TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheLazyLibertarian Archive

View 1 posts and 38 comments by TheLazyLibertarian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

TheLazyLibertarian/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Is that effect limited to women? MY guess would be that average/above-average have fewer children regardless of gender. Wasn't this the main thrust of that documentary Idiocracy?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/14 07:52 PM
5

AWALT is such a pain. It has one legitimate use in my eyes. When it's used as shorthand for: "I acknowledge that there are exceptions to my generalization, however because we are speaking statistically my conclusions still have merit." Really it should be MWALT but AWALT is pithier so that's what stuck. The problems arise when people get confused and think it's a suitable counter-argument for individual cases. E.g.: "So my girlfriend makes more money than me, should I be worried about her cheati…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/14 07:59 PM
7

I think one of the things that turns people off most (aside from the occasional misogynistic rant) is the rampant generalization of all women into some sort of homogeneous group, like they're all superficially different on the surface, but underneath essentially the same. It's understandable that people wouldn't like being considered interchangeable like this. I understand why this happens, lazy language. For the most part, when this sub says "women are..." it really means "MOST women are..." bu…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 06:40 PM
3

The problem is if pussy is a commodity, giving it out for free decreases its value. Women who put out easily have less value. Giving away a commodity for free decreases it's price but not it's intrinsic value. An apple you got for free doesn't taste any worse than one you payed for. Sluts are girls who either have such a low SMV nobody will date them (so why would I?) or they're addicted to male attention (and the attention of 1 man can never equal that of a carousel). This may be true. Right no…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:58 PM
-4

A millennia old jewish myth? What does that have to do with anything? Are you perhaps conflating promiscuity with infidelity?
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:49 PM
1

You can't be red pill and also beta? I didn't know that.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:48 PM
7

I hadn't even thought about that angle. Good point.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:33 PM
-3

How does female promiscuity undermine the family? Good breakdown of men there but aren't you excluding the largest group? Betas who are trying to improve their game to become successful free riders. Or would they be classified in the free rider group?
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:25 PM
3

Yeah dude. Kudos to you. It's so easy to just give in and go with the flow. My coworkers are always baffled when I turn down their cupcakes (they're obsessed with the bloody things). Stay strong brother. Enjoy that chicken breast :)
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:42 PM
1

Sigh. I kind of figured it would be this way, i.e. mixed data. Damn. My gut says the story is overblown on both sides. There isn't a rape epidemic, but there also isn't an epidemic of false rape accusations. Yes rape is real (and likely underreported if anything) and there is totally bias against men in the legal system for dealing with rape. It's a shame we can't just come together and reform the system to be equitable for everyone. I guess it's the quality of rape being simultaneously extremel…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:28 PM
1

Hmm. Does anyone have data on how common false-rape actually is? I mean, I'm a logical person; I like to see both sides of every issue. The above is very plausible, but I've also read the feminist response. It goes something like "false-rape accusations are very uncommon because most women don't want to go through the emotional and legal shitstorm of a rape case over a drunken hookup." Which also seems plausible. The best way to determine between two plausible hypotheses is with data (i.e. scien…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 03:37 PM
4

I'm a little confused. I get that the world ISN'T fair but that doesn't imply it SHOULDN'T be. The world isn't covered with trees that produce ice cold beer but it totally should be. I've noticed the naturalistic fallacy (this is how things are ergo this is how things should be) crop up a lot around here, although to be fair sometimes it's just people not giving all the evidence in support of a commonly refuted claim.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 10:00 PM
3

That makes sense. She did end the relationship and didn't cheat on him. So I guess the only thing she did wrong is telling him the reason too explicitly. A little more "I've met someone else." and a little less "I want to bang our neighbor."
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 09:35 PM
3

It's easy to condemn this girl, I mean she pretty clearly broke this dude's heart, but it would be a tricky situation for anyone to be in so I'm posing 2 open questions: What would be the appropriate action for a woman in this situation? I.e., finding yourself more attracted to someone new than to your current partner. What would be the appropriate action for a man in the same situation?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 04:21 PM
6

Ha! Imagine trying to occupy Texas. The Middle East has nothing on us. Our country ONLY EXISTS because we out-insurgented the strongest naval empire of the time.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 04:10 PM
0

How do the "Yes means Yes" laws keep men from going to college?!? I thought it was only about getting consent before sex, not attending college altogether. Is there some kind of crazy clause keeping men from going to college at all? How is this possible?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 04:04 PM
1

I loved that mug too.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:06 PM
1

This is a great example of how a good thing can be radicalized and become awful. I think the biggest lesson to learn from this is not to generalize. Obviously these women have had bad experiences with men, but generalizing that experience to all men is just stupid. That said, I've seen the exact same thing done by certain MRAs and MGTOWs who assume that all feminists/women are like the ones in the OP. Can we all just make a vow right now to stop generalizing entire groups based on the wackos we …
/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:04 PM
2

I'd have gone with wanktastic! Wankerrific? Wankadelic?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:28 PM
0

Yes, that sexy sexy brain.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:15 PM
2

I say everyone should be able to eat whatever ice cream flavor they want and not be judged for it. Also, I don't like strawberry. Crap, I think I'm a hypocrite now.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:14 PM
1

That sounds right. Can't really deny those expectations are there, but she's not saying "don't be bold" she's saying "be what you want and fuck society's expectations."
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:11 PM
1

Don't wank you're knickers, we're just having a faff.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:02 PM
2

Seconded.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:59 PM
1

We're talking about the literature then? OK. According to the science men and women both form more favorable initial impressions of potential partners with traditionally gendered traits; strong jaw, big boobs, etc. However, deeper bonds are based on much more complex and varied partner traits and often don't follow traditional gender roles. So yeah, you're more likely to get Emma's attention with a confident opener (probably better to be tall too b/c evolution) but, I mean, the girl gives speech…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:57 PM
1

Well. You were definitely right about that ruling. Still, that was 1918. Wars aren't really won with numbers anymore. It's more about technology and intel as far as I'm aware. I guess I'm saying we live in a different age, perhaps we need different rules. Voters decide where government goes, and the vote is 55% female. Since women's suffrage, government has expanded from 3% of GNP to 40% of GNP. Why? Because men are paying for most of it, and most if it goes to women's services. Good gravy, what…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:48 PM
2

She didn't even say that much. She just said she likes men who actually ask her out rather than waffling for a few months first. Don't let them make you forget this is a paraphrase not a quote.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:23 PM
0

You seem to know a lot about what Emma Watson is and isn't willing to do. I'm impressed. Are you a close friend of hers or something? I'm sure you're not just assuming what kind of person a celebrity is based on vague paraphrases from a tabloid. That would be dumb.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:21 PM
1

You're conflating expectations and preferences. She's not saying "I expect men to be XYZ." She (not a real quote but we'll give the second source the benefit of the doubt) said she prefers men who just ask her out to ones who faff about for 2 months first. Edit: The "Shy" "Bold" language was not necessarily hers.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:12 PM
1

I can't find that Supreme Court case. Do you know which one it was? I googled "supreme court rights responsibilities 1918" and all I got was the sedition act of 1918. Seems to me that rich white men and congressmen (sorry, redundant I know) decide where the government goes. Maybe they could do the fighting themselves. Ha! I see where you're coming from though. "You voted for them so you indirectly supported the war they decided on." The logic is sound but it's a little ridiculous to say I have t…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:08 PM
0

I think it's more like saying "Cheeseburgers are bad for you but I can't stop eating them because they're delicious" Are you a hypocrite? Perhaps. Does that change the fact that cheeseburgers are bad for you. Not in the least. Edit: Not calling you a hypocrite Expendible. Talking about the cheeseburger guy :)
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:57 PM
0

Wasn't the whole point of that quote that we shouldn't let gender roles influence how we act? I don't think she was calling for men to drop their gender preferences but for society to drop it's gender expectations.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:54 PM
0

You think feminism is going to cause the economy to collapse? I'm actually really curious. How does that theory work? You're right about feminism only existing in a strong economy. In the old days men and women shared responsibilities because if they didn't they'd starve to death. Men generally got the final say because they hit harder and women were too busy avoiding the aforementioned starvation to organize a resistance movement. A golden age indeed. Thank god they weren't being decadent.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:45 PM
1

It's not "the way I want" is "rights and responsibilities are linked". You need skin in the game. Women, as a group, don't have it. Linking rights and responsibilities is not how a democracy works (democratic republic technically). The whole idea is that everyone gets a say no matter how dumb or useless they are. If you don't like democracy fine. It's not perfect but what are you suggesting? Some kind of meritocracy where you get more say as you provide more to society? That kind of system can s…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:36 PM
1

How could you possibly know that? Are you perhaps generalizing the experiences you've had with a tiny sample of women to all the women and thus Emma Watson? Because, I mean, I don't think I have to point out that generalizing based on anecdotal evidence doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:34 PM
1

IF Emma Watson shamed men about their sexual preferences then you can call her out on it. It seems a bit unfair to just condemn her for something she hasn't done yet. Has she said something to that effect that I'm not aware of? I'll admit to not following Emma Watson very closely.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:31 PM
2

What a polite reply. Kudos to you sir.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:10 PM
1

I'm sure she'll be devastated that some random dude(I assume) on reddit no longer finds her attractive. Don't worry Emma Watson, who I'm sure is reading this, I find you even more attractive now, so you break even. If you'll check your "Random People Who Think You're Sexy" account, you should find it unchanged.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter