TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheNerdWonder Archive

View 12 posts and 560 comments by TheNerdWonder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
934

Social IssuesTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:34 AM
101

Social IssuesTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:25 AM
73

Legal RightsTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:29 PM
44

False AccusationTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights09/08/21 05:38 PM
32

misandryTheNerdWonder/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 03:37 AM
28

DiscriminationTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:16 AM
22

Activism/SupportTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:25 AM
18

Edu./Occu.TheNerdWonder/r/MensRights20/11/21 06:03 AM
16

False AccusationTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:31 AM
11

DiscriminationTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights05/12/22 03:23 AM
2

Edu./Occu.TheNerdWonder/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:52 AM
1

Legal RightsTheNerdWonder/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:30 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It isn’t if you pay attention to politics in and outside of the US as well as what progressives said about her hence why she lost. Like I said, American politics is broken and has overall swayed to the Right that someone like Harris can be called progressive despite largely pushing right wing policies (like mass incarceration which you literally acknowledged), a border security bill (that again, was getting lots of praise from Republicans before Trump called to nuke it and pissed off lefties), e…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:09 AM
3

Overall, mass incarceration started under Nixon though and continued on from the string of Republicans we had from the 70s to early 1990s. Literally the whole tough on crime thing was pushed by conservatives to fearmonger about poor people and people of color. It was their signature political project. It succeeded in part because of center to center right enablers like Harris and Clinton They weren’t progressive outside of one or two issues so it’s a bit inaccurate to call them that when even pr…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:59 AM
4

I dunno. I think conservatives pushing trickle down, mass incarceration, etc have done far more to devastate men and the nuclear family than anything lefties have ever done rhetorically or policy-wise. Problem is that the disdain for feminism (for good reasons) is distracting us from the fact that we do have more in common with those lefties than conservatives.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:06 AM
3

And also just really ignoring how conservative ideology has done more far more to destroy the nuclear family through things like trickle down
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:04 AM
0

I mean it isn’t the Left that is against affordable healthcare and removal of the draft - both major issues for men’s rights. That is most prominently conservatives so idk how anyone can call the Left the more prominent threat, other than if they’re being duped by red meat attacks on trivial shit that certain lefties do.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:03 AM
-6

They don’t but a lot of folks here seem to make it one when they gravitate expressly to one side (conservative) that has done way more damage overall to us - be that opposition to removing the draft or elevating dipshits like Tate.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:00 AM
12

I keep saying shit like this and get downvoted because it’s an example of how MRAs keep becoming useful idiots for people who don’t give a shit about us
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:30 AM
1

But I don’t think ending no fault is the solution to those issues and is likely to cause more issues including forcing kids to grow up watching very unhealthy situations.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:28 AM
-19

The BSA is still mostly boys so what is being taken? This is a reactionary distraction from the fact Hegseth wants to send off boys to fight an unnecessary war in Venezuela? We gotta stop being useful idiots for the Right who do shit like this to distract us from the shit that is far, far more destructive for men and boys than anything leftists are doing or not doing.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 11:09 PM
-21

Because this is the real priority, not the whole issue of this administration/the Right wanting to send men off to die in a stupid war in Venezuela? If MRAs want to change things for men for the better, we have to stop getting distracted by little culture war shit like this and letting conservatives use us
/r/MensRights25/11/25 11:06 PM
4

But largely, MAGA ain't helping us. Very little of what they're doing will and doubly so if you look at how it'll impact the economy. Who do you think will be homeless first as Musk, Trump, and Vance crash the economy? Us.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 03:26 PM
3

Doesn't change that Vance and Trump are the least qualified to talk about this issue after that little fight they had with Zelenskyy who over the last 2-3 years has shown himself to be more masculine than either of them including the other day. He showed tremendous restraint while they screamed at him like fucking toddlers, not adults.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 10:13 AM
0

Preach.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 10:12 AM
9

That is pretty much it. Lot of fellow MRAs need to decide whether they want to be tools or not for a side that is far more manipulative and cynical about our grievances.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 10:10 AM
9

I distinctly remember being downvoted to hell here for suggesting MRAs should uh, maybe be not so petty about abortion bans because of rightful hatred of feminists and be the bigger people. Reproductive rights are not just for women, they are our rights too and we need to grow up and remember the long game/precedent.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 11:38 PM
5

That's not mutually exclusive from the economy though. There are absolutely people who hated her because of her gender and race. It can be all of the above, including with Latinos and especially Latino males who turned out for Trump more than Latina women did. I've grown up in and with that culture enough to see that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/24 05:03 PM
5

And a lot of people forget or dunno that a woman voted with the conservative male Justices to upend Roe as precedent in Dobbs v. Jackson.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 11:28 PM
1

And the few scholars in gender studies who gave it legitimacy and objectivity in the 70s and 80s got chased out, either for being men or because they acknowledged man's plight without denying women do face much of the abuse we hear about. Harry Brod is a good example of this. The few who remain like Don Dutton often are seen as controversial for following the data/evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 11:26 PM
3

And the U.S. Intelligence Community also said there was insufficient evidence to conclude the lab leak theory as credible. Granted, getting intel out of China is tough but its quite clear that the theory is not unimpeachable and shouldn't be treated as remotely gospel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 11:16 PM
5

There really isn't one. This most recent election and the last 4 years overall illustrated how far MSM (MSNBC, CNN, etc) bends the knee to the Right (politicians, specifically) and barely fact-checks things they say. Hell, they only recently started reporting on Trump's more extreme policies like tariffs and their consequences after he won.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 06:56 PM
0

Again, why are you ducking out on criticizing explicitly anti-male move like this or that time they failed fathers by opposing paid paternity leave? You are forgetting that in years prior to 1921, we also started having sales taxes and income taxes but I'm the one who is historically and economically illiterate? We have not relied solely on tariffs as a source of revenue since Wilson. Smoot-Hawley illustrates why leaning just on tariffs is the definition of "I failed economics" but hey, what do …
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:30 AM
-1

Smoot-Hawley begs to differ. It is not a major source revenue like it is for inflation. Even conservative economists concede this. Problem os, Trump is so extreme and illiterate about free-market economics that he makes Dems look smart. Yeah, they hate men. They do. Meanwhile, Republicans killed an equal draft bill. You did not respond to this because you know they are just as bad, if not worse.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:11 AM
-1

Putting tariffs on us is America last and a gift to China. Not saying Dems are saints but it is quite clear the libs do not hate me as badly as conservatives do.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:06 AM
1

If this bothers us then why do so many fellow men vote Republican even though they oppose putting women on the draft? I'm trying to connect the dots about why we're cutting our nose to spite our face. Seems like we need to reconsider that. I know I did.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:04 PM
-42

It should but doesn't. Not taking the high road of apathy does not help us either though.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:37 PM
1

I've been shouting this to the high heavens. He's bad for men based on economic reasons alone but that clearly wasn't a deal breaker for some of our fellow men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 06:56 AM
18

This. The RW, especially RW politicians including the US GOP writ large do not care about men's issues outside of as a way to win votes before passing all the same misandristic legislation in Congress. Your last point really drives that home if they're pushing the same old regressive talking points about both trans folks and male predators. In what way does swinging Right help us if that is happening, as opposed to TRYING to get the Left to address an area where they are demonstrably and elector…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 10:43 AM
18

Yes. It's one of the few things Trump's administration got right. Mainly because they consulted with MRA groups during the development of the rules.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 03:34 PM
-5

No, it is not. Cringeworthy, arrogant, ignorant, and misguided? Absolutely. The future should be equal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 05:42 AM
1

Fascism is right wing. Left wing extremism is different. Otherwise, you're right. It's like saying "liberal Marxist" when those are wholly different ideologies and Marxists tend to hate liberals.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:46 PM
6

That they'd blame patriarchy is such a gross and cynical lie.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:44 PM
9

Why? I am not being violent and am only responsible for my own actions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 01:07 AM
4

I doubt it. The Guardian overall isn't actually a bad publication and is mostly serious as opposed to other outlets like the Daily Mail. They do good reporting. It's just that they also hire a few obnoxious and/or pretentious writers who think they've made a really great point and have no self-awareness as to how to bad their "really great point" is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 07:37 PM
117

The condescension is real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/24 07:10 PM
3

Is this womansplaining?
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:43 AM
1

Pretty much. Hilarious that she blamed the Left and Labour for that, as if they aren't still largely recovering from the failures of Corbynism that led to the big 2019 blowout. Just classic feminine and Tory irresponsibility that's fucked the UK since the motherlode of bad decisions that is Brexit passed.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:29 AM
3

I dunno. History has shown morality isn't exactly defined by time. Throughout various periods of injustice, there have always been a number of people who knew those awful things were wrong, just as we all do today. The American Founders knew slavery was wrong. There were plenty of people of all races that saw Jim Crow as evil, even in 1955 and 1964. Many men knew women's suffrage was important for an American democracy that had to put its money where its mouth was on equal representation. It is …
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:41 AM
6

And while those wrongs were wrong, who ultimately corrected them? Men. Men, who made up the majority of lawmakers gave them voting rights with the 19th Amendment. Men, who let them have credit cards independent of their husbands. Men, who (sadly) voted on and passed Title IX. Men, who criminalized spousal rape. Men, who they still demonize.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:37 AM
3

Problem is, feminism does not encourage responsibility which is critical for an organized society that follows a social contract. They reject it because they believe it subjugates women somehow even though that is not at all the case. It's what makes their ideology so extreme.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:35 AM
2

Pretty much. Feminism has infantilized women and led them to believe they're entitled to everything without any effort. If they don't get their way, they'll remind us how they are more immature than men and throw tantrums about misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:43 AM
1

You mean they want fewer kids who will disrupt the workplace by complaining about feeling uncomfortable at the mere presence of a man in the workplace and be legal liabilities?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:41 AM
3

Yeah, because that has faired so well for civilized society. Nevermind how the UK has elected multiple female Prime Ministers who all wrecked the British economy. Give us actually well-credentialed leaders.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:38 AM
1

As a Black guy, I don't think the race issue is the same. It's more complex and yes, ongoing given slavery technically never really ended in the U.S. due to the 13th Amendment permitting carceral slavery (which was abused immediately after the Civil War) and though Jim Crow ended, we provably have seen policies get passed that exceptionally discriminate against POC, especially Black men such as the 1994 Crime Bill who ended up doing most of the carceral slavery. That is still the case today in m…
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:20 PM
7

Her only qualification is being a woman.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 08:54 PM
4

Imagine if a male director said this about women. Really, just incredible.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 08:51 PM
2

If she was a man, there'd be no media sympathy.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:02 AM
1

I feel like there may be some legal benefit to this when it comes to child custody cases and making courts gender blind.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 06:49 AM
4

Because ultimately, women (esp. feminists) are exceptionally chauvinistic and follow "girl code" which impedes them from calling out other women. All their talk about "bro code" is projection and deflection from spending the majority of time calling out women over men because that is who largely does sexual violence and domestic violence, per data.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 06:45 AM
1

Feminists have spent decades eroding that.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 06:42 AM
2

It wasn't just the party that said "no" to Sanders though. Dem primary voters also largely said no, even if he was honestly a better candidate than her. Though that probably isn't saying much since it hasn't hard to be better than Hillary.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 04:44 PM
0

They've had other and far better opportunities before her and when you look at the # of women in other senior leadership position in the party, it's the same issue. There's so very few and you can't tell me that that's not bad optics as opposed to Democrats who are absolutely the opposite, even if they suck at everything else.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:19 AM
1

I mean, the Clintonian economy was just Reaganism which is partly why we have the problems that we do in this country and those Trump tax cuts provably contributed the most to our current deficit (just like Reagan and Bush 43's tax cuts) and led to the last 40-50 years of economic disparity that's adversely impacted men who account for the majority of America's poor and homeless. Neither Ronnie, Willie, or Trump were even close to being on the right track. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:59 PM
7

Yup. Feminism is just female chauvinism.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:57 PM
2

The funny thing is, it won't work. The GOP/conservative establishment for whatever reason is not as willing to nominate a woman for president like Democrats are, even if that specific woman was awful. It's not their only problem but it is one of their biggest problems in appealing to demographics like Gen Z that are becoming essential to winning elections. Kevin McCarthy said as much himself recently when he said that the party looks less like the whole of America and like a very exclusive count…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:53 PM
2

A republic is a form of democracy. That said, you're right. We mostly abdicated that with Bush v. Gore, Global War on Terror, PATRIOT Act, Citizens United, etc.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:19 AM
1

I mean, he was all those things but so too is Joe even if some #Resistance/#ImWithHer liberals won't admit that he's everything genuine leftists and some reasonable non-MAGA conservatives warned us he was. They're part of that same extreme establishment. Some folks are just now getting a wake up call to the fact that it is two wings of the same morally compromised bird because of his handling on Gaza and some other things his administration has been up to that are just the same continuation of T…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:17 AM
1

I mean, yeah. It's been well established that one of the strongest constituencies in U.S. politics that elected Trump in 2016 and nearly re-elected him in 2020 was suburban and conservative white women. They were also the biggest force behind Glenn Youngkin's win in Virginia as well a few years back. Just one of many examples of how big female election turnout is and how it influences electoral outcomes. Sources: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol48/iss1/3/ https://journals.sagepub…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:13 AM
6

It is the first source. It's from 2010, but later data sets reaffirm this hasn't changed. Sources: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/21961 https://www.hrc.org/resources/understanding-intimate-partner-violence-in-the-lgbtq-community https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/violent-victimization-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-2017-2020
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:03 AM
8

There are but a lot of them tend to focus on IPV between LGBTQ+ women with two-thirds identifying their abusers as of the same sex or gender. These numbers are also higher than gay, bisexual and heterosexual men who account for about 37% and 29% respectively. Broadly, it's also been found through a study from the U.S. Office of Justice Programs (OJP) that IPV is higher among LGBTQ+ couples than heterosexual ones. Notice though that feminists ignore all of this in their misandrist and heterophobi…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 09:55 AM
7

I'm skeptical. I'm Gen Z and if there's one thing that's true of us, it is that we rebuke norms including growing out of things. For better and for worse. In this case, it is for the worse because Gen Z women absolutely hate men.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 09:45 AM
5

I mean, it's hard to say. Gen Z (my gen) isn't that old yet. The youngest Zoomer is like 11 and the oldest is 26 and the Gen Z women are 100% digging their heels in on distrusting men and making crude, cynical, and sexist jokes about us. Seen similar things from Millenials too who likewise aren't bucking the horse in their 30s and 40s.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 09:44 AM
2

A real equity issue.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:03 PM
2

And also what if you get injured and can't do much else?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:03 PM
3

And also, not everyone is built for the trades. What is the solution for those people? It's not an unfair question to ask and admittedly, a lot of trade school proponents haven't really answered that. I get why some promote trade school and the trades. I'm certainly not looking down on them as lesser. It is just that I've seen that they've shown themselves to be a much bigger risk in a number of areas compared to going to school for 4 years for a BA or BS. The worst risk for that is just student…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:00 PM
3

There is some. It's pretty commonplace in r/mensrights and not at all checked, but the rest are great. They are not just ranting about women as the exclusive source of all their issues and ACTUALLY engaging in civilized and nuanced debate and discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 07:27 AM
-13

Idk. I see a lot of comments in r/mensrights like you're describing getting upvotes and anyone who calls it out gets downvoted. It's pretty much r/conservative, which fits given how many of the usual misogynistic suspects frequent both places. This place is what that sub should be
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 07:23 AM
4

Somehow, they're different. We're throwing out due process as well to appease the feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/23 03:01 PM
17

As someone on the Left, I tend to think of this whole issue as being a product of the Left sucking at politics (what this always evolves to) because it pays lip service to one particular constituency (women), takes action for them, and outright ignores the rest of us. In contrast, the Right absolutely will acknowledge those with legitimate grievances towards left-wing arrogance with respect to gender issues and men feeling left behind. They may not actually do anything beyond that lip service an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/23 02:21 PM
2

Except the innocent until proven guilty principle has never applied in civil court. We never said this was a problem when Depp rightfully won his case, so why is it now here? Like, people upset at this sound as bad as the Heard supporters who made similar claims that Johnny was trying to use the civil trial process to erode the rule of law. He wasn't.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:14 AM
2

Trump made that deal during the pandemic which dramatically reduced demand for oil from the oil companies he was protecting. It was an understandable move, but also stupid because he didn't consider that eventually the economic circumstances would change and turn that into a really bad deal down the line. Yes, I agree that the chickens would come home to roost but what a lot of the "Let's Go Brandon" crowd doesn't want to admit is that a lot of our economic woes in this case tripled between2017 …
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:07 AM
3

So yes, Trump is a shit-bag, but he's also being targeted. "Words matter" anything that happens to him, can happen to any one of us. Yes, that's what happens in a democracy. Nobody is above consequences or the law, be that criminal law or in this case, civil. That's not going to scare anyone other than those who don't know how to pick their battles and will gleefully die on the hill of defending a shit-bag and have gone too far down the right wing rabbit hole. As for the taxes thing, I think ult…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:51 AM
2

Yes, because that's what happens in civil trials. This wasn't a criminal trial where the standard is to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil trial, it's based upon the preponderance of the evidence and Trump didn't produce anything to cast a doubt on the claims that left the jury convinced he didn't cause injury. We weren't complaining when that standard worked for Johnny Depp in his civil case against Heard.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:45 AM
1

Except that's not the legal doctrine applied in this case since it was a civil trial. You can't be "guilty" or "innocent" in those like you can in a criminal trial. inb4 I get downvoted for stating the obvious because people here like to get overly emotional and die on the wrong hill to defend someone that definitely isn't going to do men or the movement for our rights any real favors.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:40 AM
1

I dunno. A lot of polling shows they like us when a Dem is in office, compared to the last two GOP presidents. Doubly so if you look at why, and it isn't because of a perception of weakness.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:39 AM
2

The gas prices went up because the prior administration made a deal with the Saudis to cut oil production for 2 years in order to protect struggling US gas and oil companies. The economy is fine after the insanity of a global pandemic. Now it's just slowing down and is still seeing record job creation. Inflation is and has always been a natural economic phenomenon that no president perfectly controls regardless of party. He doesn't have dementia. He has a stutter and is far more coherent than Tr…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:36 AM
2

Unless there's been a change in management
/r/MensRights24/04/23 10:31 PM
0

But that's not what you implied. You implied that party label, regardless of gender is why Porter is somehow getting away with this when you have a media outlet reporting on her. If your argument is now that Democratic women are somehow now held to a different standard as you claim then tell me what happened to a Democratic Congresswoman like Katie Hill after it was found out that she sexually exploited an intern in violation of House ethics rules. What media outlets covered her? How'd that lett…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 09:34 PM
2

And they seemingly make money too.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:26 AM
1

Meh. She's overrated. Always was. She's basically the Democratic version of Marjorie Taylor Greene. Both are loud, obnoxious, and love cameras more than doing their actual jobs as members of Congress. The only difference is that one isn't an antisemite who is pretty much the future of the conservative movement and gets away with being a violent nut job.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:16 AM
1

How did that letter fair for Andrew Cuomo, Bill Clinton, Al Franken, Aaron Coleman, Antonio Villaraigosa, John Edwards, or Anthony Weiner? Despite being Democrats, every major and supposedly "liberal" mainstream media outlet routinely reported on allegations that those folks did something inappropriate towards a woman that either involved sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic violence, or extramarital affairs. The letter has nothing to do with it. There is no double standard on a party bas…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:04 AM
1

And suddenly, their logic would change, and they'd say you shouldn't generalize women.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:00 AM
3

Yup. Gen Z too. We're very big on thrift shopping, and almost half of my closet is from thrift stores if not to save money, but also support local/small business.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 06:56 AM
3

Healthcare.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 06:55 AM
3

And feminists/women just can't muster that.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 02:48 PM
1

I don't need to imagine it. I've seen the meltdown and all of its hypocrisy..
/r/MensRights10/04/23 07:33 AM
-6

No, but you're pretending as if women haven't faced injustices. They have. Those genocides are just an example but according to you, they're "imagined" wrongs. How can I be anti-MRA if I am one? Unlike some of us, I just don't believe that we should adopt the same extreme mindsets as feminists because of a lack of maturity and jadedness that you're showing with the "with us or against us" response because I dare ridicule fellow MRAs for acting just as petulant. It doesn't help any of us to play …
/r/MensRights31/03/23 04:12 PM
-12

So are we just really going to pretend that the pattern of sexual violence during the Rwandan genocide, Bosnian genocide, etc didn't happen? Let's not turn MRAs into the same historically illiterate extreme as the feminists. History isn't lying. It just makes you uncomfortable to admit that neither gender has had a fair run of the mill for one reason or another. I know that's hard to do when this sub has a lot of intersectionality with far right cesspits like r/conservative but let's try to be s…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:56 PM
-10

I dunno. Some of those actions were real.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:41 PM
0

And that's where you're wrong. We said "it's not going to happen" with Roe. How'd that turn out? They are going after things like the Morning After Pill and birth control aka why this isn't simple and we should proceed and think both rationally and carefully, instead of being spiteful because of how the matriarchy treats us. This just isn't something we are suited to address because ultimately, we aren't in their boots. They aren't in ours. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/us/wyoming-abortion-…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:38 PM
1

No, they weren't.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:35 PM
0

What about states in the United States that are actively banning those options too on top of the abortion bans? This isn't as simple as we men think it is.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:34 PM
0

It isn't that simple because of cases of rape, incest or medical complications. Also, what about the trauma that comes with being a foster kid since most get stuck in poverty and don't get adopted? How's that better for the child and doubly so when the people advocating for solutions like dumping them off never follow through and adopt? To me, it seems like this isn't happening just to tailor to the whims of women and serves a lot of other people too. I also just don't think government should ha…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:28 PM
1

To be fair, present data shows that the majority of these things are perpetrated by men. Can't say this assumption isn't coming from just a gender bias. It sadly isn't.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:27 PM
1

That's not racist. It's literally an objective fact that America has a very problematic racial history that persists today and is best evidenced by false accusations of Black man. Sebold's victim and the person you're referring to aren't the first, nor will they sadly be the last. Emmett Till wasn't that long ago either for the majority of us, all things considering that most of us have had grandparents who were around back then when that boy was murdered. It may as well have been yesterday for …
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:23 PM
1

There's no way California should be the best.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:21 PM
1

Problem is, our criminal justice system is just as bad at this as Title IX is. The only decent improvement that can come after that is if we see harsher sentencing for women, that leads to more of them going to jail for fairly long durations for making false accusations. That and fines and greater openings for very rewarding civil lawsuits against false accusers and the state that supported them.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:15 PM
1

About the only good thing this guy has done.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:13 PM
4

It's funny how they think Disney supports him. If they didn't even support Johnny Depp and automatically believed Heard, they're even less likely to back a Black guy like Majors, given America's long history of falsely accused Black men.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:12 PM
8

It's also about getting revenge on all men for the actions of their forefathers, when we had no say in how they treated women.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:08 PM
4

Yup. It's a sexist slur and should be frowned on in the same way "slut" is.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 05:21 AM
1

He hasn't had just one bad take though, lol.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 03:22 PM
2

And if people read actual Islamic history, they'd know women were treated fairly well and equal to men. Probably moreso than Westerners care to admit.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:09 AM
3

I mean, that's TECHNICALLY not false. Police are there to protect life, liberty, and property, which can include capital. It's probably the one thing you can get socialists and capitalists to agree on, albeit for different reasons.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:02 AM
1

Yup. That's been me in my anthropology class. Just fauxpression by women living in the West.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:00 AM
4

The amount of times I've seen both conservatives, centrists and liberals worship this guy is insane. He's utter garbage.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:55 AM
7

Who needs to file police reports when you have modern activist lynch mobs that have eroded due process? Far more damaging than prison.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:54 AM
6

It's lynching, minus a noose.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:52 AM
2

Hope he sues those publications for running libelous reports. We need to make accusers scared and quiet again when they lie.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:50 AM
2

Yup, same here. Awful premise that is both bigoted and contradictory. I don't doubt it. If it is not that, it's someone trying to get even since we know that women today are increasingly less mature and can't walk away from opportunities to be petty.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:48 PM
2

Yup. Every day, we're supposed to praise them or acknowledge how they're victims of "oppression."
/r/MensRights07/03/23 09:58 PM
0

Given a lot of the stuff she's said on Carlson's show and the bomb threats at hospitals that she undoubtedly inspired, it's not hard to see why any sane person regardless of political belief should find her crazy and just as extreme. I'm ready for my down votes since this sub, even when it makes some good points is often a second front of the cesspit that is r/conservative
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:41 AM
4

It's a UC. Hugely corrupt.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:33 AM
2

Going through that right now. I took a Title IX training at my university and one of the modules on gender norms automatically started talking about toxic masculinity and how men are more likely to rape (no data supports this) someone than not. It was disgusting since the whole idea of it was prevent the reinforcement of gender "norms"... while it actually did that.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:32 AM
2

Found women doing that more
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:28 AM
1

We are and that's the unsurprising result of fostering the idea that we should overthrow patriarchy instead of upholding and strengthening it.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 09:02 AM
1

That first part had me laughing. When have they ever been silent? They've always had a voice and won't stop bitching, pissing and moaning about being victims... while being the dominant group on college campuses, having dozens of government offices for their needs, earning more than men in a number of professions, and holding dozens of major political offices in pretty much every Western civilized nation.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:19 AM
1

Suuuuurrreee. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:01 AM
2

And this is why "believe women" is dumb and not something we should take as seriously. It's an affront to due process.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 06:59 AM
1

Hamada was just in charge of DC stuff, not WB overall.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 06:54 AM
94

And the patriarchy we're told to hate and supposedly live in doesn't exist. It's a myth made up by feminists
/r/MensRights05/03/23 05:31 AM
23

And many in society will never learn that it literally cannot function effectively without men. They'll try and then fail miserably.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 08:09 AM
5

Either way, it's used often as a sexist slur by feminists. The origin doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 09:04 PM
12

Said it before but society would collapse without men. Women are never going to do a bulk of the dirty jobs or the fighting, bleeding, and dying.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 07:18 AM
8

But if this was a dude who was fat, they'd shame and demean every step of the way.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 07:42 PM
3

Feminism. I've zero desire to hate any woman outside of feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 02:46 AM
2

I got falsely accused of sexual harassment by a feminist, even though I exchanged simple small talk.
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 08:41 PM
2

Pathetic
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 05:40 PM
1

It was almost always that for much of its existence. It's just gotten more obvious.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 07:30 AM
7

And also how feminists tokenize certain communities with genuine issues and hide behind them whenever people catch on to their game.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 05:49 PM
1

While I agree there's an intersectionality between race and gender, I find it funny how often feminists can't concede that when it has to do with everyone but them.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 05:48 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/zzc734/trying_to_get_feminists_to_answer_how_women_have/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button The one in the purple shirt and pearls is right. Feminism is not about equality. It maybe was at one point but nowadays, it's not. It is plainly about women using whatever means they have available to enshrine special treatment and privileges -- the very thing they often chastise MRAs and men in ge…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 10:44 AM
14

https://afsp.org/suicide-statistics/ "In 2020, men died by suicide 3.88x more than women." Obviously, the HuffPo post was in 2016 but I doubt the numbers were any better back then.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 10:38 AM
1

Probably won't based on what I've seen on Twitter and a few other places. I'm as center as you can get but I don't think you can help these people. The fact they're worried about "groomers" instead of genuine ones like Tate says it all.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 09:28 AM
3

Oh to be a woman living in the West who is so willfully ignorant of how (mostly) privileged they are as opposed men in the majority of places. Feminism is a cancerous rot.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 09:24 AM
2

Pretty much. Women love to complain about there not being a ton of men, but they never want to reflect on the fact that maybe those men aren't ugly or whatever. Maybe the issue is that they are judgemental and shallow. Same for everyone in media crying about a shortage of women in relationships. They'll never blame anyone, including the right people like they will men
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:34 AM
4

Yup
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:17 PM
6

I mean, yes. There is SOME intersectionality with incels and white supremacy. That's a fact but so too is this and that for the most part, these are people who are upset and won't do anything except cry about a society that has left them behind which they aren't wrong about.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:01 PM
6

And also you have a few cases where they admittedly do employ violence as Eliot Rodger did. However, that's the exception and not the rule despite what the media thinks since of the majority of extremist attacks in the US, incels account for only about 3%. https://www.adl.org/murder-and-extremism-2021
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:59 PM
3

Problem is that "left" is deeply misinterpreted because most of the policies that Bernie and AOC favor aren't extreme and on par with what has been in place in Western European democratic states for decades. They just aren't even remotely like Greene and Boebert.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:56 PM
-2

Kinda hard when the best examples of a modern RWer are Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Nick Fuentes, and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Being tolerant and open minded is important but that doesn't apply to people who genuinely are extremists who do espouse some degree of antisemitism and racism.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:53 PM
3

I'm sure the authors of this study have gotten shit from the terrorists-- I mean, feminists. Tends to happen when your work is unbiased and doesn't comply with established supremacist dogma.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:51 PM
42

Yup and this isn't even to say that there perhaps is not something wrong with SOME incels. There probably is. However, it isn't because they are incels. There are other things wrong with them upstairs (mentally) and the incel stuff is just one possible way that their mental illness might manifest. It's unfortunate. They need help and they aren't getting it because of the overall stigma men face on mental health and how they're treated in discussing this issue because of the narrative feminism ha…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:48 PM
-1

And why might that be, given America's history? In that instance, that isn't the problem you think it is like it is with this school board.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:39 AM
2

Wonder if the answer then is to not just sue the university, but specific on-campus individuals
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:26 PM
5

Or they'll send men to do it for them since feminists tend to not want to fight wars that they historically lobby for. Look at Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power's record.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:32 PM
3

This is the issue with saying the military is apolitical or nonpartisan. Left, right, or center, it does not matter. They are political because it is an organization that pulls people from all over the US and is subjected to oversight by a political body like Congress that's naturally partisan. Milley, like those before him, is just bending to political pressure from several fronts due to the nature of civ-mil relations. Can't help that admittedly though because I still prefer a society where ci…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:32 AM
6

Where are the feminists on this, including female military leadership? I thought they cared about victims or is that under particular circumstances? All the more reason we need to shut these people and those sympathetic to their beliefs out of every level of decision-making.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:50 AM
14

Crazy how these people are saying this even after the JDF death. It's a super important topic.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 08:47 AM
61

For feminists, it very much is zero-sum.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 08:45 AM
2

And that the majority of time, they do lie and we should be prosecuting them for it.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:15 PM
2

It is short-sighted in the sense that menocidaires (play on genocidaires who do genocides) aren't considering the consequences of eradicating and subjugating men. They aren't going to do the tough or dirty jobs that kill men.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:56 PM
10

It literally is arguing that we ignore male victims and that it is unethical. What are you talking about? Did you even read it? Especially these parts: "Not only is this claim that women and girls are disproportionately affected an unsubstantiated assumption but acknowledging only the suffering of one gender is ethically wrong, and impedes our understanding of sexual violence in conflict as a whole." "For example, in UN field missions, the appointed lead for Women, Peace and Security matters, in…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:42 AM
2

I left this out. It happened more than once. Either way, why or how did these wealthy people with still operating businesses get funding reserved for small businesses? Pretty clear that's some sus crap. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.propublica.org/article/trump-friends-and-family-cleared-for-millions-in-small-business-bailout/amp
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:57 PM
2

Wouldn't call this baseless if it happened more than once and again, to wealthy people who did not need it including Trump associates. However, that does not mean Trumpers were the only ones who got it or engaged in fraud. I did not say that. They were just part of the discrete corruption and fraud that took place with the PPP loans that the public paid no attention to but the FBI visibly was in other instances. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.propublica.org/article/trump-friends-and-family-cle…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:55 PM
0

I mean yes but the PPP stuff had a lot of problems. Especially since it was just rife with fraud and in general did not go to those who needed it. More often than not, it went to people who didn't need it including associates and supporters of the former POTUS which happens when you have a corrupt businessman and incompetent administrators with zero ethics making decisions for 4 years https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/07/company-that-gave-six-figures-to-pro-trump-super-pac-got-ppp-loan-over-…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:20 AM
0

No, that's not at all what I mean and you're basically making excuses for xenophobia, antisemitism, etc.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:36 AM
1

No, this is just far too extreme and untrue.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:51 AM
-14

Their culture is often the one that's disrespected and dehumanized so...
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:50 AM
1

It's a far right subreddit more focused on transphobia and shouting down women than ACTUALLY caring about serious inequality men face. You're not going to get a cogent, logical argument that's fact based. There's more moderate and level headed subs to deal with men's rights issues and this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 08:00 PM
1

Ignore it. Not worth your time.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:30 AM
-21

No, you just can't differentiate gender (socially constructed like race) from biological sex so he's really not a fraud. They don't need mental healthcare. They just need people to stop loudly not understanding gender issues and dehumanizing them for their identity which is what creates the dysphoria. inb4 a decades long fact gets me down voted because people aren't paying attention in their basic biology classes where it's always been taught gender isn't the same as sex.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:57 AM
0

It's wrong, but you do realize WHY they've started to do that, right? It can't be lost on you, can it? They're basically using the same argument as pro lifers when it comes down to it. If you want government to set a precedent that they can dictate human reproductive health, they may not stop at women. They could in theory go after men next if they wanted to and did at one point as we saw SCOTUS do with Buck v. Bell which hasn't even been overturned. The MRAs with the same sour grapes vindictive…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:05 PM
4

Now you're just making sense. That's dangerous!
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:03 PM
1

Yup. Even polls by right wing outlets like Fox News have shown this. What's that tell us? That SCOTUS approved an unpopular agenda that will help literally nobody and the states who've banned it are about to learn some harsh lessons.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:02 PM
0

No, but if you want men to definitely be on the hook for child support, government is about to make sure you pony up now that they've banned it in sometimes. Cutting your nose to spite your face is just lousy.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:00 PM
2

Because this is somehow easier than leaving abortion alone and addresses the mess that the conservatives caused by overturning Roe as part of their efforts to push an unpopular agenda that doesn't help women and most certainly, men. 🙄
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:58 AM
6

Woody Allen got left off the hook mostly outside of criticism. Weinstein did for years until people said something. Hollywood had an Oscar delivered to Polanski after he got outted as a disgusting pig. Joss Whedon got outted and people still defend him for on-set abuse and sexual harassment. Really hard to look at any of this and think it doesn't go both ways. Celebrities in general live above us as far as the rule of law goes. This is more of an issue of class/social status than it is gender.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:22 PM
2

You're basically saying women can't get married or get jobs if they have their own opinions based on facts they've learned through the course of their education. How does this not make you sound like all the worst stereotypes of men? Genuine question.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:01 PM
2

Listening to Putin's rhetoric and overall conduct on the world stage, it's pretty evident that the decision to invade Ukraine had nothing to do with NATO. There was no legitimate concern other than the one he used to try to justify it to a nationalist base. If anything, it is more that Putin was frustrated that former Soviet Satellite states had legitimate security and economic concerns because they lived under Russian oppression based on things like Prague in 1968. As a result, they ultimately …
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:41 AM
5

It depends on what specific area of STEM you're referring to, which is important because we often paint gender disparities there with a broad stroke. As this study shows, the majority of people who work in engineering and have degrees in that area are men but if you go into healthcare, it's the opposite. This study by Mark Perry, a fairly reputable economist who I don't always agree with breaks it down pretty well and shows that while there's certainly a gap between M/F in STEM more broadly, it'…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:28 AM
7

It depends on what specific area of STEM you're referring to, which is important because we often paint gender disparities there with a broad stroke. As this study shows, the majority of people who work in engineering and have degrees in that area are men but if you go into another area of STEM like healthcare, it's the opposite. This study by Mark Perry, a fairly reputable economist/MRA breaks it down pretty well. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/gender-gap-in-stem-women-are-majority-of-stem-grad…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:26 AM
1

This and I don't get why people are missing it. You're not going to create institutional change or win hearts and minds by going to trade school or insulating/isolating oneself from the real world. Feminists, even if they're mostly elitist in terms of demeanor still understand this better than we do and it's why they have successfully shaped the discourse on gender issues. That and the Men's Rights Movement let them because of a belief that conservatism (tradition and all that) and favoring pett…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:19 AM
7

I dunno. It's pretty evident that on average, those with college degrees are still earning more on average than those without. Not saying trades are bad or that you can't make more without one. You can, but it's the minority and we are exaggerating how much of a panacea they are in a country like the US which is fiercely anti union. Unless you're healthcare or IT, you're not going to make as much working in trades. It isn't 100s. Sources: https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/col…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:17 AM
1

Could be because of stuff like this, even though incels have no political orientation. https://icct.nl/publication/spring-provides-timely-reminder-of-incel-violence/ https://www.lawfareblog.com/incels-americas-newest-domestic-terrorism-threat https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:25 PM
2

It's a serious issue because there is an emerging trend of violence among them that we should be concerned about since people get caught in the crossfire as well as how dismissive conservatives (who overall are far too mute about the lack of moderation on their side) are towards discussions about it. However, it's also thrown out far too casually by lefties who themselves also don't understand the gravity of what an incel is and may do. It's a serious charge/accusation and the equivalent to what…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:23 PM
-1

Problem is, a lot of people think sex and gender are the same thing. They aren't. Never have been and that was before the current political climate. It isn't controversial to say gender is a social construct, just like race is. Everyone from biologists to sociologists to anthropologists have said it. That's usually what gets people mad and causes them to frame that as "anti-trans" and erasing that identity.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:12 PM
0

Almost as if timing and awareness matters. The current environment is understandably raw and people are rattled so I can understand the guardedness about certain discussions on the 2A.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:10 PM
4

They never share the full context of why they get banned because there's no sense of personal responsibility or accountability.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:08 PM
0

Conservatives Not Understanding The First Amendment Challenge.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:07 PM
1

Unless you've got certain skin issues and require a shaving profile. Seen plenty of soldiers and marines with trimmed and short beards because they get really bad razor bumps otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:51 AM
1

It's just obnoxious whataboutery that recycles an old overused joke that isn't serious about men's rights or as funny as it used to be.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:48 AM
1

Well, that has more to do with gas mask fitting supposedly but I'm not sure how when other militaries aren't as strict and do similar CBRN training. Only way I can think of is the gas masks are different than the US ones.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:45 AM
3

Thy shall shooteth thyself in the foot to get revenge on women.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:44 AM
0

Yes, but sometimes we should be the bigger people. That's what MEN do and boys don't. Don't you think that helps us since it is a way to push back against the worst stereotypes? That it makes the feminists look worse to people who are middle of the road (as most people are) which helps us in the long term? If not, how does that vindictiveness make us sound different from feminists who undeniably do the same thing? I can't seem to get a mature answer from this sub without downvotes or insults.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:43 AM
0

Getting even is more important. They're really in a competition with the feminists on who can be more childish and vindictive or the worst stereotypes.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:37 AM
5

Especially when the GOP also opposes drafting women and pushed half the "tough on crime" legislation (Dems helped of course because Bill Clinton helped shift the party more to the center to center right) that allows men to be incarcerated at higher rates than women but that doesn't stop the largely conservative crowd on here from shooting themselves in the foot for believing in the same ideology that has never helped them even once. That is unless shouting down women and getting even is helpful …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:34 AM
3

What if she doesn't know she could get an ectopic pregnancy? Rape? This isn't as simple as saying "don't have sex."
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:31 AM
3

Or maybe they know that the Dobbs decision actually was a backwards decision that used a similar argument as pro-slavers and segregationists. Leaving civil rights issues to the states makes things uneven and in the case of slavery, led to Bleeding Kansas and then the American Civil War.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:29 AM
1

Except they weren't legislating from the bench with Roe like they did with Dobbs and most other decisions by the Roberts Court.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:28 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:13 AM
-2

Downvoted and based for the truth.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:32 AM
-10

Are they men, boys or infants? I think the point of time when most people get it is relevant here. If they are infants (as is the case most of the time), it is on the parents who make choices for their children. Inb4 the downvotes for common sense and nuance instead of just "what about?" which ya'll are tying with the fem subreddits with for lousy ones.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:32 AM
4

No, Planned Parenthood is not that. It provides low income healthcare to women AND men because what the far right won't tell you about PP is that they provide prostate exams (a big issue for men's health activists hence why we have Movember), condoms, consultations for people who want to produce a child, STI tests, etc. Abortion is not even the majority of what they do or why women choose to get one most of the time. Let's not let that same jaded bitterness that guides feminists also cloud our v…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:29 AM
-15

I mean, the parents choose whether or not the kid gets circumcised so it's technically still a matter of choice as should the choice to get an abortion in consultation with a physician. Not sure how you expect infants to make that choice.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:25 AM
2

And the intention is to protect those rights. Whether they are skewed to protect specific people is a different thing.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:22 AM
1

No, women and girls still don't have as much control post-Dobbs. This recent news from Ohio is evidence of that and that our bitterness has led us down a really scary path where we are more concerned with getting even and shouting down at women than actually fighting for men's rights and autonomy. It's the same sort of childish bitterness that drives feminists and we should not let that be the impetus of our movement. It will be us helping feminists feed the worst narratives about men's rights a…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:08 AM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:00 AM
1

Gross
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:08 PM
-16

Based on what I've seen, the feminists don't need to. The opposite extreme is already here based on the reactions to the Roe decision. Same shit, different gender/movement.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:02 PM
-25

Seems too late for that, based on the last two weeks. Asking MRAs to not use the same ass backwards logic as feminists and be bigger people is too radical and being a "leftist" or "simp."
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:59 PM
0

I could go on 2XChromosomes and find a similar comment but about men. What does that say about you versus them? Just two people, same awful and childish sexism.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:36 AM
1

You're saying "no" to some innocent people over a fringe. Not sure you know this, but that makes you as bitter as they are. Literally, you're using the same sort of vile logic and ignoring how some young 12 year old girl who was raped may go through a traumatic experience she had no choice in. Are you really okay with that?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:31 AM
0

Yes, we are all losing our minds that an 12-13 year old rape victim could be impacted by this. Why aren't you? That's a much worse ordeal than anything a man or woman can go through.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:28 AM
2

Yeah, it's going to suck for 11 year olds raped by their uncle... even worse than adult women and men. Gender equality shouldn't be the oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:25 AM
0

Statistically, 80% of Americans are pro choice. Pro life is TECHNICALLY a minority in comparison. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:23 AM
-1

After women protested and went to prison for it. Let's be balanced here. Those men back then didn't do it on a random whim and they were specific wealthy white men who would have done nothing otherwise when it came to voting rights for women and yes, poor white men who likewise didn't have those rights.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:19 AM
-1

They're being as spiteful as the feminists and it makes you wonder how many them of ACTUALLY believe in fighting for men's rights and gender equality versus just wanting to shout down at women and get even for shit. It's rightly the same question and point we think about with feminists and it works here too. Inb4 the opposite extreme down votes me. Idgaf.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:13 AM
1

Don't tell these people that. The bitterness here is as bad as it is on any feminist subreddit
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:10 AM
1

Not sure we need reciprocity here. It should just be common sense that an 11 year old raped by her uncle should not be forced to bear a kid. If we are okay with that, I'm not so sure the feminists are the only dirt bags now.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:09 AM
1

You contradict yourself in one post. Impressive. Not sure what it says about a movement that claims to fight for men's rights and gender equity... while using similar thought processes as the extreme feminists. Way to make yourselves and everyone look like the opposite extreme and play into the feminist narrative. I'm ready for my down vote from people who don't want to hear the truth from someone who vehemently loathes feminism and doesn't want this to turn into something where it's more about …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:06 AM
1

Lot of people on this thread are showing that the sexists aren't just in places like r/feminist and that there are plenty of awful people on both sides. But no, this is totally not a primarily right to far right subreddit like r/feminist is a far left to left one. (Sarcasm)
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:50 PM
-3

We tried that leaving things to the states with slavery and segregation. How did that pan out? Republicans already want a national ban and can do it if they get the trifectq
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:48 PM
0

Yeah, and that's awful. If you hate humans as a whole losing autonomy in an egalitarian society like this movement claims it wants, then you should be just as angry as Roe. Otherwise, hard to separate you from the people on r/feminist who are just as dishonest about their beliefs.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:47 PM
0

Yes, because that's what it means to be a better person than the feminists. A lot of you don't seem to understand you have to SHOW that you're better, not just say you are. Yeah, and you can do that. It'll just show that the average conservative male is violent and just as bad as the feminists
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:44 PM
-2

It's not though if you have any understanding of biology and the first trimester.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:41 PM
0

So we should stoop to allow similar lows instead of doing better? Really representing the fight for men's rights as being as garbage as the feminists
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:40 PM
1

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/02/1033727679/fetal-heartbeat-isnt-a-medical-term-but-its-still-used-in-laws-on-abortion That's not a heartbeat in 8 weeks. That was debunked.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:35 PM
2

It's hard for some people to take the high road unlike the feminists who go low
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:35 PM
-2

I don't care what they are saying. I care what we are saying as individuals and what is within our control and right now, this movement/subreddit is sounding as extreme and as petty as the feminists on this issue. I know that's not who we are so let's show it!
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:34 PM
1

I am too. Same for all the down votes. The movement needs to be better than the feminists, instead of like them.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:30 PM
-7

Well, now we have even worse sexist bullshit because this also guts Casey.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:06 PM
1

And they can't see how the pettiness and jadedness is why our movement isn't making progress and is being framed as misogynistic.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:05 PM
-1

The 9th Amendment suggests otherwise. It doesn't have to be in the Constitution to be considered a right.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:03 PM
2

You could say the same for voting rights and segregation and we all know why that principle was wrong there, just as it is here. Those rights aren't important if it impinges on other rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:03 PM
-27

Or you can be a better person and not be what they say you are. Doesn't help men's rights in the slightest. Edit: Love all the down votes. Really showing how a lot of MRA's are just as bad as feminists, instead of better as they should be.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:01 PM
-14

Because it still sets the stage for a national ban eventually if the right people are in office. Pence is already calling for one.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:00 PM
-59

What if they're raped or have an unexpected ectopic pregnancy? This is an unfair simplification
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:59 PM
1

You should care because it does impact men. It was just explained why.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:58 PM
0

We can be the bigger people and not what they say the Men's Rights crowd is. Stop falling into things.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:57 PM
-32

Half the time when people get an abortion, it isn't really a child. There's no heartbeat. Edit: A lot of people down voting seemingly dunno what an embryo in the first trimester is.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:56 PM
3

I'm a Depp supporter, but I honestly don't think he should sue her again for financial and mental health reasons. The woman is never going to shut up and will always be enabled by the feminists to keep spewing bile that will just keep him in court all the time. Another lawsuit on top of his City of Lies one is just not good for him and we should be concerned about what is ultimately best for him as a person instead of a prop for the Men's Rights Movement. Do we genuinely want Johnny to spend his…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:49 AM
2

I get what you mean but I've seen otherwise given the number of women who have seen combat action, including Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester. If a woman's very presence upsets men and supposed "male unity" (which shouldn't exist in the military anyways, given the importance of cohesion regardless of who you work with), I'm not sure that the women are the problem here.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:42 AM
3

Why? If they want to serve, they can.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:38 AM
8

Because they have a razor thin majority and Republicans abuse the filibuster and other procedural tactics to take up time hence why this took forever to get into the last NDAA that they had to remove it from because of time constraints. That's why in general Dems have not gotten much done like they'd wish. Whether you support them or not, it's hard to say they've only had issues because of incompetence.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:34 AM
5

Almost as if there can be in roads with them versus tradcons who are affirmatively hard headed.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:34 AM
1

Yup. It's a basic logical conclusion. How can one gender not suffer even one instance of abuse? I mean, you already have the Catholic Church scandals for starters.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:09 PM
1

No, Asia Argento. I shouldn't have said founder. I equated Argento to that because she was one of the loudest voices at the beginning and so I naturally associate the movement with her more than Burke. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.amp.html
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:07 PM
0

Yeah, he's experiencing racism... by making loads of cash and getting book deals and adaptation of his work by Hollywood. We have bigger issues and actual instances of racism that don't involve a celebrity.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:05 PM
1

His wealth has everything to do with it for the same reason it does for the other authors I mentioned. If there was genuine racism towards these guys, they wouldn't get whole bookshelves with their names on them or TV and film adaptations based on them. That is literally a fact and it isn't being woke or pushing the apex fallacy to point that out to someone who sits in the middle. Yes, and those highest earners show that they aren't being mistreated and can make it if they've got a good idea and…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:02 PM
1

Those mean as much as the Oscar's.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:53 PM
3

Yup. Never heard them discuss LGBTQ IPV between lesbians.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:30 PM
-6

Not really. He just disproved his own point and you pointed out based on his net worth, given how many other authors like him exist including Dean Koontz (he is older than Patterson), Stephen King, David Baldacci, etc. All of them are white males who roll in the dough compared to others and they all have worked with Hollywood. You don't hear them crying about non existent racism or woke crap. He just is doing something similar to what the Left does and advocating for people to get writing work d…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:28 PM
-6

Not really. He's being laughed at because he's a wealthy and famous author with an estimated income of over $700M. That doesn't sound like a white guy who experiences any form of genuine racial discrimination or suffering from racial disparities like others are. It's not "woke" to point this out and that he's just trying to jump in on the tradcon grievance shit to get attention and siding up with him doesn't help anyone. The fact is that white male authors aren't experiencing racism. It's that t…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:26 PM
1

It isn't helped by the fact that the woman who started it got caught lying about being sexually assaulted. It was always rooted in a terrible foundation.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:21 PM
1

And I won't pretend to know everything about the history of the MRM or every current strategy, but from what I've seen I'm surprised that I so far haven't seen it being employed widespread. I mean, you see it occasionally with Title IX lawsuits but those are 1 or 2 individuals and not any big men's rights law firm or men's rights activist organizations which is more of what I think we need. We can't do it with groups like the ACLU though. It's an organization that has shown it can't be trusted t…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:58 PM
1

Been saying this. We need to start using lawfare to bring them down.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:27 PM
1

Except Islam doesn't naturally advocate for gender segregation. That's more of a cultural thing and dependent on what part of the Islamic World you land in and if you look at actual classical Islamic history there's plenty of evidence that shows Muslims of both genders cohabitated in numerous spaces. Aisha, one of Muhammad's wives actually taught men and women together. The rest you're right about, but not that and if we are headed that way then we should only blame feminism. It has divided our …
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:17 PM
5

Sadly, it's still here and will be unless we pass laws that deter and penalize false accusers. That and encourage more lawsuits against false accusers and the organizations who might support them and peddle defamatory crap. Johnny showed us it is doable and that these cases are winnable. The MRM needs to use full on lawfare to break the back of the feminist movement and its backers. It's the only we can advance our rights and positions and then preserve them within our society. This includes our…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:08 PM
3

He should have checked his male privilege. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:04 PM
0

It might be but I still think it is in bad faith and he's not serious about addressing it, given how often he and his party still ultimately adopt policies that create challenges for fathers and oppose those that will actually bring families together. This includes opposition to paid paternity leave and the exploitative criminal justice system, which does disproportionately incarcerate men of color hence why there's a very complex issue surrounding crime in ethnic communities. https://www.google…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:10 AM
2

Plus, Depp just wants to move on. He was never looking to be a crusader for men's right and I 100% think that was the right thing for him and his own mental well-being. It would not be fair to ask for more from him. All that needs to happen now is that he just needs to get off the drugs and get some much needed help because the drug use didn't do him any favors in terms of optics or his actual physical and mental health. I think we can all admit that that's the one area where he was messed up ev…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:48 AM
4

While I'm sure fatherlessness is a problem, I genuinely think these idiots are genuinely just using it as a deflection from genuine discussion about gun control and mental health and it is fucking gross.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:45 AM
7

Yup. Nothing will change because actually caring about this requires an interrogation of systemic misandry, the danger of the matriarchy and how both enforce female privilege which actually does exist
/r/MensRights22/04/22 05:37 AM
1

Sad.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 11:04 PM
-2

This sub definitely isn't pretty soy. I have had enough interactions on here, even as an open supporter of the MRM to know that this absolutely is a right wing sub. There's nothing wrong with that but let's be honest. Any liberal dogma likely is actual centrism. Either way, it's grossly inaccurate to say Reddit is far-left when again, you have plenty of right and far right subs on here that are not banned. A lot of them including the one I mentioned that tends to ban moderates and anyone who dis…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 10:58 PM
6

I agree with most of this (to an extent given how long subs like r/conservative have existed without getting banned) the exception of this sub. I wouldn't exactly call it centrist/moderate. Let's be honest, it's at best, right wing.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 10:50 PM
3

Much easier than admitting that institutions overly prioritized women and girls at the expense of men and boys instead of treating them equally.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 07:26 AM
2

But will they do anything to close the gap? Probably not.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 07:25 AM
43

Pretty much. I'm as progressive as it gets and I'll even admit it. Crisis/war doesn't create these issues so much as they get revealed.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:11 AM
337

They want all the privileges and rights as men, but none of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 11:36 PM
1

Who were the biggest enemies of the Nazis in 1933?
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:12 PM
1

No, they are not and it is historically inaccurate given that Nazis were right wingers who killed socialists and communists. It also is the same broad brush painting against the Right that we accost the Left for because neither side is 100% authoritarian and they all have the potential to escalate to that.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:11 PM
2

And treating everyone like we are all the same as the one man who mistreated them.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:02 PM
1

If the situation was the opposite, it would be so much more than criticism.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:01 PM
1

And Trump isn't or have you not heard of the recent drone scandal in Baghuz, Syria? Truly amazing how little you understand economics or international relations. Biden isn't doing nothing about Ukraine. He's just trying to avoid a direct conflict with Russia, which we can't realistically afford. Biden did not take more vacations than Trump or do you not remember all the reporting that he was overwhelming the Secret Service and constantly going golfing last year. You're not a centrist. I actually…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 06:03 PM
0

If you sincerely believe that the media has gone easy on Biden, you're definitely buying the opposition's narrative even though they themselves have no real agenda outside of lousy culture war shit and are not being objectively ridiculed. They either both sides everything, Blame Biden or give the GOP a pass even after their pandemic response got us where we are because they made a conscious choice to politicize something that was definitively a hoax. As I said, that was many things that turned o…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 04:48 PM
1

I have plenty of friends who have and are Russian themselves. They left because of how repressive Putin is. Also they arbitrarily detain Americans as a way to stick it to our government. That's what happened to Paul Whelan who is still being held as a political prisoner in Russia.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:13 PM
1

Their economy isn't doing better than ours. It's done worse actually and again, if you think our society is repressive you wouldn't like it there. You wouldn't be able to criticize government like we do here and over issues such as the draft. You also wouldn't be to campaign like our movement does.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:12 PM
0

No, feminists are alt-left. It's the opposite extreme but with the same outcome nonetheless in which discrimination still happens. George Orwell's Animal Farm characterizes this pretty well. As to your point about calling out, I have only seen it once or twice on this sub but we need to do it a lot more because I've seen things on here that are just... well, not at all kosher and good for a gender equality movement that can be a big tent needs to incorporate not just men, but women as well who a…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:23 PM
1

The media bias is actually against Biden, given that they're ignoring the 4.2% unemployment rate (his predecessor had it at 4.1% before COVID) and the fact that he's created more jobs in his first year than his predecessors did in their inaugural. Jobless claims are at their lowest they've ever been since 1969. I wouldn't trust the MSM on this front, given the stark different between their reporting on Trump creating 210,000 jobs and then saying the same about Biden who created 200,000 but calle…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:14 PM
2

You mean, the Summer of Love where 95% of the protests were peaceful compared to January 6th? Democrats largely condemned that measly percent compared to Republicans on January 6th who still refer to the rioters as political prisoners or tourists despite all the evidence showing otherwise. I would not trust the mainstream media in their reporting of 2020, but nice deflection. Wrong is wrong and there is no genuine equivalent to January 6th, no matter how much you want there to be. It was a far r…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:02 PM
1

Pretty much. They were at least attempting to be consistent on their stances and were open to debating with people, instead of shutting them down and accusing them of being sexist. It's a night and day difference between the ones of RBG's time (when sexism against women actually was pervasive and institutionalized) and today where things are much more equitable to women than it has ever been for men.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:43 PM
1

No, because who was her client? He was a man. She showed that social security discriminated against a man who couldn't claim benefits after his wife died because it was usually the reverse in those times. Only widows could get those benefits, not widowers. Now it is universal. I'd urge you to re-review that case again and actually look at the facts of it, cynicism aside for one moment. The background is straightforward in that it is dealing with an issue of MALE DISCRIMINATION. https://en.m.wiki…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:39 PM
2

Again, if you want this movement to look like a bunch of controlling, bitter and hypocritical sexists because of our stance on circumcision and men's bodily autonomy, I would leave it be or get behind it. It would definitely benefit us long term in terms of growing our movement, debunking the idea that we are this sphere of misogyny and breaking away from those who are like that. Also, men are off the hook in terms of potentially paying for a child if the wife takes a hike with the custody due t…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:35 PM
0

Why? They're practically the same in terms of how they treat personal freedoms. Only difference is that in Russia, you may also get poisoned or mysteriously shot instead of just forced into a labor camp.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:26 PM
1

No, the view of integrating women into all aspects of life including military acadmors You may have a hard time believing that due to understandable cynicism, but I urge you to look up the case Weinberger v. Weisenfeld. It's a pretty landmark case. Look at what was at issue there.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:24 PM
1

I have friends who are women that literally serve as combat engineers. Maybe you just don't have a lot of women in your unit. I also know some who have been killed or been in a fire fight and they held up.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:35 AM
1

I've seen the utter opposite but sure, let's fight sexism with more sexism. Totally helps us and doesn't make MRAs look terrible and more like people who belong to a culture that's not about gender equality and inclusivity which we need. There's plenty of women out there like Sgt. Leigh Anne-Hester who show that women can hack it in the military, are strong and can do combat jobs. If anything, pointing to that is a better way to show why they should be drafted instead of shouting them down and r…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:28 AM
3

Yes, female teachers do it by coercing young boys who aren't genuinely consenting. If not that, rohypnol is a thing. It's pretty much proof that while one can use physical force and violence to rape someone like we see men (biologically, we are stronger), that physical force/strength isn't a pre-requisite. As for accountability, it varies. A lot of people tend to glorify it by saying things like "where was she when I was in school?" Pop culture hasn't helped either given that a lot of movies and…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:22 AM
3

I mean, on the issues overall it's pretty evident that Hawley's party has really gone off the deep end compared to Democrats. They're quite literally the Party of QAnon and incited a violent insurrection. The Dems and their base haven't gone that far off yet. On the issue of men's rights, they're both terrible.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:18 AM
63

Yes, because it is exploiting young boys who don't know any better and is not genuine consent. A child who is 13-14 years old and going through puberty is not credibly in their right mind to make that kind of decision or weigh the consequences of sexual intercourse. Rape isn't just the use of physical violence and force to get non-consensual sex. There's a mental component present in all cases. That includes female rapists and predation, which isn't as discussed as it should be or in the way tha…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:13 AM
26

This happens when you raise people without consequences and nurture them in such a way that they are eternal victims who take out their trauma, real or imagined on anyone even if they aren't the "abuser" or whoever today's bad guy is. That's what women are raised to be and how they are educated to think in our school systems.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:10 AM
2

China isn't any better. They're worse so I wouldn't defect, lol. Same for Russia.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:06 AM
-2

Because some MRMs legitimately are on the alt right. We do have rotten eggs in our basket and shouldn't be dismissive of that (I get ridiculed a lot for pointing out this and why we shoot ourselves in the foot when we aren't doing enough to acknowledge it) while acting as the legitimate voices for equality. If we want to get broad appeal, we can't alienate moderate groups who get just as turned off by us as they do the alt lefty types like the feminists who downplay their bad actors. Even I get …
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:05 AM
1

It has been evaluated. It's just up to Congress to include it in future legislation, which they won't do even though DoD and Congress did launch reviews on it that showed it wasn't unconstitutional. Same for SCOTUS whenever they punt the issue to Congress because they know Congress has the authority to do so.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:55 AM
1

There's a significant difference between a draft and an abortion. It's not a baby at 3 weeks. It's apples to oranges. It's not even a fetus and it's more connected to the woman than the man. It's a particular reproductive healthcare choice that is private unlike the draft which is not. Two wrongs here don't make a right and confirms the narratives about us that we don't want being true. We shouldn't let our anger dictate the MRM's positions on equality, even if we have a right to be angry. Going…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:51 AM
1

Yes, she wrote the majority opinion but it wasn't just Democratic nominees who tossed it. The current SCOTUS is conservative majority so conservative Justices appointed by Republican Presidents also tossed it by voting with her. The other thing is that SCOTUS indicates that the Chief Justice writes the majority opinion and if not, who gets to write it is based on the seniority of the Justice that's in the majority. In this case, it just happened to be Justice Sotomayor.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:42 AM
2

Liberal Justices like RBG likely would have supported females being entered into the draft based on the opinion she wrote in United States v. Virginia (1996). It's why I am surprised that feminists never turned on her for that or any of the other cases where she represented men since that's largely who her clients were in sex discrimination cases before she got to the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:13 AM
3

Because in traditional political theory, rights and privileges usually come with responsibilities and obligations per the social contract that we as individuals consent to as naturally political animals that form governments. In that system, including democracy, we forfeit some rights in exchange for others to be protected because freedom has never been absolute except for in the state of nature.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:07 AM
1

I'm not saying feminists aren't full of it. Direct me to where I said that. They absolutely are full of it and condescending. What I am saying in general is that tradcons in our movement in a lot of areas do quite a bit to harm us based on rhetoric and on stances towards abortion. Those are things that confirm feminist narratives and we are letting them say it because there are people who prove them right. These are the people they point to. Feminists are the aggressors, but they aren't always i…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 07:30 PM
1

https://youtu.be/l0QTkaKxEFc According to this person though, universities are still for primarily straight white men.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:09 PM
1

This is the same guy who literally threw a snowball in the Senate and doesn't believe in climate change. These Boomers live on an entirely different planet and will always be backwards. This is just another reminder of that.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:07 PM
1

The problem is that they value tradition and that includes traditional views on gender roles. I don't think it is hard to see how that might color their beliefs on gender neutrality in the eyes of the law and why that can be problematic for men. That's why people are rightly blaming cons here. They don't help outside of maybe paying lipservice to the more reactionary side of our movement that actually are legit misogynists, instead of moderate voices in the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:05 PM
1

Err, libertarians aren't actually into that. They haven't been seen since Ron Paul and the conservative Mises Caucus hijacked the party. You'd be right prior to that though. As for changes to society, don't you think that would maybe be a good thing on principle because it means changing the way we view men as privileged when they aren't?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:59 PM
0

I'm a centrist. I don't hate you and I want this movement to grow. I just don't think leaning into the opposite extreme helps us win because people don't like reactionaries and the bad faith behavior from tradcon MRAs just ends up confirming what feminists say about us in the eyes of some. Tradcons truthfully are an even greater problem because of that alone.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:56 PM
0

Spend more time listening to tradcons, unfiltered and throughout history. He's not wrong and it's ultimately done more to hurt white people and men in the same way feminism has for women.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:54 PM
2

I dunno. The GOP is going the opposite extreme with Trumpism which is frankly even worse and will be even more problematic for the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:52 PM
13

I mean, given that suffragetes opposed giving black people the right to vote I don't think anyone should be surprised. This would include Elizabeth Cady Stanton who was quoted numerous times as being a racist. Even further, the KKK had a women's branch. With a history like that, how can you reasonably say that feminism is not a supremacist movement? It is. It's in its history and DNA.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:41 PM
2

I mean, even a basic biological anthropology class will explain that these behaviors between the sexes isn't really misogynistic or misandristic. At least, not intentionally. The intention is so clearly for both to identify a biologically compatible mate to produce kids and continue the species.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:20 AM
1

Yes, but it won't be because he won over moderates.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:12 AM
2

Yeah, then idk. Maybe it's alone time/self-care like some guys do. I occasionally go alone to drink too to decompress. Not often though.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:36 PM
1

I dunno. The GOP today isn't as moderate as they used to be. Trump mostly scared them off, just going off the election results. You actually do need a big tent to win elections. That's literally how our system works and it shows that the GOP actually doesn't represent the majority of Americans, statistically speaking. Look at when they last won the popular vote.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:34 PM
8

Cut your nose to spite your face because at least they don't hate men like those other people who are more than raving mad (January 6th shows they're insane and that's just the tip of the bloody spear) and support things like this that are just as prejudiced towards men. Again, literally playing into the worst stereotypes and narratives about our movement.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:25 AM
1

Yup and it's also been proven that abortions lower infant mortality rates too. Banning that truthfully creates more problems than it solves. Source(s): https://www.americanprogress.org/article/limiting-abortion-access-contributes-poor-maternal-health-outcomes/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312072/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-anti-abortion-infant-mortality-20190515-story.html%3f_amp=true
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:19 AM
0

And how many pro-lifers are stepping up to adopt those kids and caring for them since they're already here instead of a clump of cells that isn't even a fetus at three or so weeks? Worry about them first. That's a bigger issue than abortion.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:17 AM
1

Government has no place in the bedroom. Why is this so hard?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:15 AM
1

Men shouldn't for the same reason a woman shouldn't have say in whether I want a vasectomy or have one forced on me.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:14 AM
3

Precisely. The draft ended up being too controversial (for good reason, given which men were primarily getting drafted disproportionately) and literally no D or R president is going to take that massive political gamble by reactivating it unless things just go full on WW III. It arguably is one of the things that destroyed LBJ's re-election chances hence why he didn't seek a second term. The only "benefit" to the draft was that it made Americans actually pay attention to our foreign affairs beca…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:09 AM
6

Animals are animals. Women do this to men too and I'm not even denying that men do it. I know we do it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:01 AM
4

I mean, some of them genuinely do come off as stereotypical Karens. It's across the political spectrum too. Either it's a white liberal Karen who is a diehard feminist or someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:00 AM
6

From my experience, it's usually girls going out with their friends to have a "girl's night out." My girlfriend does it here and there. Of course, this is in the US specifically. I dunno if it is a custom in other Western countries or overall but I wouldn't be surprised if other countries did that.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:58 AM
16

Likely in a support job too. No judgements on that end towards those currently in a support rate, specialty code, or MOS though since that's the majority of the military technically. Combat arms are reflective of only 1% of the US armed forces.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:51 AM
7

A double whammy of misandry and misogyny. Guy decided to go all out.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:51 AM
1

If anything destabilizes our military, it won't be this. Not that I think you can do that.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:50 AM
11

Given what Madison Cawthorn said recently, yes. That's exactly what these people think. They don't really hide it anymore.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:48 AM
1

They are a bigger tent than R's but they can barely keep that together, albeit for different reasons than why R's aren't good at building a big tent themselves.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:42 AM
0

Why? Those traditional gender roles aren't any better and Waters is highlighting why exactly that is. You're basically working against your own interest. A cyanide pill is still a cyanide pill, even if you pick a different colored one. You also end up playing into the worst narratives about the MRA, which doesn't get us anywhere.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:41 AM
1

Yeah, well they aren't any better than Dems sooo... load of good that's doing you. (Sarcasm) You end up going for people who are just as bad and also confirm some of what the "woke" (whatever that means, it's a buzzword half the time for any earnest conversation about social issues that tradcons hate discussing including this) Dems believe.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:39 AM
1

This was a big problem well before the social safety net. We just started talking about it more because corporate America doesn't want to pay their share.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:30 AM
8

And yet a lot of people in the MRM gravitate towards them even though they're even less helpful than Dems because of their belief in traditional gender roles and how that shapes their policies which have done far more to destabilize families.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:29 AM
-13

And an LGBTQI family is still a family, even if they wish it wasn't based on their narrow, dogmatic religious views. Edit: Downvotes kinda proving that some people are deeply unserious and help people with Waters' view because they'd rather concentrate on discriminating against gay people. Way to play into some of the worst stereotypes of our movement, guys.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:27 AM
11

-78 now
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:34 PM
3

He's an ignorant person and one of the worst Secretaries of State we've ever had.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 03:27 PM
28

2XChromosomes.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 03:22 PM
3

Yeah, that's usually it. Feminism has always been a grift, was never about gender equality and if it is, then this is about the only thing that it is equal on. Men and women both use it to make money off the rubes!
/r/MensRights30/11/21 03:15 PM
1

Basically, this is the opposite extreme of woke. That's basically what you are doing and it doesn't help us. If there are female time lords, this shouldn't bother you or be seen as being "woke" and "gimmicky." The bad writing should.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:23 PM
1

It's the new McCarthyism, chauvinism and authoritarianism included. Anything that dissents from publicly "accepted" norms and beliefs is bad and if dissent or affiliate with dissenters, you are radioactive and not to be trusted. You are the enemy. It's even worse on college campuses, where even center, center left and left wing folks like me who are critical of feminism and its objectively corrosive influence on social, economic and political equity can get dogged on for voicing our evidence-bas…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:52 AM
1

SRS?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:19 AM
3

Which is what feminists want. They want to get even and treat us like some men treated them because that was what society expected of women. They want to punish us, all of us for things most of us would not dare condone and know is wrong.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:13 AM
4

The joke I always make with them is imply they're schizophrenic and basically ask, "if rape is everywhere and everyone is a rapist, are they in the room with us now? If so, what are they saying?"
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:10 AM
8

They'll claim that it's internalized misogyny instead of accepting that maybe feminists actually are misogynist and believe in a regressive ideology that infantilizes women as purely victims, dismisses their capacity to abuse and holds them back even at a time when women are now surpassing man, fairly and unfairly due to pandering.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:09 AM
4

Not according to feminists. You have to orally (pun completely intended, lol) give consent. You have to say it.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:06 AM
10

It's damaging to our society in general.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:05 AM
17

It won't and if it does, she'd serve less time than if a man did it. This society coddles and even enables feminine criminality, instead of putting the boot on its throat and pressing down like the system does with men.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:02 AM
5

But yes, MGTOW is a terrible thing somehow. (Sarcasm)
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:31 AM
6

This is precisely how feminism infantilizes and holds women back. They have to be victims, nothing else even when this happens to men all the time. There's no discussion on that in the media or in the public square overall. We are just told to ignore it, suck it up and be the bigger person so maybe the solution is to do the same for women. Maybe women need to be told to suck it up more often, no matter how big or small the problem is. If they want to be our equals and treated the same as men acr…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:28 AM
1

And this is why we need to start prosecuting false accusations as a way to deter future ones.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:06 AM
1

Thing is, a female Doctor was inevitable. It's been a discussion for decades so no, the terrible writing and the feminisation of the Doctor aren't connected. The latter isn't the problem.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:31 PM
1

Great actor, but terrible view.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:17 AM
2

Yeah, Whittaker is actually a phenomenal actress and I was excited to see her as the Doctor. Problem is, she was handed some terrible writing.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:15 AM
1

I don't know. Seeing Steve still try to fight that bully in the alleyway without powers is pretty inspiring. There's a lot more to this than a super soldier serum and I don't need a young character to be my age or whatever to look up to him.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:11 AM
1

Steve Rogers is extremely relatable because he's the underdog who came from nothing and was demeaned for not initially being a big buff guy. How is that not significant?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:09 AM
5

Spider-Man, Superman, and so on. There's plenty. It's not a right wing conspiracy. It's just culture war garbage that you'd expect from feminists. Men and boys have issues and are left behind, but this is furthest from the cause. If it is, it's truthfully the lack of REAL role models in their lives such as male teachers and in some cases, their fathers who may be gone due to broken family law systems, racial profiling, etc.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:08 AM
15

Yeah, if someone is committing crime over stuff like a female Doctor or whatever then I'm not sure the onus is on the popular media then. They just have legitimate mental issues and can't distinguish reality from fiction and they desperately need help.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:03 AM
8

Yes, the biggest threat that men face is fictional characters and their gender. Ffs. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:01 AM
9

Yeah, it's a bunch of illegitimate and nitpicky culture war garbage that makes the MRM look terrible. This is the stuff we should expect from feminists, not our side.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:59 AM
1

When feminists think they can speak and be outraged for BIPOC who can perfectly do all those things on their own.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:51 PM
3

That happens when you appoint Catherine Lhamon.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:48 PM
4

Well, feminists have been known to prey on young boys hence why most sex scandals with teachers usually see the female teacher getting arrested.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:38 PM
7

Srebrenica wasn't enough for them, I guess.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:35 PM
1

I dunno. A lot of the friends I know make a load of money. Granted though this is based on anecdotal knowledge and based more around private defense contracting.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:32 PM
6

It can be both.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:41 AM
3

A lot of the people I know who have gone far with those certs usually enlisted in the military and did an IT based MOS. That's a good way to get into contracting work with the government, which is where the big beaucoup bucks are.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:40 AM
0

That's almost every Western politician today. They are all beholden to Saudi interests with the exception of a few.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:42 AM
8

I doubt they'll care about that. There's no bottom or limits to the chauvinism and misandry of feminists. They want to get even with all men and have declared war on us because of some very negative experience.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:23 AM
1

Another example is that more women today are running for public office than ever before and winning. They're also getting into key appointed positions in government and the private sector. That's great, if we want them to be equal and held to the same standard as men which is what equity feminists like Sommers support because it does mean women are capable. However, it also means that the gender feminists (who largely run the feminist establishment today) are wrong about gendered and patriarchal…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 01:33 AM
2

I am more than happy to. One of the first things we have to understand about Sharia is that not all of it is gleaned from the Qur'an. Most of it is taken from the hadiths, which are recorded stories about the Prophet Muhammad and his views on the issues in a given situation. However, these hadiths are problematic in the sense that they were recorded and written down long after the Prophet had died so his words can easily be misinterpreted to suit the agenda of whomever is pushing a certain hadit…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:22 PM
4

Well, when you realize that the person who started the movement got outed as lying about the allegations, it's a perfect testament to that.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:55 PM
2

Oh absolutely and I edited my comment to better reflect that since I was largely alluding to the point you made.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:54 PM
2

And if it is (which I think it is to an extent), we should look at the HOW that fatherlessness happened. That starts with the disproportionate incarceration of Black men and the disproportionate homicide of them by law enforcement.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:35 AM
1

Look at how they handled the Massacre of Srebrenica. That alone showed the UN is to some extent, okay with gendered violence.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:34 AM
1

WHO did not cover up COVID. The Chinese government failed to disclose information about what they knew. That's different.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:33 AM
56

Srebrenica being the most glaring example of them openly taking a side in gendered conflict. They legitimately had time to at least make an effort to save everyone, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:31 AM
3

And lawmakers who are predominantly male make dozens of laws to protect feminists and women but none for men, starting with the Violence Against Women Act. Where's the Violence Against Men Act? Where's the specialized offices for us?
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:22 AM
16

It's the end result of society being conditioned to detest men.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:17 AM
1

The tradcons overall still have the most sway in the party and among GOP voters (aka why Trump largely appealed to them and Evangelicals) who don't see that this honestly hurts them more than it helps. Even some Dems see why barring women from the draft is a terrible thing. Not saying Democrats are great, given how influenced they are by feminists but I have to give them credit here. They are doing a mostly better job of reading the room than R's are on this issue. https://www.google.com/amp/s/w…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:47 AM
1

Depends on what legal school of Sharia. They aren't all rigid and conservative, but sadly the media doesn't acknowledge that or the nuances of religion in general. Popular culture is included in this and is just as guilty.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:40 AM
3

The best part about that Paris situation is that law was designed originally to prevent women from being discriminated against. It's nice to see feminist laws come back to bite them, hold them accountable and make them actually be equitable.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:39 AM
75

Immature 13 year old girl?
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:30 AM
2

Thanks to feminism.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:55 AM
14

Basically, the thing women claim is being done to them by men is actually inverse.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:46 PM
1

Yeah, I think he's an ass with no self awareness but I'd never body shame him. That's just low hanging fruit when there's better things you can go after him for.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:42 AM
4

Oh they did. We just didn't mind because actual politics weren't as crazy. We are all guilty on that front.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:38 AM
2

I mean, that is feminism for you. It's a mixture of immaturity, pettiness and insecurity towards others.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:36 AM
1

We are called erratic, creepy and so much else when we express ourselves. The things that they accuse men of doing to women, which I don't believe has ever been true.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:35 AM
3

I wish it wasn't taught on college campuses. It's too divisive and frankly has no utility in the real world.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:33 AM
3

I see it as indirect genocide.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:31 AM
6

Especially men of color who are most disproportionately incarcerated on those grounds. I've continued to make this point and I won't stop. If we want feminism to be seen as terrible as it is, we need to also bring up that it isn't just virulently sexist. We've established that correctly. What we haven't done enough is discuss that it is racist too. There's plenty of evidence and I'm happy to provide it. We can start with the Central Park 5 and the framing of the case in the media. Hillary Clinto…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:30 AM
4

Immaturity and intolerance.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:12 AM
4

I dunno. Western pop culture never hid its agenda. What changed is that it allowed some room for things other than what we presently see.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:11 AM
2

Literally the opposite of extreme of the uber lefties and they can't even see it or why they make the MRM look terrible. We can't win playing the game of either side, but especially there's. That's what the feminists would want and we give it to them every time because we fail to call out the tradcons and disavow them and the stereotypes they create.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:06 AM
5

They're the ultimate example of what's wrong with tradcons.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:50 PM
6

And that last one from liberal media sounds like they're still trying to put the fault on men for why we suffer when it usually isn't our fault. It's typically victim-shaming and blaming, which would never be done to a woman or women.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:49 PM
0

I mean, if a show ends up doing a good job with the character and the characterization is right then I'm personally okay with gender swapping a lot of the time. It's pedantic if the character's gender is the only thing that they change and people obsess over it.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:44 PM
4

Eh, I agree with you outside of Captain Marvel. That wasn't bad or good. It was really bland and generic like the character of Carol Danvers has always been in the comics. I pretty much got in trouble with both sides for that and for saying the MCU exploited the upcoming hype of Endgame to get people to see it because it was assumed there'd be something related to it in CM. Obviously there wasn't which made it even worse.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:42 PM
1

This assumes that everyone follows those specific people and that BLM is not also a decentralized movement (it is), not just an organization. That is also well established, but again people pick those people to delegitimize the movement entirely in bad faith when not everyone in the movement is a Marxist. Again, buzzwords and bad faith from conservative politicians and MSM isn't helping us here.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:39 AM
1

BLM actually has legitimate reasons to exist and does believe in equality. It also shares some things in common with the MRM, given the way the movement has highlighted how black men are treated. None of that is related to Marxist thought unless you agree with the buzzword tactics employed by conservatives (who definitely aren't allies to the MRM, given their views on traditional gender roles) and are in that camp that thought MLK was one without credible evidence. Antifa, I dunno. I'm not a hug…
/r/MensRights15/11/21 02:19 PM
1

Which ruined MeToo because it was never about accountability. It was about punishing and getting even with all men for perceived slights, legitimate and fabricated. The fact that the person who started it ended up being exposed as a liar is the greatest testament of that.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:25 AM
3

Yes, and those "traditional views" have had real world consequences and normalizing them without considering that is wrong.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:21 AM
5

Nobody has said Democrats are any better. They aren't. We know they aren't, based on Joe Biden's record on Title IX alone and don't get me started on Clinton's "super predator" remark. What is being said though is that conservatives have a very problematic record and worldview on gender issues and the MRM shouldn't align with them. It doesn't help our image or our objectives when a lot of them are both misandrist and misogynist.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:20 AM
32

This and also liability/accountability which is a bigger deal now in the age of COVID. Even off campus extracurricular events hosted by clubs are required to follow similarly strict guidelines at my campus.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 11:30 PM
0

Daily Caller has a pretty clear ideological bend so I'm not buying this.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 12:06 PM
3

They didn't just turn against her. They did a lot more than that. A whole lot more. They threatened her and forced her into hiding.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:49 AM
1

Because you literally are. Conservatism does not do anything to advance the MRM and is also what gives us a bad look. You may not like to hear it because it makes you uncomfortable, but it is objectively true. The cons con you every time.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:39 PM
1

You would think an MRA would see why this is a problem, given who will be most hurt by this but I guess not.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:51 AM
2

You'd be surprised at how wrong this is.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:50 AM
1

Nope. That just sends them to the opposite extreme of feminism which is another thing the MRM needs to proactively distance itself from if we want equality.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:50 AM
1

This is patently false.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:47 AM
1

The day we hold more women to the same standards as men, including in incarceration and executions, the more objectively equal we will be. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Nothing sexist about it.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:56 AM
6

Aka why it shouldn't be taught anywhere
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:51 AM
1

The funny thing is that historically, countriss are more likely to go to war when a woman is the head of state. There was a study that even looked at this which stated that queens were 27% more likely than kings to engage in interstate conflicts in Europe between 1480 to 1913. Largely to overcompensate out of a fear of looking weak. There's a few other points the source makes about this, but we don't talk about it as much as we need to. It's why I even as a Democrat, I was deeply concerned about…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 09:03 AM
1

It's always been about revenge.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:48 PM
2

No, they're also dropping out of higher education and have lower grad rates. Even my school is like this and they're hard-core into the feminist bull.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:43 PM
3

And frankly, they deserve the jerks. They belong together. They're made for each other because they're both so shallow.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:41 PM
2

They also want to condescend men and remind us that we are all rapists, pigs, and all sorts of other terrible things. Why would we want to go to a place like that that's essentially told us that we aren't welcome?
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:39 PM
3

Sadly, they'll never take accountability for it.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:36 PM
10

She's a woman. She can do anything. HR won't do anything to her likely because of a fear of being labeled discriminatory because we allow women to abuse the law for their own ends instead of dismissing them and holding them to the same standards as men. As it stands now, women are not held to any standard when it comes to sexism.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:08 PM
1

You'd be surprised. Matt Walsh is a common figure idolized by some in our sphere (he shouldn't be because he believes in a lot of things we shouldn't and brings bad PR to our movement) and he's been bashing it, among others.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:04 PM
1

You'd be surprised how people can still accuse you if things with that. I had it happen awhile ago and yes, the accuser was a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 07:50 AM
1

She just said that to get confirmed. A lot of people say whatever to get the gig. Ask William Barr.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 07:49 AM
3

I think she's right. Regardless of gender, parents should be able to spend time with their kids. I really don't understand why those on the Right, some who claim to be MRAs are upset at this.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 05:18 AM
9

No, it was a member of his cabinet. Raab works under Johnson.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:09 PM
0

Nobody is doing that despite what disinformation you've heard from pols who don't want these issues to be discussed even if it can be a good thing for men who are mistreated such as black men and we all know feminists played a role in that. If anything, the MRM should support it if it leads to more people potentially becoming critical of feminism and its racist history.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:03 PM
3

It's even worse for black men. Especially on Title IX cases which shows that feminism isn't just an extension of sexist thought, but also racism.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:02 PM
1

The sad thing is these people don't understand CRT and are as bad as the people who bash it without understanding what it is.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:02 PM
3

And they sadly are in leadership and they're shaping policy, which she seemingly wants to do. The future is going to get darker when that does.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:56 PM
1

Feminism is the immature belief in getting even.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:44 AM
1

In this instance, I think it has to do with traditional conservative views about the role of women in society which is just as problematic as the feminist opposition to the draft.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:14 AM
7

Women thinking they can just condescend, insult and objectify us which they dismiss as not having an effect on mental health.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:05 AM
1

It's a little more nuanced than that and you can apply that "worked harder" thing to those other groups as well.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:15 AM
1

Yes, because I'm not an expert and while there are studies that show what you suggest they aren't the majority. Thing is, Asians aren't the only racial minority and there are others who legitimately are underrepresented in the tech industry and elsewhere, both women and men. Meritocracy can still be exclusionary in a non-conducive way hence why DEI exists. It's to actually make it more balanced.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:39 PM
1

When you have women like this in charge, yes. When you do not, no. It can be a conducive thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:30 AM
2

Harvard Business Review (pretty reputable): https://www.google.com/amp/s/hbr.org/amp/2018/07/the-other-diversity-dividend MarketWatch: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/the-numbers-dont-lie-diverse-workforces-make-companies-more-money-2020-07-30 Forbes: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/annapowers/2018/06/27/a-study-finds-that-diverse-companies-produce-19-more-revenue/amp/ Entrepreneur: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.entrepreneur.com/amphtml/346229 Ther…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:38 AM
0

And it's funny because as a black man, I'm generally a big supporter of DEI because I do believe women and people of color who actually are qualified for jobs need to be advanced more because studies have shown that businesses that embrace that perform better. However, I also believe that there are people, predominantly white women who tend to exploit something that should be geared more towards ACTUALLY marginalized people and white women (the main audience of feminism, which is very exclusiona…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:59 PM
23

It’s almost like there’s a significant amount of people, mostly white women, that treat diversity as a way to advance their own narrow careers and interests and don't really care less about others including actual victims and people of color who actually can be and are discriminated against and treated terribly in the workplace.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 05:39 PM
1

I dunno. Given the way Hillary was treated in 2016 due to her connection to him and also how Anthony Weiner was disavowed and pressured to resign by Pelosi a few years ago, it's hard to say these are the same people. These are also the same ones who got Al Franken to resign for profane behavior too. All of their attitudes towards women and history of it was profane, just as Cuomo's was. I've seen more of that politicization of sexual assault and double standards from the Trump side when it comes…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:15 AM
1

Clearly not according to the investigation where numerous witnesses were interviewed. Same for Trump. It was a lot more than boasting and courting in both instances. Again, thinking otherwise is you carrying water for the feminists and proving them right. Is that really the sort of thing you want? Society was out to destroy people who were predators in this case or do you not believe men should be held accountable for anything they do that's terrible? If it was a woman doing all these things, yo…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:05 AM
1

Pretty much and given the way people were critical of that dynasty in 2016, I'd say it mostly happened.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:12 AM
1

See my other comment on this post. They're basing it on a double standard that some have shown.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:33 PM
1

Because unfortunately, some MRAs who called out Cuomo do support Trump despite his own legit history of misogyny and sexually assaulting people which has made sexual assault into a partisan issue. It shouldn't be and when a lot of them do that, they carry water for feminists and prove their dishonest narratives right. No matter if you're a D or R, sexual assault should be called out and condemned. If you're going to rightly condemn Cuomo (before he was even found officially guilty by the NYAG), …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:31 PM
1

Or we should stop supporting far-anything. Just amplifies the other extremes.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:00 AM
5

Feminism is for women who are really just insecure girls who never mentally got past middle school. That's as far as their views of men go. No adaptation or change. We all stayed immature to them, according to their 13 year old minds.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:40 AM
1

I hated the Trump Administration, but their approach to Title IX was the one thing I think they got right surprisingly. They listened to all stakeholders and incorporated MRA feedback into the policy, including allowing lawyers to cross examine accusers. If only they did it sooner and went further to legally compel/force public universities to disclose those numbers. Private universities too since they do receive some degree of federal funding. They had the means and power to put pressure on Tit…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:34 AM
1

They mistake feminism for expertise.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 04:01 AM
2

And there's no question that feminism is the cause of this. No other ideology breeds this level of violence and fear towards people. This is why it is the greatest social ill in our society next to racism and why we must marginalize anyone advocating for it, just as we do with racism Also, I expect her to get less prison time for this than a man if he did the same crime since we know women are not held to any standard in life, especially when it comes to criminal convictions like men are.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 03:57 AM
2

It's called feminism and getting even.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:55 PM
18

Wouldn't be the first time they left men to die. Never forget that they left men to die at Srebrenica.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 05:44 AM
4

Because they bought into the bullshit notion of toxic masculinity and MeToo with a bunch of ads. They drank the Woke-Aid.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 09:02 AM
1

The ACLU was also involved in this so it wasn't just an MRM group that thought women shouldn't be excluded. Don't expect feminists who claim to idolize RBG to protest this terrible decision even though she absolutely would have said women should be eligible.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:41 AM
1

The difference though is that NYT isn't partially or entirely funded by the US government. RT is absolutely funded or partially funded by the Russian government hence why you'll never see them publish stories that are extremely critical of Putin.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:37 AM
5

It's funny because white supremacists and xenophobes use this same tactic. Just replace the "men" in "all men" with "black people" or "immigrant" or some other marginalized group and the premise will ultimately remain the same even if you change one detail. They have more in common with who they hate and don't even realize it. Feminism is to gender, what racism is to race.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:29 AM
3

He wasn't just around when the DCL went out. He wrote the damn thing and under his own standards, he'd be expelled and in jail for the shady accusations that Tara Reade made against him last year. It's funny. The Trump Administration was terrible and Betsy DeVos was beyond unqualified to be Secretary of Education but I will say that their approach to Title IX was the one thing they were right about and I'm skeptical as to how much they were involved in the process of revising it.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:22 AM
8

And it's hilariously tragic because the guy who wrote the DCL would later be accused of sexual assault and under his own standards, he'd be kicked out of a university and in jail. That guy is now President of the United States.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:20 AM
1

We can. I'm just stating that at least AOC can mostly think reasonably and her points come from some degree of statistical evidence. Having met this person, I can say that. She's purely an ideologue who literally only talks about action but never does anything and when she does it's exclusionary to anyone who doesn't have a vagina.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:01 AM
1

It's just amazing. Feminists talk about inclusion and diversity, which I agree are good things and important things to have because that can make an institution stronger and more in touch but then basically demonize and exclude white men the next who are dramatically falling behind in K-12 and higher ed. If anything, universities are for women now. Men seemingly are told they don't belong which can hurt them economically because having a higher degree of education can give access to better payin…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:54 AM
12

Especially since the Biden Administration urged the Court not to hear this case based on their own review.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 12:53 AM
10

Yeah, we are pretty much screwed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/21 11:52 PM
3

Because feminists have weaponized "sexism" to mean anything and everything is sexist, even if it isn't at all. At this point, I'm firmly convinced they internalize it and make up 95% of it so naturally they'll find it everywhere and see it even when it's not there. The only sexists and people who produce ACTUALLY sexist climates are feminists. They're a bitter, cynical and paranoid lpy.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:47 AM
2

And most of their actions are horrid when it comes to dealing with men in interpersonal situations
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:45 AM
2

It's hard to do that when feminists are the least empathetic people in the world and most women sadly believe in feminism.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:44 AM
12

Go to Afghanistan and Pakistan and look at what the Taliban is specifically doing to young boys. If they aren't being turned into child soldiers, they're quite literally molesting them as part of Bacha Bazi. That is the same as what's being done to women, but the so-called "egalitarians" at the UN won't tell you that's happening because they too are buying into the feminist dogma. If they weren't, there wouldn't solely be a UN Women. There'd be a UN Boys or UN Men. There'd be more discourse on t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/21 08:35 AM
3

Because our biology isn't 100% the same. At best, you get pre-cum.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/21 05:06 AM
2

If anything, just judging them off of their oral prowess is a man literally asking to possibly get screwed over and not in a way they want.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/21 05:04 AM
8

In the eyes of simps and feminists, only women can have standards, most of which are actually arbitrary and sexist.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/21 04:59 AM
1

Because feminists lied to him
/r/TheRedPill07/06/21 04:58 AM
1

This is more true for women who demand men give them head and give nothing back because we are objectified far more in contemporary times due to sexist and bigoted ideologies like feminism.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/21 04:55 AM
16

Problem is, men are treated just as bad in those countries and feminists won't acknowledge that ever. A huge part of their dogma is quite literally never admitting fault in their extremely flawed worldview and acknowledging that male privilege hardly exists for at least 97% of the world's male population. We should be purely egalitarian even in those places because feminism will never stand for actual equality. I mean, look at how feminist thinkers thought about black men and women, for instance…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/21 04:01 AM
16

I'd go further. Feminism is harmful to society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 07:32 PM
49

Yeah, we do. I just joined. I'm just waiting for my membership card to show up in the mail now.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 05:24 AM
1

It's never been concluded clearly that he was a socialist. It's only ever been suggested as part of a racist dogwhistle by people who wanted to reduce his credibility back then. Labeling anyone a communist or pinko was a good way to do that back then. People even lobbed it at Kennedy because he was an Irish Catholic, which pushed against traditional WASP perceptions of who could be POTUS. And you don't think police officers or law enforcement in general can't be a tool or mechanism designed to u…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:58 AM
0

I did. There's two problems here though. The first is that a group getting money isn't a grift if they are using it to help others, not enrich themselves. The SCLC under MLK received money too as donations. Were they grifters by the standard of the writer? The BPP likewise saw donations. The second would be that the way people see these movements is impacted by race and some may have a better understanding than others because it relates specifically to them. The writer of this piece doesn't quit…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 06:18 AM
0

It's not and the majority of people who are black and subscribe to it know it. Do certain people grift off it? Sure, but that's not the movement. No different than how some people grift off of the Men's Rights Movement. By your own logic then, if a feminist said this movement is just a white supremacist grift because one guy who is a white supremacist grifts off of it the entire movement is. That's terrible logic based entirely on generalization. You know it and it makes you play right into what…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 06:05 AM
1

Specifically lower class white men who are poor. BLM actually has acknowledged the intersectionality of race and class and how it hurts even whites. The Black Panthers did too in the 1970s, hence why they formed the Rainbow Coalition in Chicago with the Young Lords (Puerto Ricans) and Young Patriots (whites). It's also what Critical Race Theory looks at, despite what purposefully dishonest people try to say.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 10:22 PM
-1

Who? Candace Owens, the opportunist? She's not exactly what most in the black community strives to be since she's quite literally just grifting off of ACTUAL racists. Most of us absolutely don't see it the way you think. They genuinely are pushing for change but it's hard when people look down on it and see it as a grift without actually talking to people who support it.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 10:20 PM
1

Aka why I don't entirely understand why some MRA's hate BLM. It generally is pro-men and low income white men who it tries to help.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 10:18 PM
2

How old was the nephew?
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:42 PM
1

And therefore, feminism is a lie and based on women wanting to get even with all men for the actions of one scumbag. Why? Because your average feminist has the intellectual and emotional capacity of a high school freshman.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:38 PM
2

You're literally a fucking furry. Go get laid.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:48 AM
3

I mean, religion in general is not for me but if it helps someone get through a hard time and with self-actualization then fine. That's their peach and they can have it. That said though, don't ram it down my throat because that's how you get people to resent religion. Also to your point, I agree. If someone is a Christian living in the West and has never been to regions of the world, like the Middle East where Christians are actually still persecuted in some parts they can't really talk about C…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 05:36 PM
-1

Guessing you didn't see what happened on January 6th, Oklahoma City Bombing, and lots of other terrible tragedies in America over the last 30-40 years where innocents got killed or hurt. The majority of which were not caused by the Left or by immigrants so there's no correlation. The Left did not make Timothy McVeigh blow up a building with innocent people in it, including kids. The Left didn't cause some guy to shoot up a Walmart in El Paso. These were psychos who made their choices. They had t…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 08:11 AM
1

And it would reduce prison overcrowding which is pretty much a problem all over the US and it puts people in a situation where they have to release people who maybe shouldn't be released.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:09 AM
1

Not really since you have plenty of psycho religious fundamentalists on the far right, which is very prominent and more common in America. In fact, radical Islamists actually do have more in common with the far right than they do the left or far left. Pinning this on one side or just the left or whatever is lazy reactionary thinking devoid of critical thought.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:06 AM
1

She's got a vagina so she won't face any consequences.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:04 AM
1

Well, the US criminal justice system doesn't really focus on rehab or restorative justice even though it's been proven to work in most other places its been done.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:03 AM
1

If that were true, why are violent crime rates actually higher in red states? Mississippi for instance has one of the highest homicide rates in America. That kinda tells you that so-called "tough on crime" policies don't work and only enable it. They also disproportionately target low income white men and men of color, which is something MRAs should be deeply concerned about because the feminists sure aren't despite what they claim. Source: https://smartpolitics.lib.umn.edu/2009/09/16/red-states…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:02 AM
1

True. It just leads to prison overcrowding, which is an even bigger issue and what leads to certain people getting released that maybe shouldn't.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 06:58 AM
1

Yes, because most of the people didn't have sufficient evidence to show they engaged in property damage. That's how the law works. Others definitely were charged though for the BLM protests, 95% of which were peaceful so I wouldn't call them riots. They also weren't against Trump. They were more against widespread issues that have existed before them, which men, especially black men have suffered with so it's very much part of this sub about men's issues when men are impacted.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 06:57 AM
2

But the feminists told me women aren't privileged naturally and don't get help.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:52 AM
5

Feminism is to gender what racism is to race. They are social ills rooted entirely and deeply in prejudices, which are not conducive to productive change that benefits men AND women.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:47 AM
7

https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women And the APA has said women are naturally biased to women than men are to men.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:29 AM
68

They probably are feminists. This is why I'm so weary of women in that field. They aren't objective about gender issues. Same for why rape allegations where women are the accusers shouldn't be investigated by someone of the same sex. They won't be impartial because they'll see themselves in the victim. I'd say the same for male investigators. Even the APA has acknowledged that women are naturally more inclined to gender biases than men. https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:24 AM
30

I'm not sure it's solely white women. Feminists in general put the targets on themselves, even when they aren't targeted as ferociously or consistently like men are when it comes to discrimination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 04:50 AM
1

Now that I'm more aware of. I've seen the MGTOW page and the phrasing in the article is biased too, not just the sources cited. That's an even bigger red herring for me.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 08:37 PM
1

Both are feasible and should happen. We should lower taxes on the middle class, but raise them on the 1-2%. Would you rather government run more inefficiently with even less revenue to support daily services, including LE, the military, etc? Look at the poorest states in America and how things go if they eliminate taxes entirely.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:31 PM
1

No, I know. I read it. I was just being sarcastic which I'll admit I'm not good at conveying over the internet, lol.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:25 PM
2

We should all do the same to the women's rights movement and feminist Wikipedia pages except we wouldn't be defacing it with lies. We'd be editing it to reflect what feminism actually is.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 09:25 AM
5

And it's basically saying the info provided may not be accurate because the feminists who edit it don't provide evidence.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 09:24 AM
23

But I'm sure men are responsible for this too somehow, according to feminists
/r/MensRights22/05/21 09:23 AM
3

Because it would debunk the narrative that men have it easy in every country all over the world, which is patently false.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 09:20 AM
1

Yeah, and there's nothing wrong with valuing good grades, personal responsibility and the like. That's normal and everyone should want that for themselves. That's not a problem. However, it will become a problem when you tie your entire self worth to a test score or a letter grade. Believe me, there are people who don't have straight A's or do not pass all tests with 100% that still make it to the top.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 08:08 AM
-1

Again, they both do that equally. You can see that if you look at a lot of the GOP's policies which aren't exactly positive for men of color or impoverished white men and pander to the people who literally were shouting things like "Jews will not replace us." They play to similar cultural and extremist grievances and push polarization. In the case of the GOP, it caused a literal insurrection that caused a lot of hardworking and respectable cops to get killed or injured because of lies they were …
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:57 AM
1

If anything, it's prescient now.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:52 AM
6

And thus making things harder for female victims with credible allegations and evidence that much harder to come out because they won't be believed. Almost as if feminists are bitter and immature girls (not women, I won't call them something that implies intellectual or mental maturity) with chips on their shoulder who have deluded themselves into thinking they're helping anyone but as a result of that chip, they actually make everyone's life harder including for victims. The sooner we acknowled…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:48 AM
6

They won't do anything. They just want to punish all men and get even with all men for the actions of a few dirtbag men who mistreated them. Feminists are just that immature. They are people who are mentally stuck in that vindictive and immature female high schooler phase.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:40 AM
6

Don't expect the UN to do much about this, including establishing a UN Men's body. They're still pushing the wokeist feminist garbage and only valuing women's rights. It'll be worse once Amina Mohammed takes over for Guterres..
/r/MensRights22/05/21 07:37 AM
1

I didn't support Joe, but this wasn't stolen. Trump could not prove it in court and even his own appointed SCOTUS justices said it wasn't stolen. Even some of the federal judges he nominated ruled against him too. His Attorney General, FBI Director and DHS CISA Chief (who he fired) both said this was the most secure election in US history and any voter fraud wasn't significant enough to influence the direction of this election. All of these were Trump appointees, who serve the Constitution, not …
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:36 AM
0

If you are a taxpayer, it's not a government handout. It's your rainy day fund. It's them giving you back your money that you paid in. Would you rather the government hoard it and ACTUALLY have taxation basically be theft? Everyone regardless of race or gender should have that in case they fall on hard times and everyone does. There's a little more nuance here that you're missing. Even Republicans at one point believed that because it was common sense conservatism that government does have its u…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:19 AM
1

He's not a puppet. He's just towing that same line as any establishment politician (aka the problem), including with Israel which isn't exactly all that pleasant for Palestinians not related to disgusting groups like Hamas. Plenty of Jews and Israelis don't like the current government either given how it's created such a toxic environment for Arabs, Christians, Jews and Muslims in the region. Trump did the same establishment line towing too, just in the opposite direction. It doesn't make either…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:17 AM
1

Both parties are terrible at race relations, lol. Biden and Trump are both proof of decades of how both parties lean into different excesses that shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:11 AM
1

Which at times comes at the expense of their mental health. There's a huge stigma with mental health in Asian and Asian American communities. You see it a lot in ethnic communities overall, but I've found it to be far more endemic, troubling and entrenched in that community than a lot of others that are trying to address it more.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:10 AM
2

By that logic, same for Trump. Let's not push conspiracy theories and act like these people aren't autonomous in making mistakes.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 07:53 PM
3

Yeah, I agree with certain policy proposals of the LP but I'm very skeptical that they could be a check or a balance. D's and R's don't even check or balance each other. As someone who studies political science, I'd argue that political parties ARE the problem and what George Washington explicitly warned against in his farewell address, among other things. The LP is no exception and not without its flaws that would make them no different if they ever got enough influence or power. This would par…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:07 PM
2

What are the UK birth rates? Not entirely familiar with them, given I'm not there. It was originally projected in the US that the pandemic would foster a lot of unintended pregnancies and start a baby boom in 2020. Months later, it's been found that we actually saw a baby bust which continues the trend of US birth rates being on the decline for the last 35+ years. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56288038.amp
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:02 PM
18

It won't. D and R governments both break laws they set out for themselves.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:11 AM
16

That's more likely than some conspiracy theory about him having handlers. That and he's listened to what polls well with people and for some godawful reason, feminism sells.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:11 AM
14

He bought into the feminist lies because that's sadly a powerful undercurrent that Democrats will not do anything to marginalize even though it's pretty evident that feminists will cost them elections like it did in 2016. They are partly what got Drumpf elected. James Carville, a top Democratic strategist that got Bill Clinton elected even acknowledged that the Democrats' demonization of men and white people as being all privileged does not get them votes. I'm a long time Democrat and think he's…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:07 AM
3

That's still the narrative they're running on, as if they don't have more rights and privilege than ever before to pursue their own ends. The fact more women are going into the workforce upon getting college educations while men fall behind in education and labor is proof of it. The patriarchy does that for them, even as they insult it routinely and bite the hand that feeds them. It's not overly protective of them. If that were the case, well, they'd never be in school or working. They'd be forc…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 08:29 AM
6

Possibly. We coddle women. If anything, given the benefits that women have in our society i would say that patriarchy coddles them and cares more for them than it ever has men with some exceptions. Think about how our child support system has worked, for instance and what it forces men to do, even if they may not want to be dads and who enforces that. Men, upon other men. Why? Because as Aristotle noted, the most basic political unit is the family and the head of it is the father. The father's j…
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:46 PM
34

This is what I'll never get. Women, the media and so many others routinely say that men are less mature than they are but yet more women engage in gossip about anyone under the sun. Studies have even shown this best which state that women tend to be crueler towards other women. They internalize their own misogyny to the point they see it everywhere, even in places where it may not exist. If it does, they'll put it on men as the source. If anything, they're clearly less mature than any man could …
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:32 AM
1

That isn't necessarily true. At least, not in the US. I can't speak for say, the UK. Depending on where you live it's hard for two parents to afford childcare and that's a widespread issue.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:44 PM
1

Uh, you're also forgetting Trump is accused of actually sexually assaulting people too even outside that comment. It was wrong for Clinton too, but the whataboutism to him whenever Trump is discussed is basically upholding the silence you're upset at, just on another side.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 11:20 PM
7

MeToo hasn't helped. It's just weaponized against men to destroy their lives with false accusations because feminists have twisted, distorted and molested our criminal justice system into something where "justice" isn't truly being served. The standard of "innocent until proven guilty" no longer applies. It's now "listen and believe."
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:14 AM
-2

The tape is pretty clear and he was rewarded for that gross behavior by being elected. Bottom line. I don't care what party someone is from, that was not acceptable.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:12 AM
1

And they specifically have to advocate for it. This way, not only will they be advocating for equality (for once), they'll be admitting upfront that feminism for much of its existence isn't about gender equality. It's in the name and its for advancing female supremacy. When that happens, we can deligitimize and diminish its influence.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:27 AM
3

Almost as if feminism has never been about gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:14 AM
5

Doubt it. Feminists will still try to maintain control.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 05:40 AM
1

Following the last 4 years of the GOP, I'm not sure. There's a much bigger grift there than with the Democrats. I mean, look at this Matt Gaetz thing.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:37 PM
3

Fascism is not a left wing ideology. The majority of political theorists, historians and scholars identify it as a form of far right ultranationalism and you can visibly see that in the policies that Mussolini and Hitler pursued hence why the symptoms of fascism include things like labor suppression (socialists and communists are big on labor movements), protection of corporate power (commies aren't big fans of that), religion and government intertwined (communists tend to oppose religion and th…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:52 AM
1

Crenshaw isn't career. He's only been in Congress since 2019. He's just an opportunist cashing in on the current faux populism trend of the GOP under Trump that people aren't as quick to acknowledge like they do with Democrats.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:17 AM
0

The system wasn't rigged. People voted. Trump lost, largely because he mishandled the pandemic and his photo op stunt during the summer. This is as bogus as people claiming Hillary lost because of rigging. Only difference is that her supporters just whined and didn't storm the US Capitol based on a lie and threatened to kill the VP, Speaker of the House, etc.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:13 AM
2

They're both crap. Under Trump, we pulled out of the JCPOA which is why Iran is closer to having a nuclear weapon than ever before and that was furthered by the neocons in the admin like Bolton and Pompeo. His foreign policy in general was terrible.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:11 AM
2

Trump literally surrounded himself with neocons like Bolton and Pompeo. Do you really think he wasn't hawkish? He was. The media didn't have to do anything. They didn't drive him to pick those men to serve in his administration.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:09 AM
-1

The difference is that Joe had an ankle injury recently and naturally, his balance is likely off from that. Normally, he walks fine. That's what is different.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:06 AM
1

They're trying to handicap men early on, starting when they are boys.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:49 AM
3

Uh, Mussolini and Hitler were NOT leftists/liberals. They killed socialists and communists at the behest of the wealthy conservative industrialists of their respective countries, hence why they also banned labor unions. They actually were fascists which is on the far right.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:45 AM
5

Erin Pizzey, who was nearly murdered by feminists
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:42 AM
6

And feminists won't have a single problem with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 02:46 AM
2

Then explain why mainstream discourse in feminism has never acknowledged men being sexually assaulted and statistics proving that it's usually by female predators? Explain why feminists continue to minimize it and assert a monopoly on victimhood.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:01 AM
2

Because feminism isn't based on moral standards and as men, we let it happen. We listened to them out of compassion and maturity because it's the right thing to do in most instances. We didn't consider how they'd abuse our kindness and use it to get even and facilitate a literal moral degradation in our society. We didn't enact safeguards to rein them in instances where they misbehave like you would with immature children. We underestimated the exceedingly low and underdeveloped nature of femini…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:58 PM
3

This is why men, including male legislators need to stop supporting women's shelters and other services. If feminists won't show us the same selfless kindness and concern that we have shown them because it's the right thing to listen to those in need then we should stop taking care of them. It's time for men to tend to their own gardens.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:53 PM
1

Can't you file an anonymous report to DOL?
/r/MensRights17/03/21 12:58 AM
1

Oh they'll go to jail. They'll just see less time than a man would if a man did this same crime.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 12:57 AM
3

Uh, evangelicals had a sizeable influence on the Trump Administration's policies (second only to their role during the Reagan Admin) and both of his presidential campaigns since they were his core base. The religious right and religion in general will always play a substantial role in our politics. We saw it again recently with people discussing Joe Biden's Catholic faith and the ways that it may influence his presidency. It's not playing a tribal game to acknowledge that religion is married clo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 01:22 AM
4

You're welcome! In general, women have played a central role in extremist organizations and movements across the ideological spectrum. For instance, al-Qaeda has used women to recruit people, run the majority of their suicide attacks, and even a Jihadist version of Cosmopolitan that's geared towards female Muslims. There's a lot of literature that's been cranked out about that role women have played in these groups for decades, especially following 9/11 and the scope has been broadened to look a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 10:34 PM
9

I mean, feminism has a shared history with white supremacy. Elizabeth Cady Stanton voiced extreme opposition to black women and men voting. Oh yeah and by the 1920s, you had millions of women joining their version of the KKK through an independent organization. It is by nature, exclusionary to its core and has evolved over time to fit different eras and ideologies. https://www.google.com/amp/s/timeline.com/amp/p/72ab1439b78b
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 08:10 PM
1

https://19thnews.org/2021/01/white-women-fight-trump-alongside-far-right-extremists/?amp https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/08/19/books/review/sisters-in-hate-seyward-darby.amp.html This begs to differ. White feminism CAN play a role in white supremacy and still does, even in 2021. They see it as a way to empower their identity as white women.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 08:03 PM
3

No, they are not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 06:24 PM
2

My most recent response to him shows that conservatives have a history of it and are essentially the creators of cancel culture so if liberals are doing it, they learned it from conservatives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 05:45 PM
3

Except it didn't start with liberals. Remember who wanted to ban Dixie Chicks in the 2000s? Teletubbies because apparently one of them was LGBTQ? Nike? Heck, let's go back to the 50s even. Who flipped out over Elvis? What about HUAC? That was government sanctioned cancel culture that was spearheaded primarily by conservatives like Joseph McCarthy. If libs are engaging in cancel culture, they didn't invent it. They learned it from conservatives who frankly do have a long history of doing it becau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 05:44 PM
1

It can be and there's definitely a history to prove it and that feminism by nature is meant to always be exclusionary to others.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 06:51 AM
1

They can be. Problem is, they've allowed feminists to exploit them because they're too sympathetic and don't believe in "trust but verify."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 06:51 AM
14

Eeyup. The far right is vile and does a lot of work to radicalize people on their own. It's just made easier when they have allies on the other side who help drive those people towards hating the left and prove them right that liberals aren't inclusive, which isn't true. We are but when you burn people enough, can't do much else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 04:00 AM
1

Feminism helps reinforce their insecurity
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:55 AM
2

That last line about a jackhammer killed me lmao
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:54 AM
15

Under feminist fascism, discrimination is okay.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:52 AM
3

I mean, it's been proven by studies that women are essential in terrorist recruitment and attacks across all extremist ideologies. The majority of suicide bombers in Iraq during the early 2000s were women as were al-Qaeda recruiters. You also had millions of women in America joining the KKK by the 1920s. Also just remember that leading suffragetes (early feminists) like Elizabeth Cady Stanton were outspoken racists and did not want women of color included in the Suffrage Movement. Feminism at it…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:44 AM
16

Yup. Look at what happened to Erin Pizzey after she said men can be abused too and that feminists shouldn't make it a gendered issue. She got death threats and went into hiding after feminists tried to send her a bomb! Feminism, white supremacy, and radical religiosity are the biggest existential threats we face today when we examine the landscape of violent extremism.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:04 PM
1

Because feminists will exploit any movement they can. That's not on BLM as a mostly decentralized movement.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:01 PM
1

It's because it's using black people to raise awareness on a whole host of other issues because they're most effected. What do you think the Rainbow Coalition was? It sprung out of the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Panthers (which had white members) who used the issues of systemic racism towards black people to springboard talks on racism towards other races and classism towards low income whites hence why the BPP had an alliance with the Young Patriots (Caucasian) and the Young Lords (Pue…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:58 PM
1

And how many other instances have we seen cops come down on people like Floyd and use excessive force on people of all types but especially POC? Even with the supposed fentanyl issue, it doesn't change that we do have an issue with systemic racism (and classism to some extent if we are discussing how low income whites are treated in America and that is likewise a problem) in our legal system and in law enforcement. There are plenty of former and current black cops who have talked about that exte…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:52 PM
1

I took a political theory class once and one of the things I learned was that the most basic political unit in our society is the family which is governed by the father (patriarchy). His job is to protect and promote the well being and accountability of everyone in that family. That's why we have compulsory child support for dads, some of whom legitimately are deadbeats. It's why more men are in government and enforce those laws and establish initiatives agencies, bureaus, branches, offices, and…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:26 PM
8

And yet men receive harsher penalties and about 64% longer sentences than women for the same crime. Sometimes, those women may not even see the inside of a jail cell. Even more troubling when you acknowledge that most of those men are of color so you can argue feminism isn't just a sexist movement. It's a racist one that ignores those issues.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:09 PM
3

Erin Pizzey got a good taste of that and she was a woman. Kinda shows you this movement only values women when they fall in line with their hateful agenda.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:06 PM
3

They're just looking to get even for the 1 or 2 bad men in their lives and think we are all responsible for that.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 07:36 AM
1

And then they get mad at people for being toxic to them. You are the toxicity that you put out into the world.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 07:04 PM
2

Not all men could vote in the UK prior to WW I, believe it or not. They expended that right to them after the war as a token of appreciation for their sacrifices in the trenches. Feminists are truly averse to history if they think men in particular haven't been oppressed and treated as disposable via military conscription in those countries where that happens.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 07:01 PM
1

Yeah, that's why it's dumb to get on Biden for it, regardless of if you support him or not. This is an issue that's been around since long before his presidency. You can't blame any single individual for it.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:57 AM
1

If it ended with the absolute abolition of Title IX or a ruling that leaves it nearly unenforceable I'll be fine with it. I'd rather the Title IX office at my school be an overly restricted, useless, and lame duck thing with no power other than saying "SEXUAL ASSAULT BAD!"
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:54 AM
1

This is why feminism is one of the biggest threats in our society next to white supremacy.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:50 AM
3

This is why we need to either find a legal way to overturn Title IX or gut it in a irreversible fashion that would also leave it almost unenforceable even if it still would be on the books. I'd rather an overly restricted and ineffective lame duck Title IX office at my university that can't really touch me or anyone else.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter