TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheOneTrueSnoo Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by TheOneTrueSnoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Find me a replicated study that has demonstrated the existence of hypergamy as red pill construes it.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 01:17 AM
2

I’m a fucking retard, but I’m a retard with credentials. So I can argue from authority without it being fallacious. My first comment was evidence from my degree. I then said I wouldn’t take your advice on board since I have formal education and you don’t. Go and pull the evidence from the papers that backs red pill. If you want to do it, I’ll take the time to show you why it doesn’t. And you can’t accuse me of cherry picking. Red Pill is built on a cherry orchard.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 01:07 AM
5

Then why are you arguing with me? LOOK AT HOW FEW FUCKS I GIVE - GO ON, LOOK AT IT
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 01:01 AM
4

Wow, such skill. I’ll be sure to take that into consideration with my degree in psychology. Learn to spell if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 12:59 AM
3

No, they don’t
/r/ExRedPill01/06/21 11:52 PM
4

Read my comment - this is how hypergamy is defined in the research
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 02:19 PM
3

Ah, whoops. My point stands even if I got the book title wrong. I met him on a promotional tour for The Laws of Power. He just came across like a massive creep in mannerisms and speech. It’s an intangible quality, but I trust my gut on it. Honestly he seemed more interested in self gratification and showing that he was clever above anything else. He seemed Machiavellian and sinister. Additional edit: his books are some of the most requested in prisons. They have also been banned in many prisons …
/r/ExRedPill28/04/21 02:03 AM
2

I have met Robert Greene and am deeply skeptical of his motivations and his work. Particularly given the Laws of Power was written with 50 cent - a man who has said “yeah, I’m a narcissist, you can print that”. Greene was sleazy as fuck and evaded or discounted questions about the methods of work. For more robust work on how manipulation works I would suggest The Principles of Persuasion by Robert Caldini. He is a psychologist who made his name working for and studying corrupt sales companies. H…
/r/ExRedPill28/04/21 12:46 AM
1

Have you also ruled out codependency? I believe that is highly correlated to Narcissism. Check our r/narcissism
/r/ExRedPill20/03/21 11:54 PM
8

Tell her that you aren’t a mind reader. If you’re cool with listening to her talk and being there for her, communicate that to her, but make sure she understands that it’s her responsibility to ask for that help. Part of being an adult is acknowledging that you aren’t responsible for another’s emotions. Being a good friend, partner, whatever does involve asking “are you ok?” But it’s also being firm with someone that they need to bring their problems forward. You’re not an emotional miner. You d…
/r/ExRedPill26/02/21 08:04 PM
2

Emphasis on the tend too. If you get to know them then you aren’t making a prior judgment, you’re making an informed judgment
/r/ExRedPill23/01/21 03:40 AM
1

It’s not so much that as that women tend to mature more quickly than men. Ergo to find someone more at their maturity level, they may date older.
/r/ExRedPill23/01/21 02:04 AM
12

Hypergamy in it’s original context is that women marry up or equal in social class - red pill went and misrepresented that argument. That last finding is particularly interesting as a counter argument to what was originally argued (I’m not going to go and find those references, I just woke up). So we know they don’t divorce at a higher rate - what was the level of statistical significance uncovered by Schwartz and Han?
/r/ExRedPill16/01/21 10:03 PM
2

That’s like saying “you’re addicted to the dopamine of cocaine, not cocaine itself”. This comment adds nothing
/r/ExRedPill04/01/21 03:12 AM
5

Tinder is designed to function the same way a slot machine does - random reinforcement cycle. It is addictive by design. What you’re describing is not abnormal, I don’t know what your views on women are but being insecure about how many women you’ve been with is not uncommon (but you can learn how to not feel that). Wanting to connect with people is normal. Sounds like there are a few things you need to unpack here. Tired advice, but check out a therapist
/r/ExRedPill04/01/21 03:11 AM
7

Take her word at face value and move on. It doesn’t matter if she is or isn’t lying. She doesn’t want to be with you, or she isn’t ready to be. It sucks, but there is nothing to do here but work on yourself and your own insecurities
/r/ExRedPill31/12/20 04:08 AM
6

Most of the dudes I knew who were red pilled hated themselves more than women. They were deeply insecure and while they did get laid, they never got love
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:52 AM
3

Buddy read through my comments and you will see I have consistently said hypergamy is real, it is just not what RP thinks it is. You are calling me something you consider insulting, in an attempt to attack my character rather than argument. That’s an ad hominem What tells you everything you need to know is the infinite circle jerk or your logic. I have critiqued your genetic argument and offered a refutation of the RP concept of hypergamy. I haven’t touched the concept of “Alpha”. However the du…
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:47 AM
6

Not an ad hominem. I’m just about to show you that my position is not blue pill, and that I likely have had more success with women in the short and long term than you. I also have a degree in psychology. So anecdotally and empirically I intend to eviscerate your argument. You’re accusing me of being “blue pilled” - whatever that means. I’m going to offer my own experiences in relationships and sex as a counter argument to your ad hominem of saying I’m blue pilled. I buy neither position. They b…
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:33 AM
6

I’m saying that we’ve had multiple societies were polygamy were the norm. Multiple societies that had eunuchs and castrati as part of their culture. Also the fact that men are infinitely more likely to die young and violently. I’m not denying that hypergamy is a thing. But as I keep saying, it’s a population level trend. And it also doesn’t mean that women will only sleep with and breed with hyper successful men. If that were the case, poor men would have less children, and we know that isn’t tr…
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:30 AM
6

Buddy, how many women have you slept with in your life? How many relationships have you had go above 3 months? How old are you?
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:26 AM
5

So you’re not going to refute my counter position or the example of 10 other men who altered the gene pull like old mate khan? Your argument is weak
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:25 AM
2

Exactly. RP cherry picks
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 11:24 AM
5

Here’s ten more pal
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:46 AM
7

No. I’m saying that there are multiple men who have done that in history. I’m also not saying that women don’t go for men above or equal to them in social status. At a population level, they do. But as always, there are individual differences Are you seriously denying that Genghis Khan raped a bunch of people?
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:44 AM
6

Robustness is one measurement of technological advancement. You’re ignoring dozens of others to create a narrow claim. Again, committed to some biological fallacy. All of the cultures you’re talking about, in fact any culture you can name that has been conquered was the result of more advanced weapons. Counter point. Afghanistan. No one has ever successfully invaded or changed Afghani culture in history. They’re comparatively backwards, does that makes them less robust?
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:31 AM
5

Are they actually? Read the above comment about Genghis Khan.
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:26 AM
9

Of course there are more women. Look at the gene pool of asia - one man is responsible for most of that. Genghis Khan. All you need is one ultra aggressive or rapey dude to mass inseminate women and you will have that effect. Spoiler alert, there was more than one
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:23 AM
5

I’m sorry are you measuring human success based on the ability not to be conquered? That’s a very narrow way of looking at things. Particularly given what we know about how unhappy most “civilised” societies actually are
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:21 AM
3

What’s your evidence that we are slaves? I’m not talking about a notion of free will, but you’re making a claim about biological determinism. You’re pretty committed to some kind of biological or genetic fallacy, and I want to see what evidence your pulling from. Pull some peer review
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:20 AM
-1

Wrong. It’s social psychology, and it is an observable trend. This does not mean that all women will leave you the moment they find someone with a higher income legel or social status. It’s the equivalent of the typical female insecurity of “my husband will leave me for a prettier woman” Yeah he might, if he doesn’t love you and is shallow enough. In the same way your wife might leave you for a wealthier man, if she’s shallow enough.
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:14 AM
3

Hypergamy is the tendency for women to marry up in social class or marry people above their income level. Red pill then takes this and says that women will leave you if they find someone who earns more than you or has higher social status than you. They are making an incorrect inference based on a population level trend. Very big emphasis on trend. It is not a given that all women do this. Furthermore, that data is related to marriages, not divorces I don’t deny that hypergamy is a phenomenon. I…
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 10:11 AM
1

No. But you can with any decent look at the literature. Hypergamy is not what red pill claims it to be
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 07:47 AM
10

This is a delicious post. Most of the young guys who are roped in aren’t statistics literate, thank you for making this
/r/ExRedPill28/12/20 01:58 AM
2

I mean that’s a hard question to answer. I’ve had relationships where 2 times a week was the norm. Others were more or less. I’m single currently. When I’m actively looking I usually meet a new partner (on average) once a month or once a fortnight. I tend to have repeat encounters rather than one night stands and I usually meet through apps. Now that one person a month is the one I sleep with. I usually have some good interactions with about 3-4 others, but for whatever reason those fizzle out. …
/r/ExRedPill27/12/20 01:21 AM
2

That is attachment theory. Your relationship with yourself is deeply influenced by your initial relationships with your primary caregivers
/r/ExRedPill24/12/20 01:53 AM
3

I agree with this. I find myself judging people of other gender for being a “slut” (quote unquote) when they’re doing it to avoid who they are. It extends to other vices too. Anything is fine until it becomes about avoiding oneself regularly. We all need an escape sometimes sure, but it’s the regularity that can be the issue
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 10:04 PM
12

This is actually an interesting question. The idea here is that somehow higher numbers would lead to decreased sensitivity to oxytocin signalling in the same way that any other addiction would work. I don’t believe there’s any evidence to support that though. My suspicion would be it’s less to do with oxytocin and more to do with attachment style. Insecure attachment might lead to unstable relationships. Secure attachment and a high sex drive could lead to lots of casual sex with no major proble…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 05:10 AM
2

Damian is an interesting guy. I’ve met him before and have read parts of his book. Overall a likeable guy with good things to offer, but this is my informed take on the man. He’s pulled heavily from Mark Manson, but he feels more salesy. I went to a free seminar of his and I was aware that I was being pitched. He was using several of Robert Caldini’s “tactics of persuasion” (re:manipulation). For example he had us say to each other “tonight is the night that everything changes” (consistency comm…
/r/ExRedPill22/12/20 03:03 AM
2

Then you need to get into therapy
/r/ExRedPill18/12/20 01:34 AM
3

Models by Mark Manson is the best place to start
/r/ExRedPill17/12/20 11:56 PM
2

Your sentence doesn’t make sense
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 12:23 AM
2

There are already chatbots out there that can pass a Turing test. Give it 20-50 years and yeah, it’ll definitley be a thing. However I don’t think it’ll be replacing women. I think more likely we’ll see this technology being used by people prone to loneliness - older people for example
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 12:17 AM
1

Empathy could be programmed my dude
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 12:11 AM
3

No, I don’t
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 12:10 AM
5

He sound like a shit cunt
/r/ExRedPill14/12/20 11:51 PM
-2

Look man there’s no denying that TRP works, it just doesn’t work on emotionally healthy women. Nor does it create an emotionally healthy man.
/r/ExRedPill14/12/20 10:54 PM
2

I’m so sorry dude. My uncle is a widower, I know he still deals with pain twenty years later.
/r/seduction05/12/20 09:50 PM
2

You have kind of a weird bucket list
/r/seduction05/12/20 09:48 PM
1

Good for you man
/r/seduction05/12/20 09:41 PM
1

Nice one man, how did you start? Any tips?
/r/seduction05/12/20 09:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter