TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheSandbergPrinciple Archive

View 26 posts and 1,145 comments by TheSandbergPrinciple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
51

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:00 PM
22

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:49 PM
20

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 04:57 PM
17

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 11:01 PM
16

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 05:40 PM
13

DebateTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 05:35 PM
13

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:24 AM
13

DebateTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 11:32 PM
9

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 05:26 PM
9

Question for BluePillTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:29 PM
8

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 04:18 PM
7

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 04:46 PM
7

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 12:07 AM
6

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 03:01 AM
6

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:31 AM
5

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 06:26 PM
3

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:49 PM
3

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 04:22 AM
2

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:48 PM
2

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:30 PM
1

TheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:31 PM
1

CMVTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 08:15 PM
1

TheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:08 PM
1

TheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:31 PM
1

DiscussionTheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 01:28 AM
0

TheSandbergPrinciple/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 04:42 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,145 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The problem with feminists is that you aren't a political movement for the equalization of the sexes, you act more like a union trying to get the best deal you can, even if it's at the expense of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 10:54 PM
7

Feminists made their bed, a lot of us gave up on love considering how modern women turned out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 03:51 AM
1

It's not so much he was exchanging drugs for sex, but the fact that he was a the archetypical dangerous bad boy (and looked and acted like it) that made him super successful with women. Pointdexter dolling out mollies isn't going to get nearly the same sexual success as that dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 10:39 PM
1

Because he's a typical dark triad bad boy who pumps and dumps lots of girls? There were a lot of lonely guys on campus who would have romanced these girls, but niceness is like kryptonite to a western woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 10:26 PM
5

TIL the tatted up drug dealer in college was the most kind and caring person to have fucked a ton of girls, a lot more than any other dude i knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 10:05 PM
11

As dave chappelle once said, 'if you could fuck a woman in a cardboard box, you would NEVER buy a house'. Essentially true. Women drive the economy: first because they're materialistic and will buy useless shit and second: because they drive men to buy shit to impress women and prove they're provider material.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/16 04:58 PM
1

Thats a load of BS. Birds of a feather flock together. I never saw the guys that were Chads from my school with average looking girls. Never. Ever. That's because they're fucking those girls, not holding their hands to class. Like i said, "Of course Chads will fuck average chicks, as long as he doesn't have to pay attention to her, spend money on her, etc." I am aware of the infamous bodybuilding dating website experiments. Many of the guys that message on dating website are fake/stalkers/bots/w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 10:11 PM
7

There was a poll a few years ago that Atheists were disliked more than Muslims in this country. You are out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 08:51 PM
1

Look at the instagram's and facebook's of the Chads in your life. Can you honestly sit there and tell me with a straight face that there are a ton of photos of them with average looking girls? Yes? The bodybuilding forum has done multiple experiments where they find some fat ugly woman's photo, created a fake profile on a dating site with said photo, and gotten tons of replies from average/above average dudes msging her. Of course Chads will fuck average chicks, as long as he doesn't have to pay…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 08:43 PM
1

Whatever it is, it disprove your theory that women are 'intimidated' by dudes who are way above their SMV, and not even the vows of marriage will stop that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 08:18 PM
1

They aren't paid to fuck, they are paid to dance around for the ladies, just like female strippers are. The difference is, you're not allowed to even touch female strippers while almost brides to be are going to be blowing/fucking the male strippers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 08:04 PM
1

As I posted about previously, many women are intimidated by guys that are way above their SMV, and they admit it. The whole TRP idea of hypergamy is questionable. Like attracts like. Bullshit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5ag3w8/re_women_assessing_sexual_partners_actually_they/ Somehow i doubt all the cheating ass hoes who blow/fuck male strippers before their wedding are near the same smv as the male strippers they blow/fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 07:59 PM
1

At the very least the mods verified that he was a male stripper. Besides that, there are lots of weird people with weird fetishes. I personally don't understand the 'cakefarting' fetish but that's a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 07:45 PM
1

The mods verified that he was indeed a male stripper, doubt he would need to make shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 07:43 PM
4

Low N Count, Loyal, Sweet, Gentle, Not Materialistic, Not Loud, doesn't care about dumb shit like Kim Kardashian or whatever dumbass celebrity is doing these days. Basically the opposite of your modern woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 07:42 PM
2

so you admit you don't know after all! now we're getting somewhere. i live near a big city, but the club i went to was on the outskirts so perhaps it was tamer (though that would just mean men might act even wilder in the city). There's probably more truth that women act like whores around male strippers than some fictional reality where women don't act like whores around super attractive men and their sexuality is more 'complicated'. imagine that. Yeah, imagine a reality where male sexuality is…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:16 AM
3

you don't have to nitpick like this just to disagree with her point. she started with a disclaimer, everyone understood. move on. Not a nitpick, she said one thing then completely contradicted herself. fair enough; i do live in a somewhat conservative area. however, we've now moved from "any woman will do anything with male strippers in secret and they're just waiting for their chance!" to "well, maybe in some places, or not...". No, i was just speculating, however, considering most people live …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 01:05 AM
6

well yeah, she established that she didn't mean all women, and went on with her point because repeating that would be annoying. just like how people will say "general you" and then just say "you" from that point on. This doesn't have any meaning to me in relation to what i was quoting. She didn't even preface it by saying something like 'some' or 'most' women. i don't think so. perhaps at one point, but i'm pretty sure that's just an outdated joke now. Maybe if you live in a more conservative ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:51 AM
5

"sexually liberated women"... aka, 'modern women', 'feminists', 'whores'. Whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:38 AM
7

If the overwhelming majority of brides to be are giving blow jobs/having sex with male strippers, then no man should ever marry. That's the big secret that nobody knows about. There's a difference between going to a boy band and going to a bachelorette party right before your marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:37 AM
10

Says she wasn't speaking for all women, then speaks for all women: Women don't really think like this. We appreciate a good looking dude, but if we're ever going to think about him sexually it'll be after we've gotten to know him or know about him a bit. Of course this is a complete lie. Just take a woman to a strip club and you'll see how they act. "party girls acting wild in a party place doesn't really disprove what she said though" It's very common for women to go get a male stripper for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 12:36 AM
4

Because a boy who has an older brother or dad who knows WTF he's talking about can help him kill it in the sexual market place. I gave my nephew some TRP-lite advice and he finally has a girlfriend. Of course if the parents are blue pill morons they should keep their mouths shut.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 04:44 PM
2

Pffft, it's like putting one brick in at a time. Patience my dear :D
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 05:47 PM
1

Glad you admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 02:41 PM
1

Interestingly, the distribution of ratings for each sex looks very similar to the OKCupid study with men's ratings distributed more evenly than women's. Figure. I remember when i pointed this out, Bloopers were making a ton of excuses due to the way OKCupid operates, something about if you rated someone too high, they would get a msg. And women get too many msg's as it is, so they rated men low to avoid that. Turns out Bloopers are full of shit, who knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 02:33 PM
3

More like he has a 'sees reality as it is' issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 06:16 PM
3

Did you read my post? Women bring NEGATIVE value. Your post was the most AWALT thing i've ever read. Haha, 'bring to the table', as if having a decent job and being a decent person isn't enough. Thanks for validating TRP. My best friend's roommate was a drug dealer who got tons of pussy. What does he bring to the table? Tingles. Fuck providing these worthless women with a lifestyle they don't deserve, i'd rather be THAT guy than some sucker.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 06:15 PM
5

Sorry guys, now that women aren't handed out like participation trophies, you actually have to bring value to the table. This is why marrying outside of the country is becoming more and more popular. My friend, who is average by all standards, married a beautiful eastern European woman. He couldn't be happier. He was smart enough to marry one that was super religious and evenc converted to her religion (Orthodox). And other men just drop out and anesthetize themselves with porn and videogames. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:47 PM
2

Oh yeah, i'm sure women will next chads. Women don't like being pumped and dumped, but they will do so with chads anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 07:50 PM
8

I'm seeing a lot of men who can beat the competition and get laid/secure commitment, but they still aren't happy. Aren't you? I'm quite happy. The biggest thing i learned from TRP is to focus on my own happiness, not on the happiness of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 01:45 PM
4

If women enjoyed sex like men do, the earth would be exponentially overpopulated more than it is now. These idiotic ideas are perpetrated by moron feminists. Ignore them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 05:46 PM
1

This is the problem with blue pill thinking, nobody gives a crap about anecdotes like this when they're trying to improve their lot in life. Yes, it's possible i could win the powerball too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 05:57 PM
5

1) Because it's so uncommon. Not really. Lots of lonely older women with younger men wanting to get easy pussy. It's fairly common now. Cougars are everywhere. 2) Society is conditioned to see women as victims more than men. Now we're getting somewhere
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 05:30 PM
22

Now explain why nobody has a problem with a young dude and and old woman. crickets The real answer is because an old guy + young girl pairing reminds old women how worthless they are to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:10 PM
5

What's your bar for someone to be worthwhile? Low n-count, preferably virgin Someone who chooses me not because they ran out of options and desperately need provisions, but because they desire me for me. Someone who doesn't daydream about the 'one that got away'.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 10:28 PM
5

This is what we call a zero sum game. Worthwhile women are a rare breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 10:11 PM
16

Imagine in your youth that you're used to driving Lambos and Bugatis but once you turn 35, you're forced to give up those cars and drive a Toyota Camry due to circumstances. Sure the Camry breaks down less/is more dependable, and has much better gas mileage, but you are probably going to be resentful that you had to trade way down to a less exciting car. Trust no woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 07:26 PM
2

And yet it's the thugs and players who are getting pussy. Watch what women do, not what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/16 07:19 PM
1

Who gives a fuck. The badboy gets all the girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/16 02:37 PM
2

Do you honestly believe he would have gotten to where he was if he stayed a pussy?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/16 02:35 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/4ih7dm/the_sub_rniceguys_often_likes_to_make_fun_of_guys/d2y3w46 You are wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/16 01:59 AM
2

hint: your problem almost certainly isn't that you're "too nice". If he says it, i believe it to be 100% true Tupac was a total gentleman (aka a pussy whipped blue pill bitch) when he was young and he couldn't get pussy. Then he realized that treating women nicely was what prevented him from attracting women. Guess which version of Tupac got all the pussy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AHH0bdNKyM
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/16 01:56 AM
1

You can be an ugly mofo with no money and marry an ugly broad with no money and the most "high value" hot thot will now want you, because plain and simply a women wants a man who's willing to commit, take risks and not overthink the bullshit. The amount of bullshit you guys spew is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 07:47 PM
3

And whining about social constructs when it's based on biology is idiotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 11:50 PM
1

There's no such thing as socially constructed gender. It's all biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:03 PM
1

Perhaps that is why we are the dominant species then.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 04:29 AM
3

Whenever you guys develop some mass hypnosis technique or some genetic re-engineering that destroys patriarchy forever, please wake me up, in the meantime, the rest of us will live in the real world where men and women are different thanks to biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 04:25 AM
3

"listen to what women do, not what they say" is a major tenant of TRP. The crybaby beta bitch bp feminist men aren't the ones getting laid. The stoic alpha is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 03:32 AM
6

Feminism fights against gender rolls... for women. Feminist women reinforce gender rolls by the type of men they fuck. I don't need to provide proof. The overwhelming majority of men have not been hit on. A minority of men in the history of the planet successfully reproduced, that's all the proof you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:42 PM
3

Yes, because their SMV is astronomical. 6'3" men who have ripped bodies and model good looks can experience something similar. The point is, 99.99% of the time, it will have to be men who initiate. All the feminism in the world isn't going to change that, and ironically, it probably exacerbates it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:11 PM
8

My point is, for 99% of men, they have not experienced that. Gender roles are here to stay, thanks to biology, no amount of trying to reprogram society is going to change that. Feminism is a mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:09 PM
1

I like women with a slim waist and an above average bust size not because it's the 'least attainable', it's because that's what my biology told me to be attracted to. If everyone women looked like that, my biology isn't going to tell me i'm attracted to something else. Fatness signified wealth in the middle ages, not 'oh man i want to fuck that', that's why they were sought after. You think painters are going to paint emaciated people who haven't had a haircut/took a bath? Of course fat people a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:08 PM
6

Yes, i've seen that happen as well, for the overwhelming majority of men, that does not happen at all. You think Leonardo Dicaprio needs to pull many, if any, moves to do this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2331383/Leonardo-DiCaprio-surrounds-bevvy-scantily-clad-women-aboard-luxury-yacht.html You probably attribute that to him being a 'feminist', rather than being one of the most desired men on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:04 PM
2

Yes, women are attracted to self esteem. However, when you do tests to see if women prefer taller men, you aren't testing self esteem, you are only testing height, and guess what, the tall guys win it. Fat people were attractive because for most of our history, people starved to death. Now first world countries have too much damn cheap food making people fat. Of course poor people would want to be with the fat people, there were so few of them and those fatties were royalty! That doesn't mean be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:45 PM
2

It's not fair that men aren't typically attracted to fat women, thus i don't see any reason to keep living by it! It's not fair that women are mostly attracted to taller men, thus i don't see any reason to keep living by it! Girls can whore around all they want, but don't expect men to find that attractive as an LTR. It's not society telling me i should be repulsed by sluts, it's my own biology, and your attempts to try to reprogram me and a lot of other men are futile.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:37 PM
9

So, being above gender rolls does not mean that you will not have to flirt, date, and ultimately woo a girl for her to want to sleep / date you. Interesting how 'being above gender rolls' means it's the men who have to be the initiator while women are allowed to be passive in this mating ritual. What a load of bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:30 PM
2

Yes, it is a socially based double standard, and it's because it's born into our biology that we as a society to adopt this double standard. You will find this is true across almost all cultures. It's interesting that virtually every culture allows boys to fuck around while trying to protect girls. It's not an accident
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:26 PM
2

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-04/iu-eia043002.php Shit, it even isn't being a slut, it's just having sexual intercourse early on, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:17 PM
2

Because the experience of one person is useless when you're talking about the population as a whole, that study i talked about, i bet you will find young girls who don't have low self esteem who fuck around a lot too, but the average is what matters. How is this not obvious to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:04 PM
2

above average... by 1 inch. So unremarkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:03 PM
2

Because feeling like a 'winner' and 'loser' when it comes to sex is built into our lizard brains. There was a study done that showed that teenage girls who had a lot of sexual partners had low self esteem while teenage boys had a lot of self esteem. This isn't because of 'patriarchy' or anything, this is because of millions of years of evolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:56 PM
11

Mental health is something lacking in TRP suggestions on how to become a better man, that's why i meditate every day. As a result, my 'give no fucks' attitude is off the charts and i don't really give a shit about women or how they act, who treats them like garbage, etc. etc. etc. I used to have the same anxiety, same anger at women, anger at alphas as you etc. but meditation (and lifting) cured all that. Shit, i used to get nervous around HB7's and above, now they're nothing to me. You still ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:51 PM
2

The 'feels good' function is incentive to procreate, that's evolution for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 03:15 PM
4

Well, it's certainly unsafe for thin skinned SJW's (feminists and their male feminist allies), that's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 02:33 AM
13

I like how women can have internalized misogyny but men can't have internalized misandry, is what you're implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 02:33 AM
1

Getting laid and getting into a relationship require initial attraction. It's not that different. If you're giving 'just be yourself' as advice for both (or either one of them), then your advice is garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 11:02 PM
0

Obviously, you wouldn't ask an incel for dating advice. Still doesn't change the fact that 99% of dating advice given by women is garbage. Also, getting dating advice from the 6'3 model with chiseled abs probably isn't helpful either. The most useful advice you can get is from an average/above average due who slays.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 10:59 PM
13

Feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:47 AM
2

It's all on a sliding scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:39 PM
5

Being a pussy (BP) vs. Not being a pussy (TRP), gee i wonder what is harder. It's easier to be an effete passive feminist bitch boy rather than someone who takes life by the nuts and shapes their own reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 06:50 PM
1

You don't become rich by being idiotic with money like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:32 PM
2

Trump never remarried the SAME woman and he fucked over Ivana with an ironclad prenup (there's a hilarious SNL sketch about it, btw) that gave her peanuts. Sorry, no pussy is worth billions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:20 PM
1

My advice to her would be to find the man who excites her sexually... then don't fuck him. Girl game him into submission. You want her to find men who have lots of options and then withold sex? Yeah, i don't think you're talking about Miranda Kerr here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:22 PM
11

I think i've told this story before, but i saw Michael Cera at a bar with 40+ girls drooling over him. If he weren't a celebrity, he'd probably be an incel. The guy is a huge fucking dork. TRP is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:02 PM
2

Teach men not to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 01:14 PM
2

Too many are like that to make it worthwhile to play that sort of russian roulette
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 01:13 PM
5

If you aren't going to have sex with your future hubsand, be up front about it before marriage so they can run the fuck away. Women are the ultimate fraudsters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 04:22 PM
4

I stopped giving a shit about what women say they want and it's worked wonders for me. If they want some emotional tampon, they have a see of pathetic betas she can use their shoulder to cry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 04:21 PM
6

Far more women go to college than men do and that statistic is getting wider. We will see a 70-30 split in 10 or so years. Who do you think these women are marrying? The man who says 'fuck this' and drops out of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 10:37 PM
6

Statistically women want marriage more than men do. And marriage rates are going down. Do the math.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:26 PM
2

TIL i need to lock my husband up in the basement. whoops. Essentially yes, it's YOUR wedding, it's YOUR house, it's YOUR kids, etc. Even when the man is paying for fucking everything, it has to be a certain way for the wife for it to be 'our home' (her home really) ... typically wth good reason. men aren't incapable of doing the same if the situation is appropriate. The only reason is because women marry up. If we switched it up and men married women who made more than them, you will see alimony…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:11 PM
5

I imagine it's self selection, no woman who fucked up is going to come here and admit they fucked up. How many women even post here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:56 PM
5

It's women who are bitching about all the 'good guys' being gone when it comes to marriage, fuck that shit. Women are the ones who initiate divorces. Women are the ones who think the home belongs to her and men get relegated to the garage or basement. Women are the ones that withold sex. Women are the ones who are most likely to collect child support/alimony. Marriage is dangerous for MEN. WE are the ones who have to think hard about getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:48 PM
6

Then the wall hits and then the panic hits. Any man with a job and a full set of teeth are going to think twice about marrying a 30+ year old. Biology is a bitch, ain't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:39 PM
7

We respond to incentives. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. You wanted feminism? You got it in spades. Porn/Weed/occasionally fucking around/video games sure sound a helluva lot better than the slow painful death women give men these days. You can be 'strong and independent' all you want, but you can do so without us.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:22 PM
4

If it's not a false report, what is it? Indeterminate. We only know of false reports when accusers do stupid shit like accuse someone of rape when they do stupid shit like accuse someone of rape when they're out of the country or there are text messages that show the act was consensual. The problem is rape. False reporting is also a problem, but seriously, there are far more rapes than false reports. We don't know how much more. What we do know is feminists want to convict men JUST on the word o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 08:25 PM
4

2-8% are false reports, the other 92-98% are real reports. That's not a comment on the guilt or innocence of either party, just that the report was made in what I assume is good faith - the victim believed something happened. What else do you want? 92-98% are NOT 'real' reports, as in we can prove a rape happened. You're making shit up. Someone can file a rape cape not because they BELIEVED something happened, but because they wanted revenge. So now you're debunking your own sources? I'm debunki…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 07:04 PM
5

Wait, you want your source to say it's as high as 8%, but also that we can't tell at all? You can't have it both ways. Yes, because saying 2-8% are false does NOT mean 92-98% are true, do you understand English? Here, let me spell it out for you: Dr. Lisak's report shows that 58.8% fall into the vast gray area referenced above where we simply don't know whether it was a rape, a non-rape, or a false claim (and, again, from the innocent male's perspective, it makes little difference whether a wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 06:39 PM
2

Something like 1 in 2 have been sexually assaulted Ahahahahahaha, if you believe that, you are the biggest fool ever. Sexual assaults have dropped down a LOT from the last couple decades. Basically you think 200% of women were sexually assaulted in college back in the 80's.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:54 PM
4

Total speculation. There will be dozens of articles about why he was acquitted. It's not speculation, it's fact. He can never have a public life. He will never be hired again. Ok, 8 percent. That's still not oppression by women, especially when 68% go unreported. The point isn't about the exact number, it's about the apparent magnitude of the problem. 2-8% is incredibly small and should never be considered a larger problem than the fact that rape happens much more frequently than anyone is comfo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:44 PM
3

Um, wasn't Jian Ghomeshi just acquited? Weren't there Blue Pillers in this thread talking about how shitty the women were for doing that to him? His life is ruined, his career is ruined. Feminists will continue to make his life a living hell. And statistics indicate the exact opposite of what you just said You can tell when a feminist is a liar when they bring up the 2-8 percent statistic, then lop off the 8 percent http://www.nsvrc.org/publications/articles/false-reports-moving-beyond-issue-suc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:12 PM
5

To say that anti-women oppression should be upheld by society equally with pro-women feminism because all ideas should be respected equally is a total misunderstanding of what society values, and what the various groups are asking for. The goal is the removal of oppression. Feminists have become the oppressors. Look at virtually every fake rape case. Men's lives are ruined before anyone even bothers looking at evidence, and even when evidence points to innocence, nobody cares, the damage is done…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 04:48 PM
6

Here's a thought exercise, you brought up racists, but where are racists accepted in our society? Feminists are accepted by media/corporations/educational institutions, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 04:33 PM
4

And who is fighting against misandry? And how successful are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 04:03 PM
2

Women stand idly and silently nod their heads while this shit happens because they benefit from it. The only ones standing up to this BS are explicitly anti-feminist women, but they get shit on by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 03:33 PM
8

The way ideas are presented: their wording, their phrasing, the tone, the intent behind all of those things That's a long winded way of saying, "MY FEELINGS!"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:21 AM
1

He had a serious mental illness of course he coudln't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 03:20 AM
5

They treat women nicely, thinking that's what will attract them, when being cocky/indifferent/aloof/a bit of a jerk has a higher success rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:01 PM
1

Only a fool would accept marriage period, women lie about their count.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:56 AM
2

therefore short men can propagate their genes. Overly simplistic way of looking genetics. Jeremy Lin is like 6'3" and his parents are both under 5'5". Shit is more random than you think
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:55 AM
6

Women are the majority initiators of divorce Women with high n-counts are statistically more likely to be unhappy in a marriage Do the math. High n-count women are statistically worthless for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 07:07 PM
1

It kinda does. If sleeping around gives you bad self esteem and you still do it....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 12:48 AM
5

Studies show young girls who have lots of sex have poor self esteem (opposite for young boys). Studies also show that women who are married who had high n-counts are more dissatisfied with their marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 11:57 PM
24

It's completely the man's fault: He got married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 06:16 AM
1

Most men are exactly that way. If men were more discerning, women , even average looking or with shitty attitudes, wouldn't have thousands of dicks thrown their way throughout their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 07:32 PM
2

Men have to actively do things to keep women feeling loved. Women simply need to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 05:14 AM
2

Ah yes, because the most radical thing you can do is vote for hillary clinton, a moderate conservative posing as a liberal, over bernie sanders. Gloria Steinem is dumb as shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 05:13 AM
1

Men are dropping out of marriage because women are delaying marriage for career, you got cause and effect backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:01 AM
1

The fuck are you talking about? More men choosing industrial careers = more men vs women being injured. That just basic statistics, it has nothing to do with male/female relations. There will always be undesirable, more high risk jobs. No question. The fact that more men than women choose to do them has nothing to do with women being inadequate/lazy bitches. It has to do with the fact that women simply aren't risk takers, whether we're talking about risky jobs to one's health or entrepreneurial …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:01 AM
3

The Department of Labor’s Time Use Survey, for example, finds that the average full-time working man spends 8.14 hours a day on the job, compared to 7.75 hours for the full-time working woman. Employees who work more likely earn more. Men working five percent longer than women alone explains about one-quarter of the wage gap. ... There are numerous other factors that affect pay. Most fundamentally, men and women tend to gravitate toward different industries. Feminists may charge that women are s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 03:50 AM
1

If you say so http://www.cityam.com/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/content-editors/images/u40097/Screen%20Shot%202014-02-25%20at%2009.40.31.png
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 03:35 AM
1

You forgot to add that the overwhelming majority of industrial deaths are men, that men work much harder, that women are far from being risk takers, that men will work through sickness and injuries while women need fainting couches if their feelings get hurt. Yet you want it all without risk or hard work.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 03:15 AM
1

Don't care about your anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 03:13 AM
11

I'm just going to copy/paste this: The Male Romantic Fantasy I'd say that men usually feel most loved when this normal state of affairs is negated; when they are made to believe that a woman's love is not conditional in the cause-and-effect manner described in the parent post. Love is work for men, but it can be rewarding work when things are going smoothly and the woman is happy as a result. But the male romantic fantasy is to be shown that the woman feels the same way and stands by him when he…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 03:09 AM
1

I thought TRP was all about rejecting monogamy? So wouldn't men moving away from that social construct also lead to the current issue you've identified? We're rejecting it because women want their cake and eat it too. AFBB. Being a beta to some over the hill hag is enabling this behvaior. Back when women were feminine, more loyal, and married younger, monogamy made sense. Then the pill/feminism happened and made marriage dangerous for men. Wouldn't better access to birth control, abortions, etc …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 10:15 PM
3

Statistically, in America, women go for bullshit college degrees, then cry about the wage gap (which happens because men go for harder disciplines which pay better and men work longer hours than women do, take less sick/vacation days as well).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 10:09 PM
1

How does that contribute to less population growth? Because monogamy was an artificial social construct that reigned in hypergamy. Now hypergamy is almost unrestricted. Now instead of high value women settling down with high value men, even average chicks are going after high value men and there's no commitment/marriage because the high value men are spinning harems. For example, the extreme wealth disparity in America. Which only exacerbates hypergamy and it's effects on a dwindling population.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 07:29 PM
1

Blue Collar pays much better when you factor in opportunity cost/risk. Of course women think they're too good for blue collar work even if it pays better. Women crave status.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 06:18 AM
3

Easier to do with Chad than faithful Beta Bob
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 06:17 AM
1

Not understanding how this has to do with hypergamy, even if you blame it on a decline in population. Women waiting to have children until they are older/having less children isn't necessarily a bad thing. Less population also equals less population to take care of as they age. I fail to see how this is a "but for hypergamy" argument. I just explained to you the direction connection between hypergamy/feminism to a declining population to an inverted population to not enough young people working …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 06:17 AM
1

That's blue collar... They pay well. In fact, one could argue better since you don't lose the opportunity cost + the actual cost of going to college (not to mention the risk cost of not actually getting a job). WHEN should they START a career? Like go to school? Lol...this isn't that hard. If not at 18, WHEN. LOL Who says you can't go to school for a job AND look for a husband at the same time? Besides that, women whine about not getting into tech, but there are now programming boot camps that l…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 04:31 AM
1

Yes, if you believe retirees deserve social security + medicare At some point, the taxes you will have to extract from the young to pay for that shit will be so onerous that the system will crumble because young people will figure out it's not worth it to work just to hand over their paychecks to the old. People will pay taxes when they can see the benefits themselves, but not when it's a wholesale transfer from one person to the next.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 04:29 AM
1

Hypergamy + the pill + feminism = less marriage. Before the pill/feminism we used to have something like 3+ babies per women. After feminism, we have under replacement level births (replacement level = 2.1 babies per woman). This is compounded by the fact that women give birth later.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 04:08 AM
1

Is it? Because there are more women in school than men ;) Doesn't mean they all want to be careerists. Part of the reason why even women who go to college to get a Ms. Degree is because men are dropping out of college. Also, how are you going to have this 'decent' white collar job without going to school...which presumably HE did. The trades. Of course we all know how much women like working with their hands and marrying men without college degrees though ;) And pretty sure you said you can have…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 04:07 AM
1

Yes. We will have an inverted population pyramid around 2050/2060
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 04:03 AM
0

What the hell are you talking about, nobody said you have to start your career at 30. If you have a husband who works and you both have decent white collar jobs, you can afford childcare while you work. I would prefer Solipsism
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:57 AM
2

Hypergamy + the death of marriage/monogamy means lots of 'YOUNG INDEPENDENT WOMEN' chasing too few alpha dicks, while nice guy betas get mad and drop out of society or when they turn 30 and they didn't fuck up/have a career, they fuck around to make up for lost time. More and more women are finding out that the 'nice guys' who they thought would wait for them when they were 30 aren't there anymore and won't be willing to commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:54 AM
2

You always have time for a career. Young women don't seem to understand that if she wants a marriage with a quality man and children, the odds are actually stacked against her starting out of the gate and having lots of dicks thrown her way gives her an illusion of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:42 AM
0

I'm not aware of feminists shaming SAHMs, but I'm not saying I don't believe you. Any examples you can share? Mitt Romney's wife when she claimed she worked as a SAHM, she got hammered by feminists. Feminists think SAHMs are traitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:38 AM
5

I'm saying it's an additional explanation. She finds Chad sexually desireable. She probably likes Beta Bob doing shit for her and being all nice for her (the ultimate setup would be to fuck Chad and use Beta Bob as an emotional tampon). However, messy breakings is an extra reason why she wouldn't want to go after Beta Bob. Beta Bob had a much easier time of it before the sexual revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:37 AM
1

Not sure what this has to do with my OP
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:33 AM
1

1) https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/44ixsi/cmv_the_reason_why_many_young_modern_women_dont/czqoxma 2) Men are dropping out of looking for marriage/settling down looking for a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:32 AM
1

Hypergamy means Alphas will fuck around, not have kids while women settle down with betas and have kids later in age.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:31 AM
1

Nope, by roughly 2050/2060, we will have too many old people and not enough young to support them. Hypergamy means babies are not being born at replacement level.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:30 AM
-4

"I'M A STRONG INDEPENDENT WOMAN, I DON'T NEED NO MAN!" I think that's a big part of it. Feminists shame women who are SAHM's. I think that's a big part of why many 30-something women who aren't married yet and who don't have children are on anti-depressants.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 01:15 AM
7

Isn't it just "Chads" just inspire more sexual desire in them? I'm a big proponent of that argument as well. I'm saying both are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 01:02 AM
1

Missing out on both Alpha dick and the ability to get the career they want. It's a double whammy. Hypergamy is going to destroy this nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 12:40 AM
2

When she says men have the power, she means men who meet a minimum level of looks/status, not every single dude. Obviously the engineering department is going to have a lot of incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 05:42 PM
2

Read the rest of the article. Read the part where there are lots of lonely men. That should be impossible if it's 60% female to 40% male on campuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 04:42 PM
2

When laws are passed to cap congressmen salary to 50K a year, then honest people will do the job. Nope, that would only increase the incentive to be more corrupt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 06:24 AM
1

it does not prove hypergamy. When you look at the whole campus it does https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/44ev5a/cmv_many_rp_ideas_such_as_hypergamy_are_greatly/czprnbl
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 06:19 AM
2

Correct. Your taking a small portion of men, allowing them to go into a wild party, with many more girls than guys, and leaving the rest of the men out. It's forcing the women to compete for a small number of men. This makes no sense at all, most colleges have an abundance of women vs. men, there are a lot of colleges where the ratio is 60:40 female to male due to men not going to college and women STILL ignore half the guys under those circumstances: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 06:18 AM
1

Is your boyfriend monogamous? If so, i had a friend who's roommate was a drug dealer and he had tons of hot college chicks jump in his bed. He's infinitely more sexually successful than your BF. Of course I find my boyfriend physically attractive. You don't say. If he were joe average, he'd be invisible. You like your BF IN SPITE of him being a 'nice guy'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:23 PM
5

Speaking as a "Bernie Bro" who happens to be a Terper, i really only dislike feminism. And you can see why as Hillary Clinton is trying to turn the debate between herself and Bernie as much as she can about sexism rather than issues. Feminists are going to destroy progressiveism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:20 PM
7

Saying to a woman, "I'm a nice guy!" is like going into a job interview and saying, "I didn't steal from my last employer!" It's such a basic requirement that the fact you feel the need to mention it...seems a little suspicious. Stupid analogy, because being nice is a detriment to triggering the animalistic attraction in women by itself. Here's a better analogy: Try joining a biker gang by telling them you follow all the rules, never broke the law, you were a choir boy and were a boyscout. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 10:15 PM
8

If biology didn't matter, i would be fucking dudes and not bothering with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 01:57 AM
0

High quality women don't want or need to be led Yeah because women get wet for thirsty beta cucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 12:23 AM
2

Basically put as many constraints on men (especially lower smv men)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:44 PM
5

LMAO, you think you can negotiate sexual attraction. You can make a conscious effort to NOT go after people you are attracted to, but you're just lying to yourself. Are you telling me, if they invited you over, and they took off their clothes and basically told you they wanted you to fuck them, you wouldn't do it? GTFO.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:19 PM
2

But feminists keep telling us that being a friend first without stating your romantic intention is 'deceitful'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:18 PM
11

Yes they are totally random women. The football players just show up and then act like they own the place and the women are there just for their own amusement. You, on the other hand, would be just a random guy. Thanks for proving my point. he whole point of catcalling is that the targets are random women. Completely random. Not even talking about catcalling, i'm talking about what otherwise would be sexual assault. SMV trumps everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:46 PM
7

It's not like they KNOW these women. I mean, if i went to a party, it's not like i can just start groping women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:17 PM
17

You're wrong about this. I went to a school with a mediocre division 1 football team and the football players would literally grope random women at bars and they LOVED it. If your SMV is high enough you can get away with stuff that would get other men arrested, nevermind catcalls. It's validation when a high SMV guy does it, 'harassment' when a low SMV guy does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 04:28 PM
5

crime is up also thanks to feminism. The net effect is it increased.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:43 AM
2

Yet people opt to live in neighborhoods where they feel that those around them will create it takes a village type atmosphere. No they don't. think about why people want to move into the suburbs once they have kids. That's not a commune. My neighbors don't do shit for me. I don't do shit for them. Many people opt for communal style living. No they don't. Think about dormitories. Think about frats or sororities where there is clearly someone in charge and often they serve as a father or mother fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:59 PM
8

Suicide rates are at the highest they've been in 25 years http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/articles/2014/10/08/us-suicides-hit-highest-rate-in-25-years Crime rates are still much higher than they were before the pill was introduced. The mitigating factor is the fact that abortion is available so poor/shitty mothers are able to discard their accidents that would otherwise turn into hoodlums.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:56 PM
9

It's extremely difficult to provide the love and care for a child if you're the only one doing it. The real truth is some women simply shouldnt' have children period.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:52 PM
7

"WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD MEN GONE!?!?" - Screams the over the hill strong independant female hooked on anti-depressants.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:51 PM
6

Very few people want to live in a commune, they want freedom. A commune is like one big extended family. It's the same reason why people don't want to live with their parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:46 PM
9

Well you're not going to get NYC commune
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:35 PM
2

It's not an issue if there's no commitment. I'm not holding anyone captive. These are just temporary arrangements.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:16 PM
3

Hypergamy led to the breakdown of the family unit which led to many of the societal ills, it sure is a BIG coincidence that the rate of divorce, the rate of suicide, and the rate of violent crime seem to go up at the same rate of each other and that it started RIGHT after the pill, doesn't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:14 PM
7

Most women do opt for it though. They want the cosmopolitan lifestyle. They're not going to live in some backwoods commune.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:37 PM
2

It was intentional, tongue in cheek. But it really is simple. Also, putting your partner's needs/wants dead last makes for a shitty relationship. You don't want a wife/GF, you want a slave. I don't want a partner period. They can leave whenever they want, i can leave whatever i want. These are not permanent or even semi-permanent situations. My expectations are finely tuned to reality. This is why RP works.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:32 PM
14

Sure, but you forgot to ask what percentage of single parent homes are 'functional'. It's incredibly difficult to raise children by yourself when you have to work a job as well. It's even harder when you're poor. Sure the rich woman can hire nannies and shit to do all the dirty work, but how many women have that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:07 PM
5

It doesn't, but an RPer sure as fuck won't get divorced and we don't have unrealistic expectations about relationships. When i was a nice guy blooper i used to get depressed about this shit, now i focus on my own happiness and put women's happiness dead last. Many societal ills would go away if men would just follow this simple little trick. Imagine how many rampage killings/suicides that could be prevented.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:04 PM
11

No, they don't on average, modern women want to live in cities like NYC (which, btw, is one of the reasons why NYC is great for men... more women than men = Sodom and Gomorrah)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:54 PM
11

Studies show that children who grow up in single parent housing do worse overall vs. 2 parent households though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:52 PM
14

Oh yeah, i'm sure modern 'strong independent women' will go for that kind of pre-historic living arrangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:45 PM
7

"I'M A STRONG INDEPENDENT WOMAN, I DON'T NEED NO MAN!" destroys civilization in the process
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:44 PM
5

An RPer who doesn't commit, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:39 PM
8

Didn't say that. Being a non-committal RPer is the solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:26 PM
9

Hmmm, so suicide, crime, and divorce skyrocketed as a result of unrestricted hypergamy and you're celebrating that as a success because anecdotes, ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:11 PM
1

How isn't it supported. Hypergamy was always there, it's just the pill removed a major cost in unrestricting it. Suicide, divorce, crime all go up at the same time with each other, starting when the pill is introduced.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:00 PM
3

correlation isn't causation Yeah, it's certainly weird that all our social ills start to skyrocket up once the pill removes one of the biggest costs to unrestrained hypergamy for women though, isn't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:46 PM
2

https://youtu.be/4wpca1ZDIRQ?t=1194
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:36 PM
6

https://youtu.be/4wpca1ZDIRQ?t=1194
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:36 PM
1

I would say the alpha bro who sleeps with hundreds of women, uses birth control, never marries is infinitely more successful than the virgin betabux who despareately marries some over the wall cc rider and has a kid. Doubly so if betabux gets cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 02:29 AM
9

crude biological determinism. If it wasn't for biological determinism, i would be fucking men right now rather than putting up with women (gay men have it GOOD). You cannot negotiate attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:50 AM
1

Remnants of religion forcing monogamy on society. Take a bunch of clean slate humans with no knowledge about anything, put them on an island, and you will see harems and men killing each other to fuck because a few alphas are hoarding. Which is basically what you see through human history. Also, reproduction != sexual success in modern terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:18 AM
8

Somebody posted a study here showing that most women cluster around the mean when it comes to sexual partners but men have a much higher standard deviation around the mean for sexual partners (meaning there are a few men who have a LOT of sex and a bunch of men who are getting nothing). That should tell you all you need to know about hypergamy. Yes, it's proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 02:03 AM
4

No, my logic is that women can't have their cake and eat it too. If you want to be a slut, go ahead, but a lot of men are going to write you off as marriage/ltr material.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:08 PM
1

Facts and logic The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) who say that having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives has dropped six percentage points since 1997, from 35% to 29%. For women, the opposite effect occurred, as the share voicing this opinion rose from 28% to 37%. This gender gap is a new development, as men and women were statistically equal on this measure in 1997. http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/young-men-and-women-differ-on-the-importance-of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:42 PM
3

Because they do. They value marriage/LTR's more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:32 PM
2

Don't care at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:52 PM
2

Divorce is setup to benefit women as much as possible. Men are just expected to suck it up. That's how society is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 07:31 PM
2

Because nobody says they want an unsuccessful marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:22 PM
1

No, this doesn't always happen. There was a survey in which only 4% of women would even consider dating a man with no job. Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:05 PM
2

Dude, you ASSUMED these people were married already, and nowhere in the article was that even stated. They didn't ask '18-34 year olds who were already married'.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:36 PM
2

they care less about their marriage (if they get married) being successful. Yeah, that's just stupid. Getting married has major consequences if it doesn't work out. At least now you're realizing that they might NOT be married though. You're getting there buddy!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:31 PM
2

No, you're making your own interpretations which is certainly not in the article. By YOUR interpretation, the overwhelming majority of MARRIED men AND women DON'T care if THEIR marriages are successful, that makes absolutely no fucking sense. What WOULD make sense is Pew trying to find out why so many young people aren't married: https://media.deseretdigital.com/file/e3014d8427?resize=width_760&c=17&a=7f3f30c4 And realizing it's men that's holding out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 04:31 PM
14

Incorrect, I would be disgusted with the women i sleep with if i were to be emotionally invested in them, which is why i don't invest. If i don't see them again, i don't care. Sluts are disgusting within the context of commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:36 PM
2

Nowhere does it say those people are ALREADY married. Notice who they surveyed: The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) How many 18/19/20/21/etc year olds do you know who are married? The average age of marriage for men is around 30. That makes absolutely no sense what you're saying. Edit: And again, nobody says they want an UNSUCCESSFUL marriage. It especially makes no sense for men because they bear the majority of risk, thanks to divorce laws favoring women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:27 PM
3

https://media.deseretdigital.com/file/e3014d8427?resize=width_760&c=17&a=7f3f30c4
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:02 AM
2

And you don't think that means men don't want marriage less? Holy shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 04:23 AM
3

That seems like childish wishful thinking. "I will just take my ball and go home, that'll show them! Boy oh boy are they going to miss ME!" The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) who say that having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives has dropped six percentage points since 1997, from 35% to 29%. For women, the opposite effect occurred, as the share voicing this opinion rose from 28% to 37%. This gender gap is a new development, as men and women were statisti…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:59 AM
2

Yeah, i did. Nobody says they want an unsuccessful marriage. Tell me which man wants to get divorced raped with alimony+child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:58 AM
4

Sour grapes is women whining about 'where have all the good men gone~!??!' after they're done riding the CC and they're approaching 30. Women should be prepared for a life of solitude (unless you account for the company of cats).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 12:14 AM
5

Explain to me why any woman within her right mind would agree to those terms? Because it's women who want relationships. You want to change the rules of the game? Ok, then don't cry when men start using women as disposable fuck toys or just drop out of the game altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 12:12 AM
2

This has to be the most idiotic thing i've ever read. You're seriously saying men get into marriage NOT caring about whether it fails or not? Again, what are you huffing? Men are typically MOST at risk of a failed marriage since women don't like marrying men who make less than they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 12:10 AM
1

Oh please. Feminism hasn't increased depression rates. Lol. Seems to be highly correlated at least Let me read this article. Okay so I browsed it, and yeah it's not that they want to get married...but place a SUCCESSFUL marriage as being important. Nobody says they want to have an UNSUCCESSFUL marriage, what are you huffing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:00 PM
3

If she doesn't like anal, she doesn't like anal, period. If she does it at all, it's because the man has such high SMV that she will do just about anything that she's normally uncomfortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:54 PM
26

How are women physically beautiful and sexually desirable? Performance. It's hilarious that a blooper thinks merely existing is 'performance'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:51 PM
2

Meh, statistically, men don't care that much about marriage anymore, you're only hurting women, which i don't care all that much about (and, to some extent, i actually encourage as some sort of retributive karma)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:49 PM
2

For everyone has gone up. Correlation does not equal causation buddy. I didn't say feminism didn't take it's toll on men TOO. You're going to need to provide a reference for this "Women valuing marriage has actually gone UP from previous generations." Pretty sure marriage was the only way a woman could survive back then. Man, you sure are not aware of what's going around in society. The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) who say that having a successful marriage is one of the most important thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:47 PM
2

"Dear other women: Fuck you"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:44 PM
4

Yeah, 'anecdotes'. http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/young-men-and-women-differ-on-the-importance-of-a-successful-marriage/ The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) who say that having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives has dropped six percentage points since 1997, from 35% to 29%. For women, the opposite effect occurred, as the share voicing this opinion rose from 28% to 37%. This gender gap is a new development, as men and women were statistically equa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:42 PM
2

Female depression has gone up. Women valuing marriage has actually gone UP from previous generations (while men value marriage LESS). You're wrong about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:40 PM
2

Heheh, you probably think the women crying about how the men pumped and dumped them and there are 'no good men left' is some deep universal truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:39 PM
3

1 person's anecodote doesn't undermine redpill dogma. Statistically speaking, women value marriage more than men and that gap is growing wider. THAT is something that matters. Not one person's anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:27 PM
3

Because on a macro scale, it's a worthless anecdote. I'm pretty sure you could find a 5 that married a 10 lingerie model too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:18 PM
2

She (aka modern women) are retards then ... Okay... That says what about your OP then? Sounds like everyone is having a terrible, no good, very bad day. ... He unintentionally explains why women aren't worth the effort as a result." I dunno, seems clear as day to me. Modern women are the ones who make the choice as to who they fuck/have relationships with. It's their own damn fault if they are idiots about it. And that's why it makes no sense for men to work their ass off for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:16 PM
3

Which is why I'm saying if 90% of the raters were 25 year old bikini models, it's definitely going to skew the results. Yeah i think we can rule that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:00 PM
4

So be it. If that's the price of freedom, I'll take that consequence. Solipsism. Like a typical woman. So? Your case falls apart, that's 'so'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:59 PM
4

A girl, but I'm assuming my brothers aren't trying to bang me. Maybe they're just trying to appear less shallow or not make you self conscious about comparing yourself to a really hot woman. Right, but my point was that it shows us 4 pictures of how many thousand? And none of the ones that were considered above average. What traits do above average guys share that are pushing them up there? I don't think you need to see thousands of pictures to see that those men aren't all 'below average', just…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:54 PM
8

Yeah well, men are withholding commitment, in a way, we're saying 'you're not worth it'. How's that for respect? If only the boys respected women and the housework they did...and didn't jeer and say it's 'womens' work in a demeaning way. Yeah, because modern men are known to do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:51 PM
4

No, hot women include money and status as well. Still shallow, but not physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:49 PM
4

Okay... That says what about your OP then? Well, my original title was: "Askmen poster makes a fantastic post about why men aren't into fictional romances like women are. He unintentionally explains why women aren't worth the effort as a result."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:47 PM
4

Or, like men, women have specific tastes. I mean, I have guy friends that assure me that they don't think Scarlett Johansson is "really that hot". Are you a guy or girl. Can we see their pictures? Yeah https://www.google.com/search?q=okcupid+80%25+below+average&oq=okcupid&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i60j69i57j69i59j69i65l2.1183j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8 Click the first link. The examples they gave were of guys who are CLEARLY average or even above average. Also keep in mind that according t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:46 PM
2

She (aka modern women) are retards then
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:42 PM
3

Fucking hot guys who are way out of their league, relationship wise?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:42 PM
9

They're only lonely because they artificially limit themselves to men who are AT LEAST on their level (of course, hot men would rather play the field than commit to a hot woman). That's their own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:38 PM
10

We wouldn't be where we are if women decided to be spoiled brats who expect men to do everything for them with nothing in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:36 PM
4

Your average D1 football players and fratboy superstars are the OPPOSITE of 'gentleman'. I mean shit, feminists complain fratboys are all rapey, and to some extent i actually agree with that. Now you're pretending that they're all gentlemen who just 'treat women right' just because you don't like the point i'm making. Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:35 PM
6

https://www.google.com/search?q=ok+cupid+80%25+below+average&oq=ok+cupid+80%25+below+average&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i65j0l4.5232j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8 Click the first link, they give some examples of who was rated 'below average'. Some of those guys are CLEARLY average or even ABOVE average in looks. Women are delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:32 PM
14

Yeah because women wised up and saw they weren't getting respect back. "it's women's work" and "women belong in the kitchen" "women should be seen and not heard" golly gee, it's a wonder why we are where we are now! The irony is, when those phrases and ideas were more popular, men got MORE respect. You live in some other dimension. Most modern men are feminized beta bitches these days, not 'misogynistic patriarchy monsters' of yesterday.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:31 PM
3

But most women ultimately seek commitment from the men they have sex with. Not when they're young they don't. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/fashion/sex-on-campus-she-can-play-that-game-too.html?pagewanted=all
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:30 PM
3

Yes, we call those guys 'outliers'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:28 PM
4

So i guess you're saying women are dumb as shit for falling for that then.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:26 PM
2

Pfffffffffffft, a BPer said sluts enjoy sex, that's why they have so much casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:26 PM
4

but the attractiveness differential between a hot guy and average gal makes up for that disappointment for the girl to a large degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:25 PM
8

Yeah... those lonely betas sure are swimming in pussy. It's called rationalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:24 PM
3

Except in career, if an average iq person can perform just as well as the high iq person (by working harder), you expect to be treated the same. I don't expect my employer to deny me anal while letting chad fuck him in the ass just because chad is 6'3". That's where your analogy breaks down.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:23 PM
14

And it's that way across the overwhelming majority of cultures. It's biology. The difference now is that when men work their tail off, it doesn't guarantee love, loyalty or respect as it once did.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:21 PM
9

They at least have access to SEX with hot men. Which is more than what average dudes can get. Yes, women want relationships, but the attractiveness differential between a hot guy and average gal makes up for that disappointment for the girl to a large degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:13 PM
20

desperate enough to date assholes and selfish takers Aka modern women. Yeah, because women are known to initiate. Valentines is coming up, who do you think is going to be making plans, the guy or girl? You're delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:11 PM
3

There is a select group of women who would treat you like a king No there isn't. Women are conditioned to be passive in relationships. There's a reason why the phrase "Happy Wife, Happy Life" is a thing (the implication that men have to actively keep their wife happy to be happy).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:09 PM
1

Also: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/41pj5v/askmen_poster_makes_a_fantastic_post_about_why/cz45l5g
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:07 PM
4

So? What's your point? Average men do not have access to hot women while hot men have access to (and actively pursue) a WIDE range of women and not all of them are 'hot'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:06 PM
2

its like your angry that men have to be the performer. but most the times men wanna be the performer. There's no guarantee that being a performer inspires love/loyalty There's a select group of men who get the milk for free while all other men have to work their ass off for the cow. Would you look at your woman the same way if you knew she would do everything for those types of men with no effort on their part while you have to work your tail off?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:04 PM
7

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html The women in the article above are saying the exact same thing as me. You, OTOH, are delusional into thinking your average jock is a gentleman who holds doors for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:02 PM
4

6'1'' with a symmetrical face makes you probably attractive, not Alpha by definition. There's an endless sea of attractive dudes that are in no way shape or form alpha Hahahaha, no there are not an 'endless sea of attractive dudes'. Women rated 80% of men on OKCupid as BELOW AVERAGE looking (which is statistically IMPOSSIBLE). Attractive men are RARE. status != alpha Status is a component of alpha. Yeah, if you're a complete social retard, you're not going to do well, but you have a leg up on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:01 PM
8

I'm average in facial attractiveness. I'm average in height (5'10"). I have no problem admitting i'm not a Chad. However, you don't have to be an 'unattractive man' to make the posts i do. Hell, you don't even have to be a man: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html It's just wishful thinking on your part that you think anyone who points out stuff we point out is automatically a bitter unattractive guy. Are we seriously supposed to pretend the D1 football star is a 'nice guy'/ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:55 PM
4

False. Patently so. Takes effort, and a lot of it, to be the prize everyone wants. Oh, i didn't realize it took effort to be 6'1" with a symmetrical face. I guess technically speaking, you do have to pay dues to a fraternity. That's... something... i guess. Every college and high school jock you guys obsess over also took chicks out on dates and opened doors and bought flowers I went to a university with a division 1 football program. The funny thing is, it was a mediocre football program, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:40 PM
1

Because it doesn't exist. Men will go for the path of least resistance while women will hold out for the best she can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:20 PM
9

We're talking about effort and reciprocation when it comes to relationships. When it comes to sex, guess who is the one who's expected to perform too? Men not being into fictional romance is just a side effect of men being expected to be the performer in romance in real life while women just sit back and relax.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:11 PM
1

Ok, i reposted... i guess i'll copy/paste the 'rant' with some edits
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:02 PM
1

Ok i can sorta see why you might want to ban the 2nd sentence thing, but the 2nd part is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 04:54 PM
2

Be fit. Develop confidence. Have your own interests and hobbies, learn who you are as a person and what you want out of life; minus validation from others. And hypergamy? Are we supposed to pretend that doesn't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:49 PM
5

Right, because when a woman states she's not attracted to the traits you've already decided are attractive in a man she's a liar. If women dated men based on their explicit stated preference, there would be no such thing as dateless 'nice guys'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:44 PM
8

That's why feminism is so insidious, they need to pull the wool over everyone's eyes so they can keep up the charade. If AF/BB were not only common knowledge but also talked about openly, the house of cards would come crumbling down. No sane man would EVER commit to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 01:17 AM
2

I don't, i have 3 plates thanks to TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:44 PM
11

TIL, most women are assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 09:00 PM
2

TLDR: Don't trust women if you are a beta (aka 80% of men)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 08:58 PM
6

We do not have to do what our nature commands. Oh sure, i could theoretically speaking, as a heterosexual male, fuck another man, but my urges dictate that I won't. Both men and women are free as individuals to choose the extent to which they indulge their deeper nature. Women wanted to have fun when they're young and settle down later. Men are rejecting women because of that. You want to see indulgence? We're seeing that right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 08:30 PM
-2

Because often women are told, by fucking everyone, that men don't want that. Men don't like women acting like spoiled cunts but they do that anyway. What a load of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 04:13 PM
13

The reason why feminists want rape accusers to be able to choose whether colleges or law enforcement are the ones that investigate/prosecute rape cases is because it allows women with flimsy (or even false) evidence to punish men easier. Colleges are under enormous pressure from the federal government to take all rape accusations as true (even if they aren't). Colleges do not have the best interest of anyone in mind other than their brand. So if someone is accused, especially if it becomes a med…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 02:23 AM
13

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather A white feather has been a traditional symbol of cowardice, used and recognised especially within the British Army and in countries associated with the British Empire since the 18th century, especially by far-right nationalists and some early feminists in order to humiliate men who were not soldiers. World War I In August 1914, at the start of the First World War, Admiral Charles Fitzgerald founded the Order of the White Feather with support from the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 10:16 PM
10

Those feminist have the political power. "Moderate" feminists might as well not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:44 PM
8

Duke Lacrosse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:27 PM
8

In some instances, yes, but the Obama administration (again, thanks to pressure from tumblr feminists) have put colleges in an impossible situation where they HAVE to comply with anti-due process measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:23 PM
10

Speaking of UVA, do you think people throwing rocks through the windows of the frat house, spray painting that they were rapists on their house, and going on their property to protest them, calling for them to be castrated is 'free speech'? This is how feminists operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:21 PM
15

The idea of 'due process' has been destroyed at the university level thanks to "Tumblr Feminists". It has gotten so bad, that you see shit like 28 Harvard Law professors, HARDLY a conservative group, decrying biased collegiate judicial that harm men: https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/14/rethink-harvard-sexual-harassment-policy/HFDDiZN7nU2UwuUuWMnqbM/story.html It's not about 'free speech', it's about not being fucked over by batshit crazy cunts like mattress girl and 'jackie' from UVA …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:18 PM
2

Billionaire, feminist icon, and #1 NYT and amazon.com best seller Sheryl Sandberg is advising girls to hookup with these guys: http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/772391-when-looking-for-a-life-partner-my-advice-to-women “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find so…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:15 PM
1

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/772391-when-looking-for-a-life-partner-my-advice-to-women “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairn…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:13 PM
15

but who takes them serious outside of their echo chambers? Government and Universities
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:10 PM
2

Like i said "The ONLY reason why a man would date a crazy girl is because of extreme desperation." That and women INTENTIONALLY go for crazy/morally questionable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:54 PM
7

"undergraduates and delinquents has shown that high mating effort is significantly correlated with delinquency, promiscuity and coercive sexual behaviour. " Read your own damn study.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:07 PM
7

How is it any different for a man being attracted to a woman who exploited kids and was involved in sex trafficking and was a drug dealer? LMAO, since when are men attracted to any of that? We care about T&A. In fact, we have a phrase 'don't stick your dick in crazy' for a reason, so what you listed would actually cause many of us to be repulsed. Meanwhile, you have a popular feminist pushing women to date 'bad boys/crazy boys'. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/772391-when-looking-for-a-life-part…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:06 PM
11

I'm shocked that bad boys get more sex than boys who follow the rules. Absolutely shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:11 PM
5

This is why when I do give general male advice on this sub when it comes to self-improvement I always say to "improve your strengths," as opposed to TRP's "lift," because, as you say, women want to be impressed by something in a man. Clearly D&D nerds should become the greatest D&D players of all time to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 04:13 PM
6

My happiness is not tied to women anymore and I make my own happiness. I'm ahead of 99% of men thanks to TRP. Feminists want men subservient to women. I'll take what TRP gives me rather than what you're offering. Women would freak the fuck out if every man were as liberated as i am.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 04:46 AM
5

If men want unconditional love, get a dog. Don't expect it from a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 04:18 PM
1

Of course we hoped men would adapt! We sure have! http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:06 PM
2

She's gotten pretty fat, recently, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 03:24 PM
1

Thanks to feminism, that's the reality that we live in right now. You want to be 'strong and independent'? Well, that's what you get. It's pretty absurd that feminists never envisioned that men would respond to changing conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 03:19 PM
1

Heh, the funny thing about that is that commitment from men would go down even FURTHER. If women complained about men not complaining, they are going to complain about it even more. "You reap what you sow"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 03:18 PM
2

SOME women are a highly valuable, but quickly depreciating asset.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 04:52 AM
1

Well, if you're high SMV, you'll win now. When i'm talking about 'over the long term', i'm talking about all relationships between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 06:41 PM
3

It's not a race when you're at the top of the pyramid or near the top and you have multiple options. High value men are RARE. Ultimately, because women value monogamous relationships more and have a faster expiration date, they always end up losing over the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 06:33 PM
5

No, this is why men shouldn't be emotionally invested in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 03:53 PM
6

That's what plate spinning is for. If you have multiple bitches and can attract MORE bitches, do you think we care if women use dread? Patrice O'Neil once said that a man should aspire to be so much of 'the shit' that you could even laugh in a woman's face if she cheated on you. The person who cares less has all the power.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:48 PM
2

Because it doesn't matter, there should be few 'lonelyhearts' on campus. Even ugly/average chicks don't want ugly/average guys... even when they are at a numbers disadvantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 12:38 AM
3

And also, if all the guys are chads - why do the guys talk about men being able to date up? Aren't chads already at the top? Because those guys might be 7's/8's who are seriously dating 9's/10's. Everyone below are being left out in the cold. The 10 chads are the ones banging everything in sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 11:37 PM
7

How do i live with myself? Easy, i stopped caring. Feminism made that excruciatingly easy to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:53 PM
5

Because one of the students said half the 40% men are invisible to the woman. Note: Not invisible to just her, but MOST girls. That leaves 20% 10% seem to have serious girlfriends That means they are fighting over the 10% left. And the woman isn't making it up, look at the 2nd paragraph i post afterwards. Jayne Dallas, a senior studying advertising who was seated across the table, grumbled that the population of male undergraduates was even smaller when you looked at it as a dating pool. “Out of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:50 PM
1

Of course nobody will actually believe you. Go start a thread somewhere on that, whether men or women do the overwhelming majority of pursuing. The answer you get will not be surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:44 PM
1

I don't have to 'support' it, you can just ask everyone you know if men or women pursue the overwhelming majority of time and everyone you know IRL will back me up. Thinking men and women are 'the same' is a feminist delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:32 PM
3

This in no way implies that hypergamy is real in this setting. In fact, it appears men are the hypergamous ones: Yes, because of unnatural circumstances (i.e. a 60/40 female to male ratio). It mostly describes how guys don't have to approach girls on campus and can treat women like crap, be hypergamous etc. No, it describes CHADS who do that shit. I mean, yes, if we committed genocide against a significant portion of men, more men would have more choices. This is not a revelation. What still doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:07 PM
1

The point is, it's so rare that it isn't even worth discussing. On a macro scale, the overwhelming majority of men haven't been approached by women. Women are passive in romance, that is a fact of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:04 PM
5

Read the rest of the article. Even those men on campus have the advantage in the male to female ratio, they are complaining about being alone. This is not unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:17 PM
2

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:57 PM
1

You could... and you could also proclaim the opposite on TV and become a laughing stock. I could do the same and everyone would nod in agreement. Are you going to go on TV and say the earth is flat next?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:48 PM
1

The overwhelming majority of men have never been pursued by women. The overwhelming majority of men who have ever been in relationships have never been allowed to be passive when it comes to romance (while women are the active ones). Don't be absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 05:00 AM
2

That's not 'tons', that's called 'outliers'. Besides that, i said pursuing AND romancing. Do you honestly believe those women allow their guy to just sit back while they romance them? Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 04:21 AM
2

Men act. That is part of being romantic. By being unemployed, those men are passive, by nature. Being romantic is often expensive. A trip to paris, flowers, dinner at a nice restaurant, etc. That shit costs money. Yes you will. No you won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:11 AM
1

Soooooooooooo... women are retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:36 AM
2

It was posted here or TRP, i don't remember, but if you're going to c all me a liar, ok And no, i will not find 'tons of examples', that's just retarded. Here's a study i did save: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/unemployed-men-survey-its-just-lunch_n_1631289.html Of the 925 single women surveyed, 75 percent said they'd have a problem with dating someone without a job. Only 4 percent of respondents asked whether they would go out with an unemployed man answered "of course." "Tons"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:34 AM
2

There was a study done on who pays for meals when men and women start dating. Of the thousands of participants, they couldn't find a SINGLE woman who paid 100% (but they found lots of men who paid 100%).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:19 AM
1

I'm not, you said 'very attractive people', but when you go down the scale of attractiveness, average women get away with shit average men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:39 PM
1

Very attractive people get away with things normal people don't. Average women get away with shit that average men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:14 PM
2

How is he going to protect her after he pumps and dumps her?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:52 PM
13

Jesus Christ, that's the worst case of rationalization that i've ever seen. It's a combination of being emotionally neglected by bad boys too many times, not being pretty enough for bad boys anymore, and freaking the fuck out about your shriveling ovaries/not having the high status life a betabux can bring you the status you want as you realize you're competing against younger women. That's it. There was a joke in TRP i read once that said that if 'the wall' for women was 1000 years old, women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:53 PM
6

Explain to me why the type of man she settles down with changes. "Settle down" means 'my options are disappearing quickly' for most modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:45 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3zq0h8/one_of_the_things_rp_gets_most_wrong_about_women/cyogmz9
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:40 PM
4

Basically, yeah. Trust is just another word for 'attractive enough'. That's why an average guy can act a way and be called 'creepy' while the same guy who's attractive will bang the very same girl acting the very same way. Ever been to a college bar full of D1 football players? They grab girl's asses, and they don't even know them. If a normal dude did that, he'd be arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:39 PM
5

I was being facetious and sarcastic when i was saying 'it's weird' Trust has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:05 PM
3

This is male solippybippy. Men 'do' romance, women have romance 'done' to them. I feel pretty safe in saying that if you're male, and you believe this, you haven't experienced being loved by a woman Why don't you women prove yourself and YOU GIRLS do the pursuing and romancing then? Oh that's right, you won't, thus you prove our point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:59 PM
17

Interesting how women automatically trust the 6'2" guy with muscles and an aesthetically pleasing face when it comes to casual sex. Which is weird, if you think about it, he has an easier time overpowering women than 130 pound 5'5" pointdexter I guess when you mean trust, you mean 'i trust this guy to give me tingles in my vagina'. Stop trying to rationalize the nature of attraction and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:54 PM
1

Also: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3zlhoh/cmv_men_are_not_as_rp_asserts_the_more_romantic/cyoa507
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:38 PM
1

No. Your point was that women do nothing. They really don't. Which makes me think you've simply never been liked by a woman. You're completely underestimating how many men feel this way. Read these 2 comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/3z8o75/why_dont_men_get_as_much_of_a_thrill_over/cyk7gr8 https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/3z8o75/why_dont_men_get_as_much_of_a_thrill_over/cykm7bm Notice how this wasn't in TRP or any other manosphere subreddit. Notice the huge positive resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:14 PM
1

What response... anway, see my reply to another poster: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3zlhoh/cmv_men_are_not_as_rp_asserts_the_more_romantic/cyo4okk Basically there is a disparity between how much effort a woman will put to show appreciation for her man vs what a man will do/is expected to do. The ultimate example is the marriage proposal. You want an example of what romantic is, there you have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:03 PM
8

I like how women rationalize settling down with betabux losers when they start losing their looks and realize that the alphas treated them like garbage. I don't trust women who say this garbage when they didn't settle down earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:01 PM
0

You could say that about anything. Cooking isn't inherently 'romantic', like you claim. The time/money/effort for lingerie isn't really much. Also, lol if your SO feels 'special' because you put on lingerie. I sure as hell wouldn't call it 'romantic'. Are we going to call whips, chains, and handcuffs romantic too? At least there's effort with it, but i sure as hell wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:04 PM
0

Like i said, romantic is spending time/effort/money on dumb shit to make your woman feel special. Like cooking an entire meal with candlights, rose petals... maybe singing for her or hiring someoene to sing, buying plane tickets to paris for a surprise trip, writing a poem, giving her a massage with oils with candles surrounding you. Also, look at how much expense and lengths men go to when proposing to their women. Note: These are nothing i would ever do for a woman because i understand the imb…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:10 PM
0

Wearing lingerie isn't 'romantic', it fullfills our sexual fantasies. Romance is spending time/effort/money on dumb shit to make your woman feel special for the night.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:00 PM
-2

Notice how you said 'cooking' first... then you have to add 'candlelights' to make it romantic because OBVIOUSLY cooking, by itself, is not 'romantic'. (not that just adding candlelights takes much more work). Now you're adding more shit. Rose petals? No dressing 'sexy' is not 'romantic'. I mean, dear god, are we really going to give credit to wearing lingerie now? Try the fuck again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:06 PM
1

Cooking for someone else, running a bath, wearing sexy clothes or getting a gift is not 'romance'. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:10 PM
1

Sorry, but men are by far the more romantic sex. Women just sit back and enjoy it while men prepare a romantic event for them. They don't do shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 07:29 PM
4

Welcome to selective feminism, where feminists treat rights and responsibilities of men and women as a buffet, and it's not surprising that feminists just pick and choose rights but never choose responsibilities. "There are no feminists in a house fire"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:44 PM
1

They have enough that adminsitration and professors bend to their will. If it was just a small group at each college, they wouldn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:42 PM
2

Men have a shotgun approach to showing interest in women. Women get to choose from the thousands of suitors. How is that really a choice for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:41 PM
6

There are lots of homeless/low paid blue collar men that women can pay for. Also, the wage gap (that feminists push) is a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:40 PM
2

It's meaningless in the grand scheme of the statistics, why do i care about your 1 individual anecdote. Because some men are lazy ass fucking pussies? They don't divorce, they just sleep in the guestroom or on the couch, mumbling hateful insults under their breath. Yeah, so selfless, so noble. LOL, the only reason they don't leave is because they're afraid to darling, not for love or because they're happy. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzt wrong, it's because we aren't whiny bitch pussies who try to divorce rape t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:39 PM
0

Meanginless, 1 out of millions of cases. Since women are just as likely to be violent, why don't men divorce as much? That's the fucking issue here. Women divorce at a disproportionate rate. Modern women are fucking garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:41 AM
1

What was the point of that copypasta and what the fuck does it have to do with me? You were bitching about how men beat women, hinting that's why women divorce more. I mean, if you were ONLY saying that as an anecodte, then that's completely useless. Haha! citation needed. If intimate partner violence is equal, then we have to ask why women are divorcing disproportionately from men. One obvious reason is because women are hypergamous and typically try to marry men who make more money. There is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:29 AM
8

Women are the choosers. They have thousands of penises thrown their way. If they choose to get knocked up by the shady alpha, that's on them. Unfortunately, for women, the internet has made the spread of information much easier and a lot of us responsible men with good jobs are opting OUT Of becoming golden parachutes for modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:24 AM
1

http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/ Research showing that women are often aggressors in domestic violence has been causing controversy for almost 40 years, ever since the 1975 National Family Violence Survey by sociologists Murray Straus and Richard Gelles of the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire found that women were just as likely as men to report hitting a spouse and men were just as likely as women to report getting hit. The researchers initially ass…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:09 AM
4

Hahaha, yeah, because the guy who was educated and brought up in a good family and has a good job has a high chance of just walking out the fuck on their family like some bluecollar/nocollar deadbeat alpha. Just a reminder that women initiate divorces 70-80% of the fucking time. Women are god damned stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:50 AM
1

Liz Lemon and Kimmy Schmidt are attractive because, for the most part, we don't allow unattractive women to be onscreen. But they're not overly attractive either. They are how average women can identify with. And they're not stupid, and they're not incompetent. And they're not fat. That role is reserved for men, whether it be in cartoons (The Simpsons/Family Guy) or live Sitcoms (King of Queens/All in the Family). Men are portrayed far worse in the media, and it's not even close. But my main poi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:48 AM
1

Cool story. Still not watching videos and why are you talking about Oprah? Because she made billions from being media icon who made really stupid gynocentric statements. Nice think piece from Daily Beast- did you look at the actual data? Men are name called and embarrassed in anonymous forums and women are stalked on social media where their actual names/faces are known. Still remains irrelevant. Nope, we receive death threats and abuse, stop trying to call it 'name calling' as if it's just a si…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:18 AM
1

He's actually a fantastic comedian, one of the most viewed on netflix, one of the most popular podcasts, constant guest on Conan, etc. Oprah was and is a big deal for women. I had a girlfriend that watched her constantly and she always said dumb shit like. You realize she's the only black billionaire in America, right? Her popularity and reach with women is insane. "Name called and embarrassed", leave it to a feminist to downplay it: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/04/men-are-haras…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:24 AM
7

Nope, i didn't: Statistically speaking, sluts are statistically likely to become more unhappy in a marriage (note: this is only statistically significant in women, does not apply to former male sluts). Of course, you're probably the type of person to avert your eyes at such evidence because cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:09 AM
9

Like that men don't have to pay to entertain women. Statistically, men DO have to pay to entertain women (unless you're a true alpha that is). It's funny, there was a study done on who pays for meals when men and women are out on dates. It was no surprise that on average, men pay more than women, but the really "surprising" (but not really, if you're swallowed the red pill) finding was that they couldn't find a single woman who paid 100% of the meals, but there were lots of men who paid 100%, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:01 AM
1

Hahahah, of course you won't watch that video, it disproves your theory. And feminists are cowards who need their 'safe space' intact, always. How much hatred do single mothers receive? We're told CONSTANTLY women as a whole receive more hatred/threats online in the media, but actual studies show it's men who receive more hatred/threats online, but that's never really talked about because our media and society as a whole pedastilizes women and goes out of their way to protect women while men eat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:56 AM
3

Virtually every fucking college has this problem. Try to get Bill Maher (a self professed LIBERAL) or Hirsi Ali (a feminist with 'wrong thought') to speak at any college and SJW's will most certainly block him from speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:43 AM
1

Single fathers are not invisible. But let's pretend they are. Are you saying if single mothers were not praised, there wouldn't be attack pieces on them? Yes, because single mothers, and lets be honest, mothers in general, get an undeserved amount of adulation from society. Again, Bill Burr points this out well, our media pedastilizes mothers (and especially single mothers) as saints: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hitc8haEu_g Single mothers ARE failures and drains on society (again, with the e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:39 AM
4

Yeah that's what you guys kept saying, but now we've seen out in colleges as diverse as Yale and Mizzou that SJW's infect colleges across the country and ruin shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:27 AM
9

Oh right, you'd marry a huge slut, because 'past doesn't matter', right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:26 AM
9

So? How is the mother's fault if the guy she's with turns out to be a deadbeat dad? Because they're going with the tingles in their vaginas rather than any sort of logic. There are lots of decent guys with jobs, 401k's, with a good upbringing, but no, when you fuck low rent alphas, that's what you get. By your logic (and virtually every other feminist), women have no agency, no responsibility for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:24 AM
1

Only because nobody praises single fathers, there's no need to attack them, they're invisible. Single mothers are praised all the time. Who even praises fathers as a whole? So you're saying conservatives are RACIST, ok, i won't disagree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:23 AM
3

Radfems own feminism. Moderate feminists are irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 12:27 AM
2

What? Feminists are doing away with due process for college men ... 'moderate' feminists might as well not exist. BTW, moderate feminists can't claim to be for equality between genders when radfems are actively trying to harm men and getting away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 11:31 PM
2

I'm not sure how this relates to batshit crazy feminists having all the power and breaking shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 11:15 PM
8

With the exception where they're single mothers because the father died, most single mothers are that way because they make terrible choices in men https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-n76u46qOdk
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 10:45 PM
1

Traditionalism? I don't see conservatives attacking single mothers in those links. Single fathers aren't appreciated/talked about at all, why would radfems even need to attack them?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 10:44 PM
2

Well, i already did. Feminism is a Motte and Bailey ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 10:14 PM
1

lmao, i googled it, and like half the links are coming from the manosphere. GTFO. https://www.google.com/search?q=single+mom+trash&oq=single+mom+trash&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j69i61l3.2047j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8 Dalrock, Judgybitch, sosuave, mgtowhq... really? That just proves my point, a small niche section of the internet hates single moms, but that has nothing to do with society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 10:08 PM
1

WHAT vitriol at single mothers? Society can't stop talking up single mothers like they're fucking mother theresa Here's another video you won't watch (but it's pretty hilarious) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hitc8haEu_g
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:51 PM
6

LMAO, really? Single mothers are basically sainted by society. With the exception of the rare cases where the husband dies, TRP realizes that most of these idiots put themselves in that position. Men/Society lies to you to protect your feelings because we (not even red pill) treat you like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:41 PM
2

You want feminism, that's essentially what you get. Hypergamy destroys societies. We're just playing by the rules women made (remember, women are the ones who choose the men, not the other way around).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:37 PM
6

Is that like how feminists SAY they don't like the crazy SJW feminists that have taken over colleges and call all men rapists but never actually do anything about it (and maybe just sit back and enjoy it while the crazies do all the 'good work' on their behalf)?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:35 PM
5

Do you feel like single dads are vilified? They're not villified, they're just not talked about like single mothers I am not giving your buddy a YouTube hit. Sorry bout it. Not my buddy, but i'm not surprised, feminists need the world to be 'safe spaces', that's why they're so ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:33 PM
4

Feminists recognize that raising children alone is difficult. You wanna call it celebration go ahead but it doesn't mean all feminists endorse all actions of single mothers. Because feminists praise single fathers. (Neat job blaming the women left with children not the men leaving/a predatory justice system which incarcerates far too many young men though!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-n76u46qOdk
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:25 PM
2

That's not how women operate. Women are so used to getting everything they want, not only from men, but from society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:58 PM
2

Ah, the poisonous mixture of single motherhood and the feminists that cheer them on. She's not grooming him to be a mama's boy, she's grooming him to be a 'nice guy' who says 'm'lady' whose love interests will get fucked by chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:29 PM
2

about what he should expect from women. Absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:13 PM
10

Meh, statistically, that's how it is. This is why it makes 0 sense to commit with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:12 PM
2

Nah, men have lots of time. Even if you did get fat, you can still lose weight. Women lose their looks and that's it, they're finished. Plus, on a fundamental level, men know older women giving birth give birth to more children with defects or even have trouble giving birth at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:01 PM
2

oh, you're a dude? Well, obviously this doesn't apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:59 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-n76u46qOdk&index=157 Don't let this guy say 'i told you so'
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:53 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-gfxjAaZg0
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:49 PM
12

"Dear unlovable losers, you are not allowed to have negative emotions in your solitary confinement of perpetual unrequited love, besides that some of these girls will want your money/security when they reach 30 and finally agree to a loveless/sexless marriage with you... with responsibility and no rewards so sit down and shut up"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:44 PM
0

By the way, sitting around and waiting for a woman who is clearly not romantically interested in you to finally give up on life and settle with you is not "doing the right thing." Well, you're in luck, we're not waiting anymore, we got the message. Modern women can fuck off and have their cats. Men are waking up and realizing, over the long term, we win: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:47 AM
48

Both the nice guy and jerk want to have sex with women. The only difference is, the nice guy is capable of treating women well, being romantic, caring about her, caring about other attributes other than tits+ass. Women rationalize why they don't like those nice guys by saying 'oh they're just TOO perfect', 'i don't deserve someone like him', 'i'm not ready to settle down with him', when in reality, the reason why they don't want to get with him/stay with him is because those women to get with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:38 AM
1

Women lie about their sexual history on surveys. http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/sexsurv.htm Is "stud" the new term for "male sexual worker"? Chads
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 12:02 AM
14

Well yeah, women turn into spoiled little cunts, but whether that's a downside for her is a matter of perspective. Modern women probably consider being held responsible for their own actions a downside, not getting everything you want in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:20 PM
15

That's like saying cutting taxes on the rich hurt the rich as much as the poor. Everything is sexism, everything is misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:16 PM
10

What if a woman has a job, does her own housework, and doesn't want kids. Would this mean that 95% of men have nothing to offer? No, it would just mean that she might not want what men have to offer. Statistically, women want marriage, it's men who are opting out. You don't describe reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:11 PM
1

I respect a woman who excels at STEM (i mean really excels, not someone who just got in via affirmative action and coasted along). It doesn't do anything for me sexually though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:24 PM
1

Again, because of AF/BB, a 'stud' can get infected just by the shear number of partners he has and he can infect hundreds of women. A beta can get nothing (because of involuntary celibacy/monagamous lifestyle). There are lots of betas. Here you go https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2014/08/Screen-Shot-2014-08-26-at-9.39.40-AM-e1409066252786.png&w=1484 10 partners isn't even considered 'a lot' for this curren…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:21 PM
22

It's not only about attracting women, it's protecting yourself against women as well. Knowing WHY something works the way it does is just as important WHAT you're supposed to do. The WHY is what BP finds offensive (because they believe men and women are the same).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:19 PM
1

Probably not, but how may real chads are there in college?? Last time I visited a campus seemed like there was mostly pudgy or skinny jean wearing hipsters around. That just makes the true chad's harem bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:57 AM
1

If i lived in my dad's generation, my opinion would probably be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:34 AM
9

Like physically dangerous? A god damn fool, that's what i'd call her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 08:45 PM
8

Not being easily fooled by people trying to take advantage of you, avoiding dangerous situations, being financially smart, being able to figure shit out yourself instead of treating me as tech support.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 08:41 PM
3

I value street smarts/wisdom in a woman. A woman's gender studies degree means nothing to me, actually it means she's probably an idiot/crazy, if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 08:19 PM
3

This is why nice, hardworking guys should, under no circumstances, get married or get too emotionally attached to women. Women lie like hell about this shit. Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-n76u46qOdk
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 05:25 AM
1

The vagina is one big receptical, obviously women are more at risk: http://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/webpages/Modules/STD/s1pg22.htm Women are also biologically more vulnerable to STDs than are men. Women are more susceptible to STDs during sexual intercourse because the vaginal surface is larger and more vulnerable to sexual secretions than the primarily skin-covered penis. Also, the volume of potentially infected male ejaculate deposited in a woman’s vagina during intercourse is large…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 03:29 AM
3

Just remember that men having preferences is bad (doesn't matter what race the dude is), while women having preferences is good, thanks to our gynocentric society/media. This is why Jezebel/Gawker can drool over a 16 year old boy while shaming men for having preferences for the type of women they go for. Or when Jezebel/Gawker went apeshit mad over The Fappening but cheered on Justin Bieber's unauthorized nude pics being released. When you remember this rule, everything else makes sense. Now man…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 11:25 PM
1

Most women are 'low quality' to some degree, it's all relative, feminists have brought the scale down so far low. Besides that, even good girls can turn to shit after you've committed to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:57 PM
1

Ok, i'm a 'tech obsessed bloke' (I have a surface Pro 3, Ipad Air, Nexus 7, Nexus 6p, a tricked out Desktop for occasional gaming, 2 laptops, 3 LCD/Plasma televisions, A raspberri Pi, an Nvidia Shield, an Xbox One, 2 Chromecasts, all connected to a nice AV stereo system with ceiling speakers and probably some other shit i forgot). Add all that up, and they aren't even worth my shitty car.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:54 PM
1

Toyotas are basically indestructible. I change the oil when needed, that's about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:52 PM
8

Women contract STD's more easily than men do. Studies show that women who have more sexual partners are more dissatisfied in marriage. Male sluts don't suffer the same fate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:51 PM
1

The ratio of good girls to nice guys is out of whack, how hard is that to understand? If it weren't that way, TRP wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:55 PM
1

instead of finding ways to seduce the women who are different? The ultimate zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:45 PM
1

But most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:17 PM
1

Nope, I am pretty negligent with my car and it still runs great. Hardly any maintenance required.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:00 PM
1

Because that's the way women are. Women drive economic spending. Women are a black hole of economic slavery. As Chris Rock once said, a man's test in life is sexual, a woman's test in life is material. Dave Chappelle also wisely pointed out that if men could fuck a woman in a cardboard box, we wouldn't EVER buy houses. Women are, by nature, status seekers. Men only buy worthless shit to impress women because women drive that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 07:49 PM
3

Iphones cost less than houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 02:12 PM
4

It's middle class in the area where i live. Average house costs 600k
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 02:12 PM
2

You're living as if in poverty just to prove that only women require money. I wouldn't want to live like that. That's not my motivation, but i do think flashing money to attract women is for CHUMPS. I see money differently than women do. Women see money as a way to gain more and more comforts in their empty lives. See: All the women i know who live in NYC who spend way too much for Apartment Therapy type living arrangements and probably don't have much savings. I see money as freedom. If anythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 03:38 AM
6

It shows poor character when you willingly want to become a part of the problem. No it doesn't. Ultimately, it's women who choose who they have a relationship with and relationships in the modern world are fucked. Until we can genetically re-engineer women to unfuck this situation, it's not going to get better. There's nothing Beta Bob can do to make the situation better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 02:11 AM
1

You're assuming this only applies to pretty girls. It doesn't. Average girls are actually sluttier (they have to be to get alpha dick).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:56 PM
1

You're not disagreeing with me. That's the entire premise of my OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:43 PM
4

If you say so http://national.deseretnews.com/article/4535/us-marriage-rate-hits-new-low-and-may-continue-to-decline.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:29 PM
1

Of course you know men are the initiators and it's extremely rare of women to approach. Men bear the risk of rejection, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:24 PM
2

A lot. Which is why there are so many women who are missing their chance at marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 06:31 AM
6

And that's why women are clueless when it comes to their RMV and this happens: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html Women mistake SMV for RMV and become spinsters later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 06:23 AM
3

Because women never fall in love or become attached to men who aren't in the top 10-20% right? They do, but it's not true/lasting love. Once that dopamine wears off, they also look to branch swing to an 'upgrade' when they're young. Which is why many men are distrustful of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 06:21 AM
8

I already responded to you with this in the other thread: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html You never replied. A lot of those lonely 30something women wouldn't be lonely 30somethings if they had a more realistic view of their SMV/RMV. A lot of us 'nice guys' would have happily setteled down with them when we were young. But we realized that a lot of you women weren't interested in us until you panicked and needed us to be your beta bux golden…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 06:15 AM
1

"acutely aware": http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 05:08 AM
0

Average men mean shit because women are hypergamous/the choosier sex. They're also deluded when it comes to evaluating their own value with regards to LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:23 AM
2

The majority of the males are beta at best. Women think 80% of men on OKCupid are 'below average looking' according to women. But they may still date them anyway, because they may not have a choice at the moment (choice being, an alpha willing to commit). Most betas are thirsty, so snagging a girl, almost any girl, is certainly more of a 'win' for him than it is for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:46 AM
2

An average guy would go out of his way to clear his schedule for virtually any girl he just started dating, by virtue of being the intiiator (thus guaranteeing equal interest at worst, but more likely higher interest).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:42 AM
1

She wouldn't have to be Emma Watson or anywhere near as pretty to find a guy who will move heaven and earth for her. Unless of course she gunned for the hottest guy in class. If I had a daughter, i'd teach her a contrarian view of dating anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:40 AM
2

Therefore, you shouldn't have a scarcity mentality either. Yes, i agree. I'm just describing what average guys deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:36 AM
1

In the back of most women's minds, they have multiple suitors. Therefore they don't have a scarcity mentality (until they start losing their looks). If they had a scarcity mentality like men, this dynamic would be flipped. What i'm saying is, being average, for a man, means shit. Being average, for a woman, means you still have many options. That is why women will not put in the effort for men they're seeing unless there's a large disparity in SMV (edit: in the woman's favor, obviously)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:24 AM
1

But if a woman's schedule was busy and there were just a few slots available for a date, the man would move heaven and earth to clear any conflicts on his end.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:19 AM
0

I'm saying low value men don't even get dates. This is how normal guys are treated.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:18 AM
2

Like i said, most men would put more effort into clearing his schedule for a woman, especially one he just started dating. Remember, men are the initiators, therefor, he is almost guaranteed to be more interested in the girl than vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:14 AM
0

. In fact, doesn't TRP claim this is most common with 'Chads' and high value men? Women fall 'head over heels' for guys all the time. There are few chads and few chads will commit. I'm talking about normal guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:13 AM
1

Here's what really happens. Modern women are used to punching above their weight when it comes to casual sex which gives them a false sense of worth when it comes to ltrs. So even average girls will be dissatisfied with average guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:01 AM
1

But would she cancel if it were Ryan gosling asking her out? That's the point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:53 AM
4

Oh right, because there are so many women who would leave Leonardo Dicaprio when they start reading about his sexual exploits in gossip magazines.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:17 AM
5

Tim Tebow isn't an INVOLUNTARY celibate though. Also, his most recent girlfriend dumped him because he wouldn't have sex with her. http://jezebel.com/miss-universe-allegedly-dumped-tim-tebow-because-he-ref-1745203158
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:16 AM
3

Those guys are whipped motherfuckers. Probably pulling them to something dumb like 'brunch' (hat tip to Bill Burr)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 09:07 PM
9

How would a woman know the man she's just met is a kissless virgin? When he attempts to kiss/have sex with her, duh. It was either twoxchromosomes or askwomen, but there was a thread with lots of women saying they would be turned off by a guy who hadn't had sex by a certain age. Edit: I'm sure being shy/awkward is also a tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:33 PM
11

If your status is high enough, you can 'cheat' on your LTR/wife while she openly knows about it and tolerates it. Hell, if your status is high enough, you can literally date two women at the same time with their approval. You can even bring them on the same date! http://bossip.com/1079012/double-double-nba-baller-lou-williams-has-two-girlfriends-who-are-happily-sharing-him/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:29 PM
2

Everything. Especially when it comes to relationships and the nature of men/women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 05:36 PM
7

But yes, The Blue Pill isn't around to give advice. Some people might, but it's mostly to make fun of TRP. If you're constantly wrong about something, perhaps you are making fun of the wrong group.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 03:30 AM
2

'Rationalization hamster' is simply 'rationalization'. It's a better descriptor. Everyone rationalizes... women rationalize on hyperdrive though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 11:35 PM
2

You think women don't notice when men are treating them like children? I've found that at work, you get in the least amount of trouble when you treat women like children. If you treat them like adults and hold them accountable, that's when women really act like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 11:24 PM
7

Regardless, I think his point is that he doesn't hide his love for women, and in turn women bask in his attention and give themselves to him. I suppose his advice (love women and the'll love you in return) is predicated on meeting a minimum standard of physical attraction, so... the unfortunately deformed and uncommonly short are probably S.O.L. (but aren't they S.O.L. regardless of strategy?) You know, there are lots of guys who says they are feminists JUST to get laid, but the trick is, only t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 11:22 PM
3

Dr. Nerdlove says men should become feminists to get laid. There are lots of relationship 'experts' who say incredibly stupid shit that make no sense, but who preach to an female centric audiences rather than the audiences who need the advice: MEN.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 11:19 PM
2

I'd rather be the bad boy who is the 'bad prospect' than the high iq hardworking beta chump who gets hitched to a quickly depreciating 30-something year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 10:44 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3yj1qh/being_a_smart_morally_upstanding_hardworking_guy/cydtmi0 But even if what you said is true, it's still a step above being a virgin incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:25 PM
-3

There are only 28 grad students who are in the masters humanities program (297 for PhD) at MIT, so probably not very statistically significant. http://web.mit.edu/facts/enrollment.html I would bet you that even at 'normal' schools that have a 60-40 female/male split, the men in the engineering programs still have more virginity than everyone else, while alpha frat bro pseudo rapist majoring in underwater basket weaving is getting laid left and right.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:23 PM
2

Huh, so it does... that probably means virginity in MIT undergrad students is much higher, solidifying my point even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:09 PM
21

That might explain why criminals get laid by many women, but doesn't explain why MIT nerdboy doesn't get laid AT ALL (i.e. having a steady girlfriend)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:28 PM
7

Getting laid once or twice a week isn't going to destroy his research. Also, wtf are you talking about 'research', they're not phd students, they're undergrads. Shit, MIT students don't even pick majors until they're done with freshman year.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:22 PM
12

You're basically saying MIT students don't do anything BUT research which is dumb. People have time for different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:59 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3yj1qh/being_a_smart_morally_upstanding_hardworking_guy/cyduvgm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:55 PM
14

Sex drives at that age are incredibly strong. Saying research becomes a priority is a copout. It's not like casual sex or even a relationship would take up so much time that they don't have time for research. That's just stupid. You think they'd rather be playing hours of WoW/watching anime/star trek every day rather than fucking hot girls? Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:50 PM
1

typo, i don't know why i included 'alpha' at the end. i'm in my early 20s and at least an 8 on TRP's insane scale. Oh yeah that's believable. How rich is this guy. If he's poor, produce a video of the both of you kissing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:46 PM
1

I'm arguing your fiancee isn't the bad boy who is jumping from bed to bed, but the betabux alpha you're settling for marriage. TRP certainly doesn't deny this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:41 PM
8

Because i'm arguing using feminist logic. Men who can't laid are bad right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:36 PM
9

Riiiiiiiiiiiight, because MIT nerdboy suddenly gets all the pussy once he graduates. Have you noticed that the age of marriage has gone up with each successive generation? If alpha boy wanted to settle down at 20, do you honestly believe women would wait so long to finally marry someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:35 PM
3

She's one person with one of the best selling books for modern feminists (which is where i got the quote from). And yes, you're dodging since what I replied to was the second question about wether college kids want stability. College kids want to drink and fuck. I guess you're basically saying feminists are the least stable people in the face of the planet, because they're probably the most wild people in college.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:33 PM
12

Hahahaha, now we have to call it 'deviancy' for the men who are successful in getting it to deflect away from the poor bastards who aren't getting any. Guess what, those feminists who jump from cock to cock are also 'deviants'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:32 PM
6

No, i'm directly contradicting you, not dodging. Sheryl Sandberg is facebook's fucking COO and a billionaire and she tells young women to fuck the bad boys first (probably from experience). You assume young women who were fucking the drug dealer were idiots who were failing school. You are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:28 PM
17

Yes, because being smart means you don't want to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:27 PM
11

He's still far more sexually successful than MIT nerd boy is after graduating though. And MIT nerdboy is getting the quickly depreciating leftovers when 33 year old Jane the reformed slut is finally willing to marry him into a sexless marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:26 PM
5

I said: 1) You assume these women are idiots Basically, you're wrong. I mean, you're basically saying Sheryl Sandberg was a failure in school/failure in work: "“When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:24 PM
9

Yes i did answer your question, how these women performed at school/work while fucking the bad boy is probably the most irrelevant thing you could point out. most people prefer to spend time with people who provide them with stability in life. Nobody is looking for 'stability' when they're in college. Except maybe for religious chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:18 PM
3

An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women. They're probably the most successful ones, but of course you don't have to be violent An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women. I'm guessing by 'disagreeableness', he means dark triad traits. Edit: Manson is ugly as fuck and married a cute chick wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:15 PM
5

1) You assume these women are idiots 2) You assume men give a shit about women's grades or success at work when it comes to sex. Bloopers gonna bloop.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:11 PM
13

Nope, the drug dealer i knew in college was fucking the HOTTEST women. And even if what you said was true, it's better to be THAT guy than nerd boy who has crushing loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:08 PM
8

Except you said it's a good crude proxy to measure a man's character. Except it isn't. Statistically speaking, men who are violent/are into crime are the ones who get laid while the men who are smart, hardworking, and play by the rules are statistically more likely to be virgins. http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/[1] I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school eac…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:01 PM
13

I like how you deflect. Your whole claim was that men who can't get laid have some defect, yet clearly 'bad' men get laid all the time, probably the most out of anyone. Sounds like you're upset that TRP is teaching how to be 'bad' and lead to sexual success and all you're saying is, 'no no, that's not right, bad men DON'T get laid'. How many more conditions are you going to add to this concept?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:49 PM
12

Ok, so back in my BP days, i had trouble getting laid, however, when i went to Thailand, i didn't have trouble getting laid. Ergo, Americans are morally superior to Thais? You subscribe to a Just World fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:42 PM
8

But... the hottest girls went after him. He had several new women every week. By your standard, he must be Ghandi.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:32 PM
9

More that, if you've never been able to get laid, there is a common denominator in play (it's you) and you're probably not a very nice person. The most sexually successful person i know was a drug dealer in college who didn't give a shit about the women he fucked, just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:27 PM
1

engaged to
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:40 AM
4

Yes, because blue pill feminists are known to go after the effeminate 5'5" manlets who weight 250 pounds and wear thick ass glasses, rather than 6'3" chad bro with visible abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:52 PM
4

If a women wants to be a SAHM, she should be allowed to do that without shame. Just a reminder that feminists shamed Mitt Romney's wife for being a SAHM. In fact, women who don't work and just stay at home taking care of their children are 'traitors'
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:43 PM
1

Don't lots of Red Pillers do this? They are on the carousel to hook up with girls, but then want a non-rider if they choose to commit. Is that not lane-changing? Those of us that hook up don't have the intention of changing lanes, for a variety of reasons. Most of us WOULD have wanted to be in a commited relationship, but modern women signaled that they aren't worthy of committed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:42 PM
23

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH, you think the 'geniuses' are getting laid? HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA For a man, the higher IQ you have, the more likely it is you are a VIRGIN. In fact, the lower your IQ is below 100 (but not TOO low), the MORE sex you are having. Being in a gang, using a weapon in a fight and other disagreeable anti-social behavior is correlated to HIGH numbers of sexual partners. If anything, female hypergamy is creating iodiocracy. You bloopers need to open your fucking eyes. http…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 03:41 AM
9

Translation: "Uh, guys, can you just chill out and bend over while feminists fuck you in the ass?"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 01:29 AM
1

These articles are basically clickbait to a very small minority of angry disillusioned kids Then explain to me why misandrists like Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, The Jezebel website all get millions of clicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 01:23 AM
0

TRP uses both science and experience to arrive at truth. TBP uses feminist dogma to arrive at truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 10:00 PM
1

I think you're overestimating how much guys would jump in, in the first place, which is why girls don't do shit like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:29 PM
2

Except for most guys, we'd happily jump in the sack with an average woman as well as a beautiful one. I doubt i'll be able to pick up women leaning against a Honda Accord (even if the highest trim).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:26 PM
3

lmao, great point :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:23 PM
1

Also, add to the fact that women don't use fancy cars to pick up men. It goes to show how different men vs women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:22 PM
1

DING DING DING
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:21 PM
2

Why, are your guy friends clueless? I mean, if it was apparently obvious that she was trying to use that car to pick me up, there's no way in hell i'd jump in. Accepting creates somewhat of an obligation. I'd be doing her a favor in NOT accepting. It just goes to show how hypergamous women are versus men. I don't care about what cool toys you have/how much money you have versus how nice your face is, round your ass/tits are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:20 PM
6

If an ugly woman offered you a ride home in a 1992 Camry or a state of the art Richard Branson spaceship, which would you choose? Notice how you needed to change that to a FUCKING SPACESHIP for that to even work. If an ugly ass bitch tried to pick me up while leaning up against a lambo, i'd laugh and walk away.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:14 PM
2

Meh, i used to be a beta pussy who would give the world to just about any woman who showed interest. THere was no 'flocking' back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:05 PM
3

Rigidly enforced social hierarchies in high school, don't worry, a lot of those girls started fucking chads later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:51 PM
1

I'm saying your argument about 'charm' is bullshit. It's all about status/looks. When you have sufficient status/looks, you can treat lots of women like human garbage and still fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:45 PM
2

my office is full of nerdy ass engineers and coders who are mostly socially awkward and yet all of them have GFs and/or wives. BETA BUX
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:43 PM
4

Right. I said that statistics have found the common sense advice that being decent to each other is a better predictor to a successful marriage than the guy being a douchebag to his wife, as red pill advises. And my argument is that women treat men like garbage anyway, there's no sense trying and there's no sense in going for LTR's anyway. If you're so angry with women, don't date 'em. Don't worry, i only fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:40 PM
1

Yeah, my comment was in response to your 'presence' argument. THat's what i've seen at bars and parties with d1 football players, when i went to college. I dunno, i guess groping women's asses is 'charm', according to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:38 PM
3

And yet, the quiet average looking 'nice guy' is stewing in his apartment because no girl is paying attention to him. Manson has gotten thousands of love letters.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:36 PM
1

Presence like the D1 football team groping random girls at parties and fucking them later?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:35 PM
2

Every time i hear about a mass murderer going to prison, i hear about all the female attention he gets. I don't really hear about it from female psycopaths who go to prison. I mean, when was the last time you heard about a dude marrying an old ass ugly bitch serial killer? Shit, even Manson's doing pretty well for himself: http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/2013/article/is-charles-manson-getting-married-20131120/19948/_original/1035x713-20131119-manson-x1800-1384973102.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:33 PM
4

Studies show that being decent to your partner is a better predictor of long-term success in the relationship. Yeah, too bad that women decided that wasn't worth their time when they became 'STRONG INDEPENDENT WOMEN', long term relationships are a waste of time for men. Statistics are not on your side You want to look at statistics? Look at plummeting marriage rates. Also, women want marriage MORE these days than previous generations (men want it LESS). There's your statistics. http://www.pewres…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:28 PM
8

But mostly it. He forgot facial aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:21 PM
1

shouldn't make any big conclusions about female sexuality because some people are interested in murderers. I wonder how many love letters female murderers get. When i hear about that shit, i don't go 'man, i sure wish she were my wife!'. Seems more of a female phenomenon than a male one. Also, Fritzl is ugly as shit and he got 200 love letters (probably more by now). Explain to me why the nice guy incel can't even get interest from 1 girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:19 PM
6

Women who tend to favour hookups/promiscuity and dominant 'asshole' men tend to be insecure and have low self esteem, raised in neglectful or abusive homes which left them with an insecure attachment style. They typically exhibit co-dependent traits and seek out a benevolent paternalistic malignant narcissist. They fall somewhere on the covert narcissism spectrum, quite often have depression or anxiety disorders and an overwhelming proportion have BPD. They also tend to hate other women, secretl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:13 PM
4

For me, it's a go/no-go decision. Since when the flying fuck do we care about your personal anecdotes? Studies show that men with machiavellian traits are more sexually appealing to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:11 PM
8

Meh, modern women are pretty worthless... in terms of LTR's. It's all about context.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 02:55 AM
2

Men are waking up to this fact much earlier in life, which is why marriage rates are plummeting. When i was more of a blooper, i would put so much effort into trying to make women i dated happy, but i woke up a terper and realized that on average, women don't even put in a fraction of the effort to keep their men happy. Modern women are selfish scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 06:41 AM
13

The funny thing is the ones who 'fall' for this are more likely to be feminists, especially those with high powered jobs. In my experience, those types of gals love being degraded/dominated in bed and respect men who don't take her shit. For more conservative/modest girls, I would treat them more with respect and kindness. It's become cliche at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 10:46 PM
10

It's because women are selfish. As Bill Burr said, 'there are no feminists in a house fire'.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 08:45 PM
1

Yup, it makes infinitely more sense to stay single, in terms of economics, as long as you play your cards right. If you are spending money as a single man on cars and expensive housing/apartments to signal that you are a provider, you are DOING IT WRONG. I bought a 3000 square foot house, but i rent out to 5 other roommates, so i don't have to sweat any cash flow issues since i pay no mortgage each month. If i were married, the bitch would most likely be asking for a mansion and would put us und…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 03:55 AM
4

77% of men over 25 have been married. http://www.citylab.com/work/2014/09/not-married-the-odds-that-you-never-will-be-are-higher-than-ever/380686/ That says absolutely nothing. Marriage is for WOMEN and of course beta bux start looking good when women start to age. This is a TRP principle. Even a loser can find a way past post wall woman to marry. 95% of 25-to-45 year old men have lost their virginity. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201106/are-there-really-40-year-old-virgins…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:48 PM
1

And what do you do/what are your skills that give you that much leverage?
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 09:42 PM
3

How old are they. How attractive are they? How educated are they? Most of my male friends i know also have no problem finding women, except that they're 30+ and almost all have graduate degrees. A lot of them had trouble dating when they were younger though. I would never call them 'average', in any sense of the word as my social circle is not representative of the broader population. Someone pointed out the apex fallacy you bloopers operate under, it appears you guys aren't able to learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:21 PM
2

big fat ugly women are invisible to high status hot men to, i guess high status hot men dont jump through hoops denying it or act unself aware about it though, they are blatant about it https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3xcq7q/question_for_women_growing_up_did_you_think_men/cy3t2i7
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:01 PM
2

Stop comparing apples to oranges https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3xcq7q/question_for_women_growing_up_did_you_think_men/cy3t2i7
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:00 PM
3

Right back at you for the more homely and less attractive girls. They are invisible too. Except men aren't as picky as women. So when you say 'homely', you are talking shit tier attractiveness in women. Average looking men are invisible to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:00 PM
2

Interesting. When TRP says "Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks", Bloopers cry foul, but when a woman (a feminist icon no less) espouses the exact same idea, it's embraced. Read this article and tell me how Sandberg's advice worked out for these women: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 05:39 AM
3

Part of a sexual strategy, yes. Toxic masculinity is a bullshit term made up by feminists to demonize men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:04 PM
1

You're getting the ages wrong. You assume that women who START looking at 30 are easily able to get married in a few years, that is simply not the case. Men are averse to marrying post wall women. A woman who starts looking for marriage minded relationships at 23/24 is going to have a MUCH easier time finding a man for marriage than someone who starts at 30. They're not going to find someone easily. The biggest issue is that they still have high standards so their ability to find someone is goin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:02 PM
6

lol, women (and ESPECIALLY feminists) willingly get into relationships with 'toxic' non-rp men (who lead RP lifestyles) anyway, the reason why feminists don't like RP is because it defeats their sexual strategy and the BB golden parachute is disappearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:43 PM
2

You're wrong and statistics back me up. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3x40nx/the_reason_why_its_a_bad_idea_to_marry_a_woman/cy1cc3b The sweet spot is women marrying around 27, that represents the lowest risk of divorce. Assuming marriage is at 27, you would figure that woman would have been in a commited marriage minded relationship since she was probably around 23-24. Women who wait until they're 30 to find a partner are at a VERY high risk of divorce, which is no surprise …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:23 PM
3

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/772391-when-looking-for-a-life-partner-my-advice-to-women “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairn…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:01 PM
5

Also, you have to remember, post wall women aren't looking to fuck 18 year olds either, so there is a long lag time for when these 'nice guys' start looking like an option for post wall types.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:57 PM
6

So desperate nice guys shouldn't want to date desperate post wall women? No, they absolutely should, what they shouldn't do is commit to them (which is what desperate post wall women are looking for). IMO, nice guys should stop being nice and just take advantage of their desperation for marriage from these 'stable' men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:50 PM
12

I mean, most guys wouldn't fuck an ugly girl just 'cause she's 'nice'. While this is true, an average looking girl who is nice is surely more attractive. The opposite is true from average looking men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:47 PM
6

go introduce yourself to women who are open to meeting you and dating. You don't seem to understand that this is a zero sum game, there are far too many nice guys and far too few women who would be open to dating them (outside of desperate post wall types). If it were more even, feminists would never bitch about the lonely nice guy phenomenon because they wouldn't exist! The most sexually successful guy i ever knew was my best friend's roommate who happened to be a drug dealer. Kind of psychopat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:43 PM
6

Being nice and considerate is incredibly attractive. Anyone who says otherwise clearly doesn't have much experience with dating. Being nice and considerate has nothing to do with whether women are attracted to you or not (outside outliers). This is why nice guys get mad and become red pill, because you lie to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:35 PM
4

Only Arthur Chu really got it[3] . No he didn't, the absolute truth is that moral character has nothing to do with whether or not you're successful with women. In fact, traits we might ascribe to be negative traits are actually associated with more success with women. Arthur Chu is a fucking moron and crazy to boot, btw. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/hallq/2014/02/on-some-criticism-of-lesswrong/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:33 PM
10

So yes, there are plenty of assholes who get plenty of women, but those relationships aren't always (or arguably, even often) healthy. But those assholes get what they want. Stop telling nice guys that 'they'll win in the end' (aka aging desperate women who can't get with an alpha anymore and who need a betabux will come flocking to you, as long as you have a halfway decent job) and just tell them the truth: Moral character has nothing to do with whether you're successful with women or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:19 PM
2

Age is a good metric to see if a woman makes good decisions or not. If a woman waits until 30 to find a husband, that signals to me that there's a good chance that she rode the CC and was a party girl (with a slim chance that she was just unlucky with relationships). Can't turn a ho into a housewife.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:16 PM
13

Feminism turned women toxic to begin with, we need to protect ourselves. Women don't like the fact that men are learning to protect themselves. When the BB Golden Parachute dries up, THAT is what you women secretly are scared of (but surely won't admit to) when it comes to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:38 AM
2

Well, not the ones that plate women, but i'm sure the ones that are LTR oriented they would be up for.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:37 AM
2

At 60? WTF
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:18 AM
1

Shit, there's even less reason to marry at that age, women FAR outnumber men after 30, since men die young.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:12 AM
2

Actually, the shittiest men i know get laid the most. Dark Triad + physical alpha traits = lots of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:27 PM
3

You obviously didn't read the link, divorce risk goes up after 30. Optimal marriage age is around 27. So women should get into a serious marriage minded relationship around 23/24.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:26 PM
10

Might as well throw in "has really good genes and ages well too" in there You can't see it, but i'm rolling my eyes at your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:46 PM
6

Women lie about partner count, multiply whatever they say by 3
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:41 PM
6

There are a million alternatives out there, we don't have to advocate any specific one. That's not what we're about. Because none of them work. Even if you accept that TRP is dumb, BP approved alternatives are FAR dumber and much more worthy of scorn. I'll give you an example. Dr. Nerdlove is hailed by BPers as a great sex/love guru, but he says that you should become a feminist/ally to get laid. You can take the dumbest fucking thing from TRP and it's not even NEAR as dumb as what Dr. Nerdlove …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 09:53 PM
3

Never. LTR's always favor the woman, never the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:51 PM
6

Still mostly accurate The reason why it's a bad idea to marry a woman who's approaching the wall (or past it) Still not as dumb as taking account to teenage divorce in coming up with your '30' average.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:16 PM
6

Your analysis was dumb nonetheless, the highest risk of divorce are those people who marry in their teens and thirties/fourties, why on earth would you average that out. The chart clearly shows that the lowest risk of divorce is women who marry around 27, so you figure they've been looking for their BB around 23/24 years old, which proves my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:09 PM
18

The highest risk of divorce are those people who marry in their teens and thirties/fourties, why on earth would you average that out Way oversimplification, and nowhere in my post did i say that age differences in marriage ended up being happy: The trend has been for divorce risk to go UP for people who marry in their 30's. The sweet spot is mid to late 20's. That would assume that most couples would have been dating for a few years before getting hitched too which means those women were pretty …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:38 PM
8

How is that a contradiction? Women want stability of marriage and children, particularly with alphas, but alphas are 1) rare and 2) typically not willing to commit (that's why in the alpha fucks/beta bux spectrum, alpha bux is the rarest of men). So they have to settle for the beta to get their marriage/children. Women lie to themselves and men to get what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:16 PM
2

Meh, more like when the truth reaches critical mass, then society collapses. Either you drop out of the sexual market place or you become a sociopath like all the other sexually successful guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:14 PM
20

Shrug, probably the most mysognistic guy i know gets tons of pussy, most of the women he fucks are just another notch in his belt and he jokingly refers to the women as disposable fuck toys. You can get away with that when you're 6'3" with a swimmer's body and good facial aesthetics. Moral character has nothing to do with getting laid, that's why feminists attack 'nice guys', in order to rationalize a type of just world fallacy in their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:12 PM
10

Sure, but those betas never had much attention from women, so they'd work harder to make the marriage work. Average modern women, OTOH, have ridden the cock carousel so they know they're missing something they USED to have but can't get anymore. That's going to crush her spirit as she limps across the finish line of her CC riding youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:09 PM
14

Because we were lied to about the nature of women. If women were more honest about not caring about the moral character of the men they date/fuck, then we'd be in a much better place. I suspect the other reason why women lie about this shit is because it would completely ruin the feminine sexual strategy if women outright admitted this. Betas are the golden parachute for women who fuck around in their teens and twenties. That's why women tell betas shit like, 'eventually those girls will leave t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:04 PM
23

So when the short ugly guy complains that he's rejected and lonely Shit, it's not even the short ugly guy anymore, that you can at least rationalize that away. Even average looking/average height guys are getting fucked over, i think THAT is the reason why you see so much aggression from feminists against 'nice guys', they can't rationalize why these men can't find dates, so they have to dehumanize them in some fashion to make themselves feel better about the world in which we live.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 02:53 PM
0

Unfortunately the one way that the woman can think of to fix the pain (if she knows the guy personally or could conceivably do so) is to become the nice guy's girlfriend. Oh yeah, because this happens so often, wtf lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 02:39 PM
3

Thus you confirm red pill's theory about the hierarchy of love. Men love women, women love children. Because you damn well know that women put their children above all else once they are born.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 02:50 AM
1

Anna Nicole Smith married a billionaire, and she probably had money before that. She clearly works out a lot and she clearly yo-yo's between almost fat and normal weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 12:27 AM
1

She yo-yo's between almost fat to normal weight. She's the type of gal that will gain weight fast, especially as she gets older and her metabolism goes down. She's basically this generation's anna nicole smith.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 11:23 PM
3

Yeah and see where they'd be at in 15 years when she gets fat, old and ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 10:06 PM
-1

Not like women do though. And there are drugs for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 09:40 PM
1

Eventually i'll get bored with someone like Kate and she'll get old and ugly anyway, why would i want to commit?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 09:02 PM
3

That's weird, because commitment means committing to a vastly depreciating asset.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 06:03 PM
7

Oh and if you're wondering where i'm getting this from, it's from a new tell all book with interviews with secret service agents http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/07/29/author-on-bill-clinton-he-has-a-blonde-busty-mistress/ “He has a blonde, busty mistress, and she’s been code named Energizer by agents. This is unofficially, but that is what they call her…She comes in to the Chappaqua [NY] home whenever Hillary leaves. The details coordinate to make sure they don’t cross paths. She, unlike H…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 05:29 PM
9

Bill has a side chick he's fucking on the side while Hillary's campaigning. Feminists don't understand the meaning of 'social construct'. They say 'toxic masculinity' is a social construct, but it's our own biology that makes us behave the way we do. Ironically, what a social construct is would be to suppress natural male instincts (i.e. what mostly female teachers try to do to boys in school).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 05:06 PM
14

I think what people "want" is largely socially constructed. I'm pretty sure me wanting to fuck lots of women isn't socially constructed. Is it socially constructed when male animals of most species want to do the same? What a load of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 04:53 PM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375720/What-women-really-want--money-Research-finds-women-look-paid-job-partner.html I don't care about your anecdotes. And if you really want to see the disparity between genders: http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/2753-dating-unemployed-men-women.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 01:12 AM
2

Isn't it interesting that they sudden care about the decent guys when they hit 30? That sure is one helluva long adolescence for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:02 AM
1

That only INCREASES the effect of hypergamy, you're out of your damn mind if you think that women suddenly don't care about how much men make when they are considering a relationship. Women who earn a lot of money are fucked 10 ways to sunday.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:00 AM
1

Aren't you agreeing with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 08:14 PM
3

If it's their own doing, who's fault is it? You have men falling over themselves wanting to fuck you, at least choose a decent guy while you're at it, but women don't give a shit about moral character of the men they hook up with when they're young. It's all about tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 08:14 PM
1

That's the difference. No, the difference is, if i had the choice between committing to Kate Upton for the rest of my life vs. fucking an unlimited supply of 6's, i'll take the latter, it's not even up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 07:33 PM
1

Yeah, because being aware that all your guy friends want to fuck you and are only doing nice shit for you for that specific reason is such a grand universal 'big picture' mystery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 06:28 PM
6

Mine had twelve children and watched six of them die before adulthood. And now we have better medicine, nothing to do with the idiotic choices women make with their sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 05:11 PM
12

This really challenges the red pill notion of women being adored and loved and having a wonderful charmed life in their teens and twenties. That's because women make bad decisions in regards to their sex lives/romance. They have all the power and squander it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 05:10 PM
1

They aren't self aware about their own hypergamy, aren't self aware about their beta orbiters, aren't self aware about the wall until it's too late. There's a lot of things women aren't self aware about. Hell, women are so god damned stupid, they think men care about their accomplishments like women do for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 03:17 PM
0

Prostitutes are honest about exchanging money for sex, average women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 03:16 PM
2

Prostitutes are more honest than you average woman, at least they are explicit and honest about exchanging sex for money. Don't look down on prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 12:03 AM
3

socially intelligent In some ways yes, in some ways no. a lot more self-aware HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 12:01 AM
3

I'm sure the father would kill the woman who gave birth to his heir. Intelligence gave us great weapons of war. Something women couldn't possibly come up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 03:19 AM
1

Pretty sure my testosterone is 95% responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 12:52 AM
2

If women really didn't want sex, they would have killed almost all the males long ago and just kept male breeders in cages. Oh right because women have the strength and intelligence to do that. Man, just look at all those matriarchal societies where women were warriors and men stayed home and picked berries all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 12:51 AM
1

I'm pretty sure using a roided up woman doesn't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 12:48 AM
2

I went to a university with an average D1 football team and even they were having parties with basically FFFFFFM orgies. So yeah, OP's pic is pretty accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 07:46 PM
3

Please explain to me why at most universities, half the male population are basically enuchs even when the gender ratio favors men. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2yipqi/from_the_new_york_times_women_are_suffering/ Women are literally saying half the men are undateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 07:19 PM
4

Please explain to me why at most universities, half the male population are basically enuchs even when the gender ratio favors men. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2yipqi/from_the_new_york_times_women_are_suffering/ Women are literally saying half the men are undateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 07:19 PM
5

He has a masters in evolutionary psychology so i would say he is a valid source
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 03:36 PM
9

Nope. Not super sexy either but I'm decent looking. Oh ok, so you bring nothing to the discussion. Be attractive Don't be unnattractive duhhhhh
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 01:29 AM
14

Yes we do, especially after a LITTLE traininig.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:45 PM
6

Logically speaking they won't allow that, it's just pretense. I mean, imagine a woman having to carry a wounded soldier.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:40 PM
7

Finally, some real feminism in this age of tolerance and acceptance. See you on the battlefield ladies. Thoughts/reactions to this idea? They won't be required to be at the front lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:38 PM
12

But if there is, nobody should be exempt, not the wealthy/well connected or women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:38 PM
2

If he really had no respect for his daughters, he'd raise them to be dumb fuck free wheeling sluts with no sense of responsibility like most modern women these days. If he's responsible, he'll explain the implications of modern sexual relations and all the consequences for the decisions you make and allow his daughter to make her own choice. If she wants to be a slut in her 20's, that should be her business, but she should make an informed choice in that she might not be the most desirable LTR/w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 08:03 PM
2

Yes you can, it's called Dowry
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 03:48 PM
1

it basically teaches men that meaningful relationships (which they crave as much as women do) are not worth pursuing It's not worth pursuing because there are far too few worthwhile women to pursue meaningful relationships with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 03:40 PM
3

Maybe it's just my social circles, but many people don't appear to subscribe to the PC narrative in their personal lives. Then why the fuck don't they speak up when the mainstream gynocentric media cries rape just from men looking at women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 02:25 AM
2

She looks good enough to be a cum dumpster for a night then forget about the next day, that's about it. She must be fucking HIDEOUS without makeup though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 02:24 AM
10

Modern women are tremendous entitled cunts. Unbelievable. The ubiquity of porn is a mighty fine replacement when there are NO good women left.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 02:23 AM
7

Do you know who margaret thatcher is? She was a tremendous cunt who killed unions and was a war hawk.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:35 PM
1

No, but the sexually desireable ones sure as hell liked him a lot. Remember, these women want to get their party on during college before they turn into 'responsible' women when they reach 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 07:31 PM
4

Why the fuck do i give a shit what jonathan mcintosh has to say? This is what he wrote about sexism against men using his feminist frequency account: https://twitter.com/femfreq/status/533445611543363585
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 07:30 PM
2

It's simple, I had a friend in college who's roommate was a drug dealer. He pumped and dumped lots of women because he provided drugs, excitement, a little bit of danger and an 'i don't give no fucks' attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 11:52 PM
21

Those are CONVICTIONS. Says nothing about accusations that will never see the light of day in court but will still ruin a guy. See: College 'tribunals' throwing men out of college even when there's no evidence or even evidence pointing to innocence. Also see women using social media/the media to destroy a man's career/reputation (I highly doubt james deen will ever go to court, but his career is highly harmed and might be over).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 01:34 AM
36

Don't ask redpill that question, ask the men who have been falsely accused of rape on campus who have no semblance of due process in the college judicial system to clear their name, thanks to feminist activism. There are consequences to radical feminism, not just dumb internet posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 07:50 PM
3

What if those fears and insecurities are justified? You'd rather us cover our eyes and ears and pretend all men have an equal shot at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/15 11:36 PM
0

That's actually the main point of aggravation most non-red-pill people have with TRP. It's not just the unfairness to women or the badmouthing them on the internet. It's the core idea that no woman is unique or special and that every single woman is replaceable. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3tjpg6/cmv_trp_justifications_for_their_hypocrisy_has_no/cx6z13b
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:55 PM
4

DAE think that people and relationships are disposable? Women and society treat men as disposable, which is fine with feminists. Now it's a problem when the shoe is on the other foot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 03:54 PM
10

The overwhelming majority of women don't identify as feminists, why would i jump on that mentally unstable false rape advocating grenade.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:28 AM
3

Your remark was idiotic, how is it 'odious, juvenile, and hypocritical?' It takes 2 to tango.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:47 PM
2

How? Was coercion involved? Was lying involved? Then it isn't. Women don't HAVE to be sluts if they don't want to. Maybe they should go for the nice guy who will commit to them while they're young (HAHAHAHAAHAH)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:25 PM
2

I have an Indian friend who married via arranged marriage and he's completely happy. Indians have this shit figured out, why bother with these cunts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 02:09 PM
6

Men show more narcissistic entitlement than women. ... Men are more prone to the self serving bias than women. Oh my sides!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 11:42 PM
5

No, your quip about pregnancy is a straw man, the overwhelming majority of relationships don't end in pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:28 AM
1

That's fine, but women should shut the fuck up about 'where have all the good men gone', especially in the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:19 AM
5

Can someone tell this guy that birth control exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:18 AM
3

Women are also finding out that it's not men's job to make women happy either (see: declining marriage rates).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:42 PM
4

Except the alpha men aren't having children and educated women are waiting to long to get married and their eggs are drying out. If anything, feminism has turned this world into idiocracy where the dumb and poor are procreating far more than anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:41 PM
1

Young George Clooney: http://media.portable.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/george-clooney-young-portable.jpg 50 year old george clooney: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v685/caz87/ACTORS/George%20Clooney/5d7930f3b412dee92adac7b2c9089d01-9e3a6b464d977b8b0dd9323b52f53000.jpg My father is far better looking now than he was in his 20's.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 04:17 PM
7

I don't understand the OP, what does a trust have to do with survivalism?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 04:41 AM
9

This is the attitude that allows violence to continue against men unabated.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 04:33 AM
1

True!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 12:55 AM
5

You know, the more i read about how women are suffering and men who have their shit together are taking advantage of the situation thanks to feminism, the more i think i should ironically be a feminist. It's killing off the competition and making it easier to pump and dump these retards.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 06:06 PM
31

The only correct answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 05:04 PM
13

It would take women being worth commitment for commitment to make a comeback. Women are incapable of looking in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 05:04 PM
1

Men aren't nearly as picky as women, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:43 PM
0

Click my link, in a situation where there are 60 women for every 40 men, women still feel entitled and will see half the men as invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:25 PM
0

He was also bullied by girls he was attracted to in high school, women sure as hell didn't make it easy for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:13 PM
0

Women's standards are ridiculous. That's the problem. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3qi2lb/couldnt_help_but_notice_some_similarities_between/cwfgk9f
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:12 PM
-1

grossly exaggerated expectations Like not being a virgin into your 20's, 30's, 40's and beyond? See: George Sodini.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:58 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3rduv8/discussion_bill_maher_says_what_nobody_else_in/cwn5xj1
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:49 PM
1

He had his ABC show cancelled because of his controversial remarks over 9/11 He could never do a show on the networks or even the normal cable channels, he can only do what he does on HBO.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:48 PM
0

Other way around: it's much more to do with the fact that women's standards are much higher than they were in the past. "I don't need no man, i'm a strong INDEPENDENT women" and all that. Also see: Alpha Widowhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:40 PM
4

I added some disagreement, but i don't see why i have to, this is dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:35 PM
12

It's so rare that i haven't seen it but maybe a couple times. So what, i've seen racist shit get posted on r/videos, better shut down every sub then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:23 PM
13

It's hard enough for women to get their AF/BB sexual strategy on as it is as men are running away from marriage ALREADY. But for a group of men to logically deconstruct women's sexual strategy for all to see will only accelerate the process further. Of course women hate TRP, and i don't blame them. It's going to be harder to trick beta bux to act as their golden parachutes when those betas wise up, dress better, go to the gym, get game and start pumping and dumping like alphas do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:13 PM
20

There have been multiple attempts to rope in TRP with coontown and get the sub banned. Are you blind?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:11 PM
1

Your study is crap because it doesn't break down by gender on the marriage question, mine does. This is what your study says: The New Monogamy: Singles are not desperate to marry and have children. 72% of singles would live with someone in the future without marrying. In the 21-34 age group, 62% of single women and men want to marry, 9% do not and 29% aren’t certain about marriage. For singles ages 35-44, those numbers drop further. In that category, 40% of singles 35-44 want to wed, 19% do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:00 AM
-1

Yes, from a REPUTABLE organization: http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/young-men-and-women-differ-on-the-importance-of-a-successful-marriage/ The importance of a successful marriage has gone UP for women from prior generations while it has gone DOWN for men. Marriage is declining because MEN are the ones that are running the fuck away from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 01:15 AM
1

COULD lower costs. Guess what happens to health costs when there aren't enough doctors to service everyone? You will have massive amounts of rationing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:31 AM
2

Statistically, women want marriage more than men, that's a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:25 AM
1

Yeah, and it sure is easier to do when you're single.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:25 AM
1

Taxes will be so high that incentive for work will go away. Medical costs are rising. And you're doing away with retirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:25 AM
3

No we don't care. At all. YOU don't care. But there's that female solipsism coming through again. Lots of women are suffering because they can't find a husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:09 PM
2

Yeah good look getting a 'committed relationship' with a man when you're over the hill, even if it isn't marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:08 PM
1

I work for myself, and don't spend any money. Other men just do the bare minimum to survive. You're finding out real quick what happens when men check out of society. I'm not going to wine and dine any woman and i'm not going to buy status objects to signal to them that i'm some sucker/walking wallet. As Dave Chappelle once said, 'if men could fuck women while living in a cardboard box, they would NEVER buy a house!'
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:06 PM
1

And who is going to pay for medicare/social security when there is a less than 1 to 1 worker to retiree ratio?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:05 PM
2

Also, sex is a big motivator for men, so taking away sex from betas means society will crumble. Actually, even alphas, you're taking away motivation because they get sex so easily without having to even pretend to be able to support women financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 02:43 PM
1

You'll find out when the population pyramid becomes inverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 02:34 PM
23

A cunt doesn't like the fact that people dislike her being a cunt. News at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 02:33 PM
2

Feminists are destroying society, so that makes them sociopaths/psychopaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:27 AM
0

Fine by me, if they fuck feminists squarely in the ass, i'll laugh my ass off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 04:26 AM
2

This is how i see it. If we becoming like 'feminists' and try to change the system via politics, that would take way too much energy/money/time or whatever. However, if we drop out, either the system collapses, or enough people suffer and realize how much destruction feminism has wrought that there's change. Dropping out takes far less energy/resources than fighting. If muslims take over, so what, i'm not affected, and if i am, i'll simply move out. That's the power that men have, we have the ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 10:03 PM
1

Slutiness LOWERS SMV especially when you're talking about LTR's. Even men who sleep with these sluts look at these women with disgust after cumming. The reason why sluts have low self esteem is because they give out the pussy so easily but can't snag commitment (from high SMV men) which is what most of those sluts really want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 01:09 AM
1

Hell yeah!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 12:34 AM
1

Simple: There are few material goods i actually care about and I don't care all too much about family. I have a good job and lots of savings. If muslims 'conquer' the west, men who 'check out' won't be much affected. And if i do, i'll simply move somewhere else. The future is pretty bleak for women though, but that's of their own making. Wanting marriage is more for women. Women are the ones who demand more material comforts in life. Men (especially ones who check out) can easily live more fruga…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 11:41 PM
1

http://www.onyxtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Josh-Duggar-Onyx-Truth-620x400.jpg "Alpha Male" Bloopers gonna bloop
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 06:21 PM
2

This is where people will say "oh, but they've just ridden the 'cock carousel' until settling for a 'beta'". There are two problems with this. Firstly, not all women do this! The actual average number of sexual partners is relatively low, and very few people remain virgins all of their life. You do realize that women are notorious liars when it comes to their n-count, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 02:46 PM
1

Bull fucking shit, if Ryan Gosling offered unprotected dick, you would all be clawing each other's eyes out to jump on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:00 AM
-1

Under the condition of MONOGAMY (and having their SO on the pill AND being tested)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:27 AM
-1

We don't want fucking STD's and ESPECIALLY out of wedlock kids. Getting fucked with child support BY ITSELF just about ruins any thought about raw dogging it. I'm talking about men who are reasonably educated BTW. These cunts who got into Umich are ostensibly smart, but they jump on the minority of men who are LESS likely to use condoms. That's how you get guys like Antonio Cromartie (the Jets cornerback) who can't even name all his children because he has so many of them (seriously, he was on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:05 AM
-1

holy shit my sides Oh right, because IQ is 'culturally biased' according to you 'progressives'. "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein ALL OF THEM. Well you're just in luck. Nah, we're good. You can leave though. Nah, i'd rather stay and intentionally accelerate the decline. Another man with a good career not marrying is another woman who will become a barren spinster.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:57 AM
-2

Sure, but the overwhelming majority of us will still WRAP IT THE FUCK UP. I guarantee you these legions of whores who raw dogged it with this dude would DEMAND condoms on beta bitch boyfriends (god forbid their inferior DNA impregnates them).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:51 AM
-5

Only a blooper could cheer on Idiocracy in real life. I have an IQ of 129, bachelors/master degree (STEM, not worthless liberal arts degree) and a good career trajectory. How many out of wedlock children in poverty are you bloopers going to cause with your cheering on hypergamy/single motherhood? This country is fucked. This is what you bloopers have created: http://national.deseretnews.com/article/4535/us-marriage-rate-hits-new-low-and-may-continue-to-decline.html
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:49 AM
-1

Good, because deep down, most men know that modern women are worthless whores: http://national.deseretnews.com/article/4535/us-marriage-rate-hits-new-low-and-may-continue-to-decline.html
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:46 AM
1

lol, you are delusional http://national.deseretnews.com/article/4535/us-marriage-rate-hits-new-low-and-may-continue-to-decline.html
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:45 AM
-1

Bloopers lean feminist. Feminism is the root problem of shit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:43 AM
0

lol, you think it's only redpill men who are saying no to marriage, LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:41 AM
-1

Only because i observe reality, you live in a bubble. Let me guess, you think these whores are 'wife material'
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:39 AM
-1

Of course she is, i've completely adopted TRP and sworn off marriage altogether. I'm with 3 different women at the same time at the moement, why the flying fuck would i get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:39 AM
-2

Feminism + Hypergamy = fucking disaster
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:38 AM
-1

No you don't. Besides that, TRP and the manosphere teach men not to marry PERIOD.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:36 AM
0

Nope, the overwhelming majority of men don't want STD's or be on the hook for a baby. Many professional athletes grew up in dirt poor inner cities with poor sex education, that's why many of them go broke: they have so many illegitimate children they have to pay child support for so many of them. These are 'educated' women at Umich who are throwing out any semblence of logic when presented with alpha dick (who is obviously at Umich not because he's smart, but because he's a fantastic athlete).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:34 AM
-2

Uh huh, if you say so. Wishful thinking at it's finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:24 AM
-1

I have a strong suspicion that the overwhelming majority of men would wrap it up while a shitload of women will agree to raw dogging it if the man has sufficient status.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:23 AM
2

Because you and your friends will never be 30. Female_Logic.txt
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:19 AM
-2

Again, just ONE dude... and an ARMY of WHORES There are tons of 'nice guys' on the Umich campus who will have RESPONSIBLE monogamous sex with these women, but again, women are the gatekeepers of sex and they only want alpha dick (until they get older). Of course this is women's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:17 AM
2

If you say so: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html Also: see plummeting marriage rates Thanks to the internet and manosphere, most men know your game.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:16 AM
-2

Men are the gatekeepers of commitment, women are the gatekeepers of sex. When women give up that responsibility, this is what happens. That was the only thing preventing alpha polygamy from being so wide spread. Simple as that. Also notice how she is completely comfortable not only cucking her BF with a football star, but also possibly exposing HIM to STD's as well. Modern women simply don't care about the well being of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:02 AM
-2

It's a serious public health risk, for one. This dude's status is so high he can convince a horde of whores 'women' to raw dog it with him. An alpha with a high enough status can convince many women to do things that they would never do for normal men. The only thing we can pray for is that these super alphas have the decency to fucking wrap it up before banging these whores 'women'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 04:38 AM
-3

Nice non-reply, cat got your tongue? Feminists/Bloopers are causing the spread of STD's and creating an army of worthless women who aren't worth having LTR's with. How much more do you want to destroy the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 04:27 AM
4

Men will win, ultimately because we can simply not hold up the system and let it collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 09:07 PM
13

Certainly more than modern feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 09:06 PM
7

She never asked any of these people for money, she made the film already, her project was in jeapordy, a journalist picked up on it and now she got funding for it. She never asked them BEFORE she did all the work she needed to do. All the money was for post production work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 09:06 PM
2

Of course you won't read it, because it disproves your ridiculous thesis. But let me TLDR it for you: In a setting where women outnumber men (60 to 40 in this case), half the men STILL can't get the attention of women (and those women complain about being lonely and being played/cheated on by the 'studs' on campus, while ignoring half of those men). Explain to me how 'most' men are getting healthy sexual relationships with women again? Also, i'm dating 3 women at once so i'm doing fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 03:07 AM
7

You're delusional. Let me copy/paste something from the NYTimes that i posted before and tell me whether you would call this 'healthy sexual relationships with women': http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html?pagewanted=all Here we have a situation where women on college campuses far outnumber the men and the women are bitching about not being able to find a date: “This is so typical, like all nights, 10 out of 10,” said Kate Andrew, a senior from Albemarle, N.C. The experience ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 03:00 AM
1

We were bound by biology and also by how society is setup. obsession with sex How could TRP be obsessed with sex when 'monk mode' is taught? Even some advocate nofap. social hierarchy ("alphaness") A man who obsesses where he stacks up vs. other man is the opposite of alpha. peer acceptance Not a concern of TRP, except for possible utilitarian reasons. and the denigration of an "other." Describing nature is not denigration
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 02:55 AM
-2

Also, TRP is the opposite of the slavery to the ego. Slavery to the go means you are constantly aware of your social standing and constantly insecure of it (no matter where you are on the social ladder). TRP advocates constant self improvement and also to 'give no fucks', that is a true mark of an alpha. When you don't give a fuck about how people view you, then you are truly free.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 02:37 AM
1

TRP is about destroying man's slavery to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 02:07 AM
-3

I once found $20 in a library book. I bet that happens as much as your situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:38 AM
3

When you have so many options, you take all of them for granted. When you have almost no options, you cherish the rare ones that come your way. Try being an incel. How many mass murders happen because the woman can't stand having so many suitors? This is some 1st world problems type complaining with regards to sexual interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:29 AM
2

We wouldn't exist if it weren't for them. TRP didn't just happen all of a sudden in a vacuum. That's like blaming the dog for biting you when you continually abuse him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 10:44 PM
3

They focused on the wrong things, and we know that because female depression is skyrocketing compared to prior generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 10:29 PM
1

Your point was dumb: Except those are exactly the type of men RP strives to be.. No one really talks about dating women in their 20swhen they're in their 20s. They want high schoolers or college girls and then when they're 40 will give 25 year olds the time of day. You can live your life under that theory, but people will call you out for it. Women created this new reality. A lot of men would have been happy to marry women their own age when they were young. Women rejected that notion, and now w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:31 PM
6

Because men want to be winners. And because women don't REALLY want to be winners, they want to be MARRIED to winners.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:29 PM
2

They all left me... And TRP turned out to be right, yet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:14 PM
2

"You can't change a man." Loneliness and rejection can change a man into the greatest scoundrel. Women, you are the ones who created this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:13 PM
3

Uh, a lot of us men were available for LTR's and marriage when we were younger, but all the women made a mad dash to the hottest guys because of their innate hypergamy. TRP wouldn't exist if it weren't for women acting the way they do. The fact that there are expired women who are crying about their lonely situation is what we call 'karma'. Call me a bad person all you want, but it brings me some sense of joy that these women are bearing the fruit THEY THEMSELVES planted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:10 PM
3

I like how you completely ignore the fact that the article repeats what i wrote above: Men and women overall do not answer differently in rating the priority of a successful marriage to them, but there are differences among young adults, ages 18 to 34. About four-in-ten (39%) young women say that having a successful marriage is “one of the most important things” in their life, compared with about three-in-ten (29%) young men who say so. When you look at declining marriage rates, you can see that…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:48 PM
-1

Women are hypergamous, thus they want mates who ideally make more money than they do. Then they can divorce rape the man, take half his shit, AND get alimony (and child support if children are involved). That and women win custody battles most of the time. Don't be clueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:27 PM
2

Again, you're delusional. Women want marriage these days MORE than their counterparts a previous generation ago. Young men want marriage LESS than a previous generation ago as well: http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/young-men-and-women-differ-on-the-importance-of-a-successful-marriage/ The share of young men (ages 18 to 34) who say that having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives has dropped six percentage points since 1997, from 35% to 29%. For women, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:51 PM
2

You're delusional. It's women who are lamenting the lack of guys who are willing to commit. Being an average guy from 30 onwards is pretty fucking awesome, you have the pick of women you can pump and dump and not give a shit about. Women OTOH: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704409004576146321725889448 http://www.thebolde.com/9-reasons-hard-find-good-man/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/so-where-have-al…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:41 PM
2

But TRP doesn't try to change media/academia/female spaces/corporate america and turn them into 'safe spaces'. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:46 PM
1

Tell that to my RP ban. TRP doesn't try to make the world a 'safe space', feminism does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:06 PM
3

Again, i'm not sure what your reply had to do with the thing i posted... i posted a feminist comic where they make fun of 'nice guys' who try to be friends with women before revealing how they really feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:22 AM
2

What i'm talking about 'being friends' first before romance: http://imgur.com/gallery/RmAjE
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:09 AM
4

I'm not sure what to make of your story, i guess there's lots of gaps to fill in, but if you were friends before and then fell in love and got married, then great! I wish more relationships were like that. But men trying to be friends with women first then trying to start something romantic later is 'being dishonest', according to feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:06 AM
3

Oh no, my dad won, i'm talking about the modern version of my dad. If he were 20/30 years old today, he'd be an incel. Sure go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:41 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3o8t2x/question_for_both_bp_and_rp_what_was_your_parents/ <-- tells you a little bit about me. In an ideal world, men who resemble my dad would be the winners, but they aren't. We live in modern times and modern times are debauched
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:37 AM
3

Women can't get married if men aren't willing to do so, what do you want to make it a law to punish men who don't get married after a certain age? It takes 2 to tango.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:33 AM
2

Yes, but only so we can fuck as many women as possible. Theoretically, average dudes can fuck lots of ugly chicks, but there's a base minimum standard that men have.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:32 AM
6

I'm an ex-romantic. One thing you don't seem to understand is that most TRPers are pissed off because we loved women TOO much and we're disillusioned by the disney fairytale lies we were told about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:31 AM
5

Except they want commitment (preferably from high status men, but if not, stable betas). Men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Except men are going on strike (either because they are winners in the fuckfest buffet or they are losers who don't want to put up with that shit to get shackled down).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:30 AM
5

That's what most terpers advocate too. Are you a secret terper?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:28 AM
2

Did you reply to the wrong person?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:26 AM
2

Yeah, that's what all bloopers say. You'll spin plates and pump and dump, but you'll do it in the 'feminist approved way', thinking you're not hurting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:25 AM
4

If men were hypergamous, they'd work harder to get their ideal mates. Except they don't. Men will go for the path of least resistance most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:24 AM
4

Do you think all men have zero standards as to who we fuck? Like, a single man will never turn down sex from any woman, no matter how poor, ugly, and otherwise unattractive? I didn't say that, but the top 20% of men can get average to attractive women to pump and dump. Everyone else is forced celibate or forced into monogamy (serial or otherwise). More for us. But not enough for those women, see: Marriage rates. Do you honestly think you're doing those women a favor by fucking them and not commi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:22 AM
9

On average, most men would be perfectly happy to fuck around, and that's what we're seeing in society. Also, I didn't say 100% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:20 AM
9

Of course it happens. Also, some people win when they play russian roullete with 5 bullets in the chamber. The issue is that there's 5 bullets in the chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:19 AM
8

Actually yours is: 1) Relatively speaking, men want to have more variety than women 2) It doesn't explain what the variability is and how much men fall in certain categories vs. other women. It doesn't even explain what the scale is, like whether there are people who want a mate they are completely in to but also still fuck around as well (my personal preference).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:12 AM
8

"You're wrong!" posts wikipedia article showing that i'm mostly right
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:06 AM
11

Hypergamy leads to cock carousel riding when women are young. High status men won't commit, but they sure as fuck will fuck lower status women without commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 03:58 AM
2

I think the last polling showed that MRA's are mostly democrats over at the mensrights subreddit anyway. A lot of MRA's are ex-feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 03:46 AM
14

Everyone is naturally "hypergamous". What is unusual is not that women prefer a high status mate, but that men do not do so to the same degree. Men do so to some degree. An average-looking man who prefers a very beautiful mate, is hypergamous in a way, for beauty is a form of status, and he would undoubtedly enjoy having her on his arm for an evening out. Given the choice between investing in an ideal mate that conforms to a man's 'hypergamy' vs. investing as little as possible to fuck as many w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 03:38 AM
5

If marriage rates weren't plummeting, nobody would give a shit about TRP, that's my point, but TRP gives a blueprint to the reasons why (that aren't feminist approved reasons) and actually advocates bringing marriages rates down even MORE, that's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 03:34 AM
6

For example, domestic violence services. It's severely lacking for male victims. Women have countless services, for male victims, the hotline number for men directs you to services to help you STOP committing domestic violence in many countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 03:32 AM
7

I wouldn't say MRA's are conservative, most are for government services that fairly address the needs of BOTH men AND women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:49 AM
5

So you're telling me that TRP giving logical advice to men why marriage is a bad deal, about 'the wall', about AFBB... whether all of these are true or not (they're true, btw), that women wouldn't be concerned about it when there's a marriage crisis in this country? Remember, marriage is what WOMEN want and there are men out there that are doing their best (successfully i might add) to tear that institution down.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:41 AM
16

Women hates TRP because it exposes women's sexual strategy, first and foremost. Women wouldn't mind TRP if men eventually fell in line and married these crying harpies, but they're not (with or without TRP). The last thing desperate unmarried American women who hit the wall need is for a group of men to reveal their tricks, reveal how unfair marriage is for American men, reveal how much better men's lives can be if they withhold commitment, etc. It's no surprise why American women would hate the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:35 AM
0

Meh, i'm looking at recent statistics of Russian mail order brides and the divorce rate is still lower and it appears domestic violence isn't a concern: http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac%3A155792 Nonetheless, mail-order marriages are less likely to end in divorce than marriages overall in the United States: divorce rates in mail-order marriages for which the courtship period lasted more than 4 months were between 35.8 and 41.3 percent when compared to the overall US divorce rate whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:32 AM
0

The ROK reference is from 2013, but if you actually look at the google search for that quote, you can see there are several references from 2010, including from this book: Listverse.com's Ultimate Book of Bizarre Lists: Fascinating Facts and http://www.amazon.com/Listverse-coms-Ultimate-Book-Bizarre-Lists/dp/1569758174 The actual scanned page from the book that references it: https://books.google.com/books?id=DAc2vqmcjTYC&pg=PA261&lpg=PA261&dq=The+United+States+Citizenship+and+Immigration+Servic…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 01:29 AM
1

Once you get married you are a citizen i believe, i think as long as immigration doesn't suspect you are one of those girls who just pays someone off for citizenship that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 01:15 AM
8

They acknowledge their low place on the SMV scale actually. I'm talking about whining about even rating people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 11:48 PM
5

Physical attractiveness is usually the first thing that allows you to even get your foot in the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 10:38 PM
9

Who the fuck cares, men are also rated in the marketplace too, you don't hear us whining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 08:57 PM
16

when someone describe a woman as 7/10...leaving aside the fact that it's rude Only an American woman could complain about being above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 08:56 PM
3

Each side provides something, the man provides security and the woman provides her beauty, no different than relationships before the feminist revolution. That creates attraction. There's no complementary relationships between american men and women, which is why the relationships don't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 07:00 PM
0

Black dudes like 'em thick.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 06:36 PM
-1

because I know that she wouldn't want to be with me. How do you know that? If you marry an American woman, she'd be more likely to divorce you, signifying she's not really into you. In fact, she would have probably married you out of fear (hitting the wall) than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 06:08 PM
5

Someone sounds bitter!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 05:54 PM
1

If you can divorce rape a man, do you need to know anyone? And these marriages seem to persist for years. Also, these mail order brides still converse with the man before marriage and they have their pick of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 05:27 PM
-1

the main reason is that mail order brides have little or no option other than to stay with the guy they're with. That, of course, is not true. Divorce is cheap and easy for women and they get to rape the man of his assets/income.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 05:23 PM
1

Apparently, not divorce. I think beta attributes actually work to the advantage of the man here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 05:18 PM
2

You're comparing apples to oranges, arranged marriages that you're talking about are different to women who have free will as to who they choose for marriage, which these mail order brides do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 11:50 PM
2

Mail order brides aren't forced into marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 11:37 PM
2

Or maybe these men that feminists make fun of as 'nice guys' really are nice and treat these women great and don't take them for granted because they've never had romantic success in their lives and these women are appreciative of their "disgusting" niceness and reciprocate in kind and they have a healthy relationship as a result????
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 11:30 PM
1

If she's miserable, she can take the man to the cleaners via divorce. Give me a break, arranged marriages are successful, and that scares feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 11:26 PM
1

…marriages arranged through [mail order bride] services would appear to have a lower divorce rate than the nation as a whole, fully 80 percent of these marriages having lasted over the years for which reports are available.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 10:30 PM
1

Jack remained a passionate secret that existed only in Rose's memory, and she never told anyone else, not even her husband. "A woman's heart is a deep ocean of secrets" - a statement that can be interpreted in any number of different ways. Basically, Rose was an alpha widow.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 09:45 PM
2

Our laws favor easy divorce. If those arranged marriages are unhappy, then either party can get divorced as easy as submitting paperwork for a passport, just like how american women divorce rape men at the drop of a hat. And the foreign bride who divorces gets all sorts of goodies out of it. But they don't, because they're not spoiled rotten like american women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 03:01 PM
3

Do you know what proportions are? I'm not talking about absolute numbers, i'm talking about PROPORTIONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 03:16 AM
2

To dispel the disgusting myths about men and women who find love via unconventional means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 01:13 AM
10

There is far less divorce between american men and mail order brides than there are between american men and american women. This is remarkable if you really think about it, because the men who go for mail order brides are typically those who have frustration finding romance in the first place. A rational man would seek a marriage OUTSIDE the US based on these stats: http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/MobRept_AppendixA.pdf (the file got removed or moved somewhere else, but i saved this link for …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 12:51 AM
3

There is far less divorce between american men and mail order brides than there are between american men and american women. This is remarkable if you really think about it, because the men who go for mail order brides are typically those who have frustration finding romance in the first place. A rational man would seek a marriage OUTSIDE the US based on these stats: http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/MobRept_AppendixA.pdf (the file got removed or moved somewhere else, but i saved this link for …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 12:50 AM
1

Not for marriage she isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:38 PM
2

This single sentence crushes the whole foundation of TRP Link to where TRP says to be 'domineering' TRP says to have abundance mentality and give no fucks. You don't need to control your woman when you have several of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:36 PM
7

It's a reminder that women are hypocrites who don't deserve commitment. These women have absolutely no problem divorce raping men. When the shoe is on the other foot, they scream like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 03:10 PM
1

I think most employers care more about what you can do rather than what school you went to. If you have a great portfolio, you have a chance.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 05:07 PM
7

Just learn coding by yourself, there are people who work at Google who only graduated high school but took the initiative to learn on their own.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 04:16 PM
3

Gay guys have about zero problems and need no advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 02:42 AM
1

I personally wouldn't want to have any relations to ex-sluts either, they are still liable to fall off the wagon.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:36 PM
0

Hahahaha, yeah ok, i'm sure you will be content with cats in older age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:31 PM
7

Women's advice towards dating is worthless. A man who fucks a lot of women who is self aware of social dynamics is far more valuable in terms of REAL advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:30 PM
1

Show me the breakdown. The study found that high self-esteem females had a significantly greater number of sexual partners than low self-esteem subjects. So it's showing high self esteem women vs low self-esteem 'subjects', what the fuck does that even mean? That includes men too?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:24 PM
2

Because when you have thosuands of dicks thrown your way and lots of thirsty men willing to do anything just to hold your hand, it becomes quite obvious that you can get men to do stuff for you just by existing. It's hardly rocket science. TRP delves into more complicated ideas on a macro scale (i.e. AF/BB) that's not inherently obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:15 PM
1

So they mixed men and women together and focused on those who have liberal vs. conservative attitudes. Worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:02 PM
1

Ok, show me where it says that, all indications show that low self esteem girls have lots of sex, not high self esteem ones. When you really think about it, girls have sex a lot because they can't get men they desire to commit to them. Those tend to be more average/below average looking girls. Of course they'd have lower self esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:45 PM
2

Manipulation is the weapon of choice for women, of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:40 PM
6

Should there be a Red Pill sub for women who wish to manipulate men and marry beta bucks for their money No, because that's the default state of the modern women, they KNOW this already.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:39 PM
5

This does though: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/claire-hannum/casual-sex-depression_b_4373641.html Edit: Also, copy/paste the part where it shows having lots of sex shows high self esteem for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:33 PM
14

Maybe this is my generational gap showing, but this is not exclusively TRP knowledge. Most men instinctively know to not commit to these type of women. Yeah we know, the reason why people hate TRP is because TRP codifies this for everyone to see when prior it was just common knowledge distilled on the 'down low'. If i were a feminist/single mom/slut, of course i'd hate the fuck out of TRP, they're exposing secrets that bluepilled men might not know about and hurting their sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:23 PM
7

You're arguing correlation vs. causation On a practical matter, i'm arguing it doesn't matter which it is. You shouldn't be a BPer, you should be an RPW.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:17 PM
6

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003700/Women-lost-virginity-teenagers-likely-divorce-says-new-study.html Women who lost their virginity as young teenagers are more likely to divorce - especially if it was unwanted, according to new research. The University of Iowa study shows that 31 per cent of women who had sex for the first time as teens divorced within five years, and 47 per cent within 10 years. Among women who delayed sex until adulthood, 15 per cent divorced at five years, compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:15 PM
7

Right, because girls with low self esteem who have sex earlier suddenly close their legs when they're in their 20's/30's Lets be real.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 04:12 PM
9

Except those women have HIGHER marital satisfaction. http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage. We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be. This association was not statistically significant for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 03:34 PM
9

Nope: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-04/iu-eia043002.php Self-esteem plays an apparent role in the loss of virginity among adolescents, according to a study by researchers at the Indiana University School of Medicine published in the April 2002 issue of Pediatrics. Self-esteem had opposite effects on young girls and young boys. Young girls with high self-esteem were less likely to engage in early sexual activity, while young boys with high self-esteem were more likely to report bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 03:31 PM
3

Oh yes, because once you get old, you'll get tons of male attention /s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 03:15 PM
3

Who the fuck cares? If you're marrying a slut, do you CARE whether they make a bad wife because of correlation or causation?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 02:39 PM
10

Virgin women who marry are happier with their marriages, less likely to divorce, but we should give sluts a chance because reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 02:29 PM
-2

Yeah, it's indicative of the fact that women are idiots. Again, teaching women that frats aren't safe is akin to victim blaming. It's like you wanting to stick your dick in a wasp hive and me telling you not to do it, saying it's victim blaming. Then being totally surprise when your dick gets stung.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:11 AM
4

Because they get laid so much they get used to it and assume all women in their frathouse wants it? Don't forget that feminists have widened the definition of rape to absurd levels too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 12:43 AM
6

college rapes happen more often at fraternities than anywhere else on campus. The national discussion is on college rape, not rape overall, because that affects middle class white women and we need to make them feel comfortable over everything else. And if you tell women not to go to frats, you're victim blaming. We have frats becaue of tradition/it concentrates power (good for connections for a job).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 12:21 AM
1

Women finding 'purpose' in life is why female unhappiness/depression (and consequently taking anti-depressants) is on the rise. A career and a family can both be pursued in bad faith - as in not for the right reasons. Most people don't like their jobs, very few are actually fulfilling. Which, again, is why female depression is on the rise. Men used to do shit jobs, but they'd come home to a loving wife/family who respected him so he had something to live for. Now women are doing boring/unfullfil…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:45 PM
1

No i'm not, you look down on women who aren't "STRONG AND INDEPENDENT"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:31 PM
1

Another difference between men and women, you women get 'triggered' so easily. You think men run away when you call us all rapists? Women are emotionally weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:29 PM
2

I don't care if she earned a bullshit degree in gender studies and became an HR person. I'll take the high school grad that puts actual value on sex and relationships (actual character) over the woman who jumps on any hot dick she sees while focusing on her 'career' any day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:28 PM
2

Why would a woman lie about that? Women don't lie 100% of the time, but they have to have a specific reason to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:17 PM
1

That's hilarious because it's REDPILLERS who say frame/masculinity is important but you bloopers keep bringing up how facial attractiveness is more important.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:16 PM
2

There's plenty of women who can be loyal and a good mother and don't have an ounce of character. wtf is this bullshit, women who are loyal and make good mothers by definition HAVE character.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:06 PM
13

Brett Favre is not considered a pariah because he sent some dick pics. However if a woman in the same position (age, success, marital status) send a picture of herself spread-eagle she would be PILLORIED. What crack are you smoking, men sending dick picks get torn to shreds, holy shit, that's the OPPOSITE of what is reality. Have you noticed that there's absolutely no outrage over the justine bieber pics while when female pics get released, it's tantamount to rape? Women are the target of stalke…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:01 PM
1

The smart ones realize that a woman who's only value-add is sex, doesn't go very far with guys who have equal or higher SMV. So she works to better and develop herself so when the right man comes along, she's got more in her purse than her vagina for sale or rent. Except women are hypergamous and they don't date down and high value guys are less likely to commit. Men really only care that women are pretty. And when it comes to commitment, we only care that they are loyal and have an agreeable pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 10:55 PM
1

Does too!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 10:53 PM
1

Like i said, i would have gladly been 'raped', 'molested', and 'groomed', by several of my teachers @ 12. Male and female sexuality are completely different beasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:49 PM
3

Marriage is still the thing WOMEN want overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:35 PM
3

Well, ignorance has it's consequences, just look at all the unmarried 30 somethings who rode the CC and now are doomed to spinsterhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:30 PM
2

Men use porn to satisfy their sexual desire. Women use porn as an aid with a partner and also 'exploring their curiosity!?!?' Yeah, that explains it entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:29 PM
2

How the fuck is it moving the goal posts? If you have a high sex drive, you don't get bored of it just because you're w/ the same person. This study is great because it shows why women are such shitty LTR's. Edit: And now i understand why gay men are called gay. Not having to deal with women would make any man happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:26 PM
8

The key quotes: Men often use pornography on their own and for more immediate sexual pleasures. ... Women, on the other hand, are more likely to use porn to enhance sexual experiences with a partner or explore their curiosity Yeah, thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:19 PM
7

Of course you would never ask me for a link if you lived in reality. Everyone knows women's sex drive, ON AVERAGE, is fickle and not as strong as men's. This is just common sense, unless you're a feminist. http://www.livescience.com/18233-women-lose-sexual-desire.html New research is demonstrating what many people already knew from experience: Women lose interest in sex over time, while men don't. The finding has the potential to help couples, the researchers said. Knowing that many women's sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:10 PM
8

Women's 'problem' revolves around being pumped and dumped (their own fault) and not marrying a billionaire alpha (unrealistic expectations and a condition of being spoiled by 50 shades, SATC, and years of 'unwanted' male attention)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:07 PM
9

Also, this statement is so idiotic, i can't let this go, if women's sex drives were so high, there would be a huge porn industry for women, but there isn't. I mean, shit, 50 shades of grey needed a billionaire super alpha to get women wet and that made, what, 10's of millions of dollars? Porn is full of disgusting low class women and that's a multi billion dollar industry. Don't be absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:05 PM
1

No i'm not, most boys want to fuck at a young age.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:03 PM
7

Better to be angry and bitter and know the truth than to fake happiness with the BP reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:02 PM
5

Wrong Actually you're wrong, another study was posted showing that male sexual desire didn't drop off during long relationships while female arousal did. If women's urges were high, that wouldn't happen. This is why /r/deadbedrooms is full of mostly men. Less and less earlier. Which is a good thing. People shouldn't commit to an important life decision like marriage do early. Haha, you think the tinder generation is going to get married later, that's cute. Why on earth would men who are getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:01 PM
2

No i'm pretty sure i do. Young girls who have sex at a young age have low self esteem while the opposite is true for boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:58 PM
1

Only if the boy isn't gay and some priest does it. You don't understand male sexuality at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:56 PM
3

Women have urges too Nowhere near like men plenty of men who commit to relationships. Less and less each year
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:54 PM
5

Still doesn't mean i wouldn't enjoy it. There are some double standards that make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:50 PM
7

this isn't something that women want. pfffffffffffffffffffahahaha, yeah, ok they just exploit it. is is a symptom of the horrible gender roles on our society, something feminism is all about abolishing. Feminism doesn't want equality, feminism wants to go to a buffet and pick out all the things they want, but none of the 'yucky' stuff (i.e. responsibilities). thanks for proving my point. you see women as children. not only that, but sexualized children (wtf). Now you're just making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:50 PM
5

I don't really consider myself a MRA, besides that, you have no idea about male sexuality. Also, the only reason why i'd hold women to the same standards as men when it comes to sex with children is because feminists are idiots and trying to make genders equal when they certainly aren't. I mean, deep down, i know that women have sex with young boys is far less damaging than men having sex with young girls, but if you want a policy of equality, then you need to suck it up and take up all absurd p…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:47 PM
4

Men do love us though. Men pumping and dumping and not committing/marrying you is not 'loving' you, it's fulfilling their primary sexual urge.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:39 PM
7

They get offered it, then they act on it. There are some (by some, i mean few) mature women who don't. But modern women are manipulative sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:32 PM
3

I mean, if Ms. Z 'molested/raped/groomed' my 12 year old self, that would have been a win for me, different strokes i guess. Edit: Haha, i just remembered, Ms Z left school and there were rumors she did fuck a student.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:31 PM
11

More like, 'unless women stop bitching about everything as being "sexist", jumping on all the alpha dick they can find then trying to trap a BB provider at 30, etc....'
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:28 PM
7

but there's shit we have to worry about that you don't. Yeah poor women, even unnattractive men looking at you is rape nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:25 PM
5

Meh, i wanted to fuck some of my teachers at 12
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:24 PM
6

If we're talking drunk? Yeah possibly, if i think she's a batshit crazy feminist who will claim rape afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:19 PM
2

And yet, boys would welcome pussy being thrown their way at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:13 PM
9

Yes i did. I'm saying if they want to be viewed as more than a 'moist hole' ,they need to be loveable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:08 PM
4

b-b-b-b-ut that's rape and women can't be held accountable for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:08 PM
2

I dunno, probably around 12 or 13, whenever boys enter puberty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:07 PM
4

If you want to be loved, you need to be loveable. Women don't seem to understand this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:06 PM
2

For guys, there are physical jobs: high end mechanics, electrician, plumber, and various types of engineering that can earn from decent to awesome money. (I know guys who went into heating/air conditioning, and construction who pull 6-figures and really love what they do. They like machines, not being behind a desk, and owning their own businesses. The plumber makes good money--but he may be a bit more ambivalent wading through other peoples' shit.) Women with degrees don't like dating blue coll…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 04:59 PM
9

The consequences of casual sex is that you make a terrible fucking wife... casual sex affect commitment. The question was whether i would choose to look for casual sex and my answer would be no, because you'd be wasting time and men would rightfully look at you like used trash so they won't commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 04:55 PM
10

No, because having lots of casual sex with men above me would be self delusion. You're not getting their commitment. If i were a below average looking woman, i'd go for a hardworking beta who's a bit thirsty who is looking for commitment and i would do it YOUNG. His SMV will rise while mine will decline. Of course, most women are too stupid to think this way, which is why they lose the dating game: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 04:25 PM
4

Let me fix that for you: Most women love alphas, but hate that they won't commit. They hate betas with a passion
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 04:18 PM
4

Feminism made women hate half the population, we're just responding to incentives.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 03:31 PM
3

God you date awful girls . . . except I always try and pay for more or all restaurant meals and stuff like that since I make more money Oh yes, because so many girls are known to pay even 50% Bloopers were bitching here about MEN not paying 100%, since it was the MEN who asked women out, so it's on THEM to pay. Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 03:30 PM
1

And that's why some of us aren't into 'free economies'. The state can do specific things to combat declining populations, both carrot and stick approaches. For example, amend the stupid tax laws so that MARRIED couples get a much larger tax break and a larger tax burden falls on single folks. Also more tax incentives for childcare for those women who INSIST on working. We can also get rid of negative incentives that prevent marriage like alimony and replace it with positive incentives like basic…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 03:02 PM
1

Oh really, so they're aware of the anti-male bias from k-12 and college which leads to too few men for them to date? I doubt most women are that aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 02:21 PM
4

Who cares, TRP keeps growing and it's silly to expect us to keep 100% of our members. All of us were bluepillers at some point in our lives and we went to TRP, ergo...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 02:20 PM
2

Oh yeah, because any other generation (except really old ones) are viable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 01:28 AM
1

"It's not the programs that are unsustainable, it's just this key feature of them that's unsustainable!" Come on, dude. The economy will go down the toilet REGARDLESS of whether you have those programs or not if your population declines. If your "program" depends on a variable of human society remain constant else it'll fail, you probably shouldn't have it. See above.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 01:20 AM
0

https://archive.is/jV3gs
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 01:19 AM
-2

I think you're projecting your own fears and insecurities. I was a drunk mess of emotions and insecurity about my future. If you were a drunk mess, that's your own damn fault. Insecurity about your future? I thought all modern womyn were STRONG AND INDEPENDENT. Besides that, again, men don't care nearly as much as women about the other's job. You don't understand men at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 08:16 PM
3

Peter Schiff put his foot in his mouth so many damn times, it's not worth listening to him. After 2008, he predicted hyperinflation in 2-3 years, that the domestic stock market would crash compared to the international stock market, that commodities would be a much better bet, etc. All of these were wrong btw. And it's nto that medicare or social security are what's going to cause the crash, it's the fact that there aren't enough young to support those programs. Those programs would work if we k…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 08:13 PM
0

If you're really THAT scared, don't have sex with anyone! Or, don't have sex in a college setting. Remember, this is only a danger if you are a college student. You don't get locked up because of a false accusation given to a school administrator, but you WILL get expelled and the 10's of thousands of dollars you 'invested' in your worthless education goes down the drain. yes, for sex, men in their 30s and 40s will go younger. For relationships they tend to date around their age. That's not what…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 07:39 PM
10

Most PUA Gurus are scammers. They basically tell men that they only need 'game' to pick up women and 'looks don't matter'. RP is more realistic and tells men they need to be physically attractive as well, that is why RP advocates lifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 07:33 PM
4

I didn't say false rape accusations were the ONLY factor, but there is certainly a big sense of fear from men over it, again, listen to the NPR report here from men talking about it: http://www.npr.org/2015/10/15/446083439/for-students-accused-of-campus-rape-legal-victories-win-back-rights I mean, if you told me that not only would i be going into deep debt for nothing, but i might be falsely accused of sexual assault, yeah that WOULD be a big factor for a lot of young men going into college. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 07:25 PM
9

That's just peter schiff nonsense, the system is going to crumble because there are going to be far too many old and not enough young to support them and the old will ask for far too many transfer payments for medicare/social security.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 07:17 PM
1

They have examples of what is 'below average': https://www.google.com/search?q=ok+cupid+80%25&oq=ok+cupid+80%25&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i65j0l4.2344j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8 It's blocked at work for me, but i believe it's the first link, some of the men they rated 'below average' are actually average/above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 07:11 PM
1

There IS a feminist "conspiracy" to widen the definition of rape on campus and also get rid of due process. For example, 'retroactive rape' is a thing now where if a girl consented, she can take away that consent later. Another thing is due process is being done away with, so even if, for example (and these are REAL examples), you have a text message from a girl asking you to bring a condom to her room for sex, you can't admit that to evidence at your hearing from your school and you can get exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 07:09 PM
5

Did i say they locked them up all as rapists? No, but clearly men are getting pissed off at the lack of due process on campus/punishing men JUST on the word of women. Even NPR has a good piece about this (be sure to listen to the voices of the male students in the audio recording); http://www.npr.org/2015/10/15/446083439/for-students-accused-of-campus-rape-legal-victories-win-back-rights Also, you completely ignore the anti-male k-12 bias as another reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:56 PM
1

Attractive people with no brains or personality are a dime a dozen. No, they aren't. Women on OK Cupid rated 80% of men as 'below average' attractiveness. Women have impossibly high standards for what they consider 'attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:50 PM
1

It's different for all women, but late 20's (say 27/28), women start to think about getting their beta bux.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:40 PM
6

Young women are outearning young men. Raising taxes will fuck women mroe than it does men. If men drop out of the work force, women will be the ones that are taxed more and the system starts to crumble.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 06:39 PM
1

that female sexuality goes way beyond the physical Not really, physical is the first thing women judge men on and is the most important thing for YOUNG women. Women would prefer the latter. Older women for sure. Isn't that like, red pill 101? Red pill preaches that PUA is snakeoil (you don't need good looks, you just need 'game') actually. While game is certainly important, looks are more important, that is why RP tells men to lift.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:32 PM
21

I disagree, Betabux walking away fucks up the entire marriage golden parachute ecosystem for women who just hit the wall.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 06:29 PM
1

You're pointing to trends in terms of significant gender imbalance. It doesn't prove your point at all. It completely proves my point. They are somehow choosy as fuck even when the numbers are against them. Ever heard the phrase 'beggars can't be choosers'? Well in this case, beggars are even CHOOSIER. Do you honestly think that if there were more men than women that women would still go for more high character guys rather than the hot guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:03 PM
1

Also when they rape. Don't forget about the rape. Also, lol @ thinking doing charity work automatically makes you a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:29 PM
0

As long as religion is around, there will still be some worthwhile women to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:27 PM
4

Here are women talking about what it's like to be a woman: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html?pagewanted=all Note, even when women are outnumbers 60 to 40, hafl the men are invisible and a small minority of men are banging the women/cheating on them/etc, they don't care about the moral character of those men, they care about how hot they are/their social status. Stop being delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:22 PM
1

Yes they are, feminists say so. You defend rapists and white knight them, pretending they are all angelic hard working athletic good looking saints. Interesting how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:16 PM
0

maybe you're asexual? You're defending rapists btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:38 PM
1

lol, yeah, keep defending frat bros, probably the most rapey people on earth. Again, it's hilarious that on one instance feminists bitch about frats being the epicenter of rape on campus: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/24/rape-sexual-assault-ban-frats And now you're defending them as being simply more virtuous. Get the fuck out of here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:24 PM
1

TIL being good looking build character. It's interesting how feminists bitch about how rapey frat bros are and now you're white knighting them. Make up your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:19 PM
1

Used to be, never said i was NOW. Remember, RP teaches machavalian traits. We are simply responding to incentives set by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:17 PM
1

That literally has nothing to do with whether or not they have 'moral character' and you are proving my point, young women care about looks and status more than character
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:15 PM
1

holy shit, dude, you said, You think being uber religious = "free thinker" And i said the OPPOSITE of that, what the fuck are you smoking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:12 PM
1

You think being uber religious = "free thinker" The opposite actually. You suck. Nah, women do
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 04:03 PM
1

So the choice is being a free thinker and maybe getting a devoted wife, yeah ok. Women suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:51 PM
1

Still getting all the pussy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:49 PM
1

Then those women are retarded. No, they know they aren't getting shit from them. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3o6coz/cmv_the_natural_state_of_humanity_is_for_the_top/cvujbn2
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:49 PM
1

What do you mean by this? How do you know it? Do you think feminists really believe air conditioning is sexist or that manspreading and mansplaining and manslamming are real issues? Or is the most likely explanation that feminists are simply seeing how much power they can grab before society gets sick of their shit? Because you would have to have a SERIOUS mental illness to beleive those things are real issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:48 PM
-1

They jump on his dick KNOWING they won't commit to them, thus those women are trash and not thinking about his moral character.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:38 PM
2

Oh yes, because the girls that jumps on frat bro superstar's dick cares about his moral character, get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:34 PM
1

More upset than jealous. See where i'm coming from: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3o8t2x/question_for_both_bp_and_rp_what_was_your_parents/ I'm getting the sex i want and every time i do, i feel disgusted by women a little bit more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:33 PM
1

. everything: From his teeth to his credit report to the way he speaks to his mama. Yeah, women don't give a shit about that stuff until they hit the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:31 PM
1

I used to be a beta who was romantic by nature, but woke up to the fact that women don't give a rats ass about that shit, what's so hard to decipher about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:29 PM
1

I'm an ex-romantic beta if that tells you why i feel the way i do
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:23 PM
3

RPW can find high value men, but those men will most likely be religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:09 PM
4

Sure, if choosing between the two, she would go for the 8. Isn't the same true of the "8" man though? Why would he choose to fuck a 6 if he could have sex with an 8? Because he's fucking her, not committing to her. Path of least resistance. The 8 will expect more wining and dining. Men also like variety, which is why they will fuck down.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 01:13 PM
5

This needs to be higher up. Sex has been severely devalued thanks to feminism and the pill. Back in the day, women needed to feel secure about their relationship to men to have sex. Now sex is cheap and almost free like candy, well, except that it's only a handful of men that are getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 10:27 PM
1

The reason why men are dropping out of society is because feminism is exposing how selfish women really are and beta idiots like the author are their accomplices.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 02:57 PM
2

Just have to repost this again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hitc8haEu_g
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 05:41 AM
1

You're delusional if you don't think they do
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 03:11 AM
1

at least until she decides to settle and a BB comes along. And those BB's are wising up thanks to the manosphere (or just from their own personal observations).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 11:31 PM
1

This should be at the fucking top
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 11:25 PM
2

Only because women see a lot more people with more wealth than them. It's not enough to just have a roof over your head, food on the table, and some comforts in life, women need to one up their peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 04:18 AM
1

No, you originally brought up feminism, hypergamy, and the pill, to which I offered a different explanation which was level of development. You then somehow you jump to workforce participation. ... Lol. And you say this right after you also agree that they are traditional. You are jumping to conclusions as to what I mean sort of like how you did when you assumed that I thought eastern culture was "backwards" when I said they are traditional. ... I think we haven't been on the same page when it c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 10:10 PM
2

No comment? That's a shame, because that is the number one reason why I know that TRP is BS. I am a woman who started dating a guy over two years ago. He was very sweet and kind. He was planning on going to a hiking trip near my hometown while I was visiting my mother. He sent me a text message asking if I would mind that if he goes on the trip. After every time we hung out together, he'd ask if we could continue, or when the next time we could see each other was. He was never pushy, not dominat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 09:30 PM
1

That's just because they are. They are very family oriented (perhaps it'd be better to say less individualistic), less promiscuous, more likely to have family structure of working father/stay at home mother. Hell, even Singapore is described to have a 'Victorian era' view of family. Women work and obtain an education partly because having a strong work ethic is emphasized/revered/honored. In the U.S. it's very much seen as a means to an end. There are some very interesting differences between ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 09:22 PM
1

It totes is o.O The blue line (the world) is at 2, are you blind? http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN You mean the red line that is going up? It's really flat Again, the overwhelming majority of countries are in decline. Assuming you're american, you can see ours is in decline as well (see the last column showing the graphical trend): http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 09:07 PM
2

You seem to brush off a lot of BP advice from happy, romantically successful people for that to be the case. ... Translated into something neutral, this is "believes mainstream views on sex and relationships". Which is pretty typical of a lot of us. Oh, is that why colleged aged women cry about being pumped and dumped, not being in a romantic monagamous relationship, and won't even consider half the men even though women outnumber men on campus? https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 09:02 PM
1

Look at college graduation rates between men and women, the ratio is getting worse and worse. Remember, women are hypergamous, they don't even really want blue collar men who can make a good living (like plumbers), i highly doubt they want men who work in retail or are jobless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:55 PM
1

Birth rates are also tied to how developed a country is. Developed asian countries that are traditionally conservative like Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea are facing similar issues. How the fuck are those countries 'traditionally conservative' when they have lots of women going into the workforce? If they were, they wouldn't do that. I'm ok with changing immigration regulations to increase population. Oh yes, because importing poor people will somehow solve this. Also, what you're doi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:54 PM
1

I don't know how to remove it and the documentary actually lists those things as causes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:51 PM
1

It's not "2.5" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate#/media/File:Trends_in_TFR_1950-2050.png It's going down in most countries: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN And people in Zambia aren't going to support you and i when we're old, why the hell are you taking a world AVERAGE when we're talking about highly developed economies?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:49 PM
1

This IS the misandry bubble bursting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:43 PM
0

And what audience are they pandering to, red pillers? You're saying those chicks are doing it to pander to us, eh? You're not worth talking to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:39 PM
1

I suppose when you measure how good advice is by how much it aligns with TRP No, we measure advice against results. Men are far more practical than emotional. If women got wet for men who were good at math, you would see a shortage of calculus books. If Dr Nerdlove or any other BP approved advice actually worked, you would see men flocking to that. Do you, honest to God, in your red little heart, think that us blues all secretly know that TRP is true, and we are just sulking? That is actually wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:25 PM
3

Just an example, but virtually any advice you guys give is terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 07:27 PM
3

Well, not one person, but Dr. Nerdlove is quite popular with feminists. But if you look at his alexa statistics, the hilarious thing is far more women traffic his site than men do, which shows you the efficacy of his garbage advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 07:09 PM
4

BP leans feminist and i've seen Dr. Nerdlove advocated by some of you guys. Dr. Nerdlove advocated to become a feminist ally to get laid. Let that sink in for a bit. If you think TRP advice is bad, your advice is infinitely worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:59 PM
1

Are you really offended that we don't offer more? Not really, but the reason why you don't offer more is because your advice will never work in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:57 PM
0

What evidence do you have to support this? What, are you serious? That's all women have to do. An average woman could have get fucked by several hundred dicks today just by going outside and announcing she'd do it. An average man can't do that shit. And even good looking men would have to work a LITTLE to get that kind of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:56 PM
2

Women just have to sit back and choose one of the thousands of dicks that get thrown her way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:53 PM
9

I like how there's so many fucking narrow rules to this for men but women can just do whatever the fuck they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:50 PM
1

oh yeah, because weight lifting in groups when there's only a few benches is so practical. Now compare that to yoga. You make no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 12:31 AM
2

Attraction is absolute not relative. It's both. If Michael Cera walks into a room, girls will start jumping him. But if Chris Evans walked in right after, the girls will forget about Cera and jump Evans' dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 05:42 PM
1

Essentially. When you're down in the dumps, you may feel more empathy for others in your situation. Male camaraderie is naturally stronger than female camaraderie.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 05:40 PM
5

And yet i could totally see michael cera being an incel if he weren't famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 05:22 PM
6

The fact that if Adele came onto me, i wouldn't have sex with her, but i saw Michael Cera with 20 girls hanging onto him in a bar once should tell you all you need to know about how different we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 04:16 PM
0

"Crony Capitalism is fucked... I'd like some Socialism for a change." False dilemma. What I hear is "too much government is fucked, let's try more government." Just out of curiosity, Libertarians like to point to Singapore as an example, but they actually have some true socialist tendencies (i.e. the government owns all the land/most of the buildings that people live in and the government owns a significant portion of the GDP producing 'private' companies coming out of singapore), and it works o…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 03:26 AM
9

Meh, i'm a liberal redpiller (sans feminism because it's a garbage ideology), there's more of us than you'd realize.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 02:21 AM
1

again, go to r/pussypass, lots of women having sex with minors without getting charged/incarcerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:42 PM
1

So you are saying that feminists such as my self don't go into STEM, we don't work in construction or do anything hard. Are you all women/feminists? I don't think you would have made it in my data analytics program And we don't deal with literal shit. Yeah, all those female plumbers. Do you know what I do for a living or do you just want to keep digging your hole deeper and deeper? See above comment So wait you hate HR because they think you should have a basic level of knowledge to do a job rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:41 PM
1

Even if women are incarcerated at half the rate that would STILL mean men are the majority of paedophiles. Again, that's for ALL crimes, not just sex crimes against children.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:38 PM
2

Not nearly as attractive as the models Seal is fucking though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:11 PM
1

Indian women don't have a cultural bias against mathematics to hold them back. That's because they go and do it and don't whine about it. Yeah, correlation and causation. Someone posted a bitch ass article about a former female scientist whining about how STEM is 'intimidating' for women because of "star wars posters" and the stereotype of greasy autistic men that occupy it, but then i see lots of indian/chinese women in the program who don't bitch about it and JUST FUCKING DO IT. India is bruta…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:10 PM
1

Again, bullshit, India is far lower on the gender equality index than Norway, the NUMBER ONE on the index (and ironically, a higher amount of gender segregation in employment). Stop bullshitting. Watch the damn documentary (or not, gender theorists get embarrassed by REAL scientists so you might get triggered). May I ask what STEM degree do you hold that lets you state that STEM is fucking hard? Just out of curiosity. Data Analytics. I wouldn't even say MY graduate degree is all that hard compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 05:06 PM
1

AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA No seriously AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH Yeah, bullshit, since when the fuck do feminists fight to get into construction or plumbing NEARLY as hard as they try to go into STEM? Yeah i'm sure feminists really want to deal with literal shit all day. STEM = prestige + money + comfort + low danger. Women want an air conditioned office (oh wait, air conditioning is sexist, i forgot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNH0bmYT7os ) with high pay and prestige. Why does HR make your job harder B…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 05:02 PM
2

You don't understand english: "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." (note this is ALL crimes, i wouldn't be surprised for sex with minors if this was way higher) That doesn't even count courts that just 'let shit go' without conviction even if proven, because she's a woman and boys 'want that'.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:59 PM
2

I mean you all seen Seal, right! That dude scared the fuck up! And dating like models and shit. And I bet Adele's gotta date somebody who works at like: AT&T. - Lil Dicky
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:47 PM
5

I still don't believe this is a common occurrence in general workplaces however. That's because you're ideologically driven and not fact driven. The fact that you were resistant to the idea that men are scared as fuck to go into teaching due to these insane false accusation rates and dismiss redditors telling you this as 'liars' is what's wrong with this society. Let me guess, you're captain save a ho whenever women make up bullshit wage gap or rape claims (statistics proven to be false)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:36 PM
1

Thanks for proving my point with your comment about India. In countries that have the HIGHEST amount of gender equality (i.e. norway), you have the MOST amount of men and women going into gender roles. While those with LOWER gender equality actually have MORE women going into STEM. A fantastic documentary on this, btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70 More proof that 1st world feminists are lazy whiners. STEM is fucking hard, no shit you bitches go into 'humanities' degrees and HR.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:32 PM
2

1) No they don't ALWAYS go to jail. Women are twice as likely to avoid incarceration than men: https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx "After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in an…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:29 PM
1

Also, one other point, it's hilarious that women ONLY want high prestige jobs that are comfortable and safe. Yeah, these men who die on the job, they are the ones who build society. The bitch that does HR doesn't do shit (and actually make MY job harder)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:14 PM
1

So let me summarize: "it's the fault of men, so fuck them if other men suffer". "men are lazy, fuck them if they go homeless". You're just fine and dandy that men will target men for murders, but won't target women. I wonder why that is. Interesting that, for example, you can't seem to connect the dots between the lack of male teachers and boys suffering in school. It's also interesting that you can't connect the dots to a feminized school system creating a system that hurts boys and helps women…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:12 PM
2

That's because we don't classify women as being predators nearly as much as we do men, because those boys 'wanted it', that and male sexaulity is demonized while female sexuality is glorified. Subscribe to /r/pussypass and you'll see lots of examples of women escaping justice for having sex with a minor. This is why women quite often don't even go to prison for having sex with a minor (again, sentencing disparities i described above).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:05 PM
1

Also, men are dropping out of certain fields because of false sex crimes accusations against them are astronomically high: http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/false-accusations-growing-fear-classroom Male role models are becoming increasingly scarce in Canadian classrooms, and the demographics indicate that the current low numbers will continue to decline. New teachers are quite prepared to take up the pedagogical issues raised by changing standards and a changing demographic; however…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 03:55 PM
2

HOWEVER, if one notes that among the many problems with the judicial system colour plays a much bigger role. And this may have to do with the fact that most women aren't being convicted for the same sort of crimes. 1) Nope, while color does play a role, gender plays a BIGGER role, SIX TIMES more than color 2) Nope again, they are comparing for the same crimes. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx "After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 03:53 PM
1

Women don't want equality. Equality implies wanting freedom AND responsibilities. For example, even though women face 63% shorter sentences for the exact same crime that men perpetrate, feminists STILL don't think women have enough privilege over men, thus one of the most respected newspaper in the country actually posted this feminist drivel: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/ As if that makes any sense in terms of just…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 03:10 PM
3

And in case you think canada is an isolated incident: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/men-too-scared-to-teach-for-fear-of-being-falsely-accused-of-childsex-offences/story-fni6uo1m-1226913910688 Gee, look at that, proportions of male teachers are going DOWN in the down under. Funny thing is, men are more feminized today than they were yesterday, so your other point is retarded. More than 50 South Australian schools had no male teachers last year and experts say this rate will w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 03:03 PM
8

Facts and logic are like kryptonite to you blue pillers http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/false-accusations-growing-fear-classroom Male role models are becoming increasingly scarce in Canadian classrooms, and the demographics indicate that the current low numbers will continue to decline. New teachers are quite prepared to take up the pedagogical issues raised by changing standards and a changing demographic; however, the spectre of violence and false accusations adds a level of dan…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 02:39 PM
6

There were reddit threads from professors on this. Also, why do you think there are fewer and fewer male teachers for k-12 these days, being accused of sexual harassment is FAR riskier for those teachers than it is for college professors.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 02:22 PM
1

The fact that 1st world feminism exists is evidence that the red pill is needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:43 PM
7

What about professors? They're scared as shit to be alone w/ female students. Many will refuse to meet with them with their office doors closed. The more paranoid have their webcams on or will only meet in public spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:38 PM
5

than be with the men who don't have any sympathy for them Oh yes, because there's hardly any white knights out there
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:38 PM
3

I sometimes wonder who these men are who have this fear. Professors, for one. Many will NOT meet with female students with the door closed. The more paranoid will have webcams turned on or only meet in public spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:33 PM
3

She would just scream to get her own way. And people would give in to her. Thus proving your sister is female.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:31 PM
32

Yea damn my awesome relationship, STEM career, equalist social circle. Being a feminist is sooo horrible. Yet another example of solipsism. You're projecting your own life onto other women, many who are having a difficult time, especially when it comes to finding commitment from men: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 10:43 PM
1

Which is funny because i counseled a friend who's relatively wealthy and REALLY REALLY wants to marry (even though i told him all the pitfalls of marriage, especially with today's 'modern' women) and he's seriously depressed at all the gold diggers that throw themselves at him, but he won't listen to my advice about not marrying, so i'm trying to help him limit the risk to him by suggesting he live modestly (i.e. moving out of his penthouse and into a cheap apartment, buying a beat up car rather…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 08:10 PM
2

I'm guessing because they're not so status driven.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 01:35 PM
4

Sorry, we're going to ruin your life because you smoked some weed. Sorry, we're going to shoot you because you're black. Government is always right and just.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 05:39 PM
5

This is true. Men who hit women are insecure (i.e. afraid she'll leave him). But confident men are also the ones who don't give a fuck when it comes to women's feelings and pumping/dumping them because they have abundance mentality, and don't give a fuck if women don't stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 01:43 AM
1

dude sounds like a driven romantic to me. ... nope, i think it's charming. ... you work your way into a PhD program and write romantic letters to the love of your life, while abstaining and staying faithful, completely with a zest for life that only hollywood could muster? your father is an inspiration. i'm not even religious... anymore. I still look up to him, because that's the model of how courting SHOULD be, but that's old fashioned and doesn't apply anymore. Ok so i never wrote a love lette…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 01:34 AM
2

Great stories, very enlightening!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 12:54 AM
7

And that's why women married YOUNG
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:05 PM
10

But you are wrong about what happened in the past. Marriage rates were HIGH in the past. As a woman, you would have had to have been a TREMENDOUS loser not to have been able to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:02 PM
3

Didn't you spend a whole fucking thread arguing with me that average guys didn't have any trouble getting a date? You're contradicting yourself, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:01 PM
1

Did you even read the fucking article.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:00 PM
2

Actually, it's the average looking women who are more loose and the top men who are very happy to pump and dump them. They can't lock down an alpha so they try harder with their pussies to get more attention from them. That royally fucks up assortative mating because beautiful high status women can't make high value men wine and dine them for commitment and betas get bread crumbs, if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 04:59 PM
-1

Women should be able to make their own conditions, however, they should also be informed of the consequences of their own decisions. If you want to ride the CC, so be it, but don't expect a high value man to commit. And expect more and more betas to wake up to the fact that you're trying to entrap them into a life of misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 04:56 PM
4

The woman was often considered lucky to have someone to marry Uh no, that's true TODAY in a society where women have 'choice', ironically. Men are the ones who decide if they want to commit and they are saying 'fuck no' to that. "Back in the day", marriage rates were astronomically high compared to today and people married young. And we had assortative mating, not this female hoarding by the 20% that we have today.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 04:55 PM
2

A lot of men are incels: Copying/pasting from another comment i made: Even on college campuses where MEN have the ADVANTAGE over WOMEN when it comes to proportions (i.e. 60 women for ever 40 men), HALF of those men are invisible to women. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html?pagewanted=all Here we have a situation where women on college campuses far outnumber the men and the women are bitching about not being able to find a date: “This is so typical, like all nights, 10 out of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 04:58 AM
2

Basically yes, feminism is ironically the capitalism of the sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 04:57 AM
2

The ones women go for already are. And women use betas. Turnabout is fair play.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:32 PM
6

I obviously wasn't talking about literal whores. I know, i'm giving you perspective. Modern women are WORSE than whores. Whores are actually honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 08:19 PM
15

Sure, provided that the RP Man is the LTR type not the spin plates type.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:23 PM
2

Correct, she is treating you like she would a sister. She doesn't see you as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 04:57 PM
3

Feminism. Keep telling 'nice guys' who don't have any affection from women that they're actually bad guys. And see our recruits go up even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 04:52 PM
13

Women preferring rich men does not make them whores per se. You're right, because whores are upfront about exchanging money for sex, women aren't. Modern women play a long con where once they approach the wall, they entice hard working betas with sex (despite not being attracted to him), but once she has him on lockdown with marriage, that sex dries up. Thus whores, on a moral level, are far superior to your average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 04:34 PM
3

What does that mean exactly " we don't have subjects in schools that interest boys" so boys become disinterested in academia. There are two issues: 1) The things that are taught don't interest a lot of boys. Boys like to tinker with stuff. We need more vocational options for boys in school. Not everyone likes rote book learning. When i was in school, my favorite classes were an electronics course i took and also wood working. I know my high school got rid of thsoe courses due to budget cutbacks …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 04:08 PM
3

hahahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:55 PM
0

lol, you're beyond delusional. Even on college campuses where MEN have the ADVANTAGE over WOMEN when it comes to proportions (i.e. 60 women for ever 40 men), HALF of those men are invisible to women. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html?pagewanted=all Here we have a situation where women on college campuses far outnumber the men and the women are bitching about not being able to find a date: “This is so typical, like all nights, 10 out of 10,” said Kate Andrew, a senior from A…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 02:59 PM
10

Society is quickly learning that you need to give incentive for those 'unmotivated betas'. Funny how society is quickly falling apartment when you take away those incentives via feminism. For my father's generation, working hard also meant having a very good chance of finding a wife (a YOUNG one at that). OP complaining about betas is fucking retarded, OP and her ilk are the ones that caused this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 02:09 PM
0

lol, you don't think this happens to 'real women'. Average looking women hook up easily with the top 10% of men, then get dissapointed that they can't score commitment from them, then when they turn 30, they panic and settle for the stable average joe. You're telling me women aren't picky? Yeah you don't live in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 01:55 PM
9

That's hilarious, you have to find a woman that's almost mentally incapacitated to be trustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 01:52 PM
0

Oh really? Why does Bar Raefeli have trouble finding a man? http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/super-model-rafaeli-laments-single-status-article-1.1489317 Hint: It's because women are hypergamous. Women marry/date UP and men marry/date down. Of course it's ludicrous to someone like you that bar raefeli would have trouble finding a man, but it makes sense through the lense of hypergamy. Even though there are billions of men who would probably die for her, only a tiny fraction are goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 01:23 PM
1

Do you understand the english language? Nobody is condoning what they did, but it makes SENSE why they did it. When you are genetically programmed to procreate and you face a lifetime of crushing loneliness, yes, i completely understand why they would lash out at the world with violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 01:16 PM
1

What, like this? https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-dawn/200908/sex-and-violence The relationship between sexual frustration and violence is evident in chimps, where most of the male/male conflict arises over access to ovulating females. Among free-loving bonobos on the other hand, there is little, if any, male sexual frustration and thus little, if any, violence. This is no coincidence. war-like societies intentionally cultivate sexual frustration in young men because their resulting aggr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 04:16 AM
9

TRP is hardly known, but men are rejecting marriage and falling out of society out of their own volition. We don't need TRP for men to know that a small number of men hoarding lots of women is going to make many men angry, pissed off, and just drop out of society (being anesthetized by porn and video games) or just give up LTR's/marriage altogether. Men need incentive for marriage and feminists took that away. Now women are 'dating' on MEN's terms (the attractive ones, anyway). This isn't going …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:27 AM
2

Nobody suggested that, however, thanks to feminism, the younger generation has done away with assortative mating. At least in the past, far more men got access to sex via old fashioned courting rituals/marrying young. Now it's an all you can fuck buffet for men at the top while the men at the bottom suffer crushing loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:16 AM
1

How is it exaggerated? He got applause from the joke. Do you think comics are just lying about how they feel just because a mic is in front of him? He didn't condone the murder, but he UNDERSTOOD. ER and the oregon guy are far more understandable than OJ. OJ was a celebrity (Ex football star, and movie star back then) with a lot of money, access to women, etc. Sure his wife left him, so what, he still has all of life's pleasures available to him. Incels who go murder NEVER had anything going on …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:14 AM
1

Women aren't really that picky, man. Ok, this is the dumbest opinion in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:02 AM
1

I have a sex drive - a high one - but if I'm not getting laid I don't make bones about it. I have a type. Bullshit, if you have a high sex drive, you aren't picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:01 AM
1

Your reply proves TRP's theory that RP theories are socially acceptable as long as they are from a comedian (or other women)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 10:01 PM
0

Thanks, this is the only worthwhile reply here
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 09:59 PM
4

I guess i'll have to disagree, ER's whole schtick was being an incel. THe other guy's manifesto also talked about never having a girlfriend/being an incel. It's almost like a pattern is emerging! Don't forget that old dude... i think his name was george sodino or something, he was also very lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:54 PM
2

Well, i'm just going to have to disagree, note: i didn't say JUST have ONE girlfriend, but unlimited access to pussy. He wouldn't need violence because he felt insecure about his woman and keeping her in her place, because he could have any woman he wanted at any time. Fuck, if i could fuck any woman i wanted, why the hell would i care who else she fucks on her own time? But if i only had one woman, you can be sure as fuck i would care about what she did on her own time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:50 PM
1

No, but I sure as felt angry at the world when i wasn't getting any. I totally understand why Elliot and all those other guys did what they did. Kinda like that Chris Rock joke about OJ simpson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8TqhBIEbWA
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:42 PM
7

Oh yes i'm sure dignity would have been an acceptable substitute for pussy, intimacy and the feeling of being desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:37 PM
1

I don't know why you're comparing both. It makes sense that a woman who fucked several 6'2" chads with muscles would be sexually disatisfied with her frumpy 5'9" average looking engineer husband with a gut.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:36 PM
1

Fine, i edited in an explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:34 PM
2

more likely to have substance abuse addiction, less likely to be able to have a workable/satisfying relationship with someone with a lower partner count (which seems ironically to be the red pill ideal). Correlation is not causation. Being a stud doesn't cause substance abuse. Being a hedonistic thrill seeker is what causes both. Besides that, i'd rather be THAT guy than the stay at home incel who doesn't do drugs OR have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:24 PM
1

Oh sure, i've known girls who used to be wined and dined by betas with a decent job who were bummed that they had to start paying for shit again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:22 PM
2

Well yeah, feminists will demonize studs while also fucking them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:21 PM
1

what percentage of men are high value man? A small percentage, otherwise they wouldn't be high value. If everyone were a millionaire, being a millionaire wouldn't be special. and how do you explain all the women under 30 in relationships with men that are not high value? It's called settling. If men didn't have a refractory period, it'd be even less.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:18 PM
2

The other difference being that a lot of men want to be 'male sluts' whereas a lot of women don't really like being sluts and would rather get commitment from a high value man rather than being pumped and dumped. This is especially true for average looking women who are insecure about not being hot and have to use their easily available access to pussy to just get a taste. THAT is the difference and a very important one. Ever seen two average looking girls at a bar making out in order to get att…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:09 PM
3

It's not a negative thing if you don't value LT relationships and being a slut is FAR more damaging to a woman than being a stud is to a man. The video is about why both should be treated differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:00 PM
3

Your sentence made no sense, look at the video in the OP i posted
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:58 PM
1

This has nothing to do with the video, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:54 PM
13

Boy, let me tell you about academia in GENERAL http://theweek.com/articles/441474/how-academias-liberal-bias-killing-social-science Let me guess, all those other studies are unbiased and ok with you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:33 PM
13

he researcher behind that study He's not the researcher of that study (Galena K. Rhoades and Scott M. Stanley) and it doesn't even mention what was wrong in the study. criticisms More like criticisM without the last s. It's not even a good one. Show me where he's wrong about higher n count women being dissatisfied with marriage vs. lower n count women, there were other studies that back that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:16 PM
16

The evolutionary programming to feel disgust with sluts with respect to LTR's is scientifically justified: http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf "But that’s not most people. In our sample, only 23 percent of the individuals who got married over the course of the study had had sex solely with the person they married. That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 04:15 PM
4

Who cares, society is going down the toilet. Men are programmed to want to fuck, if women incentivize chad behaviors, that's what you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 04:08 PM
9

I mean, being a doctor will DEFINITELY bring you respect and a lot of women (in their late 20's/early 30's) running to you, but that's a parasitic relationship. If i were a doctor, i would be EXTREMELY suspicious of newfound interest in me by women after i receive my degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 03:47 PM
16

graduating medical school (eminence). Ah yes, getting pussy via being the greater beta bux. Fuck that. Why don't you just say, 'hey men, why don't you work harder so you can give more money to women'? Is what you really mean to say. I gotta say, i'm enjoying watching the decline as 30 something women are missing out on their 'big day' because men are running the fuck away from marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 03:41 PM
2

Without a doubt. The combination of feminism ("YOU CAN HAVE IT ALL!") and technology (Facebook and tinder has turned women even MORE self absorbed than they already are) has ruined women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 02:14 PM
2

Because humans are lazy and many would rather complain than do something about it. Do all men want money? Yes. Then why wouldn't they study to be a doctor or engineer? Yeah, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 02:11 PM
5

Marriage rates are plummetting because men are saying 'fuck no' to women. It's WOMEN who are complaining about the hookup culture and lack of commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 01:58 PM
4

No it's not predatory or nefarious. I've found the best way to go about it is to meet through mutual friends, having female friends helps quite a bit Yeah, many men have tried this already, women have zero incentive to help betas get with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 01:53 PM
5

Because there are plenty of women who actually like relationships with friendly, genuine men. Which is hilarious because marriage rates are plummeting among the young and women are complaining about the hookup culture. Sorry, but those 'friendly, genuine' men said 'fuck it' when women rewarded brutes with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 01:52 PM
3

Why do women still go for Bill Clinton (he has a NEW mistress right now)? http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/c8b87f6ebdb0813590bae9bb0c883042ebf470ea/c=0-345-2832-2478&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2014/04/09//1397087771000-XXX-Bill-Clinton-hdb2733.JPG Again, power... hell, he isn't even POTUS anymore, but he still has a lot of influence. And he's nowhere near as rich as Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 03:15 AM
2

Why not both. He's obviously rich, but he also projects power. He's basically Alpha Bux. Women love powerful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 06:33 PM
9

I don't agree with much of his politics, but he embodies RP philosphy well. You should almost NEVER apologize in public and stick to your guns. You can tell a RP man from a BP man often by the women he keeps. When you're a powerful AND confident man, you can get someone like this, even in old age: http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/news/060116/dtrump.jpg When you're an apologetic beta BP twerp like Jeb Bush, this is what you get: http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Republican-…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 06:07 PM
1

Blues rock, blues, some jazz some dubstep, some classic rock I'm listening to more hip hop as it has a LOT of red pill themes in it and these artists just GET it when it comes to women, no filtered bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 06:01 PM
1

Your study doesn't define what 'masculinity' is. A big hairy lumber jack with a bit of a gut is masculine, but not many women would touch him. A guido with biceps, pecs, and shredded abs is masculine, and a lot of women will jump on his dick. When we say 'masculine', we ALSO mean high physically aesthetic. Besides muscle, he'll also have a square jaw, and he's also tall, etc. A masculine man who works out is going to get a lot more pussy than a twink with a pretty face, that's just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 05:17 PM
1

Too bad for many women, those things are at odds with each other!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 02:33 AM
2

You're implying that "The Situation" isn't attractive, which is pretty stupid. He's both attractive AND masculine. You wouldn't send Ryan Gossling in as a male stripper to get women wet, but you certainly would with the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 01:32 AM
3

I don't know, but i'm pretty sure a large percentage would never admit to it. See: My story about my best friend in college who had a roommate who was a drug dealer and seemed to have a different in his bed every night. I can't imagine those women admitting to sleeping with him today. Women don't like to look like dirty sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:38 PM
16

He's probably fucked more women than this entire subreddit combined. You're confusing likeability/your own personal feelings with sexual attraction. To me, he's a complete douchebag, but i GET why he gets laid so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:31 PM
6

Explain Michael Cera Edit: and I further presume you'd think they were lying. I mean, they lie about liking 'nice guys' when they go for thugs and chads so why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:27 PM
5

It's not about trust, it's about betas ganging up on alphas and driving a spear into their hearts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:26 PM
10

Ah yes, the random reddit comment is proof of something. Now you've jumped the shark. how are people really different then vs. now? and please be more descriptive than that's stupid, or just look at the difference. Far more religious and far less sexually promiscious? This is not hard. Being ostracized by society for not following norms is a very powerful incentive to stay within those norms, even when it goes against your biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:57 PM
1

Something tells me if Gosling wanted to have frequent casual sex, he could. Only because of his fame. Again, Michael Cera, one of the doofiest looking motherfuckers in hollywood has lots of girls hanging off him. yes, i do think, on a base level, for short term gratification, women would prefer the thug in the sheets over ryan gossling. If you're having trouble thinking about this, strip away their fame and think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:51 PM
9

how much do we even know about the human history we have records of? and what percent of human history is that? stop pretending we know how humans behaved historically. we can only make speculations of varying accuracy about certain small periods of time. What the hell are you talking about, before civilization, it's generally well accepted that the history of the world was generally very rough for everyone based on evidence. We mostly don't rape and pillage anymore do we? that's a misunderstood…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:49 PM
7

Depends on what you're asking about. For fucking or marriage? "The Situation" is quite famous for having a ton of sexual conquests, Ryan Gosling is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:41 PM
10

Why do you need a study? Just look at history, we were a world dominated by warlords who had harems of women and would kill each other over and over again and it wasn't hard to get men to kill when you hoarde all the women and promise the hapless beta that he'll get pussy through rape and pillaging. If you want to look at studies, you only need to look at the study that showed only a small minority of men actually procreated through history. Then came religion, a regulated sexual market place th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:30 PM
26

No offense but that guy is too ethnic to be a Chad. Ah BP racism. He's considered Caucasian, by any meaning of the word. A Chad is more like a Ryan Gosling. He's hardly a chad, he can attract women DESPITE his wimpy demeanor because of his fame. Edit: I once saw michael cera with like 30 girls drooling all over him at a bar in NYC, if you don't think fame by itself is enough to make you desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:25 PM
9

more men would have toxic masculine instincts and civilized society would not be possible We overcame this by the fact that when you have armies of sexually frustrated men, alphas who sit atop civilization have a higher chance of being disemboweled, thus we came up with things like religion to suppress these natural instincts. The whole point of giving betas a chance to procreate was purely for self preservation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:22 PM
1

illogical to never get married and have kids and use all of my lifelong resources on them There's no logic in that statement either way ) evidently I don't think that every other woman wants this, that is my point in short form and The ones who want to get married the most are women you don't care about my anecdote because it disproves your RP theory. Anecdotes, by definition don't disprove theory. Stop proving my point about women being illogical right.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:19 PM
1

Allegations starting the day divorce is filed would be highly suspect without an earlier record of interventions by social services. All that would happen is that women would start planning allegations in advance.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 03:59 PM
1

It's hard to feel special Boy, wait till you see your friends getting married, having children and you're living with 10 cats. Your degree will be meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 02:29 PM
1

That or become suicidal. Or worse looks at oregon
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 02:27 PM
1

Hang on... so I'm proving that women have no logic (I'm a woman) because I am logically fine with the fact that I might end up in a house filled with animals? How is this illogical? No, you're proving your illogic by applying your situation to every other woman. Nobody cares about your anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 02:27 PM
8

The only correct answer. Plus, if she divorces him, she won't get 100% of his wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 02:26 PM
1

I have never, ever, wanted to marry and have kids. Ever. Just not part of my biology. No biological clo Do you know what an outlier is? Just because YOU are fine with being a cat lady doesn't mean the vast majority of women are ok with that. Women have no logic and you prove TRP's view of female solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 07:55 PM
1

Feminism has made everyone more miserable. You have feminized men and masculanized women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 07:54 PM
3

women aren't content with utter mediocrity. They would be with the right man. Again, depression amongst women are going up as they become more and more independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 07:49 PM
1

All women view potential mates that way, to varying degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 07:48 PM
6

Your attitude is exactly why depression among women is going up and up. Women don't want to be winners, they want to be WITH winners.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 04:16 AM
30

Do you sympathize with the beta men in their 20s who can't get any female attention? Or, do you sympathize with the "high achieving" women in their 30s who can't hook a man with suitable status? Both? Neither? Sympathizing with the women is like sympathizing with with the rich kid who blew his inheritance on coke and hookers in his youth and now is homeless. Women who ride the CC in their teens/twenties and later become post wall cat hoarders is the very definition of karma.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 03:53 PM
1

You're demonstrating my point. You and the rest of feminist shit on men for even TRYING to do the right and are SURPRISED at the state of male/female relationships today.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 04:41 AM
0

i don't agree. you (or most) can't change personality that drastically. Years of trying to be the good guy, getting nowhere, and seeing all the shitheads around you getting all the pussy can change your personality almost 180 degrees. I should know, that happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 04:11 AM
5

He's exactly that bad. http://www.doctornerdlove.com/2013/08/secret-to-get-more-sex/ The Unbelievable Secret To Getting More Sex Be An Ally Yes, I’m advocating being a feminist ally because it’ll help you get laid. Remember what I said about enlightened self-interest? It applies just as much here. I mean, shit, i'm not a beta male incel, and even I get angry reading that. The dirty secret is that feminism has freed sexuality in women, yes, but he completely forgets about female hypergamy and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 03:58 AM
10

Because TBP knows they have nothing to offer men. Actually, OP is kinda wrong, Dr. Nerdlove publicly denounced TRP and he has his own 'truths', however, his 'truths' are so fucking stupid, not even TBP is really willing to push it as an alternative. For example, Dr. Nerdlove says that you should be incentivized to be a feminist or 'ally' because then you'll get laid. Anyone with half a brain knows that such a suggestion is beyond fucking retarded. BP doesn't offer anything realistic in terms of …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 09:47 PM
12

Teach these guys that life is not all about sex or relationships. Hmm, yes, teach these guys to go against their biology, that'll work out. That's what they've been forced upon them their whole lives. It's the lie that makes them enraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 03:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter