TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThePrinceJays Archive

View 0 posts and 338 comments by ThePrinceJays on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They straight up lack empathy. Im ngl to you. People that lack empathy straight up do not deserve to speak on social issues. They have the same level of lack of empathy the far right has when it comes to talking about issues like systemic racism. Zero empathy for men’d issues whatsoever. This whole internet is just a wild circus where everyone fights against each other and talks past each other. I have to detatch sometimes. The negativity, conflict, and pointlessness of it all can be incredibly …
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/26 11:46 PM
-14

Weak ass celebration
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 11:13 AM
10

I dont do no weak ass celebration like that when my team scores tf 🤣🤣✌️this is hella inaccurate. Maybe thats how SHE celebrates
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 11:13 AM
2

I’m ngl I was hanging out with a girl and this was her entire feed, yet she was totally cool with me. I think women do this thing where pretty much every guy they are cool with in real life is the exception. Which then makes them not the exception. Which means they only think they view this way because it’s what the media tells them. Also women on social mecia sensationalize to an astronomically ridiculous degree and many times they don’t mean or follow 95% of the stuff they are saying. Stuff li…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/26 07:58 PM
5

Imo it’s ok to be introspective about social issues and complexities. But it gets to a point where some people are so cripplingly obsessed, that it looks like a full blown mental illness. Just go out, interact with people, and live your life. If that’s not working, find and make better life plans, and try again. But this type of mindset just holds you back
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/26 07:58 AM
2

In a lot of places, especially where I live in the Caribbean, gay men may not have their sexuality or LGBTQ specific struggles openly discussed in public mental health campaigns because of cultural stigma, censorship, or political restrictions. So their experiences might be ignored or underrepresented during these campaigns. But yeah I agree with the fact men’s mental health month doesn’t take away from pride month. You have your mental health awareness programs and you have your pride parades. …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/26 01:18 PM
3

This is cryptic
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 12:02 AM
5

If you’re a dude you should never hit a woman. But that’s not for her sake that’s to protect yourself because the inside of the court and outside of the court they will genuinely take her side over yours. God forbid you go too far and cause her serious injury. You’re life is over. However, her takes like “you can beat a man but never beat a woman because we all deserve respect”? Wtf? So all men don’t deserve respect? Also if a guy fights you, just go straight into throwing hands? How about deesc…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/26 05:57 PM
8

Aren’t women like her the ones who say women are far better at handling loneliness than men to begin with? And men are far worse at handling it? When men say “We don’t receive enough support for our mental health issues like women are receiving,” Aren’t women like her the first ones to say “That’s because you’re not as vocal about it as we are.” If she feels women need more support for loneliness, she should put that energy into actually vocalizing support for those women instead of attacking ot…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/26 08:50 AM
2

Same as the whole body count thing. Some women say that body count doesn’t matter and that you shouldn’t shame a woman for her body count but will happily call the next woman she does not like a slut or hoe as an insult. If body count doesn’t matter then why is that the first insult you go to. Definitely not only a woman specific thing. I’ve seen both genders do it consistently
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 07:19 PM
3

“Men so obsessed with announcing they don’t like Taylor Swift” The funny thing is that he isn’t throwing shade at Taylor Swift or even saying he doesn’t like her music, he’s throwing shade at “swifties”. And obviously they took that as a personal attack. I doubt this comment would even personal affect Taylor Swift herself that much. She probably knows how ridiculous and embarrasing her core fanbase can get.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 07:09 PM
3

Can you say without a shadow of a doubt, the man here felt sexually abused here? If not then I wouldn’t skip to making such egregious assumptions when this could be normal for their family/culture. Like I alluded to before, in some families or countries, kisses on the lips between relatives are normalized. In others, it’s seen as flat out inappropriate. That doesn’t mean every instance is abusive. This could be a norm for them. Innapropriately timed, obviously, but could/could not have been sexu…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 02:03 AM
8

By the look of the houses I don’t even think this is in America. Looks like some European country. Foreign cultures see families kiss on the cheek and/or lips. Where I come from it was not uncommon to kiss family on the lips 20 years ago, but some places change, others don’t. It looks like the people in OP’s pictures purposefully took it out of context to try and shame the dude. Tbh it’s weird. Just leave folks alone. And why even post this for the internet to see, likely against his consent? Pe…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 11:15 AM
7

This is so confusing
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/26 02:15 PM
3

Most normal people don’t have any of the stuff she’s asking for, but she probably does lmfao
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/26 11:40 PM
8

She would pick the bear
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/26 06:36 PM
4

Only a woman with her type of disposition is getting unalived by her son, not even trying to be rude she’s just being hateful and it’s going to project to her kids, so she really doesn’t need to be havinng children at all. It’s like a racist mother not wanting to raise a racist son, but is actively raising a son that is of the race that she has no problem being racist towards. Zero sense
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 07:52 PM
7

> why do they even bother having a male partner if they hate men to the point they need to censor the word men? Literally makes no sense They think their man is an exception. In their heads since they know him enough to know he's not like the men that are always asserting their dominance or patriarchical values on them. He's most likely a soft dude who lets her do what she wants. And women still want the love and affection even if they don't like men. Lots of these raging feminists and misandris…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 10:45 PM
1

This is why people need to stay off social media and take a long break from their phones. Social media overuse is poisoning everybody
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 05:48 PM
–

Denying what reality is/what they think reality is* I’m a believer in the gender wage gap but there are so many people out there who are not going to see eye to eye with you in general on dozens of points so I agree. People who want to debate me on crap I don’t want to debate are incredibly exhausting and no one else likes them either if they don’t have any other redeeming qualities
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:56 PM
–

Idk man my ex told me if she was in my body she was confident she could have sex with any girl she wants. I can see older women knowing how hard dating is for men but most young women don’t have a clue ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:47 PM
1

Yeah pretty much. Most people have great respect for feminists that can articulate themselves well, debate with maturity, and have a grounded ideology, but extremists just ruin it for feminism. Ofc that goes for any movement though.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/25 01:02 AM
0

You’re expecting the most careless and impulsive of us, no offense to them, male and/or female, to not be careless and impulsive. Lmao that’s gonna go down real well, lol. Not really that wise expecting the same people who can’t remember to pull out, use protection, or think past next weekend to suddenly start making rational, long-term socioeconomic calculations. That’s just not how this works lol. I’m for opting out of child support but it should be executed in a way that won’t put the burden …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 05:23 AM
4

I think women have to work even harder than men to have a career and have to sacrifice more. Most households are run by women cooking, cleaning, raising kids all by themselves. They have no personal time, and trained young age to take care of others and be subsurvient to men. Men literally get a free pass for everything. They can date and fuck around without consequence, they don’t have to do any house chores or serve their parents in any way, they don’t have to cook or clean or raise the kids, …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 05:06 AM
3

Yeah you’re right and many black women have called them out on their bs over the years. Feminists only ever side with minorities because it puts them at a advantage, once their usefulness has run out or they aren’t needed anymore or they feel like their problems have nothing to do with them, they’re quick to cast them out. They don’t actually care about minorities. You only ever see a very, very small amount of them in struggling black/minority communities.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/25 09:21 PM
3

Lol no, when they say they hate men they mean they hate whatever men is most represented in their life. If they’re white, they mostly mean white men, if they’re asian, they mostly mean asian men, if they’re black, they mostly mean black men.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/25 06:14 PM
15

A lot of women with this mindset are utterly losing in life. Upvotes are the only thing they can look forward to getting whilst the more sensible women are running laps around these. It’s a self fulfilling prophecy for them. More upvotes and validation for poor mindsets and bad life decisions bring outcomes that progessively become worse and worse. While upvotes may look like a blessing to you it’s a curse to them. And the worst part is that they’ll never recognize it until it’s too late. Same g…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 06:10 AM
1

How do you realistically get anyone to "desire" you if they already don't? My last reply was supposed to answer this question, self improvement, sorry if I did not make this clear. The common misconception about self improvement is that it is not really about making everybody like you, it’s about making more people like you. And someone can still do all of this and not find someone who is genuinely attracted to them. The majority of men are not so ugly that if they took self improvement seriousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:48 AM
1

Gross behavior man
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:45 PM
0

It is hard but a house isn’t gonna make her like you, it’s gonna make her like your money. She’ll kiss you then go bang the dude she actually wants to be with. To be attractive to a woman if you’re 5’5 and ugly you have to have to get fit, get a stable income, dress well, have a good social life, and go for the ugly women in or under your league. I know I am somewhat attractive and tall but I’m a good two or three leagues under a prime Jessica Alba, Angelina Jolie, or Adriana Lima so there’s no …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:33 PM
-1

Regardless of how you feel about past societies they still did a lot of stuff right to be able to get us where we are today. To totally dismiss them would be ignorant. To progress moving forward we have to learn from what they did well and avoid where they messed up. Arranged marriage probably isn’t the way to go but listening to family when they tell us not to date the drug dealer or the woman who smashed all of your friends is probably for the best, lol. We gotta learn how to respect authority…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:19 PM
1

Start working out, dressing better, talking better, hygiene, get a degree, better social life, do not have unrealistic standards. Everybody has potential it’s just that not a lot of people are reaching it. People wouldn’t have issues dating if they put in the work to overcome them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:08 PM
6

Why do you have “purple pilled woman” under your name if you don’t believe in red or blue pill stuff? I thought purple pilled was supposed to be some kind of balance between the two pills
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:54 PM
4

I’m saying lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:38 PM
1

😭😭😭😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:36 PM
1

Depends on how you define a friend. One person may view anyone they hang out with and share good vibes with as a friend, other people only see people they’ve spent years with as friends, and the rest as acquaintances. A lot of guys who say this, assuming they’re not just sexist, probably 1. Only share the second definition as friends and 2. Only vibe on a deeper level with men. So it makes sense why they don’t see the point in having female friends. The men who are just sexist don’t despise dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:57 PM
2

She says “Women don’t need any of this modern stuff to survive.” And gets 6 upvotes. A lot of people sub are complete idiots who’ve never gone a day without warm water and a roof over their head.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:45 PM
0

I’m sure it had NOTHING to do with men forcing women out of computing. I took CS as my undergrad in college. We had 1-3 women in my CS core classes most of the 4 years. 1-3 women for my advanced math classes. My CS degree classes were dominated by men. As are everyone else’s CS class. Nobody is forcing women out of programming, they’re just not interested in it. They’d rather do communication, BA, finance, social sciences, or medical sciences degrees. In my freshman C++ elective class, half the …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:30 AM
0

I think both men and women tend to downplay the contributions either side has to the other. The OP I originally replied to triggered me. I had to calm down and edit my original comment 5 times because I was being way too extreme. Not sure how people think it’s okay to start problems like this. I would’ve never been in these comments if not for bait like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 08:45 PM
1

According to recently released data from the U.S. Census Bureau, only 11.5% of payroll employees in the construction industry are women. In the article you sent, it confirmed most women in the construction industry aren’t actually constructing anything. Office & Admin jobs are mostly basic paperwork and HR jobs. Again, my point is not that women do not contribute anything or contribute significantly less than men do, it is that they contribute in different ways. Most women are just not cut out f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 08:31 PM
0

I mean you’re talking about city boys that don’t want to do the boy scout stuff versus the girls that actually want to do that stuff. And those type of boys are a small percentage of the overall male population. If we we’re talking about the city girl archetype they aren’t even touching a tent much less doing girl scouts unless they’re being forced to. But I do see where you’re coming from to some extent. And I agree modern life does not prepare people for survival conditions. It’s just that a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 08:09 PM
1

Infrastructure is pretty important I’d think, lmfao. Women still contribute immensely in their own way though. We wouldn’t be anywhere near where we are today without women even if men didn’t need women to reproduce. Both genders are extremely important in every species.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:46 PM
2

Plenty of male fathers have raised their children on their own fine without mothers for millenia. Plenty of these kids are high iq. And many women have contributed in building houses, buildings, towns and cities. But obviously men are better at what they do and women are better at what they do. I’ve already acknowledged we would be nowhere near as advanced as we are today without women in my previous comment. I agree with most of what you’re saying in your comment. That doesn’t change the fact t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:43 PM
1

Fair point. You’re right here. Probably my personal experience since I was in the military for a bit but I’d wager there are many more men that know how to do such things than women given the places you learn such things are predominantly filled with men. And if they don’t they’d be far more enthusiastic and capable to figure it out. Given time and preparation I don’t think neither gender would have an abysmal time trying to survive without the other gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:19 PM
0

If you watched the island by Bear Grills, most of the men were fine, the women were hopeless. You have prep time in that situation for sure, but most men I know know how to start a fire, most women I know would sit there trying to rub sticks together for a few hours then give up and start crying.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:58 PM
1

“Men better off without women” implies they’d be better without women then they are with women. “Men better off than women without the opposite gender” implies they’d be better without the opposite gender than women would be. I already explained why they’d be better off than women in another comment but men are stronger, faster, more durable, better with hand eye coordination, more knowledgeable in regards to survival among many other things. Women can survive just fine, especially given they ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:49 PM
1

Men are better off than women without the opposite gender is not the same as men are better off without women. But if you think it’s the same, more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:41 PM
2

I never said that. I said men would be better off than women without the opposite gender. That’s what I meant when I said “Men would be a lot better off than women without women.” But I’ll change it since it was worded awkwardly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:31 PM
2

Even in 2025 where women have all the opportunities to build towns, cities and infrastructure, they very, very rarely ever do. And if they do they’re far more likely to get seriously injured. Women developed many notable things, without women we would be nowhere near where we are at today, even if men did the exact same things. But compared to men women didn’t and still do not do as much as men do in regards to infrastructure for society. Which is why I thought I made it clear men should be grat…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:18 PM
-1

It’s easy to say that from the comfort of your current lifestyle. Not so easy to go out and actually do it. Most women don’t even know how to build a fire and where to find/how to purify water, much less where to go to forage for whatever they need nor do they even want to do so. Survival isn’t something you can just do on a whim with no preparation. Especially for a far weaker gender who aren’t built for or knowledgable about survival to the extent men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:14 PM
-8

Foraging isn’t enough to get society where it’s at today nor it is enough to survive when you have to worry about wild animals, natural disasters, lack of technical knowledge, lack of survivability knowledge and many other factors threatening your safety and survivability.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:46 PM
-2

I overexaggerated a bit there had to change that. But tbh I’ve never agreed with that sentiment
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:42 PM
-11

I seriously doubt most women are surviving any more than a month if all men and everything they built disappeared tomorrow even if they could reproduce on their own. Meanwhile men would be a lot better off than women without the opposite gender and everything they’ve built if they could reproduce on their own. Men pretty much build almost everything women use on a daily basis even now when they are able to build towns and cities barely any of them do. Women should be thankful they have men. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:30 PM
1

For most ~20yo dudes, the number of women they could realistically date on demand is very low, usually 0 to 1. For most 30yo dudes, the number of women they can date on demand, assuming they start working out regularly, eat healthy, have a stellar social life and make a lot of money, is in the dozens. Most guys aren’t ugly, they are just average but under/overweight. Through working out they can become exceptionally more attractive. And through socializing and becoming more charismatic and confi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:11 PM
1

I know guys making six figures that are doing a lot better in dating than they were in their early 20’s and guys that are doing worse than they were in their early 20’s. The common denominator seems to be the lifestyle they’re pursuing outside of work as well as what they’re working with. The ones who keep fit, frequent social events, and hang out with lots of friends get a lot more women than they did before. The ones who gain weight, only go to work, etc. are worse off, obviously. Not sure how…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:23 PM
0

At that point I’d say as long as that job allows for some kind of free time, a man needs to find ways to put himself out there. Or just start his/her own business or find out how to make passive money through investments in order to get more free time to put himself out there. That jump in money makes a massive difference in ones dating life if they’re managing their work life and life outside of work properly. If you’re just working all day then obviously you’re gonna do worse than you did when…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:52 PM
1

Women police people far more often than men in general. Men just do not gossip about other people, their personal lives, or who they are dating as much as women do. Mens conversations typically revolve around things (sports, etc.), women’s conversations typically revolve around people (relationships, etc.). And a lot of women end up disliking or even hating each other for small things. So you’re end up with a lot of women talking smack about each other behind their back. Grown adult men just do …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 10:21 PM
2

I never said they don’t care about their partner’s sexual history, I said they don’t care about the next girl’s sexual history. By next girl I meant every girl besides their partner. If I want my girlfriend to be Christian, that doesn’t mean I’m policing women’s religious views. I don’t judge you if you’re atheist, nor will I shame you for being atheist, we’re just not going to work out in a relationship because the difference in ideologies and lifestyles will cause problems in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 07:50 PM
1

Mb, by “like that” I meant women judging men negatively because of the man’s promiscuity. But I agree with most if not all of what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 07:30 PM
2

If said man is trying to date her seriously, sure. Otherwise most men literally do not care about how promiscuous the next girl is just like we don’t care about her monthly cycle. It’s just not important to most men. You seem to have been heavily influenced by red pill ideology when it comes to how you think the average male thinks. The average man isn’t trying to police women’s bodies like that lol. They literally do not care.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:15 PM
0

Most men aren’t building institutions around controlling female sexuality. Most men are just trying to pay bills and support themselves/their family. This is a chronically online take I’ve seen many women on this site hold of average everyday men, their mindset and the way they think of women. Same with men who think bs like most women are hypergamous and always want the next best man. Most men could not give a crap about the next female’s sexuality. The average office working 9-5 man with a wif…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:52 AM
-1

I think the guy is talking about real life, not internet. Most dudes don’t really care about a girl’s body count as long as it isn’t over 15 or 20 if she’s a young adult. Meanwhile the first insult a girl throws at another girl is “slut”, “whore”, etc. I don’t really see women judging guys like that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 11:58 PM
3

Yeah what lol. Most women want monogamous men. Hate is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 10:10 PM
0

Yeah it seems like most men with multiple wives/partners on social media only succeed in doing so because their wives are really close with and love each other. So in a way they’re all have multiple partners in each other, not just the man. At least that’s what I saw from the two relationships I saw on youtube or netflix, someone can correct me on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 10:08 PM
1

You can say being the target of scams isn’t a privilege, that doesn’t make being rich not a privilege. Having more options in the dating market is still a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:48 PM
2

Money, fame, beauty and more options in the dating market are still all privileges regardless. Most privileges do come with downsides. That’s just how this world works and has always worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:25 PM
3

There are plenty of people out there that are rich, unsatisfied and don’t consider being rich a privilege due to various downsides. That doesn’t mean being rich is not a privilege. Celebrities may suffer from stalking, but they still benefit from the privileges of fame. Beautiful people may suffer from objectification, but they still benefit from being beautiful. Having lots of dating options is a privilege even if you don’t consider it to be. Not sure how we can’t acknowledge the obvious realit…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:21 PM
-1

This is like saying “Solution to homelessness? Everybody, get a house!” Like what lol. The people in this sub are some real characters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 10:57 PM
1

The reputable sources for cheating statistics are consistent across institutions and studies with 10-20% of women cheating and 20-25% of men cheating. Other sources like the APA report that 20-40% of marriages end due to infidelity, which strengthens these statistics. Because most people aren’t going to lie and say their partner didn’t cheat if they actually did. There are other correlated statistics you can find that verify the cheating rate statistic. A lot of websites have surveys done by non…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:48 AM
1

The statistics are supported by large, peer-reviewed studies such as GSS, and published by institutions like the Institute for Family Studies and Pew Research. The surveys are anonymous using randomized methods meant to minimize bias and encourage honesty. Not to mention the results remain accurate and consistent spanning over the course of decades. “Cheating means different things” yeah, but definitions are usually standardized in surveys. These aren’t amateurs doing these surveys like many peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:27 PM
1

One very simple thing people in this sub seem to look over is the very simple fact that women bond with men given they spend enough time with them. Even if you’re a 5’6, mediocre, average man, with a 3-4 incher, as long as you’re in shape and slim, well groomed, with a good sense of fashion, charismatic, adventurous with a solid and stable income, and she has little sexual history with no red flags in terms of infidelity, you won’t have trouble keeping that woman if she’s bonded well enough with…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:35 PM
1

I’m pretty sure she’s trying to say not many women say this because when they do, they get called shallow golddiggers who only care about looks and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:20 PM
1

A vast majority of people do have moral principles, are strongly against cheating, and wouldn’t cheat unless put in a bad predicament. Which is why cheating is only done by 25% of men and 13% of women. Most people aren’t going around sleeping with whoever they can find like what is happening at OP’s gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:44 PM
1

Yes, kind of. Most of these “people you’d never suspect” are people that OP just doesn’t know very well. If you hang around someone, know their dating history, the people they hang around, and their behaviors, and you can see red flags, you pretty much know if they’re having regular casual sex or cheating on their partner or not. Most people who fall victim to this while knowing the person very well just do not have a good eye for red flags or tend to ignore red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:23 PM
1

I wouldn’t worry too much. There are tons of women out there who are faithful and would never cheat. The women messing with them we’re just low quality women. Not all women are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:10 PM
2

I was dating this girl who was promiscuous. Pretty much everywhere we went guys were hugging her, flirting with her, touching her, at the beach, in the city, in restaurants and dates, etc. And many of the guys who did had sex with her before. Some of the dudes who were my friends were talking about me behind my back, etc. The relationship only lasted a week lmfao. Ever since I don’t date women who have sex outside of serious relationships. And I don’t date women if I know I’m gonna be around tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:07 PM
1

That’s probably a woman who’s inexperienced by circumstance. A woman who is inexperienced by choice is not going to take your efforts in the bedroom for granted unless you’re just that bad. Or possibly there’s something else that is messed up here. Has never been an issue for me tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:57 PM
3

Saying women face serious risks from objectification isn’t the same as dismissing what men go through. No one’s denying that men deal with real struggles too. You straight up mockingly reduce male struggles to “being swiped right for having a decent job” which trivializes valid male concerns. You and other women, and even men who mock and reduce men’s issues are part of the problem. You can address your points without being ignorant of men’s struggles. But if every time women bring up their expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:45 PM
9

Men get reduced to their physicality, height, status, and income all the time and end up beating the primary victims of violent crimes, robberies, harassment, and loneliness to a higher degree than women do. You can provide reasons why society needs to cater to women more, but diminishing the struggles of men isn’t the way to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:35 PM
1

Yeah I agree. There’s also levels to it. For example, being a widowed single mother might take her chances of finding her ideal man down 10%, being a single mother who was married for a few years down 20%, being a single mother who never got married down 60%, being a single mother who doesn’t know the father or has a list of men that could be the father 😬down 80%. Depends on the man too
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 06:06 PM
3

Yeah I agree with you too. Some dudes here take it far. Even though your situation is sort of like a special case to me, there are other more common circumstances that can change a person. Like their partners parent dying, them losing a limb, them succumbing to deadly diseases that change them mentally like ALS. Situations that completely change people. So yeah it’s short sighted and somewhat ignorant to put all single mothers in the same “picked wrong” box. Though tbh, I’d also argue most peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 11:10 PM
3

It’s fair to blame someone who knowingly picked wrong, while it’s unfair to blame someone who unknowingly picked wrong to the same extent as the person who knowingly did so. So I see where you’re coming from, and I somewhat see where the people who say this are coming from. Either way I feel it’s bad practice to downplay people’s bad decision making. But I don’t agree with shaming people for it unless they absolutely need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 09:05 PM
5

If you pick a bad apple from a store thinking it was good, you still picked wrong. Whether there was a big brown spot you missed or the apple looked fine on the outside. Life isn’t fair. You can innocently make bad choices, you’re still stuck with the consequences of choosing wrong whether the outcome was what you wanted or not. Unfortunately, the world and life in general is cruel a lot of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 07:03 PM
–

I meant the people are bots, reddit is full of them. Yeah reddit is insanely leftist & ultra liberal. Not even sure how this app got this bad. Youtube and Discord are way better and far less biased. You find a wide variety of conservatives, liberals and centrists. What amazes me is that people on this app don’t even realize how brainwashed and botlike they are. You say one thing that could be interpreted as centrist/unbiased or a little anti liberal and they start glitching.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:43 AM
–

Yeah this app is full of bots
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:27 AM
–

If you’re not horribly ugly and you have a great personality, 6/10 in terms of attractiveness, 5’7, in shape, 4 inches down there, easy going hollistic lifestyle, you can go a long way and end up getting a great woman if you do the right things. You’re right but at the same time, once a woman falls in love with you, shes a high quality woman with morals, boundaries, and not much of a history and you keep the relationship fun and interesting, you most likely will never have significant issues as …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:23 AM
–

Women and men lie for brownie points on this app. Instead of trying to act like women don’t do this just call it for how it is. The guy you’re replying to is 100% right. Reddit is software that is fundamentally designed to be a massive echochamber that rewards people who agree with everybody else in that sub, and punishes people with a differing, many times realistic opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:16 AM
3

Well OP’s examples were pretty weird and kinda bad I’ll admit that. But if red pillers say family is important then partake in practices that are statistically known to destroy families, like cheating, they’d be hypocrites. Something a lot of them do. Of course there are some red pillers like StephisCold that do not have views on family being important, and even tell men not to marry at all. So a lot of red pillers don’t follow OP’s line of logic but a lot of others kinda do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:47 PM
1

Well OP’s examples were pretty weird and kinda bad I’ll admit that. But if red pillers say family is important then partake in practices that are statistically known to destroy families, like cheating, they’d be hypocrites. Something a lot of them do. Of course there are some red pillers like StephisCold that do not have views on family being important, and even tell men not to marry at all. So a lot of red pillers don’t follow OP’s line of logic but a lot of others kinda do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:46 PM
6

The point OP is trying to make known is the fact that red pill men, many times (not all), are hypocrites. If you say one thing then do another you're a hypocrite. It doesn't matter what the other side does, the focus is on what you say and if your actions reflect what you say. I'd agree with you with some stuff you said on a different post though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:46 AM
1

> Conservative/red pill men are always complaining about how women are all hoes nowadays, how family values are dead, fatherless behavior, women don't value men anymore, blah blah blah. Red pill men yeah, conservative, depends on your definition. If you're talking about men who proudly call themselves conservative, yes. Yeah hypocrisy is a huge issue with red pill/manosphere in general. They talk big game about conservative values yet they want to indulge in liberal culture (like promiscuity) wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:39 AM
2

Oh I was mainly talking about power and looks vs kindness and looks when I brought up the 1 to 2%. Usually kindness and looks, and just looks (no being kind or unkind) is gonna make you more successful with women than power and looks and being unkind if you’re not in the top 1 or 2% power wise. I agree with everything you said here though you’re spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:37 AM
1

Kindness is a lot more meaningful if you have the power to get away with not being kind but decide not to be* Obviously if you have power, simple acts of kindness can mean a lot more depending on the circumstance. But kindness is meaningful no matter who you are. We should all strive to avoid being jerks to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:08 AM
3

This only applies to the top 1 or 2% of men. For the other 99% of men kindness and looks far outweigh what very little power they’ll have. Imo this is the eqiuivalent of advising men on how to find a captain for their yacht they don’t have and will probably never get.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:02 AM
0

How are you getting downvoted for this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:17 PM
–

Lmao you sound ridiculous man
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:12 PM
–

You seem to think women are some sort of creature of myth like a succubus; exploiting their hapless victims and consuming their life essence. LMFAO
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:10 PM
–

This honestly isn’t true at all. Neither is what the OP saying true. Many men care about other men and many women do not care about other women. Oftentimes I find adult women’s hate for each other far stronger than adult men’s hate for each other (which is a lot of times nonexistent). Men just care differently than women do. That doesn’t mean we “tend not to” care about each other. I also have many friends I can turn to for support and value, but definitely not intimacy lol. Not necessarily deep…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:36 PM
1

Yeah fs
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 12:51 AM
1

Yeah like macaroni & cheese
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:27 PM
1

It took me many years to learn how to talk to women & people in general properly. So this post makes so much sense. Unfortunately for a guy/gurl at adult age that genuinely sucks at social interactions, they’re behind 50-80% of other people who learned how to talk to people after years of positive social interactions. So you really have to go through hundreds, possibly even thousands of negative social interactions. And what makes it worse is that a lot of people won’t tell you that it was a neg…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:10 PM
4

I wouldn’t say he flat out doesn’t care about kids. Kids are just not the focal point of this post. It’s probably the best red/purple pill post I’ve seen in this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:01 PM
1

What is with you and these weird questions lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 03:55 PM
1

Good luck brother
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:31 PM
2

Really bad sub name tbh. Maybe misandristhypocrisy or something along those lines would be better tbh
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:29 PM
5

At this point they’d probably see some woman’s cats die peacefully from old age and say it must’ve been a man who had the woman kill her precious innocent cats in secret then force her into saying they died from old age. Ngl cause the way they came to the conclusion that they arrived at here is insane lmao. This is wild.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:26 PM
2

What are moids lol?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 07:13 PM
1

No good looking woman who has options is going to stay with a broke (like actually broke, not low earning) dude the rest of her life. And no high quality/high value woman is going to even give a broke dude who is no good for her the time of day (many women in my life have a no tolerance policy for these types of dudes). Sorry dude, no matter how attractive he is to her, she will eventually move on. Looks, social life, charisma are for short term attraction. Once you get your looks, social life, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 09:59 PM
2

Poor men must die to protect women*
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/25 10:35 PM
2

I mean it depends from household to household. Some households men don't work dangerous jobs, so picking up some of the chores is expected. Though women shouldn't be complaining about a lack of chores done in these situations either. Because the pressure for men to have a job in a relationship is exponentially higher than the woman. Chance of marriage failure and depression increases dramatically when men lose their job. When women lose their job? Finances get harder to cover, which really sucks…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/25 06:13 AM
1

If people knew what you were saying was a rhetorical you wouldn't have gotten downvoted for it. It just wasn't that good of a rhetorical. There are people who would bring up your point clueless to how these situations happen or out of bad faith 🤷
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/25 06:03 AM
4

You’re acting like there are only 2 options, finding someone to spend the rest of your life with or sleeping around. 70%+ people who date do so because they find somebody they like and are attracted to, and want to be with them. Being attractive is a massive cheat code for doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 12:56 AM
3

You asked “why would he snap” and I answered your question. Wym that’s what I meant?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 11:24 PM
3

I had the same thought as you, but note the part where she said “went up to him to check if he was alright”. If you’ve ever been slapped by a woman, most slaps that “are a little harder than intended” won’t hurt enough for them to be actively worried if they really hurt them or not. It’s obvious she slapped the s*** out of him and it clearly left him hurt enough to where she was worried about him. Now she’s downplaying her slap and focusing on the fact that he might be abusive, because she slapp…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 10:50 PM
6

Dread game doesn’t work in a long distance relationship, which is a part of the reason I’d never date long distance. Not that I do dread game. My strategy when it comes to women is to make as many friends (women & men) as possible and go out with them, have fun with them, soft “flirt” with them, then soft friendzone them. It’s faily easy to build attraction with women irl, and you can do so to a much, much, much higher degree than online. Which is why I just don’t date online anymore. Though may…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 10:10 PM
1

I've never really heard of that before but yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:03 PM
1

Forreal, this is sad
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:57 PM
1

Politically conservative? No. Conservative lifestyle? Yes, it's true that people, not just women, who live conservatively cheat less than their liberal counterparts. If you're comparing one person who drinks, parties every weekend, sleeps around, has many friends of the opposite sex, has a body count above 15, to another person who never drinks, never parties, has a body count of 2 or less, has good family, not attention seeking etc., male or female, it's only common sense that the person who li…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:56 PM
1

I was partially joking with my comment, but nah, people should at least be average in all areas and 8+/10 in an area/a few areas if they want to live a good life. Presentation (looks, dress, hygiene), fitness, social life, personality, charisma, confidence, maturity, money. There are other areas I can't name off the top of my head. People should at least be average in all areas but becoming above average in one or a few areas will give the best results. Average meaning they look ok, dress ok, do…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 01:20 AM
1

It’s not about looksmaxxing it’s about statsmaxxing. Looks is only one stat you gotta maxx them all out if you want to be chad/tyrone bro 😭😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:35 AM
8

They’re talking about men as if they were a dark souls final boss lmfao
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 07:41 AM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:12 PM
–

Goofy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 07:55 PM
2

In different contexts, sure, otherwise we are pretty much equals, just in different ways, apart from physical attributes and characteristics
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 07:54 PM
2

I’m not okay with that because I wouldn’t do it in a relationship. Though if it was once a month or something, maybe it would be tolerable. It’s not like cheating though, so I guess there would only need to be a talk. I’ve never met girls who actively watch porn though, and if they do I wouldn’t even get involved with them if they’d continue to do it going into a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 12:54 AM
3

Her: Men’s mental health is their own business. Also her: It effects all of us! We’re all victims! GET MENTAL HEALTH NOW MEN!!! Feminists aren’t even living in their OWN reality, much less ACTUAL reality. 🤣🤣🤣 These people are emotional mouthpieces, nobody irl actually listening to them. The only people they’re hurting is themselves. They’re steadily losing credibility with these ridiculous takes. Trumps reelection is proof that you can’t stigmatize men and expect them to treat you favorable/like…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/24 02:34 AM
0

These types of women say stuff like this then wonder why we live in a patriarchy. We live in a patriarchy because men have seen stuff like this for the past 50 years and said “why would I give power to somebody who hates me?” They expect favorable treatment by men whilst treating them like garbage and throwing senseless insults at them. This is why Trump and the republican party will soon rule the US. This is why Hillary and Kamala both lost. This is why women still don’t have anywhere near as m…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 02:45 AM
11

Facts
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:50 AM
20

Really good and quality take, definitely one of the best takes I've seen in the sub. It's important to get both sides and perspectives in order for us to see the bigger picture of why things are the way they are today.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:48 AM
1

You're not getting the point he's trying to make. Women (the radical women/feminists, not 70-90% of normal women, not you I believe) fear and resent men, but don't want them to not like them for it. If they go on social media talking about how horrible men are, then go to work the next day and get fired by their male boss, they should be cool with it. Except they never are. These women (radicals) aren't cool with facing the consequences for the way they move. You can't just be going around sexis…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:42 AM
1

It aint that bad lol. Times have always changed, we just have to stick to what we know and believe in individually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 08:26 PM
1

Women say this, but get mad when men assume they’re more emotionally irrational because they’ve dealt with many emotionally irrational women, get mad when they don’t get the promotion because their male boss has had better experience with male employees than female, among many other things. Women can’t really complain about men making assumptions about women and favoring other men over women when they do the exact same thing. I’m black, people have treated me different because of my skin tone, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 08:12 PM
3

Valid
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 08:03 PM
2

Lol you should know the answer already. If the bombs drop tomorrow and society turns into FO, liberty would be the absolute last thing on their minds. We live in the safest period in human history they’re always going to choose liberty because they feel secure as it is. Pretty easy answer lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 07:59 PM
1

Because undesirable men genuinely do not exist to most women. They could have met them a few minutes prior and forgot they even talked to them, again, just a few minutes prior. Happened to some of my friends multiple times. I was so confused by this the first time I saw it happened I thought I was in a simulation or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:33 PM
6

😭😭
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 05:25 PM
2

Yeah exactly, and even then, most women are more than sensible enough (I strongly believe) to take the theoretical concept seriously, then others, like this woman, don't, and think they can do whatever they want as long as they have a man behind them to cover for them when the situation goes downhill. I wouldn't be so harsh if she had written the post with even a little bit of empathy but genuine empathy was no where to be found in that post.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 05:35 PM
9

The GF I can almost guarantee from the way she's writing this, that she was putting herself in harms way just because she had a man there that she thought was going to protect her. If a woman does this to you. LEAVE IMMEDIATELY. These types of women are the type of women to get you killed. This woman might have thought she was doing the right thing by putting herself in harm's way to protect the girl, assuming that if she couldn’t handle it herself, she'd have backup in the form of her boyfriend…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/24 10:21 PM
2

You’re not wrong
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 10:14 PM
1

“Their actions suggest that they believe women can do no wrong” So they’re fine when a woman wants power over them? They’re fine with women aborting? They’re fine with women taking the lead in relationships? It’s okay if you forgot they did all of these things, but they do. In no way is this statement true lol, in any way, shape, or form. I think you’re confusing conservatives with white knights.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 04:09 PM
4

Yeah, applies to your comment too
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 03:58 PM
7

“Any person subject to this chapter who engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section and shall, upon conviction, be punished by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct, which shall be consistent with the punishments prescribe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:56 PM
4

Conservatives 🤝anti misandrists “Men should be treated with more respect in society” “Men deserve to be celebrated for their achievements instead of denigrated when compred to women”. I hope you see how delusional your comment is
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 03:24 PM
2

I really want to say you’re wrong and that both genders have it hard in their own areas, but there’s nothing I can really say to go up against this. It’s really the difference between a broke guy trying to find a car and a millionaire trying to find a car. Both guys may say it’s hard from their perspective, and I’m not gonna say either man’s perspective is invalid. But there’s a very clear difference in why it’s hard for either one of them to choose. Women have it much harder in other areas, lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:58 PM
5

Yeah this right here. The good girls get snagged pretty early and the dating pool of good women gradually shrinks as you get older because more and more of them will have stable lives and families off the dating market. Same with good men as well
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 02:40 AM
1

OP goes off the rails because he fails to realize this, like you said, is fake status, though it would help his argument if he did. The fake status still creates the delusion OP is arguing about in some (not all) obese women. I think shaming of obese women should be combated and stopped immediately, they already have enough problems to deal with, but going from shaming to glorification, one extreme to another extreme just creates delusion due to the fake status you're bringing up. Many programs …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 02:28 AM
30

<image> Not celebrated everywhere, only in certain medias/events and stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 11:37 AM
9

I didn’t mean to sound like that with that comment but yeah I agree with you, men are just as bad as women. In no way do I think accountability is a woman only problem
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 11:34 AM
1

I didn’t get that impression from OP lol. But I don’t support any man who wants women to think that way. I don’t see that type of mindset helping anyone at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 03:59 AM
-7

Where in any of my comments did I say or even imply she has to wear a scarlet letter A for adultery and flagellate herself? You’re putting words into my mouth. They do try to vet better but it’s not as simple as saying “I’ll vet better” and they magically vet better. You can try as hard as you can and still fall for the wrong person you know you shouldn’t be with. People go through tough times where they make decisions they shouldn’t. Accountability is important but so are many other things, lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 03:48 AM
-5

Accountable for making decisions that led to their predicament. Accountability and recognizing where you went wrong is mostly important for yourself, not others. Or else you make the same mistakes and keep ending up in bad predicaments. If you ended up a single mother the first time, instead of putting all of the blame on men (even if it was 90% him and you never saw it coming), for your own sake, look internally and do what you can to properly vet the next guy to the best of your ability. Becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 03:36 AM
5

OP is talking specifically about the women who push toxicity, not regular everyday women who do not engage with it. Unless I’m missing something here
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:22 AM
2

You see an issue with people taking accountability for their actions and the way they move?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:19 AM
10

Goofy little girl
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 09:12 PM
1

It’s not black and white, there’s an inbetween that changes depending on how many items any given party has and how much time they have to spare, in this situation. Obviously, most people would agree, he’d be a complete jerk if he had 100 items and she only had 2 and she had to get back to work, and he still said no.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/24 12:28 AM
2

The issue with this line of thinking is that women seem to conveniently forget men built all countries and societies in the world. Without men women wouldn't even be able to build anything past huts. You're gonna have the men who build societies and you're gonna have the men who cause tragedy. Sometimes the same man does both. If you're gonna be so preachy and holier than thou in regards to the way a male driven society works, then build your own matriarchal society where there is none of this t…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/24 12:13 AM
1

Not due to the gender war at all. That’s just because of shift in culture, economy and change in laws over time
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:32 PM
2

Not due to the gender war at all. That’s just because of shift in culture, economy and change in laws over time
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:32 PM
5

I swear I heard that last line in the show at least a dozen times lol top tier meme
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 08:25 PM
1

Women definitely care about status. But most men don’t realize how massive the difference between having status vs having no status is until they go through that particular life experience where it is shown to them. It’s not something you can explain or show to someone. It’s one of those things you have to experience firsthand to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 07:05 PM
1

I mean it exists, for everyone, regardless of whether you or your friends care about it or not lol. Not sure what you’re trying to say here
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:45 PM
2

We've never had sensation issues. I've never had sensation issues either. Some of my friends who are uncircumcised say they have a harder time getting off, some easier. It depends on the person. You have different experiences than I. So if you're against it and I'm not, that's just where our views differ.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 01:34 PM
2

😭😭😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:14 PM
1

Me and all the men in my family were circumsized and we’re all fine so we aren’t against it. But “A place where women talk about boys being circumcised like it’s no big deal :)” is one of the wildest things I’ve ever seen on the internet. Very dehumanizing
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 10:18 AM
2

Lol you’re right it is gender flipped mgtow but even less sensible and less credible
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 11:53 PM
2

They’ve objectively been on the decline losing power in government since Obama to the point where we are at today. They have mainstream media backing them but not the American people. They will continue to decline if they don’t make serious changes going forward
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 11:24 PM
1

How the heck did you get that out of everything I just said lol. I never said you’re hanging out with people you don’t like. If you don’t like them just find another group. It just sounds to be like you have no friends. Which is okay, you don’t have to have friends. You don’t have to have any status at all. But lots of men are looking for better results in their lives and dating. If you want better results in life, you become healthier, eat right, go to the gym, find friends and a partner who wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 11:18 PM
1

Status is relative, but it doesn't depend on who those people are. If you have a good standing in your social group, you have status within that social group. Different groups offer different benefits. A D&D social group may offer entertainment, a book club social group may offer relaxation, a church group may offer spirituality, and another social group may offer access to women. Which is why it's good for men to make acquaintances and have standing in multiple types of circles if they want hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 10:56 PM
2

Everybody has “status”. Some people have low status and others have high status. Status is simply how many friends, acquaintances, and connections you have and how much they respect and admire you. A guy with high status is genuinely liked by many, a guy with low status is either liked by few or hated by many. OP isn’t talking about you, he’s talking about women in general. You guys don’t have to make everything about yourselves lol. Most women would take a man with status rather than a man with…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 04:53 AM
8

Nah put them on the front lines with no type of equipment whatsoever. If these women want to talk down the very same soldiers protecting them, they don’t deserve to be protected.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 04:23 AM
2

These women would never say this in front of veterans and men who’ve actually been deployed. Crazy how powerful people can feel behind a screen.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 04:20 AM
1

Tell women to stop leeching off man made governments and make their own
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 06:49 PM
1

I could understand minor pushback if you had laid out 20 items. But receiving major pushback from only 2 items is crazy. She only had to wait a few seconds. The entitlement is unbelievable and disgusting
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 06:39 PM
2

Politicians often exaggerate to get in positions of power, then become much more moderate with their approaches while in office, because implementing extremist policies that will surely bring negative consequences. They are not dumb. They know this. The people know this, they are not dumb either. Both Kamala and Trump’s plans would become economic disasters if handled and executed poorly, or they could become an economic success if executed effectively. The difference between Kamala and Trump is…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 02:59 AM
3

America needs change. We don’t need to be doing the same thing we’ve done for the past 4 years while the economy continues to crumble. That’s why people voted for Trump. They want change in how things are run.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 12:46 AM
3

You're acting like democrats care about anybody but themselves. Yes, every political party pretends to care to get money, influence and votes. And the right is not the same thing as the republican party. The right is everybody who believes in limited govnt intervention in the economy, traditional social values, and strong national defense. Most of whom are millions of men. Why would they want to treat men like garbage? Again, if you're talking about the people at the top they do not care about a…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 06:18 AM
0

Nobody in the real world cares or has time to care about misandry or misogyny. Normal people are struggling just to pay groceries. They’re voting for the candidate who is going to help them thrive financially. And Kamala being incompetent was a far greater threat to most people than the fact that Trump can be an extremist. Kamala Harris had came out and said multiple times that she will continue to do what she’s been doing/working towards since her time with Biden. And when people hear that, the…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 12:18 AM
1

If most bars & clubs are like that where somebody lives, you can’t really blame them for forming a stigma around the people that go there. The people shaming them are gonna be the first ones who don’t give a damn when they get their heart broken. Men and women both need to learn to choose their partners a lot more wisely. Because at the end of the day the effects of poor decision making extends past them unto their children and families.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:40 PM
1

Well I mean it’s not like they’re going to church. Most guys don’t care, but I would never date a girl who goes out partying regularly. Just not the type of woman I want to take seriously and spend the rest of my life with. But every guy is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:35 PM
2

The faces are too funny man lol. But yeah true
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/24 03:40 AM
3

ohh i thought the pictures were just a joke I had no clue they were an actual jab
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/24 11:26 PM
2

But she looks happy in the pictures lol. Man this is confusing as heck
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/24 11:25 PM
0

I’ve been told I can be slow sometimes but I’m genuinely confused on what is wrong with this. The gender roles are flipped? Are you trying to say she is mocking him or something?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/24 10:46 PM
11

They only want progression for themselves, regression for people they don’t like
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/24 07:46 PM
1

I love family so I guess trad? But as a guy I can’t see myself being under a man. This is a weird question. It’s like asking a vegan what type of meat they’d eat if they weren’t vegan lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 03:01 AM
0

I don’t like men and I could never see myself liking them so I honestly can’t say. Knowing how the women in my family turned out, a mix of both. Basically 1 body count religious modern women who are traditional in most ways and not in others.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 07:34 PM
3

They’re speaking with their fleeting emotions. There’s no logic or consistency in what they say when they’re emotionally charged like this
/r/EverydayMisandry29/10/24 07:23 PM
–

People are a science. If they weren’t psychology wouldn’t exist. Basic communication skills with a lack of knowledge on how to communicate isn’t gonna do anything for anybody. I used to be a person that was liked by few and ignored by many. I learned communication skills from a youtuber and he also taught me why they were important. Next year I had more friends than I ever had in my life. I was already good at talking, but lacked knowledge on how to maintain eye contact, proper posture, gesturin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:02 PM
–

Women aren’t more emotionally intelligent than men. This is feminism and the mainstream left feeding you propaganda. Men are better at controlling their emotions than women are, while women are better identifying emotions. This is the balanced perspective, this type of negative ideology only hurts men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:51 PM
6

This is the only right answer. If you dont see enough of x type of people, it’s because you don’t surround yourself with them. Whether x people be black people, spanish people, christian people (the more obvious ones), liars, cheaters, manipulators. (the less obvious ones) People aren’t willing to go out of their comfort zones and search for these people. I get it, I wouldn’t want to either, it’s a lot of work. But acting like these types of people don’t exist is so stupid. This post screams clu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:15 AM
44

They’ll love the bear
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:29 PM
-1

Tbf dude, good looking men got it even better than good looking women in terms of being worshipped. If you’re in the top 1% of men you’ll get worshipped by 10s and you can do no wrong. It doesn’t work the same the other way around at all. You don’t get nearly the same amount of privilege as far as career opportunities and opportunities in general but as far as dating goes you’re on the very top of the hierarchy. The privilege is ridiculous. Other than that, she’s crazy. And you make a good point…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/10/24 09:54 PM
15

These people need to go back to elementary school and restart from grade 1. The education system has brutally failed them.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/10/24 07:07 PM
5

Nah 100%. If you get rejected too much you’ll start to gain a bad reputation😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 11:10 PM
1

If she’s already attractive to them, if other men find her attractive BUT she doesn’t pay them any mind, attraction to her increases greatly. It’s called the madonna affect. But thats just attractiveness, which has nothing to do with the decision to date her, only to ‘smash’. Otherwise, if she’s unattractive to a man, nothing will change that lol. I could try my hardest to like her but it will never really work if there was no attraction to her in the first place. But to answer your question dir…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 11:01 PM
15

😭😭😭
/r/EverydayMisandry12/10/24 03:50 PM
1

I’m extremely codependent when it comes to women too, but I’m repulsed by bad women, so I never end up dating any of them. Only really date wholesome women. You’re saying you’re codependent AND attracted to bad unwholesome women? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:10 PM
0

Ahh yes because you know what every single Christian white women in the US is willing/unwilling to die for because you are omniscient and know all things. Again, you’re smarter than this. Or maybe you really aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 10:53 PM
8

A grown child
/r/EverydayMisandry10/10/24 10:47 PM
12

Children shouldn’t be given phones
/r/EverydayMisandry10/10/24 10:38 PM
1

Many Christian white women raised in good strong households by strong parents who don’t tolerate BS would strongly disagree. Generalization is okay. Overgeneralization shows a strong lack of maturity, intelligence, and consideration for variability. You’re smarter than this dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 01:34 PM
0

Many women have strong character, are strong in honesty, integrity, compassion and respect. Many have strong principles they stand by. Many modern day women would die for their beliefs. Just like most women in the Civil Rights movement were. Just as women have in the distant past, for example, early Christian martyrs. This type of crap is the same thing feminists say about men. Utter garbage. If you truly believe what you’re saying and you’re not trolling, I really hope you get help mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 01:04 PM
1

Excludes all women? Dude what
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 12:16 PM
1

This is a naive assumption. It's easy to sit up on the internet and say "they can be treated" but it's not that easy for a lot of men. Many men on reddit have talked about their experience with phimosis and how they tried everything to treat their condition, eventually resorting to getting circumcised for a permanent solution. It's not some easy solution for men. To act like it is, is highly disrespectful and ignorant of many men's struggles with these conditions. Women do not have this same iss…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:21 PM
19

It ruins their credibility. It's a good thing these types of women aren't everywhere you go. Most women are rational enough to know murder is wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/24 05:57 PM
2

There are medical considerations that many parents weigh carefully. With uncut penises there may be increased risks of phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis, and other infections. There are no possibilities for any increased risks of infectious diseases in "uncut" females, and there are no benefits to FGM, which is why it's illegal. If there were no increased risks of infectious diseases in uncut males, circumcision would be illegal. Male and female bodies are different, surprise surprise. Shaming p…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 01:50 PM
2

Facts
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:27 AM
0

You’re getting downvoted but you and p3ngwin are both right. Women can simply opt out of sex and therefore not get pregnant and so can men too. If they have sex and end up getting pregnant/getting another pregnant, they should have to deal with the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:26 AM
0

It’s the parent’s right to decide what they want to do with their child. Some parents will have the procedure done because they’ve had to get a circumcision anyways later on in life and they’d rather make sure their kid never has to go through that experience like they did. Shaming these parents who genuinely want to help their children not go through the same thing they went through is counterproductive and unhelpful.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:20 AM
1

That’s wild lol
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/24 11:00 AM
4

Men could say the same thing about women considering a fraction of them regularly do stuff significantly worse than what most men do. Does that mean women deserve sexism because of a few bad apples? No. Same applies to men. Bad people are just bad people, no matter what gender.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 01:33 PM
–

The same applies for men’s advice to women. Men do not know women’s experience, so while they can provide basic advice, if you don’t have your own gender’s perspective you’ll always fail. For example, women will tell men to treat the women they’re dating kindly and with respect. Some dudes will take that to heart and treat women too kind, while throwing themselves under the bus. This negative experience is amplified because many times men choose a bad woman. Men will tell women to be agreeable. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 05:11 PM
1

Don’t see a problem with any of the comments before the last one. Obviously the last one is pretty bad
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/24 01:28 PM
8

I think this is the craziest thing I’ve read in this sub. These people are deranged.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/24 12:46 AM
1

"In my experience, Christian's I've seen will make excuses and bigotry towards other people I've met." That's fair. Though people will use any set of guidelines as an excuse to bully others. That's not exclusive to Christianity. That's just human nature. "Sure there are living conditions back then, that still doesn't excuse the fact that it's still homophobic and killing is not a great idea." I'm sorry dude, but this comment is extremely and utterly naive. The naivety is understandable as you li…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/09/24 02:59 PM
1

So, in other words, the negative stigma towards men not following their gender roles are the reason why homophobia is rooted in misandry. This is fair. But there’s nothing wrong with gender roles themselves, just the overly negative stigma that comes from people that get upset when others don’t follow their roles.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/24 08:58 PM
3

No, homophobia against men isn’t by default rooted in misandry, but it can be. But if it was, it would have to be influenced by misandry, which it hardly ever is.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/24 05:22 PM
2

You’re being downvoted because you’re taking a verse of the Bible out of context and using it as a weapon against the religion. Bagel explained the living conditions back then, and the New Testament rectifies many old practices of the Old Testament. Including brutal treatment of certain groups. If you read the rest of the Bible you’d know killing and mistreatment of others isn’t something we are supposed to do anymore. We are supposed to welcome any type of man or woman, gay, straight or anythin…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 08:16 AM
2

Yeah it really is lol. ChatGPT Summed it up here: ChatGPT: It seems like the person is trying to lay out their perspective on which social groups they believe are oppressed or privileged. They’re questioning common views on privilege and oppression, particularly focusing on gender, race, and sexual orientation. Here’s a breakdown of their points: Oppressed Groups: • They include men in this list, claiming that men face systemic misandry (discrimination against men) and that it has serious conseq…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 07:46 AM
5

People really doing victim mental gymnastics and writing whole essays to randoms trying to validate their victimhood. This is sad and hilarious at the same time. 😭 In terms of the power hierarchy black people are even less powerful than women as a collective. Women are the second most powerful collective group of people in the country yet you get posts like this.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/24 05:07 PM
11

I get you’re mad but you’re doing too much dude. Don’t stoop to the enemies level and start using shaming tactics. Girls like OP might take your message in the wrong way and grow up and spread even more misandry. Especially after that bad experience she went through. If you want people to be empathetic towards you and men in general, you have to show you can be empathetic towards them.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/24 03:27 PM
1

I’m not sure how you classify AI bias, but I personally think even books and photos, things that don’t think can be biased. I agree that it’s programmed to be biased, but much of the internet is biased towards the left and women and against the reasonable center, the right and men in general.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 10:38 PM
1

I agree with you when it comes to this example, but Candour is not talking about this example alone, he’s talking about the AI/programming bias in general from search engines to chatbots like ChatGPT. They can get crazy sexist depending on what you ask them.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 10:01 PM
5

Can’t be mad at this. She and the other women who do this are practically telling the world that they are complete losers
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 01:49 PM
-1

I could do the same thing, doesn’t mean it’s not edited. Only way to prove it’s not edited is to either take a video or have someone else confirm they got the same results. You don’t need to do this, I’m just saying. It also depends on your search history, web history, location, etc. Which is why I said I’m assuming you’re telling the truth. I don’t know why you’re downvoting me for questioning the validity of the post.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 07:44 AM
-1

Didn’t get these same results. But regardless I’m going to assume you didn’t photoshop them, even though the photo looks edited and a little suspicious. In my results the husband search assumes the husband either has unsolved anger issues, lack of communication skills or is emotionally abusive while the wife search assumes she is simply depressed by circumstances out of her control. The bias is definitely there.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 02:20 AM
2

Doesn’t matter who created it. All that matters is that somebody fixes the sexist AI bias issue.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 02:14 AM
2

If men are worse than bears they should give up their houses, built by men, give up on electricity, maintained by men, stop buying food, produced by men, never call on police if they’re in trouble, because the cops will have an 85% chance of being men. And go to bears looking for all of these things. Just boycott all things related to men if they are that bad. Except they aren’t. And that would mean they are left with literally nothing. The real problem here is that she’s lumping the good men wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/24 07:39 PM
1

As long as they pass all of their examinations and shown they are competent sure.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 01:33 PM
6

The real problem here is that it's only negativity with these people. They don’t want to acknowledge all the good men do in the world, but they’re quick to fiercely acknowledge and attack the bad. Whether it’s men supporting their families, working hard, or just being decent people, none of that gets recognized. But the moment something bad happens, it’s blown way out of proportion, and suddenly all men are the problem. Saying things like "Men need to stop letting this type of thing happen" woul…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/24 11:59 PM
1

Congrats Banana. But we have to be realistic. Embarrasment is going to affect most young guys. So it’s not like they can just shrug off negative feelings and act like everything is okay.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 07:23 PM
1

Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted for this. Sometimes it is and sometimes it’s not but the commenter you replied to made it sound like two girls holding hands is sexual by default which is very weird.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 07:07 PM
1

There are a lot of things they can do. One of them being Embarassing you in front of the class, “Certain people have been acting up and voiding detention so until we stop that behavior, the class will have to write an essay everyday before class starts” or “…no computer privileges.” if they are having a bad day teachers they will call you out by name (which nobody should condone, but it happens). It’s good for correcting bad behavior but it can become wildly dangerous and horrible if used by a s…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 07:03 PM
9

I agree. But realistically they’d have to serve support roles. Makes no difference though. They still need to be drafted and serve their country in times of crisis whether they want to or not.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 09:31 PM
2

Ohh I didn’t know the context behind her. It makes perfect sense she was being deceptive with the post looking at the last paragraph she posted. She has serious issues.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 06:26 PM
1

I couldn’t even really talk back to the first few paragraphs of the comment because the men she’s talking about generalize the women as well. Honestly, cheating isn’t a gender based problem it’s a people problem. Last paragraph is just her being petty. Trying to add fuel to her argument by using underhanded tactics and misrepresenting men. I can’t be mad at her because it just makes her look that much more childish and pathetic. Luckily she’s not representative of most women but to me it just sh…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 03:21 PM
2

But yeah I totally agree with the fact that it shouldn’t always be on men to provide. The burden of provision should be on whoever earns the most and has the most stable job. Always.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/09/24 01:59 AM
1

Well I mean nowadays it isn’t always on men to provide in the first place. Most households have men and women both providing financially. Almost always if men are the sole providers it’s because they want to be. Same with women. Gender roles are more laxed and flexible then they ever have been.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/09/24 01:57 AM
2

Yeah, some really crazy stuff. Providing is important and necessary, but men should always make time for their children. It's vital to their growth as well balanced functional participants in society.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/09/24 12:13 AM
2

Go glad I don’t have to interact with idiotic people like this on a daily basis
/r/EverydayMisandry07/09/24 10:34 PM
1

The old people would push for it because they’re stubborn and grumpy. I remember having to give up my seat to young women a lot and getting pissed for it when i was a teenager but don’t really remember doing that the last time i used to catch the bus as an adult. Especially if I sat in the mid-back of the bus.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/09/24 06:44 PM
9

Her ideology aligns with radical feminism because they play into an anti male + pro women agenda. Just because people say they are conservative don't mean their ideologies are conservative. I wouldn't even call this radical conservatism because they would likely say the opposite.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 01:03 PM
10

Should add the context that even though men had exclusive legal rights over their children, they weren't the primary caretaker in the modern sense of the word: day-to-day child-rearing responsibilities. It doesn't make sense, aside from social and cultural influence, for people's perspectives on father's to shift so drastically though. Especially with statistics showing that Fathers treat their children better than Mothers do.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 12:57 PM
1

Yeah I agree that there are a lot of other things to consider than leftist policy. The introduction of birth control played a big role in promiscuity in men, women and the introduction of social media also played a big role in the decline of mental health as well. Like you said, things like access to weapons also increases suicide rates. Lots of things contributed to the decline in men’s mental health. I also agree with everything you’ve said about the right pushing against equal drafting. I’m a…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 06:28 PM
0

Again, putting your feelings over facts and statistics and the feelings of men. You’ve again shown that you put your views over what is right for men. Denying the reality of men, misrepresenting them, and leading them down a path of self destruction just so you feel validated in your own views is misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 06:19 PM
0

You don’t care about the facts, so you don’t care about men if it doesn’t benefit your agenda. In other words, your views are misandrist. Got it. No point in continuing a conversation with someone who values his views over men.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 06:10 PM
0

"The right doesn't embrace masculinity; they crucify it on a cross of self-hatred. Everything they define masculinity by is actually men participating in their own destruction and enslavement, cracking the whip on their own back so that some callous-free hand need not bother." Fact: According to a 2018 survey by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), 74% of right-wing men view traditional masculine traits, such as leadership, strength, and courage, as positive and essential to society. Debunk:…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 05:41 PM
0

"You have, and still are." Fact: Over 80% of right-wing voters in the U.S. emphasize the importance of traditional family values, which closely aligns with male advocacy groups focused on preserving family structures (Pew Research Center, 2020). Debunk: You’re wrong. The right-wing and male advocacy groups both prioritize traditional family values, and the data shows they’re on the same page. "Yeah, that's part of what makes them misandrist." Fact: 75% of right-wing policies promote father invol…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 05:21 PM
0

Modern society is the most lenient society in human history when it comes to gender roles. I don’t know why you’d ever think modern society is more strict now than it was 70 or 100 years ago. If gender roles were the problem, a society 70 or 100 years ago, that had the strictest gender roles possible would have more men committing suicide, and modern society with laxed gender roles would have less men committing suicide, however the complete opposite has been happening. As society loosens up on …
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 04:12 PM
0

I'm assuming you meant to type "you’ve confused the majority of the right wing with male advocacy groups" I haven't. The right wing puts a focus on the traditional family structure and strong families. They are the backbone of any society. They improve men's image by highlighting and celebrating masculinity and men's roles in the family and in society instead of demonizing them like the left does. Women, in general like masculine men. They instinctually want a provider and a protector. Deviating…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 04:41 AM
-3

So you think the left, that caused permanent irreparable damage to men's image not just in America, but all over the world, over the course of 70 years, and the actual reason why male suicide has increased almost twofold, is just as bad as the movement trying to improve men's image. "Because a lot of their “embracing masculinity” comes at the cost of directly increasing suicide rates" Nothing has increased suicide rates like leftist policies deterioration of the nuclear family. This is a fact. M…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 03:09 AM
0

How is the right, who embrace masculinity, as misandrist as the movement that seeks to mock and destroy it? We got to be real here, we've seen some misandrist stuff from the right, but the mainstream left pushes out 50x the misandrist stuff in all types of media daily. We have to put our biases to the side. Maybe you've been hurt by the right personally, I understand, but they are nowhere near as bad as the left.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 12:36 AM
3

This is literally a mental illness, she needs to see a therapist. This sounds like a mix of PTSD, Paranoid Personality Disorder, Social Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Even ChatGPT said "It's crucial for this individual to seek support from a mental health professional who can offer a comprehensive assessment and provide appropriate help." And the bot is heavily biased towards feminism.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/08/24 09:38 PM
16

Half if not most of the prenatal calendars on the app store were probably made by men. Helping billions of women around the world. Yet they’d rather the men in their space not work on them because it gives them the ick. Loll it’s hilarious
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 07:18 PM
8

Didn't even realize this but you're 100% right lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/08/24 05:35 AM
2

I mean, you did generalize feminists
/r/EverydayMisandry22/08/24 02:11 AM
1

That's not only feminists that's pretty much women in general. A lot of women solve their problems, at least temporarily by talking to others, men just don't operate that way so therapy is less effective for them at a surface level. Video games, movies, or exercise is a man's therapy. Western society in general is leaned towards being lightly misandrist and somewhat heavily anti misogynist. So even the most center women are going to have a lightly misandrist mindset. So I think you're right, the…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 05:46 PM
3

Most people in real life are not that bad unless you’re on a college campus. Assuming you’re not constantly talking about men’s issues, misandry or misogyny to random people, they have more important things to care about and they won’t even bring it up in a conversation.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 03:50 PM
5

My therapists have all bern female and none of them are misandrist or misandrist-adjacent if that’s even a thing. It makes sense because they have to listen to how hard men (and women) have it daily. My mom used to be a feminist, but stopped claiming to be one by the time she became a social worker. Probably for this same reason. It makes sense for people who don’t care about men and don’t want to hear their problems to end up becoming misandrists.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 03:46 PM
25

I really can’t understand how people like this exist. We really have to watch out who we have sex with, because this really could be any of us.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 03:38 PM
1

Yeah the mantra isn’t always true. It was really meant to be a joke though
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/24 06:09 PM
0

Get woke go broke
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/24 05:25 PM
1

It’s good for telling the good women from the bad ones. Women will always tell on themselves in one way or another. Hence why the good ones lead good lives and the bad ones lead lives as bad as the men they sleep with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:49 PM
1

Getting a woman wouldn’t have been easy for him unless he put in the work. Charisma didn’t get him there. Work + Working Smart (not hard) + Charisma + Luck + Connections, befriending the right people and a lot of other things got him there. You could have the charisma of hitler and still not be wanted by any woman. Charisma is heavily, heavily overrated. A man has to put in a lot of work regardless if he wants results.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:45 PM
1

Well, you’re on to something lol.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:37 PM
1

Billions of men have been circumcised with no issues as well. Only a very minuscule percentage of men are unhappy enough to speak out for or against circumcision. “Parents who didn’t cut their sons did the right thing, you can’t blame them for keeping their son the way he was naturally born.” The men who had to get circumcised as adults & the adult men grateful with their circumcised penis because of the problems they see with other men online and real life would not agree with you. I don’t thin…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:20 AM
1

What would you say to the 10-15% of uncircumcised adult men having to get circumcised mostly due to health related issues? That number would double, possibly even triple once you illegalized circumcision until adulthood. Personally, I’m thanking god my father and mother chose to circumcise me, because a lot of men, in person and on reddit, have to get circumcision as adults, and with the various surgeries and procedures adult men already have to get, most don’t want another painful procedure the…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 10:03 PM
-8

No, most children don’t get their ears pierced until far later. Most babies get circumcised sometime after birth. Anybody who would circumcise their child at the age most children get their ears pierced, should be seriously questioned and critiqued. Circumcision isn’t some type of anti male rhetoric so I don’t even know why it’s so pushed as anti-male so hard in this sub. It’s not like feminists/misandrists or anyone anti-male are fighting tooth and nails to “mutilate” children. It’s been around…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:13 PM
23

This is what social media does to people. They’re being fed a literal alternate reality where all women are righteous gods and all men are evil devils. This woman needs to be mentally evaluated and banned from using a phone for her own mental health.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/24 04:08 PM
1

If it was a different subreddit i could see where you’re coming from, but it could very much be seen just misandry-bait. Just like the man vs bear argument isn’t misandry in and of itself, it just brings alot of misandrists together to crap on men. Plus this is a weird question to ask. How do you not let other people ruin events for you lol? If folks find weird people, men or women, at events, they just naturally keep their space and avoid them. Women are naturally far more keen to this, but no …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/08/24 03:36 PM
6

Put them with a man on a stranded island with pack animals and see how quickly their mindset changes. Only the chronically online can say stuff like this, get upvoted for it, and think they’re actually on to something. Living in lala land.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/08/24 03:48 AM
–

The question assumes that men devalue everything about a woman besides sex, similar to assuming that person on a healthy diet devalues everything about a meal besides the protein. The protein is just one part of the well balanced diet which includes vegetables, fruits and whole grains along with the protein, just like physical intimacy is just one part of the whole of a well balanced relationship that includes emotional intimacy, kindness, respect, and attractiveness among other things. Of cours…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:38 AM
–

A man making $100K is much more likely to chose the woman making $35K. 1) Because the woman making $150K is only looking for men who make her salary or higher, or 2) Because like you said, the man wants a woman who doesn’t out-earn them. Even with the men who don’t want a woman out-earning them, the reasoning behind that goes back to 1), the woman that makes more than him has a higher likelyhood of either 1) Being less attracted to him or 2) Looking for a man who makes more than him, while viewi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 04:19 AM
–

Physical attraction and a nice personality get your foot in the door, short term initial attractors. Personality, hobbies, shared experiences (from similar lines of work), shared values, etc. are what keep you in the house, long term attractors. Men don’t care about careers and education, it’s the shared experiences and mindset that comes from your education and career that matters to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 04:11 AM
–

Most men don’t actively look for women who are well educated and successful and most of them genuinely don’t care. It seems like they do to you, possibly because you’re looking at it from a female perspective. But men don’t operate like that. Men look for women who are attractive, nice to talk to, nice to be around, and intelligent enough to hold a conversation. The woman’s personality, shared values, hobbies, and workspaces, among other things are what keeps them together in shared social circl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 03:54 AM
27

Doesn’t matter if she’s apart of lesbian couple or a straight couple. Her view on half the human population is disgustingly toxic. Which automatically makes her less qualified than 90% of parents, male or female. It’s also hilariously funny that male/male parent households are far more stable and child friendly as opposed to female/female parent households. But, a child being raised by a blatant bigot and sexist is even worse than a child being raised by a blatant racist. They should conduct bac…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/24 04:17 PM
1

I'm not taking his side. He's clearly in the wrong, which is why I said I agree with most of your comment. I was just giving his perspective on a specific part of that comment. OP should have her SOs perspective made known to her. It helps her in case he actually does say something like this. When making demands with people, taking their perspective into consideration can help the demand go through successfully. Sometimes, the consideration for their perspective is absolutely crucial to the dema…
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:56 AM
4

She's a liberal masquerading as a conservative. Real conservative women like my grandma know men don't bother opening doors for women anymore because many women (not all) treat men like garbage. Online and real life. Real conservative women know "conservativeness" goes both ways.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/24 03:44 AM
1

"Of course if she's the one to cheat then that's an entirely different story, but my initial comment wasn't about her cheating." Neither was my comment. She should get what she needs + what she deserves from the split. Whether she gets 50% of everything or 10% of everything, as long as she has all her needs covered while she rebuilds her career, there should be no issue. That is the main point I'm trying to make in my comments. "You took a small portion of my statement out of context and applied…
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:15 AM
1

Well it seems like we agree with each other in your new comment. The only part I don’t agree with you is everything in your first comment past “I’d make it abundantly clear, you will be demanding an equal share in all things that have happened since the marriage.” IF, he got cheated in any way while in the relationship. It’s just not realistic to suggest equal share in all things IF she screws him over in the marriage. It’s a men’s rights subreddit, men should have the right to not get punished …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:00 PM
0

If he gets cheated, why would he want to give away his property(ies) and everything he worked so hard for? He should only be obliged to give away what is necessary for him to give away so that both parties are able to walk away with minimal damages. He gets to leave unscathed and she will still be able to walk away fine. She doesn’t need ownership over 3 properties if he had 6. She doesn’t need $20K/month in alimony for decades to come if he’s making $40K.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:19 PM
1

There are lots of good men out there who will do this, but not every man is good willed. Some people, men or women will take advantage of their spouses’ weaknesses and deficiencies. It’s just how some people are. It’s reasonable to assume the men/women we marry aren’t always going to be the same loving and kind person 5 or 10 years down the line. So we protect ourselves just in case the relationship goes south, for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:04 PM
2

Most of the time they’ll be obeyed by courts as long as they’re reasonable and everybody gets out okay
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:59 PM
3

This, to me, isn’t even worth my time and I don’t even take it seriously. And honestly, a part of me feels sorry for women like this. What kind of trauma do you have to go through to have such a degenerative mindset like this. And the worst part about is no one will ever take her seriously.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/08/24 09:35 PM
3

These radicals appeal to men so that they won’t have to appeal to men anymore. It makes sense in theory, but it will never work. In any universe, when the majority of men are fed up with the way they’re treated, and they get a strong leader, they will physically revolt and willingly put their lives on the line to get better treatment. The more men being treated badly, the worse the revolt. Society will bend to their will because society knows they need men. The difference between men and women i…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 10:39 PM
1

Assuming he is as socially adept as the other guy (which could be unrealistic for a lot of guys) sure he could, but throwing parties is still apart of building your status. So status is still far more important than money. Whether you get to 1mil first and then focus on building status, or you get to 100K first then focus on building status, then going to 1m to boost it, status is still more important. And the qualities that allow a man to build status easily: Charisma, Charm, Social Intelligenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:34 PM
12

They diminishing others people’s struggles, yet when you bring up women who are actually oppressed in middle eastern countries, or women who are kidnapped and forced into horrible situations, they call you out for diminishing their struggles. It’s stupidity. We should live in a world where we listen to other peoples struggles, whether they are hetero, homo, male, female and everything in between instead of dismissing and diminishing them.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/24 07:38 AM
3

Yeah because that is ridiculous
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/24 02:43 PM
3

I’m in that subreddit. I’ve said far worse and not gotten banned. Why did they say they banned you? Keep in mind, I did get banned from r/exredpill though, which is mainly a hardcore radical feminist subreddit.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/24 08:26 AM
3

Radical feminists strongly believe in the hierarchy of victims. Once they start dismissing other victims in the hierarchy, the less credible their victimhood based around this hierarchy is. They need to recognize other victims to fight this made up patriarchy that not only oppresses them, but everyone else. This also means creating as many patriarchy victims as possible. This doesn’t apply to the decent and logical feminists though. Logical feminists don’t have to rely on gimmicks to fight for e…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 04:52 PM
–

Facts
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:55 PM
–

It’s the man’s fault if he isn’t living up to the standard he was living when the wife decided to marry him in. It’s the woman’s fault if she she doesn’t accept him anymore for whatever reason. Same goes the other way around if the man isn’t attracted to his wife anymore. If you lose attraction to the same person you chose to marry, it’s obviously not his fault it’s yours either for marrying him regardless of not finding him attractive, or your fault for the mindset that let to you thinking him …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:45 PM
2

Bringing up dehumanization is a straw man that literally never proves the initial argument wrong. To prove the argument wrong you’d have to prove human value wrong, which is literally impossible as we put value on anyone depending on what they can do for us. But even if you decided to go along with the straw man, once you explain why people value others, whether it be for their humor, emotional intelligence, rationale, loyalty, the dehumanizing argument becomes obsolete. You could also point out…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:18 AM
2

Yeah I had to distance myself from the patriarchy feminism BS and gender war so I ended up muting tons of subs and completely switching my youtube account as to not get flooded by hundreds of redpill misandry/misogyny videos.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/24 04:43 AM
3

Sounds like one of my posts 💀. More people need to start using this argument against patriarchy because it’s such an easy debunk.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 08:17 PM
3

Status is more important when you pass the $80K a year threshold. Assuming one guy is making $1M a year (performing an isolated activity like selling stocks) with no status, and the other guy is making $100K a year with all the status (hosting and getting invited out to parties, cookouts, and other events every weekend), the second guy is getting exponentially more friends and relationship options. We gotta stop deceiving men and acting like all they need is money, and if they can’t attract wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 05:36 PM
1

For adults you have to create your own communities or join existing ones and usually requires you to have at least high 5 figures and a good sized house to host parties, gathering, cookouts, etc. Outside of that, you go to gyms and engage in sports with other men, who invite you out to parties and social gatherings where you meet more people to then host your own gatherings, consistently inviting new people. Status is being seen as the central figure in the communities you join or create. People…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 05:26 PM
2

I wouldn’t label it misandry at all. I’d rather save that label for blatant hate or clear prejudice. But it’s definitely possible.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 01:53 PM
1

Honestly, it may be my limited experience with female best friends but none of my female friends, even casual has ever lashed out at me like how you describe. I think you may just need better female best friends.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 12:39 AM
1

This is super weird. you guys were that close, and all it took was 1 conversation for her to hate you, belittle you, and throw you away like trash? She was never your close friend mate. She never saw you as a close friend. And if you somehow were close friends, it was only because you put her on a pedestal. Either that or you are leaving out a huge part of the conversation where you may have been disrespectful and overly blunt, unintellionally or not, I've seen guys talk to women very disrespect…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:24 PM
1

I said the following in another message: Patriarchy: A system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. Key Word: Excluded. Excluded: To deny (someone) access to a place, group, or privilege. Monarchy: A form of government with a monarch at the head. A monarchy stops being a monarchy when a monarch is not at the head. A patriarchy stops becoming a patriarchy when women are included into government and start holding power in society. In the Unite…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:09 PM
-9

Well yea women prefer circumcised dicks but that’s not really the main argument 💀
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:09 PM
-4

64% in the US. Everybody I know is circumcised too. In terms of the world, 38%.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:49 PM
-6

Since the majority of babies get circumcised, circumcised is the norm and is what is normal here in America. You’re confusing the word normal with original.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:30 PM
-8

Where are the studies saying 64% of the male population undergo trauma from circumcision? I was circumcised and I feel fine, as do every man I know, and all the men they know. I’ve heard many uncircumcised men online complaining about the problems they’ve had with cleanliness and disease because they’re uncircumcised, this is the first time in my life I’ve ever heard somebody complain about being circumcised and it’s not even because of a cleanliness problem or disease they got. It’s because “th…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:27 PM
1

Since the majority of babies get circumcised, circumcised is the norm and is what is normal here in America. You’re confusing the word normal with original. Normal: the usual, typical, or expected state or condition. Circumcised. Original: present or existing from the beginning. Uncircumcised. If you’re going to make arguments to push your points forward, make sure they actually make sense and are linguistically correct.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:09 PM
1

I’m talking about women 9/10 of men would rate at or below 3/10. Like objectively ugly women men slightly avoid. Not repulsive though. The bottom 30 or 20 percentile of women in terms of attractiveness. Sure they can go on Tinder and get a match, but sleeping with someone that doesn’t even want to talk to you, for a woman (not men), isn’t even worth it. And since 9/10 or all guys find you ugly, you won’t get dudes that want to hang out with you at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/24 05:42 PM
1

Mens health, religion and nofaps subs are already doing this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/24 01:38 PM
4

This is facts too, though this mainly applies to average/attractive women, who would make up a majority of the women anyways so your point still stands.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/24 01:26 PM
2

When women are single, a lot of the time it’s a choice. When men are single a lot of the time, it is not a choice, but a predicament. Men aren’t happier, wealthier and healthier because they’re married. It’s because the men who are happier, wealthier and healthier are the ones that get married. While the ones that aren’t are the ones who are single. This means it’s less of a problem of “we need to be happier single” and more acknowledgement that we aren’t happy single because we’re already lacki…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/24 02:03 AM
2

AskFeminism doesn’t do this?
/r/MensRights28/06/24 01:10 AM
5

Because smoking/drug abuse is bad. And the best way to avoid drug abuse is by abstaining from it any kind of regular drug use. A woman/man who regularly uses/abuses drugs is a massive red flag. Especially if they’re doing it just to fit in.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:54 PM
3

In my community, Mother’s day is a day of love, where Father’s day is a day of respect. You show love to the women, and the utmost amount of respect to men. Not sure how this is in other communities, but in ours it’s most likely in response to radical second & third wave Feminism, which has done nearly irreparable damage to the image of Fathers over the past two or three generations.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 01:05 AM
0

Your argument only works if the 10 children with the same father are the only children on the planet. Enabling male disposability? War and hard labor have always existed since the dawn of humanity, and it was always men who have defended and built every society. We have never been seen as “disposable” until recently, and only by misandrist women and weak men. I’m not saying men are disposable. By definition disposable means “Intended to be thrown away after use.” After men go to war, they often …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:32 PM
-2

The double standard is necessary. Birth rates are already plummeting, women don’t need to be drafted to kill even more potential mothers and risk our population. Women also need special considerations as pregnancy is a very vulnerable period for them where their health needs to be closely monitored and supported in order to ensure the birth of a stable next generation of not only women, but MEN as well. However, from my knowledge or lack thereof, prison sentences should be equalized and men dese…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:00 PM
12

Right. And honestly I don’t think it has never been women. But when we say gynocentric government we mean a government that prioritizes women over men. Giving them equality (a good thing) along with all the privileges that come with being the protected sex (which is also okay). Giving them extra help, aid, and protection while denying those same privileges to men (bad). Slightly unrelated, but that leads to the problem a lot of us have with many women. The Patriarchy benefits the women far more …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:07 AM
0

So you find most of the human population, and most women on Earth to be silly? This line of logic is pretty silly in and of itself
/r/ExRedPill12/05/24 11:14 PM
3

Exactly. Be the best version of yourself is way better advice. Don’t even know why people still tell others to just be themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:59 PM
2

So you’re supposed to act undesirable if you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:57 PM
10

Just be yourself is only good advice for people who are already successful in dating and socializing. And most people who are already good at dating don’t need that advice. You should act in a desirable way as long as it’s not in genuine. If I’m a jerk, what good would come out of just being “myself”?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:56 PM
2

You’re sticking multiple stigmas on multiple groups of men in the red pill space. Most redpill men don’t care about virtuous women. Half the community is “going their own way” and have no interest in marriage, long term relationships or women outside of the bedroom. While the other half don’t care about how freaky or “virtuous” a girl is as long as she has a low body count. The hypocrisy lies in the fact that TRP teaches men that they need to have high body counts while only marrying a girl with…
/r/ExRedPill11/05/24 02:11 PM
1

“You may say that they shouldn’t be enforced and just acknowledged- but keeping them around is enough to enforce them- they’re a system of oppression.” You’d be right if people didn’t have any say in who they dated. At the end of the day, if you don’t like the fact that your man is trying to force you into a gender role, you can simply leave them or stay single. It’s literally that simple. “I think both men and women should’ve and should have the choice to fight in a war or stay on the home fron…
/r/ExRedPill11/05/24 01:59 PM
1

If you’re saying acknowledging gender roles isn’t positive, that’s your opinion. From what I’ve heard from you, you think gender roles are negative because from your own experience, men and women have suffered from them. I’m not going to argue you on your personal experience. “Men and women have biologicial differences, but that does not mean behaviors are innate.” Innate Definition: Existing in, belonging to, or determined by factors present in an individual from birth. The behavior we’re talki…
/r/ExRedPill11/05/24 01:53 PM
1

Lol I’m in lots of red pill videos calling out many red pillers in the comment sections. They never call me a feminist. Usually if they call you a feminist it’s because you’re actually talking like one. You can be ex red pill and not sound like a feminist, but some people go from one extreme to the next and end up sounding exactly like a feminist without even realizing it.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 10:16 PM
1

"Just to be clear, you said nothing about respecting men, which no, is not a negative at all." I literally said, "Some red pill beliefs that are positive and helpful... respecting men." To which you replied, "the positive you listed aren’t positives at all and contribute to the negatives." So I'd be logical to assume you we're saying one of the positives I've listed, which was respecting men, isn't positive at all and contribute to the negatives. But maybe you just misread that. Idk. "The issue …
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 09:45 PM
1

Your response is literally exactly what I’m talking about. Respecting men isn’t positive and contributes to negativity? Understanding the differences in genders isn’t positive and contributes to negativity? The “real” positives you mention are still positives. So why are you trying to act like since everyone else is doing it, it isn’t positive anymore. People are actually improving themselves because of red pill beliefs, like I did and am still doing. Islam has contributed towards terro**sm and …
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 07:43 PM
1

I always tell anyone that has mental issues or tauma not to date anybody else with mental issues or trauma. It just makes everything 10x worse. Trying to fix him probably won’t work either so you should really just leave. But if you really don’t want to leave, what you really need to do is have a serious conversation with him. You need to tell him he needs to change his ways and the way he talks or else you’re done with him. You need to stand up to him, set your boundaries and let him know you w…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 01:38 PM
2

The problem I’ve seen is that people often answer people’s questions simply saying “Just go get therapy.” Without even trying to come up with any solutions for their problems. Literally comes across as lazy and straight up unhelpful a lot of times. I applaud the people that actually try to help people by offering solutions and advice WITH their therapy suggestions. But I haven’t seen a lot of that here, just a few instances.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 01:03 PM
1

Honestly, there’s another huge issue with this sub. It seems like a lot of people on here weren’t red pill in the first place. I came on here thinking this was a sub where people learned a lot from red pill, have some red pill beliefs that are positive and helpful, like gender roles, respecting men, differences in dating between men and women, gender differences, strengths and weaknesses, but also find red pill destructive because of the blatant lies, disrespectful anti women behavior these peop…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/24 12:31 PM
-1

If attractiveness was subjective, a persons physical attractiveness would be based on a person’s feelings, opinions, and emotions, and would have absolutely nothing to do with someone’s attractiveness, which makes no sense and is flat out and utterly false. Preferences, depending on how they’re framed, are subjective, attractiveness is objective.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/24 10:42 PM
1

Yes, if 75% tinder users are men and 25% are women, it makes it easier for women to get a match and harder for men to get a match. Which is why its still 10x harder for a man to get a match. Idk if you were trying to elaborate on my point or disprove it, but it doesn’t disprove my point at all. It just adds credibility to my previous point because the dating pool is already larger for women off rip. Making dating far easier for women in general.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/24 09:06 AM
-5

What lol. A large majority of dads get custody because they do try to get custody and they end up getting it. The percentage of men that aren’t in their childrens lives at all is in the single digits. And a lot of them can be boiled down to reasons other than not wanting to be involved like drama, mental issues, financial issues, etc. Idk if you’re biased against men and fathers or you just didn’t know, but spreading this type of false rhetoric can be destructive. I strongly agree with everythin…
/r/ExRedPill20/04/24 03:28 AM
–

There is no statistic to prove there is any difference. But I’d say men handle general loneliness much better. Many men just play video games, workout, or do other things to keep busy. Men commit more suicide yeah, but women commit self harm far more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:40 PM
1

S***** marketplace value for a woman is measured by how many men view her attractive enough to have bedroom fun with, or in simpler terms how many men she is able to have bedroom fun with. Half of men would out there sleep would sleep with any average+ woman even if she didn’t get ready that morning. We’re not talking about the men you like, I’m talking about all men period. The average girl doesn’t have to take 2 hours a day or even 30 minutes to attract the local mailman, or the delivery boy, …
/r/ExRedPill14/04/24 12:05 PM
4

"Don't love a man for what he is." This red pill idea was flawed from the very start so the rest of it is going to be incoherent because they think women are unable to love in the first place. Women do love men for who they are. Love is a bond. You form that bond with that person by spending time with them and going through things together. It is basic human biology. The Redpillers you're speaking of do say women are selfish and materialistic for wanting a man that can provide them security and …
/r/ExRedPill13/04/24 11:56 PM
0

If men could get as many women as women do, by taking hours to get ready. You'd see every man on Earth gladly take 5 hours to get ready every morning. If we're going on based on Tinder statistics, men need 100 swipes to get a match while women only need 10. There are countless studies showing how easy it is for the average woman to get a date vs a man. To become a man that can essentially get a date every night if they want to, like the average woman is able to get, you have to put in thousands …
/r/ExRedPill13/04/24 11:28 PM
1

You might have messed it up or it may have been her. Either way, not too much you can do about it until you guys meet up again. So it’s best not to stress about it and find something else productive to do to take your mind off of her. This is a good lesson on dealing with, what you perceive to be potential rejection. Also, if you think you may have looked too unappealing, maybe you need to do some grooming, possibly. Find clothes that compliment your body type and style well. NOT for her, but ju…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/24 02:49 AM
1

The value they’re talking about is “s***ual marketplace” value, for both genders, which is primarily how valuable you are as a bed partner. Women are born with all the value they’ll pretty much ever need minus the makeup and accessories, while men do have to work pretty hard for it. What they’re saying is true, the problem is it reduces men and women to s** objects, which is a simple minded way of viewing humans. A person’s value is determined by how valuable they are to other people. A true hig…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/24 02:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter