TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheLaziestPeon Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by TheLaziestPeon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I wish people would quit bringing up this analogy because it’s not comparable. Attention from gay men isn’t the same thing to a straight male because there’s no possibility of a good outcome. Male attention to women might seem overwhelming at times, but it’s how virtually every relationship ever begins. It’s a necessity. They might not want certain men to do it, but some man must do it eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 12:46 AM
0

As an example, I actually dont know for sure if women are able to enjoy sex. This kind of confusion just gets me demonized. This statement was so profoundly stupid that it completely derailed the rest of your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 05:35 PM
5

I don’t think men are at all affected by the looks of men in ads. I think they’re affected deeply by the men they see being most successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 06:32 PM
1

As a tall guy with short friends: I’m definitely not. I have no business being as successful with women as I’ve been compared to them. But you’re right, I skimmed over the word “controllable” so I take it back and agree with OP now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 09:01 PM
3

For women, yes. For men I’d say height is still #1 although body fat is definitely a close 2nd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 05:05 PM

“Women are wise to pick up on [sons of single mothers] and steer clear” is absolutely an attack. At least own it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:39 PM
2

Women are born, men are made. The sooner y’all get that through your thick skulls, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 08:25 PM
2

There’s no way so many guys grew up just not putting together that women value looks. I refuse to believe it. It’s like growing up thinking the world is flat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 10:56 PM
4

I’m not clear on what parts of this lifestyle are so difficult to deal with. Even if you’re just dating “normally” (and I use the term loosely), you still have to deal with flakiness and arbitrary rejections. If you’re attractive enough to get more tries, then you’ll figure it out eventually. A hypothetical sad guy in that scenario will mature faster than he would doing nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 09:08 PM
2

It’s more or less fine. 7) if you’re a fat blob, getting in shape even if it’s just to impress women is still a huge improvement. 3) I don’t wanna split hairs about masculine/feminine because those apply to most people, but the important part is polarity: you should bring something she doesn’t have and vice-versa, whether that’s masculine, feminine, or some undefined third thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 12:55 AM
1

I did not bring up the significance of six packs: the post you replied to in disagreement did, and I replied in disagreement with you as one does on a public forum. The topic was already being discussed by the time I arrived and I took the other guy’s side. Saying that having a six pack doesn’t make you visibly different even with clothes on and that it only matters if you’re at the beach is an incorrect and indefensible position, so we can consider this matter settled.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 11:41 PM
1

I didn’t change the discussion — you misunderstood the significance of six packs and I had to chime in to elucidate. Now we can all agree with the importance of six packs and why they alter a woman’s perception of you even if they can’t see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 11:15 PM
1

The attraction which is based on not being fat, which you aren’t if you have a six pack. You’re actually agreeing with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 10:47 PM
1

And I’m saying that having a six pack entails more than just prominent abdominal muscles and they affect your looks without being seen, so a woman is in fact deciding to sleep with you because of them at least indirectly. But let’s be real here: she’s already put her hands on you by then and knows what you’ve got.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 10:40 PM
1

Clothes will obscure it a bit, but fat can be gleaned pretty easily even with clothes on. Two guys of the same height wearing the same clothes but separated by body fat is a clear difference. Whether a guy is skinny without a six pack or slightly pudgy is splitting hairs: the point is you can still tell if he’s fat, which is what ultimately matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 10:25 PM
2

You’re taking it too literally. Having a six pack requires low body fat and that is absolutely noticeable even with clothes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/23 10:07 PM
6

Honestly just make dating apps illegal Lol replace it with … state-owned systems Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 05:19 PM
1

Don’t be silly. Obviously be dating other people, and there’s no law that says you can’t actually be friends. I did this once and she knew from the start how I felt so it wasn’t at all a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 04:57 PM
1

Reading your stupid responses is so infuriating. It’s like you can’t admit that your analogy is completely flawed so you just keep repeating it essentially verbatim.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 09:11 PM
1

Ahhh. Thanks for the reminder that PPD has a lot of judgmental kids with half-baked ideas of the world leaking out of their orifices.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 05:37 PM
3

As I already explained: it isn’t special. If you get your hair, nails, and eyebrows done, and you get a wax or a tan or whatever else you want to do, then these are things you carry with you in your entire life both professionally and personally. You can date ten guys in the time before you need to do them again. It’s an investment in yourself that pays dividends. The guy, on the other hand, is initiating, planning, and spending specifically on you. He can’t buy one meal and distribute it across…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 09:36 PM
2

Women don’t believe that looking good is to their benefit outside of dating? Gotta say, that’s definitely a new one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:57 PM
2

That’s their routine. When they do it, they benefit in all parts of their lives aside from a single date. None of that is an investment in a particular man in the way the man is having to invest in her. She still looks good after the date, but he can’t get his meal back.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:07 PM
1

But that guy in your example is still tall, fit, tattooed, and gainfully employed despite playing Pokémon once a week with his boys. And if she isn’t a total moron, which is admittedly not a given, she should recognize the importance of her man having a friend group so that he’s not entirely dependent on her for “emotional labor.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 07:01 PM
1

Male expectations of having to be a sole provider haven’t been reduced, it’s just not economically feasible anymore. They’re still expected to be primary breadwinners and the more the better. This is an expectation since time immemorial. That’s one of a laundry list of things men are expected to be, on top of having our own version of beauty standards which are things we can’t change with makeup as I alluded to before.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 11:57 AM
1

Things that everyone has to do to attract people and maintain healthy relationships. The onus of looking maximally beautiful is pretty exclusively female. You’re trying to paint these “other, actually meaningful things” as also being their exclusive domain which is amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 11:47 AM
1

We have? And what’s not to understand about what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 02:58 AM
3

I love my gf to death. She’s absolutely stunning without makeup. She still looks better with it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 04:25 PM
1

Lul. Striving for beauty is the one responsibility they have and you want to relieve them of it. Should we also normalize men not shouldering their burdens? Not the least of which is their own physical attractiveness standards to which they are inexorably bound in a way that a useful tool like makeup can’t fix.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 04:11 PM
1

So we're about even, then. I called it faux science (as evo-psych tends to be) purely as an aside. It wasn't even the main point of what I wrote, which was my personal feelings on the topic. You just saw the word "faux" and got defensive lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 11:55 PM

All the faux-scientific explanations in the world mean jack to me. What it boils down to is far more personal (and petty): I'm judged harshly as a male for my low n-count, so I can't bring myself to care about female slut-shaming. The day a male virgin can be open about what he is without fear of shame is the day I'll honestly fight for female promiscuity. Until then, I call it just desserts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 11:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter