TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheRabbitTunnel Archive

View 42 posts and 2,619 comments by TheRabbitTunnel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1922

Social IssuesTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:02 AM
1643

Social IssuesTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights04/10/21 07:13 PM
811

Men's RightsTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 08:21 PM
788

FeminismTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights10/07/21 08:44 AM
739

Legal RightsTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights09/05/22 10:56 PM
660

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW10/11/18 04:09 PM
611

h0nk !TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW24/01/20 01:45 AM
542

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:56 PM
497

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW20/10/18 07:48 PM
422

Red Pill TheoryTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 07:02 PM
392

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW16/08/18 07:04 PM
268

CMVTheRabbitTunnel/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 05:29 PM
199

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW19/12/18 03:14 PM
190

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW09/11/18 09:30 PM
174

legal rightsTheRabbitTunnel/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 05:21 AM
162

FeminismTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:38 PM
143

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW22/09/18 10:37 PM
130

misandryTheRabbitTunnel/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:06 PM
126

FeminismTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:04 PM
88

TheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill30/01/16 04:21 PM
86

Red Pill TheoryTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill26/11/18 08:56 PM
76

MemeTheRabbitTunnel/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/21 12:44 AM
60

False AccusationTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights23/05/21 04:14 PM
56

Takin' the PissTheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW05/11/18 03:36 PM
45

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW19/07/21 12:46 AM
42

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW16/01/20 11:38 PM
38

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW17/01/19 09:51 PM
30

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW13/02/20 09:48 PM
27

Men's RightsTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 10:59 PM
24

CMVTheRabbitTunnel/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 06:53 PM
19

Red Pill TheoryTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 08:17 PM
18

TheRabbitTunnel/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 02:41 PM
18

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW27/01/19 12:12 PM
14

legal rightsTheRabbitTunnel/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/22 10:54 PM
4

Red Pill TheoryTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 12:34 AM
2

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW25/02/20 03:57 PM
2

Red Pill TheoryTheRabbitTunnel/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 11:25 PM
1

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW16/01/20 11:30 PM
1

Post for ModsTheRabbitTunnel/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 07:55 PM
1

FeminismTheRabbitTunnel/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:55 AM
1

TheRabbitTunnel/r/MGTOW28/06/19 05:38 PM
0

DebateTheRabbitTunnel/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 06:05 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,619 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Except they are propped up so every time new users join they radicalise them Dont be dramatic like the wokies are. People should be able to read radical opinions. It wouldnt be a problem if not for literally promoting these like auto adding all women users into twox and stuff like that. I agree that its really dumb that subs like TwoX are default subs. Thats not the same as wanting those subs banned. I hate censorship just as you do You dont Ask for better treatment for yourself in the current s…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 05:54 PM
-4

lets make men feel valued too. All you have to do is not go into their subs and read their posts. I mean reddit is full of dumb posts about men even on main subs, but thats not the kind of posts that OP is advocating to be banned. I hate hypocrisy I hate censorship for wrongthink.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:45 PM
-4

We are supporting censorship for wrongthink now? Thats the same censorship that will get us banned. Who cares if delusional misandrists write dumb rants on reddit.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:38 PM
16

Loser mods removed it
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:55 AM
1

that way From what I know, innocent men being executed is almost always from murder trials. How many innocent terrorists were executed? How many innocent men in prison were executed due to them supposedly killing other prisoners? Although I will say, it doesn't seem hard to frame someone for murder in prison. So maybe not use the death penalty for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/22 03:30 PM
1

You know what I meant. I dont support what our military has done and is currently doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/22 03:26 PM
-3

Thats an oversimplification. The death penalty could be reserved for extreme cases like terrorism or prisoners who repeatedly kill other prisoners/guards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/22 03:22 PM
3

Whether or not the death penalty should exist is a complicated issue, but this legislation in the OP is complete and utter horseshit. Wrongfully convicted people deserve a lot of compensation. They deserve it and it incentivizes the state to stop wrongfully convicting people. Executing people when theres doubt about their guilt is also a gross injustice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/22 03:05 PM
1

I was confused because me and the first person you responded to didn't defend the teacher in anyway. We just said it wasn't rape (based on the info. It could be rape if more info came out). Your responses made it sound like you thought it was definitely rape. But I guess it wouldve been better for me to just ask about that right away.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:16 PM
31

They can't argue most of their points with facts or rationality because facts and rationality don't support their echo-chambered delusions. The reality is that, in the Western world of 2022, women are the privileged gender. They still have issues, but they are small and niche, at least compared to issues of other demographics. Despite this, feminists continue to claim that women are oppressed and we live in a patriarchy. So basically, their general beliefs about gender issues are just straight u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 06:21 PM
1

That is such an insane strawman. Pretty much zero feminists are saying "all heterosexual sex is rape because all men have power over women." However, there are plenty of feminists who do say "when a man in a position of authority has sex with a female beneath him, its rape because she cant consent due to power imbalance." There are people in this thread who are using a similar argument regarding OPs post. Theyre saying "because the teacher was in a position of authority over the student, its rap…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:15 PM
1

I clarified that we can’t know and there is a power balance and therefore to protect students or people in care of are other, the guardian/care person are not allowed to have sexual relationships with them and it therefore being illegal. I dont remember you clarifying that, maybe I missed it. While I disagree with people jumping the gun to say its rape, Id say I mostly agree with this comment.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:10 PM
0

I already clarified that I agree that teacher/student sex is wrong and should be punishable. You clarified that you dont think this case is rape. So we agree. But you keep flip flopping between "we agree" and "we dont agree." Make up your fucking mind clown. Why are you arguing age of consent even? I didn’t argue about age of consent. Are you fucking serious? In your other comment you specifically said "minor", as in someone too young to consent. Im done dealing with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:26 AM
1

He didnt say all men have power over women. He said (paraphrasing )"if you consider this rape, you are doing what feminists do, which is claiming that whenever someone with authority has sex with someone beneath them, the person with power is always at fault regardless of context." Your response to that ("teachers have authority, men dont have authority over women") made no sense. He didnt say all men have power over women and he never denied that teachers have authority over students. He wasnt …
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:18 AM
1

Youre clearly not understanding this very simple concept, so this is my last comment. Someone made an argument. You made a counter argument. But now youre saying you never actually disagreed with that person and that Im dumb for assuming that you did. Its not my fault you made a counter argument against something you agreed with. Obviously, that implies that you disagree. Goodbye, clown.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 07:34 AM
1

I dont disagree about teachers having authority. I thought you were claiming that this situation is rape, since you are arguing with someone who said it wasnt rape. Now try again Your comment isn't the "dunk" you think it is. Youre refusing to explain why youre arguing with someone on a topic youre claiming you 2 agree about. The other person never said teachers don't have authority, they simply claimed that this situation isnt rape. Youre now saying you never claimed it was rape either, so what…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 12:46 AM
1

Someone argued that this wasn't a case of rape. You responded to them by talking about how teachers have authority over their students. If you agree that this wasn't rape, why did you argue with someone who was arguing it wasnt rape?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:15 PM
1

Did you not follow the chain of comments? People were debating about whether or not this is rape. Someone argued that its not rape and someone responded by saying that "teachers have authority over their students." Edit: It was literally you who did that. If you agree that its not rape, then why are you arguing against the people who are also saying its not rape? Clown
/r/MensRights21/05/22 10:30 PM
1

I think a teacher sleeping with a student is wrong regardless of age. But that doesnt make it rape.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:46 PM
1

Im not the clown whose suggesting that its rape anytime someone with authority sleeps with someone beneath them. Thats ridiculous, which was my point.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:45 PM
1

You just keep missing the point over and over again. One person argued that "its rape when someone with power has sex with someone beneath them." Thats complete nonsense and I pointed that out by using the example of a woman sleeping with her boss, because thats clearly not rape. Teacher/student sex doesn't have to be identical to boss/employee sex for my point to be valid. My point was that its not always rape when an authority figure has sex with someone below them. Yet you just keep saying "a…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:53 AM
5

consent in a minor towards their teacher Age of consent is 16 in philly, where this took place. Might be different in your country, but thats not relevant. Your country isn't the moral dictator of the universe. Does this passage read to you like I am talking about rape? Especially the last sentence? Does it, mh? Ya don’t think so. Then why are you so aggressively arguing against two people who say that "this is wrong, but not rape"? Dont argue against someone and then complain when they assume t…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:50 AM
1

Second a teacher should never have sex with a minor and that is still taking advantage over your student and cheating on your partner I completely agree. Its wrong and teachers should be fired for it. Doesn't make it rape and I refuse to stoop to the level of feminists by referring to this as rape. First again I didn't wrote that. Oh someone else wrote it and you were the one who responded to my response. Anyway, your rebuttal is still nonsense, for the exact reason I described. The other person…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:39 AM
-7

So are you saying it was or wasn't rape? I thought it was pretty clear we are in agreement that student/teacher sex is wrong and any teacher should be fired for it, because its such a conflict of interest. But that doesn't make it rape. Do you agree or not? That was the point of the original comment. That we shouldn't be classifying cases like this as rape. Its what feminists do. Lets not stoop to that level.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:28 AM
-4

I didn't said that You literally said this quote, word for word: "Teachers are literally in a position of authority over students. Always the case if they're their students. Are men in a position of authority over women?." That was a terrible argument for two reasons: It implies that if someone in a position of authority has sex with someone beneath them, then its rape. Thats nonsense You said "are men in a power of position over women?", as if there are no men in a position of power over any wo…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:19 AM
-8

lol, are you really so naive that you don’t realize it doesn’t have to be said to still have an effect? Like, for real? No, I think teacher/student sex is wrong and any teacher should be fired for doing it, for the reason you said (conflict of interest). But that doesn't make it rape. If theres any evidence that the teacher coerced the student, then yeah that opens up the possibility of rape. But with no evidence of that? And the student was old enough to consent? Then no, not rape. Lets not sto…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:14 AM
-11

No. Youre the one who said "one is in a position of authority." Im showing you why that argument is silly, because its clearly not rape every time someone in a position of power has sex with someone they have power over.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:09 AM
1

You literally argued based on legality. "One is legal, the other is not." You didnt make any moral/scientific argument as to why people under 18 cant consent. You argued based on the fact that legal age of consent is 18 is most states. Dont make an argument based on legality, then immediately switch to "oh but thats states law is wrong." 17 year olds, generally, are mature enough to consent to sex. There isnt some magic switch that flips once they hit 18 and suddenly makes them understand sex. N…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:01 AM
1

Age of consent in Pennsylvania (where this took place) is 16. By arguing that right and wrong is based on the law, you just completely negated your own argument, as the law says this was consensual sex. I agree with you about media bias, but this was not a case of rape.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:48 AM
0

One is legal and the other is not. Age of consent in Pennsylvania (where this took place) is 16. You just completely negated your own argument. Arguing that the law dictates right and wrong is an incredibly terrible argument to make.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:47 AM
-20

All male bosses are in a position of authority over their female employees. Do you think it should be classified as rape anytime a woman sleeps with her boss?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:44 AM
-24

How do you proof consent when there is a clear power imbalance like teacher/student? Did the teacher say "have sex with me or it'll effect your grades?" No? Then the power imbalance isn't relevant. literally illegal to give grades to a (university) student you have a sexual relationship with because of this pretty obvious conflict of interest Conflict of interest =/= rape. In Pennsylvania, where this happened, the age of consent is 16. The 17 year old student went over to the teachers house, mul…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:42 AM
1

Dont worry about the downvotes. No matter how good a subreddit is, its an echo chamber to some degree. This student was 17 and voluntarily went to the teachers house, multiple times, for sex. Furthermore, the age of consent is 16 in Pennsylvania, where this took place. This clearly wasn't rape. But the people in this sub are used to the media refusing to refer to female rapists as rapists. Because of this, some get carried away and classify pretty much any student/teacher sex as rape, even in ca…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:39 AM
17

Their idea that "women are oppressed" is literally the definition of unfalsifiable. Any evidence that women aren't oppressed is just dismissed in one way or another, like referring to female privilege as "patriarchy backfiring."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 06:55 PM
2

I agree. As things are now,, more PTO would be nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/22 06:18 PM
1

Not necessarily. I'm a strong believer in workers rights. We need to make sure that workers are safe, that they're not abused/manipulated, and that they're compensated fairly. I would also prefer a 4 day work week. However, I disagree with lots of PTO. Why should a company pay you to sit at home? I think people should only get paid if they are working, but that pay should be good enough that they can take plenty of unpaid days off and not worry about bouncing checks. I feel the same way about he…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/22 04:59 PM
1

I see now, but in our current society, only 1 gender has to take responsibility. That was the point of this post.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:46 PM
1

I agree its used to divide people. That doesnt make what I said any less true. In fact, its good to address this shit, because until this kind of shit is addressed, the elites will always be able to use it to divide us.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:12 PM
1

So youre saying its also the womans choice to be a parent? And no, consenting to sex isnt consenting to parenthood.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:09 PM
2

You said that if a man has unprotected sex, and cums inside her, it was his choice to be a parent.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:47 AM
1

The bill doesn't stop abortions in the event that the mothers life is in danger. Try drinking less feminist cool-aid and actually read it.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:11 AM
1

Well I'm glad we came to some sort of an understanding. Usually, when the conversation comes to this point, the person just ignores me. You seem like a genuine, well-intentioned feminist. I promise you, many of them are not that way.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:08 AM
3

The fact that men have to pay child support for children they didn't intend to have is absolutely a reproductive rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:57 PM
2

That article mentioned nothing about suing for child support. It just said if the bio dad is not on the birth certificate, he has neither any right nor responsibility (for example, a mother could put her new husband/the childs stepfather on the birth certificate). This article actually discusses how mothers can sue the fathers for child support even when theyre not on the birth certificate: https://www.lawforfamilies.com/12332834-pay-child-support-im-not-birth-certificate.html
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:55 PM
2

I don't really have one for you You said you looked it up and found out that as long as men dont sign the birth certificate, they dont have to pay child support. So send me whatever it is you found. Unless, perhaps, youre full of it? Or maybe your country is one of the few that do that? In the US and many other big countries, men are on the hook for the child whether they sign the certificate or not.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:16 PM
2

Source? And buzzfeed doesnt count.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:50 PM
2

You hear feminists say that? They like to lie a lot. Because if they dont, their narrative crumbles to dust.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:43 PM
3

No it doesnt. She can sue for child support and she'll win.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:34 PM
5

Way to counter my argument about how society cares about womens issues but not mens. Which was the point, which you clearly missed.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:20 PM
2

No, she gets to abort it. Or give it up for adoption. And female child support is a joke. Way lower than mens and never enforced.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:19 PM
2

If there is an unintentional pregnancy, and the woman keeps the baby even when the man doesnt want to, then he is being forced into parenthood against his will. 18 years child support at minimum. And dont say "you take that risk when you have sex" because that would apply to women too. But of course youd freak out if someone said that. Goodbye, clown
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:12 PM
1

So when 2 people have sex, its only the mans fault if she becomes pregnant? Rofl
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:09 PM
2

Its called body autonomy, genius. And being forced to be a parent is 100% relevant to abortion, obviously. Im done with your emotionally loaded non-arguments and misrepresentation.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:07 PM
3

Im mocking feminists who dont give a flying fuck about the fact that men have 0 reproductive rights but freak the fuck out at the possibility that some states may ban abortion. Anyway, Im tired of your bad-faith bullshit and obvious misrepresentation of the situation, so I wont be responding anymore
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:05 PM
2

Abortion rights are about body anonymity thats it Bull fucking shit. Its also about not being forced into parenthood against your will.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:03 PM
3

Rofl, so if 2 people have sex, its all the mans fault? Clown.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:01 PM
3

Nothing ive said indicates I have a lack of empathy. You, on the other hand, clearly have no empathy for mens issues. Which was the exact point of my post. Thanks for helping to prove my point.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:00 PM
3

Lmao it takes 2 to make a baby
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:58 PM
3

Nope, this post is about the gender empathy gap.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:58 PM
2

But you still presented it as something that should be taken seriously I didnt, I present it as mens pain that people dont care about. The entire point of this post was to 1. Point out the gender empathy gap and 2. Point out how insane it is to suggest that women dont have more reproductive rights than men. Pointing out that plenty of men feel intense emotional pain from an abortion they didnt want is a way to support the claim that men suffer more from reproductive issues, not women. Yet, peopl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 03:38 AM
1

No, there isnt. Outlawing abortion would be the only way to do that.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:27 AM
1

I didnt argue that abortion is murder. I said plenty of men feel like their child is murdered during abortion, which is absolutely true. Its just another reason that its so asinine to suggest that women dont have more reproductive rights than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 03:20 AM
2

I thought your comment was in response to what I said. Like, a woman saying "oh, you as a man dont have reproductive rights? Welcome to our world"
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:47 AM
15

Lmfao, so the same applies to women? Youre saying that anytime any women has consensual sex, shes consenting to pregnancy? Obviously not. If two people have sex and they never discussed pregnancy, its pretty fucking obvious that he didnt consent to pregnancy.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:46 AM
9

Im not forgetting anything. Im pointing out that people dont give a fuck about mens issues, but go hogshit insane over womans issues. Being forced to be a parent when you dont want to be is way worse than just carrying a pregnancy to term.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:44 AM
1

The fetus is growing in her body, so she has final say. I didnt argue that she doesnt have final say. Im clarifying that its women who have reproductive rights, not men. Because feminists are acting like women have less reproductive rights than men, which is asinine. Abortion isn't murder and we won't entertain that argument here I didnt say it was murder, I said a lot of men feel like their child was murdered through abortion. Doesn't mean they should be forced to make her carry the baby to ter…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 02:42 AM
0

Welcome to your world? As of now, you have all the reproductive rights. So no actually, its you who may be welcome to our world. Men have no reproductive rights. During a pregnancy, the woman gets to decide everything. With abortion being outlawed, that changes. So no, its you who is welcome to our world.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:39 AM
2

Being forced to be a parent when you dont want to be one is WAY worse than being forced to be pregnant for 9 months (unless of course the pregnancy is dangerous). It is absolute nonsense to say that body autonomy is the #1 issue here.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:37 AM
9

You are claiming no one cares, but that's objectively false Im well aware that there are people who care. You know what I meant when I said nobody cares. With women: it has nothing to do with anything other than the pregnancy and what that does to the body. Absolute 100% nonsense. Pregnancies effect on the body is definitely part of it, for sure. But women usually get abortions because they dont want to be a mother, not because theyre worried about pregnancies effect on the body. And I didnt arg…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:32 AM
28

Its about the gender empathy gap. People are perfectly fine with men being forced into parenthood. But women being forced into parenthood? They go hogshit insane.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:37 AM
6

But this is a pretty big fucking deal I didn't say it wasn't a big deal. Reproductive rights are a big deal. But where was all the outrage before this, when it was just men who were forced into parenthood? There was none.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 12:31 AM
65

Speaking of pure bigoted garbage, there was a highly upvoted post on twox that said "Im not going to date men anymore until I, as a woman, I have the same reproductive rights as men." Uhh, what? Men dont have reproductive rights. During an accidental pregnancy, the man is at the complete mercy of the woman. If he wants to abort it and she doesnt, he has to pay 18 years of child support. Furthermore, if hes not active in the childs life, people call him a deadbeat. And if he wants to keep it (bec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/22 01:45 AM
23

people using their underprivileged status Its not even underprivileged status. Women are more privileged than men in the Western world. "Mansplaining" is a made up thing by feminists who have nothing left to complain about.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:18 AM
5

She could not walk the streets alone without the very real possibility of sexual assault and or murder. Absolute nonsense hysteria. Heres the data for crime in india: https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/CII%202019%20SNAPSHOTS%20STATES.pdf A total of 400k reported crimes committed against women in India, compared to Indians 700 million women. Thats 1/1750. Further more, "crimes committed by husband or relative" where the most common. So no, it is completely nonsensical hysteria to say that wo…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:15 PM
3

Hope she sees this bro.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:04 PM
2

no he just blamed men not being men anymore on radical feminist No, stop atrawmanning. He literally said that womwn entering the workforce made wages stagnant. There's no evidence for this anymore than there is evidence that immigrants are decreasing wages No evidence? That is so disingenuous. Look at the data for wages compared to cost of living and inflation since the 50s. Wages became stagnant while everything else kept going up. As women became more and more common in the workplace, wages dr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 12:46 AM
1

He didnt say that women shouldnt be able to work. He said that women entering the workforce is the reason that wages became stagnant. Which is true because the supply of labor almost doubled while the demand didnt change much. Feminism absolutely helped capitalists. Doesnt mean that women shouldnt be allowed to work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 12:25 AM
1

Fantastic counter argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 11:59 PM
9

Its also a complete myth that incels only want supermodels and refuse to settle for less. Ive read plenty of incel forums and actual incels would fuck pretty much any woman that would let them. Feminists have to straight up lie about incels, because if not, it shatters their worldview. Incels are proof that female privilege exists independent of "the patriarchy backfiring", which they just refuse to acknowledge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/22 09:05 PM
6

They are allowed. Wtf are you talking about?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:44 PM
2

closeted homophobes Do you mean closeted homosexuals? If not, Im very confused by your comment. If you do mean homosexuals, then yes I agree. Its very insulting to imply that shitty behavior is connected to being gay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/22 08:17 PM
20

Misandrist is too strong of a word if you're going to say "majority of women." Lets not just throw that word around the same way that feminists just throw around "misogyny." However, I agree that the majority of both men and women are more critical of men and protective of women. Most people think its acceptable to criticize men as a whole and they see no problem with society prioritizing women over men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/22 07:18 PM
1

Tall men make women feel safe because of evolution. Not because people make fun of short men. Are you serious?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 03:53 PM
14

Women are evolutionary attracted to height and strength. Women dont feel attracted to tall and strong men just because gym bros encourage each other to be muscular. What planet are you living on?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:30 PM
11

Whered you read that? Buzzfeed? Most soldiers on both sides are men. Women get to flee while men have to stay and die. Try using your fucking brain.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 06:36 AM
2

I'm always a little confused when I read men saying they've never encountered the most radical branches of feminism Hes likely encountered them, but doesnt count them as radical because he doesn't see a problem with what they say
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 08:30 PM
17

Textbook feminism is all about egalitarianism Its not. Both men and women have their advantages and disadvantages. Feminism advocates to make women "equal" in any area that men are disadvantaged, but is perfectly happy with women staying advantaged in the areas that theyre currently advantaged. Thats not equality, its female superiority. For feminism to be identical to equality, there would have to be no ways in which men are disadvantaged. As long as there are ways in which men are disadvantage…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 05:48 AM
7

Egalitarians aren't blind to the differences between the genders. They can recognize that catcalling is worse for women than men and conclude that we shouldn't be catcalling women. You can absolutely advocate for womens issues without being a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 11:26 PM
22

Its complete nonsense. Just one of the many feminist myths that they so desperately grasp onto in order to keep their unnecessary movement alive. Society takes womens health (and all their other problems) more seriously than mens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 05:32 PM
4

Feminists are welcome to debate us here and in other mens subs. As long as they make good-faith arguments, we engage with them in a respectful and civil way. This is pretty rare, however, because feminism is dependent on lies. Most societies/cultures cater to women. In countries like the USA, women are very privileged. They have everything from systemic privileges (courts in their favor, more funding for womens programs, healthcare, etc) to cultural privileges such as them getting more financial…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 04:07 PM
5

Go read feminist forums and tell me you honestly believe that they dont trash men. Unless feminist forums dont count as "real feminism"? How about Katherine Spillar, a major figure in feminism who opposes reproductive rights for men and denies that men go through domestic abuse? If feminism is about equality, how did a person like that become so successful within the feminist movement? What about Erin Pizzey? She started the first and largest domestic violence shelter in the world. Not only does…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:28 PM
6

Those people are not real feminists. Do you think you are enlightening us with such profound statements? No, weve heard it thousands of times already. They are real feminists. Feminism is defined by the behaviors of its members. When most feminists are hateful female supremacists, it means thats what the movement has become. There are feminist organizations that work on men’s rights Most of them dont and many of them actively oppose mens rights. The whole concept of feminism is to one day have g…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:49 PM
15

The dictionary can say whatever it wants. That doesnt change the misandrist behavior of feminists in the official movement (organizations and whatnot). Even aside the misandry, feminism still isnt about equality. Men and women both have their advantages and disadvantages. Feminism focuses on eliminating womens disadvantages, while doing nothing to help mens disadvantages. This has put women in a position of social superiority. They still have the benefits of traditional gender roles (not being d…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:05 PM
13

Fuck off
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:50 PM
2

If I was more acknowledged about something, he wouldn't hesitate to ask for an opinion This genius doesnt know the difference between "knowledgeable" and "acknowledged", yet shes ranting about how men don't take her intelligence seriously. Oh, but the one guy who did take her intelligence seriously? Yeah, she cheated on him ("the relationship ended for external reasons"). Zero self awareness.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/22 04:47 PM
8

Youre a fucking idiot if you think this is about "country." Its about 1 group of elitists wanting power and another group of elitists fighting back. The soldiers are just pawns in their game. Ukraine alone doesn't stand a chance, so its ridiculous to force the men to stay and die in a war they can't win. Either NATO should get involved to stop the war, or they should just let Russia have Ukraine. Ukraine fighting alone just means a bunch of unnecessary civilian deaths (men getting conscripted). …
/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:30 PM
18

You think theyre pussies because they dont want to die? How the fuck do you call yourself an MRA? If youre so passionate about it, go to Ukraine and grab a gun. See how you feel about russian tanks and helicopters shooting at you. Fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:20 PM
2

Misinformation reporter "Misinformation" has been hijacked to mean "anything that challenges the woke narrative." Every single "misinformation" reporter/researcher Ive seen has been a woke shitlib.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 07:28 AM
1

Can I be approved? Ive been active in mens rights subs for years.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 11:43 PM
3

I agree with most of you, but women can fail to see the downsides of being male, without assuming that men have the same in-group bias as women do. Its specifically the recognition of in-group bias that I disagree with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:45 PM
7

That doesnt mean they are aware of their own in-group bias, which is whats leading to them sticking together. A lot of our behavior is the result of our own subconscious processes that we aren't aware of. They instinctively stick together without even realizing they are being biased.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 05:00 AM
9

Yeah, many of mens issues exist because of mens out-group bias. Just like you said, theyre willing to have a draft for themselves because of the out-group bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:48 AM
35

I dont think that women assume men have the same in group impulse. I dont think they even recognize their own in group bias. Its subconscious. If thats true, then women dont assume "men arent fixing this so it must not be a real issue." They just never cared from the start. Its evolution for humans to care about women and take care of their problems. Aside from that, I think that if men had the same in group bias that women do, then feminism wouldnt be nearly as popular and mens advocacy would c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 11:47 PM
26

For one, feminism never stops. Women are already WAY ahead in education, yet feminists just keep pushing for more advantages for women in education. No matter how good things are, feminists find some way to play victim and demand more rights. Feminists are also disgusting liars. Spreading harmful lies about patriarchy, wage gap, rape culture, etc. They tell women they are constantly in danger from men, which is hysterical nonsense. They also treat men like shit. When men try to discuss mens issu…
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 06:33 AM
23

Why do we pretend that in order for things to change , women won't have to lift a finger? Probably because of all the idiots who say "men created patriarchy. They made this mess, its their job to clean it up." As if we are still in a patriarchy. And as if women had no role in creating the (historical) patriarchies and our current society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 12:57 AM
7

I would avoid basing my political ideology on internet buffoonery The internet isnt some separate dimension. Its real people saying their real beliefs on a computer. Dismissing these people on the basis that "its just the internet" how it became so widespread in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 10:19 PM
0

If their small article is so solid, why didnt they provide any sources to back it? Theyre making all these claims but didnt post any studies or data to back it? Yeah, youd have to be a moron to not see that as suspicious.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 05:20 PM
1

Your "sources" havent been credible backs to your argument. I dont need sources cause im not the idiot claiming that you can take hormone blockers during a crucial developmental peroid and have 0 long term effects. Its like youre saying "prove god doesnt exist!". The burden of proof is on you because youre the one defending hormone blockers for teens.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 04:48 PM
1

Really? So if you take hormone blockers from 12 to 16, then decide to stop, you will finish puberty as if you never took blockers? No permenant effect from taking blockers for 4 years during a crucial time of development? Get the fuck out of here. Thats is information provided by UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. Not some tabloid Doesnt matter where its from. If they dont reference anything to back it up, its an unsupported claim.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 04:39 PM
3

Here's yet another source that probably won't be good enough for you, for one reason or another LMAO, that link is just text. Wheres the evidence? Theres nothing to back it up. No studies being referenced or anything. The fact that you think thats a valid source just proves how little you know about actual science.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:35 PM
5

Let me give you an example of why Im so skeptical of how you're approaching this. There are plenty of people, even "scientists" who are arguing that trans women should be allowed in womens sports and that they don't have an unfair advantage. They have their "science" to back it up. Of course the studies are intentionally flawed/misleading, because good science says that men are clearly much stronger. The evidence back this up, because trans women are dominating when they do compete. Smashing rec…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:03 PM
7

Heres an idea, why dont you post a link that actually supports your argument? Then we can start discussing things. Without seeing solid science one way or another, Im gonna stick with the idea that you cant just go through puberty again later in life (and have it be the same). You are the one making the claim that a person can go through puberty as an adult and it will be the same. Your need to back that up. You didnt. You did a quick google search for pro-trans articles and just posted those. Y…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:53 PM
5

Stop acting like science is unanimously on your side. The fact that you think it is just proves that you know nothing about science.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:51 PM
18

4 sources? I took the liberty to read through the first one and there was not one thing about how you can fully reverse puberty blockers, or surgery, or anything. Which is exactly what your argument is. So yeah, you posted an irrelevant source. If you want people to look at your other 3, youll have to point us to a specific part, because Im not reading through another entire link just for it to end up as nothing again. Waste of time. And I'll point out not a single one of you have been able to p…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:39 PM
25

I read the first link and it said nothing about how you can fully reverse the effects if you change your mind, which is what youre arguing. Which means Im not going through the effort of the other 3 links because your credibility is already ruined. Doing things like taking puberty blockers absolutely has long term effects that can't be fully undone. And scientists disagree with each other all the time, especially with how much politically motivated "science" is being pushed. Its idiotic to find …
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:27 PM
29

"Its just tumblr weirdos bro, this stuff doesnt happen in real life" "The internet isnt real life" is one of the stupidest arguments to dismiss real issues.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:22 PM
2

Lmao fixed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 02:35 AM
9

It sounds like a good lesson in self destruction, but yeah the way that people portray her as a victim is so outrageous. Definitely gynocentrism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 05:53 PM
2

It was serious in the event that it broke the fourth wall and for the first time in a long time brought political violence back The BLM riots already did that. Talk about police reform all you want, the reality is the media wildly exaggerated the way that black people are treated by police. In 2019, there were 27 unarmed black men shot by police. And unarmed means no gun (they could have other weapons like a knife). 27 in a country of 320 million people. Could the system be better? Sure. Is the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 05:10 PM
1

Jan 6 was incredibly exaggerated. It was a bunch of boomers protesting and they got out of control with going into peoples offices. A total of 4 people died, and they were all protesters who went too far. They weren't even armed either. Calling it an "insurrection" is a gross exaggeration. There was literally a 0% chance that they succeed in taking over the govt. The govt used it as a nice excuse to heavily increase their police force, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 04:41 PM
0

Sure, some actual leftists (the left before all this woke shit) are doing that. Wokies? They dont give a shit. Everything they said about police reform was nothing more than their social bandwagon. Thats why they suddenly became pro-cop once the cops were "on their side" (covid enforcements, dealing with 1/6. etc). Also there were some police shootings of black people that were 100% justified but the wokies just screeched about how police keep killing the innocent. It was very clear that they di…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 04:30 PM
1

No. Youre exaggerating how bad conservativee are. Theyre not all trailer trash hillbillies that love to scream the n word as loud as they can. Conservative media is actually pursuing some mens rights issues now. The left? Not at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 04:13 PM
1

Woke lefties at least wish to abolish the draft. Didnt hear 1 peep about it until the govt proposed a bill to include women. Then they wanted to abolish the draft. Once that bill was shut down, and the draft remained as male only, they went back to total silence about the draft. You didnt address my points about how wokies constantly attack men and aggressively oppose to fixing mens issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 04:03 PM
43

The main issue with mate-guarding is that it reveals an insecurity This is the exact answer. Insecurity is an indicator that youre low status/beta.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/22 12:24 AM
2

They don't talk about black women like that Yes they do. What are you talking about? They don't talk about lesbians like that Theyre not as harsh on lesbians but its still homophobia, not misandry. When they complain about immigration they use pictures of men crossing the border in droves. They don't show the Mexican cleaning lady with the same "scum of the earth" language, it's men. The ones opposed to immigration are opposed to it for both genders. You think they dont want male immigrants but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 07:25 PM
8

Ask conservatives about black men Yeah, black men. Its a racial issue, not a gender issue. And while racism isnt dead, most conservatives aren't racist. The media has convinced people that theres a white supremacist boogeyman around every corner. Its nonsense. In my experience, conservatives are much more class-biased than racial-biased (telling poor people, black and white, that its their fault theyre poor cause they don't work hard enough, while ignoring societal factors). When conservatives t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 06:58 PM
8

conservatives talk about men worse than "woke" lefties do Uhh, what?!? Conservatives do view men as somewhat disposable and dont take many of their issues seriously, but they still treat men a lot better than woke people. Woke people trash men and oppose advocacy for mens issues, based on their idea that men are privileged. Furthermore, woke people believe in lots of the conservative gender roles anyway, with them again justifying it by saying men are privileged. Woke people opposed the draft fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 06:43 PM
13

What makes you think that most of them are male advocates? Because of the heavy overlap with this sub. Menslib users who dislike this sub are misandrists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/22 08:14 PM
46

An interesting comment by radioactive-subjects in MensLib (it was deleted obviously) Of course their terrible mods deleted it. Its baffling how much overlap this sub has with menslib. That sub is such an anti-male shithole. The mods remove content that talks about real mens issues (like mens lack of reproductive rights), but allow content that talks about mens fake issues (like men being teased for wearing a dress). Heres a great example of how terrible that sub is: One of their current top post…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/22 02:48 PM
19

The average man is physically superior to the average woman Thats biology, not any sort of cultural/systemic privilege. In a social sense men are far more likely to be taken seriously than women Hahahahahahaha Woman are victims of more sexual violence than men Yep, this is one of the few areas where women are generally worse off. That all you got?
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 05:28 AM
2

He is the person I responded to. It goes him>me>you>me>(and now you). He said that if you dont listen to lived experience, you will become biased. I read your top level comment. I disagree that we need to listen to lived experience (when it comes to social issues). I think there are far better tools and that lived experienced is more appropriate for a 1 by 1 basis, like a therapist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 05:06 PM
4

Nobody is arguing that. Actually he kind of did. He didnt say it has a monopoly but he said that if you dont listen to lived experience, you will become biased by your own lived experience. This is false. You can learn about social issues and stay unbiased without listening to lived experience. It's just one of the tools. Its pretty much the worst tool, for the reasons I explained in my other comment, that neither of you really addressed. When a woman complains that a man interrupted her because…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 04:46 PM
2

100% agree. Which is all the more evidence that IdPol/wokism isnt about true justice. Its a nasty, tribalistic, hateful group of virtue signalers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 04:25 PM
5

But lived experience doesnt have a monopoly on raising awareness for issues. Statistics and activism is much more effective at that. If a black person says "cops treat me different from white people", how do we know if thats true or if its their warped perception? How do they even know how cops treat white people? What if theyre a criminal whose just using racism as an excuse? But then we look at the stats and that is much better evidence that cops interact with black people differently than whi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 04:04 PM
4

Swap the genders and the title is actually pretty accurate lmao. Mental patients are more connected to reality than these feminazis.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/01/22 02:24 AM
4

That sounds much more useful for a 1 by 1 basis. Like if a person is having trouble, their therapist should listen to their lived experience. But if we are talking politics? Feminists complaining about how they cant get hired cause of sexism? Far right conservatives complaining that they cant get hired due to immigrants taking the jobs? Nonsense I think peoples lived experience means jack shit when it comes to politics, for the reasoning I said in my other comment. Such as feminists convincing w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 05:56 PM
0

I agree. I get where you were coming from.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:50 AM
3

Its not about being strong and independent. Its not like we all believe that all men have no control over their money. The point of this graph is to disprove the feminist myth that "men have more financial power." Not trying to throw shade at you or your boyfriend. Its good that you 2 have a system you both like. I just genuinely didnt understand how the comment related to the post, cause lots of couples let the man control the spending.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:41 AM
-2

Exactly. What does this post have to do with your comment? That was my original question.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:34 AM
-1

What? This post is to acknowledge that women, generally, have much more financial power than men. The feminists myth that "men have all the money" is total bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:28 AM
19

I do think we need to listen to people's lived experiences Ive never understood this. Whats so good about it? When someone tells you their side of the story, youre getting exactly that, their side of the story. Its always anecdotal, except for when lots of people in the same demographic are saying the same thing. But even then, does that make it valid? Feminists have convinced tons of women that they are oppressed. So, plenty of women talk nonsense about how they are constantly in danger from me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 07:25 AM
-6

Ok? Am I missing something or is this comment pointless? Lol
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:10 AM
20

But she thought being a slut would give her commitment? Why would he or anyone commit to someone like this? Theres more going on here. She says every guy just uses her for sex then dumps her, and the last guy unmatched her immediately after sex. She sounds insufferable. Plenty of guys will keep a slut around as a FWB, but nobody wants that with her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/22 08:38 PM
4

All you've said to them is "our problems matter more than yours and you shouldn't even complain" Nope, i specified that theres nothing bad about pointing out problems. Whats bad is the feminist hysteria where they act like theyre such victims and that mens problems dont matter. I very clearly wrote that in my other comment. Ill.expand on my analogy: theres nothing wrong with a rich person complaining that he thinks his taxes are too high. But what if he insists that his life is worse than a poor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 08:49 AM
2

We will have to use hypothetical numbers for this. Lets say there are 100 significantly distinguishable forms of violence that anyone can face (domestic violence, robbery, etc whatever). I think in about 95 of those, men face significantly more violence. So for feminists to complain about the 5/100 (again, hypothetical numbers) seems like a rich person complaining that he pays more taxes than a poor person. Really, its not that acknowledging the issue is bad. Its the way they prioritize the 5/10…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 07:15 AM
2

I fundamentally disagree that violence against women can't be amplified for gender related reasons (aka because they're women) I didnt say that. There are of course some men who are willing to be violent towards women but not other men. I said that, in general, women experience less violence because theyre women. Because of that fact, its nonsensical for feminists to complain about "women experiencing violence because they are women." It's kind of dismissive to compare violence to wealth complai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 07:01 AM
17

I'm saying everyone outside of this subreddit views "anti-feminist" and "anti-women" interchangably. You didnt say "the comments that others view as anti-women", you literally said "the anti-women comments here." It sounds like youre backpedaling. a lot of the things discussed in this sub could be discussed among feminists without much issue, but because many assume that their beliefs are sheerly incompatible with feminism, those conversations never occur Lol no. Its because feminists, and many …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 05:53 AM
6

I don't think you're fully contextualizing the statements like "women die just because they are women" Plenty of feminists do mean exactly that. Ive seen it with my own eyes all over internet forums. Are there some feminists that mean something else when they say "women die for being women"? Of course. But they should word it properly instead of making an emotionally loaded, unclear statement. Its not my job to jump through hoops to come up with the most charitable interpretation possible of eve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 05:43 AM
2

Sure, but then the issues are unethical companies and male disposability, not androcide. If an MRA said that was androcide, I would call it fearmongering, as I do when feminists say femicide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 05:34 AM
5

are men dying in coal mines victims of androcide? Arguably, they are in those jobs in some degree because they are men and it's expected of men to work jobs that require hard physical labor No, they arent victims of androcide. They chose to do that job. Its complete nonsense to say they died for any reason other than they took a dangerous job and it killed them. Billions of men in the world, and a very very small fraction of them die due to working in the coal mines. To say this is "androcide" i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 03:30 AM
30

That's the reason r/menslib is the widely recommended men's issues sub to the mass of Reddit - because it's easily understood, even if they often don't give a crap about men. Lol no. MensLib is recommended on reddit because its a feminist sub first and a mens sub second. Reddit is full of woke people who believe in things like "we still live in patriarchy" and "men cant experience sexism." MensLib aligns with the beliefs of typical redditors. Thats why its widely recommended. Not because its "ea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 03:17 AM
4

Oh whoops. Thanks for the correction, I learned something new today!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 03:14 AM
19

you shouldn't have to have a detailed and nuanced understanding of feminism and the history of the movement to understand if a comment is anti-women or not. It's the old "I hate men" battle but flipped around Ive almost never seen an anti-women comment on here. The problem is you seem to use "anti-feminist" and "anti-women" interchangeably. why shouldn't we say "feminism as an institution" or "the feminists in power" or "the feminists who advocate for [issue]" when we are doling out criticism? B…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 03:12 AM
4

Ok, I was wrong about the terminology. I looked it up, just to double check, and femicide means "killing of women just because they are women." Exactly how often does that happen? If an abusive husband kills his wife, he didnt kill her just because shes a woman. He killed her because hes a violent abuser who thought it was ok to attack his wife. The only time women are killed "just for being woman" is when some psycho (like Elliot Rogers) goes and kills random woman just because theyre women. Ho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 03:01 AM
6

Femicide isn't saying that men don't matter, it's highlighting upticks in crimes against women Bullshit. If its simply a matter of "pointing out an increase in crime against women", why the hell is it called femicide? Even if that is the idea of femicide, then that means feminists are such hysterical female supremacists that they think genocide is comparable to a small increase in crimes against women, because they chose to take "genocide" and swap it to "femicide." Youre giving them way more cr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 02:41 AM
26

You dont need to write a PhD every time you criticize feminism. Sometimes, people just want to make a brief comment without going into a long elaboration. It doesn't mean they are uneducated. On the contrary, you should like the uneducated one, because you seem to think that nonsensical terms like "femicide" have any sort of validity to them. Its nothing more than fear-mongering hysteria. In 2019, there were 1647 women murdered by men in the US.. That is about 1 in 100,000 women. So yes, when fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 02:32 AM
1

Ok, fair enough. My response was more hostile than necessary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 04:43 AM
4

I disagree that this person is here in good faith (his post and comments about feminism makes it sound like hes already made up his mind and that hes here to educate us on patriarchy, not listen to us). But i could be wrong. Maybe he is here in good faith. His comments really suggest otherwise, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 03:02 AM
1

Ok, fair enough. Youre right that we shouldnt send people away. I just gave an honest answer based on what he said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 12:54 AM
3

Its not a personal attack or hostility. He asked if he belongs here and i genuinely dont think so, for the reasons i listed in the comment you removed. I like most of your content and think youre a great mod, but i disagree on this one. Reading his post and comments, he definitely seems like a menslib type of guy. I think if he did post here, it would be "patriarchy this" and "feminism that." In his post he even said he believes in the wage gap, lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 12:51 AM
1

Im not gatekeeping, i did address the arguments in my original comment. I just honestly believe menslib would be better for him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 12:45 AM
13

Feminist spaces on Reddit are largely like this, but I know of genuinely egalitarian feminists, and so I'd guess there are probably pro-male feminist spaces elsewhere, or at least offline. I'd like to see them clarify that. This does not, at all, address the point at hand. The point is that feminism isnt just "a few bad apples", which is what OP suggested. He said that it was only a "handful" of feminists that are authoritarian, misandrist, etc which is false. I don't think they said this, they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 05:51 PM
1

Yeah exactly
/r/MensRights17/01/22 06:36 PM
8

Yeah but nobody suggested that we go and read other articles from this author. On the contrary, OP acknowledged that he was conservative, but said that he made good points about mens issues anyway. If someone writes a good article about mens issues, we shouldnt ignore it just because theyre conservative (or any other political affiliation).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 01:31 AM
19

No it wouldn't. The idea that incels are out stalking, attacking, and raping women is a complete myth. Theyre venting on internet forums from their basement. Most male on female violence is committed by a boyfriend/husband, not incels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 07:30 PM
17

Haha, no apology necessary. We cant write flawlessly all the time. As for the rest of your comment, youre spot on. One fundamental problem with identity politics is that it completely ignores individuality. "Male privilege" does jack shit for men who have a low quality of life (depressed, poor, etc). When we discuss mens issues like suicide, we aren't trying to help "men get further ahead of women". We are trying to improve the lives of men who are struggling. But because identity politics group…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 07:26 PM
31

How about you just listen to whats being said instead of worrying about the general political views of the person saying it? This article did a good job highlighting some mens issues. The political views of the writer doesn't magically change that fact. You can strongly agree with someone on certain issues even if you disagree with them on most issues. And no I'm not conservative. Just pointing out the nonsensical tribalism that is far too common.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 07:16 PM
49

cold indifference to men Your comment is great, but I just want to point out thats its not simply a cold indifference to men. Many modern leftists arent just ignoring mens issues, they are actively fighting them. Discussions about mens issues get derailed into a conversation about womens issues. Depressed men who seek help with their unsuccessful dating lives are cruely labeled as incels and told theyre not entitled to anything. A fucking fire alarm was pulled to shut down a speech about male su…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 07:10 PM
20

As another comment said, you absolutely need to take this to sky news australia. They would love a story like this and the scumbags who forced you to take down your videos should be exposed for the garbage that they are.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:44 PM
1

I would absolutely talk to a lawyer about this. As far as I know, a college staff member (whether it be a professor or admin) cannot kick you out of a course or the college just because you make videos about mens issues in your free time. Document everything (get it in writing that they are threatening to kick you out, such as through an email) and talk to a lawyer. Youll likely be able to continue making videos without them threatening you anymore. You might even get lucky and they'll offer you…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:43 PM
1

Was it my post? I actually made a post on this sub about motte and bailey, about a few monhs ago.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:25 PM
90

Thats one of the least deceptive things they do. Usually its straight false information and then moving the goalposts when those lies are pointed out.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:13 AM
8

Of course some parts of the world are dangerous for women. Thats not the argument being made. The idiots who say "Ashling Murphys murder proves the world is dangerous for women" are talking about anywhere, not just dangerous areas. I think you can see how it's so shocking for women in general who would think they're safe as long as they are out in daylight but then a case like this makes them realise that maybe they aren't Absolute nonsense. Again, in the US, about 1 in 100,000 women were murder…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 09:49 PM
6

So you dont actually agree with the people highlighting the issue, you were just explaining their argument? So are you saying that you agree its nonsense fear mongering for people to say "society is so dangerous for women?"
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:39 PM
14

But I must point out that I did not say "women can't even go for a jog without worry about being murdered", I didn't practically say that either You literally wrote this word for word in your other comment: Aisling Murphy did nothing wrong, she was out for a run at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, and still got attacked. So, this was a good example for people to use to point out how dangerous it is for women in society Youre a clown lol
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:29 PM
14

You said that the same men who attack and rape women are the ones killing and robbing men Wtf are you talking about? I never said that. I said that men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime and murder (which they are) and that its extremely rare for a woman to get randomly kidnapped and murdered (which it is. Most women are killed by someone they know, like an abusive spouse). Therefore, its fear mongering for you to say "women cant even go for a jog without worry about being murde…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:17 PM
30

Are you sure about that? If so, I'd love to see your studies /stats on this. I think it's highly unlikely You have no clue what youre talking about. Men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime and murder. In 2019 in the US, there were 1647 women murdered by men. Thats about 1/100,000. Furthermore, most women who are murdered are killed by an abusive spouse. Its extremely, extremely unlikely for a random woman jogging to get kidnapped and murdered. Saying "the world is so dangerous fo…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:49 PM
3

Yep, cause they say men can give birth, so its offensive to say that only women can give birth.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 08:49 PM
16

What I said: "it wouldn't impress me". What she claimed I said: " You literally said you would think less of her" Shes correct that you clearly think less of those kind of women. However theres nothing wrong with thinking that way. The more men that a woman sleeps with, the more likely she is to be unhappy/unfaithful in her relationships. Also, she had no interest in your genuine opinion. She wanted you to give her validation by saying "theres nothing wrong with a hoe phase." She wanted you to s…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:41 PM
1

You are missing the point that the author is completely full of shit when she says "Men get away with this. Shes only getting punished because shes a woman." How delusional do you have to be to believe that?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:32 PM
2

Theyre hanging out with all the examples of the wage gap, the patriarchy, and "rampant misogyny." Simply in the minds of delusional feminists and nowhere else.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:31 PM
2

What the fuck does the gender of the attacker have to do with how tragic the death of the victim is? Violence against women gets way more attention because people care more. Not because the attacker is the opposite gender. Would it have been more tragic if ghislaine trafficked boys instead of girls, since shes the same gender as the girls? Yeah, thats how stupid you sound.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:35 AM
2

Yes I said that getting anally raped is worse than getting vaginally raped. Are you going to make a counter argument or just keep calling me stupid?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:33 AM
1

What makes them exactly equal? You didnt address my argument at all, you just called me stupid. Its peak irony that you called someone else toxic lmao.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:26 AM
2

No? Anal rape is way more painful than vaginal. Would you agree that a woman getting anally raped is more traumatic than a woman getting vaginally raped? Id assume so, since anal rape is way more painful. Then why is a straight man getting anally raped equally as traumatic as a woman getting vaginally raped?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:22 AM
-5

It depends on the situation. If a straight man is anally raped by another man, do you think that wouldnt be worse than a straight woman getting vaginally raped? Both are awful, but I imagine a straight man getting his ass forcibly penetrated would be more traumatic than a straight women having her vagina penetrated.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:18 AM
38

Very good post. Also, what about the wealth transfer gap? Men give much more money to women than women give to them. Something like 70-80% of all spending is done by women. As another commenter said, feminism is just a business. They make money by pushing false/misleading narratives and convincing people that women are oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 08:43 PM
30

The comment you're referring to is buried so deep I couldn't even find it with a cursory search. Its the 3rd most upvoted comment on the post. And there are only 56 comments total, so under no circumstance is this comment "buried deep." And youre incorrect about the 1st and 2nd comment. The top comment is about sweden. The 2nd comment is about how nobody should be drafted. Nothing about mens education or opportunities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 06:49 AM
17

Lmao the post is on the front page of menslib and this comment that i copy/pasted is the 3rd most upvoted one. Go back to menslib.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 06:45 AM
7

Didnt say that. You clearly have reading comphrehension issues.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 03:00 AM
6

Still not hearing a good argument for why women in western countries are oppressed. The fact that trans women have issues has no negative effect on cis women.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 11:38 PM
10

Cis women arent oppressed just because trans women have issues. Furthermore, there are trans men. So you could just as easily say "men are oppressed because trans men get treated like shit." Another completely shit argument from you.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 11:20 PM
10

The fact that thats your counter argument just shows how full of shit you are. Women arent oppressed, get over yourself. Women have more rights and privileges by a mile.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 11:09 PM
8

If you think women in Western countries are oppressed, youre delusional.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 10:58 PM
1

Why TF are you posting in MensLib?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 09:49 PM
7

100%. A shady account (new but mods lots of subs) made a post saying "racism, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia are becoming a huge problem in this sub", which of course got people fighting about that. Ive lurked that sub many times and literally have not once seen a racist, homophobic, or transphobic comment. Its IdPol hysteria to divide everyone. They used the same tactic to break up occupy wall street
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/21 01:07 AM
6

Feminism is 100% dependent on lies. Feminists insist that women are oppressed. The only way to do that is to lie, because theyre not oppressed.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/12/21 05:34 PM
16

isn't egalitarianism about equality for everyone? Yes, thats what I said. while feminism focuses solely on men and women No, feminism focuses on women. There are plenty of areas where women are ahead and feminism fights to keep those advantages. Such as the fact that women are far ahead in education, and feminists just keep pushing to get women further and further ahead. because of the gender pay gap? Do you seriously believe that employees and paying women less just for being women? Or do you u…
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:52 AM
10

What ways would you say theyre worse? When it comes to the draft, liberals didnt outright say "men should be drafted, women shouldnt", but they certainly werent trying to get the draft removed when it was just men. And there are other issues where conservatives side with men and liberals are explicitly misandrist, like the #MeToo attempt to make men guilty until proven innocent. Both liberals and conservatives have gynocentric views. Both of them still expect men to conform to traditional gender…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 02:38 AM
21

feminism=equality between men and women Nope, thats what egalitarianism is. Feminism is about privileges for women. Feminism doesnt get a monopoly on gender issues.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 02:22 AM
3

Democrat politicians dont care about you either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 05:04 AM
0

Stfu false flagging douche
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:42 AM
9

Its a troll/false flag post to make MRAs look bad. Look at this other comment from OP: Thank you I really appreciate that. It’s not all women but it is most women That was a response to someone who said "women can be awful." The story is clearly fake and OPs comments just make it obvious that its a troll or someone trying to make MRA look bad.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:08 AM
-1

Nice false flag/troll. Especially this comment from you: Thank you I really appreciate that. It’s not all women but it is most women You dont have anything better do to than make fake posts to make MRAs look bad? Fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:07 AM
25

That was a list of celebrities who got fat and there were men on that list. Do you really think an article that specifically targeted women (e.g. "women with the smallest breasts in hollywood") would be acceptable?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:59 AM
29

Men face some systemic hardship, but those only exist because of systemic oppression of women Ah, the good old "patriarchy is responsible for everything" argument. As if the patriarchy has a monopoly on all gender issues and that no society could be unfair to men unless its due to patriarchy. Such clowns.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/12/21 01:40 AM
16

The article is sugarcoating their preferences. They dont simply advise to stay away from mentally ill men, they advise to stay away from any man that has any mental imperfection.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 07:52 AM
49

Hard disagree about men. Its a myth that incels are just holding out for supermodels and refuse to settle for less. The reality is that incels (due to a combination of looks, personality, etc) cannot get any woman interested in them. Sure, there are some shallow men that get pissy over the fact that hot women dont want them, but thats not the norm. When men complain, its usually about womens unrealistic standards. Its completely false to say men think about the top % and dont care about the rest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 04:06 PM
3

Jesus fucking christ dude, just stop before you embarrass yourself any futher. That highly upvoted post was about a father with his daughter, and people assuming he was a pedo. Not an actual pedo who literally raped young boys.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:37 AM
11

Youre clearly one of the geniuses who didnt look at the evidence or watch the trial, yet you think youre an expert on it cause you read a short article on Buzzfeed or whatever. There is video footage of kyle running around with a medic bag and fire extinguisher, asking people if they need medical assistance and putting out fires. He was running from the crowd and fell down. 1 person charged at him, but when kyle aimed his rifle at him, the guy backed off. And guess what? Kyle didnt shoot him. He…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:34 AM
8

The internet brings out the worst in some people due to a degree of anonymity Nah, that just shows you who they truly are. In person, people are often hesitant to say their true beliefs because of potential conflict, social anxiety, etc. Internet anonymity removes those factors and lets you see a person for who they really are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 03:09 PM
7

He takes feminist articles and swaps the genders. Thats what youre referring to as "ludicrous."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 08:57 AM
5

"The right" is not a monolith. The right wingers that say "lazy people are scum, mentally ill people need to get their shit together, and prisoners are scum of society" are not the same people saying "men need help cause of homelessness, addiction" etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 08:51 AM
4

There isnt going to be a massive land war that wipes out a giant chunk of a countrys population. Its gonna get to other things like nukes before that.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:56 AM
6

Since when has conscription ever been more than a fraction of the population? And if both genders are being drafted, it means the amount needed for each gender is cut in half. Lets say a draft needs 10% of the male population. If its gender neutral, it can be 5% women and 5% men.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:48 AM
8

I agree conscription shouldnt exist. But if its going to exist, it should be gender neutral. Maybe adding women to conscription is whats needed to abolish it. And your original point is still just plain false. Having women enlisted in conscription isnt going to cause huge problems for a countrys population.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:39 AM
10

I misread the other comment. Regardless of that, there are plenty of non-combat roles for conscription. Furthermore, women getting drafted doesnt mean that all the woman are gonna die. Only a fraction of the population gets drafted, and out of them, not all of them die. Your argument for why women should be exempt from conscripted is extremely weak.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:28 AM
24

The fuck are you talking about? And as another person pointed out, conscription isnt just about being a solider. There are plenty of military services that are non-combat.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:11 AM
28

It wasnt funny the first time
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/21 04:55 AM
8

People use the term incel to mean "any man who criticizes women in any way, shape, or form." If someone tosses out the word "incel" when it has nothing to do with involuntary celibacy, you can just disregard them as an idiot.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 01:45 AM
42

Imagine the national outrage if men mutilated the genitals of baby girls and used it for their own plastic surgery. Society cares about womens problems but not mens. Men are seen as disposable. The idea that we live in a patriarchy where men are privileged and women are oppressed is so fucking ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 11:03 PM
9

Is he a nice guy beta male or is he just a kind, respectful husband Miscommunications happen with terminology like this. I meant that hes kind and respectful, but that turns women off. From her own words - it seems like he's just a kind, loving, respectful husband. Thats just what she mentioned. He could be a doormat who worships her. And based on the fact that she literally wants to vomit when kissing him, Id say he probably is like that. It's not because he's beta, it's because she's impossibl…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/11/21 04:09 AM
2

If youre not gonna address my argument, then sure lets stop here. Repulsion doesnt pop out of thin air. If you feel repulsed by someone, there is a specific reason for it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:47 PM
4

No
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:37 PM
3

Just because she is repulsed by him doesn't mean there's one of three things wronh with him. All sexual attraction boils down to those 3 things. So if she feels the opposite of sexual attraction for a man (shes repulsed by him), then yes it must be one of those 3 things. Theres a specific reason she feels repulsed. Its either his looks, his personality, or his financial status. Theres no such thing as "just cause."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:27 PM
11

There's very little nuance to modern women No, theres plenty. They subconsciously judge you for pretty much anything you do. Her desire to have sex with you is based on a combination of your looks, personality, and financial status. Either a guy is 'hawt af' or he's ugly and invisible No, theres plenty of guys who are in between hot and ugly. Average looking guys who are alphas are way, way more successful with woman than average looking guys who are betas.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:24 PM
8

All female attraction comes down to 3 things - Looks, personality (alpha vs beta), and resources (money). Money was never mentioned, but looks and personality were. She said hes handsome, so that shouldnt be an issue. Whats left? His personality. She even specified she used to have "dumpster fire" relationships where the sex was good, but now shes dating a nice guy and the sexual attraction isnt there. Not only that, but she cant even kiss him without wanting to puke. You could say "oh well shes…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:21 PM
7

Its not just about an inability to pair bond. Shes repulsed by the idea of kissing her husband. And it wasnt always that way. Her post suggests that she lost attraction to him overtime, and now its gotten so low that she cant even kiss him without wanting to puke. His looks didnt change that much, but his personality certainly could have. If you worship women, they will be this repulsed by you. Its about his beta personality, not his looks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 11:01 PM
12

I think this is a misunderstanding. Based on your comment, it sounds like youre a looks reductionist, or at least close to one. Looks reductionist means looks are all that matters. beta af but if he's hot enough, all but the most used up of whores could still be happy with him If a guy is really hot but beta af, he will have success with most women in the beginning of the relationship, but their sexual desire for him will go away overtime. Some women dont mind the beta personality, but Id say a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 10:38 PM
9

Lmao, if youre just going to disregard everything in the post as "her lying", then whats the point of trying to analyze it? You said I had 0 evidence for my claim that hes beta, yet its you that has 0 evidence that hes ugly. This conversation is pointless if youre a looks reductionist that dismisses any evidence that maybe there is more to attraction than just looks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 10:25 PM
21

Possible. Or maybe hes decent looking and shes repulsed by his "nice guy" beta personality. Either way, looks reductionists are such idiots.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 10:21 PM
17

She said that her previous relationships were dumpster fires and now shes getting away from that and dating a "nice guy." She said "he respects me and treats me kindly." "I feel very comfortable with him but he doesn't give me butterflies." How is that 0 evidence?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 10:02 PM
31

When grandma calls their ugly grandson handsome, they know that hes not handsome. Its just a generic compliment that elders give to young people. If this guy is actually ugly, why did the wife say hes handsome? Specifically in a thread about not wanting to kiss him. The most likely explanation is that he is decent looking but his beta personality is such a turn off that she cant stand to kiss him. She even admitted her last relationships were "dumpster fires" but that the sex was good. But now t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 08:15 PM
149

This post is also a great example of why attraction isn't all about looks (which is what some people seem to believe). In her on words, she said: I've always found him handsome Despite the fact that hes handsome, his "nice guy" beta behavior is such a turn off that she can't even kiss him without wanting to vomit. Personality does matter a lot when it comes to attraction. Bad boys, assholes, etc are a turn on for women. Niceness is a turn off. She implied her ex's were "bad boys" and she said th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 07:19 PM
4

It's about safety Its not, its about bashing men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/21 09:13 PM
47

Its the red herring fallacy. First, they make the bullshit claim that women are in more danger and need protection. You then point out that men are actually in more danger. Instead of admitting that they were wrong, they throw out a red herring by saying "its men committing the crimes." That statement is literally irrelevant to the original claim that "women are in more danger." However, they are too caught up in their woke nonsense of "men are privileged, women are victims" for them to realize …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/21 07:03 AM
26

Its about social status more than masochism. When someone is an asshole to you, its a subconscious indicator that theyre "above" you on the social hierarchy. When someone treats you really well, its an indicator that theyre "below" you. Women are attracted to status and want to get the highest status man they can.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/21 04:34 PM
13

Yes there is, dipshit
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 09:18 AM
1

Lol based
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 06:53 PM
10

Isnt it funny how people stop saying "best interest of the child" when talking about abortion? Seems like its just used an excuse to get men to pay.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 11:35 PM
10

AHS (AdolfHitlerSupporters) are zealots who cant have their mind changed, but good post anyway :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/21 05:08 PM
9

Did customer service know whose phone it was? Did her friend initiate the conversation with customer service? If they know who the phone belongs to, theyll talk to that person. Sounds like the typical "looking for something to be offended about" from feminists.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/11/21 01:27 AM
64

Lol of course the mods of /worldnews removed that post. Such zealots.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 03:27 PM
27

"Some bigger women like fat guys" Yeah, they call fat women "bigger" but fat guys are just fat.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 08:08 AM
1

I dont want anything, we can agree to disagree. I was just saying that this isnt about frustration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 06:51 AM
3

What frustration? This isnt about emotion, its a discussion about whether or not the internet is "real life." It is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 05:36 AM
5

Its pretty rude to randomly tell a fat person how they can lose weight. However, that doesnt really happen much and its certainly not what these feminists are complaining about. Theyre probably complaining about stuff like someone saying "hey that triple cheeseburger with extra bacon is bad for you". Or they say "Im so fat" and people give weight loss advice instead of saying "no queen, youre perfect as is!"
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:28 AM
3

the terminally online Most people on the internet are not terminally online. And this radfem stuff isnt limited to feminists forums. Go on generic social media like facebook and youll see idiots saying radfem things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 05:17 AM
5

It's more so out of a hundred people I'll meet 96 more-or-less-moderates and two radicals from each side of the spectrum No, youve meet 96 people who appeared to be moderate, based on the conversation. Why do you think that all 96 of them were telling you their true beliefs? When people discuss issues like feminism, in person, it is very common for people to hold back their exact beliefs. For the sake of avoiding an argument, or someone thinking less of you, or whatever. On the internet, people …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 03:17 AM
6

I also hate being this guy but people are wayyy less political in real life than online Thats because people put on a mask in real life. They dont want to cause controversy or have people hate them. They dont like confrontation. On the internet, especially on an anonymous site like reddit, they are free to express their true opinion without worrying about losing a friendship. Theres this idea that the internet "isnt real life" which just isnt true. People on the internet are real people expressi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 02:21 AM
5

Quality content from you as always :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 02:14 AM
9

I think the ones who are out there yelling the loudest are generally the radical ones Well if you go on feminist forums, the ones yelling the loudest are also getting all the upvotes. So even if others arent voicing radical opinions, they are certainly supporting them. Furthermore, look at woke culture and its influence. You can trash men and its no issue. But if you say something misogynistic, you can get an internet mob after you, get fired, etc. And its not just radical feminists that support…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 01:30 AM
9

Would you agree that feminism is becoming radical feminism? Id say that out of all the feminists activists (people in feminists groups, people on forums, etc), that most of them are the "radical feminists"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 12:57 AM
25

Most moderate feminist advocacy is compatible with men's issues. The feminists movement has been anti male for awhile now. Mens subs should be egalitarian, not feminist. Feminism doesnt have a monopoly on gender issues and equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 12:29 AM
25

Would you be surprised if a feminist sub banned the topic of paper abortion? Because menslib is a feminist sub above all else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 12:18 AM
29

Top comment on that post (113 upvotes): Convinced that every subreddit except those that direct their attention AT this issue are just misogynistic. Every one. People with severe dementia arent as disconnected from reality as these radfems are.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/11/21 10:50 PM
94

Menslib is a feminist sub. Its kind of like Controlled Opposition, except instead of it being a conspiracy, its just self hating men. Feminists always reference menslib when people ask for a good mens rights sub. They say its basically the only good mens sub. Thats why Id call it controlled opposition, but again without the conspiracy factor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/21 09:50 PM
20

You personally? No. But society in general? Absolutely. The 80/20 rule is common in many areas, such as the workplace hierarchy. Data shows that women rate 80% of men as unattractive. When women talk about male privilege, they are always focused on the top (roughly 20%) of men who are successful, while ignoring the (roughly 80%) of men who arent successful. If you argue that men are privileged/catered to because the top men are successful, while ignoring that most men are unsuccessful, then yes …
/r/MensRights31/10/21 08:10 PM
21

The irony of this comment, coming from you, is off the charts. Its not MRAs that have a victim complex. Its feminists and woke people like yourself. Zero self awareness.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 08:04 PM
15

No. No one says a white guy flipping burgers is more privileged than Oprah Thats a pretty bold claim, because Ive seen plenty of wokies claim that straight white men are more privileged than black women regardless of factors like income. Youre doing a reverse-strawman where youre giving woke people way more credit than they deserve. And no, white people being the class with the most influence What influence? Are you talking about powerful people like CEOs and politicians? Because they absolutely…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 08:01 PM
13

Straight white males are by far the most successful group of any class in western society Nope, asians are the most successful demographic. They earn the most, on average, by a significant margin. The fact that most CEOs are white men isnt evidence that white men are the most successful, which is the argument that you feminists always use. Talk about being scientifically illiterate. You take the cake for that.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:55 PM
37

Glad that paranoid gaslighter is now your ex.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/21 09:07 PM
144

I fully agree that its rape by deception and if it can be proven, then she should be charged. But the problem with this is the same problem of #MeToo. Its going to often be he said vs she said. If you can prove that she lied about being on birth control then she should be charged. However, if its just he said vs she said, there shouldnt be charges. We shouldnt lock women up just because a man made an accusation with no evidence, similar to how we shouldnt lock men up just because woman makes an …
/r/MensRights18/10/21 04:48 PM
7

I have heard "women just want the same rights as men" thousands of times. Yet not once have I heard of a right that men have that women dont. The closest people have come to naming one is saying "there are more male CEOs", which is a laughably stupid argument.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 04:57 AM
12

For what its worth, they think that anyone who disagrees with them is radical. In a woke sub, there was a post that said "/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a group of right wing extremists." It had plenty of upvotes and comments agreeing with it. Im not gonna name the sub, because I dont wanna cause potential problems for us, but Im sure most of you can guess which sub it was.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 04:41 AM
21

Its also complete bullshit to say that average women go through what Jonah has. Jonah has been a celebrity punching bag for awhile. Just watch the first 20 seconds of this video. No ladies, receiving a backhanded compliment about your makeup every once in awhile is nothing compared to what people like Jonah go through. Get over yourselves.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 05:54 PM
2

If youre willing to go back 4-5 days in my comment history, you should find comments that I made in the thread. It might take you a little while to find, but on each page of my history you can do CTL + F to keyword search "amitheasshole". Nothing about that is against the rules. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 01:07 PM
7

make the braindead conclusion that somehow women are to blame Very ironic that youre calling others braindead. Did OP say that women are the reason men murder men? No, he said how female murder victims get the attention even though more men are murdered. He said he hates how feminists pretend that women specifically are in such danger when men are much more likely to be victims of crime. The fact that its other men is literally irrelevant to that point. Its men who are in danger, so its disingen…
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 11:55 PM
1

You should tell the police what you told us.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 05:01 PM
5

It sounded like that was your opinion
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:35 PM
10

Getting out of the car in that situation is extremely dangerous. Criminals will lay down in the road to get a car to stop and help, then a group ambushes the person. If you see that, you call 911, just like the guy did.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 04:33 PM
6

We've heard this garbage argument a million times. Men aren't oppressing women. And sexism can be both systemic and case by case. If you treat a person differently because of their gender, thats sexism. Sexism isnt limited to societal structure. Point being that even if men were more privileged, it would still be true that women can be sexist. Nobody is interested in woke rhetoric 101. Say something with a little more depth next time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:13 PM
21

Ive got a deadline either midnight or 5am Theyre a liar. Either a scam or someone dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/21 04:08 AM
116

"Study finds that 80% of the 300,000 sex abuse victims by the church were boys" MSM headline: Study finds that the church sexually abused 60,000 girls
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:07 AM
1

Feminism fights for "equality" in areas that women are behind, but insists that women keep their privileges in areas that women are head. Which is not equality. The share of housework should depend on the situation. If both people are working equal hours, then they should be doing equal housework. But if the husband is working and the wife is not, why should the husband also have to do housework? The entire idea of a stay at home wife is that she takes care of everything at home. She should sinc…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:55 PM
31

Least realistic part of this story? The claim that someone referred to her as "hot".
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 09:56 PM
1

If youve drank a lot of coffee already, I suggest you dont have any more.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 07:39 PM
1

I think a lot of men would prefer a stay at home wife. After a long day at work, its nice to not have to worry about taking care of things at home. An obviously if youre wife is a homemaker, you have to pay all her expenses. What I think is stupid is when women work but still expect their husband to pay their expenses. I think its dumb, but it doesnt piss me off, cause its their preference which theyre entitled to. But what really pisses me off is when a woman (who works) says "you should never …
/r/MensRights05/10/21 07:30 PM
2

Too much coffee during sleep depravation can give you a stroke. Not even exaggerating. Put the coffee down and get some sleep my man.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:31 PM
1

You'd be better off asking a flock of seagulls for their opinions. I tried, but they just Ran So Far Away... I'll leave now
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:30 PM
1

Didnt mean to make you nervous. And youre a stranger on the internet, so its nothing personal. I wouldve responded the same way to anyone else. Maybe I was a bit cold/mean because it rubbed me the wrong way when you said "I agree with her first few lines." Also, I didnt mean to give the impression that theres something wrong with being a homemaker. Theres nothing wrong about it and it often results in happy couples. Nothing wrong with a husband providing for his stay at home wife. What I do have…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:27 PM
2

And its 20-30% of the salary before taxes. A guy making 150k will pay about 35k in child support. But that 150k gets reduced to about 100k cause of taxes. So out of the 100k net salary, 35k goes to alimony and he has 65k. And if theres children, there will be child support too. Yeah, our courts are fucked.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:33 PM
3

However, in such case, complaining about having to pay some alimony, when you wanted your ex wife/husband to be a SAHP doesn't really make sense. Well, typically alimony is complained about because its too high. In my hypothetical example, I said 5% of the salary could go to alimony. In the real world, alimony is often much higher than that. Closer to something like 20-30%. Hence my argument for why it should be reduced.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 11:59 AM
1

Youve been up 2 days and you dont wanna sleep? Are you on drugs?
/r/MensRights05/10/21 11:22 AM
1

Oh yeah, many of them definitely know what theyre doing. But theres also a decent portion of them who really dont get it because its happening on a subconscious level. For this group, they consciously think that men paying for them means hes making an effort. Subconsciously, its about the money, and their mind has figured out a more socially acceptable way of expressing that ("its about effort") before it even reaches the conscious mind. I agree with you, but i thought it was worth mentioning th…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 11:03 AM
4

It just seems very illogical that if you choose an unpaid lifestyle of being a SAHM that you suddenly are entitled to alimony once divorce happens. If a woman choose the unpaid labor, the man choose the paid labor, why should she get alimony when she herself chose to stay at home, raise the kids and take care of the house? That's he choice. If she wanted a paid lifestyle, why choose an unpaid lifestyle? Its more complicated than that. What if the husband wants her to be a SAHM? What if they have…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:54 AM
2

Get some shut eye man
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:24 AM
12

So that means they think circumcision is such a non-issue that its a mockery of bodily autonomy to oppose it. There are plenty of adult words Id like to say right now, however I dont feel like getting banned, so I'll just leave it at that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 09:16 AM
8

He disagrees with you that /mensrights is misogynistic. He thinks youre (unintentionally) helping to "spread the feminist lie that mensrights is misogyny." I do agree with him that its an exaggeration to say that /mensrights is misogyny. That word has been so diluted that its lost almost all meaning. This sub is definitely better about things like not generalizing women, but i dont think /mensrights is misogynistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 09:11 AM
11

Normally Im able to understand the reasoning of feminists, even though i usually disagree. But with this, i have no idea whats going on. Whats the connection between pro choice and pro circumcision? Are they saying they support the mothers rights to choose ("pro choice"?) whether or not she wants the circumcision for her baby? Are they saying that anti circumcision makes a mockery of bodily autonomy? I dont get it. They get weirder and weirder each day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 08:58 AM
19

They dont. They see "MaleAdvocates" in the sub name and steam starts shooting out of their ears. They just assume it must be right wing because they are so politically polarized that they think anyone who advocates for mens issues must be an alt right incel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 08:48 AM
2

Did you get the genders mixed up in the story? In your other comment you said that he was more of an asshole than her. But he wasnt. She was much more of an asshole than him. And she started the name calling, not him.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:00 AM
3

I admit to rushing while I read. And the more I think about this, the less I see why I left a comment so I'm not fit to answer all your questions. Are you saying you disagree, but dont know how to answer the questions? My point was that plenty of women, such as the woman from this story, want money from men and theyll make up excuses to get it. One common excuse, which is the excuse from this story, is "I want a guy who puts in effort." Again, spending money has nothing to do with effort. Its ju…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 07:53 AM
5

Shes not. I said "hes fighting gender roles" by opposing her claim that men should pay for everything.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:54 AM
2

I was under the impression that she meant, in a way, men who pay for a meal show that they are financially stable Why did you think she meant something different from what she said? I posted the dialogue between him and her, word for word. She said "I tell all my friends to never date a man who splits the bill. Men who split the bill aren't worth it. They don't put in effort and they're not romantic." Based on that quote, how did you get the impression that she meant "guys who pay on a first dat…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:37 AM
6

We had a lengthy discussion awhile back where you wanted us to try to get the reddit admins to change and I said I thought we couldn't do it. I hope that didnt leave a sour taste in your mouth. While I disagree with you when it comes to our ability to get the reddit admins to change, I think most of your posts are quality content and its great to have you as a mod. Just wanted to clear that up, incase you remember that convo XD
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 06:19 AM
6

AITA is usually pretty friendly towards the idea of real equality For women, not men. Which isnt equality. That sub is incredibly biased in favor of women.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:15 AM
4

The first two lines are fine and I actually agree with her until she said "well I'm not dating you" Before she said "well I'm not dating you", this is what she said: "I tell all my friends to never date a man who splits the bill. Men who split the bill aren't worth it. They don't put in effort and they're not romantic." You stated that you agree with that second quote. Thats why my response was "men are not your ATM machines". Also, after I replied to your other comment, I went back and skimmed …
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:00 AM
5

The first two lines are fine and I actually agree with her Stopped reading. Men arent ATM machines for women.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:30 AM
9

You always have good content. Glad youre a mod here :D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 04:17 AM
6

What backwards ass alternate universe are you living in where feminists dont justify double standards by saying "patriarchy"?
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 03:24 AM
3

Yeah, a lot of people will see a wall of text and just not bother
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:19 AM
4

Everything was perfectly fine until the other person commented on women's rights being an excuse not to put any effort into a relationship. At that point, the non-asshole response isn't to call the other person a gold digger... Thats not when he called her a gold digger. He called her a gold digger after she said "men who go 50/50 make shitty boyfriends, husbands, and fathers." That was after he specified he goes 50/50. I agree with you that he didnt handle it optimally. But he wasnt that much o…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:17 AM
2

Yeah I get what you mean. There is no official definition, its just lingo to describe a group of people acting like morons.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:14 AM
2

Ive never joined that sub. Ive known its garbage for years. I just lurk every once in awhile and laugh at the stupidity. But this thread was just so over-the-top stupid that I figured Id make a post about it.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:12 AM
4

What does that have to do with the other comment? You posted it in response to my other comment that said "He could also remove the word reddit :P"
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:00 AM
3

What?
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:57 AM
31

At this point I really dont think its much of an exaggeration to say that wokism is like a cult. Cults arent always a group of people drinking blood in an abandoned church. Cults come in various shapes and sizes. There are underlying psychological phenomena that cults have in common, which is what really makes them a cult. These include radicalization, thinking that youre enlightened and everyone else is wrong, thinking that you need to convert people to your group, etc. Thats exactly what wokis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 02:33 AM
9

Depends exactly what you mean by obligations of being a wife. If shes not being a good wife, he can divorce her. And the sooner he divorces her, the less the alimony is. Like I said, I mostly agree with you. I just dont think its as black and white as "alimony should be fully abolished." It should be reduced or removed for most men, but not all.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:27 AM
1

Oh lmao. Its not an official term or anything, its just lingo. A "clown fiesta" would be a party of clowns. So the idea is when a group of people are all acting stupid, like clowns.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:24 AM
5

Haha no worries about the long comment. Just for future reference, you might want to break it up into smaller paragraphs :P If you leave a blank space in between two bodies of text, like Ive done here, the 2nd body of text will be a new paragraph.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:22 AM
16

Yeah I saw those. Hilarious that they banned it and claimed the reason was that "its a fake post." Nah, the reason is cause it exposed the bias of the sub.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:12 AM
17

The courts are very biased against men. Men are routinely treated unfairly and ordered to make excess payments. So I mostly agree with you, but there are a few situations where alimony makes sense. Lets say two young adults get married and have kids. The husband works and the wife is a stay at home mom. This works great for 20 years, then they divorce. The husband has spent 20 years building his career so his salary is 150k. The wife has spent the last 20 years raising kids and taking care of th…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:08 AM
8

He could also remove the word reddit :P
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:59 AM
2

I reported it, just waiting on a mod to get it. Can you report it too? For the reasons you just mentioned.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:52 AM
1

A really absurd situation, so much so that its laughable despite being a serious topic.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:29 AM
57

Its a hate sub, but "hate" has been redefined to "not being woke", so its not considered to be a hate sub.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:21 AM
2

I specifically didnt link it because its against the rules. You should remove this post because its the kind of thing that can get this sub in trouble with admins.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:05 AM
7

Reread the dialogue and pay attention to the order
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:22 PM
36

Oh yeah Im well aware of that. I just thought that this specific post/thread was an extra level of stupidity. On top of being hypocrites that supported patriarchial gender roles, they were aggressive and vicious about it.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:18 PM
13

If I was in his situation, I wouldnt have called her a bitch or gold digger, just because Id prefer to stay on good terms with my friends. Plus, arguing with idiots is often pointless. However, I don't think hes an asshole for standing his ground. She began by making rude and sexist comments. He respectfully disagreed and specified that he splits the bill. She escalated it by saying even more rude and sexist things about men who split the bill, such as "they make shitty boyfriends/husbands/fathe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 08:44 PM
5

Yeah, its insane how biased some subs are.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:29 PM
9

Im not going to give a link because of reddit ToS. However, you could go to my profile, look at my comment history, and it wouldnt take long for you to find the thread. Nothing about that is against the rules. People on AITA are mostly sane I have a hard time believing this. Lmao what?
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:20 PM
11

Nah I've known for awhile that the sub is really biased. I dont follow it, I just lurk every once in awhile. But this thread was just a new level of stupidity. Specifically because people in that sub are normally opposed to gender roles, patriarchy, etc. But when theres a dispute between a man and a woman, and a woman is advocating for gender roles, their brain short circuits and they still defend the woman. They are so protective of women that theyll abandon their ideas at the drop of a hat and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 08:16 PM
34

Yeah AITA is normally biased in favor of women, but I think this was a whole new level of stupidity. Specifically because AITA is normally extremely opposed to patriachy, gender roles, sexism, etc. But then all of the sudden, they support it when its a woman advocating for it? The level of cognitive dissonance is off the charts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:46 PM
9

Im very much pro free speech, but I thought I should mention it because I think its against the subs rules. It might even be against reddit TOS. Your comment might get removed if its not changed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:38 PM
5

And here you have the proof of that: a literal story of a woman pining for another men straight to her boyfriend's face like that's totally normal and people supporting it I totally agree with your comment, but I wanna make one correction. It was her husbands face, not her boyfriends. Its not like shes just joking around with a casual boyfriend. Shes saying this crap to her husband. And reddit is siding with her and calling the husband insecure. This is part of why I find Aldous Huxley's Brave N…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:35 PM
6

I totally agree with what youre saying but you may want to use a different term in your first sentence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:30 PM
38

I didn't want the post to be too long so I didnt include some specific comments, but I'll leave them here for you guys. Here are a few copy/pasted comments that are heavily downvoted in that thread: "I'm female and always pay half. You don't know the other person financial situation. I think its cringe that their are girls out in the world who still think that men should pay but are also the same girls wanting equal rights for women." "I don't even want a guy to pay for me. It feels ridiculous."…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:26 PM
299

I didn't want the post to be too long so I didnt include some specific comments, but I'll leave them here for you guys. Here are a few copy/pasted comments that are heavily downvoted in that thread: "I'm female and always pay half. You don't know the other person financial situation. I think its cringe that their are girls out in the world who still think that men should pay but are also the same girls wanting equal rights for women." "I don't even want a guy to pay for me. It feels ridiculous."…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 07:25 PM
15

The "women are wonderful" effect and gynocentrism are definitely some of the root causes, because this crap happens everywhere. However, its even worse on reddit, because redditors in general are more woke than the average person. Theyre more into patriarchy theory and all that. Being woke causes massive bias because woke people view everything through the lens of identity politics. Regarding that story I mentioned a few comments ago, how many people do you think read it and automatically jumped…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:21 AM
19

Yeah, same. But AITA is hugely biased in favor of women, so you didnt see many comments like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:07 AM
7

So you really think all these guys in magazines and on TV don't wear makeup? Not nearly as much as women. Of course they will use basic makeup like skin enhancement. But they cant use eye liner and eye shadow to significantly increase their attractiveness because most women dont find it attractive. Women, on the other hand, can do that. The only false binary here is yours in that men can't wear makeup to improve their looks. Thats not even a binary. You should look up the defintions of words bef…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 06:01 AM
10

And thats why guyliner is so popular, right? Oh, wait. And of course you didnt address any of my other points. We're done here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:57 AM
13

Yes they can. If they want to they can, and if their date doesn't like it then it's a bad match. No, its not. Most women think eye liner or shadow is weird on a guy. Its not a bad match just because she thinks that way. Youre dismissing a valid point with a false and nonsensical binary. Anyone who isn't willing for their partner to express themselves however they are or want to be is a bad date. Nope, this is extremely impractical and just plain false. You shouldnt just do whatever the hell you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:43 AM
14

"Woman are more at risk when having sex, despite them having complete control over the pregnancy. The reason theyre still at more risk is cause we can discuss financial abortion after court reforms of child support" ??????? Again, what are you even saying? You are trying to argue that woman are more at risk when having sex, and you keep trying to back that up with completely irrelevant points. If you said "men are at more risk, but we can change that with court reforms" then thats valid. But you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:37 AM
19

This is an overly simplistic way to dismiss a valid point and its pretty far disconnected from reality. Men could maybe use a little skin makeup to have better looking skin, but its not like they can use eye liner or shadow. Most women would think thats weird. And no, a woman isnt a bad date just because she doesnt want a man wearing eye liner. Either way, a womans ability to enhance her looks with makeup is far greater than a mans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:34 AM
11

When it comes to a women's right to choose is has everything to do with her body. No, the issue of reproductive rights is much more nuanced than "its her body". It has a huge impact on the man if he becomes a father to a child he doesnt want. What are you even saying at this point? I pointed out that fathers have basically zero reproductive rights when it comes to pregnancies, and therefore they are at risk when they have sex. In the even of a pregnancy, they are at the mercy of the woman. You r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:28 AM
14

Starting with simply health, A pregnancy effects the woman, and the consequences of pregnancy or even abortion the risk is on herself. Cut the hysteria. How many women suffer serious, long term health problems due to pregnancy? Its pretty rare. The number is definitely much lower than the number of men who are forced to have a kid they dont want. What you mean when you say is that men are at more "risk" strictly the risk they aren't concidered in the choices she makes about her body. No thats no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 05:11 AM
22

I explained why they carry more risk. You did nothing to address the points I made. Saying "no, just no" is pointless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 04:57 AM
37

Yeah, and avoiding gender debates doesnt even give you a full escape because the misandry is the default for many subreddits. /AmItheAsshole is a great example of this. If there is an interaction between a man and a woman, the woman will have to do something really over the top for reddit to say YTA (Youre The Asshole). But as soon as a man does anything less than perfect, its YTA YTA YTA YTA YTA. There was a post recently where a man was asking if he was TA (The Asshole) for not going to a conc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 01:30 AM
15

Nice write up. Here are a few additional points: The person who asked for the date should pay Complete nonsense. When 2 people go out on a date, they both benefit from it. They both get food, drinks, and a potential partner. Since both people are benefiting, theres no reason for 1 person to pay for it all. If you want to go on a date, pay your share whether you asked or not. If you dont want to go on a date, then just say no. No one is forcing men to pay for first dates. The problem is that some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 01:14 AM
3

Wow man, on top of the horrible situation with your wife, youre in another bad position with your house. That must be terrible. Do you see a solution aside giving up the dogs and garden or getting a different job? If you post enough openings online, maybe youll find a "country" type of person who would enjoy living in the woods for cheap rent. If you do find someone, is there anyway to give them a separate living space (like segregating a part of the house or giving them a separate building) so …
/r/MenSupportMen27/09/21 09:06 PM
2

Maybe look for a roommate and offer discounted rent in exchange for taking care of your dog and garden?
/r/MenSupportMen27/09/21 08:42 PM
3

Agreed. I didnt mention it in my first comment because I was specifically talking about the bullshit claim that "women get murdered just because theyre women", which literally never happens except for psychos who kill women just cause theyre women (which is basically just serial killers and mass shooters. Again, extremely rare). The point I was making is that out of all the women murdered (which is only about 1 in 100,000 in the US), many of them are murdered because theyre married to an abusive…
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 06:06 PM
3

You know, it's funny that you jumped to the conclusion that husband must be abusive if they kill their wives I didnt say that he must be, but yes when husbands murder their wives, theyre usually abusive. That doesnt mean that the wife wasnt abusive though. The abuse is often mutual. hat if a woman is a psycho abusive wife who keeps nagging and humiliating her husband and children to the point it becomes unbearable? What if she hits her husband and he doesn't hit her back because he was taught no…
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 03:41 PM
1

It's true whether you alt right beta male degenerates Politically, Im a centrist. But of course a wokey like you would see that as alt right. You think anyone who has any non-woke beliefs is alt right.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:25 AM
1

According to who? Some random beta male degenerate loser? Says the woke simp. Irony is off the charts. LMAO you incel cockroaches are hilarious. "Anyone who doesnt worship women is an incel"
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:23 AM
1

I already found that and I talked about it in another comment that I just made.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:17 PM
1

I actually found a link to some studies and they werent downloadable files. Apparently I examine your own sources more than you do (which isnt surprising, given that your idea of a source is just finding something that backs up your beliefs and linking it without reading it). There are multiple problems with the studies. First, its nothing but surveys. Anyone who knows science 101 knows that surveys are a terrible way of getting accurate data. How can a survey get accurate data on how many women…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:14 PM
1

Instead of posting link after link that has no study attached, why dont you link the study itself? Since you claim it links to the study, link it.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:40 PM
1

A normal person would read those sources such as the specifically mentioned national crime victimization I read the sources. It was a list that didnt provide any link or anything to actually look at the study done. If a source doesnt show the study/data itself, then it cant be analyzed, and therefore it may as well just say "trust me." or they would click the link "understanding rainn's statistics" Thats literally what I did. Thats what I was talking about in my previous comment when I said "the…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:28 PM
1

You clearly dont read your own sources. I clicked the link, and again, it just made claims without backing them up. It didnt show research methods, actual results, or anything like that. That link was nothing but a short abstract that made claims without backing them up. There are a list of sources at the bottom, however its nothing but a list. No links or anything like that to see how the study was done. The list of sources may as well just say "trust us" because theres no way to analyze the st…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:05 PM
1

The link doesnt cite any studies. It just lists stats with nothing to back it up. You think thats proof of your claim, so further conversation is obviously pointless. This is gonna be my last comment. A man approaching you alone at night is also a reasonable situation to be afraid For robbery? Sure. For rape? No. Its extremely rare for a man to snatch a woman at night and rape her behind the alley. Most rapes are men taking advantage of drunk women. Most women know their rapists prior to the rap…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 06:43 PM
23

The only time women are murdered just for being women is when some psycho goes and kills women just because he hates women. This is extremely, extremely rare. Most women are murdered by an abusive husband. Which means they died because they were married to an asshole who abused his wife, not because they were women. For what its worth, less than 1 in 100,000 women were murdered by men in the US in 2019. Approximately 165 million women and around 1647 murdered by men. While we debunking the myth …
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/21 06:25 PM
1

From what I know, that statistic comes from a radical feminist who surveyed women and asked "have you ever regretted sex with someone" and if they answered yes, it was considered to be a rape. If you have a credible source that performed a proper study that shows 1/6 women are raped, I'd love to see it. Anyway, it seems like you have 0 interest in changing your mind, so I'll just leave our conversation at this: Fear should be dependent on the situation. If you are a woman drinking at a frat part…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 06:07 PM
1

Im confused if you are incapable of understanding sentence structure or you are ingoring it to bolster a weak point. No my sentence structure is fine, its you whose having trouble with logical connection between things. You keep trying to justify one thing by arguing a point thats completely irrelevant. You just did it again in the rest of this comment. Most men arent rapists BUT most rapists are men. So what? The fact that most rapists are men does not justify a fear of being raped by men becau…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:37 PM
1

Most criminals arent black people. Of course. And most men arent rapists. If you are scared of being robbed by a black person, you arent scared of being robbed, you are scared of black people If you are scared of being raped by a man, you arent scared of being raped, you are scared of men. If you are scared of being raped then there are absolutely circumstances where it is valid to be cautious around men. If you are scared of being robbed then there are absolutely circumstances where it is valid…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:20 PM
1

Do you know what circular reasoning is? Youre doing it right now. Im disputing the claim that its a reputable source and my evidence is the fact that they consider Vice to be "center left and mostly factual." You keep saying they are reputable without providing any evidence. Youre starting with the conclusion that theyre reputable, and using that to back up your claim that theyre reputable. Its literally circular reasoning.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:15 PM
1

I saw your other half baked responses and none of them address my point. You sound like a parrot, just repeating whatever nonsense you heard from feminists, regardless of how irrelevant it is.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:04 PM
1

The irony of this is off the charts. Youve given 0 evidence to back up your claim, yet youre saying "Im gonna need more than your opinion." Its you whose only give your opinion, not me. I gave evidence, which is the fact that they consider Vice to be "center left and mostly factual." Of course you believe that because youre as biased as them, but its not true. Vice is a far left, woke shithole of a website.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:02 PM
14

That website said daily mail is between right and right extreme, which is blatantly false, so the site you linked is clearly not a credible source. Edit: LMAO. That website said Vice is "center left and mostly factual" hahahahaha
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:55 AM
14

That's a false equivalency. Women are raped, the vast majority of the time, because of their gender. White people were almost never robbed because of their skin color.The attributes relevance to the crime is an important consideration that you are ignoring Nope, its literally irrelevant to the point. The point is that you shouldnt be judging an entire demographic just because a small minority of that demographic is bad. You shouldnt worry about a black person robbing you just because some black …
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:52 AM
1

My bad, i thought you were referring to my other comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 06:30 AM
6

Do you pay attention to what feminists say about men? They think men are predators. They want men to be guilty until proven innocent whenever a woman makes an accusation. I dont remember all the details, but Im 100% sure that whatever kind of prison sentences that feminists wanted to abolish, it was for women only.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:50 AM
4

Not off the top of my head. Ive seen people post about it a few times. It might just be for non-violent crimes, but it was definitely for women only. The feminists were specifically requesting that prison be abolished only for women. Whether it was all women or just women who commit non-violent crimes.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:38 AM
7

Women who make a lifetime career in the military are rare. Why are you switching it to "women in the military"?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:36 AM
8

I know you think you did something here. But you did not. If Im wrong then why cant you explain what Im wrong about? You suggested that countries with military conscription typically have it for both genders, and used "lots of nordic countries and israel" as your list of countries. You said "lots of nordic countries" but there are only 5 total, so that statement was nonsensical. As of 2021, there are 67 countries with military conscription. There are only a few countries that require women to do…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:54 AM
9

a lot of the nordic countries There are literally 5 nordic countries. What do you mean "a lot of nordic countries"? Yeah, theres Israel, a few countries in Europe, and maybe a couple countries in Asia. Thats it. Almost all countries that require military conscription only require it for men. I know plenty of women who have served and made a lifelong career of serving for their country. This is literally irrelevant. We are talking about conscriptiont. Not people who willingly sign up for the mili…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:30 AM
6

Yeah baloney. Just based on what youve said throughout this thread, its obvious you dont know much about Erin. Shes literally an anti-feminist and identifies as MRA. She says that feminists oppose male victims. Youre contradicting yourself by saying you agree with most of what she says.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:23 AM
10

It wasnt a mens shelter and it was feminists who banned her. Shows how much you know about the situation.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:22 AM
14

Before I type my rebuttal, I just wanna point out that in another comment on this thread, you said that all the countries that have military conscription are gender neutral. Meaning all the places that require military service from men, also require it from women. This is very obviously false and its baffling that someone would make such an insane suggestion. So your claims mean nothing. And no, it is feminists that fight against funding for men. They argue that it takes away funding for women a…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 04:05 AM
39

Lmao wtf? I dont know of any countries that have mandatory military services for women. I know plenty that have it for men.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:02 AM
15

Nope, feminism is a group that has people in real organizations that get real funding and lobby for real change. Its not a group of random people on the internet, its the people in official feminist organizations. As of now, that group is a female supremacist group. They keep demanding more and more privileges for women even in areas that women are already ahead, such as education. They fight against funding for mens shelters. They fight against equal reproductive and parental rights for men. Th…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 02:51 AM
1

LGBT either refers to any person who falls under those 4 categories or it refers to the group of political activists who advocate on the behalf of those 4 categories. Either way, its a group. However, the group isnt a monolith. Obviously its not correct to say "all LGBT people have this opinion" or anything like that. But, there is indeed a lot of overlap between LGBT people and feminism, wokism, etc. Your anecdotal experience doesnt reflect the general population. the left welcomes LGBT people …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 02:36 AM
5

not every LGBT person agrees with radical feminism Of course not. He didnt say that. But there is a lot of overlap between groups like LGBT and feminism. Here's the subreddit user overlap for MensLib. Menslib heavily overlaps with woke subs and feminist subs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 01:51 AM
33

self proclaimed feminists Its just feminists. No need for the "self proclaimed" label. Its not as if these people are "not true feminists." Its normal, "official" feminists that support this horseshit. Feminists in the UK have suggested completely abolishing prison for women.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 11:03 PM
82

No double standards please. Let keep the logic consistent regardless of the gender. From menslib? Lmao. Youre asking for blood from a turnip.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 06:44 PM
2

You're just demonstrating that you don't understand what "toxic masculinity" is. It's inherently gendered because it's referring to stereotypically masculine traits that are imposed on men Yes, and women impose those traits on men more than other men do. You got brainworms or something?
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:28 PM
2

It does in the minds of women. Out of all the women that complain about doing "emotional labor", how many are referring to their husbands showing emotional weakness? A decent amount.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 05:24 PM
29

Many women despise emotional weakness in men. They see it as unattractive and pathetic. They feel legitimately burdened when helping their husbands deal with "weak" emotions like depression. So when feminists came up with the idea that women perform "emotional labor" for men, it spread like wildfire, because so many women could relate to feeling annoyed/disgusted when their husbands showed emotional weakness.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:57 PM
35

Shill's may say "oh they aren't true feminists" Id be retired if I had a dollar for every time Ive heard that stupid phrase. Yes, random person on the internet. Youre the true feminist. Not the people in the real movement who oppose mens rights and fight to give women more privileges even in areas that theyre already ahead, such as education. Nope, theyre not real feminists. Youre the real feminist, stranger on the internet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 01:46 AM
47

Many women despise emotional weakness in men. They see it as unattractive and pathetic. They feel legitimately burdened when helping their husbands deal with "weak" emotions like depression. So when feminists came up with the idea that women perform "emotional labor" for men, it spread like wildfire, because so many women could relate to feeling annoyed/disgusted when their husbands showed emotional weakness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 01:44 AM
24

The shadowban is very telling. You didnt break any rules or do anything wrong, so they wont issue you a regular ban. But they are so far gone in their echo chamber that they cant stand any content that doesnt fit their narrative. So instead, they just shadowban you. They are beyond pathetic. Also, I didnt know you made that sub. I just joined :D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 12:39 AM
28

Yeah Im not worried in the least bit about the ban. Feminist subs will ban anyone who doesnt conform to their narrative. Its peak irony that the sub is called mens lib (mens liberation), yet you are only allowed to discuss mens issues from a feminist perspective. Absolutely hilarious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 12:34 AM
30

Completely agree. Its odd that so many people think feminism has a monopoly on gender issues. They think that if you believe in womens rights, you have to be a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 12:28 AM
134

I got banned from that sub due to the following conversation: Feminist: Men are constantly toxic to women without realizing it. They have unconscious biases which makes them treat women like shit without even knowing theyre doing it. (This comment had lots of upvotes). Someone responding: Ok, I get that. But can you tell me more about it or give me some examples, so I can be better? Same Feminist: Its not my job to educate you. Im not your personal yoda. Same person responding: See, this is wher…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 09:04 PM
1

its a cluster of cells Humans are just a cluster of cells
/r/MensRights19/09/21 06:38 PM
2

Why do you feel the need to identify as a feminist? Feminism does not have a monopoly on gender issues. You can believe in equal rights for women without identifying as a feminist. A political movement is defined by the actions and beliefs of its members, not the arbitrary dictionary definition. As of 2021, the feminist movement is primary about female superiority and male-bashing. I could write a big wall of text about why this is, but plenty of other comments have explained it, and you seem to…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 06:35 PM
9

0/150 cant be representative of the whole because it would mean that out of all women who murder their husbands, literally none of them were being abused. Some women do murder in self defense. However, that number is greatly exaggerated by feminists, who insist that women pretty much only kill when they are being abused. Erin Pizzey said that domestic violence is often reciprocal. So when a spouse gets murdered, theres a decent chance that there was abuse coming from both sides. But only when th…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 04:31 PM
45

"Feminism is just about equality"
/r/MensRights19/09/21 04:22 AM
15

Not to mention, we can speak on mens issues without invalidating women's issues. After all, women are the main ones bringing light to them. LMAO. Women are the main ones bringing light to mens issues? She must've forgot her schizo meds.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/09/21 08:10 PM
3

Not really. They wear it mostly because they want to look more attractive. As for the idiots in the screenshot, theyre just straight up wrong. Women arent required to wear makeup to look professional. Its just more whining about the non-existent patriarchy. There are definitely plenty of women that make other women feel like they need makeup. But thats not the only reason they wear it. And they certainly arent required to wear it for work.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/09/21 06:31 AM
2

They dont. They dont support you claims. You clearly didnt read them.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 07:24 PM
3

Linking a google search is pretty must the laziest thing you can do. The results dont even match what you are trying to back up, which proves you didnt even look at the sources yourself, you just assumed they were legit. Another comment pointed out that most were either done in 3rd world countries or were flawed. You are a clown.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 07:22 PM
4

I mentioned about how not everything we do is because of our nature Nope, youre now lying about misrepresenting the situation. You didnt say "not everything we do is because of nature." You said "humans have evolved from their biological instincts." I made a claim that "humans do X because of biology" and you claimed that we evolved past that, which implies that biology has no influence on behavior. You switched your argument from "biology has no influence" to "not every single human action is b…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 07:09 PM
4

1647 women dying IN ONE YEAR are so many fucking women. Given that the US population of women is around 165 million, its literally less than 1/100,000. No, its not "LITEARLLY SO MANY WOMEN" and it doesnt indicate they are oppressed. I'm talking about men killing womem because of their gender Abusive husbands dont kill women because of their gender. They kill their wives because they are excessively abusive and obsessed with power. You realize abusive men like this also kill children, both boys a…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 07:03 PM
6

Humans have evolved from their just biological instincts LMAO. That must be why our taste buds still feel pleasure from lots of fat, salt, and sugar, despite them being unhealthy, right? And why we feel anxiety even when we know theres no danger? And why we lust for sex? All that exists despite us being evolved from our instincts? Its fucking hilarious that woke cultists, such as yourself, say that conservatives are "anti-science." You will deny any science, even the most basic and accepted scie…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:47 PM
4

Really? Hundreds and thousands of women being killed by their husbands all around the world isn't a problem? It fucking is. What does OPs post say? It says "I see a lot of feminist claiming that they want equal rights, and I thought they were speaking about some third world countries were women actually have their rights negated. Sadly I discovered that (not all) but a lot of them were talking about first world countries." In 2019 in the United States, 1647 women were killed by men. The estimate…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:41 PM
4

And yes, female privilege comes from female oppression, you are right! This is gonna be shocking to you, but guess what. There are some cultural/biological norms that arent the direct result of patriarchy. Isnt that crazy? Humans have a biological instinct to protect women and give them resources. Its how our species survived for hundreds of thousands of years. Those traits are still left over, and thats why we have female privileges like the courts favoring them. Denying this is just straight u…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:27 PM
3

You didnt cite a single source, so youre full of shit. And what the other comment said is true. Why are you spending so much time in this sub? Shouldnt you be giving your wife a ride to her boyfriends house?
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:24 PM
7

Your wifes boyfriend must be so proud.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:22 PM
1

maybe when femicides stop What femicides are we talking about? A few mentally ill men going on a killing spree? Guess what, a few dozen people being murdered by a few mentally ill men, out of literally billions of people, isnt some emergency that needs to be fixed. rape statistics for women aren't this high Feminists grossly exaggerate how common rape is. And whats your solution? Tell people not to rape? Until society hits some sort of massive technological advancement where we can cure all crim…
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 06:21 PM
1

Nothing you said addresses my points, zealot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 02:56 PM
10

What the hell are you talking about? Almost all young people start with no wealth. And inheritances/parental support actually favors women, as parents are more likely to see men as providers who need to take care of themselves. Are you seriously arguing that in the past men held all the wealth, and each generation they passed it down to other men and excluded the women? Like men, generation after generation, have had a monopoly and wont let women get any money? I mean, its clear that youre sayin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 03:00 AM
26

Literally nobody is saying that feminists are the reason that men are attacked by other men. We criticize feminism for fearmongering and then victim blaming when someone points out that they are fearmongering. Heres an example: Feminist: "Women are in danger. Women are in constant fear. Its not safe for them to go out at night, unlike men." MRA: "Actually no, men are much more likely to be victims of violence crimes. They are in more danger than women." Feminist: "Because of other men." MRA: "So…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 02:42 AM
12

No as a group, women earn less. Yes, I just explained why. Men and women dont each hold 50% of all jobs. There are more male engineers, for example. And this is actually changing for the younger generation. Young women are outearning young men. But for the older generation, men do dominate high paying positions like regional managers. Segmenting women into sub groups changes the data. Of course it changes the data. It shows that women arent being paid less for the same work. You dont want to cha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 02:33 AM
18

How does owning a third of the wealth men own a financial advantage? They would have as much wealth as men if they didnt spend way more than men. It’s well established that women, taken as a group, do not make as much as men. Nope, young women are outearning young men. Overall, men do make more money. But that doesnt take into account different jobs. If you look at men and women working the same jobs, they earn about the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 02:19 AM
21

Even when the data clearly shows that women are disadvantaged - such as the fact that women own 32 cents for every male owned dollar Because women spend much more than men. Women make up something like 80% of all purchases in the economy. Young women are out earning young men. Women are not at a financial disadvantage. If they were, you would be able to point out that men are paid more, rather than pointing out that women have less savings. Women are actually financially advantaged. Theyre makin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 02:12 AM
3

Negative IQ
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/09/21 04:28 PM
3

What ways do women face systemic discrimination? Oh and men do face some systemic discrimination. Family courts and courts in general, male domestic violence victims being denied services and often taken away by cops while the abuser goes free, single fathers not getting the welfare that single moms get, and male circumcision being acceptable. Those are just a few off the top of my head. Can you name even one way that women face systemic discrimination? And no, the fact that most CEOs are men is…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/09/21 05:13 AM
25

Imagine being such a zealot that whenever you learn about something that doesnt fit with your view of the world, that you just automatically assume its fake without looking into it. Must be nice in that bubble.
/r/PussyPass29/08/21 04:47 PM
14

Lmao @ your pathetic false flag account trying to get this sub banned. Can some mod ban this loser?
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 02:06 AM
27

I laughed out loud reading that part. Zero self awareness indeed. Out of all of chucks outrageous comments, only 1 (the most outrageous one) was downvoted. He received a fair amount of criticism, but also received a fair amount of positive feedback. Clowns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 12:07 AM
12

So the leftists in europe dont believe in Identity Politics? The feminists in Europe dont give any conservative arguments regarding mens rights? Yeah, right. I understand that leftism is different in europe and the US, but thats not the reason that feminists give conservative arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 03:44 AM
1

Saying "this isnt about left or right" is overly simplistic and incorrect. Saying "its aimed at women" is also incorrect as reddit is male dominated. This is absolutely an issue of leftist elitism. Its the left that is obsessed with identity politics and censoring "hate speech", with "hate speech" meaning "anything thats anti-woke." If big tech wasnt so woke, then censorship of non-woke wouldnt be such an issue.
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/21 03:04 AM
19

Your suggestion implies that some women might abuse the system. The claim that women might commit fraud makes people go batshit insane. Its pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 02:57 AM
18

Humans have a very strong unconscious bias where we believe that men are supposed to give resources to women. Humans cant stand to see a divorced couple where the guy is wealthy and the woman is living an average life, because they believe she should get at least half, because they see men as providers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 02:55 AM
21

What are you talking about? These problems with the left are not limited to the United States, and leftists in the United States are not conservative at all. The only reason that some of their arguments sounds similar to some conservative arguments is because the left has gone so far off the deep end with IdPol that they will justify their anti-male bullshit in anyway they can, some of which overlaps with conservative anti-male rhetoric.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 02:48 AM
11

Horseshoe Theory is legit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 02:44 AM
-6

Landwhale is a bit of a stretch, but yeah shes heavy and shouldnt be anyone dietary aid.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/21 02:09 AM
11

So having all of your expenses (mortgage, food, children, etc) paid for, on top of getting spending money, is "unpaid"? And women apparently work 16 hours a day? Stay at home moms literally have no free time? These idiots have so few real problems that they need to lie and make up problems out of thin air.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 02:08 PM
3

OP makes a post about his personal experience and it gets flaired as unconfirmed? Why does he need to prove a personal story? How many subs on reddit require people to provide proof of their personal experience? If a woman posted a realistic story about a bad experience with a man, and it got flaired as "unconfirmed", you dont think that would be dismissive?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:51 PM
3

I agree we shouldnt make any strong judgments just based on the article alone, and this kind of post isnt exactly high quality, however I think we can also use logic to reason that this stepmom is biased in favor of the ex girlfriend. Whether its because of female in group bias, or just because she dislikes her stepson. Think about it. The stepmom is arguing that the ex girlfriend deserves much more money and has twice told her to talk to a lawyer. Then she wrote to an article website about the …
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:33 PM
9

We dont have enough info to say one way or another. The only info we have is what the stepmom said, and she didnt say how much the stepson and girlfriend each paid (which is suspicious). The ex girlfriends name is on the loan, but not the deed, which is also suspicious. Sometimes, people need someone to co-sign a loan to get it approved, but the co-signer doesnt actually pay anything. Its basically a backup for the bank. If you cant pay it, the other person is on the hook as well. Ive seen this …
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:14 PM
2

Backing on your comment for visibility, because this post is already full of comments and I think this is important for people to see: Why is OPs post flaired as "unconfirmed"? We cant even share our personal stories without it being discredited, unless we somehow provide proof? I dont get it. Are the mods trying to appease those who dislike us, by trying to make the sub more skeptical about bad feminist behavior? What an odd flair. What other subs require proof of a personal story? We should be…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 11:58 AM
1

This is a perfect example of an unfalsifiable belief. Literally nothing will change your belief that "feminism = equality." By the way, feminism =/= equality. Thats egalitarianism. Feminism is the advocacy of women, supposedly on the basis of equality, but its pretty clear that its no longer about equality. Guess what? If you focus only on the issues of 1 gender, and keep trying to lift that gender further up, even when that gender is already ahead, then no thats not equality. Feminism is no lon…
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 02:28 PM
2

Lmao hahahahaha "feminists in the movement, in official organizations, with real political power, arent real feminists" hahahahaha
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 01:41 PM
1

If you’re against feminism, you’re against equal rights for women No, because feminism isnt about equal rights. You can believe in equal rights for women without being a feminist. Feminism doesnt have a monopoly on gender politics. Why is this so hard to understand?? Lmao, ask yourself that question
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 12:04 PM
2

You said “real feminists hate her and banned her from her own shelter” but the thing is that those people were NOT real feminists because real feminists would never neglect male victims of domestic violence HAHAHAHAHA What did I say in my post? I said "Im using the term 'real feminists' to mean people in feminist organizations." People who are officially in the movement. Not tumblr weirdos. Do you think it was tumblr weirdos that banned Erin from her own shelter? No, it was the other feminists t…
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 12:02 PM
2

It wasnt intended to be an insult. Not in the least bit. I was saying i think theres something legitimately wrong with people who genuinely believe things like "leftwingmaleadvocates are a bunch of right wing extremists"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/21 11:54 AM
1

I literally addressed this in my post and this is your response? Jesus christ. Talk about a broken record.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 11:41 AM
1

I believe you, but can I get a source? Im trying to compile a list with sources.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 11:05 PM
55

Hate speech = anything that doesnt agree with my radical woke dogma
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 10:58 PM
9

Anti-feminism & misogyny are so normalized that western men are calling a Taliban member "moderate, pleasant man while female MRAs are either directly supporting Taliban or creating strawman + sexist conspiracy theories to silence feminists. The title literally sounds like someone who forgot their schizo meds.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/08/21 10:13 PM
16

Lmao theres very few things that are more pathetic than simps
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 10:08 PM
2

Yeah thats a great post, I actually read it earlier today. Do you have any other sources? Id like to have a list of citations.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:23 PM
3

Thats exactly the kind of content needed for this post. If you have any sources for those, please post them. Im looking to compile a big list of examples of feminist organizations being anti male.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:49 PM
4

I think feminism is defined by the majority opinion of the movement. But for this post, I was defining "real feminists" as feminist organizations, because people cant say "shes not a real feminist" if shes literally a member of a feminist organization. Like the feminists who banned Erin Pizzey from her own shelter.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:26 PM
1

I agree, but for this post I was requesting examples of anti male policies/behavior within feminist organizations. As opposed to anyone on the internet.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:24 PM
3

Just curious, why label yourself as a feminists instead of an egalitarian? Feminism doesnt have a monopoly on women issues, either. You can not identify as a feminist but advocate for the issues that women do have.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 02:02 PM
13

Internet forums are not the problem. There are literally millions of men who have visited incel/manosphere forums. And what, 2 of them committed horrific acts of murder? Mental illness is what causes people to go on a killing spree. Not internet forums. Pro-censorship assholes are trying ban forums that they dont like, using the excuse "its linked to terrorism." Stop helping them by spreading their fear mongering bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:16 PM
27

Nothing on that sub is satire. They really are just that crazy.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 11:07 AM
8

If youre so adamant about men dying over bullshit, you can lead by example and go to afghanistan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 09:11 AM
1

Double standards?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:02 PM
16

Once censorship starts, it never stops. Thats why I was rolling my eyes when people were supporting mgtows ban and advocating for FDS to get banned. Yeah, mgtow became misogyny. Yeah, FDS is a shithole. But neither should be banned, because censorship is absolutely a slippery slope. It just doesnt stop. Now that incels, mgtow, etc are banned, we are the next target.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 05:21 PM
10

What in the actual fuck is she even trying to say?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/08/21 10:35 PM
1

Username is uncensored, this breaks reddits ToS. Admins are just waiting for an excuse to ban us.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:49 PM
1

You cant. Its a shaming term people use when you say things they dont like. You cant please everyone, especially in politics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/21 08:11 AM
1

These people are living in a fantasy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/21 08:09 AM
3

Yeah exactly. And they never take a step back and realize they think that way. Even when its pointed out, its just in 1 ear and out the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/21 08:07 AM
0

Education can only go so far. Either we will evolve out of it eventually, or fix it with technology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/21 07:55 AM
5

How have we evolved past them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/21 07:53 AM
13

I dont think society hates men. The woketards definitely hate men, but society as a whole doesnt. But, society as a whole doesnt give a shit about mens issues.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:36 PM
4

Nothing you said addresses the main point, which is that society cares about womens issues but not mens. The question isnt "why do we circumcise babies?", the question is "why is it illegal to circumcise women, but legal and common to circumcise men?" This isnt about the history of circumcision. Its about the fact tbat society cares about womens issues but not mens.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:18 PM
1

This post isnt about specific amendments to the constitution. Its about the fact that society cares about womens issues but not mens.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:15 PM
31

What does this have to do with male vs female circumcision? OP isnt asking "why is there circumcision?", hes asking "why is female circumcision illegal but male circumcision is legal and common?" The point of this post is that society cares about womens issues but not mens issues.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:12 PM
4

Thats the idea for circumcision, but this answer does nothing to address the main point, which is that society hates female circumcision but doesnt care about male circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:10 PM
6

Nah, people acknowledge that movies are unrealistic. Feminists are so caught up in their idea of "patriarchy" and "social conditioning" that they think any percieved weakness in women is just social conditioning.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/21 01:32 AM
6

When you ignore all mens issues and hyperfocus on all womens issues, its easy to believe that men are privileged and women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 03:51 PM
5

Youre just assuming shes in the right despite evidence to the contrary. OP said he didnt wanna drive an hour for it and she pushed back and implied she was worth it, instead of just accepting no as an answer. On top of this, OP told you that she expected a free meal, free stuff for her kids, etc. And you ignore all that and make up lies about OP, like saying that "hes throwing a tantrum" and "probably lying about her expecting free stuff." Again, youre just assuming shes this great person and OP…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:30 AM
-3

Ive been in this sub for years and stopped posting in mgtow like 2 years ago lmao. Do you see what this guy is saying in other comments? Saying OP "threw a tantrum" and other nonsense. Hes clearly simping for her.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:26 AM
5

A simp is a man who gives women special treatment and creates problems out of thin air so that he can fight for her. This entitled single mother said "how do you know a date with me isnt worth a 1 hour drive?" and OP made a witty reply. And youre on here defending m'lady and smearing OP, making up crap like "oh hes an asshole who threw a tantrum" lmao. You are like the definition of a simp.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:18 AM
1

Wow, a gay man simping for women who dont even know him? Thats gotta be the 1 thing more pathetic than a straight men simping for women who dont even know him.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:12 AM
2

No because women are unattracted to simps. But Im sure you could spend lots of money on her before she drops the ball that youre just a friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:06 AM
2

"You dont even know me, you dont know if Id be worth it"
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:03 AM
-21

I would say this regardless of gender. Someone throws a drink at you, you can shove/punch them once, and if they run away, its over. You dont chase after them and kick them while theyre down.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 10:59 PM
32

Women dont often date 35 men at once, but they do often date multiple men and string men along for money/food/gifts. The main point is that theres about a 0% chance a woman would be arrested for doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:05 PM
14

There are so many feminists that think men arent stronger than woman, and that its just social conditioning. The delusion is off the charts.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 08:59 PM
-17

His response was a little excessive, but her behavior was ridiculous. Dont harass and throw drinks at people. Pass denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 08:58 PM
32

Woke people dont care about truth or actual justice. They care about flaunting their moral superiority and showing everyone how woke they are. Great example is when that cop shot the black girl who was literally trying to stab another black girl. The woke mob ignored all context and ranted about how "cops are killing innocent black kids." Some even went so far as to say that stabbing isnt bad and the cop shouldve just let her stab the other girl. If they see someone being non woke, they wont car…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 05:58 PM
3

Why does FDS need a ban? Maybe just a quarantine or warning or whatever. I dont see the need for the ban until they start doing things like doxxing. When you ban things for hate speech, censorship moves further down the slippery slope and theres nothing you can do about it. I dont know enough about NNN to say whether or not they should be banned, but I dont think a ban should happen unless theres very clear malicious intent (like how companies write clickbait and lies for views). If its just peo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 04:12 AM
6

But you answered boy yourself when you said 'causes trouble for others.' By "cause trouble for others", I mean serious things like doxxing. Not people saying mean things. FDS if read by men in many different circumstances could cause lots of trouble. Yes some of them really could go the whole 'shooter' route. We may know that the very things we talk about in subs like this one pushes certain kinds of men towards that horrible outcome, but the subject matter talked about in FDS or the now banned …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 03:39 AM
18

Its just another feminist attempt to dismiss the valid points made. Instead of addressing the arguments at hand, they can just cover their ears and say "they dont care about real issues, they just wanna trash women, so their points arent valid."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 02:09 AM
-1

That said, FDS really needs to go and go yesterday. 83 upvotes When did the left become so pro censorship? I hate FDS but I dont see why it should be banned. The only subs that should be banned are the ones that either post illegal content or cause trouble for others, like doxxing people or harassment campaigns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 02:04 AM
22

Yeah, a working pair of eyes. Do you pay attention to politics? Leftists in general are becoming more supportive of polygamy and less critical of cheating. Many of them think that monogamy is "patriarchy."
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 09:21 PM
35

Monogamy is becoming less and less popular with feminists. They encourage cheating/polyamory, with the excuse that "women arent mens property" and "its not the 1950s anymore." Cheating/polygamy is becoming more acceptable and its not the traditional people who support it. Its "progressives".
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 08:55 PM
3

Identity politics is taking over leftists in general.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 08:26 PM
1

You are clueless. There are so many hateful liberal subs like /fragilewhiteredditor and fragilemaleredditor.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:15 AM
2

Literally nothing you said addresses the clear political bias when it comes to subs getting banned. FDS can post 24/7 "men are worthless" "we should castrate most men" etc and admins dont care, but mgtow says "marriage is bad and women are much less moral than society thinks" and its banned. The admins have literally stated that hate speech doesnt apply to men as a group or white people as a group, even if you say things like "most men are closeted rapists who should be castrated." You are blind…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:13 AM
7

Mgtow didnt cause a mass shooting. Mass shootings are caused by people with severe mental illness. Not internet forums. Millions of people have browsed mgtow without shooting anyone. Its not mgtow. I heard the shooter also drank water. Not just him, but every mass shooter ever has drank water. So water is 100% correlated to mass shootings. Time to ban water.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:53 PM
2

Lmao cope harder woketard
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:43 PM
2

Lmao. Yeah its just a massive coincidence that all right wing and male subs just happen to break reddits rules, while all liberal and female subs just happen to follow reddits rules. Yeah, one big coincidence
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:36 PM
3

It should, but it doesnt, because of the ideologically driven admins. Theyre flawed people just like everyone else. They have biases. Most people in california tech are liberal/woke. Theyll ban right wing and male subs for "hate speech" but not liberal or female subs.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:22 PM
2

/FemaleDatingStrategy, a subreddit of women who trash and belittle men nonstop
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:06 PM
4

Lmfao, what rules did mgtow break? Admins even said they are cracking down on hatw speech, which doesnt aplly to men or white people.. It is so clearly ideologically driven. Theres a reason that mens subs get banned but FDS isnt going anywhere.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:47 PM
6

Im not right wing. My point was specifically about ideologically driven censorship.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:29 PM
49

This cannot be true given the political bias of reddits bannings. Mens subs, right wing subs, etc are banned. Meanwhile, left leaning subs are untouched, no matter how bad they are. Furthermore, women get a pass on the bannings (FDS). It is absolutely ideologically driven.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:42 AM
14

Youre a fool if you think that they arent coming for us next. AHS is alfeady demanding that this sub gets banned.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:05 AM
37

I thought Musk cut ties with her once it came out that she abused Johnny?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/21 03:57 PM
4

I dont understand the fixation on admins. Reddit admins allowing misandry is just a symptom of a much bigger problem, which is that the woke narrative has a stranglehold on media and big tech. And admins wont change until the bigger problem does. Furthermore, we already know the admins tolerate misandry. "Raising awareness" in this sub isnt raising awareness because were aware. To make any difference, we need to spread the word elsewhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 11:59 AM
1

Did I tell him to stop doing it? No, I said his goal to make the admins remove powermods was unrealistic. And it is. Then he said "feminists are right, we are just a bunch of whiners that dont wanna do anything", which is ridiculous. If you don't agree that his strategy will work out, the STFU and go work on your own. Nobodys strategy is gonna make the admins change. Thats tbe entire point I made. Are you having trouble following this conversation? Which is still worlds better than what you're d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 11:53 AM
3

They've changed before due to public outcry. But I guess since it's men we're talking about it's hopeless. Are you saying this sarcastically? Because thats literally the reason. Every single time that big tech changed due to public outcry, it was for woke reasons. Can you give an example of them changing for mens rights? No, because they havent. Thats why you had to use an example that wasnt about men. so again. our feminist critics are correct. People just want to complain and not actually do a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 09:21 AM
3

Your fundamental principle of "spreading awareness to help little by little" is correct. It just wont help enough to get the admins to change. Not until the woke narrative loses its monopoly on big tech. Spreading awareness is good for other reasons. It sows the seeds for the future of mens rights. And not everything needs to be explicit activism. Some people just want to read/discuss things on forums, without any plans for changing the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 09:14 AM
4

Who said do nothing? We should keep posting on forums and supporting each other. Its just that people dont want to participate in your specific objective to get the admins to remove powermods because its extremely unrealistic. We can still discuss mens issues and fight for mens rights in other ways. And I already told you Id participate in an email campaign. What do you want from me? To lie and say I believe we can get admins to change?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 09:05 AM
3

Ok, but their skepticism is valid. It would take an enormous media movement for admins to actually change. Admins allowing misandry is really just the symptom of a much, much larger problem. A problem that we cant solve. We just have to hope for the best. Like I said, I'll participate if you do an email campaign. But I don't blame you if you give up, because the cold harsh truth is that it likely wouldnt result in reddit changing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 08:58 AM
2

So you dont have a solid argument/evidence as to how we could make a media fiasco big enough for admins to change? Again, if you cant give a convincing argument, you cant expect people to participate in the activism. People arent going to organizing and send out emails to specific people at a specific times if they think that nothing will come of it. I still dont understand what exactly you want. Youre complaining about inactivism, but youre not providing a solution or evidence that the solution…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 08:40 AM
3

Yes, thats the claim. Can you support that claim? Can you give an argument, or provide evidence, as to why advertisers would cut ties with them? Crowder making a video on reddit bias isnt going to change advertisers opinions. Neither will an article from the daily wire. And thats basically the best we can do for a media fiasco. Do you think a company like CNN is gonna report on "reddit misandry"? And even if they do, will that be enough for advertisers to pull away? How are you going to make a m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 08:21 AM
5

Thats not a convincing argument. Too many people just dont care. Big names in media (Tim pool, Crowder, Shapiro, etc) are constantly talking about the dangerous rise in censorship and the disturbing levels of power that big tech has, yet most people dont care. If they dont care about an issue as serious as that, theres not a chance they will care about reddit powermods being misandrists. The IdPol narrative is in control of big tech and the IdPol narrative says "misandry isnt just acceptable, it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 08:14 AM
8

I scanned the comments and only found one person who said it probably wouldnt do much. And they said they were worried that it might give LWMA a negative label. You cant really blame people for being skeptical. It is impractical that the admins would change, even with big media like crowder exposing them. However it was really shitty for those people to agree to do something, but then to not participate when it came time for action. The possibility is there. We just need to actually do it. How? …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 07:48 AM
7

Agree to disagree. I appreciate what you are doing, but I dont think its gonna make the admins change. Posting it on reddit, to subs that already agree with you, does nothing beacuse they already agree. Posting it on other subs does nothing because it will be downvoted/removed. Again, I think your best bet is to send it to other media. Youtube channels, article sites, etc. Since we are on LWMA, I assume you dislike conservative media, but theyre probably your best bet, because they are anti IdPo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 07:25 AM
9

Lol dude, its not defeatism, its reality. Theres a huge difference between giving up on a practical goal and realizing when a goal is near impossible. If you said "Im gonna keep playing the lottery until I hit the megabucks" and I said "youre just wasting your money", would that be defeatism? No, its being realistic. Furthermore, Im not opposing you. Its not like I downvoted or reported the post. Im just saying that big tech is at the mercy of IdPol and theres a near 0% chance that admins will r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 07:01 AM
13

Oh that was you who posted it? Small world lol. Point is if this creates a big enough splash the admins will either be forced to do something or people will be made more aware of their bigotry. Its not going to create a splash, nevermind a splash big enough for admins to take action. Misandry isnt just ignored, its actually being encouraged, through deceptive identity politics. And exposing the admins wouldnt do anything because most people either dont care or actually agree with the misandry. W…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 06:46 AM
70

The admins have literally said they dont care about hate directed towards men. Paraphrasing, theyve said "our rules of harassment are based on vulnerability. White people and men are not vulnerable in the same way minorities or women are, so the rules do not apply." I agree it would be great if those mods were gone, but there is about a 0% chance that those mods get removed due to misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 06:23 AM
36

Manslaughter is when you accidentally kill someone, like running them over in a car or accidentally beating them to death in a barfight. Not for when you grab petrol, dump it all over someone, and light him on fire. What a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:01 AM
41

Only a very small minority of men hate women. And its not politicians or govt officials, its lonely men in their basement. Leading to point 2 - Women dont experience systemic discrimination, degradation, or violence. Women have all the rights as men, plus plenty of special privileges. Women are also significantly less likely to be a victim of violence. When women hate men, its usually because of their delusional feminists fantasies. Rape culture, patriarchy, etc is all nonsense, but they believe…
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/21 06:10 PM
11

Both of them are paying their exs way, way more money than they should have to. But society only cares about one of them.
/r/MGTOW228/07/21 08:59 PM
1

What are you basing that on? The fact that she doesnt support true equality? Guess what, feminists dont support true equality. They want rights without responsibilities. Nothing in this posts indicates that shes tradcon. Most feminists oppose women in the draft.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/21 09:16 PM
3

Way more than 4k. Out of all the women who saw the tweet (maybe like 100k woman total), 4k of them decided to hit the like button. And there are probably a lot that liked it but didnt hit the like button.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 11:32 AM
30

I think the problem is that people have become extremely hostile towards any sort of male behavior that could be seen as "creepy" or "sexualizing." Lets say the roles were reversed and a man said the same thing to a woman. I dont think it would be harassment or unreasonable. I think it would be a compliment. But our militant feminist society would throw a fit about it. But when it happens to a man, people dont care. I dont think its a big deal whether this happens to a man or a woman. The proble…
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/21 12:08 AM
2

Lol nevermind, I was wrong. You arent here for an honest discussion. Nothing will change your mind. Enjoy life in your bubble.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/21 12:56 PM
2

I disagree with your arguments, but you did a good job of addressing the specific arguments I made. I was wrong to say youre not interested in an honest conversation. I have a long response so you may want to use PC instead of mobile to read/respond, lol. I gave data for men paying off their school loans an average of 2 years earlier than women Because men are more likely to pay off debts. Women have way more debt compared to men. I dont just mean education, I mean debt in general. And its not a…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 11:48 PM
3

Okay so you asked me to stop making partial arguments, and focus on the main point, so I did No. When explaining why "feminism isnt about equality", I made a handful of arguments. You ignored some and responded to others. Heres a few that you ignored: The fact that young women are way ahead in education and have also pulled ahead in the workforce (young women are outearning young men), yet feminists keep pushing for more Feminists banning Erin Pizzey from her own domestic violence shelter becaus…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 10:17 PM
3

If your main point is that feminism is bad When I say you are ignoring my main points, Im referring to my supporting arguments. Youre clearly not ignoring my claim that feminism is bad, but you are ignoring the supporting arguments Im giving, the arguments that explain why feminism is bad. And then you just keep repeating the same points like "yeah there are some fake feminists but those arent real feminists" which does literally nothing to address the points I made. You’re correct that I’m not …
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 09:40 PM
3

Im not cherry picking anything. I pointed out your bias. You talked about "bad feminists" and gave terfs and swefs as your examples. So your idea of a bad feminist is someone who doesnt support women doing sex work, or someone who doesnt support trans women. Those feminists are nothing compared to the legitimately man hating femimists who oppose mens rights and fight to keep female supremacy in areas where women are ahead. Im trying to show you your bias. Which i should probably give up on, beca…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 08:18 PM
1

Courts are biased in many more ways than just child custody. For example, women recieve significantly lighter sentances than men for the same exact crime. Whats feminism got to say about that? Well, in the UK, feminists want to increase that gap. Theyve literally said they want to reduce women in prisons, despite female privilege in the justice system. Another example is look at female pedos vs male pedos. When men have sex with underage girls, theyre sent away for a long time. When women do it,…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 10:03 AM
2

You can access it through the link but the mods removed its visibility from the subs feed. Go to the sub and it wont be there.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 07:46 AM
34

Yeah, that second paragraph looks like she just copy/pasted it from FDS sidebar, lmao.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/21 05:24 AM
6

Things about the experience of being a man that suck for men were not invented by women. We’ve never had the power to make those kinds of decisions…so if they suck for you, feminism can help change that. No, not everything that sucks about being a man is due to patriarchy. I know feminists love to say that, but its false. And feminists are doing the opposite of helping. They actively shut down mens rights discussions, both online and in person, under the false pretense that its "just woman hater…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 12:51 AM
6

I didn’t push back on the fact anymore, because my point was about all the people being dramatic about it being ‘censored’ or whatever No actually, you did push back on the fact. And nobody was being dramatic about being censored. Someone pointed out that mods removed its visibility, because mods on big subreddits constantly censor posts that dont align with feminist/leftist dogma. From my perspective people were saying ‘oh course it’ll get removed’ on a post that was still up from my POV. And y…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/21 11:46 PM
9

The mods literally removed its visibility from the sub. You can access it with a direct link, but it doesnt show up on the subs page. It has 26k upvotes in 18 hours so normally itd be at the top of the front page, but its not visible in the sub at all. You are clearly wrong, and instead of admitting it, you double down and tell the person who corrected you that hes just projecting. How typical of a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/21 11:09 PM
2

Not even once every few months? So youre in a dead bedroom marriage, yet bragging about your relationship and calling us a bunch of losers?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 10:38 PM
2

Wow, not even once a month? If it was more frequent, you wouldve likely corrected me. So what, your wife gives you sex once every few months?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 09:49 PM
2

Proving you right? Women are sexually repulsed by simps like you. Your kid probably isnt yours. How often do you and your wife have sex? A lot less than youd like to, thats for sure. What do you get, starfish sex once a month?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 09:24 PM
9

Your wifes boyfriend must be so proud that youre doing such a good job raising his kid.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/21 01:34 PM
22

Women are attracted to dominance and are turned off by submission. Women are attracted to jerks because their behavior signals dominance. They dont like nice guys because niceness is perceived as weakness/submission.
/r/MGTOW214/07/21 12:55 PM
6

Yeah, that was a fair estimate. Your attempted critique is laughably ignorant.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:50 PM
8

You've built up a strawman for you to tear down with this post. Congrats. No, I didnt. Do you read feminists forums? They love to talk about how women are afraid of men killing them due to rejection. I already explained that I didnt talk about things like rape because this post is specifically about the feminist manufactured outrage of men killing women due to rejection. Did I say that women face 0 problems when rejecting men? No. I said theyre very unlikely to be murdered because of it. If you …
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:42 PM
9

Its not an attempt to move goalposts. Its a specific post about feminist hysteria of men killing women due to rejection, because Ive seen it more and more on feminist forums lately.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:31 PM
2

I explained it was an estimate. Out of all of the women murdered by men in 2019, what percent do you think were murdered due to rejection? Most of the murders are abusive men killing their wife/girlfriend. Another good chunk of those murders involve crime, like a robbery gone wrong. I imagine the number is significantly lower than 5%, but I went with that as a generous estimate, because I didnt want to lowball it either.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:29 PM
7

you'd not just want murders but also harrassment, sexual assaults, rapes This post isnt about harassment, assault, rape, etc. I agree those are issues that probably happen more than people think. This post is specifically about the feminist hysteria of men murdering women. More and more lately, on feminist forums, Ive seen women complaining about "being murdered for rejection" and "incels killing women" and whatnot, so I decided to look at the stats for it. the way OP frames this is super dising…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:25 PM
7

I didnt say you were a feminist. I said that feminists are creating fake outrage and hysteria with their bullshit claims that women are constantly in danger. Lets calculate an estimate of the likelihood that a woman gets killed by some random guy when she rejects him. In 2019, there were 1,647 women murdered by men in the United States. Many of these murders were abusive men killing their wife/girlfriend. Furthermore, there are plenty of reasons that men kill women besides getting rejected, such…
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/21 07:02 AM
8

Most murdered women are killed by their abusive husband/boyfriend. The amount of times that a guy kills some random woman for rejecting him is extremely low. Its manufactured outrage and hysteria from feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/21 06:10 AM
19

Im so sick of this manufactured outrage hysteria regarding "men killing random women." When a man kills a woman, isnt it his wife/girlfriend like 90% of the time? Does anyone have stats on how often men kill random women for rejecting him? I bet the number is close to 0.
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/21 08:02 PM
3

Im not criticising leftism, im criticizing vaush. Hes scum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 05:04 AM
7

Must be why they have sex with fuckboys so much sooner than good guys lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:16 PM
16

Yeah exactly, it 100% depends on the context. If someone is here making reasonable, seemingly good-faith arguments and questions, thats totally fine. Censoring that would be awful (which is what feminists subs do). But if some jackass says something like "Y'all are a bunch of pathetic incels. Youre just mad that you cant own women as property" then they deserve a permaban. No reason to have that crap.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:38 AM
136

I dont have a source, but awhile back I remember hearing about a study that said when women are rejected by attractive men, they lash out at ugly men in response. It was a comment on a post where a guy gave a girl a fake number. She texted the number and the response was "sorry, someone gave you the wrong number. Im not Josh" and sent a selfie to prove it. The guy was super nice about it; saying things like "people are such jerks. Sorry you had to go through that" and her response to him was "yo…
/r/MGTOW08/07/21 08:29 AM
1

No worries. It really is annoying, though. Vaush isn't the monster people make him out to be. Maybe he is, maybe he isnt. You dont think he is, plenty of people do think he is. If you discuss people like Vaush on internet forums, youre going to get people sharing their opinion of him, and plenty of people wont be nice about it. If I were you, I wouldnt specify that Im a fan. Because youre gonna keep getting push back from it. Maybe just talk about Vaush without mentioning that youre a fan? I thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 08:19 AM
3

Dude, youre a stranger on the internet, I couldnt care less if you watch vaush. I asked out of curiosity, because it sounded weird that you agreed with those criticisms, but also called yourself a fan. Im not trying to police who you watch. it's really annoying that I have to be sat down for an intervention every time Vaush comes up in a left-leaning space and I have the audacity to say I like him Yeah, theres a reason that Vaush is so heavily criticized, even in left leaning spaces. And its not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 08:00 AM
2

From your other comment: I watch Vaush pretty regularly. You could accurately call me a fan No, this isnt about me thinking you only watch vaush. This is you admitting you are a vaush fan and me being genuinely curious as to why, given you said you agree with the criticism of him (from the other comment). I promise you, Vaush is only convincing to people who already agree with him. He doesnt make good arguments that address the nuanced opposing views. He makes feel good statements that sound sma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 07:50 AM
3

The other commenter said: 2) Vaush has admitted that he cares little about misinformation as long as it furthers leftist ideas. 3) Vaush is left leaning to a degree that is unreasonable. He views all views besides his own as "reactionary" because he sees his movement and ideas as progress. You responded - I don't think I've seen a truer statement about him than this. And then when I asked you what you like about him, your response was: He models some good debate tactics and provides some strong …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 07:40 AM
24

I love living in "patriarchy" where women face 0 consequences for this disgusting, vile, criminal behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 07:19 AM
2

Why the hell do you watch him if you agree with those criticisms?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 07:18 AM
5

(G)old
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 07:42 PM
2

Its a left over evolutionary trait, just like our love for fats and sugar. Fats and sugar arent good for us but we still enjoy the taste. Our taste buds havent evolved to dislike them yet. In primitive times, women were much more likely to survive/reproduce by mating with the dominant men. They still have that trait left over.
/r/MGTOW06/07/21 01:51 AM
2

Despite the wokies love for Islam, Islamic countries are legitimately patriarchal. Other major religions like Christianity are also patriarchal, but most Christians don't even follow their own religion. How many people wait until marriage to have sex? A patriarchy is a society where men work, women take care of the house, and both have strict gender roles. Our society clearly looks nothing like this. Women dominate education. Young women are outearning young men. Marriage is declining and there …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/21 08:16 PM
6

I agree the top men are much more successful with women. But thats not society catering to them. Society caters to women more than the top 20% of men.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 01:42 AM
-17

How does society cater to the top 20% of men?
/r/MensRights03/07/21 12:26 AM

Jocks being successful with women and nerds being unsuccessful isnt just "the movies", its reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 02:36 AM
1

Nah FDS was always trash. Before FDS was a thing, I used to have "debates" on here with the founder/head mod of FDS. It was never genuine discussion about red pill or blue pill ideas, or women becoming the best versions of themselves. It was always her just trashing men. FDS uses PPD as their 2nd soapbox to trash men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 12:03 AM
8

Yeah exactly, theyre saying you have internalized misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 11:38 PM
0

FDS literally says that your man needs to be paying for you. I said that you were sugarcoating this as "investing in the happiness of your partner."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 11:35 PM
65

The conversations are pretty similar whether youre a man or a woman who is arguing against the partiarchy. The difference is that if youre a man, theyll call you a misogynist. If youre a woman, theyll say you have internalized misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 11:21 PM

In high school and college, the low IQ jocks/frat boys are by far the most successful with women, while the nerdy guys are by far the least successful. This only starts to change later on in life, when the nerds are making money and the jocks arent. And the jocks that do end up making good money are always successful with women later on in life. What a coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 10:48 PM
3

You can be really smart but if you just ramble on about theorems but never went to college that doesn't mean much. I wouldn't say intelligence ISN'T attractive You literally said those 2 sentences, one right after the other, no break in between. And you dont see the contradiction? Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 10:45 PM
1

Lmao no this isnt about my own interpretation, its about their very clear demands. Go to the sub and look and what they say. If they say "I refuse to date a man who makes less than 100k", it means literally just that. It doesnt mean "I just want a man with a decent job", which is what youre sugarcoating it as. You said they want a man whose "self sufficient", which is just an example of total BS. They dont want a man who is simply self sufficient, they very clearly state they want men who will p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 10:07 PM
3

Ive seen it posted in feminists subs in the past, with a good amount of upvotes. Go simp somewhere else.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/21 10:02 PM
28

Lots of idiots in the comments today. This post isnt anti-refugee. Its pointing out feminist hypocrisy and their disgusting attitude of "so many men are rapists that women are justified in discriminating against them."
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/21 02:37 PM
16

Its an anti refugee message from trump jr. One that was heavily criticized by feminists for being discriminatory. But then they go and do the same thing, except to men, and say that its fine. This post is about feminist hypocrisy.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/21 02:35 PM
30

Yeah exactly. Its just a euphasism.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:48 PM
0

Lmao you strawman redpill and sugarcoat FDS. You even wrote "a man paying all his girlfriends bills and spending money on her" (like fancy dinners) is just "investimg in her happiness." God, FDS is so fucking pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:56 PM
1

They want a lot more than that. They want a wealthy man to treat them like royalty. Stop sugarcoating FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:52 PM
-1

There are men who take care of their appearance, work hard, and will be nice to women.The idea that somehow this is unrealistic is setting the bar way too low for men FDS expects a hell of a lot more than that. FDS expects men to be handsome, fit, make lots of money, pay all the bills, have no physical or mental problems (even minor ones like ADHD), and treat women like goddesses. "Sugarcoating" is a massive understatement to describe what youre doing. FDS is nothing but vile hypocrites who tras…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 02:02 AM
2

Way to cherry pick the post and only respond to the weakest argument. The post is correct. FDS wants men who are alpha in good ways and beta in good ways. They want a tall, handsome, wealthy man who treats them like royalty. What is ridiculous about this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 01:38 AM
8

It's even worse when child support is involved, you reeeaaaally see the stereotypes come out then. What the fuck are you talking about? Men who dont pay child support are seen as deadbeat losers. When women dont pay child support, people barely care.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:08 AM
3

No worries. Its a hilarious sub if youre a fan of parody.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:52 PM
5

Its FDSP, a parody sub of FDS.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:42 PM
1

Why does it need to be quarantined? I hate FDS, but I dont think they should face any censorship. Censorship always gets abused by those in power. Theyre never satisfied. Theyre always looking for the next thing to ban, even when theres no longer anything bad to ban.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 06:00 PM
0

Youre getting downvoted because youre lying. Short, fat, ugly men arent attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 12:19 AM
2

Shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights26/06/21 02:52 PM
38

Based Shakespeare
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/21 12:42 PM
1

The fuck are you talking about? We are talking about OP, not me. Clearly, she wasnt a plate for him because he stated that he made her his priority.
/r/MGTOW26/06/21 12:33 PM
1

He made her his priority and he got shit on because of it. He pursued other women after it. I dont understand what you think it is that he did that was so bad. He was dating a girl and she lost respect for him and moved on to someone else. He is just telling his story about this and recommending not getting tied down to 1 girl.
/r/MGTOW26/06/21 01:15 AM
2

OP didnt complain about her dating multiple guys. He said the issue was that sex stopped and she barely talks to him anymore. It sounds like OP is saying dont get too involved with 1 girl and keep yoir options open, because women will drop you the second a "better" guy comes along.
/r/MGTOW25/06/21 09:13 PM
14

Female nurses need more access to nursing jobs when they already occupy 80% of them? Lmao
/r/MensRights21/06/21 09:42 PM
10

Theyve run out of real issues to complain about, so they have to make new ones up. "Emotional labor" this, "rape culture" that etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 06:38 PM
9

Yeah, spending money on this is nothing compared to how much is wasted on nonsense like expensive restaurants.
/r/MGTOW12/06/21 01:35 AM
2

Yeah. Again, we cant prove it was AHS, but its pretty obvious it was them. They are really, really sick.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 12:37 AM
11

Top comment on that post - Dude my job pays peanuts and im super short, yet im never called creepy. It's almost like that stuff doesn't matter. Yeah, height and income mean literally nothing to women... More delusional than mental patients.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/06/21 11:57 PM
2

Most of the posts on FDS are trashing men. Once in awhile theyll say something like "trans women arent women" or something, but its not common. Almost all posts on there are misandry. Yet, everytime I see AHS posting about FDS, its always transphobia. You can do the math. They dont care about misandry.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 06:20 PM
2

Not proof, but check this out - /MgtowBan is a subreddit very similar to AHS and has heavy user overlap (basically everyone there also uses AHS). Both of them are pro censorship subs, trying to get anti-woke subs banned. This is a STICKED post on /MgtowBan. A STICKIED post for almost A MONTH - https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOWBan/comments/neu1cn/plans_to_take_over_mgtow/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Yeah, these people are sick. It was a couple years back that someone provided screenshots…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 05:45 PM
15

Nope, FDS is only posted because of transphobia. AHS will never post FDS for misandry. Its always transphobia. Really speaks volumes about what a shitshow that sub is. Its not actually against hate subreddits, its a radical leftist/woke sub that wants to censor everyone who doesnt conform to their dogma.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 04:45 AM
1

He literally said that the preferences of other people dont effect your dating pool, which is just not true. Im not arguing that other people need to change their preferences for you, Im just saying its idiotic to think that other peoples standards arent a restriction on you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 10:54 AM
1

Why do we still need feminism? What rights or social norms need to change, that feminism is fighting? Because as far as I can tell, feminism achieve its goals, and now it needs to make up non-existent issues to continue. Lies about rape culture, the wage gap, the patriarchy, etc. The movement has turned into man hating hysteria (like talking about how women are constantly in danger of being attacked/murdered by men, when men are the overwhelming majority of violent crimes).
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:10 PM
2

Im literally the person that you said was "writing BS." In your other comment, you said "You can be part of the solution by not responding to BS like this." I was the one who wrote the "BS." So nice try with your armchair psychoanalysis, but no, its not that Im too sensitive or have a subconscious need to be included. Theres very little misogyny in this sub. Theres a lot of valid criticism of feminism, which gets confused as misogyny by idiots.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:51 AM
1

I’m neutral when it comes to reproductive men rights. You are the one pushy with your white/black fallacy. No, youre the idiot saying "feminism doesnt oppose mens rights", then when I show you a blatant example of a prominent feminist fighting mens rights, you say "idk, its not my place to speak", instead of saying "oh wow, I guess I was wrong and some "real" feminists do fight against mens rights." Like I said, I have evidence that what happens in the 80s doesn’t reflect on what is going on tod…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:25 AM
1

"Bla bla bla its not my fight bla bla bla USA sucks" Youre ignoring my points and talking about other shit. Im all set with this conversation. I showed you hard, irrefutable evidence of "real" feminists being anti male, and you respond "uhhh, urr, uhmmm thats not my fight so I dont have an opinion, and uhh errr it was the 80s so it doesnt count." And then just talk about other nonsense to distract from your lack of argument. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:12 AM
1

let’s work with stats instead of your stupid ass assumption Stupid ass assumption? Youre the genius arguing that "theres no differences between men and women, and therefore any imbalance in any part of society is due to sexism against women." No, even in the most feminist countries, like the nordic countries, there are still less female coders, engineers, etc. But there are plenty of female politicians, for example.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:02 AM
1

The fact that its rapidly improving (young women are already out earning young men, theyre way ahead in education, and the gender gap in high positions is shrinking), and other countries like Sweden are basically already there? Jesus christ, youre dense.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:00 AM
1

I actually don’t believe that there is such thing as reproductive right for men So a woman lies about being on birth control and gets pregnant against a mans will, and he has to pay child support for 18 years. Thats not a reproductive rights ssue? A woman cheats on her husband and gives birth to a kid that isnt his, but he thinks it is, and she lets him believe it. A few years later he finds out it isnt his and he wants to revoke parental rights. He cant, and hes still on the hook for child supp…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:58 AM
1

I didnt say women are naturally not fit to lead. The people who become leaders, like CEOs, are people that work at it all day every day. And yes, people of all races and genders do work all day everyday, but for whatever evolutionary reason, white/asian men disproportionally work all day every day. And by the way, there are still some lingering effects of the patriarchy, but that doesnt mean we still live in one. Since it was more common for women to be stay at home moms, even just 50 years ago,…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:55 AM
1

This completely fails to address the argument I made. Youre backpedaling and just saying generic things because you have no answer. You keep repeating "women are still oppressed" and your only evidence is "there are more male CEOs and politicans!" Oh yeah, there are far more male prisoners, workplace deaths, suicides, homeless people, etc. The list goes on. So I guess we actually live in a matriarchy, since all the people at the bottom are men? Right? Since we are making the arguments based on p…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:50 AM
1

there is still a bunch of those FACTS that prove that there is a gender inequality in higher end of the society and power No, none of those facts prove that there is massive gender equality. There are natural differences between men and women that lead to differences in occupation, such as there being more male construction workers, oil rig workers, software engineers, etc and more female nurses, therapists, etc. Your argument is circular reasoning. "I know that women are oppressed, because ther…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:47 AM
1

No, it was a legitimate movement that did make serious change, and now that the necessary changes have happened, it has nothing left to do but to make up issues - such as lies about rape culture, lies about the patriarchy still existing, lies about female oppression, etc.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:41 AM
1

So we are discussing "real feminists" being against mens rights, and I give you a perfect example of a prominent feminist fighting against reproductive rights for men, and your answer is "uuuhhhhhhhhh, Im a gay male and pro choice so Im not answering"? That makes no sense. You cant admit that some big feminists actually do fight against mens rights? The Erin thingy happened in 1980.. and yeah it sucks but I don’t thing it reflect the actuality of today. Uh, what? Feminism, overtime, has shifted …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:36 AM
1

A patriarchy is a system with strict gender roles where men have legitimate power over women and women are domesticated housewives. In the 1800s, this is what life was like. The husband was the head of the household and worked. The woman stayed home and took care of the house and had children. Thats not the system anymore. Sure, some women choose to be a stay at home mom, but its not the norm, and its not enforced. Women are not legally stopped from working or shamed for working. Its actually th…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:12 AM
1

You made the claim, but provide no sources yourself. Then say that I cant provide sources? You are like those religious idiots that say "oh yeah? PROVE GOD DOESNT EXIST!!@#" YOU are the one claiming that we are in a patriarchy. The burden is on YOU to back up your claim. Not to say "PROVE IT DOESNT EXIST." If you had sources, you'd post them. But you don't. Your argument is "more CEOs are men, therefore we are living in a patriarchy" which is laughably absurd. We were in a patriachy in the 1800s…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:09 AM
1

Yes, internet forums and feminists blogs/pages are relevant to feminism. How do you think that they are separate from the feminist movement? You think that the real feminist movement is this isolated noble group doing great things, while internet feminists are nasty man haters? Lmfao And its not just "crazy tumblr feminists" fighting against equality. Did you watch that clip I sent where Cassie Jaye interviewed Katherine Spillar (a huge name in the feminist movement)? She advocated against repro…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:06 AM
1

You are insisting we are living under a patriarchy (despite it being obvious that we dont), refusing to link any studies to support your bold claim, then saying that I need to provide studies that it doesnt exist, and that Im lazy if I dont? Remember earlier when I called you a clown? I was wrong. Youre the entire circus.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:58 AM
1

Feminism is a movement with real people who do real things. The actions of these people is what feminism is about. Not some arbitrary dictionary definition. If the dictionary says "feminism is a movement for equality", but the feminist movement as a whole does not fight for actual equality, then guess what? Feminism isnt about equality.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:51 AM
1

Show you studies that feminism is man hating? Just go on any feminist forum or listen to feminist speakers. Show you studies that the patriarchy doesnt exist? No, youre the delusional one who thinks we are still living under a patriarchy, the burden is on you to give studies that show we are a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:49 AM
1

Also this is a big flaw that I hear too many time: it’s not because a movement isn’t inclusive to everyone problems that it’s a bad movements LMAO. I first argued that feminism is anti-male, and you said "no, its just about equality." I said "no, its not equality, its about lifting women up and leaving men in the dirt", and you again insisted its just about equality. And now youre doing a complete 180 and saying "feminism doesnt need to be inclusive to men", which is admitting that its not actua…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:47 AM
1

Yeah, sure. The increasing hostility and man hating is sure making it more inclusive. The patriarchy hasnt existed for decades. Women are ahead in education, young women are ahead in jobs, and women of all ages are being lifted up the corporate ladder. We aren't living in a patriarchy just because most politicans/CEOs are men.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:41 AM
1

You tell me I dont get to decide what feminism is, while you yourself are deciding what feminism is. You are saying "feminism is equality, anyone who believes in equality is a feminist" and Im saying its not. You dont get the authority anymore than I do. Feminism is a specific political movement that has specific political goals. If you do nothing to help with that movement (no internet posts, no protests, not part of any group), then what the fuck are you doing that makes you a feminist? Simply…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:38 AM
7

Yeah, its fucking awful. A woman requesting a female therapist would never receive significant backlash or threats for it. But god forbid a man wants a male therapist who could relate to him more and wont dismiss his issues as "patriarchy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/21 05:35 AM
1

At least I bring something to support what I’m saying On my "list of ways feminist are anti male", I linked 3 sources. All of which you ignored. Also, use some common sense. Of course companies arent going to write on their website "btw, if you are accused of sexual misconduct, we are firing/moving you", but that is the policy they use. What do you want me to link to prove that? Have you never heard of what happens to men accused of sexual misconduct? Have you never browsed twitter and seen the …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:34 AM
1

Feminism is not about equality. Men and women both face issues. Feminism tries to fix womens issues, ignores mens issues, and actively harms men if it fits their goals to help women (eg, the Duluth Model). Thats not equality, thats female supremacy. Most women are not feminists. Most women will say they believe in equality, but most women are not posting on feminists forums, protesting at feminists protests, joining official feminists groups, etc. So no, most women arent feminists. Believing in …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:29 AM
1

Feminists have successfully shifted our culture so that "guilty until proven innocent" is the norm in a lot of places. At work, if a man is accused of sexual misconduct, he is commonly fired/moved, even without evidence. In college, if a man is accused of sexual misconduct, he is often required to move dorms or expelled, even without evidence. On the internet, if a man is accused of sexual misconduct, he will have the twitter lynch mob after him and will certainly lose his job. If a woman makes …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:14 AM
1

And your encounter with some feminists is anecdotal too Spending a decade debating with feminists and reading thousands of feminists posts is not anecdotal. That’s fallacious mate, you are not the one deciding what are the relevant point No, its not fallicious. I said feminism was anti-male, you argued that it wasnt and called me a misogynistic incel. Then we went back and forth for awhile, with you repeating that I just hate women and dont understand feminism, and failing to address my points. …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:02 AM
1

You werent giving me a taste of my own medicine, thats my point. You claimed X, Y, and Z were issues, and I claimed they were non issues and backed up my points. When you tried to give me a taste of my own medicine, you said "X, Y, and Z are all non issues" but failed to back up those claims. Its not the same. If you think that womens issues like "being expected to shave" and mens issues like "guilty until proven innocent" are anywhere near the same level of importance, youre insane.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:49 AM
1

You ruined your credibility by repeatedly failing to address the relevant points, then you complain when I refuse to read your wall of text. You cant spend a ton of time making bad arguments, then expect people to read your wall of text. Next time, either make your point in a shorter amount of text, or dont ruin your credibility, so that people will bother to read big posts. Nobody is going to read a wall of text from someone who has been making bad arguments and calling them a misogynist incel.…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:46 AM
1

You tried putting it in perspective, but failed. You argued that women faced issues X, Y, and Z. I said that those were non issues and I backed up my argument. You havent made a rebuttal to this. You just took what I said about men, claimed they were non issues, but failed to back up your reasoning. See, thats the difference between us. When I make a claim, I back it up. You tried to "copy me to show me why Im wrong", but you didnt copy me, because I backed up my claims, and you didnt.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:42 AM
1

Ok so all problem women face are non-issues got it In 2021 in the western world, there are very few issues that mostly/only effect women. The idea of feminism is to give women rights where they are lacking. They arent lacking any rights, thats my point. Because they have all the rights, theyve run out of serious issues to complain about. Yet, the movement is still burning strong. It has to make up fake issues to keep going (lies about wage gap, patriarchy, rape culture, etc). These lies are anti…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:36 AM
1

Do you not recognize me from the other thread? Im the same person youve been debating with tonight, about MRAs and feminism in general. I said feminism is anti-male and you aggressively rejected that theory and said I hate women. So Im giving you my evidence that feminism actually is anti-male. And no, I didnt dodge the period thing. Yeah, periods suck for some women. So what? What are we gonna do about it? Scientists are already working on a solution. Again, this is such a non-issue compared to…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:06 AM
1

I've given you a list of ways feminism is actively anti-male, and for each point I've made, you either ignore it or blatantly deny it. But since you want to insist that you've "won this debate", I'll give you a brief list off the top of my head - Here are ways feminism (the movement as a whole, not a "few bad apples" on tumblr) is anti male - Advocating for a "guilty until proven innocent" system for men accused of abuse or sexual misconduct The Duluth Model Opposing funding for male shelters Wh…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:55 AM
1

Gaslighting is when you make someone question their sanity by explicitly denying something that you did. The term comes from a story when a man turned on gas lanterns, then shut them off, and when his wife said "I smell gas", he said the lanterns were never on and that shes crazy. No, I didnt fucking gaslight you. I disagreed with you. Not surprising that someone like you thinks that they mean the same thing. We are done here.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:38 AM
1

I read your first paragraph and stopped reading. Most feminists know what MRAs are. They wont stfu about how all MRAs are "alt right nazi incel terrorists who dont care about men and only advocate for mens rights as a way to oppress women." Im exaggerating, but you get the idea. In fact, youre doing literally the same thing. Youre saying were "just a bunch of misogynists who dont care about mens rights, we just want to bash women and take away their rights". If you scroll through this subreddit,…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:32 AM
1

I had a friend who would loose consciousness because of the pain from her periods Thats extremely rare. Expecting women to have a week off each month, especially a paid week off, for periods, is fucking asinine. It’s a fucking big deal that you gaslight Gaslight? Lmfao. Not surprising someone like you would sloppily use that word. Its used commonly among pretentious people who have no idea what theyre talking about.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:27 AM
3

Theres no logical connection between "Men suffer from problem X, mostly caused by other men" and "Therefore, X isnt an issue." The problem is, many people dont need perfectly valid/logical arguments to believe something. If they want to believe something, you dont need to give them a bulletproof thesis for them to believe it. You can give a witty, smooth sounding "explanation" and theyll accept it, even if theres no logical connection. People hate the idea that women might be privileged. When yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/21 03:23 AM
2

Here are ways feminism (the movement as a whole, not a "few bad apples" on tumblr) is anti male - Advocating for a "guilty until proven innocent" system for men accused of abuse or sexual misconduct The Duluth Model Opposing funding for male shelters When talking about male reproductive rights, feminists will say the same things conservatives do ("dont have sex if you cant be a parent"). When Cassie Jaye interviewed a prominent feminist about male reproductive rights, she literally said just tha…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:02 AM
1

Every feminist Ive ever disussed MRA with has said they dislike the MRAs. Every time I seen feminism talking about MRAs (like if Im browsing a feminist forum), they say they hate MRAs. This isnt a small anecdotal experiences. This is me talking to/observing thousands of feminists posts over about a decade. So yeah, my claim that "feminists generally dislike MRAs" is correct. False, again. Your hates towards women make you think that they hate MRA I dont hate women. I hate feminism. Its a vile, f…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 02:26 AM
1

Its a funny parody sub of FDS. Theres nothing wrong with posting there. The fact that you think this was such a good comeback speaks volumes about your intelligence
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:23 AM
1

feminism, who helped and still help empowering all women around the world Im not against feminism for other countries where women still face real issues. by giving them the right to vote Without being forced into draft, right? better salaries Wage gap is a myth, been debunked millions of times. They still wont shut up about it. fighting abuse, sexual abuse, home abuse Fighting it by advocating for a "guilty into proven innocent" system for men accused of abuse or sexual misconduct? I wish I woul…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:20 AM
4

What a fantastic argument. You really addressed all the points I made!
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:39 AM
7

Feminists are, by far, the strongest opposers to mens rights. They are the ones stopping funding for male shelters. They have created a hostile political environment where people like James Damore are fired for daring to say that "sexism isnt the reason there are more male coders." They are advocating for a "guilty until proven innocent" system for men accused of sexual misconduct. Its not "a few bad apples on tumblr." Misandry is mainstream feminism. Feminism is a huge obstactle for mens rights…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:31 AM
3

There are aspects of our society that favor women and treat men unfairly. The court system, funding for shelters, funding for cancer, the Duluth model, etc. Feminism defends these aspects and fights against mens rights activists who try to change it. So you can take your "no real feminist" crap and shove it.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:54 PM
17

Feminists support policies like the one that OP is dealing with. In domestic disputes, the men are taken away, regardless of evidence. Feminists support this. Just like how they support "guilty until proven innocent" for sexual allegations. Go preach your no true scotsman nonsense elsewhere
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:42 PM
81

Remose are rehabilitation are supposed to be a big part of the justice system. Thats the entire idea behind parole. This bitch rolled her eyes when he talked about the false accusation ruining his life. She has 0 remorse and shows no signs of rehabilitation, yet only gets 1 year. The justice system is such a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 06:58 PM
12

Right, you could easily find a male therapist who sucks, and youd wanna switch too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 06:49 PM
1

If a male employee claims that a female employee is acting inappropriately, and she denies it and management sides with the her, you think that the courts would be on his side? Not a chance
/r/MGTOW206/06/21 05:50 PM
1

Your username is awesome btw
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:09 PM
3

Its cuckfornia. They side with employees over bosses, but also side with women over men. If he tries to sue for wrong termination, he will have to tell the story, in which case the courts would side with her and he'd lose and could potentially be counter sued.
/r/MGTOW206/06/21 05:00 PM
39

Go to a male therapist. Idc if people say thats sexist. There are far, far too many female feminist therapists who dont know how to actually help men. Therapists are humans and have flaws like everyone else, and plenty of female therapists are feminist women who believe in patriarchy, male privilege, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 04:53 PM
15

This is what feminists actually think
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/21 04:44 PM
1

the pigs always side with women Yeah a lot of cops are simps. It sucks.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:35 PM
61

Feminists will defend this shit, saying "men are more dangerous" or some nonsense, and say "we just want equality." Feminism is such a joke.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:34 PM
3

She wants to be woke but doesnt wanna deal with the consequences of being woke. And yes, she will fail to see the monumental stupidity of that.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 04:31 PM
13

She wants to be woke but doesnt want to actually deal with the consequences herself. Its common among wokies. For example, there were plenty of people who cheered on the riots and said "all cops are bastards", but once the riots came to their neighborhood, they said "get these animals out of here" and called police.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 04:25 PM
1

Its not a noisy few. Women have all the rights as men, plus privileges, and theyre still bitching. They are opposed to mens rights because they see men as privileged oppressors and women as victims. Femimist man hating isnt just a few crazies on tumblr, its big name feminists. And if its just a "noisy few" why do they have so much success within the movement? Why is it their content thats getting upvoted and shared by feminists?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:19 PM
29

The overwhelming majority of murder/violent crime victims are men. Another day, another schizo post from /feminism.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/06/21 10:25 PM
14

I hate to make anti-feminism an aspect of the MRM, Why? Feminists actively fight against mens rights. You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to think that feminists in 2021 are about true equality
/r/MensRights05/06/21 10:13 PM
3

Thats not what the post said, but its still a completely asinine post. It legitimately sounds like the ramblings of someone having a schizo episode. Humans used to feel really bad about eating animals, so humans feminized them and no longer fell bad, because humans hate women so much that they dont feel any sympathy for anything feminized Thats literally what the post is saying. Anyone who believes that should be in a mental hospital.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/06/21 01:13 PM
5

Unfathomably based post
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre03/06/21 12:53 PM
6

And this isnt just the rantings of some tumblr whackjob, shes a literal feminist icon. Speaks volumes about the movement.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/21 12:42 PM
7

Hi I actually am a Feminist Why? What rights or privileges are women still lacking? Do people still consider themselves anti vietnam war activists? No, because the war ended a long time ago. So why do you still identiy as feminist, even though women have all the rights, plus special privileges? Women are literally privileged in the western world in 2021 but still crying oppression.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 12:27 PM
2

Another day, another schizo post from /feminism.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/06/21 12:59 PM
20

Lmfao, as if women arent constantly bitching about being fucked zoned or cheated on by the guys out of their league. No, its not just men complaining about womens standards. Most of the complaining comes from women who date/fuck guys out of their league and get used for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:55 PM
5

You said that other peoples preferences dont effect your own dating pool, which is obviously wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 07:11 AM
6

Of course, but not how someone else's standards are restricting your dating pool. That's ridiculous. What the fuck are you talking about? If 70% of women refuse to date men under 5'8, that heavily restricts the dating pool of anyone under 5'8. If one gender generally wont date X, that does limit the dating pool of the other gender who are X.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 01:22 AM
2

Im not offended. I dont care that FDS exists. But when someone dishonestly says that "its just women helping each other avoid toxic relationships", Im gonna call bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 11:07 PM
1

Everything you just said (except about not needing meditation/buddhism to be happy) is blatantly false. If you go on FDS right now, its full of posts trashing men. Not posts on how to avoid abusive men or become happy or independent. Its like Im saying the sky is blue and youre saying no its orange. Anyone who isnt blind can see that the sky is blue and can see that FDS isnt about avoiding abusive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 10:41 PM
2

It’s only harder picking through all the rubbish we find Thats just a euphamism for "men suck." Thanks for showing your sexism, although it was already pretty obvious. Women should be emotionally, mentally, financially, and physically stable before she goes dating otherwise she’ll end up with trash Nah, its just that your idea of trash is "any man who isnt perfect". Women consider their male equals to be trash. fds is about holding ourselves to a higher standard No its not. The sub is filled wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 10:28 PM
4

I mean if some chunky chick is holding that high of a standard and is getting what she wants I don’t see the problem The problem is people claiming that its women who suffer from unrealistic beauty standards and that dating is harder for women. it just sounds like your whining cause no one will sleep with you. Nah, Im correcting someone who thinks that dating/sex is harder for women. Why dont you go back to FDS or whatever dump you came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 10:05 PM
0

The other comment claimed that "dudes hold women to a high standard", not that "women have low self esteem." Women dont have low self esteem. Most women have high standards and wont settle for their male equal. whining about not getting any isn’t helping your case, you’re not untitled to it The irony here is off the charts. Youre whining about how hard life is for women (when its not), then telling men to stop whining and that theyre not entitled to anything. Lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 10:02 PM
9

I don't think the fact that any woman could get some gross loser to have low effort casual sex No, its not that they can get gross losers to have low effort sex. Its that even below average women can get sex from very attractive men. Who is willing to fuck you and who is willing to date you are two very different things and women are held to much higher standards for dating When it comes to dating, women hold men to way higher standards that men hold women. Again, the idea that its women who suf…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 08:21 PM
10

Dudes hold women to a high standard when it comes to appearance, they should do the same for themselves. They dont though. Even ugly, fat women have no problem getting laid. Average looking women have no problem hooking up with very attractive men, because most men are willing to sleep down. The idea that women suffer from unrealistic beauty standards is so ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 07:50 PM
41

99% chance that she fucks other guys. Women say they want a feminist boyfriend, but they perceive those men as losers.
/r/MGTOW24/05/21 11:57 PM
19

Its not just that the system favors traits that girls are better at. Girls get higher grades than boys for the same exact work https://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier-1.pdf
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/21 09:19 PM
8

This is more common than you'd think. Its just that nobody gives a shit about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/21 04:54 AM
-1

Stop making excuses for their bullshit. The patriarchy no longer exists and it hadnt existed when they came up with "toxic masculinity" and "internalised misogyny." Even when we were a patriarchy, it was both men and women who agreed on that system, so it wasnt all mens fault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 11:17 AM
2

You outsourced your share of the cleaning to a cleaning service because you have the money. You shouldnt be doing half of the cleaning on top of paying for a service. Is your wife using you for your money? It sounds like she might be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 06:07 PM
1

If she expects you to share all the money, she should be doing 100% of the housework
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 04:07 PM
19

Whats he gonna do, go up to their face and say "hey bro, stop simping?" Very unlikely that theyd change. Not all criticism behind peoples back is bad. We are in a sub that often talks about simps. This guy is sharing his personal story about his friends who are simps. Telling him that "he shouldnt be friends with them if hes gonna make fun of their simping" doesnt make any sense.
/r/MGTOW18/05/21 10:33 PM
55

You can be friends with someone and still criticize their bad choices. Should he stop being friends with them just because they simp for their girlfriends?
/r/MGTOW18/05/21 10:22 PM
2

You said "I dislike it because of the negative energy." "Negative energy" is a vague, nonsensical term If you mean the word negative as in toxic (or any similar term), then no, mensrights isnt negative. Most people that dislike mensrights dislike it because its critical of feminism. But theyll word it differently. "its full of misogynists", "its anti-women", "its full of negative energy" etc. So when you said "its negative energy", I was saying "cut the bullshit euphamisms and say what you mean,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 09:19 PM
3

I'm not about to argue with someone who literally just admitted to putting words in my mouth. I didnt put words in your mouth. You gave a vague criticism of mensrights ("negative energy") and I asked you if it was because they were critical of feminism. You said no, and then you said "mens rights is just angry men", which confirms that you are mad that it criticizes feminism, because its not angry men and the only people that dislike mensrights are the people who dislike its valid criticism of f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 08:57 PM
7

As another commenter pointed out, the claim that "marriage shortens womens life expectancy" is just blatantly false.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 08:33 AM
10

That being said, it's extremely shitty to expect your wife to do all the cooking and cleaning and childcare I think it depends. If the husband is working full time, while the wife is a stay at home mom, then she should be doing most of that. Why should the husband work 40+ hours a week, and then split all the housework with his wife that works 0 hours a week?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 08:31 AM
12

Unpaid labor If the man makes most of the money and pays for your house, food, bills, and gives you lots of shopping money, then its not unpaid. Plus, those are also her kids. Its not like theyre babysitting for a friend for free, theyre taking care of their own fucking kid. Theres also plenty of "unpaid labor" that men do. Who mows the lawn, fixes things around the house, and does any other task that the wife doesnt want to do? Yeah, the husband.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 08:29 AM
1

Youre literally describing how women see men, not how men see women. Im just gonna assume youre a troll, because the genders are so perfectly swapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 08:21 AM
1

What fucking planet are you on? Most men would fuck average looking women. Plenty of men, even decent looking men, would fuck ugly girls, just cause they wanna get laid. Sounds like youre projecting. Its actually women who have been conditioned to have high standards. Social media, tinder, and online dating has caused average women to think they deserve nothing but the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 08:07 AM
37

Menslib is a shithole. Its a feminist sub disguised as a mens rights sub. If you write about real male issues, like male disposability or the fact that a huge chunk of young men unable to find girlfriends, youll get downvoted into oblivion and called an incel. If you write about fake male issues, like "men should be encouraged to write diaries", youll get thousands of upvotes. Its a complete joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/21 08:04 AM
48

I cant believe this joke of a post is at over 200 upvotes. You go to a place for a coffee for 15 mins max. then go for a walk 15 mins max If you have game, you can do either of those activates for hours without them getting boring. If you need to constantly be doing new things to stop her from being bored, it means youre boring. I think OP is boring and is projecting that onto others. "Bro you need to be switching up your activities every 15 minutes or else she will be bored bro". It sounds like…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/21 07:38 AM
4

I'm not sure you know what "literally" means, but whatever. Lmfao. I guess Ill spell this out for you, since you still dont get it. OP made a post from PornHatesWomen for us to laugh at (because, again, the monumental stupidity of the post). He also made fun of feminists in general, because theres a strong disagreement among feminists about whether or not porn is empowering or misogyny. You came in here and said "people in that sub know its bad, youre strawmanning by saying they cant make up the…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/05/21 03:42 AM
3

Then why use a crosspost from PornHatesWomen? Because the post is ridiculous and we're laughing at the monumental stupidity of it. The post literally said that "porn is the rape and battery of trafficked women", which is completely absurd. Yeah, once in awhile that happens, but 99.9%+ of porn is women choosing to do it. Not trafficked victims getting raped. As for OP saying they cant make up their minds, again hes talking about feminists. Nobody said that the sub "PornHatesWomen" cant make up th…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/05/21 03:27 AM
3

Funny how youre accusing him of strawmanning when youre using a pretty ridiculous strawman right now. He didnt say that /PornHatesWomen cant make up their mind about whether porn is empowering or bad, hes talking about feminists in general. Obviously a sub called "PornHatesWomen" is full of people who hate porn. The other person wasn't suggesting that people in the sub "PornHatesWomen" cant make up their mind about whether porn is empowering or bad. He was saying that feminists, as a group, cann…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/05/21 02:54 AM
3

Allow me to make it less confusing for you: it's bad. Nothing in that sub you crossposted suggests otherwise. You suggesting we can't decide whether it's empowering is a strawman of its own. Who said we are only talking about that sub? Of course a sub called "PornHatesWomen" is going to unanimously agree that porn is bad. We are talking about feminists in general, where some of them say its empowering and some say its misogyny.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/05/21 02:28 AM
1

A young, attractive women would be ideal for most men, but they will happily date someone who isnt young and hot. Women have much higher standards than men. There are so many women who have nothing great about them, but wont settle for anything less than a great man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 02:15 AM
30

Porn is the rape and battery of trafficked women Lmao their posts always sound like the ramblings of someone who forgot to take their schizo meds
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/05/21 06:43 PM
1

but it seems men get mad when there’s ANY importance on money. What are you talking about? As you just said, its gold diggers that men hate. Who are these men that are getting mad about women putting ANY importance on money? If a woman says "Having a job is a requirement", do you think men would respond "omfg bitch, you should date an unemployed loser"? No How are going to buy a house without money? How are you going to be able to feed your kids without money? How are you going to handle family …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 03:43 AM
8

Lmao yeah womens biological hypergamy, that has existed for hundreds of thousands of years, only exists because because of chores. Lmfao If women had the option of dating either a hot, high status guy who did 0 chores, or an average looking guy who did all the chores, 100% of them would pick the hot, high status guy. and doesn't make more money than them. And that's the way most men - western or not - expect a woman to behave in a heterosexual partnership No. If a man and woman make the same mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 08:34 PM
11

Really, youve observed that dating/sex is a cakewalk for average looking and ugly dudes, so long as theyre not "painfully awkward and shy"? No, youve observed attractive men having it easy as long as they arent awkward. Lmfao, the blue pill is really something else
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 08:21 PM
20

Based
/r/MGTOW12/05/21 10:30 PM
1

Arent womens teams paid proportionally more? If you look at mens pay compared to how much money the league makes, and womens pay compared to how much their league makes, Im pretty sure women get paid a higher percent. Their demand to get paid the same as men, despite their league making a small fraction of the money that the mens league makes, is just completely asinine. "Hey, our league brought in 230 million revenue, but the mens league is paying their players a total of 600 million, so youre …
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 04:22 AM
13

You beat me to it. I literally laughed out loud when I read "US womens soccer teams are far better than mens, yet theyre paid way less." "Delusional" is an understatement to describe these lunatics.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 04:04 AM
4

Argue with a feminist about mens reproductive rights and they will give the same arguments that pro-lifers give. "Dont have sex if you arent ready for a kid", "be more responsible with birth control" etc. But when pro-lifers say that to feminists, they totally flip their shit. "CONSENT TO SEX ISNT CONSENT TO PARENTHOOD", "FORCING A WOMAN TO HAVE A BABY IS SLAVERY" etc. But then when talking about mens rights, they use those same pro-life arguments that they just criticized. 0 self awareness.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 04:00 AM
7

They care about women, not men. If men have 99 problems and women have 1 problem, they will only focus on the womens 1 problem.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:45 AM
2

Because those are manufactured outrages that are meant to generate click Thats exactly what I said, and your response was to sarcastically say "MSM bad!" First you said I was wrong about the media bias, but now youre admitting the bias is there and pretending you never denied it. Pathetic is an understatement to describe your behavior. go to college Ive already graduated college. diversify your sources Peak irony, coming from you. Who's the clown here? The one that poked a trillion holes in your…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:50 AM
2

Bla bla bla bla bla What the fuck are you talking about? Stick to the main point, Jesus Christ. Don't bring up other bullshit controversies to prove your point. We borh know its 100% relevant to our discussion about media bias regarding incels. The fact that youre flat out denying it just shows youll go to extreme lenghts to avoid admitting youre wrong. You shouldve just ignored it, youd at least look less foolish that way. I think we both know who is denying me the conversation and crying "Blah…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:22 AM
1

What an odd response. Youre just digging this hole deeper and making it more obvious youve had limited success with women. You really should stop embarassing yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:12 AM
1

We are on the internet, who are you trying to fool? You should stop embarassing yourself. Youve made it clear you know nothing about female attraction. We all know youve had limited success. You can stop preaching about how much of an expert you are on women when we both know the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:08 AM
2

I said that "I wasn't a casablanca Thats a sugarcoated way of saying "Ive had little success with women. Youre not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:58 AM
2

I didnt say virginity is bad. I said its hilarious that youre a virgin (or pretty close to one) yet you think you know all about female attraction.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:53 AM
1

Lmao you dodged the question, so I guess the answer is yes. because I know what they do and do not like You have no clue what they want or dont want. "Bro women love fat ugly guys as long as theyre funny" LMAO. I am no casablanca, but I know enough to reach what incels consider "Luck" Translation - Ive had very limited success with women but I refuse to believe that women arent perfect.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:14 AM
2

Did I ever specifically said MSM never lies? I only said that using the "ur dumb if u believe big newspaper" argument useless. The news articles about the incel subs weren't op-eds, they used quotes and sources The media absolutely exaggerated and created unnecessary hysteria. Eliot rogers is pretty much the only real incel "terrorism." Yet the media was saying all this bullshit about how the joker movie was gonna cause incel mass shootings, how incels are planning terrorists attacks because wom…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:08 AM
1

I added to his point about how matchmakers are there to let you know that you can get any girl with the right attitude. Girls are picky but not physically lmao, most girls give a chance even to the fattest and ugliest because of attitude. What else is there to talk about. Are you a virgin? Im not asking that in a sarcastic or insulting way. Im genuinely curious. You are so clueless about women that I would be surprised if youve had any success with them.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 12:46 AM
2

Lmao so generic, "MSM bad" keep going dude I am almost getting a bingo. Hang on, are you actually arguing that no media outlet would ever misrepresent something for the sake of getting views? Jesus christ, you are even more clueless than I thought (and that bar was already pretty low, so props on lowering it even further). Like you when you dodge the sending the unread sources that proved your point wrong and you are still parroting your incorrect (proven by you) arguments? Thats not what happen…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 12:11 AM
3

The fuck you basing this on? Movies, tv series? I know ugly women who have high n counts (over 50). I also know plenty of men who fuck ugly/fat women just because they wanna get laid. Its no secret that plenty of men will fuck ugly/fat women, just cause they wanna get laid. 5/10 with just a bit of hygiene and self-esteem you can get the 8/10s easily A 5/10 man, with just a bit of hygene, can easily get an 8/10 woman? You are beyond clueless. The only way a 5/10 man is getting an 8/10 woman is if…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:39 PM
3

Lmao, so you are ignoring fact? There is evidence and newspaper articles from both the left and right wing media sources that conclude the same thing I just said Oh yeah, its not like the media would ever exaggerate to generate clicks and ad revenue. I literally spent time in incels forums, and you didnt, and you are telling me what they were like. Youre a clown. Lmao, getting the Tinder data that you forgot to mention that the mayority of women were from the "up side" of the attractiveness curv…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:11 PM
4

We are talking of centuaries of increasing beauty standards for women, and stagnant standards for men What, the fuck, are you talking about? Mens standards are going down for women (lots of average/good looking guys will fuck ugly/fat women, because they just wanna get laid), meanwhile womens standards are rising. Its not women suffering from increasing standards, its men. Even a fat and ugly woman can put on some makeup and sleep with average men who just wanna get laid. Meanwhile, short and ug…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:36 PM
3

Let me guess, the incel sub was closed because lots of love and happiness and not the amount of women hate and death threats that came out of that sub? I actually read some of their forums, instead of just taking other peoples word for it, and no, it wasnt full of terrorism or death threats or any of that hysteria. It was depressed men venting about how they couldnt get a girlfriend. I love how Im the one who actually read incel forums yet youre telling me what they were like. Women have much hi…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:31 PM
4

Women can improve their looks much more than men can. Skin care and cologne is nothing compared to makeup. To pretend that they are the same is completely ridiculous. It really just shows that youre not interested in having an honest discussion about gender differences, you just wanna defend women. At the end of the day, if we go to the realm of serious relationships and age demographics, your argument will fall apart. It doesnt fall apart. The only argument you've made to back this up is the as…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:13 PM
4

Incels are the ones that judge women for their social behaviors and constantly limit themselves on who they want to sleep with while blaming women for not wanting to sleep with them You know nothing about incels except the false info you hear from shitlibs. What a shocker. You'd be surprised how many men will not even look at a girl just because she doesn't meet their physical standards. Women have much higher standards than men. The data proves this. Read your sources, Wolfinger said, that wome…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:03 PM
6

Even statistically, women have the same options as men Its clear that youre clueless on this issue, so I'll give you a quick summary. The average man and woman have the same options, but this is misleading. Theres a reason we use medium and mode, instead of just averages. Average men and average women have the same options (its mathematically necessary that they do), but the medium and modes are way different for men and women. The top men are very successful with women, while a large chunk of m…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:48 PM
2

Valid preference, but what's not valid is when men cry about how they won't get a women because of that inflexible preference The only men Ive seen do this are some incels. Most incels are so desperate for sex that they'd fuck a girl no matter how many other men shes slept with. The amount of men who are complaining that they cant get a girlfriend, only because of their own preferences, is pretty small. That is so statistically and anecdotally wrong, but whatever since it's your view on women. I…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:10 PM
22

Mic drop Lmao this is their idea of "Deep"
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/05/21 08:28 PM
7

Caring about N-count is not the same as "obsessing with virginity." I also know men who dont date women with high N-counts. Its a reasonable preference. Women with high N-counts are absolutely more likely to cheat/divorce. There are plenty of women who wont date men with high N-counts. Are you gonna go shame them too? There are better Men's right topics that are worth discussing than what this bullshit post is trying to point out. The post is pointing out feminist hysteria. They grossly exaggera…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:05 PM
16

I dont know a single man who is "obsessed with female virginity." Its just more feminists hysteria to get people angry at men over something men dont do.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:16 PM
7

They’ll respect you in turn if you listen and be the best you can personally be I think I know what you mean, but that statement is false and will lead to disappointment. Some people will be really nasty regardless of how respectful he is, especially when it comes to politics. Teach him to be the best he can, and anyone whose worthy of his time will be respectful back.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:27 AM
18

You are the one coming in to our sub and aggressively claiming that black women receive harsher sentencing than white men. Why dont you post your statistics? The gender sentencing gap is larger than the racial sentencing gap, so if you want to show otherwise, you should post your own statistics.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:35 AM
26

Also women used to get hung for being sexually active. Women used to get fined for showing skin Youre so oppressed yet you can't even point out modern problems? You have to talk about the past? The gender sentencing gap is much larger than the racial sentencing gap. A black women would absolutely get a lighter sentence than a white man, especially if it was a sexual crime. Go preach your anti-male nonsense somewhere else, like a place that doesnt care about facts. Any feminist sub should do just…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:29 AM
26

Turns out 1984 is actually 2021. George wasnt too far off.
/r/MGTOW05/05/21 08:42 AM
7

Remove the username link, its against sitewide rules and admins are looking for any excuse to ban us
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/21 04:01 AM
9

I’m not trying to make a counterpoint to everything hahaha. This isn’t fencing 🤺 I don’t win by one-upping you x many times. Really? You were making counter points for awhile. Thats what you do when you have a debate. You only stopped making counter points when you couldn't address the points I made. What a coincidence, huh? all I’m saying is that when you look at the power struggles in the world and you take a 50,000ft view of the world, women have it harder than men. End of story. There’s no r…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:22 PM
7

Dude, from her Wiki it seems like her argument is more like, “people suck” less than “men are victims too” And the “people suck” statement is not a very appealing one for the people who are sitting in the back going, “uh no I’m pretty sure I was beaten” Bull fucking shit. "Men are victims too" is exactly what she said. Where are you getting this ridiculous idea that her philosophy is "telling abuse victims that they suck"? She started a shelter because she cares about people, MEN AND WOMEN. But …
/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:11 PM
10

I didn’t say you were. I said actual incels, like self acknowledged incels Incels discuss womens advantages in the dating world and concepts like hypergamy. They arent discussing MRA issues like male domestic violence shelters. You clearly no knowing about incels, aside hearing idiots use the term incorrectly (its become a catch all term for "a man that doesnt worship women".) It’s alright, we know you’re just a closeted misogynist (or maybe a lite-misogynist) but like it’s okay. "I cant respond…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:04 PM
9

I love the “x/6 I’ve totally pwned this feminist” shit 😂 I love how this is your response, instead of making a counter-argument to what I said. Yes, you made 6 arguments, and all 6 were completely ridiculous. Like come on just admit you don’t like women and we can all move on. "I have no counter argument to any of the points you made, so Im gonna ignore them and claim that you hate women, because that will allow me to believe I am right, despite my lack of argument." All I’m saying is this whole…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 07:51 PM
7

Erin Pizzey, the women who built the first and currently largest domestic violence shelter, has been banned from HER OWN SHELTER THAT SHE CREATED because she dared to say that men are also victims. You want sauce? Read just the first few paragraphs of this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey Heres a preview for you - "Erin Pizzey is an English ex-feminist and men's rights advocate, domestic abuse advocate, and novelist.[3][4][5][6][7] She is known for having started the first and current…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 07:36 PM
13

silent epidemic Yeah, epidemic is a pretty extreme word to describe it. But its definitely true that female-on-male abuse is much more common than believed. So many men dont report it, for a variety of reasons, 1 of which is that they're the ones who would get in trouble anyway. that a lot of actual incels make it out to be. Lmao yep, anyone who disccuses mens issues is just an incel. Incels dont even talk about MRA shit, they talk about the unfair dating market and how women are advantaged in d…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 07:25 PM
23

they make up the most of every influential fields in the public and private sectors Thats an extremely low percent of men. What the fuck does that have to do with the average man? His life isnt any better just because most CEO's are men. What a ridiculous argument. And why so many more men have homes than women Most homeless people are men. Again, what a ridiculous argument. And why men spend so much less than non-men on a yearly basis Women spend more money than men and thats a privilege for me…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 07:16 PM
6

Theyre not complaining about the existence of womens shelters, theyre complaining about the fact that feminists lobby against mens shelters. Its bullshit that almost all domestic violence shelters are womens, and feminists continue to lobby against mens shelters, despite the fact that men make up a good portion of victims.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:57 PM
12

It depends on the context. If a woman is beating the shit out of her husband, and he finally hits her back, and she calls the cops and goes to the hospital, then yes she absolutely had it coming. Despite what you man-hating feminists believe, plenty of domestic violence situations are mutual. Erin pizzey, who created the first and largest domestic violence shelter in the modern world, says that domestic violence is often mutual. She actually became a mens rights advocate because of the disgustin…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:54 PM
19

What a fantastic, thorough, well thought out argument that totally addresses all of my points. Yes, men actually do have it worse than women in 2021 (in developed countries). Whats your argument that women have it worse?
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:50 PM
9

And yeah, seems like men get more resources in general What planet are you living on? Wanna give some sources for that? Because its pretty obvious that women are given more resources across the board. Given that there’s no consensus that men actually make up more of the homeless population, just the ones that report it Report it? Its not like homeless men are going and reporting their homelessness, while women arent. Homeless people dont generally report their homelessness. Homelessness data is …
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:44 PM
22

Men here are acting like men get followed in the dark of night Men are much more likely to be victims of crimes such as assault, robbery, etc. This idea that women are in more danger is ridiculous. you get trafficked because you’re men An extremely low percent of women are being trafficked in developed countries (its a problem in poor countries). Using this as an excuse to deny funding for male abuse victims (in developed countries) is beyond absurd. be as vigilant as women when it comes to goin…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:28 PM
1

there's some assholes that are successful with women and there's lots who are not successful. you're being blinded by confirmation bias. Assholes are disproportionally successful with women. Meanwhile, men who treat women like queens are the least successful. What the hell do you even mean by competence? Competent at what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:41 PM
3

Assholes are generally successful with women. Youre saying the reason for this is because women feel the need to comply with them, rather than women being attracted to assholes. Youre jumping through hoops to avoid changing your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 08:00 AM
3

Still waiting to hear your response to my other point, my main point. Which is that you made the ridiculous claim that all assholes basically threaten/scare women into dating/fucking them. No, women date assholes because theyre attracted to them, not because theyre scared of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:35 AM
5

Trp says women are attracted to assholes, which is the result of their evolutionary attraction to status (alpha males). Either way, we were talking about women being attracted to assholes and what you said doesnt address the point. Men can manipulate women into sex by acting like assholes, because women like assholes, and therefore will become attracted to them. I really cant explain it any simpler. If you still dont get it, I dont know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:28 AM
7

Lmao what? You believe that when a man acts like an asshole, it makes the women submit to him out of fear? When 2 people start dating and the guy acts like an asshole, she keeps dating him because she feels the need to comply? Jesus christ, people will jump through insane hoops to deny the redpill. No, the asshole personality is attractive. Thats why she sticks around. Not because she feels the need to comply.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:23 AM
9

Again, what the hell are you talking about? We arent talking about someone saying "have sex with me or ill hit you." We are talking about someone who acts like an asshole to get sex. That only works if women like assholes. If they dont like assholes, then acting like an asshole wouldnt manipulate them into sex. What is so hard to understand about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 06:54 AM
10

What the hell are you talking about? In one you're building relationships based on what people like in the other you're manipulating people. Youre manipulating them by utilizing what they like. It makes no sense to say that the manipulation is separate from what they like. A normal guy realizes that women like assholes, so he acts like an asshole in order to get sex. Thats how the manipulation works. If women dont like assholes, then acting like an asshole wouldnt get you sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 06:47 AM
16

The only reason that men can "act like assholes to manipulate women into sex" is because they are attracted to assholes. If they werent attracted to assholes, then acting like an asshole wouldnt do anything. If women dont like assholes, then acting like an asshole wouldnt manipulate them into sex. OP keeps saying "manipulate women into sex" without acknowledging how/why the manipulation happens. A normal guy realizes that women like assholes, so he acts like an asshole to manipulate them into se…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 06:44 AM
32

You keep saying "manipulated into sex" but dont explain how. The only reason that a normal guy can act like an asshole to "manipulated a girl into sex" is because theyre attracted to assholes. If women arent attracted to assholes, then how does acting like an asshole manipulate anything? It wouldnt have the power to. The fact that women are attracted to assholes is the specific reason that normal guys can act like assholes to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 06:34 AM
1

I mostly agree, I just dont see how capitalism is at fault here. Its a means of providing people with what they want. Even in a post money/scarcity society, women will still want to read bullshit like 50 shades, and those books will still be available.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 08:33 PM
20

I find it crazy that even google, a search engine, is so biaised against men. All big tech is biased against men. Google is big tech.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 03:30 PM
9

The 2nd most upvoted comment said shes not the asshole. God, this website is filled with so many r-slurs.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 03:27 PM
3

But when further pressed the responses I’ve gotten are all along the lines of “if your not giving lonely/unattractive men a chance then you aren’t really sympathetic & part of the problem” Lmao, yeah right. A small minority of men think that sympathy means you need to fuck them. Offers of advice are rebuffed and any sympathetic advice given is thrown back in your face. Probably because your advice is complete nonsense. "Just be yourself", "treat her like a queen", "youll find the right one" etc.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 08:39 PM
2

it's not just "trying to negate the female advantage in dating". No, it is much more than that, but thats one of the fundamental problems. In sexually liberated societies, women "sleep up" and tons of men cant get sex. And then theres lots of single motherhood and other problems. Child mortality is not a problem. Dying from childbirth is not a problem. Controlling pregnancy is not a problem. Needing more soldiers to defend against neighbours is not a problem. What does any of that have to do wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 06:57 PM
2

(To get rid of the power imbalance) we need to promote movies that have a healthy view of romance, a more realistic view The power imbalance exists because of human nature. If we try to use good movies to change the power balance, that would mean we are trying to use a small portion of the entertainment industry to massively change our human instincts from millions of years of evolution. To quote Walter White, that sounds like grade school teeball vs the New York Yankees. Theres a reason that pa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 06:39 PM
2

I mean an argument can be made that the natural male instinct is to pump and dump Lots of men do this. It being natural doesn't mean it is good or that we should continue doing it. 100% correct. But lets acknowledge that this natural power imbalance does exist, rather than it being created by things like shitty romance movies. Also, whats the solution? Again, I agree that it would be better if this power imbalance didnt exist, but how do we fix it? If we got rid of shitty romance movies, that wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 06:18 PM
2

You say it's a natural imbalance that movies accurately portray. I say movies are portraying it this way, which pushes people to act that way. It's a bit of a chicken and egg situation In nature, males compete to impress females and females select mates. Our instincts are still this way. Men try to "win over" women and women select the men they want to date/fuck. This isnt societal conditioning. Its not the result of movies portraying this. Its natural instinct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 06:00 PM
3

Whats the alternative? To ban it? (I actually dont think thats a bad idea, I just dislike how faults in women are being blamed on capitalism).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 05:44 PM
2

Because it normalizes the same narrative of women having multiple partners chasing after them for no good reason But thats reality. The movies arent causing it, the natural power imbalance between men and women in the dating world is whats causing it. Isnt it good that the movies show that? If I'm throwing another 10 lbs on your back, it might not be much compared to the 200 lbs you're already carrying, but it's certainly not helping. Fair enough. However the original comment in this thread said…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 05:41 PM
-2

Why? It seem so futile compared to what OP wrote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 04:55 PM
11

So its capitalisms fault that so many women want to read garbage like 50 shades?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 08:45 AM
-5

Weird response to OP. He made a great post about legitimate issues and massive societal hypocrisy and love triangles is pretty irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 08:43 AM
7

Lmao based
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 11:34 PM
16

Based
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/21 06:19 PM
1

Plenty of feminists believe that men dont experience sexism, and their "punching up" mentality is the foundation of that argument. Instead of bending over backwards to defend feminists for things that they are guilty of, why dont you hold them accountable?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 07:23 AM
1

Instead of focusing on bullshit semantics, why dont you backup your claim that feminists arent the ones who spread the idea that sexism doesnt effect men? Feminism is absolutely the source of it. Feminists are the only people who think men never experience sexism, because of their r slurred theory that "since we live in a patriarchy, only women can experience sexisn." please don’t use ableist insults, even if you censor them) Lmao, are you trying to take the moral high ground, or do you genuinel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 05:24 AM
1

Way to respond to my main point. I support free speech, but it would be so much better if cucks like you were banned. Feminism is exactly the reason that people say "men cant experience sexism", theyre the ones that came up with it. What is your problen? Why are you so adamant about defending feminists for things they are guilty of?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 04:45 AM
1

Thats exactly where it stems from, you fucking r slur.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 02:00 AM
2

Interesting. What happened?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/21 07:30 PM
5

I try to rock with feminists Why? Theyre not the least bit interested in equality. They want to bash men and use ridiculous laws to "pull women ahead" in areas that they are "behind", but also "leave women ahead" in the areas where they are doing better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 06:52 PM
12

Of course theyre oblivious. Its one of the soy subreddits, they know nothing about economics.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 01:59 AM
9

We just have different anecdotal experiences then. For my whole life, women around me (friend groups, family) would pretty commonly resort to those insults. If theyre talking about a man they hate, its always "small dick" this and "nobody wants him" that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 11:36 PM
8

The majority of people I’ve encountered who talk like that are non-feminist men Ah, the classic "its mostly other men who are doing X to men" We're done here
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 07:48 PM
10

But, at least in my life, I know almost no one who talks like that or if they do they do so extremely rarely and I grew up in a very heavily feminist cultural context. Lol, if you listened to them talk when they think nobody is listening, you'd be heavily surprised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 07:05 PM
10

I don't think MOST women use those insult Maybe not on a regular basis, but most women certainly use it sometimes. How many women NEVER say "hes got a small dick" or anything like that? Not many MOST women are not even on social media Lmao what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 06:52 PM
12

Dude, most women use those as insults. Do you really think that most women never say "hes got a small dick", "no woman wants him" etc? Also, the "loudmouths" only "win" because theres enough people who support them to make their ideas go viral. When a woman tweets "hes got a small dick" and it gets 310k likes and 120k retweets, thats not just a "loudmouth asshole that nobody agrees with", its tons of people actively participating in shaming men for lack of sexual success. I really dont understan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 06:41 PM
13

You say that like its just a "few bad apples". Its not. In fact, a good chunk of women will use it for insults. "Small dick", "cant please a woman", "no woman wants him", etc. How many women do you know that never use those insults?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 06:25 PM
4

You are underestimating how cucked our society is. People like this not only get away with their bullshit behavior, they are patted on the back for it. If OP reports it, there will be a follow up with thorough questions. When he explains how she was talking about "toxic masculinity", the case will be dismissed. Doubt shes stupid enough to incriminate herself. When the investigators ask her if she was debating politics with him instead of trying to help him, she will say "I was trying to help him…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/21 06:15 AM
3

Hes likely just a divorced boomer who has no clue what hes talking about.
/r/MGTOW10/04/21 12:53 AM
2

Oh I actually didnt know chess grandmaster was a lifetime title.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 11:30 PM
1

Pretty idiotic statement, I guarantee a lot of hearthstone pros make more money than you.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 05:58 PM
2

Popular strategy games have ranks for professionals. Just like how there are chess grandmasters (players officially recognized as some of the best, who compete in tournaments), there are hearthstone grandmasters.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 05:23 PM
0

If you had a functioning pair of eyes, you could easily see that big tech has a huge political bias. Watch the JRE episode with Tim pool and twitter, he makes their bias clear and twitters only response are non-answers that sound good to someone not paying attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/21 05:30 PM
1

Regardless of the cause, neoliberal dogma is being promoted, while contrary opinions are being censored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/21 11:50 PM
2

Use google and duckduckgo to search for things that go against neoliberal dogma. You will have very different results.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/21 11:47 PM
16

Its googles bias. Big tech like google, twitter, facebook, etc are really weird. Not only are they openly anti-male, they actually code their websites to hide pro-male content (as well as plenty of other content that doesnt align with their neoliberal dogma).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/21 03:49 PM
53

Youre bragging about being an idiot? Lmao
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/21 07:04 AM
1

I misjudged you, but I still disagree about women facing widespread discrimination in STEM in 2021. Your only argument to support your claim of discrimination is "women are told to stay away from STEM" and "old outdated policies/cultural norms are still having a huge effect today", and I just disagree. You haven't supported those claims well. This isn't the 1950s. People arent telling women "math is for boys." Very few parents are telling their daughters "you cant be an engineer, youre going to …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 07:43 AM
1

From the article - “Everyone wanted this holy grail,” one of the people said. “They literally wanted it to be an engine where I’m going to give you 100 resumes, it will spit out the top five, and we’ll hire those.” The AI isn't just looking to hire people, its looking to hire the best of the best. This means its not discriminating against women, its discriminating against anyone whose resume didn't reflect the "best of the best." So sure, plenty of women's resumes didnt make it because they didn…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 06:25 AM
1

Im on mobile so I cant respond to your wall of soy. We can continue this conversation when im on my PC. That is, if you drop the pompous ass attitude.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 05:39 AM
0

Ive argued with hundreds of people like you. All of you refuse to accept the idea that men, on average, are better at some things. Just like how women, on average, are better at some things. Also, you completely ignored the main point of my last comment, which is that the article didnt just mention the discrimination of the word women (which was removed), it then went above and beyond trying to rationalize why women werent picked as much, like the nonsense about "masculine language." Its obvious…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 04:26 AM
2

Lmfao, you clearly didnt read it much. It said that the AI first discriminated against the word women, but then it was removed. Thats not even what I disputed. But then the article later discussed this idea of "masculine language" (which is what I was referring to, which you clearly didnt see). This part of the article was not about the word "women", it was this gibberish about how the AI favored words that men use more than women. You asked for proof, I provided it, you rejected it as hippy non…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 03:52 AM
0

He claimed that when they made it gender neutral, the AI system actually preferred women 52%. The article said nothing about it. Furthermore, the article made up some nonsense about how men were advantaged because of "masculine language." The reality of this situation is that when you hire purely based on merit, more men come out on top. That wasnt acceptable though, so they had to make up some nonsense about "masculine language." I hope you can figure out how to click a link. Best of luck broth…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 02:38 AM
11

So you make an obviously bs claim and then throw a tantrum when someone asks for a source? Stay classy
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 12:05 AM
19

Source?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/21 11:40 PM
2

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 06:53 AM
5

No, women dont like submissive ir scrawny men, regardless of how tall they are. Furthermore, 5'2 women dont want 5'3 men, they want 6ft+ guys, just like the tall women. Women arent attracted to feminine traits. Your post is so obviously wrong that it sounds like satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 11:02 PM
9

Women love feminine men too. So women love short, scrawny, submissive men? LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 10:23 PM
5

From the comments- Women are routinely discriminated against just because theyre women. Must've forgotten to take her schizo pills
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 11:21 PM
8

Lmao this is their idea of deep
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/02/21 11:49 PM
3

Her brother isnt asking her to take care of their parents because "its a womans job", hes asking because he doesnt want to do it. If she was a man instead of a woman, you think her brother wouldnt have asked? This is what feminists do all the time. They look at a situation that has nothing to do with gender and they screech "ItS cAuSe Im A wOmAn!" He already has a job. She is still in school and online classes are the norm in this pandemic. Having her live with their parents and take online clas…
/r/MensRights23/02/21 06:48 AM
2

And shes gonna be a scientist. Based on her idiotic post, she obviously doesnt have the brains for it, but our gynocentric society will hire her anyway. Shes not the only one, either. Science and academia are being overrun by woke lunatics just like her. God, the future is looking so dystopian. Edit: why the downvotes? In her post she said shes studying to be a scientist. Also, based on the post itself, shes clearly an idiot. But that wont stop her from getting hired.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:34 AM
1

Yes women have it bad How? People just accept this without question. But is it true? How do they have it bad? Young women are now outearning young men. More go to college. Despite this, they still have programs to help them further, like women only scholarships, affirmative action, etc. Women have much more emotional support from friends and family. They have it much easier in the dating world and can get sex easy. They have the choice to either be a housewife or work, where as men just have to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/21 04:40 AM
30

Thats the hilarious thing - the same people who screech "nobody is entitled to sex" are socialists that think theyre entitled to free money, housing, food, internet, etc. They claim that everyone should get all this stuff free because everyone should have a decent standard of living, but somehow its totally fine for 30% of men (and growing) cant get any sex. Clowns
/r/MGTOW215/02/21 11:32 PM
8

Theres a correlation between stupidity and conformity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 02:38 PM
9

Nah, if you "lose" your common sense from IdPol, you never had it to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 02:22 PM
11

A good chunk of people with degrees in social science are some of the dumbest people on the planet. Modern education doesnt require intelligence, it requires the ability to memorize snd repeat. Any clown with enough determination can get a PhD these days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 02:21 PM
25

That sub is a complete and utter joke. I was banned for pointing out flaws in a study because they liked the results and didnt want to believe the study was flawed, despite it being obvious. The sample size was 16 and the study was ideologically driven. It was trying to prove a point by failing to prove the opposite. It tried to find a "statistically significant" difference between cis kids and trans kids of the same gender identity, and with a sample size of 16, of course it didnt. With a sampl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 02:10 PM
9

Men are judged more harshly for looks than women. Even an ugly women can put on makeup and date/sleep with decent looking men. Short and ugly men are struggling and its only getting worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/21 10:09 PM
17

Feminism has achieved its goal of equality. The people who genuinely care about equality have stopped identifying as feminists, for the same reason that people stopped identifying as "anti vietnam war" once the war was over. The people who still identify as feminists are people who want to bash men, under the disguise of "equality." Telling them to fight against misandry is like telling the KKK to fight racism. As you said, the solution is for men and women to break ranks with feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/21 12:32 PM
2

I don’t understand where these people get their ideas. Most of the time, it just sounds like the ramblings of someone who forgot to take their schizo meds.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/02/21 10:43 PM
37

Keep crying, youre just proving the meme to be true.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 07:20 AM
1

How do we misuse it?
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:06 AM
45

Anytime feminists talk about men, just replace "men" with "black men" and suddenly they sound more racist than the KKK.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 09:40 AM
6

Its also the most upvoted comment. What a bunch of entitled, self righteous brats.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 09:36 AM
4

OPs definition isnt perfect, but the main point of his post is correct. Feminists, simps, and radlibs completely misuse the word. "You dont agree with the #MeToo movement, where men are guilty until proven innocent? Misogynist! " "You disagree with the idea that we are living in a patriarchy? Misogynist! " "You think men should also have support for when theyre domestic violence? Misogynist! " Go look at any feminist page on twitter, facebook, or reddit and you will constantly see idiots misusin…
/r/MensRights29/01/21 09:24 AM
7

Good post but why did you post it on menslib? Thats a feminist sub disguised as a mens sub. All male issues must be discussed through the lens of feminist theory. They dont talk about real mens issues, they talk about nonsense like men not being able to wear a dress. Real mens issues get removed because they conflict with the feminist narritive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/21 12:22 AM
20

Is that what I said, you fucking cretin? Thats literally exactly what you said. Youre backpedaling now that you see how stupid it sounds. Maybe at least try to argue on good faith moron. Kick fucking rocks Lmao. Self awareness isnt your strongest quality, huh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/21 08:25 AM
1

Funny story man. Keep up the good work as an engineer. Save all your money, invest, and retire early :D
/r/MGTOW20/01/21 02:40 PM
72

"I want to date an intelligent guy" = I want to talk about horoscopes with Chad.
/r/MGTOW19/01/21 09:24 PM
18

Logic cannot change opinions that were formed without logic
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:52 PM
0

Just accept the compliment and dont further enforce the idea that women arent funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 11:28 PM
1

I actually laughed at this one. Maybe youre not so un-funny after all
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 10:59 PM
3

Hope she sees this bro
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/21 10:47 PM
47

No, you didnt. Feminists are misandrists. Their hate for /FemaleDatingStrategy has nothing to do with FDS being anti-male. They actually agree with FDS on the anti-male garbage. They hate FDS because its anti-trans, and most feminists are pro-trans.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/21 10:46 PM
141

Just so you guys know, the one and only reason that feminists dislike FemaleDatingStrategy is because its anti-trans. Feminists agree with FDS about how "men are trash", but they hate that FDS doesnt think that trans women are women. Its the same reason that subs like /GenderCritical were banned. Its not because they were blatant misandrists, its because they were anti-trans. Feminists hate them for not conforming to the pro-trans ideology, not because they hate men.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/21 10:41 PM
2

Stop embarassing youraelf. You are only enforcing the idea that women arent funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 10:34 PM
3

Do i want to fuck someone who isnt kind and respectful? Also no, thats even more stupid. Well women constantly date/fuck those type of men, so apparently its not that stupid. Kindness and respect are baseline traits i want in a partner, not the cause of attraction. You want fried ice. You want a squared circle. You want a man whose dominant, but submissive to you. A man whose a ruthless business man, but also believes in liberal principles. A man who is simultaneously "better than you/above you"…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 10:31 PM
2

As someone else pointed out, I was talking about the original post in the other sub, lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 04:11 PM
198

Pleasantly surprised to see that simps didnt downvote his comment into oblivion.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 02:40 PM
3

So we're back to square one. What? I made a point, which you arent addressing. We arent at square 1, we are waiting for you to address the argument. I wrote that It's usually men, so that's a miss and we're again back to square one. I know what you wrote, and its wrong. Men dont usually refuse to date women who outearn them. Its a minority of insecure men that feel the need to be the "big man." On the other hand, its not just a minority of women that refuse to date men who make significantly les…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 01:17 PM
3

Idk, I'm on track to ear more than my partner and I am happy because it just means we'll have more money. Not me me, but we, because it's normal to share finances/costs. Thats you. And plenty of women are like you, but plenty of them are not. There are far more women who refuse to date men that earns less than them, than there are men who refuse to date women that earn more than them. Don't speak in absolutes You mean generalizations? I clearly didnt speak in absolutes, I made a generalization. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 01:03 PM
6

The fuck are you talking about? Most men dont care if their wives outearn them. Its women who dont want to earn more than their husbands. Its women who say "I make X per year, so Ill only date a man who makes X or more." So no, the reason that women date men with more money is not because "men wont date women who make more", its because lots of women wont date men who make significantly less than them. Why are men are always at fault and women are always the victims? Its so fucking tiresome
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 12:39 PM
21

Im pro science I fucking love science I believe in science What clowns
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/21 12:15 PM
2

Just legalize prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 04:46 PM
2

Why is "human" an adjective but "man" is a noun? They both sound like nouns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/20 01:30 PM
1

Either legalize prostitution, or return to lifelong monogamy (no sex outside marriage).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 09:25 AM
11

Why the hell are you with her if you arent getting sex and she treats you like that?
/r/MensRights30/12/20 09:07 AM
64

You know that their misandric use of language isnt accidental/innocent, right? Feminists use language they way they do (saying "toxic masculinity" but not "toxic femininity") because they enjoy trashing men and portraying women as victims. If you tell feminits about their misandric use of language, they wont say "Wow, youre right! I'll start using better terms", theyll say "bla bla bla patriarchy, bla bla bla men have the power, bla bla bla women are the oppressed ones." They actively defend the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 12:41 PM
17

wanted to give the mods a break from "emotional labor" Even in something as non-political as the mods taking a break, they have to discuss it from the feminist perspective. Using the term "emotional labor" because everything on that sub needs to be discussed through the lens of feminism. That sub is a complete joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/20 07:26 AM
2

Married couples get more tax refund or something like that.
/r/MGTOW217/12/20 01:28 AM
2

And theres huge overlap between the trans community and feminist theory about patriarchy, privilege, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/20 01:28 AM
2

Its a radical feminist/liberal sub that is anti-MRA and views mens problems through the lens of feminism. Ie, everything wrong with the world is patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 04:35 PM
8

Ive heard of the "bachelor tax." Is it real? I wouldnt be surprised.
/r/MGTOW216/12/20 02:05 PM
42

You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to think that women are oppressed in 2020. A woman can falsely accuse a man, with no evidence, and society starts a witch hunt against him. That man can prove that he was innocent and that she was actually abusing him, and society doesnt care. Furthermore, they dont care that some ridiculous organization is paying her insane amounts of money to give speeches about domestic violence, the very crime she committed, denied, and made false accusations about. Mgtow…
/r/MGTOW216/12/20 12:32 PM
22

Simps prefer that women walk over them. Thats how desperate they are. Look at the caption of the picture They didnt earn a badge, but they never forgot that day For cleaning a womans shoes? Thats such an amazing experience that theyll never forget it? Thats how simps think. The caption was clearly written by a simp or by a woman who is used to simps doing crazy shit for her.
/r/MGTOW16/12/20 12:10 PM
479

The article said they were already working towards removing the law. Now that women are ahead, suddenly "equality" quotas are now considered bad by feminists. Equality my ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/20 11:53 AM
15

Subreddit overlap for menslib and other subs. Many of the people who use menslib also use TrollXChromosome, WitchesVsPatriarchy, BreadTube, ftm, AskWomenOverThirty, TwoxChromosomes, MenWritingWomen, etc. A bunch of radical feminist, man hating subs. Menslib isnt a mens rights sub, its a feminist sub under the disguise of caring about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 05:03 AM
13

Hope she sees this bro. Well actually no, white knightning is a huge turn off, so hopefully she doesnt see this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 04:11 AM
9

They cant argue against his ideas, so they smear him as a nazi to delude themselves into thinking that they dont need to argue against his ideas, because anything said by a nazi must be wrong anyway. These idiots also call themselves "pro science" and the media and big tech are supporting them. We live in such a strange world.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 10:03 AM
18

Drinking gallons of soy each day will make your brain this delusional.
/r/MGTOW14/12/20 09:13 AM
2

Keeping an open mind and admitting when youre wrong is mature. Respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 05:00 AM
1

I didnt say most women getting advanced degrees are subpar intelligence. I just said that many of them are, and its snobby to refuse to date someone just because they dont have the same degree as you. Youre the one that said women are having trouble finding men who are of equal intelligence, which is a completely ridiculous and ignorant claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 04:10 AM
1

The message is that a lot of intelligent women are not able to find equally intelligent partners or at least partners who equally value intellectualism Hahahaha. You are equating degrees with intelligence. There are plenty of people with advanced degrees that are below average intelligence. If you refuse to date anyone who doesnt have at least the same degree as you, thats your problem. Most of the true intellectuals of the world are men. The fact that more women are getting advanced degrees doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 03:58 AM
7

Alpha bucks (best of both in 1 man) is their preferred strategy. If they cannot get commitment from a financially sufficient alpha, theyll settle for a beta and fuck an alpha on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 06:26 AM
5

Feminists and wokies have created such a hostile cancel culture that scientists cant criticize feminism, even though many of them would love to. Then, they say "science is on our side! If you disagree, youre anti-science!" Nah, the people holding science hostage are the anti-science ones.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/20 07:33 AM
14

Make enough money that I dont overthink the wine list Math is hard
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/20 06:58 AM
103

Correct. Facts and feminism dont mix well.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/20 02:19 PM
6

They werent there in the first place
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:45 AM
1

Can you back up that claim?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:28 AM
1

History shows that most of the time when women were in power they were also in trouble. As women were not really seen as fit to lead. This makes no sense. In times of trouble, countries would need their best leaders to fix it. If they thought women couldnt lead, why would they put them in charge during a bad time? All that would do is make it worse. If you think countries intentionally self-sabotaged themselves, just so they could say "see? Women cant lead!", youre nuts.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:27 AM
1

Most of the Queens were already thrown in a bad situation where open hostilities were inevitable. Do you have any sort of evidence or argument to back this up? Or are you starting with the conclusion that "women are not more warhungry than men, therefore all the historical examples of Queens declaring more war must mean that women were put into power after their country was in trouble"?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:17 AM
11

Why not "EntitledPassDenied"? Because society doesn't give entitled people a free pass. It gives women a free pass. Hence, we have a sub for situations where that free pass is denied. God, these people will do anything to defend gynocentric aspects of our society while denying that those aspects even exist. Also OP you should censor out names and repost. This goes against reddits sitewide rules and they are just waiting for an excuse to ban us.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 11:55 PM
9

Liberals hate logical facts. Simps would be a more precise label for this specific situation, but what you said is true too.
/r/MGTOW26/11/20 11:51 PM
46

Because they can't answer it directly without their bias being extremely obvious. They care about women, not men. When there's an issue that effects men and women, they discuss how it negatively effects women, but not men. Even if that issue effects men much more than women, they'll discuss how it negatively effects women, but not men.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 11:01 PM
19

In primitive life, men were the providers. This hasnt changed much even as we progress into a technologically advanced civilization. It used to be men hunting, gathering wood, materials for weapons, etc and giving them to women. Now its men working and paying taxes into a system that supports women, as well as paying for dates, bills, child support/alimony, etc. As advanced as we are, we are still quite primitive in some ways.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/20 02:36 AM
13

Feminists when they are debating Mens rights: "The Mens rights movement is sexist an unnecessary. Feminism helps men too!" Feminists when theres a real male issue: crickets
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:27 AM
11

Much better than no workout at all. Nice job.
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 09:25 PM
20

"Feminism stops when the govt wants to give women unfair privileges"
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/07/20 01:35 PM
24

To me it sounds like a 40 year old virgin in the making.
/r/MGTOW16/07/20 02:48 PM
2

His hands are tied. If he defends himself, he'll be smeared as a crybaby misogynist by the media and morons on twitter.
/r/MGTOW15/07/20 10:28 PM
4

You are right, i didnt think about that. But dunning kruger still doesnt apply. Dunning kruger is incompetent people overestimating themselves and competent people underestimating themselves. This is because incopetent people dont know how dumb they are. Smart people have enough knowledge to recognize that theres still so much they dont know, where as dumb people think they know it all because theyre unaware of how much more knowledge there is that they dont have. Dunning kruger doesnt apply to …
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 10:23 PM
7

No, it doesnt, for the reason I just explained. Stupid people think theyre smart because theyre too dumb to understand what smart actually is. A shit scientist thinks hes a great scientist because he has no idea what a great scientist actually is. His idea of a great scientist is skewed by his own ignorance, and so his idea of a great scientist is very different from an objectively good scientist. This doesnt translate to looks. Its not like ugly people are unaware of what an attractive person l…
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 03:49 PM
12

No way. Dunning kreuger applies specifically to areas where your own ignorance makes you overestimate yourself. For example, a shitty philosopher may look at mediocre philosophy arguments and think theyre amazing, because they have no idea what good philosophy is. So their ignorance is making them value mediocraty, because they dont know any better. I dont see how that would apply to people rating their own attractiveness.
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 03:08 PM
3

Oh, the irony
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 06:55 AM
12

Hell will freeze over before feminists/SJWs stop blamimg men for everything. No, its not that men are holding themselves back, its that women want gender roles when it benefits them and "equality" when that also benefits them. Heres an example - men dont want to be emotionless rocks. But when men open up and show weakness, people shit on them. Especially women. Women will see a guy as a wimpy loser as soon as he shows emotional weakness. People saying "men need to open up more" seems to be along…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 06:53 AM
22

Some Chads will only fuck beautiful girls but there are some Chads that just love sex and are willing to fuck average looking girls. And almost any woman can be at least average looking by using makeup. So yeah, these ugly women cant get any Chad, but they can get some Chads. The Chads that just want as much sex as they can get, which there aren't a shortage of. I know multiple Chads who have fucked ugly girls.
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 02:37 AM
2

What? Are you saying she think Chad finds her ugly, despite him being willing to fuck her? Or are you saying she think shes ugly compared to Chad? Well Chads a 9/10, and even a 5/10 is ugly compared to a 9/10. So she could think she is indeed a 5/10 when in reality shes a 2/10.
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 02:32 AM
11

The study could be correct about the "ignorance is bliss" aspect of it, but its clearly wrong about the "women are extremely oppressed" aspect.
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 02:30 AM
1

99% is an exaggeration. But there was an AI programmed to choose candidates for jobs and it wasn't aware of the persons race or gender, just their qualifications. The AI disproportionally chose men (idk by how much, and idk if there were any differences in race) and the SJWs freaked out and basically got the idea scrapped because it was "sexist."
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 02:27 AM
50

I didnt read the whole study, did it talk about differences between gender? I imagine that most people who dont know theyre unattractive are women, for two reasons. Lots of ugly women can put on makeup and get Chads anyway. Simps tell ugly women that theyre beautiful. I really cant imagine too many ugly men being unaware that theyre ugly, given that basically all ugly men struggle with women. Beta buxx at best. Between hookup culture (men sleep down, women sleep up) and makeup (further inflating…
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 02:20 AM
1

I dont think its possible for a couple reasons. It is a legitimate rights issue. Telling women theyre not allowed to work and must find a man is pretty close to a form of slavery. Past societies only resorted to this when shit really hit the fan, which may not happen again due to technological advances. Secondly, in a patriarchy, womens main purpose is raising kids. We cant have that anymore. World population is a huge concern already. We cant have half the population dedicating their lives to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:24 PM
1

You know why we have so many more female ancestors than male? It’s because of a very well-known and common behavior pattern, practiced by many animals, documented throughout history, and backed up by anthropological studies of tribal behavior. It’s called, “kill all the men (and often children as well), rape the women and make them have your babies” Much choice! Very autonomy! That doesnt explain why so many more women than men reproduced as recently as 8000 years ago. Way more women than men re…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:59 AM
2

In fact, I would point out that one gender has pretty much been excluded from positions of power and autonomy for all but the last 100 years of human existence Nope, this isnt the first time women have had rights. For the past 10,000+ years, humanity is going in a cycle between patriarchy and matriarchy. Civilization stars out as neither. But then massive imbalances between the sexes (women sleeping with all the top men, leaving most men sexless) causes long term problems, and society becomes pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 03:20 PM
2

The men bad boy alphas Im attracted to aren't graceful. A good chunk of men basically worship women, but women arent interested in those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 02:58 PM
6

I just pretend to be a nice guy Thats why she made you wait a month, nice guys arent attractive. Next time pretend to be a cocky badboy and youll be getting laid on the first date like those other guys.
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 02:17 PM
33

the bad boys, cool boys, commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys She managed to say the same thing in 4 different ways. Shes trying to disguise this as "dating a little bit of everything" but really those 4 qualities are all in the same 1 type of man. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated, and ambitious. She just accidentally admitted that these qualities are unattractive. Because she first talked about th…
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 02:08 PM
3

Dont worry, other countries are gynocentric too.
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 01:50 PM
6

I have seen many women attacked by men in the street in France, where I live, on the metro etc. Lmao, yeah right. And no one has ever stepped in or even called the police. It's always other women. LMAO, yeah right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 05:39 PM
32

Because they were TERFs. (Trans-Exclusive Radical Feminists, for anyone unfamiliar with the term.)
/r/MensRights08/07/20 03:02 AM
1

Doesn't matter whether you're a douchebag or a nice guy. If you have the looks, women will chase you. If you don't, you don't exist to them or you will have to put 10x the amount of effort to maybe get some attention. There is more to attraction than looks. If a handsone guy is a spineless, clingy, emotional beta who worships women, he isnt going to get anywhere with women. No sex or girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 03:48 PM
5

Its hilarious how blue pill answers say so much and so little at the same time. Blue pill answers are always non-answers. "Stop overthinking it" "go get therapy" "communication is key." Blue pillers say stuff like this all the time, and its never anything meaningful. OP made a specific point about how women raise their sons to be "nice guys" and you respond with "red pill/mgtow is toxic, therapy is great." Do you see how much of a non-answer that is? Its like some people on this sub just repeat …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 03:41 PM
13

Against hate subreddits. Btw they define "hate" as "anything not radically left wing." Pretty sure this sub is on their list of "hate subreddits". r/conservative is on their list for sure.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:55 PM
195

Reflects a destructive gender binarism and engenders a strain of zerosum thinking Oh, the irony. When someone tries to bring up male issues, how common is it for someone to step in and make it about women? Women have it worse. Men have all the rights. Thats just misogyny. We let people talk about womens issues without throwing a tantrum. We want actual equality. But when we try to talk about mens issue, feminists (and lots of people in general) throw a fit. But its MRAs who are guilty of gender …
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:52 PM
2

Thats not why they demand it. Do they demand it from their female friends in the same way? No.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:37 PM
2

I dont see the point youre making. Trans suicide rates are high because life sucks as a trans person and being trans is highly correlated with other mental illness. Both of those contributing to a high suicide rate. What does that have to do with women being clueless about mens problems? Except that maybe trans men commit more suicide than trans women?
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:36 PM
6

Yeah, guarantee shes never dated or slept with a guy who did any of those things in front of ger. Shes just virtue signaling.
/r/MGTOW04/07/20 01:31 PM
3

Most women are clueless about the struggles men deal with. From adolescence they are told men are privileged and theyre oppressed. Most women believe their lives would be much easier as a man. They think men have it great, and thus dont need programs like the one in the picture.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:18 PM
1

What do you mean? Go find a case where a man was punished more harshly for the same crime? That wouldnt do much, given that we already know all men (and moat women) wouldve been punished more harshly.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 03:17 PM
4

You are right about the cherry picking aspect of it, where most cases arent like this. However I think there is still an important point. When women commit an awful crime like this, they sometimes do get away with it, even if its rare. Where are men virtually never get away with it. And thats part of the sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:34 PM
19

Please explain how the massive sentencing gap has nothing to do with mens rights? This is a great example of it. The courts go far easier on women.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 01:51 PM
3

Are you not being hypocritical by now stating you have a psychology degree? Sounds like you think your opinion is better. I dont think a degree means much. But you do. And you thought your opinion was better because you were a psych student. So I pointed out that Im a psych graduate. Hows that hypocritical? Im juat showing you how flawed your thinking is (how flawed "appeal to authority" is). As for the rest of your comment. No, you werent "stating facts." You didnt say a single fact. You just r…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:08 PM
3

But advocating for a “men’s rights” group is not going to help this cause. Women do not hate you. Stop hating them. So, advocating for mens rights (which just means advocating for legitimate male issues) means hating women? But when women are opposed to men fighting male issues, thats not hating men? Careful you dont sprain your ankle from those mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:52 PM
2

Wow, you clearly have received no education or have any actual experience with mental illness I actually have a degree in psych. I laughed when you said "psych student here" because you thought it meant your opinion was better, when I have a literal degree in the field youre currently studying. Your appeal to authority is hilarious. Youre doing nothing but repeating the things you learned in a psych class. Youre not using logic, reasoning, or anything like that.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:29 PM
3

I disagree, here are my main points - The legal/medical definition of "attempted suicide" is too loose, so suicide attempts are over reported. Behaviors that arent suicide attempts are classified as a suicide attempts. Lets say someone takes a non-lethal dose of pills 5 minutes before their family member normally comes home. Is that attempt suicide or a cry for help? Unless the person is a complete moron, its a cry for help, not a suicide attempt. Women are more likely to do these kinds of behav…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:50 AM
10

People will literally change definitions of things to fit their opinions. Like how racism means "judgement about someone based on race" but now radical liberals are saying "racism against whites cant exist because they have political power." To anyone with a functioning brain, its obvious that suicide is much more a male issue than female issue. But feminists/SJWs cant stand this, so theyve changed the definition of "attempted suicide" to be so loose that any mildly dangerous behavior (like maki…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 06:13 PM
42

Shes also putting the link in the post title (as opposed to comment flair or something), which is just going to immediately turn everyone away.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 02:14 PM
2

No I know, I was just making a point about the format. Walking away is what he did (and should have), and the meme represents that with the sniper being there. Metaphorically "one upping" his (ex) girlfriend.
/r/MGTOW30/06/20 03:45 AM
3

Whenever someone says "dude I saw this hot MILF earlier", we assume hes talking about a 35-50 year old woman who still looks really attractive. Because thats what the term refers to. Not an 18 year old with a kid whose "technically a mom."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/20 02:23 AM
2

She would if they were married
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 07:48 PM
2

You cannot simultaneously be bad at linguistics and a good writer. Good writing requires linguistic abilities like using the proper words and good pacing. Theres no such thing as someone as a talented writer who is linguistically retarded. Your claim that "Shakespeare is all about great linguistics, but female literacy isnt" is just wrong. Also wasnt it a guy who wrote 50 shades of grey?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:57 PM
2

They are not "linguistically clever", otherwise Shakespeare would've been a woman. Funny you bring that up. Out of all the worlds professions, women are disproportionately more likely to be writers. All the worlds top chefs, athletes, business people (CEOs, investors, etc) are mostly men. But writing? Journalism? Theres lots of women in there, and they have lots of success. JK rowling is the worst richest/most successful author. So no, your point about "Shakespeare not being a woman" is mistaken…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:51 PM
2

Can't discuss that buddy, that's womanese. In womanese, every word means everything and nothing. Depends on how they want to interpret it. Dude, what are you talking about? We were debating whether or not women are attracted to toxic masculinity. "Toxic masculinity" is a real phrase with a real definition, despite some people misinterpreting it or using it inconsistently. The fact that many people butcher the definition does not change the fact that it has a real definition (again, like men not …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:44 PM
6

I originally said "women claim they aren't attracted to toxic masculinity." You responded with "yes, they are, they like things like masculine hands, muscles, etc." I said "thats not what toxic masculinity is. Toxic masculinity is things like men not showing emotion." You said "no, thats only crazy women who are (rightfully) slut shamed." I once again said "no, that is indeed what toxic masculinity is, not things like muscles." Now you are responding by saying "See, you're talking about what wom…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:30 PM
11

No, that's only crazy ass bitches who are slut shamed (rightfully) here. No, that is toxic masculinity. Look up the definition of toxic masculinity. Most women crave masculinity and don't call it "toxic masculinity". Correct. What point are you arguing against? Women crave masculinity, even the parts of masculinity that are considered "toxic masculinity" (like men not showing emotion). But they wont admit being attracted to toxic masculinity. Women are constantly bitching that men "dont open up"…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:06 PM
9

Most women that I know openly talk about how they love a man's rough hands, masculine attitude, fit / muscles, etc. Thats not toxic masculinity. Toxic masculinity is things like men not showing emotion, men taking charge, etc. Which women claim they hate, but they love it. You need to interact with more women. I know plenty about them, thanks. This is a really weak supporting argument. I understand the bitterness, it always happens when you discover TRP and discover you've been bluepilled to dea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 03:59 PM
24

Well, this meme format is about who has the upper hand. The girlfriend thought she was one step ahead of the nerd by dumping him when he appeared broke, but its actually him whose one step ahead. He anticipated that she was a gold digger and so he only pretended to be broke. She thought she won, but he did. So while you are right that he is walking away in real life, the sniper of this meme format isnt going anywhere until the GF is gone.
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 03:48 PM
37

Its not a communcation issue. If you ask them to elaborate on what a "good guy" is, they arent going to say things like "masculine." A good chunk of them actually say that toxic masculinity is bad, and would never admit to being attracted to it. If you ask them "whats a good guy?" theyll say things like "treats me well", "is nice to me", "doesnt flirt with other girls" etc. And what they really mean is "I want a confident Chad who treats me that way" because she has no interest in the nerds who …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 03:35 PM
45

When they say "I just want a good guy" they are really saying "I want a handsome, confident, socially dominant man to is also a good guy". There are tons of nerdy/beta men who treat them really well, and they want nothing to do with those men, because they arent attractive (looks or personality).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 03:13 PM
17

Either I find my husband or I find my adrenaline partner. Either I find my beta buxx of my alpha fucks Shes hoping to find both
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 04:05 AM
6

If feminists really cared about this problem they would condemn those people Exactly. Feminists have provided a mountain of evidence that they dont care about equality or justice, they care about political power and female superiority. Instead of criticizing women who make false rape accusations, they turn it into a womans issue and say "this is bad for women, because now less victims might come forward." As if its not bad for the men being falsely accused. And some of them even bash men for sim…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:39 AM
7

Sorry to hear about that man. Are the people who gave her a slap on the wrist still there? If you bring that up and show any kind of evidence, they may get in trouble. The fact that feminists/sjws literally dont care male sexual assault victims, women who falsely accuse, older women who prey on underage men, etc shows that they aren't the least bit interested in equality or justice, they are interested in political power and female superiority.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:29 AM
11

Most of the people who support the #Metoo movement aren't doing so because of logic or reason, theyre doing so because of emotion. Logic and reason go in 1 ear and out the other. They are emotionally invested in it and ignore rationality. So to persuade someone like that, you have to find a way to get through to them emotionally. How to do that? Im not sure. It seems like most of them are so hopelessly emotionally invested into it that theyre not gonna change their mind. Maybe some solid argumen…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:24 AM
10

I dont think it was true even 50 years ago. This tweet in specific is about "moral privilege - the presumption that youre a good person" Look up the "women are wonderful effect." We have been evolutionary programmed to see women as "morally better". Most people think women are kinder, more caring, less selfish, etc than men. Like many things that feminist say, this is just straight up false.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:10 PM
1

Your quote is incorrect. It's: Avoid touching M.E.N, Follow W.O.M.E.N Because I said "remember W.O.M.E.N" instead of "follow W.O.M.E.N"? Youre nitpicking at irrelevant details. It does not at all follow that because they chose men / women they are praising one and hating on another; they're merely memorable and related. Yes, it is because they hate one and praise the other. The "E" in W.O.M.E.N" stands for exercise, which has nothing to do with corona. Clearly, theyre trying to make it fit. it's…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:55 PM
1

It’s neither about hating men nor praising women. Yes, it is. Thats my point about the acronym being forced. Theres so many possible acronyms they couldve used to convey the message, but they chose to say "avoid M.E.N and remember W.O.M.E.N".
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:18 PM
8

If it was purely about hating men, they couldve just left it as the "M.E.N" acronym without adding the woman acronym. They added the woman ancroym because they wanted to praise women on top of hating men.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 07:29 PM
27

Its effect is insignificant. Its clearly a stretch to make the "W.O.M.E.N" acronym work, because they want to hate on men and praise women.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:18 PM
62

Acronyms like this should only be used if they really make sense. The "E" in W.O.M.E.N stands for "exercise and eat well", which has nothing to do with corona. Its clear that theyre just trying to force the acronym to work, because they want to hate on men.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 05:57 PM
2

If you had tons of subways near you, would you ever gef that shitty deli sandwich instead? No. Thats modern hookup culture. Most women have access to top men and arent accepting anything less.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/20 11:37 AM
109

Its more complicated than that. This is the real answer - Men are willing to "sleep down" because they just wanna get laid. Meaning, most guys who are a 8/10 for looks will fuck a 5/10 woman. With hookup culture and online dating, this has resulted in women chasing "top men". A 3/10 woman can put on makeup, look like a 6/10, and fuck an 8/10 guy. Men are "sleeping down" and this is resulting in women sleeping with men far out of their league.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/20 01:58 PM
1

You are using the word "anything" in two different ways. First, you said "anything that says "hoes aint loyal" is misogynistic" (which is absurd, btw). Then you use "anything" to actually mean "everything." You are interchangeably using the word "anything" and "everything", which is dishonest. Yeah, OPs post is saying "hoes aint loyal" in 1 sense, hes not saying that hoes are never loyal. You are literally saying "anything/everything that ever says "hoes aint loyal" is misogynistic, which isnt t…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/20 06:30 PM
1

Immediately jumping to “these hoes ain’t loyal” to describe anything outside of a Chris Brown song is textbook misogyny. This post isnt describing anything as "hoes aint loyal", its a shitpost making fun of someone who said something stupid. Not every single criticism of women is "textbook misogyny". Go back to your feminist subs.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/20 02:27 PM
0

Well you are using the word misogyny to mean "anything that criticizes any women in any way, shape, or form." So yeah, based on your definition of misogyny, "chill out" would mean ignoring "misogyny", because it would mean ignoring posts that lightly poke fun at women. You dont need to throw a tantrum at every single shitpost that says anything negative about any woman. If there was a post that lightly poked fun at men, would you be throwing a tantrum? No, so stop being a white knight and chill …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/20 10:49 PM
1

Except a tweet like that would be smeared as "misogyny", "incel shit" etc, where as most people think that this tweet is just "good advice." Theres controversy in this comment section about whether or not this post is relevant to mens rights. It absolutely is. One of mens biggest issues is that feminists (and really society in general) will lie/exaggerate about how awful men are. Its socially acceptable to hate on men, and we should want that to change. "Men who only respect attractive women" ar…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:11 PM
2

How am I moving the goalpost? First I said that these "men who only respect attractive women are rare, and this is just another feminist boogeyman that people use an excuse to hate on men." Then I said that if we swapped genders and a man tweeted "ignore women who only respect attractive men", it would have a different reaction. People would say "misogyny", "incel" etc. And thats not "moving the goalpost", its pointing out double standards, which is very much a mens issue.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 02:56 PM
-2

You didnt address my point about how this "man who only respects attractive girls" doesnt really exist, its just another made up thing for people to circlejerk about how awful men are. If someone tweeted "avoid women who only respect attractive men" it would definitely recieve hate. Itd be smeared as "misogyny", "incel shit", etc. i very highly doubt that people like you would jump in to defend the tweet. This is top tier incel shit and shame on you for defending it. This stuff is precisely what…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:40 PM
2

Theyve been full retard ever since theyve wanted to convict men for nothing but an accusation. But now theyre supporting women who are proven to be falsely accusing? This goes beyond full retard. This is legalized domestic terrorism. For those who think this sounds extreme, look up the definition of terrorism. Aside the legality issue of free speech, it fits quite well for something like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/20 01:29 PM
0

How many men out there always respect attractive women but constantly disrespect non attractive women? Its rare, its another feminist boogeyman that society encourages. Its absolutely an MRA issue. One of the biggest problems for men is the fact that society not only accepts, but encourages people to make up lies about how awful men are. Take this loser incel shit out of here please. Lmao, the classic "any criticism of women is incel shit." Nah, if you think valid posts are just "incel shit" bec…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:19 PM
3

It doesnt matter if censorimg names doesnt help much. This is about reddits sitewide rules and us getting banned.
/r/MGTOW24/06/20 12:53 PM
22

Its against reddit rules to not censor names when posting screenshots like this. The admins are waiting for any excuse to ban us, I dont get why the mods dont enforce this rule more.
/r/MGTOW24/06/20 01:59 AM
1

What does he in particular have to do with it? You think hes the only guy that women are passing up for socially dominant low-lifes? Women constantly bitch that they just want to find a nice guy, but then date assholes. Woman says what she wants Man says that's not what women want. aight Yes, because their actions are so different from their words. If your roommate told you that they hate pizza, and love spinach, but they never ate spinach and constantly ate pizza, would you be wrong for saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 01:32 AM
3

You mean "out of all the guys I already find attractive, the one I'll choose is the one who gives me undivided attention"? Qualities like respectfulness are not attractive, they are just a bonus to already attractive men. Lets look at two hypothetical men. An average looking, nerdy dude who gives you undivided attention, and a tall, handsome man with a prestigious job who doesn't give you undivided attention. In fact, he doesnt really respect your attention. While you talk, he'll look on his pho…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 01:23 AM
1

Its because its a load of nonsense. This is a classic example of apex fallacy. Basically, beta males are sexually invisible to women. When women think "what am i attracted to?" they look at the men they already find attractive, and compare them. Ie, a hot douchebag and a hot nice guy, and they think "although Im attracted to both, the douchebag makes me mad and the nice guy doesnt, so what I prefer is niceness!" However, the niceness is only appealing because shes talking about men shes already …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 01:17 AM
3

I've only known one truly fat girl in my whole high school and I've only seen them around here or there in college. LMAO Its insane how much your standards differ for men and women. Clearly, based on what youve said, you think any man without a 6 pack is a fat slob, but the only "truly fat" women are morbidly obese women. How can you sit there and type "ive only known 1 fat girl in my entire time in highschool, and only a few fat girls at my entire college campus" and think it doesnt sound compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 07:51 PM
4

What planet are you living on where most women are fitness, health, and beauty freaks that workout, diet, and work on their appearence all day? Most women dont diet or workout. Most women are at least a little bit overweight. And you said "women are much more attractive than men even without makeup", so your point about women putting lots of time and effort into their makeup doesnt help your argument. Youve clearly been through some bad stuff in childhood, but most women havent been through that…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 07:25 PM
3

men will call a perfectly normal attractive girl ugly bc they're so used to perfection I've met very very very few truly attractive men in real life but I meet attractive girls virtually everywhere I think this is the single most ironic thing I've ever read. No, its you (women) who are used to perfection because top men sleep down. A 4/10 woman can put on makeup, look like a 7/10, and fuck a 9/10 guy. Its women who are so used to perfection that you think most guys are ugly. You yourself said th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 06:36 PM
2

At least shes aware (maybe subconsciously) that any beta buxx willing to take care of her isnt a guy she would wanna have sex with. Shes preemtively letting them know that they wont be getting any lmao.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/20 04:56 PM
20

Heres my ban story, its a good one - There was this girl talking about how awful men are (and getting upvotes for it). A guy asked her how he can improve. He wasnt being sarcastic or anything, he clearly believed her. Instead of giving an honest answer, she freaked out and said "im not your therapist" bla bla bla. I replied, saying that her reaction indicated that her original claim was wrong. If she cant even give any advice whatsoever on how men can "be better" in the specific way that she wan…
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:20 PM
8

Its because inept parents are comedic, but they cant make the moms inept because feminists would freak out and get the show cancelled. So its gotta be dads.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:06 PM
45

Rich guys are lazy in bed No, dont fall for her sugarcoating. Its not that "rich guys are lazy in bed", its "the only wealthy people that will sleep with me are nerdy guys that i dont wanna sleep with". Nothing to do with being bad in bed, everything to do with Alpha fucks/Beta bucks.
/r/MGTOW23/06/20 04:03 PM
1

Women are just more attractive on average, whether or not makeup is involved No, they arent. What are you talking about? I've met plenty of girls not wearing makeup and I've seen all of my friends without it, but even without they're still objectively more attractive than a huge portion of men This is very clearly your own personal bias. Btw are you bisexual? If not, how are you judging men and women on an even scale? There are really only about like 5% of men who are like, physically attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 01:29 AM
1

The issue largely stems from that there are far more attractive women than there are men You mean after using makeup? Yes, womens ability to use makeup to boost their looks is creating a massive imbalance in the sexual marketplace. So yes a lot of attractive women fuck unattractive men No, they dont. Because of makeup, most women have access to top men. Why would they sleep with ugly guys when they could easily get sex from an attractive guy? Literally 30% of young men (mid twenties or younger) …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 08:12 PM
1

You invalidated it earlier bc you said "I don't think you're actually attracted to them", that's saying the attraction isn't real, or "the only way you could be is abuse" which is invalidating bc it's saying that this attraction can't exist in its own without needing to come up with an extreme reason. I dont think thats invalidating it. After we talked more I said "ok yeah now I believe that you actually are attracted to them." My initial statements were skepticism. No I said "even if it were a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 07:03 PM
53

Correct. But the internet isnt flooded with articles from big/popular websites bitching about women. Bitching about men though? Thats everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 03:06 PM
46

The funny thing is that theres not a shortage of men who make decent money. Theres a shortage of men who look good, have an "alpha"/confident/assertive personality, and also make lots of money. Women want all 3 of those, but most attractive "bad boy" men arent financially well off. Hence their complaints. They dont wanna date the shy and/or ugly nerdy guy.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 02:17 PM
2

Even if it were a reason, it wouldn't invalidate it. I didnt say it invalidated it. I specified there had to be a reason because it sounded like you thought there was no reason. You even said "no need to psychoanalyze it." Again, all women ever have to be attracted to the exact same thing. Men can be unique and have a wide variety of preferences for different sizes and shapes and types, but for women, the only reason any one of 3.5 billion+ people could ever have any uniqueness is because of tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 11:58 AM
1

It actually does. Have you seen a women with and without it? It makes a big difference. you definitely sound like a women hater. Ah yes, the classic "your valid argument is actually invalid cause i label you a misogynist"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 11:48 AM
1

Of course there are exceptions, but there are reasons those exceptions exist. I dont know why a man would be attracted to obese women, but i know there must be a reason. Likewise, if a woman is attracted to short, shy betas, there must be a reason, even if I dont know it. My best guess would be something like abuse, probably in childhood. Also, since your point is "exceptions exist", are you agreeing that women do generally prefer alpha, confident, tall men? And youre saying youre the exception?…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 02:30 AM
-2

Men like that practically trigger a fight or flight in me. So you were abused by a man(s) like that? To the point of trauma? Like your dad or uncle? The only way you'd be not attracted to alpha/confident/stoic men would be if you went through a traumatic experience by a man like that. And as for the beta/shy/emotional men. I dont think youre actually attracted to them, but they dont trigger you either. So, they seem good compared to the "bad boys." So its not that they have attractive qualities,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/20 11:44 PM
1

I have always liked boys who are very shy, soft, sweet, feminine, who show emotions and cry and are kind hearted. Like =/= sexual attraction. You may have many close male friends with those qualities, but sexual attraction isnt there. You may end up dating/marrying them for resources, comfort, or something else, but not sexual attraction. If you were going to hook up with a guy and you had to choose between a beta, shy, emotional man and an alpha, confident, "bad boy", youd pick the alpha every …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/20 10:44 PM
7

Its two reasons Makeup boosts a womans looks by a lot. They equate their looks while wearing makeup as their "level of attractiveness." Because men care so much about sex that tgeyre willing to "sleep down." Lots of attractive guys will fuck a girl as long as shes not ugly or crazy. So a 3/10 girl can put on makeup, look like a 5-6/10, and sleep with guys that are like 7-8/10. Sometimes even 9/10 or once in awhile a 10/10 if hes a player that wants to get as much sex as he can.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 02:21 PM
1

Well its easy to refute an argument when you use the worst version of the argument. Try refuting this - A 3/10 looking woman can put on makeup, look like a 6/10, and get sex from an attractive man (anywhere from 7-9ish out of 10), because lots of men are willing to "sleep down." Meaning that they care enough about getting sex that theyll sleep with a women as long as shes not ugly or crazy. Yeah, the 10/10 men who legit look like supermodels arent bothering with average looking woman, but plenty…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 01:53 AM
5

I broke up with my bf, cause I thought he deserved much better Can they just for once talk about relationships without the virtue signaling lies? Christ.
/r/MGTOW15/06/20 03:31 PM
1

Thank you for being a woman that cares about mens issues, it really is a breath of fresh air. Im so tired of all the virtue-signaling lies. Feminists telling men to open up, to show emotion, etc only to treat him like garbage when he actually does. Most of the time, they will unconsciously think less of him (and so would other men). Obviously theyre not going to admit that. But instead of at least having the decency to keep quiet about their dislike of weakness/vulnerability in men, they go the …
/r/MensRights15/06/20 05:00 AM
3

Hearing feedback like that is good too. Im working on a website. Ill add you on here and PM you the details.
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 02:27 AM
6

80/20 is the tip of the iceberg. Theres a reason that most past societies were monogamous patriarchies. Why? Because without gender roles, society fell apart. All women were single moms who just slept with the very top men. Its evolution. Women are evolutionarily programmed to seek out the best possible mate. And men are programmed to impregnate whoever they can (which in modern day translates to sleep around). This is why past societies had monogamy. When a society becomes "sexually liberated",…
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 02:24 AM
2

No prob, any feedback on it? Its actually my post, and Im working on becoming a writer for this type of stuff.
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 02:14 AM
9

The phenomenon you are describing is correct. Things are better in the beginning in 99.9% of relationships. Theres a specific reason for that. Give this a read my man, it should explain why that is - https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/9vohjq/happiness_is_an_impossibility_in_modern/
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 02:01 AM
22

No it is absolutely an ego blow. A huge part of womens self worth is her ability to secure a quality mate. When a beta/unattractive man tries to get with her, he is implying to her that maybe hes good enough for her, which she despises. Lets say you were the CEO of a company and one of your entry level employees asked you to hangout after work, and got mad/insulted you when you declined. What would you be thinking? Youd probably be thinking "who the fuck does this guy think he is? He thinks hes …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 01:09 AM
3

Heres everything you need to know about fundamental attraction and why the friend zone exists - https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/9vohjq/happiness_is_an_impossibility_in_modern/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 01:03 AM
63

Both of you are completely missing the point. Obviously women enjoy being desired by men they desire. But, they could enjoy that without also enjoying the fact that those men objectify/sexualize them. But they also enjoy the fact that those men objectivfy/sexualize them. So why bullshit? Heres is the point, which you both missed - Women complain about being sexualized/objectified. However, this complaint is not genuine. Its a sugarcoated way of saying "I hate that betas/unattractive men hit on m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 01:00 AM
3

Awesome to hear that things are going well for you man. What kind of company do you own?
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 12:43 AM
12

I think this quote is specifically referring to "nice guys/betas" vs "bad boys/Chads". "Heaven" refers to the man who treats her like a Queen. A man that gives her the best life possible. "Hell" refers to the bad boy that treats her like garbage. If that is indeed what the quote is referring to, then the quote is accurate. Women subconsciously hate it when men treat them well. It makes her see those men as a loser. She will take his niceness for granted. Demand more, cheat on him, etc. Where as …
/r/MGTOW13/06/20 12:39 AM
2

Liberals made it political by abandoning their principles such as "rights for the accused" and "true equality" They used to support the rights of the accused. Now they support #metoo and the witch hunts that go along with it, even when theres no evidence. They demand "gender equality", except only when it benefits women. When women are behind (like less of them in STEM) liberals demand change. When men are behind (like higher suicide rates, or working more shitty jobs like garbage men), liberals…
/r/MensRights12/06/20 06:03 PM
17

Sorry to hear that man, best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:10 PM
45

If it were upto feminists/SJWs, you would have been found guilty and your life would have been ruined, regardless of evidence. But yeah, feminism is totally about equality...
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:46 PM
173

The media will literally do anything to excuse womens behavior and slander men. The story is accurate, but a bunch of SJW/leftist news sites are trying to hide that fact by lying and saying things such as "this isnt accurate" "the judge didnt have the right information" etc. Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:18 PM
12

No, it is absolutely correct that a major factor in why men are "losing the gender war" is because men are divided and women arent. Women have an in group bias where their beliefs tend to side with women. Eg if you look on subs like "AmITheAsshole" or "RelationshipAdvice" you will see women making excuses for other women and they will also be overly critical of men. There are countless posts where men are ripped to shreads by the comments, but when the genders are swapped, the women is let off t…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:05 AM
3

What are you basing that on? I dont know a single man who was with a girl while he was at nothing, then dumped her when he was successful. Evolutionarily speaking, hypergamy was beneficial for women but not men. A female leaving her mate for a better male meant better chances of survival & reproduction for both her and her offspring. But theres basically no such thing as a male leaving for a "better" female because females didnt compete in a dominance hierarchy like men. For example, a female is…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 12:53 PM
0

Yes I wish we would get a societal push for men/boys to suck less And for women? Or do you think women dont need to "suck less"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 01:36 AM
2

Hookup culture has resulted in most women sleeping with top men, because top men are willing to "sleep down" (a 9/10 looking guy is typically willing to be FWB with a 5/10 girl). So, for example, a 7/10 girl isnt settling for a 7/10 guy because she has access to sex with a 9/10 guy. He wont commit to her, but he'll fuck her, and thats enough to make her think shes good enough for a relationship with a 9/10 (notice how women are always bitching about a lack of commitment?) So if a 7/10 guy wants …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 07:11 PM
9

Lmao projection. No, if a woman is with a man when hes at nothing, and she sticks with him until hes successful, hes not gonna think he "deserves better." Thats hypergamy, which is what women do. A single man whose successful in life ("already at the finish line") is way more likely to be the cheating, "player" type of guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 06:58 PM
10

Yeah women hate pussy-worshipping guys like him. He probably hasnt had sex in months. Shes probably getting plowed right now while hes at work.
/r/MGTOW03/06/20 01:46 PM
83

That was only because they were black, not because they were men.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:26 AM
1

I disagree. When idiots say that women suffer more, or that women suffer as much as men, its worth it to point out that thats complete nosense.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 12:47 AM
66

Its what feminists are known for.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 12:05 AM
1

There aren't any sides on who suffers worse What? Men very clearly suffer a lot more. Women suffer too but nothing compared to men. Men are the ones who are actually dying, losing limbs, getting PTDS, and women are just their family members.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 05:08 PM
6

Comet to destroy all life on earth - women most affected
/r/MensRights01/06/20 01:31 AM
4

No, the post is about the fact that fat women dont want to date fat men. It mentioned nothing about the medias deceptive use of language. I was pointing out the fact that overweight women were called "plus size" and overweight men were just called "overweight". Edit: I originally didnt see the comment at the bottom. I see your point now. I didnt intend to virtue signal, i just didnt know that the post was about language. I thought it was about double standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/20 05:42 PM
20

How is that virtue signaling? The media constantly uses softer language for women. For example, when a female teacher rapes an underage student, the media say "had sex with" instead of "rape." The media, and our judicial system, cater to women. One of the ways they do that is through soft/misleading language. Whats wrong with pointing that out? Why are you two being so hostile over that?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/20 05:31 PM
21

Notice how when a woman is overweight, the media calls her "plus size" but when a man is overweight, hes just called "overweight"? Our society is so gynocentric. People who think women are oppressed are braindead.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/20 04:45 PM
2

Garbage women choose garbage men. All women love the garbage "bad boy" men, not just the trashy women.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/20 01:23 PM
22

Defend your family Probably not his biological kid tbh. This dude seems like the type of guy whose wife has a boyfriend.
/r/MGTOW28/05/20 12:32 PM
25

I dont think so. Many non-rulebreaking incel subs with less than 1000 users have been banned. FDS has something like 70k and its growing fast. You are right about self preserving though. Society freaks out about misogyny, but doesnt give a fuck about misandry. So male "hate subs" are banned but female hate subs arent. Same with race. White supremacist subs get banned quick, but black supremacist subs dont.
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 04:02 AM
5

He wants a group for single men because hes probably single and a virgin. Women hate white knights. They love the support and validation but they see white knights as complete losers.
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 03:58 AM
2

Lol bro, tons of men of all races have noticed this for awhile. Just look at all major religions, where strict gender roles and a patriarchy are an important part of it. But if a white man says "feminists suck" theres a witch hunt after him. As a black man, you have the privilege of being able to speak your mind without having SJWs starting a witch hunt, because they think youre oppressed.
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 02:05 PM
1

What do you think of the theory of the Dec 2021 bull run?
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 02:02 PM
98

Nah lots of men talk shit about feminists, but black men are the only ones that get away with it because our retarded SJW PC culture refuses to criticize them. If a white man said the same stuff that black men say about feminists, he'd be banned and a witch hunt would be after him.
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 03:53 PM
47

https://www.thedailybeast.com/cuckolding-the-sex-fetish-for-intellectuals Already here, my friend
/r/MGTOW19/05/20 12:20 AM
29

Feminists/liberals love doing this. They pretend that the manosphere is responsible for tons of mass shootings and other awful things when in reality its just a bunch of men on the internet complaining about how gynocentric society is and why true love/happiness isnt a thing with modern relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 01:31 PM
32

This is exactly what I was going to say, and to add to it, OP answered his own question within his own post. all the misogynist subreddits are either banned, quarantined, or really niche. This is good because hatred is unacceptable, especially when aimed towards women. Especially towards women means that its worse to be hateful towards women than men. Which is how society operates, and thats the reason why male "hate subs" are banned but female "hate subs" arent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 01:22 PM
2

Nah, average men treat their grlfriends really well. Your idea of average is skewed. Women rate 80% of men as "below average." When you say "average" you mean average among top men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 01:18 AM
2

Not all men are these cheating "player" inconsiderate douchebags that you speak of. In fact, most men arent like that. Most men treat women really well. However, you hate that. You dont like men who treat you well. And you rationalize it by saying "theres no chemistry" or some other nonsense. You are attracted to men that treat you like dirt, because it asserts social dominance. When you say "men are trash" you mean "the top men, who get all the girls and wont commit to any of them, are trash". …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 07:35 PM
2

Clearly thats not true. Anyone can pay for hookers in thailand. What about other races? What if an asian man, who lived in america all his life, went to thailand? Yeah, your buzzwords like "white privilege" dont cut it. Try coming up with an actual argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 05:00 PM
2

White privilege So if a black/latino/asian man from a wealthy country like the USA goes to a poor country to have sex, theyre not exploiting people because theyre not white? See how just randomly throwing out your buzz words/phrases can easily backfire? Try making an argument instead of throwing buzzwords at everything. How exactly is it exploitative for someone to travel to a poor country and have sex with women? Those women want to have sex with those men. They are glad that they have the oppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 03:21 PM
1

He obviously wasnt referring to sex trafficking. Everything you post is either wrong, dishonest, rude, or a mix of those 3. Many others have pointed this out. Youve said multiple times that all men are worthless perverts and men have no inherent value but women do. Idk what the mods were thinking when they only gave you a temporary ban instead of permanent. Go back to your hate sub and leave the debate to the people who are actually interested in having a rational discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:31 PM
1

Why are you so obsessed with specifically referring to them as parasites? It doesnt fit the definition at all. It makes them manipulative pieces of shit who completely lack empathy. Hahahaha. Actually, the reason that they are the way they are is because women gave them that power. Women are all chasing the top men, and thus these top men dont wanna settle. Theyre having fun having tons of FWBs/hookups all the time. Deal with it. Deal with it? Deal with what? Lmao. It sounds like youre the one w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:20 PM
5

You agreed about 1/3rd of men fit your dating criteria. Youre telling me that so many of them spin plates and wont commit that you cant find a boyfriend? Somethings not adding up here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:49 AM
3

So if you are dating these nice, kind of nerdy-ish men who treat women well, why are you complaining about men "spinning plates"? Clearly the type of guy you supposedly date isnt like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:20 AM
3

A pretty large chunk of the male population meet your criteria. Reads, decent job, is nice, and not ugly? Thats like 1/3rd of the male population. Or are you sugarcoating? By "decent job" do you mean at least 6 figures? By "not ugly" do you actually mean "handsome", since women rate 80% of men as "below average"? Obviously it wouldnt be hard to find a man with those 4 criteria. You probably already know plenty. Either your criteria is incorrect (meaning you are mistaken about what you want, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:12 AM
3

I think my issue is that what’s a top man is an average woman in terms of what I give and get back in a relationship Hahahaha. Simps treat women like queens. Top men treat women like dirt. But you women are oh so fatally attracted to that bad treatment, because you love the social dominance aspect of it. Most men simp for women, women simp for the top men, the top men sit back and enjoy it. If you dont wanna date an average guy, thats fine. But dont go around saying that you want a top man since…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:54 AM
3

No, you didnt give proof. Previously dating one man 3 inches shorter is not proof that you currently dont have high standards. If a short guy is handsome, confident, alpha/high status than he is still a top man. Did you date a 5'2 "nice guy" janitor? No, of course not. And even if you did, lowering your standards one time doesnt mean that you still have low standards. Who are you trying to fool? The fact that youre bitching about men not committing makes it obvious that you are indeed primarily …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:43 AM
4

Did i say anything about height? Obviously that guy had some other good qualities if you dated him. Either handsome, or alpha/high status, or lots of money, or some combination of the 3. Btw, lmao @ the immediate downvote and angry response. Dud I hit a nerve?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter