TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheReasonableMensch Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by TheReasonableMensch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The phrase you're looking for is 'straw man.'
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:07 AM
-3

No. It's revisionist history. Not wasting my time.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:49 PM
-1

The roles are a construct of physical differences between men and women. Society uses people in roles where they are most efficient, and where society gets the most bang for the buck. K, getting off the train. That's 100% unscientific bunk. Just, you know, so you know. Men can raise children, and cook, no problem. Women can go make money and have jobs, no problem. Its nonsense. 90% of men ARE NOT stronger than 90% of women. The peak of physical capabilities is higher, no doubt, but that's the pe…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:48 PM
-2

Watch Karen's video. She makes the point that yes, it was originally like that. Look, I'm not watching some spin video, I learned about the women's rights movement of the 1800s in like middle school. Seneca Falls, NY? Susan B. Anthony? I know what those women were about. They were about the right to vote. Equal Rights. You aren't arguing otherwise and being factual or truthful. Some gender roles are societal That's literally the entire point. The argument starts with sex vs. gender. SEX is your …
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:23 PM
1

Thats modern feminism. Feminism in its original form was not that. They have waves or something, I don't know. The more recent waves are nonsense. The original is not. And gender as a social construct is definitely something you can argue. Roles, clothes, attitudes, social expectation. SOME of that is linked to biology, (but doesn't HAVE to be) but a lot of that is just the way society IS. Just because someone has boobs doesn't mean they default to a dress, and equally just because a man is biol…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:45 PM
1

misawhatnow? Back to reality: India, not a good place to do this sort of thing. Pick a different country. How your movement is perceived affects how successful it is and is affected by the context in which it operates. That's reality. Timing matters. You wouldn't go into the slaveholding south and talk about LGBTQ(ABCDEFGLMNOP) rights, don't go into India and talk about mens rights. And, no, not lazy, just not worth my time to read more pseudo-intellectual nonsense, regardless of which side of t…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:39 PM
0

K, TL;DR. Not a sexist, one way, or the other. I won't be keeping anything to myself. Don't emulate SJW trash by being more SJW trash. IF you're going to devote resources to how men get shit on sometimes, maybe pick a different country than INDIA.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:27 PM
2

I really don't want to hear anything about mens rights in India. Women in India have it shit. Until that changes, I don't think there's really a need for a 'what about us' campaign there.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:28 PM
1

*modern 3rd wave (or whatever wave we are on) feminism. The idea that women should have equal rights and freedoms is the core of feminism. 'Gender is a social construct' is something you can argue about too in a logical way. It's the modern 'all of society is patriarchy, men are wrong by merely existing' that needs to go.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:27 PM
14

At least, not in a way that gets their sentence reduced. You have never once actually been involved in the criminal justice system in any capacity, have you? Happens literally all. the. time.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter