TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheLittleGoodWolf Archive

View 0 posts and 120 comments by TheLittleGoodWolf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Wow... that was umm... something. I am actually exhausted from reading that.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:50 AM
1

This doesn't matter one bit really. Her statement was the women were the primary victims of war which is just completely untrue either way. The primary victim is the one who is directly affected by something, if I choose to kill myself I am the primary victim of my suicide and those close to me are the secondary victims. The whole statement, intentionally or not, fully demeans and diminishes the suffering of male soldiers in war and of male civilians killed, and the male survivors, and the male …
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:44 AM
1

Perhaps I spoke to harshly when I said stupid, but a person, an average person in the 1900 was vastly less knowledgeable than an average person today. Need I remind you that in the 1900s physicians still believed that many diseases were caused by masturbation. We knew very little about the rest of the world. The wright brothers had their first sustained flight documented in 1906. The advances we have made during that entire century is more than vast. The discoveries and the knowledge we have ama…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 06:32 PM
9

Phew... I'm a swede and I got seriously worried for a second there. I don't keep up much with the media because it's mostly depressing to read. I still feel really sad about the comments though. I guess they weren't an april fools joke. Also, people were really shortsighted and dumb in the 1900s compared to now... in other news the sky appears to be blue!
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:29 AM
0

Well that's not what I'm talking about at all. I'm talking about being accustomed to a standard of living, as your wealth increases so does your standard, and as your standard increases the costs of maintaining that standard also increases. Say you are wealthy but you fall on some (relative to you) hard financial times and you have to sell your fancy car and buy a cheaper old car. Now that is not as universally bad as someone not affording food for the month but relative to their standard it cou…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:26 PM
2

Wealth isn't about your financial struggles and how hard they are. If you are wealthy you get more struggles as you raise your standard to match your wealth. Simply put a rich person has many financial struggles because their wealth is placed in many different places. A poor (-ish) person has only one financial struggle and that is to acquire enough money to pay the bills and make a life. I don't deny rich people their money but some of them do need some perspective at times.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:36 AM
2

This seems about as solid as it can get at this moment. I don't think there is much more room for misunderstandings if one actually reads all that you have stated here. I think it's a fair interpretation of accepted and sound statistical data, now we need more data on the subject.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:34 AM
3

Seems like your situation is more reminding of the Will Smith quote, I don't remember it right now though. It was in a similar vein but focused more on personal growth and success.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:02 AM
2

I just want to say that I don't disagree with the premise that more men than women have experienced non-consensual sex acts. I don't think there is enough data to solidify that statement yet however. When you subtract the number of women who suffered "attempted rape" one should also endeavor to do the same with men, however that figure is sadly not available in the statistics. The "made to penetrate" number is including incomplete attempts as well and while we can speculate on the size of this n…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:56 AM
5

12 Month Prevalence of Sexual Violence — U .S . Women Rape: 127,000 1,270,000 Made to penetrate: * (Statistically insignificant) 12 Month Prevalence of Sexual Violence — U .S . Men Rape: * (Statistically insignificant) Made to penetrate: 126,700 1,260,000 just thought I'd clear up the numbers there for you. Additionally, "Completed alcohol/drug facilitated penetration" accounts for another 781,000 female "rape" victims, so you may have a point. And no, the other 781,000 cases were included in th…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:03 PM
2

I always saw it as what is a privilege to one person is a problem to another, neither person is fully equipped to understand the other. We all have our problems and while being rich makes some things practically easier there are also several obligations and problems that naturally follows. I never understood why people seem to hate privilege so much, why not be glad for those who have it better as much as we feel bad for those that have it worse?
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:26 AM
1

At 12 it is possible that his foreskin had not naturally detached from the glans yet. The membrane that keeps the foreskin attached to the glans can remain long into the later teens without it being bad in any way. If his problem was aim (as in not hitting the toilet) and nothing more the circumcision was probably completely unnecessary. Of course it'll throw off your aim if there is loose skin in the way but you can easily fix this by sitting down or pulling back as much of the foreskin as you …
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:36 AM
2

While I can't really see why you wouldn't want try to keep any part of your body intact unless all other options are tried that is slightly beside the point and not really any of my business either. I thought it was always heavily implied that this discussion was about circumcision of children and infants. Whatever people wish to do as a consenting adult is all up to them.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:47 AM
3

Glad to spread the information!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:00 AM
7

It degrades the appearance in that it is altered from it's natural state. I know appearance is highly individual but there will be scarring. Function, the natural state of the glans is to be moist, it's an internal organ and when the foreskin is removed it dries. The function of the foreskin is to keep the glans clean, moist and healthy. This is done with smegma, which is actually antibacterial and antifungual, it is produced constantly so the excess needs only to be rinsed off and all is well. …
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:45 AM
1

Okay so your thread has about 100 children and I don't have the energy to go check out what you learned, just want to get that out of the way first. Second, mad props to you for actually listening to some information provided and actually considering it. I know I'm giving you props for being a decent human being and that it shouldn't be needed but I don't see that often enough. You are still in the blue, vote wise, but with that edit you earned my orange. Thirdly, if you want to know more here's…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:38 AM
1

This is new to me, granted the only penis I know of is my own and I happily retract the foreskin fully during masturbation (feels awesome for me btw). How old are you? what parts hurts when it slides back? It's not necessary for it to slide back though and unless you have other problems with it, doing something that hurts is just plain unnecessary.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:28 AM
5

I gotta say props to you for not making an irreversible decision for your son, giving him the bodily integrity he deserves. Quick fact the number of baby boys circumcised today in the us is about 32% whereas 30 years ago that number was in the 80% range or higher. I wonder why it dropped...? Secondly about mutilation, I copied from wikipedia (since the oxford dictionary failed me) Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, some…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:21 AM
3

Ah, context, for someone who didn't read the article fully (guilty) this is exactly what I needed.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:06 AM
0

Well the argument could be made that it's like having your nails removed. I'm not fully sure on their exact function actually (although I do know what the foreskin is for) aside from scraping stickers and biting on. I'm also not sure of if they would grow back if removed. What I do know is that the membrane that holds your nails to your fingers is the same kind of membrane that holds the foreskin to the glans in a young boy. Sure this changes with age but while attached it's pretty much the same…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:03 AM
7

It's seriously rare. Most kinds of pathological phimosis (because phimosis is the natural state of the penis for the first years and can last way into the late teens without being pathological) can be treated with changed masturbation habits, manual stretching, steroid (not anabolic) creams, minor incisions etc. There is rarely a need to fully circumcise the penis at all. I believe plenty of medical personnel are either misinformed or just wanting a quick fix. I will admit there may be cases whe…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:53 PM
1

I remeber when I heard Warren Farres (I mean Man) tell this story, and it really got to me. I think this is something that should be done more often. I kinda thought the story went a little differently though but that may be fuzzy memory.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:22 PM
5

I kept reading the total times of the runners and couldn't really understand how she could win when she had a longer total time. Then I got it.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:13 PM
1

Well so is homicide right?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 02:55 AM
1

Yeah, that was just speculation on my part and more with people without relatives ect... But the step doesn't seem that far IMO. About the burial ceremonies I have always considered them to be more for the grieving than the deceased. Which is why I can understand them having more choice in the matter. I can understand that you are conflicted, I would probably be too but since I don't have such a story I take the cold logical route. Still it's only my opinion. We can't say and we can't really kno…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:13 PM
1

Okay then, I suppose we won't fully agree. My reasoning behind "disposal" is that from a purely logical standpoint it's necessary due to other problems that can arise. And while having your organs harvested after death won't do much difference to you (because you are dead) removing that choice becomes a slippery slope. Where does it end? Can medical personnel claim "emergency" and just take an organ? Could you as family decide to "sell" the body for medical testing? when you stretch one rule eno…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:16 PM
1

Well shit, I had no idea that was the case about the DNRs, not even sure we have them where I live (I would want one though). I always lumped that together with organ donation in my moral library. I can't be forced to donate or give up body fluid or tissue (except for drug tests or similar) while I'm alive, and shouldn't be forced to do so after I'm dead. These are my beliefs and personal moral standpoint though, the law is still the law even if it's a stupid one. As for DNR I would never ever w…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:30 PM
1

I would expect some sort of validation from his family - but if there is none, the woman does not retain the right to his DNA. The right to bodily autonomy should remain even in death. I am part of a national registry of organ donors where I state which organs I wish to donate if I die. I there are no such wishes expressed no one should have the right to decide that for me even after I die. how to handle burial and similar things are different. I will admit that if something happened that put my…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:07 PM
4

"If video games shaped people as much as people say they do we'd have a shit ton of mushroom eating, turtle killing, pipe climbing, plumbers" Not really accurate because as far as I know I haven't seen either Mario or Luigi ever fixing a pipe but I think the point still stands.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:35 PM
1

That is excellent! Where did you get that information from? I'm actually a little surprised as to how small a percentage that is, I thought it would be much higher actually. I'll look into it some more I think. Thank you for the information.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 09:40 AM
2

Interesting, very interesting. Now I have something to read tonight! I only wish our own country could realize this though, still it's a step in the right direction. Thanks, from your neighbor to the east.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:04 PM
1

That's pretty much the story of my youth and the entirety of my teens. To make a long story short; I grew up with a single mother who had been brutally abused and mistreated in one relationship and had a really nasty divorce with my father several years after that. It's all fact checked so I know it's not BS. She had largely feminist views during my upbringing and that's what I got to hear as I grew up. "Men do this", "men do that", "men have treated women bad for ages", "don't be like your fath…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:37 PM
1

it may be more extreme because most of the patients are incontinent. Quite possibly so yes. Both these articles assume a relatively healthy and normal person of course. I fixed the link in the first one, but if you couldn't make sense of the second one I doubt the language is much better there. One point in both of them is that washing with soap (I suppose the soap you use is specifically made for heavy use) and excessively (even without soap) will eventually cause damage to the mucous glands in…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:54 PM
1

Sweet, glad that cleared up.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:02 PM
0

you are not alone in that belief, and the same could be said about hate and words connected with that. Misogyny, racism, hate crime, hate speech, even misandry. All of them are used very loosely, in the wrong context, and even to say something that they don't mean, by people wishing to shut up others opinions. Sure sometimes they are used legitimately but from what I have seen that is not often the case.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:33 PM
1

least nine times a day. On a single patient? That can't possibly be good. I was trying to find some good scientific or medically backed English websites on the subject but find myself lacking, finding mostly blogs and a men's health entry about the subject on askmen.com. Since I'm Swedish most of my sources on information about this are also Swedish and I was hesitant to use them since I don't know how to easily translate the page. However I want to give you a good viable source so here goes eit…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:53 AM
1

The outside parts yes, but the interior parts of the genitals are sensitive to soaps that can easily dry out the sensitive skin in those areas causing a number of different problems. This is not inherently dangerous but if done often enough there will be damage. of course in any medical environment pretty much everything is supposed to be washed and cleaned from bacteria as much as possible. But I suppose these are not long ongoing daily occurrences with the same patients? Here is one source
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:17 AM
1

I see, thank you for clarifying. And if the two tribes had no contact with each other or any other human tribes?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 11:23 PM
2

He mentioned a type of BS in his post and I asked what kind of BS he was talking about, not that what he said was actual BS. As I stated immediately after (as seen in the quote) I wasn't opposing what he was saying, I was seeking clarity in what he was talking about. Oversimplified version: him: ...that kind of apples won't work well with.... Me: what kind of apples are you talking about? you: then maybe you shouldn't call them apples. Oversimplified but the easiest way I could explain the situa…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:21 PM
2

In my example I state that the tribes exist apart from each other, perhaps I should be more clear in that they are worlds apart with no physical means of coming in to contact with each other with their current technology. My point is that in genetic survival men are expendable, the death of a male is not as damaging to a group as the death of a woman. Men are physically (we're talking averages here) stronger and if groups of matrifocalists think that kind of BS would stand, they'd be in for a ra…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:33 PM
1

Difference with the tribe example can be hinted at in other species of mammals. The tribe with mostly men would simply wipeout the young of others and take did their own the women. Men are physically (we're talking averages here) stronger and if groups of matrifocalists think that kind of BS would stand, they'd be in for a rather violent awakening. I'm not sure if we agree on my example or not, or what you want to say with this. What kind of BS are you talking about? I'm not implying that what y…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:46 PM
0

Got any juicy examples? or just a simple direction where I can start my journey?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:17 PM
5

And a little bit of extended research can give you alternate functional treatments for all of those reasons that don't require the scalpel. The only exception being paraphimosis or rare acute conditions. Paraphimosis in itself really rare and there is little time fore delicacy there, however even that does not require the removal of the foreskin, only an incision to relieve the pressure. So while circumcision can be used to treat these ailments it is not needed. I'm willing to rephrase the state…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:54 PM
1

In the same way that the vagina also needs to be manually cleaned to get rid of the byproducts of the natural cleaning. Why should soap never be used when cleaning a vagina? For the same reason that it should not be used to clean the intact penis. They can both handle their own with just the minimum requirement of regular rinsing in warm water.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:36 PM
1

Lying and hiding it from her husband is not taking responsibility for it, it's in fact the opposite. And she now blames her husband for her trapping herself in her own web of lies for 5 years (check out the updated thread). It's not a witch hunt, it's the opinion that she should be responsible for her own actions, and that lying for 5 years to your partner is a great violation of trust. So basically, she had good intentions and it back fired, as often happens. Which is why good intentions should…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:33 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:11 PM
22

If you have not seen the videos from girlwriteswhat I will suggest you watch this one. There is no real simple answer but in short it's because men are expendable and have always been expendable and still are expendable. Quick illustration of the evolutionary reason for that is found in considering two tribes, one with ten men and a hundred women and the other with ten women and a hundred men. Assume these tribes exist apart from each other and can fairly easily obtain food. Which tribe do you t…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:11 PM
-4

Lady All circumcision is different and unnecessary. FTFY.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:56 PM
6

While I don't doubt the numbers... source?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:54 PM
0

Thing is I rarely hear penises (even circumcised ones) being labeled as "good looking" or anything of the sort. I also hear even less opinions about the looks of the flaccid penis other than being a grower or a shower. The flaccid state is where the major difference in appearance lies too. An erect intact penis usually has the glans exposed or easily exposed. So while I disagree that the circumcised penis is better looking my point is that the actual impact of this difference is of little to no …
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:49 PM
4

This may be seen as slightly hyperbole but it's only meant to provoke thought not as an attack on you or your parents (I'm sure they are decent people). Ritual sacrifice was probably not done in malice either (most of the time), whether it was of humans or of animals. Yet this is often considered cruel too by todays educated society. In fact I think the very reason that such ceremonies ended (or became symbolic) is because of increased knowledge and the fact that they did end is indicative of th…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:40 PM
4

Male intact here, never really been told to clean under my foreskin either, it just kinda came naturally with the notion of general hygiene. Also ever since I have been able to retract my foreskin it also came naturally to wipe under there after I pee. Sorry if TMI but I think we could cut boys some slack. I also think it would be way easy to tell boys to spend one or two minutes going over and touching their penis while in the shower and boom, problem solved. May even get more boys interested i…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:25 PM
3

Mostly because it's not really necessary most of the time since it often happens by default when you clean the rest of your sexual organ. Also since the vagina seems to have this glorious self cleaning system, much like the uncircumcised penis does. Both of these systems produce smegma which is easily rinsed off with water for that fresh clean sensation.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:19 PM
4

'yeah I figured it would be more complex than just either or. But set a boundary between "harassment" and "annoyance. This is good, I will try to remember that.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:49 AM
9

I still have troubles deciding whether or not I feel harassment should imply malicious intent or perceived malicious intent. Can I be harassed without feeling harassed? Can I feel harassed without being harassed?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:31 AM
3

This stuff happens in life to well meaning men and woman all the time. Whoa! I have a strange feeling of Deja vu here. Seriously no, this stuff doesn't just "happen" to them as if it couldn't be avoided or that they had no part in it at all. That is what is usually inferred from such a statement. The point I'm making is that it shouldn't be understandable for him to feel guilt because of what she did. She deliberately kept him out of it. When she decided to keep that from him she made him exempt…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:50 PM
4

which is what lead to her being trapped in the lie in the first place. These are the consequences she needs to face, that she trapped herself in a lie and only she could take herself out of it. Now the lie is shattered and she needs to take the responsibility of having been there for all that time. That responsibility is purely her own, and the fault is purely her own. What good came out of talking him out of the vasectomy if she takes for granted that he still doesn't want kids? that's not impo…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:26 PM
4

Well it kind of is. The fact remains that the didn't tell him about this, something she knew would be kind of important to him. She did something that she knew would affect them both behind his back and lied about it for several years. I'm not saying she's the devil or anything but I am saying she needs to take responsibility for her actions and accept that what she did was wrong and a serious breach of trust. I mean if she could lie about that for so many years what else could she have lied abo…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:23 PM
3

Like what? She obviously didn't care enough about her husband to tell him the truth about something that was quite important to both of them. It obviously affected her severely and as a couple, what affects one inadvertently affects the other as well. Over the course of Five years she has not only lied to him about her being pregnant three times but also about her being fertile for all this time. He has the full right to be upset with her about this. It's about the breach of trust and what it ha…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:47 PM
4

Well the first one would kinda have been a sign that there would be more if they didn't change anything. Being diagnosed as infertile and then becoming pregnant kinda nullifies the whole infertile part. Also motivation means jack squat in this situation. She knew he didn't want children, but how did she know that he hadn't changed his mind? Or perhaps that he might want, nay deserve, to know that she's fertile and they are having unprotected sex? The fact that she kept these things to herself ei…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:28 PM
2

That (or this) is what (IMHO) feminism should be about, problems faced by women and helping women who need it, who actually need it. Not about playing the blame game or organizing a pity party. Yes there are some close minded people in our society who don't believe that women can own businesses or that men can be good fathers or even that you can have a 20/80 gender ratio in a position and still have gender equality. But these people are just that, a close minded minority. The fact that they are…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:35 PM
3

Well not completely... I think that people who fail to realize the importance of our diversity are bound to fail in a society on their own though. Still the human race is a persistent one so it might just survive anyhow.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:39 PM
61

I think this is mostly because the whole "don't hit women, ever" thing that is present throughout our society. You pretty much never see a man hitting a woman in any situation other than being an abusive husband, or potentially the bad guy in an action move but even then I can't recall anything at the top of my head. How often do we really see a woman get physically hurt in a movie aside from being close to an explosion or getting shot? That would be in a cat fight or a "don't touch my man" scen…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:23 PM
1

That sounds really hopeful to me though. Sure it's not all of it but it's better than nothing. I hope to live to see the day when MGM is as little of a choice as FGM (or when both of them are considered remnants of a barbaric past.)
/r/MensRights28/12/13 06:23 AM
1

Admittedly my knowledge on the subject is lacking (due to not really needing it) but I always thought there could be actual restoration. Sure not 100% but still restoring basic form and function. I suppose not though.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:59 AM
2

but you can't regrow a foreskin. Well actually you can! Just to start you off
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:39 AM
8

If you think the foreskin is a piece of insignificant skin you have some reading up to do my friend. We are a resilient and adaptive species, we can take huge amounts of trauma and still function in a relatively normal way. That does not mean the trauma was insignificant. You could rip out the fingernails, or toenails for that matter, and they would heal and if done early enough the child would grow up not knowing what it missed. It will adapt to the world as it presents itself and could well co…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:32 AM
2

Trust me it's there, you may not have thought about it or noticed it but it's there. further reading.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:15 AM
3

I think there may well be some truth to that, I'm not sure how to accurately measure it though. Since circumcision is usually done so early and there are so many other things that can affect the mental state. It is most definitely a trauma though, and it most definitely has some physical effects, most prominently the loss of the most sensitive part of the penis, and the desensitization of the second most sensitive part. By the way I have to say that I find it wonderful that you can have this kin…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:09 AM
1

I may be using the same reasoning as feminist logic... Will have to check on that after a good few hours of sleep I guess... I saw it as her finding the "natural" penis as "gross", refusing to even accept the input of the actual owners of penises. Also having watched a few circumcisions have put some utter disgust into me, and I can't believe how any loving parent could do this. A woman going behind the wishes of the father to have her son's penis mutilated for her own cosmetic reasons? That jus…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:57 AM
2

Sorry to break it to you buddy but if you were circumcised there are scars. You may be lucky in that they are less prominent but they are there nonetheless.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:50 AM
2

I'm not the one you asked but I'll tell you my reason. I take a look at the outside world, the world away from the Internet and its sometimes vile comments. I also find a refuge in places on the Internet and on reddit where stories of hope and joy are shared. I get to realize that the world is a great place really, and no matter what problems we focus on here the potential for true greatness beyond our dreams still lies ahead.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:36 AM
1

Seriously interesting viewpoint... have to look in to that some more.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:27 AM
2

Not the initial pain no... but he will bear the scars for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:14 AM
2

I honestly don't know much about the HIV arguments, but even if it turns out to be true, the most effective way to prevent HIV is not to have sex with those who carry the virus! And condoms, for the love of god condoms, again condoms! Oddly enough in the study done in Africa on the benefits of circumcision in preventing HIV the circumcised males were given and educated on condoms... while the uncircumcised were not. And I can fully understand how it could be less likely for a man to get HIV with…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:12 AM
3

Labiaplasty is not considered FGM according to the WHO so that should technically be allowed to be done right? Not really comparable and I'm not well versed in details of infant female genitalia enough to say if it's even plausible. But the argument could be well made that large inner labia is "gross" and thus should be corrected at birth. To be clear I advocate neither of these on infants (adults can do what they damn please to their own bodies though) and it is just for the sake of argument.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:50 AM
9

While I wouldn't put it so crudely as you do I must say that I agree with this. Since I live in a place where circumcision is very uncommon the discussion rarely arises and most people agree that it's a bad thing to either gender I rarely have to deal with it. However should I come across a girl who would go so far as to promote the removal of a body part of her child because she finds it gross? I would give her a piece of my mind and have her out of my life ASAP. If that is not misandry I don't…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:42 AM
8

Male circumcision is a religious rite that almost certainly arose for health reasons. Nope, see Maimonides: As regards circumcision, I think that one of its objects is to limit sexual intercourse, and to weaken the organ of generation as far as possible, and thus cause man to be moderate. It has been used as a tool to prevent masturbation for centuries perhaps even millennia. Female circumcision has been used much the same way. In fact in early medical journals female circumcision was advocated …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:32 AM
3

the most brutal forms of female circumcision involves the total removal of the clitorus. The most brutal form of female circumcision (or FGM) is the removal of all parts of the external genitalia and then sewing it all together. This is also the least common form of FGM. The more common forms involve the removal of the clitoral hood and/or parts of the (as I understand) external clitoris, also the removal of the inner labia in connection with parts of the clitoris. Pricking, nicking and cutting …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:47 AM
1

I don't know if I want to prosecute her, because in her twisted way she thought it'd somehow help if she beat me into 'understanding' her viewpoint. Read this and the following statements a few times and really think about what they sound like. It's pretty much exactly what you will hear battered wives saying (Since I rarely hear about battered men I don't have much to go on there but my bet is that it sounds similar) about their husbands trying to justify the behavior. By not bringing something…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:36 AM
1

Ahh, to be interested and knowing about cars... I love to drive them, I can change the breaks, and take care of most common servicing on the car but aside from that I know jack shit... and while it is interesting I got other things that I'm more interested in. Again I would gladly drive a car like that though.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:11 AM
2

Yes we can, since if reported to the police the victim stands under greater protection from the police if necessary. Or at least the option exists. Also if reported to the police it may well be with the desire to prosecute the perpetrator in court. Making it less likely for the perpetrator to extract revenge. This may well be minimal but since the school institution is less capable of handling these issues than the police I still find it worth mention. But yes, a similar scenario could well happ…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:28 PM
4

An interesting video, will watch the other one(s?) in a minute but I just need to correct you on the math terminology a little. The 1.31 is the difference in percentage units something that is important to mention when talking percentages. To be fair to the maths 1.18% is 47.39% lower than 2.49%, this could be read as the circumcised had a 47.39% lower risk of contracting HIV. You could also say that the uncircumcised had a 111% higher risk of contracting HIV. This is all play with numbers and a…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:10 PM
1

Now I know next to nothing about cars, but that sound's pretty fuckin' sweet! you minimize your shortcomings that you can't do anything about by maximizing other attributes which you can. Oh yes yes yes... I will try to remember this, it's an excellent statement, and exactly what I believe in.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:22 PM
1

First of all, rape victims are not helped in any way by making reports through the form. In fact there is high risk that it might actually be harmful for any "real" rape victim to report on that form. The rapist is brought to the Dean for interrogation and warning, this may ignite a flame of revenge in the accused and if the accusation is true he probably knows who made it. Thus that person is now in more danger. Even more so if it was a friend of the victim who made the accusation on the form w…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:17 PM
3

Umm the form had no legal binding what so ever so no one would get arrested for it. In fact if they were it would be a huge infringements of their constitutional rights. This form had no viable purpose what so ever, and the only reason it hit the media was that there was people posting on ideas to expose the fact that the tool wasn't even functional to begin with. I really do wonder what would have happened if these threads didn't exist...
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:53 PM
1

Yeah I always had a problem with it being wrong to acknowledge that some are better than others, and that we as people actually are different. Being different is good, why not celebrate that instead? There can only be one #1, thats kind of the point of the whole thing, it's something for others to aspire to and work for and be inspired by to be better than they are. Guess what? you can always be better than you are right now, but that doesn't mean that you are bad. And you not being bad is no ex…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:20 PM
6

Nono, I differ prostitute and escort in that respect. At least in my mind a prostitute is pretty much sex only, and an escort is the whole shebang. I may be wrong of course, and if so I will concede to that. I have very little knowledge about these things. You do raise an interesting point though, since even in that business there is more to the table than sex. Makes me think of the Geisha in Japan (whole other, but interesting, topic there) and how sex was not even always a requisite in those s…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:09 PM
5

I will most definitely treat people differently based on their attractiveness, however I will treat everyone with the same level of basic respect until I get to know them better. I treat people equally in that I treat them all differently.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:52 PM
2

you gotta be gentle with them for stupid reasons. You know, I can sort of relate to this statement. I don't know how often I do it myself but I often try to advocate for people to take the high road when we wish for others to take it. It may not always work but if we are always going to wait for the other party to come to their senses I don't thing we'll ever see any change. I never understood the reasoning behind those people though. Someone being better than you at something doesn't make you a…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:46 PM
17

I keep wondering a little about that, since it's illegal to hire a prostitute where I live I can't say much about the quality level of professionals in the field here. Thing is though what if it was a perfectly legal and viable profession? What would that do with the whole dating scene? If you pay the same amount for a decent date as for hiring a professional and all you really want is sex wouldn't that remove those people from the dating pool automatically? If there are professionals available …
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:35 PM
2

i really like this approach, both because sadly there is politics and image involved in being a group like this and being able to do good with it. Also because it is focusing on good things and promoting good things. I always believed in celebrating what we are for instead of protesting what we are against. Sure some things need to be stated and protested at times but there really should be minimal effort on that IMO unless it's something immediate. Also are there really any people against gay m…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:04 AM
2

Ah yes... but what is it more than that? or is that all there is? Does patriarchy theory say that we still live in a patriarchy? has it been redefined as when the "majority" of positions of power are held by men? What will it be called when positions of power are equal? Is equal 50/50 and how will that be enforced? Is there a short concise summary of what patriarchy theory says and is? And finally what is the point of it? (genuinely curious here)
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:53 AM
6

i can both agree and not agree with that. I have had strange nightmares about the laws of alimony in the US. I'll take whatever comes here instead of that any time of day. In day to day life things are pretty much still working and I have bigger issues with local transportation than I do with feminism here. What bothers me is that it has become such a dogma and that it (like nationalism and similar loaded topics) can't be discussed in an open environment. When I say discuss I mean both to be abl…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:46 AM
5

Sure I'll play, how come patriarchy theory has nothing really to do with the actual definition of patriarchy? It's pretty much a fancy way of saying gender roles from what I have seen you explain here. A patriarchy is a society where a man is always the head of the household, and where a man is always the leader of a nation. Were england governed by the royal family it could easily be described as a matriarchy, at least in a way. What is patriarchy theory really saying though? I have heard so mu…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:37 AM
5

Whoa I'm a swede and I have heard nothing of this, I hope it gets the news soon. This is at least some great progress.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:08 AM
2

A thought occurred to me quite a few years ago, one that has not been able to leave me alone since. It was an honest curiosity about how many homosexual people there actually are in (for the sake of simplicity) America. What is the percentage? We know that women are the 51% and thus a majority although very slight. So what would be the percentage of homosexual people? of bisexual people? of trans people? etc... When you start dividing people into groups like that and bind them together suddenly …
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:20 AM
2

Nope once you are 15 in Sweden you are legally allowed to consent and therefore fair game. Unless there exists some sort of major power difference such as the person being your legal guardian or caregiver, teacher, boss, or something else along those lines.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:50 PM
3

I thought it was because a cornerstone of the Sith "religion" was their black and white perception of the world, where there was little place for gray areas. Whereas the "Jedi" should be open to all possibilities, wherein something actually can be black and white. something like that... I agree about the better line though... but I just like the mentioning of absolutes and the whole mentality surrounding that.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:38 PM
1

I now look at Justin Bieber in a whole new light...
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:55 PM
1

If anybody didn't watch the video about the $7000, watch it. I was gonna slip it but its worth it to watch. I took your advice... was not disappointed in the least! That was a great video and good feelings were had all around. I am a firm believer in that the means should justify the ends, and in this case it was just some pure goodwill from a few guys who wanted to do some good, and did.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:30 PM
2

There is some well thought out explanation to that statement which I seem to forget pretty much as soon as I have read it. I wish it was a better quote though because it's a really telling statement of the reasoning of the other party.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:02 AM
7

It's not the mustache on the outside that counts you know, it's the mustache on the inside that counts.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:47 PM
2

The instinct of the hunter survives and adapts to new modern environments, I like it.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:50 PM
3

They may well be able to do the job but obviously not well enough. Would you want a doctor who tested below standards but somehow still was allowed a license to practice medicine? She may have passed all the other tests but so did everyone else since all these tests mark the lowest standard for a firefighter. These are people who save lives while risking their own in a high stress and highly physically demanding environment, there is a reason as to why they need to be in peak physical condition.…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:16 AM
2

Sweden here! We have a number of different things we can be tested on, the tester then decides which 10 (or something, don't remember the number) points that will be the focus of the test. Fail any of these points during the test and you're out. Parallel parking can be one of these and you have about three or for "moves" (not tries but moves) to get it right.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:08 AM
8

Because the procedure is not yet approved in the US, they are apparently beginning animal testing at this moment. I don't know about India but I suspect it is not entirely out of the testing phase there either even if they do human testing. Vasalgel is what it's called, if you want to know more you can google it because I'm lazy at the moment.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:54 PM
2

huh, thank you for that, might be some interesting reading later on. Hope it works out well for you.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:55 PM
3

How far along the restoration process are you? I have been looking for inputs from people who have had their foreskin restored and would love to hear about those experiences. In my mind those are really the only people who know both sides (apart from those who get circumcised as adults) and can give a statement of actual differences between the two states. While i think the practice of genital mutilation on children should be banned worldwide (preferably yesterday or a century ago) and that ther…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:21 PM
5

And it should be common knowledge by now that erection =/= arousal just the same way that if a woman is "wet" =/= arousal. The sad part is that most of us are taught that an erection is a definite sign of male arousal and sexual desire and that the natural lubrication of the vagina is a definite sign of female arousal and sexual desire. This is of course often the case but it's not limited to that, think of it as all thumbs are fingers but not all fingers are thumbs (in fact only 1 in 5 fingers …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:02 PM
1

What you say makes sense, and I do agree that a lot of our rules and laws need an overview to better suit our society as a whole. I'm not prepared to debate over what, how and when since I don't know enough on the subject.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 12:11 PM
2

Where do you draw the line then? When there is a 25 year old and a 14 year old? Even further? I really don't know if I agree with you or not and since I don't have much legal knowledge or history behind the law I will not take a side here. Still, it is the law, retarded though it may be, and will be followed until changed. Also not everyone knows the difference between consent and nonconsent apparently not even between adults.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:08 AM
0

The thing is that (as far as I know at least where I live) even a "ceremonial nicking" as you call it, is considered FGM and illegal. I am all for religious freedom as long as it does not do damage or permanent changes to nonconsenting adults or children, who are not legally able to give concent. You can do whatever you want as long as you adhere to that and the laws of wherever you are. I realize that to get this through may require different methods of argumentation but from where I stand a hu…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:45 AM
5

It's all in the legality, an underaged person can not legally give consent and so it's sex without consent and thus rape. This is intended to protect the children who may or may not know better and who could be taken advantage of. How well this works.... Well that's a different matter.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 08:46 AM
2

You know if children were taught critical "thinking" and cold logical reasoning in school and at home I think there could be a big change in our entire society. Also some real effort put in sexual education instead of what we have today. I was never taught about female lubrication in school, neither was I taught about many other things about both genders bodies. STIs and proper use of condoms, plus the whole babymaking process beginning with the already fertilized egg was pretty much the extent …
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:51 AM
2

This is true!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:44 PM
1

Thank you! While it is true that most people in Sweden are very keen on being PC and general feminism is considered a part of that, it does not mean that there are more (percentage wise) extreme feminists here than any other place.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:50 PM
1

yup... as a swede, pretty much 25% (if not more) of what I see on reddit is new and of unknown origin to me. It's either exotic american or exotic australian.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:55 PM
2

I see! Didn't quite get that. math checks out and I will too... for some much needed sleep. I apologize for the missunderstanding, people in my vicinity usually missinterpret percentages so I'm too used to seeing it. Goodnight
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:47 PM
1

In the case of 12 rapes, a 10% decrease is 1.2 rapes less, a 100% decrease is 12 rapes less. you are confusing percent with percent units. Still seems to be an awful small sample size, I don't know anything about that though, just thought I'd step in on the math, unless I got lost somewhere in the words, in which case I apoligize.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter