TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheGorgeousGodMother Archive

View 0 posts and 440 comments by TheGorgeousGodMother on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How is that femslaining to you? Or you just want to get back at the angry fiminists? I am not even explaining anything to you .. I proposing my personal belief based on experience for why men don't give a fuck about female brains. Or should i also take your permission for having an independant thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 02:54 PM
1

Missing the point
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 11:41 PM
0

Can you read? I never said that you said you weren't physically attracted . I am saying physical attraction is by nature a sexual attraction . However, you imply they are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:51 PM
1

I wouldn’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised if many men have had sex with both of the women in a threesome easily Dude, you think women can't fuck two men at rhe same time? Have you watched gangbangs? This isn't some special male ability. If this is prove of polygamous imperative, then women are more polygamous because they do not have refractory periods and can have multiple rounds of sex with multiple orgasm.. The only thing that might make a woman no longer interested in sex fatigue after se…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:48 PM
1

No, not always, and probably not even usually. I’m guessing that in a lot of these cases the man is still having sex with his wife, too. After all, older women supposedly enjoy sex even more than younger women I didn't say the sex stopped because the older woman does not like it ... They could just no longer have the sexual chemistry or attraction.. High status male figures usually care lots for public impression and one way to do that is keeping the appearances of a happy and functioning marria…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:40 PM
1

×There is a reason why men who often have power and resources often try to set up polygynous systems for themselves Where? And why do only powerful men? Everyone can cheat And are you aware of the cutural and economical factors that drove those arrangements? ×even if such a system involves merely having a younger mistress. How is that a harem 🤣.. A man having a mistress who he would usually be more sexually active and in love with than thier wives, isn't exact the most polygamous behaviour.. In …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:09 AM
1

No, I don’t think that it means permanent loss of interest. This is what Wikipedia says Implication that they lost interest in current partner.. They do not desire to mate with them whether temporary or permanently until a new after a new mate.. I will look it up more. However, human males are still significantly differnent . Most males after 30 minutes of sex aren't going to be immediately horny amd ready to 5 minutes laters after meeting a new woman. The hope is that with two women in bed that…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:43 AM
1

sorry visual symmetry isn't the only thing that makes someone attractive and desirable Yeah because it's not fk*** describing anything other then wanting to act smart and equivocate What the heck is more visual symmetry other then more visually beautiful?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:21 AM
1

You literally say in one paragraph that you are taking about looks and in another, not only about looks, then it's visual symmetry which apparently different than physical attractiveness which one is fucking it? Do you want me to quote you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:19 AM
1

×sorry visual symmetry isn't the only thing that makes someone attractive and desirable And the 500 times I repeated that we were only counting physycal looks escaped you? And i am the one with llw comprehension?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:17 AM
1

f****.. How many time should have to repeat to you that we are taking strictly about physical and sexual beauty, not non phisycal or emotional traits ? Amd how many times you are going to conveniently pretend that is what you mean when the context requires?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:02 AM
1

ive already said a really attractive older woman is more visually attractive than an average-looking or ugly nyoung woman, 3 times in fact. What you is attempted to do is manipulate the meaning of the word visual as if it's something differnent then than just finding the person more PHYISCAL attractive Another quote again attractive 40 year old women aren't exceptions to age declining their beauty, i said they're just still in the race compared to most 40-year-old women. they are still dramatica…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:59 AM
1

ive already said a really attractive older woman is more visually attractive than an average-looking or ugly nyoung woman, 3 times in fact Read what youn wrote the last paragraph especially yes, i am still talking about which one is more attractive, i just said of course the really beautiful 40 year old woman is more symmetrical and has better facial features tthan an averagge looking 20 yearold woman. that doesn't mean she is more attractive and desirable than younger women to men... Notice sai…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:53 AM
1

i just said old age will drastically diminish your desierbalilty compared to most normal to above average young women Idiot we are not talking about desirability not in terms of million psychological factors, but simply physical beauty. Juat say your position is horseshit and stop having to dance around × i just said old age will drastically diminish your desierbalilty compared to most normal to above average young women Again in terms of PHYISCAL BEAUTY, not fucking some vague desirability, i j…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:36 AM
1

You are repeating equivocations and vagueness and think i am stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:29 AM
1

they might find her to have a more symmetrical face On other words more attractive? but an above-average younger woman will be more desirable Said five seconds ago that an extremly attractive woman is still dramatically less attractive than a younger girl, but now it's the above average girls 😂😂😂😂😂 which is not even thr average younger girl but a minority And uses the vague shit of a word desirable to Avoid saying more phisycally attractive because you got caught up in so many contradictions Use…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:28 AM
1

Go act act obtuse somewhere is and stop wasting my time
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:18 AM
1

yes because she's old. age dramatically decreases womens desirability. do i have to repeat that agian for you Npw will define desirable as non-physical 😂😂😂🤦🤦🤦 So most men will say this is more physically arousing, enticing, attractive amd beautiful and desirable https://www.google.com/search?q=Ugly+yiimg+girls&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwj5-NSA1Yj4AhVFXxoKHQxQBoYQ2-cCegQIABAC&oq=Ugly+yiimg+girls&gs_lcp=ChJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWcQAzoECCMQJzoHCCMQ6gIQJzoICAAQgAQQsQM6BAgAEEM6BQgAEIAEOgYIABAeEAU6BAgAEB46BA…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:16 AM
1

You keep swingimg between physical attraction to more desirable based on non-physical factors. So again, would most men find megan fox less desirable and physical attractive than the average any younger girl that fall in all levels of attractiveness ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:10 AM
1

that doesn't mean she is more attractive and desirable than younger women to men The 40 is has better physical features, but is least physical attractive 🤦 Dude what makes someone more physically attractive other than that they have better looking physical features? Do i look stupid or you really just want to win?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:07 AM
1

think that the Coolidge Effect means that a male regains his sexual vigor back faster when a new female is present. It's probably a big reason why many men enjoy the idea of a MFF threesome. How long after? What does MFF has to do with it again Coolidge affect means loses interest in those tbey slept with and immediately regin interest for new partners, men obviously don't have a male chicken secual strategy and can fuck the same chick for years
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:56 AM
1

×desirability includes looks and other aspects. the total package And the converation was only about physical attractiveness and its obvious you understood that initially
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:53 AM
1

And desirable was obvious in the context of physically attractiveness because it was literally the premise of the argument. You repeatedly showed you meant physical beauty, but when when it suited you, yoi started playing semantics
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:51 AM
1

Yeah, but he can have those feelings for multiple women, as well But the vast majority of time they don't and this isn't something that just happen to men.. Morever, the vast majority of falling on love with multiple people is often like 2 people, not with a rotating harem.. That kind of fixation is just not possible with a big mlnumber of people, so even if we grant that love does not necessary mean monogamy, its still significantly limit polygamy amd contradict the be with as mamy women as pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:47 AM
1

a very attractive 40 year old woman may be more visually attractive, but not more desirable M* F. Don't change the parameters of the situation and then pretend it's my poor reading comprehension The question isn't whom men would choose, it's whom they will find more sexually and physically attractive because the damn converation was about men finding 30+ by defualt less PHYSICALLY attractive and younger women more PHYSICALLY attractive simply for youth and age , not if they prefer young women th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:34 AM
1

more fertile have less trauma, lower n count, smoother skin, are less demanding, less masculine etc., its just generally better for a man to go for younger women You know what physically attractiveness means right? Yes, it has shit, Exept skin, to do with any of those things above You can have all this with the ugliest gal in town
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:28 AM
1

most women aren't beautiful that's the thing, so yes their older age will drop their desirability dramatically Completely irrelevent.. Their age will drop their desirable isn't the as their age by defualt will make them less physically attractive amd beautifully Of that is what are saying, than yo u are fucking begging the queagion amd restating your poorly argued opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:25 AM
1

they are still dramatically less desirable compared to most younger women Who.. The very attractive woman or the normies? If you mean the very attractive , then do you realize most younger girls aren't above average? In what world is am extremely attractive 35 year old atill less attractive than an average year old? When o showed you the pics, you said these are just exeptions because clearly salma hayek att 55 was significantly more attractive than the 18 year old but now you recant amd pretend…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:20 AM
1

A lot of male behavior evolutionarily is explained by a preference for polygyny, not to mention phenomena such as the Coolidge Effect Can a male fall in love and became extremely attached and focused on one female or not I don't give a fuck about a bunch of made up speculations .. I care about reality Why do men fall in love and get attached if their sexual strategy is to just to impregnate as many women as possible? And how does the Coolidge affect apply to men? Man who fucked five moment ago i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:11 AM
1

×so you have to make a perfectly controlled environment to prove your point How is it perfectly controlled ? ×in reality most older owmen dont age well, and will becomine drmatically less desirbale compared to most younger owmen Most women aren't terribly aging by 30+ Jesus fucking christ rhat they because ugly while they were beautiful 10 years ago but as soon as an above average young woman comes into the equation, those outlier attractive 40 year odl women cant compete How attractive is the a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:03 AM
1

again attractive 40 year old women aren't exceptions to age declining their beauty, i said they're just still in the race compared to most 40-year-old women. they are still dramatically less desirable to most younger women When were ever taking about race? ... Dude, the question is are they more attractive amd desirable than younger women even though they are older, not if they could still. get men compared to normal 40 year olds Now your are just straight up lying
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:56 AM
1

I would still posit that in my scenario of choosing a 20-something vs, 30 something woman at random to have sex, a man would still choose the average 20 something knowing nothing else Very disingenuous answer because the queation isn't whom he would choose, bit who is more physically attractive/beautiful Now you are just bringing other factors and passing them as prove of more physical beauty because of youth.. It could be a 20 year old is just easier and less expectations
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:48 AM
1

×an extremely attractive woman who is 35 will be more desirable than most average young women, shes an outlier That's not an explanation.. That's juat saying she is an exeption. You have to explain what makes her an exeption when she too grew older and you claim youth is the primary factor in attractiveness in women. ×most average/ above averag young women are more deseirbale than 90% of older women This is called restating an opinion, not putting an argument.. And the was never about are beauti…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:43 AM
1

You keep saying my reading comprehension then you repeat the same damn argument that shows you made zero affront im trying to understand what i wrote Let me explain it to you like you are five If there exist 10 women all 20 years old, 5 are noticibly more attractive then the others, somehow those five became 10 years older but took good care of themsleves , are those five still more attractive/beautiful or they became uglier the the others, or the others became more attractive than they are simp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:41 AM
1

You curate one set of women for being in the top 99th percentiles, and the other set of women being in the 50th percentiles, and ask to compare. Simply ridiculous and displays you don’t know what averages mean. Dude thats exactly the point.. You made the same fallacies premise .. You curate one set of women for being in the top 99th percentiles, and the other set of women being in the 50th percentiles, and ask to compare However, why is it ridiculous when your argument is that youth is the prima…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:35 AM
1

most average to above average young women are more desirable than most women over 35. how many times do i have to repeat that As many as you keep not understanding ×most average to above average young women are more desirable than most women over 35 Says that as of 35 implies a certain level of attractiveness ..lol What if the 35 year olds are significantly above average? .. This is called beginning the question you are already assuming the 35 years old are less attractive bu not disingenuous av…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:23 AM
1

×you can easily find that in a younger woman Dude who said younger women can't be more beautiful? The point is she isn't more beautiful simply because she is younger or she is by default more beautifully than most older women simple because she is younger because she could still have not very attractive features that lots of older women easily have,making them more attractive even of they had older skin.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:08 AM
1

f a lot of those normal 40 year old women were just as attractive they would be megan fox and jessica alba, but they arne't This does implies if these 40 year olds were very attractive, they would have been celebrities. Conclusion, if you are not a celebrity, you aren't very attractive ×didn't say they were exceptions, i just said it affects them less than most 40-year-old women It does not explain why it would affect them less when they still have the same youth decline compared to younger wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:03 AM
1

×attractive women are outliers Here lt goes ×Megan fox is still way less desirable than most above-average young women That sentence has no meaning unless you define on what level of attractiveness megan fox falls.. If she is extremely attractive, are you saying most men will desire a slightly above attractive 25 year old over an extremely attractive 35+ year old and also think the above average is more attractive than the extremely attractive older, something does not add up However, i don't ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:51 PM
1

I know what an average means... And my point is the average older woman(30+) who was more attractive then the average younger woman when she was her age, is likely going to remain more beautiful and attractive than the average younger woman because youth is not the sole factor in attractiveness and beauty . It's not about how many number of women there is that this rule could apply to , it's that the criteria used to measure attractive based solemnly on features prominent in youth is very simpli…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:40 PM
1

anyhting an older woman has, a younger woman has but better Exept maybe a less attractive face or phisycal shape ? Thats the point you aren't getting. If a young woman has an ugly nose and and hige chin, , her youth isn't goimg to make her more attractive than the 40 year old with symmetric face
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:31 PM
1

f a lot of those normal 40 year old women were just as attractive they would be megan fox and jessica alba, but they arne't Yeah because only celebrities are attractive jesua fuck.. Again you are still not explaining why them being very sexually attractive makes them exeptions when the comparison is between youth and older and they just like anyone else still look older than younger women, but yet still more attractive , why?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:28 PM
1

You literally don’t understand what “on average” means Dude a strip clup is not average women Why don't you answer my hypothetical A strip clip of average looking women women, vs a strip clup of 9-10 looking looking 50 hear olds? Who would men rank more attractive In your hypothetical you tried to make it look like it's only the age that is affecting and that it's a representation of the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:22 PM
1

They are not outliers. They are just attractive women. So all ot takes for a 30 year old or 40 or 50 year old to be more attractive than a 18 year old , is that she was more or at least as attractive as she is when she was 18 years old. In other words, more attractive will always remain more attractive untill theh hit very declining age, so age is not primarily factor to Beauty and attractiveness. You think a woman who was beautiful at 25 will turn significantly less beautiful at 30 or 40 or 50?…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:21 PM
1

again i didn't say it was thew only thing, you really cant read Dude you have repeatedly insist on the younger skin and ignored every other physical factors I have presented as an argument for why lots of older women could easily be more attractive than lots of younger women. Ans no there is no noticible decline that a 30 year old becomes ugly and a 18 beautiful
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:15 PM
1

.. Moreover, what makes them an exeptions? They still have older skin amd bodies than most younger women ? Is it because they have beautiful features that has nothing to do with age? You are proving my point without knowing Megan fox and Jessica alba aren't outliers because they aren't the only attractive 30 and 40 year olds.in fact lots of normal women are more attractive then they are. They are just thr examples we can give because they are public figures
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:12 PM
1

And the older woman i showed you in the pic is not even 30, but 55 lol, and the younger is 18 and clearly has a younger skin, but yet still significantly less attractive because she lacks the beauty facial features slame hayek has. So point is, a woman who was more beautiful in her 20s than than some 20 year old, is most likely still going to be more beautiful than that 20 year old when she is grows much older than the 20 year old because the primarily features that made her more beautiful aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:07 PM
1

Than translate this men will fuck anything, but if we were to rank from most beautiful to least desirable, young women will be first and old women will be last You are quite literally saying older woman will come last after every younger woman..
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:57 PM
1

most young people have more attractive skin than most women over 30 You really are so darn stupid.. Do you think skin alone makes you attractive or beautiful ? You keep repeating the same shit and obviously not comprehending a single thing i am saying I never said skin does not affect attractiveness, I said since it's neither the only nor the primarily factor o attractiveness , it zerk makes sense zer to say every or most younger people are by default more beautiful or attractive just because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:43 PM
1

You literally said in terms of attarciveness a younger will always rank first.. Maybe you can't comprehend and understand logical conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:42 PM
1

This is not a good hypothetical because the younger strippers are likely all selected to be very physically attractive and beautiful and we are no longer taking about the average woman.. You are no longer comparing all older women to all younger women You are comparing beautiful young women to beautiful older women So the conclusion becomes, a beautiful 18 year old with a young skin is more attractive than an equally beautiful woman older woman with older skin.. So in this situation, all is assu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:40 PM
1

You are saying you would or all/most would rank this https://www.google.com/search?q=unattractive+young+girl&client=ms-android-huawei-rev1&prmd=ivn&sxsrf=ALiCzsb0GCWx3AZaW2-8cYsMEoPH9DDAvg:1653949120334&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjw1azOoIj4AhXTgv0HHVEaC-MQ_AUoAXoECAIQAQ&biw=360&bih=662&dpr=3#imgrc=s3dig3Xt-1deTM Before this https://www.google.com/search?q=attractive+women+in+30&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjfypSRn4j4AhUmXvEDHYrnBhwQ2-cCegQIABAC&oq=attractive+women+in+30&gs_lcp=ChJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzL…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:20 PM
1

its wrinkly and unnatractive compard to younger women, how many times do i have to repeat that. Jesus fucking christ, what part of skin is not the only or primal factor attractiveness aren't you getting? Just because you have better skin than someone, it does not mean overall you are more attractive than they are because multitude of OTHER FEATURES are factors to what makes an attractive. And younger people do not necessary have better akin than an older person.. More goes into a healthy looking…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 10:13 PM
1

How the fuck is that any of what I said.. I said nothing about working harder. It's like you are intensional trying to not understand The point is the attractive features more eminent in youth are not the only or primary factors to Beauty and physical attractive that younger people by default become overall more attractive than anyone older just by the virtue of being younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 09:57 PM
1

Even late 40 and 50 could still be more attractive than a 20 year old . All it takes is for that 40 year old to be a very attractive person and the 20 year old an average, that's being generous because they could be ugly So obviously youth is a factor to attractiveness, especially the bigger the age gap gets, but a multitude of factors goes into what makes someone attractive and it's not a privelege one only has in very young age
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 09:23 PM
1

wrinkly rough skin makes women unattractive, women 16-28 have smooth youthful skin Dude, 35 year old women don't have wrinkly unattractive skin... Maybe are thinking about 60-70 year olds . So, Whatever better skin a younger woman might have is still not enough to make her overall more attractive to may 30 year old.. Lots of women have good skin but are still unattractive and even ugly. The point isn't that skin does not affects attractiveness , the point is its neither the only nor the primary …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 09:17 PM
1

It's mostly, better skin, better body, Better skin alone does not make you more attractive. It's like you have zero concept that what makes a person physically is a multitude of features , less damaged, more compliant, more youthful energy and fertility for reproduction reasons. The rest have nothing to do with physical attractiveness. However, have you seen the skin teenagers? Younger women actually tend to have more skin problems if you're a man with options there is no benefit marrying or dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:42 PM
0

yes, women are valued by their youth and fertility. sorry You are not even fucking engaging what is am saying, and women are not valued for their fertility.. Most of the reasons men like to chase younger women have nothing to do with fertility. How many of them do you see dying to have children with these women? It's more the excitement of chasing and being desired by someone young because mid life crisis ... Why are the older men usually obssesed with young girls not younger men? Like of comple…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:20 PM
1

Ghosting after a first meeting doesn’t bother me too much The point isn't really whether you perosnal care about it or not. Of you were dating a guy you really like, but all the suddenly he ignores you and pretend don't exist, it would not hurt you? It's very obviously to me why most people will feel insulted and disrespected.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:17 PM
0

Age is the only thing you need to be attractive in women? lol... So there are zero unattractive young women? A woman who was more attractive in her 20s than the 20 year old, is very likely to still be more attractive and beautiful than her when she gets to thirties because their is a factor to Beauty called your physical features.. Choppy flat 20 year old isn't going to become more physically attractive than a 35 year old fit woman just because she is younger. Just compare 30 year old attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:03 PM
0

Zero lust =! Not attracted to person/never attracted to the person Physical attraction is by defintion sexual. It means the person body stimulate you sexually There is no such thing as physical attracted to someone, but not sexually The point of the study was to show that the women were sexually stimulated and aroused by the visuals, not necessarily horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:00 PM
1

No, but many men would choose harems if it were socially acceptable and if they had to be resources for it. Men are by nature polygynous If no then your argument was false since technically the man and the woman are still acting the same but you implied a difference. However, What men usually imagine as harems is just having sex with a bunch of beautiful women that only want them.. In reality, its a tons of responsibilities and women and kids he has to care and provide for and meet their physica…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:55 PM
2

To be honest am just happy for you and hope it works out
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:44 PM
1

I didn’t say I wasn’t attracted. I implied I wasn’t feeling lusty You literally said you were feeling zero lust..that's not the same as i was not lusty because lusty implies intense and overwhelming sexual desire. I know what “I am horny 😍😍😍” feels like and is not that Again, there is wide range of intensity between sexually interested and horny No was saying the women were horny, they said they were at least sexually interested and attracted
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:38 PM
1

×I would venture that complex is in the eyes of the beholder Now plays semantics to avoid a real answer Would you be content with the condotions I provided since your sex and food needs are provided? Life is about choices, mediocre sex with someone who isn't attractive, sounds as if someone didn't think their choice through. Kind of the missing the point aren't you? Wasn't what mattered is that you were getting the sex? The point you've attempted to simplify men's needs by listing few , but forg…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:35 PM
1

The average attractive 20 year old who is now 30, against the average 20 year old I know, and if that 30 year old was more attractive than the 20 year old when she was her age, she is probably still more attractive than her now that she is 30 because there isn't some significantly decline in attractiveness between those age range that youth alone and the primary factor of beauty and attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:31 PM
1

×. I'm talking about the process of vetting a partner via text/calls during the lead up to dating Ghosting: The act of suddenly ceasing all communication with someone the subject is dating, but no longer wishes to date.. Most if what we consider as ghosting is after you have dated the person. Not that you just exchanged few texts with them on a dating site as long you jave not give them the impression that you'd like to date them
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:28 PM
1

Since being 18 does not mean you are attractive, and being divorced and okder does not mean you are ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:51 PM
0

women can't comprehend how a man can be willing to sleep wjth a total stranger whose name he doesn't know without any connection to her whatsoever. We actually do because we know how shallow and one dimentional men are, but we just don't admire it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:49 PM
0

Men are not complex at all for the most part, in our younger years, if we are able to satisfy our most primal needs, eating and sex, we're satisfied And if that sex mediocre with someone who isn't attractive , and the food is one dish type for the rest of your life, and you live alone with no one giving a fuck about you, you become very complex very fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:47 PM
1

Nope. Hypergamy is about social class and status, but even if you shift it to looks, it still doesn't make sense for men, because hypergamy is also about comparison to oneself The principle is still the same.. Instead of men monkeybrashing for statues, it's just looks.. Morever, looks can be a symbol of statues.. Statues essentially just mean your social value
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:41 PM
1

That makes zero sense . Polygamy does not mean desiring everyone and having no standards... That makes at mucj sense as saying of men were polygamous, why aren't they fucking their female family members
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:39 PM
1

Which is why women are SERIALLY monogamous. But they aren't polyandrous. Another deluded gal who things women are only attracted to their partners as long as they are with them. You think the vast majority of women who have been with their man for decades have never thought something about another man!?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:37 PM
1

The truth reality is there js zero fucking objective science about what men or women or predisposed for, but all nade up speculations and night time stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:34 PM
1

Men are attracted to the best looking chick , the second best looking chick, the 29th best looking chick etc. etc Horshit... The 29th and 28th and 27th just sound like good looking women... You are acting like their is somw obejctive metric by whivh rhese womnw are rated. Second Attraction and fuckable enough because i just want to fuck are two different things. A man isn't crushing on every woman that passes by him. Hypergamy is women being attracted only to the best man (in looks, status, game…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:33 PM
1

Many men would be perfectly willing to have sex with only one guy for the rest of their lives at whatever age if he were her “dream guy” and she never met a man who was above him. Most men aren’t like this. So most men will leave their dream woman to sex with uglier and less interesting women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:16 PM
2

If women want a committed relationship, then I’m willing to oblige in just that so I can have sex. So if she gets sick for few months and no sex, you'd just leave he since that is the only reason you are there... I don't know why you men are proud to just flunt that you really can't care nor love a woman and it's just her vagina that matters and then expect a woman to give a fuck about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:55 PM
1

Exept the context wasn't casual sex, but what men care about in women in general. Men always say they don't give a fuck about women's intelligence and success and education because they don't affect how fuckable a woman is in contrast to women prioritizing education and success.. I mean do women care about a man's sucess and income for casual sex?? So obviously they are talking about more serious relationship not ONS
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:37 PM
0

×most women over 30 aren't as attractive as most 20-year-old women What the fuck do you think happens to a woman in her thirty? Ya morons think age is that you need to be attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:04 PM
1

×Obviously that is an ‘on average’ statement. The average early-30 something odd woman is not as physically appealing as she was in her mid 20’s. On a average is still like the vast majority dude. What makes the average early 30 early 30 year old not as physically appealing? ... You think after 5 - 10 of age difference women's skin just come off? Or that she because a woman is an 0 she is hot and beautiful? Moreover, the post said not attractive, not not as attractive as younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:02 PM
1

Thats not true at all married women historically report much more happiness and fulfillment It's not hard to be happy with what you got when you have no other option.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:19 PM
1

I’ve felt the range. I require it to feel like the other more intense half of the range for me to be thinking about wanting sex But that's the problem.. You are conflating not thinking or feeling about wanting to have sex with, therefore, i have zero sexual attraction or arousal. You can subtly find someone physically or sexually attractive without actively desiring sex with them in that moment. This is one of the reason women and men can't understand each other because each define attraction di…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 12:41 PM
2

Sexual satisfaction is about reproduction tough Sex is for reproduction, but humans don't have sex just to reproduce. There is a big difference between sexual desire and desire to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:43 AM
1

Men want to mate with nearly every woman°° Exept the obese, ugly, old and not very young. So that leaves 15-20% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:38 AM
5

Men don't give a fuck because subconsciously they still think of intelligence and success as a male thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:00 AM
1

A lot of men truly don’t care about a woman’s academic achievement. It doesn’t make them more physically attractive to many The implication is that if you can't fuck it does not matter , meaning all that matters in a woman of she is physically fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:47 AM
1

Does not make its any less sum and cowardly and disrespectful, .. Would you find it valid if they dating for months? You never own anyone explanation for why you don't want to be with them right? So why not apply that logic to all types of relatioships?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:18 AM
1

Found the 30 something year old women that’s clearly triggered I am 33, so it most be because i am old, worn down and useless so i am projecting my insecurity, not that your argument is just flawed.. If you think i need the opinion of some shallow one dimentional male to feel confident in myself, try again
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:09 AM
1

Quote The argument is that younger women are universally more attractive than older women. Less Bagagge, more fun have nothing to do with physical attractiveness. So the question is, did you read your post ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:05 AM
1

Such crap. Can you imagine if you put that some kind of logic into play with all your relationships What logic? It's undeniably fact that the primarily motive for ghosting is to avoid the awkwardness of rejecting the person, which makes it cowardy... Whether its common or should happen does not change that. . You go to Some kids house to play video games but don’t have much fun. But then your friend call you a coward because you don’t call that kid up and explain why you have decided you won’t b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:01 AM
1

But no the average 20 year old woman will look better and have an easier time looking good. The average older woman, say in her thirties who was very attractive in her 20s, will likely still be more beautiful and attractive than the average average looking girl in her 20s. In other, youth is not all that makes you attractive, else there won't have been unattractive young people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:47 AM
1

Notice how the 31 is just old, and the 20 year old is hot...because it couldn't possible be that the 30 year old is hotter. Youth is not the only factor to Beauty and attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:42 AM
1

. Sex isnt the only value a women has I would commit to Yes yes it is when you fucking think a 23 is old . You just know you can't afford to exchange her forever. all the non physical value remains the same, she can still be fun to be around, can still cooperate with me, still is a mother if there are children, and still provides feminine energy. All of which you can keep having with the tighter pussy you'd rather leave her for. She is not going to be as fun to be around when she isn't arousing.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:36 AM
0

The average 23yo woman is much more attractive to men than the average 35yo woman There no significantly noticible decline in physical attractiveness between the average 23 year old and 35 old that the man would find the 23 more attractive just by virtue of being young. Youth is not the only thing that makes you beautiful. You can be young and ugly, so this tells me they are more attracted to the idea of youth than that the 21 year is more actually more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:26 AM
1

On a balance of probabilities a younger girl will be more attractive than an older one. Define younger and older? Is an 18 year old more beautiful and attractive than most girls in their 20s simply by the virtue of being 18?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:21 AM
1

They don't think that after mire variables are considered, but for initially dating younger women are more atractive on average Exept Op is not taking about logical consideration. He is essentially saying men only truly desire youth and think an older woman is worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:18 AM
1

noone said worthless just in a relationship for men it would be a big step down to start seeing women who’ve hit the wall.. w.r.t sex at least which is our primary need.:. Whats their other worth that men care about again?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:14 AM
1

which is why you need to get hitched before you “hit the wall There is something called a divorce... If he only cares about how tight your pussy is, how many rings he put on your finger changes nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:09 AM
1

Translation. I have no self esteem and need a very weak woman that would have no other options than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:07 AM
1

The argument is that younger women are universally more attractive than older women°° This is horseshit.. Age is not the only factor in attractiveness. You thing most 20 hear olds are just more attractive than most 30 year olds simply for age ? That would mean the ugly 20 year old is more attractive than most 30 year olds who were not ugly when they were her age.. The woman who was more attractive than the 20 year old when she was her age is more likely to remain more attractive and beautiful th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:02 AM
1

Just because something is common does not mean it's a good thing or does not reflect negatively.. I mean whats so hard about saying that you are just not interested any more? Its cowardy because they don't want to have to face the situation and be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:22 AM
1

You most certainly suspected you were going to ghost. You are intentionally getting with them fully aware that you'd be ghosting them if you were not as interesting as you'd want.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:19 AM
1

It's a perfectly good behavior Ghosting isn't not giving an explanation, it's pretending the person never existed and not caring about their emotions enough just be honest that you are no longer interested. Its not a good behaviour, it's playing with people..
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:16 AM
1

Okay..
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:02 AM
1

I always find the same type attractive Finding that type the most attractive and never ever being able to find others that don't perfectly fit that type are two different things. The point is everyone has some type consciously , but they are still physically attracted to a range of people because so much can go into what makes someone sexually or physically interesting that could not be boiled down to a strict list. The list is just preferences, but what you think you like does not always end up…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 12:06 AM
1

Were you actually sexually attracted to him or just liked him romantically? People confuse the two And did you consider him ugly for you to count it as personality winning over looks? That is if he was actually physically very unattractive to you, woukd you have liked him for his humor alone? .. The point is just because someone is not conventionally attractive, it does not mean you don't actually find them attractive to some degree and only liked them for their personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 11:48 PM
1

Was he hideous and hard did you want to fuck him?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 09:04 PM
1

Are they not physically attractive in your eyes. Your realize 'type' does not mean you never find anyone that does not fit thsie standards attractive.. I think kots if times we aren't good at defining what we would find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 09:01 PM
1

The fact that you won't it again shows that youn were just not aware or truly sensing the real dangers of the situation. In other words you were not. scared enough
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:54 PM
1

Then why are dimesexuasl not attracted to everyone with a great personality? Why do they still have a sex preference?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:50 PM
1

Women and men's body don't react the same to testototerone.. testototerone has an effect but its not the main hormone in women's sexuality.. If testototerone was the only factor, tgere would have been zero women with higher sex drives than men, and zero healthy men with average or low or nine sex drives, but that is obviously not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:48 PM
1

I require feeling something. And wetness doesn’t feel like anything BUT the wetness happens because you you feeling something right? Maybe you are just not consciously aware of ot because it is not peak and intense?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:43 PM
1

There have been times where I suppose you could say I was more lubricated down there and I’ve felt zero lust And how do define zero lust? You are not ready to take your close off and have sex immediately..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:41 PM
1

You nust have zero standards to be attracted to all women... There is a difference between real attraction and ' i am horny and would fuck anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:33 PM
1

What does being attracted to them means then when you only see their looks if not you are physically /sexually attracted to them ? I think you mean there is a difference between being sexually attracted and wanting to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:30 PM
1

Women are most certainly NOT anywhere CLOSE to as horny as men, that is biological fact Show me the scientific proof..a social questioner that is based on lots of subjective definition and asumptions is not a scientific proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 10:22 PM
2

I have literally never said that is just women having more self control. I said it's men being mindless animals if you say they can't function few days without sex. The point is women aren't performing some special kind of self control. They are doing what any normal human with a prefrontal cortex should be able to do. And how the fuck is women not having more sexual control not evident in society when you moron is literally using it as a prove that women have less sex drive? You aren't making a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:43 AM
1

You obviously live in another dimension. If anything, humans today have higher moral standards than the in the past . You know the shit the humans in the past used to justify and condone? Humans will never be perfect morally, but I am glad I live in these times than the times were you could be burn alive for your beliefs. Are you saying just because a behavious was considered in the past as perverted that means they were right? I guess you want having sex with 9 year old's back.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:07 AM
3

× it’s not women being able to control themselves better which is self evident if you look at other patterns of self control such as gym going Yes sex drive and behaviour is like going to the gym... What the fuck are you even trying to say? It’s literally just that you don’t have anywhere close to the same sex drive as men Yes you've repeated that with zero logic and evidnece. I guess repeating something equals prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:59 PM
2

How many women bitch about not locking down the 0.01 speciman you spoke of? Not being able to find a good relationship because most men just care about using womwn for sex equals bitching for not getting Rayan rhenolds in your book.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:56 PM
1

Yes. That's why people are totally cool with a pedophile assuating kids that aren't theirs. Individualism has nothing to do with not relating and empathasizing with others.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:53 PM
1

My initial comment was literally that society is built in people caring about others and what happens to them because we are social beings.. It's called empathy and sympathy by the way Edit: it's called empathy...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:02 PM
3

it’s not self control, why would it be when there’s no evidence in society that women have better self control than men! The same person that uses women's ability to control themslevs as prove they don't need sex as much as men. Which is it my friend. If you knew the amount of desires people have to control everything to build a civilized society, you won't be using such a superficial measure of sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:01 PM
2

What the fuck is wrong with you for expecting me to understand what you are asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:58 PM
8

Yeah not true. Dreaming something is different then expecting something . Men actual bitch about not being able to fuck and dominate a herd of hot women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:55 PM
2

Where the fuck did I say masturbation is the only thing to measure sex drive or even a good measure ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:54 PM
1

It's not about whether we have a machine that could measure sex drive ... And I know how social sciences works, buy my critism was this social science is based on lots of assumptions themsleves aren't proven to be measure of sex drive For example, even if people typically who have high sex drive exist lots of fantasies, that does not justify that you have to have lots of fantasies to have a high sex drive. So Just because social science does not have an objective measure, that does not mean they…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:39 PM
1

sex drive-the urge to seek satisfaction of sexual need That actually proves my point.. Nothing in there specifies that it has to be with another humans. I sex drive just means how much you desire sex. That's common sense. It does not even make sense to measure sex drive by how motivated are you to seek sexual partners. Someone can have social anxiety and fear approaching women and still be a raging animal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:37 PM
1

Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for various sexual practices, willingness to forego sex, initiating versus refusing sex, making sacrifices for sex, and other measures. None of those things are objective measure of sex desire nei…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:14 PM
2

"The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation That's actually not what a sex drive is. You realize lots of asexuals have high sex drive? A sex drive in layman term is just how much you desire to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:08 PM
2

And if a woman was content with masturbation, men could still rape women and reproduce right? Jesus fucking christ stop making up strawmans. No one said a man or a woman will be forever be content with just masturbation because there is a deeper psychological pleasure with physical being with a human you desire than just relieving yourself through masturbation. What is being said is masturbation can relieve sexual tension and extend your ability to a while without physical contact especially if …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:06 PM
2

no idea how different and stronger the male sex drive is. Have you fucking been a woman? You the only one is is making a claim. The reality is things are complicated and no one fucking knows.. Best science have been able to tell us is that humans are varied in their sex drives and desires and that so many things influence sexual desires and motivation So this reality where every or the vast majority men are 24/7 raging sex bots and sex just being a little convenience to women isn't anything prov…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:57 PM
2

Not for males. It gets so strong that without a woman. It'll keep being a nagging problem Lol... Wanting a sexual experience with a woman is an entirely differnet thing than not being able to release yourself sexually with masturbation. Women in general as well would still prefer the sexual experience with man than having to pleasure themsleves. However, the point is in some circumstances, masturbation is a management. Men like women sometimes prefer masturbation as a low effort alternative than…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:36 PM
3

Wrong. It’s not called a cum drive, it’s called sex drive Yeah, it's called so, therefore it proves anything.. Ofcourse humans crave a human touch during sex because there is a different experience and connection with sex . However, you body only cares that your reach release or organism . Infact, some people become more accustomed to pleasuring themsleves and using thier imagination because they know themsleves better. As much as a man is horny if he masturbate and relieves himself, he isn't go…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:33 PM
2

Sigh it is just a simple question, that averages to 10 times a month jeez Its a simple question with a flawed premise. Or they could have literally said 5 times a week sometimes 0 times a month on others, why is this so hard??? And what did you say when the woman did imply that her sexual behaviour changes? Literally used it as proven men have higher sex drive as if men don't have other priorities and emotions and burdens in life but just to think of fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:26 PM
5

And literally the only prove usually given for why men have higher sex drive, is that they can't control themselves. Loll What a very scientific circular reason However, I never said women control themsleves better.. However, women in general face so much more socially complex situations for them to be as care-free and irresponsible with sex like men. Guess who is left behind pregnant and with more social shame? Men just have stronger sex drives Show me a single respectable scientific reaserach …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:20 PM
3

What the fuck? Dude people desire fluctuate and is affected by so many things.. They might have wanted sex 5 times a week 6 months ago, but zero times last month, but your question assumes stability if desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:15 PM
1

now i truly sympathize with women because of this unflattering reality. the same way i sympathize with men who are short because they are viewed negatively as well The difference is height is a reasonable attractive trait... A women being old and not attractive when she is literally 25 is borderline absurd... It's as if all men at heart are pedophiles if a woman has only few years after teenage a to be considered sexually attractive. ×i mean we can all find random people who say wild shit. it’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:13 PM
1

I don't think I undersnad you point
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:02 PM
2

Great, how in the hell does "times a week do I want it" not relevant to measuring a person's libido What a nice stramman.. Did not say it's not reverent. Said it's not a criteria you can use alone to come to an overall conclusion about sex drives. It's not even a criteria people a gauge realistically bevause so many things affect desire.. It's not like people are either raging 24/4 or they don't like sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:00 PM
2

it is scientifically proven by countless studies men have far higher sex drives. It is also very easily observable. Citation.. All this scientific proofs boil down to testing females sexuality from a male perspective... Women are less likely to want to jump in bed with some creep that approached them on the beach.. Prove women have no sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:51 PM
4

Dude.. You are saying just because she could manage her urges while she has so many things going in her life that's means women must have very low sex drive. Basically men are just animals in heats that are missing the part of the brian that controls emotional and desires. it’s just simply that your urge to have sex isn’t even in the same realm as the urge that men have And you proved that with ' if men could , they would' '
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:47 PM
5

All sex drive needs is that you masturbate... You realize that? Someone can be raging horny and still satufy it with some 'beating'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:45 PM
4

No women isn't in average lower. Women on average have to have more responsible sex life... This is not something you can just measure by 'how many times a week'
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:44 PM
4

How the fuck did you calculate this average men sex drive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:42 PM
2

Options are options even if you don't like them That's the most rediculous thing I have ever had... So much women coming on to me when I am gay....it's still options!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:34 PM
2

Poor guy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:27 PM
1

both men and women complain about unreasonable shit. like women complaining about men finding younger women the most attractive You mean women complaining that men see them as old and useless uglies when the start passing the the age 25. a 39 year old women is high risk pregnancy and i think lost over 90% if not all of her eggs? she practically a senior a citizen First I meant to say 30.. Men literally saying a woman above 25 is old.. And Yeah...men are really worried about safe pregnancies when…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:24 PM
1

Yeah.. That was the point there I don't know how you caught it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:18 PM
2

Which only you will suck...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:16 PM
1

None of what you said means humans stopped being social beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:16 PM
1

never suggested you are less human for not getting male gaze I never said you did. I said men in general treat older women are less human.. That's because women only have value when they fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:15 PM
1

Thats assuming these women give a shit about anything beyond what's in the mens wallets 99% that's what it is. I am not saying not young girl has truly liked a grandpa, Bu that's often not reality. A frequent complaint Mong women of this cohort is that the men of their age are more immature and less settled And the better alternative is a 60 year old that only wants them for their young pu***
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:12 PM
1

men like young women, it is what it is. just like women like taller men A 39 year old isn't an old woman.. That's the difference.. However, since it's what it is, and since most young women don't like old fucks either, so men should stop whining about not being able to fuck harem is hot women and then ghost them. .
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:09 PM
1

People in general will care when others noticible start marketing as just a less desirable human. You objectify women and devalue them and then have the audacity to say the only reason they don't like approaching death is males attention
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:59 PM
2

Lots of hot women aren't fertile. No man is just attracted to a woman just because she is fertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:53 PM
1

You can have more kids with a woman in her 20s and there is much less risk. You are acting like people are popping out 10 kids these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:52 PM
1

They are loosing thier youth to somone that gives no shits about them beyong what's between their legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:50 PM
1

Yes, why do people care about other people... Someone needs to tell this guy how society works.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:48 PM
–

In exchange for what?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:40 PM
–

The average woman is not asking for a harem of super hot men to only fuck her and jump in front of the truck for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:38 PM
4

So every woman is attracted to the same 1/5 men... Said nothing new.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:36 PM
1

Glad it's working great.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:34 AM
1

Do you never fear that such inclination would never fade and could resurface? .. Honestly he is the embodiment of everthing I avoid in a man. I can barely trust the fediltiy of men in general let alone the fideit y of someone who has never had to practice it . so I guess asking about past sex life does have its benefits. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:31 AM
1

The society we have today is built on it so yes The society is built in subjucating women ? Your also turning the word patriarchal into something it is not that's pretty much what it is. All the but they were protected and fed won't cut it because so were slaves And for the record I have three daughters. Who are brought up to be strong. Not weak little victims I know men who say they have brought up their daughters strong by teaching then to obey male 'leadership' Bringing them up strong but at …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:27 AM
1

His is in triple digits Heck how does someone like that settle down to one person. I guess this is another perception people fear from dating somone with a Promiscuous past. We gear they are less likely to commit or remain faithful. Nevertheless, StD only takes one person, not triple digits, so the details was still quite irrelevent. The point is most of the time it is in this manner that the converation is brought up not 'so how many people have you fucked' lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:20 AM
1

Every household is either matriarchal or patriarchal and thats a good thing. Gay men have a btm or top. Lesbians butch etc and thats good as it works None of these realtionship describe those two social concepts in any form or shape Patriarchy is male superiority and dominance and females inferiority disppowerment So I aksed of its so great would you want to be the woman in a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:52 PM
1

I guess you are one of those that thinks everthing is weird..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:36 PM
1

Because you can post on any thread that's still open. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:34 PM
1

You say it shows incompatibility on values of he simply asks .. does that mean you have a value that says the persona you date should have no sexual values and should be open to any sexual pasts you any have had? Are you not open that a person would not necessarily not want to be with your but only trying to learn more about your and your values and what you think about the topic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:33 PM
1

So he did bring it up one way or another way.. People rarely ask directly or anticipate the conversation directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:31 PM
1

I don't want to be with someone who views women as somehow damaged or dirty based on how many people they've slept with. Now here is where you projecting. I am a woman and I would not be with a man whore because it shows they view the act of sex and love completely different than I do, not because I thing they are damaged . It's perfectly possible that some people simply feel more intimate being with someone that shares their viewbinn sex as an expression of love and emotional connection and com…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:30 PM
1

So oyu did have that conversation one way or another no know you have similar casual relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:20 PM
1

Pretty much just proved its all about insecurity. It's like you subconsciously thing you've did something wrong, so it's an immediately turn off for someone to show any kind of sexual values.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:18 PM
1

So you have a value that says someone should not care about your sexual values?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:15 PM
1

So we were asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:10 PM
1

So we were asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:09 PM
1

The big question is, why do we think patriarchy is bad Do you want to be woman a woman in patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 10:13 PM
1

The way humanity is right, it's better suited with men in charge Please define those way that makes men better to be in change?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 10:09 PM
1

I’m saying a male can’t become a woman because he can never become a woman or stop being a male What a brilliant logic and explanation. Dude seriously just keep your moith closed when you can't say anything but a circular argument. This makes zero sense. I’m not saying a male can’t become a woman because he can’t get a real vagina You literally brought up the parts not being real to counter the point where I was claiming that trans people most certainly can achieve the biological physique of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:26 PM
1

This one, which is why straight men don’t date transgenders So if we asked most men right now whether a woman is a Female that has certain biological sex characteristic they will say flat no!!!!lool I have honestly stop taking you seriously million years ago but you are quite hilarious to read, but maybe I should stop wasting my time
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:34 PM
1

Which is ideologically consistent with what I’ve said the whole time… A woman does not become a man because she cuts up her genitals No it is not ideologically consistant because you are both arguing that genetelia does not define a woman while simultaneously arguing that a male not being able to get a real vagina means he will never became a woman..a vagina is either fundemetal to what makes a woman or not. And previously you were arguing that no particular physical aspect of fundemetally to wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:27 PM
1

I disagree. A cut up vagina made to look like a dick is not a penis (or however they do it Literally argued 5 second ago yourself that genitalia is not what makes a woman.. It's all convenience to you . When you want its what makes a woman, but then it's not. Moroever, what is scientific it not matter of opinion. Nevertheless , whether the parts are real or not, you still think she is a woman even thought she no longer has any female sex characteristics. Lol...I don't think you are going to argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:03 PM
1

Biological sex isn’t the same as genitals Who the fuck said they are? But genetelia is one of the fundemetal aspect of biological sex . You come out with these random announcement that aren't even clear what they are adressing A woman can’t “transform her biology to be male She quite literally can scientifically if by biology here we mean transforming to a male reproductive and physical anatomy. You realize trans women, for example, don't just change their genitalia but their whole sex hormone a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:32 PM
1

No you never said a woman can transform herself biology to a male and still be woman. When you say a woman is still a woman in a male body, I don't know what else can make womanhood anymore seperate to physical sex.. You never said a woman is not defined by being a female of certain sex characteristic. You never denied that genetelia or sexual reproductive organs are a major component of what constitute womenhood. You have not been arguing for hours that attraction is to a ' woman' not her biolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:18 PM
1

. I never said women can be born into male bodies, I’ve never seen an example of that ever happening. Jesus christ give me patience. I said you believe a womanhood is seperate to biological sex. Therefore womanhood can theoritically exist in an opposite sex body. This is what trans people belief. Now we will go into another 10 hours round of your pretending this is not about you thinking gender is seperate than biological sex, but that you said someone can be born in the wrong body..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:07 PM
1

I just explained it's not the question . If you support that womenhood and manhood are separate essenses to bilogical sex then you are supporting one of of transgenderism central premise about how gender relates to biological sex... Since someone can be a woman in male biology because a womanhood exist in essense seperate to any physical biology , which is something you've been advocating for hours, than you quite literally legitimating that a woman in essense can be born in the wrong physical s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:00 PM
1

I don’t because they believe that their men are woman and I don’ It’s very odd that you are still not getting the simple question that my 4 year old grasped hours ago ?! I DID NOT ASK YOU IF YOUR BELIEVE THEIR WOMEN ARE MEN OR MEN ARE WOMEN .... What I am asking is how your proposition of how biological sex relates to gender differes to what trans people belief about sex and gender because it opon That belief that theybclaim that a woman can be born in a male and vice versa
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:46 PM
1

No Trangenderism is the belief they were always women even when they were physically males. Moreover a bizzlion time I am not asking what makes them not woman. I am asking how are you not supporting one of transgenderism central premise about the seperation of gender and biological sex? If you repeat because they are not women I am am seriously going to start reporting all your replies because you are obviously intensionally arguing in very bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:34 PM
1

No of course not. But that doesn’t mean that having a vagina, overies and a uterus is what makes one a woman You say this to the question whether a penis and testicles can equally be a normal aspect of womenhood But later you a woman is no more or less a woman based on any physical physical aspects. Then later you say a woman/females can be even with a fully literal makes bodies So womenhood one moment have major sex characteristics and another theycan be full males, and another can actually be …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:25 PM
1

You are a woman by simply being a woman. You can’t become it, you can’t unbecome it, you just are Let me repeat the question Okay what majorly makes someone a woman of not their biological sex ?can you be a woman without having a female biological sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:17 PM
1

No it’s not. You’re not more or less of a woman, you’re just a woman or not Honey that's not the question and actually makes no sense because it essentially means a woman can be anything. A woman is either defined by tangible features, or its literally nothing but but a meaningless fantasy. ×Simple really: Because they’re not women, they’re men You are still not answeirg the darn question. I am not asking what makes them not women Trandegerism is the position that womanhood exist in essense and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:07 PM
1

So theoritically a woman can be anything, racoon, monkey, donkey ? Can you describe how this womanhood is mentally perceived outside of an assumption of certain biological aspects?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:02 PM
1

Yeah if a woman cuts herself up to look like a man she’s still a woman No actually just quite literally become a a male both biologically and scientifically. Your perception of them as females might not change, but that is not a biological reality and that has nothing to do with how a woman is biologically defined. Trans women arent real women simply because of the 'fake' or 'unreal' perception of them, not because having a female biology is not what defines a woman. You are committing a serious…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:00 PM
1

Except it isn’t. You ask any normal person if a man cut up to look like a woman is a man or a woman, they’ll say man But we aren't talking about tragenders.. What do most people think when they are asked what a woman is? The answer is simply a females with certain female biological characteristic You know what a woman is. Unless you’re transgender Jesus fucking christ. I tell you what I think a woman is then you tell me it wrong, then come back and say I know it. Why don't you just define it?!!!…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:44 PM
1

No of course not. But that doesn’t mean that having a vagina, overies and a uterus is what makes one a woman The question is whether is a major component of a woman, not if it it's the only thing that defies a woman Because they’re not actually women Pease answering the question. If womenhood is seperate form biological sex how is this not supporting the Trangenderism bevause trans women belief in essense they are women even if they have males bodies . Do you get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:37 PM
–

A woman has a female body because they’re a woman, they’re not a woman because they have a female body What in the name of flying monkies does that even means lol. So that means womenhood is a seperate essense then having females bodies? Does that not means that in theory you can be a woman without having female bodies?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:34 PM
1

You are a woman by simply being a woman Okay, now define what a womam is? If your are heterosexual, how do you distinguish women and decide your sexual and romantically attracted to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:29 PM
1

But that's literally what define a woman to the vast majority of people outside of Trangenderism . A woman is simply a female . A femlale scientifically is someone who has female characteristics If you don't agree why idnt you just give your defintion and stop Turing us in circles. Pretty easy right? What is a woman to you? Don't you see how trying to avoid asnwerig that question is started to seem like you don't have an answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:27 PM
–

Not necessarily biological sex, but genitalia sure When have a ever define biological sex as as just genitalia? However, how is genitalia which would include the whole reproductive system, seperate to how a female/womne is defined. Are you saying a penis and testifies can equally be a normal aspect of a womanhood as having a vagina, overies and a uterus? Yeah because they’re not Why if you agree womenhood is not defined by bilogucal physical sex which is the major premise of Trangenderism?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:23 PM
–

Okay what majorly makes someone a woman ifb not their biological sex ?can you be a woman without having a female biological sex? If I introduced a group of people to your how would you distinguish females/women from men/males?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:17 PM
1

Okay what majorly makes someone a woman of not their biological sex ?can you be a woman without having a female biological sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:16 PM
–

×A woman is a woman. Every culture since the beginning of time know what’s a woman is So you agree a woman is someone with females sex characteristics? So a man being attracted to woman is literally being attracted to somone with female bodies?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:15 PM
1

No one said only, all I said is that being attracted to women is what defines straight men’s sexual orientation, not attraction to female appearance Fair enough, so sparing the nonsensical semantics, so you agree Sexual sttraction is also a sexual response to physical biological sex characteristics? .. Therefore , is it not equally superficial and immoral to exclude people based on their private parts and arbitrarily secondary sex characteristics when they are immutable and do not affect how the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 04:06 PM
–

No one said only, all I said is that being attracted to women is what defines straight men’s sexual orientation Yes a man come in contact with an attractive woman and his first thought is does she have the essence of a woman? , not wow I want to bang those boobs what you are essentially saying is that a woman theoriticay be a polar bear and men would want want to bang the shit out of her? You literally defining womenhood as someone seperate than physical biological sex, yet you still deny trans …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:38 PM
–

Are you seriously arguing a woman/female body is not one of the major aspect of what makes her a woman/female? ... I don't know should I cry or laugh to be honest .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:27 PM
–

Lollll..... What defines a darn woman. You are either the most dense person alive or the most muniplulative and disingenuous debater. A woman is literally someone with a female appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:25 PM
1

You don’t know what a woman is Stop acting obtuse. You obviously know this is about trying to ground you own definition of what makes a woman since you have been equivocating this point like a lost drunk for hours. You denied a woman is defined by her sex characteristics or psychology what is woman to you? I think appearance can be a major part to a lot of people, but not without the person being a woman first of all What does that mean ? That the attraction to the appearance is distinct to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:21 PM
–

You literally fucking said this... Did you or did you not deny that sexual orientation is primary attraction to a set of distinct biological sex markers and physiques and calmed sexual orientation is mostly an attraction to an essense ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:00 PM
1

Heterosexuality is for males the attraction to women, that doesn’t mean the only thing about women that’s attractive to men is the fact that they’re women What the hell you taking about dude? What defines a damn 'woman 'is the question here, so stop answering hulluucinations in your head. ×No one said that the only reason men would ever be attracted to someone is bc they’re female and only because they’re female, and thus all females No one said that you said that M**F*** .. What the actually fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:45 PM
–

The difference is that men marry a woman that’s just about the most attractive woman he’s even been with, so he values her greatly I thought men are only sexually attracted to the essense of womenhood, not distinctive biological sex markers. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:31 PM
2

The difference is that men marry a woman that’s just about the most attractive woman he’s even been with, so he values her greatly I thought men are only sexually attracted to the essense of womenhood, not distinctive biological sex markers. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:31 PM
1

If sexually orientation was an attraction to an essense, then all heterosexual men or women or gays would have been equally attracted to anyone of the desired sex since this 'essense' has any physically or mentally detectable features to make one person sexually or romantically more desirable then another, which will put 90+ of your redpil male and female sexuality nature down the sewers. Don't you love it when people dig their own graves.lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:21 PM
1

Moreover, genital mutilation is quite literary destroying thier genitals whether it has positive affects is irrelevent. I undersnad the ethical reasons for why we should avoid such triggering terms, and I do think we should avoid them, but let's not put a subjective pseudoscience spin on it to pretend our politics are grounded in hard science.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:38 PM
1

Do you think if science was suddenly able to detect this elusive essense of manhood and womanhood men will suddenly start desiring anybody regardless of physical sex or physical hormonal transitioning who has been shown to have this essense such) ? You know someone argument is absolutely bunk and utterly absurd when they have to argue that having a vagina, breasts and female physique has nothing to do with a heterosexual man sexuality and attraction to females/women. Lol. If you have to deny rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:26 PM
1

What kind of crackhead logic is this. They’re not women, and that’s exactly why men don’t want them, not because they don’t look like women because a few of them do What the fuck is a woman then dude if neither their bodies nor their essense of feeling like women 'psychologically/mentally ' makes them women? Somehow we would have to believe that this total nothingness, which is also sex, defines every fiber of your being 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In other words, describe this essense men are attracted to withou…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:00 PM
1

Moreover, you still have not explained how this mystical essense makes it any less shallow of a reason to discriminate agaisnt someone sexually and romantically. In fact I cound not thing of a more shallow reason than a literally immeasurable and intangible concept , or how it's changes your own proposed standard and criteria for what makes moral dating choices. In other words how is this 'essense' affecting the way the person can treat you and how intensely they can love you and you them! Addit…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:32 PM
1

Hello! Just so you're aware, the term "genital mutilation" is a term that is often used by transphobic people to discredit surgeries that trans people get to alleviate gender dysphoria, Glad to know what vacabularies transphobic people use. However, the reaosn I used the word is to show how straight men who refuse to date trans people perceive the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:24 PM
1

Yeah men are attracted to the very essence of a woman There is no such thing as an essense of a woman. Attraction is to physical markers of biological sex.. People can have abstract ideas of what makes a woman and a man, but biological sex features is 99.9 % of what makes a man and a woman. that’s why 99% of men would never date a transgender no matter how much they look like a woman because she is perceived as a male that mutilated her body to look female..I hate to describe it like this, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:18 PM
1

How is sexuality even remotely comparable? What is sexuality if not an attraction to a group a arbitrary physical features that don't affect how hard someone can love? How is sexuality different than being attracted to any other physical feature? Someone being a woman is something that affects ever fiber of their being, someone being flat chested does not LOL.... Being a females which is defined by having certain physical features affects every fiber of someone's being, but a female having no bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:45 AM
1

I do think it’s bad to not date women who are flat chested, Why is it bad to not want to date someone you don't find sexually attractive? How is it good to force yourself to fuck people you don't actual desire?Do you think most people with grain of dignity would want you to force attraction and interest in them? so yeah I do think it’s bad to exclude people based on some arbitrary feature that doesn’t change how they treat me or how hard i can love them So you think it's bad for a homosexual to …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 10:18 AM
1

You’re completely tripping over your own definitions. You don’t date someone with a bad personality bc they have a bad personality, not because they check a box that says “bad personality Is that sentences suppose to make sense to an intelligent mind ? Loll And you don't date someone who has a ugly body because they have a ugly body, not because they check a box that says 'ugly body' You acting like of that ridiculous argument makes a special exeption for personalities. Same thing, you can rejec…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:57 AM
1

"There is nothing to feel about about" i can judge my feelings, don't do this And I am not saying you can't.. You are pretty dramatic "pretending that it perfectly summaries what I said I don't care whether it was intensional or not, but after something has been explained hundreds of time, but you still fail to correctly fully represent their argument, than it might as well be intensional. I am not responsible for your low comprehension. good bye, next gaslight attempt results in block Open a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:45 AM
1

How am I gaslighting you about your feelings and intenaions? Just because you are confused does not make it my fault. I jave been explaining my position many times, but you still never failed to make a Strawman out of each attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:24 AM
1

Not dating someone because of their immutable traits is wrong On what fucking moral framework? You are basically saying attraction should have zero to do with why you should date and sleep with someone because immutability has zero relevence to whether a feature or trait is emotionally and mentally attractive . Moreover, lots of people can't actually change their personality, . A psycopath can't change his desire to want to slaughter and torture humans, so basically we should have to date everyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:09 AM
1

And hiring someone to do a job is not uisng thier body... In what world is paying someone to fuck their vagina equivalent to paying them to fix you sink? Makes me feel bad and honestly i'd rather talk to someone else where i don't get attacked. There is nothing to feel about about and you not being attacked , but stop taking pieces of sentences out of my argument and pretending that it perfectly summaries what I said. It's just frustrating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:01 AM
1

Bad analogy if criminility gets involved where there was none Why would legality reduce one's ability to repent and become a moral person?!!!!! Jesus christ Is paying someone to kill an animal moral? Is paying someone to kill another human moral? Once criminality gets involved it changes the subject substantially. When will get through your skull that what is moral is entirely different than what is legal? Legal laws are mostly based on common set of agreed upon human rights You know lots of thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:57 AM
1

I don't have a problem with you. I have a problem with you it undersaidng basic English . My argument is that morality is not defined by disgust Neve said morality is defined by disgust. What was said though by you is that disgust is just a purity response, so answer why you thought otherwise in case of having sex with children. Pedophiles dont feel disgust yet they feel the acts they desire to do to be immoral Because they know the social reprecussions and how people feel about violating childr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:52 AM
1

I didnt bring rape in, you did. I don't see a relevancy of talking about rape, you do. 🤦 The question of morality is about prostitution, not rape. I already said rape is immoral You really have no grasp of what an analogy is right? I brought rape up to show you that just by repenting and an action being in the past does not magically stop that action being associated with you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:38 AM
1

Obviously 'no one' is not literal. I was only talking about myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:34 AM
1

×You asked me if it's just purity and i answered. I don't understand why you get mad at me Soory, but you most be on another level of dense. The point is I am disgusted by having sex with children and by your answer you don't think it's just purity, so your argument that disgust is just purity is wrong Degrading humans is what makes it immoral Yes, using someone's body a commodity is very dehuminizing
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:31 AM
1

Yeah, discrimination by people’s immutable traits is wrong, but only racism is racism Not wanting to fuck someone is not what is defined as legal discrimination dude....you literally just said not fucking someone because you don't find them attractive is wrong...I guess rape comes in all shapes and forms And I am going to pretend 'only racism is racism' make any fucking sense Racism is taught not natural, and if you were a better person you’d work on unlearning the racism you’re dripping with Ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:28 AM
1

First it was legality, now its bringing force.. This conversation was literally never about what makes an action immoral or not, but what was the relevence of legality to the morality of an action and the ability to repent for it... You are trying really hard to avade a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:23 AM
1

Why should I answer for what another person said? And how is that even confusing doing with being is beyond me!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:20 AM
1

Fucking children is both immoral and disgusting. For pedophiles it is only immoral and not disgusting but arousing. The disgust or arousal doesnt define the morality. This is a very good example Oh my fucking God. Where did I say disgust defines the morality? You calmed disgust had nothing to do with morality and its just only about purity.. I said we typically feel disgust toward things we deeply find immoral. Please actually try stick to a premise. Do you think it's immoral for only one side b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:13 AM
1

I was asking solemnly about the morality of the act when you brought up legality ... We obviously have a serious communication wall
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:06 AM
1

Aren't you confusing the morality of an action by the person deserving forgiveness? No one said having done something immoral means you are always an immoral person, just that certain actions, depending on their moral significance, can always reflect on you in people's perception no matter how much you changed and repent. It's unfortunate in my view, but it's just such a strong psychological bias in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:04 AM
1

See, i feel like being disgusted by the act and finding it to be immoral are actually two different things. Disgust is about purity (emotional shame) and morals are about sth different (maybe harm?) (emotional guilt I am disgusted having sex with children, so it's just purity? Morals are pretty much often based on feelings . And disgust is a very common reaction toward things you find immoral. Moroevr, I never said it's immoral only because it's disgusting. I remmeber explaining why I find it ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:58 AM
1

I've never explained how i defined morality, though What did you mean when you said morality is about what to do, not what have been done? I think the illegality changes a lot, but i'm happy to agree to disagree on that point as i'm not that interested in it What does legality change relative to the morality of the action and whether you can repent for it especiay when I already told you rape isn't illegal everywhere? I am really finding it hard to undersnad your argument. Can you not repent for…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:40 AM
1

I already argued rape to be immoral. Rape is also illegal. Why are you persevering on something we actually agree on Because that was not our disagreement. The disagreement was with your logic of what defines morality My point in rape being illegal is that you change the argument of the analogy massively if you bring illegality into a moral question. No it does not when the conversation is solely concerned with the morality of the act. The only change you brought was diverting from the actual po…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:34 AM
1

I think you misunderstand me. If you repent from immoral actions you have done, i argue you are not an immoral person. The actions still stay immoral Glad you cleared that up, but just because you repent for something does not mean you remove someone perception of you. I agree it's pretty extreme in my view to forever not want to be with someone just bevause they had sex once in exchange for money, but someone could be just more disgusted by the act then I am. Just like I will never want to be w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:28 AM
1

You bring in force in a situation where there was none. This is rape and is illegal. This is not buying bodies for pleasure but rape What does legal have do DO WITH IT? Dude legal and moral are two differnet things. I am asking if rape would be immoral based on your own standards , not legal. ×To your question about those countries: i think they should make laws to represent morality and make it illegal for a wife to rape her husband and vice versa Something wrong with your comprehension. No one…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:25 AM
1

Jesus christ... Explaining why rape is immoral is not address the big fallacious argument that you made that morality is about what to do not what have been done whatever. I think paying for sex is immoral because sex is obviously such a private and perosnal thing and should be based on genuine attraction and desire not someone desperate for money and another taking opportunity of it. It's just very degrading and dehuminizing to reduce a person's body to a commodity and object for sale to be exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:18 AM
1

What the hell you trying to say? So when you said men prefer young women and don't really dwant to fuck those in thier age range you were only talking about men having sugar daddy relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:11 AM
0

Who gives a shit about what is legal or not when the question is about morality? This is the most pathetic attempt at avading the subject. You know forms of rapes are legal in many countries, such as marital rape? So according to you, raping your wife in those countries are not immoral as long as it's something you have did, right ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:07 AM
1

What a ridiculous argument, so it is not immoral, it's just a crime. You know legality and morality are two different things, right? Moreover, what the hell does legality has to do with anything... You said morality is about what not to do, not what have done, which means any immoral action is moral as long as it's in the past, which makes no fucking sense. An action is either moral or not regardless of its point in time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:53 AM
1

Yes, your boss fuck your ass to make profit ... Try another example. I am pretty sure you see no difference between your boss forcing you to come to work at 8 and forcing you to bend down for a quicky in the anal . It's just all buying bodies for pleasure, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:51 AM
1

What the hell are you talking about. By your logic, any sexual preference is discrimination as long it isn't by sex What makes not fighting the color black sexually attraction NY differnent than not finding any other physical not attractive other than that skin has a political sensitivity ? . And why would naturally occuring make it any less sexist? Its just be a innate sexism. Lol. You do know their are innate reasons why people are racists? Human generally and naturally prefer those who are si…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:47 AM
1

Do you always just take every conversation to the wildest extreme with zero common sense? Everyone keeps saying testosterone isn’t 100% but it’s a large factor I am not talking boot everyone I am.? I am talking about a dude that literally said its simply testosterone No one is saying no woman over 18 is not having sex with anyone their age. Stop with the straw man No yo just said men aren't really genuinely interested in them. Learn what a strawman is ×Again, no one said any of that shit about n…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:43 AM
1

Well yeah of course men want younger prettier women. They don’t want to have sex with older women their age, they’d rather a young pretty woman None of that is adressing that it does not seem to have anything to do with higher libido, just men looking to get a certain type of woman not just looking to have sex. And Yes that explains why no woman older than 18 is having sex. Men are genuinely never attracted or sexually satisfied with any woman their age ever. All the they find interesting is a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:56 AM
1

Show me this study first so I can refute it. And who the fuck conducted a study showing naked children to men? But before even reading the methodology of the study I can refute one major premise and that is arousal to an imaginary means gunuine sexual attraction. And how we're they even measuring arousal? For example, women are commonly shown to be aroused to images of naked women,but obviously most women aren't sexually interested it attracted to other women. With that logic we will have to con…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:50 AM
1

Jesus dude.. Not relevent
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:50 AM
1

I don't how to explain it to you... Thinking a literal kid with no life experience whatsoever is equal mentally and emotionally to you isn't being adaptive. It's called being as immature are they are. I never said I couldn't relate to them, but it would be mostly because I have been through that period of life and understand them, not bevause we have lot of things in common where I am now in my stage of life. Moroever, this was never about finding one thing in common with a much younger person e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 12:46 AM
1

Who asked about how this comment thread started? I am saying stop replying to arguments put of their context and expecting someone to just understand their relevence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:40 PM
1

Irrelevent because that was not the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:39 PM
1

Citation
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:38 PM
1

Being able to speak and finding yourself on the same mental wavelength are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:38 PM
1

I think that's utter bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:33 PM
1

Dude what the fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:30 PM
1

Asking for a source is an argument because your while damn premise based on making a scientific claim
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:28 PM
1

Common sense tells you women aren't physically attracted to men? Women are physically attracted to hot men al the damn time I think you are confusing it takes more for a woman to want to have sex with to be aroused. And If women displayed more arousal toward women, than that means they are visual, but just not toward men. In other worlds your study is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:25 PM
1

You are confided about sexual attraction and mental attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:22 PM
1

You seriously thing age is the only factor of attractiveness? Lots of people in their forties are way more attractive than 20 year olds Lots of young people are just not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:16 PM
1

Then maybe you are an immature 28 year old
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:11 PM
1

Actually lots of women are way more attractive in their thirties than when they were in their twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:54 PM
1

Maybe you should stop cherry picking random arguments out of context just so you can pretend to have something to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:48 PM
1

I literally said they were not based on any genuine feelings in the same damn sentence. Full relationship does not mean committed and serious. It means it is both emotional and sexual. The emotions are just not real Serious implies a genuine commitment based on a genuine connection and desire to built a lasting realtionship with the other. They are no differnent than prostitution because they are both exchanging sensual and sexual pleasure purely for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:42 PM
1

I still don't know what question you are answering or how it's relavent to the overall conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:39 PM
1

Not fucking people because on their race isn't nay more racist than not fucking people based on their sex is sexist. The defintion of rasicm is unjustified discrimination and prejudice agaisnt someone solely for their race. Sexual desire does not need a justfication
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:36 PM
1

Lots of personality traits are not things a person can consciously choose either. However, why we should be attracted to somethung just bevause it is not a choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:31 PM
1

Why do you keep answering questions not asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:27 PM
0

Just because attraction is possible does not mean it will develop. Attraction is always possible between family members don't your think?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:22 PM
1

Men really can't comprehend that not only them can appreciate variety.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:15 PM
1

Really, so raping someone is moral as long as it has been done in the past. You are not making any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:57 PM
2

Home renovation takes hard work and skill, so desperation is not the only reason you'd hire someone to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:53 PM
1

I just can't respect someone who would buy someone's body for pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:52 PM
1

One night stand is quite different than buying a women's body don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:51 PM
1

×They're more serious than straight-up prostitution Not really. They are just a longer term prostitution. You are acting like you have to marry the sugar daddy and devote yourself to them. It's a temporary realtionship that makes you some money and you can literally be dating and banging other people simultaneously. More will, yeah. Look at Hugh Heffner. Look at Donald Trump. Women really like status and wealth What makes you think they settled for them and don't actually love them? And there ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:33 PM
1

Have you heard of the word in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:29 PM
1

But a 10/10 hot woman would want to settle for the ugly rich old man? And rich sugar daddies are settling for average women. Lol And you seem to keep missing the fact that sugar relationship are literally not serious relationships..no one is settling for anyone. In fact, most sugar babes have multiple clients at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:27 PM
1

Dude you keep moving the goal post...just when we are talking about why a woman would want a sugar relatioship, you then go into what the man would have to do instead. And stop repeating this bullshit about men not caring about wealth as much
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:20 PM
1

No you need to work on you comprehension. I know men and women in general can want differnet things, but what a man and a woman interested in some sugar arrangement have in common is desperation so they don't afford having high standards in the first place. And what the fuck did you bring this ideas that it takes less work for a woman to be stay attractive than a man? Men looking for sugars girls aren't seeking average and ugly girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:12 PM
1

Ofcourse we are assuming men having a higher sex drive is scientific in the first place. However, just because sex drive can affect behaviour it does not mean it has to be the major reason or at all for a certain sexual or social behaviour. Most sugar daddy relationships are men seeking fake effection from very young and pretty girls, I don't see what higher sex drive necessarily have to do with this when most of these men can easily get normal sex and relationship with women. What they want is …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:06 PM
1

The problem is that you can't fathom that not all women have the privelige of being with whatever hot guy she is interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:02 PM
1

What does traits have to do with anything. Men who buy women for fake affections aren't exactly having lots of options either. The point is the same applies for the kind of woman that would need that kind of relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:58 PM
1

What men is satisfied by a woman just turning up? Desperate ones. You are acting like men who go for sugar daddy relationships are the hottest on the horizon. All he reasons the reasons you emtioned for why a woman would not want that kind of relationship applies to men. Morever, a sugar daddy or mommy realtionshipis is just a financial transaction, you don't have to marry or be serious about the person that is investing in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:54 PM
1

I don't give a shit.. There is no work easier than fucking someone and going on a date with them and getting free food and having a ferari in exchange for it. An hour ago you literally said men are willing to do this 'super hard male romance job' for sex, but somehow we would have to believe they would not like a nice apartment and car for it in addition.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:39 PM
1

Jesus fucking crist..certainly easier than working for hours under a strict schedule and mean boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:32 PM
–

No one gives a fuck if he thinks there may be other reasons or not. The fact remains that he still ignored and dimished the role of other strong social reasons. He doesn't need to literally say this was the only reason for his explanation to be pretty reductionist. The fact remains that he still said its not that complicated and can be easily explained by one hormaone
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:29 PM
1

And I am saying it's fucking bullshit that most men don't care about having money especially easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:23 PM
1

No I asked what's your prove that men are less interested in getting paid for romance which you then expanded in chain of equivocation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:23 PM
1

How could you even pay for romance? Isn't part of romance planning nice dates? Is the guy supposed to set up dates using his sugar momma's money Romance isn't paying for a nice date. It's mainly about the emotional and sexual interaction during the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:21 PM
–

He literally said simply because testosterone followed by saying how ignorant everyone is about the world that he alone figured out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:15 PM
1

What the fuck does work have to do with anything. This started by you implying that men would care less about making money that's why they aren't selling romance. Romance just means telling a woman you like her and banging her and going out for a free meal , which is something men already like doing, but somehow you are making it sound like that work is equivalent to having a 12 hours shift at the office. No matter how poor and lazy a guy is he still have ato get some money from somewhere for ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:10 PM
–

I undersnad what you are saying, but the person I was relying to said men sell romance for sex. That is they date and go into a relationship with you just to bang you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:08 PM
1

They are lazy to work harder is not the same as not caring to be wealthier, and it is the latter you claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:04 PM
1

Protect their women? Well they protected them from wars, crime, famine, disease, poverty, filthy and dangerous jobs etc What the fuck.. Men are obliged to protect women from disease and crime in what damn religion or even society ? As for war, it is relative as most men do not have to be protecting their families from wars and crimes . Morever, women weren't any less likely to be killed in wars and men fighting in wars were never about protecting women, but an obligation toward their country. Al…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:58 PM
–

There isn’t anything I want from men that I have to pay for when there’s a line of men willing to give the same for free Men aren't willing to give you a genuine realtionship for free. A man being in a relationship with you for sex isn't exactly giving you what you want is it. Moreover, why do men have to pay for sex when women aren't any less willing to do what men want to get what they want This logic only works if it's only men that want something from women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:51 PM
0

Can you a least show me this last point and how it proves which of his point bevause he made many ?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:47 PM
1

They would like a nice car but not enough to work for it, but they are willing to do the same work for years for some sex that they can just buy? Lol... Have you really never seen those apartment photos where all the guy owns is a mattress, a TV, and a single chair? And those guys have how much money in their bank account ? You are acting like that shows their lack of desire to be wealthy. How many men commit crimes just to make money?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:45 PM
1

Yeah, by the daddy, who fulfills the stereotypical male role of planning and paying for the date. Do you think many women want that? Want a guy who's only contribution to the date is his presence How is this relevent? The point is that most sugar daddy relatioships are not buying sex, but a fully romantic relationship. I'm sure some do, and some sugar mommas do exist. But not as many. I really don't understand what you're arguing abou The conversation is about why that is What is your explanatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:43 PM
1

Have you seen how most single men live? They're easily satisfied. They don't need the money Yeah, singke men don't have monetary needs. Men would mind a nice car.. You convinced me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:30 PM
–

Men aren't selling romance for money, but they will sell it for sex. Which is what dating is So women are already getting as much sugar mommies as they want but it's just for free And where is your prove that men will mind getting paid for romance? Women aren't pursuing sugar mommy relationships because there's fewer lonely women who would want that, Prove. And since the number of men and women are equal , how can there be less lonely women than men? For every lonely man, there is a lonely woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:23 PM
–

Still waiting for this scientific article that says women lose their libido every 2 weeks... Moreover, if by hormonal cycles you mean menstruating period, lots of womens libido actually increase around their period. Nevertheless, none of this explains why she would be more patient after she has not have sex for a year for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:14 PM
–

Sure, but not as many as men. There are sugar mommas, just less of them than sugar daddies. There are significantly small number suger mommy relatioships relative to the number of desperate single women why are men not selling romance for sex since their lifes revolves around it ? You literally just said men aren't selling romance. Pick one. why are men not selling romance for sex since their lifes revolves around it ? So the reason women aren't perusing sugar mommy realtionshipis is because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:12 PM
1

And you keep avading the main question and that is sugar daddy relationships are often a persuit of a certain sexual realtionship, not a lack of opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:08 PM
–

Ok, highly depends on women, but lower libido that drops every 2 weeks significantly extends their ability to wait Still not answering the damn question and on what science are you basing that a woman libido drops every 2 weeks bevause as a woman my libido certainly increase the longer I wait.. Moroever, do you seriously think men sexual drive is never interfered with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:04 PM
–

Men with options will pretty much decline women they aren't attracted to and there is a big difference between a man being willing to sleep once with a woman and wanting to be devoted to her sexual needs.. This myth that most men would sleep with any woman just is just that a myth. You are forgetting that a sugar daddy relatioship is not a one night stand.. It's literally a full relationship emotionally and sexually, it's just not genuine , and lots of sugar daddy relationships are purely emotio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:01 PM
–

You don't think more men being available makes it more likely she'll find one who will suit her needs It does not means it guarantees it. Lots of women suffer from loneliness and lack of sex life. Dude I said women are more likely to want romantic connections and dates, and you answer is that they don't need to pay for it because lots of men would fuck for free? Do you know the differnece between men willing to fuck a woman for free and willing to date her and shower her with romance ? I could a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:52 PM
–

It just needs to last 2 weeks before you are in a hormonal low and then it can build up again What? I am asking how long do you think a woman can last before she is desperate for a sexual relationship with a hot guy? Moreover, you did not answer whether sugar daddy relationships are motivated by lack of sexual patience or sexual frustration , or by seeking a partner of particular physical looks? Its very obvious it's the later and you proved it yourself when you said most men seek very young gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:45 PM
2

Let's not act like we don't know what completely 'turned off' means. Key word completely.. That almost sounds like men become nauseated at the thought of having sex with attached women. No, if you are still sexually attracted and desire the nazi girl, you are not turned off.. You are just not interested in Pershing it for moral reasons. Morever, if that is what OP meant, than how is that different for women unless he is implying most women actively try to persue or try to get an attached men to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:35 PM
1

Let's not act like we don't know what completely 'turned off' means. No, if you are still sexually attracted and desire the nazi girl, you are not turned off.. You are just not interested in Pershing it for moral reasons. Morever, if that is what OP meant, than how is that different than women unless he is implying most women actively try to persue or try to get an attached men to cheat with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:35 PM
–

You are assuming those options will be interested in her, or the ones she wants will want her. Morever, there are more women looking for romantic connections than women, yet we don't see lots of women paying sugar men for romantic dinners and dates, which is a major component of sugar daddy relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:31 PM
–

More patience How long does that patience last? There How weak do you think women's libido is? Morever, do you think lack of patience is the only hindernace to not finding a sexual relationship especially with a particular person? Would women be any less interested in a sexual or romantic relationship with a hot dude just because they don't need sex as often? Moreover, do men really have a hard time finding partners or just partners with certain features? Yeah...older women don't feel motherly t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:24 PM
0

Well then you agree OP is wrong However, since you made a differnce between interest to persue and attraction, do you seriously think most women actively try to persue an attached man or it's just that they find him more attractive ? And in the initial stage looks is the bulk of why anyone is attracted to anyone, men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:20 PM
–

Yet you think it's simply explained by more tostetorene ignoring all the complex social interactions that go into it. Someone can have a low sex drive and still find it convenient to have a sugar something that fit specific needs. Morever, lots of sugar relationship don't include sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:15 PM
2

Dude... OP said men lose all attraction and interest once learning a girl has a boyfriend And do you seriously think looks is the only thing that attracts a man in a woman ?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:08 PM
–

You have zero understanding of how complex the world is...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:06 PM
1

A quick fuck does not sound like they lostall interest either like OP said
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:54 PM
0

Really because men persue women they aren't attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:51 PM
1

What religion controls women in all areas of their life.. The most it tell men is feed thier family... There is a reason women are the ones who tried to get the priveliges of men, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:09 PM
2

How often had men have to protect their women? Women on the other hand have to always be inferior slaves to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:04 PM
1

are you really saying that beautiful women cant manipulate men and get them to do what they want using their beauty? or are you just pretending to be ignorant so that you don't have to concede on that point Give an example or stop wining .. All you are saying is if woman is beautiful she can attract a man, so that's manipulation. Lmao Anyone can manipulate anyone regardless of their physical shape. The fact beauty make a man more likely to fall for anything or want to do anything for sex is a we…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 01:29 PM
1

× exactly that's my point women love the power imbalances that benefit them. and shame the ones that dont. I really don't think you have a point . Again what power imbalance specific to women that they love and defend? Just because you can call something a power imbalance does not mean you know what the fuck you are taking about. Yes, you can probably find a degree imbalance if all forms of relationships. No two people are completely equal in all aspects, but an imbalance does not necessarily me…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 04:42 AM
1

women desire tall men, the man can use his height advantage to get what he wants from her. he may not have consciously and actively obtained that height as he did with his wealth, but they can get the same results and compliance from the women they desire. Using an asset to get what they want form a woman Looool. You seriously think a man can realistically mentally abuse an adult woman simply because he is tall? What Lala land do you live in? You might as well say there is a power imbalance any …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 12:57 AM
1

If extremely ludicrous to think height alone is enough to manipulate someone as it is for someone at an age of 50 year old to manipulate someone who is still mentally a child with zero life experiences. I literally no of no situation where someone was abused beacsie if height differences. Morever, is disingenuous to equate hight to physical dominance. You mean physical strength in this case, an advantage 95% of men have above women. What would oyu have us do. Ban saying all together? However, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 10:01 PM
1

Because you can't exploit height you idiots . You can exploit someone who is mentally way immature and inexperienced than you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 05:19 PM
1

How do we live in an age where “gender is a social construct” but age is some all encompassing indication of character and compatibility? With that logic. Why can't we date children then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 05:13 PM
1

Women are not sex dolls even when they think of themselves as that No men think of them like that. ×No. That is how literary devices like imagery and metaphor work in order to convey a succinct yet complex message. It is now we communicate pictures, feelings, and environments with words. What are you taking about???? If you want me to speak in the cut and dry language of science I can certainly do so if you understand that language better Where how about the part of science that says men have an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:43 PM
1

You assume a lot, not to mention jumping to conclusions That's literally the question that was posed to you. You are sorely mistaken. MD and CEO rarely own the businesses, usually they merely run/manage them How is that relevent? The CEO still have the authority to overrule everthing. So staggeringly and absolutely incorrect Who makes the rules of a business? because I am sure a common employ is not on it, so regardless of your pedantics, this analogy is not equivalent to your marriage where you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:31 PM
2

You make a scientific claim then expect me to go search whole Google for it. Without Citation, you have just an opinion. That's how debates work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:10 PM
1

Oh but they do. Do you think i just made this all up from thin air? And beleive me, i am not the only one.. Why is it common among women to disregard issues or call it whining when men face them? Because reality says otherwise. I don't know any woman other than very small minority of very conservative women that don't regard traditional female sibmsjson and male headship as anything to her than sexism male superiority that belongs in the cave Era. Or is it because "oppressors" should not have pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:09 PM
1

A slave can not choose not to be a slave. A slave don't have a choice to be a slave to begin with I am talking about practicality. As long as she chooses to be married, she has the freedom of a slave. ×A man in a traditional relationship is more so a slave then a woman, because we do not have a choice wether to provide or not, and many times we have to jobs we don't like at al That's the choice you make in exchange for having control over everything else. That is a far stretch from being a slave…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:50 PM
1

Where i see the problem is that society teaches women to be "strong and independent", but most women still carve for traditional relationships, they want traditionally masculine men Then why are women simply not looking for them. It not that hard. But since they are "strong and independent" they do not know how to follow and they feel entitled to whatever the heck they want, while they do not even know how to cook that freakin bacon. In other words, they do not want to traditional relationships.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:55 PM
2

You can google, I'm not saving and cataloguing every piece of thing I read So it does not exist. However, do you underhand that might have to do with protecting a new born with low immunity? Me studying for 3 additional years is no luck. Her choosing a dude with genetic predisposition is no luck You studying for 3 more years does not mean your wive should pay back for it for another 30 years. Her choosing a dude with genetic is no luck You're obnoxious. That's the only predisposition I have noti…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:38 PM
1

So you are subservient to all authority? Can you show me a body of authority where I have to obey all the decisions I someone? You are being disingenuous, as you believe authority to be absolute and it almost never is Than why don't you explain the limit of your authority instead of going around in circles. What does you wife have or does not have to obey? Do I have the authority? Probably yes, do I exercise that authority in a tyrannical fashion? Absolutely NOT How you decide to use you authori…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 02:59 PM
2

Not necessarily such extreme as germophobics, but they're supposed to become more germophobics after having a baby than before There is no such thing as more or less germophobe anymore than there is more or less pregnant, and I am going to need sources that women cleaning standards become very unrealistic after birth What about both putting the same results so that we're sure same effort has been provided The premise is literally that the same efforts has been provided. However, trying to compen…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 02:34 PM
1

Whatever you want, whenever you want, is tyranny What is being submissive if not doing whatever he decides? You can't even makeup your mind. You admit that you have the final decision on everthing, but than you say it's tyranny of she has to obey everhthing. Those two things are not consistent or at least compatible.. 15 years in the military, something like 3 in frontline service and a combination of engineering roles definitely has that covered What the fuck does that have to do with you being…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 01:54 PM
1

Women have way higher standards for security, cleanliness and orderliness, and that's even worse when they have a newborn. it has been studied that women's brains adapt for child care this way, it wears off in 2 years Women become germophpbics after having baby? That logic is generally favorable to women but not to men. If you don't earn the same, the time spent working isn't of the same value First, I never said that apploes only to the man. If the woman had higher income, she should equally co…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 01:10 PM
1

"Challenge is an instigation or antagonization intended to convince a person to perform an action they otherwise would not Like a disagreement, but without the antagonism ? What's the point of having a disagreement if you are not going to attempt to convince and persuade the person? Essentially you allow your wive to talk but God forbid she acts like her opinion matter or is important? "A challenge is to invite someone to take part in a competition The key word was in the context is a romantic r…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 12:23 PM
1

Maybe because they're the primary ones who impose standards for these. Most men who try give up. What standards. That they should be able to be more than house keepers? They go around saying that men who earn more than their partner should pay bills proportionally. Then when you tell them they should do most of the chores they say it's a false equivalency Well, it is a false equivalence because both are spending the same time working. The equivalence would be him working 10 hours and she 3 hours…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 11:50 AM
1

I'm answering a question, not writing a book. But that was not the question. The question was how do you appprocah disagreement and decisions with your wive since you do not like her changeling you , not the nature and outcome of the decision you make. Does the CEO, MD etc. make the rules Yes, because it's their business and their money No, the rules and even decisions are collaborative Exept, they decide whom have the authority to make decisions and what decisions, so they do make the rules. bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 11:03 AM
1

×It's not just my wife it's a sentiment general to most women I ever talked to, and most of reddit too Sorry, but most husbands I know don't do anything around the house. In fact there was a study to that effect which concluded that working wives are still primary expected to be responsible for the kids and the home. I am sure many women feel like that, but don't project your relationship issue onto other relationships just because you have heard some wives say some things your feel reflect your…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 10:43 AM
1

The initial convo was that you implied that women in general today expect that men do everthing by themsleves. I told my wife I would pay her a salary so that she can be illegible for retirement. But she's too scared for her independence. I get it, but it sucks for both of us really hard Why don't you just stay home then since you are the one complaining? You don't want to be the dependant? Maybe if she gets a big raise I'd be the SAH, I'll fucking burn out otherwise. But I'm the one who earns m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:47 AM
1

By being controlling. "You have to do what i say, no matter what". Emotional blackmailing, manipulation overt control.. No consensus, "my way or the highway". While the burden of performance and most responsibilities are still on me. She makes bad decisions, i suffer the consequences. This kinda shit Here is what you initially said. You think a woman controlling you and wanting you to do whatever she wants is wrong, I agree. However, you still want the authority to do the exact thing to her, alb…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:30 AM
1

Where did I say anything about SAHM? First the point of no one is expecting that in a relationship where only the men works. Secondx alot of these men who want a submissive wive, still want/have a wive that works
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:07 AM
1

In the context above, submission is the ability to be able to follow. Nothing more then that I am not sure that is contradicting my definition. The abiloty to follow does not exclude nor contradict the property of having yield to superior authority. × It does not mean that we will treat this women as a slave, and give them no authority whatsoever, but since in this traditional-type relationship, all responsibilities for the livelihood of the family are on men, the final word is on men too In oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 09:04 AM
1

×Submissive, one who submits Subservient is useful in an inferior capacity How impressive. Submits means to obey all authority in a way that makes someone a subservient Disingenuous much Do you or do you have the authority to decide everthing in the relationship? Answer that and we would see who is being disingenuous Just because you personally make caring and nice decisions , I assume, does not change the fact that in principle, she still has to submit to your every whim, not matter hwo nice an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:45 AM
1

Huge difference between tyranny and leadership, you should look it up I said nothing about tyranny, but don't sit her pretending that you are making life-changing stressful decisions in your day to day life and that you'd have liked the role of being a submissive. Morever, leadership and tyranny are not two differnet authority models that are mutually exclusive. Tyranny can be an aspect of a leadership. Hitler, for instance, was still leader. Putting my career on hold, so we could move countries…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:26 AM
1

Who said she doesn't disagree with me, or argue with me? Than what you think someone challenging you means? Morever, when someone's asks you how do you and your Spouce approach decisions and disagreement, but your strategy is to avoid answering that and instead list how you make beneficial decisions for the wellbeing of the family, it makes it looks like her opinion and perspective is not important at all, but only what you decide and choose. ×She's my inspiration, because she makes me want to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:15 AM
1

Yes it is No tos not. All it said was I make the decsion to benefit my wive. It says nothing of how you approach disagreements and different perspectives You have zero clue what leadership is, do you? Yes, you make the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:04 AM
1

You think our choice to walk away from women is easy No, because who knows how long it is going to take to find another sex doll. I suppose I should thank you because the constant invalidation of our feelings does in fact make it easier to walk away. The constant attacks at our hearts have a wearing down effect. How can this organ ever be expected to function when it is removed bit by bit since the day we are born That's not how biology and instinct work. All I can say is that I assure you the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 08:02 AM
1

Submisison the action of accepting or yielding to a superior force or to the will or authority of another person
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:59 PM
1

×How do i do that? When you do not understand what's written in the first place? How do i refute your general claim with specifics? The whole thing doesn't make sense. I misunderstood you, but you can't explain how did? I am not asking you to quote parts. Just explain in general. ×Like for example you are are deliberate in ypur intentions or you are retarded, which i didn't say, because that would be ad hominem. No, this is how chicken fight works. Debate requires the parties to mutually underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:57 PM
1

My point is that woman submit because they are weak, lazy, and, stupid, or want to fuck you, not because they made some smart analysis that the man have some special natural ability and knowledge to make the most sound and intelligent decisions in all that is important for the rest of their lifes because that's is an impossible standard that require some infallible Devine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:47 PM
1

No dude, I'm not playing your games. This is the third time i am asking you to quote me. Come on, do it already, show some womanly virtue! Or walk away from the conversation without admitting that you are WRONG. Both fine by me I literally saying that I read you text wrong, but you want me continue pretending that I was right? We can cross that bridge when we get there. First sort out the issue above It's crossed to me. Now I will wait till you get back to your senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:40 PM
1

Oh the instincts is there. We are just aware of it now and we can better decide to act on it or not That's called making a decision , not an instinct. The whole point of an instinct being an instinct is that it's extremely hard to fight or override at best, and at worst, you'd be very mentally traumatized to ignore it for long. For the looks of it, ya have no problem fleeing when convenient. However, we both know men have no such instinct when they've been raping, beating, enslaving, murdering a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:36 PM
1

Okay now explain where I misunderstood your English. It's simple. Disclaimer : my initial comment to you was not based purely on the comment under which it was posted , but from a general sense of the many things you've repeatedly posted, so it's not simply a misunderstanding of a single paragraph. Why are the men in here notorious with repeating assertions without efforts to demonstrate them? By enquiring about your skills i was - in fact - trying to be nice. What you are doing enables me to pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:19 PM
1

I would want nothing more than be wedded to a sexist polygamist. The ultimate female fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:09 PM
1

Honestly , I just reread what you wrote and I read that as you saying submission is respect, not is like respect. Many were justifying submisison by saying it is respect for the husband so immediately read your text as arguing the same, so that was my mistake. Nevertheless, I disagree on the whole idea of women needing to submit in the first place, earned or not. How do you suppose you earn a woman's submission? After how many years of relationship experience should she give him this honor? It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 05:08 PM
1

Expecting men to work and to clean the house by your insane standards is the real slavery Correction. Expecting men to help with the house while both equally have jobs. And the reasonbale standards is that women should be fed and clothed in exchange for submitting their agency, being locked in the walls of the house, house keeping and cleaning , cooking, raising the children and sex? Yeah buddy . You might want to search the definition of slavery because I just described it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:55 PM
0

Clearly I’m not talking about submissiveness in the face of abuse, practically nobody wants that. I’m Where did I say YOU were advocating for submission with abuse? However, submission is inherelty extreme susceptible to abuse, which is not exclusive to the physical. I’m just talking about a simple leader/follower relationship, Where the boyfriend does the leading and the girlfriend follows And what is a simple leadership/follower relationship? Hitler/Germany was a leadership/follower/submission…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:48 PM
2

You shouldn't preach about basic logic, when you are the one who does not understand under what context respect was used in an analogy LOL. and under what context was respect used other than submission? Context have nothing to do with it. What matter is that premise that submission from wives means an expression of respect. Submission means respect. No submisison disrespect. So how does a husband not submitting to his wive can equally mean I respects her? Or are you saying respect have different…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:28 PM
1

Than why don't you explain how don't know what taking about? That's the whole point of having a damn debate Sure that can be resolved by just answering a straightforward question, or you don't want to because you can't equivocate and sugar-coat things as you'd like? If we should be in agreement to have a debate than what's the point of it in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:21 PM
1

I mean, this is under the assumption that the boyfriend doesn’t beat women. That kind of extremism applies to basically anything How does that disprove my point? My point is that most of these woman who praise love being submissive are willing to be that way as long as the husband isn't being actually very dominant and demandng. In other words, as long as she conveniently does not care about having a opinion about the things he mostly make decisions about. It's just a way for lazy women to have …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:09 PM
1

I am not going to read a whole ass thread to know what you think.. However, I have and it means exactly what I think you think it is. Either you think you are the leader and you make all the decisions, and therefore, your wive obeys all, or you are engaging in some fantasy relationship where things do not mean what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:55 PM
1

Oh I know. I have read your very loving definitions. Does your wive have to agree and obey , whether she likes it or not, with everything decision? Provided your highness thinks is important enough to concern your superior male brian with it ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:49 PM
1

It means I manage everything that matters. So you make decision on everything that is important in the course of you marriage? Oh you see submission isn't that and ladies because I let my woman make choices on the silly and child-play things that I convenieny don't give a shit about. Well pardon my confusion, but who decides what matters?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:48 PM
1

Submissive does not mean "one person makes all the decisions Submission literally blind obedience. And the whole point of having the leadership and authority is that you make all the decisions . Pick your damn guns. If she get to make decisions as well, than does that mean you are submissive ? Dictionary : Submission is defined as acting always obedient, particularly to a master. An example of submission is the state of a disciplined animal to his owner. The quality or condition of being submiss…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:43 PM
2

Okay, the context implies that respect would be one sided because submission by natural is. How about basic logic? You say submisison is about respect. You don't think men should be in submission. Therefore, respect is only for husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:39 PM
1

Yes, I have been looking for soo long for a man who would treat me as a slave. Take me please.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:36 PM
1

I just wrote english. Did I not? You whine about women wanting to take your authority and how that makes them bitches while wanting to exercise the same bullshit over them. Is that English enough for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:35 PM
1

No, it is NOT what submission means in the context of a male-female relationship Than enlighten me
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:29 PM
1

How the heck is that the conclusion ? My point is there is no such thing as an independant but not strong woman because the former is derived from the latter, so you ideal of a woman is a fragment of your imagination. You are either getting a useless adult child or you are getting an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:28 PM
1

That's literal what submisison mean. If she can decide what she can or can not submit to, than she is not submitting. Come back when you understand submission Apparently your type have an obsessive fantasy for something they can't even explain Here is Oxford for you Submission is defined as acting always obedient, particularly to a master. An example of submission is the state of a disciplined animal to his owner. The quality or condition of being submissive; resignation; obedience; meekness
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:26 PM
1

There has to be, though most women never get the chance to live that way Have you read history? Maybe the plague of depression is us still trying to figure out how this can be done The plague of depression is you not having any sense of self worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:23 PM
1

Maybe I have lots of passive hormones or maybe it's from the way I was raised. I definitely know it wouldn't work this way if my husband weren't as smart as he is Why is it always that the guy have to be some special God specimen? And smart does not mean knowledgeable on everything. Now what if he is smart, but a total dick wanting to control everthing you do including what to eating, wear, where to go, whom to befriend, when to sleep etc.......?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:21 PM
1

Than get a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:16 PM
1

That's not answering the question. The question is how do you appprocah it? Does she just shut up and you decide to do what you want including moving to a course that was supposedly for her benefit?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:13 PM
1

My wife is submissive, my inspiration and compass How the fuck does she do that without challenging you and disagreeing with you. She is your inspiration because she knows her place?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:12 PM
1

You conveniently forget about the responsibility and accountability that comes with power and authority Yeah, it's do hard having to do whatever I want. What responsibilty you speak off other than making your wife life miserable. Is God going to smack you when you fuck up?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:09 PM
1

Firstly being submissive doesn't mean being subservient That is literally what it means Submissive means letting your husband lead, that's it And what does following his lead means if not being subserveint to his every whim? You people have a hard time calling a cow a cow. Leadership means you decide everything and she follows
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:05 PM
1

This term is so overused that it completely lost it's meaning IT means deep down you despise women and think they are below you. Check.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:01 PM
1

I get to lead because I'm better at it than she is, she doesn't want to lead, and we both like it better when I lead How is one person just happen to be better at making every single decision in life? What are you actually doing when you lead? Decide when to fuck and get pregnant? Or how many children you should have? What is it about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 02:57 PM
1

×Simple: the woman is following your lead, and trusts your judgement, that's it. How is that her not doing whatever you want and just pretending that she is happy about it. What if your lead is a horseshit ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 02:53 PM
1

By being controlling. "You have to do what i say, no matter what". Emotional blackmailing, manipulation overt control.. So they are taking authority by doing what you do to them? Sounds fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:36 PM
1

There is a big difference between being independent: taking responsibility for your own actions and not expecting others to sort out your life for you; and being strong and independent, which is usually code for dominant How can you be independant and weak at the same time? The word literally means not having to depend on someone
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:16 PM
1

Part of the reason why they call it "submissive" is that feminists and blue pillers paint that role negatively since decades and generations°° Give u s the advantages of women being slaves please.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:10 PM
1

How do you find it devaluing? Are you not an egalitarian? You believe in modern feminist ideology, no? The ability of women to use their bodies The ability to use one bodt does not mean you can't choose to something degrading
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:58 PM
2

Submission is like respect, one needs to be able to show that they are capable of submission, though submission itself needs to be earned. This implies that respect would be one sided because submission by natural is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:56 PM
1

Yes the government should not have a say in what two consenting adults do sexually You can not have that and then say it should be like any other job. The government does have a say with labor and business.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:54 PM
1

No, he doesn’t lie about meaningless stuff like this. The point is you would not know his true intentions on everything. However, could he lie about more greater stuff when he really just want to have his way? When you to teach someone thag you are less deserving of respect compared to them, they are bound to disrespect you. It's inevitable that perhaps more than 80% of the things you have to submit to are just simply because he likes it that way, not because there is some greater hidden purpose…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:48 AM
1

You think I’m being inconsistent because you’re taking everything so seriously and black and white You can't just assert something and think you made an argument. Can you point me to a statement that was meant to be figurative but I was taking ot too literal? If black and white means understanding what words mean and being able to infer outcome and conquesnces of bahavioir, than you can say I am. No, you are inconsistant because, You say you are submissive, but that does not mean you obey everyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:40 AM
1

Not at all Than why do you think he only makes decisions or have desires or prefenrces after extensive analysis? Since you can’t image how a couple communicates, it’s something like, “How come?” “We can go tomorrow when we pick up this other thing at the same time.” “Ok What does that have anything do with I not knowing how communication works? And I am not an idiot to not notice that you have inserted an entirely good reason for why he might have made that decision as of its physically impossib…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:24 AM
1

The protect and provide instinct is most prevalent when a man is dealing in a direct relationship with a woman where she is his only concern and is protecting her from other individual men or the elements The instinct to protect and provide goes out the door when organized modern conflict is involved LOL... So there is no such instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 06:53 AM
1

Because not being submissive and having an opinion mean having the power to win a war? Stupid male logic
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 06:47 AM
1

So male nature does not apply to taliban men? Why would you think things would be any differnet in the west under the same circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 06:43 AM
1

So male nature does not apply to taliban men? Why would you think things would be any differnet in the west under the same circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 06:37 AM
1

If none of these were important to be considered, he probably would not care enough to decide and defer to what I wanted. He has more important things to worry about for decisions that don't matter LOL. What are you dating a robot or analytical machine? He could not possibly care to just not want to go fucking shopping? He will deter because he wants to go to lunch. It's called being a normal human being. He has more important things to worry about for decisions that don't matter And those are? …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:01 AM
1

What did you want me to go do? Your happiness is irrelevent because the objective isn't to stop you from what you want, but your inability it be intellectually honest and consistant
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:37 AM
1

You think all men lie What a fucking Straman. It's more like do you think he is incapable of lying, especially in such minor issue? No its more that people aren't going to always be honest about thier reasoning. In fact, people can rationalize their behavior or reasoning to convince themsleves they aren't bad or being selfish for wanting what they want. You partner motivation could purely because he does not want to go shopping, but convince himself he is not being selfish because he could const…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:36 AM
1

Edit: Do what? I am not the one who said I want to be submissive to a man and than pretend we are equal and it not really a relationship of subservience.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:25 AM
1

Because we communicate And he is just going to tell you the truth.lol 'Oh honey it's not like I think shopping is boring and I would rather be with my friends. It is because I made a smart analysis and came to the conclusion that it would be more beneficial that I go to my friends because he is closer and it waste less time and resources" And you keep avoiding the central issue and that it does not matter whether you like or agree with his reasoning it not, you have to submit regardless What if …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:23 AM
1

It's an old post so I don't remember what was said What old post when we speak of siemthing you said five seconds ago? Lots of women do not want to be agreeable. They want the man to be agreeable to her so she can always get her way. That's how I was before Like the red pill men and your partner? And how is this relevent to the point that submission and agreeable are entirely. differnet things? That's why I said you're getting too hung up on the word "submit". It's more like "agreeable" if that …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:14 AM
1

He has already considered which activity makes sense to do first, what's the urgency of each, which is more convenient to drive to now versus another day, which will have more traffic or require driving out of the way, what makes more sense for our schedule and if we have time for it, etc. He's not making decisions willy nilly How do you know that these are his reasons and it's it because he does wnat to go shopping? And you are insane if you think every decsion is going to take that deep analys…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:09 AM
1

You're being too literal. TRP guys just want a more agreeable woman. Who the heck does not like an agreeable partner? And you are very disingenuous . Agreeable is not the same thing as she submits and I get to decide everthing. Agreeable is more like not stubborn for the sake of stobburn, not she can give her opinion as long as I have the authority to override it and not respect it. ×I shared that in my particular situation it's working better than my past relationships And that's good for you, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 03:05 AM
1

Honestly, I don't think you'd get it unless you met someone you truly felt was extremely intelligent I hate to break it to you, but outside of striving to be physicist or rocket engineer, intelligence alone does not make competent or knowledgeable person. You seem to be conflicting knowledge and experience, which would be more relevent to a relationship , with sheer intelligence. You can be very intelligent and very ignorant or inexperienced. For example, if you had a child, unless you very inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 02:44 AM
1

I was disrespecting him by not trusting him, questioning him, nagging him, etc Having an opinion implies that you can voice a disagreement. How can you do that without questioning Saying you were disrespecting him by not trusting and questioning his decisions literally implies that you have to agree with whatever he says without question, else it would be lack of trust , and thus lack of respect. Essentially, you should not be respected because he gets to question your decisions and opinions and…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 02:03 AM
1

Beautiful women I guess should be busy sucking your dick or following your orders to have time for a social life, or wait, they are too stupid to understand a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:46 AM
0

Did you pass first grade comprehension class? I am not saying this is true of women. I am saying this is the logical conclusion of delegating inferior roles based on sex, which I think is sexist and you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:45 AM
1

It's not news to me that you'd want please someone's when you are so blinded by love and attraction. Both men and women do this all that times, and as long they are happy and satisfy, to each their own. But what I hate is when this is pretended to be constructed on reason and logic that reflect the inherent harmony and beauty in female submission, and the character flaw in women whom have self-respect and independant personalities. The fact that you refer to red pill means you think this reflect…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:43 AM
1

Here is a dictionary definition of submission Submission is defined as acting always obedient, particularly to a master. An example of submission is the state of a disciplined animal to his owner. The quality or condition of being submissive; resignation; obedience; meekness You have it in your head that submission stop meaning what it means because he is a nice master.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:31 AM
2

I happen to be very beautiful thank you. And you are here because no beautiful woman wants to fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:14 AM
1

Dude read again. Their sex is the reason they are put in an inferior postion. Which means their sex is designed for that position , which means their sex is inferior. It's not that difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:12 AM
1

You have it in your head that submission is a horrible thing that is only black & white when that's not the case. He's not just ordering me around like a servant, you know What does submission means of not I obey everthing he wants? It does not matter whatsoever what he demands it not. It matters what is expected of you regardless of his orders. He does not need to order you around like a servant for him to stil have the authority to make a very damming request from you. What if he listens to yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:11 AM
1

What are you talking about? Disrespect is about the way you go about it I agree, but that does not explain why you thought giving him authority was your way of finally respecting and trusting him. I was disrespecting him by not respecting his opinions or decisions And how do you disagree with someone's opinion without disagreeing with someone's opinion? For the love of all that is holly, do you or do you not think that not accepting his decisions or agreeing with his opinions is disrespectful or…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:03 AM
2

You don't understand how logic works ha? To say a women's inferior position is inherent to her sex is literally saying her sex is inferior. That's means she is in that roles because of capacity of her biology, which is inferior to that capacity of the man's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:31 AM
1

Cool, but you admit you aren't being submissive?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:29 AM
1

Is this suppose to be demonstration of your superior intellect because I don't understand your gibberish
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:28 AM
1

I didn't mean I was disrespecting him for having an opinion. You can share an opinion respectfully So you don't believe you would be disrespecting him of he had no authority or leadership? I was disrespecting him by not trusting him, questioning him, nagging him, etc So you were disrespecting him for insisting on your opinion ? Why is the assumption that he was objectively right in his position? Do you think it would be nagging and disrespectful for any decision no matter how wrong they are to y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:27 AM
1

Where did I call you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:09 AM
2

Because you are an insecure prick. Get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:07 AM
2

And where is your evidence that men are natural better at leading. What is leading in the context of a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:05 AM
1

Absolutely I should be respected. Just because someone else is making a decision, doesn't mean they don't respect you Exept you siad you were disrespecting him for trying to have an opinion and making a decision. You associate respect with the ability to make a decision and have authority. That straight out means he is deserving of respect, but you are not. I agree. Even the smartest person doesn't always know best. That would be impossible Yet your whole submission is predated on the assumption…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:04 AM
1

Than you aren't submissive. You just don't care about the particular decisions you are choosing to allow him to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:01 AM
1

You submit to him in a things right? Would you submit if he : Wants to cheat on you Marry another woman Stop you from having friends Dictate what you should wear, eat drink Stop you from going out Etc....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 12:00 AM
2

The women's inferior position is delegated by her sex, which means her sex is inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:57 PM
1

This is analogous to saying children are supposed to have complete agency over their lives Agency means the ability to choose the course of you life and make decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:55 PM
0

Every day. Every day I go out and support her with my blood, sweat, and labor, I'm "doing something my woman asks". I don't have to do it. I do it because she asks it and needs it So you would have no problem being the submissive . That is she makes all the decisions?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:53 PM
0

It does NOT mean I micromanage her life. It does NOT mean I tell her everything to do or even everything I should do. It does NOT mean she cannot disagree with me. It does NOT mean I use physical force to get my way. No it means you manage everything you care about managing
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:48 PM
1

And what's interesting is that everyone pretty much knows it. You are a misogynist dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:43 PM
1

Yep. Once a girl realizes she can trust your leadership This is only possible of the man an infallible God.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:39 PM
1

So you are submissive long as they aren't too demanding . Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:36 PM
1

Boils down to I didn’t respect him enough Yes, I wanted to have an opinion equal I did not respect him. Does that not mean you think you should not be respected because he should get to decide everthing? Compared to my new guy, it feels totally different. He leads and I follow. I don’t feel the need to question him and I can just trust he knows best Does not means he always knows best. This bullshit is always predated on this assumption that men are some perfect fallible specie. Did your trust s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:33 PM
1

The boyfriend can do what he wants because she wants him to do what he wants Until he decided to beat her ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:25 PM
1

I’m a submissive woman in my relationships with men. Quite frankly, I don’t want to have make decisions Does that mean you follow everything he wants because that what submission means? Do you have sex everytime he wants? Do you take his permission to go out? What to wear? What to eat ......
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:20 PM
1

You role is inferior to your couch's. However, you couch isn't there because of his gender, but his merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:15 PM
1

I submit to my mma coach when he discusses what positions we're drilling today, or whether we're sparring or rolling or hitting focus mitts Do you also submit to him when you want to go out with your frimeds or get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:13 PM
1

¦ The average wife is happy if her husband can get his socks in the hamper. She's over-the-moon if he can manage to watch all the kids (even the baby!) for a couple of hours while she runs errands. Women blessed with husbands who can do this often brag to their friends, who "Ooooooh" in envy Yeah, women brag for having a marriage where they don't have agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:09 PM
0

Submission does NOT mean "you are not allowed to disagree with me No to just mean you have to obey what I say whether you agree or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter