TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheGreat_Danton Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by TheGreat_Danton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Actually though. Gotta give it to him though, he was a great teacher. I also rode bus 69. 11 year old me was in comedy heaven.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 02:36 AM
12

My fourth grade teacher was Terrance Dick. I can only assume his parents hated him from the start.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 01:59 AM
10

I've heard the "women aren't your therapists" thing a few times now and always thought it was weird. No one should expect anyone to fix them, but a SO is always going to be the keystone in my support network.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 06:10 PM
16

It’s not alright to have the decision made as an infant without your consent
/r/MensRights23/02/19 04:50 AM
1

Horseshoe effect. The more radical a sect of an ideology is, the closer it reflects the opposite end of the spectrum. We’ve gone from striving to judging people based on their character, to the group they belong to.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 12:37 AM
16

“I was talking the other day about the different worlds men and women live in.” Different worlds were when women were expected to have children and couldn’t support themselves without a husband. Just say you’re not interested. It’s that easy. We have modern law and social order. Fear of someone else doing the wrong thing is not a valid reason to not do the right thing. Anyone could be a crazy person with a gun, it doesn’t justify being a doormat to appease everyone.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:49 PM
5

If you have the initiative, I argued with a “feminist” that said there would only be equality after women ruled the world for 300 years a month or so ago. Somehow we’ve gone so far left that we’ve gone from judging everyone as individuals back to eye for an eye and tribalism.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:45 PM
3

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I believe feminism started with admirable goals but as with any movement, those who stood to gain took advantage of it.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:35 PM
4

I agree with equality. Some feminists believe in that as well, and I agree with them. Some feminists distort the ideology into a self serving bastardization, and I don’t agree with them. -ism’s can be distorted as anyone can claim to be a member and say whatever they please. I could claim to be a communist and say we should kill all Muslims and you’d be under the impression communists want to commit genocide. In the internet era, labels are essentially meaningless online as there is no verificat…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:00 AM
1

It’s cultural here, not religious. men did it to their sons because that’s how theirs was, and what society expected. Roots back to puritans trying to discourage masturbation.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 06:55 PM
13

Study finds removing part of organ reduces cancer rates in that organ. No fucking shit. Should we cut out infant girls breast tissue to get rid of breast cancer? A far more common form of cancer than penile? In other words, there is no official medical preference on circumcision, so it's completely up to you to decide if you want to circumcise your son. No it’s not. It’s his body. Only he can say what stays and goes. preaching reproductive rights and then saying a man has no right to his foreski…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 07:02 AM
29

In the United States, yes. I’m in my early 20’s and it was definitely stigmatized. I remember a study hall in 10th grade where everyone, boys and girls, went around saying how gross uncircumcised dicks were. While I’m incredibly grateful I wasn’t now, that shredded any self esteem I had remaining and left me feeling dirty and unwanted.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 04:24 AM
2

But we strive to be better people. A better society. That’s humanity. You are your own person and responsible for you own actions. You are fully in control of you. You don’t get to blame your misdeeds on human nature.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:02 PM
2

Oh you're one of the shitty, anti-equality people. That makes sense.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:56 PM
3

HAHAHA holy shit, read what you said. Women can't control themselves, this is the entire basis of "Toxic masculinity." Holy shit if mental gymnastics was in the olympics, you'd take gold.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:56 PM
2

HAHAHA ok bud, so never should have had those campaigns for equal representations of women in STEM and uppermanagement. Those guys were entitled to their opinions and you're for freedom of thought right?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:54 PM
2

Society has views, and it doesn't take a genius or a study to figure them out. There is an attitude that men are the problem, and I have had enough of being told that. And to me, it seems to come from wanting to blame someone rather than accepting they are just as much to blame as themselves. Men are the cannon fodder and the only ones not allowed to have problems, so they must be the cause. I have seen no one else say anything else about getting together a thousand years ago. I'm tired of being…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:52 PM
2

Jobs were agricultural and eventually industrial. Men had to do the jobs because of the physical requirements while women then needed a provider. This is no more my outlook than evolution. YES. Feel and think however you want. You want women being subservient to men? You are free to do so! I am all for this freedom, bud! Glad you get me now. They are free to think it but we as a society have decided its wrong. They are ridiculed and shunned, just as your pathetic sycophant ass should be.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:45 PM
2

This is the reason anytime a men raises an injustice men have, he gets told by you to stop being a victim. You blame men for your injustices, and refuse to accept women may hold just as much of the blame for their societal problems as men. You don't have to explicitly say something to be able to read between the lines. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:40 PM
4

Again, the natural way was also women in the kitchen, but we have recognized this as injustice. Men were stronger and worked, women took care of the children and home. But we have moved past that to try to form a more equal society. Men were entitled to think less of women right? That they don't belong in STEM or upper management. Who are we to change how they feel? Do you see the ignorance here? Maybe you're just blinded by the power this imbalance has, some kind of privilege you have as a fema…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:38 PM
1

For every up there’s a down. Society was never equal but people like you like to pretend men got together a thousand years ago to oppress women. These problems and injustices arose out of the old societal order that got us here today and we’ve spent decades working out the issues it’s caused for women but not acknowledged a single one for men. Pointing out our injustices is no more of being a victim than women doing it. You just want all the benefits of equality with none of the downsides.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:33 PM
6

The fat acceptance movement has a lot to with men finding them attractive. Go to any blog and you’ll see how strong muscular men should want them for beautiful women they are. How about you look outside of your victimhood lens for one fucking second. Men have been given women’s point of view for the past two decades. I know how you see it. All of the feminists movements are to change how people feel. “Toxic masculinity” is trying to change the very essence of what it means to be a man. If you ca…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:26 PM
5

It is exactly the same. Men are naturally not attracted to fat women. Plain and simple. Women were expected to be in the kitchen. Men were attracted to women that fit this role. All of modern feminism is based on changing people’s minds, until it happens to benefit you, then it’s the way it is.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:15 PM
4

You could ask all these same questions about fat acceptance or women being in the kitchen. Those are both evolutionarily rooted, yet we have acknowledged them as unjust. The are countless efforts to redefine femininity from beauty, grace, etc. why is masculinity different? Why do women get to define both genders?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:09 PM
69

It’s actually pretty much that. Women still have access to sex even if they’re obviously broken and can’t form proper relationships with men. That’s how you end up with the stereotypical stripper with 0 self worth other than her body. They at least have the release valve of empty sex, even if it’s harmful itself. Men don’t.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:41 PM
657

A common theme in serial killers is abuse and neglect from their mothers. They can’t form proper relationships with women and the sexual/intimate frustration and resentment builds and festers into a pathological mental illness. Also factors into why women are usually the victims.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 02:56 PM
25

There can be class struggle, it’s just not A vs B. It’s a spectrum of power that you can subdivided anyway that fits your narrative and that’s the problem. I’d argue most of our problems today come from meaningless divisions among ourselves. It’s not men vs women, left vs right, black vs white, etc. it’s everyone vs everyone. Every problem is a societal problem, societies fault. Men didn’t get together and agree to keep women in the home, society did. Just like women didn’t get together and agre…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 04:19 PM
6

It doesn’t matter what the underlying cause is, it’s still unjust. The man’s job is often incompatible because he has to provide a majority of the income. It’s a catch 22.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:42 AM
5

Yes that’s what I’m saying. It’s not right even if it does result from the old male provider paradigm. You can’t say men shouldn’t see their children because they have to provide for them, which is what the article stated. And honestly I don’t think I buy into the bond being the best. The most responsible, stable parent should be the primary caregiver. A child shouldn’t be given to a drug addict mother because she spent the most time with them. All of these arguments have a lot of probably’s and…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:34 AM
18

“It’s just the way things are” Sounds a lot like the answers first wave feminists got when they asked the obvious questions.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:38 PM
16

The opinion piece cited is an incredible display of mental gymnastics. “It only makes sense that mothers who have a closer bond due to the time spent caring for a child be the one more likely to retain primary custody after a divorce.” The father that sacrificed his time with his children to support his family shouldn’t get to see the children because he made that sacrifice. That divorce coach can go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:36 PM
11

That opinion piece by a divorce coach sure is some hard hitting factual proof. “It only makes sense that mothers who have a closer bond due to the time spent caring for a child be the one more likely to retain primary custody after a divorce.” That is such fucking horseshit. The father who has to sacrifice his time with his family to support them, shouldn’t get time with his children because he made that sacrifice. That article is so biased it’s absurd.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:34 PM
21

I’ve just heard it described that way by herion addicts. It’s just one that stuck with me because it’s a scary description, “a warm loving hug.” I’ve only had a 3 day narco script for a separated shoulder one time, and while it didn’t feel like being loved I could see how they could be related. This isn’t from personal experience. Sorry if I may have offended.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:23 AM
26

Opiates are also the closest drug to feeling loved. If you’ve been starved of love/intimacy like a large portion of men, I can see why they turn to it. If no one is going to love them, at least it feels like opiates do.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:11 AM
2

You need clear communication of desires and all of those what if’s are irrelevant. It’s easier to find a hot guy willing to fuck than a hot girl. No matter where you fall on the spectrum that determines who’s hot or not, that holds true. Both men and women want and need sex. They also need intimacy. Woman have ready access to sex but not intimacy while men have access to neither. But it’s not too literal. If men were as picky as women, the human species would have died out long ago. Men vary mor…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:01 AM
1

Or they could be choosing to see the beautiful parts of a woman, and is giving her the attention she desires. That whole line of thinking is based on a malicious view of men. And if everyone only wanted to have equal or better, You could only date/fuck someone exactly as attractive to you. In practice that means no one dates/fucks. that’s how orders work. Women have the ahem, privlege of being able to choose mates greater than or equal to themselves.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:31 AM
2

Different cultures for sure. And this was strictly a college town, in a city or rural ymmv.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:25 AM
1

Then you could get with a guy a league or two above. if you confidently approached an attractive guy, he’s going home with you 9/10. He may not approach you, but he wouldn’t turn you down. While the converse is not true. I’m pretty conventionally attractive, slowly going from cute to manly. I worked at a bar, getting a phone number on a receipt was pretty much a free coupon to get laid. It’s the closest thing to a completely sanitary sociological study as we’re gonna get. I got hints of attentio…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:29 PM
6

I can only speak for young adults and colleged aged people, but usually guys at or a league above theirs. If you went out to a bar and found a guy in your socially defined league, there is a much greater chance he will be willing to sleep with you that night than to say if I as a man went out and did the equivalent. And like you said, anyone thats had enough casual sex knows it gets hollow fast. If a woman just wants to have a wild night and have casual sex, she's probably going to go after a se…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 09:39 PM
10

Foreskin is analogous to the clitoral hood. the way it rolls down the shaft makes the top half much more sensitive along the underside of the shaft, which contains the tissue analogous to the g spot. The extension of the clitoral tissue that runs down the length of the vagina. Assuming you’re a woman, the difference in sensations would be like having the first inch or so of your vagina be the same skin as your outer lips. Robbing you of the sensitivity of the opening.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:23 PM
4

People want what they can’t have. Any given weekend you could have found an acceptable guy willing to sleep with you. All but the top echelon of men couldn’t do the same. And neither men nor women can find love easily. It is fundamentally “unfair” men don’t have the option, even if they most likely would choose not to exercise that option as you said. I don’t know how we’d go about changing it, but there is a fundamental power imbalance in sex and intimate relationships.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:12 PM
7

Removal of the clitoral hood is classified as the mild form of type 1 FGM and is the anatomical equivalent of circumcision. If someone chooses to have this done to their own bodies, so be it. But doing it to children is disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:20 AM
15

Seriously, what the hell? It’s unreasonable to be afraid of being falsely accused? It’s risk aversion, plain and simple. The article says that avoidance is evidence men just give into their urges. It’s more men know they could do everything right, and still be stabbed in the back at any time and have their career destroyed. The ability to accuse and condemn the mentor is always looming. Any rational man is not going to put his career on the line to mentor a young woman.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:32 PM
6

None of these messages about toxic masculinity ever mention the role women have in defining masculinity. As the gatekeepers of relationships and sex, held over from the hunter gatherer society; women have just as much influence, if not more than men in defining societal masculinity.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:39 PM
3

Seriously, when did making someone uncomfortable become sexual assault? Men are still expected to make the first move but now we’re being told it’s unacceptable to flirt in 99% of common situations.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:11 PM
40

That’s because women sexualizing themselves is a form of power. An alternative to sex threatens that power and they’ll do whatever they can to prevent that. The same as anyone else in an unjust position of power.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 01:01 AM
1

In a prehistoric society, sure. But we have risen above our instincts and urges to try to be a better, more virtuous species. We have progressed towards a more just society since the beginning of civilization. Demonstrating worth and female gatekeeping arose out of the health/survival risks for women. They could die in the process or be left with a child and no provider, so women had to be picky. But with the transition from agriculture to industrial to service industries, modern medicine and la…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:32 PM
3

This article has put everything I have been saying to a clear, concise package. These SOCIETAL gender roles were created by SOCIETY and have advantages and disadvantages for both sexes. And also a writer finally acknowledging the social and sexual power women have over men.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:00 PM
12

The thing is, in any one on one situation with a man and a woman, there is a power imbalance. There is a chance the man could over power her for any number of reasons. It’s the nature of the two genders and we keep like to pretend they’re completely equal. But fear of what could happen is not a valid reason to not do what is right for you. You could be killed anytime you go outside, so the safe thing would be to stay inside all the time. But that’s not life.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:34 AM
281

Since when was making someone uncomfortable a crime? A strong woman would have told NDT that he was making her uncomfortable and stood up for herself. Personal responsibility is essentially gone.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 07:48 PM
1

I'll just leave this here https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/abpptz/why_99_of_guys_dont_approach_women/ed2y183/
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter