TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheRiff Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by TheRiff on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There actually is more to the story regarding Cho. Frank Cho and Greg Rucka seemed to not like each other very much. Cho says he was assured Rucka would have no say in his variant covers, Rucka says he was assured he would have ultimate veto power on anything related to his WW book. So then some of the covers start getting cropped, even going so far as to cut off Cho's signature. Cho made a big public stink about it and quit. And Cho continues to get commissions of muscly women yelling "Outrage!…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:27 AM
1

It actually caused a bit of an uproar in feminist circles when it was cancelled. Not just because it had moments like OP's, but also because the writers for "Sensation Comics Featuring Wonder Woman" were female and the Wonder Woman Rebirth book that replaced it (and other WW books) was an all-male team that had a better track record with the character. And the WW Rebirth book had variant covers by Frank Cho, which was salt in the wound to some feminists.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:02 PM
7

I feel like it's worth pointing out this is from a digital only* comic that was cancelled 2 years ago in preparation for the DC Rebirth reorganization. The author had more control to do things like this, possibly just because it was under the radar, but it was never the mainstream WW comic and its sales reflected that. Marvel pushed PC in mainstream comics, and doubled down on PC despite fan outcries. DC tried it here and there to see if it worked before committing, and backed down when they rea…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 06:46 AM
10

the longest running musical in Broadway history Third longest, after Phantom of the Opera and Cats.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:50 PM
1

He said, very clearly, that whether you are a man or a woman is determined by your genitals. That denies trans people exist. And gender isn't a "social construct". Parts of the human brain are different based on gender, and that includes trans people, who have brains that do not match their genitals. So you can go on and on about this all day but it doesn't change the fact that trans people's identity isn't subjective.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:09 PM
1

He may not have intended to do it, but he did it. He apologized and explained his misunderstanding, so I don't really care. It's over. But the quote doesn't belong with those other quotes.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:11 PM
6

The Claremont era is what made the X-Men huge I agree. Claremont also made one of the first openly gay heroes. Stories where religious leaders opposed mutants because they think they're "born unnatural". Implied a gay relationship between Destiny and Mystique, who he intended to be Nightcrawler's parents. An implied relationship between Storm and Yukio. And I never said the themes in X-Men weren't an allegory for racism. I only said it wasn't solely about race. It is an allegory for prejudice in…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:55 AM
3

I've read the first 200 issues of Uncanny X-Men, in addition to having read them since I was a kid, years before the cartoons even existed. Just because we disagree about certain aspects of the story doesn't mean I'm not a fan. If your'e going to try to belittle me by pretending I must not have as much experience with them as you do, this conversation is over.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:38 PM
2

Okay so, in an era where gay rights were much more controversial, when comics could be ripped off of shelves if they didn't obey the rules set by the comics code authority, I'm supposed to find an interview of Stan Lee talking about putting gay rights in a comic book? In an era of forced silence somehow that silence proves I'm wrong? Because his words mean nothing unless they're from the 60's? And you tell me I'm the one subscribing to "the author is dead" when my entire fucking argument is abou…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:31 PM
1

So you think Stan Lee lied about his intentions when he created X-Men?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:02 PM
4

Stan Lee is on record saying the X-Men were, from the very beginning, about prejudice of all kinds, and that they went out of their way to make sure anyone who had experienced prejudice of any kind could identify with them. And whether or not society at large had "homosexuality on the radar" we know Stan Lee cared, because he also had a gay character in Sgt. Fury only half a year later. So they were about race. But they were about homosexuality as well.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:51 PM
8

That Penny Arcade guy's quote doesn't belong there. It had nothing to do with misogyny or misandry. He was denying that trans people exist.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:13 PM
7

the LGBT people The mods of /r/LGBT are known to be extremists who censor discussions. That's the entire reason /r/ainbow was created. And it's really stupid to insult an entire group of people based on the actions of a few, considering that's the main complaint about people attacking the group this subreddit represents. It's really obvious confirmation bias on your part. And believe it or not, there's plenty of overlap between the two groups. Lots of LGBT people have reasons to be angry at the …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:09 PM
1

I've never met a woman who makes jokes like this that isn't: A) a girl too young to actually know about serious relationships or B) divorced, usually more than once, and quite unhappy about their own relationships
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:55 AM
2

Uh, no, she divorced him and settled with him for custody of the baby. She was afraid of kidnapping. That's not the same thing. This might resemble a lot of cases of women who unjustly take children away from their fathers, but only on the surface. For one, if Cruise wanted custody he'd either have it or the whole thing would still be tied up in court. He's backed by one of the biggest groups of some of the best lawyers in the world, who are known for forcing long drawn-out legal battles in orde…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:17 PM
1

Not only that but they're siding with Scientology, a cult that is associated with kidnapping, using the legal system to prevent legal information from being shared that criticizes Scientology, has a policy of openly attacking anyone who criticizes them on all fronts possible, brainwashing, among a million other suspicious activities. And Katie Holmes has even stated that the main reason for the divorce in the first place was because she feared they would abduct her daughter and use lawyer-bullyi…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:37 AM
3

But not sexual orientation, the one that would actually help him in this case.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:34 AM
2

Oh I think I see where you're going But wait, men can't be objectified because of patriarchy But these calendars are made by the same companies as the other ones Then they must also be objectifying women somehow Women would never buy a product that objectifies women So it must be for gay men But gay men don't objectify women But that's impossible because all men objectify women Therefore gay men don't exist So these calendars are a ploy to inflict their objectifying standards onto women and then…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:11 PM
1

What about them?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:33 PM
52

Wow they stole the male model calendars too? How can they possibly reconcile that with their views on patriarchy?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:54 AM
2

Maybe that's just what he wants us to think because in reality he's actually trying as hard as he can already. On the other hand, how hard can it be to draw some feet?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:42 PM
1

I would think money would cover it quite easily. Also being a stubborn, chest-puffing, bonehead should prevent him from even realizing anyone feels that way.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:17 PM
3

I could spend the rest of my life having no other conversation than "Rob Liefeld sucks" and I'd never run out of examples for why.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:13 AM
4

Uh, you know heteronormative includes strict gender roles, right? 123Simone28 didn't say anyone was gay, but the whole "guy's don't wear makeup and women do" is heteronormative, regardless of anyone's sexuality.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:10 PM
1

I'm pretending he was obsessed with the TV show Maude and not a person named Maud.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:28 AM
3

He was never the same after the show was cancelled... I blame the revamp where they made her a congresswoman. If they had stuck with the premise Bea Arthur probably wouldn't have gotten tired of the role as quickly.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:04 AM
2

Being gay is wrong, and only black people are gay. Is that how it works? Or is it Being black is wrong, because only gay people are black.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:32 PM
1

Just because a person is opposed to those kinds of laws doesn't mean they think private enterprises shouldn't be shamed when they turn people away for sexist (or other hateful) reasons. Most libertarians who oppose that kind of law do so because they fear government abuse regarding their oversight, not because they disagree with the sentiment.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:48 PM
1

That's the point. The hypothetical scenario points out the absurdity of assuming rape happened just because drinking was involved.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:54 PM
9

Only this outcome is equality What about "neither was raped"? If neither of them were trying to take advantage of the other's drunkenness, how is it rape?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:54 AM
41

You wanna watch the head of someone who believes this explode: two guys get drunk and have sex with each other. Who raped who? Answers I've heard: the one who asked first raped the second under the assumption that he was being domineering, the one who was the "man" raped the "woman", no rape because no woman, they raped each other, and my personal favorite: THAT COULD NEVER HAPPEN. Quick edit: To be fair, three of these answers came from the same person who kept backtracking.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:30 AM
3

I completely agree with that though. Wonder Woman's classic outfit looks ridiculous! Sexy is fine, but it should cover enough skin to be at least a little practical for a superhero! If she had a suit that was really tight but covered more, I think it would be a double standard, but not necessarily as it is. For me at least, it's more about how her costume looks dumb. A good example of this double standard would be if they were arguing to de-sexy Catwoman's fully-covering but skin-tight suit. Tho…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:49 PM
3

A bit of a nitpick, but while your definition of Bara is the general understanding of it in the English-speaking world, in Japan it was a genre distinguished because it got its start in a certain type of men's magazine, and was exclusively by and for men in the same way yaoi is generally understood to be by and for women. The fact that bara typically features muscular men is not a genre definition, but simply common due to popularity.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:12 PM
6

A sort of reverse of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"? That's interesting, I'd like to see some examples of this with different issues in history.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:18 PM
1

There was a time when that relationship is what marriage was. But thank God we have the government now to force us to ask permission first, otherwise those dumb commoners would marry their furniture by accident! Imagine the chaos if the masses could make decisions for themselves as if they were human beings!
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:32 AM
3

Then the message should really be "take marriage back from the government" and get married in a ceremony that is strictly non-legal... Now that I think about it, common law marriage laws might throw a wrench into that plan. So check your state laws first! Alternatively the message could be "don't marry a woman".
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:07 AM
4

And yet he got plenty of them. True story, I saw him surrounded by like 4 hot ladies at a bar once, doing lines of coke. Costume was on and everything.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 10:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter