TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThePlayfulDom Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by ThePlayfulDom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Well I don't know about other downvotes, but mine were not a result of the idea itself, but rather his very poor attempts to explain why it may be true, or at least why he would believe it. Everyone seemed open-minded and polite in trying to understand why someone would believe that, and the answers he provided were extremely unconvincing. If it is really true then he should have been able to give us at least one or two good reasons for it, or some supporting evidence, something. Instead we just…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 01:40 AM
1

They are, in what they espouse publicly anyway. Which is why their alliance with Islam make no sense on its face. Once you accept that the left doesn't actually believe any of the nonsense they tell their followers though, and is only interested in power and controlling language, it makes perfect sense. Though I usually try to avoid politics here as we're a diverse bunch, and I don't really begrudge anyone their opinions, even if I think those opinions are batshit crazy. Hell, I doubt there's a …
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 01:30 AM
1

He said the writers understood it. They would essentially have to have understood it to a large degree in order to come up with the rules. They weren't just lucky guesses. They didn't write down the detailed explanations in the bible though, because that's not what the bible is about, and because it was all fairly well known stuff back then. We ALL understand male/female dynamics on an instinctual level, which is why it takes endless propaganda to even partially confuse us. When it comes to man …
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 01:10 AM
1

Agree...to a point. I think it's hard to ignore the fact that "the man behind the curtains" is currently driving the Democratic party pretty much in full. We're all in this together, but I can no longer delude myself into equating left and right. Both are flawed, both concentrate far too much on petty partisan crap and not enough on real issues, and both are infected by globalists to some degree. But only one of them wants to censor speech and destroy the 2nd (so that they can then merrily destr…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 01:17 AM
3

Not much of a conspiracy guy but I feel a need to point out here that they did manage to keep the NSA secret for decades despite employing tens of thousands of people. Saying no conspiracy involving x+ number of people could work just flat out is misguided. When large amounts of power and money are involved, much becomes possible. Cheers!
/r/TheRedPill04/03/18 03:20 AM
2

This. Enforced monogamy and the nuclear family has built civilization, and it's abandonment will destroy it. Our western version at least.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/18 02:59 AM
3

If you think this is what liberalism is all about I've got an awesome investment opportunity for you for the low low starting contribution of just $99,999! Hurry while supplies last!
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 09:46 PM
5

It's not cheating if you're honest and upfront from the get go, which is what this is talking about. There is nothing wrong with "ethical non-monogamy." You're talking about an LTR (not an mLTR) with side girls you don't tell your LTR about. That, of course, is cheating and morally questionable. What is described here is not.
/r/seduction25/02/18 09:53 PM
1

That seems easy, just heavily discount looks. I suppose body type would still be a factor. I would think that both male and female smv are going to be mostly decided by the non-looks factors. Other than that, women are women and men are men, meant to go together, blind or not. I would imagine a blind person pursuing a sighted person would pose more difficulties than otherwise, but if they had a strong enough and long-lasting enough connection, it's certainly been known to happen. I wouldn't swea…
/r/seduction25/02/18 07:01 AM
0

Poor people breed like rabbits bro. Hell, when you don't have money to do anything, ever, what do you think they do for free fun? Sex. Or is that not what you mean by "disadvantaged?" If that's the case though then your target audience will be other poor girls. Women generally date sideways or up status wise. Unless you're living in a cardboard box or something it's very doable though. Go to some dive bars and shoot some pool, be social, and try to have fun and just make some friends. You can ma…
/r/seduction25/02/18 06:30 AM
14

Indifference + escalation. You still have to be the man. I think that's where you two are not meeting.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/18 01:57 AM
3

In other words you only posted this hoping at least one person would tell you what you already wanted to hear. You had zero interest in actually soliciting any advice. You've been given lots of good advice here, but you're going to ignore it and just do what you already intended to do. Oh well, people need to learn the hard way anyway.
/r/seduction18/02/18 10:54 PM
3

Stabbed okay?
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 09:54 PM
8

He'll no. There is in fact a very good chance she will "come around" again. Come around to start using you again, that is. You will NEVER get what you want from this girl. Do not let yourself be used anymore.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/18 11:29 PM
3

TH and social media are both heavily geared towards women. Men love excitement. Extreme sports, action movies, etc. Women love drama, aka the emotional rollercoaster. Yes, there are effeminate men who live drama and other feminine traits, but they are still a minority even among "normies."
/r/TheRedPill15/02/18 11:16 PM
6

You got friendzoned for acting like a girl combined with no physical escalation. No masculine/feminine polarity, no attempts at physicality...that's almost always going to land you in the friendzone. Another commenter mentioned possibility of another man, and that is possible. She may have found someone she was more attracted to. But even if so I would say that still comes back to my other points. Your actions all acted to lower whatever attraction she had started out with instead of raising it.…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/18 10:55 PM
9

If being approached by a 3 gets you giddy enough to brag about it then you've never had a 7+, much less a 9. Come on man.
/r/seduction10/02/18 11:53 PM
6

You should have refused the movie date and suggested alternatives. If she "didn't feel up for anything" then you should just delay the date until she is up for something rather than do the movie. You submitted to her frame, and have taken the submissive position, which is her role. Too late now, I know but something to keep in mind for next time. Don't follow, lead. Do the best you can in movie i guess, but I would try to lead the date so where else after the movie. Your place, drinks, anything …
/r/seduction10/02/18 11:05 PM
1

In that case I would probably argue that you don't really u understand what modern liberalism is about, because it isn't that. But anyway the "living wage" thing is a joke. I live in Seattle and the "fight for $15" here is destroying lower class workers and many small businesses as well. It has ended up hurting far more poor people than it helped. Which is perfectly predictable from an economics standpoint. Literally any but the most ideologically biased economists could (and did) predict the ou…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 12:59 AM
3

Curious here. Even after some googling as far as I can tell it is literally impossible not to lose weight if calories in < calories out. I see no way that can't be correct but if I'm mistaken I'm all ears.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/18 06:39 AM
2

Yes bro. You already know what you did wrong. Continuing the convo would have been the natural thing to do at that point, between any two people. Instead you made it awkward, and there was no recovering from there. Maybe try having random convos with people you're not trying to pick up so that when you are it's more natural. There was no reason not to continue talking to her, but you know that. Less outcome dependence, you're just trying to have a convo not get in her pants right there. Step at …
/r/seduction06/02/18 01:31 AM
1

Can't believe some idiots down voted you lol. YES, as I wrote in my reply below OP's problem is he is not masculine! He is not creating any masculine/feminine polarity. No polarity, no gina tingles. Basic stuff. People and girls already like you from the sound of it, so if you can fix this issue you'll be golden.
/r/seduction04/02/18 02:51 AM
1

I suspect a lack of masculine/feminine polarity is at least partly at work here. This post describes you displaying a lot of feminine traits. Your mirroring, your over friendliness and lack of polarizing sexuality, your empathetic nature, etc. You're creating bff's vibe not a let's fuck vibe. In short, you're not being masculine, you're coming off as androgynous (or possibly even effeminate, but probably not that bad), and the feminine is attracted to the masculine. I really strong suspect that …
/r/seduction04/02/18 02:45 AM
1

You screwed up a bit. You just met this girl, haven't even had sex yet, and you're thinking in terms of a relationship all ready! She isn't worried about you "breaking up with her" in this imaginary relationship you've created in your head. Combined with the texting, you're coming off needy and she's probably having second thoughts. If it's not already too late you need to chill on that stuff now. Just relax and have fun and quit thinking about a relationship already. You will scare her off for …
/r/seduction04/02/18 02:30 AM
3

I approached a hijab wearing girl once in college...And she promptly jumped about a foot off the ground, looked like she thought she was about to be raped, and then scurried off in fright. In 8 years of approaching I've never had a reaction like that before or since. So yeah, won't ever approach one again, and couldn't recommend other guys do so either. Take it off when you're going to be in places you might want to meet guys. Other than doing the approaching yourself that's really your only opt…
/r/seduction01/02/18 09:30 PM
2

He's a wimp (non-derogatory) and is scared of rejection by making a move. Which isn't cool of him because women are even more fearful of rejection due to being the "choosers" in nature. He should man up and make the move, but I sympathize since I was once just as bad. Maybe try grabbing his hand to start? I mean, I can pretty much promise he won't reject you even if you make a stronger move, but if you're worried then the hand hold would give you some "plausible deniability". Have you tried givi…
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:37 AM
0

This is wrong. Very wrong. And I know this not just from the academic literature (of which there is plenty) but also from personal experience. You absolutely can control your state and frame. Not ALL the time, of course, but enough of it. Do some research on state control, mindset and no mindfulness.
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:05 AM
5

It's a decent program. Max is my favorite of the rsd guys. I downloaded mine free off a torrent though cuz I'm a stingy bastard. But if you have it then yeah, use that shit. Unless you're pretty advanced I promise you'll get some value out of it. Maybe not $300 in value, but some and you already spent the money. He is pretty funny too I got some lolz out of it as well.
/r/seduction01/02/18 03:23 AM
2

I like RSDmax and learned some good stuff from his "the natural" program but if you've already gotten your inner game handled (or at least understand what you need to do to get it handled) then there are better companies out there for game. Todd Valentine is big right now but I'm not the biggest fan. Sounds to me though as if you've gotten all you can from RSD. Move on.
/r/seduction01/02/18 03:17 AM
1

The right move is exactly that, but while not letting yourself get so attached, invested and needy! If you've got the skills (probably not but I dunno) then dating multiple women at once would probably help you get over this problem of over attachment and investment fast.
/r/seduction01/02/18 02:03 AM
3

Girls love to stalk social media profiles. And in my experience they only do so if they have at least SOME level of interest in you. And either way, you have absolutely nothing to lose by assuming that she is interested. In fact, that's just a generally great frame to have. Instead of looking for all these signs a woman is interested, just assume she is and instead keep an eye out for signs that she is actively disinterested. This girl almost certainly likes you to some degree though. Now all yo…
/r/seduction01/02/18 01:49 AM
1

Women find intelligent men sexy. IF that intelligence comes in a fun, playful, overall attractive package. In other words, all other things being equal, intelligence is a plus. However, smart guys have a tendency to over think things when it comes to women, and can also often be a bit uptight, judgemental of less intelligent or more "fun" people, and can be too logical and serious in their conversations, especially with women. So that means that all other things are often NOT equal. My intellige…
/r/seduction27/01/18 12:21 AM
6

Very true, but you're applying it wrong here. You really need to grow up and quit listening to mommy bro. Man up and think for yourself and be sure in your boundaries. You were doing fine till mom got involved, and then you made it worse by taking it to your gf. Just start doing what YOU already know YOU need to do and all will be well in the long-run.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 03:11 AM
5

Well, tbh it doesn't work quite that well for women as men in this regard. Fair or not, most of your value in the sexual marketplace as a woman is going to come from your looks. A pleasant, social demeanor helps, of course, but it starts with physical attractiveness. You're not going to be able to use "game" techniques or other value improvement strategies (like being socially dominant/a leader, confident, etc.) In the same way a man can. In most cases he'll either be attracted to you or not, an…
/r/seduction18/01/18 10:15 PM
3

For the attention/validation.
/r/seduction11/01/18 08:35 PM
4

Do you do any dominance stuff? Not ALL girls like it, but probably around 80%+ do to at least SOME degree in my 39 years experience (22 of actual sexual experience). It can definitely spice things up. Dirty talk is great too, and almost all women can enjoy that to at least SOME degree. The key for both of these, when with a new partner, is to start mild and see how she reacts, calibrate, and then work your way up from there. Also, don't be afraid to ask about things she might be curious about, f…
/r/seduction11/01/18 08:22 PM
1

She was doing everything but straight up telling you to fuck her. Everything. From the high comment (gives her the excuse to be a slut, which is what she wanted) to the relationship stuff, to the ducking everything. Don't worry, I was once as clueless as you (and believe me, you are clearly completely clueless). Sou d's like you should learn a bit about showgirl work before your next missed opportunity. Girls are not like us bro, they are subtle, and you must ALWAYS lead the interaction. There's…
/r/seduction11/01/18 02:59 PM
2

It's easy and I do it all the time. The key is be social WITH EVERYBODY. And start doing so from the minute you walk in, before even getting a drink. Guys, ugly girls, bartender, anyone and everyone. Make new "friends" every time. Have fun and self amuse. Do this and you will have a lot of social proof and massive passive attraction. Works ducking wonders if you have the personality to pull it off. And if you don't, well, you probably won't have much success no matter what you do. Cheers!
/r/seduction11/01/18 02:50 PM
16

You went full beta "nice guy" on her, and her attraction to you tanked. This is almost impossible to recover from and the effort almost certainly isn't worth it for the low odds. There is some good advice out there though if you're stuck on her. But if you're that stuck, she'll feel it and will be disgusted by it, which is what happened in the first place. Work on yourself, see other girls, post pics on social media of the cool stuff you're doing, the fun you're having WITHOUT her, and of you wi…
/r/seduction11/01/18 02:43 PM
4

You should have a pleasant demeanor anyway, at which point a small, seductive grin is easy and natural. Going from grump face to goofy smile is awkward/creepy. Make it a natural habit and it becomes nothing.
/r/seduction11/01/18 02:32 PM
2

Imply you already have the hotel. Or that it's already paid for. Talking about getting the hotel FOR HER is generally not a good idea, no matter how you word it. That puts a lot of pressure on her regarding your expectations. If she knows you're spending $100 or whatever on a hotel to be with her, she is going to feel pressured that you expect her to put out, which is never good for arousal.
/r/seduction10/01/18 01:44 AM
1

Yep. I'm a bit infatuated with a girl right now in large part because she has some of the most amazing, expressive eyes I've ever seen (she's also hot, very feminine and my type but the eyes are truly what get me). It's like i can practically read her mind when we're having strong eye contact. Intoxicating tbh. Too bad she has a bf cuz there is zero doubt that there is mutual attraction there. Oh well, they're just eyes after all lol.
/r/seduction10/01/18 01:22 AM
3

Yeah you got butthurt about it so most likely even if you did still have a chance, you destroyed it at that point. And you actually went through with deleting, so move on, hard as that may be to hear.
/r/seduction10/01/18 12:58 AM
5

Actually, making eyes and then NOT doing anything about it is creepy. Approaching her would not even remotely be creepy unless you did it in a creepy, insecure way. Man up. When you want something, go for it. That's what a confident man does. The creepy guy stares while being too insecure to do anything about it and act on his desires. Good luck bro.
/r/seduction10/01/18 12:47 AM
3

No. You must set boundaries and since you obviously don't want him to come you should say so. Doing this is a no lose situation. If she refuses then next, she wasn't into you anyway. And if she is into you, even a little, then she will respect you for putting your foot down (politely and respectfully) and her attraction will increase.
/r/seduction10/01/18 12:37 AM
4

As a general guideline this is true. Game is not about absolutes though, and I have found talking about each others passions to be very good for comfort/rapport. Asking about something they've always wanted to try but haven't been able to, or have been to chicken to try is good also. Number 4 seems solid as well but can't claim I've field tested that one. Don't get too caught up in "rules" like "never ask questions". Just avoid the "interview" feeling which you mention. Don't be the weird pua gu…
/r/seduction10/01/18 12:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter