TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheLizardKing89 Archive

View 3 posts and 330 comments by TheLizardKing89 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-8

What is the privilege you enjoy that lets you think your horrible grammar and spelling is acceptable?
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:45 AM
16

She’s not in the military, she’s with the USO.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:58 AM
0

Is it pedantry to use the actual definitions of things? Pakistan and Afghanistan are part of the Muslim world but neither of them are part of the Middle East. Hawaii, while being part of the United States, is not part of North America.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:43 PM
17

No it isn't. It's in Central Asia.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:04 PM
10

I'm not sure where you're getting your information. California's three strikes law always required the conventions to be felonies and now, with Prop 36 passing, it requires them to be violent or serious felony convictions.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:20 AM
1

If I knew that someone was a child molester, I'd let the public know. Giving vague warnings doesn't really help. Saying "there are sexual abusers working in Hollywood" is a far cry from saying "Harvey Weinstein is a sexual predator."
/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:04 PM
0

How are parents supposed to protect their children if he won't name the predators? Feldman is more worried about his own situation than protecting children from these people.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:15 PM
1

This isn't a story about Las Vegas or South Florida. What's legal there isn't relevant to a case in California.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:18 PM
18

It's only against the law if they discriminate prices or on entry.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 09:11 AM
3

Can you link to the story? I'm googling "Brady campaign lawsuit" and I'm just getting times where they sued gun dealers. Nothing about them having to pay massive damages.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:19 PM
7

https://archive.is/20141119163531/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fculture%2Ffeatures%2Fa-rape-on-campus-20141119
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:45 PM
-5

The same photo was on the front page of the New York Times and people didn't get bent out of shape about it.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:43 PM
4

Just look at the Brady foundation and the tens of millions they owe to firearm retailers and manufacturers currently. To what are you referring? I haven't heard anything about this.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:39 PM
1

Obviously the state didn't want her free; she was suspected of murder. My point is about the delay. Defendants will often delay their trial if they believe it will help their case. The prosecution cannot delay a trial because the accused has a constitutional right to a speedy trial. In New York, the law says they have to be ready six months for all felonies other than murder. In California, it's 45 days. There's no way she spent over two years in pre-trial detainment without doing so on purpose.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:54 AM
1

Her defense attorneys almost certainly waived her right to a speedy trial so they could have more time to prepare a defense or negotiate a plea. It clearly worked.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:18 PM
5

This argument is ridiculous. Just because someone is paid a lot of money doesn't mean they aren't underpaid. The number one pick in the MLB draft will make $7.7 million. He could easily make more money if he was a free agent; therefore, he's underpaid.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:14 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_formulation
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:02 PM
2

Can a petition not be made for this women to be put on trial again, this time under a different judge? No, that would be a violation of the prohibition on double jeopardy.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:09 AM
2

I will never believe this is not a joke.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:13 AM
2

Considering the way the judge saw this case, I'd consider a plea bargain a good deal. There's a chance she could have been acquitted at trial.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:07 PM
86

This is the worst of what happens in the pursuit of equality. It's cutting down tall trees to make everyone the same height.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:27 PM
1

The divorce settlement was finalized on October 17, 2011. On March 27, 2012, the agreement to sell was made. The sale was closed on May 1. If she had had better lawyers, Jamie McCourt could be a billionaire instead of merely a hundred millionaire.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:04 AM
7

You and me both. I know people who hate him so much they refuse to park at Dodger Stadium because he still owns a share of that.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:23 PM
21

I know in the US, a divorce settlement isn't amended just because a company owned by one spouse is later sold for a higher value. Frank McCourt, who owned the Los Angeles Dodgers settled with his wife for $130 million. He later sold the team for $2 billion. His wife doesn't get to see any of that money.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:35 PM
0

Except it is very likely that people in the Saudi government were involved in 9/11. If only we could read the unredacted 9/11 Commission Report. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_Saudi_role_in_September_11_attacks
/r/MensRights01/04/17 09:12 PM
0

That's one poll. Look at the trend line. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:07 PM
10

And it wasn't as partisan an environment when Obama took office? Obama's lowest approval rating ever was 38% in September 2014, at the height of ISIS power.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:03 AM
2

What polls said HRC would win by 15 points? Everything I saw showed her having a 3-5 point lead at the end. Seeing as how she won the popular vote by 2 points, the polls were well within the margin of error.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:48 AM
9

Trump got 46% of the popular vote. His approval rating is at ~40%, a record low for this early in his term. Even Bush, who had the Supreme Court give him the presidency, didn't hit 40% until late 2005, well into his second term. Trump is historically unpopular for a president this early in his administration.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:46 AM
9

15 of 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. Saudi Arabia wasn't on the list.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:39 AM
15

Yes, the liberals who run CPAC got him. /s
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:20 PM
7

You clearly don't understand how something can be both a criminal act and a civil wrongdoing. If I burn down your house, I can be criminally charged with arson. Even if I'm acquitted, you can still sue me for the damage to your property.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:14 AM
1

It's called a bench trial.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:11 AM
1

The mechanism of jury nullification exists in that a jury cannot be punished for their verdict. That simple fact gives rise to the concept of jury nullification.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:16 PM
78

I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:00 PM
9

14 year olds shouldn't be having sex. I agree but I also don't think they should be criminally prosecuted for doing so.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:35 PM
21

That's unbelievable. I mean I literally don't believe it.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:15 PM
7

Bring up the workplace fatality gap.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:29 PM
2

Three of the six people falsely convicted in this case were women.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 11:08 PM
1

And Trump wants to invade Syria.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:07 AM
3

Or you could just have a sign saying that there's a recording system. That would eliminate the expectation of privacy and your recordings would be legal.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:16 PM
8

You're thinking of the exclusionary rule, which prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used in court. I'm talking about crimes charges that could result from illegally recording private conversations. If you remember Donald Sterling, those recordings would be illegal if he didn't know he was being recorded.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:49 PM
-1

This problem isn't exclusive to the UK.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:17 PM
3

Audio recording isn't totally legal. Some states require all party consent. Otherwise, it's illegal wiretapping.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:36 PM
4

I think a lawsuit has a much higher probability of success than going for criminal charges.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:10 PM
3

12 years prison is a shitload of tax dollars. Worth every penny.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:20 PM
3

Amen brother. Locking her up for 30 years will be costly, but it will be worth every penny.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:10 PM
2

No DA is going to file charges without a cooperative victim.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:01 AM
-1

Good luck getting a conviction without a cooperative victim.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:00 AM
3

Sure it is. Just like "kill all the Jews" is an opinion. It's horrible and any person who seriously said such a thing should be made a pariah. Hate speech is like beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:31 PM
3

I didn't make the rules.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:42 PM
14

It totally depends on the job. Working the drive thru at McDonalds? Dye your hair whatever color you want. Being the secretary at a white shoe law firm? Probably going to need a bit more of a conservative appearance.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:46 PM
14

They're the same thing. All "hate speech" is, is an extremely distasteful opinion.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:40 PM
8

Because it's an unnatural color. No one cares if you bleach your hair but it's not the same thing as dyeing it blue.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:36 PM
8

With this logic, the universe could have sprang into existence, fully formed 5 minutes ago.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:21 PM
3

This is correct, but there is evidence that Corey already gave his children his land to prevent it from being taken by the government.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:35 PM
56

My favorite anecdote was Giles Corey's last words. Because he refused to enter a plea, his trial couldn't proceed. They tortured him to death by putting heavy stones on his chest. His last words were "more weight."
/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:22 PM
1

Exactly. This is like sexual harassment on steroids. One person has power over a minor and it's funded by the taxpayers. I'm totally fine with it being illegal. If one was a teacher at a different school, then I'd be in the "who cares?" camp.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:59 PM
3

You can be against this law (you'd be stupid in my opinion) but it is the law. She committed a crime. And the "teachers aren't perfect" horseshit could be used to minimize the culpability of anyone convicted of anything. No one is perfect, that doesn't mean we throw away the law books.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:42 PM
1

You should read the article too. Part of the plea agreement is that she surrenders her teaching license.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:39 PM
11

She's a teacher, they were students. That's illegal. Read the damn article.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:25 PM
7

And no sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:24 PM
1

Absolutely. There were many volunteers after 9/11.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:03 AM
1

That's a fair point.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:48 PM
1

I think plenty of people will fight for this country, if they know what they're fighting for. If Chinese soldiers are marching down Sunset, plenty of people will be signing up. If it's to invade Iraq because of some made-up reason, maybe not so much.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:48 PM
12

That's because whites were more likely to have deferments, not because the draw was biased.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:43 PM
1

If a war is worth fighting, there will be no shortage of volunteers.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:42 PM
8

I'd say they're opposites.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:49 AM
8

Yeah, it's called impeachment.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:30 AM
51

You call 10,000 people commies, and you're bound to be right once or twice.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:58 AM
3

Yeah, if you don't care about executing innocent people, then killing people is cheap.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:32 PM
-1

Because capital punishment is more expensive they way it is currently set up. If you want to reduce the cost (fewer appeals, less time on death row, etc.) you will invariably increase the odds of executing an innocent person.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:31 PM
-1

If all you care about is saving money, why bother having trials at all? Let's just go to a Judge Dredd system where the cops are judge, jury, and execution.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:15 PM
2

Doesn't that depend on the age of the person being imprisoned, though? No. Everything involved with capital punishment is more expensive; the trial, the appeals, building a special death row, etc. The trial alone costs about $1.2 million compared to about $700k for a regular murder trial. Housing prisoners in death row costs about $90k per year compared to about $50k per year for general population. I know I'd rather die than rot in a cell and I'd like to give people that option if they so desir…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:02 PM
4

Capital punishment is more expensive than life imprisonment.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:16 PM
151

If she didn't get an abortion, that 10 year old would have to pay child support.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:23 PM
0

I really hated how it mentions that teachers make more than the average American but neglect to mention the fact that every teacher has a college degree and most have some post-college study while the average American does not.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:38 AM
2

I think both America and the MLB would have been better off if he became the commissioner of baseball instead of getting into politics.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 07:45 PM
2

anyone who isn't in denial knows without a doubt women in combat roles make no sense. There are plenty of non-combat roles women could be drafted into.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:56 PM
2

I totally understand the concept of freedom of speech in the UK; you don't have it. Something like the Westboro Baptist Church wouldn't be allowed to exist but in the US, assholes like them are the price of freedom.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:55 PM
1

Suits for defamation aren't criminal penalties. Also, good luck collecting unless the false accuser is wealthy.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:16 PM
1

Are criminal charges pressed for any other situations where someone gives a false testimony Yes, it's called perjury.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:15 PM
3

Yes. In a capital trial, there are two phases; deciding guilt or innocence and sentencing. If convicted, the jury then decides life imprisonment or death.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:03 PM
2

Wrong. The same jury that convicted the defendant is the jury that decides life or death.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:01 PM
6

Correct. The only exception is if the prosecution is seeking the death penalty. That sentence requires a jury to impose it, not just a judge.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:46 PM
2

Based on his logic, it would be OK since he wouldn't be charged criminally! /s
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:13 PM
2

Call me old fashioned or a communist, but I think we should all share from one big bag.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:51 AM
5

Yeah, because when I bring drugs for a party, I make sure each person has their own bag. /s
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:02 AM
0

Aim it at Parliament.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:18 PM
1

Watch the GOP debates, I'm sure one of them will propose it.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:41 AM
3

Because those double standards should be stuck down on the basis of equal protection under the 14th Amendment.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:24 AM
1

The nazi flag and holocaust denial aren't the ones I'm worried about not being able to express their beliefs. Its more so any unpopular opinions. That's why it horrifies me. It starts with speech 95% of people think is offensive and it grows from there.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:43 PM
1

Oh yeah, I often criticize Europe for their weak protection of free speech. The idea that Holocaust denial or displaying the Nazi flag should be illegal horrifies me.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:02 PM
2

I guess it's hard to convey this via text, but I am truly happy that "hate speech" is protected for exactly the reason you mention. The government has no business determining what is and what isn't "hate speech".
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:02 PM
2

SCOTUS somewhat recently upheld the Westboro Baptist Church's right to protest soldiers' funerals, even if that causes the families of the deceased emotional distress. I'd say the First Amendment is doing OK.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:36 AM
1

I agree. My original post sounds sarcastic but I'm totally serious.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:39 PM
1

Without serious changes in how the First Amendment is viewed, this has zero chance of working in the U.S.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:55 PM
-3

Too bad that hate speech is still perfectly legal in the U.S. Thanks First Amendment! /serious
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:53 PM
7

I'm glad the U.S. has a First Amendment that would make things like this much more difficult to pass.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:06 PM
3

It's the most populous region on the planet, they need it the most.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:38 AM
19

Except your competitor just creates the $100 cure, ending your whole business of treatment.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:35 AM
3

Do you do yoga to stretch like that?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:31 AM
1

As a guy who's half Polish, we're totally white.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:41 AM
7

He very well might be arrested for hate speech, since they're in the UK.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:01 AM
7

But it wasn't really a genocide, it was just a few Turks who didn't like Armenians! /s
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:00 AM
12

In the US, Jewish is white.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:59 AM
3

Not if they're in public. Zero expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:51 PM
1

http://youtu.be/Jo4568PIRnk
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:51 PM
23

She's holding one man responsible for the problems of a whole country? How would she feel if she was rejected for her country's less than ideal treatment of Jews?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:43 PM
11

They just want to get back the time when trials weren't necessary for rape charges. Like this guy didn't need one. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/aap/photo06.jpg /s
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:38 PM
8

I hope he sues her. He probably won't collect much, but he should garnish her pay checks for the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:07 PM
4

Yes, it could all have happened consensually and I don’t remember it. If I was on the jury, that's where I decide "not guilty." That's more than enough reasonable doubt for me.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:26 PM
5

Vaccinations have huge positive health benefits while circumcision does not.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:09 AM
6

My body my choice.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:07 AM
11

Christina Booth, like her husband, spoke to authorities without an attorney present. Idiots.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:22 PM
15

My body, my choice.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:20 AM
1

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:30 PM
1

My mistake. I live in California where common law marriage has been abolished for over a century.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:14 AM
2

Glad I don't live in Ireland then. Palimony is settled law in the US.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:44 PM
30

Discriminating against black people was once good business. It doesn't mean it was right.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:21 PM
1

No one cares what a 16 year old girl thinks.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:03 PM
3

No charges could mean anything Anything other than guilty.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:11 AM
8

Yeah, I'm totally with you on this. I don't think a kid should go to adult prison for life but I also think he shouldn't just get out of juvie at 21.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:39 PM
4

I didn't downvote you. Other people did. "legally speaking" & "legal protections" implied that rape victims have some sort of legal protection in the US. They don't.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:08 PM
3

Wrong. The UK doesn't have a First Amendment.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:47 PM
8

Me too. It's almost as if people don't know about the First Amendment.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:45 PM
14

Rape victims have no legal protection from being identified in US media. First Amendment protects the media.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:44 PM
2

Legally the paper can name her. The First Amendment protects them.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:42 PM
8

Like many articles on this subjct, no mention of the fact that a man (MLB pitcher Justin Verlander) also had his nude pics revealed.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:03 PM
7

It's a federal crime, so no parole. She maybe gets a quarter knocked off for good behavior.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:38 AM
1

What is a gang? If it's a group of people who break the law, why do we need a new law to arrest them? Just arrest them for the original offense and if it applies, use RICO. Why do need to go so far as to just make associating with certain people a crime?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:04 AM
3

Cities don't pass these laws to make money for anyone, they do it to try and make being homeless in their city as unpleasant as possible to live in with the hopes that homeless people will leave. If they were honest, they try enact a policy that made being homeless punishable by death. The goal would be the same.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:31 AM
0

It does provide some protection against men contracting STDs from women. It still isn't OK.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:04 AM
0

Perhaps if media organisations showed any semblance of tact or respect for victims then it wouldn't be necessary, Free speech means people don't have to have tact. We (Americans) allow Neo-Nazis and the Westboro Baptist Church to protest and they are horrible people. Freedom of speech has its downsides but it's definitely better than the alternative.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 12:42 AM
2

This money would be better spent on promoting condom use. Circumcision does protect men against getting STDs from women, but it's hardly bulletproof.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:16 PM
0

I hate it because it means that the criminal will remain anonymous. It should be up to the editorial board of each newsroom, not the government, to restrict speech.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:05 PM
1

Yeah, too bad we have the right to peaceably assemble. /s
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:03 PM
1

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/16tabledatadecpdf The rate of rape in the US is 26.7 per 100,000 people, or .0267%, much lower than in prison. And if you think people only get put in solitary for violent acts in prison, you're wrong. You can go to the SHU in California for "being in a gang." http://solitarywatch.com/facts/faq/
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:52 PM
2

I hate that this is a law. In the US, the press generally won't ID kids but that's their policy, not the law.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:38 PM
15

Why wouldn't she, it isn't like she faced any real consequences.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:35 PM
1

Looks like it's time for the Love Contract. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo4568PIRnk
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:40 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo4568PIRnk
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:40 PM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo4568PIRnk
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:39 PM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo4568PIRnk
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:38 PM
1

You aren't working with any conscripts now, I'm just saying women should be forced to sign up for Selective Service, just like men.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 12:50 PM
5

Forget war-related civilian work, there are plenty of jobs in the military aren't pulling triggers. For every man on the front lines, there are a dozen supporting him.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:47 PM
15

To quote every parent about peer pressure; "if he asked her to jump off a cliff, would she do it?"
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:45 PM
5

But they kicked him out and not her? Ugh.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:37 PM
11

Why didn't you tell the cops she started it?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:54 PM
1

In my opinion the text in a constitution should be timeless. It should enumerate values that will be true 100, 200 years in the future. If this was the case, slavery would still be legal.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:02 PM
-1

It's because you're still under the thumb of the British royal family.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:40 AM
4

You are correct. 13 was when she claimed the abuse started. My mistake.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:33 PM
3

He never should have taken a polygraph. They don't work and if he failed, he would never have shaken the stigma, no matter what the PI dug up.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:00 PM
5

Ideally, this would be automatic Then why isn't it? And I mean that regardless of the kind of accusation or who is involved. In the US, the DA is an elected position. It probably wouldn't look great to be prosecuting an 18 year old for something she said when she was 13. In the US, politics are always involved in the justice system.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:58 PM
1

Since it never went to trial the charge wouldn't be perjury (lying under oath) but more likely filing a false police report.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:57 PM
8

It's easy to say that when you aren't facing a life sentence.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:29 PM
2

It isn't her private life, she brought it up.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:15 PM
3

I was uneasy about the use of the word "targeted" as well, but I couldn't come up with a more neutral replacement. Any ideas?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:30 PM
2

According to the guy suing you mean. The other people who were allegedly fired haven't confirmed that.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:15 AM
8

Yeah, it's one guy complaining and stating his case. We're literally only hearing one side of the story.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:28 PM
3

The traditional appearance of the US military was that blacks were in segregated units an women were only nurses. Argument from tradition is a shitty argument.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:34 PM
18

Being sued isn't a criminal punishment. Also, it has a lower burden of proof. It's why OJ Simpson was acquitted of murder but found civically liable for those deaths.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:26 PM
11

Why not both?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:21 PM
9

Literally the first link in Google for "kbr rape victim" http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/kbr-could-win-jamie-leigh-jones-rape-trial
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:46 PM
1

I totally agree.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:45 PM
2

Wiretapping laws only apply to recorded audio, not video. That's why most security cams don't have mics.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:32 PM
6

I work in a middle school and we're "mandated reporters," legally obligated to report even suspicions of child abuse. Why aren't adults in colleges held to the same standard?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:29 PM
0

Good, they shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:27 PM
26

She wasn't raped.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:24 PM
15

You should have at least talked to a lawyer about a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:39 AM
9

Can someone tell me why people with zero legal training are adjudicating violent felonies? The schools should just let the police handle it.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:19 AM
2

Not by the victim.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:16 PM
14

This wasn't a case of false accusation, just plain old wrongful conviction.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:36 AM
31

It's why even old cases need to be reviewed. If this case happened today, these guys almost certainly wouldn't be convicted with an exclusionary DNA test.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:35 AM
11

DNA wasn't tested at the time because the samples were too minute to get a reading with the technology that existed at the time. The cop is the bad guy here. He has been disciplined many times and ignored other suspects in this case. Without a trial transcript, I can't tell you why they were convicted.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:33 AM
18

Read the article. The victim was blindfolded and couldn't ID her attackers.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:15 AM
2

No. Even if the US ratified it, it would only apply to the US federal government. It's why the global drug treaties don't affect cannabis legalization in Washington & Colorado.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:57 AM
2

No they can't. The phrase is "adding insult to injury" because they specifically AREN'T the same thing. Words are not actions and cannot physically hurt someone.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:48 AM
4

Based on this thread, there was sufficient evidence to prove that she did worse. What, a 14 year old bragging to his friends?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:17 AM
5

Ok wait. Oral sex on a 14 year old is rape. What's this other crap? And why didn't she get 30 years like every other man in the same situation? Yeah it is. She wasn't convicted of oral sex on a 14 year old, she was convicted of touching a 14 year old's genitals.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:52 AM
8

As far as sentencing is concerned it is.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:48 AM
6

? I know what plea bargaining is.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:38 AM
17

The jury believed her & not him.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:51 PM
17

She plead to touching, not oral sex.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:51 PM
2

I'm aware that Zimmerman had to post a $1 million bail. She was released on her own recognizance. That means no money. If she made bail, I wouldn't have as big of a problem as I do now.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:13 AM
2

The original article's first sentence: A federal judge has ordered a Montana newlywed to be released from jail on her own recognizance. . .
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:47 PM
6

I think anyone charged with murder has a non-zero flight risk and not demanding bail is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:55 PM
11

Zimmerman had bail set at $1 million. If this woman had made bail, fine, but released on recognizance on a federal murder charge? Stupid.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:47 PM
2

Is this radio station broadcasting from 1953?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:24 PM
142

Released on her own recognizance on a murder charge? What the hell was that judge thinking?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:17 PM
1

It's crazy that the "victim" still has anonymity, even if the accused is found not guilty.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:55 AM
1

Him being found civilly liable for their deaths didn't help.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:47 AM
2

Sucks not having an 8th Amendment.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:45 AM
23

A quota enforces biases. It reserves slots for people who don't qualify based on merit.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:33 PM
1

Well yeah, if you get caught.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:30 AM
1

He figured it was better to tell you privately and then let you tell your husband on your own. Personally, that's what I'd want. He didn't (and shouldn't) presume.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:36 PM
1

Bayesian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:19 PM
5

Yeah, he didn't mention the nature of the accident, but if someone rear-ended someone else, the person in the back is almost always at fault.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:13 PM
4

He should pull a "Not Without My Daughter" and go to Japan & take his son back.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:18 PM
3

Get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:27 AM
17

Can judges be fired in the UK?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:44 PM
-5

Stalin & Roosevelt fought against Hitler. You know that right?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:09 PM
1

That's crazy to me. In California, you don't get a jury trial for infractions, like speeding tickets but even the weakest misdemeanor & you're entitled to it.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:48 PM
1

No doubt.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:48 PM
-10

For the record, the idea that adults should give game balls to kids is BS. I've been to dozens of games in my decade of going to games and have nothing. If I get a ball, it's mine.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:22 AM
2

Sounds sort of like Social Security in the US.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:53 AM
2

This idiot should have lawyered up. Don't talk to the police.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:24 PM
1

He should have kept his mouth shut and demanded a lawyer. They told him he was accused of sex crimes, that should be all he needed to hear before lawyering up.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:03 PM
2

If he got to West Point without learning that he needed a lawyer, that speaks to the poor educational system in this country.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:02 PM
3

I would feel much better for everyone involved if these things were done through the normal police. You don't let campus cops investigate murders or shootings, why should they investigate rapes?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:54 PM
0

Acting suspiciously how? By being black in the wrong neighborhood.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:00 AM
-1

Didn't know about the judge's history. I just know that in general, DAs face even less accountability than police officers.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:43 AM
0

I agree with all of that. That being said, what is wrong with women saying what happened to Martin was unjust?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 12:44 AM
-1

Men make up the vast majority of murder victims in this country. I'm not demonstrating anything.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:04 PM
-1

I don't understand your point. Martin was profiled because he was a young black man.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:46 PM
-5

To be fair, male prosecutors get away with misconduct as well. The whole system is corrupt, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:40 PM
0

Don't forget having the wrong skin color.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:37 PM
-1

That isn't what all the news is saying.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:11 PM
-1

Source?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:02 AM
-6

Just because he beat the charge doesn't mean he'll beat the suit. Just ask OJ Simpson.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:55 AM
-1

Immune as in he can't even be sued or immune as in he'll have to prove it again in court?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:51 AM
-13

He'll need the money to pay after Trayvon Martin's parents sue him.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:46 PM
7

Most of the ones I've been in do, if not for false rape accusations, for evidence in robberies.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:48 PM
1

You don't need all eleven to hang a jury.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:56 AM
3

I'd rather get maced than shot.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:58 PM
7

You know in some states, people can carry guns without any training.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:31 AM
3

It's very difficult to jail someone for possessing objectionable material. Plenty of people, especially during the Bush administration tried, but bans of cartoon depictions of child pornography often run into First Amendment problems.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:10 PM
-3

That's what happens when you don't have a First Amendment. GO USA!
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:33 AM
6

I agree but those situations are, in my opinion, too rare to justify the existence of a system of capital punishment.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:12 AM
8

Putting a .50 cal in the head of an innocent person. The Innocence Project has already freed people from death row. Eliminate appeals and the chance of an innocent person being executed skyrockets.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:59 AM
1

Executing murders isn't a deterrent, catching them is. You've got roughly a 50-50 chance of getting away with murder in the US. Changing that would be a better deterrent.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:57 AM
1

Yeah, there was a case on the First 48 where a guy was the victim of an attempted murder but he shot the two guys first. The shooter was cleared for the killings as self-defense but was still arrested for a felon in possession of a weapon.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:23 AM
1

Yogi Berra?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:43 AM
6

Totally agree. I don't want abusive assholes owning guns, but unless they've been convicted of being an abusive asshole, the state shouldn't do anything.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:29 AM
7

I know they waive their right to a speedy trial, why shouldn't they be allowed to waive their right to a public trial?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:53 PM
35

Public trials are for the defendant's protection. She/he should be allowed to waive that right just like they can waive their right to a speedy trial.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:24 PM
1

In the US, they most certainly can. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of_transsexualism_in_the_United_States#Discrimination
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:22 PM
0

I bet you all think Jonathan Swift wanted to eat babies too.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:22 AM
3

The criteria for marriage also used to be white+white or black+black.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:42 AM
1

I'm totally against capital punishment but this women deserves life without parole, from what I've read.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:18 AM
2

If I have time, I like to see multiple movies in a day at the theater. I saw I Love You Man After seeing He's Just Not That Into You. It was so clear that I Love You Man was a romantic comedy if the main characters were two straight guys and they became friends instead of getting married.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:58 AM
2

My favorite scene, even though I saw the punchline a mile away, is when Paul Rudd's character plays Rush on his laptop for his fiance.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:52 AM
1

I agree, but the argument that the draft violates the 13th Amendment was shot down in the Selective Draft Cases during WWI.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:15 PM
-4

Too bad SCOTUS disagrees.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:06 PM
19

Who cares? If they're both consenting, it's no one else's business.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:54 AM
1

Yes. You could be facing a felony. You need a criminal defense lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:41 AM
1

If there is a draft, we won't be getting the best, we'll be getting anyone we can.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:03 AM
49

For everyone who says it's not a big deal because there isn't a draft, I say "then if it isn't a big deal, force women to sign up too."
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:43 AM
4

Do you know how expensive it is for the taxpayer for a kid to go through public school?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:30 PM
2

Not Canada. Go somewhere that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:45 AM
22

The mothers aren't demanding support, the state is.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:20 AM
-1

There's no such thing as a non-physical sport. That being said, I think gendered chess leagues are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:26 AM
1

I didn't say she didn't get a slap on the wrist. Just pouting out se didn't get convicted of murder.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:58 PM
2

She plead to reckless manslaughter.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:01 AM
3

That's former Doctor Andrew Wakefield; he lost his license.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:49 AM
5

What, like we're robots who are faking it?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:22 AM
3

How is me burning a flag a threat to someone else?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:45 AM
5

The government shouldn't be in the business of telling people the appropriate way to protest.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:51 PM
6

I would burn a flag or a Bible specifically for the connotations, as a protest against the US government or against Christianity.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:46 PM
7

What do you mean by "unnecessary"? Weasel words like that sound like ways for governments to ban unpopular opinions.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:06 PM
10

Banning such acts would be even worse. Sacrilege doesn't override freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:41 PM
4

Oh yeah, that's wrong. Stopping people from speaking or interrupting people speaking is definitely against the concept of freedom of speech. Also, there's nothing wrong with burning bibles as long as the burner owns them.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:31 PM
3

Protesting a speaking event isn't violating freedom of speech. Making it illegal to say certain things (Holocaust denialism for example) is a violation of freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:22 PM
1

Let him sit there. Unless he has PC, he ain't coming in.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:52 PM
1

In either one of these scenarios the man is getting taken in. If he didn't open the door, he wouldn't be. Shouldn't have talked to the police.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:36 PM
1

The chances of this happening are much less than your chance of saying something dumb. You're always better off saying nothing without a lawyer present.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:03 PM
3

It does if she uses a foreign object. But yeah, it still doesn't cover forced vaginal intercourse.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:56 PM
1

Not anymore. They changed it at the beginning of the year. http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/attorney-general-eric-holder-announces-revisions-to-the-uniform-crime-reports-definition-of-rape
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:33 PM
1

Not necessarily. It might be beneficial to talk to the police but you should never make that determination, your lawyer should.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:31 PM
3

How can not talking be damaging? Also, the point of not talking is to avoid arrest, not avoid a conviction.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:43 PM
2

By the time they arrest you and read you your rights, it's too late. They already have enough evidence (or so they think). If a cop walks up to me and says "what's up?" and I respond "I want a lawyer", the problem is there's a cop in my business.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:53 PM
3

You're not wrong. Sucks to live in a country without a written constitution. Still though, talk to a lawyer first. They may advise you to make a statement, but only if it's in your best interest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Public_Order_Act_1994
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:17 AM
19

Never talk to police without a lawyer. It's sad that people need to be told this, but we have the 5th Amendment for a reason.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:15 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:08 PM
2

Penn Jillette is a well-know atheist and skeptic but he is hardly left wing.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:17 AM
2

Yeah, a dollar sign would have cleared that right up.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:03 AM
3

Why not give baby girls double mastectomies so they don't get breast cancer when their older?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:01 AM
5

He was jerk but she was a bigger jerk.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:11 AM
1

They're students, not inmates. Her abuse of power is why she should be fired but I still don't think that's reason enough to jail her.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:10 PM
3

She says they were and since she wasn't charged with statutory rape, I'm inclined to believe her.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:54 AM
12

Which is why she should be fired. I still don't think she should go to jail.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:06 AM
1

Lineups aren't even double blind. Until they are, they are absolutely useless.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:00 PM
23

5 years for having sex with consenting adults? That's just wrong. Don't let her teach, but don't put her in prison.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:55 PM
6

This is why you never talk to police. Ever.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:11 AM
2

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:50 AM
0

Kentucky & Missouri both had representatives in the CSA congress.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:17 PM
1

I thought the timeline of him being a huge star was off.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:21 PM
0

Only 6 weren't part of the CSA and of those 6, most weren't states at the time.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:12 PM
-1

It's state-sanctioned child abuse and a violation of the 8th Amendment.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:52 PM
-2

Thanks Confederate States!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:51 PM
2

This video is cut so badly I have no idea what's being said in response to what.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:48 AM
1

Not to mention the use of polygraphs which don't prove anything.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:23 AM
1

These are jokes, not bullying.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:54 PM
2

How are people going to survive in the real world if their skin is that thin?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:41 PM
0

Plenty of men you mean. And if they'll be filled with volunteers, why should men be drafted then? A draft means there aren't enough people volunteering.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:06 AM
6

So why can't women be drafted into non-combat jobs? There are plenty of them out there.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:43 AM
2

Yup. Or a finger.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:02 AM
2

Not one made of flesh.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:15 AM
0

A woman can penetrate a man.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:40 AM
1

83 is long lived for right now.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:24 PM
3

Mountain Dew flavored mints?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:23 PM
1

Just glad there's no palimony in California.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:08 PM
1

The school is gonna be really sorry when the parents sue.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:10 PM
1

RAS Syndrome strikes again!
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:22 AM
2

That's what Japanese-Americans said on Dec 6, 1941.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:55 AM
6

That's why I'd talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 04:09 AM
1

A search is protected by the 4th Amendment, not 5th.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:55 PM
1

I'm glad that no government has ever put people in camps based on anything in their DNA. /s
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:54 PM
16

Prenup? Seriously, talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:08 PM
1

Sounds like teachers in Japan get the treatment that cops in the US get.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:21 AM
2

Of course not, but your post implied it wasn't considered at all, which could not be further from the truth. If you had put "not SOLEY based on the seriousness of the crime," I'd be fine.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:03 AM
2

Seriousness of the crime is absolutely a factor. Why do you think bail for murder cases is so high?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:28 AM
2

This idea that the rape victim is victimized a second time when the guy is released for not doing it is fucking insane. Even if that is being victimized twice, he was victimized everyday for over 20 years.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:46 PM
2

Yeah, why should the police apologize to you, they're busy apologizing to the family of the wrongfully convicted.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:44 PM
6

As a commenter on the original site said, of course it's worth it to her, she'll never face a false rape charge.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:18 AM
1

Technically, it's only a civil wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:51 AM
1

I wouldn't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:46 AM
39

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:49 AM
5

Am I the only one who thinks Katy Perry is dumb for not having a prenup?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 04:18 AM
-1

You should have sang the Rolling Stones song "Beast of Burden" for her.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 10:42 PM
2

Sounds like No True Scotsman to me.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 10:46 PM
5

I'm just glad bail was high.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 11:49 AM
1

Lawyers generally get a third to half.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:43 PM
1

The things I do for love.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 04:07 AM
1

Someone ought to have a White Night, where white people get discounted drinks.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 04:25 AM
1

What. A. Cunt.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 10:21 PM
1

Should a place be allowed to charge black people more?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 02:02 AM
1

A rule of shooting, any shooting, is to know what you are aiming at.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 10:17 PM
6

Dean Harshbarger questioned the reasoning of the judge, and warned it could lead to reduced hunting safety. "The judge is now saying that anybody in the woods is fair game for any hunter," he said. "If you see movement, you can shoot at it and then say, 'whoops, I made a mistake, I shot at a black mass.' It doesn't matter any more." This is the part that scares me. Same with the Diallo shooting in NYC. A cop can apparently shoot anyone and say they were going for a gun. If he/she doesn't have a …
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:56 PM
8

He's a cop who abused his authority. He deserves to be fired, at the least.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 02:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter