TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheRealBlueBadger Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by TheRealBlueBadger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

In my mind the best friend would try to fuck my wife in a sec Bro, your mind is fucked, or your friends are. Either way, you need to change things.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/20 11:21 PM
2

Idk man, since my country has come out of lockdown seems as easy to pull on Tinder as ever. Wouldn't have spent more than a couple of hours on tinder while I'd be fucking around on my phone at night anyway. If you're following rules one and two (which admittedly is way harder on tinder than in real life) it's a pretty easy supplement to whatever else you've got going on still.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/20 12:04 AM
2

This subs straight circle jerk these days. It's embarassing. 'Chicks with tats are ugly' is not red pill at all. That's some blue pill, I can't get what I want from them so they must be ugly bullshit. Don't trust them, sure. Don't fuck them, fuck off. Next up it'll be 'chicks with vaginas are the ugliest thing on the planet', because the weak men voting here got hurt by girls with those too.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/20 09:52 PM
2

are the ugliest thing in the world This is so, so bitter. 'chicks with tattoos are unattractive' is a normal opinion. Ugliest thing in the world, man's been burned.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/20 09:40 PM
-24

They're fucking hot. You sound bitter.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/20 08:23 AM
1

Once again, your lack of results are your own, and don't discount other people's successes. Spooge's experience may align with yours, but your results are both bad. Your amount of matches means fuck all, it's easy to get thousands of trash matches. Matches with chicks that you want to fuck/meet, and that will meet you are what matter. Apparently for you you're not getting the right matches, or not converting the potential matches into people who want to meet you, so for you that's close to zero.…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/18 10:42 PM
1

Your lack of success doesn't negate others' success. Unsuccessful men will make the same claims about most red pill truths rather than face their own shortcomings.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/18 01:07 AM
1

And 10 years ago a bunch of attractive dudes were using it to meet attractive chicks, for good reason.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/18 01:05 AM
1

In a city of half a million I get 4-5 matches a day (sitting over 750 since January), and I swipe right on maybe 20% of people, probably less. Talking to the ones I want to meet takes a few minutes a day. I don't have to go anywhere, I can do it during breaks where I'd be fucking around anyway, and most of the conversation I genuinely enjoy because I just have fun. Maybe all your right swiping is lowering your ELO (probably), maybe you're not as attractive as you think to your target demographic…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/18 12:03 AM
1

Bro I smash 8s, 9s and 10s from tinder. Your lack of success doesn't mean it isn't possible.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/18 05:03 AM
1

People don't complain about good looking people asking them out, especially not the type you'd approach if you're good looking.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/17 03:30 AM
1

Your story literally ends with her leaving and mad. You can defend your actions all you like, no one here is going to give a fuck what you do or don't do, they're just telling you how to make things more easy mode than you're already playing on. There's well founded knowledge that what you did wasn't required, it factually fucked things up for you, and you're proposing to use more effort than is needed in the future because of a hangup you have. That's not red pill, fact.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/17 04:04 AM
2

You are not red pilled as fuck at all if you think girls won't bang you because you're 28; girls don't give a fuck, and their families opinions don't stop them sleeping with people. The community is really helpful, and they're trying to help you out on this one.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/17 03:35 AM
5

Really? How old are you? I haven't found any resistance to being many years older than girls, and see it frequently among other men in the 26-30 range.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/17 03:21 AM
–

Using children to push your agenda is never cool. No matter how right or wrong the cause, this is a dick move.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:54 AM
–

You completely over estimate people's ability to reason and not take law into their own hands if you think that would be in any way fair to innocent people who are bought up on charges.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:44 PM
1

It's also recognising your own emotions and knowing how to deal with them. We might not call it by a name, but striving for a higher EQ is very much TRP.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 02:08 AM
1

One person's misjudgment doesn't exonerate another's negligence.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/16 08:22 PM
5

While you've got the words the acronym stands for correct, you don't have the meaning correct. You're applying it to things it doesn't apply to.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 12:36 AM
2

Sorry for poor quality. Saw this while I was handing in an eftpos card and my curiosity while waiting got the better of me. Wish it hadn't.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:29 AM
17

Violence? Mate, try getting cat called! I'm sure we'd all far rather take a hit than be subjected to uninvited advances! /s
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:45 AM
–

This is a rather immature and reductionist attitude. He clearly said she is supporting him, and she's entitled to her own feelings on the matter. Everyone is different, and you have no idea what her history is like or how it affects either of them mentally. Don't be so quick to judge.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:02 AM
3

To be fair I would think similar of any woman being a bitch to me because of rejection by others. That kind of person isn't for me, male or female.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:32 AM
1

which is EXACTLY why it was done. Fixed. Misrepresenting a view will only curry you favour with people who already agree with you, and is likely to turn off those that don't already, despite the merits of your argument.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:15 AM
0

To you. To you, that's what it comes down to. You've clearly come to your conclusion with an oversimplification - that doesn't mean you're right or wrong in and of itself, but certainly that your conclusion is poorly reasoned and not worthy of perpetuating in your form.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:42 AM
-1

I'm not sure you understand the basics of philosophy; Your possibilities all heavily beg the question, and you've not addressed either premise or the conclusion. Despite that your third option should also be broken down into unhappy but unwilling to subject self to procedure, unhappy but willing to subject self to procedure, and happy. It's very disingenuous to assume the baby would want the burden of the choice and costs of the choice as an adult to try and strengthen your argument.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:35 AM
-3

While an adult circumcision and an infant circumcision both are removal of the foreskin, they're otherwise two very different options with a huge disparity in costs to the person.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:15 AM
-1

Is it perfectly fine to tattoo a baby too? From a philosophical standpoint: Are you reasonably sure the baby is going to want the tattoo? Are you reasonably sure the cost of having the tattoo done in adulthood outweighs the possible costs of the baby not wanting the tattoo in adulthood? If the answer to both is yes, I would say it was right to tattoo the baby. Would you disagree? (without twisting the points)
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:08 AM
1

Your point on female genital mutilation is huge progress from the usual one, but highlights its weakness too. No one is going to disagree that clitoral hood removal isn't like circumcision. When people talk FGM, unless they are being specific, they are almost always think removal of the clitoris though, which at your own admission is different to a circumcision. When discussing this kind of thing a distinction needs to be made if you want to be taken seriously, because the assumption will always…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:56 PM
-2

Dude, you're clearly looking with rose tinted glasses, assuming you know more than anyone other person or group because they don't share your opinion is weak as fuck, and is a clear indication of your controlling bias. It's also forcing you to spew out information completely irrelevant to my complaint about your comment. You just linked me to a bunch of opinion sites (notice I used peer reviewed papers, at least one of which wasn't funded by an interest group) about the procedure or the penis an…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:41 PM
–

Parents make almost every choice for a child, as a child we need the parent to do that because they're better informed and able to do so - when we are born with fully developed brains you'll be right though...
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:36 AM
–

I don't miss the point at all, I disagree with it, and I find your reasoning lacking and biased. Sure you can like what you have, realistically you'd probably like what you had if you were left intact. And if you didn't, you could go get the surgery done yourself. Removing a foreskin isn't like shaving an armpit, it's not something you can do without large costs in adult life (recovery time, forgone work, pain, social stigma, possible regret - all possibly compounded harshly if something goes wr…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:23 AM
0

Not at the cost of credibility.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:31 AM
–

Fuck other people and their opinions of what looks best on me. I think it looks better, and that's all that matters (and to an extent my partner, or anyone else who's opinion I chose to give weight to). I don't know why you attack it so vehemently. You projecting gender expectations is just as damaging to men's rights as anyone else doing it, and they think they're doing it altruistically just as you do. What you have is an opinion, and like a dick, no one wants it forced down their throat. Chil…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:58 AM
–

I'd have chosen to be circumcised, and I got it done when it didn't have any adverse affect on my day to day life. I'm pretty happy about that, and pretty unhappy about your assertion that it's a negative alteration. Maybe for you it is/would be negative, and you MAY have a point about the consent, but I'm very happy my parents made the choice they did for me. The way you're putting forward your position is unnecessarily offensive, and like SJWs and feminism it's form works against the credibili…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:47 AM
–

My objection is to the word framed. That requires evidence. I'm definitely hoping he is innocent, is found innocent, and the girls are punished. I don't have the details to say whether he is guilty or framed yet though, both of those titles require proof, and we shouldn't use either simply because we want it to be true.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:35 PM
–

[serious] Has it been found he didn't rape any of them? I wasn't aware if so.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter