~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People should be consistent with any criticism they have with men.But I agree. The missing piece of the conversation is the understanding that discourse is but a function of purpose. Indeed a thousand different voices will come together to conform behind the same narrative, because it does not matter what is true and what it isn't, and what is right and what is not - all these considerations are instruments, not goals. The purpose itself is of course that which you know already; to claim victimhood for oneself, and assign guilt on others. This is true for any … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/06/25 04:12 AM |
| 4 | People should be consistent with any criticism they have with men.You'll forgive me, I am not sure that I get the point you're trying to make. Me what I meant to say is that when we complain about the seemingly psychotic irrationality of 'society' we are actually grouping a whole bunch of different opinions together as if belonging to a singular, contradictory person - which is not the case. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/06/25 03:51 AM |
| 10 | People should be consistent with any criticism they have with men.Don't base your understanding of the dynamics at play on a Goomba Fallacy; those who say one thing are not the same people who say another thing. "So which is it? This or that?" It's not any one thing, because human social dynamics are not defined along a singular narrative. If you find that to be the case, you are in all likelihood experiencing an echo-chamber from which you should remove yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/06/25 03:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter