TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheNewMasterofTime Archive

View 0 posts and 382 comments by TheNewMasterofTime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

He could have just about whoever he wants, yeah, but if he is not the type of guy to prove it sometimes, yeah, he is just the type to be enthralled by this sort of witch.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 11:03 AM
2

Ultrafeminists and LGBTQ, both minorities, mostly just hate the rest of us....and they are winning in their campaign to ruin life for the rest of us. I have defended both groups on some points in the past. I don't know if they changed or if this was their master plan all along, but my support for them both is basically gone. We have to stop letting them win.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:21 AM
1

Look mate, if your wife gave you such “permission” that’s nothing to do with me. Well then neither is Will and Jada Smith. You might want to divest some of your attention.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:53 AM
0

She’s got him wrapped around her little finger. Yep. How did that happen do you wonder? Any chance it came from turning off the sex spigot sometimes? Maybe?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:52 AM
6

Delete yourself you stupid bot.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:46 AM
-2

and I've fallen into depression numerous times, BUT NOT BECAUSE OF THAT! Well, this not really about YOU is it? I only said sex is paramount to me as an example. I know there are many others out there. Not you? Fine. But that does not prove I am wrong, but only that what I say does not apply to you...which again...is fine. If I need a run in the woods to be happy, you would not be freaking out at me. I don't see sex as any different. Calm down.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 08:21 AM
-1

I think the gap being your ears is too narrow for me to help you. Carry on believing what you want. It will probably just make you bitter in the end, but its your life.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 08:17 AM
1

You are seriously out of your mind. The adult people I mentioned are the ones who did the defending of their past minor selves.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 07:33 AM
1

Could you just tell me honestly if you are clinical? You are so very off with every post. I literally posted a link to a 19 year old who went to jail for having a 14 year old GF. Although I would never agree she is or was a child, there is no hypothetical. And that is not the only case.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 07:24 AM
-1

Find someone else who does. Most people do not want that. Right. Most people want their own freedom while tying down another. Most people want tyranny. ​ We don’t need a new standard for relationships. Right. Everything is fine and has been for a long time. What's the fuss? Nothing to see here. We don't need new ideas. None. At all. ​ Your ex being okay with you having sex with other people as long as she didn’t find out is not an example of how most people are. Except how can they be angry abou…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 07:18 AM
1

Then, why are you still doing it? Sick in the head You are accusing me falsely. I have no gender bias here. Also, I think you are confused as to what a predator is. Edit: I can see the guy below has accuse me again and then blocked me so I cannot retort. I am defending zero predators. But I have pointed out how society creates them. And not defending anyone based on their gender. Switch the genders and I feel no differently.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 06:02 AM
-6

As soon as its brought up, doubt is sown. Most people can't just talk about it. Society needs a new norm...a realistic one this time. My ex was not agreeing to an open relationship. She was just acknowledging reality and dealing with it like a sensible human being.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 06:01 AM
1

Okay. I imagined it. And I didn't like it. So I wll stick with the idea that predators need to be rehabilitated if possible, whatever plumbing they have. And non-predators need to be left alone, also regardless of plumbing.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:57 AM
-1

First, fairly determine who is a predator and who isn't. The people I mentioned in my above comment that went to jail clearly were not predators at all.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:17 AM
-18

you should discuss that with your partner and break up with them if that's something you can't work out. Two problems I have with this. 1) discussing this seems to be the female idea...and the reason does not seem to be purposed to arrive at an amicable solution. The purpose seems to be to be given an opportunity to brow beat your partner into perceived compliance...and guess which gender does that better. 2) to break up over sex implies the entire relationship is based on sex...and that is a ho…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:08 AM
4

No surprise I guess. It seems to be that way with most female mammals. I am sure they do get a sexual thrill when they see two males fighting (over the females) cause as soon as one wins the banging is going to commence. Imagine if it had turned in a full blown fight and Chris Rock won. I think the loyalties would switch immediately and Will would be branded a weakling and loser.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 02:10 AM
-29

Person who cheat on partner should be extremely ostracized without any excuses It never ceases to amaze me how little people think of sexual satisfaction. Too me its paramount to my happiness....and I think most guys are the same and most women are not. Yet you want to put me in a position where my partner can cut me off and I am the bad guy for refusing to allow myself to fall into depression.....so you insist I be ostracized to make sure I fall into depression? ...and you doom mostly men to th…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 02:06 AM
2

There was no punch. And it was not a simple matter of joking about his wife. Part of the issue is that losing some hair due to aging is now being viewed as some sort of disease.....the joke was about her shaving her head...and even I at the time thought it had to do with an actual disease....cause I don't pay much attention to celebs. So I thought Chris was out of line at the time....but now I know better. But I still ask myself if Will was confused because it seems Jada has done a good job gasl…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:58 AM
44

So there is a simple and conclusive means to discover the truth....but they openly declare the truth is not desired. Why even have laws and courts then? Just let the law of the jungle sort it out.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:52 AM
15

They say you need to prove non-access to the wife. So they say you have to prove a negative. Except that is impossible.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:49 AM
2

What bothers me is I didn't hear about any rape accusations. But there was an ATTEMPTED rape accusation. But that is something I tend to dismiss because how do people know someone ATTEMPTED something that didn't happen? That is entirely subjective. Any assault that happened at the time happened, so that is what it makes sense to focus on. There can be witnesses, bruises, torn clothes etc. So I definitely remember the assault accusations. But ATTEMPTED rape accusations are NOT rape accusations.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:28 AM
-4

If an underage girl isn't capable of consenting What if a legal adult is not capable of consenting? Look, I am not sure what you are trying to say....but if a person is underage their consent is simply ignored. Its not that they cannot consent, its that the legislators decided that judges and juries were too damn lazy to be bothered determining the actual facts, so they will just run with a really stupid presumption that is easiest for them...which is why we have 19 year olds going to prison whi…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:40 PM
8

Winning a court case is not as much about the truth (which is often hard or impossible to determine) as much it is about who tells the best story. Part of telling the better story is presenting a better character. And how you present a better character of each race is different. And the character of the other family members also counts. Judges, and juries too are humans...and most humans are stupid, biased things. They will judge you based on your family and your race, so you better present them…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:01 PM
64

She up and took his kids away to a secret location.....which is often called kidnapping even if the kidnapper is the other parent. What punishment for her I ask?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 01:55 PM
1

Thank you. You are correct. I should have said post removal.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 01:05 PM
1

I was clear. Stop stalking me.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:59 PM
-1

I thought No. Clearly, you did not.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:55 PM
-1

Odd questions to ask someone who just said they strongly oppose MGM. Yeah, I think the abuse is lessened by not having a memory of it. But that does not erase the abuse. I was cut. I would prefer I was not. I am a bit angry about it. But I am not traumatized. Also, non-consensually drugging someone is such a massive violation in itself that compounding it with rape still makes it worse even if the victim has no memory. ...however...if the victim condones it after the fact the case is closed for …
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:51 PM
1

Have you considered context at all? This is two women talking. If you want my opinion on "if the genders were reversed" why not just ask? I might be the least hypocritical person you ever met in your life! ​ So victims can be sexist? EVERYBODY can hold sexist beliefs, yes. Its what they DO that matters. What did this woman actually DO besides run her mouth?? Its all well and good to try and help her get past the sexism, but being a bully to her is the least likely strategy to actually work. ​ Ca…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:45 PM
-4

Uh...what? Who got raped??? Edit: Can no one just answer the faxing question? What is with the downvotes but no answer? Cowardice? Its cowardice isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:33 PM
1

Are the posts themselves ban worthy tho?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:42 AM
-5

You should not conflate your experience with the experience of others. There are plenty who are not claiming to have been abused....at all. I am not happy to see more arrested just to make up for the gender disparity. That's not justice. Neither is locking a person up when there is no victim.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:41 AM
12

Pro-tip: Scammers really don't like to have their scams exposed. They often get real mad. They may also accuse you of being the actual scammer. Or of "ignorance".
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:37 AM
2

Well spotted.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:29 AM
-11

This doesn't answer my question. You catch on fast!
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:27 AM
-10

How could we know since almost all that was talked about was this incident? You do know those appointment reviews are about finding faults right?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 04:17 AM
10

Yup. A woman points a finger and the man is typically arrested and put in a jail cell to be questioned by police.....as if voluntary questioning would be some sort of "special treatment" for someone who has been accused without any physical evidence.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:29 AM
48

Bad headline No attempt to explain details by the OP but just a link. So the bad headline which omits important information ON PURPOSE gets passed off as accurate. Had to downvote this low effort trash. And what urks me about Kavaugh is the fact that the primary victim's story was just typical teenage hijinks but the debate about the story covered up any talk of what could have actually been wrong with the man....cause being a normal teenager in his teen years certainly wasn't.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:14 AM
-2

Oh. So you know it only happened to her once. Okay. My bad. And you think MGM is sexual abuse and molestation? I mean, I strongly oppose it and all, but....uh.... And you apparently you think we men have memories of this that affect us to this day? You know what? Forget my attempts to help you get along with your co-worker. Instead, I now hope she gets online so I can give her advice on how to deal with YOU.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:54 AM
-8

If she is not your twin then I think you should stop expecting her to be the same as you. Technically I am also a rape victim, but it doesn't bother me. But for other guys, its different and I don't expect them to change in an instant. Steps are needed and it sounds like the first step here is to get her to at least be more professional and leave her unfair opinion at home. But that first step is going to require a calm appeal to her sense of reason. The rest will have to wait.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 05:53 PM
50

bEliEvE wOmEn
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:40 PM
-16

And what would you say if she had been raped or molested by her father or her friend's father? I certainly don't like to be discriminated against because of what some other man did, but that sort of attitude is typical among victims, and friends and relatives of victims. Had it been a female perpetrator she might have it in for women. So, my advice is to slow down. You don't know what is in her past and she may never be willing to tell anyone. She may be wrong, but she may be carrying too much b…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:37 PM
18

A woman losing her job to menopause symptoms is truly regrettable. But I am going to go out on a limb and say that far more men lose their jobs to the their suicide symptoms than women with menopause and women suffering the side effects of suicide combined. Maybe we need supportive type laws to prevent men killing themselves eh? Then maybe they can take care of grandma financially when she is forced by life to quit work?
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:14 PM
10

He has to defend his character....cause they are going to attack it. Its actually nothing to do with anything that happened or proving it did.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:31 PM
1

I am beginning to wonder if the boss himself is not somehow involved. I might actually look him right in the face, asking him point blank, and judge his reaction to that. Anyway, I have no idea how you "make" someone bend over by asking for something. Does the women have no knees? Have they fused or something?
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:30 PM
1

Not always. One event can be extreme enough to constitute harassment. But in any case, its rather subjective how much is too much. You yourself described the one off event of butt grabbing as harassment.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:34 AM
1

My experience suggests nobody loves to abuse doubts and vaguarities more than women. So so many will sow doubt and vagueness whereever they can so they can manipulate. And that is probably a core reason women were generally kept out of political positions for centuries and had their legal rights curtailed.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:31 AM
2

A lot of this is simply pandering to (most typically) female mental delusion. Loads of people believe they can accurately determine people's full intentions, which is essentially a claim to be a mind reader. Even judges and juries in courts of law do this and many laws are founded on the idea! But day to day its usually females who are so very sure of themselves when it comes to these mind reading attempts. Well, people cannot read minds. They generally have to rely on repeated behaviors to at l…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:17 AM
0

Its a tough call. On the one hand, harassment is usually defined as a series of events, or repeated behavior in some way. You yourself indirectly accessed that when you said that asking a person out once cannot be harassment. However, some events are so severe and/or obviously intented to make a person feel attacked that just once can also be considered harassment. Its something of a murky area, mostly because how YOU feel about it does not clearly indicate THEIR intent. Plus THEIR intent cannot…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:03 AM
0

Pot smokers are not demons. People who are sure they can defeat the charges are not demons. People who are sure the corrupt cops that falsely arrested them will lose their jobs are not demons. People who feel manic are not demons. I am sure I could go on, but what would the point be? I doubt you even understand what I just said.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:45 AM
10

I don't know what all the fuss is about. Just get the convictions via confessions gained under torture! Problem solved! Surely they can just retrieve a rack, a cat o' nine tails and an iron maiden from a museum rather than fiddle with some complex new technology? Bring the Dark Ages back right I say! No half measures! /s
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:50 PM
3

A worthy question. Its possible. But even so, all we can do is accept that he is an adult and he has made his decision even if it turns out its a foolish one. And if it a foolish decision, it becomes a lesson to others.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:34 PM
3

They don’t have to just stay silent just for the sake of a man’s feelings and take advances from men around them. Holy fuck. Indeed, holy FK. How is it you interpret being treated with respect with remaining silent......ohhhhhhh....its a female thing isn't it? You just can't deadpan say something, but you have to attach some predetermined emotion to it....is that it? Like you cannot just say....I am sorry but this is a very uncomfortable situation for me....I am going to go. Its got to be more l…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:43 PM
222

The victim is against her going to jail and instead wants her to get treatment. Case closed.... Except there remains the question of if we reverse the genders we would have the same outcome.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:57 AM
9

Sounds to me like several people in the system should get life in prison. I would not even complain if they got execution for this. No physical evidence. No witnesses. Whole family says no and that several events were impossible to have even happened. Child Alyssa says it happened but grows up and says no....of course the adult her is more reliable! Police demand the mother "cooperate" or she could lose the kids. Judge threatens jail to the false accuser for trying to recant. A retrial is ordere…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:02 AM
1

I wasn't talking to you. I have no interest in any form of communication with perverts You don't get to openly and publicly accuse me of mental illness or criminal behavior and just walk away from that. You are a witch hunter and slanderer on the level of a false rape accuser. Now GFY. And if you need a break from that maybe get an education and some mental help from a professional who can explain to you how bad you are fking up right now.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 10:22 AM
3

I looked for other sources and it was not easy to find something that was not related to Dr. Phil. But then I found this from 2016. https://truecrimedaily.com/2016/05/02/rape-conviction-appeal-denied-girls-story-recanted-16-years-later/
/r/MensRights20/02/23 10:11 AM
8

We are still expected to be the primary initiators. This is the demand of a majority of women. Thus, we have a right to initiate. So when we try to initiate, we have a right to be treated with respect.....and not treated as if we have crossed a line just by initiating. What is more is that we are more and more being reduced to text on a screen for women. We are more than that, and this situation only guarantees us less respect, and that includes respect of our rights in general.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:43 AM
7

She concluded that the popular narrative is what causes trauma for this silent majority of child molesting victims I hope that some of the folks posting here will realize that when I say society is to blame for a lot of people's trauma, this is what I am talking about. And I hardly think its isolated to child molestation. Its much the same when a man gets raped. Society fills his ears with a whole bunch of crap, and that can either increase the original trauma or be the very source of it. For ex…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:28 AM
1

just like the apologist you're responding to. When I was young I declared that plenty of Black people were good people. They called me N-word lover. I also said plenty of gay people were good people, and their consensual gay relationships were harmless. So they called me gay. I also said some girls were okay, talented, smart and could do lots of things boys could do. They called me a pansy. I also said I didn't care if people have sex with animals, so long as the animal is not harmed. It sure se…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 08:07 AM
0

I can't remember if I have seen male mug shots smile when they are convicted? Most of those were not mug shots. Do you even know what mug shots are? ​ I found some, and they vary interesting. The face can often tell all. Pictures of faces are generally rubbish. Carefully selected stills from videos have far more creedence. Actual mug shots? Garbage. Motives for smiling in those are probably in the teens.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:53 AM
1

And they treat cartoon characters as legal humans....who never age. The sun is intense in Australia...and human heads tend to be directly in the path of the rays.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:44 AM
1

Not that time he wasn't.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:12 AM
22

I have defended Bill Maher from similar accusations in the past but not this time. He just barfed up a real dumpster fire there. For half a second I thought he was going to equally lambaste women but no, he went right back to laying it all at the feet of men. He just came off as a real douche-bag fking simp with all that "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" nonsense. Just go talk to her? WTF? Talk to who? Random girls on the street? Cause we do talk to girls we actually know already. Women want …
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:07 AM
1

she was crying because she got caught in a massive lie? Look, I know this article is novel sized to a pea brain but I did quote the article. Also, I don't usually suggest people watch TV more, but if you had, you would realize that the defendant does not get to question the plaintiff in court. You really need to stop throwing around words like "retarded", well, unless you have a mirror in front of you. A key piece of evidence in the case was a cellphone video Riep took ofthe alleged victim which…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 04:29 AM
1

You mad bro? Can you even explain why she was crying? Tears of joy you think? I mean, just give your explanation for that. Lets hear that reasonable explanation you got. Or just git mad some more.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 04:14 AM
1

I am so sorry I questioned the narrative and needed some proof to believe. May I be excused sir?
/r/MensRights20/02/23 03:59 AM
0

I punched my ex-wife's lover in the face a couple times. It was not because of the affair. Sex can be just sex. Its because I was sure he was in love and trying to take her away from me. It was doubly annoying because we were living 3 hours apart due to her doctorate studies and my job. They are now married so I feel justified. Still...I have no real answers for how a court should handle such a situation. I am having this idea that a price should be negotiated up front though or the guy goes to …
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:04 AM
23

SIMP le man. Please forgive me women of the world, for things other men may or may not have done to other women you never met. I take the blame, but PLEASE forgive me. See! I kick myself for you!
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:50 AM
3

And it never was even just Black Americans. The people with power don't view any of us non-rich as humans. Just have a look at the East Palestine train derailment. Those people are as White as pastry. Yet people keep falling for the narrative that they are respected citizens in a democracy. Utter madness.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:40 PM
3

I guess it depends on how you use it. Its not like I am out there running around looking for trouble. I am just saying that if some fksticks come along and think they have authority over me just cause some other fksticks said so, there is a chance they will discover the only authority they had was the ability to receive some fresh leaking holes on their persons at no extra charge. I won't be lead by fear. We have wars because most people are. Until most people are like me, war will never end.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:18 PM
0

It’s looking a bit more like a list don’t you think? Yes, but its the details that matter. I assume you mean Queen Isabella II of Spain. I don't see where she initiated war. Looks to me like she was defending against uprisings and rebellion. What you are blaming Catherine de Medici for I have no idea. She had no power at all! Indira Ghandhi also quelled an uprising but she started no wars. She got non-militarily involved in helping Bangladesh in its independence fight against Pakistan, but it wa…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:03 PM
3

Not only will I not wear a leash, I will also not wear a collar. But you do you. Yes, I know you think you meant something else by "untethered" but from my view its people who think they owe a state a stint as a murderer that is crazy. Not playing that friggen game. The state threw us into an indoctrination mill when we were kids and stole a chunk of our earnings as adults, and we owe them? Oh hell no. I never signed this "social contract" they made up.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:42 PM
4

Only if you believe its truly the presidents calling the shots.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:32 PM
9

I believe the parties don't even matter except for the tactics THEIR masters choose. The oligarchy is NOT partisan. They just make a show of it.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:30 PM
2

Is that your version of pacifism? From wiki: "Pacifism is the opposition or resistance to war, militarism (including conscription and mandatory military service) or violence." Of course, the pukes on the draft board probably won't accept that. They will be so hard line that if you much as raise your hand to block a punch aimed at a baby they will say you support violence in defense of others...therefore you support violence...therefore you support war. And I have to tell you, I am surprised wiki…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:27 PM
1

That is not what I am doing. Both are trash in their own ways.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:08 PM
2

Youtube shorts are a crime against humanity. The content is funny, but those damned shorts. Hate 'em.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 05:14 PM
0

I just told you I will fight....THEM. Making excuses? Oh no. I will be making THREATS. And if at all possible, I will be making MEAT SACKS.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 05:01 PM
-1

Well there is two. Does two make a list?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:55 PM
3

Good points. I should have said we never have enough to make a difference. And I have to point out that the oligarchs stole Sanders' nomination for president.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:49 PM
1

What is going on is you think teenagers are kids....to start. The first time Alexander the Great led troops in battle he was 16. He won.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:59 PM
36

Because he refused to kill anyone, even as the murderous cretins threw a monkey wrench into the wheels of his life.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:55 PM
11

I hope you don't hold your breath waiting for a list of the war starting women....that won't go well for you. But now that I say that, I wonder if someone is going to hand us a list of women involved in war leadership...only for us to point out that near all of them were on the defensive side. They will have Killary Godamn Klinton though...the Butcher of Libya.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:53 PM
38

We never have a major party anti-war candidate to vote for...because its all rigged.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:46 PM
65

Mohammad Ali also chose that path. He was a real American hero, or even just a hero.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:45 PM
-2

The boys were as young as 10. Listen up non-reader, those were the ages at the facility NOT the ages of the victims. Look, I know you want this to be as horrific as you can possibly imagine, so you can enjoy wallowing in outrage, BUT PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF OUR BUTTHOLE cause this is not about YOU and your outrage masturbation.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:25 PM
5

We all need to get our pacifist papers in order so we have a solid, relatable method to refuse the draft that the oligarchs will foist on us and our boys....for the war those war mongers and war profiteers will create from thin air. But they won't accept our claims of pacifism for the most part. So we all better be ready to escape to other countries, injure ourselves, wet the bed, suddenly develop bone spurs, or get real good at faking mental disease. I will be telling the draft board that the m…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:15 PM
0

Fair enough. Evolution is complicated...but I maintain it has a lot to do with the way (the English) language works. Conceptually its not as complicated as it seems.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:19 PM
-1

You are not pissing people off, just making them shake their heads. I have done plenty of both. But naturally those people never used the internet to go get a clue what is and is not pedophilia. To even get an education on what people are talking about is anathemia....just the same old recycled taboo crap....no logic, sense, science, discussion, or sincere debate allowed. Society is GARBAGE. Incidentally, men's rights are in the same stupid taboo boat. Just bring it up and brace for OuTrAgE!!!!!…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:46 PM
-16

I can accept your opinion of rape...barely. ​ Although legally unable to give consent aged 15, he admits back then 'to be honest, I was over the moon', Pedophilia? No. Its not pedophilia just because you want it to be....and that is exactly what is going on...you WANT it to be...so you can enjoy being indignant. And I threaten your enjoyment of that, and that is why you fight me.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:41 PM
1

You cannot define pedophilia. This isn't it. I am not defending pedophilia. I am attacking society. And not even be able to distinguish between what is and what is not pedophilia is just another damn good reason to attack society! Also, explaining is not condoning. I do not like or approve of what happened at all. But I do believe that society made it to be this bad and it maybe need not have been. And yes, your attitude comes from the same place as all the other taboos in history. Its worth poi…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:23 PM
1

What annoys me about these stories is that there seems to be an assumption that the perpetrator always does EXACTLY what they wanted to do, as if the event happened in a vacuum. One has to think back to when gays were oppressed. What they wanted to do was live openly and get married. Instead, they did things like hang around in parks and restrooms for random sexual trysts. NOT their choice. One has to think back to when inter-racial marriage was oppressed. What happened? To KIll a Mockinbird typ…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:01 PM
-2

I think you may have misunderstood the part you quoted. I am not really saying that women are not protected nearly enough. I am not saying we are generally failing women. And I am not saying that above and beyond the parking spaces, there is so much more we need to do. NO. I am saying that in general, women need more physical protection than men, simply because 1) most violence is from men and 2) women naturally lack the ability to protect themselves from those men. And that goes double there in…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:24 AM
0

This is a BAD thing. One of the very rare times I actually agree with TheNewMasterofTime. This will happen more as time goes on. And though your support is backhanded, I still appreciate it. I am actually getting harassed and stalked for my views on this now, and its a very bad look for the sub and movement.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:11 AM
-1

Great. Could you leave me alone please?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:06 AM
60

I suppose. But I were the mod I would leave it alone or just lock it and ask the OP to make a new AITA post asking "AITA for switching genders on you all?"
/r/MensRights19/02/23 10:12 AM
-1

Its an analogy = argument. Any more hur dur you have to add?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:47 AM
186

That was a great idea! Its sad to see that the gender reversed post got removed. But its refreshing to see the edit from someone who noticed and kicks themself over their own bias.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:40 AM
-12

Its an analogy. WTF are you even thinking? A parallel? God damn. Dumbest crap I read all day, and I have been reading some damn dumb crap.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 09:29 AM
2

Not always. A synonym for "90 percent".
/r/MensRights19/02/23 08:07 AM
0

I don't care what rainn says. I doubt the gov. of South Korea does either. What happened with the author of the article, IDK. But I still care most about the actual physical violence, sexual or not. Am I allowed?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:57 AM
0

It probably will as you get older.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:17 AM
19

There are loads of women out there who can be great friends. In fact, I think a minority of women are literally the best people in the world. But I find that even with 90 percent of these great women, you better just avoid certain gender based conversation topics or you get a bitter, irrational fight.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:58 AM
-2

I would say being evidence based makes one more of a man. Leave the assumptions and emotive arguments to women.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:52 AM
-4

This goes against everything first and second wave feminism fought for No it doesn't. It goes against what third and fourth wave feminists simply believe. Why do I think women are weaker and need protection? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeRV6tgkIjw And do you know that South Korean men pretty much all have to serve in the armed forces? (and don't you dare say I support that. I am just telling you a fact.) So yeah, I think men who generally underwent military training AND are apparently not be…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:45 AM
2

You cherry picked the point about harassment, ignored the point about sexual assault and further declared that you doubted rape even happened. Strawman? No idea where you pulled that from. ​ It isn’t actually direct action to tackle it Not everything has to be DIRECT action to be helpful. FFS Would you refuse an ice bath to reduce a deadly fever because it won't cure the influenza directly? ​ and most of your points you tied to women, would actually be helped with family parking spots On the one…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:36 AM
-3

You go ahead and assume it happened. Rape and sexual assault are in mthrfking article. So why don't you get off my mthrfking back and go after the mthrfcking BBC if you have a mthrfcking issue?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:29 AM
-4

NIce hair splitting. (slow clap) I actually care more about the actual violence...which I am going to assume did happen.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:32 AM
-5

It sounds like you live in a basement parking lot in Seoul you know so much! ​ Including harrasment as a violent crime simply to manipulate the figures. ​ No chance of an innocent mistake to throw that in with the rest??? Harassment may not be violent, but does that mean its not significant?? If there is no rape, does that mean that beating a woman, ripping off her skirt and underwear and dry humping her is just a nothing burger??
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:50 AM
-1

You are, after all, a women worshipping simp. Well, this just shows your hand as a troll. You will have to go troll someone else now.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:35 AM
-4

Do you deny the high statistic of violent sex crime happening in the parking areas or do you deny that its primarily women facing victimization? Or are you trying to say that men were getting murdered there and got murdered more since the change? I don't even know what FDS is and I am no white knight. FFS
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:21 AM
2

Driving. and walking away from a parked car, are completely different things. Children can walk away from a parked car. And now that its mentioned those with kids should have special parking privilege as well. Affording the weak a benefit to cover the weakness is NOT a blatant privilege. This is not a sport's event. like women are not allowed to park/drive in areas with high crime rates. That is not remotely practical. Could you keep to the topic of this parking lot situation? I cannot see how m…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:09 AM
-21

Its a fallacy that giving one group a special priviledge requires a separate group to get one too. Its like saying the installation of an elevator for those in wheel chairs means the able bodied people have to get something too. I mean yeah, there are areas I do believe men (in general) should be able to get special privileges, but that is all well beyond the scope of this specific situation and far more complex.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:58 AM
-16

Do you honestly believe the parking situation has altered the stats on men being attacked or murdered? I mean your stat is real and all, but I don't see it applying much to this situation. The article says: "Government figures in 2021 showed more than two-thirds of violent crimescommitted in the city's car parks were sexual crimes: rape, sexualassault and harassment." Definitely not trying to deny that men are also victims, they are, but we all know the majority of sex crime victims, at least in…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:31 AM
-29

In principle, I actually support women-only parking spaces just so long as its a managed system. If there are always empty spaces then they need to cut down for example. Thing is, I am not for equality across the board because I don't see men and women as being generally equal. I think women need more help and protection and that's fine. What isn't fine is them pretending they never needed the help or protection.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:49 PM
13

Well I have been warned off of reading the article. But as I often point out both men's and women's reported happiness (at least in the U.S. and apparently Westernized nations) is at an all time low. Its been a rather dramatic drop especially for women from the 1970s and that coincides with feminism achieving pretty much all its policy goals that were meant to create gender outcomes that still have not panned out. I don't think the drop in happiness is coincidental to that. And I think every lon…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:34 PM
2

ChatGPT is like ultrafeminists. It will say whatever inconsistent thing will serve it in that moment.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:22 PM
27

Imagine if someone else charged a "female tax" on wages due to the fact men are still paying more for dates. FFS
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:20 PM
2

I don't think making people aware of those with tendencies such as "pathological liar" is vilification or violation of due process. At least it would not be in a society of decent people.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:54 PM
1

I am not saying they are all the same. I am sure some are as you say.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:42 PM
2

That would require super powers I don't have.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:41 PM
2

I am baffled why you think you know them all or why this cannot possibly be a thing. Do you have super powers I don't?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:02 PM
0

I really don't care why they lie. What if its a mental issue she cannot control? What if she could learn to control it through therapy but never got diagnosed or treated?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 04:42 PM
2

Do we let them go as well then? Can you quote me saying anyone should be let go? I am thinking you can't because I am pretty sure I never said that. In other posts I have suggested they be institutionalized, treated, monitored, or exposed to those around them. But I cannot agree with punishing a person who cannot be helped by the punishment. What's the point if we do? Vengeance?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 04:30 PM
2

Neither. Because theyre not all dangerous. Oh I have to disagree. I think Oprah Winfrey is extremely dangerous for example. I know many will disagree, but I think her effect on society has been horrible. Same with many of these greed bag, lying CEOs that get bizarrely worshipped.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:53 PM
2

You can't lock people up "just in case" they commit a crime, jeez. It is done every day. We may have more options in today's world, but the mentally ill are sometimes institutionalized before they hurt themselves or others. .https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-244X-13-169
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:51 PM
2

Vast majority of women who lie about rape are not insane. But do they have mental problems that make them incapable of NOT lying? Can you imagine being unable to stop yourself from lying?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:43 PM
2

Well false accusers should definitely not just walk off scot free. For me its a question of punishment or mental help, depending on the false accuser. I cannot answer your final question. I don't even think I understand it.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:27 PM
1

Are not some of them mentally damaged/impaired and incapable of being honest about things like this? I have no mercy for those who are making conscious decisions to lie to get money or revenge. But those who lack normal self control levels should not be punished the same as those who do.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:24 PM
2

Should they not at least be monitored? Or should they be identified for all to recognize?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:21 PM
2

They may well get out of prison even if they have not changed. Prison is a place of punishment, not rehabiliation. They should not get out of the institution unless they have changed. Which they might because that is a place of rehabilitation.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:18 PM
2

If "care" means putting them in an institution for life, would that be the thing to do?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:15 PM
-1

Look. I find your writing to be extremely unclear. I am not asking you random questions. I am asking you questions in an attempt to understand what you have been trying to say. I asked you why they lied NOT because I value excuses, but because I want to know if they are crazy, sane, or trying to get revenge for a real or perceived wrong. There is no need to explain to me how bad false accusations are. I know. -------------------- Yes, mentally impaired people are sometimes given some leniency an…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:13 PM
2

Is it better if we are warned about them and know who they are? Or should they be in an institution for life?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:06 PM
6

Yes. But I would much prefer she was identifed and quarantined long before she murdered my family. Now let me ask you something: If someone slipped LSD in your coffee at the office, and you started thinking you were trapped in a zombie apocolypse and killed a few coworkers you legit thought were zombies, would you think you should be found guilty? Cause not being able to control yourself, whether mental or slipped LSD, is a real thing.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:04 PM
2

You are right that proper wording is essential and mine is working against me. We assume that children can learn, and that is why we punish them. That said, though, I have met those who cannot learn, and it bothers me that society does not insist those kids (or even adults) are not marked and treated in the special ways they need. Instead they are foisted on teachers and care givers who don't know and get driven up the damn wall with their antics. And then as adults they pull this kind of crap. …
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:59 PM
1

Oh you're right Its nice to see someone on Reddit with humility. Its a rare quality. and how about cases where the woman CAN help herself but wants to get somebody to jail or get a financial award from her lying? Public apology, prison or house arrest depending on situation, and financial restitution. No instant parole. No suspended sentence. ​ Try taking as a different example any other mental disease and match it with the treatment you mention here: That actually does not change anything for m…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:54 PM
-16

I've met plenty of pathological liars who were shitty human beings but never went as far as to file a false police report. Okay. So why did these women lie? I will accept multiple general answers if you have them. ​ This is just victim blaming which feminists constantly accuse men of doing. I am genuinely confused. Who is victim blaming? Who are the victims?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:46 PM
2

A psychopath is not mentally ill. They have no empathy, no remorse, they play with people to reach their goals, no matter what. Will punishment fix them?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:43 PM
2

If someone kills as a result of an untreated mental condition he/she shall be treated as a criminal. Where??? AFAIK they are not guilty by reason of insanity and then institutionalized.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:35 PM
-9

What they might need is institutionalized. I really don't have an answer. But they are a danger for sure. Something has to be done, but if they can't help themselves punishment can't fix it.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:33 PM
80

But it only destroys his life because society effects that or lets it happen. Society is trash.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:14 PM
1

What I am about to say may not be appreciate by either the Men's Rights Advocates here nor the ultrafemnists who would label them as victims but.... I honest think most of these women truly have some sort of mental issue that causes delusions and/or an inability to accept certain truths to the point they really cannot muster the mental energy necessary to accept responsibility or the truth. And I think its ties to so many women's inability to tolerate certain (esp. swear) words, or stories with …
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:11 PM
0

Oh I think they are more competent. Simple evolutionary explanation.....fast blooming young men got killed cause they were threats but were inexperienced. This is also part of the reason why girls mature and grow faster than boys physcially...until boys have a sudden growth spurt. Its all about survival. Of course the girls also needed to hurry and be able to bear children as soon as they enter puberty. Boys needed to stay out of sight until they had a chance in a fight.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:12 PM
1

The short video is visually dark, but captured the sound of the woman saying she's crying and then agreeing after Riep asks if the sex was consensual. I cannot cheer. I need to see this video and hear more explanation of this. Why is she crying?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:07 PM
5

Fact is, females are far more likely to fail at their suicide attempts. Must be because the patriarchy keeps the shotguns and rope away from them leaving only the pills and razors. Damn Patriarchy again!
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:58 PM
3

being a sexual assaulter aint ok I have no idea how you apparently got the idea it was. Look, its not okay by me if a wild lion eats me. But if I go running around lions with raw meat draped over my body, what do you expect will happen? Now let me be clear...I am not saying men are as out of control as wild lions...but some are pretty damn close. And the rest of us are definitely having our urges manipulated and women need to be mindful and respectful of that fact....cause it can build up. In ot…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:53 AM
1

There shouldn't be gender equality, men and women are not the same. Every species is like this not just us. If you add the caveat "most" before men and women, then I agree. But its important to make a distinction between equal and same. For example, we can be equal under MOST of the law, but that won't make us the same, nor is sameness required for a lot of equality. ​ boys know women are trouble before puberty thats why they avoid them. I didn't. I was attracted well before puberty. Girls thoug…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:45 AM
1

The elephant in the room no one is talking about is menopause. And it ain't no joke. You don't want a menopausal person carrying around the nuclear football, even if a man could somehow go menaopausal. Younger females are more competent than their male peers in just about every category but sports, math and science. Men bloom later and larger. I could explain why using evolutionary psychology but we all know its true. Then women get blasted with menopause, some worse than others. They may or may…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:15 AM
2

I tend to feel there are no solutions and gender equality is nothing but a dream that can never be reality. And people are getting massively frustrated by the fact nothing is working and therefore coming up with ever crazier "solutions" that just make things worse. I am very often in agreement with people on their ideas of how the world "should" be. But then I start parting ways with them as I start finding reasons why people just cannot be expected to ever be that way. There SHOuLD be gender eq…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:27 AM
2

Not sure how you feel about Ben Shapiro, but consider this an introduction to the scandal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BjxNbUOmEk
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:18 AM
6

You are trying too hard to turn the tables on me. I was not talking about laying blame. I was talking about women taking steps to protect themselves. One lock on the door is sufficient protection from theft in most places. Insisting on 5 is well overboard. However, in Afghanistan I will recommend the burkha.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:44 AM
12

Its because for so many women their reputation is damn near everything. If a man needs to be thrown under the bus to ensure she is not viewed as a dirty slut, then a man goes under the bus. To make it even worse, so many women are not even on the verge of being labeled a dirty slut, but simply act of fear that it *might* happen. Plus, being a *victim* is a golden ticket.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:38 AM
6

rape wasn't addressed seriously for decades ​ Well, it still isn't. Now its just being addressed FURIOUSLY. Whether today or the 1950s, there is no way to magically sort a "He said, she said" situation. You can collect all the pubic hair samples and semen you want and conduct DNA tests, but if he says it was consensual and he is clearly not a stranger to her and she was clearly not kidnapped, then you better have a video or audio recording. Do "victims" come to court with those? No. Because that…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:31 AM
6

Yup. Liam Neesen fell for that crap and turned temporarily racist (cause she said a Black man did it) but he won't get any leeway citing "temporary insanity" from the cancel culture feminazis.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:23 AM
4

but this is equivalent to telling women not to wear slutty outfits. Its not. And wearing slutty outfits is proven to slightly increase chances of rape. PLUS, I think it also increases the chance of a different woman getting raped. Working so hard to turn random men on is a really stupid and irresponsible thing to do. Even us men's rights supporters know there are men out there you just don't FK with because they have very little self control. And then the rest of us get heat for what those rejec…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:20 AM
6

Yup. And that is why I pointed this out. Right is right. And this is WRONG.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:05 PM
13

If it is written into law that we must all spit on you as you pass, would that make it okay? No. It would not. It would be a clear and obvious violation of your natural human rights. No words on paper required. And that is exactly what this is. F the Ukraine government. F the Russian government too. But especially F NATO and the U.S. government. None of them give a damn about us ordinary men.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:41 PM
29

What did he do to deserve it? Yeah I can safely ask that question. Imagine if the genders were reversed and I asked: What did she do to deserve it? I would get death threats.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:45 PM
3

Thank you...missed that.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:57 PM
18

Well that is quite the gyno-centric article! Not a single world about how many sons he had or how much is being taken from them. But we know that against his wishes his wife will get half and he has four daughters who will all get something. Edit...it says he has two sons. My bad.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:17 PM
2

Despite the definition of a partiarchy being a system built by men for the benefit of men I do not think this definition is correct. I had a look around at various definitions but I found nothing to support the idea that a patriarchy is "for the benefit of men", as in, "men in general". My understanding of patriarchy is a system that is for the benefit of a handful of elite men. The other men are simply placed between themselves and women, with women at the bottom (though caste and racial segreg…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:05 PM
18

You don't understand. She FELT stared at and violated and we MUST do whatever it takes to make her feel better. This guy should be doing everything he can to console her, including giving up his membership and perhaps giving her some compensation money. And he should be thankful to have been able to provide such altruistic service to her and do the right thing! How else do you brutes expect the woman to go back to feeling safe and secure??? Why do you hate women?? (sigh) Anyway if you thought an…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:10 AM
9

Mostly people don't want to help you. They want to wreck you. They will say whatever it is at that moment that will wreck you. If you are a happy single, they will say you are wasting your life. Saying so will not increase your odds of finding someone though. In fact, it will probably make the odds worse for wrecking your happiness. If your own sexual politics won't wreck you, they call you incel to shame you and help you either remain or become an incel for feeling shame. And if they can get yo…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:47 PM
-4

Hear me out....I understand the woman/women. Women are always pushing eachother toward the center and toward balance and harmony. And most have a very difficult time handling disharmony. If a man (or woman) is being too friendly or not friendly at all, its on an extreme, and becomes disharmonious.....creepy. But most men are not like that. And since they were boys they were mostly with boys and boys do not work so hard to manipulate a group into a group of harmonious equals. Group dynamics are b…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:35 PM
3

Good question. I would say that anyone who ACTS to further the men's rights movement is an activist. That could be attending protests, giving public speeches and lectures, writing books, creating goods or services for men with promotion of men's rights as a basis for that action, or, as OrangeBlue22 has done here, make a video to promote the movement.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:27 AM
1

A good case has been made that its social conditioning responsible for the spike in the number of people claiming to be bi, gay, asexual, or whatever is trending. They say the numbers indicate that its teenage girls representing the overwhelming majority of the number shifts. And that is because teenage girls are the most succeptible group to BS social trends. Of course that goes against the "strong female" narrative pushed by the feminazis, so they won't accept such an explanation...even as the…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 04:27 AM
12

I refuse the label of "activist". Accepting it would be rude to the people who do actual activism on behalf of the movement. I am a men's rights supporter...all I do is run my mouth in support. I have got nothing on the actual activists. Nothing.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:14 AM
0

LOL. Your vote never mattered. Look up Tweedism. Look up the 2016 Democratic primaries. And modern voting machines connected to the internet are not helping. Cell phone voting would make it even worse. People who cannot be bothered to count paper ballots with their own hands never had democracy, and never will. Its not convenient and if it is, its a sham.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:45 PM
-13

I don't think this is real. This is reality TV.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:05 PM
1

Okay. And you are further saying there was no sabotage or that sabotage doesn't matter? Are you saying that this debacle is insignificant? https://thepoliticalinsider.com/dnc-rigged-stole-election-from-bernie-sanders/
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:48 AM
0

How what? Used to is past tense. Is is present tense. What is to explain???
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:39 AM
1

A blog? https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/popular-vote-turnout-2016/index.html
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:37 AM
0

Far too many people are far too stupid by nature. By the time they get voted out the damage will be done. I am sorry but intelligence is genetic. Its proven though people don't like to admit it. Even so, intelligence is only proven to have been inherited by real world trials. Whether that intelligence has been leveraged into capability is also only proven with real world trials. Those who cannot pass such trials are damn dangerous to hand political power to.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:28 AM
1

the whole community just being women haters, feminist haters, or ex-feminist haters... I don't think that was done. But the post is gone now so I can't double check. But, you know, I asked you a question and you dodged it. Why?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:16 AM
0

Well that is a different kettle of fish isn't it? Just because a man can be broken down by desperation and the realization he will die a virgin is NOT evidence of low or non-existent standards. That would be like saying a starving man eating pond scum is proof pond scum is good enough for him.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:14 AM
1

I figured it would be easier for newmasteroftime to read it. I just want to thank you for showing me what a waste of time it is replying to you. I am not going to try and clarify anything to someone who is going to openly admit they have no respect for me. There is no point. You can just FO now.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:11 AM
1

Can you explain to me why Clinton got the nomination over Sanders?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:06 AM
1

it's disingenuous to say they didn't vote when Hillarys campaign was on being female. That makes no logical sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:53 AM
1

Huh? What do I have to be accountable for??? All I am telling you is that both candidates were garbage and that is evidenced by record low turn-out. Yes, SOME feminists pushed Killary because of her vagina. Why are you trying to blame them all? Did some actually like Trump AFTER pushing for Killary? People can change their minds, but, I think its more likely you confused yourself there.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:51 AM
2

Men are more violent (as feminist put it) or women are less connected to reality (as you put it) is not convincing to me. People are not stupid. Yes they are and both genders too. Not being connected to reality is not proof of low intelligence...its proof of a lack of experience with reality or an inability to connect with reality. Dreamers can be as intelligent as anyone....a person with a doctorate in literature can be just as intelligent as someone with a doctorate in engineering....but one o…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:43 AM
-10

So used to = is? Cause that guy is full of shit?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:31 PM
0

I could agree to that if we had a meritocracy at least. We can't have those Americans who can't find Ukraine on a map running the show. Certain positions need to be limited to people who have built companies, people with doctorates, authors of famous books, people with extraordinary IQs, famous architects, top engineers....stuff like that....
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:29 PM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:21 PM
-15

While it was not directly stated, it was well implied that SOME people are not reading carefully....and that is as nice as I can be about this. There is a difference between BEING a feminist and having USED to be a feminist. And seeing spew from people like you accusing people of BEING when they said multiple times they USED to be is really farking aggravating. And if you cant quit doing it I humbly suggest you just QUIT.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:20 PM
-27

Thank you for proving his/her point. The door out might still be open.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:13 PM
-5

No idea what you are talking about regarding Clinton's being traitors. Nothing I've seen indicates such things. Stealing elections, even party elections, is treason against the American people.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:00 PM
4

That is a representative sample No. it. is. NOT! This is not a random poll. It is a VOTE. And a vote for Trump is NOT a vote of support for Trump. It is just as easily a vote AGAINST Hillary, who is a fricken war monger. Maybe they voted for Trump because they didn't want to die in WWIII like we are on the verge of now that Ukraine Oil Biden's Dad is in office? But they kept HUnters laptop well out of the MSM news cycle so they didnt know better than not to vote for Biden. ​ white women voted FO…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:58 PM
-2

I wonder if those women you know even registered to vote? And yes, it was a horror to watch Clinton and friends steal the nomination. They should be in a friggen jail cell...for life...as traitors to the nation and a threat to national security.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:32 PM
3

Great, so even less reason to care about your opinions. No vote, no say Excuse me? You do realize that Clinton stole the nomination don't you? U.S. elections are rigged, just not in the way that Trumpers think it is. There is this thing called Tweedism, and what it means is that you choice of candidate is completely meaningless. None of us ordinary Americans have a say in Federal government. At all. Period. The Fed is owned by the mega rich who run the big banks, the pharmaceutical companies, th…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:29 PM
-2

But a "relatively high" amount could be only 20 some percent of all White American women in this case. It is straight up gas lighting that its a problem. Hell, I cannot even tell you what anti-feminist thing Trump did or threatened to do! What changed or almost did??? I am going to guess it was....NOTHING!!!
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:50 PM
1

Geez. I know you can't give a name or post a picture but could you at least give us a state and county so guys have a heads up about this demon on the loose and others can relax?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:40 PM
14

OMG.....NO! 55 percent of White women DID NOT vote for Trump! MOST Americans did not even vote!!! Voter turn out was so bad in 2016, and both candidates so reviled that a literal sack of dung might have won if it were on the ballot! I cannot even be bothered to dig deeper into this manure pile, but I would not be surprised if most feminists simply opted not to vote at all! Just because the conservative White women went to the polls and voted for Trump does not mean most American White women or e…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:28 PM
-1

No-one said that guys don't have standards. Is claimed just after.... ​ Most men take whatever they can get. Whatever they can get = no standards. But thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:12 PM
3

I think its a myth that most guys have no standards. Its a few insane guys that get the rest of us labeled as weak and standardless. But I am open to stats and studies if they exist.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:16 PM
9

WARNING NSFW but it is wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labiaplasty No feminist would recommend that surgery be forced on little girls or baby girls and may even object to any suggestion a female might be better off with it. But male circumscision? They tend to see that as totally different when its not much different at all.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:35 AM
1

Delete yourself you stupid bot.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:29 AM
1

That definition is horrible yes. Some feminists are useful idiots to the elites, yes. But if you could just name for me a few American Founding Mothers, that would be great.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:28 AM
4

Women are more likely to suffer from a variety of neurosis and also more likely to cave to social conditioning....which of course opens them up to more neurosis....bulemia, anorexia, anxiety, thinking they are lesbian when they aren't....etc. Women sing about how they don't care about their bad reputations. Most men don't need any affirmation to raise their middle fingers to what people think. Suicide is not a simple issue. Part of the reason why men commit suicide more is simply because they ar…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:16 AM
2

why do people post stuff like this?? Because the internet is filled with hate and honest questions are often downvoted into the dirt. ​ How does advocating for women’s issues somehow invalidate men’s issues? The easy answer is it doesn't...not automatically. However, since some people have filled their heads with women's issues, and spent all their time in women's issues echo chambers, they often assume that men have no issues. Further there is a strong tendency to blame all men for women's issu…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:10 AM
5

Sorry, but do you actually mean that society is TOO equal now? Women will only date equals or better. But since they flooded the job market they brought men's position down. That makes men unnattractive to them but men don't care about her position...unless its bottom or top.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:57 AM
-8

Women more than men report having a greater number of potential deal breakers when it comes to dating. The balance is that men's deal breakers are less likely to be overcome. Women won't start getting men for securing a management position or starting her own business.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:51 AM
6

The blue-haired, bloated Karens are winning, and I am sure the admins of this site are rejoicing the fact. They convinced most of America to forego one of the greatest pleasures in life. They got their "revenge of the nerds".
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:48 AM
3

I think of this type of thing as toxic masculinity more than toxic femininity, but it might be equal. This could just as easily be the case of the bully, football jocks laughing at "other men's" problems (toxic masculinity) as some misandrist crap from a woman or women who seek to belittle all men (toxic femininity).
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:44 AM
1

It was overwhelmingly rich, old men who made the financial, military and political system, and its still mostly rich old men at the top directing it today. Naming a few women with direct power doesn't change that. Its still a patriarchy and still a patriarchal system.....as far as that sphere goes. I think America has a matriarchal society though, and that influences the low end of the federal politics, like age of consent to marry, rape law, custody norms etc....which those big female names don…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:21 AM
0

Okay, so let me get this straight: men are evil, and they invented this system in which a very few men There is no helping you. I said nothing like that. FO.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:31 AM
0

Yes, and that's thanks to the feminists you claim will change things for the better. I specifically said they would not. You seem to be hell bent to make an enemy of me. Congratulations. You have succeeded. Sick of your nutball misinterpretations. Kindly FO.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:30 AM
1

Single mother homes have more child abuse than any other kind of living arrangement for kids. I am pretty sure they account for more custody than men. Can you count? Also, if you think feminists in power would change things, you have got to be smoking the good stuff. They'd do the opposite. The question would be their intent though. I see what I believe to be real feminists making decisions and pushing arguments that would or do hurt women all the time. They really can't see two moves ahead. A p…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 06:32 AM
0

So how the heck is it a patriarchy if it isn't even men?! The Hell? Have you no concept of numbers? Have you no concept of non-feminine women? Have no concept of traitors and sell outs? Have you no understanding that even patriarchs have wives who influence them??? Even a patriarch's marriage is not a pure master/slave relationship. So....Larry Fink, Donald Trump, George Soros, Barack Obama, Bill Gates, Joe Biden, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, Elon Musk, Charles Koch, Lloyd Blankfe…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 06:26 AM
6

However I think find that the common 'definition' of Patriarchy as used by feminists is "A system which benefits men at the expense / oppression of women" Absolutely. They are deeply confused and confusing others as they run their confused mouths. This is part of the reason why they end up promoting female dominance, because they keep insisting on more priviledge to equal men's, but men's privilege is mostly imagined by them and isn't real....even as they ignore how men are down-trodden even mor…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:04 AM
1

Well there is three. But the point is not their gender, but who they represent. They represent the elites and no one else.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:01 AM
-2

How the fuck is patriarchy to blame for the kinds of abuse that goes on in so many single mother households? Because they will not lift a finger to fix it and in fact they are all for destruction of the nuclear family. Part of my post was deleted earlier because of this crappy site's coding. Please reread it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:00 AM
-1

So basically, it's the Marxist concept of the bourgeoisie, but just adjusted to fit into a gendered worldview. Got it. Bourgeoisie includes the middle class. I am definitely talking about the one percent of the one percent here, not even bottom tier rich. ​ More and more women get into power all the time, and yet men suffer more and more. Women are slowly rising. Ten years ago they made up about 1/3 of the U.S. Congress. Now its about a quarter and still not enough to really change anything. But…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:50 AM
0

Not that many I think. I would be hard pressed to name any outside of Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:28 AM
2

I mean special treatment in ultra-feminist discourse.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:25 AM
4

They were forced and tricked to throw away their best years by their elders. And now that they are the elders they are doing their best to force/convince young women to throw away their best years too. The cycle of abuse continues. Their jealousy toward younger women manifests itself in overt hate of men and stealth hate of young women, and I include teenage girls in that.....and your great-great grandma probably married as a teen and was as happy as today's woman is miserable and consumed with …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:14 AM
3

It totally screwed me up and I still have a bunch of issues from it to this day. When I hear stories like this I always have to wonder if it was the contact that screwed people up or how the rest of society treated them and their feelings about it. I think its something for you to think about. Society is so much more interested in itself that it scarcely cares about your ability to rise up and move on. It feeds on victim stories like vampires and so, hopes you remain in victim mentality forever.…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:58 AM
5

I have one.... Its the rich, old men who run industry, control the media, and run the government and military. Less than one percent of men with a few honorary female members mixed in. They are robber barons, and they are the enemy of us all.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:49 AM
1

The deep state is real though. Eisenhower warned us about it in his farewell address. He called it the Military/Industrial Complex, but its more like the Military/Industrial/Congressional Complex. Kennedy didn't get a bullet in the head for nothing and that whole episode doesn't have question marks all over it for nothing either. As for "patriarchy", as I said in a comment here, if you define it as the old, rich men running the government and industry everything starts to make sense. Telling us …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:46 AM
1

A lot of this rides on how you define "Patriarchy". If you define it as "Most or all men have political and social power over and above women" then you will see a lot of outcomes that make no sense. But if you define it as "A minority of rich and powerful men in government and industry lording over EVERYONE else." then suddenly male homelessness, the draft, no funding for men's health, etc. starts making more sense. After all, why would rich men seek to help their competition? Who among them wil…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:35 AM
1

Women do speak quite differently about things when they think no male is around. I’ve seen it directly. Well yeah. The opposite is also true. I got exposed to a lot of it, as I say, being a rare male in a family of women. Sure they made "small dick" comments, but nowhere near like my male classmates. I think its natural for teenagers of either gender to be dismissive and insulting of both genders.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:14 AM
1

My foreskin is not growing back. And I already know enough to be against circumscision. Not much point diving deeper until I become a person of influence.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:54 AM
24

I never was a sports fan. But any org that allows military goons to conduct pro-war, pro-empire brainwashing shows at their events is on my hate list. F the NFL. F the empire. F their wars and F their presidents.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:19 PM
1

What I believe about Tate is I don't know what to believe. But he is not half as bad as the scum that fly and order around America's terror drones and murder children in their own homes. Its really hard to dedicate a single brain cell to hating Tate.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:12 PM
1

Why pretend that is some sort of man thing? First of all, I was replying to a comment within its context. And it was not your comment. Second of all, I have never in my life heard women being critical of breasts to the degree I have heard teenage boys be critical. Maybe its because I am a man? But as one of few males in my family who was surrounded by women, I have certain heard women's private talk a lot. I grew up with it. But that's my family and their friends. IDK what a more representative …
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:05 PM
5

He is, he believes in Islam, that's all the evidence you need False. None of the major Abrahamic religions hate women. But few believers read their holy books and even fewer understand what is written. For example, the parable of Onan is not about wasting seed. Its about Onan failing to fulfill his duty to his new wife, that he didn't want. Of course the Pope will never tell you that because all Popes are there for control and fleecing of the flock, not the benefit of the flock. Onan was meant t…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 10:18 AM
1

Would you stop asking for intent? None of us can read minds. And writing it down does not make it the truth.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:00 AM
11

Will you wake the hell up? Even if we met in person you could not get the skinny on me so damn fast. I do think highly of women, I just don't think they are men with vaginas. Women are friggen incredible on many fronts that I could not possibly hope to cover or equal....but they are just as flawed as men are. Men and women need to work out their differences so they can work together, but ultra-feminists have poisoned the minds of many women against men and even themselves. Ultra-feminist dogma i…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:39 AM
13

This sub is an echo chamber, so you'll get validation for incoherent beliefs no matter what This sub has better debate and opinion tolerance than most subs I have been to. The problem is not this sub...its modern western society. ​ but you claim women 1) >avoid risk and hard work? but you alsoacknowledge that 2) >housework is a real, important job and its moredemanding than part time work I was not really making claims there. I was just pointing to how you seem to be agreeing with things you say…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:33 AM
7

Found the incel That will happen less if people get all the mirrors out of their house!
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:19 AM
10

Self-styled misogynist influencer??? I am pretty sure Tate never claimed to be a misogynist. I am pretty sure that label was stuck on him by the gyno-centric western media.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:07 AM
17

So what you are saying is that from childhood, males are encouraged to overcome brutal adversity and sacrifice themselves, and females are encouraged to expect males to save them while they avoid risk and hard work? And you think is better that we have nice stories as a reward? Actually, I think you might be in more agreement than you expected. I think most of us guys really don't care so much about the course taken on equality, we just want the sails set directly on that course with no zig zagg…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:59 AM
2

Pound Me Too is wrecking the lives of both genders of all non-old ages. But yes its worth having a conversation about how its harming school boys specifically. But I think the blue-haired, incel Karens are having a good time with it....and probably will until we bring back accusations of witchcraft with all its trappings....or some clever stand in.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:09 AM
1

name one popular femenist, Christina Hoff Sommers
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:58 AM
1

Nobody owes anybody else sex, That only works if the non-sexual partner steps aside and allows the sexual partner to have affairs. Being a spouse, GF or BF comes with obligations and that is a core one. If one feels no responsibility for their partner's sexual fulfillment then what is the point of even getting together? Oh, you could cite the case of two asexuals forming a bond, but lets talk typical here. Most people want sexual fulfilment and just unilaterally opting out while also barring the…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:52 AM
1

Yeah, but you don't represent the 3.5 billion other women on Earth. Congrats on being an exception. There are others.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:46 AM
-1

Just because she says she is on the pill does NOT mean you should believe it. Plus if she messed up her schedule you get to be a dad. Do you want to be an accidental dad? Do you want to be tricked into a being a dad? Far better for me to educate on the reality that won't change than pimp the dream that isn't going to happen. Men can take control of their lives and I am tellling you how. This little rebellion against reality is not a good look and only serves to undermine other men's rights issue…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:41 AM
-1

The nuance of words seems a bit lost on you. I admit it is possible. And I think it was you that posted a study which made it seem even more likely in my mind. So I am not 100 percent sold, no, but I was at maybe 70 percent before and 80 percent now.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:31 AM
4

a crack. Freudian slip?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:14 PM
1

As for the discrepancy in how male vs female infidelity is depicted, that's just the same old human instinct to selectively empathise with women. I don't disagree entirely...I think that sentiment is there....it just does not always manifest itself on the cheating question. The Hebrews would stone them all the same, and it remains the core of honor killings in South America. Meanwhile at certain times in certain places, males have been allowed mistresses and even multiple wives. So it mostly see…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:29 PM
15

She should be under loose house-arrest and the baby daddy should be her slave until the child is 18. The state should free the jailed man and pay him double what was taken. Then they both should become the slaves of the state until they pay back the state what the state paid the jailed man. If they can do that before the child turns 18. then they can remain free.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:13 PM
50

Who said America does not have debtor's prison???
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:09 PM
7

If I seem to have become entrenched in a position (extreme) then I think its okay to TRY. For example, people have called me anti-American before, even when I wasn't. They had reasons to suspect because I offered them no positives about America. So I gave them some postives. The people who accepted that were okay, but those who still called me anti-American were not. So....this tactic can be a double-edge sword. Damn...this is more complex than I thought.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:50 PM
27

Most women love drama as much as men love sex. There is a reason women are glued to the TV and men their computers. But drama without conflict would be dull indeed. Cheating is high drama of conflict.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:40 PM
13

Noone, not even a psycho on twitter, is calling helping during a crisis toxic masculinity. Noone. That is true, but you miss the point of acting like they do. Its to call them out and give them a chance to deny they think its toxic. And if they cannot at the same time praise men like this, then clearly it is proven they just hate men or seek their submission to womankind. So its more of a tactical exercise than a statement of fact. And I think its legit in that sense, so I support it.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:34 PM
-7

Unless you're alleging that men are raping women to cause pregnancy.. Which is patently false, you're 100% bat shit crazy with this statement. Bat shit crazy??? Well, if you are going to take the gloves off, so will I. You live a small minded, absolutist fantasy land where the only way to live a proper life is to take zero risks. Well I got some news for you....you are not the first absolutist hur dur to walk this Earth with ideas of "jUsT dOn'T hAvE sEx" and even when those with power foisted i…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:18 PM
0

Seems to me you think this is a pissing match and you need to tinker with the math in order to "win". "motivated couple". "only a week". "75 years of life" which is irrelevant. You are just flat out ignoring facts like people having jobs, periods getting in the way, ovulations even existing or being viable, etc. You can't just cram it all into one week and then that math is defintely going to work. I am sorry, but for most people 14 tries is quite a lot of sex, and that goes double if they are n…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:59 PM
2

Amen.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:32 AM
4

That's all true....but she is the one wanting to be pregnancy free so bad.....she needs to bear the risks if he doesn't want to....even if she will end up bearing more risk...its her with the problem and its not his to bear.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:32 AM
0

The barest minimum amount of sex is involved in procreation I upvoted you for the rest of the post, but on average it takes 14 tries to cause a pregnancy....and I mean 14 unprotected direct attempts. And that explains why we have evolved in a manner in which sex is such a recreational pleasure and constant drive. If we slack, birth rates nose-dive....and that is where the industrialized, sex-hating nations with matriarchies are right now.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:27 AM
28

There are feminists who celebrate masculinity that is not toxic. But here is my challenge for you...name some. I can. But if you start from zero, its a real challenge. And when you realize that, then you will understand what is being said to you. Most modern feminists, particularly third and fourth wave, believe all masculinity is ultimately toxic....but you are correct that this not what toxic masculinity really means....but they don't know that and good luck educating them. They cancel those w…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:38 AM
-10

Wow. Are you always this panicky? How do you manage to even leave the house...you might get hit a by meteor out there! Look there is no way using vasectomy, condoms and pull out at the same time is going to cause a pregancy if a person has any modicum of sense and self-awareness. Less than one percent of vasectomies fail and when they do it is detectible and redone within the first 3 months. Condoms fail at similar rates and usually because the user is a moron. Pull out fails more but that is be…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:27 AM
-11

Absolute bullshit. No. Its not. Not anymore than saying people can fly. You can't of course without knowledge, training and equpment, but people can fly. Of course someone who never heard of airplaines who say "absolute bullshit". But as it stands there are no formal classes on pull out. But guess what? You can have a vasectomy, use a condom AND use pull out all at the same time. It would take a miracle to cause a pregancy like that.....else you should get a paternity test.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:02 AM
-10

There are many options besides vasectomy and for both genders too. But the best way to not be held responsible for a child is to not cause a pregancy, and men by virtue of nature hold all the important cards here. The pull out method is not 100 percent, but technically, neither are condoms. However, if you use your brain, know your body and practice (with a condom) it can be EXTREMELY effective....though I personally would not do it with anyone I could not bear to have an accident baby with.....…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:54 AM
-19

I know this opinion is popular, but hear me out. We men are so outrageously lucky on this score. We can prevent pregnancy EASILY, complete piece of cake, with just a little bit of sense and attentiveness. Condoms are a complete magic bullet for us, especially if one uses proper water-based lubricants in conjunction. I have had a ton of sex, even vaginal sex without condoms, but never caused a pregnancy I did not want. And I am not advocating random use of pull out here, but I did use it with ste…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:19 AM
10

A couple of the posts are amusing, where one woman gave her husband an ultimatum of no vasectomy, no sex, and he chose no sex. I would choose sex...just have to find another woman to provide. No partner has the right to enforce celibacy. Either they provide or they step aside. No more excuses accepted after a few weeks of missed chances. Its already a stretch just accepting monogamy if some one has. But celibacy is NOT monogamy. Monogamy means there is ONE sex partner, and if that person's name …
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:09 AM
3

Thank you and good point. I am not a fan of this type of post without certain strict pre-conditions just for the sake of fairness, but yeah, this also encourages brigading and harassment.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:27 AM
-9

Yep. I think grown men are not so critical of breasts. But teenage boys are.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:21 AM
9

Its REALLY bad form to post a screen shot from there to here without crossing out her name UNLESS you have gotten permission to do this. She is just getting her reputation trashed with no opportunity to defend herself or learn. We just pass judgement with an incomplete picture. For example, she may realize that it was not actually men, but teenage boys, that did all this talk about boobs and she had just remembered that from her teen years and assumed it never changed.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:10 AM
2

I have known women that are practically hobbled by their periods...and others that barely seem to notice. Seems like the sort of thing that should be sorted by doctors on an individual basis, not politically mass applied. Yes indeed, plenty of women's priviledges need rolled back, but this one is not about priviledge. Its about biological reality....for some but not all women.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:58 PM
16

I just want to point out that you can pick someone for both shallow and deep reasons. In fact, I think that's completely usual and normal. Almost no one is picked just for age, wealth, fame or body alone.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:54 PM
7

What do you think the word "exposed" means? Removing the skin exposed the head. Hello?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:46 PM
-5

You brought up female circumcision, so I provided the female equivalent parts. I ask you again...where are you getting your information? There is no clear evidence that pleasure is diminished. It is widely believed but it is not a fact. But even the common belief is not for the reasons you say. Its not the direct loss of nerve endings, but rather the fact the glans is now exposed to rubbing contact with clothing which is believed to decrease sensitivity.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:30 PM
-5

Where are you getting your information? The most sensitive parts are the glans and the clitorus, and both are naturally covered with a hood, called either the foreskin or hood. Its the latter that is removed by circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:58 PM
3

I think she is about as real as the WWF. You know, fake personas with fake stories are often generated to garner controversy and clicks for things like.....podcasts. There is no proof any of this is real. She could even just be a compulsive liar completely of her own design...like Oprah Winfrey.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:53 AM
-4

I appreciate the sentiment of this picture/card. The factual inaccuracies I could do without though. "Raped" with a knife? "Most sensistive" part? Nah. Mutilated with a scalpel. And had my most sensitive part permanently exposed and thus desensitized.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:27 AM
1

Jaded. Resigned. Not much difference there. Black American males have had so much of that crap you just cannot expect them to panic.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:19 AM
1

I don't know exactly what you mean by "patriarchy theory", but Christina Hoff Sommers says Saudi Arabia is a patriarchal society but America isn't by a long shot. Honestly, I don't know how anyone could say that patriarchies and matrarchies do not exist...if that is what you are saying.https://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/christina-hoff-sommers-to-feminists-you-re-out-of-touch-elitists
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:15 AM
1

I suspect you’re “silent majority” are those women who say “feminist” “somewhat describes them” Yep. ​ To what degree can such women even be meaningfully called “feminist”? Its a fair question that can be asked about so very many groups and movements. Like people claim to be "Democrats" just because they voted for a Democrat president once. That's it? That's all it takes? Some will say yes, Some will say no. But since we cannot agree, there is confusion.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:36 AM
1

Some people define hate as simply holding that something or some group has negative or inconvenient properties, such as if I say my wife's periods have ruined our weekend plans several times, I could get hit with.....yOu HaTe WoMeN!....or the same if I said some women lie about rape....cause clearly some do. Its not a semantics game on my part to point out that the word "hate" covers a completely unreasonable amount of philosophical territory. Also, if you think you know basic female nature so w…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:32 AM
1

Also, how can a microwave or a freezer be misused? It's not a microwave or a freezer making you fat. If you have zero appreciation of food, you will wind up knowing nothing about it. Of course, not knowing never stopped anyone from talking like an authority on the subject, did it? Or, explain to me why you are so damned sure there is no relation. Do you know why the space age dream of food pills never panned out? Do you know why scientists cannot just throw some lab created chemical components i…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:17 AM
1

But she’s ostracised by pretty much all feminists. Certainly all feminist groups. Are International Alliance of Women and/or Women's Political Caucus feminist groups? Yes or No? Are Camile Paglia and Nancy Friday feminists? Yes or No? And how are you using the word "mainstream"? As dominant or as commonly known? I know that noisy, bloated, blue-haired, bull-lesbian feminazis hate her, but I think you over-estimate their popularity.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:03 AM
1

Right....so I gave a 30 year old woman some chocolate and a stuffed animal and in the car I kissed her and put my hand between her legs and told her I like her well I was "grooming" her. And the fact she liked it is irrelevent. Right.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:34 AM
2

I don't think you understand how many wildly different definitions of hate are being thrown around these days. I also feel like your world view is confined to just one area of the world or perhaps one country. The phenomenon of women gathering in groups to scream obscenities, wave picket signs and chant about the pAtRiArChY only exist in certain places. So are those where women on the outside identify with those crazies in the slightest.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:30 AM
2

"Refrigerators have ruined society. They're for lazy people who don't feel like dying of starvation because of a bad winter." ~ You, apparently User name checks out. Actually the freezer is more of a problem, but I am talking about misuse, not any and all use. And I bet you have no idea what I am talking about. Also the microwave is great. But not if its misused. Again, I bet you have no idea. But the fast food people are getting their obesity and diabetes from is abusing both. Your conditions? …
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:25 AM
1

Be gone with those double-standards. Be gone with your strawman. The only double-standard here is the one you made up so could imagine yourself clever and "winning". You also seem to think I am not an advocate of men's rights when am. There are places on Reddit you can go and actually attack a real ultra-feminist you know.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:15 AM
2

Most of the things you listed realistically don't even have to be done daily. Millions of overweight and diabetic Americans are clear evidence that these modern, time saving shortcuts you are so proud of are garbage. In a family, YES, most of the things I mentioned need done everyday, and the cooking is best done 3 times a day if you count making packed lunches. And if you are cooking for family and not shopping pretty damn often you are either cooking crap or doing some gardening which is more …
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:26 PM
1

Calm...down. Its defunct because we don't need a special term for the same thing. Just say "courting a child". Is that not sinister enough without pimping it up? Further, people are using the term outside that scope because they don't know what it means and think it means something else, such as totally legitimate and approved sex education as well as gender issues. When you start creating new terms everywhere people get confused and so does the issue.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:17 PM
2

That totally depends how you want to define "hate".
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:05 PM
2

Feminism is not monolithic. But there is a lot of bad mixed in with the good. Remove the bad and there will better results. Feminism reminds me of the attempts to make the first airplanes and gliders. There were so many catastrophic failures until Lilienthal and his massive successes followed by utter disaster. But he inspired the Wright Brothers who finally achieved lasting success.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:02 PM
1

None. How many unhappy people don't? And how many people were happy for 40 years before something awful happened one day and they killed themselves over it?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:56 PM
2

Can you give some examples in mainstream media of self-described feminists arguing against female privilege? The mainstream media??? Why add such a ridiculous caveat? The MSM is bought and paid for and is not representative of actual feminism and is not even trying to be. If it is your aim to have me declare that the MSM is a sham and is propaganda, I do. But I thought we were talking about feminism.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:50 PM
1

There is no game. In order to explain why a thing is defunct, the thing must first be defined. I have heard various things called grooming, and I merely wanted to know what it means to YOU, so that I could explain it better to you. But I will say this about how I am using the term....everything called "grooming" would be called "courting" if the ages were different.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:44 PM
2

You and another are REALLY fixated on the idea that suicide rates are proof of gendered unhappiness.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:56 PM
1

Can you even define grooming? I am not asking for a link or a cut and paste. Can YOU define it?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:09 PM
1

I'm talking about real unhappiness You are grossly oversimplifying suicide and its causes.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:08 PM
1

Do you ever read to the end of posts? ​ that movement will be labeled "feminist" even if it comes to realizethat all prior feminists did worse than fail them, it made women's livesdemonstrably worse. ​ Just because feminism THINKS its on the right path does not mean it is. It does NOT mean the path cannot change. And I say again, IF they change they will still be labeled as feminists....but they WON'T be the same....so NO...its NOT more "feminism".
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:03 PM
0

Feminism is the cause of females unhappiness. SMH Well, if you have an alternate explanation, go for it. Women's happiness has done little but drop since feminism took off. Please explain. ​ https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Happiness-by-Gender-over-Time-in-the-US-GSS_fig2_265230842
/r/MensRights10/02/23 12:32 PM
2

Numbers tell quite the opposite. Suicides in male population are 3 to 7 times higher than women's. You seamlessly went from unhappy to suicide. And men talk about their feelings with male friends and do it lots. Happiness is rare by default? That is absolutely nuts. Industrialized societies have made themselves miserable and its not remotely because "life hard". Anyway...an actual chart on happiness, gender and time.https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Happiness-by-Gender-over-Time-in-the-US-GSS\…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 12:31 PM
2

But both are vilified by feminists overall. Well, I am going to pull the silent majority card. The rabid, noisy, screaming crazies of just about any movement tend to get the lion's share of the attention. It would take extensive polling to prove either one of us right, but I do not believe Sommers is widely vilified...in fact...I bet most feminists are non-active and never heard of her. As for affirmative action, once again, I bet if you poll non-active feminists and told them the stats you just…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 11:00 AM
1

Most men are not Leonardo DiCaprio. If they got a teen girl (and you can assume legal age commonly 16) they would want to hang on rather than attempt to go from GF to GF. Of course the guys that go from girl to girl get all the notice and now women think we are all like that. (again, Leo). Anyway, an example would be Courtney Stodden who gets herself some fame and I assume money by marrying Doug Hutchison, a minor actor. Everyone was out to break them up, the press, the feminists, the jealous me…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:52 AM
2

Is there any reason to believe that feminism has realised what things they push which reduce overall female happiness and pull back on those things? Traditional feminists have a clue I think. And I think they could be presuaded to see the general truth of what is going on. Christina Hoff Sommers is a very reasonable person and she has loads of fans. Turd and Force wave feminists hate her of course, but they are idiots and/or evil.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JJfeu2IG0M
/r/MensRights10/02/23 09:39 AM
-10

Feminism, certainly 3rd or “whatever” wave is clearly anti-male. Third and fourth are yes. Have you ever seen a prominent feminist, one who isn’t disowned by the wider movement Pah! Your caveat of "the wider movement" would be whatever the hell you decide it is. Semantical BS. If you want to have a discussion with me, okay. But stop trying "win" with trick questions. ​ So why are special measures to boost women needed? And given thisexample, give me one good reason why we should believe thatdisc…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 09:06 AM
2

Occam's razor agrees with you.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 09:00 AM
-9

I don't need a scientific study to know that some men hate (nearly) all women. A lot of this rests on what we mean by hate exactly, and the word hate is full of semantical issues. For example you could argue that Old South slave owners did not hate Black people....cause why would they own that which they hate??? No. You are playing word games. Not interested.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:53 AM
-1

Wrong on both counts. https://listverse.com/2019/06/14/10-jews-who-fought-in-hitlers-nazi-army/
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:39 AM
-5

Ill hate who i want. Yeah. You do that. Its your wetware. But you do that without spewing irrational hate here and without harming the movement that is not in existence to foster your irrational hate and be consumed by it. I agree that feminism is, at least for the most part, not needed today. But that is all well removed from the irrational turds you dropped in your OP. I don't know if you can smarten up but I encourage you to try.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:36 AM
-29

Posts like this not only harm the movement, they are suspect as being designed to. Half of these charges cannot even be laid at the feet of extremist feminists, let alone moderate ones. Also, plenty of men are feminists and don't hate them. And plenty of men think all talk of men's rights is a joke. And some men do hate women, but most don't. This post is just HORRIBLE on so many levels.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:14 AM
5

as in they live in someone else's house for free. That is like saying factory employees get to use factory premises for free....no they don't. I am sure Jeff Bezos would say they do though....are you any relation? Cooking is work. Cleaning is work. Washing laundry is work. Shopping is work. Taking care of kids is work. Work entitles a person to rewards, which can be money...or it can be a place to live, or food, electric, water, and gas expenses paid. Did you miss the part where I said I live al…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:02 AM
4

That's like saying 80 percent of the military are free-loaders, since most never see the combat, even in major wars. The value of logistics cannot be overstated. At the very least you should view a stay-at-home parent as the logistical arm of the family. I live alone and the shopping, cooking and cleaning eat up a LOT of my time and spirit. If I had kids to take care of as well there is no way I could handle working a formal job. I would be dead inside....and so many who try, are.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:15 AM
3

Not only compelled but even those grunts realize they can shove your face over your phone and your fingers too.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:08 AM
1

Grooming is a defunct concept. You did nothing weird or unnatural, and the term/concept is predicated on the lie that you should have no sex drive or someone her age should hold no natural attaction for you. What she did is abuse your trust. What you should do is recommend everyone delete said pics because they are child porn. I mean, I don't agree with that description, but you can use that to turn it around on anyone who would even think to shame you. You tell them they looked at and might pos…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:20 AM
1

I would say it won't work much or work well. But not at all? I think that is saying too much. I have seen desperate men and who they will take on. Hell, men have been known to use sheep for relief. Loads of MILFS are more attractive than that!
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:45 AM
1

Material girl can get away with a lot of crap. Material old lady cannot. When was this EVER different? Looking back, would I have traded being super popular in my teens and 20s (as females are) for being mildly popular in my 30s and 40s as men can be and I was? Yes, I think I would have. The REAL problem is that females are being blocked from capitalizing on that popularity. However, Madonna has no excuse. She just got spoiled is all.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:31 AM
13

The recorded evidence might be unusuable in COURT. But it can be very helpful when making a journal which IS usuable so long as you are timely about making that journal....like that same day when your memory is fresh. Best to get the time and quotes correct and a secret recording can mean you make a PERFECT journal.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:21 AM
4

Saying most men are this way and most women are that way is fine in my book and can be true. However, "You know how men are." crosses a line with me, because that is not some, but all. Also, if she never points out general female negatives, such as the tendency to BLAME MEN for all their problems, then it is certainly a case of misandry. Also, I suspect whoever is doing the hiring might be selecting men based off certain traits....such as the perceived mindset that will tolerate gender discrimin…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:17 AM
1

A LOT. I never made such a determination until after watching a LOT of porn.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:10 AM
1

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:08 AM
1

I called it a cosmetic procedure because it didn't happen to a baby but to a consenting adult Right. But even stories like this help men understand what is being done to a baby. As it is, right now, its so natural to American men they cannot even imagine an adult male considering it...you know....such as themselves....and how much pain that is going to be plus the possibility of post op problems. I will not say he should have told her no. I do believe he might be quite happy right now if the sur…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:05 AM
7

My first wife was years older than me. The amount I learned from her was immense. I think I walked out ahead. People just want a horror show. So they invent a horror show. But they need to learn to invent them on their own time and mind their own damn business.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:32 PM
-6

Some women are....but who knows why. I certainly think a cut penis looks A LOT nicer....you know...if I were judging it on artistic merit cause I am straight. I also think hidden labia minora is also A LOT nicer. And I recently learned that is the type of vulva most popular in porn but also the rarest type.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:13 PM
3

No clue why we got downvoted. But I appreciate your backing off of that. I might also suggest its because the mod accused him of hate, but my experience with moderaters is they just grab a canned excuse to ban people who seem counter to their agenda and "hate" is more popular than Campbell's soup for what mods like in a can.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:09 PM
4

Her story sounds like a failure of sex education to me. I was horny as hell from about 10 years old but I had to wait, and wait, and wait. Amazingly despite my desperation I did turn down a 20 something lady I was seeing when I was 16...she suddenly wanted it out of the blue in the middle of nowhere but I had no condom on me and she was a bit "off". But anyway, yeah, women have made sure sex is not readily available so men are usually on the desperate side and act....desperate. Its going to take…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:01 PM
1

Hateful? The other charges I can see, sort of, but not that one. Can you explain?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:51 PM
19

I cannot speak for the OP, but no man is going to have rights with a spine of jelly. It does sound like the guy failed to reinforce his spine in several areas. Stories like this make us men realize how we need to learn how to put our foot down....or even pull the plug. And the whole circumsicion thing....man...American men really need every related story they can get...cause that abomination perpetrated on male babies really is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:46 PM
0

Its sounds to me like the over-riding issue here is that the doctor is an incompetent quack. You have to find the right doctor for this sort of thing and its unusual for an adult male to do this. You cannot just trust the first doctor who is brimming with confidence. Even my baby brother's circumscision was apparently botched by some quack. Its part of the reason why American me decided my sons would not get them...especially as they are not even a common thing here in Japan and so who is a comp…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:39 PM
8

I see Mr. Benton wears glasses. And he got into a sexual encounter with her. I suggest he needs a new, stronger pair of glasses...some nice bifocals might do the trick.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:22 PM
0

Really, which part of the OP says the other side is screwing up? The opening sentence. Though I don't know why you restricted this to the opening post. She went into more detail in a later comment. Just looks to me like you are hot to judge her via burning evidence that is inconvenient to your campaign against her...which appears...misogynist to be honest. If anything, I think you might be doing a better job undermining the movement. But perhaps we do not agree on what the movement is meant to a…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:14 PM
-8

I would say if you have a problem you should be talking to the moderators, or explaining we need more moderation. Most of my experience with moderators has been bad. Talking to them never seemed to be a solution to anything. Not opening your post with 2 paragraphs about how men generalise, You just generalized and left out the part when she says the ultra-feminists are even more guilty.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:01 PM
1

Anybody against anybody crime is also a thing.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:15 PM
0

Bad bot. Delete yourself.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:14 PM
13

I would not assume that. Black American males tend to know what's up and they have gotten jaded to it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:13 PM
-1

Tribalism is a dangerous thing, and we must seek to thwart it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:00 PM
-4

You think a concern troll openly states the other side is largely screwing up in a certain way, but our side is just some comments....and those comments hurt us? I think you should slow your roll a bit. Others have pointed out to her that some of of those comments are people venting...due to the mistreatement they experienced at the hands of extremist feminists, liars and abusers.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:59 AM
-4

This is what concern trolls do. Yeah. But everything you said about a how a concern troll starts out is also precisely how a concerned reasonable and helpful human being starts out, so good luck with that. And she did not say this community was toxic. She said some comments were. And frankly, changing people's words and meanings is toxic.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:55 AM
3

Reddit can't ban me for being feminist. They will cancel you if they find you to be a threat to the cause. Don't even doubt it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:39 AM
62

Oh, for some its sheer malicious desire to "win" at all costs. "Misunderstand" is often too generous for what goes on.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:33 AM
55

Make no mistake....the thanks you get are for speaking up. Those who remain silent are no help really.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:31 AM
-2

Thank you for your comments AND your support! Yes indeed most generalization of men and women, on social and psychological matters, does NOT work. I will even go so far as to say that it works even LESS for women, as there is a larger variety of female mindsets IMO. I will tell you it is ABSOLUTELY your place to stand up for men's and women's rights as a responsible human. Anyone saying otherwise is toxic. I will also tell you something I firmly believe about SA, and that is that it too has been…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:26 AM
-1

You got to give her some credit though. So many women are so incompetent they fail at suicide in amazing numbers. But this one did paralyze herself at least! Half a point for women on this one!
/r/MensRights09/02/23 07:22 AM
3

Ultra-feminists care about more about the health and troubles of foreign girls than their own boys. I remember the media blitz about FMG over a decade ago and listening to these ultra-feminists go into an absolute rage. But bring up male genital mutilation they allowed to happen to their own boys and its silence or bUT tHaT's DiFfErEnT! You bet its different...to an agenda driven hypocrite.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 07:18 AM
0

Toxic masculinity is a good and fine word and concept. So is toxic feminity. Feminazis are just using it wrong and teaching others to use it wrong. I am not endorsing Beau of the Fifth Column...I mean he does have some good takes. But you might want to skip to 2:30 and just get what he claims is the real history of the term...and I tend to believe him on this point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APoQuX5M2P4
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:16 PM
11

I can see no direct objective reason to support that subjective sentiment. So it just looks like pure conditioning to me and you should probably be conditioned the other way frankly. But call spiders creepy at your leisure. Edit: I should put that in better context so here goes: Publically judging a relationship by your feels is no different in this case than publically judging gay and interactial-relationships by the same sentiment of "creepy"....which I am sure was done loads in the past leadi…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:41 AM
3

Your wording is damn hard to follow. I have no idea who "he" is. Also the difference between observation and opinion seems like hair splitting since I can't see the comments there but I can see your post here.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:16 AM
3

Do you mean rifle through all their statistics??? Or do you mean there is a single statistic proving your claim?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:57 AM
2

Are you claiming it was anywhere near equivalent?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:56 AM
1

That most Reddit subs will ban you for a non-gynocentric opinion. I will accept that as either fact or opinion, although I think "most" might be overstated, even if understandably given the sheer volume of anti-male sentiment on this platform.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:54 AM
0

Then I take your word on that. But I am just providing examples. There could be more.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:52 AM
1

We are speaking of a man, and his name is Leonardo Dicaprio. You can say "person" all you like and pretend you are being fair. However, well all know that most people who got rich directly are men, that rich women shun poorer men, that men do not shun poorer women, and that women are far more likely to marry into wealth. So yeah, its men with the supposed power imbalance here. Next, if you even tetatively assert that wealth differences create unnacceptable power imbalances, yes you are condemnin…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:49 AM
3

To be fair, you made a statement in the title which can be taken either as fact or opinion, and only brought it into question with a question in the body of the post. But yeah, I am pretty sure we get downvoted and banned on most or a damn lot of Reddit for saying anything perceived as anti-feminist or anti-trans, and never mind if we spoke demonstrable fact. Take the fact that far more women than men are diagnosed and treated for neuroticism therefore leading to the (most likely true) belief th…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:43 AM
5

Your post got removed because Did you read the post or the exchange???
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:32 AM
26

Reddit IS woke censorship and cancel culture IN PRACTICE.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:31 AM
1

Well, the journalist thing could be disproportionate depending on the proportion of male and female journalists OR the number of journalists involved in dangerous conditions, such as investigative journalists during political crises or war correspondents. But of course for the latter, it is improperly contexted as just "journalists". But the homeless thing has no such excuse. All I have for it is that if its an article specifically about women, then, of course. I also won't poo-poo a stat from a…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:25 AM
2

Are you claiming it was anywhere near equivalent?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:30 AM
3

People did not bother to revisit the case of Doug Hutchison and Courtney Stodden. He lost friends because they assumed he was some sort of abuser. Later they learned it was the 16 year old Courtney calling the shots....of course by then the damage was done. And as if that girl was just going to go to high school and do her homework like the other girls anway.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:29 AM
1

Honestly, if anything, the person with a vastly higher wealth I think is the more questionable one. Power difference and all that. So you condemn any man this wealthy to automatically have a dating pool of maybe 10,000 women across the entire planet. By the time we get to things like their current marital status, the language barrier, religion issues, current global location, legal age etc. there might be 2 people left in any random U.S. state for Leonardo to date...and they are both fat, old an…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:23 AM
3

Who gives a damn what other people think is weird? The problem is who they are standing up to condemn, and it ain't the woman called Madonna. Its the man called DiCaprio.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:14 AM
0

That whole brain development = maturity thing is psuedo-science. The brain is 90 percent developed by age 5. From there its a steady development of about 0.5 percent per year. People who push this stuff in sex/age topics tend to want to push the age of consent to never. As if any of it guarantees abuse or is required to enjoy dating and sex anyway. Some people will abuse others given the chance. We call those people A-holes. Most people are not like that.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:12 AM
6

i'd much rather be with someone i can talk to Well for one, you never talked to her. How dare you judge her by age alone? For two, if you need a certain kind of conversation, are you allowed to have friends? Date/romantic conversation is pretty much doable for anyone who can talk...what's for dinner, what are we doing today, where will our next big trip be, how do I look in this, are you ready to go, have you ever tried X, etc. What do you need from your date? A dissertation on the Ukraine war f…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:02 AM
9

LOL This sub??? Just say "men's rights" anywhere and brace for derision. There won't be a fair shake in any case.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:55 PM
-6

You have described the difference between traditional feminism and ultra-feminism...or third and fourth wave....or turd and force wave feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:52 PM
10

Preach
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:49 PM
13

They do it because it serves as a tool for them to change society and therefore their own situations. I think that perhaps females see this clearer? Its hard to generate a narrative out of nothing.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:47 PM
9

There are several facets to this. One is sheer jealousy since Dicaprio didn't pick them. Another is an innate desire to C-block and beaver dam that in the past was channeled toward gender and race rather than age as it is today. Another is older women using their power of seniority and experience to try and edge the younger females out of the dating market through shaming men's natural desire for younger females and telling younger women the lie that they are guaranteed victims if there is an ag…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:42 PM
6

She is pretty damn far from alone and as we have seen, the idiot squeeky wheels get the grease.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:28 PM
18

I think every society is to some degree a matriarchy AND patriarchy. Acting like one gender has zero power is quite foolish. Women can gain power simply by becoming someone's mother....the person who did the bulk of the child rearing and influencing of that child. She can often gain power over a man who is often obliged to provide for both her and the child, and he must meet several of her demands in the process. Plus, she tends to run the house. Men have a less natural path to power and influen…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:32 PM
6

On the one hand I have to question if this is even real. Stories like this keep support for America's police state high. On the other hand, there is no way this could happen in a country that was more casual about sex and nudity. Imagine a teenager who could simply say..."Yeah...everyone here already saw me naked at the local spa. Nice try though." Or imagine one that did not resort to instagram in the hopes of finding a girlfriend...since in America the usual and natural routes are so often clo…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:18 PM
-1

My take is that culpability for this is shared between the genders. But yes, what rankles is the attempt to pin it all on men when its women that hang on to this tradition much more firmly than men. (It also rankles that people try to pin this on Islam when its from certain regions in Africa.) Another annoying point about this whole issue is the world of difference between different forms of FGM, one of which is equivalent to MGM (circumcision), and Western women with large labia minora have gon…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:25 AM
3

He should have encouraged trans-women to apply. Then he would have been golden.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:41 AM
4

Well, you really said a mouthful there. There are no "rules" in evolution. So there is no direct path to evolve to break rules. But it is certainly true that mammal males have evolved in such a way that they are aggressive and competetive. The thing is, humans made the rules. And the rules that humans made are more often broken by men for being more aggressive and competetive. We could well have made the rules things that women would surely violate more (such as use of psychological violence), b…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:04 AM
-3

I would not say its their bias. Its the bias of the public in the countries they seek donations/support from. They know where the money is at. And the money is on pimping the "poor female" narrative.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:30 AM
5

Usually I see this cited as "violent" crime. But yes, what you say is true according to statistics. However, it seems to be balanced a bit by the fact women so often get free passes when it comes to suspicion, arrest, conviction and sentencing. Meanwhile, men get railroaded for victimless crimes, and/or falsely accused or falsely convicted. What lesson do the genders learn from this? Women that they are safe and protected, and men that they are constantly in danger. Who do you think is more like…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:12 AM
4

Do you mean rifle through all their statistics??? Or do you mean there is a single statistic proving your claim?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:04 AM
34

Do they realize that they are not achieving anything but dehumanizing innocent men more and more? Oh no no. They are literaly achieving more misogyny too. And they seem to like the outcome because it leads to more drama.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:58 AM
8

Even if she was 13 and you bonked her a dozen times, your family and friends that failed to support you are still utter shite. That's Romeo and Juliet spacing and at 17 and 13 both still minors, legal in many states and probably the state next door. None of what you described had anything to do with justice or the protection of society or young people. Its just about being able to shanghai people into the prison and policing system to keep them profitable. Its amazing anyone could be so dimwitte…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:55 AM
6

Well, it isn't. And the man should not be jailed either. Don't like drugs? Don't do drugs. Simple.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:14 AM
3

I cannot decide who to hate more...the false accuser, the cops, the legistature or the courts. Why the HELL was he hauled of to jail? Why the HELL was his mother not informed of the charges by police at the time? Why the HELL can't he even just be put under house arrest until the trial is over? Or HELL, even just free until the trial is over? This is just another part of the war on men. Sick, twisted and utterly irrational people are destroying our justice systems as well as men's lives.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:21 PM
3

They are correct though, there IS no smoke without fire. But the fire in this case was her PANTS ON FIRE and I assume she was hanging from a telephone wire at the time.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:16 PM
4

And I think Ukraine could have avoided all this by 1) not suppressing ethnic Russians in Crimea and Donbas and 2) not attacking them after they rebelled. That was over 8 years ago and it was going on all that time. So who is the original aggressor here? Is Russia also an aggressor? Yep. So I see two direct aggressors. I got no love for either. And I see that America helped instigate Russia's invasion and also counts as an aggressor. So the only people I have left to support are the people of Cri…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:39 AM
4

Well, actually, its not necessary to support either side with weapons. Opting out of other people's fights is always an option. In fact, its my general preferred one. Often there is no need to pick sides or choose a lesser evil. Biden...a coward? Yeah, but of all the things he is guilty of, I am a little surprised you chose that one. So much more to say about the "man"...and all of it bad. Putin was a criminal from the start of his presidency way back. No denying that.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:20 AM
6

I just would like to see more women dealing with the frontline stuff and having grenades dropped on them from drones. Uh...I...uh...think I know what you mean.... I personally don't want to see anyone having grenades dropped on them...or any other manner of legalized murder.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:14 AM
-1

Look, I am sorry for your friends, but that does not prove what happened with every single person killed in Bucha. It just doesn't. If you think the Ukrainians have not been perpetrating similar atrocities across Ukraine on ethnic Russians, then I have two gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea to sell you. Will give you a pass on the sad ad hominem...this time. Edit: This guy replied to me, then blocked me, and also stated he would report me...for....what? For not believing any major media outlet on B…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:11 AM
5

They were Berkut, special police force members. In other words, government terrorist thugs that deserve to be worm food.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkut\_(special\_police\_force)
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:07 AM
5

Vita Zaverukha is a very controversial Woman in Pro-Ukrainian Subreddits due to the fact that she is an Ex-Convict who shot two Ukrainian Policemen in a failed Bank Robbery in 2015. You got so much wrong I had to withdraw my upvote. That "creature" was all for suppressing ethnic Russians in Ukraine from way back. Golly, and people wonder why the people in Donbas were upset. And she is a neo-Nazi, but yeah, its okay to be Neo-Nazi now just as long as you are a Ukrainian neo-Nazi...gotta be clear …
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:04 AM
34

I have seen lots of videos of Ukrainian women all dolled up in clean uniforms. Somehow I seem to have missed the combat footage with women in it. Must be my selective "man eyes" or something. Can someone please femsplain this for my poor man brain? /s
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:51 AM
-6

Are you quite sure the Ukrainians are not genocidal? They could have abandoned enthnic Russian enclaves, but oh no, they just had to try and force them to stay while suppressing them. Also, yeah, Bucha and Mariupol. Well, do I trust the western media OR the Russian media OR the Ukrainian media to give us the truth on that? Why no, I don't. Why? Ghost of Kyiv, Snake Island defenders back from the dead, Zelensky claims Ukrainian missile in Poland was Russian, Ukrainian propaganda minister fired fo…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:47 AM
1

Indians seem to have a disproportionate amount of great takes on various subjects. I think this guy could choose his words better, but his take is so fair and insightful. His CYA is also skillful.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:36 AM
16

I have to agree. Women excel at psychological violence. Men excel at physical violence. But it has been decided that now men cannot use physical violence at all, but psychological violence is basically okay (cause its generally assumed the woman will win) PLUS women can use physical violence to a degree but men cannot. The goal is the slavery of men and it isn't going well for either gender.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 08:20 AM
21

I would have said it was a "half a glass of water", which is entirely neutral. But I can bet there would be people who would insist I just said it was "half full" merely for acknowledging the existence of the water over the air! So I guess I should say, from now on, I see a glass half full of air just to boggle the complete crap out of them.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 08:17 AM
36

Yep we are attacked for being men. What is easier to see though is that we are being attacked for defending men in any case that comes up. We were attacked when we defended Johnny Depp. We were attacked for defending locker room talk caught on the microphone. We were attacked when we parried demands for more women's rights with a demand for more men's rights. We were slandered, we were bullied and we were banned from subs and websites. And while I would not describe myself as a misogynist, I oft…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 08:01 AM
1

This is how they will get more misogyny. Feminists have become their own worst enemy.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter