TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheKingofHearts Archive

View 2 posts and 32 comments by TheKingofHearts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Like I don't know what they expect? Shouldn't we look for the people who will accept us for who we are? If they'd accept or reject you based on age, they proooobably would not be a good partner in the first place. In cases like yours, you rejected your date not because their age but because they were deceiving you. It's the deception that was the problem, not the age.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 08:55 PM
4

I mean, then why hide the age in the first place? If it's so seemingly innocuous but it then begs the question of what else they could be hiding. This is why people say "Tell the Truth (or at least don't lie)".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 08:31 PM
6

I've come across a wide swathe of TRP and dating manipulation manifestos that encourage men (mostly 30+) to set their age-range as 20-24 and to portray themselves fraudulently to "have the best chances". Fraud isn't the eighth circle of Hell for no reason...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 08:09 PM
8

They also submit photos of themselves portraying themselves as younger. The date doesn't know they're older until they actually meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 08:01 PM
1

Rewrite the title? Or the whole thread? I will mull it over and try to correct it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 03:25 PM
1

My bad, i saw other thread titles formatted like that and thought it was okay. Can i resubmit my thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 03:22 PM
2

I feel like its danger doesn't even exclusively lie in the topic itself, but the dangers of instant gratification. Getting things quickly and on demand diminishes their value and robs us our discipline and patience. We don't even have the self-control to hold out for the best or favorite thing, just the average is "enough".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 04:51 PM
1

It looks like your post double-posted, just putting that out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:08 PM
1

I'm getting downvoted for this, but it's gotta be said. It's kind of odd to me that the outcry's talking point is about selfishness, when it's anything but? If things like healthcare, education, vocational training, and shelter were taken care of collectively through national taxes, like they do in Canada, Scandinavia and New Zealand; even "the rich" ultimately pay less expenses. Like there's examples of countries where that kind of socialism taken to the umpteenth degree have failed, so okay, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:03 PM
1

I've had this thought about the collective unconscious that if we found someway to overlap EVERY culture's principles by way of religion, mythology, even fiction from novels, comics, TV shows and movies. We'd be able to accurately define the "good traits" and "bad traits" that humans seek since the dawn of time but ALSO use those definitions to try and incorporate them into modern thinking. Not everything old is bad, but not everything new is bad either. It could be used progressively if given e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 02:04 AM
1

Ah it's Jungian analysis! I've never heard of this book before, but now I have to order it. Thank you! I'll admit I have a soft spot for it because of Peterson, but it Jungian psychology definitely resonates with me in a way that actually helps me understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:45 AM
1

Positive masculine traits in my eyes are: assertiveness decisiveness responsibility courage strength confidence standing up for yourself I think society lauds these qualities in myth and fiction but rarely prop it up in normal life. The mistake is that we ONLY disapprove of the negative traits, and don't encourage the positive traits that can essentially "force the negative traits" out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 12:05 AM
1

So you're saying "good man" is strictly based on the perspective of the woman. Even though the man needs responsible for "building him", in the face of everything. This gets troublesome when a supposed "good" behavior is sought to be curtailed by the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:57 PM
1

I don't know if our ideas contradict. I don't like the usage of "cuck", "bad boy", "alpha" because it's all rather reductive, but all-in-all you understand the gist that the balance of the characteristics is incredibly complex and not as simple as many would have you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:36 PM
2

Your post is what inspired me, and yes in some respects I believe I touch on that point. A woman wants a man uniquely STRONG and defiant towards anything and everything, except against her. It's somewhat contradictory in nature, and that's why the balance of compassion and aggression is critical. It's trying to remain true to yourself (and your desires) while AT the same time, doing good to those around you so nothing goes awry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:31 PM
1

I engage with trepidation, but I hope we can come to understanding in good faith. I'm gonna make a few assumptions one of which is that you're a woman with ideas of the modern variety. The manchild is not your responsibility. Building a man is not your responsibility. Being his mother is not your responsibility. Picking up his socks is not your responsibility. His going to work isn't your responsibility. Solving the problems of men is not your responsibility. Your responsibility is to do the bes…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:29 PM
3

Peterson basically disapproves of the modern tribalism that exists today. That we should focus on the individual to do the right thing, and that if each individual "did their part", then we'd be better off. I haven't read Foucault or Derrida, and I'd be remiss to try and interpret their works with any certainty. This is just how I understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:13 PM
2

*not just talking about females hating on chivalry, but also the RP males who scoff at those who strive to do good and contribute to society, instead wishing to see society burn and so as to themselves becoming the new barbarian warlords ruling over the ruins. Right, I hope this stance came through in my message. While I highlight the responsibility of the good woman here; the hammer falls on those who just want to see the world burn and be king of the ashes. Everyone has a role to play, and eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:38 PM
4

Peterson's problem is that the post-modernists give everything up to interpretation and post-modernists choose not to engage in dialogue for understanding because ultimately that understanding is "cowing" to one side or the other. Because everything is up to the individual to interpret. Peterson frames it in such a way that while, Yes, there are many different interpretations that can exist theoretically, there are only a few "viable" interpretations that can exist in the reality of the world th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:31 PM
3

Well the foremost "villain" he says would be Jacques Derrida, the French philosopher, but go ahead and hear what Dr. Peterson has to say. You might need to research a bit so maybe Google or Wikipedia concepts that are unfamiliar to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:19 PM
3

Dr Peterson has hours and hours of lectures online like Youtube, and these ideas are interspersed through all of them, so I can't give you what you seek. This Joe Rogan Experience clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCfIuFmULkg does have Jordan summarize his ideas (I try to avoid Rogan and exclusively listen to Dr Peterson). This should give you a good starting point and related videos in the side-bar should guide you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:12 PM
3

Listening to his lectures? What i'm doing is dreadfully paraphrasing but also trying to help by answering your question. I have to be honest with you in that I don't have the capacity to truly encapsulate such a broad concept as post-modernism. You should research and discover for yourself before you take my word as gospel.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 10:06 PM
2

Post-modernism boiled down is that nothing has meaning, and there's no such thing as truth or good. Only interpretations. Yeah because it's quite rampant. Minorities blaming majorities, LGBT blaming non-LGBT and men blaming women to bring the point back. Are these people hated and oppressed? Without a doubt. Does that give them an excuse not to do the right thing? No. We learned that an eye for an eye made everyone blind. Yes, we should stand up for what we believe in, but not without examining …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 09:54 PM
5

He blames post-modern collectivists, the people who solely try to judge others by their characteristics: "race, ethnicity, sex, sexuality, political stance, etc." for creating "us vs them" ideologies to place the blame strictly on those pre-existing groups instead of placing the blame on the people most responsible for our misery. Ourselves. Genuine honesty to the consequences of our actions, however slight, will wrest control that we think we don't have from the unknown "other". We need to all …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 09:46 PM
4

Man... this is a lot more flexible and straightforward than I imagined. I guess my problem with FDS is the usage of harsh language ("trash", etc.) and generalizations that cut men with a wide swathe. But from here it's giving me the impression of "Hey guys, get your shit together... but if we like you too, we'll try and make it work." That's a lot more comforting, thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 02:15 AM
1

That's understandable, if a guy is only "kinda into you" and doesn't really invest effort to try and impress, then it doesn't inspire you to be anything more than "kinda into him". Ohhh, so you're saying HVW would be... flexible? Like if he's on a tight budget, then yeah, you'd work with that. But if it comes out he's only being a cheapskate, then that's a problem. It's more about being open and honest about the situation, and not being butt-hurt if the girl is like "You're great but i'm looking…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:55 AM
2

I can really only speak for myself, so this'll apply to me primarily. So yeah, I feel when it's a guy 35-40, if he's still middling/poor, i'd be very worried about his general life ambitions and choices (how did he get it to be so bad?) For me, i'm 27, so my range would be 25-30 women. If I could use a chart from FDS: listing "Boundaries vs Standards" https://i.redd.it/wrmjmveydv851.jpg I find a lot of these boundaries and standards reasonable. It's generally expecting the man to be responsible …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:34 AM
2

Is it okay if I pick your brain about FDS? I'm a man, so I can't post there but honestly I think FDS has the right direction going (e.g., a focus on responsibility) but I had a few misgivings I wanted to address, but I also don't want to invite a dogpile onto you about FDS. Edit: Re-reading this back, feels like my comment feels low-key disingenuous. Like i'm trying to "sealion". To be more open and honest about my intentions, I think FDS has the right idea to stress responsibility on the part o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 12:43 AM
1

Oh so the nomenclature was from rhyming. As I said in the other comment I just made, OP seems to be asserting "Men should be lucky to get whatever they get as a Betabux."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:52 PM
3

Ahhh. So he's "textbook stable" and the woman doesn't actually value him. And to maybe clarify the point of the original thread is that the original OP is saying "Men should count themselves lucky to get what they get." Hmm. What is the price of companionship if your companion doesn't value you for you? Yeah the dude should work on his self-worth and kick the user/abuser to the curb.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:50 PM
1

Wait, to clarify, Betabux is seen as a form of currency? Correct me if i'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:31 PM
1

What in the ever-loving hell, is a Betabux? I've skimmed through these three threads now and no one actually sits down and defines it! >:(
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter