ThePhoenixJ Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Womp-womp It depends when you start. If you start at 18, you probably don't need 20%. If you're like a ton of Americans and don't start until your mid 30's, 20% might not even be enough.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/01/21 03:02 PM
1	Double standards getting your blood boiling you could apply same logic for 12 yo olds, by passing mexican borders. I mean, you really couldn't call that the same logic. 16 is a VERY common age of consent in developed countries (more common than 17 or 18). My argument was clearly not about geographical proximity to Oklahoma, but rather how very close to meeting (or outright meeting) the age of consent laws in very similar jurisdictions.	/r/MensRights	16/10/18 11:24 PM
1	Double standards getting your blood boiling Age of consent is 17 in Texas. 120 days for having sex with a child is horseshit. This was a 23 yr old having sex with a 16 yr old. If you're just talking about age (not the fact that she was his teacher), if they had driven an hour and a half north, it would have been legal. He was 50 miles or a few months away from being legal. Not saying it's not fucked up or anything but I don't know that I could comfortably call that "sex with a child" without any qualifiers or context.	/r/MensRights	16/10/18 09:00 PM
1	Jury orders blogger to pay $8.4 million to ex-Army colonel she accused of rape “Everything in that blog post was provably false,” Am I the only one who thought that was a typo for "probably false" and couldn't understand why a lawyer would ever say that?	/r/MensRights	12/08/17 02:41 PM
–	Female barrister who had sex with man outside Waterloo station has her criminal record cleared after claiming she was drunk but his caution stands: Initially the pair both admitted to charges, however the woman would later claim that she was too drunk to consent Could you quote my words back to me and show me where I made a claim?	/r/MensRights	24/05/17 12:15 AM
–	Female barrister who had sex with man outside Waterloo station has her criminal record cleared after claiming she was drunk but his caution stands: Initially the pair both admitted to charges, however the woman would later claim that she was too drunk to consent Honestly man, this is the problem with subs like these. Open discussion is always treated so hypersensitively to the opposing view that a simple question from someone who actually is 100% on the men's rights side is shot down because I didn't make it superly expressly clear which side I'm on, so I'm assumed to be on the opposite. I am asking a question. You are assuming I'm arguing for the opposite and the way you approach it is To make your argument, you literally took a question I said and "qu…	/r/MensRights	24/05/17 12:05 AM
–	Female barrister who had sex with man outside Waterloo station has her criminal record cleared after claiming she was drunk but his caution stands: Initially the pair both admitted to charges, however the woman would later claim that she was too drunk to consent I don't understand how you can say I made a claim when my statement is literally right there? I'm not being snarky - I genuinely don't understand how you can call a question a "positive claim".	/r/MensRights	23/05/17 11:47 PM
–	Female barrister who had sex with man outside Waterloo station has her criminal record cleared after claiming she was drunk but his caution stands: Initially the pair both admitted to charges, however the woman would later claim that she was too drunk to consent Well you're kind of switching the burden of proof as if I'm the one that made a statement	/r/MensRights	23/05/17 10:38 PM
–	Female barrister who had sex with man outside Waterloo station has her criminal record cleared after claiming she was drunk but his caution stands: Initially the pair both admitted to charges, however the woman would later claim that she was too drunk to consent I never understood why Men could not be too drunk to consent. Is that the case? I understand biases in the court, but your statement makes it sound like a man can't claim he was too drunk to consent.	/r/MensRights	23/05/17 08:19 PM