TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheLonesomeCheese Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by TheLonesomeCheese on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I originally said that Autistic women's traits are more accepted, and your response was "no they aren't, they're just sexualized". So it kind of feels to me that you were making that argument. Ah yes, here's the old classic of breaking down any conversation about dating into thinking that I just want to "fuck people". That's a familiar attempt to shut down the discussion of any guy who admits to having struggled with dating. Yes, I think relationships and intimacy in all forms are a valuable par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 06:53 PM
1

I'm still not sure that I understand your argument. Are you saying that Autistic women are only sexualized as a fetish and are never desired in any positive context? Because I don't believe that at all. I would say that many Autistic men would prefer to be in relationships with Autistic women who they can better relate to, have more in common with and can understand each other's quirks. But in my experience the reverse is less often true, Autistic women often prefer to date more socially compete…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 08:06 AM
1

I don't buy your "sexually attractive child" argument which suggests that people are only attracted to Autistic women for nefarious, predatory reasons. Having traits that are seen as desirable does not mean that they are purely a fetish. Also I have to be open here, I'm an Autistic man who has never even had a first kiss because my social difficulties mean that meeting people and potentially dating has always been difficult for me, and in my experience women are simply not attracted to shyness, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 02:14 PM
1

I would argue that this is still a form of acceptance, at least it shows that those traits are seen as desirable in some context. I genuinely cannot think of any traits of Autistic men that are sexualized or fetishized in any equivalent way. Infantilization, yeah Autistic men get that too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 12:27 PM
77

Yeah, I've always felt that it was exactly the opposite of coddled. Autistic women's social quirks are simply more accepted, while society is less tolerant towards men who struggle and don't fit societal expectations of what a man should be. Then because Autistic women are have more social opportunities, they get more of a chance to improve their social skills, compared to Autistic men who are more often viewed and treated differently from a young age. In my experience, pretty much every Autisti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 03:20 PM
2

Yes, I know it's a controversial statement to even suggest that social hierarchies and alphas exist in any context. If you knew what I was saying then you could have just given your opinion on the topic too, but you didn't. As I said in my previous comment I AM NOT NOR DO I ASPIRE TO BE AN ALPHA MALE. But I still believe that those dynamics can exist in society. I have however reported your comment for calling me a weirdo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 05:41 PM
1

I wasn't trying that hard to be ambiguous. But well done for reading me, congratulations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 05:28 PM
2

I actually don't think your comment was clear. You were criticising anybody who makes conclusions about human behaviour from observing animals, which is exactly what OP here was also doing. But yes, I do believe that social hierarchies and alphas exist in humans, I don't know why that has to be such a controversial statement. For the record, I am not a wannabe alpha male myself, I am very much the opposite of that trope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 05:12 PM
2

Well your comment was pretty vague too. But what do you think I'm saying, because I'm sure you're implying something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 04:01 PM
7

Just as it's ridiculous that people created an "alpha wolf" concept based solely on one study, I also find it equally ridiculous that many have gone hard the other way and are now claiming that because that study was debunked, that it means that alpha males don't exist in any context. Neither side is that simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 03:21 PM
40

Yeah, ultimately it's just an extension of the idea that male sexual desires are inherently predatory and dangerous, while female sexual desires are seen as pure and harmless. We see that attitude show up in basically any conversation about dating and sexuality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 01:18 PM
206

Are teenage boys these days really more misogynistic than previous generations, or is it all hysterical scaremongering? The way this gets talked about, you'd think that they were all rabid woman-haters, instead of just normal kids. I am glad that I grew up before all of this panic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 12:26 PM
40

At this rate, we're likely to end up with a right wing government again at the next election. Then as happened with the recent US election, I expect that there will be plenty of talk about how men voted right because they are nasty incels who want to oppress women, with no consideration of the fact that left wing parties have alienated men once again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 06:04 PM
98

This is the funny thing, by suggesting that women need protection during debates with men implies that they are weak and incapable of standing up for themselves, which is ironically misogynistic. We've gone full circle here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 04:00 PM
47

I'm aware of Adolescence though I never actually saw it. But it was based on a totally fictional scenario with events that as far as I am aware have never actually happened in the UK in the way they were shown. Incel/manosphere motivated killings are extremely rare anyway, but everybody acted as if it was a documentary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 03:56 PM
68

What's with the current obsession with anti-misogyny at the moment? I just can't understand it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 03:38 PM
26

Yeah, whenever any man is offended by such comments, the response is to either view this as an admission of guilt and claim that he's part of the problem (we saw this a lot during the "we choose the bear" debate) or to say that he's just insecure and he needs to man up and stop caring.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 06:07 PM
75

As expected, top comment in that thread is saying it's obviously a joke. Meanwhile if a male celebrity were to say something even remotely similar to this, the reaction would be entirely negative, he would immediately forced to apologise, and might even be at risk of being cancelled. But openly hating men is totally fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 04:29 PM
158

Whenever a man expresses insecurity about his height, looks, dick size or whatever, he will be told that those things don't matter and he should basically just stop whining. Then people are perfectly happy to mock men with those exact same traits, when it's someone they dislike.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 06:10 PM
36

I'm sure that a similar study could be done to prove that misogyny doesn't exist, imagine the reaction if that were to be published.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 09:02 AM
4

I'm sorry but I can't find it in myself to have much sympathy for women who are supposedly forced into being single and lonely when they still have more sexual and romantic options than the vast majority of men could ever dream to have. Sure some might be shamed for their choices, but men who are unable to attract women are shamed too, despite having no choices at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 05:33 PM
5

But that means that they have a choice, while men don't. It's still not the same on any level.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 03:56 PM
7

Women are more content being single and sexless because they can have relationships and sex with very little effort if they wanted to. But for most men those things are far more difficult to obtain. Just look at the difference between men and women's experiences on dating apps for example. In no way does this affect both genders equally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 03:47 PM
25

I don't think it's just that. From what I can see, the mainstream opinion towards male loneliness is one of blaming lonely men. The two sides are nowhere near comparable in their social impact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 10:44 AM
20

Did he actually say "women aren't responsible but we all need to come together to solve this" though? I haven't seen the podcast so this is a genuine question. But I have very low expectations for this kind of thing anyway. He might say some things that sound vaguely good and he might have a few ideas for change, but will things actually change for men who are truly struggling? I doubt it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 10:02 AM
45

Feminist media (and many men subscribe to these views too) also fully blames men for male loneliness, with common arguments like "men just need to learn not to be misogynists" or "men just need to work harder" or similar sentiments that just shame and vilify men who are struggling. In fact I've seen a lot more content blaming men than blaming women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 09:56 AM
31

Addressing systemic causes (that he highlights) requires BOTH men and women working towards progress. Like any other systemic change. I agree, but from this quote alone he doesn't exactly seem to be saying that. I mean, he mentions twice that women aren't responsible for solving it, still sounds like he's viewing this issue purely from a feminist perspective if you ask me. Sure, it it's still better than a lot of the classic responses that just vilify lonely men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 09:35 AM
66

Solving wider societal issues will involve the cooperation of women too, the way this is phrased seems like another "men should solve their own issues because they have all the power" argument. Also there are plenty of men who struggle with dating and relationships and it's totally natural for men to desire those things, it constantly frustrates me that this is always dismissed in the topic of loneliness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 09:08 AM
7

I recall also seeing studies showing that men are more likely to develop attraction towards their female friends while women rarely do towards their male friends. Ever notice that most cases of someone being "friendzoned" seem to involve the guy being rejected and not the other way around?
/r/BlackPillScience24/04/25 10:05 AM
1

I mean, as someone who is still a virgin in his early 20s, I do think people can underestimate the ways in which losing/not losing your virginity at an early age can affect how you view sex/relationships in adult life. However, this certainly isn't a steadfast rule as things are more complex than that.
/r/seduction19/06/16 07:02 PM
1

Don't.
/r/seduction11/06/16 10:49 AM
27

Maybe because you're shallow?
/r/seduction30/04/16 12:07 PM
2

I don't actually believe that women are bitches or anything like that. To me your comment came across as pessimistic and counterproductive. Maybe I misinterpreted you, but that was the feeling I got.
/r/seduction09/06/15 05:06 PM
2

Yeah, I get that nobody is perfect and everybody has their problems, I just don't feel that phrasing it the way you did makes a very encouraging message.
/r/seduction09/06/15 04:58 PM
13

How is this helpful? It's basically saying "I shouldn't bother talking to her because she's probably a bitch anyway".
/r/seduction09/06/15 04:45 PM
22

So we all have that friend or two that goes out of his way to assert his dominance by emasculating you. No we don't, stop being friends with this person.
/r/seduction26/12/14 05:15 PM
5

No, there isn't one, you can't magically make a girl attracted to you.
/r/seduction21/12/14 12:51 PM
3

Well sure, they aren't dressed in the most attractive way, but I see nothing unattractive about that style either. Maybe I'm not qualified to say as I'm not a woman, but I feel that saying the only difference between the images is the guy's outfits is rather a simplification.
/r/seduction11/12/14 09:38 PM
6

I see nothing wrong with the outfits of the guys in the first picture, I think the main difference is that the guys in the later pictures are just more physically attractive.
/r/seduction11/12/14 09:25 PM
3

Yeah but my point is that things are rarely that clear cut. You can be confident and not be those things or you can be those things and not be confident.
/r/seduction28/11/14 07:38 PM
-1

All of it is bullshit. I'm most of the things that confident people supposedly are and I'm still not confident.
/r/seduction28/11/14 05:23 PM
4

I'd guess that your lack of experience would show and they would soon realise even if you didn't tell them. You don't have to tell people on the first date or anything, but if looks like things might be getting intimate, then it might be worth telling them.
/r/seduction19/10/14 04:46 PM
6

Are virgins really that desired? Surely if they were they wouldn't be virgins... Also, yeah many guys fantasise about porn stars, but how many would really want to date one?
/r/seduction13/10/14 08:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter