TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheJazzProphet Archive

View 0 posts and 344 comments by TheJazzProphet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Excuse me, when I saw you earlier, you picked up the sign, you all picked up signs and put them in bin bags. Why did you pick them up?" I guess people had left signs around the memorial, and these guys had cleaned them up.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:06 PM
3

There's so much encapsulated in that look. These moments are what it's all about.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 12:21 AM
5

I think Canadians also use that spelling.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 03:54 PM
3

I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:42 AM
3

Most people aren't necessarily good or bad, just self interested, and they have every right to be. The problem with political power is that it draws the corrupt like moths to flame. Where are the politicians who would treat the power of the state like Frodo treated the Ring?
/r/MensRights23/04/20 07:21 AM
116

It gives me some hope that this was crossposted from r/insanepeoplefacebook, but the fact remains someone actually had this thought and felt it was worth broadcasting it to the world.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:34 AM
7

Only if you're white and you complain about it, you're called a white supremacist.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 09:05 PM
1

That argument is so inconsistent it's laughable. Apparently you can't compare incarceration rates between men and women because "those stats aren't kept", but you can when it's sexual abuse, in which case men somehow aren't punished as severely as women because of one example of a woman being prosecuted and a vague assumption about men which is not supported by anything. Then, of course, it's time to trot out the debunked wage gap, because we haven't heard that one enough.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 04:59 PM
4

It still feels like 4chan is leaking.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 05:48 AM
1

With heroes like these, who needs villains?
/r/MensRights07/04/20 08:14 AM
4

I thought that was a false accusation. Maybe my memory is wrong, or it's more clear in the book.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 05:54 AM
29

Exactly what about this is amazing?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:45 AM
10

I must have missed that when I read it the first time. Of course everyone's entitled to human rights.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:22 AM
-17

Change "worthy of" to "entitled to" and you're absolutely right. Same goes for women though. However, I don't see what those things have to do with women not being funny.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:28 AM
12

When is society going to wake up? I'm tired of seeing mental illness glorified. Can't people see how destructive all of this is? Maybe they see it, and they just want to tear everything down because of how righteous they feel when they do it.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:10 AM
42

I'm assuming this is due to a misassociation between red pilling and r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:26 AM
11

Oddly fitting actually. Consider the humble toilet. Almost everyone in the modern world has access to one and uses it multiple times daily. In fact, the toilet is among the most significant achievements of the modern era. They've had a profound effect on our quality of life, and most people couldn't go a day without them. And yet they're rarely talked about directly except in disgust or as the butt of a joke.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:08 AM
2

Scrolled down a bit on that page, found this: https://sciencenorway.no/academia-gender-gender-and-society/women-are-not-formally-discriminated-against-in-norwegian-academia--but-they-still-dont-become-professors/1650109 A surprisingly frank, if gynocentric, take on gender disparity in academia.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:47 AM
114

Also this woman probably: "If you can't handle me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best."
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:06 AM
3

Huh, so they are actually paying more for a better product, not just the same one with pink plastic?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:09 AM
2

I recommend the Proraso soap that comes in a white tub. Great lather and reasonably priced.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:07 AM
2

If the modern style of razor doesn't cut it, you really should try a safety razor. You should be able to find a vintage razor at a local flea market or on ebay, but if you can't there are plenty of good razors still being made. I've been growing a beard lately, but when I shaved I used a Gillette Super Speed and Astra blades. And I don't have to feel bad about using a Gillette product, because it was made over 70 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:04 AM
1

Men should apparently always want to have sex with any woman regardless of any circumstances. The only reason a man could possibly have for not wanting to have sex with a woman is that he's gay.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:31 PM
2

I think the joke is that women ask men to hang things up for them when it's higher than they can reach.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 07:13 AM
1

The "I'm preaching to you" emoji.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:48 AM
10

I wonder if Pelosi is unpopular enough for a men's rights activist to win in her district. Maybe they'll actually have to primary Pelosi. Wouldn't that be something? It's a mystery to me that she keeps getting elected. A lot of democrats hate her.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:48 AM
1

"What was she wearing?"
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:06 PM
7

Circumcision is antisemitic.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 05:06 AM
93

Since when did "Founding Fathers" go out of fashion? It's only been in the last year or so that I've heard people calling them the Framers.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:14 PM
2

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:01 PM
14

I can't take people like this seriously. Either they're trolling, or they're seriously ill. It's not normal to be so ideologically possessed that every problem looks like it comes from the same source. I really don't think these people are any different from the kind of people who think Jews are some kind of boogiemen. They literally sound schizophrenic.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 03:53 AM
0

Stunning and brave.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 08:53 PM
2

It's hard to imagine the reason for doing this isn't to make women fear men and make men feel guilty. They ought to go back to reading the legends of King Arthur to kids over there. Feminists go on and on about respecting women, but they're training men to fear and despise women and grovel at their feet. The Knights of the Round Table were strong, confident men who actually respected women, and women respected them.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 08:05 PM
1

Yeah, I think I saw the first three or so, but I haven't kept track of them since. The first one was one of my favorite movies as a kid though, and Johnny Depp was awesome in that one.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 04:08 AM
2

The banality of evil.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 02:08 AM
22

Man, how could they even think about doing Pirates of the Caribbean without Captain Jack Sparrow?
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:40 PM
2

They're Neo-Calvinists, and masculinity is original sin. You just haven't flagellated yourself enough. But here's the thing, there's no such thing as enough flagellation.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 05:02 AM
109

I wonder if any of the feminists who complain about unpaid labor realize that up until the baby boomers or so it was common practice for working class husbands to hand over their entire paycheck to their wife for her to manage.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 02:26 AM
11

Well, it's recognition at least.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 10:15 PM
3

Not to mention Ghislaine Maxwell, the woman who procured child sex slaves for Jeffrey Epstein and his pedophile socialite friends, has yet to set foot in a jail cell.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 05:33 AM
2

This has got to be the biggest problem with intersectional social justice. It's nothing but a competition to see who's the most oppressed, and the irony is that those who supposedly face the most "institutional oppression" are those who can wield the full weight of oppressive institutions against anyone who opposes their dogma.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 06:25 AM
2

What does "biggest mood of 2020" mean?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:47 PM
5

And all of their evidence, if I'm not mistaken. How can any man possibly defend himself when the plaintiff can tailor their case around the defendant's evidence?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 10:44 PM
1

I made some kielbasa not too long ago. It was absolutely delicious, especially fresh of the smoker with the fat melting out of it.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:27 AM
4

Depends on your definition of "make it". Imagine being six years old and going through that. I guess the upside is that what his mother did is so horrendous that it should be easier for him to morally condemn her, rather than making excuses and forgiving her.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 06:28 PM
1

If your definition of sexism is like the critical race theory definition of white supremacy, yes biology is sexist.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:24 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:13 AM
1

I hope you're wrong, but our culture is insufferably gynocentric.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:46 PM
7

Short answer, no. Women, in general, want men to be vulnerable in order to gain power over them. Women are not attracted to weak men, no matter how many times she tells you being vulnerable is a sign of strength.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:13 PM
7

Milo Yiannopoulos is many things, but grisly is not one of them.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:23 AM
3

What I find even more surprising is that kids still watch Ed Edd n Eddy.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:20 PM
5

Maybe sex dolls and the declining birth rates are both consequences of the same thing?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 06:07 PM
2

At least it keeps predators away from children. Sadly there's undoubtedly a lot more out there who never get caught, and a lot of damaged children who grow into damaged adults. One of the many reasons to homeschool.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:18 PM
1

He still looks better that at least 90% of men. I guess this is where the "80% of men are below average attractiveness" statistic comes from.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 12:00 AM
1

It's a meme from like nine years ago. https://youtu.be/EzNhaLUT520?t=61 ​ Still, it's a weird use of the meme and it sounds worse if you haven't heard it before.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:48 PM
8

I know I'm just preaching to the choir here, but it's sad how it's taken for granted that baby girls shouldn't have their genitals cut but it doesn't even occur to most people that baby boys should have the same protection.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 07:04 AM
34

It's always sexist if men benefit.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:21 PM
14

A charitable interpretation would be that the meaning is positive in the sense that it is meant to increase access, as opposed to negative discrimination which would be restricting access. Of course, under that definition this would just be negative discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 06:16 AM
8

I honestly believe it's only a matter of time.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:16 PM
12

One kind of memory holing I can support is of terrible movies.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:13 PM
3

You'd think they could just, I don't know, wear pants and a jacket like the men do. It's a lot easier to get warm in a cold area than to cool down in a warm area.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:07 PM
6

Even more restrictive. Forget a woman's testimony being worth half of a man's. Women wouldn't even be allowed in the courthouse, let alone considered able to give testimony.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:57 AM
1

1693 will commence again!
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:58 AM
5

Feminism is based on Marxist class theory and treats all women as a class. Therefore, men being paid less in one field makes up for women supposedly being paid less in other fields. Only a Marxist would consider this justice.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 04:16 AM
1

I'm pretty sure using clapping emojis between your words is a violation of the NAP.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:16 PM
1

It seems like a lot of these people are either genuine anti-natalists or so ideologically driven that they think the extermination of mankind would be justified in order to punish perceived injustices. Either way, I just hope they stick to their convictions enough to not have kids of their own. If there's a genetic proclivity toward these kind of worldviews, I wouldn't mind if they chose not to pass on those genes.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:04 PM
7

Now, I'm not saying people should be driven out of their jobs for their political beliefs, but there's a certain poetic justice to the fact that the market is doing to intersectional leftists what they actively did to their ideological opponents through mob outrage.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:25 AM
4

I'm not a GSMphobe! I have a SIM card!
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:38 AM
11

Yeah, I think at some point we just have to accept that men and women are perceived very differently in many ways, whether or not it's warranted. Of course, I think we all know of a certain contingent who will never accept the reality of the differences between men and women, regardless of how many times or ways they are scientifically demonstrated.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:45 AM
3

It was a joke.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:06 PM
3

This is extremely transphobic.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 06:49 AM
1

I can see what you're saying, but this is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:55 PM
2

"a class of sociopathic criminals incapable of earning an honest income and extremely prone to predatory violence" is what we have now because of the welfare state. I'm not saying scrap it immediately, but it's going to collapse one way or another.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 03:33 PM
1

You're assuming that, because the government does it now, it wouldn't be done if the government didn't do it. It's not only poor people who have an interest in having their vaccinations paid for. The fact that you mentioned it means people recognize the need for people to be vaccinated whether or not they can pay for it.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 03:29 PM
1

Refusing to pay for your child care is not the same as denying care to your child.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:23 AM
4

You don't have a "right" to have your garbage collected, but it is a public service provided by the government at the expense of taxpayers. If the government didn't do it, it would be done by a private business because people value having their garbage taken away enough to pay for it, and because there are ways to get value out of garbage. The same could be said for the police, roads, and transportation. In fact, private security and transportation companies exist, and they often do a better job…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:15 AM
40

I had a feeling this would be the case, considering the reduction of mucous membranes and of the overall length of tissue results in more friction during sex. More friction, more irritation/abrasion, more potential for transmission of infected blood/fluids.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:27 PM
89

Well? Making misogyny a hate crime will embolden abusive women. In general, abusive people will use overreaching laws to abuse people.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:16 AM
10

It's only murder when the mother didn't want it to happen. Criminality is subjective.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 08:24 PM
2

Believe evidence.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:53 PM
6

It's like perjury isn't even a crime.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:58 PM
1

Yeah, this whole process has reminded me why I shouldn't trust partisan politicians. Especially considering it hasn't even been that long since we saw this whole thing play out in the other direction when Justice Scalia died in the last year of the Obama presidency, though without nearly as much wailing and gnashing of teeth. As far as the #metoo, #believeher stuff goes, I think Stefan Molyneux addressed it really well here. "Don't believe women. Don't believe men. Believe evidence."
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:44 PM
94

The lack of empathy for fathers is just astounding.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:19 PM
1

Yeah, they only thing they're liberal with is state power, and the only thing they're progressing toward is totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:20 AM
3

Just looking at some of the pictures of her on the internet, you can see why people used to think demon possession was a real thing. She has a look about her that I can only assume comes from a constant obsession with hate. I suppose that's a demon of sorts. I really feel sorry for people who live like that.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 03:57 PM
9

She said that after her son killed himself? Wow...
/r/MensRights22/09/18 03:47 PM
3

Because gendered terms like actress are sexist, because apparently women can't handle being referred to with different words than men.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:37 AM
7

Yeah, what matters is not which is "worse". Both are unjust when performed on an individual who does not or cannot consent. Both cause impaired function and sensation. Individual cases may be better or worse, and although the nature of the mutilation is specific to the sex of the victim, the severity of the mutilation is not necessarily dependent on the sex of the victim. I would be content with simply banning both, or extending existing laws to cover both, and punishing both equally.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 12:41 AM
10

I don't know about raping, but it's definitely discriminatory. A man would have gotten a full glass because patriarchy, toxic masculinity, implicit bias, etc.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:13 PM
2

It's literally the normal state for them to be in.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:03 AM
5

It may not be his religion, but both male and female genital mutilation are practiced in Islam. If he agrees that female genital mutilation is bad, even though it's sanctioned be a religion, maybe he could be convinced that his support for male genital mutilation is the same as a Muslim supporting female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:01 AM
4

Boys need to be told they're horrible. Boys need to be told that they're worthy of hate. Boys need to be reminded they are stupid, unfunny, and flawed no matter what others think. Boys need negativity. This is feminism.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:24 PM
6

It's almost as if that was the goal. Sometimes I can tell if socialists are purposefully evil or just so dogmatic, incompetent, and clueless about how society actually works that they tend do do the exact opposite of what their plans are purported to do.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:06 PM
7

Brings new meaning to "the dictatorship of the proletariat".
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:03 PM
1

It is for a Democratic party candidate.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:53 AM
11

It seems like the motivation is more to punish the man than to get money, especially in a case like this where she obviously doesn't need the money.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:45 PM
2

Yeah, I have a hard time believing that, assuming that statistic is credible, it has anything to do with the way a mutilated penis performs during sex as opposed to an intact one. I've always heard MGM causes the glans to keratinize and harden, increasing friction during sex. Wouldn't that result in a greater likelihood of inflammation, abrasion, and possibly transmission of blood from one participant to the other?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:41 AM
10

I'd rather be free and accused of a crime I didn't commit than die in a cell.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:29 PM
5

It's difficult. If your friendship is predicated on your mutual support for an ideology, I don't think that constitutes friendship. It's difficult to imagine in this particular political landscape, but people used to be friends regardless of their politics. I would say don't actively hide your views, and don't cut off people for their views. Let the chips fall as they will.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:04 PM
3

Good on you for breaking the conditioning. You don't necessarily need to feel bad about it, because caring more about women is natural for humans. And don't feel bad about being associated with such a hideous, hateful movement. From your writing, you seem like a reasonable person, so I doubt at your worst you were anything like the people featured in the documentary. If you want to do something, work on real equality with your new perspective in mind. And don't worry about how you're supposed to…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:59 PM
2

Considering that their principles seem to be based in nihilism and a desire for humankind to go extinct, they'd probably say it's a feminist act to not have kids, and to persuade as many other women as possible to do the same.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:21 PM
2

"One day a week, the shop becomes more exclusive in an effort to make the bike community more inclusive." Somehow, there are people who think this makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:16 AM
1

I suppose men and boys don't fall into the "anyone" category.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 09:44 PM
1

I suppose, as a STEM student, you're probably better equipped to have this kind of experience. It seems like scientific/engineering minded people tend to be a lot more willing to incorporate new information and actually process it, as opposed to non-scientists who seem less able to rationally process new information that conflicts with their world view. Science, after all, is based on the idea that, in order to propose a new idea, you must first try your hardest to disprove it.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:12 AM
9

Your description doesn't come close to reality, which is far worse. Imagine spreading the severed penises of babies on your face. What a horrifying thing to do. It sounds like the kind of thing that would get someone accused of being a witch a few centuries ago, or at least used as a means of framing someone as a witch.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:57 AM
3

Oh, they're the ones doing the exploiting when they use phrases like that. They're basically saying "I'm a damsel in distress, someone come save me!"
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:12 PM
3

If you get enough guys together, it won't be embarrassing. There's strength in numbers. There must be others who are pissed off about not being able to wear shorts. If it works, you may get the rules changed. If it doesn't, at least you'll be wearing a cooler outfit.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:59 AM
0

Sounds like a very bad misinterpretation of Freud.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:58 PM
1

Probably well intentioned, but I would be a bit wary of the idea of cancelling any kind of debt. You can strike debt from the books, but that doesn't mean the debt just goes away. You have to trace the credit to where it was going and what it was doing, and how that will (or won't) change due to the cancellation of the debt. In the case of student loans, that means a bunch of people getting expensive educations for free (often educations with little marketable value). That means the universities…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:39 PM
129

It's sad that there is such emotion over the idea of cutting and disfiguring the genitals of babies. You would think modern, civilized people would have given up barbaric ritual mutilation long ago, but somehow this practice persists.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 06:40 AM
5

Assuming this is real and not some kind of advertising campaign, it's no different than when British women petitioned King Charles II to ban men's coffee houses. It's not even that different from the feminist's objection to sex robots.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:08 PM
2

I totally agree, and I appreciate that you, being a feminist, came here to say what you did. This drug does seem like it needs some better testing, or maybe even a better theoretical approach. I'm no endocrinologist, but as far as I understand it, female hormonal birth control works the way it does because women naturally experience a fluctuation of hormone levels over their menstrual cycle, which birth control changes to prevent the cycle from occurring normally. This is all conjecture, but it …
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:51 AM
2

From reading the article, I didn't get the impression they were actually feminists. They seemed more like social conservatives, and the reason they gave for the stunt was to "highlight the ridiculous and dangerous move towards self-identification".
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:33 PM
29

The eternal contradiction of feminism. Women are simultaneously powerful and victimized. It's anything for the sake of saying things that feel good to say, with no regard for logical consistency.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:51 PM
7

And these are precisely the people who need to be making these arguments. It's not that someone who is not a Muslim or a Jew couldn't make just as strong of an argument against religious circumcision, but it's important that religious communities show that they can abandon barbaric traditions like circumcision and still practice their religion. Once the religious freedom argument goes, there will be very little reason to allow circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:32 AM
15

It's as if they expect the boys in impoverished countries are doing any better than the girls, or have any better chance than the girls at a better life than their parents. I'm willing to give these kind of programs the benefit of the doubt that they actually just want to help girls. Humans are gynocentric by nature, so it's really only natural to want to help girls. But what they're really doing is undermining the social fabric of these countries. I mean, feminism has done enough damage to the …
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:28 PM
16

"Mother always told me, be careful who you love, And be careful what you do, because the lie becomes the truth" Interesting that he says the phrase "Be careful what you do" twice, but with two different meanings. "People" say to be careful about how you behave toward women, but "mother" says to be careful to not give a woman the opportunity to accuse you of being the father of her child.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:35 AM
6

That argument is so mind boggling. As if humans would have survived millennia without soap if men had defective penises that needed washing...
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:17 PM
60

I have never understood the logic of those laws. Why, if a man isn't making enough money to pay his child support, would the state make it harder for him to make money? Unless the laws are literally just designed to destroy men.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:41 AM
1

Wow, what a hateful community. I couldn't imagine willfully engaging with such venomous and spiteful people. Reading this sub often makes me feel cynical, but it seems like people on that sub do it just to fuel their vindictive fury. It just makes me sad for the state of discourse on sexual politics.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:32 AM
8

Honey Badger Radio
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:14 PM
24

Seriously, it's like these feminists don't even understand the meaning of a meritocracy.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:12 PM
2

Not sure what this has to do with men's rights, but it sure is interesting if true.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:32 AM
6

You got me!
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:15 AM
238

Fumbled a bit with the "pronoun" when the when the original tweet referred to nouns and the part of speech in question is in fact nouns.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:23 AM
3

L O N D O N O N D O N L N D O N L O D O N L O N O N L O N D N L O N D O
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:40 PM
7

It's statements like these that make me think Trump is a bit more keyed into real life than most politicians. He's not perfect, but at least he said something favorable toward men. Let's not forget his runner up said women are the primary victim of war.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:23 AM
11

That's the weird thing about it. It's not as if people haven't been saying humankind for decades at least. It's some weird form of virtue signaling that feels even more contrived than gender neutral pronouns. At least those were invented to virtue signal about made up genders that didn't already have pronouns to refer to them. "Peoplekind" is a made up word that takes the place of a word that already exists, and its only function is for virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:44 AM
7

Exactly. It's not six year old girls that need feminism. It's feminism that needs six year old girls. They need to indoctrinate girls when they're young and haven't yet developed the capacity for critical thinking. It's a lot like a cult.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:48 AM
5

You know, I'd say you'd be surprised by the prevalence of mental illness in the authors of feminist theory, but it really isn't all that surprising. The really sad thing is how easily it's been able to spread to women who would have been perfectly normal and happy without it.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:40 AM
3

Wow, when did Vice get taken over by intersectional feminism? I used to think they were cool, but any hope of that died after scrolling to the bottom of an article characterizing some pretty innocuous internet stuff as hateful and bigoted, only to find a video about "Why men should fantasize about being submissive".
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:24 AM
1

The best thing to do would have been to explain it and apologise in the moment, but I think it's probably rare that anyone has the presence of mind to think of that right after being caught in an embarrassing situation. But in reality, there's no way an accusation like that would stick. As far as I'm aware, it's not a crime to look at a woman, although that may change before we reach peak moral panic.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:07 PM
21

Paternity fraud is a pretty old trick.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:27 PM
2

Is age a legally protected class?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:35 PM
2

To be fair, it's illegal everywhere in the US. Whether it's enforced or not is a different matter.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:32 PM
13

What a disgrace. There's no way you bring a gun to school and shoot 4 people by accident. If it was a 12 year old boy, he'd probably be tried as an adult for attempted homicide, assault with a deadly weapon, etc.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:41 AM
8

Apparently it is. People do some messed up things when they're ideologically driven.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:51 AM
2

Yeah, it doesn't normally take just a tray of nachos to the face to knock someone over. It does look like she recoils from the initial impact and then loses her balance.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:24 AM
5

Yeah, when we had to forage and hunt to survive. Can you imagine what having absolutely no obligations to anything or anyone would do to people?
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:04 PM
1

There is no such thing as Utopia. There's no way we can have Utopia without it actually creating a dystopia. Imagine what 7 billion people would do if they didn't ever have to work.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:50 PM
21

Don't you know PTSD actually means Patriarchal Tyranny Subjugating Damsels? It's a mental disorder that men get after experiencing something that would be considered traumatic if they were a woman. But instead of suffering psychological trauma like a normal woman, their patriarchal toxic masculinity gets unleashed and they can become sporadically violent, just like every man would if they realized they could get away with it.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:10 PM
3

Hey, if it wasn't for feminists, none of us would even have heard about him. Isn't that interesting?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:08 AM
7

This interview Interviewer: So you're saying... Peterson: I didn't say that, I said...
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:35 PM
-1

Depends on the city, and the highway for that matter. Just an anecdote, but I've never seen a car crash in the city where I live, but I've seen several on the highway that connects it to a nearby town.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 05:13 PM
10

He puts the sexual ass in sexual assault.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:35 AM
5

That's fair. There was a lot more to the Franken allegations than just the picture. But if it was just the picture, this wouldn't be any different. And with the Franken allegations, I'm pretty sure it pretty much was just the picture and the allegations for the first round of news stories, but that was good enough for the general public.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:25 PM
22

That's what people said about Al Franken. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am saying that's no defense when it's a woman allegedly being assaulted.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:18 PM
81

No, because women have no social power. Power + Prejudice = Patriarchy. If anything, that man is assaulting her by having such a nice ass. She has no agency, so she can't be blamed for having her hands assaulted by that man's ass.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:15 PM
24

It's not that they shouldn't. In fact, it's better that they do so that they can be challenged and disproven.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:42 PM
4

Also people who have more sex before marriage are probably more likely to lose sexual interest in a permanent monogamous partner.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 08:10 PM
5

Well, they only said stalking victims. That doesn't mean only 33% of stalkers are female. Although I doubt there are a bunch of women stalking women, though I'm sure it happens. Same probably goes for men stalking men, though probably to an even lesser degree.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 08:06 PM
26

Record everything, and work on getting her out of your life.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:59 PM
2

What an insufferable harpy. But in reality, this woman has probably been unsuccessful with finding a man that will put up with her, so she's pretending to have unreasonable standards to make it look like she's single because she's choosy.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 10:14 PM
2

Only the people without consistent principles do that, because they don't like it pointed out that they don't even understand that they don't have principles.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 04:17 AM
4

It's nothing unusual. There has been a tendency since at least Gloria Steinem for feminist leaders to have mental health problems.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:11 PM
32

It's the parallel to #MeToo that you'll never see in the mainstream media. Oh, but there's totally a rape culture that silences the voices of women...
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:27 PM
4

Good. I've always said "listen and believe" is fine for personal care among the victim's support group, but it should never extend into the police office or the courtroom. I wonder if getting this kind of change through will actually require more reasonable, realistic, and above all non-feminist women in high positions. Or at the very least, fewer conservative men who think women can do no wrong and need to be coddled and sheltered. It seems like it sometimes takes a woman to see through women's…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:22 PM
11

Too bad social justice isn't beholden to the same standards as criminal justice.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:22 AM
-14

No, it means you probably have better than average taste in music.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:16 AM
130

No, because men aren't the victims of their own suicide, apparently.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:50 PM
0

Chris Raygun's dick literally cures cancer.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:08 PM
10

It's how you get suicide, apparently.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:02 AM
9

This kind of gets into the area of "there are biological differences between men and women", which, unsurprisingly, is a fact that's only ever addressed by feminists when the differences between men and women disadvantage women. To be fair though, abuse of prisoners by prison staff is not gendered. Maybe the specifics of the abuse differ along the lines of the differences between the sexes, but abuse is fundamentally abuse. If it's wrong to demean a woman in prison, it's wrong to demean a man in…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 07:00 PM
25

autophagy intensifies
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:01 PM
7

But the point is that, even if nobody will probably actually check here to verify or disprove the claims feminists make about us, we should do our best for those few who do actually take the time to check out the sub to show that we aren't what they think we are. It doesn't do us any good to give feminists what they want to see.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:45 PM
5

It's sad that a human rights advocacy community has enemies. (((Patriarchy)))
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:52 AM
2

Good to know. I haven't gotten anything, but I'll be aware. Not something I'd generally click on anyway, but the warning is appreciated.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:51 AM
28

Wow, that was quite an unexpected turn of events. I guess the old adage, "Be careful what you wish for," applies here.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:54 PM
38

He had it comin' He had it comin' He only had himself to blame
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:50 PM
7

Wow. Is this in a university class? It's good to see the actual numbers being represented. I'm tired of every member of my sex being portrayed as pathologically violent.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:48 PM
13

Not a bot.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:45 AM
1

Apparently they're not accustomed enough to recognize when they propagate them.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:14 AM
7

In the words of Camille Paglia, if you're advertising, you better be prepared to sell. These people don't even understand how sexual their behavior is, and they take such offense when people respond to their sexual behavior in an equally sexual manner.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:12 AM
8

One of the handful of things I agree with Milo Yiannopoulos on is that Islamophobia is a perfectly rational fear for a gay person. Where hardline Islamists hold political power, gays get thrown off buildings or out of helicopters, or they are forced to undergo sex change.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 10:46 PM
7

Yeah, god forbid a girl doesn't want to be "strong". This social engineering needs to stop. Girls who want to be strong will be whether their parents want to or not, and it doesn't really seem to be something their parents can foster in them. What we need to do is get back to teaching boys how to be men and how to create and maintain society, because if we don't, society will certainly collapse.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:32 PM
2

This is what worries me about the desire by the American left to get a single payer system in the US. Obamacare is already driving up insurance premiums by something like 20% per year. I hate to think what kind of debt crisis we would be in if the government actually tried to manage a federal healthcare payment system.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:23 AM
2

Man, it's sad what's happening with social science, especially considering the actual valid work that has been done in social science by the actual scientists who actually care about the scientific method and drawing conclusions and developing theories and models. The problem is this bs critical theory stuff that the feminists/intersectionalists bring in as an excuse to deny stats and rely on anecdotes and baseless claims as "evidence" for their "theories".
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:40 AM
2

These departments are clearly nothing more than radical left activist factories.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:25 AM
3

Encouragement isn't the issue. It's about the idea that any woman would ever lie about rape for any reason, and that anyone should ever feel sympathetic toward a victim of false accusation. These people seem to want the power to jail men based solely on an accusation. They already have the power to have men publicly ostracized and in some places expelled from universities with a mark on their academic transcript.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:14 PM
1

It's uncanny how often this happens.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:16 AM
7

It definitely exists. At my university, there are buildings where they have a women's restroom and an all genders/disabled restroom. What's worse is that it's a single use but it looks very suspiciously like it was retrofitted from a stall and urinals setup. There are even two sinks.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:06 AM
97

Well, so much for any semblance of journalistic integrity. But, at least she's being honest about the reason she wants the book banned, and not pretending it's because the word "nigger" is used in it. At least this way everyone sees that she has a political interest in maintaining the idea that women never lie about rape.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:02 PM
20

It's not the mods' fault that 19.5k people upvoted this post. And it's not entirely a shitpost. It's pointing out the fact that men aren't actually the source of all of women's problems.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:39 AM
27

Well, if it makes it any better, there's probably a very primal evolutionary biology reason why some mothers do things like this. Human females are very choosy about their mates, considering how extremely K-selected we are as a species. If a female decides after reproduction that the mate she reproduced with was unfit, she may have some innate biological association between the father and their offspring that could lead her to reject the offspring. Rejection of unfit offspring by the mother for …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 04:43 PM
2

Assuagement of guilt seems to be a big one. I have a friend who recently became a mother and she has been learning a lot and doing a lot of research about birth and early childcare, and she has gone on facebook rants against circumcision. She has friends who are mothers of boys, and they tend to get angry at her for her word use (she called it male genital mutilation) and try to excuse their choice to circumcise their male children.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 08:40 AM
2

To be fair, it does affect women. We live in a gynocentric society. We're a gynocentric species. Why not use that to promote the issue of circumcision?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:31 PM
12

Shhh... Cats will save humanity if we just let them. They attract the crazy women who make humanity better for not passing on their genes.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:37 PM
2

Leave her. You don't need that, and she probably doesn't deserve you. Don't let her guilt you. Just get yourself free.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:31 PM
2

Looks like up to five years imprisonment or a fine, according to federal law. It probably depends on the severity of the crime and the judge's own discretion.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:20 PM
2

True "equality", if you want to call it that, would be actually prosecuting these women for perjury, instead of just letting them off. If the court proves an accused man is innocent, they've essentially proven the woman who accused him is guilty of perjury.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:02 PM
5

The oldest known man made stone structure, Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, is at least 12,000 years old.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:16 AM
8

Well, if they do, people will just figure out a different word to describe bossy women. The great thing about English is there's no shortage of words that have pretty much the same definition.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:59 AM
2

I wonder if I'm in a minority here as an early 20s college student. The main reason I'm here is because I got sick of feeling ashamed of being a man, and at some point that led me down the rabbit hole that got me here.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:53 AM
8

Feminism, or at least women's rights, is the blue pill. Most people seem to go through their daily lives thinking women are second class citizens, reviled, tolerated, and subjugated by men, and deserving of special legal protections. Taking the red pill, in this case, means realizing women have been privileged and protected out of necessity for the sake of the survival of our species for the entirety of human history. It means understanding that humans could never have survived long enough to in…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:51 AM
28

Good. I'm glad to see some accountability. I'm tired of hearing nonstop stories about women getting away with accusing men of rape, the case being dismissed or proven false, and then the women facing no repercussion. As a male college student, it makes me feel a little bit safer to know that some women face the consequences of their crimes when they falsely accuse men of rape.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:33 AM
3

Well, they probably at least cared about rich women in Seneca Falls. They definitely haven't really cared about women since the beginning of the women's shelter industry, which, according to Erin Pizzey, has been since the beginning a revenue stream for feminism after the Civil Rights Act passed and their revenue streams were drying up. Seems like that was a clear point at which feminism showed itself as a profit driven industry.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 12:29 AM
14

Frankly, at this point it seems like they care more about fake women than real women.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:45 PM
3

Yeah, if there was a registry of boys who cried wolf, that would just give the wolves a list of targets who have a history of lying and would as such be considered less credible. Maybe some secret resource that's only available to law enforcement or by court order. It would obviously make sense for there to be such a list, but making it publicly accessible seems like a bad idea.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:49 AM
30

Those laws really should be extended to cover the accused too. With a crime like rape where the court of public opinion has a tendency to sentence an accused man to a life sentence of social ostracization regardless of the outcome of the trial, it would make sense to wait until the court of law has made a decision.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:44 AM
13

The jury wouldn't agree. No such thing as equal protection under the law when it comes to men defending themselves from violent women.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:39 AM
29

Yeah, the myth that women are incapable of horrific crimes needs to be shown for the falsehood that it is. Not to say that all women are bad, but that some are. For all the talk of toxic masculinity, it's still clear men don't have a monopoly on cruelty. Thankfully, it's only a small minority of people, both men and women, who commit crimes like these.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:31 AM
114

It seems like feminists are so quick to take offense when they're barely even indirectly challenged. #femininitysofragile
/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:06 PM
7

Ehh...
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:50 PM
2

Nah, she has the right kind of hair, but she has a hardened look that you won't see in a feminist. She looks like she's actually had to deal with shit in her life.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 12:27 AM
2

Yeah, I don't know about anyone else, but when I was in physics, it never occurred to me to compare my pee to a projectile problem.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:21 PM
7

That's true, but feminism is directly opposed to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:41 AM
3

Nothing wrong with that. The problem here is that what appears to have previously been a multi stall men's room has been converted into a single stall gender neutral room, while the women's room was left untouched.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:45 AM
2

Oh, good point. Wow, that being the case, you'd think internet companies would want common carrier status as a means of avoiding liability for the data they transmit. They'd never have to worry about being sued by an IP owner for allowing their IP to be shared illegally.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:28 PM
11

Does that mean cellphone carriers are technically acting as CP trafficking rings?
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:03 PM
3

Wow. Is anyone else wondering how that trial will go, considering he's both the alleged perpetrator and victim?
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:01 PM
17

You raised a good girl. That boy doesn't know how lucky he is.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:32 PM
1

Not that it isn't kind of weird and probably illegal to watch porn in public, but how is it sexual harassment? I guess the metric for sexual harassment victimization is whether you feel like you're being harassed.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:32 AM
6

It's amazing that she can say something so on the nose and yet be completely ignorant of it.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:18 AM
6

The funny thing is that the two ideologies would probably not agree that the other values women. Feminists would say conservatism treats women as slaves, and conservatives would say feminism degrades the inherent value of femininity. Everybody has their own ways of expressing their love for women.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:10 PM
2

Just like constantly being told STEM fields are sexist makes women less confident going into STEM fields. It's not as if women simply can't do STEM jobs. They're just being scared off by feminist fearmongering or pigeonholed for the sake of diversity.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:05 PM
3

Well, at least it's a legal admission that women are fallible.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:59 PM
2

I was born vaginally in hospital after my brother was born by cesarean. Of course, that was in the 90s, so things may have changed since then. I was also about a month premature.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:29 PM
6

The sad thing about James Damore's memo is that it could actually increase employment and productivity of women in tech if people would bother reading what it actually says. Seems like the biggest problem is that women are being shoehorned into jobs that most women don't want to do. Not saying women should only be secretaries, but their potential isn't being exploited fully by putting them in jobs that men tend to be better suited to.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:15 PM
14

Wait what? Getting drunk doesn't give you permission to take advantage of someone? I thought getting drunk automatically turns you into a rape victim when you get into a sexual encounter. Oh, that's just for women?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:28 AM
3

It's an easy mistake to make. They don't exactly go out of their way to make it clear what they're doing. I was confused for a while too.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:58 AM
15

r/menkampf is about men though. They take pictures of sexist articles and replace men and women with Jews and Aryans.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:52 AM
5

More evidence that Gen-Z is woke af.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:44 AM
4

Yes, that's exactly what I said. The problem is when she says no to test how much you want it. If you call her bluff, you force her to stop bullshitting and make a choice for herself. It's not worth it to go for it if she refuses, because she could accuse you of rape.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:20 PM
14

Yeah, so long story short, no doesn't always mean no. I've heard one solution to avoiding lability for a rape accusation when she's doing token resistance is to just go along with it and completely disengage. Force her to give affirmative consent.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:13 AM
13

Last I checked, token resistance was almost exclusively a female behavior.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 05:39 PM
0

The difference is that in the US, if you can prove that it's happening, you can take them to court.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:11 PM
3

Wow, they don't even try to hide it. I'm pretty sure that would be illegal in the United States.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:09 PM
-1

True, but Christianity was used as an excuse.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:29 PM
3

Exactly
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:00 PM
20

*Every culture that practices an Abrahamic religion ftfy
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:37 PM
35

Ha, that would be the argument, wouldn't it? Well, they can cut off their clitoris and see how they like it...
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:35 PM
190

Not to mention committing crimes with the crown as her accomplice. At least she was convicted of perjury and perverting the course of justice. I highly doubt anyone who supports men's rights wants to prevent legitimate rape victims from getting their justice, but when women use the court to falsely imprison men, they degrade the integrity of the entire system. They need to be prosecuted and treated like the predators they are, for the sake of the men they accuse and all legitimate victims of rap…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:47 PM
1

*libel
/r/MensRights23/08/17 09:26 PM
2

Do those global standards take cost of living into account? Because you could be a high earner in Eastern Europe and not be able to even afford rent and necessities in parts of America.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:09 PM
1

Unbelievable. This is the kind of thing that makes people want to bring back workplace gender segregation. And to be fair, it would solve a lot of problems.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:03 PM
9

Wow, did a woman really write that in the Canada Globe and Mail?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:46 AM
1

I'm sure there are some people in the left who deliberately lump together MRAs with white nationalist in order to discredit MRAs, but I think some of them just genuinely see everyone to the right of them as a political monolith. Maybe it's a consequence of identitarianism. All white men on the right must be white nationalists, right? Is kind of like how they can't wrap their brains around a woman not being a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:31 PM
5

Is it really? I thought it was just illegal for professional athletes.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:47 PM
3

Wow, good point. It's amazing that people think it's safe and reasonable to give children supplemental hormones to change the way they experience puberty.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:56 AM
1

Well, maybe the author of the memo should go into social science. That or self employment. Seems like his well might be poisoned for most SJW-friendly employers.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:45 PM
2

Oh, so it's fine if the education system shuts doors in the face of young men who want to study?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:52 AM
3

I feel like real rape victims are more realistic about things like this. I've only ever heard it from a rape victim that women victims often orgasm when they're raped, and it's a source of a lot of shame and self doubt. You feel like your body wanted it, even though it was traumatizing to experience. Given that it's quite a bit easier for a man to get an erection than for a woman to have an orgasm, it's not hard to imagine how a man could be raped by being forced to penetrate a woman. We actuall…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:50 AM
13

What? If there were commercials featuring male on female domestic violence, a lot of people, not just feminists, would be up in arms about it. I'm not generally in favor of any kind of censorship, but seeing abuse of men in this way just trivializes and normalizes something that's already seen as a non-issue.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:24 PM
5

Exactly. There's no turning back the clock on the sexual revolution, and I wouldn't want to even if we could. We're in a new world for women's liberation, and now it's time for some men's liberation.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:51 AM
1

True, and I suppose not all women who wear diamond rings need them to be expensive and flashy. But there is definitely a status component to wearing a diamond ring.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:49 AM
2

What's that thing feminists are always harping on about? Power differentials? Hmm, who's oppressing whom?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:32 AM
3

Well, what is a diamond ring but a public display by a woman of her man's wallet?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:29 AM
2

True. The purpose of an expensive diamond ring is really just for a woman to show off to other women hope much they're worth to their man.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:27 AM
26

Whatever, I'm still against circumcusim.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:27 PM
3

From each according to his ability, to each according to her need.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:33 PM
18

And they think men are gross for making fart jokes...
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:07 PM
1

I don't know, it seems like companies only follow the strictures of social justice up to the point where they may suffer legally or financially for it. I get the impression that when money or reputation is on the line, good sense tends to win out. This seems like a failure of the hospital's legal advisers to properly educate the staff, and I would be surprised if it's a widespread issue.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:58 PM
3

How are they not educated on these things? That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:51 AM
25

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:49 AM
29

The cycle continues.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:03 PM
2

Oh, he was just guilty of mansaving.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:13 AM
7

Yeah, I'm no feminist, but I can definitely get behind the notion that women get some pretty fucked up messaging from the media as far as what's expected of them. Kind of like the way men are made to feel worthless if they're not working to support a wife.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:17 PM
9

Can you imagine the kind of backlash there would be if there was a similar subreddit for rapists? There would be no tolerance. And we live in a rape culture. Sure...
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:51 PM
95

She refers to herself as "SHE-EO". Does that mean "Sexual Harasser of Employees Executive Officer"?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:11 AM
2

Possibly referring to the legal debtors person that still exists for those men who can't pay alimony it child support.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:41 PM
1

Not necessarily. There are hormonal disorders, trans people and others who take supplemental hormones, etc. It's largely a result of genes, the main ones being on the y chromosome, but it's not the genes themselves. Hormones are directly responsible, so it's more correct to say that it's hormones.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:29 PM
3

Whenever feminists use the word toxic, I think of the Britney Spears song. I'm convinced that's the definition they're using. :P
/r/MensRights16/07/17 10:01 PM
1

Not genetics, hormones.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:56 PM
1

Well, in the same way, you could boil down toxic masculinity to "men are inherently domineering and will always try to subjugate the women and weaker men around them". All of this talk of toxic behaviour has to do with how men's and women's instinctual be behaviors interact. And female hypoagency isn't just that men get blamed for women's problems (though they do, see patriarchy). It's that women can manipulate others with their ability to be taken seriously as an object with no personal respons…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:37 PM
2

I get what you're saying, though I think some people didn't. Men are judged by what they do, not what they think and feel. If you want history to remember you, you have to do great things.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:46 PM
2

Toxic femininity is basically behaviors related to hypoagency, in contrast to toxic masculinity and hyperagency. It's the excessive shifting of blame and responsibility from a woman to any other man, whether it's reasonable or not. Karen Straughan has done at least one video on it.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:42 PM
3

We need people like you. Thanks for using your disarming neoteny to further the cause. It's a lot harder to be taken seriously as a man. If you're talking about things that disadvantage you, you're seen as weak, and nobody likes a weak man.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:26 PM
10

It's nice to feel like some people out there hold masculinity in high esteem, considering the usual is either neutral or negative.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:20 PM
5

Because she's not overweight and she doesn't have short, dyed hair. It's a stereotype, but it's pretty accurate.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 12:33 AM
6

I don't think it's necessarily "society" that only cares for women, but self righteous men certainly care for women whenever they turn on the waterworks. It's a kind of neoteny. Women are biologically better than men at crying, and crying is a signal that they need help. I'd be really curious to see if there's been any research comparing women's sentencing rates by the sex of the judge, because there really seems to be a tendency for male judges to let women of the hook if they cry in the courtr…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:23 PM
1

Nice of Google to provide a link for feedback. I left a message saying the definition is wrong because it isn't necessarily condescending and it doesn't necessarily refer to a man's wife. I doubt they'll do anything, but whatever.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 09:34 PM
2

Yahoo?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:59 AM
12

I didn’t feel like he was dead, I felt like he had left me. The fact that she said this is telling. She didn't really care about him. She cared about what he could do for her.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:17 PM
19

So, is "lifestyle" the new word for editorial? This article is ridiculous, and I have no doubt this business would be praised if it was run by a woman. I love how she characterizes tailoring a business model to the needs of mothers as identifying and exploiting working mothers' Achilles heel. You'd think they're enslaved or something, rather than working from home on their own schedule. This article was clearly written by a bitter, overworked working mother who's projecting her own feeling of be…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:19 PM
1

For people whose ideology is based on Marxism, they sure are shrewd capitalists. The contradictions run deep.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 04:25 PM
13

Besides whining? Isn't that what they're doing?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:07 AM
9

I'm just curious where that statistic came from, and what it's actually referring to. There's no way that's the divorce rate.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:52 PM
19

86.50% of marriages? Or is it supposed to be 86.50% of divorces?
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:17 PM
5

Yeah, sorry but this isn't a conversation, it's a legal case.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:29 PM
7

What I don't get is how feminists can (rightly) say that just because a woman has an orgasm when she's being raped doesn't mean she consented, but they don't consider it rape if a male victim had an erection. Of course, feminists generally don't consider it possible for a man to be the victim of a female rapist, especially if he penetrated her.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:07 PM
22

She's a keeper.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 05:06 PM
354

I know. I was shocked at how unsympathetic the article is to the perpetrator. I mean, they have a big, unflattering picture of her (usually it's the woman looking sexy or coy) under the headline "Woman spared jail after she raped daughter's 13-year-old boyfriend". They call it rape and refer to the boy's age in the headline, and they finish the article with a quote from the deputy attorney general characterizing the perpetrator as a criminal and the boy as a victim. It's ludicrous that she didn'…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:56 PM
10

I'm tempted to say they just shouldn't be allowed to own guns, but that kind of petty, belligerent defense of one's own ideas and refusal to be inquisitive at the risk of falsifying a previous claim is a quality that would make me worried about how they would come to a decision on how to vote. Not saying they shouldn't be able to vote, but they probably don't do it for the "right reasons" and probably don't have a very good sense of the consequences.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:35 PM
21

Not random, just another man hater who believes all sex is rape because of the "inherent power differential" between men and women. Seems she wants women to be raped, or have sex and claim to have been raped, in order to imprison more men. Utterly vile and ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:27 AM
6

So much for widows and orphans.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:10 AM
13

"I want 'equality', but the men in my life should still feel obligated to serve me."
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:29 PM
0

You forget where you're posting. The Asperger's per capita on this sub is probably significantly higher than the general population. Don't count on your sarcasm hitting the mark. It's hard enough for a non-autistic person to pick up on sarcasm in text.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:39 AM
2

I feel like we might need to make a consent form with a space for signature and date that men can print out and have women sign before having sex.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:08 AM
42

True, they're not idiots. At best, they're blinded and manipulated by their ideology. At worst, they're willfully manipulative and destructive. I feel bad for the feminists who think they're in the right and don't question the narrative. It's not just that it's easy not to question. For most, the idea of questioning just doesn't occur to them. I know, because before I was red pilled, the stats feminists push about rape and domestic violence made me ashamed to be a man. This is why we need people…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:48 PM
3

Hey, they can get jobs in college gender studies departments. I bet there's no sexism in hiring there. /s
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:37 AM
7

The assumption was that women are just as qualified as men, so implementing gender blind CVs would result in an increase in hiring of women. The reason it's a big deal is that they disproved their hypothesis, which means women aren't discriminated against on job applications. It's interesting because they ended up making a pretty interesting discovery by disproving a hypothesis that they had taken to be fact.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:34 AM
1

Or a man with a wife and children and a mortgage and a car payment and insurance payments.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:41 PM
30

That was never the goal. They implemented this system to allow more women to be hired, because they thought interviewers discriminated against women. Now they're advocating against it because it turns out interviewers actually favor women. They probably don't even understand that the reason more men are hired despite being held to higher standards is because there are just more qualified men.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:38 PM
14

Did you read the part where the guy was talking about diversity? These people want diversity for the sake of diversity. They would gladly hire a less qualified person over a more qualified white male.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:33 PM
6

Ha, I love that the acronym of the group that did the study is BETA.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:29 PM
83

They want accusation to be the social and institutional equivalent of conviction, and to a large extent it already is. They want to be judge, jury, and executioner, because apparently our legal system isn't good enough.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:18 PM
5

I mean, until he's proven guilty by a jury of his peers, it wouldn't change much. We have this thing in our liberal democratic legal system, it's called presumption of innocence. Frankly, I'm worried about its future.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:08 PM
1

Welcome to identity politics and cultural Marxism. It's just like how Black Lives Matter supposedly represents all black people.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:37 AM
13

That's the problem with men's rights and pretty much any other community that discusses highly contentious issues. If you don't explicitly state that you're with me at every possible opportunity, you're against me. You actually see this mentality in feminism too, when feminists engage in smear campaigns against celebrities who, even if they claim to be feminists and support feminist issues, miss one opportunity to support feminism or say something against the narrative without meaning to. People…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:50 PM
7

Yeah, I agree. I also consider myself mostly liberal, but since I've started reading more about men's rights and anti-feminism, I feel like I've been incorporating some more right or libertarian ideas. Women in general draw more out of welfare programs, and it seems like a lot of welfare programs are either implicitly or explicitly set up to cater to women's needs over men's. I think I'm a liberal with the stipulation that government programs don't specifically target any one group unless there …
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:58 AM
1

pinkishorangelivesmatter
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:10 AM
1

Homosexuals are people of all the colors of the rainbow. :P
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:09 AM
6

Imagine what will happen to the social justice radical left when all the sane people with actual intelligence get bullied out and all that's left are the spoiled adult children who rode through their education on affirmative action. Give it maybe five or ten years at the most. The left will implode. No amount of donations will save a movement that's managed by people who think they're the center of the universe.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:13 PM
8

When racial minorities talk about diversity, they mean diversity of minorities. Whites are not included, because they're the one racial group that is socially acceptable to hate. This bullshit needs to end. Whites, as a "race", have nothing to apologize for. A lot of whites don't even have ancestors who owned slaves, which seems to be the main point POC SJWs use to legitimize their hate. A lot of whites don't even have ancestors who lived in America when slavery was legal. Like myself. I'm only …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:07 PM
4

Seems like female teachers in STEM fields are pretty fair, which frankly is what you'd expect from scientists and mathematicians. That being said, I had some really good female writing teachers who gave me good grades.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:27 PM
3

Wow, that's quite a difference. I'm glad none of my female teachers were like that. Actually, I remember having really good female teachers.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:11 PM
2

To be fair, it's the Daily Mail...
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:25 AM
1

I'm not saying combat is the same as office work, but the fact remains that whether a man dies on a battlefield or spends his whole life working, he's sacrificing himself, often in the service of women or so that women don't have to. I guess it's kind of a fatalistic way of looking at it, but I'm not trying to say they're the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:02 AM
3

Whether you're doing it on a battlefield or in an office, you're still giving your life away in service of someone else. In both cases, you're legally obligated to, but men have been serving women without any legal obligation for far longer.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:18 PM
47

Not even remotely surprising. Men are only useful when they're laying down their lives for women and children. This is the way it has always been.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 04:14 PM
1

Yeah, I mean, I was a kid, and she was and is fairly attractive. Frankly, I was never really interested in her for her ideas or her politics.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:01 AM
3

Don't you know manspreading is a characteristic behavior of a Patriarch?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:15 AM
2

Man, Emma Watson breaks my heart. I grew up watching Harry Potter, and I had a huge crush on her. So sad...
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:52 PM
2

That's kinda the point I was trying to make with my edit. It's not as if men have a monopoly on taking up space on public transit. There should be some standards of behavior on public transit, but it shouldn't be gendered when both sexes are guilty of taking up more space than they need, be it with testicles, lanky arms/legs, excess body fat, or bags.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:00 PM
23

That's the problem. People just don't want to talk to each other I guess, even to the point of engaging the legal system. I guess this may be a product of the feminist narrative that women should fear men. If you're taught that it's natural and normal behavior for men to oppress women, what good is it for a women to try to reason with a man? I see this as feminism taking one step further in the direction of converting all of women's personal responsibilities into men's legal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:43 PM
3

What is this? Are we both conceding points to each other? This isn't how internet discourse is supposed to take place! D:<
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:38 PM
2

Yeah, that's true. There are definitely biological arguments to be made beyond the obvious one. I guess I'm speaking from the perspective of a man on the lower side of average height and weight.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:23 PM
7

I think she's refining it over successive deliveries. I know I've heard a lot of the same arguments and anecdotes from her before, but I've never heard her do it in such a compelling way.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:16 PM
2

Am I the only one here who's completely bemused by both sides of this supposed argument? It seems like feminists and MRAs are just getting up in arms on this issue for the sake of opposing each other. I don't see why this needs to be legislated, but I also don't see why someone of either sex should be allowed to stick their knees out past the edge of their seat and take up extra space when there are other people who want to sit down. Edit: That being said, I do think it's really dumb that femini…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:28 PM
4

Ha, now I feel like an idiot. Thanks for pointing that out. :P
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:22 AM
2

Funny but marginally related. I'm watching it now, and I noticed that the Amazon video player said its length was 1:21:42, which was confusing because I thought was 2 hours. Turns out it is 2 hours, and when mousing over the progress bar it shows the duration to be 1:57:XX. I guess whoever wrote the code to display the full time at the bottom forgot our time system is base 60, not base 10.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:01 PM
5

Yeah, it's not as if anyone you meet is necessarily going to become an activist. But I do think people in general are willing to admit men face problems in society. It's just that feminism is such a loud voice in the area of gender issues, and feminists will never admit men face any problems whatsoever. But people definitely know divorce courts favor women over men. I mean, you rarely ever hear of a divorced mother complaining about not being able to see her kids as much as she'd like, but that'…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:46 PM
4

I don't know. I kind of get the impression that the gender debate takes place mostly on the internet and college campuses. Otherwise, people seem to view feminists as a bit too extreme, and they also tend to be mostly receptive to the idea that men face problems in society.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:03 AM
3

Having seen at least one of her videos, it's amazing the difference that makeup makes. Porn industry makeup artists must make a fortune.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:49 AM
7

I dunno. I thought it was funny.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:48 AM
12

Well, the problem with letting feminists focus on domestic violence and rape is that they're constantly redefining the terms. If you include all forms of forced or coerced sexual intercourse, including a man being made to penetrate a woman, the gender disparity vanishes. And I'm not saying the majority of all domestic violence is initiated by the woman. But according to this report, 70% of unilateral domestic violence (ie. one partner hitting the other with no physical retaliation) is perpetrate…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:46 PM
33

Men commit more violent acts against other men. From what I've heard though, most of the violence between men and women may actually be perpetrated by women. I don't have any sources on hand, but I've heard that most domestic violence is mutual, and most unilateral domestic violence is done by women.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:24 PM
1

Well, they hadn't invented cars yet, so I'd say walking would have been the primary mode of transportation. Oh, were you talking about pederasty?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:18 AM
2

The difference, of course, being that today we call it murder, whereas in a theocratic Christian or Jewish society it would be state sanctioned.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:05 AM
2

But what is valuable about a woman who hasn't been raped? Something about the "woman as property, man purchasing woman from her father" narrative seems lacking, or like it's not painting the full picture. If a woman's value is her sexuality, why would a man buy her from her father? Does a father need compensation for losing access to his daughter's sexuality? It's not as if he's personally losing any value that needs to be made up for. And if it were a matter of the father being concerned about …
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:57 AM
2

Rape of women is always seen as a bad thing because we have a natural tendency to protect our women and their genes. Women are instinctively more selective because the stakes of reproduction are higher, so we tribally defend our women from reproductive opportunism.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:33 PM
11

Well, in Nepal (I think?) they kick women out of the house and forbid them from preparing food or drinking the men's drinking water when they're on their period. But that tradition is mostly maintained by women, and it seems like they're pretty much abandoning it as education increases.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:27 PM
6

The problem with The Red Pill is that it directly contradicts the idea of a patriarchy by showing that men have feelings and face problems in our society and legal system.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:22 PM
8

Here "planting bombs, smashing shop windows and acts of arson"
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:29 PM
21

As far as I was aware, girls both start puberty earlier and reach physical maturity earlier. I don't know what this person is on about.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:23 PM
24

It seems feminists want the power to prosecute men for scaring them, regardless of the fact that women are the most likely demographic to report fear of being the victim of violence while simultaneously being the least likely demographic to actually be the victim of violence.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:47 PM
1

Probably this. I mean Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine were funded by the CIA.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:03 PM
14

It's literally self satirizing. How they manage to maintain their political and social power is beyond me.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:08 AM
3

Exactly. This is the same reason Karen Straughan and probably others talk about not just having reasoned discussions with feminists but recording them on video and uploading them somewhere. It's not about the feminist you're talking to. The likelihood you'll convince them to concede a single point is very low. But if a single person sees the video and questions their assumptions, you win.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:09 AM
1

Feminism has always been bad. It's never been anything but a female supremacist, anti-male movement. Here.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 04:36 AM
4

4chan gets a lot of hate for the kind of stuff that gets posted there. Some of the hate obviously is deserved, but a lot of it just comes down to the norms of the community. It seems like in order to be taken seriously on 4chan you have to talk in tasteless, shocking, often racial jokes. The people who post those things don't necessarily believe or support what they're saying, they're just making witty jokes that they know will catch people's attention and get them recognition and acceptance in …
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:29 AM
1

Yeah, it would be a problem if it was the only showing in town. If there are other theaters, they're just screwing themselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:23 AM
8

Now the real test is whether they're able to drum up more patronage (matronage?) from this stunt than they would have if they'd just let men see it too.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:21 AM
2

Eh, it looks like it's just a publicity stunt, and it's not as if there haven't been businesses that have excluded women as a policy. But considering how excluding women from anything (other than Freemasonry, I guess) would not fly in today's social climate, it just kind of smacks of irony. Like, way to show your true colors, feminists. We already knew you weren't about equality of rights and opportunities.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter