TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheIntrepid1k Archive

View 12 posts and 385 comments by TheIntrepid1k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
123

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:27 PM
76

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 09:13 PM
30

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 09:12 PM
27

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 05:23 PM
21

DebateTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 07:03 PM
14

TheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 09:27 PM
12

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:22 AM
2

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:02 PM
1

TheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 06:34 AM
0

TheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 11:29 PM
0

TheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 05:21 PM
0

CMVTheIntrepid1k/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 10:55 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

You actually want a high N count woman, like versus a normal/lower n count?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 06:53 PM
–

The problem here is if a woman were to reject a guy for sex, after he paid for a nice date and she abruptly told him to leave her house, no one would for a second think the women was not being nice. Your comment shows clear bias. This is the problem, you seem to vilify mens need for sex and not vilify womens need for attention. Its okay if women manipulate men into giving them attention and time/resources but when it comes to a man doing it, its plain different.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:57 PM
–

hahahaahah fk man this was spot on, its rife and reeks of the same bs we all try to expose on here to women and get nowhere with. in the end the women on here are usually arguing from an emotional response, most have had rejection by chads like this so they always seek revenge in situations like this. were not gonna get anywhere with this crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:49 PM
–

The funny thing is the women who defend the women are doing the same thing the women in OP does; look at things emotionally. Its ironic isn't it. I think the men of this sub have to realize this and stop engaging with women on these matters, nothing will ever change because feelings are just that, fee fee's. If a woman feels that 2+1=tomato sauce, nothing you can say will change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:47 PM
–

Ah yes, women can do no wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:45 PM
–

Then why did she have sex with him without any emotional investment in the first place and make herself a glorified sex toy? This is the issue with this sub and this is what so many men complain rightfully so about with women. You cant want equality and then at the same time expect your feelings to matter more than the mens. My friend has the same problem with this all the time, he is a bit above average but he is a great musician who plays amazing electric guitar. Women literally throw themselv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:43 PM
2

This is because most women are bisexual and at times depending on their hormonal cycle be fully attracted to women and/or fully attracted to men. It takes a lot for a women to be attracted to a man because of this. Throw in the fact that if a woman is on birth control, she is less likely to find men attractive in general because she stays in a part of the cycle that makes her find feminine features more appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:15 PM
3

"et me repeat what I said in another reply. If you don't know the difference between glancing or staring, you are likely the creep. Now creep can be subjective yes, staring someone up and down, eye fucking them, is not subjective. It is objectively creepy. Most people would agree, if you don't agree, you may be the creep." 'may' be the creep is the operative sentiment of my post. Whats creepy for some women from some men isn't for other women for other men etc etc. Secondly, the world doesn't ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 09:00 PM
2

Go ahead, no one is saying you cant carry a gun or weapon. If you still feel insecure after that, well you probably could benefit from a boyfriend or a guy friend. Seems like a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 08:57 PM
3

Unfortunately for you, if you feel like your not 'at peace' when men stare at you, yes you need to feel more protected and a boyfriend helps a lot with that. This is the problem with you idealists feminists, you ignore basic biology when it suits you. Instead of asking yourself, why do I feel unsafe when men stare and coming tot he conclusion that its because men in general are stronger and pose a threat or simply look inwards and realize most men are decent and wouldn't attack you, you attempt …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 08:56 PM
2

There is not a set of funadamental rules that we can men can equally apply to what or what doesn't make a woman feel comfortable. Also, its not a mans job to make a woman feel comfortable, she can insists on the right to physical saftey but emotional satisfaction is on her. If she really feels so uncomfortable with men staring, she should take responsibility for it and dress in very unraveling clothing, ie. masculine clothes like hoodies, hats that cover, sweatpants, heavy trench coats, etc. Or …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 06:29 PM
3

Women are 3 times more likley to identify as bisexual. I think its just a nature thing. ​ ​ https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sax-sex/201004/why-are-so-many-girls-lesbian-or-bisexual
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 07:28 PM
1

Relationship therapist. Thats just funny, nobody cares. Most relationship therapists are a joke. nobody on here is going to respect your opinion on that basis. Make a good argument or get the fuk out of here 'kid'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 09:03 PM
1

Hate to break it you but most men aren't going to confide in a woman that he in insecure and has anxiety related to women. Thats like one of the last things you 'male friends' would ever confide in women in general and truthfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 08:52 PM
–

Both genders have their flaws and faults, as you point out physical violence with men, emotional problems with women. So calling women the common denominator for the failed relationships is BIAS. I agree that both genders have their flaws. Men for example have issues being emotionally available, they can lie a lot just for sex, etc. However, a clear trend presents itself that women in general tend to give up on relationships and marriage to fast jumping from one relationship to another, never se…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:45 AM
1

I have a theory that a large % of women are unfortunately lesbian than would want to admit. I think this is why so many marriages end in dead bedrooms, something like 25%. Once the women have the kids/house/marriage, their good to be who they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:37 PM
-3

Yes there can be in this day and age. People date people they dont really and cant really vet properly because we dont date among st our immediate social circles anymore. In the past, people dated in their immediate communities/social circles and so men/women who would be serial daters/users/players would get outed early on and a reputation would form, warning people about this person usual intentions. Now, people date people from across social lines and online and never really know who these pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:28 PM
-2

Women lying to themselves? Noo thats soooo uncommon. Btw did you see lizzzooo in her last music video? Isn't she just like the hottest girl in the world? So brave and fierce.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:22 PM
-1

I would imagine a lot of bisexual women in hetero relationships are particularly unstable and cause a lot of drama. If they just admitted to being what they are, most likely lesbian and left men alone, there might not be so much DV. they probably get with guys who put up with a lot of craziness but it spirals quickly when the men realize all their romance isnt going to make them into him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:18 PM
23

Its funny that people like you like to immediately point out things like; men are the overwhelming perpetrators of violent crime. We all concede this to be true, its obvious but instead of admitting, it would be like us being like ; well, men are socialized differently hence the violent crime. What if, and I know it may shock you, but what if women just have a problem with relationships and women emotional state/mindset is to blame?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:15 PM
18

Or that women are the common denominator in failed relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:13 PM
0

I wish you good luck though, these types of thoughts rarely work out well in the long run, not to mention the type of relationship you have with these men is almost doomed to fail and my guess the failure will begin in you when you wake up one day and realize you have zero respect for these guys because they have even less for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 06:44 PM
1

You have two male partners? hahahaah Okay that explains it. I am not a man of god but I do pray for those two poor souls, no offence but to be living with someone that obviously hates men must be torture I guess some guys are just way to horny they will literally put up with anything for crumbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 06:42 PM
1

I wish I could say that but mainstream media seems to promote these ideas strongly. A lot of women have these views and have a generally distrust for men in the same way. She obviously either has been radicalized or her trauma has made her very susceptible to it. Its insane how someone could possibly believe female sexuality has been erased.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:44 PM
1

This is the problem, you see how asinine these feminist types are? They dont trust men, its like arguing with someone who thinks deep down your just a nazi Your never going to get anywhere because in the end every argument you make, no matter how good it is, will always repel them emotionally due to this inherent lack of trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:16 PM
1

"You might not want to oppress women. But I don't think that's the case for many, if not most men. Because those men are aware that the only way for them to have a partner, is if women have to lower their standards in order to survive. And we aren't willing to ever go back to that. The world can burn first. Being single is a small price to pay in comparison" Case in point. If you honestly think that most men want to oppress women, your deluded and insane and tbh I would stay away from men in gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:14 PM
0

"I mean yeah. You say that womens standards are too high. Which implies the solution is for women to lower their standards. But women would rather remain single than settle. So that's not really a viable option for us. What else do you suggest?" The issue isn't the standards and you missed my point entirely, this is just an example. The problem isn't the standards, its the complaining that is followed by the high standards and then when men in general attempt to allude to why women keep getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:13 PM
2

Good lord, this is case in point. The disdain you seem to have for men in general is palpable and insane. You REALLY really believe that men in general are trying to ERASE WOMEN? And you think you could ever have any non biased insights into dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 02:25 PM
-1

My point is men and women were oppressed by the same group, wealthy/powerful men AND the women but women seem to think that men as a gender were the oppressors. Thats simply untrue. I would argue that being a woman would favorable throughout history compared to being a man. Men in general were treat incredibly violently from birth and majority died brutally and young during war. Most men as a matter of fact didn't get to reproduce. For example, 17 women for every 1 man reproduced . In other word…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 02:23 PM
-3

Case in point, this is exactly the sentiment that a lot of women have. You simply dont trust most men and default to assuming we are trying to control you in some way shape or form.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 01:00 AM
0

I said most men, not all men want to resolve dating issues and help women understand why dating seems to suck for them as well. Equally, I acknowledge that there will be women that no matter what do not want to listen to male sentiment/advice/experiences for the sheer fact that their experience has led them to hate men, as a class of people and view them as subhuman. Look at all the women that gawk at the male lonliness epidemic, for example, they literally dont care that our suicide rates are 4…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 12:59 AM
-3

Ironically enough, your proving my point. The current narrative in the west is that women were an oppressed class in the past without mentioning the obvious oppression men also face all the time as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 12:55 AM
-6

Prove that. I have yet to see any proof that female sexuality was controlled by most men and male sexuality was not. I can see certain societies where both genders sexuality was controlled by the elite of those societies for their benefit, but I have yet to see one where female sexually was oppressed and mens was not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 12:54 AM
2

You missed my point entirely. But just to illustrate it, how many men do you try to match with generally out of every 10 men you see on the app? If you answered less than 5, your more than likely just going to be shooting yourself in the foot. The data is in, most girls dont match with over 90% of men. Its clear who has the problem here because a lot of guys match with most women, upwards of 30-40%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 06:49 PM
2

Its only exhausting because women have an illusion of options/matches. Women need to be very selective on dating apps and not in a fun way. If your approach to datings apps is find the best possible person out of your 'options' as a woman, your bound to choose men who will be wholly emotionally unavailable and being pursued by many women, some better than you. Unfortunately, because of this the onus is on women to find a guy who matches her sexual market place value within 1-2 points. Even then …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 06:08 PM
12

I disagree that she knows that, you seem to understand that and I applaud this. Here Ill give you an example; imagine i go to a third world country and find 20 women interested in me. Then I make a tik tok telling women from my home country that they should consider themselves lucky to date me because I have 20 women who would drop everything and marry me. Whats the problem here? Well its simple; we know why they are interested in me and its most likely because they want a way out of the economi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 05:36 AM
0

My point is exactly that; you wouldn't recommend your daughter gain self confidence on the basis that she is being messaged and pursued by guys online. Would you? If your little cousin came up to you and said, "im so amazing, i have so many guys messaging me on instagram would you encourage her to accept that as a boost to her self esteem? No because its dangerous to believe you are better than you are and arrogant. People dont tend to like arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:24 PM
1

She's not telling all the men in her country they should feel lucky if she messages them.... she's telling all the men... anywhere... who have messaged her or another woman first...who are more in number than can be dealt with promptly. That's a big difference. Dont take my example literally; its just an example to prove that 'options' aren't always what you think they are on the surface. Lets use another example then; take an only fans girl. Imagine for a second, an only fans girl says to every…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:22 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:16 PM
1

What are you talking about and who is ya'll?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:15 PM
-7

Why does it sound like that? How about ACTUALLY try to understand my point, instead of like glossing over it and being offended?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:15 PM
3

No offence but it is. You probably have never had a convo with a girl in the top 5. Those girls usually role with higher ups and celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:24 PM
2

Women are being mislead by reality. Reality is deceptive. We all get confused about big things and life usually eventually hits us with reality and we adjust.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:23 PM
5

Relax, she kind of is. No offence but maybe you consider yourself much less than her and that sucks because you might consider yourself average. She is above average but nowhere near high level. In a room of 100 women her age, she might be more attractive than 60-70 which is slight above average. Pretty sure you could see a room of a 100 women and she wont be in the top 10 taking into account that the top 15 would be in the model range.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:22 PM
2

I agree, but the math is just easier to understand for most if you use 5% which is still a crazy number. In a room of a 100 people you will be more attractive than 95 of them. Its more understandable than saying in a room of a hundred, there may or may not even be an adequate distribution of sexual attractivness given that .1% of people become super models etc. You cant logically represent .1% of a person that would be nonsensical to a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:18 PM
4

Thats a massive issue, however, to be fair, this is by far the biggest issue. The difference in attention that women get is 10 fold from the average guy. Atleast when it comes to income and education were not that far off from women. Average women recieve 10 x more attention than men do and women now a days like her are miscronstruing what that attention means
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:16 PM
-6

Most men will just take sex from women, its up to women to use the power of their feminine sexual energy to find good men who are also looking for other things as well. With power comes responsibility. Just like men are taught to be gentle with women, women have to be gentle with men for both genders to benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:13 PM
5

Yea well its a symptom of the problem that social media has, women think they are way higher than they are, this one included. People have a hard time applying numbers to things like dating because its heavily tied to their ego, not to mention the ego's of feminists who think every criticism aimed at womens bloated sense of ego, is an attempt to usher in a new patriarchy and take away their freedoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:11 PM
1

Okay, yea that was harsh but reality is that the guys who have lots of girls are even more harsh, trust me, i know guys like this and they are way way worse in their descriptions. Maybe you've never known guys like this or are a girl to which they wont show their true face. "This woman is comfortably very attractive and I have no doubt about the quantity of messages she receives and I’m sure there is a healthy portion of them that are just looking for something casual" Yeaaa, no. Sorry but the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:08 PM
2

Bro, you suck at math man. If your in the top 1/20 you are in the top 5%. LOL Jesus christ and lord help you if you think this chick is hotter than 95% of girls. You must be very very horny to think she is. fuk ahahaha joking bro but cmon
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:05 PM
3

If a man sends a message with intent of getting a reply...and get a reply when many others don't...he has experienced a felicitous event. Ill give you an example that better illustrates my point because its going over your head. Imagine I become a passport bro, move to thailand. I end up getting 20 women to agree to marrying me. I then proceed to naivly make a tik tok video, saying "Women back in the my home country should now consider themselves lucky if I message them, I have 20 women interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 07:03 PM
4

But yes, she let the feeling of excess male interest get to her head. not only that, she bases how she approaches me based on fake male attention. thats fools gold
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:25 PM
3

forgot to put slightly above, like i did in my op. my bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:25 PM
-1

I took that into account, for sure, 6/10 ish for me, slightly above average
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:23 PM
2

No, unless you think it is but for most women who want a relationship it simply isn't. It would be like if i went to a third world country and had 20 women proposition me for mairrage. Should I turn around and make a tik tok saying "Hey, women back home, I have 20 girls interested in marrying me, you should consider yourself lucky to marry me if I so please" The obvious answer to that is "Are you on drugs? Ofcourse they want to marry you, they want a green card, not ACTUALLY marry you for YOU. "…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:22 PM
4

"If she wants to tell Chad she has an inbox full of other men she can talk to so don't take it for granted" She can do as she pleases but her argument is false, your aren't lucky if she messages you because those people interested in her are NOT ACTUALLY interested in her. It would be like trying to convince me that you have the best restaurant in town and showing me a bunch of people who are homeless and starving for food saying they would like to eat there desperately. Just because a bunch of …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:17 PM
1

I mean, everyone can wear make up, you have to judge em based on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:13 PM
11

"I'm willing to bet 95% of those guys are significantly less attractive than her and would gladly date her." I would take that bet and you would lose for sure because she isn't more attractive than 95% of men/women, that would put her in the realm of a super model. I dont think you know how the math works. Either way, she wont message 95% of them and the guys she does, as we have seen in statistics will be the ones who have plenty of other women already and most likely are more attractive than h…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:12 PM
2

I am a dude and trust me, she is nothing special, slightly above average at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:09 PM
2

"Stop making it seem like men completing for attractive girls is a new phenomenon." Where did I say competition is a new phenomena? See what your not understanding is that your not competing with men, in the end she makes a decision based on her own assessment of her value whether she talks to you or not. The problem is that she is basing that value on messages from other men, an intangible illusion of options that dont really exist. Even if she did 'make you a lucky one' and messaged you, it wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:08 PM
3

Nah, thats way to low, she is a 6+ depending on her body but still decidedly in the average range.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:05 PM
-1

"You might not like how she is saying it, but if she has 20 men on her dms, you literally have a 5% chance. So, you kind of are lucky." She has 20 guys messaging, 19.5 of which could care less about her and want to use her a cum sock but the guy who gets messaged is the 'lucky' one? XDDD You apparently missed the whole point of my post. Those men messaging her are not 'options' that she can easily turn into a loyal boyfriend, so your not lucky if she messages you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:04 PM
6

Where did I saw this was a privilege? XD You lack readin comp skills lil bud
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:02 PM
7

And then theres the opposite side of the coin, with people like you making low effort responses, sweeping generalizations because you cant look at the truth. Your scared and biased and think everything people say about women is an attack on their freedom or an attempt curtail it. Sucks to have generalizations thrown back at you, don't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:01 PM
4

How do you know she is thin? Also, i didnt say she was average, she is above average but nothing crazy. Look at my op. XD you missed it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:58 PM
6

Wrong thats just wishful thinking. The interest hasn't boosted everyones expectations at all, mostly only average women and highly attractive men. Average women like this one who might be more attractive that average think they have 100's of men interested in them. This is a major problem because its just an illuion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:40 PM
–

yea in my opinion this next decade is going to be shit, unless somehow im underestimating the rate of societal change that can occur which could be the case given that info and peoples experiences spreads so fast now adays.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:29 PM
–

Yea, well its unfortunate but the dynamics at play right now were set in motion years ago. It was inevitable. The only hope is that people recognize the weaknesses of the current system and eventually change. I dont see it changing so fast tho, its going to take a decade or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:26 PM
1

Well its simple really; just because your attracted to a guy doesn't mean that it will be a net positive to seek out a relationship with him. This is because women have more needs than simply the need to be attracted. They want loyalty, security, emotional stability and good nest to raise their children, etc etc. If your constantly going after guys that your attracted to and it turns ugly, your far better off humbling yourself and atleast having SOME of your needs met. Nobody in life gets EVERYT…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:24 PM
–

Yea I made a point about that; women think that their preferences are unique and putting the onus on women to approach men would make them realize that they are not unique. This would make it obvious to most women that A. They are no different than other women and thus B. The outcome of dating a bad boy will most likely be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:21 PM
–

Oh 100% this whole forum is a day dream. The hope is that people learn about the market and pass it on to their offspring, for the time being, its pretty doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:19 PM
4

Date with intention to find a good match for their sexual marketplace value. If your are average, try to give average guys a chance to get you interested in them. The term matchmaking implies that there is a right person and wrong person. If your matchmaking simply by going on your feelings and whether you feel initially attracted to the guy and your not a woman that is highly attractive to most men, you most likely wont be able to hold onto said guy, hence its a bad match.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 02:47 AM
16

The statistics dont lie; the truth sucks some times. Your being vapid by not accepting the truth. Look at the stats, its clear as day. 60% of women believe they are in a relationship, 30% of men do. The fact that he mentions that there are women who easily fit that dynamic in real life, where a large percentage of women, over 30% are just being used by the same clones of highly attractive men confirms it in his life. I know its easier just to pretend that women and men are totally equal and ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 02:40 AM
5

This is fine, no one thinks women should be forced to have sex with men they dont find attractive. The problem is that most women, though possibly not you, but most get emotionally attached during sex and most women seek an emotional bond prior to sex and after sex. Some womens brains aren't wired that way, however, the hope is that your okay with it if you partake in those kinds of relationships. The worst thing would be to partake and lie to yourself that your okay with the emotional fallout. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 02:35 AM
10

Actually, online dating would work very well for women because men outnumber women by a large margin. The problem is that the guys who you will match with are highly likely to be highly desirable, or in the top 5% of looks etc, as per the statistics. IF and this is only an IF, you want to find a good match, you have to recognize your level of attractiveness on the market, MATCH that to a man and go from there. Sadly, if your average or below average, your might not find those men attractive at f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 02:27 AM
2

Oh shit yea, never thought about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 09:08 PM
1

Ahh wrong; very wrong lol. you must live under a rock if you think men aren't expected to approach. XD but okay i mean, if you HAVE to believe that to be consistent with your other beliefs i understand, but you might want to look at why you HAVE to ignore such an obvious truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 08:44 PM
1

"I wouldn't be so high alert if I was picking him. The problem being, most men want to be dogs." Mos men who have the personality traits that allow for constant rejection and constant approaching are dogs...thats my point. If women approached, the men who didn't have these traits would get a better shot at showing their qualities. The mere fact that you cant see how your approach to dating makes you HAVE TO BE on high alert, shows the double standard here. Its palpable and obvious. The question …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 08:21 PM
1

This is my point exactly. My OP is an attempt to reduce the probability that psychopathic/sociopathic men succeed in dating. By having the onus put on women to select who they talk to and reject, you are encouraging a healthier environment where men who aren't predisposed to psycho/socio traits of dehumanization and lack of empathy can have a better chance a pre selection. It isn't going to solve the problem but it will in my mind allow for a lower likelihood of the problem rearing its ugly face…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 08:19 PM
1

So let me get this straight. Your definition of someone having something expected of them is for them to have a gun pointed at their head? Are you on drugs? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 08:13 PM
1

Not its not true actually and I explained why. You are conflating approaching a man and giving him sex immediate to letting a man approach you and not giving him sex right away and doing it the right way, waiting to develop and understand if he is a good choice to open yourself to. Why is this so hard to understand? Your trying to convince us that the two acts you did; approaching vs being approached ended up with totally different results, but when you explain what approaching means you add tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 07:15 PM
8

You be outside yo. LET HIM COOK.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 05:03 PM
1

What can men not see? I dont get this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 05:01 PM
1

But you approached and didn't wait for sex. Thats not good, its not in your interests. Most likely what you mean is you approached a guy out of your league and got butt hurt when he didn't want anything more. So really all your saying is 'I didn't value myself properly and shot out of my league, therefore, approaching doesn't work'. Imagine if a guy said, 'well i approach dozens of models and they are just wanted to use me for my money, I guess i'll never approach again' Thats a cop out. Your ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 04:59 PM
1

No actually, women would less likely approach jerks because of what I pointed out; the guys who do well with women usually carry socio/psycho pathic traits due to the fact that these are a penchant to diminish the value of others which enables them to easier recover from rejection and making a woman feel uncomfortable and move on to the next one. Think back, whats one of the first things that PUA's say to their followers? STOP GIVING A FUCK. Ironically, stopping giving a fuck what women feel/thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 04:53 PM
1

Men are certainly expected to approach. Men are also expected to protect for example. Not sure if you get to decide what men are expected to do or not, but most people expect men to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 04:49 PM
2

Women do approach more than ever now, and that will continue as long as society doesn’t start moving backwards to being more patriarchal. Thats simply not a relevant amount of change, not anywhere near the difference that online dating is having. "It definitely doesn’t take being a socio/psychopath to be able to handle rejection well enough to approach someone" Stop looking at things in such a black and white way. Sure, a politician could not being corrupt by the goodness of his/her character bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 10:03 PM
5

I didn't talk about whether or not they are advocating for sexual equality. I can see how you misunderstood. You might want to address peoples arguments instead of just picking the parts of it that might relate to something obvious and assuming the person arguing is wrong because of that. It would be like me saying "this is why people hate feminists(you), they like to gaslight and strawman peoples arguments" Its wrong because I havent asked if you are a feminist in the first place. This is the l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 09:46 PM
9

There is when were basically wasting time arguing with them as if they actually care about making life better. Its like when feminists scream that they care about equality, when in reality they are only concerned with making things equal where it benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 07:39 PM
2

Biology has nothing to do with it. If it we reduced human mating to biology, one could easily argue in support of rape, given that men are much stronger than women biologically. Realistically most of our ancestors engaged in rape, especially in the beginning of our evolution. You missed my point entirely. It would be in womens interests to be the ones who approach because it minimizes the success of men with psycho/socio pathic traits. Its about women protecting themselves against manipulators/a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 07:06 PM
8

Im married with 2 kids, have been for over 10 years. Try again. This time use your spidey senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 07:01 PM
2

"And other girls aren’t impressed with each others jacked boyfriends. Anyones boyfriend can become jacked. They can’t all become tall with a rectangular head and great teeth." ​ Thats what they think but the reality is that not everyone can get jacked. Trust me, ive been in the gym for over a decade and i've seen guys going just as long not get anywhere near what some other guys get to. Im one of the guys that got a lot out of the gym and i realize now not everyone has the genetics for good musc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 05:30 PM
26

Dont even bother trying to understand this logic, its just women trying to find a way to have their cake and eat it to. Its a tale as old as time; hypocrites abound. They aren't REALLY trying to find a way to help the situation and facilitate smoother social interactions between men, they are trying to find a way to discourage most men from approaching all the while somehow not discourage the attractive ones from approaching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 05:10 PM
–

Fodder? Im not sure I get the point of using this word. Anyways, the problem is that we can use your same line of reasoning to discount womens oppression in other countries as well, given that you have agreed that the men at the top are oppressing them. It would be like me saying "How is it my problem that women aren't allowed to own property or vote? Sounds like a women problem, why should we expect men like me to have to do anything about it? The reason thats not a good response is that it tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 10:10 PM
7

"You can’t shame or force a women to like shorter guys." No you cant thats a fact, however, where it all goes wrong is when women ONLY date guys who are over 6 feet, have bad experiences with them and blame all men for those experiences,\, ie. lack of loyalty, emotionally unavailable, cheater etc. , as if your choice to date a man with highly desirable traits had nothing to do with it. If you put the shoe on the other foot and imagine a world where men only date model women, then turn around and…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 02:18 AM
6

Being single is fine when your young and most likely still have a active social life/family is still alive. When you hit your 40's and 50's and people start dying around you, friends move or focus on their families and make friends with other parents, loneliness will kick in 10 fold.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 06:36 PM
30

Men as a group aren't in 'charge' of anything. A small % of wealthy men insignificant and detached from modern males experiences are. If you think the billionaires in silicon valley care about the average mans experience, your off point and dangerously deluded. Men are in large in charge of most of the armies in the world, but do you honestly think people like vladimir putin or george bush give two fuks about the people that died in iraq/ukraine? Your reasoning is palpable and reeks of underpinn…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 06:34 PM
2

The problem is that female sexual experience is inherently emotional, whether women are aware of it or not, they bond during casual sex and the breaking of that bond is painful. Its a very common experience for women to seek more in casual relationships than the men. Not only that but the emotions they feel after sex encourage them to seek to nurture that bond. In the end monogomy is a compromise between the sexes. Most men get access to sexual intimacy, as opposed to the opposite where most get…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 05:35 PM
-3

​ "And as soon as you have any evidence to support that claim, we can have that discussion. For right now, however, my evidence supersedes your speculation." You dont have evidence at all, those are just statistics, they haven't made it into the evidence because you have yet to apply context to the data that is relevant to the discussion. You really dont have much at all tbh and men will continue to be adequately resistant to the problems and inequalities in the divorce/marriage market.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:21 PM
–

Thats a dangerous assumption because in the end you just like women cant undue their desire for a top guy, tall handsome etc, they cant undue billions of years of evolution and the need to partner up and procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:14 PM
6

"I started with this one because it's the only one that has the slightest kernel of truth to it. Women do get 50% of marital assets in divorce...in 3 states. In the remaining 47 states, "equitable distribution" applies which does NOT just give each party 50% but takes into account their contribution to the marriage and other factors to determine an equitable split, meaning the red pill boogeyman of "wife who doesn't work and spends all her husband's money" is not going to be viewed favorably whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 06:35 PM
–

Maybe you aren't. but Wtf....do you live under a rock? You've never heard of FWB/situationships/women using men for dates/food/money. People in these things are considered single and consider themselves single.....So like your living under the fallacy of the women are wonderful effect or are you just in such a small eco chamber of women that you dont see how most women live?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:34 PM
–

Theres a reason why empires that enforced monogamy are the superpowers of the world and any empire that practiced polygamy failed. Children born into families make for the best kind of citizen because they grow up with the attention of two parents + extended families, whereas societies where polygamy was the norm didn't have that, not only did the children feel rejected as is the case with dead beat fathers/ mothers, the mother felt unimportant and passed on her feelings of rejection to her offs…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:30 PM
–

Thats societies problem in my opinion. We can't leave young people totally to their own devices when it comes to mating because families are the cornerstone of society, without strong families society collapses under its own weight in the matter of a few decades. Its why japan has invested close to a billion dollars on matchmaking services and why many countries will be following suit. This is just your privileged talking; you dont know it but families are the reason the west and modern world ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:27 PM
–

Indeed its a huge problem. I get that you think its just on the male and thats your prerogative but at some point your going to have to look at the other half of the equation if you want to see the full picture. It would be like victimizing a woman who has a relationship with a man knowing they have various baby mamas and children that they aren't being attentive to. At some point you have to ask these women to take responsibility for their libido and put their unborn children first as well. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:24 PM
–

Women who say they enjoy being single, really are talking about being in serial FWB relationships and situationships. This changes, however, as most men are able to garner more resources, those men look to younger women to date casually with and the women who once enjoyed the 'single life' are no longer enjoying the lack of attention and actually have to compete with other women for a smaller pool of men who are interested in their age bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:20 PM
–

Men learn early on that they shouldn't waste time pursuing girls that are much more attractive than us due to the fact that we have to face rejection and pain in doing so. Women dont have to pursue so they dont learn that lesson early on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:15 PM
–

You can negotiate attraction. You've never had anyone in your life tell you they didn't find x partner attractive at first and the relationship started as a friendship? You can most certainly negotiate attraction, instead of saying 'well he isn't 6'1 or very wealthy, im not even going to bother, you can negotiate with yourself as say "well maybe he isn't 6'1 but he is funny and ill give him myself more time to see if i develop attraction'. Its ludicrous to expect your going to be immediately att…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:13 PM
–

Men aren't complaining that women want mutually satisfying sex, rather that women are complaining that there is no stability or commitment in these relationships with these men and then painting all men as trash or immature. Not only that but its to the detriment of society that most men be kept out of sexual intimacy and more importantly that women procreate with a man and bring a child into a fatherless world with a man that will not commit to their stability as a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 05:05 PM
2

I would agree with you as long as you mentioned one key fact: women are only matching with 5% of men on dating apps, which is crazy especially considering we outnumber women 3 to 1. If you do the math, only 15% of men in the general online dating world are matching with any women at all and that includes all failed matches, which make up the majority of them. So, although i agree that the majority are lookin only for casual sex, an important distinction needs to be made; a majority of men in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:22 PM
–

The market decides her level, not her. You can decide your on the same level as leonardo decrapio, but are you able to secure the same level on the market as him? Nope. Thats what women and society dont understand. No, sweetie, not everyone is a 10, not everyone will get someone they are head over heals in love with that is near perfect in every conventional sense, no everyone is not beautiful or that unique. You dont get to decide your value to others, you can pretend to make up some value to y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:13 PM
1

Good call, this is the best way to ensure you don't waste your time with a guy, as you get to know them through yourself and your friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 05:04 PM
0

This is good to hear, its what men generally want women to be aware of and what we learn at a young age; if we try to pursue women who are generally very attractive and we realize were not, we get rejected and ultimately stay single. Most men now adays are just waiting for women to realize this, so we can get on with at least pairing up with a well matched partner and build a life together. Obviously were in 2023 and cant force women to choose better, but we hope they do so sooner than later, li…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 05:02 PM
7

Because the men they swipe on those dating apps are largely men who most women match with and thus unknowingly enter into a competition with for their attention. most of of the time they lose given that the most beautiful women in the end take the attention of the men in competition naturally. Dating apps fail women just the same as they do men. its just that they fail them in different ways; rejection for men on dating apps is immiadte, overwhelming majorities of us dont get any matches. For wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:59 PM
4

We have to know what our league is because we have to face rejection if were wrong. Its a survival mental health struggle that forces us to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:55 PM
2

"Women will then choose whatever they consider the best option of those who have shown interest." And this is where women fail and sometimes end up alone. They think that all guys that hit on them are 'options'. The reality is that male attention is fleeting and the majority of male attention is simply an express interest in sex and nothing more. Worse yet, men know that women are looking for more and prey on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:54 PM
–

Finding stuff like this funny, even when you admit you most likely dont read it or attempt to understand it. Its okay, reality doesn't really care if you understand it or not. In the end reality gets the last laugh, if you choose to willingly look away theres benefits to that, no doubt. But if you look away at something that is true and affects you, forgive us for laughing when you get snapped back to reality and its not so funny anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:41 PM
19

Its funny because you have no idea how men live and will never have any idea. The funny part is you can't conceive that things are different than your viewpoints. What he is saying is somewhat true for some women, especially the ones who say 'they are happy being single or happier' They dont mean single they mean serial dating, serial situationships, and just having multiple sex partners. Being truly single and alone means not having any of those things, not substituting one aspect of the whole …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 06:12 PM
1

Wow dude, its amazing ur still here after going thru this. hope u find some peace and happiness eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 05:55 PM
0

Its why they want a guy who is bigger than the rest and not just big. They want to have the mental freedom to act like hypocrites and use the leverage of a big guy to continue to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 05:51 PM
0

There is the obvious one and its clear that women want a guy who can protect them etc from most men, but that would mean an average guy would do, ie. average vs average = protection. However, what a lot of women who say this mean is "they want a guy who can protect them and make them feel safe, when they impose their social will on other women who might or might not have other men." So its a way to feel safe in being annoying and agressive in the way females are. I've encountered this a few time…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 05:51 PM
1

Even if they dont have immidiate sex with a man, men can still game them without the women knowing any better. Even if women do as you suggest and make a man wait, most men will simply have a number of women on rotation waiting for when that women would be ready. As a matter of fact that already happens. The point is that in the previous market that was very difficult to pull off because people only met people that they knew through their friends/family/work and so the reputation of the men foll…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 10:58 PM
1

yes, SOME women dont mind and will always only ever give chad a chance, even if they know deep down commitment is impossible but there is a large percentage of well meaning women who would benefit from the previous dating market system and its ability to help vet male desire and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 10:55 PM
1

Thats just to black and white and shows me you have little experience in the real world. Trust me, I know what ppl consider chads and yes, they have to exaggerate and/or lie still. Remember, high end women have different standards than the average ones. Sure a chad can easily sleep with an average women, without putting any work or lying but they still need to 'game', exagerate or lie to high end women to bag them as well. Seems like you dont understand that everything in the dating market is co…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 10:53 PM
1

Problem is that women usually are wired biologically to attach emotionally to hot guys when they have sex. However, the hot guys move on with ease. Unless science is wrong about female sexual arousal/satisfaction then this sentence is incomplete and lacks context.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 07:45 PM
1

Ever heard the term 'man up' ? Why do you think it was coined and directed at men and there is no social norm to tell people to 'women up'? Oh right, because society expects men to shut up and bit down hard,whereas women are allowed to wallow in self pity victimization and complaining and whining and its accepted. If you cant see this, your lost. ​ Oh wait let me guess, your going to blame the term man up on toxic masculinity. right? HILARIOUS. Yes, blame men for a term society uses on mass dire…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 07:43 PM
1

I agree they should take accountability, however, helping women make better decisions about dating is important and the current system doesn't allow for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:25 PM
1

Sure giga chads dont need to lie but ever chad isn't on the same level. Theres grey areas of chads that need to use lies or exaggerations to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:24 PM
1

Whats stopping them is a culture change. Everything went online, friends included is my point......You have a new generation of women who's lives are mostly online from a very young age. They do care but there is little way of vetting guys now adays due to the social structure and so they just give up and try their best on social media because they dont know any better. Feminism made women believe men are like women so these young girls date on social media with the expectation that the men are …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:23 PM
1

OLD is not a reflection of biology because feeling of needs for stability and loyalty are biological. before the system reflected a need to satisfy those feelings but now the system is setup to completly ignore those and the end result is what we have now in mordern dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:16 PM
1

No one in their right mind would as for commitment up front without trying sex with a person. Were talking about spending the rest of your life with someone, if the sex is not good, your screwed and the relationship is due to fail. Thats why the previous system was better. women would be able to vet a guy who most likely they knew what their reputation was like, to a certain extent. It wasnt' perfect and some women would go against that reputation thinking they would change him but there was a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:14 PM
1

"Regardless, this infantilization of women is bullshit IMO. We should apply the same standards to women as we do to men There will always be women who will only ever give chad a chance regardless of reputation etc. However, a lot of women in the past didn't do that and chose the guy who would give commitment over the latter but can't because they have no way of knowing the kind of person they are. In the past, the player would usually be identified early and a lot of women would choose to stear …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 06:08 PM
1

That is true, however, my point is that decisions are better made with more data and especially in the case of relationships, it is easy to deceive people. Its not hard for a guy to lead a girl on for a couple months to a year because most women wouldn't expect commitment until a few years down the road. The guy could conceivable just lead her on until then and then break it off and let his true intentions known, meanwhile finding a replacement at the click of a few fingers which was never the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 05:11 PM
1

For sure, there is certainly as stated in my OP that there will always be a small percentage of women who will sleep with high value men in spite of knowing its not going to end up in commitment. However, my point is that social media and dating apps make it laughably easy for men to deceive women who might otherwise want a relationship and get away with it. There is no longer a system of that allows people to make a more informed decisions because the anonymity of the internet allows people to …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 05:07 PM
3

"Equilibrium is just physics. " Are you suggesting that we use physics to understand social dynamics? If so, one quick look at mammals as a species shows that this is simply not true. Take seals for example, only 5% of male seals ever get to reproduce., 95% dont. How is that an equilibrium? The rest of what you said seems to be begging the question with no real thoughtful answers. We cant solve the sexlessness problem however, we can mitigate it as it has been done in the past. We are living in …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:08 PM
1

Not sure if its more, but no the data shows that women believe they are in a relationship at twice the rate men do which means that women are dating a smaller percentage of men, thinking its exclusive. I think it was like 60% believe they were in a relationship where only 30% of men were.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:05 PM
0

Chad doesn't commit so you are proving his point. The types of guys women approach aren't going to be the types that are likely to commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 07:51 PM
3

" Why are these truths never positive why are they always negative? Logically, dating patterns should reveal good and bad." So this is the 'just' world fallacy. Why should uncovering truths be both good and bad, equally? Is it because you feel like men and women are equal and so the problems men face and equal to the ones women do? Thats naive as hell and shows huge lack of experience. Life isn't equally good and bad for everyone, some peoples lives are just worse than others and given different…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 05:19 PM
1

There won't always be simps either. Thats changing. See what most women dont understand is that men are watching on the sidelines in their 20's, the average men that they will try to marry in their 30's, are watching, learning and reacting. They are seeing women openly talk about their sky rocketing standards and the way society treats them and when time comes for the new generations to marry in their 30's, these men will laugh and balk while they date women in their 20's looking to upgrade thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 08:43 PM
4

Men want mairrage more than women? I'd like to see those studies XDDD Thats a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 08:10 PM
5

Majority of women want children. Just because your some back ass wards redditor with odd views on life, doesn't mean even nearly anyone is like you. The reality is most women want kids and a happy marriage. You can continue to make excuses but for the majority of women there is a timeline and its far far more slim than people like you make it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:08 PM
2

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/12/14/barely-half-of-u-s-adults-are-married-a-record-low/ This says your wrong, you know, statistics. XDD ​ You guys can ignore a problem all you want. Women are particularly good at ignoring them and focus on how they feel but when how you feel doesn't match with reality, all you will have is confusion when your feelings dont amount to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:05 PM
1

Okay - Is that why more than half of Americans are not married and that number is at a record high? I mean you can ignore the issue all you want, it doesn't change reality. Im sure your going to have an excuse for that too, sadly excuses won't make things real.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:04 PM
2

"Exclusively fucking hot men in your 20s and settling with a stable but less physically attractive man to grow old and raise a family with in your 30s makes complete logical sense." The problem is that you don't get to do the second part. Thats the OP's point. You can't go around doing hot guys in your 20's and then pick a guy in your 30's. If you pass on average guys, they will pass on you because they can still easily get women in their 20's when they reach their 30's given that they have more…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:48 PM
5

"One thing RP men can’t accept is that women aren’t under any pressure or timeline and rarely if ever have to search for or settle for a man." Can you explain how there isn't a timeline for women? I want to have a laugh. I guess you probably believe men can be women as well right? XD Yea, no timeline AT ALL women can easily have kids well into their 40/50's. XDDD
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:41 PM
3

Happens way more than the opposite. Guys are way hornier than girls and will sleep with women way below their generally accepted level of attractiveness(exceptions always exist). Some guys literally will sleep with a girl because they have ONE above average feature or because they are a race they never slept with. Stupid things. Thats one thing all women need to understand. A mans sexual attention means NOTHING. We hand out sexual attention like candies. Its super cheap to us and its like breath…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 09:44 PM
7

240 pounds at 6'2 is quite overweight, especially if you are not muscular. If you were like a power lifted or advanced gym goer, 240 at your height wouldn't be so bad however, its pretty obvious you dont have a lot of muscle. You really have to get down to 200 and under before you really try to figure out if u have to settle or not, GOOD luck
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:55 AM
1

Cant that be flipped around though? For example, why is the responsibility on the man to have conversations with a woman and not a woman having the responsibility to have a conversation with a awkward man? This is the crux of the problem with women now adays; they want the guy to fullfill all the old time tested trait charismatic, confident, entertaining, funny, makes the first move, etc, but they also want equality in the other aspects of the relationship. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEAD: it simply …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 01:42 AM
0

Thats not submission. What your describing is what you think her emotional and physical cue's mean. The catch is that submissive people tend to be overly fickled and change their minds on a wim. They are very unpredictable because they dont have emotional anchors in reality. Not only that but they can be easily dissuaded against you by most anyone who makes them feel 'safe' for a moment. Imagine a dog, hating you now times it by 100. Submissive people cant be taken to seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:09 PM
1

I hate to break it to you. "bi' is basically normal. Most women are fluid in their sexuality. This is why they can be so picky about the men they choose, they have a whole other intimacy that men dont get from their relationships with the same sex that woman can tap into when they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 10:24 PM
2

10 bux says he wasn't good looking. If he was chad, she would've pretended she plays all sorts of 'games'. The sad part isn't that she would choose a good looking guy over an average dude, the sad part is they blame the guy when in reality its her her biological instincts telling her to stay away from ugly and secure best genetics. She seems to think she did something 'good' when in reality she was just acting like an animal. XDDDDDD
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/21 06:07 PM
1

That is true but someone saying the things that this woman has said shows far more than simply just not being happy with his sexua prowess. Its obviously a massive red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 04:43 AM
1

The problem is that if she is still talking about her ex in that way, it means she still has strong feelings of regret of the relationship ending. Its a massive red flag. To be fair its probably not just the penis, its the other things as well, probably his over all appearance too. Even if she lied, those very very strong feelings will be the end of the relationship and will lead to cheating most likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:52 PM
1

Hasn’t that been the case historically? Or as you’ve stated; naturally? So do you agree it’s in our nature to compete? That Chads naturally have an advantage. Yet if you work hard, and smart; you can gain advantages too? You can if you change the way you look. You can't if your using things like money/fame to mask the reality of the competition. "Or is a Patriarchal Society preferable? Where we all stay in our lanes?" Preferable to men, I would guess so but only marginally because you would stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 03:00 AM
2

Genetic manipulation is the only thing that makes sense. Ultimately if you leave male and female sexual energy in a free market, men loose out, just like it in nature, very few males get to reproduce. Until males and females have similar levels of sexual desire, one gender will always loose out to the other. You can pretend that money equalizes our natural state but it doesn't. Money only masks the true butal state of nature. In the end, the obvious excesses become apparent, female sexual energy…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 01:06 AM
1

Your not getting it buddy boy. READ; SHE DOESN'T WANT YOUR SEXUAL ENERGY, SHE WANTS YOUR MONEY. So its basically prostitution with more steps bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 09:52 PM
1

No, they dont quite just want the alpha chad. They just can stand to wait for him because its not as painful as it is for a man to wait. Alpha chad will regularly fk many types of women, they just have to wait their turn. You are putting the cart before the horse. Ever heard of a slut? What do you think differentiates them vs your normal chad chaser? Sluts are just that much more horny, possibly not bisexual either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:58 PM
2

"gigolos provide a feeling of commitment from a high value man." Someone needs to put that on a plaque. Its so ridiculous that its funny. ahahahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:55 PM
1

Use their sexual energy to garner a better lifestyle that money brings.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:54 PM
1

It is when your on reddit and people HAVE to believe women and men are the same, its just our insecurities or our culture that makes us different, not like, you know, billions of years of evolution. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 11:13 PM
1

Money is not sexy. Sorry to burst your bubble. Money doesn't make women want to sleep with you, it makes women want to use their sexual energy to achieve a certain lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 11:12 PM
1

"Men just tend to suck at getting women in the mood." LOL - womens sex drive is just as strong as mens. but at the same time you say Men just suck at getting women in the mood. Men don't need a women to get them in the mood! Thats the whole point honey bun. You even admit it yourself!!! Theres a clear difference between men and womens sex drive. Its in your own post.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 07:20 PM
1

The average man isn't unattractive. Look at gay men, they have sex WAY more than any other pairing in our society. Average males are attractive, when the person ACTUALLY has a strong sex drive and is orientated to be attracted to men. The average woman isn't attractive either by your stanrdards, look at obesity rates in the USA. But look at how easy it is for overweight women to have sex. The reality is if your horny enough, you anything becomes attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 07:17 PM
1

In the black community single mothers make up over 70% of all mothers. To say that women are more clear headed is complete insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 07:07 PM
1

women are more clear headed around sex? Is that why so many women end up single mothers? Bitter about how all men are trash from being pumped and dumped their whole lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 07:06 PM
5

Oh god here we go. REPEAT AFTER ME; nobody is attacking female sex drive. Not every post about men and women is about WOMEN and how they suck. For the love of god, stop projecting your feminst worldview on everything. The world isn't out to get you because your a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 05:04 PM
6

Oh no though, ur not getting it sweetey. You see, female libido is holisticcccccc Get with the times sweeetyyy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:32 PM
5

You seem unwilling to accept female libido is less than male libido, so you instead describe female libido as 'holistic' requiring a bunch of extra steps. The reality is that its simple verbal diarrhea. Women have a lower sex drive, which affords them the ability to make a far more detailed selection when it comes to sex because of the abundance of options afforded to you by the many willing and able men ready to have sex on a whim BECAUSE of our HIGH libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:30 PM
1

On reddit, its not. In real life, it is. Reddit is obsessed when neutralizing gendered language, seems like your a part of the problem. In the real world, women withhold sex from men far more commonly than men withholding sex from women. Maybe your friends group is a bunch of non binary wierdos, but in a normal group of average men, you would get laughed at for insinuating a man would with hold sex from his gf/wife. You would be a laughing stock.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:26 PM
9

If women had a higher sex drive, most men wouldn't seem unsexy. Your putting the cart before the horse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:19 PM
1

Gonna be honest with you, unless your a nympho, a guy withholding sex is either one of two things; he is getting some on the side or he is a little less straight than he is letting on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:19 PM
1

e also live in a society that stigmatizes (and has always stigmatized) women’s sexual drive, and that has an impact on the way it’s viewed. OMG when are you feminists going to wake up to reality? Wet ASS pussy was the number one song trending in the world for weeks and you idiots still think female sexual drive is being stigmatized? I mean what the fk is it going to take for you idiots exactly? God you people are so fkn dense and live in some wierd fkn world where everything and everyone is out …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:16 PM
1

I disagree, women can wait for chad because they simply dont have a much need for sex, where as chad would gladly fuk multiple times a day and not think twice about fuking a 3 or a 4 every now and then. Online dating has made this really easy for chad and has made the current problem with sexless men much more apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 03:13 PM
0

I can understand that point, however, why is it always the women withholding sex in relationships and not vice versa.? Again, its so obvious to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:46 AM
1

I AM A THREE HEADED BISEXUAL DOLPHIN, WHAT NOW!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:25 AM
4

Wow really? Where is the science that shows women have a higher libido?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 04:10 AM
1

Honestly, if everyone reduced it evenly across the board and it didn't have detrimental effects on my mental healthy (which unfortunately low test has), yes I would. I find my sexual drive kind of bothersome. It never gives me a break, unless im engaged in physical activity or competition or am hangry, but even then its still fairly potent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:30 AM
1

I disagree, women are pickier because they can afford to be. It doesn't cost women a lot to not have sex more than once a week. Most men, need sex daily so most men have drastically lower standards than most women, we simply cant afford to be. Horny men suffer, horny women suffer, but their suffering is far less than ours, especially during the part of their menstrual cycles where they do not ovulate. It is this lack of suffering and for men, abundance of it that leads women to be the choosers, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:26 AM
1

Mmmm nah. I dont think a robot will ever surpass the feeling you get from having sex with a living female who is equally horny for you and enthusiastic about sex with you. Thats just hopefull thinking. Unless you can pair sex robots with a drug that makes you forget they are a sex robot somehow, its never going to measure up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:22 AM
2

https://www.webmd.com/sex/features/sex-drive-how-do-men-women-compare
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:21 AM
0

what narrative...i posted a study. its really pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:20 AM
1

Obvious, its been like that for ever. Sexless marriages are far more common than anybody knows and the sexlessness is usually maintained by the females, not by the males.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:20 AM
4

Men can indeed fuk anything but the studies show that bisexuality is rare amongst men and very common in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:19 AM
2

Dont be so pathetic that you think that bezos gf actually wants to fuk him for more than just trying to keep him happy, so she gets access to the lifestyle he unlocks for her. Leo is a different cat, he actually sexual attraction on his side, but in the end for the average guy the sexual dimorphic nature of sex drive amongst the sexes always means that your average guy will always have to work harder for sex than your average female.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:18 AM
2

whats ur point
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:08 AM
1

You cant really invest in yourself and acheive sexual parity with women. Just because women chase you because you have a bunch of money/status that you gained from investing in yourself, doesn't mean that there is sexual parity. Gold diggers still run the show when it comes to sex. Why? Its simple, most men want enthusiastic sex, not starfish sex or a girl who just pretends to be into it. At some point the pathetic male who achieved being able to mate with the female will have to abide by her le…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:06 AM
3

It sounds like your projecting. Does the post make you feel uncomfortable? I can understand it, especially if you already struggle with women or if your a woman in denial of her sexuality. Anyways good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:02 AM
14

No no, im just a misogynist. Its really simple; life isn't complicated when you live in the patriarchy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 10:29 PM
1

True, it really is. However, I hate to say it, female sexual energy is as well. There are far more females who identify as lgbtq than men. You could say that is cultural but i suspect its simple hormonal. Men have very distinct sexual drives, easily discernible and largely unsaleable. Female sexual drive isn't as distinct and thus is far more fluid. It goes the same way with emotions. I remember a conversation i had with my gf. She spoke so explicitly about her feelings and I told her I wish I k…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 10:28 PM
17

Women love sex. Men however, the love is way more. Its just basic science. The hormones responsible for sex drive are 3-4 times higher in men than in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 09:59 PM
3

Who said anything about female babies. We just need parity, personally I would probably just reduce male sex drive to parity with female sex drive. Male sex drives are is kind of annoying. The damn thing never leaves of off the hook.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 09:55 PM
1

Because masturbating to porn is not at all the same as exposing your asshole for the world to see. It is also not nearly the same as having 20 men ejaculate on your face. Porn is just for men to be able to successfully climate without using their imagination. Its not real to us, its just a tool. Here is the difference; if you could choose to be born into a family which one would you choose? A: one where your father masturbates to porn. B: one where your mother has shown her asshole to the world …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 06:05 PM
3

My girls do.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 09:56 PM
1

thousands of years of human history? Where in your history have we ever allowed sexual exhibition and fluidity and had a strong civilization? This is all an experiment, its never been done in history on a large scale. Let me ask you; do you think 30-40 % of men being sexless leads to good outcomes? We are already seeing radicalization if you look closely enough. The manosphere, mgtow, incels, etc are just a natural outcome to a high % of disgruntled men. This is just the beginning though, the re…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 06:01 PM
1

Look at the problem were facing right now. Japan for example; 50% of men are virgins. Negative growth rates. In the west 30-40% of men are sexless. Right now we wont see the consequences of this, but eventually there will be. In fact, japan is already investing hundreds of millions to help stop the problem. You cant have a large portion of the male population disenfranchised like that. There is a reason we evolved to by treating sex different than just some transaction. Its not just about religi…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 02:53 PM
1

And even if it was, that’s still no justification for punishing the children of the “sinner” (or whatever you want to call her). They aren't punishing the children at all, they are doing them a favor. They kids need a fresh new start.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 03:26 AM
1

"Furthermore, why is sexuality a deeply emotional thing? That may be true for you, but that does not mean that it is a universal human truth." Who cares if its universal. The point of the matter is that society does not benefit from a cheapening of sexuality to the point of exploiting it for money.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 03:26 AM
1

Yea, I don't think I would like to live in a society where people use their intimate body parts to make money. Sexuality is a deeply emotional thing; to cheapen by exposing it to strangers to make money should always be considered shameful. Sexuality is a fundamental framework that society is based around; it involves important things, such as future generations and the continuation and prosperity of the species. Theres a reason humans have been able to get where we are, compared to animals. We …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 02:55 AM
9

Very true. But again its a woman, so its 'societies' fault.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/21 07:36 PM
0

Do you not realize how much fkn bullying will happen in school to these kids? hahahaah Its for their own interests to get expelled and start over again at another school. Do you not realize how much fkn bullying will happen in school to these kids? hahahaah Its for their own interests to get expelled and start over again at another school.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/21 07:22 PM
1

Do you not realize how much fkn bullying will happen in school to these kids? hahahaah Its for their own interests to get expelled and start over again at another school.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/21 07:22 PM
6

Do you know how much ridicule these kids will recieve in school because of her actions?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/21 07:21 PM
1

You cant say that anymore because more than a third of men suffer from sexlessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/21 05:33 PM
2

Im 34 and I agree 100%. The wolrd has changed dramatically. Its sad tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/21 05:31 PM
13

Its not even misandry its just that they have the power and just dont care. So any attempt to undue that power is bashed. Men need to start doing the same thing. Women have been sticking up for each other for years, its our turn now.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/21 07:38 PM
3

"Be mad if you want to. The truth hurts." Who is mad? XDD you sound ridiculous. Your the one with the ass backward views. XDDD Men are always told to put their lives on the line for women/children and usually we capitulate. If you think that AT ALL compares to women feeling like they need to make people feel comfortable, your patently insane. Your probably a part of the idiots who believe being a mom is the 'hardest' job in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:02 PM
1

hahahaahah - to who?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 06:46 AM
1

Actually the number of sexless men has tripple in less than 10 years. Its probably higher now, closer to 40% of all men. Sexless = 18-34 no sex or virgin last 2 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 09:47 PM
4

We have been socialised to be the "glue" in society; to appease, submit, placate, put the needs of others before our own, be tactful, censor You really think that men aren't told to put the needs of others before our own? What wierd world do you live in? Its literally the opposite. If a boat is sinking, who are the first to be saved? If a man hits a woman, who is expected to help the woman, a man or a woman passerby? This just proves the point of this post. XDDD How ridiculously out of touch are…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 09:36 PM
2

Says the guy that thinks we exist in a free market when some people are born quadriplegic.....XDDD
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 07:22 PM
1

Is that a guess on your part? So your saying 40% of people in relationships currently are the types of people who get into short relationships only? So 1/2 people almost, is in a relationship for a short run only?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 11:50 PM
1

do you know how disability works?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 07:30 PM
0

Then why do women complain about men who cant commit? What he means by a good man is a man who is true to his word and values women intensely not just as some moving fleshlight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 04:30 AM
3

40% of new couples meet online. Where do you get that its a small portion?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 04:29 AM
0

It already happens. Countries in europe already provide money for a sex worker for disabled people. The problem is that lack of innate ability to attract a member of the gender of the sex you find sexually attractive is not yet considered a disability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 04:28 AM
2

Do you know how statistics work? It sounds like you dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 09:52 PM
1

The choice not to get divorce raped and get treated with passive aggressiveness your whole life with the added bonus of being a walking ATM. You do realize that when you are a betabux in a marriage the women stands nothing to lose by divorcing you, right? She has literally ALL the power once you have kids/married. Be honest, have you even thought about this critically?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 09:37 PM
1

Did you really just compare the fact that men have 4x higher suicide rate 400% higher suicide rate, to the majority of pregnancy related deaths? I think thats enough time on the internet for the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 09:28 PM
1

Your just to scared to be misogynist so you dont even want to explore any other possible reason why women don't use OLD that much anymore. Personally, my theory is that facebook/insta are how people date now adays. Clearly the data shows that women are having sex, more sex than men. To right women off as cautious is dubious in the face of the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 04:53 AM
0

I didn't say women partake in less sexual activites than men. You did say that indirectly that what your not getting. By assuming women are not using OLD because they are more cautious/weary of sex in general, you indirectly assume that they are less sexually active. Now, if you said for example; women are more selective therefore they stray from places like tinder where the men are jockying for one night stands, you would have a point and it would not contradict the data. the ironny is you agre…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 12:19 AM
1

Its called reasoned logic. Again, if you are generalizing that women are more selective and thus less inclined to have sex/partake on sites like tinder that are based around hookup culture/on night stands, why are women have more sex than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 12:01 AM
2

The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x's more men ages 18-34 are and have been sexless/flat out virgins in the from 2 years from when the data was collected in 2016 i believe. over Almost 1/3 men, as opposed to 1/10 women. T
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:58 PM
1

The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x's more men ages 18-34 are and have been sexless/flat out virgins in the from 2 years from when the data was collected in 2016 i believe. over Almost 1/3 men, as opposed to 1/10 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:58 PM
2

The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x's more men ages 18-34 are and have been sexless/flat out virgins in the from 2 years from when the data was collected in 2016 i believe. over Almost 1/3 men, as opposed to 1/10 women. If women dont want casual sex, why are men 3 more likely to be virgin/sexless?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:54 PM
1

The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x's more men ages 18-34 are and have been sexless/flat out virgins in the from 2 years from when the data was collected in 2016 i believe. over Almost 1/3 men, as opposed to 1/10 women. If the ratio of partners to mates was 1;1 as you say it is, why are men 3 x more likely than women to be virgins/sexless? Its actually the norm now that more women are sharing a smaller and smaller % of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:52 PM
3

Eventually a good % of women will settle down with a guy. Problem is that the guy the date is unlikely to satisfy them. Imagine you dated women who were 8/9's all your life and then married a average 5-6, do you think you would be happy? Unlikely. You may like his personality or his ability to be a father/support you financially, but you will never be the fun/crazy good looking chads they dated at a young age.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:49 PM
6

"It's an interesting take. I think generally women are more cautious when dating while men aren't, which could explain the ratio to some extent." Women aren't more cautious when dating than men. If that was the case, more men would be having sex than women. The opposite is true. The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x's more men ages 18-34 are and have been sexless/flat out virgins in the from 2 years from when the data was collected in 2016 i believe. over Almost 1/3 men, as opposed to 1/10 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:28 PM
3

Majority of women are so inundated with attention from men from other sites, ie. facebook/instagram/twitter etc etc that tinder is not really required and has turned as a way to advertise their other social media. Alot women also have a steady stream of orbiters that she can replace at a moments notice and will do so once in a while when one of them gets fed up and drops out. Obviously, this is with mostly the new gen, millenials dont really fall into that category. The reality is that 2.5 - 3 x…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:25 PM
1

You are crazy if you think mate selection is so finely tuned that it can predict intelligence based purely off of physical features. At best mate selection has evolved to pay attention to the most pertinent aspects of genes fit for survival in a given ecosystem. In most cases that means, in men, strength and genetic markers of strength. Intelligence is pretty useless in most ecosystems in the world. Intelligence is only useful NOW given that our societies are formed in a highly complex manner, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 11:05 PM
1

You are crazy if you think mate selection is so finely tuned that it can predict intelligence based purely off of physical features. At best mate selection has evolved to pay attention to the most pertinent aspects of genes fit for survival in a given ecosystem. In most cases that means, in men, strength and genetic markers of strength. Intelligence is pretty useless in most ecosystems in the world. Intelligence is only useful NOW given that our societies are formed in a highly complex manner, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 11:05 PM
4

You are crazy if you think mate selection is so finely tuned that it can predict intelligence based purely off of physical features. At best mate selection has evolved to pay attention to the most pertinent aspects of genes fit for survival in a given ecosystem. In most cases that means, in men, strength and genetic markers of strength. Intelligence is pretty useless in most ecosystems in the world. Intelligence is only useful NOW given that our societies are formed in a highly complex manner, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 11:00 PM
1

Studies have shown that its actually not true. I made a post on this a while back, the rate of women who had sexual feelings for another woman is 10 times higher than it is for men. TLDR; men tend to fall either within 99% gay or 99% straight, with not much variance. Women tend to be bisexual generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 08:20 PM
0

When she talks about 'white men' she means Chad/highly attractive/high status males. In the world view of people like hers, men rule the world because most people in power are men. She glosses over the fact that 75% of homeless people are men, 75% of suicides are men. This is because she has been rejected by higher status/highly attractive males and thus hates the world. ​ Its a highly ignorant form of projection. 90% of 'men' in her definition aren't even considered men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 08:12 PM
10

This is why the blackpill is so important. Blackpill men for the most part know that there is a hierarchy in attractiveness and would know that your probably out of reach for them. The problem is the bluepill is so misleading because it tells men that their personality matters more than anything and hence don't recognize the friend zone as well as they should. It tells men if they are nice and friendly, that this is enough to gain the sexual affection of a woman. These lies are meant to help ugl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 07:17 PM
1

hahahh good one Good luck, you'll need it from the looks of it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 09:17 PM
1

"Dude, you seem OBSESSED with this guy in a really unhealthy way. No offense." You got me fucked up bro. This is the first time I've ever commented on this guy in forever. Look at my history wtf...Are you scared of truth ? You ask questions, I answer and then you fkn attack me? Your fucked. Also, this 'search' took me all but 5 minutes. Ever heard of google? You sound really young, I hope your right for your own sake because it sounds like you have some trouble with women. Anyways good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:48 AM
1

One finaly pic you would like to see; https://preview.redd.it/m1529wh4n3951.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=9c1f2b2d402b1badc2f9b782c8c02932637e0151 You think THIS is a smoking hot man? The issue with you bluepill types is you label and define things based on what suits your argument. In what planet is that smoking hot or anywhere near even AVERAGE. He literally looks the size of a 16 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 08:11 PM
1

A guy 5'7 with this frame, is going to have a lot of trouble finding even an average girl to pay him any attention. https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ctvnews.ca%2Fpolopoly_fs%2F1.1838321.1401113297!%2FhttpImage%2Fimage.jpg_gen%2Fderivatives%2Flandscape_960%2Fimage.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ctvnews.ca%2Fworld%2Fwho-is-california-rampage-suspect-elliot-rodger-1.1838182&tbnid=YxEc047U9JQEgM&vet=12ahUKEwiyl4WjwsvsAhWpdd8KHYzkCIMQMygSegUIARCiAQ..i&docid=9K4Txz6zev2iJM&w=960…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 08:09 PM
1

Found a post from a guy on r/short saying he used to see him at a grocery store and pegged him at 5'7. https://ibb.co/m60KDH9 https://www.reddit.com/r/short/comments/26kchk/elliot_rodger_virgin_killer_was_obsessed_with/ Not only that but his 120 pound frame was also very noticeable under average.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 08:08 PM
2

Didn't waste my time cause it was actually fun to give some contrast to your questionable statement. Yeah, to an individual woman he definitely could've been 'smoking hot', of course that is never going to happen now since he chose the coward's way out. If you have a lighter frame, you don't have a "12 year old's body", stop exaggerating, and where do you take the height number from? Didn't he state he was 5'9'' or something, and looked to be about as tall as Silvester Stallone, when they were b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 07:59 PM
2

You just wasted your time. I never said he was ugly....you goof. I was responding to this dishonest poster calling him 'smoking hot'. Like really? a 5'6 average looking guy with the body of a 12 year old is 'smoking hot'?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 04:47 PM
2

Ahh, the strawman, I was wondering when he would show his face. I've been married for over 10 years. Try again. You really are one the brightest minds I've dealt with on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 05:52 PM
2

You showed a picture of elliot to friends...they never saw him in person, experienced his height/muscularity and you think this is good evidence that your claim that elliot is smoking hot is true? You are a pretty bright one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 05:48 PM
2

https://s.abcnews.com/images/US/HT_elliot_rodger_jt_140525_16x9_992.jpg And https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/70BF/production/_101036882_elliot_rodger_2_shutterstoc.jpg First off, look at his nose and crooker teeth. Second off, look at his big thick feminine lips. He has decent cheekbones and a decent eye area, but he has a fairly recessed chin. Again, he is also 5'6, which is far under average, especially in the area he lives in where it is predominantly white and most guys would be w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 04:58 PM
1

You sound like a fkn old prick, but the reality is your just old and out of touch. The mere fact you say 'you dont use dating app's yata yata yata yata" shows your just an old fart thats out of the loop. Studies show that majority of relationships now a days are started online. Not only that, over 30% of men 18-34 are virgins/sexless, the number is likely higher. Thsi number coincides with the onset of online dating, in particular the explosion of tinder onto the scence. If you are really intere…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:12 PM
1

Not really, its like people who believe in god. Usually its because they are brought up with it as a fact and it becomes tangible through that. Pretty obvious why it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:01 PM
2

Elliot roger was smoking hot? Are you fkn mad. https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/410/media/images/76130000/jpg/_76130498_76125143.jpg If this guy is smoking hot. What the hell would you call chris hemsworth? He below average at best. Not only that but he was around 5'6 and super skinny. You have a highly distorted view of beauty if you think that guy in that pick is smoking hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:50 PM
1

he is puerto rican....it probably wasn't height alone lol unless the wife was a whale.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 09:39 PM
6

95% of the blackpill is that looks trump everything when it comes to dating. What most people dont understand is that the blackpillers dont care about securing LTR's. What blackpillers are interested in is genuine lust/affection from women. They acknowledge money can attract women, but they are not interested in the love of a woman who likes you for your money/success. They want to be lusted for, the same exact way they lust for females. This is why it seems like the blackpill is crazy, it seems…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:51 PM
3

Consent does not exist in any species. All organisms seek to take what they want when they can take it. Sex is difficult to 'take' sometimes, so there seems to be an illusion of consent and mate selection in the female side of the species. The reality isn't that at all. In species where males are 2-3 times stronger than the females, usually a heirarchy exists where the males jocky for the top places and exclusive acess to be able to rape the females. That being said, in nature females also come …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:45 PM
3

I think what people like this fail to realize is that 'body autonomy' is a moral principle that is enforced by men. they take for granted that men put effort to enforce such rule in a population. They think its their 'girl power' which gave them their rights, etc. Realistically, it is afforded to them by a group of good men who will protect women against other men who would not respect said rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:38 PM
3

Thats gonna be hard, I dont think i've ever seen anyone post a study on showing that personality trumps looks in dating/ltrs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:30 PM
6

If a guy is really into you, he will spend ALOT of time talking to you, taking you out, etc etc. The right guy will be the one who waits.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 11:44 PM
5

Depends, were there LITERALLY ZERO red flags. Somestimes its not so much being dumb, rather its wanting to be 'smart' that gets you so much that it blinds you to red flags. The only way to make sure a guy isn't just using you as a side chick is to make sure you hold off on sex for a long time and go out in public alot on dates, etc. You can kiss and other more PG stuff but anything else should off limits until a long enough time has elapsed. The rason this works is because guys who are looking f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 11:39 PM
1

But if you admit that, isn't it time you mature and increase the amount of potential men who could make you 'feel' safe and take more pertinent aspects into account, such as their personality? It seems to me the more you allow this feeling control over your mate selection, the less control you have on the outcome of the overall quality of your relationships. It would be like if I told you I feel women with big breasts are more capable of feeding my offspring successfully and narrowing my pool of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 11:28 PM
1

Yea, but if you acknowledge the feeling, you already know where it might stem from and thus wont have the same effect because the feeling is in your own thoughts, an illusion, not real etc, just something you enjoy. Just be honest with yourself, you want a guy who is generally stronger than other guys, but recognize that strength isn't just about height, hell its not even just about overall size/ muscularity. Strength is mental as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 07:08 PM
1

Thats an excuse you deluxe yourself into believing because it makes you uncomfortable that men in society can be mislead and made intentionally ignorant on a very important subject. You would probably rather believe women are the only ones society tries to screw with because it fits your narrative of hatred towards men, which was probably conceived that one time chad dumped you ass or rejected you. See how stupid you sound?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 07:05 PM
3

I think its like that for some girls, but some girls legit will take a lanky skinny tall guy over a shorter muscular guy, even though realistically the shorter guy would be a far greater protector than the lanky skinny guy. The weird thing for me about your gender has always been; how do you know how strong a guy is if you guys never fight other guys? If thats the case and you base your mate selection on your ability to perceive strength, then you are basing your selection on a limited set of ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 07:34 AM
3

It happens. I was 27 years old before I realized that women liked tall men. Society hides these things from men for some reason. Not exactly sure why, but it is. I am also not some incel/loner, I never had to much trouble with women and have been in an ltr for over 15 years. One of the reasons why I love these forums and incel forums is because of this recent awakening of mine to the blackpill. ​ All my life I would second guess what I said, how I said what I said, etc when interacting with wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 07:30 AM
1

That just happened to my cousin. Male/24, got involed with a 28 year old. I tried to warn him that it wasn't going to work out and that even though he made it clear he didn't want a long term relationship, kids/marriage ANYtime soon, she continued the relationship and goading him into moving in with her, against our families best wishes for him. 1 Month in, she pushes to sign a lease on a nice condominium and is paying for most the food and entertainment and half the rent, even cleaning 50/50 to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 07:12 AM
1

dead bed roomserino kind strangeronnies
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 11:37 PM
1

They also lack reading comprehension, as shown above. XDDD
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 09:22 PM
7

The difference in the small sub reddit is that its a small sample and because most men don't air their problems out to the world nearly as much as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 09:10 PM
1

I've had that happen to me and believe me, its far more common than you think. Its sad that you can't see that your experience isn't a basis of others. The truth is that these things do happen. End of story. If an innocent man is afraid of it happening to him, he isn't playing the victim, he is trying and failing to come to terms with a nasty reality he is facing. Theres not much worse you can call a man than a pedophile. If you think men are playing the victim for being concerned about being pe…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 01:07 AM
5

You cant view someone as an 'individual' and thus connect to them. Thats just a fallacy. You always compared and are compared to others. If you didn't then you would constantly be falling in love. Connections are made with people through agreement, agreements are a dichotomy and dichotomies are variable interconnections between members within society. Ie. let just say a girl wants a man who respects women and is a bit of feminist himself. The only reason such a man stands out is precisely becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 06:59 PM
8

You cant separate the individual from the market. Calling online dating shallow is just hear say moral BS that doesn't address the underlying issue. It makes no difference if men decide to not use OLD. Women are the ones calling the shots. Where women go, men will flock. If men don't flock and even worse version of the dating market will exist with an ever few number of men getting the lions share of the sex. Theres a reason clubs/bars let women in for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 06:51 PM
2

Yall have to stfu. Its a god damn kiss ffs. Big fkn deal. Its not like she tried to grab his cock or ram something up his butt. JUST CUZ FEMINAZIS ARE FKN INSANE WHEN IT COMES TO THIS SHIT, DOESN'T MEAN WE SINK TO THEIR LEVEL AND ACT EQUALLY INSANE AND THEN CLAIM THE DOUBLE STANDARD. Fk pff, you bunch of pussies.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:56 AM
1

Ive never seen any data on that. It might not have been collected.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 08:53 PM
6

Its around 3x higher than it was around 20 years ago. However, that % is higher now than 25% for sure because if u look at the graphs, its trending upwards. The tend started sharply when old/social media became mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 05:26 PM
4

That would only be true if women had the same levels of sexlessness as men. Thats not the case. Women have 3x less sexless women per demographic versus men. If what your saying is true, then the opposite would be true, wherin most women would be sexless, as it would the case that most men would be competing with a smaller and smaller group of thin/average weight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:26 AM
1

The problem with those studies is that it only asks men who are in good marriages because the ones that aren't are usually already divorced and single with child support/alimony payments. Most men try at some point to get married, so its obvious that the men who are married are fairing better than their single counterparts, whom most likely have been divorced already and are on the hook for alimony/child support. Those studies are biased because almost every man in society past a certain age has…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:56 AM
3

Well, the thing is that women benefit most in terms of happiness from having kids. Most men I would say want kids, but most women I know are crazy about kids. In that sense, women benefit more from having a family than a man emotionally, whereas men value their personal freedom more than women. Again, this is generally speaking. The opposite exists. In my experience, most of the fathers in my life that I know haven't been nearly as involved with their children's lives than the mothers. Biologica…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 09:05 PM
3

Okay but that has nothing to do with the point. You average guy doesn't want to raise another mans kids, unknowingly. Its not that men abhor the idea of raising another mans kids, by default. Its the unknowingly part that gets them. Its important for them to know paternity.You get that, right? People like to have choice and a say in the matter. You could be okay with the idea of raising another mans kid, knowingly and willingly, but at the same time abhor the idea of raising another mans kids th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 03:39 AM
10

Did you not see the studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 01:10 AM
1

porn is a relatively new thing 10-15 years. Your trolling now right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography#History "Most women don't want to share a dude with another woman." Doesn't matter if they do or don't online dating makes it easy for highly attractive males to lie to women with promises of fidelity/exclusivity. You do understand that the statistics recently posted on this forum show that at least 20-30% of women minimum are sharing a partner either knowingly or unknowingly?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 05:36 AM
1

"I think the prevalence and availability of porn is what is causing the male sex rates to plummet." Have you seen the discrepancy between female experiences on online dating and male experiences? It doesn't sound like your a guy, so I dont blame you for taking an apologetic stance on women. However, this isn't a criticism of women, its just a revealing of a different set of phenomena in a given generation, compared to prior ones. Nothing is inherently wrong with harems or the women who knowingly…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 02:14 AM
1

I agree, whats happening is that a large % women are being lied to by highly attractive men who are sleeping with many different women, while the majority of men get little to nothing. Hence, why we have plummeting male sex rates and stable female sex rates. Online dating is the perfect place for high value males to lie to women and get them to think they are heading towards a commitment or LTR because nobody is there to tell you otherwise. The reason this happens is the anonymity of online dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 10:13 PM
1

Who says bezo's is a high value male?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 04:39 AM
6

You really think that? Wow, your are really naive....what are you like 21? ahahahaha You think there is not reason in the world why a woman would want to divorce a dude who is a fkn billionaire? ahahaahahahaa
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 09:51 PM
2

Fairly simply really. We all know sexuality is on a spectrum, right? So what that means is that our sexual desires increase or decrease depending on both how attractive someone is and their gender. A lesbian woman, technically isn't 100% straight and given the opportunity might have sex with a super attractive male because there is enough power is physical attraction to tip the scales in his favor. Remember the scale tips based on both gender and attractiveness. For example, I am a straight guy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 05:03 PM
1

You are missing one fundamental problem. Its not just hypergamy that causes women to devalue avg/below average men, its the fact that most women have homosexual tendencies. A recent study on it showed that upwards of 50% of women have hetero/homosexual tendencies. Its not just female hypergamy thats at play here. Its the fact that female sexuality is far more complicated than male sexuality. The truth of the matter is that life is not worth living for most men. Most men will end up unhappy (deva…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:14 AM
1

hahahaah - wtf You actually believe in male privilege?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/20 07:40 PM
1

Sounds like you dont like the idea that this is the case? Looks like maybe your mad that the world doesn't fit your wierd world view?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 08:54 PM
1

I'm happily in a monogamous relationship and I don't find my 'lust for a totally different sex' strains my relationship any more than being attracted to a person with a different hair color than my partner. Well the science doesn't back that up. People who have higher sexual partners have much higher divorce rates and bisexuality is linked to higher sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 05:17 PM
2

I've seen them. They dont even come close to the changes women get from makeup. Makeup is tailored to make women look fertile and in fact it mimics the slight changes women get when they are ovulating or near ovulation. Look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 05:16 PM
1

Ahh I see. Okay buddy. Sounds legit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 05:03 PM
2

Here is some good evidence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ1Um2IZOCc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:19 AM
2

Dangerous? ...... Its the what now?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:18 AM
4

3 bisexual women already stated that I have a good point and they said in their own words, 'the avg male is way less attractive than the avg female' So no, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:14 AM
0

It's just that male homosexuality and same-sex experimentation is much more heavily stigmatized. I agree it is. However, it can still be true that homosexuality be stigmatized more in males but AT the same time there be less male bi/gay men. They aren't mutually exclusive, do you get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:13 AM
1

The reality for most women is that makeup improves looks moderately and only really makes you look very attractive if you were already good-looking to begin with. I agree with your other stuff, but this i couldnt disagree more. I feel like it has to do with race first. White/asian women benefit greatly from makeup in my experience. Less attractive women benefit more from makeup in my opinion. Naturally beauties don't benefit from makeup alot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:12 AM
2

Yes, it is. I am still digesting that...but I kind of get it now, considering most women are most likely bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:04 AM
1

Not even incel bro...jeez calm down buddy. You must be very uncomfortable with this. Wanna talk about it? No need to get angry and personal. Sounds like your having a hard time accepting it. 3 women have already agreed with me...its not like im pulling this out of my ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:03 AM
2

You shouldn't. Three seperate bisexual women came on here saying that they find the average woman far more attractive than the average male. Take a look at the posts. They agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:02 AM
1

Not being sarcastic btw. I tried it before, it never worked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:24 AM
1

Yea, case in point. I Hope it works out for you, those things rarely do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:24 AM
1

Its not the same for all women or men for that matter. Asian women benefit highly from makeup, as well as white women. The darker the skin the less the women benefit from it. This is coming from a straight male.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:23 AM
2

So far three bisexual woman have stated they find average men generally far less attractive than average females....If you dont think that has implications for average males finding monogamous relationships with one female, i have some bad news for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:22 AM
1

I meant like, even assuming he is right. I was being sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:21 AM
1

So your tastes for men are very specific, but your taste for women is varried?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:21 AM
1

Startling as in, surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:20 AM
1

I have seen the power of makeup in real life. Absolutely. You haven;t?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:01 AM
1

wyhat
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 12:00 AM
1

Indeed. A female poster confirmed that she is bisexual and finds the average woman many times more attractive than the average male. It has startling implications for the dating marker for AVG males.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:55 PM
2

Have you seen some of the transformations that women have on makeup? Indeed, makeup can jump a woman from a 3-8. Hell I've seen an abosultly troll looking guy use makeup and wigs to turn into a above average girl. You just cant do that for men because (using your words) female sexuality is different than male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:55 PM
2

And also...men are just less attractive because they don't put in as much effort. Effort = results, big whoop. I wish that were true. Its clearly not the case. You just cant put effort into the types of things men get rated attractive for. IE. height and face. Thats just the sad truth. Makeup works for women in ways it will never for men. That is atleast until women stop having height as a top attractive trait. You cant use makeup to increase the size of your jaw/skull, forget the chin.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:49 PM
1

u/ bytheappletrees ""I’m bi and I find the average woman 100000x more attractive than the average man. You have a point"" A posted in this thread posted this...how do you explain it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:42 PM
2

Really? A bisexual female poster said the following. u/bytheappletrees "I’m bi and I find the average woman 100000x more attractive than the average man. You have a point" If its that far off, why does she say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:41 PM
0

I know your like to believe that but I don't. I don't have anything against women. Just questions about why the dating market is so skewed. Why the average woman finds 80% of men as below average. Why three times the amount of men are sexless/virgin, despite having much higher sex drives. The list goes on and on and on.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:38 PM
0

I’m bi and I find the average woman 100000x more attractive than the average man. You have a point This is from an above poster. This is what I mean. You get it now right? See how it impacts your average male?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:36 PM
2

Thank you...I feel like its obvious. If ALOT of women are bisexual and like you, it would impact the SMP/SMV of average males substantially.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:35 PM
2

"No. Womens actions are based on status. Women want to get as high up as possible." Your coping to think that. Its both. Its sexual satisfaction AND status.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:34 PM
1

In a good scenario, it can be a benefit to women but not to men. Agreed, but this doesn't spell good for your average male. I imagine you can see why now? Maybe you dont care but like you said, its far more easy for a women who is bisexual to reject any given man than if she were completely hetero.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:33 PM
-1

I don’t understand. Monogamy isn’t about there being only one person you want to have sex with, it’s about there being only one person you want to be emotionally and physically committed to. Having the desire to emotionally connect with twice as many people physically strains monogomous relationships. Do you really think that you ability to be happy in a monogamous relationship would be unaffected by your lust for a totally different sex tot he one your are currently in a relationship with?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:31 PM
1

it's just not 'pickiness' it's sluttiness. Your just building up my argument more. Women with higher N count have much higher divorce rates. To me this signals much less satisfaction with monogamy and increases hypergamy among-st women. I think you live in a different world though. Your not really concerned with why a lot of men are going sexless/virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:26 PM
0

Same goes with men. You can wash away the disgusting smell after a period though. Impossible. it comes from the inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:24 PM
1

I highly disagree. You provided zero reason as to why having more sexual interests, correlate to you being equally as picky if you only have one type of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 11:20 PM
0

Men are gross, they smell, have disgusting genitals, and frankly most are dumb shits. Have you ever smelt a girl after her period? It smells like literally dead fish who have been eaten and thrown up by a whale. Its beyond disgusting. Not to mention they bleed for 20 % of the month and smell disgusting for a day or two after. Not to mention that if women dont wash their goodies, they smell much worse than a man. Its a sweaty crevice ffs. XDD
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:50 PM
0

Bisexual women tend to be sluttier from my experience. And yet its commonly know and studied that women with higher N count have much much higher divorce rates......Actually kind of adds to my point that female bisexuality is probably a root cause of hyper-gamy and inability to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:48 PM
2

In a bisexual womans world, men are not only competing with other men but their taste and desire for other women. Thats obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:43 PM
2

Okay, what impact do you think more bisexual males would have on the dating market place? Are you trying to insinuate that a bisexual male will be more naturally attracted to other males? Well for one, bisexual males are most likely far pickier than hetero males. This is simple pschology. The more variety you have in your life, the less likely you are to settle on one specific variety. I dont get why this is hard to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:42 PM
0

I think judging by this study, 50% of women probably put more weight in their friends opinions beccause they secretly have crushes on one or more of their friends. Its actually quite common for female friends to experiment with each other, as we all know. Obviously finding stats to back that up is hard, but it follows nicely from the stats we have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:41 PM
-4

Its rate for them to 'identify' as bisexual. Its clearly not rare for them to have sexual feelings for other women, as the study point out. "Women reject most men for hypergamous reasons. I see no reason to believe that bi-sexuality plays any significant role in this given that most women do not hook up with other women." I do and there is good reason. The more you like, the pickier you are about settling for one specific thing. The more variety one has, the less we are likely to settle for one …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:39 PM
2

haahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:36 PM
0

Not my experience. Science doesn't back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:09 PM
2

What are you talking about? lol What part of my message are you refering to?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:09 PM
2

Thats fine I would accept that. But on a large scale, imagine it were the opposite and men could find men attractive as well as women? Do you think it would have no impact on the dating market? Sounds a little short sighted tbh. It clearly does have an impact. A totally straight female vs bisexual one would be far easier to impress because he desire for a man would be much much higher. Do you think the a bisexual females deisre for men is the same as a hetero mans desire for a woman? Not likely …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:08 PM
2

hahahaha wtf u sound crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:06 PM
-3

Secondly, why would it suggest to you that being bi-sexual or being somewhat attracted to the same sex, would make it harder for a woman to settle for an average man? Most women are average too. I see no reason why it'd make any appreciable difference. I mean sure, if you're talking about women that are inclined to find women more attractive I could understand, but most women don't. And yet, 3 x more men are virgin/sexless than females? You really think not being fully straight would make you le…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:05 PM
-2

Really? That seems surprising. I do. I think its the major issue in the dating market tbh. It would explain why women are very concerned with their female friends opinion as well. Secretly, they have crushes on their friends to some extent. Im sure 100% would only seriously date men, but how can you not see a problem with 3/4 of the women you date being attracted to women? Do you think it has no bearing on their ability to settle for an average male?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:03 PM
1

Of course there is more men, thats the whole point. Dating is easier, much easier. The point of dating apps is to not use a dating app. Its to find someone and not use it again....Thats what is not happening for the men. I think people really underestimate the fact that some men juggle lots of women and each of the women who he is juggling, isn't juggling other men back. Its like the term 'player' has lost meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 05:51 PM
12

So many men have already given up online dating. Its fairly well known throughout most male circles that old is a huge waste of time. Even r/tinder reached that consensus many times. The men on OLD getting ANY action are well above average already. Thats why they aren't 'as bad' as incels put it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 07:18 AM
1

Not my experience at all. It was easy tbh, never had an issue with and it was always fast, sometimes even faster than me. I honestly think it comes down to that, sadly. Its funny to cuz I pick up on it now. Like I always knew something was up with my friends sister, I couldn't pin point it but its like her body language was always off. It was really eye opening how easily they live without sex. For men I imagine it would be an extremly painful thing to repress their natural urges.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 06:43 AM
1

"Haha, I think it's exactly vice versa. In essence, when society perceives it as fine, then a collective permission gets given and women are always allowed a "longer leash" when it comes to crossing gender behavior boundaries." Well the studies sure don't suggest that. I feel like in my experience, most women don't REALLY know what they want and are far more fluid. My experience with men has always been far more straightforward with a clear picture of what it is they want. I honestly do believe …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 06:41 AM
1

He needs to be able to get her off.. I think this speaks to the whole narrative that men are at fault for women not being able to orgasm. I honestly think that most women have a hard time with their sexuality and get a lot of anxiety when it comes to orgasms. Certain girls are way way easier to get off than others. I imagine if a girl is hetero-romantic but prefers women sexually its gonna be tuff to get her off. My gf has never had problems having orgasms during sex and they happen rather quick…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:44 AM
1

Who really cares if your girl also likes girls- really devoutly religious guys? Honestly, if a girl has a history of bisexuality I would be very weary of dating her. Its already hard enough to keep a woman interested in sex and in you, let alone one that can legit go off you by default now and then. I don't think it has anything to do with religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 01:01 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 01:00 AM
1

Really good point. I agree with this 100%. Really good point. This would make an interesting study.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 01:00 AM
1

Agreed, however, it impacts the sexual market place substantially because comparatively the rates of bisexuality and homosexuality is much higher in one party compared to the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 12:59 AM
1

When I was in high school, this was the go-to reason for guys when a girl wasn't interested in them. Agreed, it works the same way with women. The usually trash men who reject them. I dont think it has to do with permission. Its just that its way way wierder for a man to be bisexual than a woman because its so much less common. I firmly believe upwards of 70% of the female population has homosexual tendencies and are mostly bisexual/lesbian. It would be nice to run some good studies on it. It wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 12:58 AM
1

It's also the case that there is a much stronger tendency for bisexual women to become heterosexuals as they age than their male counterparts. I dont think so. The second link suggests whats happening is that women crave normalcy more so than men and are willing to sacrifice sexual freedom for it. It usually doesn't work out to well, however. "Even the article postulates that the rising rate of bisexuality is likely rooted to some extent in men being seen as lower quality in the current climate.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 12:56 AM
2

What do you mean? If anything this proves my point. Your not really looking to see whats happening, your just trying to fit something into your theory. Instagram is actually the most common way young people meet now adays. Its not even dating sites. OLD doesn't just equal things like tinder/ok cupid. Its more social sites like instagram/facebook/twitter, even reddit. Ever heard the term 'Sliding into her DM's'? Listen, if you really doubt the difference between a man and a woman on OLD. Just mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 12:06 AM
1

That won't change because of OLD/instagram. Women don't need to go out to find partners anymore. Your average woman gets 5-10x more interest from a pool of men that is 1000's of times larger than in the past. Why wouldn't they take advantage of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 09:14 PM
1

Wow, that sucks. Sorry to hear that. Have you looked into ketamine as a way to heal from ptsd? I've heard some good info on it, you might want to look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 07:49 PM
1

Get proof and call the police. Install a malware on his computer or like bait him into it somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 08:08 PM
1

Wow why is ur family so afraid of him?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 06:24 PM
1

How big physically is this guy? If that was my family member, I would probably beat his ass unless he was some massive SOB. He is a big fker isn't he?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 07:19 PM
3

A chad rejecting a low smv girl happens a lot. Your telling me average women are falling head over heals in love with average men and the average men reject them all the time? hahahaahah Admit it, you've never need that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 07:15 PM
2

Can you explain how this would help? Right now there are twice - three times as many male virgins/sexless males between the age of 18-33 than there are females. Im honestly curious what you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 11:16 PM
0

Nvm, I just realized why; your a feminist. No wonder your so bloody dishonest and dismissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 05:22 PM
0

it's not a "problem" to get a distribution that isn't the classic Normal Distribution, they all just exist and describe different sets of data and are different from each other. It is a problem when your suggesting the data says something it doesn't say. I'll ask you one more time; have you even seen the data? You sound scared as to what the implications are. It sounds like the truth is a bit to inconvenient to you. Have you had some difficult experiences with women and fear you fall in that cat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 05:13 PM
0

No sorry, you really don't know what you are talking about and are utterly confused. Those studies were done on hundreds of thousands of replies on okcupid, the chance that we have the issues you are talking about are slim to nil. This isn't some small survey of 100 people. Have you even seen the date yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 07:47 AM
0

Sexual attraction (or conventional attractiveness) is a cultural phenomena that changes based on the incidentals of one's time and place. Yea, Im gonna need a source. All the scientific literature i've seen suggests to it not being a cultural phenomena and being innate. I think this is where you are totally mistaken in your reasoning and not only that, but its completely unfounded. I would agree if you said it was partially cultural but I disagree with the assertion that its more cultural than i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 07:45 AM
1

It's a random human phenomena. What the hell are you talking about? Are you really going to argue that the majority of women not wanting to date someone shorter than them, random? You sound scared tbh. You want to confuse and obfuscate things because its easier to dismiss the reality of most women viewing most men as unnatractive because you might find yourself probably within that range.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 06:30 AM
1

Your making a huge mistake in your reasoning. It makes no difference if attractiveness is fluid and changing. The fact of the matter is most women were unable to point out what an average level of attractiveness is in a male, whereas men were able to find it perfectly. Females were not even slightly off, they were horrible off, placing over 30% more men below average than need be. There is clearly a huge discrepancy between females and males in their ability to assess average male attractiveness…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 06:27 AM
3

I dont think you get it. What those surveys asked women, is to rate males out of 10, based on the law of averages. If I ask you to rate what an average movie star looks like, it would no doubt be much higher than what an average day to day normal guy might look like. In such a situation average might be someone like tom hiddleston or adam driver. However, in real life, tom/adam are certainly most likely going to be above average. Ie. tall, white, good frame, high status. Even if what your are sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 06:21 AM
1

Im just trying to be realistic for the cels out here. Most people aren't gonna look like you natty.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:06 PM
1

I get that some times because my arms are top tier and my strength is good too but you look suspect because your chest is over developed and your traps as well. That and the redness on the top half. Im always suspect of guys who look overly red, its usually a tell tale sign of AAS use.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:05 PM
1

You look like your on something. Not much, dont get me wrong. Been lifting for well over 7 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 06:33 PM
1

Im guessing bluepilled men are the ones who sponsor the girls on onlyfans and twitch. That guy who complained to twitch and asked for 14 k to be refunded because a twitch steamer he was mod for and followed ended up revealing she had a boyfriend comes to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 04:31 AM
0

wtf lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 04:28 AM
1

Maybe maybe with perfect everything after years and years you might reach somewhere near that level natty. The average guy with average genetics wont even come close to that. Trust me when I tell you, just look at his skin too, that dude is on something. He is all red all over and his traps/chest at way over developed. Tale tale signs of AAS use.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:57 AM
2

jeez your are one dumb bitch lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:48 AM
-1

hahaha thats fkn bs buddy. I've been working out for years now, i know guys who do steroids personally. this guy blows them out of the water.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:47 AM
0

if you're going to choose not to have a uterus you need to learn to deal with the consequencesReplyGive AwardshareReportSave level 1lilastrScore hidden · 2 minutes agoCopeReplyGive AwardshareReportSave level 1Sandysea85Score hidden · 26 minutes agoHow about wear a condom or get a vasectomy if you don’t wan
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:04 AM
0

And your name is ladyreason? hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah hahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:02 AM
6

Sounds like your mad that the stats don't meet your expectations about reality. I am not even an incel, so I don't need to get over myself? I dont even know wtf that means. lol You sound angry, good luck with that little one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:59 PM
0

Thats not natty. Pretty obvious he uses.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:54 PM
4

Ugly moids. ahahaha - says the girl who posts on a sub for lonley women who BANNED men from posting and hitting on them. You femcels are a fkn joke. I am not even an incel but most normies know how retarded you idiots look.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:46 PM
6

Thats because the major losers of the new sexual revolution taking place is men. Men have 2-2.5 higher rates sexlessness and virinity from ages 18 - 30, so obviously the majority of people suffering out there are men. Its difficult to say who is more hypocritical, men and/or women but right now thats just the facts and the facts dont lie. Almost 1/3 men right now is facing prolonged sexlessness and/or virginity which is 3 times higher than historical rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:40 PM
1

In a college town now. Men choose, when accept or reject for the most part. My friends and I are mostly bi or lesbians (just theatre major things) and only really started dating women when we got to college because parents. Ahhh I see. Okay, well that explains your lack of understanding on it. Small towns don't represent the average population. Small towns are usually much much better, because MEN cant lie to women to get sex the same way they can when they have the anonymity of a major city. In…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:07 PM
1

In my experience not a single woman I know acts like what you describe. What do you mean? We know mathematically its impossible for women not to share, when more than 1/3 of the male population is not included in the sexual marketplace. You can say w/e the hell you want, but you have to explain it based on the data. You cant just say "Well I know that the data makes it mathematically impossible for women not to be sharing men, but in my anecdotal experience says otherwise. I guess maybe you thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:05 PM
1

except i have data to back it up and you dont. give me data that suggests that men are the ones who choose and not the other way around. Imagine if you used the same rubrik to judge your ideas as skeptically as mine.....it sounds like you don't know what to believe anymore but the numbers dont lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:15 AM
1

but where I’m from, men do the choosing. wheres that? u live in a small town?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:13 AM
1

old = online dating my theory has no source, no one has studied the effects of online dating. im just drawing conjecture by recognizing the increase in online dating, coincides with increases in male senselessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:12 AM
1

You really have to stick with me on this, your missing so many of my points. If you really want to understand this issue you will need to use your logical brain and stop trying to fit it into your worldview. "I think the reason is probably just that it’s a social norm that the man instigate sexual encounters and that’s just harder to drum up the courage to do than saying sure I’ll do that sounds good." Guys aren't the choosers now adays. The women are. OLD has changed that. Women are selecting i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:02 AM
1

"Idk why so many men don’t have sex but I guarantee it’s not that women are a hive mind who only fuck the same 4 guys lol" Well, they have to be sharing at some point. Its impossible for half the population to have more sex than the other half and a percentage of that half not share a small % of the other. Its basic math. Take 100 people in a room. 50 staight men and 50 straigt women. 30% of the 50 men(15) get no sex 9% of women (4.5) get no sex. That leaves 45.5 women, sharing 35 of the men. In…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:31 AM
1

"Idk this is all to say I don’t think that MOST women are like that." The studies say otherwise. Over 30% of men are sexless, almost 2-3 times higher than women. And to add insult to injury, men desire sex much more than women. So we are the gender that has higher sex drive, BUT we have sex almost 3 times less? Something is wrong and its online dating. Your a different kind of girl, so is my SO. She would never have casual sex like you. I have incel friends, trust me when I say, its not what peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 04:59 AM
2

They’re mad that an ugly guy messaged them because they feel offended and possibly uglier know that he thinks he can get her, and she thinks “fuck this is all I can get” and she’s correct. (maybe?? I mean sometimes people date people hotter than them by miles.”) -a This is what people find ridiculous out of women and why most men on here wouldn't take women's opinion seriously. Not saying you are like that, just that is most woman are like this, you cant expect people to take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 12:56 AM
2

Yea, its sad really. Its kind of a reluctance to accept your lot in life which can be very damaging. Your always better with SOME love rather than no love, even if it means you don't get all the love you wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 12:32 AM
2

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/its-not-you-its-me-oh-wait-maybe-it-you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 10:57 PM
2

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/its-not-you-its-me-oh-wait-maybe-it-you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 10:57 PM
6

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3081480/Hell-hath-no-fury-like-woman-scorned-rejected-attractive-man-makes-women-cruel-men.html
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 05:58 AM
7

No one would trade places with anyone unless there is a clear disadvantage like missing limbs, etc. I know that lebron james has a better life than me, but I still wouldn't change my life for his. Theres a deep discomfort in it especially in the case of women. I wouldn't for sure because I dont find men sexually appealing, so it irks me to think men might be oggling and sexualising me, at a visceral level. Life is hard to quantify but yes, clearly women have advantages over men in society.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 06:22 AM
4

Its sound like she likes the idea of having someone around that she can fall back on just in case a better looking more successful guy doesn't come into her life and sweep her off her feet. Now that this guy is no longer there she feels much more vulnerable because she can't think to herself 'well, even if brad doesn't like me atleast joe smoe who worships me will be." Thats modern dating for you and its one of the reasons why its so frustrating. People lead each other on and use each other as s…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/19 06:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter