TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThePlagueDoctor0 Archive

View 13 posts and 78 comments by ThePlagueDoctor0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you are a MGHOW, then why does it say on your website: I want to thank my loving wife Olivia for all her sacrifice and unending support WTF?
/r/MGTOW14/07/16 10:02 AM
0

little child engaged in "King of the Hill" nonsense. And all of the rest of your post... well it just serves as proof of just how completely immature you really are. Wow, talk about "shaming language"! Unbelievable. (And a complete misunderstanding of what I am saying.)
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 06:37 PM
1

As far as I know he is not cohabiting. I personally find that hilarious... it's a pure "bluepill" shaming attempt. You completely lack comprehension of what I was saying; I was following your own arguments to their logical conclusion, a.k.a. reductio ad absurdum. But I think we're talking past each other, so I'll end this discussion here.
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 06:35 PM
1

Then stop talking about stages. There are no successive stages within MGTOW; that's all I was saying. I agree with most of the ideas discussed here.
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 06:33 PM
-1

By the way, others reasons why the "stages" are bullshit: it makes it seem as though some MGTOW are "more MGTOW" than others. However, MGTOW is based on a personal principle of self-determination, not a "holier than thou" competition of who is the most non-conformist. If MGTOW had stages, it does in fact give credence to the accusations that MGHOW is a cult. For those who insist on "stages", may I suggest the following stages of MGTOW: MGTOW stage I: This stage is the first step a red-piller tak…
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 04:52 PM
1

So BarbarossaaaaaᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA is a blue-pill slave?
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 04:34 PM
0

Haha... according to this line of reasoning only absolutely destitute celibate hermits are MGTOW. One can reject STRs, without rejecting LTRs, social engagement, or economic engagement. Yup, that's called being "married" or else "cohabiting" -- and "bluepill" BarbarossaaaaaaaᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀᴀAAAAAAAA has a long-term relationship, a good social life (I presume), and a well-paying job (as a chemical engineer I think); so according to you he is not a MGHOW, but a blue-piller.
/r/MGTOW20/03/16 04:31 PM
0

Sorry to be pedantic, but the "stages" of MGTOW are completely illogical bullshit: "Situational awareness" isn't MGTOW. One can reject LTRs, without rejecting STRs, social engagement, or economic engagement. One can reject STRs, without rejecting LTRs, social engagement, or economic engagement. One can reject social engagement, without rejecting LTRs, STRs, or economic engagement. One can reject economic engagement, without rejecting LTRs, STRs, or social engagement.
/r/MGTOW19/03/16 07:24 PM
3

Cost of sex calculator
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 03:54 PM
1

They have ethical behaviors, not ethical intentions. In my impression, a disproportionate amount of vegan women are also feminists.
/r/MGTOW12/03/16 07:09 PM
2

In fact around 80% of vegans are female, so in this department you could say women are more ethical than men. No, this is female virtue signalling, not ethics.
/r/MGTOW12/03/16 04:39 PM
5

http://redditmetrics.com/r/MGTOW → Total Subscribers To the moon!
/r/MGTOW10/03/16 06:01 PM
3

An Anti-Feminist Feminist.
/r/MGTOW08/03/16 11:11 PM
2

For those who don't know: this guy is the boyfriend of youtuber Shoe0nHead, Woman Against (the word) Feminism™ .
/r/MGTOW08/03/16 07:54 PM
2

This channel?
/r/MGTOW05/02/16 01:54 PM
1

Terrence Popp's website redonkulas.com has a coitus consent form in DOC format on its home page.
/r/MGTOW04/02/16 01:27 PM
6

A.k.a. "front game".
/r/MGTOW24/01/16 06:56 PM
7

I think you are confusing a boycott with a strike: The term MGTOW is often used interchangeably with the so-called marriage strike or marriage boycott, which are not entirely coterminous with MGTOW (which is a broader concept), although there is considerable overlap. The marriage strike is a form of protest against the allegedly unfair legal conditions of marriage. Some marriage strikers hope to return to marriage once these laws have been reformed, while many other MGTOW do not wish to return t…
/r/MGTOW18/01/16 12:32 AM
1

Google Trends shows "feminism" and "women's rights" falling the whole time, except that feminism has has a slight rise in 2014 and 2015; but this may be due to the anti-feminism backlash that is currently going on on the Web.
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 11:25 AM
3

I was blocked from editing Wikipedia! Talk page: I have blocked your account as a pointy username policy violation. You openly admit here that your username is the only other common use of the acronym for Men Going Their Own Way. Further, you have shown to have a strong point of view and even a conflict of interest about the subject due to your use of the royal we and discussing an "approved version" of the article. You may appeal this block by using the {{unblock}} --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 07:…
/r/MGTOW02/01/16 12:37 PM
3

The only new word on the rise is "social justice", but its rise is mild. Also: Liberty, truth, beauty, virtue, justice.
/r/MGTOW02/01/16 11:52 AM
3

That's not what the vote is about. You might want to keep the article in its longer form, but most of the other editors do not consider the sources provided to be reliable sources (per Wikipedia policy). Hence, if you vote keep, it will (almost certainly) be kept in its current degenerate/truncated form. You should therefore vote Strongly delete instead. Click the Edit Source tab above, and use the following format: * '''Strongly delete:''' ...explain yourself here, with references to the Wikipe…
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 11:21 PM
10

Create a Wikipedia account if you want to vote in favor of deletion.
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:51 PM
1

mgtow.com internal meltdown Out of curiosity: what was that about? Or did you mean mgtowforums.com?
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 05:40 PM
2

Um no, I used them in the article, but they were deleted. And they were newspapers not blogs.
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 02:07 PM
5

There exist two (German language) secondary sources which explicitly state that: MGTOW are equivalent to the Herbivore Men MGTOW are the topic of the book by Helen Smith (Marriage Strike/ Career Strike/ Education Strike). There are also secondary sources which state that MGTOW is a general phenomenon in which men can be MGTOW without knowing about the word "MGTOW". This implies that references (that do not mention the word "MGTOW") about men abandoning marriage are relevant, because MGTOW refers…
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 12:40 AM
9

This book already exists, it's called "Men on Strike" by Helen Smith. But they've deleted this source.
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 11:41 PM
1

The Wikipedia article about MGTOW has now been nominated for deletion!
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 10:00 PM
4

Discuss whether you want me to vote for or against deletion.
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 09:59 PM
10

I didn't nominate it for deletion, by the way; I don't know who did. I am not interested in having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW just for the sake of having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW. If the page does not correctly explain MGTOW, detail the various gradations within MGTOW, and contrast it with unrelated men's groups, its equivalence with the herbivore men, and its equivalence with the marriage strike/boycott, then I don't even see the point in having an article. Do you guys want me to vo…
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 09:54 PM
2

To reiterate: I expect MGTOW to become a media buzzword in 2016 (or perhaps 2017), so it is inevitable that someone else will create the Wikipedia page again. Also, Wikipedia pages don't have "owners", so I can't just decide to delete the page myself. If you want you can nominate it for deletion.
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 01:14 PM
4

From 2008 to 2009, “herbivore men (sôshoku danshi or sôshoku-kei danshi in Japanese)” became a trendy, widely used term in Japanese. It flourished in all sorts of media, including TV, the Internet, newspapers and magazines, and could even occasionally be heard in everyday conversation. As it became more popular its original meaning was diversified, and people began to use it with a variety of different nuances. In December of 2009 it made the top ten list of nominees for the “Buzzword of the Yea…
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 10:47 AM
8

Looking at how fast it's disappearing, I predict it will be deleted. With the current state of the article, I can't say I care anymore. I submitted the article primarily for the lulz. In 2016, MGTOW is going to become so huge and in the news, that someone else will create a Wikipedia article again anyway. It's simply unavoidable.
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 01:38 AM
4

Looking at how fast it's disappearing, I also predict it will be deleted. With the current state of the article, I can't say I care anymore. In 2016, MGTOW is going to become so huge and in the news, that someone else will create a Wikipedia article again anyway. It's simply unavoidable.
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 01:22 AM
1

Look up "Aaron Sleazy".
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 07:59 PM
1

"someone who picks up women" ≠ "pick-up artist" Picking up women is as old as time. By PUAs I was referring to a specific phenomenon in the late 20th/early 21st century of a clique of internet marketeers (and to its associated community) who charge men thousands of dollars on pseudoscientific books and courses which claim that one can become much more attractive to women based on words and body language. Look up "Aaron Sleazy".
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 07:59 PM
1

Wikipedia admins practice civility, assume good faith, and do not use usernames to mislead people. I also suspect they can spell properly. You are not an admin on Wikipedia.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 09:30 AM
1

I'm not defensive (emotion), I'm simply defending my position. I also did not say that it was my plan to include the word "mangina"; you did. I only pointed out how in what way it could be included, if I wanted to include it. I'm not planning on including it any time soon.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 09:27 AM
1

The most important work this article needs is ADDING CITATIONS TO EXISTING CONTENT. Otherwise, other people will keep butchering the present contents. Please see other people's complaints on the Talk page, and help out by adding citations.
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 04:35 PM
6

ADDENDUM: The article was already nominated for deletion: It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: This recently created article synthesizes a lot of fluff media into an article that reads more like an essay. Excessive citations raise more questions about notability than they answer. If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the…
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 01:08 AM
29

"I like to travel" is just a code word women use to mean "I like someone who will spend money on me and my travels."
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 10:31 AM
1

I suspect the mod is biased, because, judging from his(?) talk page, s/he is close friends with an outspoken feminist editor (Tokyogirl). I am not interested in having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW just for the sake of having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW. If the page does not correctly explain MGTOW, detail the various gradations within MGTOW, and contrast it with unrelated men's groups, (what you call "unneccessary drivel") then I don't even see the point in having an article. The vocabula…
/r/MGTOW26/12/15 08:41 AM
1

No serious dictionary article has such a section. Wikipedia IS NOT a dictionary. I could easily find more counterexamples using the google search ["what * is not" site:en.wikipedia.org], such as: "Comparison with related genres: When attempting to define what something is, it is often helpful to define what something is not. " "What false imprisonment is not" (Note that I have never edited these pages.) A google search for ["comparison with related" site:en.wikipedia.org] and ["comparison with o…
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:34 PM
1

What do you mean by "edit comments"? Do you mean the "talk page"? Wikipedia even allows Tweets as a reference (under certain circumstances).
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:26 PM
2

The original page was deleted again and again because of an insufficient number of references. This was just supposed to be a preliminary paragraph that simply listed the references, to be elaborated and expanded by others, after which the paragraph can be deleted.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 10:10 AM
1

Wikipedia already has articles about "herbivore men" (essentially the same thing as MGTOW), "freeters", "NEETs", and "hikikomori". The current article on "herbivore men" is a relatively good and unbiased description.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:37 AM
1

The present draft lists plenty of sources, many of which do not identitify individual MGTOW by their legal name. Helen Smith's book "Men On Strike" for example, is based on anonymous interviews.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:24 AM
1

But in previous times they were "justified" in doing so according on their own policies. Today, there are sufficient "reliable sources" to justify an article (according on their own policies).
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:18 AM
1

Delete the definition of concepts section, delete the What MGTOW are not section, delete the History of MGTOW section, delete/shorten the Reasons why men go their own way section... LOL, you're basically suggesting I delete the entire article, and replace the article with a long Criticism of MGTOW article. Deleting is easier than adding.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 09:15 AM
4

Tits or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 08:56 AM
2

We won't reduce the bias if we don't participate as editors.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 08:26 AM
1

I don't see how it leads to doxxing. You can edit Wikipedia anonymously, and you won't keep MGTOW a secret just by keeping it off of Wikipedia.
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 08:00 AM
3

Please read my post again. Blogs are (generally) not reliable sources, and Villar does not even mention the subject of MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW24/12/15 08:41 PM
11

Moses' original stone tablets of MGTOW: (1) Avoidance of legal entanglements with women. This includes: marriage, common law marriage, cohabitation, procreation, registered partnerships, joint bank accounts, co-signed loans, etc. (2) Rejection of gynocentrism. A refusal of unreciprocated self-sacrifice (protecting, providing for, and helping women). (Gynocentrism refers to a biological instinct to protect and provide for women and prioritize their well-being, and to a societal/cultural system th…
/r/MGTOW24/12/15 10:23 AM
1

How they made the most famous exploding head in internet's history
/r/MGTOW23/12/15 12:29 PM
6

Not a real victory, because he was only exonerated because they found a transcript which proves he is a self-hating mangina: It’s strange that such a chauvinist monster like me has been asked to speak to women scientists. It would be a true victory for free speech if someone was reinstated in spite of expressing views that are critical of women.
/r/MGTOW23/12/15 09:33 AM
3

destructive repetitive behavior NOT having a girlfriend is "destructive repetitive behavior"? Hahaha!
/r/MGTOW23/12/15 07:23 AM
17

This movement gives him an excuse for why he can't get a girlfriend. It's like a drug addict being surrounded by drug users. They're never going to improve because someone is always there feeding the need. Amazing: They compare NOT having a girlfriend to a drug addiction... never mind that sex stimulates the brain in the exact same way as hard drugs do.
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 07:13 PM
1

Getting married for sex is like buying a 747 for the free peanuts. -- Jeff Foxworthy(?)
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 07:03 PM
3

You can use np.reddit.com links ("No Participation") instead of reddit.com links. In links that start with "np." voting and commenting are disabled.
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 06:31 PM
1

Bitcoin and silver and nothing else.
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 12:37 PM
2

The Chapwood Index measures actual price inflation without fudge factors. Passive stock investing was a good strategy between 1980 and 2000, but not anymore, in an age of zero percent interest rates and quantitative easing.
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 03:29 PM
1

More like the last 4 years. (The Dow-to-gold ratio bottomed in 2011-Q3, and is about to top.)
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 03:28 PM
2

Agreed! The Red Pill is a metaphor for TRUTH, just like Plato's Allegory of the Cave. I really dislike how a single subreddit of PUAssybeggars has hijacked what is an excellent metaphor for seeing beyond delusion.
/r/MGTOW18/12/15 09:47 PM
3

Milo is just cruising MGTOW to see if he can find guys who are confused about their sexual orientation. (I kid, Milo, I kid! (Kinda.))
/r/MGTOW18/12/15 09:28 PM
1

Google Trends shows that Google searches for "MGTOW" have skyrocketed in Britain (in comparison to other countries) after the show aired.
/r/MGTOW18/12/15 10:28 AM
10

No such thing as bad publicity Streisand Effect
/r/MGTOW17/12/15 05:01 PM
2

My suggestion is to use a 1-column layout instead of a 2-column layout.
/r/MGTOW17/12/15 10:07 AM
1

To reiterate, "mainstream" does not refer to "popularity" (of MGTOW), but refers to a type of media, as opposed to "alternative media". If you are so intent on nitpicking my choice of words, a more correct title would have been "MGTOW in the meanstream ..." instead of "MGTOW goes mainstream...". I am compiling mainstream mentions of MGTOW: Wikipedia (typically) does not consider self-published sources such as Sandspam™ (who in my view is just a spammer making money off of MGTOW) as a reliable so…
/r/MGTOW17/12/15 07:43 AM
1

So you're just criticizing the title of my post. I did not claim that "MGTOW has become mainstream because it has received media attention". The word "mainstream" in the title refers to "mainstream media" (the BBC) not "mainstream MGTOW".
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 09:20 PM
1

The video is to my knowledge the first time that the term "MGTOW" has appeared on national television, a landmark event which is completely relevant to submit to this subreddit. I completely agree that it's a biased video, but what the fuck does that have to do with me? I didn't create the video, I just linked to it. Direct your hostility at Reggie Yates, not at me.
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 08:41 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_the_messenger
/r/MGTOW16/12/15 06:28 AM
1

What do you think about this video by Soluchi? He states the exact opposite opinion: that a MGHOW should never approach until a woman shows interest first.
/r/MGTOW15/12/15 03:59 PM
1

Addendum: You can use the WayBackMachine to view old sites. Every 'history nerd' interested in the early history of MGTOW should check out the archives of MenForJustice.net and MGTOW.com for some early MGTOW contents. Unfortunately, the contents of mgtowhistory.com has been removed from these archives due to domain squatters. The Nice Guy Forums and Antimisandry.com also have some very early MGTOW contents. There were multiple versions of the MGTOW manifesto floating around, including a "MGTOW m…
/r/MGTOW15/12/15 11:00 AM
1

Some additional comments: You can use the WayBackMachine to view old sites. Every 'history nerd' interested in the early history of MGTOW should check out the archives of MenForJustice.net and MGTOW.com for some early MGTOW contents. Unfortunately, the contents of mgtowhistory.com has been removed from these archives due to domain squatters. The Nice Guy Forums and Antimisandry.com also have some very early MGTOW contents. There were multiple versions of the MGTOW manifesto floating around, incl…
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 10:12 PM
2

By the way, you can use the WayBackMachine to view old sites. That reminds me, every 'history nerd' interested in the early history of MGTOW should check out the archives of MenForJustice.net and MGTOW.com for some early MGTOW contents. Unfortunately, the contents of mgtowhistory.com has been removed from these archives due to domain squatters. The Nice Guy Forums and Antimisandry.com also have some very early MGTOW contents. There were multiple versions of the MGTOW manifesto floating around, i…
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 10:10 PM
3

It's still available from my location. Maybe you're behind a firewall?
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 09:59 PM
3

What women really think about fathers. Highly misleading description. More like: what antinatalists really think about breeders. Nina Paley is an adherent of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, and has done multiple cartoons on this topic.
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 05:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter