TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheFlagonWagon Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by TheFlagonWagon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Agreed. She should definitely be fired, but there's no reason to get the law involved here.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:11 AM
5

We're killing a hundred million sharks a year, but most of them are not being "culled in the name of protecting people" or whatever the fuck, at least not these days. A lot of them are being killed en masse because of the extremely profitable and notoriously difficult to regulate finning industry. It's actually quite chilling, because they often only take the fins. They just throw the rest of the shark away, often without even having the decency to kill it first, so it drowns because sharks need…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:30 PM
1

Is her IQ low enough to qualify her as disabled? If so, shouldn't a disability that caused her to rape a kid be enough to commit her to a psychiatric hospital?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:53 AM
1

I agree. That's why I don't do it. I said in my first post that it's shit behavior. It just can't be criminal.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:40 PM
4

There is no way to establish the difference between leering and looking in a court of law beyond reasonable doubt. Unless the accused is literally making sexual gestures or saying sexual things as they stare, "in a sexually thirsty way" cannot be proven in court. What you are asking for is for courts to take someone on their word and prosecute another person for looking at them. This, thank God, is not how the legal system works. What makes someone uncomfortable varies wildly from person to pers…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:19 PM
6

I know what leer means. My question is in a legal context, how can lasciviousness or unpleasantness be proven? Who defines those concepts? Is it the accuser? If so, that is a victim-defined crime. I shouldn't even have to explain why that's a bad idea. Is it the accused? If so, why would they ever define their own gaze as lewd and unpleasant?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:00 PM
3

But doesn't defining it by whether someone feels uncomfortable make it a victim-defined crime? And how do you prove intent to make someone uncomfortable by looking at them? I mean, I agree that making someone uncomfortable on purpose for no real reason is shit behavior, but you can't classify it as abuse or harassment because those are legal terms, and there's no way to effectively legislate staring without being terrifyingly authoritarian.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:46 PM
2

Thanks, man/woman. You too.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:24 PM
8

Fine. I'm not having the argument. Not doing it. I just woke up, and it's far to early to have an abortion argument. I'm not even pro-life, really (at least not in the legal sense). I'm just going to say it's a complex issue that hinges on your definition of "human," and then I'm not going to respond anymore.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:18 PM
8

Look at that, you misunderstood me. I was not trying to goad you into having the debate. I was trying to illuminate why pro life people believe what they believe.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:02 PM
4

I don't think you will find a single person in the pro life movement that doesn't believe a fetus is metaphysically a living human being. It stems from a desire to save lives, not oppress women. The only sticking point in this debate is that pro choice people disagree with the idea that the fetus is a living human with a right to life.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:55 AM
80

This woman's a monster, and the kid's dad is a fucking asshole who should be disgusted with himself for defending his son's rapist. These people are evil. I hope she gets jail time. I really do. Not even a fucking iota of remorse. Unacceptable. This person needs be sent to prison and then court ordered to receive mental health treatment on her own dime upon release, preferably for life.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:02 PM
0

Remind me again why feminists aren't backing Carly Fiorina? Oh right, because she's not a progressive.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:58 AM
5

You're a good father, man.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:36 PM
7

The way I think of it, that might actually be a good relationship for her. It'd be the sexual equivalent of a Mexican standoff.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:50 PM
3

Fair enough. As long as you don't do either one to your kid, I really don't care if you consider one worse.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:34 AM
0

There is no such thing as "more immoral." There's only morally permissible (moral) and morally impermissible (immoral). All actions fall into one of these wheelhouses. Anything in the second one ought not to be done. To use a much more obvious example: murder and theft are both morally impermissible. Most people consider murder "worse." That doesn't make it okay to steal. It's still morally impermissible.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:21 AM
12

And you shouldn't try. One can't be "less immoral" than the other. Performing a cosmetic surgery a person who cannot give consent is wrong. Period. End of sentence.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:51 AM
1

Obligated is a strong word, but I feel like if someone, regardless of gender, tells you that they feel uncomfortable and want you to walk them home, it's the decent thing to do.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:25 AM
12

In both men and women, arousal is a reaction to stimulus, not a sign of enthusiasm. A man will get hard and a woman will get wet regardless of whether they want to when they're being stimulated.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:37 PM
5

I agree. I don't mind content warnings for porn and gore because if I were going to open an image and it came up with a gif of a person being ripped to pieces by machine gun fire, my first reaction would be, "Ew. Fucking why?" but if text can send you into a delirious frenzy, it's probably time to get off the Internet and get into a psychiatrist's office.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:37 AM
3

To be fair, it does sound more reasonable. Hell, we've even got content warnings on Reddit (NSFW/NSFL tags).
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:22 PM
5

Hey chickenhead, he's being sarcastic. He was pointing out that your argument implies that women are weak and need to be cordoned off from the rest of the world so they won't be crushed flat neath the weights and pressures of dreadful co-ed life. And I think we can agree that is pretty damn sexist.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:21 PM
2

I probably should've said "intellectual discourse" or "academic argument."
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:50 PM
38

I think emotions are lovely and beautiful things that make life worth living, but they really have no place in argument. It's like trying to express the findings of your study on bacteriophages in the form of a sonnet. It might be a wonderful sonnet, but you were trying to inform, not inspire.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:02 PM
115

It reminds me of that Game of Thrones quote. It's something like "By cutting out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar. You are only telling the world that you fear what he might say."
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:58 PM
8

This is exactly the same principle as telling a person that he/she should go to bed in a room with a person who said, not minutes before, "I was planning on raping you in your sleep, but I'm not anymore."
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:16 PM
7

In other words: "Indoctrinate! Indoctrinate! Indoctrinate!"
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:40 AM
11

Still, I like the idea of us as "lurking in the dark shadows of the Internet." Makes us sound like cyber-Batman.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:51 AM
7

God, PUA are horrible for the MRM...
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:08 AM
1

If you think it looks better, then you should be free to get circumcised... Of your own volition... As an adult.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:54 AM
-2

Well, I consider myself an MRA/Egalitarian, and I'm completely indifferent to gay marriage. Don't know if you count that as "not supporting."
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:36 AM
1

Can we avoid talking about the alpha/beta paradigm crap? Makes us sound like TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:59 PM
0

If you're looking for a good alternative, /r/whatsbotheringyou is a pretty nice place, based on what I could tell from my casual perusals.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:45 PM
6

It's basically the biggest SJW sub on the site, but it blows that concept completely out of the water. They pick the absolute tiniest things and go apeshit over them. I'm pretty sure half the people that subscribe to it think it's a joke and the other half are dead serious. Don't go there.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:43 PM
2

I... I thought it was funny.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:09 PM
3

Wow... So, we're already going full Godwin, are we?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:19 AM
10

I think you're on the wrong board. r/TheRedPill is over there.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:19 AM
3

Troll account, everybody. Nothing to see here. Move along.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:22 PM
3

Nice try, cis scum. /s/
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:56 PM
5

You hear that? If you're a bit crap at sex and that causes your partner to be less than enthusiastic, you are a rapist.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:07 PM
3

Christian Humanist reporting in to prove your point.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:09 AM
15

It isn't so much that a lot of people aren't happy being circumcised. It's just that everyone deserves a choice on what gets done with his body.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:51 AM
3

That's how Disadvantaged Business Enterprises work in the US. In order to receive federal funding for your project, you must have at least x per cent women, x percent black, x percent latino, etc. However, if you do not want to employ any men, that is your prerogative.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:14 PM
70

Speaking as a sex-starved loser, some of us have a little more self respect than that.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:27 PM
15

I am a straight guy, and the best massage I've ever gotten was from a middle-aged guy. I'll admit I was a little hesitant about it at first, but damn was I glad I went. It really wasn't weird at all. I don't know why people insist on ascribing sexual meaning to any kind of physical contact. Actually rather Freudian when you think about.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:31 PM
5

I own this book, and I think it's damn funny. It's a comedy book. It says "Comedy" on the back under the genre heading.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:25 PM
1

This has got to be a joke... Or a parody, right? It's a parody... It has to be, right? It just has to.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:29 PM
3

The image in that article of the snow-penis chasing the woman around the quad was absolutely hilarious, imo.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 10:10 PM
12

You know, the first time I heard someone tell me about laws like this, I thought they were bullshitting me. It's just that ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter