TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheJerinator Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by TheJerinator on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Yes you're right, the original crime was when she was 17 But when she was 18 she spent a whole year knowingly keeping an innocent man in jail And when she was 19 And 20 And 21 Personally I think holding off so long should be a crime in itself
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:29 AM
1

Yup lol I was right about the ignoring part No more personal attacks. To answer your question: That depends on the size/circumstance of the discussion group. Also "have to" is pretty broad, do you mean "have to" in a legal sense? Moral/ethical sense? I didn't answer your question before either for the same reason. Please narrow it down and make it more specific
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:31 AM
1

Oh my god can you just shut the fuck up about this idiot shit. Ad hominem is Latin for "to the man" and is also defined as Attacking an opponents character rather than answering his argument. You attacked my character based on a spelling error and something you got wrong lol. If getting the definition of ad hominem wrong makes you an idiot, (as you previously stated) then you are really insulting yourself. Look, people with happy lives don't go around calling strangers idiots and refuse to admit…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:20 AM
1

Re-read your comment and forgot something: you are correct I didn't answer your hypothetical scenario. Normally people give hypothetical scenarios to prove a point, so I addressed the point your were seemed to be defending rather than the scenario. Now that we have that settled, I'll answer any of these hypothetical scenarios you want.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:53 AM
1

Well I guess that's it, I'm an idiot. Damn they should abandon all IQ tests and let /u/evanharper decide! Why stop there? You should be the sole judge of who gets into what college and university! Also no, the definition of ad hominem (yes I spelt it wrong, nobody's perfect) is: (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. "vicious ad hominem attacks" So please, direct your arguments against my position and not me. I'd be happy to have a f…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:50 AM
1

Okay lets cut the ad homonym shit and be respectful. You now give the example of being grossly outnumbered by those interrupting your conversation (30-6 in your example). This doesn't really make sense because whenever a FPH person said something nasty on another sub, they get down voted to hell. I was under the impression this is what you were referring too. Since this scenario does not make it difficult for the original conversation to keep going, I did not consider that a violation of free sp…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:29 AM
2

Lol you're right it is so basic and obvious! No if a bunch of feminists showed up that would not be anti free speech. It would just be annoying as fuck
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:16 AM
1

This is a great thing to copy paste and share but I wish someone would edit it to include email addresses or something... Make it a hell of a lot easier
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:02 AM
2

??? No it doest If one person says something and a million disagree, that million is not "anti free speech" However, If a one person actively stops a million from saying something (or any number of people) that is anti free speech
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter