TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheJum Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by TheJum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The fuck are you even on about.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 08:33 PM
2

If someone ever asks if you are "joking or serious", it's because one of those two is the wrong answer.
/r/MGTOW02/03/17 04:58 AM
1

It even makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, because it is a reward for her mating with a high value male. It is also likely a component of hypergamy, because it would be an incentive for a woman to mate with a higher value male - the sex would automatically just be better. It would also mean that as a woman becomes more acclimated to a relationship and the perks thereof, that sex will gradually become less enjoyable as what she would value has changed, thereby depreciating the value of…
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 12:35 AM
2

I think, at least in my opinion, that the image of the ideology is of actual importance, because that could turn some people off from looking further into it. The only opinion of myself that I care about is my own.
/r/MGTOW13/01/17 12:20 AM
2

I don't know what to tell you. I thought you would get a better reception there. It did pretty good here, at least.
/r/MGTOW11/01/17 11:07 PM
3

R/imgoingtohellforthis Edit: Sorry about the downvotes. R/tumblrinaction might also appreciate it.
/r/MGTOW11/01/17 08:59 PM
9

P dank, should X-post this into some meme subreddits.
/r/MGTOW11/01/17 08:36 PM
8

Honestly, I think of them as a sister-sub. They have realized the nature of women perhaps just as much as we have, they are only capitalizing on that knowledge in a different fashion. It's subscription prostitution. We like prostitution. We should be working to grow their movement, as it further undermines the marriage paradigm.
/r/MGTOW11/01/17 03:54 AM
1

Then it is better to focus on combating societal pressures to marry, or attempt to abolish the practice altogether. It is an antiquated practice and has no place in civilized society anyway.
/r/MGTOW10/01/17 08:23 PM
3

Then educate the young, because women aren't going to vote against their self-interests. And they will have plenty of men supporting them to get laid.
/r/MGTOW09/01/17 09:58 PM
2

Marry. Or procreate.
/r/MGTOW06/01/17 02:46 AM
-2

Why?
/r/MGTOW06/01/17 02:37 AM
1

Agreed. I don't think it's worth it but it's not a battle I have interest in. Women just don't seem to have as much interest in STEM fields.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 03:43 AM
2

And being activists with no goal is going to accomplish nothing at all. As for "Intersectionality"- I think it is toxic to progress. It starts from everywhere, and so is left with nowhere to go. Progress is good, and infighting because it's the wrong type of progress or progress for the wrong type of person, does nothing but pull drowning people back into the water. I could get behind a connectedness between movements maybe, in that they may have overlapping goals, but the suffragettes(at least …
/r/MensRights24/12/16 02:10 AM
5

Obviously different subgroups face separate issues, but not necessarily separate female issues. And if it is just a political belief, then what good is it? Isn't advocacy the point? Furthermore, and this is more in line with my general point thus far, doesn't focusing separately on a lack of representation for black, Latina, and white women etc. not dilute the push behind just more representation of any women in politics? Don't they then become somewhat conflicting goals? And lastly, and I am no…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:17 PM
6

I understand what you are saying, but my point is that it makes more sense to me to coordinate serrated movements than to try to pack more issues into a single movement. What issues are better served by specifying "black female", "Latina", or "Lesbian" that wouldn't be just as well served under the label of "woman"? Also, why would their privilege affect their ability to campaign for issues that affect all women?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 10:52 PM
9

Serious question: Does subdividing an issue not needlessly complicate that issue? Visa vi rights for black women alongside rights for Latin women alongside rights for lesbians, etc. I just don't understand why you would need to subdivide the major group if the overarching goals are the same for each subgroup? Also, thank you for participating in this discussion. I can't speak for others but I for one am glad that you are helping to create a little dialogue.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 10:29 PM
6

You have to have the mother's permission to have it done in Great Britain, IIRC.
/r/MGTOW15/12/16 11:39 PM
5

"Femturrupting" the conversation is the one I like. "Femsplaining" when it comes to women talking about men's issues. Men who support women to the detriment of men should be accused of "internalized misandry". Women who accuse women of "internalized oppression or misogyny" should be accused of "internalized misogyny" as well, considering they don't think women capable of forming their own opinions. Accusations of "sexist", "racist", or "misogynist" should always be met with "how?" If they provid…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 08:19 PM
3

I imagine that beyond being a pet cause, most of the feminist support for gay men is incidental from supporting lesbians.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:09 PM
9

It has become part of their identity. The oppressed. The outraged. They will always find a way to be one or the other. So in effect, trying to appease them through social change is really just paying blackmail money.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:35 AM

For all their loud hatred of it, their sex is still the lion's share of their power over men(and lesbians). Gay men have no use for them except as friends or allies, of which third wave feminists aren't particularly good for either. I think most of their working together to date is more because of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" than anything else, so as homosexuality becomes more normalized they will have less use for one another.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:50 PM
2

I have no problem with open relationships, actually. It's just the way this one developed that makes me doubt the viability.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/16 06:39 PM
10

You very well might be right. Her explanations could just be her justifying her wanting - and failing - to screw a bunch of dudes while she was abroad. Ultimately, her reasoning and motives don't particularly matter anymore. She fucked up. There's no fixing the relationship. Both sides should move on.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/16 01:48 AM
24

Although evidently the exotic dick was well capable of resisting her.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/16 01:14 AM
8

I think that is a somewhat unfair characterization. For starters, I imagine she would have just fucked random guys if that was the case? To me, it reads as someone being peer pressured by friends and her own insecurities into an idiotic decision, and only realizing the consequences of it after they had occurred.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 11:11 PM
16

I don't think having trust issues over this is childish. Why would he believe her if she said she didn't have sex with anyone while abroad? Why would she believe he doesn't have feelings for the other girl? And having frank conversations doesn't work if you don't believe the words of whomever the conversation is with.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 11:01 PM
28

It is literally unsalvageable. Even if they get back together, it will be nothing more than a thin facade of determined ignorance. He will never believe that she didn't have sex with anyone else while she was away. She will never believe that he didn't develop feelings for the other girl. It's a shame. I think she legit cares about him, she just got a lot of bad advice crammed into her head, and had a conversation she can't unhave. Sometimes we break things that can't be fixed, but that's also t…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/16 09:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter