TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheMackFather Archive

View 1 post and 56 comments by TheMackFather on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

CMVTheMackFather/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'll say to you like I said to another person in this thread who said the same nonsense. Show me where I said that. You base pointless arguments like that that are nothing more than assumptions and straw man fallacies. And for what reason? I don't agree with that at all and to say I do is nothing more than a fallacy to make your point seem more favorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 02:45 AM
1

If you had a child and someone came to you and said "You either kill me or I kill your child right now." You're saying some people wouldn't kill that person and would rather their own child die? What if all the world leaders came to you with me in the backseat of a car and said "If you don't kill this man, we're nuking the whole world and everyone dies." You're saying some people wouldn't kill me? Although these are all ridiculous and extremely out-there, they are legitimate possible circumstanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 12:59 AM
1

Where in here did I say that was okay? That's such an tired assumption and to say it here like it has any relevance is just pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 12:55 AM
1

Killing and murder both coincide. They both, by definition, involve deliberation. To say otherwise just for the sake of defending your point is a bit farfetched. Either way, circumstances can seem a person willing to kill or murder. And that is something you're not getting. Try being more empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 12:21 AM
1

Well when a lot of RPers come on here making AWALT seem just as that, people can only assume that it is what most have made it out to be. I will admit when I'm wrong and say that I was not educated of the core concept of it but I was more or less making the post about the radical view of AWALT, like a lot of RPers actually believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 09:23 PM
1

Self defense? To protect to life of another? Yeah, most who wouldn't otherwise kill would in those sorts of situations. You're not being empathetic right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 09:20 PM
1

Look at this entire thread and ask yourself if you think I would get a straight up answer to an interpretation of AWALT. EDIT: I also don't see the unrelated math part but okay. Keep throwing ambiguous statements out there like anyone is going to understand you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:56 PM
1

What are you even implying?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:53 PM
1

Lol, you're kidding right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:43 PM
1

Feminism wants equality for women and overall between both men and women. If the mom is being abusive toward her son and loving towards her daughter, she is not a true feminist. Plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:39 PM
3

Or just that guy in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:36 PM
1

Just like under certain circumstances, anyone could be a murderer. But that doesn't mean I'm going to get up and stab the next person I see, killing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 08:10 PM
1

I honestly wish you said all of that right off of the bat instead of being ambiguous about it. You no longer have to argue for this though as someone already beautifully explained it and others more or less proved my point about multiple interpretations of AWALT on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:42 PM
1

I've already covered the lying part of RP in terms on this in my description and he's just proving my point even more saying things like "They'd have to show me." It literally just furthers my point of delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:38 PM
1

Instead of providing countless "equivalents", you should just explain it in a nice an simple way so it's easier for someone like me who didn't understand it to grasp. Also, you should look up the definition of analogy. That is an analogy by definition however you want to look at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:25 PM
1

You were comparing gambling with AWALT to explain your point. That's an analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:14 PM
1

/u/DaThrowaway808 This enough credibility for ya?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:08 PM
1

Like I said, it didn't directly apply but thank you to proving my point that others have a literal interpretation of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:01 PM
2

I think you are that first and only person on this post to actually say something that makes sense about it. Thank you for this. Instead of just saying I'm wrong and ignorant, you actually went and beautifully explained it. This is something I actually understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 06:57 PM
1

Lol, I ask you all to define it for me because I can't find one solid definition for it since so many of you have different opinions of it. But since you'd rather be antagonistic instead of helping me understand you, I think this conversation is done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 06:35 PM
1

Lol, there are bots for everything on Reddit. This is beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 06:30 PM
1

Did you ever come to ask yourself why people feel this way and post these things? Possibly because they've seen it through others? And not brought in out of thin air? Have you actually come to ask why people post these things again and again constantly? Perhaps TRP needs to clarify on a few subjects then because these opinions stem directly from the opinions of others. I really don't understand how condescending anyone is really going to change their opinion on anything. If anything, it just mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 06:25 PM
2

Another poor analogy unfortunately. The house always wins because the odds are always in favor of the house with Casino games, regardless if the player wins. I don't think you and every other supporter of it understand how derogatory it is. I understand a lot mean well from this and some don't obviously but it's derogatory nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 06:21 PM
2

I honestly don't know how you can argue a women's variance is smaller than that. You basically say women are much more alike than men are in terms of the mind. When honestly, they're both the same in terms of variance. I've seen smoking hot girls who are into really big fat guys and just the opposite. You cannot say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:38 PM
2

Anything can be reduced down to a number. I'm not saying women are straight numbers and I'm sorry you interpreted it that way. I was using a law in probability to strike down AWALT. I know you aren't just numbers obviously. Just like I know all women aren't one sole thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:35 PM
3

But this bad partner could have, in retrospect, the same sort of traits as a really good partner. But because AWALT, we decided to go for them because they fell into the generalization we were looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:29 PM
2

Then correct it for me. EDIT: Wow, that was actually just an example I was using. It didn't directly apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:24 PM
3

The large majority of RPers I've debated with on this sub is more what I meant. So if you want to be one of those guys are ask for links to said "big majority" which I can't provide, then I'm sorry but this cannot go any further. Speaking of, you said "highly doubt" which also means you are unsure and more or less defensive about it. I based my interpretation of AWALT from those I've seen use it on here debating so I'm sorry if I got an improper interpretation from a lot of the RPers commenting …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:23 PM
6

If she didn't have to suppress her tendencies(because she didn't have them instinctually) then she'd be a unicorn. So what if they do say that they don't have a tendency to do something considered AWALT? You've already convinced that they're lying and merely suppressing it, just like what I said. You put absolutely zero trust in the woman's opinion and nullify anything they say after that and mark it as "suppression."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:15 PM
2

In no way did I say it was?????
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:05 PM
3

I feel like that was a bad analogy because driving has to do with the safety of my life. Generalizing a people as a whole for reasons only beneficial to my sex/relationship life and taking extra precautions for possible drunk drivers and others to insure I make it somewhere alive are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:03 PM
4

Abeit I can agree with you and say that maybe I'm not as educated on it as I should be, in my defense a big majority of redpillers believe AWALT to be a literal interpretation. Regardless, generalizations and following them don't do much justice for the reason being if you actually come across someone who is not like the generalization itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:51 PM
4

Why is it called AWALT if its different from the actual meaning? There are actual redpillers who believe this to be 100% factual and they frequent the sub, not me. So honestly, theres a mix between people saying this is completely true and people like yourself saying that I don't fully understand AWALT who know what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:40 PM
5

Yeah and generalization, as we all know, never prove to be true for the whole majority because there is always that one outlier. So to narrow my confusion down, why is it called "ALL" Women Are Like That if in the back of our minds we know it to be not true and ALL women are not like that? It's misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:36 PM
4

Give me an example of AWALT that you believe to be true then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:29 PM
2

Mayyyyyyybeeee they're just not interested in you physically thus rendering what you do as uninteresting. I've seen some guys talk about some of the most boring topics and things they're passionate about but because women were already interested in them to begin with, it made what he was talking about that much more interesting. EDIT: Stemming from that, I've seen cringeworthy guys who THINK the girl is interested when they're obviously not, so they go off on a tangent about what they like and i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 03:48 PM
1

I understand that given the circumstance, anyone will murder someone especially for the safety for themselves or someone else. But unless someone is being forced to do it, I don't understand how anyone could be a rapist. Unless of course, that is how you are looking at it such as upbringing, circumstances, mentality, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 12:09 AM
5

Not true in the slightest
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 03:44 AM
1

Omfg, I never said you did it. You're justifying it which obviously means you support it. There's no getting through to you, is there?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 05:11 PM
4

So you justify shitty behavior with even more shitty behavior? The ol classic radical red pill "some women do wrong things so that makes the wrong things I do okay" logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 08:03 AM
2

Albeit a fallacy, you can't possibly think the majority of women are like that without you HAVING to have some sort of biased about it. It's just not a sane thought. It's delusional. I'm sorry, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 08:00 AM
2

r/theredpill That is all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 11:43 PM
1

I'd definitely date Devito over Hemworth. Devito is funny as fuck, kind of charming, and not so attractive to where I'd have to worry about others hitting on him as much as other guys. Definitely seems like somebody I could settle down with. It's not ALL about looks. And this is exactly how some girls view some guys over other more attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 09:19 PM
1

So YOUR rebuttal is to say that all women that say they prefer Devito over Hemworth are lying? 3/10 Classic RP "They're lying to you" claim. Statistically speaking, it's impossible. Stats and surveys basically prove OPs broad claim to be true, and to automatically assume that some of them are lying just furthers RP negative ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 09:13 PM
1

I'm talking about the link you gave. They described Chad as a guy who was too busy with the things in his life to care for a relationship, unless your "RV" is high enough. That and they only care about sex. It literally is a huge broad generalization on what Chad is. In fact, they literally said "Chad is a guy who will have sex with you but not commit." A relatively unattractive guy can fall under that category and that's not really what Chad is. Honestly, it's not even as deep as that. But then…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 06:25 PM
1

Well with that logic and the logic of that thread, Chad could just very well be an unattractive man which is the complete opposite of a Chad. There are requirements for what would be considered a Chad and, although you're right to a degree, it's not just the fact that he's Chad because he won't have sex with you due to your "RV".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 02:41 PM
3

As soon as you claim all women are like anything, it immediately becomes a biased opinion because, even statistically speaking, there is no way all women are like any one single thing unless it pertains to human biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 06:08 PM
10

You're literally not helping anything but proving OP's point even more. Those are all heavily biased opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 01:00 PM
10

He's kiiiinda just proving your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 12:57 PM
2

Shit, my bad man. If you wanna PM me and talk or something, feel free to. /:
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 08:55 PM
2

Or just logical human being who doesn't go by assumptions. What you said was ignorant my man
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 07:36 PM
2

Excellent assumption. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 01:38 PM
1

You could always suck on those hard ons until they go away. =) What are you doing here besides insulting and making yourself look ridiculous? Or they do understand and thats why they use them. Lol. Obviously not if they're claiming generalizations are straight up facts when, in reality, they're not. They're opinions. *Illegal immigrants. Since 2013, the current administration released 86,288 criminal aliens who committed 231,074 crimes, including rape, murder. That's just the fraction of crimina…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 01:25 PM
5

What a great generalization! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/16 05:42 PM
1

Probably the best answer I've seen on this sub so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/16 06:48 PM
0

I know I'm "only here for the lulz." I'm not gonna pick a side. Instead, I'm just going to say I stand for the more logical and reasonable side of things and let everyone else do the assuming there. I'm just here because I know (and seen) neither side is going to change any sort of views, regardless of the many links given and facts stated and I think it's just hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 06:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter