TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheRkhaine Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by TheRkhaine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You should probably read up on the waves of feminism. There's four waves. That document was part of wave one. Wave two is the equality I was talking about. Wave three calls for inclusion and I agree with some of it on the foundation I believe in when it comes to equal protections. Four is where you start seeing the more extremist views of feminism come to light. But to sit there and encompass the entire definition with select negative connotations is disingenuous. I know feminists who's beliefs …
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:29 AM
-1

It's always relied on a disparity of outcome. The difference is you have Feminism like what I described, where it should be in a maintenance mode considering the law technically is equal now, and then there's the extremist feminism that wants equity and for men to be punished for [reason here]. Because the law makes it illegal to treat women less than men, it should be easy to people to go after the companies they claim are underpaying them, etc., no?
/r/MensRights10/01/26 01:01 AM
3

Statistically speaking, men are more likely to get openly attacked on the street. Women are more likely to experience sexual violence and harassment, men are most likely to experience physical violence in general. That said, why do these questions get brought up? Curious because when I usually see it, it involves whataboutism, when people should be focusing less on whataboutism and more on stopping the behaviors across the board.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:51 AM
-10

Feminism is fine so long as it pertains to its original intent: equality. Outside of that, then it's just as guilty as pushing the same negative treatment and behaviors they say they stand up against.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:32 AM
6

The problem is when you start trying to label people terrorists because they "may do..." something sets a bad standard and isn't a road you want to go down. It lays the ground work for people to be labelled terrorists for negligible reasons simply because they're protesting something. This is antithetical to the spirit of free speech. Unless people in the 4b movement start actually committing violence to push political ideals, they can't and shouldn't be labeled terrorists. You'd probably have a…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:34 AM
8

It's weird how her supporters just accept her sexism.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 04:20 PM
1

To be fair, it doesn't actually say who does the penetrating. It just says if penetration occurs. If the guy still says no and there's penetration, it still matches the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:43 AM
2

Prohibit individuals from accessing or using single-sex facilities on federal property other than those corresponding to their biological sex. This is equal protection.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:19 AM
2

"Systemic" is a just a fancy way of saying "this happens because...". The irony is anything can become systemic based on its definition. Its also a descriptor used in victim mentality to try and justify equally egregious behavior. Historically, women have been victims in patriarchal societies. However, there aren't many truly patriarchal societies around compared to historical numbers, contrary to what many believe. By trying to justify violence against men as equitable retaliation as a social a…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 08:05 PM
2

A guy can be made to penetrate a woman against his will.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:33 AM
50

You could have just told her that not all women experience racism but all men are affected by misandry.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:23 AM
3

Ah...yes, I can understand your pain because I pay attention to UK politics as well. At this point its hard not to pay attention to the state of the world if you want the world to be a better place.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:11 PM
11

I'm in the same vein. I'm very much a pro-liberty liberal and it's surprising the lack of self-awareness when identity politics come into play in the progressive circles. Like, I can understand the historical context into why they may believe what they do, but at the same time they're narrowing their viewpoints and alienating swaths of the population by holding views that are technically sexist and racist themselves.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:02 PM
7

As someone who went to school for I and big data, you are correct. AI isn't biased. It makes its decision based on the programmed algorithms and the data it was provided. Algorithms can be manipulated to make it look biased, the information in a database can also be heavily skewed, but that's not the fault of AI as a whole, but the humans involved in building it.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 06:21 PM
29

The of equality would state that is an all boys school breeds hypermasculinity, then an all girl school would breed hyperfemininity. Both are bad.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:38 PM
2

Its not even true feminism at this point. This person reach the stage of feminazi-supremacy.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:58 PM
44

Also, men happen to be a minority in the US as well.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:52 PM
1

Equity is the poison that causes riots and discourse in society.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:02 PM
2

It's saddening that they're oblivious to their own hate.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 01:49 PM
3

FDS is a cesspool of misandry...pretty much most of the time. While it does offer some honestly sound advice sometimes, the overall environment is one that promotes female superiority and benefit strictly for females. I do not believe all their users adhere to their beliefs there, nor are all of them as narrow as you may feel but I can understand why you feel the way you do over the general consensus there. I'm going to offer some advice: there is no such thing as THE ideal man. Just like there'…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:04 PM
6

Yeah, there's some closeted bigotry there when I saw that they don't allow criticism of non-dominant religions versus all religions in general.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:45 PM
1

The only reason this is allowed is because its technically a non-profit. Its a non-profit bootcamp used to build skills for a specific group of people. There are men-only non-profits as well. I couldn't find a technical bootcamp that offers the same services but there's nothing stopping the creation of one, either.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:51 PM
25

The sad part is whenever I hear companies talk about being inclusive, it's inclusive to everyone...unless you're a cishet white male. If you are one of those, your opinions and feelings are invalid for the sake of equity. I can only speak from a US point of view but the labor laws, when it comes to discrimination, seem to be similar.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:20 PM
0

There's some deep rooted hatred in her but your dad isn't wrong, mainly because he married your mom for a reason and saw some good in her. I'm presuming he believes that having a healthy relationship with your mom may help her see the error of her ways. Your mom comes off as someone who has experienced some sort of trauma, albeit from a man; and probably needs to talk to a therapist. I'm sorry if that comes off wrong but I've seen that kind of behavior from abuse survivors, especially the narcis…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:46 PM
6

I agree with you 100%. I've had similar thoughts and when I voiced such comments, I was told that for the sake of equity, these behaviors must be allowed to thrive. Which still bothers me, because it's just perpetrating the problem. It creates a paradox.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter