TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThePedanticCynic Archive

View 3 posts and 1,948 comments by ThePedanticCynic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,948 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

No. It's only rape if she's unconscious or she says no. I'm done even acknowledging the rest of their bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:56 PM
1

At least chrome's spellcheck finally recognizes misandry as a word now. It didn't last time i used it maybe a month ago, and was mid-typing this when i realized it's now acknowledged.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:54 PM
9

I've always heard of 'stealthing' as when a woman takes a used condom from the trash and impregnates herself with it. Feminists are just trying to muddy the terminology so nobody can even speak the same language anymore. If they remove concrete language then only emotions are left, and that's all they have.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:53 PM
14

Everyone dies alone, it's just that sometimes there are people around when it happens.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:26 PM
1

Always an excuse.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:11 PM
1

*hypocrite
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:48 PM
0

Unions also provide strike protection and collective bargaining rights for those within the union, but not outside. The more members a union has the more bargaining rights it has for those within the union, and the more control it has. To force union membership is to override basic rights of free-association, which i'm against overriding. That forced-unions haven't been ruled unconstitutional is weird to me, but again, i don't understand everything. There are a few specific concerns i have. Firs…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:40 PM
0

Oh shit, seriously? I'm definitely for that as well. Damn. I have a lot to learn. I'm running for federal congress in two years. Tell me anything you think i should know, then picture an elephant made of elephant ears. That's me. I'm an elephant with a notepad.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:10 PM
2

I thought they were interchangeable. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:04 PM
3

I'm not sure you understand the math. Let's say 50/50 male/female. Men stand to pee, women always sit. Men almost never sit/take shits in public restrooms. If you want to stipulate a percentage of men who sit down i'm willing to change the numbers, but it better be low. Now let's consider the work involved. Let's call moving the seat 1 unit of work. In order to lift and lower the seat it's 2 units of work. Fine. So let's start with all the seats are up. Man walks in, has a cheeky pee, walks out.…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:40 PM
1

I know exactly who you are. I don't know what that means, but okay? That said, i don't see how this isn't glaring obvious. The rule is that if it's down you put it down. Every time a woman enters a restroom she puts the seat down. If a man walks in and lifts it up for a pee he then must put it back down. Eventually all the seats will be down, and not even after a very long time. What part of that isn't stupidly obvious? I'm screenshoting this, because wow.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:19 PM
12

How would you know that it's mainly male restrooms that are horrendous? Visit a lot of female restrooms? I've heard horror stories from people who worked janitorial that female restrooms are absolute wrecks, whereas male restrooms are kinda pissy.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:52 AM
3

If the seat is down i almost always do get some pee on it. Raising it up is a courtesy to the next person to sit down on it. The notion that it's now an obligation for me to put it back down because i was mindful of the next person to sit down is counter-intuitive to the point of retardation.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:46 AM
6

How is that a compromise? It's him doing work instead of the woman he thinks might be next and creating work for the next man if he's wrong, which is 50/50. So not only did he do extra work, but he created extra work for the next man. Put the seat in the position you want it to be in and leave it there. Fuck. How did this become an actual debate?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:18 AM
4

This is actually assault. Hell, if you know there's a thief stealing food and you put some sort of super spicy food on your sandwich, that the thief then steals and eats, even that's considered assault. We have some fucked up laws.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:12 AM
3

HR is to companies what feminism is to the world: cancer.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:10 AM
11

This is why i love right-to-work states. "You're fired." "Why?" "Because i said so." The end.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:09 AM
23

... why would that be a normal expectation? That's absurd. In a gender-neutral bathroom that will eventually mean that the man always has to put the seat back down if everyone follows that rule. Stupid rule. I put it up and i leave it up unless i'm at home.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:07 AM
–

I don't understand why relatively good looking and fit black men sleep with hambeasts.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 11:22 AM
1

I downvote anything that comes with a frivolous trigger warning.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 08:27 AM
-1

Apparently not. Too many shills.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/17 06:19 AM
15

They're pandering to feminists, who are retarded. I don't believe for a second any of them got to the position they're in and are legitimately that stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/17 09:06 AM
29

But you also gave us Ryan Reynolds... You really fucked up on that one.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/17 06:03 PM
0

So you're fine with female circumcision?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:16 AM
6

Willing to bet writing was invented by men, too. I wonder if the stupidity of the left will reach a point where women will literally invent their own language just to separate themselves from men.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:53 AM
17

How? By smirking? Facial expressions are not disruptions. I doubt anyone even noticed but the judge.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/17 03:13 AM
18

Wait... Stanford? TIL Stanford > Yale.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:59 PM
10

I know of a couple who both changed their last names to something they liked when they got married. I agree, do what the fuck you want. The law shouldn't be a weapon enforcing personal preference.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:49 PM
1

Obviously because women are the greatest victims of men's heart failure. If we die, who will give them money?
/r/MensRights05/02/17 10:37 AM
3

If men organize it will be painted as sexist by the leftist media.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:30 PM
14

Lowered expectation? I think you misunderstand: they're recruiting these types of women. Feminists hate men, plain and simple.
/r/PussyPass25/01/17 09:52 AM
1

Why do you believe they're not real anarchists?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 10:31 AM
7

Now i'm curious. What would a real anarchist due in this situation?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 09:16 AM
2

Yall will probably downvote You made a reasonable argument. This is why i downvoted.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 09:13 AM
1

So what's your disagreement with what i said? Also, isn't your country's minimum wage like $16/hr?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 09:11 AM
6

Well... no... most of them are socialist countries...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 04:36 AM
30

I have eyes. I have balls. I have a jugular and a windpipe. The entire idea behind martial arts and weaponry is giving weaker people the ability to effectively attack stronger opponents. I have no idea if the woman attacking me is trained so i'm going to treat it as i would any other vicious attack. You're going down as hard as i can put you down.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 04:33 AM
546

Anarchists are only anarchists in theory. Once they come across someone who calls them out for their bullshit they turn to the state for cover. The only reason they were able to hold that line without getting the absolute shit beat out of them was because the police were protecting them.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 04:30 AM
-1

I've had it since I was 12 So have i, and if you've had it that long and are only recently graduating college then you're not the target group of my statement. I also said relatively recent. Did you attend Phoenix Online, or...?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:50 AM
-1

How many people under the age of 50 watches TV?! Lol, ignoring the grammar: everyone in college now was raised on TV. The internet is a relatively new invention, and streaming wasn't popular prior to the last few years or so. You're clearly an idiot, so we're done now.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:40 AM
-2

Are those mutually exclusive? Seems like they fit together quite well, so your response is a miserable attempt at you trying to focus the attention yourself... kind of like... the "Me" generation! Wow. Tell your kids to stop being little shits and be a better parent. Also, i've never heard that term, but you fit it. Sounds like you made it up.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:42 AM
5

TV and leftist academia.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:22 AM
30

Basically every conversation i have with anyone on reddit outside a very select group of subs. It's difficult for me to understand how so many people can be emotion-driven idiots that it's become acceptable to be ignorant. Leftists are spreading the notion that it's virtuous to make decisions with emotions and tears, which is easy because it requires no thought at all. Generation snowflake is more like generation moron.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:50 AM
4

Wait, 1.5x? Where did you get that stat? Last i checked it was roughly 55% women.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 01:27 AM
6

You know what's especially fun? If she was out on bail that likely means she was on some form of probation, and they don't let you drink when you're on probation. She broke like half the laws that town probably had.
/r/PussyPass19/01/17 04:01 AM
4

This is one of the few areas i would like to hear Oprah's thoughts on the issue since she said she was molested as a kid, and is obviously a leftist.
/r/PussyPass19/01/17 03:58 AM
8

It's real. She publicly admit to molesting her younger (very underage) sister and feminists, for whatever reason, are fine with it.
/r/PussyPass18/01/17 12:59 AM
2

Holy shit. I didn't know it was that high. I was in the military in a very, very 'don't ever leave the US' sort of way and many of my female colleagues got pregnant and left the service. I just assumed it was because they wanted children, not because they were about to be deployed. I was undeployable so i reasoned they were too.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:06 AM
5

Don't worry, she prefers little girls.
/r/PussyPass16/01/17 12:46 AM
2

I used to think that too, but since i've delved into the political discussions and started paying attention to reddit i don't think it's women, i think it's leftists and feminist. Their core belief is that women are better than men, and thus deserve more rights than men (which they obviously have), and they have a lot of popular support on reddit. Anytime someone makes a point that in any way counters this notion, even unintentionally, they get denigrated, ostracized, and often even censored. I …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/17 02:16 AM
1

According to this last campaign cycle any woman who doesn't vote for a woman is a gender-traitor, and any man who doesn't vote for a woman is a sexist.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 12:06 AM
0

and wives of husbands would vote in their stead when he was deployed. Wait, what? Guess we should have had our first female president years ago.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:54 PM
2

The biggest issue with drafting women is there is no way to keep them in the military. You can't force them not to have children and the military has a provision that allows pregnant women to be honorably (maybe medically?) discharged if they want when they get pregnant. The expense of drafting women would nowhere near be covered by their service and we'd have a population boom that we couldn't afford in the middle of a war. You'd need a new law that states it would be a dishonorable discharge, …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:52 PM
5

In the US that wouldn't work because there aren't strictly laws against us. To be a white man means you're automatically sexist, racist, and a predator in the eyes of the snowflake generation. People are being trained to think that men hate women just by default. There's no easy way to deprogram that kind of lunacy.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:48 PM
52

What's even worse is i've never met one of the people they claim they're fighting. They're creating ghosts to claim victim status with so they can oppress an entire gender. I'm angry and i don't even live there. I don't understand how this can be legal.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:45 PM
29

They know that if a man hits them back then the man is the one in trouble and they'll get a nice paycheck out of it, especially if he's rich. Self-defense doesn't apply against women if you're a man.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/17 02:37 AM
51

Only if you're male.
/r/PussyPass08/01/17 07:01 PM
9

Right? I bet a neanderthal accidentally left an insidious drawing in a shared cave once or twice.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 10:07 PM
16

Trust, but verify. Trust, but security. Not that pre-nups work anymore, and at this point feminists are pushing for common law marriages occur after two years of co-habitation. Have them sign a pre-nup before even moving in.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 07:31 PM
3

I believe at first women will invest all they can in the beginning to show worth, then it steadily declines as time goes on because of some sort of Diminishing return stops their progress. This certainly explains what happens after marriage.
/r/PussyPass05/01/17 06:31 PM
2

Okay, but how do you prove self-defense if it's just the two of you? She'll say you tried to rape her or something and that's that. You're now a sex offender in the minds of everyone who knows you and you'll be lucky to escape jail. At some point you have to understand that women have all the power.
/r/PussyPass05/01/17 06:22 PM
1

Lol. Okay dude. Saved-RES for continued humor. Downvote me all you want man. I think of negative karma as spending good ideas on stupid people. Good chat, and good luck with life. You'll need it.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:51 AM
1

I agree, but to paraphrase Sean Bean/Ned Stark/Odysseus in Troy, "It's not offensive to say a dead man is dead." Logic fallacies exist, and you used one by calling me stupid. Why do you not acknowledge that? Why are you doubling down? I'm genuinely curious whether you think what you said is a legitimate fallacy.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:41 AM
1

... right. The expression is there to represent the notion of an alternative stance. 'I bet you won't' isn't an actual bet, but it's a stance that someone won't do something. You chose a stance against me having a memory free of lies, and i asked how that would be proven. Since you had no answer you devolved into ad-hominem attacks, like a feminist. Please tell me you're still in college or something so i don't have to feel bad for you.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:31 AM
1

... how would either of us win that bet? I'm not aware of any lie i've told myself or anyone else. I mean, why lie? Nobody gives a fuck. Biggest lie i told myself was when i was in highschool and convinced myself i wasn't all that attracted to my best friend and didn't want to ask her out. I obviously know that's not true... so you lose?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:16 AM
0

Either that or my only experience with memory is with my own, and my own memory is apparently stellar. I'm not a psychologist dude. I don't study stupid people for a living. You're also not going to call out my obvious typo in the previous post? Big of you dude. 8)
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:11 AM
-1

Jesus fuck, really? How stupid are people that they can't remember reality? I don't know what my IQ is but i figured i hover around average. If this is what average looks like then i'm must be a goddamn genius.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:07 AM
1

Still... still sounds like Zorro, but i'll pick it up next time i'm at the library.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:24 AM
-1

From my experience humans are pretty fucking simple; in a Gilbert Grape kind of way.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:21 AM
2

I really need to read that book. My understanding is he's basically Zorro? I did love The Three Musketeers.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:57 AM
3

It's okay... 6.5/10. Worth watching once though.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:54 AM
1

You are 100% correct. You forget that judges and divorce courts don't give a fuck. Story time? Story time. Another financial snaggle i came across was a boy of about 22. His parents set up a trust for him when he was a toddler that he could only access when he was 25 years old and only if he had a degree. He got married at about 21, got his degree, then divorced at 22. He was still years away from access to the trust. Long story short: the judge ruled that the trust was his wife's, even after a …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:49 AM
-3

No. How shitty is your memory?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:38 AM
5

He was a greater victim than she was. She was still free, he was unfairly imprisoned. I can understand keeping the secret for self-preservation reasons, but at some point she had to have realized what she did was wrong. She didn't until pressed. The issue that people have isn't that she kept the secret, it's that she kept it for so long. A 13 year old girl being abused by her stepdad who (presumably) told her to lie? Yeah. Every decent person in the world can forgive her for that. But that's not…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:37 AM
50

I don't think i would. I'd let my anger simmer in the hopes that some day i'd get out... Now that he's out i kinda think the judge, jury, attorneys, and she need witness protection. I'm kinda thinking 'Law Abiding Citizen' levels of retribution right now.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:24 AM
3

It's simple: you don't have a choice. You're basically in prison for the rest of your life and there's nothing you can do about it. He probably just adapted and tried not to get raped too often.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:33 AM
15

until he commits suicide. Or murders everyone involved and gets shot.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:31 AM
255

His life is already over, and imagine being labeled a cop, rapist, and a pedo in prison... There is no way he's even remotely sane by this point.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:29 AM
14

Okay, so when she turned 18 and moved out why didn't she go ahead and fess up? Surely the coercion didn't sustain itself well into her 30s?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:28 AM
43

Evidence: she intentionally lied about being raped in order to sentence someone to life in prison. Evidence: she kept this secret for 21 years. No, she's definitely an awful person and i hope this cop sues her into fucking oblivion for the rest of her life. She should be charged with a felony, because this is paramount to murder. His life is over because of her. Not to mention i hear terrible things happen to cops, rapists, and pedos in prison. Imagine being all three.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:25 AM
1

Oh no. The trust didn't go to the wife for educational purposes. She just got the money to spend how she sees fit.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:29 PM
25

I used to work in finance. I quit because of stories i'm about to tell you. I once came across a guy who had an education trust set up for his sole daughter in the amount of roughly 60K. Normally trusts are fairly untouchable. This guy got a divorce though, and because of that all bets are off. In the divorce a judge decided that the entirety of the educational trust goes to his wife, and furthermore the father is now responsible for the entire cost of his daughter's education. I forget the exac…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:34 PM
41

There should be a max limit on child support. According to the Huffington Post (i know i know) it will cost roughly 250K to raise a child born in 2013 to the age of 18. That's slightly under $1,160/month. This means child support should never go above $580/month, because anything more is no longer in support of the child.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:20 PM
12

If you pay attention to the wording it says 'assault by penetration', meaning the woman has to penetrate the man for it to be rape. If a woman forces a man to penetrate her then it's not rape. The Sexual Offences Act outlines that Assault by penetration is illegal; this means that it is an offence for a male or female to penetrate the vagina or anus of another person without their consent. It is not illegal for a woman to force a man to penetrate her, at least under these guidelines. It may vagu…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 05:06 PM
6

Have to sit in an environmentally controlled building all day and do basically nothing because HR won't let them fire an affirmative action hire? How stressful.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:30 PM
16

That's what i don't understand. Men do the most dangerous work in the most high-stress environments possible, so how the fuck did this study conclude women are more stressed out? Did they wait until crab fishing season started so none of those guys could answer the phone? Something's fishy. I don't trust this at all. They had to have cherry picked.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:39 PM
6

I would pay someone exactly what they think they're worth. If i offer someone, say, $13/hr to do a job and they accept then there it is. If i offer them $13/hr and they say they want $14/hr, and i accept, then there it is. Pay as little as possible. It has nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:37 PM
1

Just to play devil's advocate, aren't there free condoms at planned parenthood? I have absolutely no idea. I guess i'll assume they are, and that's also wrong. Or are you saying that they should be paid for by our taxes? No, i'm saying none of it should be. Insurance should be just that: insurance. A net just in case something catastrophic happens, not a free pass on daily use of what amounts to cosmetic issues. You know what's a detriment to my health? Not eating. I guess food is now a healthca…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:42 PM
8

they get no bc other than condoms I would also like to add that birth control for women is now completely free under the ACA. Condoms are not.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:26 PM
25

The problem is women have become exceedingly good at hiding their crazy until you're already invested. I dated a girl for about a year before i found out she had extreme rage issues. She went from zero to infuriated instantly. Nothing in between. I never saw her annoyed so i just figured she was chill.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:24 PM
73

Lol. Maybe for women.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:22 PM
87

Either this or, "Well i'm pregnant anyway, we don't need protection anymore..."
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:21 PM
18

I don't know this is necessarily a mens rights issue so much as aan overbearing government issue. I read a story about a woman who was arrested for negligence because she let her two daughters play in the park by themselves. The government is the issue. That, and retarded police officers.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:25 AM
1

Why would anyone put a Marine on a sheep? Now you're talking nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 04:24 AM
6

Former Air Force here: blue is a great color. Wild Blue Yonder motherfucker. 8D
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 12:36 AM
50

Sounds like she was the real winner here.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/16 10:15 PM
5

I would love to know how your brain works. What series of thoughts led you to that conclusion?
/r/PussyPass22/12/16 11:45 PM
33

I think that's just the standard response from any guy towards her.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 09:47 AM
2

I'm talking about my subscribed feed. I can only assume massive censorship. I never go to r/all.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:33 AM
2

He's right as i'm having the same issue. I'm subbed to both r/politics and r/The_Donald and i just scrolled down (in res) to the 400th submission on my page. 53 mentions of r/politics and zero mentions of r/The_Donald. r/The_Donald is by far the more popular sub, so why can't i see it without going directly to the sub? I've had this problem on and off for a few weeks now. Some days i can see it, others i can't. Haven't had that problem with r/MensRights yet though. At least, not that i've notice…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:34 AM
3

Most people don't have a problem with female on male violence. Ever watch one of those videos where a girl is beating the shit out of a dude and nobody cares, but the second he defends himself everyone rushes in to stop him? Yeah, nobody gives a fuck about men.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:34 AM
42

No shit he's cheating on her. She keeps trying to beat the fuck out of him.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 11:44 AM
29

Other guy to attacked man: Leave, please go away. Jesus fucking christ. Even with him clearly being the victim of a vicious attack and responding in the most tame way possible everything is still his fucking fault. I hate the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 11:44 AM
44

Not only that, but are these men just not fighting back? I'm obviously not going to watch the show, but i imagine a dude could take these girls out with one punch and send them to jail for a very long time.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 08:10 AM
11

I don't understand this reference. Can you explain?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 08:08 AM
7

Why not just re-enlist? Retire at like 40 with 10 children having never worked a day in your life.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/16 05:00 AM
16

I'd say most 14 year olds would know that a false rape accusation is pretty damn serious. Then clearly you've never visited other sections of reddit, or tumblr, or the internet in general. Feminists/SJWs advocate for false rape claims. There are SJWs on campus who'll take a picture of a random guy and put up hundreds of photos around campus claiming he raped them. This is just the world we live in. You don't even have to know the person to be accused of rape, and everyone seems fine with that.
/r/PussyPass10/12/16 08:30 AM
1

Excellent distinction. Thanks for that. I've never thought of it that way. You're right.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:24 PM
2

You make a good argument, but i'm still not happy about it. I'm 50/50 on both abortion and 'free' birth control. I'm okay with abortion and birth control being de-legalized because men don't have the same reproductive rights as women and i think the current wave of feminists need to recognize what it means not to have that right. Let men have financial abortions. On the other hand... people without access to abortion/birth control tend to generate criminals. If we abolish either then in about 15…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 04:57 PM
8

Meh, we have a cure for that. Abortions are still legal and apparently the whole country is paying for every woman's birth control, so that's nice too.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:26 PM
7

Plus, he was black. It's like holding a stack of get out of jail free cards.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 02:49 PM
13

Nope, just welfare and food stamps. God i wish i were a woman, except for the period thing.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 02:47 PM
3

I do feel I have to state the context again, my ex wife liked to say No No No during sex and I am 100% sure that she consented and that I had not mis read the situation because we talked about it and she explained that it was her thing and it turned her on by saying it.... No, i understand. I'm saying the law doesn't give a shit about context or you. According to Germany's laws, and probably every feminist there is, you raped her. Go straight to jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/16 03:47 PM
19

Hope she's not in Germany, because according to this video they just passed a law saying you raped her every time she said no. As if rape claims weren't prevalent enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/16 10:03 PM
4

he will always be 'that rapist that got off' Not to me. I literally never believe a rape claim anymore due to feminism and their massive support of false rape accusers. There's no way to know and reality seems to indicate that false rape claims are far more prevalent than actual rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/16 10:01 AM
2

She's a woman and thus less capable of forced physical labor in the prison system. That's why nobody gives a shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/16 09:57 AM
5

Unless they were Muslim, then the left would be all about it.
/r/PussyPass29/11/16 09:06 AM
2

That's the thing with the brain-dead leftists known as feminists, they equate feminism with women. If you say something against feminism you are defacto saying something against women, even though it's clearly not the same. There is no answer to this. Just don't talk to idiots, even though they seem to have control over the Democratic party now. I hope Roe v Wade gets repealed just to spite these tantrum throwing crybabies.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:07 AM
5

Probably. I can't speak for that guy, but the benefits of a 'solitary' life far outweigh the potential benefits of a long-term relationship when i consider the risk involved. Without the risk i could really go either way. I love my free time and have no interest in having children. The biggest draw for me is a good sense of humor, and few women i've met have that anyway.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 11:06 PM
1

I was taking a sip when i read this and it came out of my nose due to laughter.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 11:03 PM
9

Didn't you know? Men are invulnerable! Especially our balls and eyes.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 11:00 PM
2

I agree with OP. I don't see the value of a proportionate response with regard to violence. If you take a swing at me in earnest then i'm going to break as many of your bones as i can before someone stops me. People who instigate violence get no sympathy from me, and it's probably not the first time they've done it. Maybe if they're stuck in a full-body cast for a year they'll have time to consider the error of their ways.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:55 PM
13

Not women, feminists. Don't put all women in the same group as those brain-dead leftists. I've met plenty of women who agree with us.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:52 PM
11

The Gold Ribbon Oath.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:58 PM
0

That sounds like a great way to decimate a small business.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/16 04:14 AM
1

Just a wonderful reason to never hire a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/16 04:11 AM
3

It's because he doesn't want us to think he actually holds this belief. It's a mockery.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:04 AM
9

It's not vague at all. It means stop hiring men, though in some contexts it means stop hiring white men.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:33 AM
16

No, it's feminism at work.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:32 AM
2

Poe's law.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:05 AM
11

Even though she tried to shove her fingers into his eye with her first attack. He's a man, so obviously his eyes can take a finger.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/16 12:04 AM
6

That was she did was statutory rape, not 'sexual assault'. As her teacher she was also in a position of power over him, so it could be considered rape even if he was capable of consenting; which he was not.
/r/PussyPass24/11/16 11:29 PM
9

If this happened to a 16-18 year old student i might be with you, just because when i was 17 i had the most beautiful English teacher... but at 13? Fuck no. He can't make that decision.
/r/PussyPass24/11/16 11:27 PM
26

continuous sexual assault of a child What. The actual. Fuck. How is it not statutory rape? Or even just rape, considering as her teacher she probably coerced him. Oh, right. Because women can't rape men in this day and age, only sexually assault them. Fuck this whole system.
/r/PussyPass24/11/16 11:23 PM
5

Thing is... she really isn't that attractive. She has a nice face, but she's like 50 pounds overweight.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:03 PM
28

I'm sure one of them touched her boob at some point, too. Sexually assaulting her.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/16 02:25 AM
44

... why was someone walking around with a bottle of piss? I'll never understand feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/16 02:25 AM
155

They still have to go to court to fight it. That's where they get you. You're paying out the ass either in time off work to fight the charge with no guarantee of winning, or the fine itself.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:34 PM
6

Right? Too many men out there who smoked weed once in their life to take up prison cells with the likes of a drunkard woman who beats up children then flees the scene of her crime.
/r/PussyPass16/11/16 07:09 AM
31

Their response should have been, "She no longer works for us."
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/16 07:02 PM
18

Army truly doesn't care if it comes from a female. Nobody does.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/16 07:02 PM
6

Well, she seems to be a feminist so a little of both. Smart people don't become feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:05 AM
0

Well, i've never seen a quota that included white men even though they only make up roughly 25% of the US.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:32 AM
2

Australia seems to be the worst mix of the US and the UK. It has all of our weaknesses and none of our strengths.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:14 PM
1

To be fair, it used to be. Feminism essentially started because women couldn't do things like vote. Now women have more rights than men and feminists are still pushing for more.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 08:07 PM
43

Then i guess she won't be dancing on anyone else's desk. Preventive measures.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/16 04:49 AM
13

whereas the 1 in 5 uses sexual violence by anyone against women. Not only that, but the methods they used in the CDC study were abhorrent. Basically if a woman had a drink and then was kissed by someone they essentially deemed her unable to consent because she was inebriated, thereby ruling it sexual assault; even if she was kissed by her boyfriend or was enthusiastic about it, which they never ask about either. There weren't clarifying questions. On top of which, this was also a self-reporting …
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:22 PM
14

This is objectively false. Here are the female powerlifter records. And here are the male powerlifter records. They aren't even close. Men's records are nearly double.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:04 PM
9

I had the exact opposite. My sociology prof was slowly doling out TRP information, which i didn't really understand as TRP at the time, and it made a lot of sense when taken in small independent bites. This may have even been before TRP existed. I have no idea when it became a named thing rather than a vague concept.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:59 PM
32

If you have to work all day every day just so you don't go to jail then you're a slave anyway, pure and simple.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 03:49 AM
6

The itinerary here is 'spite', and it's hard to disagree with. Everyone has their own threshold.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 03:48 AM
1

Best case scenario is 4v3 as far as witnesses go, and one of them (the victim) could have easily been threatened into testifying against you or your father. Suddenly it's 5v2 and you're fucked. Best case scenario is you go to trial, and get a reputation, for beating the shit out of a bunch of women. Doesn't even need to be true, the rumor is enough. He's right. In this instance 'scratched' means going to fucking jail. Are you really this naive? You sound like a whiteknight idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/16 02:40 AM
28

He probably didn't want to go to jail for assaulting a bunch of women. All they'd have to say is he tried to rape them or some shit and his life is ruined. Women hold all the cards. Cops always believe anything they say.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/16 02:44 PM
11

It sounds like this was a recurring thing between them, so it might be the only way to stop the fight. If he hits her, she just hits him back harder and harder until she IS going for a weapon. And it's not like he could have called the cops. Cops would have taken her side anyway.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:30 PM
22

If only it were that small. Women have the full aid of the entire 'justice' system. Family law, especially; but men also receive 50% longer sentences for the exact same crime.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:27 PM
19

Hell, we're nearing the point where a man is laughed at if he wants to go to college.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 09:40 PM
4

That's quite a uterus. Not everyone wears magic underwear.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:41 PM
68

Ideally, yeah. Then you sit back and do nothing on that government paycheck.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:59 PM
1

Wait, what? Is this in the new season that i have yet to see? If so... why are they all back in the incubator? No! Don't answer! I feel like Jared isn't the only one who got fucked.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:51 AM
1

I refuse to believe this was not a Sorkin shot. LET ME HAVE MY DREAMS.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:47 AM
2

It's really a very interesting difference. A man works out several hours per day to get these reactions, and women are upset they get them from just not eating like a cow. I think it explains why feminists are predominantly obese and HAES supporters.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:27 PM
3

If you need a green card to the US i'd be happy to gay marry you. We have guns and big macs.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/16 12:00 PM
3

Logically, yes. Since when has logic been prevalent in either women or the justice system?
/r/TheRedPill10/09/16 11:59 AM
-4

It's an objective assessment, not an condemnation or guide to behavior. Why did you take it as such?
/r/TheRedPill10/09/16 11:57 AM
6

Anyone can be accused of rape, and that's often all it takes. "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~ Twain
/r/TheRedPill10/09/16 04:33 AM
1

Where do you live?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 05:53 PM
15

Feminists have never fought for equality, but the elevation of women. It only seemed like equality back when women didn't have many rights, but now that they do feminists are fighting to ensure women continue to have more rights than men. No feminist has ever fought for equality and if anyone argues that they have just ask what rights men currently have that women don't. They'll call you a sexist and exit the conversation with cheers from like-minded idiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 11:44 AM
108

The way most women think: entitled. In some areas feminists have pushed to make common-law marriage active after only two years.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/16 11:06 AM
85

TwoX? Yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/16 11:04 AM
2

That's the definition of feminist. Barely functioning member of society, and i'm sure even that's a stretch since many of them are still in college leaching off their cis-lord father.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:59 AM
1

Wow. What utter nonsense. I'm an atheist myself, and i'm familiar with both Matt Dillahunty and William Craig. The fact that nobody had an answer to Craig's absurd arguments doesn't mean he was intelligent, it means that those he debated either weren't intelligent, or weren't familiar with his line of reasoning. I studied philosophy and it's difficult to come up with a response to an unknown philsophical dilemma on the spot. Furthermore, the fact that you say those atheists were prominent doesn'…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:50 AM
1

That's only because the UK is so socialist they don't need feminism.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:39 AM
10

I came across the same problem with an ex's family. Basically her grandmother had a decent amount of money. The grandmother got the Alzheimer and degraded. My ex's mom took care of her for years, and their family did nothing. Grandmother dies and leaves everything in the will to ex's mother, and ex's aunts go full bloodthirsty-golddigger and like 10 years later, and last i heard, they're still fighting for it. I don't understand it. I couldn't give less a shit about money. It's just there so you…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:57 AM
38

Most women in a divorce do.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:49 PM
43

Not only that, but her four children? Takes more than one person to have a child.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:49 PM
2

That explains so much. Thank you. The term 'radical' is used so often to mean extremist, or fringe, that i naturally concluded that 'radical feminist' meant off-reservation thinking. That said, i don't know that i'm wrong on this. Popular understanding is far more important than literal definitions, and so to bandy about the term 'radical feminist' is generally understood to mean they're a minority. We need to stop sub-dividing in ways that confuse the hurtful purposes of mainstream feminism. Wh…
/r/MensRights03/07/16 04:25 AM
1

Actually, i find it to be the foundation of feminism. I've yet to meet a feminist who thinks men should have reproductive rights, for example. I've also never met a feminist who thinks it was a good idea to force women into the draft. They always dodge the question by saying nobody should be drafted, but where was that fervor when only men were forced to fight? Nonexistent. The only way to make feminists care about male issues is to put them in the same boat. That's why i'm fine with making abor…
/r/MensRights03/07/16 04:16 AM
37

And the other 18 percent are either deeply irrational, or just passively agree to being a feminist because they were told the often-heard lie that if you agree with equality then you're a feminist. The cult magic isn't as effective as it used to be. Glad it's down to 18%.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:41 PM
4

Can we dispense with the 'radical feminist' terminlogy? They're all 'radical' like this. Rational people do not become feminists, leaving only the crazies and the man-hating feelz-driven to power the outrage machine who join up. I have never met, heard of, or spoken to an intelligent feminist.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:33 PM
5

Each of whom immediately become irrelevant in the opinion of anyone who can think.
/r/PussyPass29/06/16 04:40 PM
3

Clearly you've never talked to or heard of a feminist. If they were logical they would not be feminists. 'Feels > reals' didn't appear in a vacuum.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/16 04:33 PM
1

But then they wouldn't be feminists.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:03 PM
1

I disagree. It's fine to hit someone when you're defending another.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:59 PM
10

I seriously doubt anyone has ever learned something from that particular class.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:16 PM
22

This does not seem like a woman who stayed home to raise her children. In fact, most women aren't anymore. The uber wealthy hire nannies, which invalidates the entire claim; with the middle class nearly everyone has a degree, which invalidates the entire claim; and with the poor both parents have to work, which invalidates the entire claim.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/16 04:19 PM
0

Let's amend that to 'never hit a lady.' Any female who'd hit you or your friend is no lady.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:45 PM
1

Holy. Fucking. Shit. The future sucks, and Europe is a feminist shithole.
/r/PussyPass15/06/16 05:43 PM
15

That nobody cares about males.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:09 AM
14

First off: what laws? Secondly: because vagina. Laws like that are against men. Women can do whatever they want.
/r/PussyPass15/06/16 05:59 AM
9

Yes. It's called college, and so far they've removed due process when it comes to male-oriented issues.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:34 AM
2

Bet he still owes child support.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:22 PM
5

The PP is inherent in the gender since they often enter situations without pause that would get a man's ass beat, or at least confronted. This is definitely PP material.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/16 01:53 AM
5

At this point in time fighting for equality and fighting for the rights of men are the same thing. At least in first world countries.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:18 AM
12

I'm not wild about him implying that MRAs aren't for equality, though.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:32 PM
3

Fun fact: anywhere in the US they can also abort without the father's consent, or have the child without the father's consent.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:09 PM
6

Huh. I read it as 'it's hard to understand'.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:11 PM
3

That makes sense to me. Too bad the SJWs/feminists can't get women as worked up about this as they did about the shirt that guy was wearing.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:07 PM
4

Let's assume that's true: what you're saying is that women dominating the field of teaching has demeaned the field because, according to you, they accepted less pay. When you flood any market with cheaper labor, as is happening with software and imported workers, the level of commitment and service is also reduced. You are no longer attracting the best of the best, but whoever is willing to take the job for less money; which is not often the best. What you just argued is that women are responsib…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:06 PM
7

This simply isn't true. Women under the age of about 30 make more than men. That's also not how economics works. If someone is getting paid less and has options then they are the one that is more likely to switch fields. Again, they aren't illegal immigrants, so they have options. There are also some cities where women make 120% of what a man makes.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:42 PM
5

This absolutely doesn't make sense. If women were really being paid less then they are the ones more likely to move out of the field than the higher-paid men. This isn't like illegal labor; these women have options.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:20 PM
2

To further vilify being male.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:42 PM
3

And somehow he managed to blame Trump.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:56 PM
5

Especially rapists, because they can pick anyone they want.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:36 PM
11

Half of everything she says is misandrist. I'm going to have to vote for Trump just to make sure Clinton doesn't win.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:36 PM
1

This is simply how feminists react. Death threats, abusive harassment, and outright violence are standard left wing politics.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 04:56 PM
2

Right? Someone got fired.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:05 PM
2

No man paying alimony in this modern age won. This is just one way things get to the way they should be.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:04 PM
1

I disagree. I think that will happen is women will be selectively exempted from the draft if children are involved. Can you imagine the riot that would ensue if both a mother and a father were drafted at the same time? Who do you think would be given a draft exemption?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:49 AM
1

Then what's the point of the draft? We don't need non-combatants if we're in such a state that we're drafting. I personally think anyone who gets drafted should move to Canada, because that's slavery.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:50 AM
-1

If nobody is being drafted then why is it a bigger deal that we are forced to register prior to other things being relevant? You're confusing two separate topics.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:49 AM
1

While i agree the draft is terrible and should never be used: imagine if they managed to draft both the mother and the father. Who do you think would be released from service?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:47 AM
2

I know absolutely nothing about this story, but yes. She faced no consequences.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:37 AM
2

I concur.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 12:00 AM
4

The only thing feminism seeks to address is the ills of society caused by discrimination in regards to women. This is exactly what i'm talking about. For you it's this, but if you ask most feminists about its goal then they'd answer it's about 'equality'. This is a first for us both, because you're the first feminist who's actually admit to me that feminism isn't about equality. That is why it is a synonym for women's liberation. No, it's not. It was back in the day, but now it's synonymous with…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/16 10:19 AM
2

Are they? I thought they were violently Catholic. Do you have support for this?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/16 10:04 AM
4

Um, no? What the fuck? Rape is always wrong, i don't care what they're dressed as. They can be nude and it's wrong. The fuck is wrong with you? They're never 'asking for it'. But yeah, maybe they want you to find them attractive. I go to the beach just so i can take my shirt off because i want women to look at me, but that doesn't mean i want to be raped. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/16 10:01 AM
7

Thanks! I had no idea. I thought feminism was once a good thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 06:49 PM
6

No, the problem is that the feminist movement has no clear goal. It's a catch-all movement. No matter what a female believes, needs, or hates; somehow, feminism can solve it. The only clear foundation of feminism is the declaration of their ability to solve your problem, no matter what that problem is. Every sane person on the planet would call that a cult, and most of us also recognize it as a hate group.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 06:43 PM
10

The problem is that the radicals of the feminist movement rule it. You're argument is basically that the KKK isn't a factor in Catholicism while a KKK member is the Pope.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 02:56 PM
20

I disagree. Feminism used to be about things like allowing women to vote. Which i agree with. I also agree that non-land owning people should be allowed to vote. The founding fathers had great ideas, but they were wrong about quite a lot.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 02:44 PM
110

There are quite a few reasons to believe feminism is not about equality, including the massive misinformation campaign they head. Feminism used to be about equality, now it's about making men subservient. It's a hate group, pure and simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 11:46 AM
8

And the whole crowd was ready to jump him after he did that. Whiteknights gonna knight.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 11:02 AM
1

I think you missed the argument. Make a u-turn, take a left at the comment, and then you're there.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:41 PM
1

Everything. She is offended by everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/16 01:53 PM
1

Huh. I thought Joel Heyman invented that term. Actually, he might have. This video is after i first heard him say it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/16 01:52 PM
3

Someone should have thrown the pan it was frying in at her.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/16 01:50 PM
1

If he was then there were a lot of unnecessary clips in there. Given what i saw i don't think the narrator thinks men can be raped.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:10 PM
7

Well... she did do one thing right. She did admit that men can be raped, and for some reason the narrator was mocking her for it. Narrator made some good points countering her, but i think he got caught up in the aggression.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:35 AM
5

I think she was just using a new angle on her victimhood.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/16 02:52 PM
1

And massive is the right word for most feminists.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:32 PM
14

Dude, all laws are enforced in a sexist way.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:28 PM
3

What? You mean take a little responsibility for the world around you? That's not how America does it.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:26 PM
3

I see what you're saying... but i think if she were as rational as you seem to believe then should would not have succumbed so easily to irrational thoughts. Again, i see that you're arguing peer pressure is a huge force in feminism... but i think that smart people don't become dumber due to friendship. Maybe she wasn't as smart as you think she was. Love is a powerful, but blinding force. That you still defend her is a credit to your character. Keep it up!
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:17 PM
24

I've said it before and i'll say it again: rational people do not become feminists. It's crazy people like this who have no concept of reality or logic.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 11:32 AM
9

The guy i responded to. How was that unclear?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/16 06:12 AM
6

Well that was some unrequited aggression.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/16 05:30 AM
17

It'll probably be more like three years.
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 04:51 PM
1

Howso? Which side do you believe to be the feminists?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:00 PM
1

While i basically agree, i do want to caution one thing: Mostly known homicides are committed by men, and we only know that those that are known are committed by men due to due process. That's not infallible, and is often biased. It's still bullshit though because it's being used to justify sexism against men when really only a tiny, tiny minority of men are murderers. More than that is the notion that women aren't. Never forget the negative connotation.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:46 PM
2

The more important aspect being that it wasn't a comparison of men vs women. There was literally no mention of gender.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:43 PM
4

Not going to lie, while watching Winter Soldier i mentally thought 'holy fuck' many, many times while looking at Captain America. Chris Evans is an impressive figure. The assumption, i think, is that women don't feel the same way about other women they find impressive. It seems they do.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:08 PM
1

Did... did you watch the video?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:06 PM
2

It's not informational because it's not true. Literally nothing on that is true.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:19 PM
10

Reason always fails with feminists, but so does humor. They are not a good group of people.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:11 PM
1

First wave feminism was about, you know, a woman's right to vote. Actual civil rights rather than made up reasons why their rights were being violated. Do you disagree with a woman's right to vote, or just that it was a function of first wave feminism?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:15 AM
45

And then she'd have reported him for sexism or some other bullshit. What's the best possible outcome from saying what you said? You can't reason with a feminist. If feminists were reasonable then they wouldn't have become feminists. They'd also properly use then/than.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:57 AM
2

Literally one feminist's logic, at best. The rest simply are that stupid. Smart people do not become feminists. They just don't.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:45 AM
3

I think you're being too kind. I've never met a rational feminist, have you? Someone who takes all the facts into account, or even is willing to listen to ideas she wasn't already told to believe by some other, even more psychotic, feminist. If you haven't been banned from r/feminism, try having a rational conversation there sometime. You won't last the hour. Rational people simply do not become feminists. That's the current wave of feminism, and trying to ignore, conceal or protect that fact is…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:22 AM
3

Triple.
/r/PussyPass16/04/16 02:47 AM
18

Women are 200% more likely to be hired in a STEM field period.
/r/PussyPass15/04/16 12:09 PM
1

Holy fucking shit! I'm basically sure this is staged because at the end there's literally no reason for the guy to surrender, but otherwise i wish cops would actually back the fuck up before using lethal force. Or just words. Or not show up. Or do literally anything else. But they're cops. What're you going to do? Not prosecute them, that's for sure! 8D
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/16 12:58 PM
-5

I have never seen a video of a cop backing away from a man before using deadly force.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/16 10:02 PM
2

Refusing to obey a cop is not invoking a PP. I disagree with this in a general sense, but i agree that there's nothing about this video that suggests a PPD. She was probably just insane or drugged out.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/16 10:00 PM
7

Because sane, rational people don't become feminists. Those with something substantial to offer the world don't surround themselves with hatred. Feminism is the KKK of gender.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 08:37 PM
10

In this case that something is feminism.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:18 AM
1

Life, man. Life.
/r/PussyPass13/02/16 08:52 AM
1

The story itself may be fake, but this has probably happened. Every story ever written has really happened.
/r/PussyPass13/02/16 08:47 AM
9

To summarize: Women are the Devil. Agreed.
/r/PussyPass13/02/16 08:39 AM
15

Most stories involving gender do, because women get away with all kinds of shit. Stick your dick in crazy sometime. You'll find out.
/r/PussyPass13/02/16 08:38 AM
12

"Sexism!" ~ Feminism Apparently sexism is worth 23% of the cost of every business, everywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/16 01:18 AM
1

Surely she could have debated it? It's hard to hold an honest debate when the entire stance you're holding has a foundation of lies. She's a feminist, remember. She doesn't have a single fact to her favor.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:04 AM
1

and perhaps get yelled at a little for having the wrong skin color or genitals. You mean being white and having a penis? Good luck even getting into college if you're one of those people.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:02 AM
3

To be fair, journalism classes are a huge waste of his time anyway. In her psychotic fervor she might have actually done him a favor. Maybe now he'll going into engineering or something.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:00 AM
7

That's just fucking ridiculous! This summarizes feminism.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:58 AM
2

You're mentally stable, though. That's why you're here and not a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:57 AM
12

Even if he didn't, what makes you think she won't claim he did? She's clearly a standard feminist: a psychotic banshee who will lie until everyone she doesn't agree with is vilified. I never believe a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:52 AM
13

So marry your best guy friend (at least on paper). This protects you from the feminist laws pushing co-habitation as marriage, since you're already technically married and you can't double marry, and allows you a tax break. You don't even have to live together. People separate but remain married all the time.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/16 10:12 PM
6

So basically... never talk to a cop. Ever. Never admit to anything, and never try to 'clear' yourself of anything. Just don't talk to a cop. 'Anything you say can and will be used against you' isn't a joke.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:05 PM
-7

Because it's not up to him. She commit a crime, so only the DA can press charges. If she'd murdered him would you be wondering why he didn't press charges? Of course not, because it's up to the fucking state. Which isn't pressing charges. Straight up PussyPass. Not sure why this is in PPD, except OP didn't understand the full situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/16 04:35 AM
4

No it's not. Feminists run HR departments now. They will applaud her for beating up a man, just because, and offer her more money. You appear to have no understanding of how the world actually operates.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/16 04:31 AM
-9

The driver can't press charges, only the DA can. She either broke the law or she didn't, and if she did it's not up to the victim to enact it. If she'd murdered him would you be wondering why he didn't press charges?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/16 04:29 AM
61

This isn't an outburst, this is a personality flaw.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/16 04:27 AM
25

The recorder 'shushes' the third parties guies who tries to pull her awaies then saiess "get him off..." when the fight comes to fruition.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 06:07 PM
1

Name someone in power, in history, who isn't or wasn't corrupt.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 04:18 AM
2

And those are only the reported stats. I imagine female rape of men is far less reported, and is even applauded when it is.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:42 AM
11

Translated: refusal to be humiliated is sexist abuse.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/16 04:32 AM
2

I don't think it does, but from the feminist perspective it's a gender issue, not a crime issue. That's why they harp on women being victims, even though men are the greater victim.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:31 AM
-8

That's what i'm worried about. The first dead female soldier, a front-line soldier, is going to get the feminists in a fucking tizzy. They're going to call for the court-martial of everyone around her at the time for not protecting her. Feminists are fucking psychos.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:41 AM
5

While i agree, i'm hesitant on this issue. The question i have on this: does men raping other men not counteract the rape? I know that sounds harsh, but let me explain. Rape, as the feminists pose it, is a gender issue. When a man is raped by another man it ceases to be a gender issue. It's just man-on-man. I think to be truly fair we need to focus more on female rape of men... which i assume is very prevalent considering the obesity issue in the US. There aren't many attractive women left.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:39 AM
4

Let's reframe this for you: if jews are slaughtered by the millions, and the NYT writes about the one german that got killed in the fray, would you not feel like it's an injustice against the jews? Sure, that german got killed, but it's a lesser story. It's clearly propaganda. Oh you got your wallet stolen today? Go fuck yourself, someone had their house robbed! That's not the story. The story isn't about individuals, it's about the statistics. The stats say men are the greater victims of everyt…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:35 AM
15

My worst memory of elementary school, way back in the day, was in PA. Some girl asked to go to the bathroom, and was allowed. A few minutes later she came back and as she walked in she wiped her mouth. You know, because she drank from the water fountain on her way back. The teacher took this as a massive offense, picked up her giant wooden paddle, and beat the shit out of her in the hallway. The girl, maybe 7 or 8, came back in crying. I pitied the girl, and heaped all my judgement on the teache…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/16 03:30 AM
36

Why do black girls always do the finger push thing into people's heads? Do they not consider that an attack, or is it more of a, "you're a pussy if that hurt you" kind of thing?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/16 12:39 AM
83

Back in the day they used to have whips and shit in their desk. Give that girl 10 lashings.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/16 12:38 AM
5

Hmm. I like the way you think. You also have to consider that there are more women than men in the US, so while the numbers are much higher, the actual rate/person is even higher than that.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:14 AM
3

Agreed. The VA is both grossly understaffed and the people working there are borderline unqualified. I go out drinking and partying every Saturday, therefore i'm an alcoholic? WTF. It's like psych 101 in there, and they only diagnose what they're pre-disposed to diagnose. They only see what they're looking for.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:13 AM
78

The issue isn't that they were bagging on men, it's the glaring obviousness that nobody gives a fuck about men. This just highlights that. Men are greater victims of everything across the board, possibly even rape if you decided to make forced insertion rape instead of 'sexual assault' like the CDC describes it. If men have it worse off in every respect, why write about women? If you want to be inclusive then write about the problem and ignore gender entirely.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:09 AM
2

I'm sorry... 12 women and 3 men? Solid jury selection. Clearly stacked in her favor, and she still lost. She must have been a true piece of shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/15 08:34 AM
1

Not because of the law, but because if you kill a cop the entire department will declare martial law on the town until they find you. Look at Frein. Tanks were rolling through that town for months, and people who so much as looked like him were eating dirt.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:11 PM
8

Plea bargains force innocent people into a guilty status just to save themselves from potential consequences, and time; as well as allow true criminals to reduce their sentences. Nobody wins but criminals, and everyone else loses. The system would only be bogged down if they don't have enough lawyers. Hire more lawyers. If we have 15 trillion to spare to take gas prices from 2.50 to 1.99 then we have enough money for the courts to not convict innocent people as a matter of convenience.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:32 AM
2

In this regard i am not discussing gender. It's a bad idea in general. It forces innocent people to take deals just to avoid greater consequences, and it allows truly guilty people to reduce their sentences out of convenience. Nobody wins with a plea bargain but criminals, and innocents always lose.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:28 AM
2

That's provably false. For instance: why are there so many more first degree murders than cop killings? If it were an actual deterrence then there would be roughly an equal amount. If nobody knows about the law then it is not a deterrent, and very few people know that killing a cop is an automatic first degree murder sentencing. I didn't know, for instance, and i'm well aware of how sadistic and psychopathic cops are.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:26 AM
2

Most people don't know not to assault police/prison guards? No, most people don't know they get harsher sentences for it over just a regular person. It's not about being a deterrent What the fuck? Deterrence is the entire point of a law. It makes the consequences of certain actions known so people are deterred from committing those acts. it's about the fact that someone who chooses to assault a police officer/prison guard isn't the same as someone who beat someone to death in a crime of passion.…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:48 PM
10

Just because everyone does it doesn't make it a good thing. Plea bargains are one of the worst things in the 'justice' system.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:39 PM
2

Any law that requires you to run is a bad law. It simply gives more power to criminals. Glad i don't live in a backwards country like Canada, or California. I'd move immediately.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:37 PM
3

Most people aren't aware of this law, so it's not a deterrent. It's straight up punishing someone to a higher degree just 'cuz.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:35 PM
5

A cop is more likely to be struck by lightning while being eaten by a shark than intentionally killed on duty. Last year something like 12 cops were intentionally killed, 15 more died because the car lets them drive like assholes.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 11:34 PM
8

Feminism happened.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:50 PM
3

She never touched him, and he's the one who initiated contact. This isn't PPD, this is two shit comedians having a disagreement and him attacking her.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/15 03:13 AM
-11

The one thing nobody seems to notice: she never touched him. HE initiated contact. Not only is he a shit comedian, but he's in the wrong on this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/15 03:10 AM
5

I take it all seriously and i don't believe any rape claims anymore. False rape accusations are so blatantly forgiven and encouraged that they've simply become a weapon. I no longer believe rape claims. At all.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:14 AM
6

He's already been fired. That's why she tweeted it. She knows he didn't rape her, yet just wants to hurt him on a personal level.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:12 AM
2

Yeah. Seems as though she revoked consent like two weeks later.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:10 AM
-1

Agreed. I literally no longer believe a rape claim unless there's video evidence. Crying rape has just become a weapon.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:06 AM
1

It is when it's done as a group and with a purpose. Are you so stupid that you truly don't understand that if i got 20 of my friends to downvote you just because i believe you're a fucking retard that it wouldn't be censorship? Maybe you're someone who needs to be censored.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 08:41 AM
0

Explain? That was nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:23 AM
-6

Didn't read any of that, and won't until you openly declare why you tried to censor me. By censorship i mean the downvote. Censorship is the avenue of those who know they're wrong.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:07 AM
-7

That's absolutely not true and, to my wandering intelligence, sexist as fuck. Physical strength hasn't been factors in the world for thousands of years. It's about aggression, though not in a physical sense. Aggression in the notion of craving power. Dominance. While that has classically been a male drive, feminists are that conglomerate of women who possess that drive; and they're winning because most ignorants view them as the weaker, or victims. On top of that: men are solitary creatures, as …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:57 PM
1

You're using logic. Logic doesn't work on feminists, or anyone who would become a feminist; because if they were logical they would not have become feminists.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:27 PM
5

When women commit crimes people literally laugh and cheer her on. Woman who cut her husband's dick off? Applause from the crowd, and somehow Whoopi Goldberg was the only voice of reason in a room of 500 women. Women appear to ache to see a man in pain, and the law is helping them with that. Family and divorce courts especially.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:58 PM
1

How does that make them Eloi? The Eloi were cattle, not rulers. Women are now the dominant gender.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:55 PM
2

The number of people who self-identify as feminist is roughly 23% in the US, and on the decline. The poll size is pretty good, but not really big enough to declare it's an accurate representation of the population. Despite that, we can still hazard a guess and say that at least some self-identifying feminists are okay with women going to jail. Still, it's a troubling number because it essentially declares no less than half of feminists are batshit insane. I've always thought of them as psychopat…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:51 PM
0

Was i? Got any evidence of that?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/15 08:17 AM
19

That which is dead may never die.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/15 07:54 AM
1

Guess you didn't read the link. He wasn't outright expelled, he was simply banned from every area of campus she might visit. This included his dorm, all of campus, and basically any place in the city. He wasn't outright expelled, the school simply denied his presence. He was not allowed to exist by school standards.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:52 AM
1

I know you're getting downvotes, but i will upvote a legitimate response. Why do you think this is true?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/15 07:45 AM
3

Even with that definition, how is it assault? Unless he put so much pressure behind that pistol it became a laser then it was not a physical attack. No harm was done.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:12 PM
3

More true than you think. tl;dr: Two men have been expelled from school because they looked like a classmate's rapist. They definitely were not the rapists, but the resemblance was enough to get them kicked out of school. Pure, unfiltered insanity.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:11 PM
8

Not even a future crime, but some random dumbass' interpretation of events in such a way that there's a potential for a future crime.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:08 PM
205

You could tell that just by her weight.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 07:05 PM
14

I was actually banned from /r/theydidthemath because i said i disagree with an SJW. That was it. No insults, no back and forth; i just said that because that person was an SJW it was very likely that i disagree with her because i believe in true equality. Instantly permabanned. Almost like it was an alt account. When i asked why i was banned the mod called me a cunt and when on some long rant i didn't read. I mentioned this to the other mods and they all back her up or pretended it was for a goo…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 10:05 PM
3

Then the very existence of the feminist movement must be a spiral of depression for you. These aren't isolated experiences.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 09:30 PM
35

If feminists had anything they say they wouldn't shout at the top of their lungs until everyone else was drowned out. Feminism is a movement utterly without substance. It's a sexist organization hellbent on censoring any real facts or truth about their psychotic beliefs.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 08:57 AM
1

In the US, and legally... a soft no. Maybe if you bribe the right people. In the US and married... why would you do that to yourself? Assuming you're a masochist... a soft yes. Hopefully you never got caught smoking weed or eating a candybar that wasn't yours in your entire life. Adoption is borderline impossible in the US unless you're a celebrity. The state makes too much money off foster homes.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:29 AM
1

You're like my nemesis. 8)
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:25 AM
27

If your mind is boggled by this you haven't been paying attention for the last decade. Women rule the world, and they do so with extreme bias.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:56 AM
7

It's easier in the sense that the woman can abort at will, just because. If she chooses, she can also cut him out of his child's life, just because. Men don't have reproductive or family rights at all. None. Zero. Here's the conversation, "Hey society... i'd really like a child.", "Sir, you can go fuck yourself." The end.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:54 AM
23

Much like the rest of the world, Lifetime only cares about women. Men can rot in hell for all the world cares. We're alone. Get used to it.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:44 AM
26

Don't get married, don't have children. The solution is obvious.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:43 AM
0

That's not feminism. What the fuck is wrong with you? Feminism is the extreme protection of women at the huge cost of male rights. That's feminism. Anything else is some other organization. You're either confused or stupid. Feel free to clarify which.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:16 AM
6

Not that anyone would care more than they do now.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:49 AM
1

Not really. I think the more important issue is that women are slaves to their emotions. Men can, and often do, regulate their own feelings. The issue is that women have never felt the need to. When a woman is angry the cops show up and the person they're angry at gets arrested, regardless of truth. Females are never taught emotional control.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:20 AM
0

Give me a single instance of that.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:17 AM
6

Not only that, but the girl who says she's low-maintenance, or even the one who claims she hates drama. Basically just take anything a girl says on a date and apply the opposite. She's just being aggressively defensive. If it were true she wouldn't have had to mention it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:04 AM
12

For me the red flag has become anger, due to... yeah, just dating women. If a woman says she has a short temper, or gets angry fast, or anything along those lines, drop her immediately. I've dated enough abusive women to realize that anger is their excuse for being emotionally unstable.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:44 AM
2

I didn't follow the story too closely because i found both her actions and the feminist response disgusting. Enraging, even. Moreso because nobody called them out for it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:29 AM
6

Within an age-group, sure, i give some leeway; but they weren't in the same age group. She was, i believe, 5 years older? It also wasn't a mutual exploration, it was molestation. Not only that, but among family makes it even worse. And the feminists still support her. That's how psychotic they are as a group.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:48 PM
8

You're wrong. Supporting insane, irrational, misandrist ideas is the core of feminism. You think 'yes means yes' came from an MRA, or would have existed without massive feminist support? What about the notion that i should have to pay for some random woman's birth control? Definitely a feminist ideal. Feminism only supports things that help women, often at the expense of men (though i think they just consider that a bonus). That's the foundational tenant of feminism. One doesn't have to be a psy…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:44 PM
24

That's the definition of 'feminist'.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:44 PM
19

Except a man doing all that is basically necessary to protect himself nowadays. She's just insane.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:43 PM
72

She's a feminist, so she'd still have support. They support each other no matter what. There was that one feminist who admit she molested her younger sister when she was a kid and the feminists still supported her. Feminism is just mass psychosis.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:41 PM
56

I wish all women did that. Just put all their crazy on the table and let me gauge whether i think she's hot/funny enough to put up with.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:41 PM
17

She thinks men are only there to serve her, and when bad things happen to men it's a good thing. She is full-blown psycho feminist.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:40 PM
13

"No means no, and so does yes."
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:37 PM
18

But at least she'll be rich, having sued every man daring for a second date, and had those same men locked up for rape. Women like this just want to ruin men's lives.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:35 PM
2

Are you kidding? Reddit is now literally run by feminists, and most mods are strongly feminist biased. I got banned from theydidthemath literally because i said i didn't agree with an sjw's. That's it. The mod called me a cunt and banned me, and all the other mods backed her up.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/15 07:59 PM
6

Pepperspray you, then publicly shame you. Or whatever else they feel like doing. You're only a man, afterall.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 10:38 AM
1

Then you're wrong. Where's the confusion?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:52 AM
-5

I'm not rationalizing anything. That's the explanation given in the website. Nobody said anything about you, and i explicitly mentioned the world to explain the context. No wonder you believe that bullshit rationalization.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:35 AM
-3

and explains that much of it is due to the woman wanting to move on. This is a bullshit rationalization. The world seems to bend over backwards in any situation that involves a woman.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:26 AM
5

You started off strong, but pulled a full titanic by the end.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:24 AM
19

No. He did nothing wrong. What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:15 AM
14

We have no reason to believe he knew she was 16, and anyone who sees another person drinking will automatically assume they aren't underage. That's a logical assumption to make. Even if he knew, who gives a fuck? 16 is the age of consent in most places in the world. It should also be obvious that anyone who is drinking is responsible for their own behavior. Nobody drugged her. Every decision she made while inebriated is on her because she made the choice to get drunk, and unless she was literall…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:12 AM
-2

Most rape claims are legitimate. Prove it. here are no good statistics on how many rape cases are false allegations, but it appears that number is likely between 5-10%. And yet rape has the highest plea rate, and the lowest conviction rate when gone to trial. How the fuck is that even possible?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:06 AM
4

This is a perfect example. You essentially just agreed with me, and somehow you got an upvote and i got a downvote. Everyone is an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:57 PM
1

Yeah. I'm pretty sick of the bullshit, and everything is bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:16 PM
5

Nah. The world has, and i'm just counteracting it. Men are automatically guilty of rape anytime a woman makes the claim, and i seem to be the only one counteracting that.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:14 PM
18

That's idiotic. I understand that should be true in most cases, but when you've got a girl running around claiming people have raped her, then it's very likely she'll do it again. People need to be able to protect themselves from her.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:06 PM
-25

I didn't like that part at all. He clearly assaulted her and she was defending herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 10:58 PM
-6

I like how he admits, on camera, that he's frustrated that she tried to control the situation and openly considers that his job. That controlling people is his job, not getting information or solving the situation. Just controlling people.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 10:57 PM
3

'Justice' is obviously wrong. The accusation itself can be as bad as the conviction. Learn to recognize that.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:49 PM
21

Because he's a man, and who gives a fuck about men?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:47 PM
19

It's not revenge. She is guilty of what she's accused of doing. They were not.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:46 PM
10

I kind of agree, in the sense that minors who commit non-serious crimes should not be named. I also think those who are accused should not be named, just those who are convicted. In this instance the girl is a public safety threat. If i come across this girl in public it's pretty important to me that i know she's going to call me a rapist if we sleep together.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:45 PM
-12

Most, i assume. I no longer believe rape claims. If a man is in jail for raping a woman i just assume he's in there because the woman lied.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:41 PM
4

Depends on the intent. If you accuse him of such a thing in good, honest belief then no, you shouldn't get his sentence. If you knowingly lie about it, then yes, you should go to jail for life. That kind of lie can ruin someone, and knowingly doing it makes you a sociopath.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:40 PM
-22

To be fair, i literally no longer believe a rape allegation from a woman. Hear a woman was raped? I just assume she has a boyfriend and she doesn't want him to find out she's a slut. If it happened on a college campus i just assume she regrets her decision. I need to be convinced that violent rapes even occur, and not this bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:37 PM
49

Naming a criminal who's gone around victimizing people in the press and in the courts is not revenge.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:34 PM
62

No. She's sorry she got caught. Any girl who would do this is a fucking sociopath.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:33 PM
-2

A woman crying rape to cover up her cheating is current news, just this particular story happens to be old.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:32 PM
-32

I didn't care about the downvotes, i cared that i was getting them without anybody answering my fucking question. Learn to comprehend and think idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 01:31 AM
-30

Thanks, despite your hatred. I did google ratchet, and all i got were webpages about tools. I didn't think to use the word slang, because... i dunno. I wasn't raised in an inner city. I'm a farm boy, and the word 'slang' is practically worse than 'cunt' there.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 12:39 AM
2

It's easy to be a big man when you're a bigger man. It's tougher to be a bigger man when you're a big man.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 12:18 AM
4

Ah, yes. I agree with that. Most fights are started by women. I read a study that concluded fights between lesbian partners are the most vicious, presumably because each are expecting the other to back down due to the pussy pass... and both possess a complete lack of emotional control.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/15 12:12 AM
13

... it's a skate park, and they had skateboards. She didn't. Do you think someone is supposed to abandon their activities every time a drunken retard wanders up and tries to start some shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:56 PM
1

She's lucky he controlled himself. I completely disagree with this. Each and every one of us should be expected to have that level of control. You are approaching this from her perspective, i think, in that you somehow assume lack of control is simply how people behave. It's also offensive to this man in particular in that you're saying his self-control at her aggression was somehow unexpected of him, or perhaps any man. Men aren't women. We are paragons of self-control, and i expect it. You are…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:53 PM
4

Did we not watch the same video? She instigated violence by slapping. It was pretty direct. She didn't hurl her daughter's hand at his face or anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:51 PM
4

I find it just as easy to be a jerk in person. For instance: just get drunk and be this lady.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:50 PM
10

Ratchet? Edit: Stop downvoting me for a question and tell me what ratchet means. I have no idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:48 PM
49

Drunk in public? Meh. Leave a bar, go for an adventure. I've done that. Drunk in public at like noon? That's the serious issue. Let's also not pretend she's just drunk. She's wasted.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:47 PM
11

How the fuck did she slip through child protective services? Oh, right. She's a woman. To many men out there letting their children play sports, where they get hurt.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 11:46 PM
13

The reason they should have to pay for it is because he can't go back due to their irrational and illegal aggression towards him over an unsubstantiated claim. They basically expelled him because he was more male than the psychotic female who accused him, and the equally idiotic women who thought this was okay. He is now ostracized from the institution, and likely many others, due to this egregious violation of his rights. Forcing them to pay for his continued education in some (what'd i'd consi…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:16 AM
54

"Yes means yes." AKA, "Automatically guilty."
/r/MensRights10/10/15 04:14 AM
1

They basically say they're not family material, they're raised in a culture that treats divorces like its normal to happen, they're sexually promiscuous, they love drinking and god forbid you question any of this you're automatically shunned, called controlling and most likely getting divorced or cheated on. No diss. This is all pretty accurate. Also, good advice. For whatever reason French women love the way i smell and are generally all over me. No cologne or anything. Any thoughts on them?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 12:49 AM
9

Why would anyone go to a softball game?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:22 AM
3

A casual glance at our justice system shows they already are.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 02:46 AM
5

'Diversity' is just code for anti-male, or anti-white male depending on context.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 02:45 AM
4

That you were simplifying makes you a simpleton. If you're not ready for complex discussions then don't pretend you're ready for one.
/r/PussyPass26/09/15 11:45 AM
7

Nor should his response be equal. If everyone in history responded with only equal force then nothing would ever be resolved. Responding with proportionate response, however, can solve a dispute. You have a gross misunderstanding of what proportionate means, and should not use that word when you mean equal. His response should not have been equal, it should have been proportionate. A mild escalation to deter further attacks and demonstrate power to a reasonable level of deterrence. I'm also goin…
/r/PussyPass22/09/15 08:43 AM
13

It's really simple: don't marry, and don't stay with a woman long enough for common law marriage to take over. I will never, ever, marry, and every woman i've dated who talked about it a little too much, or insisted, i immediately dumped. If you're a man there is literally no reason to marry. It's nothing but risk and there is no reward at all. The only reason a woman would insist upon marriage is to secure her own financial future; either with you, or without. It doesn't matter to them.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/15 08:23 AM
6

This discussion is no place for a psycho feminist. You people are the reason he had to face this in the first place. See yourself out.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/15 08:19 AM
2

I don't think anyone has ever accused either a government, nor a woman, of being too sane. This kind of bullshit is what erupts when they're in league.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/15 08:15 AM
6

That's a bad analogy. The system is the trap, the woman was the bait. He's still in the trap, but now the bait is gone and he's missing an arm because the system takes what it can while keeping you in the trap.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/15 08:14 AM
6

Proportionate is not the same as equal.
/r/PussyPass21/09/15 06:03 PM
17

Looked proportionate to me.
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 07:13 PM
-1

No... did you not watch the video? He had like a 30 second conversation with a couple crossing the street and one of them called the cops. A girl.
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 01:08 AM
-1

But that girl did.
/r/PussyPass19/09/15 10:45 PM
2

So this guy literally does a cop's job for them and they can't even be bothered to show up?
/r/PussyPass19/09/15 10:11 PM
6

(<.<) (>.>) Yeah we do! (^ . ^ )
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:35 AM
1

Classic idiot feminist. But i repeat myself.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:32 AM
3

No all of anything is anything. That said, only stupids become feminists.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:31 AM
15

Like that would ever work against a feminist. They're fucking insane. No amount of reason has ever penetrated the third wave mindset.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:30 AM
1

The definitions are given in the study. Yes, and that definition is forced penetration. Women don't generally penetrate, and even if they do they can just deny it and everyone is satisfied. Being made to penetrate (as though by a penis into a vagina), by the CDC's definition, is just sexual assault. ~30% of uk men will get a criminal record by the age of 30 Not relevant to what i meant, but i realize now that i was somewhat vague in my 5% crime statement, so i want to clarify. By that i meant by…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:00 AM
1

Of course it is. 5% in any crime among any subset of any population is outright obscene. You're fucking insane for believing it. Unlike you, i went to college, i went to parties, and i made friends. In not one of my 6 years of college and partying did i once see a situation i'd consider rape. Not once did i see a situation i'd consider assault. I saw a bunch of college kids consentually having a conversation with another bunch of college kids. If you honestly believe the college rape state is at…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 12:19 PM
1

Oh. Is that like the CDC study where basically smiling at at someone is sexual assault? Unless that person is a man, of course, then literal rape by a woman isn't rape, it's just sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:12 AM
1

Nope. Some cities are even required-union. That's like the opposite of at-will employment.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:24 PM
0

Your assumption is that feminists are capable of rational thought. Anyone who'd fire him over this would do so under intense emotion, and would not play the long game. He'd wake up one day and be fired. You give feminists too much credit. They're mentally and emotionally unstable psychopaths.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:18 PM
1

If they did i'd be surprised if she lasted a month.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:13 PM
2

Ah. That's where they get you. It's an equal opportunity employer, not an equal opportunity career.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:12 PM
0

Women outnumber men. I hate feminism so much for being organized enough to force this. We really need more structure to fight their psychotic behavior.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:10 PM
2

Yeah, but not everyone can do every job.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:09 PM
1

Depends on the state. At-Will-Employment states? Like Florida? You're fucked.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:08 PM
1

... you're the one spreading those lies. I literally have you tagged as a tumblerina. I don't know what game you're trying to play, but it's clear you're on the wrong side.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:06 PM
2

Which is a great way to be the first one fired. Women are currently the most protected class in history.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:05 PM
6

Yeah, but if you do and you get fired you can sue so hard you may actually own the company. The US has a number of whistleblower laws, Canada probably has something similar, so as long as you don't actually whistleblow against anyone important you're protected.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:02 PM
2

While it's better than an airplane that can't fly, it's not better than not spending the money on useless shit. This is a 'study' that should never have been conducted with federal money. If it were at all useful then some random and truly psychotic feminist organization would have covered it. This is not for the greater good, and it is definitely not for the public interest.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:45 PM
1

Yeah. That's feminism.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:39 PM
1

In HS if my dick went in something, and it was inanimate/willing, it went in.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:37 PM
2

Uhm... no. It's a stat, i agree; but it's not a correct one. It's still accusatory in the sense that it's well, well, below the real stat. The fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:33 PM
17

Pure, 100% anecdote here: long before i accepted TRP i dated a girl. Let's call her Peggy, because that's her name. Prior to meeting her i'd never had a serious run-in with a cop. A speeding ticket here or there, and i once forgot to renew my registration. Minor things barely worthy of words. Enter Peggy. Our first vacation we go to Key West, because she insisted. While we're there we go on a snorkel trip that offers infinite rum on the way back. Both of us being functional alcoholics, we accept…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 11:21 AM
2

I believe most feminists simply call that 'castration.' Everything a woman does is benevolent, and everything about a man is despicable to a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:56 AM
-1

I think it's right for me not to go to jail for something i didn't do. While it's part of my nature to help others, i'm not going to sacrifice my life to do it. I'm not jumping on a grenade for a complete stranger, especially not just because she's a woman. I'm far more likely to help a man i don't know, because at least then i know if i do get arrested my life won't be over because of it. I won't be charged as a rapist. It's outright foolish, not brave, to assist a woman when you know you're go…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:46 AM
2

I have roughly 6 years of college campus experience, have been to many parties, and been to many clubs and bars; i have not once seen a man taking advantage of or attack a woman. I have no idea where these things supposedly happen, but they're insanely rare if they do.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:43 AM
2

Haha. Feminists don't think men are equal. That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:38 AM
1

No, it's not. Feminism is no longer a rational movement in the first world, and thus for it to continue existing at all it must be emotion-driven. It censors, intentionally misinforms, and outright lies about facts. This kind of spread of misinformation without fact-checking, with heightened emotional responses to the most benign events (shirtstorm), makes it a mass mental illness. And that would be fine if it were passive, but it's not. Feminism is actively pushing to further reduce the already…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:56 AM
0

And then finally you have the third type of feminist. The kind that has rational arguments, and doesn't feel the need to declare themselves as a feminist before stating an opinion. As a result they are often simply seen as "people" and not "feminists" Which really, is more equal anyway right? These people are not feminists, because people who think rationally do not become feminists anymore. It is an emotion-driven movement that uses censorship, misinformation, and outright lies to manipulate pe…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:51 AM
-1

but how would we react if someone called all MRAs, RedPill white college 20 somethings or old white men. Feminists do hate MRAs. What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:47 AM
0

If i lived anywhere near there i'd do this in a heartbeat, and absolutely coat it in gorilla glue so it's borderline impossible to remove without structural damage.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:50 AM
1

Only if they were targeting female students.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:49 AM
-1

The biggest argument i come across with psychotic feminists is they argue that once the child is born it deserves the best possible chance; ie: the father's income. The rights of the father aren't even a factor in the minds of the fucking retards who would willingly call themselves feminists. I say retard, because i've never met a feminist who wasn't. This isn't hyperbole. They're all straight up mentally handicapped. I don't know how that movement got so big with so many fucking retards.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:31 AM
1

This is standard feminism. It's not even worth being outraged over, because if you get outraged every time a feminist does something like this you'll always be exhausted.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:44 AM
2

Oh. So your standard feminist? Could have just shortened it to that. I have yet to meet a mentally stable or remotely intelligent feminist.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:16 AM
5

Well, let's be honest: how often have you gotten into some shit with a girl because she just expected you to read her mind? This is just a legal extension of that.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 05:12 AM
53

Clearly the child's death was the father's fault for not being there, and so child support must continue to sooth her anguish over his lack of responsibility. /s
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:58 PM
4

At least two people had sex with that thing.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:57 PM
1

Exactly! Women are so accustomed to leisure that when there's a chance they'd be denied it they reject the notion outright.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 06:57 AM
0

The prenup & post-nupt saved his marriage, for whatever that is worth. If the only reason they're together is the fact that she can't abscond with his funds then part of me feels like you did him a disservice. On the other hand, he has his funds, and if the marriage goes south he can just find another. On the other other hand, if she's just pretending then she's probably cheating on him, even if he's not pretending. Also: i get the impression you're a lawyer. Can you tell me why there's no maxim…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 06:51 AM
0

I have yet to date a woman with a sense of morality.
/r/PussyPass11/08/15 09:48 AM
7

OP could be, but maybe not? Maybe they're referring to the proven stats that women are more likely to instigate domestic violence, and far more likely to abuse a child? What you're doing is a clear strawman, since these aren't the studies OP mentioned. You can't destroy someone's point by pointing at someone else's and ripping that apart. That's textbook strawman.
/r/PussyPass11/08/15 09:48 AM
3

Not exactly true. In Russia you're allowed to physically defend yourself from such aggression. In the US you are simply labeled a felon and barred from ever being a human being again. The centralization and criminalization of such activities as 'fatherhood' has essentially neutralized any notion of justice.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 08:40 AM
3

Now she has a boyfriend who she's already told she'll never marry because she'd have to give up my contractually obligated money on the hope that he won't leave her. This is exactly the risk every man takes in a marriage, and i don't know why few people can see it or it's considered misogynistic to bring it up. You got married, therefore you put a portion of your paycheck on the line in the hopes that she wouldn't leave you. She's in exactly the same situation, and she's choosing not to get marr…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:35 PM
36

But it failed, and even if we can now deconstruct it and explain why it failed, that does not make prenups marriage any less dangerous. You're right that prenups are dangerous though, because it provides a false sense of security. They're the illusion that marriage can ever be a safe proposition for men.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:31 PM
3

And how much does it cost to appeal in time and money? Unless there's some personal penalty to judges who do shit like this it might as well be fully binding.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 11:27 AM
1

Yes. It sounds like female rapists need that PSA.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:51 PM
4

Not only that, but they're straight up psychotic. I have never met an intelligent or mentally stable feminist.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:50 PM
3

Men are statistically more aggressive This summarizes why that's an absurd reduction. How do you figure? Arrests? That means nothing, because women are constantly given passes in the courtrooms, and in the streets. In CA it's law that the man get arrested in every domestic violence case, even when he's the victim. and I've seen way more guys fighting it out then girls. That's because girls don't fight. There is almost always a white knight around. On top of that, the overwhelming fear of her cal…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 11:27 PM
4

Job ranks on a fatality index? "Nope," says feminism. That's the only reason they ever supported women in combat: because the US military combat fatality figures are practically nothing. It's a political stance, not a functional one.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 11:19 PM
2

Ah. Well i'm in the US, and i've been going out several times a week, and every Friday, for about 3 years. I've never seen a fight between men, but i have seen fights between women. When you get two people who feel they're entitled or immune to accountability for their actions things escalate pretty quickly. Women just don't know how to back down.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 11:17 PM
11

Yeah. Don't see many women campaigning to become garbage collectors; just giving scholarships to women who enter STEM fields. If they actually wanted equality they'd also be giving scholarships to men who want to be nurses. Nope.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 08:33 PM
10

Men do not fuck with people in general. If i see something going down i just assume there's a woman involved waving her pussy pass around like it's a get-out-of-fight-free card. Which it usually is, because inevitably there's a group of white knights around ready to fight her battles for her. And that's when men fight other men.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 08:32 PM
14

Women usually are.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 08:30 PM
5

Bad PR? I say good PR. I'd love to go there, because i know the manager isn't going to take shit from some random off the streets. If someone causes a problem, i know i can count on him to handle it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/15 08:27 PM
1

Nope. If you care at all about yourself you find an alibi. This notion of 'roll over and take it' is too prevalent.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 10:25 AM
2

The notion that women have a conscience, a sense of shame, or an ounce of remorse for the things they've done is outright laughable. I once dated a girl who cheated on every single boyfriend she had (including me), and when asked about it she laughed and said, "oops" when she got caught. Women are narcissists in search of an ATM with a penis, and that most of them come with a penis is just something they put up with. They don't care about you, they care about what you can do for them.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 10:01 AM
3

They have, which is why i, too, see a bit of humor in this. Not the body or penis shaming portions that the women have indulged in; but it's kind of funny anyway.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:23 AM
1

You've got negative words about Patrick Rothfuss? Fight me!
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:22 AM
4

Err. Sorry. Not exactly what i meant. That's my bad for not explaining. Sources are always good, but you can link to what you're sourcing through http://archive.is/, which won't give them page views. Using that, you can also ensure that any edits they make, say on a controversial piece, will be made obvious.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 10:30 PM
20

Predominantly feminists viewpoint, but also very much society's viewpoint because feminists run everything; and people are stupid.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:50 PM
16

That's only because OP didn't show how many likes it got. Probably thousands.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:48 PM
10

I hate Shakespeare and i know what run-through means. Usually it's something like 'run ye through,' but semantics.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:48 PM
3

My best guess is community service hours. Those tend to come with guilty/no-contest charges.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:40 PM
3

They don't know about it. I didn't know anything about how lies were such an effective weapon for women until i joined this sub.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:38 PM
-4

It didn't even happen to me and i'm so angry i want to punch your ex in the womb so she can't trap another man by having his children.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:37 PM
1

Yes. Didn't you know? Everything is our fault. Even our oppression at the hands of feminists.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:30 PM
0

Well... that's kind of what alcohol does to your perception.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:30 PM
-1

Feminists are psychopaths, and stupid ones at that. I've never met an intelligent or emotionally stable feminist. They have absolutely no ability to understand something outside of themselves or the experiences that shred from their heavily censored echo chambers; which is why they became feminists in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:25 PM
3

I'm glad i've learned enough from the experiences of others to absolutely reject marriage as an option. I've broken up with girls because they were adamant about marriage (not specifically to me, i don't think, just in general.)
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:19 PM
6

Do not link directly to the articles. You're giving them ad revenue and page views.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:13 PM
7

Anytime i see 'rape culture' i just replace it in my head with 'rape hysteria.' Rape is the only crime that affects women more than men, and only marginally so; so if feminists really were for equality why didn't they pick literally any other crime to create false statistics, guilty-until-innocent laws, and spread lies about?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:08 PM
6

Followed shortly after by Nicholas Cage on how to be a great actor, and George W. Bush on how to pay down the national debt.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:52 PM
15

The court heard that the incident happened at Price’s family home, a £1million eight-bedroomed farmhouse in the picturesque village of Higher Kinnerton, near Chester Now it makes sense. She wanted a cash payout, which is why she didn't leave. I believe his version of the story, where he says she was moaning and enjoying it. She wanted the bruises so she could sue.
/r/PussyPass04/07/15 08:36 PM
17

You forget we're also supposed to pay for everything a woman wants, especially children. Men are either prisoners or ATMs.
/r/PussyPass04/07/15 08:33 PM
1

I just read this as a resume to apply to the NYPD.
/r/PussyPass02/07/15 09:40 AM
0

I haven't heard that story, but i believe a woman would try.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:08 AM
13

There's a bar in my town that's $10 cover, everyone drinks free all night. No ladies night. No men's night. Just give 'em your $10 and enjoy. Only bar i go to on nights where 'ladies drink free' and the like. Always has plenty of women. Great idea, too.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:13 PM
2

I doubt it. They can just argue different circumstances, or the man is more harmful, or some other feminist logic.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:18 AM
6

unless you can prove that the EVENTS did not happen. The events here being rape. You're making the classic mistake of confusing sex with rape. Sex isn't rape just because a woman says so. There is no difference between your scenarios when you don't confuse the two terms, 'sex' and 'rape'. A not-guilty statement says "this event did not happen" with regards to rape, but says nothing about the sex. A defendant who admits to sex but denies the rape is, by default, saying they believe they had conse…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:10 AM
10

"prove that you BELIEVE you had consent". Thus making non-consent the default position, thereby making this 'guilty until proven innocent.' Demonstrating that someone believes they have consent is what going to trial does by default, rather than pleading guilty. Assumed consent is the default position of anyone who pleads not-guilty, so this clearly is more than that.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:54 PM
5

Feminists do everything they can to avoid women being held accountable for their actions. That's modern feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:51 PM
6

Not really. Men don't have reproductive rights in any country that i'm aware of.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:32 PM
7

Even if they did both go to jail she would have far less of a sentence. Women receive far less punishment.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:26 PM
12

Just look at the way they attack MRAs at every opportunity, and their general attitude towards us.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:06 PM
9

No, it's a law that shifts the burden of proof to the accused, rather than the accuser. If i say you raped me, you now have to prove you didn't rather than me having to show you did.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:56 PM
8

The only way to protect yourself is to record every sexual encounter; though the feminists are pushing to make this illegal, as well. That way it's literally impossible to prove you didn't rape someone.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:55 PM
7

You act like anyone believes a woman can rape a man. Rape laws do not apply to women.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:53 PM
13

It's literally impossible to prove your own innocence in a rape case without video. Even if you have a bunch of texts or somesuch leading up to it, all she has to do is say she changed her mind. This is equivalent to simply throwing men in prison based on an accusation; which we basically do already.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:51 PM
34

Every time i ask a feminist what rights men have that women don't they shut the fuck down. When asked the most simple question about their most basic and fundamental belief system feminists are utterly incapable of even a basic response. They know they are completely full of shit. I have never met an intelligent feminist. They're all just deeply emotional psychos.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:00 AM
2

You misspelled 'feminist'. Only a sociopath thinks this is okay, and that's basically the definition of a feminist: psychotic, misandrist, terrorist women who want a support group.
/r/PussyPass29/06/15 03:15 AM
49

That's not how women/children operate. They just expect not to get hit back, because too many people see this as wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/15 10:46 PM
2

Maybe you're not from the US, but here women dominate at all education levels; and especially in HR (where the hiring is done.) Women are far more sexist than men, and so women are more likely to be hired because women are the vast majority of incompetent idiots HR reps of any organization.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 09:28 AM
1

mfw 2006
/r/MensRights27/06/15 09:26 AM
1

It's still relevant enough to be considered. In fact, it's more harmful because young minds are more easily shaped. Surrounding 5-18 year old young men by feminists and women whose only knowledge of life is through college study of 'education', and thus feministic ideals and soft sciences, is extremely harmful. Things like 'zero tolerance' exist because women don't understand boys, and feminists are winning their war against males.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 09:20 AM
5

There are practically no male professors already. To reduce the number any further would land you at 0. It's almost like the men are competing for the position and women are given affirmative action hires, or the HR reps are females looking to push a feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:42 AM
20

In my experience a woman is incapable of admitting when a man is better at something than them. This led to third wave feminism.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:41 AM
17

The huge majority of my profs were women, and the best profs i had were men. The women i guess either didn't give a shit, or were just riding out the affirmative action? I have no idea, but the men engaged, and women read from the book. I did have a few good women profs. I remember one in English, and one in Biology 1&2. That's it, though. The rest were bland cutouts easily replaced by a piece of cardboard with the day's teaching written on it. Either way, given how many more female profs i had …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:38 AM
14

They're partially right. It's not that they can't compete, it's that they don't; and don't need to. Feminism is doing everything it can to ensure a woman never faces a challenge.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:34 AM
7

Must not be a woman.
/r/PussyPass25/06/15 09:54 AM
1

Why this is stupid: They had access to it before it became universal. Any and all health issues were covered by insurance, regardless of deliverance. Obamacare just made us all pay for a woman's desire to have child free sex under the guise of healthcare. Which would be fine, if a woman were ever, ever, EVER, prosecuted for lying about being on birth control.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:26 AM
4

That's what i was thinking, but there's no fucking way it'll happen. Condoms aren't, and those are currently the only protection offered to men. Feminists just pretend birth control is a health issue in order to avoid such things. I hate feminists with such a passion.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:19 PM
21

A chokehold on the man's finances and personal freedom?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:16 PM
61

Actually, a man punched holes in a condom in order to get his girlfriend pregnant and was charged with sexual assault. One step down from rape. Of course, when a woman punches holes in condoms the system be all like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:15 PM
40

No, he doesn't. This man was neither the father, nor a boyfriend, nor agreed to be the father. He was nobody to this child, and he was still forced to pay.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:11 PM
1

It's a classroom. They're small and filled with obstacles. 12 feet in any direction would have hurled her into something that would have caused serious harm.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/15 08:00 AM
30

That's not gratitude, that's fear.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/15 09:52 AM
24

Not only that, but it was absolutely the most tame and harmless way for him to get her to stop hitting him. It was the least possible damage he could have caused. Can you imagine if he actually hit her back? She would have been destroyed. So she's essentially beating the shit out of him for a while before he retaliates with the least possible amount of harm to her, just to get her to stop, and people are up against him for that. I fucking hate everyone. They're so predictable. He should have wou…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/15 05:42 AM
1

I disagree. Corporations target predictable groups, they don't attempt to corral people into them. They simply don't care for those who don't fit within their guidelines. The government's goal is to push us all into those predictable guidelines, and eliminate those who don't fall within those parameters via prison and the morgue. Compliant people aren't usually gunned down. Know what i mean?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 09:17 AM
1

also the government often interferes with private companies, so a company might do surveillance on all of its customers just in order to comply with a court order forcing them to hand that information over to the government. What part of "is when the government collects and controls the data" was unclear? When a corporation collects your data they're just in it for the money. They're going to target you with ads, not smart missiles. my real point is that you have to concern yourselves with the a…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:17 AM
0

The only concern you should have about loss of privacy is when the government collects and controls the data. When individuals do it, it's fine.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:07 AM
1

Exactly this. I no longer believe a rape claim, regardless. I just assume it's a jilted lover out for easy revenge. That's what happens when there are no consequences for what nearly amounts to first degree murder.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:06 AM
1

Why do you think that?
/r/PussyPass06/06/15 08:51 AM
4

If more medical students are women then men, then a fuckton of women are failing med school.
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 04:20 PM
14

Less than 25% of IT and developer staffs are women (US Dept of Labor) Why is this a problem? If women don't want to go into IT, even with the mountains of financial incentives thrown at them to do so at every stage of their life, then we can't force them. If women are content hitchhiking on the side of the road hoping for a professional man to pick them up and marry them, that's on them.
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 12:31 PM
11

It's the worst parts of the US and Britain combined.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 09:34 PM
10

I think it's also important to note how the money is spent. Based on how ads are generally targeted, i would say men are responsible for bigger ticket necessities whereas women are responsible for luxury and designer goods.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 01:59 AM
9

How about 'justifiable homicide?' If the family went after this woman, and i were on the jury, they'd walk so hard they'd leave with half the fucking city for allowing this goddamn travesty of justice in the first place.
/r/PussyPass31/05/15 06:30 PM
0

The problem is that you're wrong, not that you're defending feminists. In the US, anyway, you can literally sue for anything. It doesn't mean you'll win, but you can. In this instance i think a lawsuit has an extremely good chance, especially under the UK nanny state laws; excepting the unwritten rule that racism and sexism against white men don't count as racism and sexism. If she'd said this about black women she'd probably have been shot by now.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 11:13 PM
-1

Oh, what isn't sexual assault these days?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:34 PM
4

We do not inherit the sins of our parents. If there is a current injustice then i'm against it, but i'm definitely not for a previously powerful class or group of people being held down because they were once powerful. I don't feel guilty because everyone in today's society is given more or less the same opportunities. If you're born rich, regardless of race or gender, you have more opportunities, but a poor black woman isn't generally worse off than a poor white man. They had generally the same…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:49 AM
94

You can sue for harassment, hate speech, and discrimination, which this clearly is; and fully supported by the University when they refused to fire her. They took a side in allowing her continued employment, and the message of that side (feminism) is men don't matter.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:06 AM
30

I don't feel guilty. I didn't oppress anyone.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:04 AM
39

Hah. Good luck. Feminists are in total control. A writer for Forbes was fired almost immediately after publishing an article telling Frats to stop letting drunk girls into their parties, because it can lead to their lives being ruined.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:02 AM
-6

While your math is better than OP's, filming a 16 year old isn't child porn. This is a battle perfectly in need of being fought.
/r/PussyPass26/05/15 12:10 AM
-1

How literally? On a scale of 1 to literally, where are you?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:32 PM
2

Marriage is a war, and the only true way to win a war is not to fight one. Women use the M.A.D. approach: Mutually Assured Destruction. Women behave at the whims of their emotions, and their emotions tell them that if you're not wealthy, you're not a person. For them to nuke you isn't even a conscious choice. It's just who they are. Men love women, women pretend to love men until they find what they consider a better man. That's it.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 11:05 PM
2

We seem to have done just fine without paid maternity leave since the dawn of time.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:59 PM
4

I support paid maternity and paternity leave, like most first world countries have. I may be going against the grain here by saying this, but i don't support paid maternity leave at all; regardless of gender. It rewards people for having children and punishes those who don't. I never intend to have children, so the only way to balance this out is to give me whatever the equivalent of paid maternity leave is. If everyone can't take a year off, and be paid, then nobody should be able to.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:54 PM
10

Case in point: Greece.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:51 PM
0

Fair enough, except i've spoken to at least a hundred feminists, all of which fall under this category. This isn't even considering reddit. That'd probably shoot this number into the thousands. They're very vocal and prevalent here.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 03:20 PM
2

i understand completely that a man may get paid more for the same job While i appreciate your being on the side of reason, this isn't true. Men get paid more overall, we do not get paid more for doing the same job. There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that, in today's society, women get paid roughly 8% more than men doing the same job. Either way, it's just rare that women go into crab fishing, or engineering.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 02:16 PM
8

Then you need to disabuse her of the notion that she's a feminist. She's an egalitarian. Feminists just keep trying to equate the two, and they're not. Feminism is about the elevation of women, pure and simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 08:11 PM
11

As someone who hates feminists: fuck you. Men deserve rights too.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 07:42 PM
1

Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:13 AM
2

All subs run by feminists are psychotic.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:12 AM
1

I think it applies in this instance. Feminists seem to hold the belief that they actually want equality, but when you ask them questions about equality it's clear that they don't. Conflicting beliefs. Even after pointing this out they'll still maintain they want equality. Likely part of the reason that feminists are fucking psychos.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/15 01:41 AM
0

If they exist i have never met one.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 05:56 PM
2

Nah. I've spoken with many feminists, and while most say they want equality they clearly don't actually want it. Next time you meet a feminist who claims this start asking probing questions about rights for men. Start asking probing questions about what rights they think men have that women don't. You'll find a find quick cognitive dissonance between what they say, and what they actually want. Women already hold all the cards in first world countries, and have all the rights. Any group proclaimi…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 05:55 PM
6

But even if you accept the proposition that being a feminist was as crazy as being, say, a Nazi; still clearly most Nazis aren't even diagnosably mentally ill, let alone "incapable of reasoning." Most Nazis weren't given a choice, so this is a false comparison on its face. While most feminists behave as nazis, they are not under the same compunctions. For feminists it is a decision. That you don't recognize this is what i meant by 'borderline retarded.' How could it be that all of the adherents …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 03:52 AM
18

no, feminists are literally not capable of reasoning. If feminists were capable of reasoning they wouldn't have become feminists. Feminism is an echo chamber hate organization trying desperately to become a terrorist group without anyone noticing. They terrorize people, often with violence, but they have yet to kill anyone, as far as i know. It's just a matter of time, though. At this point what are you even left with? You might as well just say feminists worship Satan. There's no daylight anymo…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 02:24 AM
11

I exaggerated, but otherwise it's true. A drunk girl can't give consent, but a drunk man can. What constitutes drunk is a matter of opinion, apparently; but this is a nearly universal opinion. Have a conversation with a fucking idiot feminist sometime. You'll see what i mean. I've never talked to a fucking moron feminist and walked away feeling like the world wasn't a worse place for their existence.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 01:35 AM
40

Talk to a feminist. They actually believe this. It wasn't manufactured from thin air to generate hate, it generates hate because it was manufactured from thin air. Despite what morons believe, only a non-feminist is capable of independent and rational thought.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 01:32 AM
29

... it has one of the most successful conviction rates of any crime, including murder; unless you factor in false accusations that later got overturned. The fuck are you propaganding about?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/15 01:27 AM
331

Holy shit. What is it the feminists are fond of saying? If you've had so much as a sip of beer you're too drunk to give consent, and it's rape? Well, i don't think there's a more pronounced male-version of this than how drunk these guys must have been to have sex with that thing, and she clearly raped them. There's no way they were sober enough to give consent to that thing. Ugliest creature i've ever seen in my life.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/15 09:23 PM
1

I assure you no one really gives a fuck either once you are past 21 and out of the college years. Nope. Once stuck my dick in crazy for 3 years, and it was a big fucking deal.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:36 AM
1

In this case, he's lucky if he's in one of the states that don't count that I'm curious. What would happen if he moved to one of those states? Is this based on where the mother is, or where the father is?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:35 AM
1

That doesn't mean they're not a terrorist organization.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:54 AM
1

Why would you say that? You just don't do it. For example: when some feminist spouts about, i dunno, how white men are the problem with colleges, then it's not abuse to simply not take her shit. You're the one throwing a voice, and a threat, on it. TRP advocates just not doing it. Do, don't threaten. That's what they preach. "Oh, you're giving me shit? I'm out." Just don't take it. What's wrong with that? Is leaving someone abusive?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:31 AM
1

Except i'm not defending TRP? She's attacking them, and i'm pointing out why she's being irrational. I have no vested interest one way or another.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:27 AM
1

I agree, except that i'm not sure he's right. Everything i've ever heard from people against TRP is the exact same tripe. I've never heard a legitimate, logical claim against TRP. Everyone just shouts 'misogyny', and everyone within earshot seems to be afraid to refute it. Feminists have so much control that even men, here, are overwhelmed by their psychotic oppression of rationality.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:22 AM
2

Good for her, but that doesn't stop the core of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:56 AM
1

What about this is charity? Telling men to better themselves is not giving them something they didn't earn, which is what charity fundamentally is. Your emotions, specifically your irrational hatred, betrays you. Calm down and think.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:18 AM
1

Most feminists are straight retarded, which is why i questioned you in the first place; and if you don't think so you've clearly never had a conversation with a feminist. That you contradicted yourself definitely was more evidence that you were a feminist than you weren't. Anyway, now that it's cleared up i agree with you. Still... your grammar needs works. You leave dangling modifiers like i hang ornaments on a christmas tree. Without understanding intent, i have no idea what you're talking abo…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:09 AM
-4

You're saying two different things. You started off by saying there's a 'war on women', which is absolute nonsense. So is the notion that there's no shadow war on black people via authoritarian actions in urban environments. Black people get pulled over for being black, women get out of tickets for being women. The next thing you're saying is that women aren't the #1 victim, i think? Your grammar is pretty terrible, so i have to guess. This directly contradicts your 'war on women' statement. The…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:14 AM
3

Really? Because i think the problem is they have shitty advisers, based on what i've just seen and what you just said.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:47 AM
0

Can't tell if sarcasm...
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:37 AM
1

Holy shit. I've been reading through some of her tweets, and she is absolutely lives up to my stereotype of the typical feminist: A complete psycho with rage issues and an intellect that makes her envious of fruit flies.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:58 AM
1

All feminists are.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:50 AM
5

The President of Harvard was fired for indicating men may have an evolutionary advantage when it comes to math.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:50 AM
2

What's even funnier is she's an assistant professor in African-American Studies. You'd think she'd know a thing or two about MLK.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:45 AM
5

And she's an assistant professor in African-American Studies. She's a moron in her own fucking field.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:44 AM
3

assistant professor of sociology and African-American studies A boycott would actually work. Both of her assisting professorships are gender-neutral, and tend to be 50/50 from what i remember. Then again, all the women would just flock to her and the echo chamber would get bigger.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:40 AM
5

Hey, there's an idea. For 364 days after Mother's Day i will commit myself to not spending a dime on women-owned businesses. Wait... that's sexist. If only i were a woman i could get away with it.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:37 AM
2

Did you read either of these posts? The first one is about a man recorded being abused by a highschool student and pressing charges from a year ago. I have no idea what your point here was, but i'm sure you failed it. The second is a theory in the title. Women see men the way men see jobs. What about that is abusive? I asked for very specific things, and you failed in all of your attempts. Kindly relate to me why what you posted is relevant to anything in this discussion, or shut the fuck up. Je…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:56 AM
3

It's not about stopping them, it's about delivering consequences. Feminists do not face consequences. He's not wrong. If he put something similar up on women's bathrooms he'd be labeled a misogynist within the day, maybe expelled due the 'hate crimes.' He's right not to do anything yet. I'm so sick of people who think women are victims in society.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:57 AM
2

But you didn't. I asked for evidence and you come at me with rhetoric. Is this place no better than the feminist shitholes we're all so against? This is going to sound rude, but only because i think you're egregiously stupid: fucking find me an example. How many times do i have to ask before you people actually give me an example?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:46 AM
2

You're probably right. For some reason i was thinking this was officially condoned. If it came from a member of a feminist organization, or club by the school, then it is official and the teacher leading that club should face consequences. The students didn't get these notions from nowhere.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:12 AM
9

Just sit down with a counselor and have a calm chat about how offensive and sexist this is. They probably won't look into it, but worth a shot. And get used to things like this if you're going to college. It's not all that bad, nobody has gotten in my face before, but if you spend any time in public you're going to run into a lot of this shit. Feminist movements are the most prevalent on my campus, anyway.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:11 AM
6

Really? Lodge an official discrimination complaint, then. Someone put these sexist signs up, and that person needs to face consequences. Is this a highschool or a college?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:30 AM
1

Not taking shit from women is not the same as abuse. MRAs don't take shit from feminists, does that mean we're abusing them? Point me towards specific instances of this being advocated in TRP, and upvoted, and i'll believe you. Right now it just sounds like more feminist bullshit that's so vague it's meaningless. You're saying about TRP what feminists say about MRAs, and with the same evidence.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:28 AM
7

A feminist not verifying information before launching a hysterical campaign decrying it as everything wrong with the world? No. They'd never do that.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:30 PM
3

not to mention TRP is genuinely toxic. I just read a post on TRP with a main topic of telling everyone to build something. Pick up a constructive hobby and become as close to an expert as possible, and the comments were all encouraging with ideas on how to do this; including the top comment strongly suggesting 3D printing being the future. Yeah. So toxic.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:28 PM
10

Except it's clearly a targeted wording, implying that women can't rape. If this were truly balanced it would have said something to that effect, and that regret does not constitute rape. It's obviously meant for men, regardless of placement.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:24 PM
21

I hope you ripped it down and put next to the women's bathrooms: "Just because you regret it doesn't make it rape. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you can't rape."
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:22 PM
4

This is what it's come to. Even in areas and countries where feminists claim women don't have rights a woman's word is all it takes for an arrest. And when that fails, 9 years of his life later, she sues for alimony!
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:09 PM
3

I'm sure a feminist has tried that tactic before. "Give me your phone or i'll tell everyone you raped me." And it would work.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:44 PM
1

Most feminists are.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:43 PM
0

Every time i read 'rape culture' i just translate it into 'rape hysteria.' It's the go-to excuse for psycho feminists, because who's going to try to argue against that? You'd be painted as someone who wants girls to be raped. This girl should be fucking expelled for even suggesting this.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:41 PM
1

It's become a cultural thing. How often do you see husbands on TV who don't give in to their wives demands? How often do you see an irrationally angry woman on TV being hailed as a strong, independent woman who's always in the right? That it's even okay for a woman to slap a man because she disagrees with him? It's the slow devaluing of men through entertainment, to the point everyone just accepts it when it happens in real life.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:37 PM
7

Going to have to. Only like 15% of the population is 6' and over. We also, for whatever reason, tend to make more money. Prissy princess bitch like this wouldn't get anywhere near me.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:19 PM
1

... really sexy? To each his own, i guess.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:17 PM
1

Why would you ever date a girl under 5'8?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:16 PM
5

Golgothan grease demons.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:16 PM
14

"You know what i call women 125 pounds and over? Friends." "ZOMG YOU OPPRESSIVE CIS MISOGYNISTIC FUCK! I'M GOING TO CALL YOUR JOB UNTIL YOU GET FIRED ASSHOLE." ~ Every feminist.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:15 PM
18

I mean, is it cherry picking if every incident has a grossly obvious double standard? That's not a tree, that's just a pile of cherries.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:56 PM
3

Feminism is a hate group trying to become a terrorist organization.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:50 PM
0

No, but how old were you when you realized the Bunny and Santa weren't real? Because i was like 4, but pretended for a few years so i wouldn't hurt my mom's feelings. There are better ways. When i was in... i don't even know which city i was in that year... wherever i was, we got monopoly money for getting right answers, or doing something well. A? That's a dollar. Good participation? That's a dollar. At the end of the year they held a bidding contest on a few items. I remember winning a Calvin …
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:15 AM
1

You said a few contradictory things, so i wasn't sure which to go with. I went with scolding you, apparently. Also, this has nothing to do with the content, but: if you're quoting someone, and you add something use []. Your quote should have been: Also, his point was that it IS sexist [...] Because i didn't use the ..., that's something you added. And while you used it correctly, you're misquoting me.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:06 AM
1

... feminists don't have to be women. That you equate the two is exactly part of the problem. A person can't call feminists out for their bullshit without someone claiming that person is attacking women. Also, his point was that it IS sexist, and was using gender reversal to highlight that. That you're offended by the 'feminist' comment (which your mind turned into women), but not the man comment, is definitely a mental issue you need to resolve.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:36 AM
-17

I'm so very on the fence about this. It's for such a good cause, but does the ends justify the means? They're manipulating these kids. Then again, so is Santa and the Bunny... Having never had a kid, maybe that's the only way to get them to do something? Maybe it's my own personal bias at play. I hate being controlled.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:04 AM
3

Fair enough, except i think his point was that it isn't okay, and he was using gender reversal to point that out. I thought you understood that.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:20 AM
16

I'm reminded of a scene from The Social Network: Girl: "Why do you keep saying i don't have to study?!" Zuck: "Because you go to BU!"
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:56 AM
8

The majority of feminists are white, therefore white feminists are the main problem. Also, nobody mentioned gender.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:54 AM
4

Great! Show me a few videos of feminists actively campaigning and rallying for the rights of men. If what you say is true it should be really easy to find.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:52 AM
35

How? If you eliminate white feminists from college then you nearly eliminate false rape claims, and the notion that Women's Studies should pay as much as Mechanical Engineering.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:49 AM
8

Then, like all feminists, you suck at logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/15 07:21 AM
1

The US isn't any better, and i imagine Europe has to be worse.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:59 PM
25

Yeah. It must be so difficult for a fit, rich, professional athlete to land women. He obviously needs to resort to violence and rape. Stupid shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/15 02:04 PM
6

Of course she's lying.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/15 02:03 PM
0

When it comes to man vs woman, in literally any instance, men lose nearly every time. If we nearly always lose that essentially means we don't have rights, no? If a woman says you did something, in the eyes of the law and the world: you did that thing. You don't have rights against women.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:03 PM
-2

Wikipedia is not the law. I can edit that thing right now if i wanted to. This also appears to refer to conversations where there's an expectation of privacy. What we're talking about is public recording. You're stupid as hell.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:01 PM
0

Few people do. Intelligence is a random genetic mutation, and the draw is towards average intelligence. Intelligent people rarely have equally intelligent children, and two geniuses having a child is more likely to result in some sort of mental defect.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:53 PM
1

That's not true. Show me the law.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:09 PM
41

I find that she has children even more disturbing. Imagine what she's teaching them.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:04 PM
8

Even supported. Just imagine how many 'likes' this got on her facebook? She thinks she's totally in the right here, and has the full support of everyone around her with regard to her mental illness about men.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:03 PM
29

Stay at home moms have become the downfall of the US with the invention of Facebook. They sit around circlejerking each other about how wicked and evil men are, and stalk men and make up stories about them, because it gets them the likes they crave. They always receive full support. SJW is a social network equivalent of Munchausen's.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:02 PM
31

Well, she took his photo, put it on the internet, and called him a pedophile while fabricating a story around it. Do you think she did this accidentally? Whether it was for a good reason or a bad one, it's still clearly malicious.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:59 PM
17

Dat male privilege doe.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:58 PM
1

Nah. It's more like you gave someone a gallon of gas for an unrelated reason, then they put it in the car and expect you to pay for insurance and maintenance costs.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:34 PM
2

I've read the same thing, and lying about this is considered sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:32 PM
0

Yet.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:31 PM
11

Then men who do this also get charged/go to jail for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:30 PM
1

It is a perfectly fair analogy in cases of women raping men, though.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:28 PM
3

Yes. Feminists are stupid. If they were smart they wouldn't have become feminists.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:26 PM
1

Vasectomies are reversible.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:24 PM
2

Let's go get wasted, then have our balls cut!
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:23 PM
2

I think it has more to do with men not being seen as people. I mean, the judge doesn't have to pay out of pocket so what does he care? Money probably isn't an active factor in the decision.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:22 PM
15

You forgot that men don't have rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:18 PM
1

Christ's 'word' was written down 80 years after Christ supposedly died. Let's say that's not true. What about what he said clarified anything? There were a lot of rules, and he didn't address most of them; including the 10 commandments. Those are old testament.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:16 PM
1

It does call homosexuality an abomination, and that was part of the reason god nuked Sodom and Gomorrah. Christian hatred isn't unfounded, per se, but it's a really stupid foundation. Like building a house on cotton candy.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:21 PM
1

I forget sometimes that the bible is completely irrelevant to Catholicism.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:26 AM
0

Then you either haven't read your bible, or don't believe it; which makes you a shitty Catholic either way.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:24 AM
0

It's a pretty big small part, though. They tell everyone who will listen that homosexuality sends you straight to hell. When god gives you lemons it's time to find a new god.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:31 PM
2

Right... and people with no religion are neither Protestant nor Catholic. What's your point?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:58 AM
1

Ask any woman: the tongue is a very versatile appendage.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:46 AM
1

Shit! You found me out! Do you even know how hard it is to insult someone while typing with your tongue? I mean, you call one dude a fucker and that's like 5 minutes of your life. Nobody appreciates the effort.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:10 AM
-7

Original? I'm pretty sure that was atheists, in their huddled hands over fire hovels of congregations. Still, as far as i know Protestant is its own sect of christianity. I had absolutely no idea there were sub-sects. Why is the word 'Christianity' even a thing if there are like 15 billion forms of it, half (pick any half) of which hate the other half (pick any other half)? Seems unnecessary to group them together.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:47 AM
1

you are not a PhD on reddit. Prove it. 8D
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:44 AM
1

It only seems condescending because i'm being reasonable, and christianity is not. Asking for sources is not about size. When was the last time you heard a Honors/Masters/PhD defense in which the defender told the board, "I mean, you can just google it." You're the one making the claim, therefore you're the one who has to back it up. Few things are more of a dodge than, "Google it." It basically just means you don't have an answer. Also, i was being flippant. I didn't know you were being serious…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:43 AM
1

Agreed. At this point i'm going to have to ask you for a christian who doesn't nitpick/cherrypick. Even the fucking Pope cherrypicks, but he's allowed to change the rules so nobody notices/cares.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:47 AM
-1

Also a good reason to stop calling yourself a member of that religion. Either follow the tenets, or find a new religion. Either you believe it or you don't. How difficult is that?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:41 AM
2

Nah. Taken in context the meaning is Gluttony, but even as i type that i see your point. I don't think any of the seven deadly sins are shunned as such, though, except within context. I don't think it's on the same level as homosexuality, which has reached a critical mass within the religious community. Show me stories of Christians bombing Burger Kings and i'll reconsider.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:34 AM
-8

Ah. Not where i'm from. Protestant is its own thing. I didn't even know it was an encompassing term. Edit: TIL: Being anti-religious bigot on this sub is grounds for downvoting. Jesus fucking christ, no wonder the feminists brigade this sub. After this i have an entirely different view of you people. I thought i was among rational men, but now i know i'm among sack of shit sexists who can't get beyond their religion. Wow. Fucking psycho religious cultists: get over yourselves and stop beating yo…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:17 AM
-1

Lack of critical thinking? Being gay isn't a choice, but being religious is.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:17 AM
1

Okay. I'll give you a chance. Point me to the passage in the bible that says being fat is an abomination (or something along those lines.) I'm a Christian, are you saying I think Homosexuality is an abomination? I said nothing of the sort.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:12 AM
0

Maybe, but if they don't it goes against their religion and there's no reason for them to call themselves Catholic.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:08 AM
-1

How is it anything like that? Christians don't consider being fat an abomination that'll send you straight to hell, and something you should be shunned and ridiculed for. That's not true of homosexuality, as a rule. Do you live under a rock?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:00 AM
1

Wait, what? There are quite a lot of forms of Christianity. So many that back in the day, before it was amalgamated into what we now know as Christianity, they were the lowest favorable religions in the US; many ranked even under atheists. If this was a joke, sorry. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:42 PM
0

Stranger, but not usually self-hating. I don't know what the opposite of Hedonism is, but that's what they seem to be doing.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:40 PM
-2

Stranger, but not usually self-hating.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:39 PM
-1

While true, why would anyone claim a religion that, by all accounts, hates their very existence?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:18 PM
2

I have never heard either of these terms. I didn't even know you were allowed to be gay and either Protestant or Catholic. From what i know those are the two strictest forms of christianity. Be like Church of Christ or something, and nobody cares.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:23 PM
51

My biggest take away from this is that a Protestant married a Catholic, and they're both gay.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:20 PM
7

Unless part of her academics included telekinesis training, this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:04 AM
1

starting a chain reaction of standards lowering. Welcome to America.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:02 AM
5

I'm a Transfat and this triggered me!
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:01 AM
3

NY is, apparently, a shithole nowadays. Cops killing and being dicks at will, and now you can't even count on the Firefighters to save you because some frothing feminist shrieked her harpy lies until a listening ear just fucking couldn't take it anymore and gave in. I think feminists keep getting their way because they're so persistent and people just get fed up listening to how strong a woman who can't lift something really is. Anyone with half a brain can tell they're full of shit.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:59 AM
1

Said the guy offending someone in power. I'm curious, do you think i should send my guys to black bag you, or do you think you should be allowed your first amendment rights?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/15 05:13 AM
17

I agree. Offending someone in power is not a criminal act, and treating it as such is a gross abuse of that power. I don't care what gender you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/15 08:52 PM
0

You're an idiot. I have no idea how the two are even remotely related, nor that there is any logic behind anything a feminist does. #yesallwomen is straight up sexism, this isn't.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:30 PM
0

You did not address my argument. 'or' is not an argument. You presented nothing. The style of discussion you're using is where you pick out a specific point from my post and counter it I countered every single point of your post, because every point of your post had a central theme, which i negated entirely. without addressing the overall topic at hand. Please read my prior statement. That was in response to my post, which was about how two people with conflicting beliefs and goals can both iden…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:57 AM
0

I don't see how they're mutually exclusive. Feminism doesn't have any clear internal definition, yet from any external objective it's clear they're terrorists.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:55 AM
0

Yes, and that's one of the many, many, many, many problems of feminism: it has no clear definition or goals. It is a movement with a foundation built upon vaguarities, stupidity, and outright hatred. Feminism is, pure and simple, pushing to become a terrorist organization while avoiding the government label.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:20 AM
-1

Men still have rights. Only thing i can ever think of.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:42 PM
-1

Not all feminists hate men Aside from this part, you're right. Hating men is practically the definition of a feminist. They actively seek to strip our rights from us, even in this age where women in first world countries already have more rights than we do, and have become the most protected and coddled class.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:40 PM
2

Can you name one purely men's rights issue you've seen a feminist actively campaign for? Hell, even held a rally for? Of course you can't.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:39 PM
-2

They're going to say that anyway. Feminists (stop using radfem, they're all psychos) don't care about integrity or rational thought, they just want to attack men. If he did put up those numbers they'd just say, "They only fought so they could lower their child support costs." You cannot win with a feminist. They're all insane.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:36 PM
0

I responded to your core point, which you even conceded to. I guess you just didn't understand it. I'm bored with this now. I'm not in the mood to talk to a closet feminist.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:17 AM
0

Yeah DV is likely 50/50 No, DV is most often women. They just don't get arrested for it, and in some places (like California) it's required by law that the man get arrested for every DV call, even if he's the victim. That seriously messes up the numbers. but not violent crimes as a whole. Once again, depends on what you're defining as a violent crime. Is women throwing things at a man during a fight a violent crime? What about the wall? What about when women slap men, or pour drinks on them? Ove…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:09 AM
0

They actually arrested a cop?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:44 AM
0

but how much empirical evidence do you have to support the claim that women are more manipulative, deceitful, and vindictive than men? Are you kidding me? It's widely known that women attend certain colleges to get their 'Mrs' degree. It's also known that women do things like get restraining orders to kick men out of the house, and help sway the courts to their favor in divorce proceedings. It's become a common tactic, and there are estimates that say over 90% of such calls from women are for di…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:23 AM
1

I get on the internet and complain about them a lot. So. You know. I'm doing my part.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:17 AM
0

My point was they are not naturally more so. I never said naturally. I said they are. As in behaviorally. They are taking advantage of a social situation. True. If that were to change they wouldn't be more inclined to these things. Hmm. I don't know about this. Look at feminism, and the collective bullshit they get away with. Maybe that is the social situation working, but there isn't really a counter-culture men's movement of equivalent size or ferocity as feminism. There is definitely somethin…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:10 AM
0

On average men are more violent Depends on how you're classifying violence. Women are more likely to abuse children, and far more likely to instigate domestic violence. They're also far less likely to get arrested for it, or face any criminal charges, so you can't really count on the arrest/conviction data. They're low. and more likely to rape Barely true. It's roughly 50/50, when you turn 'made to penetrate' from 'sexual assault' to 'rape'. Another fun fact: even if a woman gets pregnant in the…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:04 AM
-1

I mean on average, and it's likely because they are given far more opportunity to do it, and infinite leeway when it doesn't go the way they want. There's no reason for them not to be those things. Men have a hard time marrying a rich woman, for instance.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:53 PM
-1

Which makes them moreso, because they exercise it more. You essentially just argued that two people are at equal height even though one of them is sitting down.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:49 PM
0

It's an average. Can men be deceitful? Of course. But on average, women are more deceitful. Just look at divorce, and how many women will call in a restraining order just to sway the courts their way. Manipulation, deceit, and vindictiveness are so hardwired into them our laws are built around protecting them from having to change.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:47 PM
1

He generalized the survival, and i was responding to that. There are maybe a handful of men who have successfully married rich and made money in a divorce, if even that. Women use it as a tactic.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:45 PM
10

Completely and disgustingly true.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:52 PM
0

I was able to find them pretty easily a few months ago, but it seems feminists have gotten ahold of this issue and just added extreme noise and misinformation lies to the mix.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:28 PM
40

Same here in the US. It's such a fucked excused completely designed to force men to pay regardless. He only took on a fatherly role because he thought it was his fucking kid. He didn't adopt a foreign child. He was tricked into it by the lying sack of shit he called a wife. Not sure if it's true, but a few months ago i read a story about a woman who asked a man to babysit her kids a few times. He figured why not, and didn't charge her. She then sued him for child support, claiming he adopted a '…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:06 PM
3

They tend not to become professors/teachers. White knighting is straight up ignorance, and this goes far beyond even that.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:49 PM
81

As for damages the courts do not give very much because they maintain that being a father to a child is a pleasure whether the child is yours or not. The other issue is that a man is allowed to DNA test his children in the UK whether the mother agrees or not. The courst may just state that he was remiss not to DNA jest his child sooner. I just hate... everything, and everyone. So in a divorce the woman gets child support because it's a financial burden, but when a man wants backpay then suddenly…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:46 PM
12

Instinctively a woman wants the best for her and her offspring. Every study known to man that has delved into this topic has shown that children are significantly better off when raised by the father. If women actually wanted what was best for the child they would let the father have custody, and they never do. The father has to prove she's a bipolar heroin addict before he gets custody. This alone dismantles your premise, but let's continue. in this case telling the truth would not have been th…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:40 PM
30

Except that women can survive just fine without manipulating and ruining men's lives. They just seem to chose not to, because the courts offer the path of least resistance by allowing them to eviscerate the bank accounts of men on a whim. If anything, you're now arguing that women are also the lazy sex, on top of being manipulative, deceitful, and vindictive.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:16 PM
12

Maybe. If we don't have money, though, then women wouldn't want us anyway.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:02 PM
29

I didn't realize forcing a man into raising another man's child was part of survival. Men just get a job.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:01 PM
20

Burn our wallets.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:56 PM
33

Women are the manipulative, deceitful, and vindictive sex, and the court system promotes this attitude.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:54 PM
27

Which shouldn't be necessary in the first place. If it's ever discovered that the child isn't his it should be considered instant fraud and he gets the money back. 'Best interests of the child' is the first thing some psycho feminist will throw around at that idea; but that's just a smokescreen for 'best interest of women.'
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:53 PM
4

... him? What in the world makes you think a male teacher would have a problem with men having rights?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:37 PM
2

Just one more reason not to have kids. What the fuck, First world countries? What the actual fuck were you thinking?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:22 PM
389

I don't understand how this is isn't considered straight up fraud. Family courts are so fucked all over the world. Women just do whatever they want and the system creates a safety net for them by ripping the money out of the bank account of the nearest man. Men? With rights? Laughable.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:14 PM
32

They were probably in a fight and she wanted to hurt him. That's how women fight.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:13 PM
2

Basically if you're not rich, or a woman, the system is out to get you. I'm just glad i'm not black, i guess. It could be worse.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:26 PM
3

Better summarized as 'white knights', or 'husbands.' Any man who would give his life for his wife is an idiot. Save your life. Give it to your children. That woman is just in it for the security.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:25 AM
1

That's easy! It's women beaten the shit out of men because they can get away with it, then when the men or women call the cops the man gets arrested. In California it's required, by law, for the man to get arrested in every case of domestic abuse; regardless of who is hitting who, or the aggressor. It'a also assumed, at domestic abuse hotlines, that the men are the abusers; to the tune that 40% of men who call are treated like shit and given abuser hotline numbers. Who knows what the actual numb…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:06 PM
9

Fair enough. (hehe) I suppose this would be a case of equality, and i used a poor choice of words.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:11 PM
70

Manipulate the system into... being fair?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:21 PM
10

While true, i think you may be ignoring a lot of evidence we have that women don't actually make less than men, except where they don't want to make as much or more. That invalidates her argument completely in modern times. That aside, 'socially raised', if true, is a good reason for it, but not a valid excuse for why she is justified in taking his money. She still made a choice, and that choice was not to go against the grain. You can't blame society for individual decisions.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:17 PM
2

Really? I thought the root of most domestic violence from men was self defense.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:13 PM
24

I've said this before, but: in a divorce/breakup, women become the most vicious, conniving harpy cunts known to man. There is nothing more dangerous than a woman who thinks you owe her something, which is something all of society says you do, and she will do anything to make you suffer if she feels even marginally wronged. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned? Yeah, that's because all of society is designed around giving a woman what she wants, when she wants it; all while she's facing minimal…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:11 PM
41

People here keep forgetting: to a feminist (and apparently a lot of women) men aren't people. We don't have feelings, and we don't matter except as a means to an end. That end usually being financial security. We are just wallets.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:08 PM
7

As you said, common law marriage is a feminist crock of shit designed to make men financially responsible for women regardless of their willingness to do so. Second, she was a tenant. I currently rent my condo, and when i leave i don't expect all that payment back. Unless her name is on the lease, she's doesn't deserve a goddamn thing.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:04 PM
6

Yes. Most of them are called feminists.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:01 PM
13

Equally plausible? You're giving her comment too much credit.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:01 PM
12

100 million years ago my ancestors roamed and owned the piece of land now known as Florida, and i want reparations!
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:00 PM
2

He's volunteering, too; except he's the father and therefore should automatically win. I don't understand how this is even a discussion.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:00 AM
5

A lot of parents are. You can't arbitrarily decide to take a kid from them because you don't like them. If we could, i'd go after every religious family in the country. So not only is he not allowed his own kid, but i'm willing to bet he's going to have to continue paying child support to this new family.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:33 PM
2

It's this bad.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:50 PM
23

Feminists actually believe this. There have been campus-wide conspiracies to do exactly this, actually.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:48 PM
3

You and half of Virginia.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:18 PM
3

Feminists. Feminists titled it.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:41 PM
2

Right? I once turned a girl down who propositioned me on the street. True story. Ok, i lied. We totally had sex. And i knew her. Because she was my girlfriend. Otherwise, completely true.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:40 PM
5

You dare imply a man is not an infinite rapist?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:37 PM
9

This goes beyond consensual. This is sex initiated by the woman, and somehow the men are still the ones in the wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:35 PM
-1

That still doesn't explain anything. It's a conclusion with no argument to back it up. Why are women ruined by promiscuity?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 07:03 PM
-4

I wasn't pointing anything out, i was asking whether there was a good reason for this that i hadn't yet learned. Now i know there isn't. That's all i was looking for. Thank you. I also never used the word "disgusting", which your quotation marks imply i did; and also only re-enforces my statement that you people act a lot like feminists. Stop putting words in people's mouths.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 06:44 PM
-1

You sound like a SWJ, "Oh but she rode that CC 10 years ago, she's different now!" Bollocks. No, i'm asking what the legitimate difference is between a man doing this and a woman doing this is. I have been the entire time. People do not fundamentally change. Ok, so then a woman should never marry a plate spinner? Once a plate spinner, always a plate spinner; according to you. Feel free to hamster your way out of this. Also, if you can't even stay calm in a reddit discussion then you need some se…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 06:36 PM
-7

A tap that offers all the beer is a master tap, a tap that never opens is a shitty tap. Regardless of your dumbshit metaphor, or mine, you have done nothing to explain the clear bias at play.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 05:34 PM
-3

But then he's declaring himself as not LTR material, no? How long does this conviction stay on someone's record? What if she'd done this two years ago? Five? Ten? What's the statute of limitations on such behavior? Edit: No wonder people hate this sub. If you disagree with me stop being such a little bitch and tell me why. I'm not even making a statement, asking a legitimate question and nobody can answer me, but instead i'm getting downvotes while someone who didn't respond to a single point ge…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 03:47 PM
0

Any chick who "dates" concurrently, let me emphatically tell you right now, is not relationship material. I don't understand this particular point. She wasn't 'dating', so much as having plates of her own. How can you judge someone doing the same thing you are?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:25 PM
1

I was actually talking about there being more women than men alive in the US by a significant amount; nearly 2% more.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:51 AM
2

Women control the vote, therefore you can't blame men for men holding more political positions.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:19 AM
1

Yes. So? This video is to highlight the people who will vote for Hillary for no other reason than she's a woman. I especially enjoyed the part where the feminist claims it's fine to do that, but it's not ok for a man to vote for a man because he's a man. I could smell her hypocrisy through the screen.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:30 PM
1

Are you claiming they edited the footage to put words in these people's mouths? Are you claiming none of them said they would vote for Hillary because she's a woman? Because unless that's what you're claiming, the source doesn't fucking matter.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:24 PM
2

This is true, but if he did that there would be no portions of the graph in 'favor' of women getting the short end of the stick. Sex trafficking would still be there, but there's nothing to replace the rape stat with.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:58 AM
11

You're not wrong. I think this graphic is sort of throwing women a bone, though, by not accounting for that; because rape is literally the only issue they have. Every single other thing negatively affects men more than women. As for members of congress? Women have more voting power in the US through sheer numbers, so women only have themselves to blame if they can't vote in a woman.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:54 AM
1

The entire point of this conversation was to give you an opportunity to clarify what you mean. You've ignored this in favor of ignorance and dodging, and so my respect, and opinion, of you is now forever in the negatives. Good day, asshole.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:24 AM
0

consider the audience: people who could be persuaded by MRAs or by feminists. In response to my statement that the theme is pretty obvious. Not only that, but anyone who would compare MRAs to feminists clearly has a very low opinion of MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:08 AM
1

I guess i need to sharpen my question to clarify: you implied that people who can be persuaded by the MRA viewpoint are less than intelligent. I want to know why. I don't understand how bias fits into understanding a theme. I'm sorry if this was unclear. I thought that point was pretty obvious, but i sometimes am not as obvious as i think i am. Sort of like a word Ninja who doesn't mean to be.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:17 AM
1

I have you tagged as someone whose opinion i actually respect, so i would like to have your take on what about the MRA perspective you find unpersuasive.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:42 PM
3

The only person who would be honestly confused by this is a feminist. The theme here is pretty obvious to everyone else, like those who can think.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:55 PM
10

Feminists are assholes and psychos who hate the few rights men have left. Everything else is just semantics.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:19 PM
7

When an issue is brought up that is uniquely American, it's not going out on a limb to make a comment about it.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:17 PM
2

Let's be honest: it's getting taken down because feminism can't thrive without supreme authoritarian censorship. The only way feminism can make it is to silence the truth, and they are currently doing this by installing deeply psychotic feminists in the default sups; and by making subs run by feminist psychopaths default subs (TwoX). The world is overrun by deeply irrational ideals because people are deeply irrational, and so they become feminists.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:09 AM
1

Yeah, same with that "TIL 40% of men who call an abuse hotline are assumed to be abusers." If you post something like TIL: men are assholes, it'd be be the highest rated post for the fucking year. Feminists run reddit, and especially TIL.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:07 AM
9

Maybe if they stopped taking it down it wouldn't need to be reposted?
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:34 AM
12

Inflammatory? Usually. Dumbass? Absolutely not. All his shit that's based in reality is thoroughly researched. Besides. He's got the best site in the universe. Says so right on the headline. Can't argue with that.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:33 AM
11

Because feminists run reddit, and anything that goes against their agenda gets censored. Censorship is the primary weapon of the tiny, irrational feminist mind; because if the truth got out everyone who isn't a full blown psycho would be against feminism.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:30 AM
22

I was asking for bets/predictions on how long it would take to come down. Just ask yourself if a TIL post is something a feminist wouldn't want known, and if the answer yes it is coming down. Period. Reddit is absolutely run by feminists, and all feminists are censorship loving psychos.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:29 AM
1

See unless you were psychotic you'd have no reason to punch someone. And people who keep prisoners for fun are... what?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:13 AM
1

I don't understand. What situation can you imagine this being acceptable in?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:11 AM
12

She's holding him hostage. Does that need context?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:45 PM
28

I hope this is a horrible attempt at a bad joke.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:43 PM
1

For pretty much anything, so i wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:42 AM
56

'Rape' is interchangeable with 'regret', or 'revenge' to most women, and all feminists.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/15 05:35 PM
0

Because when a woman changes her mind about whether the sex was consensual, even months later, it's still considered rape. I can link you stories, if you like.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:24 PM
1

Carrier that holds a lot of F-22s? Now that's a badass carrier. F-22 that holds a lot of carriers? Also a badass F-22. Especially if that carrier is also carrying F-22s that are carrying carriers! That's the dream.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:22 PM
1

I'm not sure where we disagree, as that's essentially what i said. Unless you mean you disagree with the person i disagreed with? If a person is unable to say yes or no, then it is obviously rape if you go ahead and fuck them, if a person tells you yes I want to have sex, then has sex with you willingly, that is not rape, regardless of intoxication. Totally agreed. If she's capable of saying yes (even if it's a bit slurred, but not obviously so), it's not your responsibility to decline her. If y…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:19 PM
2

I guess my point is that if you need someone to advise you of this you aren't dating material; regardless of how much advice you're given. Got some flack for that notion earlier.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:15 PM
1

Dramatic, yes. But not overtly false. Maybe 70/30. The columnist was either tiptoeing around blaming the woman, or blaming the men; and in so doing it made her seem like she was overtly blaming the men. If you can't tell the difference between someone pretending to blame a man, and someone blaming a man; their intentions are irrelevant. Edit: Clarification of my point.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:13 PM
1

Yeah, because recognizing a feminist psychopath when i see one makes me anything other than observant. Unless that's what you meant?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:09 PM
1

I seriously doubt none of them used condoms, but assuming they didn't: how many of them knew she was working her way through every guy at the party? Whores are generally pretty discrete; because nobody wants to be number 25 within the past 3 hours.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:06 PM
1

You mean people who hold people accountable for their actions? Yep. To a feminist, logic must seem pretty fucked. Every time one of you speaks i hate the collective just a little bit more. Feminists are great at censorship, so how about you try censoring your own retarded thoughts from time to time?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:03 PM
1

You seriously don't think if a woman started shouting rape like 15 men within a 100 foot radius wouldn't come charging to her rescue? This 'rape culture' thing is absolute bullshit. If a woman doesn't want to have to sex all she has to do is say no. None of them do, apparently, and somehow it's still rape in the feminist mind. I hate feminism with every ounce of hate in my body. I hate them so much Hitler just seems like some dude to me, because i can't spare any hate for him.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:59 AM
1

At least on Dora they teach "Swiper no swiping." In the real world it's "You didn't give it to him three months ago, he swiped. Go press charges."
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:57 AM
1

Right. And next week some feminist will convince her she was raped, she'll change her mind due to regret, and press charges against them all. That's how it works. Welcome to the world.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:54 AM
2

He's a good person in the same way farmers consider obedient cows good cattle. You're still going to get eaten, in the end.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:47 AM
0

Listen, there's slut shaming, "mast key, master lock" etc. Then there's 'you did what?' She's in the latter category. It's not her overall number that's the issue, it's that it's the number for one night. The 'door without a house' analogy i created is someone who has no barrier whatsoever. Zero standards, and won't ever say no. Would you seriously date someone like this? You'd be cheated on within the the day.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:40 AM
2

I think it's cute that you think a feminist would ever consider a man human.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:33 AM
3

What guidelines would you suggest men use to protect themselves? Personally, i'd recommend filming all sexual encounters to prove innocence; just in case. But, of course, feminists are attempting to ban this.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:23 PM
16

Blackout drunk is rape. Disagree, but probably not broadly so. I've dated more than one woman whose behavior didn't change at all when she got blackout drunk. Black out doesn't mean the same as pass out. There's a distinction there i think is important. Just because a woman doesn't remember the night doesn't mean she wasn't up and active. One girl i dated tended to speak in a Russian accent when she blacked out. Couldn't tell the difference.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:48 PM
23

No... she chose to get that drunk. Nobody drugged her, therefore all the actions she took after getting however wasted she was are on her. It's not a man's responsibility to breathalyze every woman he sleeps with. She made a choice, and that choice was to drink. If it was too much, the consequences of that are nobody's responsibility but her's. But that's a moot point: if she remembers sleeping with every guy at the party she wasn't too drunk to consent.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:32 PM
38

Let's break down what the columnist said, shall we? "allowed these men to use you." No, she sought them out and used them. You don't fuck all the guys at a party without an agenda. "You need to look at how much you’re drinking and the people you’re hanging around with." A hardcore implication that the men in this story are the problem. Dude. She fucking 25 guys in one night. The worst thing you can accuse the men of is having low standards. Rock bottom. They were definitely drunk. "It also makes…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:05 PM
64

Yeah. "Try not to suck any dick on the way through the parking lot" was supposed to be a joke, not advice.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:57 PM
23

The feminist's advice brain is straight stupid. It's in conflict with reality, common sense, and anything related to not advising women it's their fault. 'Learned something' is a euphemism for 'hate all men and become a lesbian.'
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:50 PM
54

You should have no opinion, ever, except the one a woman tells you to have; but only in the moment you are meant to have an opinion. Never hold an opinion for longer than a few seconds, or a feminist will castrate you. She judged men for not stopping her, then judged the one who tried to. You literally can never win with a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:49 PM
18

Oh, those men messed up too. They all now have herpaids.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:47 PM
74

It astounds me how stupid feminists are. When i get drunk i just have to try harder to 'finish'. That's about it. That and i'm more likely to sleep with an ugly girl. The two may be related.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:46 PM
70

I feel bad for the men she's about to accuse of raping her; and then the feminist calvary who will support her claim because she had something stronger than mouthwash that day.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:42 PM
20

A master key opens a lot of locks, but a house without a door is a shitty place to live.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:41 PM
1

I'd like to go a single day on reddit without being enraged. I think that's only going to happen if i stop giving a fuck and unsub from everything but... r/funny?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:39 PM
37

I've found that life is one big pile of shit dumped right on top of you, and occasionally you dig out a small hole for some fresh air before getting shit on again.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:14 AM
0

If you're a lawyer, i've watched way too much Aaron Sorkin. I honestly expected you to be able to construct a sentence; at minimum. It's Sunday, so i am quite drunk to piss 'god' off, just in case he actually exists, and i'm still infinitely more eloquent than you. If you're a lawyer i'm a member of the fucking Stargate program.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:52 PM
9

(victim blaming anyone?) I don't think you understand. He was male, and therefore cannot be a victim.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:41 AM
27

Fucking. Feminists. Is there anything they can't get away with?
/r/PussyPass12/04/15 05:49 AM
5

It's a breach of contract. She agreed to a certain amount, which she is now unwilling to honor; thus invalidating his obligations regarding the contract.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:43 AM
2

Again, why would a woman sign this? She's just screwing herself out of money at that point. Courts always side with the woman.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:27 AM
8

Canada and parts of the US have these laws too. Our feminists are pushing to make common law marriage occur after two weeks of co-habitation. Yep. Feminists are psycho cunts, but they'll probably win anyway.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:25 AM
4

I was thinking the same thing. Isn't attempting to overrule the prenup a breach of contract, and doesn't it invalidate his obligations to her as written in the prenup? How could it not?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:23 AM
3

Hope you never get divorced, because the less money you make the more often you'll go hungry so you can pay child/spousal support. I used to work in finance. The courts give absolutely no fucks about how put out you'll be at the amount of money they're demanding. You will be bled dry, then they'll throw your bones in the grinder. 50/50 custody? Great, they might knock $50/month off your bill. Men have no rights in family courts. You're just a wallet at that point.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:20 AM
12

I used to work in finance, and exactly this. I've seen men absolutely destroyed in a divorce by heartless women. In a divorce, that woman you thought you loved becomes a vicious, money-grabbing cunt the likes of which doesn't exist in the animal kingdom. And it's always the man who gets wrecked. I've never seen a woman caused financial stress in a divorce. I specifically remember one guy who had created, essentially a 401K for his daughter's education (with tax benefits and whatnot), and was put…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:14 AM
10

By going for more is she not essentially declaring her signature on the prenup invalid? In so doing, if she loses this case wouldn't that mean he can then give her less, or nothing, depending on how the divorce court plays out?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:03 AM
15

Try talking to a feminist about fairness sometime. It's disgusting what they think, and even how they think is grotesque. All 'gimmegimmegimme'.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:57 AM
6

The feminists call it intangible support, like love. Moral support. Bullshit excuses like that, while conveniently ignoring that he probably reciprocated that support; and therefore are valuing her vague sense of support above his.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:53 AM
0

You seem to be deliberately misunderstanding my point. No, you seem not to understand the points you're making. I never said having a mainstream view meant it was true Then there was no reason to bring this up at all, and quite a few reasons not to bring this up, in its own post, during a discussion of your definition of feminists and my express request for your ideal feminist. I was just refuting the idea that most people have the same view of Sarkeesian as you. If that's what you actually thin…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:11 PM
1

... why do you think an idea being 'mainstream' (not even popular) is in any way an indication of either truth, or sanity? Once again you've dodged my question: name me a prominent feminist who isn't a 'strawfeminist'. So far all you've done is describe why the woman you labeled as a 'strawmfeminist' isn't one. I can't imagine how crazy you have to be to do that.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:30 PM
2

And... everyone else's heads. She's exactly as bad as she was made out to be. As are all the other prominent feminists you were mentally incapable of summoning despite my direct question. I see! You're a crazy person. My mistake.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:19 PM
-1

...the fuck?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:42 PM
1

Actresses are the global equivalent of 'that girl who helped you understand remedial math.' She isn't famous because she's a prominent feminist, she became famous and then decided she was a feminist. I would still consider her views pretty sexist, anyway.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:12 AM
-5

You can be intelligent without caring enough to look deeper into feminism than the "feminism = equality" bullshit that a lot of people believe That's like saying a tall person who chooses to ride around in a wheelchair is still tall. Intelligence is only intelligence if you use it. If i can't tell the difference because you don't give a shit then you're not intelligent.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:06 AM
1

They might in light of this new law; but they don't even need to. They only need to use a search engine that has no ties to the EU. If i start a search engine based only in the US, EU laws can't touch me. As far as i know, the ruling only applies to Google, anyway. They can still use Yahoo or Bing.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:58 AM
-10

Intelligent people are those who think critically. The ability to memorize facts, or quickly do math in your head, is not intelligence. It's the ability to examine what you're told, put it in context, and ask the right questions to determine legitimacy. The more capable you are of doing this the more intelligent you are. And so i repeat: there are no intelligent feminists.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:27 AM
0

It's not that difficult to imagine feminism.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:10 AM
1

I'm surprised more of them aren't in jail for murder.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:10 AM
1

Men usually are the victim. Especially in false rape claims; which i now believe to be most rape claims.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:52 AM
1

Again, no. That ruling doesn't eliminate the original source of the information. If i write an article about this kid... say in the one i'm fucking reading right now... that is on the internet for as long as i feel like. Even if somehow, magically, every instance of such an article were both found and removed from every search engine (not just Google); i can still create my own web crawler to find it. But really, do you think they're going to censor this fucking reddit thread? Of course they're …
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:48 AM
1

This is retarded. Google isn't the only search engine out there, and it doesn't eliminate the article itself. I can create a web crawler tonight and find this information.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:46 AM
6

Or gone to highschool.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:40 AM
8

How is it not worse? There are fewer black people than men (obviously), so mathematically speaking they are suppressing and oppressing a much larger group of people. They don't hang men from trees, but they rape and gut us in family, divorce, and court in general. When a feminist claims you raped her, you raped her. That's the end of the discussion. Feminists have whittled the rights of men to a fucking nub.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:38 AM
7

Ok. Point to a prominent feminist you don't consider to be a 'strawfeminist'. Note that i said prominent, not that girl who helped you understand remedial math.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:32 AM
8

Listen, if you're about to say something that can begin with, "No true feminist would..." you should just stop talking.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:31 AM
5

I love the part where all the feminists bought it. I've said it before, and i'll say it again: there are no intelligent feminists. Intelligent people don't become feminists.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:28 AM
14

In first world countries women have far more rights than men. Especially when it comes to family, divorce, and reproductive rights. It's grotesquely unbalanced in women's favor.
/r/PussyPass11/04/15 07:30 AM
2

New corporations, or corporations who don't give a shit about the quality of their work or the satisfaction of their customers. Fast food of the software world. Sure, they'll get it done cheap; but it won't be good for you.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 07:16 AM
10

Step 3 - You get what you pay for This is especially true in anything software related. I know of companies that use the tactic of being unwilling to pay fair market wages in order to complain to the government and import Indians. It turns out, when you pay someone with no education 8 bucks an hour to do a job that would normally require a graduate degree you're going to get undeployable software. I have never heard of a company being happy with imported workers.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 07:11 AM
15

You put Wanda Sykes, the female equivalent of a Wayans, on the list but not Tina Fey? You are dead to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 05:48 AM
10

I agree. I think it's the most attractive quality in a woman, so it's a real shame most women couldn't tell a joke if they were reading from a note card. Edit: Can someone please explain what problem people have with my comment? I've never dated a woman who couldn't make me laugh, and so i recognize how rare it is. The funniest person i met in real life was actually my girlfriend for three years.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 05:42 AM
59

That is stupid. It's dragging the humor level of the show down, not making a statement about equality. If there were more funny women they wouldn't have had to make the rule in the first place. Nobody is rejecting women, they're rejecting comedians who aren't fucking funny.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/15 05:40 AM
3

In no universe will i ever be convinced a jury, with all of their 'brainpower' combined, is more competent than i am.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:48 PM
3

Normally?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:23 AM
5

I didn't say any, i said 'vast majority' aren't. I can point to fucking serial killers you'd probably agree with, if pressed. That doesn't mean what they do is ok, reasonable, or in any way right. I actually had you tagged as 'brilliant' for some reason. I've changed my mind.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:20 AM
12

If the police actually had that evidence he wouldn't have been in a jail for a year without a trial. What you read is what i like to call 'propaganda.' And no, he has been in jail for a year without a trial. You know how i know that? Because he's been in jail, for a year, without a trial. Preliminary hearings aren't trials, they're just determinants of bonding, not a conviction.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:12 AM
13

Reddit is run by feminists.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:18 AM
14

Yeah. At least men understand right from wrong, and know that going out and stealing a car then running over a hooker is no way to behave. A girl sees that movie and she becomes infatuated with the idea of getting away with ruining someone else's life while facing no consequences for her actions. Really, though; she could just watch the news instead. Same idea.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:15 AM
8

So if i ever see it again i can hire him on the spot. A year in prison with no trial, and no conviction? They are hardcore fishing for a confession because they know they have no evidence, and he's steadfast in his denial. He's tough, knows he didn't do anything wrong, and is standing his ground despite an entire system out to lynch him. Yeah, i'd want him working for me.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:13 AM
20

This is standard feminism. Why are you surprised?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:09 AM
7

They should be thrown in jail, but after their due process.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:07 AM
20

I would probably threaten to kill someone falsely accusing me of raping them, too. Especially in a climate where literally no evidence is required for a conviction; let alone the arrest.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:01 AM
7

Usually when they arrest someone, though, they have evidence. I can't accuse you of robbing me and expect you to go to jail, for example, if i can't prove anything is missing in the first place. What happened to his right to a speedy trial, anyway? How long does it take to gather evidence for something that never happened? Sounds like they're just going to wait until he confesses so they don't go through the embarrassment of having to admit they have more evidence showing he didn't rape them tha…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:00 AM
11

I do think the vast majority of feminists are psychos, and deeply irrational on nearly every level. There are no honest or intelligent feminists, because if there were they wouldn't be feminists. Crime rates are strongly correlated to availability of contraceptive measures a dozen to two dozen years after they are made available. The cost to offer them 'free' is far lower than the cost of not doing so in the long run.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:56 AM
1

How intelligent can a person be if they're part of a group with no clear definition?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:54 AM
1

No, you have cases of alleged/convicted rapists getting parental rights. The vast majority of rape cases end in a plea bargain, precisely because it's a case where no evidence is required for a conviction in court. No evidence is required for even an arrest. There are multiple cases where men have gone to jail, then later the accusers being caught on tape saying she was lying about the rape. How could these men have gone to jail on evidence if there was literally no evidence of rape. How could t…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:53 AM
1

Also, when you actually examine the CDC numbers and convert 'made to penetrate' from 'sexual assault' to 'rape', as it should be, the ratio of male to female rapists becomes nearly 1:1. It fluctuates over the years, universally in favor of men being more rapey by miniscule amounts, but has a stronger tendency to stay equal.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:38 AM
1

Which, she would be tired.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/15 03:17 AM
4

I think it's deeper than that. I think most people in first world countries accept feminism as utter bullshit, but refuse to reject it due to cowardice. They view feminism in the same way most view taxes, and the government; if you deny it, they will come. Feminism is communism, and fear.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:32 AM
2

Sweet attempt at a reversal. Anyone with a brain greater than a feminist's, such as a rat, would know you've made no claims i haven't replied to. In fact, i'm the one making demands of your knowledge that you have failed to respect. I appreciate you being a moron/feminist despite the overwhelming evidence that it makes you an idiot, but at some point you need to stop lying. At some point, eventually, you must recognize that you're the dumbest person in the room and just need to leave. Right? I'm…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:09 AM
2

Haha. Nobody is as stupid as you appear to be, so i again want to congratulate you. Very good trolling. I'm using logic, which would only appear satirical to a feminist; and a dumb one at that. Even feminists usually recognize logic, they just ignore it.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:31 PM
1

Right. And my eleventy billion Ph.D.s negate your 'law degree'. PS: You really are the best troll i've seen here.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:28 PM
2

Haha. Oh my god. You just keep making me laugh. There is no way you're not a troll, and so i just want to congratulate you. You had me going for the longest time; and even now. But there's no way some dumbshit feminist would actually reference Poe's law in reference to herself. You overplayed your part. I'm still laughing, though.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:26 PM
1

I have never been less insulted. That's only because you have the comprehension of a 6 year old, like most feminists. Stop letting your emotions dictate your behavior.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:21 PM
1

"I wore glasses" and that right there is the MRA attidude Haha. I started laughing so hard i couldn't keep reading. This is fucking hilarious. I can't even... on a scale of 1 to even, i can't. I'm saving this for a future record of what 2015 feminists actually believed, so they can derive as much humor from it as i have. I can barely breath. I'm crying. This is so stupid i think i'm actually asphyxiating. Please keep talking.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:11 PM
2

Haha. Wow. You are literally the dumbest feminist i've ever had the displeasure of talking to. And that's saying a lot, considering i'm talking about feminists. I really hope you're high or supremely drunk right now. If not, please call someone to dress you tomorrow. The notion that you will wake up tomorrow alone is depressing to me. Even the mentally handicapped need personal interaction.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 11:02 PM
1

Lol. I have 6/60 vision and I'm on a packed train. Good job though. I've been on a train. I wore glasses, and still had a 5th grade reading level at the time. I'm not sure why you think that's an excuse; but you're a feminist, so i don't expect you to be even remotely reasonable, or intelligent.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:59 PM
3

Oh my god,"agreed"? You're the one using bizzare infantile ad hom homanims to prove...something? That's litterally what 10 year olds do, and I personally wouldn't use reason as the basis of an argument with a 10 year old. If anything, that's MRAs if the your actions are emblematic. This is just hilarious. I often say feminists are fucking morons, but i half expect them to run what they say through some kind of spellchecker before they make utter fools of themselves in public like this. Nearly ev…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:26 PM
-1

I had a Moustache Parakeet named Sam/Icaarus once ('cuz "he ain't got no feathers"). He was great. I did, indeed, lose him. Thanks for that painful memory, you dickbag.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:15 PM
5

I'm not a feminist That's hilarious. I don't know how you think you can tell an obvious lie like that and get away with it -- except, oh yeah. You're a feminist. You guys tell lies like i breath. Vicious and unwanted hatred has no place in reasonable discuission. Agreed. As soon as you respond with reason we'll have a discussion. I asked very clear and concise questions, and you're femdodging them because you know you don't have an answer. You push with your illogic until the point of provocatio…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:07 PM
-1

Lawl That you don't see how stupid your statement was, even after i told you it was stupid, only highlights the validity of my response. Thanks for the verification.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:02 PM
-3

Oh! So you're a moron! Sorry you wasted my time.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:19 PM
4

So I suppose yu have no issue with the fact that there are hardly any men in fields such as early education? Why would i? I don't understand your point. You seem to think that because women have autonomy they have themselfs to blame for not being reprented in many fields. That is lunacy. I don't know where you draw this conclusion from, but i'd love to hear it from the mouth of your tiny little brain. The discussion was about rights, and someone becoming a CEO has nothing to do with rights, and …
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:16 PM
8

Oppression is, essentially, a systematic and overt use of one position over another to suppress. This extends to the removal of rights. Given this actual definition of oppression, and not 'disliking that men have rights' that feminists use as a definition, how are women oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:30 PM
3

Said the person who contributed literally nothing but judgement. If you're going to disagree with me, at least have someone smarter than you draft a copy of why.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:27 PM
3

I don't know anything about that, but i believe it. Feminism is a poison on any first world society. They have a place in third worlds, but not here. Not like this.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:15 PM
8

Machiavellian is a bit extreme in regards to their behavior (though likely not their attitude). They're more opportunistic, i think. Men die. A lot. We got to war, we run into burning buildings, we die younger, and we commit suicide at much higher rates. Women make up the vast majority (53% at last check) of voters. On top of that, women are far more easily swayed by emotion, and far more likely to be at home watching TV in the first place; and over 80% of advertising is targeted at them because…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:10 PM
3

It's part of why i have an absolute hatred for feminism. Maybe you have the causality a bit mixed up there. Oh. So you think i hate retards, and therefore i hate feminists? I guess that works, too; except i have no ill will towards the mentally handicapped majority. Just the ones who become feminists, which is all feminists.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:59 PM
8

I don't know about jail, but yes, that's a scumbag move. The problem i have is that when women do it they literally get applause from the audience, and never face any charges. On top of that, women who have literally raped someone (the context of this post) still receive child support. The idea that women are oppressed is such a fucking joke that feminism is looking to put a smile on all our faces.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:49 PM
2

Dudette, delete this. It reads as the gibberish ramblings of someone not fit for human contact.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:45 PM
4

I can agree with this. Still, there's no legal precedent, that i know of, for a legal document not to be admissible in court. She signed it off knowing that he was a child, and she raped him. And she's benefiting from it.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:37 PM
2

That's what i ask every feminist, and none of them can. They always respond the same way /u/Narwhals4Lyf did, by claiming everyone has their 'pitfalls'. Feminists equate mild inconvenience, or not getting away with everything, with oppression.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:34 PM
7

Instead she uses her get-out-of-jail-free card (her vagina), reaps in the child support, and still maintains custody of the child. In a just world this is not the case.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:31 PM
7

Which would be fine, except for the fact that, again, she put the name of a child as the father on the birth certificate. She did this not only to get support, but because she knew she would never face any consequences for it. I have no problem with the requirement. The problem is that she was so secure in the knowledge that women raping men isn't going to be prosecuted that she literally wrote the name of a child as the father on a legal document. And nobody cares.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:39 PM
2

That's not even a tangentially related to what i asked. Oppression is a very clear state. It means, with great intensity, that one group of people has fewer rights, or is overtly and systematically facing negative consequences for equal actions. How are first world women oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:10 PM
5

There is literally no way to know how often false rape claims take place, because the standard of evidence for rape is non-existent. Men are often arrested simply for the claim, with zero evidence; and most of those end up in a plea deal. I do know that there's no penalty for a false claim, so there's no reason for women not to try. Women are known to pull things like this when facing a divorce; so that would just broaden their toolkit.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:49 PM
8

MensRights advocates for rights of men, regardless of status or race. It's pretty disingenuous of you to suggest that because a post about a poor black man doesn't pop up as the main context of a story every other post that we don't care. Giving men rights is our focus, and poor black men are men, too. We did have quite a lot of posts about the poor black man who was arrested for not paying support on a child that was neither his, nor he ever cared for; if that eases your protest. Race is only a…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:44 PM
23

Feminism is a sexist movement. I'm not sure why few people seem to recognize that.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:23 PM
9

Why would leaving it blank be a lie? You'd think she'd at least have enough shame or fear not to put a fucking child's name as the father on a birth certificate. She had absolutely no fear of reprisal; and for good reason, it seems.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:19 PM
18

No, that's my example of double standards. If women were oppressed they would face harsher sentences, not none.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:16 PM
3

So you agree that men are oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:14 PM
5

True... but it's still on her.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:12 PM
4

Giving someone else rights is not oppression. Anytime a woman wants child support, but doesn't want to grant visitation rights, she can simply claim she was raped. Not to grant visitation would be another weapon used by women.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:09 PM
2

Logic is often reserved for the intelligent, and there is not a single intelligent feminist.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:43 PM
3

What does one thing have to do with another? Hint: nothing. CEOs are individuals, laws and precedence apply to all women. The next time a woman rapes someone, and it results in pregnancy, there she is now promised child support. Tell me, though, how are first world women oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:38 PM
7

Ok. How are first world women oppressed?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:36 PM
-9

I fail to see how that's a flip side. It's not even in the same wallet as this coin. One is about rights, the other is about obligation. If you break my arm i shouldn't have to buy you a new bat because it got dented. However, if you wreck my car and buy me a new one on the condition you get to drive it now and then, and pay half of the upkeep, you should have those rights.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:34 PM
20

Logic and feminism are like oil and fire. One destroys the other.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:28 PM
9

She put his name on the birth certificate. She went after him.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:26 PM
48

Men have gone to jail simply for punching a hole in their condoms in order to get a woman pregnant. Anyone who still thinks women are oppressed in the first world is fucking retarded. It's part of why i have an absolute hatred for feminism.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:24 PM
1

Fun fact: women have better manual (small scale) dexterity than men. I imagine this is because they picked tiny berries for a living, whereas men literally ran after deer until the deer died of fatigue and he could drag it back to the village. Very different skillsets.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:13 AM
1

If one woman didn't cooperate, then the worst that could happen was the yield would be a little light that day. Which explains why feminism is so closely related to communism.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:08 AM
3

Hi testosterone/aggression in men, or macho men, are most likely to risk or sacrifice for an in-group. That's probably why they're so good at sports. Team above self.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:19 PM
1

Gender specific fitness magazines don't count.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:14 PM
7

Like you don't have any ghetto neighborhoods, wherever you are. Trashy establishments attract trashy people, and that's exactly what those two are.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/15 04:21 AM
1

Fair point, but i think it's more about preventing future victims than soliciting the feelings of past ones. Not only that, but she was also showing a flagrant disregard for some pretty hard laws. Statutory rape isn't something the system just shrugs off, and everyone knows it. She did all this from a position of power over these kids, too, so even if they didn't want to it's not like they had a real choice; which is my biggest problem with this. But lets take it a bit more extreme. What if he w…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 01:02 PM
1

Then you haven't been asking the right questions. Most aren't going to be openly sexist, but deep down they usually don't give a flying fuck about men; and would certainly never advocate for men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:54 AM
1

And liberals are driven by their psychotic belief that men aren't really people, and it doesn't matter if they have rights. That's why i'm independent.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:35 AM
0

Fair enough. Nobody in this thread said Democrat. We were talking about the liberal half of her psychosis.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:12 AM
1

I see.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 03:53 AM
1

Nobody said Democrat.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:51 AM
0

... liberal isn't a political party.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:47 AM
4

Those are pretty strong onions. I can smell them from here.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:56 PM
7

Yeah, but i avoid talking to feminists.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:55 PM
10

I'm not sure about that. People who think men should actually have rights tend not to be liberals, and liberals tend not to give a shit about men. Not all of them, for sure; but it's a very strong correlation.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:42 PM
24

I wonder how many shooting stars you'd have to see for this wish to come true.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:38 PM
4

This is a rape grey area. He did agree to try this... sort of. I don't consider being manipulated into sex under the rape category.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:36 AM
11

The reversal isn't quite right. This is more accurate: "My wife isn't having sex with me anymore, because she no longer finds me physically attractive. I lost my shit when she told me this and she finally agreed to buying a tub of lube to ensure penetration, and we are setting up some counseling sessions."
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:34 AM
-3

I bet you work out, too.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/15 04:10 AM
1

but when I was 16, I would have killed for that opportunity. That's why it's considered statutory rape. Would you kill for that opportunity now? At 16 your hormones are basically in control of you, and it would take quite the willpower to turn her down; regardless of the consequences.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/15 04:02 AM
3

This actually happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/15 03:57 AM
6

Yeah, that's really weird. The article makes it seem like he's trying to stand up for her, but still told them she statutory raped him. I'm guessing the guys she went after weren't the geeks, if you know what i mean. This guy sounds like he works out.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/15 02:21 PM
91

She's a gorgeous, tall, hot blonde. That look on her face is surprise at having to face consequences for her actions for the first time in her life.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/15 02:04 PM
1

Actually...
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:27 PM
3

~ Feminists. You should attribute your quotes.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:36 PM
3

There's a reason it's "Women and children first", and not "Children and women first."
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 10:46 PM
24

You don't see a lot of women running into burning buildings.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 03:55 PM
7

The 'study'. Nothing done by a feminist group counts as information.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:30 AM
3

I have never seen a more perfect summary of the effects of feminism.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:01 AM
2

I've heard of people being banned from the feminism network who have never been on it. I think the mods, having nothing productive to do 'cuz feminism, occasionally troll through places like /r/MensRights and just start picking names of people they don't like to ban. I can't support this in any way, but it sounds like something they'd do.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:47 AM
2

Apparently when you're banned from /r/feminism, they also ban you from all subs within that network. There are a few subs i can't post on that i've never been to. Reddit is pretty much run by feminists, like some kind of infection.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:53 PM
2

...yes. Yes i did post that picture. 8)
/r/PussyPass26/03/15 10:48 AM
2

Same here. I got into it with the TIL mods over modmail regarding a few issues. This one, and the Susan G. Komen foundation removal declaring the vast majority of funds don't go to research are the first two to come to mind. They are so biased it's fucking unreal that they're a default.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 10:44 AM
-2

...mandatory community service is slavery.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:01 PM
-1

It's a valid comparison; but not directly, and certainly not on the same scale. It's like comparing mild indentured servitude, or prison work (the majority of which are men, btw), to straight up slavery.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:24 PM
3

Such is feminism.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:21 PM
6

Why not just have one fucking line? I hate everyone.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:06 PM
5

Yep. People are retarded, and the ones who aren't are bastards. Most people are either too stupid to recognize the inequality, or are glad for it.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:04 PM
23

TIL deleted a post not long about a study that discovered over 40% of men who call into an abuse hotline, because they're abused, are treated as the abusers; often even at the men's insistence that they're the victims. So, no; i wouldn't call that assistance.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:02 PM
68

Where did you find this transcript?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:00 PM
8

... where? I'm not new to reddit and this is the first time i've seen it.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:59 PM
4

Or if he threatened her. Or if he looks like he's going to. Or if he looks at her wrong. Or if he looks at another girl wrong. Or if he looks at another girl right. Or if he doesn't do the dishes. Or if he doesn't put the toilet seat down. These are all justifiable reasons. Fight the patriarchy!!!!1!one
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:58 PM
6

No, you don't understand. When a woman feels angry it's justified because she's so oppressed, and it empowers her! The very notion that she should need 'help' against this freedom is the patriarchy talking.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:56 PM
-45

It seems there is no middle ground. You have the middle east, where women are basically the property of men; and you have the west, where men are basically property of women.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:54 PM
117

Almost makes me want to beat someone up. I'm sure that's just my dick talking, though, and i should ignore this feeling of discrimination; as i am male, and therefore cannot be discriminated against. Feminism is just the best thing ever! Such equality! Much wow.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:53 PM
1

Ok. How do you feel about a man being forced to pay support for a child he doesn't want?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/15 06:28 AM
0

Well, i don't necessarily agree with that either. Intent should be a factor. On the other hand, i also don't believe in mandatory minimums; which changes the dynamic as well.
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 04:57 AM
12

Yeah, what's a little spilt coffee?
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 04:54 AM
23

No, this goes beyond domestic violence. At some point it just becomes an attempt to maim, maybe even attempted murder. She pour boiling water on his fucking head. What if that water had rolled down the front of his face instead of the back? His eyes would be fucked, maybe beyond repair. This is a serious attempt at a serious maiming, she just failed. Let's treat it as if locking a psycho up who tried to blind someone has nothing to do with who they tried to blind; and punish them as if they had …
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 04:29 AM
20

Depends on the location. In this instance, she poured that shit on his head. That's a serious attempt to maim him, his face, and maybe even boil his fucking brain. What if the water had rolled down the front instead of the back? His eyes would be completely fucked, as would his face. I don't think it's a stretch to call this attempted murder, or serious intent to maim. Definitely worth more than four years; she just failed at what she was trying to do. Probably why he wants to divorce this psych…
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 04:27 AM
15

Should have just cut his dick off. She'd have gotten away with a round of applause and a speaking engagement at a feminist rally.
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 04:23 AM
-1

Nope. Feminists constantly claim that they are for equality, but if you ask them specific questions about men having rights you'll very quickly discover this is a lie. It's a recruiting tool, and straight up North Korea style propaganda. They use a lot of other tactics that should raise red flags for anyone who can think; such as the overuse of vague words with either multiple meanings, or no real meaning at all. When a feminist starts shrieking about the patriarchy, for instance, her notion of …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/15 06:09 PM
20

Life pro tip: don't hit someone who can probably pick up a fucking car.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/15 02:59 AM
16

You're thinking of egalitarianism. Feminism is the notion that women are deserving of more respect, rights, and privileges than men; while eliminating as much accountability for women as possible. They are succeeding, by the way.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/15 02:57 AM
-2

Your ignorance is not my problem. Everything you need to know is literally a Google search away, if you really wanted to know. It would have taken you less time to find this information than it did to criticize me for not giving it to you. Feel free to continue wallowing in your own mental filth, though.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:22 AM
-2

Please post the link(s) No. Fuck you. I spent like an hour finding this shit out and i don't care if you believe me. They also are not paying to be indoctrinated, conditioned and lied to. Are you fucking kidding me? From what i read, this guy was basically listening to the history of Shakespeare when he decided that it was a good time to mention the Holocaust didn't really happen. The reason.com article is not enough in my mind to take the professors side over the students side. How about the fa…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:22 AM
1

No, but in this case it's not about free speech. I read up on this story yesterday, and this guy is a total asshat. He was ranting about every offensive topic, off context, and when everyone made it clear they didn't want to listen. This wasn't a single incident, this was him disrupting the class by whipping out a figurative soapbox and interrupting the learning environment. These kids aren't paying to listen to some lunatic explain why the holocaust didn't really happen, they're there to learn …
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:50 AM
1

Jackson was right, it's not a good question if you can't actually ask the question. They're not playing Charades.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:48 AM
3

I'd have said it in middle of the fucking ghetto if Samuel L. Jackson was there telling me to. At some point you just have to be more like Marseilles Wallace, and stop being a bitch.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:46 AM
1

Let's be fair: he was shoving this down their throats. It wasn't relevant, and he talked about it on multiple occasions despite being warned numerous times to stop. It doesn't matter what you're being an ass about if you're an ass. He was being an ass. They'd probably have done the same thing if some feminist kept ranting about how all men are rapists. It's just disruptive behavior.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:31 AM
5

She said True upset students when he said that it was understandable that the Holocaust happened given that people are not often taught to question systems of oppression Ok, they are definitely overly sensitive if that's offensive; but overall, yeah, this guy is an asshat. It seems like not only was it not a topic of conversation as i originally thought, but he continued ranting about it on multiple occasions. I can see why this might discomfort people, but they'll probably push through it if it…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:30 AM
14

More and more each day i'm equating liberalism with feminism. I've never met a feminist who wasn't a liberal, nor a liberal who wasn't at least sympathetic to feminism.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:25 AM
5

I think he meant calling yourself one, not being one. I once mentioned to a couple friends in passing that i was a passive libertarian and they said i was a shitty person because of it. Since they're both creationists, which i try to avoid talking about so i don't calling them idiots, this caused a bit of a stir within me.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:24 AM
15

Just like nearly every other group.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:21 AM
0

It's really rare that a reference to someone's own username passes over that person's head. Rare, and sad.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:58 AM
1

Yep. And they elected a Republican governor. Just imagine how far fucking left those people must be for a Republican to be on the left.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/15 04:33 AM
3

Why would you feel that? The constitution only applies to government, not private/nearly-private institutions. I'm free to demand you be frisked before you enter my home, for instance. That said, yes; they are getting their asses sued off for this. The 'yes means yes' law. It's an affirmative consent law, which means the people about to engage in sex needs to receive verbal approval before doing anything. This changes the claim from, "I said no" , to the person being able to claim, "I didn't say…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/15 04:30 AM
0

Your idealism has failed you.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:24 AM
1

True, and fair enough. Ruining someone else's life needs more consequence than 16 months, though. No amount of money can make up for not being able to walk again. That destroys 90% of life. I'd prefer a whole different system, to be honest. I'm fine with her not going to prison if she had to pay this man every month for the rest of her life; and if he dies she owes his family until she dies. That's punishment, justice, and reparations, all rolled into one. On top of that, if there ever is a rege…
/r/PussyPass18/03/15 04:22 AM
12

I'm not even surprised anymore. Two groups of people get away with nearly anything they want: cops, and women. Everyone else is doing their best not to get crushed under the weight of a clearly biased system.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:58 AM
48

Feminism.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:57 AM
32

Haha. Nono. Feminists don't want women to have the responsibility, they want the privilege. Which they have in far greater amount than men, despite what every psycho feminist claims.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:56 AM
58

It's great how the man shows up after the psycho women had already tied the victim down and began torturing him, just kind of goes along with their sadistic natures, and he is the one who gets punished. Everyone involved with this is beyond fucked up, including the judge and the DA. This succinctly represents the failing of our entire system.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:54 AM
67

So when a man does something violent he's just a violent man, but when a woman does something outright sadistic she's got psychological issues and deserves treatment? Jesus fucking christ i hate the world for collapsing so thoroughly under the psychotic pressure of the cult of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:52 AM
7

Another requirement in almost all cases is the defendant going on the stand to defend himself. Without that, prior convictions can almost never come up. That's not required in rape cases. And yes, you stealing a candybar when you were 8 can be used against you in a false rape claim.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 07:55 AM
3

A drunk driver in an 'accident' had made quite a lot of bad decisions prior to the 'accident'.
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 05:23 AM
6

Technically, he's half dead.
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 05:21 AM
7

Justice isn't about restoration. This judge failed on a deeply feministic level.
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 05:21 AM
5

And this is what it's come to. This is equivalent to "she shouldn't have been wearing that."
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 05:10 AM
14

And so nothing will change. They're always crying misogyny about something. Dude wore a shirt while landing on a fucking asteroid: misogyny! At some point we, collectively, have to stop giving a fuck. Just ignore them until the cholesterol destroys their hearts at 28.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 05:09 AM
8

Men usually don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 05:07 AM
9

In California colleges, by law, men have to prove they didn't rape a girl, rather than her having to prove he did.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 05:06 AM
10

There are far fewer recanters than there are people caught lying. I'd rather punish the 90% than let the 100% go free for their sadistic behavior. What it comes down to is there will be fewer false accusations, so some of the men who shouldn't have gone to prison won't have even been accused, and we get to see justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 05:01 AM
28

The feminists would fight that tooth, nail, and shrieking harpy froth. They fought to have prior convictions be allowed as evidence in a rape trial. This is literally the only crime this is allowed to take place. If you're a man get used to the fact that you have no rights. Feminists saw to that.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 04:57 AM
8

Right, so why do you take the word of a cold blooded murderer with the incentive of a multi-million dollar payout over the default? The default being she wasn't abused. Her story simply doesn't add up.
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 07:49 PM
10

What makes you think she was abused? She said so? The word of a cold blooded murderer is to be respected. I can see why you believe her.
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 09:56 AM
6

Hell, at least one guy is in jail for not coughing up support for kids that aren't his, delivered to a woman he never dated. She just put his name on the birth certificate. The system is getting worse for men, not better.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 06:42 AM
3

What can we do to prevent her from getting away with this? Legally? Nothing. Although, maybe it would be legal by this DA's definition.
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:31 AM
7

Not even the murder is that scary, really; it's the fact that she got away with it. I mean, holy shit. How many women are now going to go out and just murder their husbands for money now?
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:29 AM
18

Not to mention: why didn't she just leave the fucking house? If someone says they're going to kill you, and you have time to call 911 before that person tries anything, you have time to leave. On top of that, confronting someone with a gun makes you the fucking aggressor. Anything he did would have been in self-defense, not her. This whole thing is such utter feminist bullshit.
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:27 AM
18

Holy. Fucking. Shit. So Canada has officially deemed cold blooded first-degree murder a better alternative to just fucking leaving? Everything i learn about the world makes me hate it more. I bet that court didn't take into account that women are more likely to abuse men. Where's the pre-meditated murder pass for battered-man syndrome?
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:23 AM
11

Only because it's against men. Women have/had(?) a website where they can simply list the names of men they are accusing of raping them. No conviction, or even arrest, necessary. No screening whatsoever. Nobody gave a shit about that.
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:20 AM
18

Weird, since most abuse is by women against men, and that's just physical. Women are masters of emotional abuse, likely because men can maintain an emotion for longer than 10 seconds. Where's battered-man syndrome?
/r/PussyPass14/03/15 03:18 AM
1

No, the court is the one who deemed him unable to pay. He fought for custody, lost, and the courts in the meantime recognized he was too broke to pay, and had no property. It's not mandatory for someone to pay child support unless the court says it is. Mothers frequently don't have to when the father gets custody.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 01:41 AM
1

What you are talking about is "would've been willing", but in this case it is about "would've been forced by law". Parse it how you like, but it boils down to capability and demand. The fact is, he wasn't forced by law. It's also an analogy, not a direct correlation. Your analogy is better, but i still disagree that you should be able to successfully sue. In the end, what it comes down to is this matter was already settled by the courts. He wasn't forced by law, and so it's over. They made their…
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 12:32 AM
2

RULE TWO: Check the commonlaw marriage laws in your area/state, and avoid cohabitation. Feminists have been push for 6 months of living together equals marriage, and have succeeded in some areas i hear.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 07:23 PM
1

How does a unanimous judges ruling not qualify as something having taken place? They already said she's going to get some money, just not the $2m she asked for. I guess that's what's on the discussion table now.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 07:21 PM
0

No, it doesn't make sense. You can't ask for something you didn't ask for in the first place simply because the person later got rich. That's not how contracts work.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 07:19 PM
1

That's not true at all. Judges can simply ignore pre-nups, and often do, because they're judges. It has nothing to do with how it's written, but whether the judge gives a shit.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 07:17 PM
20

I looked into it a bit, and the father actually fought for custody of the son and was denied. On top of that, the courts ruled the man was so broke, and didn't have any assets, that he didn't have to pay child support. Even more, the son now works in the business, likely very successfully, and lives with his father. I would say he's made up for those few years he missed. I can be ok with this, if all she gets is back pay for what he should have contributed for his son those 5 years. That long? I…
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 03:13 AM
3

I won't say there is, but i will agree there can be a legitimate claim. I'm not saying throw everything out, but these laws did not even attempt to adjust for the modern world. If she can prove his business only prospered due to their past relationship she will probably end up with a good settlement. Well, their son does now live with his father and work in the business. She did give him that. 8) I have a feeling this will settle out of court for a good chunk of change but nowhere near the amoun…
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 03:09 AM
27

So if i sell a car, can i then sue the person i sold it to 20 years later because i found out he was willing to pay more money? What about if i find out my boss would have hired me for 5K more on my first hiring, thus affecting the rest of my raises? Can i sue them? The fact is, she didn't. You can't retroactively ask for money when you find out someone would have paid you more, or they become rich. It's this entitlement culture that's resulted in men increasingly not marrying women. Her sacrifi…
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 02:12 AM
30

In this day and age, judges don't need justification to fuck a man over if it helps a woman.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 12:40 AM
14

Spite is how i would do it. It's not that i want the money, it's that you can't have it. Also, that's what child support is for. There's no mention here of him not paying child support, so this entire thing is ludicrous.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 12:10 AM
22

The judgment is also a timely reminder that divorcing couples who want protection from such claims, even if they have no money at all, should obtain an order from the court at the time of the divorce, in which they both agree that there will be no further financial claims. This wouldn't hold up. Fucking pre-nups don't hold up in a lot of cases. I hate this world. Nothing you earn is yours once you factor in the government, and any entitled bitch who happens to have walked through your life at so…
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 12:07 AM
54

The notion that she will be is what's infuriating, no matter the amount. You can't get rid of a woman's claim on your money even after you divorce her! These laws need an entire rewrite by someone who isn't a fucking feminist.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 12:04 AM
75

I've been through a difficult time, and i'm also not married to the guy; can i have $2m please?
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 12:01 AM
2

Right. Why else would they swoop in for a rescue?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:10 PM
3

I was born cynical, but on the rape issue i think i've reached a whole new level. Some kind of critical mass for jaded natures. I literally don't believe rape claims i read about anymore. If i read in the paper, or online, that a woman was raped, "Yeah. Ok." is my immediate reaction. Unless there some description of a dark alley or a gun, i just assume she's lying or seriously misguided on what rape actually is. Feminists have abused the word 'rape' so seriously, continuously, and aggressively t…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:02 PM
52

Oh, that explains it. They're not protecting the mother, they're attacking the father. Well, i guess it's for a good cause...
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:46 PM
8

The real rape problem is feminists using it as justification for every negative thing they do to a man.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:18 PM
4

Except the stigma of prison rape is true. The stats of female rape are blown wildly out of proportion, or completely made up, by feminists, often including drunk sex (even with their boyfriend); and only perpetuated by bullshit hate rallies like the one this dumbshit sign is at. Stupidity feeds on itself, and feminism is the biggest circlejerk there is. The problem with this sign is it's a self-reinforcing lie.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 11:06 PM
3

This isn't a meme. This is a statement written on cardboard at, presumably, a hate (feminist) rally. Maybe the cardboard she could have written the truth on cost too much, 'cuz patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:54 PM
11

My guess is they were looking for a 'legitimate' excuse to officially expel him so they wouldn't have to deal with the nightmare they're now dealing with. In so doing, they also made him the badguy in the view of his friends. Merely questioning about sexual misconduct will make people wonder why. This is just run of the mill feminism. Don't look too deep.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:50 PM
19

Existing as a man has now literally become a crime.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:47 PM
0

If you're a cop, self defense will earn you a scarlet letter and a career change; if you're not a cop, self defense will earn you a parade. I think you got those two backwards. Cops, at least in the US, are nearly omni-directionally immune to use of force complaints. Just recently, a cop trying to shoot a pet dog accidentally killed his owner instead and wasn't charged with anything. Or fired. Or reprimanded. Do you think that would happen if he wasn't a cop?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/15 05:56 PM
7

I looked into it, and it appears to be over the history of humanity. I thought that number was more current. I imagine it's much more even now. Still, a pretty shocking number. That's some hardcore evolution going on.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:07 AM
16

On the Wall Street Journal? How did this kind of sexist drivel make it there? Imagine if he'd written about how women are the problem and men are biologically superior. Feminists are truly a poison.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:03 AM
3

This is why only 40% of men reproduce, versus 80% of women. That... can't be right. Are you serious? You're basically saying at least half of all women have had a child with a man who already has a child. I don't think divorce rates are quite that high.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:00 AM
16

because whoever throws the first punch gets the assault charges. That doesn't sound entirely true. If someone walks right up to you and starts threatening you, self-defense must provide some exception.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/15 02:52 AM
5

Kind of like the wage gap numbers.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:22 AM
6

All around. I didn't look into the details between categories. What policy are you referring to? As far as anyone knows, there's no set in stone policy there. You opened up this line of dialogue with: "They accept roughly 50/50 because there's simply so many good candidates." That may not be an official policy, but it's certainly something that's in effect. The acceptance rates are pretty close despite the huge disparity between applicants; though more males take the offer.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:19 AM
3

Ok, then of those accepted, what if the ration just happens to be 50/50 and from that group they're all the top? Then they wouldn't have instituted the policy in the first place. Do you honestly think schools give a shit about male acceptance rates? If this policy went into place to get more men in there would have been a shitstorm the size of Katrina. From what I know there's not statistical evidence to show that this isn't the case so you can't reject this null hypothesis. You can't just decla…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:13 AM
9

That's not the case, though, certainly not that extreme anyway. If we assume average GPA of the US follow the same pattern as applicants (probably not), women score slightly higher; but men score slightly higher on the SATs. To put more importance on GPA than the SAT is kind of sexist, no? Especially at the high levels we're talking about. If you have a policy that disregards accomplishment in favor of sexism you have a bad policy. In this instance, in particular, the policy wouldn't be needed i…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:48 AM
4

What if the average female applying is possibly more qualified than the average male applying? A) Wow. I hope you're not majoring in a STEM field. The average doesn't matter, only the average of those who were accepted. If the average would be the same if they admit more men in, based on the ratio of applicants, then to not admit more men based on the ratio of applicants is sexism. B) If it were the case that the women were more qualified they obviously wouldn't need the policy, because they'd b…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:21 AM
6

Ok, now i know you're a feminist, and definitely didn't get into MIT, because you're taking what i said and completely lying about it to hook your strawman up. You're irrational. Please show me actual hard evidence to the fact that less-qualified women are getting in compared to more-qualified men being denied. Is this what i said? No. I said absolutely nothing like it. Other than just plain admissions numbers because those don't capture average female vs average male performance/grades/stats. W…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:11 AM
7

How can you prove this for sure? Are you kidding me? There's no way you got into MIT. The number of applicants are different, therefore they are selecting a higher percentage of women than men. This is like middleschool level math, dude. You're coming across as a feminist, now. Deeply irrational with no understanding of the world. It's commonly known (at least to MIT) that women are more selective to themselves, and don't apply if they're not 100% sure while more males apply even when they're no…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:05 AM
12

Two equal groups of equal merit This is obviously not true, because the groups are imbalanced. One group has considerably more of a chance to get in than the other based solely on their gender. That's sexism, plan and simple. Diversity is a word feminists use when they want to screw a group of people over. It's a code phrase for "fuck that group, in particular." Edit: Also, if they truly were equal then the stats would already be 50/50, and there'd be no need for this policy.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:55 AM
6

while maintaining that each person inside is of equal merit That's not what they're doing. They're clearly choosing a higher percentage of women than the application pool simply because they are women. and they've stayed one of the top research universities in the world due to that, so it must be working. This is an awful argument. They're among the top universities because they used to be a top university, and their reputation is known probably across the world. Probably half the valedictorians…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:51 AM
19

WHEREAS many judges and attorneys are still biased against women and fathers are awarded custody 70% of the time when they seek it Feminists have been using straight up lies for a long time now, apparently. This is so blatantly false i can't believe anyone would ever believe it.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:36 AM
1

I've never met, heard of, or read a story about a feminist actively campaigning or fighting for a man's rights. Feminists have redefined equality in their tiny little minds to mean the elevation of women. They're psychos.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:21 PM
148

I don't understand why taking up more space than you need is now a fault of men, to the point that it's a gendered word. Do women not take up more than one seat? Ever? Fucking feminists.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:37 AM
3

What i tell people is that feminism was never about equality, but the elevation of women's rights. It only seemed like equality when women didn't have any rights. Now they have more rights than men, and feminists are still trying to stack the deck.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:49 PM
1

He did lie to her, but i don't think she'd consider him more irresponsible because of the trip. She's probably questioning herself, the breakup, and wondering how much of a cashcow she gave up due to her ignorance. Any woman who breaks up with a man over money is clearly a gold digger; and things like him lying to her about his wealth will gnaw at her, not justify her actions.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:46 PM
1

Damn, two years is a long time to keep going in a relationship without talking about a big issue as finances and future prospects. Well, i make it clear right off the bat that i don't want kids. That's a huge issue for me, and without that on the table finances become far less important. I could probably support myself on near minimum wage without kids.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:43 PM
1

I was in a 3 year relationship and i don't think it ever came up, but definitely not within the first year or two. By that point i know she's not after money; although by that point she can probably infer the ballpark of what i make, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:29 PM
2

Anytime a woman claims money is more important to her than anything else, which is exactly what she told you in different words, yeah; she's a problem. You're definitely better off without a gold digger.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:17 PM
2

We don't know enough about his finances to say that he was being financially irresponsible. He said he's been saving for a while, and we don't know how much he was making, so nine thousand may be nothing to him.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:08 PM
5

My personal choice is not to talk about money, and i dodge the question by talking about my work or future plans. If a girl wants me to support her financially then she's not the girl for me.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 10:06 PM
61

Feminism hurts everyone, yes.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 05:25 PM
12

If equality is the goal I have never met a feminist that actually wanted equality.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:37 PM
1

Yes. It's a huge issue, but in a lot of areas it's not overtly legal. The cops just 'ask', but denying pretty much gets the shit beat out of you because our cops can do whatever they want without consequence.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 11:49 PM
2

I am from the US, and the police are pretty fucking bad... but the streets aren't quite running with as much blood as i imagine the reports tell you. If i only knew what i read, i'd feel like the US is in a civil war, too. That said, i hear Europe is pretty fucked too. Depending on the country, you don't have any kind of individual rights. The cops can search your shit, just because; and you can't even own a gun? How do you defend yourselves from criminals with guns?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 09:59 PM
1

Me to, but i imagine you live in the US, and that makes this your problem. As the old poet said, don't disregard those who aren't you, or it is you who will be next.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 09:19 PM
1

I'm not sure. I thought those kinds of things were only required for state amendment changes. I know in Florida, last election, we attempted to legalize marijuana, but it only got 54% or so of the vote; and it required 60% because it was a serious change. Locking up men because a woman said he should be? I'd be surprised if that even required a majority in California.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 08:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter