TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheOtherWiggin Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by TheOtherWiggin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's just lazy writing. If you can't express the seriousness of a situation using your words, show that you're passionate about it by using caps lock. Further, if someone even hints at the idea that the conversation would be more productive if you wrote in a more civil manner, accuse them of tone policing, and insist that you have every right to be mad.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:42 AM
5

First of all, this is horribly anecdotal evidence. One article on one website with only 7 examples? Really? Second, it seems to me that the bigger reason for this kind of thing would be that Hollywood is more accepting of fat men than fat women. With fewer famous fat women in the first place, it's harder to find examples of drastic weight loss. I think that's partially because there are more male comedians than female ones, and it's generally accepted for comedians to not fit the usual body-type…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:34 PM
1

Sorry, I derped. Although really, their marketing campaigns and target consumers are almost identical. I think Axe aims a little bit younger, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:37 PM
5

the Old Spice commercials with Isaiah Mustafa (The Man Your Man Could Smell Like) were marketed as to make women buy Old Spice for their men. Yes, that's what the words of the commercial were saying. No, that's not what the intent of the commercial was. It's very clearly trying to establish a correlation between Axe Old Spice and manly, attractive men. This correlation is meant to encourage men (Read: teenage boys) to buy Axe Old Spice because either "It will make me seem more manly than I am" o…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:45 AM
3

Good-looking people hardly ever feel degraded by someone 'ignoring their personhood.' I try not to make generalizations like that. People are all different and complex, especially when it comes to the issue of sexuality, which is itself complicated.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:05 PM
8

I disagree. It is certainly possible for one person to treat another person as no more than a sexually attractive body, completely ignoring their personhood. However, it's definitely a horribly overused accusation. With modern radfems, it is nearly impossible to even mention the idea of a woman being physically attractive without accusations of objectification.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:35 AM
11

The title of this post is not at all what was said in the article. The MP clearly stated that offering her a seat is not sexist. She (or at least "a source close to her") said that people being outraged that she WASN'T offered a seat is sexist. She's saying that she has no right to demand special treatment just because she's pregnant. That seems to fit right in with most MR philosophy, right? I don't see the problem here. This is shitty sensationalist "journalism" and you're falling for it.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:17 PM
4

I'm not saying whether these kind of people are actually common, or have any influence on the real world, but there ARE people that crazy: /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:16 PM
1

Yeah, I definitely agree that her point is bullshit, but it's not nearly as dumb as the point that most people in this thread seem to think she was making.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:44 PM
0

But we should all feel worse for the poor women who were naked while they were sexually assaulting him. That's not a quote from the feminist who posted originally. That's from a reply that also misunderstood her point.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:53 PM
-6

You're misunderstanding her point. She's not trying to claim that what happened to the female characters is worse than what happened to Theon. She's saying that the only reason there were even naked women in the scene in the first place is because the "problematic media" sexualizes women too much. Now, I still disagree with her on that point. The GoT TV series seems to have actually cut out a decent amount of the less plot-relevant nudity from the books (particularly the part where women in Qart…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:18 AM
2

I think the Romeo and Juliet clauses (laws?) come into place here. Each situation should be taken on it's own accord. I don't think there can be a hard and fast rule on things like this. (copypasted from my reply to someone else on this thread) I definitely don't think the age of consent should be as low as 11, nor do I think it should be 18, as it still is in some US states. What exactly is should be is a complicated decision. Tentatively, I'd say it should be 16, but with a caveat to allow sex…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:16 PM
2

Yes, there's a big difference. However, I was responding to this claim: I don't care how old you are. If you have sex, you need to take responsibility of your actions. I was using a hyperbole to emphasize a point. I definitely don't think the age of consent should be as low as 11, nor do I think it should be 18, as it still is in some US states. What exactly is should be is a complicated decision. Tentatively, I'd say it should be 16, but with a caveat to allow sex between people born within 3 (…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:04 PM
6

I don't care how old you are. If you have sex, you need to take responsibility of your actions. Now, I'll agree that age of consent laws in a lot of places are unjust, but I don't agree with your claim. I don't believe that what you did should be classified as statutory rape. However, if an 11 year old boy has sex with his teacher, and she gets pregnant, it would be ridiculous to hold him responsible for child support. If a fifteen year old takes away a life, they still have to pay the consequen…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:40 PM
20

I see your point, but when applied to reality, this would only cause problems. It would be a huge waste of time and money spent on the additional court cases. Further, it would almost certainly lead to a more unjust rulings. Again, if the law were interpreted consistently, any such case SHOULD result in the boy who was raped not having to pay child support. Yes, that is unfair to the child, but forcing a boy who was raped to then pay money for ~18 years to his rapist is certainly the greater inj…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:19 PM
44

In order for the law to be consistent, yes. Statutory rape laws make the claim that anyone under the age of consent is incapable of giving consent due to age. Therefore, even if the 15 year old boy initiates sex with the 35 year old woman, he is not responsible for his actions. She is the one responsible, and is guilty of statutory rape. Now, I think you do bring up a good point, which illustrates that American laws about age of consent are broken. 18 should certainly not be the age of consent, …
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:01 PM
3

Critical thinking. This is the most important thing my parents ever taught me, and I've only realized it recently. As often as possible, when he asks a question, try to get him to reason his way to the answer by himself. Prompt/give hints where necessary, but make him get most of the way there on his own. "That's an interesting question. What do you think?" is better than a simple answer, and definitely better than "I don't know." This ability to question everything in order to find a rational r…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:54 AM
19

No, the parallel actually does make sense, so long as you're acting on the same assumptions (both anti-gun and anti-male) she is. Problem: People getting shot with guns Assumption: Guns are to blame Bad Solution: More guns Which she parallels with this: Problem: People being raped Assumption: Penises are to blame Bad Solution: More penises
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:08 AM
1

Dude, calm your tits. If you've got a legitimate complaint with him, that's fine. There are plenty of good reasons not to like him. I've just never heard that one, and while it's less absurd that the birther/muslim claims, it seems pretty unjustified to me.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:50 PM
0

Wait, Obama's problem is that he doesn't care about the issues? Is he indifferent about all of them, or just certain ones? Why is he in politics if he doesn't care about issues? Is it possible that he doesn't speak as comfortably about serious topics because what he says is a lot more important in those cases and he wants to be sure he doesn't misspeak? I know I do.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:42 AM
1

Ewan McGregor. Definitely Ewan McGregor.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:56 PM
1

None taken.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:34 PM
1

Well, the numbering in the URLs starts at 0. More importantly, I didn't pay attention to the numbering, and just looked at the one Lurker linked to.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:23 PM
9

I agree with the sentiment of wishing fewer people had voted for Romney, but disagree with the logic that claims this shows a need for feminism. Even supposing Romney is just as sexist as the worst claims I have ever heard against him, not everyone is a single-issue voter, and it's entirely possible to have major disagreements with a candidate but still vote for them. Welcome to the two-party system, kids!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:02 PM
11

I'm usually a very casual subscriber to this sub and don't comment much, but I really feel that I need to now. I feel like the comments so far are not representing the majority of r/MensRights. I do see plenty of members who seem very jaded by past experiences. Most of the comments on this thread seem to be assuming you to be all of the worst stories of the most extreme feminists. Though I don't have time to provide as thorough a response as I would like, (and you deserve) here are what I see as…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:33 PM
5

Except this post wasn't about the fact that OP's SO was abused, it was about "Why are you opposed to men's centers?" Why is it weird for them to answer the question that was posed to them?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:55 AM
6

My biggest problem with this was the color choices. The image kept looking like it was moving, and the after-image is a bitch. Took about 5 minutes to go away entirely.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:51 AM
1

The way I see it, that doesn't present a problem with the chart, which says "Any surrendering parent is obligated to give monetary support relative to distribution of custody and monetary income of both." If the parent deemed unfit to care for the child is unable to secure sufficient income, then they would be required to give very little, if any, monetary support. Now, this may lead to the parent with custody not having enough money to care for the child, but the unfit parent apparently wasn't …
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter