper, And it hates and ridicules men at every opportunity. Does the BBC advertise any job openings in The Daily Telegraph? Of course not
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:47 PM
2

No, it’s even worse than that, you are a committed Christian! LOL 🤣🤣🤣🤮 https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueChristian/comments/oj7z81/how_do_i_forgive_people_who_did_awful_things_to_me/ Hmmmm… now let’s turn to the Bible to see how the Christian god teaches us how to treat women eh ? ⛪️✝️
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:41 PM
2

Ha Gottcha. Well done.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:26 PM
2

😂😂😂 I wonder if u/throwawayyo27890 really IS Cathy Newman?? 🤪 Or at least some SJW “journalist” doing a hit piece on this sub Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:23 PM
2

Source: I used to work at the BBC during the Thatcher era. They all, every single one of them hated her guts. And if I had told them I ever voted Conservative, I would’ve been thrown out and ridiculed as mentally ill. Proof: the director-general of the BBC himself said the BBC was massively biased to the left-wing! And if you believe they have changed in anyway, you are a dork. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1300275/bbc-news-tony-hall-new-statesman-bbc-bias-tim-davie-mark-thompson-director-ge…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:20 PM
2

Spot on. I do the same, yes you are right, it really is bizarre.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:17 PM
12

95% of the BBC staff are all left/extreme left wing. And the left all hate men (esp. white men) and blame all the world's problems on the "patriarchy". How come the BBC is not calling for "diversity" of viewpoints and political leanings?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:10 PM
11

95% of the BBC staff are all left/extreme left wing. And the left all hate men (esp. white men) and blame all the world's problems on the "patriarchy". How come the BBC is not calling for "diversity" of viewpoints and political leanings?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:10 PM
5

Through a marketing company just coincidentally owned by the charity CEO's wife, or cousin, or brother in law. And that is the truth. These "charities" and "foundations" will claim that their CEOs are not paid much; but they don't tell you how they get their dirty little mitts on the cash.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 07:54 PM
2

Exactly. Women gab-on all day about their "feelings", and yet they are far more likely to suffer from depression than men.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:01 PM
5

I’ve only ever heard of FGM where the clitoris is removed/damaged. That's because you have been subject to child sex-abuse propaganda from circumcision fetishists, people suffering from circumcision psycho-pathology, and toxic feminist etc. Try educating yourself.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:10 PM
13

Noting it “may sound like a sexist submission”, the barrister said she was not trying to excuse Young’s behaviour but suggested male child sexual assault offenders “generally” seek out employment to access the people at the centre of their fetishes or fantasies. Yes, you are trying to excuse her behaviour, and yes, it is sexist.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:17 AM
1

Exactly 🙄
/r/MensRights18/06/21 10:32 PM
1

Here's the reply that works every time: Allah prescribed that both men and women should remove their pubic hair: https://islamqa.info/en/answers/202827/the-wisdom-behind-the-prescription-to-remove-pubic-hair-and-armpit-hair Therefore, by the arguments on TwoXChromsomes, all Muslims are paedophiles. That will shut them up.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:22 PM
1

Wow, those things can happen? How can government even go against their parents will? Good point! But interestingly, in UK law, you have have no "rights" over your children. Rather you have "responsibilities" and "privileges". eg: you must feed, clothe and educate your kid; and you have the "privilege", for example, to bring them up in your faith of choice. But you have no "rights" as such. For example: you have the right to tattoo yourself, because you are a consenting adult. But you have no rig…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:15 PM
5

Unbelievable. So in a news article about a woman who kills her male partner, they list this referral service: “Men who have anger, relationship or parenting issues, should contact the Men's Referral Service on 1300 766 491 or the Don’t Become That Man helpline on 1300 243 413” Where is the “Don’t Become That Woman” helpline?
/r/MensRights17/06/21 09:47 AM
2

That is a really good insight, thank you. And it goes a long way to explaining why women, and indeed the public in general, seem to have so little sympathy for men — because, as you say that is seen as something selfish and trying to disadvantage women. And this makes them blind men’s issues.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:53 AM
5

Absolutely. Good point. They even laugh about male genital mutilation on television programmes.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:44 AM
3

Once again, a very insightful set of viewpoints. Thank you. I think your analysis is correct; but one still wonders why she went ahead with the decision; which was shared by both of them. She did not come from a family, religion or culture of MGM. Part of it is such sheer intellectual laziness; combined with a wish to appease her husband, who clearly felt strongly about mutilating his sons' genitals. And I think another aspect would be that if she fought him on the matter, she would be effective…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 11:26 PM
12

...conflate male circumcision with FGM, as if they're even remotely comparable, which they aren't. Hacking off chunks of un-consenting infant's genitals — girls or boys — is child sex-abuse and mutilation. And it's really only child-abusers who will try and persuade folks otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:15 PM
3

Excellent insightful comments; thank you. I have a female acquaintance, who identifies strongly as feminist, and runs her own small business. She is not Jewish; but her husband is, and because of his insistence, they had both their sons' penises mutilated. She told me that: "...it didn't seemed to have harmed her husband in anyway", and then she remarked with some levity: "...they didn't let us in the hospital room when they circumcised them!". I started to push-back somewhat, and was immediatel…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 01:56 PM
5

It was a propaganda war on behalf of the ideologies of powerful men that got many innocent people killed. Oh yeah, just like WW2 fighting Hitler — so that war shouldn't have been fought either eh?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 01:58 PM
10

Exactly. One of them had a stroke. I wonder if the 58,000 men recorded, includes those that died of an illness?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 01:57 PM
13

Courts, governments and charities prioritise men: Because of the "patriarchy". Courts, governments and charities don't prioritise men: Because of the "patriarchy". These feminists are daffy as Daffy the Duck.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:46 AM
24

There is literally a feminist book titled: "I hate men": https://www.amazon.com/Hate-Men-must-read-feminism-patriarchy-ebook/dp/B08JYMZ6QF
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:44 AM
6

Anyone could report this to the UK police, and they would be obliged to start an investigation. Feminists helped bring in a law, that says that even if the victim does not want a prosecution to proceed, this can be over-ruled, due to possible coercion by the defendant. Of course, they don’t like it when the boot is on the other foot.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 01:07 PM
7

This story was in all the major newspapers and news outlets, and even made international news. The only place that didn’t report the story of course was the BBC, why? It was a false allegation, and the BBC pushes the rape myth that these are “rare”. The false accuser was a Muslim; and Muslims are always victims and never guilty of anything. The false accuser was a highly educated solicitor. So if such people are making false allegations, what are less educated people doing? The guilty party was …
/r/MensRights29/05/21 01:02 PM
9

Put the prosecution rate up, result: conviction rate goes down, and so there is wailing from the feminists that the "...conviction rate has gone down". Put the prosecution rate down, result: conviction rate goes up, and so there is wailing from the feminist that the "...prosecution rate has gone down". Be under no illusion; they will not be satisfied until special "Sexual Assault" courts are set-up, and all the judges are specially trained toxic feminists, who can spot a rapist by the shape of h…
/r/MensRights25/05/21 06:13 AM
1

I just sent them $25.00. So good to see; this is the sort of action that is so badly needed.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 11:11 PM
9

"In the investigation they even offered him the opportunity to interrogate me about what I had told them..." Oh dear, now we can't have the defendant (feminist translation: "guilty rapist"), actually doubt the accusers testimony now can we? /s "Survivor testimonies during hearings to be completed without the alleged perpetrator present..." Of course not, why should the defendant (guilty rapist) be allowed to hear the accusations against him? /s These are the very elements of a kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:18 PM
2

👍🤗
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:53 PM
3

https://archive.is/xNDU5 Firefox browser, plus this extension, and you can get around most paywalls, including The Times: https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:12 PM
1

Now you are just copying me. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:07 PM
1

Exactly. You are the Chinaman of golfers. Everyone can bike it.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:04 PM
1

The red cake is breaking in you!! LOL
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:00 PM
11

Put the prosecution rate up, result: conviction rate goes down, and so there is wailing from the feminists that the "...conviction rate has gone down". Put the prosecution rate down, result: conviction rate goes up, and so there is wailing from the feminist that the "...prosecution rate has gone down". Be under no illusion; they will not be satisfied until special "Sexual Assault" courts are set-up, and all the judges are specially trained toxic feminists, who can spot a rapist by the shape of h…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:07 PM
1

A wonderful distortion of the argument – congratulations!
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:38 AM
13

Straight off the bat, they are calling the men "creepy", which is a universal "gotcha" they roll-out when-ever they have no argument. And note that ALL of those women spend THOUSANDS of dollars a year to look as young as possible: make-up to make their skin smooth and blemish free, hair-cuts and products to make their hair look long and shiny, push-up bras to make their breasts look pert, slimming products to stop themselves getting fat, and of course they all shave their vulvas — as young girls…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:04 PM
5

In the UK, it is, and always has been, totally illegal to cut off any part of the genitals of infants and children for no medical reason. When the specific law against female genital mutilation was enacted, a senior Law Lord pointed-out that it was not required, as the act was illegal anyway. The laws that stop you from hacking-off someones ears, noses, toes etc; have no exception for the male foreskin. Heck, in the UK, it's even illegal for an adult to have someone mutilate their body in any wa…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 12:47 AM
34

CCC chair Alan MacSporran said no adverse inference should be drawn against the women recruited under this "flawed" policy. "They, in some respects, in many respects in fact, are the innocent victims of the way this policy was sought to be implemented," he said Translation: Men were discriminated against and we’re denied jobs that will rightfully theirs: but the woman are the real victims. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights12/05/21 08:18 AM
3

our brain is programmed to suppress memories that are highly stressful or traumatic. Debunked as dangerous pseudo-science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repressed_memory and yes sometimes those memories are recovered after several years Debunked as dangerous pseudo-science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory_syndrome
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:28 AM
7

I think these type of cases are madness. She is being accused of abusing a boy aged 12, approximately 40 years ago. He is the only complainant, and I would imagine it is only his word against hers. I don't know anything about the complainant; but we know that folks can be unhappy with life and then see a therapist ("The-Rapist"), who then magically "recovers" suppressed memories etc. God knows how many innocent men and women are in jail over this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter