TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheSnesLord Archive

View 7 posts and 2,176 comments by TheSnesLord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,176 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Why should feminists react to some article in an Indian media outlet? 1) because feminists claim to be for "equality" 2) because feminists claim to be against hate and want to prevent hate 3) if the article's genders were reversed, feminists and people like you would be crying and screaming Maybe we should spend more time wondering why some women there become misandrists, and I'm pretty sure it's not because of some "feminist cabal". because the women want female privileges and female supremacy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 01:02 PM
2

feminism is a movement and ideology that came from women women of their own volition sign up to feminism, despite already knowing that it is a misandrist hate movement women do not have to be feminists or be labelled feminists to have feminist beliefs and agendas we should not generalize women as a group i did not do this. i am saying that the majority of women of their own volition sign up to feminism or/and have feminist beliefs and ideology even if they are not feminists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 03:02 AM
9

that a lot of feminists fight for man's rights too no they don't affirmative action, biased family and divorce courts, gender quotas, women-only scholarships in education, bias against men in workplace hiring, not allowing men their own spaces, etc. these are all sectors, laws and policies that discriminate against men and are never challenged why are the feminists not fighting against those? do you even realise that there is an epidemic of female teachers doing the unthinkable with their young …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 10:29 PM
6

For Example Kasia Babis. She recently had a long live steam about a feminazist. damage control i see
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:00 PM
15

For example, I am. you are an outlier. i don't believe you anyway it's not a popular article this is irrelevant. it doesn't matter on whether the article is popular or not, it is about the fact that this article and it's misandrist author was allowed to have this up on a major mainstream news outlet if feminism/feminists and women really were against these kinds of articles/opinions, these articles/opinions would not be written and nor would they be allowed to be put up the fact that these kinds…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:56 PM
30

it's amazing a major website like MSN.com would allow this on their site why wouldn't they allow it on their site? the mainstream media operate on feminism and misandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:25 PM
24

many people who impersonate feminism. so where are all the so-called "real feminists" disavwoing this article and the woman? could it be that the "real feminists" all agree with the article because feminism is exactly what she describes - about misandry, man-hating and female supremacy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:14 PM
1

face > height and leanness and muscularity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 03:00 PM
3

biased grading against boys from female teachers affirmative action which selects and promotes women over men women-only scholarships, grants, funding, etc. for college and university enrollment infestation of the feminist agenda at places of education which is very misandrist/anti-male, which has made men afraid and terrified anything to do with or is even considered "pro-male" or "fair to men" in those places of education is immediately seen as "misogyny" and is attacked and censored that is w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 02:25 PM
3

i admit i misread your comment, you're right Like, if you make a statement that women find looks important there is a very good chance some guy will reply telling you how wrong you are and how you probably have no personality if you're saying that. exactly this. i would also say that if a guy makes that statement (that women are shallow find looks important), it is also likely that the guy then gets outright insulted and mocked in a very harsh manner it's like a global agenda or secret mission t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 02:09 PM
8

Girls like tall guys, so what? a guy being short or not tall enough is a deal-breaker for women Guys like big boobs? So what? this isn't a deal-breaker for men. men like boobs of all shapes and sizes, some men like smaller boobs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:56 AM
3

you do realise that on average, men are taller than women? people like you who try to use outliers to attack men are always pathetic
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:53 AM
1

on average, men don't have superficial preferences at all <image>
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:48 AM
2

The biggest factor of Bodily Attractivness is Leanness and Muscle Mass both which can be influenced this is rubbish. the biggest factor of bodily attractiveness of a man is his face, which is something that he cannot change easily
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:46 AM
5

Yes people in general can be shallow but generalizing a common phenomenon and ascribing it to only one gender both men and women care about looks, no-one is denying that the difference are the standards. men date down, women only date on par or up. therefore this would mean that men on average are playing a fair game and are not shallow at all; and the ones who are not playing a fair game and are shallow are women <image>
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:32 AM
8

I have the impression that both men and women are quite clear today that they have a preference for their partner height. no, men on average do not really have a height preference for women 99% of height preferences is from women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:17 AM
7

there are so many men who do it too. no there isn't, men are usually upfront about caring about looks when it comes to dating women not only that, but men date down. men's 'standards' are so low now that guys who are 7/10s would happily date women who are 5/10s, 4/10s or even 3/10s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:16 AM
4

always funny when you see all the "where have all the good men gone?" complaints about dating from women in mainstream media, social media and female journalists what they really mean is this: "where have all the tall and handsome good men gone?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:10 AM
3

cue the "i see loads of ugly guys dating hot women all the time" card from the deniers
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:01 AM
1

I don't believe you know me or my friends well enough to accuse us of being misandrist regardless of what you think of my arguments here i obviously don't know you or your friends well enough, so thats why we can only judge on what one says on an internet forum. therefore the "you don't know me/us" argument on an anonymous internet forum is a really silly argument It's very strange to be so accusatory and rude towards someone you've only just met. more than two decades of pattern recognition of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 03:51 PM
3

I usually find it counterproductive to believe or imply that people form their beliefs around what will yield the most harm and unhappiness in others. you and your girl friends continuously complaining and "venting" about there being a supposed lack of male fanservice in video games like a bunch a misandrist feminists is what is causing unhappiness in others. you tar video games with negativity and make it political, and i have no doubt that you did this with Stellar Blade i would also say that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 08:31 PM
6

exactly months ago one of the cases was with Resident Evil 9. capcom stated that Leon Kennedy was deliberately designed by Capcom's female staff to be hot to pander to the female audiences. predictably once the game was released, feminists and fangirls drooled over him on social media such as TikTok and were very smug and obnoxious about it these are the same type of women/feminists who complained of Ada Wong (female character in the series) being sexualized for the "male gaze" meanwhile the mai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 05:19 PM
9

I'm noticing and I have the impression feminism is losing its traction. then you are either blind or disingenuous mainstream media, news media, entertainment media, governments, organizations, politics, law, education, authority, etc. are still controlled by and operate on feminism and misandry feminists are still in control of the western video games industry and it's mainstream games media there has been no signs of feminism losing it's traction whatsoever
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 02:24 PM
7

From what I can see, the complaints aren't just about highly sexualized depictions of women in the gaming sphere, but a lack of the same sort of depictions of men within the sphere. so basically what you're saying is, if there's no male fanservice, we cannot have female fanservice because of "muh equality" what a spiteful, hateful and bitter mentality to have. also let's not pretend that the majority of the complaints have nothing to do with feminist misandry and taking attractive female charact…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 02:12 PM
5

Look at how some women online react to Sydney Sweeney advertisements. The abject hate some women throw at her for the way she looks and dresses is unhinged. From people saying she's ruining everything for women by perpetuating the male gaze to calling her a slut, it completely ignores that by her own words she does what she does because she wants to. and the other issue is that not enough people call them out on it what makes it worse is that there are always hoards of white-knight and male-femi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 05:16 AM
7

I strongly think videogames don't need any sexy characters whatsoever does this include sexy male characters as well? because your examples of "tastelessness" are only female characters
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 04:52 AM
18

It started with pundits like Anita Sarkeesian, who didn't even play these games let alone understand context, coming out and making all these deliberately bad faith criticisms of video games to morally police male gamers. These people are fringe leftists who think things like completely dismantling things like female beauty standards fixed quit making it gender-neutral when it isn't
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 04:46 AM
7

in my city a while ago, Magic Mike was being advertised on the streets in broad daylight in the daytime. billboards, posters, signs, etc. of it at the most popular and crowded parts of town. it was advertised in a way where it was 'normal' (like a popular theatre play for all audiences) and nothing controversial at all, despite it being an adults-only event can guarantee you that a female equivalent of this would not and never be allowed to be advertised in the same manner, because women/feminis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 12:33 AM
4

I think it's hard to truly tell how women feel about attractive characters in video games. it really isn't on average in video games, they are fine with attractive male characters, but they dislike attractive female characters from a fanservice perspective this is demonstrated by the fact that attractive female characters in video games, and the men who like them, are always attacked it doesn't matter what "studies" you use, these studies always have a limited number of respondents and are alway…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 11:33 PM
11

Would you say Kratos is made for the female gaze? a male character does not have to be specially "made for" the female gaze for women to find attractive for example, duke nukem is a male character that is "made for" a male audience, but yet some women find this character attractive it is dependant on the audience How would those romantasy books do if the love interest was always described as ugly, poor, and overweight? exactly. and yet there are still guys out there who cope by still believing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 10:18 PM
8

Given this, I feel that most women are actually fine with sexualized characters they are fine with sexualized male characters they are not okay with and will complain about sexualized female characters there is a reason on why attractive/sexy female characters and the men who enjoy them are being ruthlessly attacked. if most women really were fine with sexualized female characters then these attacks would not happen this is particularly true regarding male characters double standards from women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 10:08 PM
0

Some All women are offended by the mere existence of men they deem unworthy fixed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 04:11 PM
73

Billie ellish is also known to be a misandrist same person who said that ugly men not be given a chance in dating. and her female fans cheered and celebrated it remember guys if you didn't win the genetic lottery, which is something you do not have any control over, Billie says no to you funny that, because men have always been accused of being the "picky" and "shallow" ones; and for decades, men are always told to value women on their character and personality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 03:37 PM
8

since Anita Sarkeesian, female characters/women are now purposely uglified in Western video games to further the feminist agenda, via denying the "male gaze"; preventing "objectification" and "sexualization" (of female characters only of course); and for "diversity", "inclusion" and "representation" not only that, but we have been seeing an epidemic of censorship of attractive female characters in East Asian video games to cover them up in the localization processes not to mention the smugness o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/26 04:34 PM
17

will be about 'how men need to better themselves for women' or/and 'women and girls affected therefore men need to change'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/26 05:32 PM
1

i didn't say i know/knew what you think it is your message that indicates and implies that only UN Women should be abolished, as quoted of you: "UNWomen absolutely no question"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 03:54 PM
2

you didn't directly say it however you think only UN Women should be abolished, therefore implying that the normal UN doesn't need to be abolished
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 03:58 AM
3

Yes in the same way some women love a "short king" they don't. "short king" is a just a term that women have made up to make it appear as if they don't discriminate/hate against short height men you're coping Similarly, some men love bigger women, it doesn't detract from the men mocking overweight women. they don't in majority cases, because as already explained overweight women can be attractive to men women mocking short height men however, is an epidemic Also, did you just bring up pr0n as ju…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 01:32 AM
3

Much in the same way many men mock overweight women they don't, because some men find overweight women attractive there is a reason on why overweight/fat women are a genre in pr0n a man being short in height is an 100% universally unattractive/undesirable trait to women therefore your "both sides" white-knight argument doesn't work
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 11:23 PM
3

lol and you honestly think that the normal UN are not feminist/women-pandering white knights? they'll parrot everything the UN Women say
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 10:57 PM
3

Mocking height would be decried when it happens to a man but not a fascist. lies mocking men's height does not get decried, it gets praised and celebrated. and always in the snarky manners by women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 10:45 PM
1

this is literally why young men feel more at home amongst the Right i wouldn't say that the Right also body-shame men for example in dating, if a man dares to say that he isn't getting dates due to his looks, the blame all goes to him for not winning the genetic lottery and not the shallow/superficial women with the ridiculous standards of looks demands
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 10:40 PM
2

would this be ok if they were handsome and went without masks or something? ask the female fans of Jeremy Meeks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 10:30 PM
1

no bitterness here. just the truth, bud
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 04:26 PM
2

You like anime you surely sexulize women and are a creep thats why women dont want you meanwhile they (women/feminists) drool over Yaoi/BL and Bishounens in manga/anime and get praised and championed for it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 04:12 PM
1

I've been thinking about why young men drift right and wrote this. you are only doing this after finding out that more men are now waking up to and fighting back against the cancer that is feminism "We Need Men (And Here’s What That Actually Means) what it really means is this: "we want handsome 6-foot-tall+ Chads with six packs who are financially wealthy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 03:13 PM
1

They have killed the bill because they know that they would get criticised, lynch-mobbed and attacked by the SJWs, Feminists and mainstream media should such a bill progress or pass. We are living in a feminist tyranny. And I'm not even joking.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 06:24 PM
1

Most young men are single. Most young women are not. And the reason for it is: Women have ridiculous standards when dating men Men can get easily have false allegations/accusations of SH or SA made against them if they approach a woman and the woman doesn't find the men attractive It really is that simple.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:20 PM
1

It's the "not all feminists are like that!" card. The same "real feminists" that are secretly approving of the radical feminist's misandry and the bringing over of the privileges and benefits for women. There is a reason on why the so-called "real feminists" are always nowhere to be seen when the radical feminists cause trouble and advocate for misandrist policies and laws. If you see a feminist, you see a misandrist.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 01:49 PM
12

I'm hearing that the feminists and women of South Korea are unhappy about this, claiming that it's against women's rights and agency. Furthermore, they are more upset about what this could lead to in the future "against" women regarding other areas in society and law. What the women in South Korea are feeling about this is the same feeling that men have in the West every time their lawmakers create a new policies/law based on feminism ideology that blatantly discriminate against men and advantag…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:52 AM
88

And of course, the law and tool only applies in cases/situations where men are the perpetrators and women are the victims.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 03:33 PM
6

Just to let you know - I didn't copy the entire article though.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:44 PM
8

Just to let you know, I didn't copy the entire article though.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:32 PM
1

She's not even a good feminist. Implying that there are good feminists, lol.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/23 04:36 AM
24

And of course the problem is, as I'm sure you already know, is that the braindead Normies of society still think feminism is about equality. I mean, those WhatsApp messages and other evidence clearly proves that the Tates are innocent and that the two women planned to frame them using false accusations, but the Normies don't care about this as long as they get to blindly white knight for women.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:13 AM
14

Embarrassing white-knighting. Are you from FDS?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:00 AM
77

"Such a move feeds into what critics say is a culture of anti-feminism that has characterised South Korean politics over the past few years. Men in South Korea increasingly argue that polices designed to advantage women are discriminatory. The current government has removed the term "gender equality" from its school ethics curriculum and is trying to close its gender equality ministry. Oh Kyung-jin from the Korean Women's Association is disappointed the spaces are being removed but is more conce…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:58 AM
6

You seem to be lost. FDS is that way.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:14 AM
1

It's not just that, in general they filter on a man's height as well. And they have the gall to complain about men not wanting to date overweight/obese women.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:52 PM
21

"Although women do have more legal rights nowadays, many of these patterns of male dominance still exist. That’s why there’s still a need to balance things out by lifting up women’s efforts, achievements, and voices." At least there the author (a woman of course) admits to the fact that women have more legal rights - but then goes on to make excuses for it. A complete joke of an article from start to finish.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:17 PM
1

They don't change.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:55 AM
1

I think its a myth that most guys have no standards. No-one said that guys don't have standards. Their standards are just low.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:49 PM
1

It's a great movement and it has helped millions of people my sides
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:37 PM
1

In general, men are always willing to date down when looking to date a woman. In general, women only date on par or up when looking to date a man. That suggests that the percentage you stated are far higher.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:31 PM
2

What a miserable world you inhabit. I don't. I am just aware of the situation based on what I see and advise guys accordingly before they go to seek dates with women. I always tell guys the truth that good looks will be the most important thing if they want to get a result, and that if they are ugly then their chances are extremely dire no matter how good their personality is. The same goes for guys who are average-looking. I will also tell them that "maxing out" (i.e. gym, build muscles, good h…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:33 AM
2

And only apply to people using dating apps. And you honestly think that this dating app shallow mentality from women hasn't influenced/leaked out into real life dating? Especially with feminism and misandry being spewed everywhere? You must be extremely naive to think that it hasn't. do they apply more to shallow hook up culture, rather than people seeking real relationships? Both. Because looks are the key that opens the door to a relationship, without the key you don't get it. Also, dating has…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:09 AM
10

And I just emailed them telling them why. I think more guys need to complain every time this kind of thing happens. Guys should start shaming them on social media as well. It's the only way you'll get some kind of change. After all, women bitch about attractive/s£xy/beautiful women in entertainment media to get it censored or banned, so men should be equally as obnoxious regarding their own issues. We will then reach a point of everything being so sanitized that fun is no longer allowed to be ha…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:40 AM
4

"satire" = the last refuge of someone wanting to defend obvious misandrist crap.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:18 AM
1

Nope, just old, That was back then, this is now. Times have changed. Also, your experiences are nothing but anecdotes. While I know the reality there are men who struggle hard to meet someone Cool, glad to see you finally got it in the end. you seem to be in firm denial that not all women, especially attractive women, are hung up on 'good' looks/height or financial status, etc. I meant in general. Exceptions do not make the rule. The studies from the major dating apps prove my point. Women find …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:15 AM
1

I was told that ambition and success are not shallow traits The elements you mention are not shallow traits, but a man needs the looks to get through the door to express his personality, ambition and success to a woman. So basically, women want looks + ambition + success, which makes them even more shallow and picky.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:16 PM
1

"Not being able to find someone who measures up is another important reason many single Americans cite. Of single Americans, 30 percent say that not being able to find someone who meets their expectations is a major reason they are not dating. Women cite this as a factor more often than men do." This has always been known within those who are Red-pilled and further proves that women are the shallow ones. Feminists have always tried to lie and fool society that men are the "shallow" and "picky" o…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:07 PM
1

What are you, a dating coach? I surely hope that you're not telling other guys (who are average/ugly looking) that looks isn't a requirement to have a girlfriend, because lying to them and having them find out the truth themselves is just cruel.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:00 PM
2

What happens to the men without money looks and status? They get kicked into the gutter and left to rot. Can he still get a date? Can he still bed a girl and take her home? If he doesn't have the looks then he shouldn't bother, and I say this with good intentions. He needs the looks first to get through the door, and only after that he can express his personality and let his status and money be known. Are these mandatory requirement to have a girlfriend? Looks definitely is.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:37 PM
9

It's always been about looks, especially for women choosing men to date. Feminists and society (who have been conditioned by feminism) will tell you that men are the "shallow" and "picky" ones, but the fact is that it is the women who are a hundred times worse when looking to date a man. This is proven by the fact that men in general are always willing to date down. Women however, only date on par or up in general, due to female hypergamy. Not only that but this also proven by a study conducted …
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:30 PM
2

Feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:46 PM
0

But there’s plenty of people who will reasonably look at you and think you’re gross for doing that. First of all, someone eating a gallon of Cheetos daily into obesity is completely different to an older man dating a younger woman. Secondly, it's clear that you've been influenced/brainwashed by feminism at some point to think that an older man dating a younger woman is not acceptable or "gross" (your implication). Either that or you're bitter and jealous that you yourself cannot get to date a yo…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:43 PM
1

This is becoming a serious issue now, along with the slander of the "Passport Bros". The more this keeps happening, it will shift the Overton Window to the point where men dating younger women is no longer acceptable in society. I highly advise men to unite and stand up for yourselves aggressively, because it's getting worse for them as each month passes. And of course double standards mean that no-one has a problem with older women dating much younger men. In fact, that is actually encouraged, …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:01 PM
1

So you're in favour of harassment then.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:56 PM
1

I agree that they should legally be able to date who they want This is you in one of your other posts: "But I still think Leo could date around other incredibly attractive women in Hollywood who are closer to his age" Have you decided yet?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:55 PM
1

Looks like a post from FDS
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:52 PM
28

Women demanding men who are handsome, over six foot, has a six pack, has massive arms, , has a you-know-what that's over six inches, has a six figure salary = "you go girl", "yaas queen", "she knows what she wants", "keep ur standards up babe", "badass babe", "strong independent woman", etc. Men having a preference of women who are not overweight = "misogynist", "shallow", "s£xist", "creep", "chauvinist", "picky", "outdated", etc.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/23 11:48 PM
7

I would be far more concerned about how the men enabled feminist ideology in politics, law, education, news media, mainstream media, the workplace, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/23 03:00 AM
1

Then they should not complain when men have standards and preferences in dating women.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/23 02:44 AM
10

If the gender roles were reversed, they would have investigated the case and have the man fired and cancelled in less than half a day.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:06 PM
5

one has to ask themselves why SO many women choose the feather? Her biology, freedom of choice and free will to choose.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 01:49 PM
17

despite how much I hate feminism, I still think it's a good thing at its core. I still think that it's meant for equality lmao Anyway, you know all the aspects you mentioned? That is exactly what feminism is and always has been. You didn't see it back then because feminists were working behind the scenes for decades to get into the important areas of society, such as education, law, politics, news media, television, institutions, organizations, etc. Now that they have successfully managed to do …
/r/MensRights05/02/23 01:32 PM
2

This will be allowed to carry on with no consequences nor penalties. And the reason for that is that men generally are not and have never been the types to unite, organize and protest against this sort of thing, unlike women. And then you also have the problem of the men who are white knights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 01:31 PM
3

There is a way, and that is to stop being "centrist", stop moral clowning, stop being the good/nice guys and to actually implement action. And before anyone says "we don't stoop to the feminists level" or/and "we're better than that", decades of Men Right's failures overall have proven that being the "moral good guys" doesn't work, and that a new approach/tactic is needed. Something like an actual hard-line approach. For example, look at the anti-feminist men's groups in South Korea. These guys …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/23 09:04 PM
30

That place can get very feminist and blue-pilled, especially from the female members.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 09:12 PM
2

How is celebrating this counter to equality? It's a counter to genuine equality because you and the article are celebrating Equality of Outcome. Equality of Outcome is when anti-male crap like Affirmative Action and Gender Quotas are implemented into education and the workplace to ensure that women are favoured over men in the enrolment/hiring process, as well as women replacing men, and that men are discriminated against. It also forces women to get into jobs that they might not want to do beca…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:41 AM
8

Useless article as it doesn't actually say WHY the men quit their jobs when there are too many women join their departments. I guess it is because the reasons (i.e. the truth) would put women in a negative light, and we all know that we can never ever do that.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:17 AM
3

The audio recording doesn't prove that he did it. He could have been set up. The question should also be asked on why the "victim" didn't record both video and audio. She could have done that secretly. And also record before and after the incident for the complete context. As for the bruises on the "victim", there is no evidence that they were caused by him. Again, the question should be asked on why the "victim" did not secretly record video and audio evidence. If the soccer player really is 't…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:04 AM
1

I never said that it was a problem at all … Yet you defend it? I quote: "This seems like celebrating equality"
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:47 PM
1

You've obviously taken too much Feminist Kool-Aid. Go back to FDS.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:45 PM
95

Feminists: "men don't need special programs and scholarships" "there is no systemic bias against men" "this is okay because it makes up for decades of discrimination against women" "male-only programs and scholarships would just result in men dominating again" etc.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:47 PM
4

then it must stand to reason that dating men on similarly superficial grounds is misandry You should see the amount of women on all the major dating apps on how they always want the 6/6/6/6's when looking a for man. They are praised and celebrated for wanting these ridiculous standards. Yet, a man who wants a woman who is not overweight is a "misogynist", "chauvinist", "sexist", "shallow", etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/23 06:17 PM
5

This kind of thing has been going on for years. Have people not noticed that in school/college/university adverts, commercials and news article images, it's always females in them?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:58 PM
41

Yet, it's only a problem only when men out-earn women?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:54 PM
110

I see the mainstream media and feminism celebrating this. I thought they wanted equality?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 02:47 PM
3

When it comes to feminism, you are correct. Considering what feminism does to men, I think I am justified in being a not very forgiving person regarding this issue. Especially to the ones who gaslight or pretend to be for good intentions whilst peddling their man-hating agendas.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 01:20 PM
4

I reckon you're just a man-hating feminist posting this to mock and humiliate men, while pretending to have good intentions. It is not the first time you've done this kind of thing here.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:16 AM
0

Because it's a known fact that women often treat men who they don't like the look of with contempt.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:19 PM
131

I see this kind of situation all the time on forums, commenting sections, chats, etc. over the years - females somehow get appointed into Moderator status and they'll gradually start abusing their power to censor or/and ban people they dislike. That's not to say that males don't do this of course, but the overwhelming pattern is that it usually happens from female moderators. Regarding AskMen, the female moderator is a problem, but the person who appointed her to Moderator status is to blame.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 02:00 PM
1

All your 'arguments' here have been "men do it to women as well" over and over again. How about actually addressing the points made instead of defaulting to whataboutism?
/r/MensRights30/01/23 03:17 PM
24

Worse than that, if a woman SA's a man, people laugh at it and she gets cheered, praised and celebrated. Ask Mindy Kaling.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 12:26 PM
3

I did to a couple other coworkers but they kinda downplayed it. As expected. Bet you that had it been the other round, the same co-workers would have fetched their pitchforks.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 05:03 AM
6

The problem is, there's an increasing double standard where the women are not required to have traditional feminine roles whilst the men are always required to have traditional masculine roles. Feminism is to blame for it. That's why we are now getting all the 'strong independent boss babe' crap, which is invariably misandrist and anti-male.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:27 AM
8

Is a man’s worth determined by his salary? Not only his salary/finance but also his looks and status as well.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:09 AM
1

Last one: https://ibb.co/t8sBk8w Quite a contrast that I am sure you will agree.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:03 AM
1

Eurogamer and Polygon are the same. It's a disgrace that "journalists" like these have been allowed to get into the industry.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 02:24 AM
4

Problem is, generally men are always willing to date down when looking for a woman. Women however, generally only date on par or up. Which means that generally, average-looking or even ugly women can get handsome men. Average-looking or ugly men however, in general do not even get a chance with the majority of women. That's the difference and this should be pointed out whenever women and feminists try the "men are shallow as well" card.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 02:20 AM
2

Here's more: https://ibb.co/Q9S0rYv https://ibb.co/C69HPd9 I'm sure you're getting the picture now. I hope the sales of this crap are falling...smh.. fkn woke idiots... The sales are slightly lowering but not enough to make a difference. Unfortunately the Normies - who are pretty much braindead and have no knowledge of the culture war or they know but don't care - just continue to buy the Woke games, putting money into SJW pockets.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 02:14 AM
20

According to this article, 61% of American women identify as feminists. You're also forgetting that a woman does not have to label herself a "feminist" in order to have feminist ideology and agendas. For example, a woman can be in favour of the biased Family Court system, MeToo and BelieveAllWomen crap but does not call herself a "feminist". Therefore if you put that in consideration, the percentage will be much higher. I want to avoid misandrists. Misandrists are everywhere all around us. Inclu…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:37 AM
3

Pictures says a thousand words: https://ibb.co/r5w25xh Also: https://ibb.co/B4NVYQ4 And: https://ibb.co/bNWhVph
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:17 AM
8

Feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:49 AM
1

They are. Quietly. We’re hiding from them. That's not men putting their foot down. That's men cowering away from them.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:46 AM
11

The results of feminist brainwashing.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:44 AM
6

I bet you she wouldn't have said the same thing if the gender roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:43 AM
7

Using your "logic", the same applies to older women who date younger men then. I mean we've already seen so many cases (which are increasing) of female teachers who do the unthinkable with their male students, which is even worse because that's actually illegal.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:39 AM
4

I think that women are attracted primarily to masculine behaviors and looks are second. That isn't really true. Women go for looks first in a man for the most part. A man has to get past the looks barrier first before he gets to show his personality and "masculine behaviours". The whole 'dating coach' and 'male self-improvement' talk of "women going for money or status over looks in a man" is a myth in general. Ask any average-looking or ugly guy with an adequate financial status, they'll tell y…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:30 AM
3

I'm a woman and we are attracted to looks: a good-looking face, first, then body -- tall and fit -- and finally youth, reveals a good mate. As long you don't whine when men look for the same qualities (beauty, youth, etc.) in a woman. I'd also say that women are far more shallow than men when it comes to looks preferences in a partner, but that's another discussion.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:18 AM
7

Honest advice, stop listening to most people on internet, they lack nuance, they are aggresive. The problem here is that the feminist agenda and ideologies flow into real life as well. It's parroted by many women in real life.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:10 AM
12

There are not many places where men can speak about these double standards without being labelled a "misogynist", "woman-hater", "incel", "would-be predator", etc. Meanwhile women can shout out and megaphone everywhere that they're dating younger men and get cheered, praised and celebrated for it. Because you know, that's apparently "empowering women", "she knows what she wants", etc. It's really shocking on how men haven't put their foot down on this considering how men have been punching bags …
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:05 AM
2

It worse than that. Women are cheered, praised and celebrated when SA'ing men. Ask Mindy Kaling. As for the double standards, it is always funny in dating when women tells men to not judge on her looks (such as weight), but at the same time she demands every man to be over six foot with a six pack.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:53 PM
14

Was texting a friend when she sent a video of a male teacher doing a salsa dance with a female dance student. It was well done and very professional and imo there were no indecency's. Her first reaction was 'what the actual fuck ewww, he has a wife and kids, that's weird/sus af'. Reverse the genders and I bet your friend would not have any problems with it.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:46 PM
13

She can have an opinion just like you. Correct, but it is a very cynical and misandrist opinion to have for such a video that the OP described. Therefore it's more her mindset that the OP is rightfully criticising.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:44 PM
3

Also don't forget, women do not have to label themselves as "feminists" in order to have feminist ideology and agendas. If you consider that aspect above, the percentage will be much higher.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:26 PM
10

Maybe, but why do you use the term "worse"? Male gamers have always enjoyed (and still do) attractive female characters in games, it wasn't a problem at all until feminists like Anita Sarkeesian and her ilk started whining about them around 2012; thus forcing all Western developers to stop making female characters hot, instead making them ugly and obnoxious. Don't fall into the feminist brainwashing trap of assuming sexualization of female characters/women is a bad thing. It really isn't. Decade…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:42 PM
7

It's true, but the same could be said about male characters. Not really, SJWs and feminists never complain about male characters, they are still for the most part handsome, tall, with chiselled pectorals and six packs. And also still allowed to be that. In fact, hot male characters are praised by them, at the same time s**ting on hot female characters.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:37 PM
9

To be fair, that was once true Indeed, there are virtually no more hot/attractive female characters in Western games now - but it won't stop them from constantly lying through their teeth to make seem as if female characters are still that. They will also use Japanese/Korean games (which DOES have hot/attractive female characters) as their 'examples' to peddle their claims.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:34 PM
66

it apparently features ideas regarding men's rights, their role in society, and reproduction. Perfect excuse for Kotaku to further s**t on men and the legal things that men like (female fanservice, etc.). The writers there are of the same ilk as the SJW/feminist parasites we see all over mainstream media and mainstream news media.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:58 PM
59

I'm a gamer who has been following the culture war since around 2008. Kotaku has been doing this for well over a decade, usually indirectly by peddling the usual SJW feminist crap like "women are oppressed", "female characters are sexualized for the male gaze", "diversity", "inclusivity", anti-male, anti-Caucasian, etc. The writers there are of the same ilk as the SJW/feminist parasites we see all over mainstream media and mainstream news media. Lord knows how on earth they are still allowed to …
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:56 PM
32

If you change it, it will changed back very quickly. SJWs/feminists/the Left have professional organizations who "camp" on selected Wikipedia articles to monitor any changes, and then reverse them if need be. An infamous example of this is the GamerGate article. Wikipedia's concept of an editable encyclopedia was a good idea at first, but it was always eventually going to be exploited by ideologues, activists and specialist groups. The owners/administrators are also Left-leaning and feminist, so…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 01:13 AM
8

That's because Prenups disadvantage women for the most part. If Prenups disadvantaged men instead, watch society cheer, applause and praise it.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 12:59 AM
1

Might also be worth to get a doctor/medical professional to carry out tests and prove that the woman is in a healthy and fit state when she signs the pre-nuptial document.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 12:18 AM
3

Depends in the state or country he is in. In some areas, recording people (audio or/and video) without their knowledge cannot be admitted in Court. It might even be a crime of invasion of privacy.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 11:33 PM
10

So it's just about what you said and nothing else. That's basically just verbal "harassment". Their complaint about you is now down on file as just verbal "harassment" at the time they made their complaints. Therefore if you take legal action and the female colleagues make up new and more serious false allegations/accusations later, then they would look very dodgy in Court. You can roast them by asking why they didn't make these "new" allegations at the time they made their first complaint. Next…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 05:07 PM
13

The first step is to actually find out exactly what they accused you of. Are the company required to disclose this upon request?
/r/MensRights25/01/23 04:56 PM
9

How much would your compensation be? If you're thinking of suing them, unless you have evidence of the conversation/argument such as CCTV or a recording, then you run the risk of the female colleagues making more serious false allegations/accusations (such as SH and SA) against you to protect themselves and get the advantage in Court. Therefore sometimes it's a better idea to just accept their decision, walk away and get another job elsewhere. Unless the would-be compensation is really significa…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 04:43 PM
1

I think we should avoid generalizations like this How about you tell the ones on your side to stop doing that with the #killallmen hashtag?
/r/MensRights24/01/23 01:14 AM
6

Generally, men are always willing to date/marry down and f**k down when looking for a woman. Generally, women only date/marry on par or up, and only f**k up when looking for a man. This is down to female hypergamy, which is a real thing. The Internet and Social Media has made women's hypergamy a millions times worse. The study conducted by the major dating app OK Cupid, found that women found 80% of men unattractive or ugly, and that percentage is probably around 85% to 90% now. Your disguised w…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 01:09 AM
1

Is he going to be repulsive to an equally unattractive woman? Yes he is going to be that. We don’t talk enough about the core issue of ugly not wanting ugly Except that there is significant difference: Generally, men are always willing to date down and f**k down when looking for a woman. Generally, women only date on par or up and only f**k up for looking for a man. This is indicated from a study conducted by OKCupid, a major dating app that shows that women find 80% of men unattractive and/or u…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 05:45 PM
5

Younger guy was for fun So you are guilty of doing the same thing. Glad you have made that clear now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 05:38 PM
2

Honestly, probably because women more often than not aren't in a position where they have anything to lord over a guy. Yes they have. Women have society and the law to f**k over a guy through false allegations/accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 05:04 PM
3

Men who only value hotness tend to not make good partners because they don't care about their partner as a human being Seems that you're guilty of doing that as well. "Mind you, young men are firmer, faster, hotter as well and while making a great fling" "Younger men are hotter too and better in bed. I had a fling"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 05:01 PM
9

I am particularly worried about the objectification of men in media and through feminists encouraging women to hire male sex workers and the simultaneous unsexualization of men's body and women's behaviors in discourse : No matter how sexually charged a situation centered around men is, it is framed as not sexual. No matter how sexual a woman's behavior is, it is just for fun. That's why we need more male actors, models, etc. speaking out against it. Some have but the responses are always along …
/r/MensRights23/01/23 04:43 PM
1

a woman who is still not attracted to them anyway since they lack the genetic qualities? This is very true. Even if a rich ugly guy put on a $2000 Armani suit and has the best haircut, facial hair styling and aftershave, he is still ugly and repulsive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 04:23 PM
11

When women grope men : it is just funny (and somehow it justifies groping them) When men look at naked women : it is sexual and objectifying. This infuriates me and is why I take the issue of objectification/sexualization of men seriously. It's not only the stuff you mentioned though. Hollywood movies, television shows, adverts, commercials, etc. are also sexualizing men, but we rarely see it happening to women now. Not only that but in entertainment media, doing it to men is praised and celebra…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 04:07 PM
23

Not sure why you assume they hired male strippers (and hired them in their office). In office work environments, if most of the staff are women, them organizing office parties and hiring male strippers is very common. I mentioned it because women, especially the feminist and "girlboss" types, operate on double standards. If a group of male colleagues in the office hired a female stripper, the same female colleagues would be screaming in disgust. But male strippers are treated much worse than fem…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 03:39 PM
3

How can the MRM succeed? Stop moral clowning, stop being the good/nice guys and actually start action. For example, look at the anti-feminist men's groups in South Korea. These guys actually get out on the street, are loud, are aggressive and make nuisances of themselves and it has been very effective as it has caused change in companies who try to ridicule men. They have also in fact, influenced and caused the election of an anti-feminist Prime Minister, as seen here: https://time.com/6156537/s…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 02:18 PM
58

Women also sexualize men, treat men like sex objects and can also be pr£verts. However of course, it's okay when women do it. The amount of women objectifying male actors like Chris Hemsworth, Henry Cavill, male models on social media, etc. is unreal. Even though your post is about women blaming men, there are also massive double standards as well regarding the issue of sexualization. Also - I'm willing to bet that at some point your female colleagues have hired a MALE stripper to perform for th…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 01:27 PM
1

I see that your Reddit Cake day is January 23, 2023. Nevertheless, I'll play along on this occasion. There’s a female nude scene with a gorgeous and dangerously skinny woman in most movies and shows "most movies and shows" Regarding modern movies and shows, what you said is a complete lie. And a lazy one at that. But the idea that women no longer face body standards I never said that women "no longer face body standards". Instead, I am saying that women's body standards for movies, etc. have dro…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 11:44 AM
1

The misandry is not only there, you may find it here as well. Because for some reason, many within our own side, who are supposedly for Men's Rights, also hate it when older men date younger women. Basically the same crap that feminists spew.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:39 PM
1

Not only as brainless and stupid beings, but also often as sex objects for female audiences. For example the shirtless scenes where often he is being ogled at by other actresses and also touched/molested by the other actresses. I consider this a negative. What makes it worse is the double standards where there is no longer any female equivalents of the above; and also how the feminists start whining and lynch-mobbing if women are sexualized. And it is known that in Hollywood, there is a ridiculo…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:34 PM
1

No matter how much you complain, older men dating younger women is perfectly legal. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:21 PM
6

Just go back to FDS or whatever feminist swamp you crawled here from.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:39 PM
3

Mainstream media, news media, news outlets, entertainment media, academia, education, politics, government, law, television, institutions, organizations, society, etc. seems to think that women cannot be abusive.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:54 PM
1

I believe there are beauty standards for women still and saying they don’t exists is just disingenuous. No-one said nor implied that beauty standards for women don't exist. This is actually you being disingenuous here. Instead, what is happening is that women's beauty standards are lowering and they can actually be somewhat average-looking and still get into Hollywood movies for major roles. The men however, have been set ridiculous standards (it was already at a high standard in the past anyway…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:47 PM
5

Indeed. Just like how when women are asked what they look for in man, they just say someone they can get along with and have a sense of humour. Everyone knows they want the handsome six foot plus Chad with the six pack and six figure salary.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:37 PM
4

More excuses. I would say that it's now more to do with providing titillation for female audiences and also to ogle at. If that's not bad enough, double standards mean that female actresses are now no longer required to have beach babe bodies and no longer have to do scantily-clad and/or nudity scenes. Henry Cavill, Chris Hemsworth, Robert Pattison and other male actors have all at some point brought up the issue of how they were sometimes uncomfortable with doing those kinds of scenes. No-one g…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:35 PM
5

That and what they call "positive discrimination".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:20 PM
8

How many people complaining about this were actually in STEM? We absolutely need more women in many of those careers. Especially things like engineering where there are large hurdles to cross to get equality. So you're for discriminating against men, we get it. Also: "equality" You've misspelled "female superiority".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:19 PM
4

Women on the other hand seldom receive any comment saying it's bad to hit men. It's worse than that. They're actually praised for it. "you go girl", "yasss queen", "empowered", "he deserved it", etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/23 04:15 AM
1

People talk so much about females and their injustices, and that's fine It's not fine if their "injustices" are fabricated and exaggerated, not to mention producing skewed and biased studies to support their claims. Which I find is happening a lot.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:47 AM
1

The mainstream media has gone bananas, catering far more for female needs than males lmao, since when have the mainstream media ever catered for males?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:43 AM
1

There is no need to pick a bone with feminism over this. There is every reason to pick a bone with feminism over this considering that they don't acknowledge male victims and that they indirectly encourage this sort of behaviour from women. Not only that, but they have a habit of laughing at and praising women who do it to men. Just ask feminist Mindy Kaling.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:30 AM
10

A man over 30 years old dating an 18 year old woman is perfectly legal. You can whine, moral-clown and white-knight about it all you want but it won't change the facts.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:22 AM
3

Beating a feminist is beating a useful idiot. This reasoning should no longer be accepted and the "useful idiots" should no longer get the benefit of being considered as "innocent" (because they've been brainwashed, paid, etc.). Anyone who peddles the feminist BS is just as culpable as their feminist superiors and should be called out and punished accordingly.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:53 AM
4

This is very true indeed.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:33 AM
29

A total disgrace and goes against equality.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 01:48 AM
3

Exactly. The absolute vast majority of the time, feminists and women never stand up for men on the issue of violence against men. It's usually "oh wimmin have it worse".
/r/MensRights21/01/23 09:08 PM
33

How is he an "a**hole" when all he did was give his opinion on the matter? The a**hole is the woman who got upset, mad and completely snapped because her man-hating agenda was challenged.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 06:08 PM
18

The point here is the double standards, not what plastic surgery each actress and actor has had done. You don't have to throw women under the bus to express dislike towards male struggles. I didn't "throw women under the bus". What is becoming an increasing pattern are female writers/producers (who are only in these jobs due to Affirmative Action and discriminating against men) exploiting, SH'ing/SA'ing and taking advantage of handsome male actors and being praised and celebrated for it. Ask Min…
/r/MensRights21/01/23 05:47 PM
22

Literally reading a book on feminism that addresses male body positivity rn. Where is the addressing of "male" body positivity in the places where it matters, such as mainstream media in general? Virtually nowhere.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 05:31 PM
1

Only because some of the material goes against their ideology. They love the man-hating and small d**k jokes though.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:36 AM
23

It's okay if women do it to men. Applauded, praised and celebrated in fact.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:34 AM
1

I know, I just posted some of the comments from other people in the article.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:32 AM
12

A few posts from the comments section of that article: Ann This was a satisfying read. I can thing of a few Dick's who I wish I could de-dick. In ancient China the removal of the dick in the balls would be a punishment for men who were licentious or cheaters. I wish this was still a punishment. I'm so sick and tired and disgusted of gross, hedonistic, selfish dishonest misogynistic cheating so-called men Rick Williams I know if that happened to me and the woman cut my penis off. I'm sure that sh…
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:07 AM
1

Projecting I see.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 02:11 AM
6

But yet, Cher dating a younger man who is 40 years younger is praised and celebrated. The slander of Leonardo Dicaprio for dating younger women is just yet another attack on men, done by shaming them with all kinds of disgraceful labels in an attempt to make men terrified of dating younger women. They're kind of doing the same thing with the Passport Bros/Guys as well. But yet of course, the feminists and media completely ignore the fact that older women take "trips" to the African continents an…
/r/MensRights21/01/23 02:03 AM
1

Nazis . Mask dropped. Next time, don't be so obvious.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 12:11 AM
3

Only female "victims" can be in the movement.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:47 PM
14

You have to remember that Reddit are very Leftist, Feminist and SJW overall. As for society, having the feminist man-hating agenda hammered into their heads daily for decades will eventually mould it.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:08 PM
12

and probably won’t get any flack cause she is a woman Worse that that. If you watched the clip of her on the Conan show, the audience all laughed, clapped and cheered it.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 05:10 PM
35

Cancel Mindy Kaling as well, she's trash. More accurately, trash who SHs and SAs men.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:15 PM
32

However, no one has come forward to press charges, so nothing can really be done about it. Even if a man or multiple men came forward to press charges, the feminists will still find a way to defend Cardi B. The men will likely be laughed off. Remember, Cardi B is seen as the "victim" here. Now IF it were a woman who Cardi B SA'd, and she came forward to press charges then maybe you'll see some comeuppance.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 03:16 PM
212

It's like how Cardi B admitted to drugging and robbing men in her stripper days. Which of course also suggests that there will have been a lot of SA on men from her, due to the drugging which will result in non-consent from the men. She won't and will never get any comeuppance.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:44 AM
44

"Tell anyone, and you’re fired." She didn't need to threaten the producers and it wouldn't have been a problem if the incident leaked out. Because after all, women are praised and celebrated for SA'ing men.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:37 AM
9

He's not exactly wrong though is he?
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:23 AM
77

How's your finances? Might be worthwhile to take legal action against her for slander, and if possible also have Witness Statements from others (such as from the gym owner) to support that you're a good guy. Get the CCTV footage if there's any available. Claim for damages and also have her pay back your legal fees. I know it's easier said than done, but your reputation could be ruined here via the false accusation. This stuff goes around quickly if the woman has told other members at the gym. Am…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:49 AM
24

There's also another reason, women/feminists don't want men getting Body Positivity because if men did get it, it would potentially lessen the amount of handsome and muscled 6-pack guys for them to ogle at and date.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 03:55 AM
60

File alongside Body Positivity, only women are allowed to have it.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 03:27 AM
13

And Western women/feminists still claim that they're "oppressed".
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:30 AM
3

Regarding dating and rejecting: In general, men are always willing to date down when looking for women. Women only date on par or up when looking for men. I think the above is something you need to realize before you drone your fence sitting "both sides are bad" and "wimmin suffer too" boiler plate lectures. Blame the system that keeps people from being happy. Feminism is already being rightfully criticised here.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:20 AM
10

When people say that, I immediately see it as a tactic to deflect blame and wrongdoing away from feminists and women, as well as mask the truth. An example of masking the truth is the Family Court system. When men rightfully complain that the Courts are biased against men, feminists will tell you that the whole system is run by men. What they won't tell you is that while men are in charge, it's the women that influence and make the rules.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:02 AM
3

Too "centrist", too moral clowning, lack of action, and too good/nice guys. And before anyone says "we don't stoop to the feminists level" or/and "we're better than that", decades of Men Right's failures overall have proven that being the "moral good guys" doesn't work, and that a new approach/tactic is needed. Something like an actual hard-line approach. For example, look at the anti-feminist men's groups in South Korea. These guys actually get out on the street, are loud, are aggressive and ma…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 01:57 AM
26

they say that punishing those who lie will keep real victims from coming forward. It's their automatic boiler-plate counter to the suggestions of punishing false accusers. That "counter" argument needs to be challenged, it's way overdue.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 01:23 AM
13

the online feminism movement is something I feel needs a reform. It's become just as "toxic" as the systems it say it's fighting against. And what are these "systems" exactly? If you mean the Wage Gap then that has been debunked a million times. The Equal Pay Act, formed decades ago has already put an end to pay discrimination. If you mean the alleged "discrimination" against women in the workplace, then there is no systemic discrimination against women in the workplace, the reason for the lack …
/r/MensRights18/01/23 09:54 PM
1

I didn't say it was feminizing men. I am saying that it's along the same lines, you know such as "encouragement" or "pressure" from feminists to transition. Go back to FDS or whatever feminist/SJW swamp you came from.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 04:10 PM
15

Feminist "equality" = a mask to hide behind while they attain their real goal of female supremacy. The "equality" mask is such a strong weapon for feminists, as on the surface, it fools everyone to immediately emphasize with and support them, and also prevents and protects them from being criticised in general.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 03:37 AM
2

Acknowledge what the 'T' stands for in LGBTQ. Also, SJWs/Feminists are in favour of emasculating and feminizing men.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 02:42 AM
7

Men are not allowed to have standards when dating a woman you see. Women constantly suggest that there is some sizable population of basement dwelling neckbeards who feel entitled to supermodels It's funny how they accuse men of that, where it's actually the other way round. If you go on the dating apps, women basically always want the top 10% of men, and demand the 6/6/6/6 of men in her profile. 6/6/6/6 means: - Handsome and over 6 foot tall - Has a 6 pack - Has a 6 figure salary - Has a you-kn…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 02:25 AM
4

Feminism is in favour of SJWs, and SJWs are basically the LGBTQ.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 02:21 AM
7

Feminists, especially the white middle-class feminists, are the most privileged, spoilt and entitled set of groups to exist in human civilization.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 01:59 AM
-5

as long as “His money, his choice” is the law of the land You know that will never happen in a millions years though so your point is redundant.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:52 PM
11

Blood boiling. Hope Stewart wins the case and ruins them.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 04:48 AM
6

Just remembered another one - men being depicted as stupid, useless, lazy, braindead, foolish, incompetent and oafs in television adverts and commercials. The man is also the "joke" of the advert in a lot of cases. Also in some cases, just sexually objectified/sexualized - see some of the Diet Coke adverts/commercials. Women in TV adverts and commercials on the other hand, are always depicted as clever, smart, independent, can do everything, brainy, and in a lot of cases is the one that "fixes" …
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:58 PM
1

Yes they literally are. And I'm VERY explicitly stating in several comments in response to so called men who are unable to see how they behave and make sense of the world like the feminists they rail so strongly against do. I'm not implying anything, I'm stating it, CLEAR AS FUCKING DAY. Wow, I didn't realize that you were the arbiter of what constitutes men's good and bad behaviour. It seems that you have mistaken 'reasonable criticism' for 'misogyny'. Maybe it's those male feminist tendencies …
/r/MensRights11/01/23 07:32 PM
2

She tries to use the 'women have always shown tits' card to justify her double standards, but it's funny how she completely ignores and doesn't mention the fact that female nudity is no longer allowed on TV and movies. There is hardly any female nudity on TV and movies now that's for sure. Piece of s**t article, piece of s**t author. I wish the male actors would just outright refuse to do nudity scenes until some balance is restored the other way.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:40 PM
4

Hello my friend, well firstly I personally KNOW of good women who call it out, and who stand by me and champion me loudly. Ah yes, anecdotal evidence. Regardless I have always known such women existed and not let my opinion of ALL women become all women bad No-one here is doing the "all women bad" thing at all, if that's what you're indirectly implying. The thing is, you cannot deny the fact feminism is in control of and is being peddled in government, law, politics, education, academia, institu…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:15 PM
8

Our good sisters, good women. REALLY need to start calling this narcissistic abuse out for what it is. If they haven't called it out in 50 years, what makes you think they're ever going to? Raised eyebrows is NOT enough! They're not even raising their eyebrows at it. Instead, they're secretly agreeing with the misandry. That's why they're not calling it out.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:15 PM
2

That's not what biology says mate.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:05 PM
3

Regarding Anime/Manga, also don't forget that in almost every show, there are always handsome male characters (Bishounens) in them, often muscled and topless showing their six packs (because martial arts, sports, gangsters, fanservice, etc.). I know for a fact that female audiences like this, hence why Anime has a significant female fanbase. Yet, the whiners completely ignore the above (or make excuses for) and complain about the female characters being sexualized, their boobs being too big, unr…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:02 PM
4

An attractive man must do topless scenes against his wishes or media outlets lambast. An attractive woman is empowering when she refuses to do nude scenes. It's acceptable to sexualise men on daytime television, it is not acceptable to do so to women. Based on your reply, I'll assume that you're a woman. I don't have much time for possibly disingenuous people like you (I didn't say you are, just that you possibly MIGHT be), but credit is due to you for mentioning the objectification/sexualizatio…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 02:25 PM
-1

There's a reason for that "double standard": Men are biologically created to pro-create. Women are biologically created in a way that they can only have one baby per year. Use your brain.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:45 PM
4

I didn't say he was uncomfortable with all the nude scenes, hence why I said "on several occasions". It's either that or I have confused and meant Henry Cavill instead.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:40 PM
10

Women who cheat on men = "the man isn't good enough, the man must have treated her badly, etc." Men who cheat on women = "omg burn him"
/r/MensRights11/01/23 12:47 PM
13

Others have always made the ones I wanted already. So here's a few relating to sexualization issues that bother me, but seems the majority doesn't really care about: Adult male fanservice/nudity scenes are allowed in entertainment media to titillate female audiences but the gender reversal isn't allowed. Example being the obligatory shirtless scenes of men in movies, some even involving an actress molesting him. Female actresses being praised and celebrated for ogling at and molesting male actor…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 12:41 PM
9

I've understood models can get fired if they refuse to go nude, probably both men and women. No, it's gotten to the point where women models/actress no longer have to do nude scenes, this further proven by the fact that the media praises and celebrates when women actresses refuse to do nude or scantily-clad scenes. Meanwhile actors like Chris Hemsworth are still required to do nude scenes, despite it being known before that he is uncomfortable with it on several occasions. Male writers and direc…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 12:14 PM
16

I'd love to find you guilty but I'd don't have the evidence.. Holy s**t.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:53 AM
5

"Study finds men ignore dirt at home, women feel compulsion to clean" "I am just a lazy, selfish person, perhaps even sexist by action" "We men may simply not perceive domestic chores as needing doing" "After reading the paper, though, I feel really bad about my wife."
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:26 AM
2

the right to vote and abortion access. Those things happened because of gynocentrism, which is biological and hard-wired into human beings, especially men. Men do not get the privilege and advantage of such a biological favour. Men have been requesting for the Family Court system and Alimony to be fairer to men for decades, it's always dismissed and ignored, meaning that nothing has changed. Halle Belle, the female actress, said how she hated paying an "unreasonable" amount of alimony to her hus…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:16 AM
3

What’s the difference? Calling out double standards isn't "men have it worse". Also, men are not making male-only apartment blocks.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 11:50 PM
11

All I see is yet another pile of feminist rubbish designed to hate on men and paint women as the victims. As if there isn't enough of that already.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:58 PM
3

a legal abortion right for men. We all know that that's not going to become commonplace in a million years, which therefore makes your point regarding this issue redundant.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:41 PM
5

No-one is doing that. What actually is happening however is that feminists are indirectly telling men that they cannot discuss their issues at all. Usually through the "muh but women have it worse" card.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:24 PM
39

"Your rage really should have been at your partner, he was the one that was cheating on you," Pretty disgraceful that coming from a Magistrate/Judge, basically encouraging violence against men. Also, how do they know that the other woman didn't know about the man already having a girlfriend? She most likely knew as they were staying in a hotel. But of course, everything is the man's fault again.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:04 PM
1

I wouldn't expect my partner to be responsible (or held responsible) for my actions bc I'm an adult Only if you and your partner are of a relationship where neither has to provide and protect for the other. However, if the woman requires the man to provide, protect and give her a lavish lifestyle, then it's only reasonable that the man has some level of authority.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 06:36 PM
1

Another woman who wants a man with traditional roles but is completely allergic to the idea of being a woman with traditional roles.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 12:42 PM
1

You cannot realistically expect someone to not have some level of authority for something they are responsible for. If a person has to have the burden of all responsibility but no authority, that's actually slavery.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 12:40 PM
1

Do you mean a movie where the audience is invited to ogle woman? Or a movie where a male actor(s) are ogling a woman? Both. Most of those movies you mentioned are before the SJW/feminist takeover of 2013. Producers and writers back then had free expression and were allowed to have sexy/attractive women for the male audience. With Suicide Squad, the so-called "sexualization" and "ogle window" of some of the female characters is absolutely nothing when compared to what was shown in the movies of t…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 08:56 PM
1

The media is full of bikini babes Nice attempt on deflecting away from the topic at hand. And I am talking mainly about the double standards, not women in bikinis. That was a general expression to make my point. There is an adult male nudity scene in Thor: Love and Thunder, where some of the audience (in the movie) are women ogling at him. Where is the adult female equivalent with the men ogling at her?
/r/MensRights08/01/23 10:58 AM
6

"mainstream games media like Kotaku and Polygon are always bitching about attractive/sexy female characters, BUT praise and celebrate "hot" male characters." that ain't equality bro
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:49 AM
12

Because it lowers the amount of (sexual) power women have on men? Yes, this is exactly it. But they won't admit it, and instead claim "objectification", "misogyny", "breakdown of relationships between women and men", "promotes subjugation of women", "promotes SA and R", "causes unhealthy relationship between women and men", etc., they'll throw out all the excuses. All while ignoring MALE SEX DOLLS and all the thousands of sex toys and devices for women. It's funny, because the men who need the s…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:07 PM
7

This is donkey s**t, it's the exact same excuse used the SJWs, white-knights and feminists to excuse Thunberg. The fact that the slur is literally gendered says it all.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:16 PM
6

At one point feminists need to be clear and stop being hypocrites. Won't happen on their own account, ever. They need to be stigmatized and called out continuously until they stop doing it. Or better still, just get rid of the feminist writers and directors. The fact that the male actors agree to do these scenes doesn't help either, especially when they say white knight crap like "oh I emphasize with women so much now that I've done a scantily-clad or nude scene". They should just outright refus…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:55 PM
9

Double standards as usual from feminists. This s**t needs calling out. The Ultra Alpha Dudebro Chads who say this is a "nothing burger" needs to stfu tbh.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:47 PM
13

Right now, 2d porn, sex dolls, and fleshlight-type techs are crude and not good enough to compete against the sexual power real women hold over men, but men have always overcome nature's unfairness using the power of technology. In the next 10-20 years, we will start to see light-field 6DOF VR porns, haptics, and sex dolls with animatronics capabilities. These improvements will be another step function improvement in the sex tech, just as modern 4k streaming internet porn is a step function impr…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:19 PM
4

Feminists and women have got a whole plethora of pathetic excuses to justify the double standards when it comes to objectification and sexualization, such as: "male power fantasy" "different power dynamics" "men cannot be objectified because they are in power" "men are predators when they objectify and sexualise women" "women lose agency and are being exploited when they are objectified by men" "men can handle it" "women have been objectified and sexualized for centuries so this makes male objec…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:06 AM
1

They want to ruin and destroy the IP, basically any medium that straight men like. That's pretty much the root of their agenda and I'm not even joking.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 10:07 PM
13

Here comes the white knight to save the day.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:50 AM
2

Just searched for anything against Operation Soteria, and just got slews and slews of articles praising and celebrating this disgraceful practice. I would imagine that all the braindead normies and sheeps will be praising this as well despite knowing nothing about it nor the roots of it, instead purely based on being told "It Protects Women and Girls!!". The surface message/goal of Operation Soteria is designed to pull on people's heartstrings and exploit gynocentrism. Therefore I think it's cle…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:46 AM
6

The double standards are a problem, but what is causing these double standards are the white knights, male feminists and simps. These parasites enable feminism and misandry everywhere and therefore are the major enemies of men. I think men definitely need to be more "harsher" and sarcastic when countering the feminist jokes/insults against men.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 12:33 AM
4

I misunderstood, therefore I have deleted my comment.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 04:22 PM
1

The situation you describe wouldn't be gold digging, Einstein. Get yourself back to FDS or something.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 03:17 PM
4

I would imagine that a major reason for men going for Asian women is because how feminist the modern Western white women have become.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 08:01 PM
4

They cannot figure out that acting like pure cunts makes them unattractive. They hate men you see. Unless it's the handsome chad who is over six foot tall with the six pack.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 07:57 PM
129

Men are no longer allowed to have male-only spaces. Excuse me for not having any sympathy for Rowling. And also, people need to know that she's an SJW man-hating misandrist, hence why she is a TERF. Therefore it's quite shocking to see many people on "our side" side with Rowling. I say just let them both fight their own kinds and hopefully both are ruined.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 07:45 PM
13

Imagine if it had been a man who said women don't know how to please men, and that "p0rn magazines of women are being sold out". Worldwide outrage, social media and feminist lynch mobbing, labelled a "misogynist" and "small dick energy", fired from his job and cancelled.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 07:38 PM
26

Just more reasons for men to not get married.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 02:03 PM
7

Even if they did look into the source material (they may have done by the way), they would never let an opportunity to whine about the Male Gaze and objectification of women pass by. And then of course, simultaneously being in favour of objectifying and sexualising the male actors because they're hypocrites.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 01:57 PM
4

Those writers and directors happened to be women "happened to be women" That's not exactly true though is it? All the "diversity", "representation", "social justice" and Affirmative Action crap has gotten women into these positions, most likely undeserved, and definitely a case of men having to be discriminated against to make way for the women.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 01:50 PM
7

discuss the benefits of feminism my sides
/r/MensRights23/12/22 12:59 AM
22

And if you bring this issue up to feminists, expect a long-winded drivel of how the "power dynamics" and how "men are in power so they cannot be oppressed" makes what Millie Bobby did okay. It is quite literally the "black people cannot be racist against white people" card but for the genders.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:13 PM
1

Nope. If "empowering women" involves stepping on and degrading men It seems that you're not aware of Affirmative Action and Gender Quotas in the workplace; women-only scholarships, courses, apprenticeships in education; and specialist government funding for female entrepreneurs. Plus I'm sure there's other boatloads of female-only advantages in those sectors. All the above, which basically discriminates against men, are labelled as "empowering women" and "female empowerment" by feminists and wom…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:46 PM
6

Don't forget man-hating and misandry
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 03:07 PM
5

However, be careful that you don't equate sexual freedom and female empowerment when it comes to the type of sexual relationships they enter with the above toxic behaviors. These days, "sexual freedom" and "female empowerment" are almost synonymous with each other. We are also seeing it over and again where "empowering women" involves stepping on and degrading men to do so. When men are humiliated, cheated on, objectified and sexualized, it is considered as female empowerment. The feminists will…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:11 PM
10

Also, the double standards in "objectification" and "sexualization" is also infuriating as well. You know, how it's unacceptable to do it to women, but completely okay to do it to men. In the scenarios you described, reverse the gender roles and there would a massive worldwide outrage with the feminists screaming for the shows to be cancelled and removed from airing. And the producers/writers/directors would also be fired and cancelled as well. Sometimes I really do wish men would do the same as…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:30 PM
7

They are usually not cool with it when the shoe is on the other foot "usually not cool with it" That's an understatement. They (women) would be screaming, bitching and posting their story all over social media if it happened to them.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:26 PM
9

People are aware of this. The issue is the message and notion that it sends out.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:24 PM
10

I think too that there is a clearly cultural push to accept cheating. Only on the woman's side. Men cheating is still s**t on. Cheating is disgraceful behaviour, it's even worse here because of the double standards.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:23 PM
2

You don't get to play the "not all feminists are like that" and "they are not true feminists" cards when all the time you see the Radical feminists all over social media, news outlets, mainstream media, academia, education, colleges, universities, government, law, institutions, Courts, etc. Where are the so-called "true feminists"? Why are they not calling the radicals out? I'll tell you why - it is because the "true feminists" are secretly and silently approving of the benefits and privileges t…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:13 PM
2

That’s why I hate it when people say there’s no need for feminism So basically, you now want female supremacy. Okay.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 02:25 AM
2

So, you center your beliefs around vidya girls? It's not just the sexuality aspect and the vidya girls fanservice censorship, but other things as well such as the biases against men in mainstream media, news media, entertainment media, academia, education, politics, government, law, society, etc. which have been influenced and caused by feminism. The censorship and/or banning/prevention of attractive/sexy/feminine women in fictional medium and events is one of the main hallmark methods in which …
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 02:08 AM
2

So your political opinions are formed and based around topics with regards to sexuality. It's not just the sexuality aspect and the female fanservice censorship, but other things as well such as the biases against men in mainstream media, news media, entertainment media, academia, education, politics, government, law, society, etc. which have been influenced and caused by feminism. The censorship and/or banning/prevention of attractive/sexy/feminine women in fictional medium and events is one of…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:30 AM
4

Feminism is totally about equality The laws and policies of the West, which are influenced from a feminist viewpoint, suggests otherwise.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:10 AM
1

"Looking" at other people is not in danger of being outlawed. Then you either have your head buried in the sand or you're just disingenuous. Also, even if it was made a law it would most certainly have to be gender neutral. It is/would be "gender neutral" on paper, but we all know that it will be the men who will be viewed as the predators and the women as the victims. When the law needs to be applied, we all know only the women complainants who would be taken seriously; and the men complainants…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:08 AM
5

This is a joke right? No it isn't. The only joke here is you here trying to peddle the myth that feminist is for equality whilst hiding behind your man-hating mask.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:02 AM
3

The issue here is, feminism is not for equality. Never has been.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 11:20 PM
1

Imagine if laws had to be made by various people based on their emotions. Are you implying that hasn't happened? In the UK, soon men will not be allowed to look at women, it will be a criminal offence if they do. And guess what? It doesn't apply the other way round.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 11:20 PM
5

To the privileged, equality feels like oppression. And that's why feminists are so opposed to the MRM. They see the MRM as a potential risk factor in taking away feminist privilege and making it egalitarian.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 11:00 PM
6

You're free to think what ever you want of course but if you don't think women deserve equality Tell us a right that men have that women don't in the Western societies. I can tell you some rights that women have that men don't in the Western societies.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 10:58 PM
1

It's not objectifying women if they choose to be "eye candy" of their own free will, know what will be involved and get paid well for it. In your own words: "as long as they're not being coerced into it, you do you girl." As for video games and "virtual TnA", a bunch of computer-generated polygons and/or pixels displayed on a screen cannot be objectified. They are not human beings. It seems that you do not have any common sense. Nor logic for that matter. Look man, as long as men (and some women…
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 08:45 PM
5

It has. I’m a woman and I’m completely independent of a man’s decisions. I make a 6 figure salary, have a dog, live my happy old life without bothering anyone. Well, at least the guys won't have to dodge a bullet now. Because of the sacrifices other women and men have made over the years for me Women? lol, it's the men who gave women the right to vote, Einstein. and those who don’t want to be subjugated by patriarchy and people like you Like feminists would never exaggerate and lie about this no…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 09:12 PM
8

little neo-nazi Mask dropped.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:50 PM
26

This is exactly the kind of mentality that allows feminists to get away with s**tting on men - people like you downplaying the misandry and telling guys to man up, stay quiet and ignore it. What an ultra alpha chad you are.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:36 PM
10

you will be met with public resistance lol, Men's Rights have always been met with public resistance to a degree since the MRM was formed.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 01:44 PM
0

I am a gamer for the most part, and have an interest in female fanservice in fictional media. If you don't know what female "fanservice" is, it's basically attractive/sexy women in games, anime, manga, comics, etc. I would also say movies as well, but proper scantily-clad "hot women" (like, Pamela Anderson and Elisha Cuthbert from the 1990s/early 2000s) are no longer allowed in them because feminists despise anything appealing to the male audience. Back a decade ago, Anita Sarkeesian and her ilk…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 01:34 PM
12

Most men are glad to leave you alone. Just don't complain when the handsome six foot plus chad with the six pack, massive arms and six figure salary doesn't come along after you hit the wall.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 03:21 AM
5

On forums and social media, I've seen so many guys kind of struggle to counter the statement (when feminists claim that men run the world). To counter this, say that men are in charge, women make the rules. Then if the feminist carries on, then you start making the points about how the laws, government, policies, education, etc. are always biased in favour of women, giving the usual examples (Courts, Affirmative Action, etc.).
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 03:17 AM
6

Men are in charge, women make the rules.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 12:40 AM
4

by my logic, a feminist is someone who believes in equality for women. So you don't believe in equality for men. That's standard for a feminist I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 12:31 AM
1

Regardless, if they get it online then it's at risk of people reading and believing it. That's why dissent of it is important.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:04 AM
1

Stop giving these idiots attention. Nope, have to call these cretins out otherwise they get away with it. Without dissent, people (i.e. Normies) will think it's acceptable.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:30 PM
2

Boo - f-kin' - Hoo then stop being such delicate flowers - geez! Tell that to the women and feminists who whine 24/7 about women being "objectified". And most of the men complaining about the men being objectified are mainly against the double standards. oh please - Playboy Magazine was on the rack every month for 47 years - so if any ladies wanna look at some abs now No-one is stopping nor preventing men's abs from being ogled at by women. Women and feminists however, are determined to stop and…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:29 PM
0

I know you're hyper ultra moralistic but free speech is not absolute and can also be abused.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/22 10:26 PM
6

Feminism stopped being a net-positive for women and society "stopped", "society" lmao, implying as if it ever was a positive and implying that it's been positive for society lololololololol
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:22 PM
3

Surprised that no ultra alpha gigachad has come into this thread to tell us that this is a nothing burger yet.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:17 PM
25

It's a cope, it's a massive cope. The problem is, once the lie is repeated enough over a long period of time, the Normies will believe it. It's still shocking on how many cretins still believe the 1-in-3/4/5 "r@pe culture" horses**t. Also how strange is it that feminists never mention anything about older women travelling to certain places of the Africa Continent and offer money and other perks to poor African young men in exchange for certain favours.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 09:00 PM
0

It was going fairly well until the first sentence of the last paragraph regarding men being the "Protectors of Society". Sounds like another way of saying she's against the Nuclear Family.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 08:51 PM
61

The feminists are now trying to paint the men who go abroad to find female partners (Passport Guys/Bros) as "predatory" and "exploitation of young girls/women", trying to stigmatize the action. In Sweden (I think) they even tried to criminalise the concept.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 08:28 PM
1

I feel OP is making a blanket statement that women are always favored in interviews It's not really a "blanket statement" when we have seen and have evidence of some companies and businesses outright saying or implying that they would prefer or encourage female applicants for jobs though is it? Not to mention all the Affirmative Action crap, as well as the female-only grants, scholarships, courses, etc. we now get in colleges, universities, apprenticeships, etc. As a woman, I personally feel mor…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:58 PM
1

And the whole anti vs woke thing This gives you away, exposing you for the SJW apologist you are, via pretending to be some kind of Centrist. Get lost.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 03:58 PM
6

Single Women = "strong, empowering, independent, free, has agency, boss babe, knows what she wants, queen, etc." Single Men = "sad, cannot get laid, incel, irresponsible, hates women, misogynist, selfish, pathetic, needs to grow up, etc."
/r/MensRights19/12/22 03:35 PM
1

They are anti-attractive/hot-female-characters. You don't get to claim that it's just an "extremist few of them" when all the time you see them all over social media, news outlets, mainstream media, education, colleges, universities, etc. whining about sexualization of women.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 03:07 PM
8

Ah yes, the "they're not feminists!" card to deflect away from a load of misandrist man-hating feminists.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:52 PM
5

Actually, you're wrong. When it happens to male actors, there's definitely a grey area which is likely abuse because I remember years ago some TV show male actors/celebrities spoke up and said they didn't expect women actors to molest and touch their private parts. To which the producers of these shows just replied to them: "oh it's just a bit of fun". Guarantee you that it wouldn't be "just a bit of fun" if the gender roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:33 PM
5

The "jokes" on the show are subjective; but I think what is really annoying, obnoxious and cringe is the fact that some of these jokes would not be allowed if the gender roles were reversed. Like for example the cretins laughing at the jokes now would instead scream and bitch if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:31 PM
6

I dont know if this trend is supposed to be payback for decades of abusing women on TV or something, It definitely is in my view, because this trend is happening an awful lot. And the thing is, the women back then wasn't actually "abused" on TV, they read and agreed to sign contracts prior to participating the show meaning that they are aware of what happens, not to mention getting paid well for it. The thing is now when it happens to male actors, there's definitely a grey area which is likely a…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:26 PM
8

The same Joe Rogan who once said that women R'ping men is not as bad and downplayed.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:19 PM
6

They prolly do this shit to cause controversy and get views. I have to say, this "oh they just do it for attention" line to justify and excuse the double standards is getting tedious.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:10 PM
1

Tedious.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:04 PM
1

I think men who are considered physically attractive may be favored by female interviewers. That's not a positive though, if that's what you're implying.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 02:01 PM
9

The problem here is the disgraceful double standards.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:56 PM
10

Unfortunately, all the Normies read it and completely believe in it.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:54 PM
23

They want equality only when it suits and benefits them.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:51 PM
27

Indeed. In movies and TV shows, I would actually be tolerable of the "shirtless men" scenes IF the male audience got their slow-motion bikini babe women shots back.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:49 PM
12

as they imply women are too weak to handle objectification They're happy to be victims in this situation though. It's like the common argument of when we point out that feminists implementing all these laws protecting women from being stared at, etc. are basically saying that women are unable to handle jokes, criticism and responsibility, making it "misogyny". Women are happy to be victims in these situations because it ensures that they get endless support and sympathy - which results in power …
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:46 PM
10

So the author is for double standards. Doesn't want her eye candy of men to be taken away from her and the female audience, but absolutely fervent and desperate for eye candy of women to be taken away from men and the male audience (which it already has been). In that case, okay then - feminists/women whining about objectification of women will be automatically and immediately dismissed by me. You can handle it ladies. Here's hoping that more and more male actors speak up against these bulls**t …
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:31 PM
8

It's happening in the Western video games industry as well. It's polluted with SJW/Feminist agenda/ideology (even within the games themselves). Say anything against it and you get labelled a "racist" or "______phobe" or "misogynist", etc.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 08:15 PM
2

How about looking at the movements themselves where it matters, instead of some Internet forums? If you refuse to do that then you clearly have something to hide.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 02:13 PM
13

and what is wrong with gay graphic novels? The fanbase and their double standards. The Yaoi and BL fanbase especially, because they like to over-promote and force that stuff on everyone. Plus the fact that SJWs and Feminists like it. And from a personal point of view, that stuff disgusts me as well. So all the reason to hate the medium and it's fans, heh.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:24 PM
15

If feminists didn't have double standards then they wouldn't have any standards at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 11:05 AM
7

He'll be okay. Because he is a handsome man, hoards of women will defend him. If he was fat and bald, then he would be in real trouble.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 11:01 AM
33

They give all women a bad name and they just need to sit down and stop acting like they represent all women. lol. Do you honestly think that women are not secretly in agreement/approving of what the feminists are doing? Think about it. There's a reason on why you rarely see women stepping up and calling the feminist s**t out.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:55 AM
13

Would you still be saying this if the gender roles were reversed?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:51 AM
23

Indeed: https://ibb.co/C08ww0s In Anime/Manga, the fangirls also use the same "male power fantasy" excuse to defend Yaoi and BL (basically g** male stuff) whilst simultaneously complaining about attractive/sexy female characters in the medium.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:42 AM
15

Even if he did, nothing will happen to those who slandered him. Feminist Courts, Judges, law, etc.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:22 AM
52

Also love the "alliance" with another writer who was supposedly sent to HR so many times they were fired. Willing to bet that this writer was male who did nothing wrong, but got hounded out by the female writers/directors and HR anyway through false allegations because he wanted to stick to the lore of the IP/franchise. And of course, also because he provided support to Cavill. And because this writer was also a gamer, he basically had the two blasphemous sins on earth (being a man and a gamer) …
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:20 AM
31

If you watch Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, it was reported the other day that for Season 2 it's going to have an all-female directing team. You know because getting rid of and discriminating against men is so fashionable and cool now.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:13 AM
11

The post made it sound like gaming prevented him from doing anything else in his life. I was trying to say he’s obviously able to balance that Because he is a successful actor and obviously has a body that requires a lot of time at the gym. Like I said in my OP, they wouldn't let an opportunity like this pass by without peddling some amount of Social Justice/Feminist doctrine.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:08 AM
19

Those who are knowledgeable, have common sense and are non-gullible saw it a hundred miles off. Unfortunately Normies are pretty much braindead sheep these days so they just listen and believe. And then you also have the white-knights and soylent brigade to deal with.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:04 AM
25

Imagine the outrage and lynch-mobbing had instead it been male writers/directors who complained of a female actress refusing to take her top off to do bikini/lingerie scenes? The whole world/industry would have a meltdown and the male writers/director's heads would be on sticks in less than a week.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:02 AM
44

His body, her choice it seems.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:01 AM
43

Of course, the egomaniac feminist showrunner had to just put her own touch on it, because she would rather see the series fail than eat a bite of humble pie. You're probably right there. I also think that the feminist showrunner had a massive axe to grind against men (as all feminists do), and thus she wanted the show to only cater to the female audience; at the same time also spite the male audience.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:00 AM
15

There were already whispers prior that Cavill was unhappy with the lore of the franchise being changed to unacceptable levels. And from what I can see, it's usually the female writers/directors who make massive changes to an existing IP/franchise. We saw it with Kathleen Kennedy regarding modern Star Wars and the female staff regarding the Ghostbusters Remake. The same thing happens in Western video games and comics as well, but that's whole different sectors. Therefore an argument can be made t…
/r/MensRights18/12/22 09:52 AM
10

I disagree. The "male power fantasy" thing is just an excuse for double standards. They do the same in Western video games as well. Both sexualization of actresses and actors are to titillate the audience at the root. If the "male power fantasy" thing is true (it isn't), then I could also say that hot bikini babes are a female power fantasy then, because nothing controls men better than attractive/hot women.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 09:42 AM
2

Years of feminist indoctrination does that.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:41 AM
1

Or maybe you should look at the actions of both movements instead of blindly sticking to words and labels.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:30 AM
1

This is just a weak nothing burger Obviously many don't think it's a nothing burger. If you think it's a "nothing burger" then why are you here in this thread?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 11:57 PM
6

Ok sure, have your opinion, idc Then idc about your total horse s**t then.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:53 PM
20

Women aren’t believed when they are raped The police reactions and the investigations that take place says otherwise. Not to mention the government continuously implementing new policies/laws in favour of women to tackle these situations says otherwise. Also the crowds within and supporters of the MeToo and Believe All Women movements says otherwise. The overwhelming sympathy and support that a woman gets when she claims that she has been SA'd or R'd says otherwise. The fact that women get speci…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 07:09 PM
19

Name a right that men have that women do not in the Western societies.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 05:15 PM
1

So are the dudes in this thread obviously. If you don't like it then maybe you should just go to FDS or some ultra alpha masculine chad forum instead? What’s your point? My point is that women can be stronk and independenz but also fragile for convenience.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 04:51 PM
3

It seems people have mistaken your original comment. You see, the way you said it, it makes it appear as if you're talking about empowered men as if it is a negative thing. That's why you have all the downvotes.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:27 PM
15

If it was a feminist without the government or her mob backing her up, I promise we wouldn't be scared 100%
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:25 PM
4

Without civilization you'd be living in mud huts and grass houses. You also wouldn't be able to spew your entitled Social Justice horse s**t over the Internet.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:22 PM
16

You don't get to play the "the feminazis are not real feminists" card when: 1) The so-called "good feminists" never call out and go against the "bad feminists"; nor do the "good feminists" make a dedicated effort to do so. (we know that all you so-called "good feminists" all secretly happy with, praising and benefitting from the privileges of what the bad feminists have brought you) 2) The "good feminists" allowed their movement to further devolve into the misandrist man-hating movement it is. (…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:20 PM
2

Because the majority of women that I know have no problem laughing at themselves And they're also happy to be fragile at convenient times to gain the victimhood card.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:26 AM
4

The patriarchy is what built and maintained civilization.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:18 AM
12

Another day, another closet-misandrist and concern troll. I'll take integrity over wearing a mask any day. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:17 AM
11

You seem lost. FDS is that way dude.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:10 AM
18

This actually makes women seem weak and people that can’t take a joke. They're happy to be fragile, because it means that they are automatically victims. Pretending to be victims grants them sympathy, support, funding and allows them to continue peddling the narrative of how oppressed women are and how men are toxic. Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:05 AM
1

Basically saying they’re too fragile to take a joke And they're happy to be fragile, because it means that they are automatically victims. Pretending to be victims grants them sympathy, support, funding and allows them to continue peddling the narrative of how oppressed women are and how men are toxic. Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:01 AM
74

Because feminists are there ready to label and slander anyone who tries to empower boys and men as "misogynist", "sexist" and "hating women". As well as telling everyone that "boys and men are in power already", "they don't need to be empowered", "this will set women back to the 1950s" etc. etc. etc.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:08 AM
274

Because feminism is a misandrist movement whose goal is to emasculate, feminize and degrade men.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:57 AM
109

Of course it makes no sense, it's just another jab at men.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:53 AM
28

Would it still be "just a joke" to you if the joke was made on women?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:50 AM
24

Well aren't you the ultra masculine alpha chad? People like you are why feminists get away with the double standards.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:48 AM
8

It's related to feminism considering that the movement actively encourages girls and women to make false accusations against boys and men via the MeToo, Believe All Women and Toxic Masculinity horse s**t. And feminism ensuring that girls and women who make false accusations against men suffer no consequences if they have no evidence or/and are caught lying. Not only that, but painting all men as potential Rs and SAs.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 01:12 AM
3

You don't get to imply that feminism has a "positive" side when: 1) The so-called "good feminists" never call out and go against the "bad feminists"; nor do the "good feminists" make a dedicated effort to do so. (we know that all you so-called "good feminists" all secretly happy with, praising and benefitting from the privileges of what the bad feminists have brought you) 2) The "good feminists" allowed their movement to further devolve into the misandrist man-hating movement it is. (not that it…
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 01:01 AM
7

Feminists don't want to hurt men. Feminist's actions suggest otherwise. Therefore I repeat what I said in my first reply to you: "Doesn't help your cause when feminism indirectly encourages making false SA/R accusations against men. Example: MeToo and Believe All Women. Not only that, feminists advocating for and implementing laws which are biased against men and determines him automatically guilty in cases like SA and R doesn't help your cause either." And no, don't bother with the "not all fem…
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:03 AM
-1

His Cake day is December 16, 2022 with negative karma. Don't be fooled by him.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:56 PM
1

Maybe you should just go back to FDS.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:55 PM
20

Except that for there was never any real discrimination against women to begin with regarding this issue. Women have always had opportunities to enter the sector, most just chose not to. And notice how the SJWs/Wokes like to call it "male dominated", this is because that wording makes it appear as if men are gatekeeping the sector away from women. Instead, the reality is that it is just male preferred. Unfortunately, the Normies completely believe the SJW lies. The only valid case of discriminat…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:39 PM
12

FDS is that way.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 09:47 PM
1

group all feminists as false rape accusers and people who hate men. Doesn't help your cause when feminism indirectly encourages making false SA/R accusations against men. Example: MeToo and Believe All Women. Not only that, feminists advocating for and implementing laws which are biased against men and determines him automatically guilty in cases like SA and R doesn't help your cause either.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 07:24 PM
13

You seem lost. FDS is that way.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:03 PM
20

StrangerrDangerr9 Cake day December 16, 2022
/r/MensRights16/12/22 04:10 PM
76

And yet, we've seen plenty of times where female news reporters/anchors mention that there are more female college/university enrolments and graduations than men; more special scholarships and courses for women; more women seeking employment than men; and some jobs that hire more women than men - and all of this is seen as some sort of "achievement" to be praised and celebrated. But yet, the moment a man reasonably suggests that men's sports earn more money (capitalism) he gets attacked and lync…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:57 PM
13

This kind of thing has been happening for over 20 years. If nothing has changed in that time, what makes you think that it's going to change now? We can keep calling this s**t out, but as long the white knights are around, things are not going to change. And these white knights are also the lawmakers, government, courts, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 12:42 PM
20

Let's be accurate here: "Feminists: Me not liking a man grants me permission to callously ruin his life."
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 12:20 PM
4

Feminists: "that does not prove that he didn't do it"
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 12:16 PM
4

Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:29 AM
3

This has been going on for ages. When it comes to this kind of thing, I believe that India is very bad for men as well. Tbh, everywhere is pretty misandrist, it's a case of which country is the least misandrist. It doesn't matter how bad it gets, nothing seems to change. And we can blame gynocentrism and white knighting for that.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:28 AM
3

And I'll bet that the women will have also made sexist comments against the men as well. Happens both ways.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:24 AM
1

Also, carry a spy camera to use the recording as evidence in case someone falsely accuses you. There's also the complication of the state's laws regarding video recording. Some countries do not allow personal anonymous recording of perpetrators (for whatever crime) and such evidence will be dismissed and not allowed in Court. There's also the issue of public decency laws, which will no doubt be used against you by the accuser to falsely accuse you of being a "creep".
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:21 AM
4

Pretty bold to do it in a country that is plagued by the feminist ideology. You are likely to receive constant threats/harassment for being in the minority. And the fact that we're a minority is the thing that is the most disappointing of all. If men in general weren't such white-knighting gynocentric sheep we would be seeing plenty of fightback against the feminist ideology and there would be changes in law made ages ago. We wouldn't even need a Men's Rights, because fighting back against misan…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:14 AM
2

Stop making excuses for misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 03:42 PM
3

Then we call you a white knight and a simp then.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:25 AM
5

What about the other way round? A 40 year old woman dates a 21 year old man. Are we going to see double standards from you?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:19 AM
3

Here comes the white knight to save the day.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:17 AM
3

What about the other way round? Are you gonna give some excuse of "it's different" and "muh power dynamics" now?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:06 AM
48

We should be able to use our own money to open a male version. And watch what happens if you attempt that.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 04:04 PM
-2

And to think, some cretins on the Anti-SJW side were actually in support of Rowling after she was targeted and attacked by SJWs over the T**** debate. She is an SJW man-hating misandrist herself. Therefore she got attacked by her own kind. Just goes to show you that just because someone gets attacked by SJWs, it does not mean that they are not SJWs themselves.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 04:00 PM
18

It's basically this: https://ibb.co/qg7BHYq
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 06:12 PM
7

Modern feminism is just as toxic to women as it is to men My sides.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 06:09 PM
3

She felt unsafe for whatever reason. And got support. That's about it. And deemed a likely innocent man to be sinister.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 06:01 PM
4

97% of women have at one point encountered sexual assault Yeah, through purely anecdotal experiences with zero evidence. I mean, feminists would NEVER EVER exaggerate, lie about and artificially inflate reports and statistics to suit their agendas would they?
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 05:58 PM
7

Same with "they are not feminists!" when I point out the feminists all over mainstream media writing multiple misandrist man-hating hate articles, feminist teachers and professors at schools, colleges and universities discriminating against boys and men, feminist politicians initiating and passing misandrist laws, pink hat feminist women's marches, feminist student lynch mobs pulling the fire alarms at colleges/universities whenever a guest speaker doesn't align with their ideology, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 05:35 PM
22

Ah yes, "the real feminist" who always stays completely silent and does not speak up nor do anything against the radical feminists. It's almost as if the "real feminists" are secretly reaping and enjoying the benefits and privileges that are brought over by the radical feminists. Oh wait, they are.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 05:24 PM
21

Feminism is the enemy of the entire planet tbh.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 12:17 AM
3

The thing is, they're angry because they're not getting everything they want, not because they've been wronged.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 03:52 PM
18

And it will be weaponized by both sexes. It won't be weaponized by men for the most part. Men are too proud and too white knighting to do it.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:39 PM
11

Deflecting away like a coward then? I repeat: How would women feel if they were policed in the same manner I wonder? I mean, there's plenty of women who walk or drive past doing the same things to men, usually on weekend nights when people go out clubbing.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:36 PM
38

So he gets fired/forced to quit, but yet he still spews out this line: "I hope to see 50 per cent of women in the WA cabinet." This guy is a traitor to his own gender. He can f*** off tbh.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:34 PM
1

If this was the other way round, there would be a world wide outrage.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:30 PM
10

I'll repeat myself again: And what if he gets mistaken for doing so? What if women falsely accuse him of doing it? See the words I highlighted? Go and learn what they mean.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:22 PM
38

Just ignore women. That doesn't prevent false allegations/accusations from being made against you.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:16 PM
21

Sad to see what? Men who value free expression and not standing to have their usage of their eyes and mouth policed? How would women feel if they were policed in the same manner I wonder? I mean, there's plenty of women who walk or drive past doing the same things to men, usually on weekend nights when people go out clubbing.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:12 PM
29

I am very sure that the statistics of women used to get this law into place have been inflated, exaggerated and purely anecdotal without evidence. And you also need to realise that women walk or drive past doing the same things to men, usually on weekend nights when people go out clubbing. But yet, men are always depicted as the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:09 PM
25

Oh but THEY do it to us. Women walk or drive past doing the same things to men, usually on weekend nights when people go out clubbing. But yet, men are always depicted as the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:06 PM
21

It doesn't matter. It's the fact that the law is in place.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:05 PM
242

Hopefully it's enforced both ways. You're living in a dream word. All the praise and celebration of this ridiculous law has been depicted as women being the victims and men being the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:04 PM
19

The so-called street harassment of women reports and statistics have been inflated, exaggerated and purely anecdotal; and does not happen anywhere as near as people like you try to pretend it does This is nothing more than draconian and totalitarian policing of men This will provide women the perfect tools to falsely and maliciously accuse and jail men they dislike; ruining their reputation in less than a day This ridiculous law does not seem to apply for women, because all the praise and celebr…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:02 PM
45

Ah yes, police how people (we all know it only applies to men) use their eyes and mouth as well as well how they walk. And another thing that is infuriating? This ridiculous law will only be applied/enforced on boys and men. And even more worryingly, this gives women the perfect tool to falsely and maliciously accuse and jail men they dislike. Draconian times for men. This planet needs an apocalypse so we can all start over again.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:54 PM
18

And what if he gets mistaken for doing so? What if women falsely accuse him of doing it? Go easy on that white-knighting mate.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:45 PM
7

It's one of the major demands of women when dating men. It's a biological factor, but that doesn't mean that's not shallow of course. The thing that really grates is that women are allowed to have all these demands of men, but yet the moment when a man says he has a preference for women that are not overweight he gets slandered as a "sexist", "chauvinist", "shallow", "picky", etc.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 01:50 PM
7

I have posted there before. Got banned there last year for pointing out double standards regarding dating. The sub also has a habit for unjustifiably blaming all of women's problems on men.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:52 PM
2

Also notice how these SJW/feminist "professors" (i.e. misandrists) always like to say "male dominated" when it comes to certain sectors of work? It should be "male preferred", because "male dominated" makes it sound as if there's some bias against women occurring.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:42 PM
2

"muh pOwEr DyNaMiCs" Just say you're for double standards and move on.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:31 PM
5

If a woman out that on her bio she would get shamed too Absolute rubbish. She would (and does) get celebrated and praised for it. You are either naive or just disingenuous.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:30 PM
5

Probably the fact that any man in the public sphere getting attacked and slandered as a "sexist" or "chauvinist" when he dares to express preferences when dating a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:28 PM
6

come up with something that could help society Yeah, jailing false accusers.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:06 PM
7

And learn to keep away from toxic women It seems that you're not aware of the fact that women can disguise themselves prior. It also seems that you're not aware of the fact that human behaviour can change or be revealed/manifest. Do you even realise that the false allegations/accusations from the woman can come after the man starts dating her?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:04 PM
1

And here comes the white knight to defend the wimmin.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:00 PM
45

Can't do that because it StOpS/pReVeNtS rEaL vIcTiMs CoMiNg FoRwArD
/r/MensRights03/12/22 03:59 PM
22

bUt It StOpS/pReVeNtS rEaL vIcTiMs CoMiNg FoRwArD
/r/MensRights03/12/22 03:58 PM
0

So you're just criticising men for the same thing for the sake of artificial "equality"? Let me tell you this: men and women are different.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 12:51 AM
1

Unless it's male fanservice for the female audience to ogle at of course, then all of a sudden it's just a "male power fantasy" and/or "power dynamics mean that men cannot objectified" and/or "positive discrimination".
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 12:43 AM
1

No, he's simply pointing out that feminism is a man-hating movement.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 12:25 AM
3

Does it mean they’ll take over ? Does it mean there will be more women ? Does it mean they want to dominate ? Or they just want to get rid of all men All.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 12:22 AM
5

Feminism has always been a man-hating movement from the very start. I mean, telling black men to sit at the back of buses and handing out white feathers to shame boys and men.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 12:09 AM
4

I just said that they did basically have absolute control over women For your sake I hope you're naive.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 10:48 PM
1

It never was.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 10:47 PM
2

There's nothing really different about it. Biologically, women are hardwired to find the best quality man they can, and the man's height is one of the major factors because being tall signals the elements of being strong, powerful, provider etc. Not only that but a boyfriend being tall and handsome is something for the women to show off to her female friends and make them jealous. It's the same everywhere. (or perhaps wanting taller kids so they dont face discrimination) This just proves my poin…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:24 AM
9

Name me a right that men have that women don't in the West. I can name you rights that women have that men do not have. There you go.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:15 PM
36

I don't think it is right so much emphasis is put on height One of the major demands from women when dating men. The victims of this discrimination are men, so of course nobody gives a flying f**k. If this was a discrimination against women, there would be a worldwide outrage and it would be outlawed. even some of the men wanted that in women. Not even close. Men tend to not want women that are taller than they are, which 95% of the time is naturally the case anyway.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:12 PM
1

From a legal point of view, if there is no evidence then it's hard to prove that the girls bullied the boy. I imagine the girls and the other bullies would downplay the bullying or even deny it outright if questioned. I'm not excusing the bullies though, I am well aware of the fact that obnoxious white-knighting, pro-female, and gynocentrism will occur in situations like this.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/22 11:05 AM
29

Notice how they say "healthy" masculinity. "healthy" = emasculate men and make them into slaves for women
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:03 AM
1

Well you heard it from the white knight folks. Male victims should not get any help or support.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:41 AM
3

Indeed. And the women who do this get praised and celebrated by the same people who bash men for going abroad to find a girlfriend/wife.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 12:10 PM
8

And the sad thing is that if that really does happen, most guys would just sit back and allow it to happen without any fightback. The problem here is that a man going abroad to find a girlfriend/wife has been heavily stigmatized by feminists. Therefore, the Overton Window has shifted to the point where Normies and Society frown upon it. Therefore, anyone having to justify on why men are going abroad to find a partner is going to be shouted down as an "incel" and "predatory". However, a woman goi…
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 12:05 PM
4

Good. Get to the point where that percentage becomes 100% and then burn the planet down and start again. Hopefully when that happens, men will find a set of balls and take charge again. Make it so that any man who even shows a hint of white-knighting is deemed to be treason and punish accordingly.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:14 AM
13

And they're of course blaming men for it, completely ignoring the fact that Korean and Japanese women have set ridiculous standards for dating men (tall, handsome, rich, massive financial income, etc.) and also because men, especially in Japan, are salary slaves.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:11 AM
3

I follow a Twitter user in Spain (an artist who is Anti-SJW) who regularly follows the feminist/men's rights situation over there. It's getting very bad over there.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:28 PM
0

The common man didn't have any say in women getting the vote or the right to work. I'm not talking about the common man, I'm talking about the politicians and lawmakers back then, which were men. Therefore, it was men who voluntarily gave women the right to vote, work, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 01:24 PM
2

The problem is, the average person is virtually everyone.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:17 PM
1

women campaigned quite hard for that. It doesn't matter how hard women campaigned, the power was in men's hands meaning that they could have chose to not give women voting rights. Because of the good nature of men, they voluntarily gave women voting rights. And now the future generations of men are paying dearly for it.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 01:15 PM
5

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech, and while it may not be pretty, it should be protected. Except that freedom of speech can be abused to silence and shut down others, as feminism has proven. You can keep spewing the moral cliche of "I don't like what you have to say but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it", but do realize this free speech you're fighting for will also be the free speech that gets YOU silenced and shut down.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:52 AM
56

The problem is, their views are also typical of Normies and Society as well.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:39 AM
39

A new trial has been set anyway. They (the so-called "victim" and her supporters) won't be happy until they get the result they want, so the guy has no chance.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:31 AM
14

Any 'feminist' who hates men, is not actually a feminist. And where are all these so-called "real feminists"? They sure as heck like to stay silent and never call out their radical sisters. It's almost as if they're secretly enjoying the benefits and privileges that radical feminists are bringing.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:28 AM
2

no one give up an advantage unless they have to. Men did so voluntarily in 1920.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 04:20 AM
4

It's still frightening to think that if you had two daughters instead, the both of you would be on the feminist train.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 04:19 AM
2

Perhaps a different approach is needed. Impossible to implement given the pitchfork mentality of society.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:30 AM
1

I thought you believed in innocent until proven guilty? We know you don't when it comes to men. All this crap of "oh just because he's found not guilty doesn't mean the R didn't happen!" from you just shows it.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:21 AM
0

If there is a nearby Court case of a man who has been accused of SA or R, I bet you're exactly like the feminists who deem the man be guilty straight away and protest with signboards for the man to be jailed, and scream and curse if he's found innocent. The stream of misandry is bursting out of you.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:20 AM
1

Fair enough. I've deleted the comment.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:07 PM
10

It was a disgrace that this was allowed in the first place. Because we all know if it was the other way round, the place would have been shut down in less than half a day after opening, and the men who ran it would have had their lives ruined.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 04:57 PM
1

"A man cannot change his height, a woman can change her weight" "Female Power Fantasy" (when defending attractive/sexy women/female characters) "femcel"
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:26 AM
8

Feminist wants men to walk on egg shells around women and be frightened like little puppies around women. Standard requirement of feminism, and it is actually already in place. The other thing that irritates me regarding feminists like this is how blatantly one-sided they are. All throughout that discussion she was just spewing about how men must not touch women inappropriately, yet completely ignoring and not even mentioning that women must also not touch men inappropriately (it happens by the …
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/22 03:03 AM
1

Feminist wants men to walk on egg shells around women and be frightened like little puppies. Standard desire of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:55 AM
1

"people" Not seen many women against Ava's view at all though.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:51 AM
1

You should invest in a discreet bodycam with audio tbh. That's closer to foolproof as video evidence is the game changer when it comes to law and the Courts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/22 10:26 AM
4

Also, Feminists and due process is akin to water and oil. Indeed. The possibility of a man being found innocent completely enrages them .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/22 10:23 AM
7

I hear men having locker-room talk with each other all the time about what they like. The difference here Einstein is that men aren't allowed to publicly say their preferences for women without getting lynch-mobbed by the Feminist brigade. Women however, are allowed to publicly say their preferences for men and get praised and celebrated for it.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:09 AM
-2

lol calm down, I wasn't implying you are. As you have taken offence to my post, I've now deleted it.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:04 AM
1

I used to know a male friend (who was ugly) from University who was treated like that on numerous occasions by young women, he used to confide to me on how it would destroy him and ruin the week for him. He was the guy who would go out clubbing in nightclubs and bars with his male friends on weekend nights, and never end up with a woman while his friends usually always did. The people who claim that women are "less into looks and more into personality" is a pile of horse s**t tbh.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:44 AM
21

I bet you're not saying the same thing when the gender roles are the other way round. It's gotten to the point now where your constant deflection of blame away from feminists/women and soylent white-knighting has virtually become trolling. You absolutely need banning from this sub.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:50 AM
32

Showing your man-hating again I see.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:43 PM
10

What can society do to fix these issues? Stop pandering to women.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:49 AM
10

There is a trend that feminists/women (who are Leftist and pro-immigration) say that they hope it's only the attractive men to come over. Therefore a bit of own medicine as a joke is not unreasonable.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:45 AM
13

Here's two more: Ensure Due Process and Anonymity for the falsely accused. Ensure neutrality in the Courts.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:39 AM
2

women's march has been compromised Nope. It's always been a man-hating march.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/22 06:33 PM
3

Getting annoyed with all these incel posts. Ever thought of ignoring these posts? No one is forcing you to click on the threads.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 12:40 PM
8

And as expected, here comes the white knight to save the day. The new law by the supreme Court of India completely goes against the idea of equality and is bordering on the edge of outright misandry.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:55 AM
7

I noticed the 2 women I have seem watch this show never question or are aware any of this. Women enjoying seeing women having power over men and men being degraded and humiliated. Therefore why would the two women who watched the show question it? IF the gender roles were reversed in this show, the two women will magically be aware of it and question it.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:00 AM
1

You guys should be aggressively protesting against this outside the Court in major numbers. The time for civility is over.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:51 AM
2

When you have many subreddits dedicated to incels, banned from the site They are not all banned from Reddit. For example FemaleDatingStrategy, TwoXChromosomes and AskFeminists are still up.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:37 AM
3

If you don't have an argument then maybe you should just crawl back to FDS and continue your man-hating there.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 01:56 AM
3

So what's your definition of incel? Obviously any man who dares refute against the feminist misandrist ideology with facts.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:43 PM
5

Because there could never ever possibly be any bias in "studies" that's made in a gynocentric and feminist lynch-mob fear-mongering climate right? Go and crawl back to FDS.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:39 PM
3

You didn't take this thread very well that's for sure.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:55 PM
8

Go back to FDS or whatever feminist swamp you crawled here from.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:01 PM
5

Will be changed to convey a negative tone against men eventually.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:06 PM
9

Here comes the white knight to save the day
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 06:54 PM
10

The article is designed to slander, blame and put a negative impression onto men; and to portray women as automatic victims. The "studies" they cite are most likely feminist biased and rigged to get the outcome they wanted as well. The usual man-hating s**t, just a different day.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:43 PM
1

Why are you so angry that you resort to foul language and insults ? Probably because you're here to blindly white-knight and move the goalposts every time you've been rebutted. Guess you need something to do on Reddit as you wait for Tyrone to finish.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 04:34 PM
1

I never said I didn't. If you must know, yeah I do have a problem with Woke feminist s**t in entertainment media, which pretty much equates to badly written characters and stories.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:20 PM
1

There are endless examples of conventionally unattractive men partnered with attractive women. And where did you suddenly pull this anecdote out of, your backside? Also, the bar is very low for what passes as "attractive " for men. Tell that to the average/ugly looking guys on all the major Dating Apps.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:51 PM
2

The critic of feminists is that women are portrayed in a poor state of dependancy and as objects. That's basically them saying they don't like and are jealous of attractive/sexy women. The "objectification/sexualization of women" is a one of most farcical and nonsensical arguments and only serves as an excuse by bitter and spiteful women and feminists to censor, remove and prevent attractive women from media and entertainment media. Examples: the banning of Grid Girls, Boxing Ring Girls, Car Bab…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:43 PM
2

As a male friend (who was ugly) I once knew in University used to say: "you can keep telling me to dress well, style my hair, wear aftershave, build up confidence and approach women but I cannot change my face"
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:56 AM
1

Many girls date down. In the past maybe. Now, no.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:54 AM
1

You're the one posing as a woman with your profile pic and you call me a liar? An avatar doesn't mean anything and I've never said I was a woman nor have I ever denied being a guy.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:49 AM
1

Status, wealth, education and ( unfortunately, in last place) personality You can have all of that but a man needs the looks to get through the door. Without it, the door is closed. When you cannot get through the door, there is no chance.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:47 AM
1

That's literally the only time you'd encounter a world like that is if you were only around teenage models or like celebrities. If this was 15-20 years ago before the Internet was truly mainstream you would be somewhat correct. But now in the age of the Internet, social media, dating apps, OnlyFans and simping, women in their 20s, 30s and even 40s are acting like teenage models and celebrities. So men are constantly in a world like that. Or maybe if someone just never left the house You don't se…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:39 AM
1

I watched some Chinese dating shows on YouTube months ago, it appeared on the recommended list probably because I was watching some Chinese MMORPG video games. The show's format is similar to the dating show Take Me Out (originally from the UK). If you don't know how it works, it's basically a group of women behind their own podiums. A male victim man is invited onto the stage and the women judge on looks if they are willing to date him. They do this by switching on a white light or red light on…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:27 AM
1

Dear lord, stop lying.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:04 AM
2

It's worse for men because to get the "ideal" men's body requires him to build muscle. Women just have to lose weight and do light toning to get the "ideal" women's body.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:01 AM
1

An average, slightly overweight woman takes around 6 months to 1 year to achieve the ideal women's body through dedication. An average, slightly overweight men takes around 4-5 years to achieve the ideal men's body through dedication. See here: https://ibb.co/hDmD0nL
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:57 AM
1

But that is not the primary driver in what they find attractive It's one of the primary drivers. Without the looks the guy does not get past the door.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:53 AM
1

But the men who are "out of her league" are always willing to date down and f**k down. That's the problem here and is why average-looking women are making ridiculous demands.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:51 AM
1

Go watch some Andrew Tate and man up. And make $350million just like that. Women aren’t attracted to physicalities like we are Tell the average/ugly guys on dating apps (such as Tinder) that.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:49 AM
1

I mean it's kind of a given that men view it that way too Men are willing date down and f**k down. Women only date on par or up or f**k up. You might want to read up in this thing called female hypergamy. You might also want to consider how in a study of the major dating apps, women find 80% - 85% of men unattractive.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:46 AM
2

Imagine if a guy said ANY of this about a woman. 17 upvotes, post this with genders reversed on any sub and it'll be downvoted to shit. And he'll be called "shallow", "chauvinist", "sexist", "hating women", "incel", "narrow minded", and d1ck jokes will be made against him.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:44 AM
1

a lot of internet people I know do not care about looks in regard to gender or common "handsome" attributes. They're lying.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:29 AM
2

Problem is that even those women are demanding the 6/6/6/6s when dating men.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:25 AM
2

Looks are not important for a mans worth. Men are allowed to be unattractive my sides Tell that to the average/ugly looking guys on all the major Dating Apps.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:24 AM
18

Even if what you say is true, it's harassment and assault anyway.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:15 AM
4

Feminist are divided in that topic That's why I specifically stated "sex-positive feminists". It's predictable that feminists are divided on this topic, because female sex workers is something that possibly provides entertainment and services for men (female strip clubs, female escorts, etc.). And we all know how feminists absolutely despise anything that appeals to men.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:13 AM
3

I agree with some of what you're saying but don't think that modern Western writers are innocent. They are clearly pushing an man-hating misandrist agenda in the medium they produce. Culture is shifting. Its very simple why millenial and gen z men are shifting their focus on japan manga and anime. Their you can still get the hero's journey. These are now pretty much the only sectors of "major" entertainment media where you get attractive female characters (fanservice) as well. But even that's be…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:07 AM
10

When ridiculous anti-male laws like this are implemented, I do wonder if the Indian men there have any balls at all.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:55 AM
2

Ah yes, another Women Can Do No Wrong post. Go back to FDS or something.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:52 AM
6

Although the author is still dismissive of what we're saying. A leopard cannot change it's spots.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:48 AM
13

Another man-hating misandrist spews a load of misandrist crap.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:46 AM
5

Being pro-women sex workers, which comes from the sex-positive feminists. Always good to see a hot woman in lingerie strutting her stuff on the pole within neon lights. Other than that - nothing else.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:36 AM
1

Virtually everyone has a smart phone now and loads of people (especially the young adults) use Dating Apps, it is considered to be the main way of dating now. So you don't get to say "Certain types of people use dating apps" to imply as if it's not a representation of dating. It is of course not a representation for all of dating, but it is a major representation of dating and the modern dating culture (where women have all the advantages). I can't think of anyone I know who's with a man who's b…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:23 AM
2

I've done both. I don't care about your anecdotes, the exception does not make the rule. What I posted is the general situation. Add to that the recent major Dating App study which found that women found 80% - 85% of men unattractive. I'm not a guy Go and feminist elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:48 AM
2

Generally: Men are always willing to date down and f**k down. Meaning that men who are 7s or 8s will date/f**k women who are 4s, 5s or 6s. Women only date on par or up and f**k up. Meaning that women who are 4s, 5s or 6s will only date/f**k men who are 7s, 8s, or even 9s. And that's why women are shallow. Go and white knight elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:36 AM
8

This is nothing new. And tbh, there really isn't a place where it isn't anti-men.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:21 AM
13

Really hate these modern female producers and directors. They only make stuff for women and produce everything through a feminist lens. They make the female characters Mary Sues, and put male actors in stupid, embarrassing and degrading roles. They outright refuse to have anything in their medium that would appeal to men, such as proper sexy actresses in sexy feminine roles. And also, a common theme that always occurs in female-directed crap is that when it comes to nude scenes, it is usually on…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:17 AM
3

An exception does not make the rule. The general ideal physical traits for men that the majority of women like are the aspects I stated in the first paragraph of my opening post. Looks-wise, women are going to go for Brad Pitt over John Goodman.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:47 AM
3

Stop making excuses for women's shallowness.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:37 AM
7

Men and women are and do need to be equal in the moral sense. Ah yes, that part-time equality.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:56 AM
4

Wait, I thought women were equal to or even better than men in every way?
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:55 AM
16

There are women out there, and I am sure that all of us know some, who have not been poisoned by the hate, hypocrisy and misogyny of radical feminists. Okay but do remember that women do not have the label themselves as feminists to have feminist ideology and beliefs. For example a woman can deny being a feminist but yet believes all the Wage Gap and Gender Quota donkey s**t, and agree with the misandrist law courts.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:59 PM
16

where did feminism go wrong? Since it was formed. It was a misandrist hate movement at the root from the start.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:34 PM
6

Even if the man was ugly or/and short but had the personality and was able to pay the rent, he wouldn't have gotten a chance because his looks didn't allow him through the door. Which means that the tall guy who doesn't pay the rent still wins. Therefore my point stands.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:15 PM
9

Mainstream challenges to feminism - not many. If any at all. The closest was probably back years ago when Milo Yiannopoulos appeared on those mainstream news TV shows to criticise feminism. More recently Jordan Peterson and that interview with Cathy Newman, but he's kind of changed. Mike Buchanan has appeared in a few mainstream areas as well. Additionally, I'm confident enough to say that the reason for the lack of challenge against feminism in this area is because feminists routinely censor an…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:13 PM
24

So you're basically proving my point for the most part. I hope you don't complain when men do the same regarding dating women.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:59 PM
15

Firstly, Megyn Kelly has her own brand of misandry. Those who remember the spat between her and Alex Jones a few years ago will know this. Secondly, regarding her criticism and attack on beautiful women showing off their bodies - I consider that an attack on men's sexuality, because she's basically indirectly saying that it's not okay for men to want to look at beautiful woman's bodies; and wants to take that away from men. This is exactly what the SJWs/Feminists do when they whine about "object…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:51 PM
46

Thoughts on this opinion on Men’s Rights? The ramblings of someone who is worried that men are waking up to and challenging their man-hating BS.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:37 PM
6

There are other roles and jobs women can do in the military besides fighting.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:34 PM
32

We should support men not being required for conscription and selective service That's not going happen so I will continue to support the drafting of women into the military.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:30 PM
1

No. But female MRAs are very rare anyway.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:02 PM
22

Indeed. Also, if you looked at the way that women completely fawn and faint over handsome men in the media and real life, then this should be enough indication that a man's looks is a priority for women seeking to date.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:09 PM
11

You don't find this problematic, but I'm willing to bet that if it's the other way round you would suddenly find it problematic.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:29 PM
4

And a man's face and height cannot be changed without expensive, drastic and potentially life-threatening measures.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:27 PM
9

The body a man was born with doesn't make a difference in whether or not I choose to take a man in or not. Oh come on, stop lying.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:22 PM
3

It has become probably the most important factor these days. Back then, like 15-20 years ago it was slightly less important, but now it's the main requirement in a man. The way that women fawn and faint over handsome men should be the obvious indicator.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:22 PM
38

Woman demanding a man who is handsome, tall, six pack, massive arms, you-know-what over six inches, six-figure salary = "yasss queen", "you go girl!", "she knows what she wants!", "queen only accept the best!", "you deserve the best!", etc. Man preferring a woman who is not overweight = "shallow", "chauvinist", "sexist", "superficial", "seeing women as sex objects", "misogyny", etc.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:13 PM
25

I'm not sorry to interrupt your session of bias white knighting.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:39 AM
5

Should we refrain from voting on women's health issues? Absolutely. They like to completely ignore, s**t on and WhatAboutWomen men's health issues. I see nothing unreasonable about passing some of their own medicine back to them.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:36 AM
6

TheGreatWhodini0 Cake day : October 5, 2022
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:09 AM
33

I'm happily married and don't leave my value up to women. lol what a contraction. And your account was registered on the 05/10/2022 (today at the time of this post). You're clearly here to try and deflect away from people calling out women's shallowness.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:00 AM
18

To women these days, average-looking men is now ugly. That's how bad it's got.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:56 AM
72

Don't be fooled into thinking that woman only want status or money in a man. They want both looks and status/money. There is a reason on why the saying "Tall, Dark and Handsome" is thing when women are asked on what kind of man they're looking for when looking to date a guy. I used to know a male friend in University who was ugly, and he'd constantly get rejected by women based on his looks alone. They didn't care about his personality or what he did for his job.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:41 AM
1

Women are very attracted to status, not looks. Biggest myth on the planet. They are attracted to both looks and status. There's a reason on why the saying "Tall, Dark and Handsome" is commonly said by women when they are asked on what type of guy they're looking for in Dating.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:35 AM
1

I don't see any of these things as right. I didn't say nor imply that any of those things are right.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:29 AM
16

Still persisting with your charade of being neutral? Feminists like you need calling out.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:12 AM
15

most just don't say anything against it. Also factor in the men who care but are too scared to say anything against it because they know they'll be screamed down and called "SA apologists" or/and "misogynists" by feminists and white knights if they speak up.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:08 AM
5

I'm female and experienced sexual abuse, but I would never wish that the person who did this to me should suffer. I do not wish someone who violates me to suffer, for him or her to not be able to live a life, to never find a job again, to be shamed and excluded by the public, family and friends. Can't help but think that you are just a feminist concern troll making this thread to bring out the white knights of this sub, and get them say how the men who wronged you should "rot in jail", "be beate…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:25 AM
0

If you must argue with them, always remember to stay calm, be cool and never get angry. You also need to be smart enough to not say anything "wrong" in which they can take and use against you. And try to make them look like the aggressors and bullies (which they are).
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:08 AM
2

You don’t argue with them, just walk away. Indeed. If they try to slander you, just outright deny it and walk away. Because unless you're really good at arguments, there is a chance that you'll say something "wrong" where they can take it out context and use it against you.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:05 AM
1

Don't think that avoids being screamed and shouted down at.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:03 AM
3

Some counter-points against the tiresome "argument" of "stopping victims from coming forward" (which is also the card used when people suggest punishing women who make false accusations): Why didn't the so-called past "victims" come forward when the supposed incident happened? Why didn't the so-called past "victims" make a Police report when the supposed incident happened? There is usually never any evidence provided by the so-called past "victims" that come forward 10 weeks or 10 months or 10 y…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:00 AM
3

98 man-haters in a misandrist echo chamber.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:28 PM
70

"As a feminist, I confess that I am not happy about this. I am also well aware of the way in which such unhappiness will be perceived by many. Typical feminist, right? I say I want equality, but I actually want special treatment. I say feminism isn’t about hating men… but actually, it is." The author says that in a sarcastic manner, but it's actually factual. And she knows it.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:42 PM
24

It doesn't help men much at all. Don't underestimate the gullibility and stupidity of Normies, and there's too many white-knights that are happy to buy into the crap that the author wrote.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:31 PM
36

Women-only spaces (gyms, classrooms, etc.) Affirmative Action (that prioritises women over men in the workforce hiring process) Gender Quotas (that takes away jobs away from men and replaces them with women) Mandatory requirements to have [insert %] women to be CEOs, Bosses, Managers, etc. Women-only scholarships in Education Women-only courses in STEM in Education (because women are supposedly disadvantaged in this sector) Companies/Businesses blatantly advertising and stating job vacancies onl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 10:22 AM
5

When men are sexualized/objectified for no reason just to titillate and for the pleasure of a female audience. Even worse is when in the actual movie, the women around the man are purposely shown to be ogling at the man with those "omg he's so hot" expressions just to really make it obvious and to hit home the "it's the men's turn to be objectified" thing. And the women, feminists and white-knights will make a plethora of excuses to defend and justify the double standards, such as saying it's a …
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:58 AM
8

When the 'Lionesses' win the WWC, then I'll change my tune Why? Even a men's team from League 2 would beat the Women's USA team.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:18 AM
10

There's a saying that goes: Men are in charge, Women make the rules Nice try though, male feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:12 AM
13

White knighting for feminists again I see. The president or boss of FIFA (I can't remember his name) stated so in an article I read last year.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 12:40 AM
40

Normies, especially Normie Men, don't seem to mind this and don't go against it so there's nothing you can do. The Snooker thing is the same situation, no-one is protesting against it, but the reasons being likely due to fear and lynch-mobbing from Feminists. The "Three Lions" song being re-written is probably a result of the England Women soccer team winning the Euros, that gave them the excuse and a lot of "credit in the bank" to demand that the song be re-written. And unfortunately as expecte…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:32 PM
18

Equality of Outcome and Gender Quotas, which is what you seem to be in favour of judging by your post, is basically discrimination against men made legal. You need to crawl back to FDS or TwoX.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:47 AM
25

You claim that you're not a feminist in another reply to me but here you are again white knighting and spewing a feminist hallmark implication in your second paragraph.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:42 AM
6

Indeed. They have the knowledge, likely Red-pilled. It'll protect them and give them a less crappy life.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:38 AM
9

Ah but you see, feminists have to specifically state that it's women's rights to avoid the possibility of helping men and also to ensure that only women can be victims.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:37 AM
22

Whenever you hear “womens rights” These days whenever I hear "women's rights" I just know it's misandry. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:35 AM
26

And as usual, another article puts all the blame onto men. No mention of feminism that relentlessly hates on men and advocates for, influences and causes biased misandrist policies and laws everywhere.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:28 AM
24

"the systemic roadblocks to her representative voice" This is surely a joke right? Mainstream media, News media, Publications, Magazines, Social Media, forums, college and university speech platforms, law, politics and even the f**king United Nations all roll out the red carpet for these feminist parasites. AND they censor/ban anything that doesn't fit the feminist agenda. Even Mattress Girl false r@pe accuser Emma Sulkowicz got to meet and have a conversation with Barack Obama when he was Presi…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:06 AM
1

If a woman who is actually better qualified for the position got it, I'd be fine with it I think it's time for you to take your head out of the sand and realise that what you said there is nothing but a dream world now. Wake up to reality. 1) Acknowledge the fact that it's already been confirmed that the Malta government has changed their hiring process to the point where it's led to the appointment of the female Attorney General, I quote from this Tweet: "MaltaGov reforms for new method of appo…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:42 AM
3

How about them not punishing men first?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:07 AM
7

And it’s unjust. Boiler plate statement. Like you care about male victims.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:19 PM
16

Go back to whatever feminist swamp you crawled here from.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:17 PM
11

And here comes the white knight to save the day. Has Tyrone finished yet? In reply to your post - no, women should not be "forced" to act in one way or another. Human beings should not be forced to act in one way or another. I am just saying that the ridiculous standards that women have set is one of the major causes of the low birthrate in Japan. Nice attempt at a strawman though.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:11 PM
1

Feminists are already saying that the man is at fault as he "must have treated her badly" for her to cheat.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/22 11:39 AM
5

They started the nonsense first. Therefore in order to stop them from doing it, you need to throw their own medicine back at them until they stop doing it.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:34 AM
10

Because she got there through some gender quota system and replaced a man. Therefore it's only fair that a man replaces her. #equality
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:22 AM
18

One would qualify that as "positive discrimination". Let me rephrase that: "positive discrimination against men"
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:20 AM
12

But this deliberate choice does reinforce the stereotype that assistants are women, right? Most people, I’m sure you’d agree, when asked to draw a secretary would draw a woman just as most people imagine a man when they think of a CEO for example. Same thing with nurse or doctor. Those are not negative stereotypes. You also need to realise that stereotypes naturally exist for a reason. And it's not because of so-called "sexism" or "misogyny" or "discrimination" or anything. Instead, it is becaus…
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 11:17 AM
6

This guy is now Red-pilled and free. It had to take a woman cheating on him, divorce and her gaining custody of their son for it to happen, but he now has the awareness and knowledge which will protect and make life less difficult for him. Hope he now concentrates on himself for himself. He can go to a Hostess Bar and get his fix of attractive/hot women there.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:56 AM
15

Indeed. Gamers like to call Japan "based" because of their positive depictions of women characters in entertainment media, but they're definitely not based when it comes to the social cultures of men and women in real life. For years it has been reported by news outlets all over the world that Japan has a low birthrate (which is true), but they ALWAYS blame this entirely on men being salary slaves and being "Otakus", never mentioning the fact that, due to feminism, Japanese women have set ridicu…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:31 AM
2

This is why every man needs a Body Cam that records footage and sends the footage to a private Cloud.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:20 AM
6

'State advocate Victoria Buttigieg to become first female attorney general' https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/state-advocate-victoria-buttigieg-to-become-attorney-general.816864 'I have accepted recommendation by independent appointments commission to nominate Dr Victoria Buttigieg as Malta’s new AG following public call. MaltaGov reforms for new method of appointment led to first female AG who has integrity & competence to carry out important duties. -RA' https://twitter.com/RobertAbela\_M…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:13 AM
2

'State advocate Victoria Buttigieg to become first female attorney general' https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/state-advocate-victoria-buttigieg-to-become-attorney-general.816864 'I have accepted recommendation by independent appointments commission to nominate Dr Victoria Buttigieg as Malta’s new AG following public call. MaltaGov reforms for new method of appointment led to first female AG who has integrity & competence to carry out important duties. -RA' https://twitter.com/RobertAbela_MT…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:10 AM
75

Didn't realise that Malta subscribed to the misandrist tripe known as Gender Quotas. If she gets fired or resigns I hope she is replaced by a man.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:01 AM
6

This is why average or ugly-looking guys need to absolutely protect themselves to avoid situations where they could be falsely accused of SA or R by women. Because if it happens and it gets to the Courtroom for a trial, the man will no doubt be automatically seen as "guilty" by everyone (especially by women) because they'll be thinking: "he's ugly so the female victim won't have had any interest in him, and him being ugly means he will be starved of sexual intimacy meaning that he is angry and f…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:47 AM
3

they only stood to lose by being white knights. So, one has to wonder why they would join together to pair the female jurors If they didn't white-knight, they would be labelled as r@pe apologists.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:29 AM
6

The survey is designed to drawn in and garner sympathy responses so they can peddle the female victimhood narrative. So of course she doesn't want the opinions of men, because guys are more likely to go against the agenda.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 01:19 AM
5

"Women are exploited sexually, men are exploited economically". I have not seen the latter said by feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:58 AM
1

Looks like someone's only seen the clips of Tate being completely taken out of context.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:55 AM
3

"I don't blame her, he had issues/was "controlling" " That or "it's obvious that he wasn't good enough for her"
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:52 AM
8

I think their issue is that it comes with the female voice as default. Which for them means that it has the "negative female stereotypes", "negative female gender roles", "sexism against women", etc. basically all the feminist man-hating tripe.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:49 AM
8

So does that mean his wife would be okay with it if these devices came with male voices as default? Because by her logic, that would mean that we're training a whole new generation to see men as "staff" right? Dear lord. This reminds me of that time when those cretins complained of the buttons (to call an air hostess) on a plane having a symbol that depicted a woman. As for that guy, he needs to hand in his man card immediately. Men who virtue-signal and white-knight for the name of feminism has…
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:43 AM
36

Because anyone with a working brain is able to distinguish between real human beings and a device, and realise that devices with female voices will not turn people into misogynists. This is just yet another attempt at white-knighting and female victimhood again.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:39 AM
5

I mean what the girls did was unforgivable, but I can at least understand the logic behind them, they thought they were hot and it was purely out of self interest. "but" I surely hope that you're not implying that what the women did was okay.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:13 AM
5

Maybe you should just leave and go back to Female Dating Strategy then? The more "Centrist" tripe you spew the more I think you're just a feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:26 PM
5

Feminists don't want a middle-ground at all.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:20 PM
2

There's also issue of women's expectations You've committed blasphemy there. Go and repent immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 11:11 PM
2

No one’s policing anything Ah yes, constantly hammering and publicly shaming the material and the men who write them until he caves in and stops it. File alongside the Reverend's wife who says the store is allowed to sell Hustler magazine, but she is allowed to publicly slander the owner as misogynist, sexist and chauvinist for as long as the magazine is being sold. but it’s funny that so many of female character introductions always includes some description of their breasts Regardless of wheth…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 10:59 PM
4

Aren't there any ugly women who might be a better match or are they all trying to match up with better looking men? The latter. On the major dating websites it's common to see overweight/obese and/or average-looking women making ridiculous demands of physical traits for men in their dating profiles.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:17 PM
3

Pr0n isn't hurting men's ability to get women. What is hurting men's ability to get women is the ridiculous standards that women have set for dating men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 09:51 PM
3

Ah yes, the sub that wants to police and shame men's free expression and creativity. Why not complete the set by posting r/ mendrawingwomen too?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 09:49 PM
0

It’s that they subconsciously internalize the images, presentations of women and don’t counteract that with other forms of media that would round women out as human beings and not just sex objects. And of course women don't do the same thing to men when they drool over the likes of Chris Hemsworth, Ryan Gosling, Henry Cavill, etc. The double standards though, holy heck.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 09:48 PM
15

Looks like someone's trying to deflect away from the fact that women have set ridiculous standards when finding men to date. Speaking of statistics, how about the fact that in a major Dating App study, it was revealed that women find 80% to 85% of men unattractive and/or ugly.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 09:38 PM
4

it’s often followed by sexual harassment and creepiness. So apparently women now find complements about beauty to be extremely creepy The keywords in your post is "Older men". They only think it's 'misogyny', 'sexual harassment' and 'creepy' if they do not like the man making the compliment. If it was a handsome six foot Chad with a six pack making the same compliments it suddenly won't be 'misogyny' nor 'creepy'. This picture says a thousand words: https://ibb.co/qg7BHYq
/r/MensRights01/10/22 09:03 PM
7

Yeah, if you take the feminist Kool-Aid of seeing every single man as a r@pist.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:40 PM
4

I think modern western society has over compensated for the chauvinism pervasive in the decades prior to the 1970s So complimenting women is chauvinism? I think someone has been spiking your drinks with the feminist Kool-Aid.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:36 PM
67

She must be such a heroine to feminists. What a complete disgrace of a Judge. Needs to lose her job and be punished for wrongly altering the course of Justice.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:32 PM
14

The 60 years for the 60 investigations.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:50 PM
47

I used to know a male friend from University who was ugly. Basically another case of women outright dismissing/rejecting him purely based on his looks. He was basically the guy who would go out with a group of his male friends almost every weekend to nightclubs and bars, and he was always the one who didn't go home with a woman or to a woman's apartment, whilst his friends usually always did. He would often confide with me on this issue. It's understandable on how he's made to feel completely de…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 09:31 AM
9

White-knight here to save the day.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 09:10 AM
8

Obviously you and other people have missed the sarcasm in my reply.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:53 AM
8

There is a definite difference between feminism, which was largely about fairness Ah yes, telling black men to sit at the back of buses and handing out white feathers to boys and men to shame them for not going off to die.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:49 AM
66

spent multiple years investigating 60 times just on the mere words of a proven false accuser. They had to do that regardless of her past because they would get lynched mobbed by the SJW Feminist brigade if they didn't.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:34 AM
3

my sides
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:31 AM
83

5 years? Should be 60 years.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:22 AM
2

Like a lot of these social justice movements they start out with the right intentions my sides
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:17 AM
11

I hope she feels awful about it This is the spokeswoman for MeToo. Therefore I really doubt it.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:16 AM
17

So basically: Men Bad, Woman Good
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:13 AM
3

Or, when feminists DO admit that men face discrimination or disenfranchisement its always with the caveat of it being at the hands of other MEN and never at the hands of women Or they just say: "oh but women have it worse".
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:11 AM
5

men are ‘exploited’ by women for extracting money, how they get unfairly ‘friendzoned’ by the girls they really like, how women want to marry only successful, rich men among others. Everything is just an elaborate, wicked plot to defame and eventually subjugate men! All true. Comments also closed on that article. Granted it's from 2016 though. When that pile of man-hating tripe was published back then there was probably loads of comments that roasted the article and the cretin who wrote it.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:56 AM
20

This has happened because women and feminists have become aware of and are slightly worried about the increasing fightback against Feminism from men, which carries a potential risk of women losing their privileges in the long run. So they would have to "monitor the enemy" and act accordingly to stop this. This kind of thing happened a few years ago during the peak of Internet Anti-Feminism when all those women took pictures of themselves holding those signs that said things like "Not A Feminist"…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:36 AM
23

Society says both are offensive. Billie Eilish did not receive one ounce of criticism from women, feminists and the mainstream media for making those comments. If a celebrity man had said "no fat chicks" he would be cancelled in less than a day.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:28 AM
10

Even if she was gorgeous and said stuff like that, it's still an unpleasant thing to say. In fact it would probably be worse.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:20 AM
9

Basically this: https://ibb.co/qg7BHYq
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:31 AM
-20

Yes she is, she's a woman.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:30 AM
2

However, men don't often shoot for dating down in looks. This a complete myth. Due to the biological urges, men are absolutely willing to date down in looks when it comes to dating women. Even Chads would do this.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:34 PM
1

Well, sometimes plastic surgery isn’t such a bad idea. Not worth it for the women today anyway.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:32 PM
31

That is the exact same mentality as "no fat chicks". At least with fat chicks, they can work out and change it. Men who are ugly cannot do anything about it without drastic and expensive plastic surgery. The same goes for his height.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:31 PM
2

I am actually attacking your argument by attacking you personally. What a contradiction that is. Way to make yourself look stupid. You are looking for teenage girl drawings People can gave real life girlfriends and still take an interest in fictional cartoons. Women fans are know for doing this too in the Anime circles (having real boyfriends and also into "husbandos" in cartoons) but no doubt that you won't say anything about this. and complaining nobody wants to sleep with you. Do you like to …
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:28 PM
9

Then tell your sisters on TikTok to stop the "wHeRe HaVe AlL tHe GoOd MeN gOnE" posts.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:10 PM
2

Nice try on attacking my character instead of the argument. What my tastes are regarding fictional entertainment medium does not have any bearing on my comment posted here.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:06 PM
5

An exception does not make the rule. Your situation is no longer possible in this day and age for men
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:02 PM
14

Indeed. Had it been an article about a 30+ year old man saying there's a shortage of "quality" women for them, the same women would be screaming.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:00 PM
14

And women aren't even remotely entitled to have any man they want in their lives either. Nor are they entitled to a man's money. This side is something women don't seem to understand at all.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:57 PM
9

Funny how it's always men are targeted and attacked when it comes to this kind of issue. Maybe they should take a look at the kind of stuff on FDS and TwoX.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:55 PM
2

Are you doing your best to take care of yourself? And yes, that means grooming and clothing choices. Have some self-confidence (it may take a while to build up) Those doesn't fix an ugly face.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:51 PM
2

Wrong. Men are always willing to date down and f**k down. Women however, only date and f**k on par or up. Which means that women who are 3s, 4s and 5s are getting to sleep with men who are 6s, 7s or even 8s. Men who are 3s, 4s and 5s are not even getting a chance with women who are 2s, 3s, 4s or 5s.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:33 PM
1

Mentioned this numerous times, I used to know this male friend at University, who wasn't blessed at all in the looks department of his face. People and "dudebros" just advised him to just work out, wear some smart clothes and have some confidence when approaching women. All that did was get him laughed at by groups of women or labelled a "creep". I haven't seen this guy for years now, and I sometimes wonder how he is doing.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:30 PM
3

If you want to sleep with someone, work out, clean yourself up, and get out there. That doesn't fix an ugly face though.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:25 PM
1

Nope. Men are always willing to date down and f**k down. Women however, only date on par or up or f**k on par or up.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:21 PM
2

You're actually wrong. Men are always willing to date down and f**k down. Women however, only date on par or up and only f**k on par or up.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:18 PM
6

I want to know why he committed suicide before he was actually tried. Because just being accused by this sort of thing will ruin his life. Even if it goes to trial and he is found Not Guilty. The stigma will always be with the man. And not only that, but society doesn't care that he's innocent.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:12 PM
6

And nothing is going to happen to the woman who made the false accusation as usual then. She gets to laugh it off and get on with her life with the public not even knowing who she is or what she looks like.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:07 PM
0

Pretty sure most of Canadian women don’t want it to become regular either That's questionable. Why would women want to give up power over men? If most Canadian women don't want this then this bias and farce against men would have stopped ages ago. Same with the terrible MeToo movement, which continues to serve as nothing but a tool to destroy and ruin innocent men's lives.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:05 PM
1

I think you should take a look at yourself & ponder on why do you find yourself unattractive He hasn't said what part of him is unattractive, but if it's something like being overweight/fat or lack of muscles he can work to change that. However if it's his face that is is ugly then there is nothing he can do besides have drastic plastic surgery. Confidence is key in attracting other people, both friends & romantic partners. That's always been a myth in my view. If a Chad goes up to women with co…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:56 PM
3

Or laugh at them for having the temerity of trying it with Miss Perfect. Lose-lose situation.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:12 PM
9

Yup. According to the studies of the major dating sites, women find 80% - 85% of men unattractive and/or ugly.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:09 PM
16

At least the unattractive women are able to open the door when dating men. And when the door is open you get the chance to form a relationship. With ugly men the door remains firmly closed when dating women. Meaning they don't even get a chance.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:08 PM
1

Don't bother being nice. You won't get the date regardless of whether you be nice or not. Women are hypergamous. Go and focus on your career, making money and staying healthy. Be the best version of yourself for yourself and not for female validation.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:03 PM
1

As opposed to femcels who say shit like men owe them everything but never take steps away from those cheeseburgers.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:57 PM
28

They have it far easier than ugly men. And that's because men are always willing to date down and fuck down. Not only that, ugly women are treated with sympathy from society; whereas ugly men are just laughed at and mocked by society.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:50 PM
6

Except that in this case, there's an actual incident that occurred and is acknowledged by both parties. In most cases of r@pe accusations made by women against men, there is no evidence at all.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:46 PM
7

It's always been a fact that men are not included in Body Positivity. Even though there are some men in some "Male Body Positivity" photos in Google searches, the actual movement does not include nor promote it for men. And this is because promoting such a movement for men could result in more men being "less attractive" for women in the dating game. No more six packs, massive arms, muscles, handsomeness, etc. Can't EVER have women unhappy now can we. But yet it's AWESOME and GREAT when women ug…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 06:05 PM
0

Regarding height, well, I personally never heared about "height-shaming", (not USA resisent), USA resident or not, you either have your head buried in the sand or you are a disingenuous white-knight.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 04:43 PM
2

For decades men have been silenced and told to "man up" whenever they want to speak about issues affecting them negatively. And being disadvantaged in the gene pool when it comes to looks has always been one of these issues. Men not complaining about this is not because men don't care, it's actually the societal culture of expecting men to accept and deal with it.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 04:41 PM
11

Feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:42 AM
10

What next, women demanding to be paid for breathing?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:41 AM
3

Melanie Mac is a Centrist for the most part. She is supposedly Anti-Woke, but never really overdoes it and usually ends up going where the ship sails. She's hot though.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:40 AM
10

You honestly think that false allegations/accusations of SA and r@pe against men, which are perpetrated by women, doesn't harm men?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:39 AM
3

If you're a man, either: be handsome, six foot tall, six pack, massive arms, six figure salary, etc. or don't use dating apps/services
/r/MensRights22/09/22 03:34 PM
5

Ah yes, must defeat the evil male gaze bogeyman in the closet. First world problems.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:51 PM
3

So men can turn up to the office to work wearing a T-shirt and jeans?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:13 AM
13

Feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:29 PM
5

People try to invalidate his all opinions with out of context short clips of negative opinion. And unfortunately, quite a few people in this sub have been fooled by it as well.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:48 AM
14

do you think that’s a luxury as well? Considering that these rights have given women superiority, privileges and more rights over men, yes it is a luxury.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 11:38 PM
30

Hope they win and that the cretins who implemented these so-called misandrist "diversity" hiring policies is also fired and blackmarked from the industry.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:11 AM
4

MeToo is nothing more than a hate campaign and political tool used by women to bully, intimidate, fear-monger, attack, target and ruin men's lives through accusations without needing evidence. It always has been this from the start. Anyone who thought this movement was a "good thing" at the beginning is out of their minds.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:08 AM
56

Women trying to get money from rich soccer players by making false accusations in England is quite a common thing.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:48 AM
2

Have you been living under a rock for the last decade? Did you miss all the endless cases of companies/businesses caving into SJW/Feminist whining over supposed "offensive" material, censoring/removing said material, and then issuing the grovelling apology?
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/22 11:00 AM
8

No, it's actually obese landwhale femcel queens demanding to be f**ked by 10s.
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/22 01:21 AM
24

During the GamerGate days, I remember how absolutely misandrist BuzzFeed was. No surprise to see that they haven't changed then.
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/22 12:58 AM
4

"people" Men do not get the privilege of the Body Positivity movement. It's exclusively for women.
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/22 12:52 AM
4

She could have just said that she hates men tbh.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:35 PM
7

Here comes the white knight to save the day.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:31 PM
16

Body Positivity is promoting and glorifying overweight and obese women. Therefore, it's indirectly promoting and glorifying unhealthiness.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/22 03:29 PM
8

I support men's freedom to do so. However I can't say I am in favour of it because it could link to and overlaps with emasculation, and the more men do this the more men become emasculated. Which of course, is exactly what the feminists want.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:36 AM
11

"When TOI contacted the women's commission for its reaction to this, the panel members said they would discuss the issue before making any statement." I wonder what they would have to say about this.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:12 AM
14

Scantily-clad attractive/sexy women are not allowed to be featured/depicted in these kinds of adverts/billboards in the West. The companies/businesses who do this are basically virtue-signalling, because they know that they don't have a choice. If they depicted slim sexy/attractive women on the adverts/billboards they know the SJW/Feminist mob will go after them. A reminder that years ago, the company Protein World was attacked and mobbed by SJWs/Feminists for having that advert of the female bi…
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/22 09:15 AM
38

It absolutely is Woke as it is a result of feminism and the Body Positivity movement. Also, if they depicted a slim sexy/attractive woman on those adverts these days, the Feminist mob would whine about it and have it taken down.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/22 09:05 AM
28

Feminists have never wanted equality.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:48 AM
6

Others include deposing and ousting feminist supremacism from all governmental function Music to my ears.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:45 PM
4

My sides. Actions of feminists/feminism say otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:37 AM
4

Feminists are misandrists.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 11:33 PM
7

Men can date down and f**k down. Women only date on par or up, and f**k up.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 09:24 PM
10

but the men she was going for is really telling. So you should understand on why I made my comment as is. She's definitely not going for a good personality. The notion of women going for personality in a man has always been a myth.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 09:22 PM
6

Then this guy must have been good-looking or/and attractive. inb4 anecdote "no he was short and average looking", etc.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:13 PM
39

This is the difference: https://ibb.co/WWWGzwm
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:11 PM
24

She might want to look in a mirror before handing out those resumes so confidently.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:02 PM
2

Feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:38 AM
3

Toilet paper is worth more than a Prenup.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:24 AM
1

People change, Einstein.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:08 AM
1

Truss also said she will be getting "cat-calling" (from men of course) criminalized as well prior to election. Basically, taking more freedom of speech away from men. We all know she's going to spew all the other usual SJW/feminist talking points and implement more misandrist laws down the line. The people of the UK voted for this. They deserve it. Just like how they voted for Brexit, meaning that they are no longer governed by the EU. While all the clueless dorks celebrated it, it turns out tha…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:50 PM
2

Forgot about that one. Edited post to reflect this.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:03 PM
12

The men hitting on her are "creepy" because they're average or ugly looking. Had it been a 6/6/6/6 Chad that hit on her, watch how it's suddenly not creepy.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:55 PM
3

And here comes the apologetics from a Reddit account that is only 1 day old at this time of writing. The institution accepted his shirt, so as far as I'm concerned it was perfectly fine for him to wear it. Besides that, he is a well-known name in the field and him expressing some creativity, uniqueness and personality by wearing that shirt is okay. The cartoon women on the shirt were not nude. The way the SJWs and Feminists targeted, bullied, attacked and ganged up on him is absolutely misandry,…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:54 PM
21

Then why mention and boast about there being no white men? And also, considering the hostile feminist atmosphere towards men (especially white men), I would not bet against that some form of discrimination against white men will have occurred in the hiring process.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:35 PM
11

And here is the white knight to save the day.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:48 AM
3

A picture says a thousand words: https://ibb.co/WWWGzwm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/22 03:08 AM
10

Feminists: "The accused men need to be exposed for the safety of other women. Even if the man is found not guilty, it would be a valuable learning experience for him that mistreating women is not okay"
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:56 AM
57

Diversity is just code for "no white men". Fixed.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:48 AM
1

Ah yes, reverse psychology.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:37 AM
18

What the feminists did to Matt Taylor in "ShirtGate" should be the clearest indication that feminism is nothing but a misandrist man-hating hate movement. And before any apologist tries, don't bother with the "not all feminists are like that!" or "they are not feminists!" cards. Where were the so-called "real/good feminists" when Taylor was made to grovel, cry and apologize to feminists on national television?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:29 AM
9

I agree - but it's very rare though.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:22 AM
57

This is their revenge? Feminists? White people? Women? Yup. The first and the latter. Feminism 101: Find a hobby/community/work sector/etc. that mostly consists of men Get the few women there to make a load of allegations and accusations of SA or r@pe without evidence to get the ball rolling Everyone, social media and news media sympathizes with the women because MeToo and "Believe All Women" The hobby/community/work sector/etc. is targeted, attacked and smeared as "sexists" and "misogynists" by…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:18 AM
73

The ‘woke’ diversity drive was scrapped after the RAF’s recruitment chief refused to implement what she called an ‘unlawful’ selection policy. This needs to happen more. The RAF has also been rocked by claims that pilots from the elite Red Arrows team sexually harassed and bullied female crew members. And this is likely their revenge because the "diversity" hiring was scrapped. Just make a load of accusations without evidence to ensure that women are favoured eventually.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:18 AM
1

Because society is hostile to anyone defending the man in situations of women vs men.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:32 PM
2

There have been and plenty of women who voted for Hilary purely on the basis that she was a woman. And besides, it's not important for women to vote for women, because any male politician they vote for will pander to and white-knight for them anyway.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:31 PM
2

I take it you're another one who only saw the short clips of his dialogue, designed to take him out of context.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:10 PM
2

Nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:09 PM
1

Yeah, praise and glorification.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 11:46 AM
3

Except my point is to show how absurd and obnoxious that feminist phrase is.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 11:45 AM
13

It's not a generalization. If the majority of women really did speak out against and controlled their "crazy sisters" (i.e. radical feminists) then we would not have the man-hating misandrist atmosphere/trend we are in today. When I read "women are this, women do that" it honestly starts to come across to me as every bit as ignorant and sexist as the feminists. At least you are only seeing this on an Internet forum. Men have to see "men are this, men do that" everywhere they go.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:35 AM
3

As a feminist would say: "That's just the way it is hun, deal with it"
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/22 02:54 AM
7

Both are good counters to the dorks who keep saying "but men are the majority in politics and government" as an 'argument' to claim that men have all the power.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:42 AM
21

In the USA, under the law, a person who is 18 or over is an adult. All the power to DiCaprio. You've written 3 paragraphs of pompous and misandrist tripe. Crawl back to FDS or whatever feminist s**thole you came from.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:30 AM
26

That said it’s rather odd so many people are so judgements about other people’s relationships which don’t impact them. What difference does it really make who DiCaprio dates? It’s his business. DiCaprio is a man you see. Men are not allowed to have preferences when dating women. But middle-aged women are praised when they publicly gush over the young male actors of Twilight though.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:22 AM
5

You need to read my post again. I didn't say that women wouldn't have spoken up for the waiter.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:18 AM
10

How long before feminists get it taken down for "misogyny" and "sToPs ReAl ViCtImS cOmInG fOrWaRd" I wonder.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:01 AM
7

Have or had? Have. Because we're talking about US history Someone doesn't realize that Queens and female rulers existed.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:01 AM
12

Women actually have more rights than men in the West. Go and crawl back to whatever feminist swap you came from.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:53 PM
30

Just say this: "Men are in charge, Women make the rules"
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:51 PM
26

Agreed. And it's unacceptable. You're not fooling anyone. That's why I don't believe this woman should be treated that way. Except that the difference here is that the woman has already been proven to be involved with the car/road incident. It happened. With men who are falsely accused, in the majority of cases there is no evidence of it whatsoever.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:24 PM
13

Looks like we had a white-knighting and feminist jury in the end. Complete disgrace of a verdict.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:21 PM
9

Feminist ilk confirmed.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:12 PM
4

Stop playing dumb. I've seen snarky drive-by feminist-type comments from you on here.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:09 PM
26

That's the thing, you as a Female have to speak up. Not much use even if she does do that, because the problem are the white-knights and simps who get their pitch-forks out without asking questions. Women have to control their crazy "sisters". They should have done this decades ago. It's very obvious on why women haven't controlled their "crazy sisters".
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:47 PM
8

No. People suggesting she be killed, named and shamed, put on a sex offender registry, sent to prison, all women are basically the devil incarnate, people like you making up strawmen... That's exactly what you and your ilk would do to any man who has allegations/accusations made against him.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:39 PM
6

Then why are you so-called "real feminists" not calling out and not making a proper effort to kick the "bad feminazis" out of your movement? We all know why.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:13 PM
3

Another feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:11 PM
4

We all know that behind your facade, you're an advocate of "guilty until proven innocent" for men (with no interest in wanting to prove the man innocent); and you're screaming for the man to be jailed. Don't think that people don't know how you feminists operate.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:07 PM
30

No man should be assumed guilty. This is what you said in another reply: "So we just assume her guilt unless she can prove her innocence. That doesn't seem off to you?" That comment from you shows that you want the inverse.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:53 PM
3

I get that women are underrepresented Horse s**t. Why does there have to be gendered representation? Why should women get this special privilege? and often not confident enough to apply for some positions. Or just maybe, a lot of women are not actually applying for engineering jobs and instead doing something else? All you need to do is guarantee female applicants an interview, it gets over the initial hurdle of applying and everyone still has a fair shot in the end. Ah yes, more discrimination …
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:47 PM
4

Feminism isn't about equality.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:46 AM
1

what the state thinks is fair. my sides
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:39 AM
9

Women now are so entitled that they expect the man to get on his knees, bark and play fetch to keep them entertained. Don't forget the man also needs to be handsome, over six foot, six pack, massive arms, you-know-what over six inches, six figure salary, etc.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:31 AM
31

I think women who stick around need to have pretty thick skin due to all the anti women comments. As opposed to men who have true thick skin who stick around on planet earth due to all the anti-male hatred they get everywhere.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:20 AM
12

#9275801 thing that it's okay if women do it, but not okay if men do it.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:13 AM
2

Go back to FDS or whatever feminist swamp you crawled here from.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:24 PM
1

I'm not even a supporter of Jordan Peterson. What part of "Except that we're talking about now and America, the origin of Sports Illustrated." do you not understand?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 09:58 AM
4

That's nice. Except that we're talking about now and America, the origin of Sports Illustrated. The model on that cover is fat/overweight and is an aspect of the woke feminist donkey s**t. Stop making excuses and apologetics for it.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 03:28 AM
5

Feminism is synonymous with misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 11:39 PM
6

Gonna disagree with feminism ‘always’ having been misandrist. I guess you don't consider telling black men to sit at the back of buses, stepping on working class men and handing out white feathers to shame boys and men misandrist then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 11:35 PM
3

Agree with some views he has, disagree with some views he has. He did a good job making a dent on Wokeness and Feminism in that interview with Cathy Newman. He disappointed when he caved to the Woke mob over that Sports Illustrated cover with the fat female model.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:16 PM
2

Until the source that provides the irrefutable data gets corrupted by feminism.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:42 PM
15

Maybe what I mean is are they actually achieving anything? Feminists have successfully infiltrated, took over, dominate and represent the mainstream media, news media, academia, education, politics, law, government, entertainment media, television, campaigns, activism, women's groups, etc. If you think they, especially modern feminism hasn't achieved anything then you either have your head buried in the sand or you're being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:39 PM
43

Saw this line from the thread: "Because we value men's needs more than women's." My sides.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:35 PM
5

What do you mean "no longer"? It was never about equality. Unless you see telling black men to sit at the back of buses, stepping on the working-class and handing out white feathers to shame boys and men as "equality".
/r/AntiFeminists03/09/22 10:55 AM
5

The so-called "oppressed" are the oppressors.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 03:31 PM
2

How do you view, understand and get through to men who still have their rose colored glasses on? You can't by telling them. Decades of feminist indoctrination has ingrained it into the men you described. No amount of facts and statistics you show them will change their minds. The "only way" these indoctrinated men can get the message and change is if they themselves become a victim of the feminism they pander to, such as: A) They get divorced (wife initiated), and find out that they lose almost …
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:37 PM
1

I don't remember him ever saying it's to 'get the chicks' he's more like F&F with their: Get fit, successful and the chicks will come. Ah, fair enough. Edited my post to reflect this.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:03 PM
4

Women should be reporting these kind of alleged crimes to the Police, not plastering it all around Social Media on a hashtag to encourage and implement pitchfork mob justice against the person they are accusing.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:57 PM
7

I 100% agree that it's become a hate movement where women can make accusations simply for clout. "become"? It's always been a damn hate movement.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:05 AM
27

The MeToo movement is designed exactly to encourage and create false accusations against men from women, whilst allowing the women to remain anonymous. Not only that, the fact that the movement is a Social Media concept also means that it is designed to gather and implement mob justice pitch-fork style vigilante behaviour. Feminists can claim all the claptrap about the movement being "for girls and women to speak up", but the fact that they're going to Social Media to post on the hashtag/movemen…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:04 AM
2

Everybody screaming he's all sorts of shit but only have the clips as proof. To dumb? to even find the originals and see the clips in context. Fresh&Fit ("male self improvement" YouTube channel) did a 3 hour stream covering this and explaining and showing how Tate was slandered and taken out of context two weeks ago. I could post the video here but I doubt that that video will be watched and I doubt that that minds will be changed.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:50 AM
6

Let me guess, you are one of the dummies who only saw the clips of Tate taken out of context by SJWs/Feminists? And I'm not even a fan of Andrew Tate just to let you know.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:10 AM
2

That men shoukd be more sensitive and complain more about it? Men get mocked, such as being called "incels" if they do so.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:11 PM
3

Go back to FDS you tedious cretin.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:55 PM
8

Women demanding a man who is handsome, over six foot, six pack, massive arms, six figure salary, you-know-what that's over six inches = "you go girl", "yasss queen", "she knows what she wants", "only settle for the best, queen", "empowering women", etc. Men preferring a woman is a not overweight = "shallow", "chauvinist", "misogyny", "toxic masculinity", "picky", "incel", etc. Saw plenty of "experiment" and "interview" videos on YouTube regarding this issue. Women would rather jump off a cliff t…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:10 PM
5

Men have always been evaluated for their looks. The notion that they are not is a complete myth. The reality is, men are evaluated by their looks AND status, job and wealth. Not only that, but men are always willing to date down and f**k down when dating women.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:00 PM
2

Here comes the white-knight to save the day.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:57 PM
9

I've noticed a lot of feminist concern trolling threads and posts over there recently, and the threads are getting loads of Upvotes. These threads and posts are almost always made by people you have never seen on the sub before. The Upvotes of the threads are probably down to a lot of the community being "fooled" by it but these days you can never be sure. That sub can be very white-knighting at times.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 01:29 PM
66

Treating all men as predators, encouraging MeToo false accusations, attacking and bashing men at every turn, making men walk on eggshells, discriminating against men in education, workforce, politics, law and government, woman setting ridiculous demands and standards when dating men, trending Misandry on social media, etc. Women: "wHeRe HavE AlL tHe MeN gOnE" which translates to: "where are the handsome six foot plus six pack six figure salary Chads"
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:27 AM
7

VikingHunterr Cake day August 29, 2022
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:07 AM
3

Don't forget this one: "Toxic Masculinity is the reason for the issues men face, so we need to eradicate it. Doing so will also protect and give equality for girls and women."
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:45 PM
5

That would be too risky as a move for them to do, since the feminists would rage against them. There's never going to be a time when it's not risky to do that though. At some point a professional entity will have to call feminism out to get the ball rolling.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:18 AM
6

The existence of an office like The Ministry Of Culture and Equality is far more alarming. The Ministry of Misandry more like.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 03:15 AM
54

After critics said an all-male selection would not be taken seriously, she had to backtrack. This sounds familiar. Almost like feminist mob influence and/or coercion...... we also find self-proclaimed feminists and gender researchers. Dear lord. Yeah, this Men's Issues panel is going to be a failure.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:53 AM
1

Fake feminist or not, she still spewed the anti-male gender quota feminist donkey s**t prior. Good riddance and hope that the "other side" doesn't give her any help either.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:55 AM
69

So Norway finally acknowledges that men face inequality I see. Shame that they don't name the movement that is causing it.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:31 PM
34

For over a decade now, men have been bullied, attacked, losing their jobs and cancelled by women and the feminist mob for reasonably criticising women or/and saying things that women don't like. Therefore regarding this "therapist" losing her job - zero fucks given.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:22 PM
1

My point is regarding stating dating preferences such as on a Profile on a Dating App, Einstein.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:49 PM
6

be at least somewhat cute That part might get you into trouble.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:42 PM
3

I am aware of that.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:00 PM
8

And women telling almost every men that they're too short in height and/or too ugly isn't cruel? Also don't forget, overweight women can actually change their weight. Men cannot change their height or face naturally. Stop the white-knighting.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:52 PM
4

It's a pretty easy thing to keep to yourself. That's why you weren't called/labelled as those things. Women can publicly state their checkbox demands when dating men. Why can't men publicly state their preferences when dating women?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:30 PM
2

Haven't read the article yet - do they say or indicate that women can be perpetrators too, and that forced envelopment is also r@pe I wonder.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:17 PM
24

Same as now. Which means no real progress, no change in societal views, no change in education, politics, law, etc. White-knighting and Simping is a deadly and infectious disease.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:52 AM
47

Women demanding men to be handsome, over six foot tall, six pack, massive arms, six figure salary = "you go girl", "yasss queen", "she knows what she wants", "she should only settle for the best", etc. Men preferring women to be slim = "sexist", "misogynist", "chauvinist", "shallow", "superficial", "disrespecting women", "narrow-minded", etc.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:48 AM
1

All we want is for you to stop catcalling us So you want restriction of expression and speech, we get it. And you only want to implement this on men only. I'm sure you know that groups of young drunk women on Friday and Saturday nights at nightclubs, bars, etc. or on the street are a hundred times worse to men when it comes to "catcalling". But of course, to people like you it's okay if women do it! MetToo was so us women and men could talk about our trauma but yeah clearly hate on that also Nop…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:27 AM
3

everytime i go out i see couples men and women And the men of the couples is mostly always tall, handsome and somewhat muscular.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:15 PM
1

I'm not justifying the r@pes. Stop gaslighting you white-knight. The reason to be against it is that the law will no doubt be abused by some women, and makes false accusations against men even easier.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:26 PM
4

No-one's stopping you from growing your leg hairs and posting them on FDS.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:53 AM
3

I don’t think that there is any law that prevents someone from being fired because they aren’t a feminist. Unfortunately the court of public opinion will likely have a say on this.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:46 AM
9

It won't be. Do remember that we are living in a Western society where a woman carrying a mattress around and lying about r@pe is celebrated and praised.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:44 AM
50

Feminists: "her father must have treated her badly" "where's her father?" "her father failed" etc.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:32 AM
1

Just out of curiosity, what are you suggesting men do now? What men should be doing is protesting and rioting against these laws.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:01 AM
8

The thing is this law is coming from Ministry of Equality. There are men who work within the Ministry of Equality peddling the feminist s**t.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 08:48 AM
42

offended when men ask for consent on camera (I know, it can still be easily contested, but it's better than nothing), asked to sign NDAs and are wondering why there's so many security cameras on their property. Of course women would get offended when men ask them of those things. After all, they are things which would cause women to have to think twice about making that false accusation against him.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:21 AM
1

Why would you want to decondition yourself from being adverse to leg hair on women? Are you some sort of white-knight?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:42 AM
10

If you're still using the lifts, then don't use them anymore. Don't try to pander and conform to women, they don't deserve your effort. Just leave them to fight amongst each other for the 10% Chad (who won't care about them) until they hit the wall.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:32 AM
47

"Positive discrimination" is a concept feminists agree with. Until of course, in the workforce, a man is hired over a woman to adhere to their own Gender Quotas. Then suddenly it is no longer "positive discrimination", instead it becomes "discrimination", "sexism" and "misogyny".
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:48 AM
59

RIP Men of spain. I've said this many times - men are the architects of their own downfall. Who are the ones enabling feminism? Men. Who are the ones helping feminists and women to draft these laws? Men. Who are the ones who help alongside women to vote for these laws? Men. Who are the politicians in government who, alongside women, vote in favour of these laws? Men. Who are the ones who approve of and sign these laws into place? Men.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:09 AM
22

it becomes rape if you stay inside too much? No. It becomes r@pe when SHE decides it is.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:01 AM
17

because women retracted consent This has got to be one of the most despicable and ridiculous concepts on planet earth. And of course, the "idea" came from feminists. How on earth can someone consent to sex, and then afterwards, an hour later, a day later, a week later, a year later or even 10 years later she can decide she didn't consent? There is seriously something wrong with the Justice system if they actually adopt and follow this concept.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:59 AM
136

Holy heck is this law going to be abused by women. Spain have made false accusations easier to make.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:22 AM
33

And even if she does say "yes", she can change her mind after the s£x or she can say that the man forced her to say "yes".
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:20 AM
73

Couldn't read the entire article (cannot be bothered to register), but this is good news. She really should have been sacked for that Tweet to begin with. Still, one less man-hating misandrist in the medical sector temporarily (because she's going to get hired by some other cu*ks).
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:09 AM
9

Won't pass in a Court of law, because the "after" video does not prove that the alleged r@pe didn't happen. She can just say that he forced her to make the "after" video.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:55 PM
29

Be handsome, over six foot tall, have a six pack, have massive arms and a six figure salary otherwise you're automatically a creep to women.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:08 PM
3

This just goes to show on how completely clueless you are and why you're not qualified to speak on the topic of feminism.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:27 PM
2

This rule will absolutely be abused by women to get rid of men they don't like (average-looking and ugly men). Absolutely ridiculous. The idea of gender segregation gets more attractive every day.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:15 PM
2

Also I think they were heavily criticized for it. They were. I edited my post to state this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 10:36 AM
59

Just yet another excuse for them to peddle the "i'm a woman woe is me" and "men are bad" donkey s**t. The author mentions Boris Johnson and Donald Trump for comparison but they weren't under suspicion of taking drugs. Also from what I remember, both were heavily criticised as well. We all remember the worldwide outrage and s**tstorm over Trump's comments on that tape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 10:22 AM
3

I mean I can’t say I don’t have preferences when looking for girls too 😅 The difference is that women are ridiculous with their demands while men are realistic about their preferences. Not to mention that men are always willing to date down; women however only date on par or up.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:49 AM
12

Secondly, not all women care about height. Most of them do though. Even the women who are average-looking or/and fat. In the past, say 20 - 30 years ago this was less of an issue, but since modern dating and feminist "female empowerment" was in place, the checkboxes of demands from women for dating men have gotten ridiculous. The thing is, regarding dating, I would have less of a problem with a woman's demands for men IF men were allowed to have equally the same "shallow" demands for women. So i…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:44 AM
12

overall it wasn't bad. Ah yes, telling black men to sit at the back of buses and handing out white feathers to shame boys and men.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:25 AM
2

“upgrade your man upgrade your life”. They’re more conditioned to cheat. Also the fact that 80%+ of people who initiate divorces are women just says it all.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:19 AM
3

"I love sex and I get bored easily, but men take [an affair] as an affront to their masculinity. They all think they should be ‘enough’ for me" LOL. And women never think that they're 'enough' for their boyfriend or husband do they? Anyway - if there's ever a message to advise men to not get married then this is it.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:15 AM
6

press charges. He needs to have video + audio evidence first. If he hasn't then he needs to start gathering evidence. The issue he may face is that people may not take him seriously because the victim is a male.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:00 AM
12

Your movement has been completely taken over and riddled with the "bad" feminists constantly spewing man-hating misandry everywhere and causing biased anti-male laws to be implemented. When are you so-called "real feminists" going to call them out and stop them from doing this? I wonder could it be that "bad feminism" is exactly what the movement is?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:53 AM
29

Let's put it this way. Older women, even middle-aged or over, are celebrated and praised for publicly ogling and gushing over the young male actors in Twilight. Many years ago, in the film premiere events of that franchise, there were hoards of middle-aged and older women at the barriers holding up Robert Pattison, etc. love signs. Now, just imagine if middle-aged or older men did the same thing to a female music band, for example Girls Aloud (UK) or Dreamcatcher (Korean). The men would be label…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:49 AM
1

Just goes to show that "Get Woke, Go Broke" doesn't really work and has never worked. As for all the apologists defending all these Woke strong female leads, the logic is basically this: Before SJWs took over the culture 2012, strong female leads were genuine and not Woke After SJWs took over the culture in 2012, strong female leads are Woke Therefore those of you who consider yourselves to be against SJWs but still defend all the post 2012 stronk wimmin protags should be f**king ashamed of your…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:15 PM
1

Strong female leads have become tedious and boring, and are oversaturated tbh. Both the "proper" and woke ones.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:09 PM
-4

So what, there are some strong female characters in some movies. Maybe some more people of colour, maybe some more LGBTQ characters than before. Not everything that is progressive is automatically ‘woke’. If it is, then so what? Stop obsessing over small harmless bullshit. The only thing that's wrong with this sub is the increasing feminist, SJW-denying and white-knighting tripe like this.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:07 PM
-3

I don't agree that strong female protaginist itself is woke. Before SJWs took over in 2012, no. After SJWs took over in 2012, yes. Stronk independenz wimmin protags are a hallmark of wokeness and Social Justice, stop trying to make excuses for it now.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:03 PM
11

It really is time for segregation now.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:20 PM
1

I have noticed that you placed "Feminists" in quotes in the title of the thread. Is this another disguised "the misandrist man-haters are not real feminists!!" lecture? Pre-third wave feminists told black men to sit at the back of buses and handed out white feathers to shame men. All waves of feminism is about man-hating and has never been about equality. And before the carcass of "but they gave wimmin the vote!!" is wheeled out for the 1074919th time, people should do a bit of research and ackn…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:51 PM
2

It is well known that women handle rejection far worse than men do. As everyone knows, in today's traditions and culture regarding dating, men are the pursuers and women are the choosers, which means that men always have the make the first move and risk rejection. Logically, this would mean that men are prepared for and are used to rejection, which means that men are able to brush it off easily. Women however, as the pursued and choosers, will find rejection by men very uncomfortable as it is un…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:36 PM
3

What do you mean "abuse"? It is exactly what MeToo is intended to be used for.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:28 PM
14

100% this.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:25 PM
4

I have nothing against movies or shows with a strong female lead role I have. It's become a tiresome and tedious trope, and it's also oversaturated. And this was even before SJWs/Feminists took over entertainment media. Time for the traditional pretty damsel-in-distress female characters to make a return. This role has been extinct for almost a decade now. I'm sure there are loads of guys who want this as well, but are too terrified to say it because they know they'll get lynch-mobbed, ostracize…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:23 AM
29

Not only that but she's also a K-Pop male boy band stanning cretin.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:08 AM
25

The thing that is infuriating is the double standards. These kinds of articles/opinion pieces are regularly popping up all over the place to smugly mock, insult and hurt men, usually written by women. But if men were to write articles/opinion pieces to expose the truth about women (without any mocking nor insults), then his articles would receive hoards of complaints and eventually be removed in less than a day.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:44 AM
10

Once again, an article of nothing besides man-hating tripe, blaming men for their own loneliness. Nothing to do with the fact that modern women have now become completely spoilt and entitled and having ridiculous standards, only wanting to date men who are handsome, over six foot, have a six pack, have massive arms and a six figure salary. "But if, on an individual level, we’re feeling confident enough to swipe left on men who don’t know how to load a dishwasher? For now, at least, I’ll take tha…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:32 AM
30

It's been shown before that companies would rather prioritise peddling SJW agenda over profit. For example, Marvel Comics is polluted with Woke s**t, they know they lose money because of it but they still continue to peddle the SJW ideology. I would imagine that one of the main reasons for the virtue signalling of SJW crap is because the companies want good PR and to keep themselves safe from SJW backlash. The other reason is of course, the Diversity Hires within the company.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:06 AM
18

Because there seems to be a lot of people in this sub who would like to reverse it. I think it's a good cause to stop misandry.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:00 AM
9

Your friend sounds like someone who has been completely indoctrinated by the Feminist Kool-Aid. His negative views on masculinity will only annoy you more and more as time goes by. Therefore just get rid of him.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:47 AM
5

The worse part is when they shame a guy for quote on quote “checking them out” while they either wear skimpy outfits, post lewd pics of themselves, or even run an onlyfans account, all for the sole purpose of getting guys to look at them. They're complaining because average/ugly men are staring at them too. If the men staring at them were all handsome six foot tall Chads with six packs then there will be no complaints from them at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:41 AM
3

This is why: https://ibb.co/WWWGzwm
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:38 AM
3

Don't be fooled, the "70% of Americans are in committed relationships" line are mostly the older generations of couples, when women were actually more realistic and less shallow. You know, before modern dating.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:19 AM
4

It's literally saying "men think X, even though women are telling them it's actually Y". Like I said in my previous reply, the author has purposely side-tracked and deflected away from the issue, skipping to the stage AFTER the woman has already approved the man's looks. What part of that do you not understand? Men do not get the "honour" of being told or signalled by women on how exactly how they want to be treated ("with respect, dignity, tenderness") if the women do not approve of the men's l…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 04:51 PM
4

women are seen as great and welcoming if they like overweight men I have honestly not seen a woman say nor indicate that they like overweight men at all.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:56 PM
2

I’m sure author of this blog is ugly, overweight and old woman. Judging by the tone she has written the article in, surely she has got to be on the level of a 2nd or 3rd placed contestant of Miss Universe at least. /s
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:49 PM
4

"'Women are just too complicated,' these same men will proclaim, ignoring the dozens of women telling them exactly how they want to be treated; with respect, dignity, tenderness." There's nothing there that indicates nor implies that women don't go for looks when dating a man. Therefore, there is no denial from the author. If anything, the author has purposely side-tracked and deflected away from the issue like your typical feminist weasel. She has basically skipped to the stage AFTER the woman …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 03:45 PM
6

You've been a victim of female hypergamy. Don't make the same mistake again.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:37 PM
7

Or maybe he actually does have a good personality but have been rejected by women too many times purely based on his looks? You cannot seem to grasp the fact that a man can have a good personality and still criticise the dating game. These two aspects can be kept separate and are mutually exclusive to each other.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:06 AM
19

There's too many things, but one that comes to mind is that when dating, men are not allowed to have any standards when dating women; but women are allowed to have checkbox demands when dating men.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 04:30 AM
50

Those kinds of women aren't in denial of their shallowness. They just don't be own up to it I don't know why women just don't say outright that they won't date a man because he is average/ugly-looking. There are no repercussions for the woman. I mean, due to feminism and the empowerment bulls**t, it is now socially acceptable and ENCOURAGED that women reject guys in the nastiest and meanest way possible. They'll get praised and celebrated for it.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:24 AM
71

they should be looking into why men have so many issues in the first place. When it comes to dating, that would mean that they would have to admit the possibility of women being at fault. Why would they do that?
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:08 AM
206

"Responding to the article via Twitter are a number of men who insist that women are “too picky” and have “double standards”. They claim that they actually have great personalities, and that women just don’t want to date them because they aren’t good looking." This is actually 100% true. The author of that article also doesn't deny it. Instead, she blames men for thinking that way, despite the fact that it is exactly this shallowness from modern women that has caused men to think like this. "So,…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:03 AM
5

Feminism originally promoted equality It never did.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:59 PM
5

They act like very bad people so most of them dont deserve any of my attention. You are correct, but unfortunately society sees it as "you don't deserve any of their attention".
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:02 PM
11

Maybe the word 'creep' isn't what gets used Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:51 PM
29

Indeed. Women not able to get a date = "the men are inadequate, pathetic and need to step up" Men not able to get a date = "he is inadequate, pathetic and needs to step up"
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:47 PM
7

Women do not have to label themselves as feminists to have feminist ideology and beliefs.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:01 PM
19

Feminism can be tiring and hard to defend I wonder why.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:54 PM
9

Is a sub about witches vs patriarchy really the best representation of women we can come up with? Okay, how about mainstream feminism then? You know the ones in the news media, entertainment media, television, education, politics, law, government, etc. who continuously mock and s**t on men. Or how about social media women? Who also use MeToo and labels of "misogyny" and "sexism" to silence men.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:47 PM
17

I'm very sexually forward for a female and now I find myself worrying on how to not come accross as a 'creep'. This doesn't apply to women when they're approaching men. In fact, the term "creep" is never applicable to women that it's literally non-existent.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:31 PM
4

Are you seriously putting forward 'sexual objectification of women' as something that should be allowed because men "like" it? I mean, seriously? It is not 'sexual objectification of women' because the female models at those events do what they do of their own free will and they get paid for it. It's their job you cretin.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:54 PM
2

I have however seen women lose their shit because a man rejected them. 100% this.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:43 PM
19

There is a certain amount of safety risk associated with being curt in turning down a man. You do not know who is going to react violently and who is going to take it in stride. The manner of which a woman turns a man down (both strangers obviously) also possibly influences the reaction of him. Here are two examples: A) If a woman turns down the man in a very insulting manner, like not saying anything to him and giving him disgusted stares (to express how ugly he is), or/and laughing in his face…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:36 PM
12

I think very few women are 'hate machines' You have not been on social media at all have you?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:15 AM
2

Sexualization/objectification/nude scenes. Since feminism polluted the industry, it's now unacceptable to put women in those kind of scenes for the male audience; but perfectly fine to put men in those kind of scenes for the female audience. The latest example is of course that scene in Thor: Love and Thunder. From what I heard, even the actor (Chris Hemsworth) said he was uncomfortable with doing such a scene but the director forced him to insisted he do it because the female audience will love…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:26 AM
9

No mentally healty and intelligent women would get mad at a man for approaching and striking up a conversation with her. You are absolutely naive if you really think that.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:13 AM
55

A young lady student who is quite pretty was on a mild rant about how guys never ask her on dates anymore Know the game gentlemen, it will prevent your life from being ruined: https://ibb.co/WWWGzwm
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:07 AM
1

WittyReason6914 Cake day August 19, 2022
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:57 AM
15

How about grid girls/booth babes/ring girls? How about men-only spaces? Is that enough, or do you need more?.... Car babes at car shows is also banned in most countries as well now due to feminism. In Darts (a sport in the UK), they used to have attractive female models for when the players walk out into the arena, that's been banned as well now. And who can forget about what happened to the scientist Matt Taylor for wearing that shirt. Not only that, but I'm a gamer, and I know for a fact that …
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:39 PM
3

Banish feminism. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 10:35 PM
66

Be a perfect adonis superhero who can do no wrong with chiseled abs, perfectly sculpted face, etc. and is impossible to actually live up to And feminists have the nerve to moan about Barbie setting "unrealistic" standards for girls and women. https://ibb.co/hDmD0nL
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:08 PM
50

Don't forget crap like Affirmative Action, MeToo, Duluth Model, Divorce Courts, censorship and banning of any "sexy women/female characters" in entertainment media that men like, ridiculous misandrist laws like making men looking at women illegal, making wolf-whistling at women a crime, etc. And that's not even including the double standards of feminism, which would make it even worse. Feminism is a cancerous ideology and movement that needs banishing from the planet.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:16 PM
7

The comments section of that article is a disgrace. Pretty much all they talk about is how bad the NHS is and how stupid the Woke language they're using is; there were very few who pointed out the sexism in the job hiring.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:02 PM
2

Another feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:43 PM
2

Men have supported feminism through the decades. How do you think women got the vote and equality? One thing is for sure though, is that the majority of women/feminists are very reluctant to support men who need equality.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:58 PM
8

That's a poor deflection and a poor attempt at avoiding my question. So I gather that by the fact that you refused to answer my question, your opinion would be that you're perfectly okay with women going to male strip clubs, thus you being a complete hypocrite?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:50 PM
1

That's not what I said. My point is that men are also expected to be and IS being made to provide, cater to and be financial slaves to women, which dispels the long-running myth of only the woman being the "slave". I would question the use of "slave" when it comes to women in housewife roles. I'm willing to bet that there are women actually naturally enjoy such a role. And no, being a housewife definitely does not mean "being treated terribly and like a slave" at all.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:08 PM
1

Women working and making money does not negate the expectation of men having to provide, cater to and be financial slaves to women.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:25 PM
35

Some posts taken from the comments section. As usual, lots of a whataboutisms from mostly female posters: "Good luck to these women! Have your fun, blokes have been doing it for years in Thailand and such places. Time for the woman to have theirs." "The women can stop when British men stop sex tourism in asia" "Men do this all the time. Imagine if Thailand, Malaysia and The Pbillipines reduced exports...!" "men have been doing it for years" "Sad old men do it with young girls in the Phillipines …
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:10 PM
1

My vacation days are filled with catering to men lol, and you honestly think that men aren't expected to provide, cater to and be financial slaves to women?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:51 PM
2

If he was random creepy looking dude in the same situation, all the women who support Johnny would be supporting Amber Heard.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:48 PM
1

Men have always, especially now, have been nothing but providers and financial slaves to women. But yet women are always the "victims".
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:44 PM
3

I think it's interesting some women are turning their back on feminism - many of them know it's flawed and become a monster That doesn't mean anything. Always remember that a woman does not have to label herself a feminist in order to have and hold feminist ideology and beliefs.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:40 PM
4

So you're for retribution and not equality.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:38 PM
3

Well of course, after all feminism has never been about equality.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:33 PM
2

Feminism was needed then and is needed now. Name a right by law than men have that women don't in the West. There are plenty of issues that men have a right to protest about but demanding women be feminine and submissive to men? Nah fuck off. Funny how you're quick to point that out but fail to mention that women now already demand men to submissive providers and financial slaves to women.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:29 PM
1

No. But I need to see some level of progress along the way if I am to believe that "feminism is losing".
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:14 PM
6

It’s great Depp successfully sued, but he’s a very rare exception. The vast majority of men don’t have the money to sue. Not only that, but the average man won't get the support from women that Johnny gets. Most of the women who supported Johnny is because he's the handsome and famous Johnny; and also because a lot of these women are jealous of and hate Amber Heard. They wouldn't do the same for the average man in the same situation.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:12 PM
5

It depends on the club for rules. Exactly, it something that the club enforces. I know for sure that due to the feminism and MeToo horse s**t, the majority of female strip clubs have been forced to make it even more stricter for the male audiences (not that it already wasn't); to the point where the actual clubs could get shut down if the rules are broken. (because feminists/SJWs will be informed of this and thus the lynch-mobbing begins) To my knowledge, there are no such rules for male strip c…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:03 PM
10

However, you can bet if women were as visual as men They are just as visual as men, don't be fooled by the long-running myth that women are somehow not as focused on looks when dating a man. If you saw most women's dating profiles on the major dating apps you will surprised, it's usually always the demand of the 6/6/6's or 6/6/6/6's. They want both money AND looks in a man. There is a reason on why average/ugly guys get outright rejected by women, not even giving the guys a chance to express the…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:45 AM
6

What about women who go male strip clubs, especially the ones that already have boyfriends or married that go to them with a group of women? Is this "absolutely gross" as well or is this somehow "different"? Because when it comes to strip clubs, women behave like animals in male strip clubs; whereas men are always strictly instructed by club rules to sit and watch in female strip clubs, or at least keep a distance and not touch.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 10:11 AM
4

Some of your comments made here suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:53 AM
11

I didn't ask you anything, this is the first time I've conducted discourse to you in this thread. Face it, you feminists don't want equality. Instead you want retribution which leads to female supremacy.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:55 AM
11

Because "incel" is associated as a male thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:45 AM
44

Feiminism is not losing at all, in fact it's getting stronger as each month passes. If Feminism really was losing then you would see: - the sexist pro-woman policies and laws be reversed (Affirmative Action, Duluth Model, etc.) - the feminist institutions and organizations burning to the ground - the mainstream media and news media stop peddling feminism - the mainstream media and news media attack feminism (oh how I wish this) - companies and businesses stop the feminist horse s**t and stop cav…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:16 AM
8

I appreciate you coming here and discussing these topics. "discussing" Sounds more like boasting to me.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:05 AM
17

I believe in men's rights too. That's why you were boasting about these aspects elsewhere in this thread then? "We are attending university at higher rates than ever before in the past and now dominate universities over men." "We now dominate certain industries that men previously dominated, so this is good."
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:04 AM
4

I see that your inner white-knight finally got the better of you. Enjoy your time at FDS or TwoX.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:56 AM
72

She got a little peeved and started telling me how wrong that is and how men just go there to see women's tits and ass! Tell her that there are male strip clubs and that the female audience that go to them are allowed to touch, molest the male strippers and perform fellatio on them. However in a female strip club, the male audience can only look and are not allowed to touch, otherwise he gets kicked out immediately or reported to Police for sexual assault. I'm willing to bet that your girlfriend…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:50 AM
15

The problem is that Affirmative Action is actual law, which means that it automatically qualifies as legal and just. That's one of the reasons on why it wasn't mentioned. It just shows you how feminists have completely subverted the system to the point where clear and blatant discrimination and sexism (against men) can be seen as "fair" and "lawful". I just hope that I see this disgraceful "Gender Quota" practice disallowed and banished in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:45 PM
29

A selection of posts from the Comments section: "The amount of butt hurt incels in these comments....LOL! Bad news fellas: you're part of the problem. Stop with the whining, excuses, and lumping all women together as one." "Well you triggered them if nothing else! At least they get to spend the day ranting about women again." "So live up to those standards then or quit whining!" "Men are gonna die alone with cats. Who's gonna cook and clean for them eh?" "Men need to stop watching so much p o r …
/r/MensRights16/08/22 04:39 PM
12

Yeah. Im against that. I bet we didn't hear a peep out of you when Gillette ran those misandrist adverts.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:01 PM
27

Also 95% of mainstream media, news media, etc.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:37 PM
5

I think Crown Paints have tried to be pandering Woke s**ts, and it's backfired. The reason for those lyrics is basically a promotion and normalization of polygamy (only for the woman of course), as if to say that it's acceptable and normal, and that the man treats it as something that is okay. Basically, he's cucked. Crown Paints have upset both sides. They can rot.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:57 AM
1

Feminists advocating for it to be against the law and writing the laws.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:56 AM
1

A pile of horse s**t slides. The reason on why the perpetrators are mostly men is because in a lot of countries, the law is defined that women cannot be r@pists. So of course it's going to skew the statistics into depicting men as the "majority" of r@pists.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:52 AM
47

lol, the Normie minds will not be changed. They still see Johnny as the evil one, and Heard as the victim. Same with the white-knights and male feminists.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:47 AM
22

Women are doing the same thing now with MeToo to all races of men. Normal service really.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:44 AM
8

"good" feminists lol
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:42 AM
6

Yeah, it's really hard to take someone seriously after they've said that. He's putting his life on the line to defend women on these issues over and over again in this thread, so he no longer gets the benefit of the doubt. He's a male feminist or a really odious white knight.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:50 PM
2

The "hundreds of other policies and laws" is obviously a figure of speech. There are more policies and laws that definitely benefit women; and I can give more than 90 social points that definitely put women in the advantage over men, such points which a lot of are indirectly the result of biased laws which favour women. Why the constant aggressive white-knighting though? I though you were for Men's Rights? Are you a male feminist in disguise?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:47 PM
3

I thought you were for Men's Rights? Why do you keep protecting and arguing for women as if your life was on the line?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:35 PM
2

The women's game also brings in less money/revenue than the men's game as well. So yeah, so much for "equality".
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:00 PM
6

It’s really just not a healthy mindset to encourage And it's feminists and SJWs that are the cause for the unhealthy mindset. it’s genuinely worrying that boys as young as 15 are this terrified of false accusations And why is that I wonder? You should know, given that you seem to be part of or side with the parasites who demonize boys and men at every turn. Not to mention another subset of this group having a disgusting habit of making SA or r@pe stories online without Police reports nor evidenc…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:52 PM
1

If you are to go ahead with it, be prepared for the SJW and Feminist backlash that will happen, and this may even include coverage of it in the media or even mainstream media. If it is covered by these sectors, expect an extremely negative tone of it. Also be prepared to face allegations of "sexism against women", "misogynsy", "discrimination against women", "chauvanists", "incel club", etc. Wishing you the best of luck.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:31 PM
8

But the overwhelming majority of Congress is male. Men are in charge, Women make the rules with their voting
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:27 PM
6

Imagine believing that a female sports star worth $260million is having a hard life.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:11 PM
13

Threatened/abused a lineswoman as well.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:09 PM
32

I was wondering when a white knight rushes in to save the day.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:00 PM
11

I didn't say name a person directly, I said naming the movement.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 12:57 PM
19

Naming the movement(s). Why bother making speeches if they're not prepared to directly name the culprits that are causing the problem?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 12:48 PM
17

What, just that ONE unicorn example out of hundreds of other policies and laws that favours women? You should realise that there are women are pro-life who are happy with that decision as well. Get out of here you white knight.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 12:35 PM
5

There's this thing called biology, meaning that men and women are naturally different.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 12:01 PM
-1

So, no this will not involve any scantily clad women. Can we have calendars and posters of scantily-clad women though
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:40 AM
16

All things that are enforced by men. Men are in charge, Women make the rules
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:31 AM
5

Ah yes, the "we're better than that", "don't be the horseshoe theory" cards etc etc etc And people wonder why the Men's Rights keep losing.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:30 AM
23

I mean a group of men just recently made a political decision about women's bodies that women didn't get a say in. When was the last time that happened to guys? You ever heard of mandatory child support payments and circumcision? Stop being a f**king white knight.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:55 AM
39

Rowan Atkinson made a decent speech about in his movement "Feel free to insult me". Made his speeches but yet didn't have the guts to directly name the culprits causing all the woke BS, namely feminists and the LGBT. Same with all these other old British comedians, they make speeches about how they're so against censorship of speech, but never name the culprits causing it.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:50 AM
31

we are both getting fucked by the same bullshit system "both" Women getting f**ked by the same system? Surely you're having a laugh right? Do you even realize who gets massively favoured in Family Courts, Divorce Courts, Education, the Workforce, Politics, Law and Sentencing for crimes? I'll give you a clue - it's not men.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:05 AM
85

This isn't really about the money; it's more about furthering the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:00 AM
115

Also the same person who whined about the women's game not getting the same prize money as the men in the Tennis Grand Slam tournaments. For those who don't know, in the Tennis Grand Slam tournaments, the men have to play the best of 5 sets; while the women only have to play the best of 3 sets. It is a major difference regarding the amount of effort, endurance and time needed between a 5 set match and a 3 set match. Of course, being the gynocentric white-knighting society the world is, and due t…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:58 AM
67

I support women's rights They have more rights then men in the West. There really is no need to keep spouting that line anymore in these areas. Ironically, it's actually men's rights that need to be supported, due to the ongoing erosion of the rights of men.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:47 AM
43

"South Korea’s, hypergamous women who seek higher-status mates compete for a small pool of economically attractive and educated men." She missed the fact that this small pool of men also has to be very physically attractive as well. Now that women are making money (often more than men), they want the world when looking to date a man. But yet, men are still blamed for being single and told to "step up"; while women are never told to lower their ridiculous standards. Good on the South Korean anti-…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:45 AM
17

Don't listen to the cretins who are telling you that you don't need the camera and to just "go out and have fun". They're just saying it blindly or have an agenda to lie to pretend that false accusations don't happen. Just because you're not an adult doesn't mean that you're immune from false accusations from girls/women. If you're falsely accused, the law may treat you with leniency during the investigations because of your age - but society (the people around you) will lynch-mob and ostracize …
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:01 AM
1

This is a learning experience for you, you'll be better for it. There is no knowledge that is not power.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 08:37 PM
76

Add a "WO" before "MEN" and watch this billboard get taken down in less than an hour after it's put up.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 08:34 PM
3

You're not for equality, we get it.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:24 PM
6

eVeRy DaY iS mEnS dAy
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:12 PM
13

I agree it’s unfair on men You were doing well up to that point. Then the rest of your post turns into a pile of misandrist horse s**t excuses.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:55 PM
2

Well that was an infuriating read. Very blood-boiling to read about someone bitching about so-called "sexism against women" when it comes to male-only scholarships, but yet at the same time also opening admitting and making excuses for female-only scholarships. I realize the article was 5 years ago, I'm guessing the male-only scholarship and it's creators and funders were cancelled soon afterwards.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:10 PM
5

There's loads of misandrist policies like this. Let them have all of those too right? You're a f**king disgrace.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:07 PM
1

Efforts to get more men in nursing would be welcomed in my books. What a lazy tacked-on comment to make it appear as if you're for equality.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:01 PM
27

everybody is supporting her and calling her ex out for lying. Seriously?? The result of decades of SJW and feminist indoctrination and moulding of the average person. As Yuri Bezmonov warned.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:22 AM
13

Looks aren't the most important part. Having the right kind of personality is also vital. I didn't say that having the right kind of personality isn't important though. The thing is, if you took these two factors (looks and personality) and compared them, I would heavily argue that looks is the more important factor because when dating, looks is the first thing that determines whether the man gets the chance with the woman. They'll lose interest within 2-3 interactions if you don't have a person…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:58 AM
20

Yeah, it is known as the "three sixes" or "four sixes". It's a term used to answer the question of what women want in men.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:51 AM
25

I don't want to be heard out. That's because you know your opinion will be a load of white-knighting s**t that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:38 AM
30

It's about the total package. That'll be why a lot of women on Dating Apps have "will swipe left if ur not over 6ft tall" and "don't dm if ur under 6ft" in their profiles? Go and white-knight elsewhere.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:36 AM
151

What " skills " are we talking about here? Be handsome, over six foot tall, have a six pack, have massive arms, have a you-know-what that's over six inches, have a six-figure salary, etc.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:56 PM
14

Second, certain academic fields, namely STEM, have wild under-representation of women. Why? Because of systemic bias towards women The "under-representation of women" is down to women naturally going for other jobs of their own free will. There is no "systemic bias" against them, so you're talking utter horse s**t.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:34 PM
0

No it cannot, because Men's Rights do not have any control of law nor does society favour Men's Rights. And besides, it is known that in Men Right's, we are always quick to call out anyone "radical" and not for the cause of equality. Unlike feminists. Your argument of "The same blanket statement can be thrown over you guys." is a lazy one to deflect away, and it does not hold any weight. Also, your term "blanket statement" is not true because the reality is that we have not seen the so-called "g…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:29 PM
19

Can these f**kers be sued? I strongly encourage that men who have been the victim of their discrimination (and there will have been) to take legal action, perhaps even a class-action-lawsuit.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:10 PM
1

"healthy relationship standards" = "men need to be handsome, over six foot tall, have a six pack, have massive arms, have a six figure salary, etc."
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:59 PM
2

Perfect, once the birthrates hit Japan levels everywhere, they'll start wondering what the fuck is going on. And they'll pin the blame on men entirely for it. "men need to step up" "men are inadequate" "men need to take responsibility" "all the red pill nonsense has turned men into incels" etc.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:33 PM
2

she compromised because he is good and she wants to be with him. i.e. she discovered she couldn't attain the taller and better looking guys.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:21 PM
1

You're not the only one. Most of the time, the general profile of an average woman on a major Dating App tells you everything. "will swipe left if ur not 6ft", etc.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:18 PM
2

The "fix" for these issues is men contribute more to the health of the relaitionship etc is the gist of the article. How about the woman contribute to the health of the relation as well? And as for the "fix", the real genuine fix would be that men stop being ball'less slaves to women.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:12 PM
14

The level of white-knighting.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:09 PM
30

And you know that if the gender roles was reversed, the platform would be shut down almost immediately and the men on it will be identified and cancelled.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:54 PM
2

Indeed. There's loads of other examples as well, such as some of the Diet Coke adverts, some of the old beer adverts, Magic Mike, Twilight, etc., if the gender roles were reversed in those mediums, the female audience would be getting their pitchforks out.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:35 PM
75

Well of course. On the major dating apps, a study discovered that women find 80% of men unattractive and/or ugly Feminism's "empowerment of women" nonsense has caused women to have superficial standards when looking for a man (handsome, over six foot, six pack, massive arms, you-know-what that's over six inches, six-figure salary, etc.) Feminism's "Body Positivity" nonsense, which has caused even average and ugly women to have the same superficial standards as mentioned in Point 2 above Feminism…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:30 PM
0

We can talk when the so-called "good feminists" unite and properly go against the "bad feminists", causing/resulting in all the biased misandrist laws and societal misandrist treatment of men being stopped and instead being revised/replaced with actual fair laws and fair treatment. Actions, not words.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:00 PM
2

The amount of white-knights in this thread who think women should just get a slap on the wrist for making false accusations of r@pe. Dear lord.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:07 PM
6

I bet reasonably criticizing women appears as "woman hating extremists" to you though.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:53 PM
3

Men make up the vast majority of those in government, and are therefor the ones who then make the laws. Men are in charge, Women make the rules
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:49 PM
4

I understand lying about rape can get the innocent person a long time in prison Stop pretending that you care about that.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:46 PM
3

You can spew all this claptrap about how moral you are but your movement's actions say otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:30 PM
4

honestly feminism needs to start calling psuedo feminists because the shit they say is harming us Nah, they and you won't do that. You've had at least 60 years to call them out and you haven't done so. And that's because you've been too busy reaping the privileges and benefits that the radical feminists have brought you. Both you and the "psuedo" feminists have the same goals at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:29 PM
6

No-fault massively advantages women (75% to 80% of divorces are initiated by women), so that's why the feminists will be mad at such a proposal. They're terrified of women facing repercussions for cheating on the husband instead of walking free as if nothing happened and then going on to ride the c*ck carousel.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:54 PM
24

"i WiSh I hAd A tEaChEr LiKe ThAt WhEn I wAs At ScHoOl"
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:33 PM
14

What are sexist moments in tv shows that piss you off? When a man is sexualized/objectified in any way for the pleasure of women, and everyone claps, praises and cheers it. Also the female audience (if it's some talk show) wolf-whistling and hollering about it. Even more infuriating is that there is never an equivalent for a woman on the show. Because you know that if the gender roles are reversed, it suddenly becomes "sexualization", "objectification", "misogyny", "degrading", "creepy", "pr£ver…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:02 PM
3

Rejecting this idea is freedom! Problem is that you are deemed an "outcast" by society, in the same way of how in the olden times, the villagers get the pitchforks, stake and hay out against that one man who is different to them despite not having done anything wrong. It's a disgrace on how the "a man's worth is measured by what a woman thinks of him" thing has been ingrained into society.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 04:49 PM
1

I wonder if it's really "biological", though, and not just socialization and cultural imprinting. In which case it could be de-programmed (but could take a generation or more). Definitely socialization and cultural imprinting. In history, Kings and male rulers were the most powerful people - strict, stern, tough, conquered countries and cities, kept everyone in check, and had harems of beautiful women at his call. This is biological. Nowadays, men are pretty much just emasculated and ball'less s…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:54 AM
41

I imagine society and feminists reaction to this is: "she needs help, not jail" "the boyfriend must have treated her so badly" "she was defending herself" "her father has a lot to answer for" etc.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:19 AM
1

The signs were already there when 1st and 2nd wave feminists told black men to sit at the back of buses and handing out white feathers to humiliate men.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:15 AM
1

Anyone who believes in "Positive Discrimination" needs to be kicked into the sun.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:33 AM
1

Well that was an infuriating read. At what point do men fight back over this I wonder. Can the ACT and the construction industry be taken to Court? Men seriously need to unite and do something about this, otherwise it only gets worse.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:06 AM
4

But even the attractive men will date down and f**k down though. So he's right that women who are 4s, 5s and 6s get to f**k men who are 8s, 9s, and 10s.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:44 AM
27

Indeed. The article frames it as if it's all the men's fault, and that the women are already perfect in which the men have to get their approval and validation. I bet this p*ick hasn't written an equivalent article with the gender roles reversed.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:35 AM
17

Another pile of Woke anti-male garbage that completely puts men at fault for not being able to get dates with women. The article mentions that women have gotten "increasingly selective" which is true, but this is massively downplayed as he then says: "I hear recurring dating themes from women between the ages of 25 and 45: They prefer men who are emotionally available, good communicators, and share similar values." He forgot: men who are handsome, over six foot tall, have six packs, have massive…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:31 AM
17

Why is there so much onus placed on penis size equating to manhood? Because it's one of the best ways for women and feminists to mock, insult, degrade, humiliate, damage and hurt a man because it's something he cannot do anything about.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:56 AM
1

It’s pretty interesting. Not really, I was banned there quickly after making a few reasonable comments.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:53 AM
2

Do you have a concern about that being illegal? He'll be advocating for that to be illegal of course. JFC, what's wrong with people? Gynocentrism and white-knighting. Two of the biggest diseases on planet earth.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:04 AM
4

my only concern with making them illegal is that it may prevent women who actually get assaulted from reporting out of fear that if they don’t have enough evidence they’ll be in legal trouble. Or the women can actually take actual measures to obtain evidence. The excuse of "it stops real victims coming forward" should no longer be acceptable to justify not outlawing false accusations. It's happening far too often and too many innocent men's lives are being ruined or ended.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:03 AM
3

And what does people changing over time have to do with my comment? It means that people (women in this case) can change and raise their standards in dating. Please, try to reply without name calling. That's rich coming from someone who told another person to "Go touch grass" like an SJW.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:51 PM
17

If only more women could just admit that they're misandrists.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:13 PM
1

Yes and no? Why would i want attention from superficial people like that? Because that is most likely your only way to get the women (or at least the women you want). You already said you don't have the looks. And besides, the money a man makes and have is part of him anyway, it's what makes him who he is. Just like how women who wear make-up is part of who she is. When women date men, she won't love him for just him. As well as good looks, he needs to have other factors such as money or/and sta…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:44 PM
21

What are your thoughts? Protest and riot outside the main EE headquarters, South Korean Anti-Feminist Men's Groups style. EE won't change no matter how many hashtags, emails and phone-calls of complaints you make/send to them. They will only change if the MRM does something to make EE "fear" them. It really is time for men to take a leaf out of the feminist playbook.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:34 PM
6

People change over time you cretin.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:28 PM
16

Not as much as it did in the past. Women are now demanding super good looks in a man as well his money, as evidenced through all the major dating apps. And this is even the average looking women making these demands.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:21 PM
22

Every time they do they get shut down by: - being called "incels", "sad", "pathetic", "anti-women", "lol this one cannot get laid", etc. - being told "you need to better yourself", which has a massive fallacy to it because a man cannot change his face and height naturally - being told "stop moaning, no woman is going to be interested in you if you keep bitching", which has a massive fallacy to it because the women were not interested in him even before he was complaining; and the fact that women…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:19 PM
2

The term "Man Cave" is basically a term that implies that the woman owns the house and that the man doesn't. You know, in the "her house, her rules" way. Just imagine the outrage if a man publicly said "there's a Woman Cave in my house for the girlfriend/wife". Even if it's said as a joke.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:57 PM
6

let alone any space in their own homes. If the man is lucky, the girlfriend or wife grants him permission to use the garden shed a "Man Cave". If he's REALLY lucky, he gets to have a Man Cave in the smallest room or basement of the house.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:16 PM
5

bUt It StOpS rEaL vIcTiMs CoMinG fOrWaRd
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:30 PM
4

You've gotten so tedious in this thread now. Go back to FDS and white-knight over there.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:28 PM
2

The shirt is correct in the way that girls/women have pretty much taken charge of the most important areas that indoctrinate and govern a country's citizens - namely society, education, workforce, law, government, etc. We all know that men are the ones who built civilization and keep the world running, but women/feminists are indirectly calling the shots. As the saying goes: Men are in charge, Women make the rules
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:07 AM
3

I genuinely believe women are naturally more picky than men So do I, that was my point really. and its not something they should be happy to be cursed with. It's not really a "curse" though, because women have the option to date down and be less picky. Therefore it's actually them being superficial/shallow. A real curse would be a man who is born ugly or/and average-looking and/or short in height, because those are things that a man cannot change. It'd actually really suck for me if i was that p…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 08:50 PM
10

The moron who said that have contradicted himself/herself. If women have to think of financial and societal positioning when looking for man then that means that she is picky, resulting in men having a far more difficult time when looking for a woman.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:09 PM
6

The shirt's message is actually correct. But yeah, the double standards are infuriating.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:06 PM
49

For example, if 7 women say they were drugged by a man in a bar but it was never proven... and my sister says she is going for a drink with him... assuming all 7 women are lying and not telling my sister anything is terrible advice. The 7 women in the bar could have planned and conspired to screw the man over.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:04 PM
199

Will be censored/deleted/removed soon.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:59 AM
3

No such thing as "red pill women".
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:49 AM
3

Also don't forget, in the UK under their laws, it is defined that women are not capable of r@pe. That's also another factor that would mask it to it make appear as if this kind of thing "doesn't happen" in the women's league.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:40 AM
6

Institute of Misandry.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:52 AM
29

Only to people like us, who are aware of the feminist misandrist s**t. Everyone else (the normies, sheep, white-knights, etc.) will see this as some sort of marvellous thing to be praised and celebrated.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:47 AM
5

Indeed. The citizens are basically paying money to install more misandry.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:45 AM
3

Here comes the white knight to save the day.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:45 AM
7

Or the statistics are skewed and that there's no unexplained pay gap at all.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:29 AM
4

The problem is society, education, companies, institutions, organizations, law, government, etc. that believe and peddle the wage gap myth. If these sectors didn't do that then there would be no problem.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:26 AM
10

Another feminist concern troll. Anyone who uses the term "incel" to directly or indirectly mock men should immediately be treated with suspicion. Or better, just outright dismissed.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:23 AM
2

Except that the difference is that regarding the two groups you mentioned, they are both universally known to be bad and universally hated without question. However when it comes to Feminism, there is a major grey area in that the majority of people actually think and believe (being fooled into) that it's a good thing, meaning that the movement/ideology always gets a pass, and makes these people believe that a woman is marvellous for following Feminism. And also if you take into account the elem…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:04 PM
1

One day, men should congregate together and put an end to this $h1t. Won't happen, there's just too many white-knight and Tradcon types.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:17 PM
0

Do you think feminism is hurting women in the long run? Feminism directly or/and indirectly brings benefits, privileges and advantages over men in society, social situations, finance, education, work, law and government. So no, feminism is not hurting women the long run. The notion that "feminism hurts women as well" is one of the biggest myths on planet earth.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:58 PM
12

I need help figuring out where I went wrong "So asked a girl out" - that's where you went wrong.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:34 PM
2

Why’s this a bad thing? Treating innocent men who have done nothing wrong as potential r@pists and SA committers is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:40 PM
24

Okay, some women are MRAs, I agree. But I won't discontinue to associate most women with feminism, because the elephant in the room that's always missed is that women do not have label/call themselves as "feminists" in order to have and hold feminist values and beliefs.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:27 PM
11

She is the result of all the Social Justice and Feminist indoctrination in the last decade. Very bad times ahead for men.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:18 PM
7

If possible the man should also start using his phone to record the psycho as well once he backs away.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:47 PM
152

What the logic behind only having mixed and female only places ? Hidden misandry Feminists and women want to demonstrate their power Take rights away from men Generally make it miserable for men "women are oppressed"
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:26 PM
3

This is an issue and it's been brought up regularly for the 5-6 years. Unfortunately until someone or a group actually does something about it, it will never change. Another problem here is that the parents of daughters won't care, and instead will actually want to keep it the way it is. I would say take a leaf out of the Feminist's playbook and use their aggressive tactics to get the point across, with the difference that our issue is genuinely factual (boys falling behind in education). This k…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:03 PM
5

Let me guess, this c**t faced no consequences for her misandry?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:40 PM
2

Do you not realize that men can be falsely accused of r@pe or SA without even having any contact with women?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:21 PM
3

Women are into and play football as well. So that means they must be not right in the head as well then right?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:18 PM
0

Sarcasm noted white-knight, but I was talking about the general differences of perception towards the "male" and "female" toys.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:32 AM
15

And making the female players take the training means more ounces of prevention and is worth more pounds of cure. Unless of course, your white-knighting levels are so obnoxious that you believe women are not capable of committing sexual assault and/or r@pe.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:12 AM
20

I think male football leagues have a much harder time with this issue than female leagues. Im not sure any female athlete has been accused. The people that should be put through this are the people that are dealing with issues and right now, professional male athletes are definitely dealing with the most issues. Though if women professional soccer players start having lawsuits pop up all over the place like the men, they should definitely have to do the training as well. The other male players/m…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:45 AM
4

Yet, the female players and staff in the women's football are not required to take the mandatory consent training. Same applies to other sectors as well, such as in colleges and universities. And don't give me the "oh but female players/women are not getting accusations so they don't need the training" crap - the other male players/men have not been accused either and they need to take the training despite doing nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:41 AM
12

Nice big ol' smiley mugshot of the pretty lady for the header image. Same with female teachers who get caught doing the unthinkable.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter