TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheMidnightMatinee Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by TheMidnightMatinee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I said you're a fucking idiot, who can't figure out why men don't want to fuck everyone they can. There are 12 year olds on a higher intellectual plane than you. Edit: Even if you're a troll, you're only imitating an idiot, without much imagination. You just pour a lot of work into doing what comes naturally for others.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:14 AM
5

I'm a silverback sex machine, and I have every crotch disease known to man. I can't remember when I saw my kids last, but I pay out the ass to raise them. ROAR! I'm the alpha male! Just wait until you see the final product! I can't wait to get raped - it's why I'm wearing enough Axe body spray to count as a war crime. Also, I trust rapists not to hurt me in any other way - my entire life is based on that trust. They just want to give you mindblowing sex, right? You're incredibly sheltered, littl…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:58 AM
1

I won't argue she wasn't acting in his best interests. But - Things can get nasty even when kids keep to themselves. Sexual forms of bullying can always create another corpse. Also... You're objectively wrong. The legal system hasn't collectively decided anything... But most of it disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:45 AM
1

I already explained why I originally reacted the way I did, and why the issue required more thought than I'd assumed. If you still question my motives, I'm not sure what else I can say. Age of consent you'd prefer If you study the ages our minds physically mature, you'd know we're not really in control of ourselves until our twenties... Assuming no delays, serious handicaps, damaged impulse control... My ideal age of consent? Old enough to take classes, pass a test, get a license... But we're no…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:51 AM
1

Explain why teenagers are to be treated like a child? Also, I said brief flashing of partial nudity was more acceptable, compared to something that lasts much longer, can't be easily contained, and involves much younger partial nudity...why shouldn't I, if my goal is minimizing harm? The latter has much more risk. Flashing genitals isn't acceptable. Flashing partial nudity? More complicated. Anything could do those things But horny trolls looking at nipples do it more often.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:01 PM
1

Sure, but ignoring any sexuality attached to breasts, no more so than with a non-topless picture. In a world where that might affect her chances of being hired for a job, or could inspire stalking/harassment? Would you be as uncomfortable if she were clothed, or not? There's good reason to portray adolescent sexuality in media, and deal with the complexities. I'm just not convinced that stripping the scene of context, and arming a sexually inappropriate teenager with uninterrupted partial nudity…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:32 PM
1

I said that I would have questions about someone who only sold photos of topless, attractive, young teenagers. I also said that absent other motives for displaying the breasts, it's risky for a teenage girl to share her body with the entire world, which is what can happen with a photo. And I'm personally uncomfortable with a topless photo of a sexually aggressive/assertive teenager, which has way more going on than just her breasts. But I didn't completely rule out teenagers posing topless, nor …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:08 PM
1

How do you stretch banning any form of child modeling out of banning all child porn?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:37 PM
1

Can a child say "No", if an adult insists? It's not like Rule 34 cartoon/fan fic porn, where immortal characters frozen in time explore whatever desires sheltered internet trolls can come up with... We're talking about a true innocent, surrounded by people with complete power over them. I'm opposed to using children in porn, full stop. Adults can get seriously hurt through sexual intimacy. Anyone who introduces a child to those kinds of risk, that kind of pain, not to mention the fact that sex h…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:57 PM
1

There are degrees of sexualization. If things get too sexual, we're inviting the amygdala along for the ride, which is tied to fear/safety and aggression. Have you ever known the human race to handle any of that responsibly? Add in jealousy, partner auditioning/selection, and depression/violence, just for kicks. And obsession. Even primitive tribes without much in the way of nudity taboos will usually conceal aroused genitals in the public sphere. I'm more okay with exposure of secondary sexual …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:35 PM
1

It would be easier if you were more specific? I edited my analysis, before reading your response, including my fear that we're making victims where there aren't any before, in order to fuel a war against normal sexual behavior. Rather personal to me, because I was traumatized by exposed breasts for a long time, and it's not a state I'd recommend pursuing if you're interested in a healthy mind. I imagine, if you don't receive my edits, and only read the original, that might be cause for some of t…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:04 PM
1

A push is violence. So is shooting someone. We both agree the breasts are considered sexual. But I said that I care about whether any harm was done, and whether there's a double standard that could potentially cause harm to be done. And so should you. Let's go back to where we started, since we're starting over - There are two obvious double standards in the scene this thread discusses, and a range of more subtle ones running in the background. A. All teenage boys are assumed to want sex, all th…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:12 PM
1

We're talking about the difference between a photo, which is a moment frozen in time, and a moment. We're also talking about the difference between something happening with two people, and one potentially shared with millions. You need to get over those hurdles, before you rush to any further conclusions.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:25 AM
1

Not pornographic - partial nudity can invoke emotional vulnerability, or be a middle finger, only with more shock. Or both. Or something else entirely - is it worth trying to cover every possible use? This all works for both men and women, of all ages. There's a message sent, that is lost if you censor it. The American government has historically allowed such messages, because of free speech concerns. Is there a situation where you would consider it A-OK to sell a series of pictures if the girls…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:59 PM
1

With their informed consent, for reasons that aren't pornographic? It already happens. It's happening now. The question that needs asking, of course, is how you intend to go about it? If you're only selling photos of attractive topless teenage girls, I'd find it difficult to believe that you're not simply cashing in on sexualizing the subject, regardless of the intentions of the photographer and the model.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:02 PM
0

Depends on local nudity taboos, potential artistic and documentary modifiers vs. sexually provacative displays, plus informed consent. You're freezing a moment in time, and potentially turning the photo loose to millions. To pretend there's no serious risk attached is naive'. With that said, it's already been done, and the world survived. Now let me ask you a question - do you think it's morally okay to sell media with topless adult women in it to teenage boys? That was where I gave your questio…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:17 PM
0

You're ignoring the part where you read all kinds of things into my posts based on what you could reasonably get away with claiming I meant, rather than assuming good faith and a dose of common sense. ME ONLY NO LITERAL MEANINGS NOW Christ, you were a dick. I tried giving your question the full weight it deserved, and even asked for your exact opinion so I knew where you really stood. But you've made no effort to return the favor...
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:51 PM
0

Some of the worlds don't survive? Some of the kids. Do you really need to make a game out of this? Are you really that obsessed with winning an internet debate any way you can? if it's a crappy dividing line My dividing line has been based on "was anyone harmed?", "can either of the two people involved, be harmed by the double standards involved in the way we approach this?" and "what is in the best interests of both?" There are degrees of sexuality involved. There is a range of possible reactio…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:16 PM
0

Children are raped every day and the world survives. I don't think that's a very good dividing line to use. Actually, some of them don't survive. And you know exactly what I meant, if you bother to stop thinking like a broken DOS prompt. You really want to score those cheap internet points, don't you? The question we're asking is whether it's moral to intentionally put minors in sexual situations intended for the gratification of adults, Which covers a lot of things. For someone complaining abou…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:51 PM
0

And you're claiming that briefly flashing breasts, in a way that looks accidental, no less, is a serious problem, without any evidence of harm. You carefully use language that places it in the same context as a rape. How disgusting. You're not allowed to make eye rape jokes anymore. I was molested. I was raped. Fuck you. This is nothing compared to that. You deliberately ignore how many boys wish they were him, and how many wouldn't care, or would get over it in seconds. You would be happy to tr…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:25 PM
1

One of the worst conditions (which some mistake as seemingly harmless) is when the individual doesn't need to put any effort into experiencing that sexuality, since this removes their perceived need for any behavior prior to sexuality. You're creating a scenario where acting nice or working hard will create an expectation of reward... And it only creates an entitled bitterness, if you consider seeing someone's breasts as a rigid gameplay mechanic, rather than a shared experience with an individu…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:53 PM
-3

Depends on local nudity taboos, potential artistic and documentary modifiers vs. sexually provacative displays, plus informed consent. You're freezing a moment in time, and potentially turning the photo loose to millions. To pretend there's no serious risk attached is naive'. With that said, it's already been done, and the world survived. Now let me ask you a question - do you think it's morally okay to sell media with topless adult women in it to teenage boys?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 02:04 PM
1

Exposure of secondary sexual areas is not 'mild flirting' though. Of course it is. Consider how it's used in Mardis Gras, Burning Man, and Spring Break, among others. Not to mention movies deliberately targeting teenagers. It's a bit of harmless shock and awe, and few consider it meaning anything other than "Look, breasts!", no matter how many underage teenagers see it. How many times does it happen in one on one scenarios? Nobody knows, because nobody even cares to count. Women sexually exposin…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:40 PM
-5

As one of those boys who needed help learning to adjust to classroom expectations, I hope you understand that teaching me the discipline served me well, later in life. Learning to delay gratification and fight our instincts is vital in our current society. Not just for ourselves, but for others. I object to the way those lessons are currently taught, because it's often poorly done...not because I believe men are less capable. I refuse to let you patronize us.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:34 PM
-1

Not so fast. Not all sexualized nudity is created equal. You're steamrolling over the difference between a PG-13 and an NC-17. If she'd been actually naked, the way the title implied, she'd be possibly locked up. But she was only momentarily topless - the breasts and the buttocks are considered secondary sexual areas, and mild flirting with them is considered perfectly acceptable in Western culture, especially if you don't take it any further than offering a brief look to a teenager. A teenager …
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:22 PM
1

a two week study Okay. British celebrities What...? on Twitter Yeah, exhaustive. The article also lists women as getting it worse in every other measure, if you'd actually bothered to read it. Congratulations, you've proven you have no ethical integrity, and maintaining the quality of this subreddit is easy with the bar set so low.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:57 AM
-7

If the average girl can't do what an average boy can, you guys are against lowering standards. Reverse it, where a minority of boys can't keep up with the other kids, and you guys demand we change the system. Hypocrites much? Truth is, our current educational system is an outdated relic of Puritanical myths. Nintendo is doing a better job of educating children, even if they're not teaching them much of anything useful.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:35 AM
1

Whatever you say, boss.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:06 AM
1

Explain that to the cancer.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 10:50 AM
1

So there are no fat men where you live?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 10:40 AM
0

And this is what happens when you hang out here for too long, sharing conspiracy theories about the worst radical feminists you can find - your brain gets warped to the point where you think the above strawman actually represents a common point of view. Edit: In regards to the post below, how many women have been arrested for statutory rape, lately?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 10:09 AM
-5

A woman without a shirt on is legal in many American cities, and nobody has been harmed by a breast when it's feeding a baby. It can also be an artistic breast, or a National Geographic breast, both of which are seen in public schools. In Europe, it's even more common. Softcore pornography features extended scenes of full nudity, and actual sexual contact, with only the genitals excluded. Spot the difference?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:53 AM
-8

If some women consider touching their breasts a serious sex crime, then we need to treat all women briefly showing their breasts like a serious sex crime! This is how I, Sloggoth1890, and the MRM, are seriously fighting for men's rights. What she did is about the same as a man showing off a 6-pack... Burn the witch.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:33 AM
-3

The problem with teenage boys is clearly that most aren't terrified of boobs...yet. We can fix that!
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:29 AM
-11

Nobody explained how sex works to you, did they? Did you think putting your dick in her nipples is how you get the milk in there? Breasts aren't genitals. Watch me actually swap the roles around and turn the argument against you. A man without a shirt on and a teenage girl. Nobody gives a shit, who isn't sheltered as Hell. Edit: Gotta love the intellectual honesty around here. Downvote away. I wasn't aware this was just a reverse SRS circlejerk.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:24 AM
-9

You mean the bullshit where you're pretending her breasts are like exposed genitals in order to turn this into a serious sex cime? If a guy was topless in front of a 14 year old girl, nobody would give a shit, but somehow men are still oppressed in this one? You're really lowering the bar for women behaving badly posts. Edit: I'm willing to hear you guys out - please explain why we should emotionally traumatize the majority of teenage boys who have briefly seen human breasts without being trauma…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter