TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheWheatOne Archive

View 6 posts and 485 comments by TheWheatOne on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Great summary. I've seen a sea of instances like this, but its just literally so common and thrown out it actually became too normal culturally for me to identify without topics like this reminding me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 10:47 PM
3

Could be a real difference. Male and females experience difference symptoms for heart attacks statistically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 12:40 AM
12

I've no doubt all that material used to avoid violence against women is still within their model of women being victims, seen as weak children that need to be coddled by the patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/21 10:56 AM
9

That's your own social construct right there. You are right that it exists, but that is of your own making, as well as theirs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/21 07:53 AM
5

I've had plenty of both, its usually just your self or your environment that limits that interaction. While there are clear social divides like gendered restrooms or biological ones, like body size, in the modern world it simply does not matter as much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/21 07:52 AM
8

I'm honestly just tired of romance in general. It feels so bland and artificial, like someone using a checklist of tropes. Its always the platonic relationships that get deep into great drama-based stories, such as dogs and their owners, war buddies, cop partners, sports rivals, and so on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 05:27 AM
49

In what world would they still post this? Feels fake.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 02:31 AM
2

Do you have any evidence I can look at? This is totally new to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/21 10:50 PM
1

Guess that guy should just have died then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/21 09:13 AM
0

Sadly people don't understand that flawed people can still be deeply connected to us, and losing them is not just as simple as walking away. Its an emotional roller coaster. If you need venting and critical resources, I suggest the Salvation Army. They helped when no one else did: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARVhlM5MjEQ
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 06:37 PM
1

Got evidence it was deleted by MensLib mods? Sounds juicy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/21 12:50 AM
2

I seriously hope so. Poe's law in action.
/r/PussyPass04/02/21 04:21 AM
6

This reminds me of the old tumblr list. Wish I could still find it.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 09:16 AM
2

Got any sources that support that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/21 03:59 AM
5

Eh, maybe ironically to show how annoying it ultimately looks when other groups use them. But I'd rather not encourage these methods for serious arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/21 01:39 AM
3

I never denied it. If anything, I stated it to be more so, since their death sentences are so rare for the exact same criminal acts as men.
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 05:41 AM
4

You're right, not sure why the downvotes. Appeals against execution happen all the time, its just that women rarely get those sentences in the first place.
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 02:19 AM
1

All those studies must be wrong. Its more believable that women are specifically are superior to men in fighting off worldwide pandemics! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/21 08:43 AM
1

The things you talk about seem pretty common actually. One of my group members sounded exactly like you, but they've found a purpose to go on and live happy despite the pain. I myself definitely feel a lot of what you've said. The things I want are simply not possible, and few people desire me beyond being acquaintances. However, when I looked at the world at large I realized a lot of people were like me or worse and still lived gratefully. Once people can be together again, perhaps you should t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:30 AM
1

Can you give sources for these?
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:31 AM
3

Have you messaged the mods about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 10:18 PM
1

Got a source for that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 06:11 AM
2

Offering abortion as the solution when you well know that the one you're replying to is against that morally, at least up to a point? Why not offer infanticide, or terminating all refugee camps, or killing all refugees as well?
/r/MensRights25/08/20 07:28 AM
1

This seems hardly a gendered issue unless evidence exists of them statistically more likely to do so. A lot of people are just ignorant of vehicle traffic communication, or misinterpret the signal, myself included. Jumping to conclusions is what get the gender wars so riled up.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 12:18 AM
1

They downvoted because most "pro-choicers" don't like the thought that they are actually have to prioritize bodily choice over life with personhood. Its less about giving choice of bodily privacy and rights and more about anti-personhood to those entities they feel unworthy of it. If some hypothetical situation happened where a full innocent human child who could think and feel (Lets say they are 6 years old), was forced by a risky act to be inside another person (who made the risk) for many mon…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 06:30 AM
2

I would like to know though, do you think killers who murder pregnant women should be charged with two deaths?
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:45 AM
-10

Very debatable. Many pro-choices who still prioritize bodily choice concede that those hours away from birth are likely children, or at least persons. Its just that its still okay to kill them. I'm surprised more pro-choicers are not more frustrated that most third-trimester abortions are illegal.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:29 AM
1

Almost all criminal acts involve victims. Should the government leave all victims to fend for themselves? Not once did I say to pay the female rapists. Not sure where you got that from.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:54 PM
4

Point is, the children is a victim as well, and should not be expendable. They should both be cared for equally, with the primary one paying the price being the rapist, with the government as a back-up.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:52 AM
1

I'm not sure why this sub cares. Is it not pro-choice? The entity could be perfectly healthy, but she could abort it for any reason whatsoever. Because she dislikes who the father is, what skin it has, what sex it is, her financial situation, or maybe because she just likes the way it suffers when being aborted by ripping apart its limbs in the most painful way possible. Its still her body, and her choice, which takes priority over the life of the entity inside, person or not. This is about righ…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:18 AM
4

Oh, yes I know about the issues. I was referring to your comment about changing diapers being a low point and war accomplishments being a high point. They were vague and could be interpreted on a whole range of issues. Perhaps the comment should have been worded a bit differently to more directly refer to education, low statues, and birth rates.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 09:04 PM
19

That's good? One of MRA's issues is how pulled from their children fathers are, most critically not just from an emotional perspective, but a legal one as well, as their lack of time with them is used against them having custody in divorces. Parental leave for men has been advocated for a long time as well, not just from a legal standpoint, but a cultural one as well. Japan for example has it in law, but the incredible shaming and indirect threats show it has yet to be enacted on a large scale. …
/r/MensRights26/01/20 07:37 PM
2

Agreed. Until proof is found by the court or through extremely obvious actions, like in video or audio recording, it should be a standard for both sexes to allow institutions such as churches, therapy, and schooling, to help with legal and emotional self-defense. Mob mentality is devastating to those who are falsely accused.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 04:36 AM
8

Holy shit. They make MGTOW and TRP look like saints.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/19 02:04 AM
1

Whats just as baffling is the comments mad at her, when they're just as guilty for automatically believing her and putting on so much social pressure that the guy killed himself. Fuck off.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 08:41 AM
10

Its a reminder just how hardcore echo chambers get on any side. Many years ago it had some good well-argued content, now its just a massive circlejerk full of bitter people.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:35 PM
0

*survivor
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:24 PM
2

What U.S. state is that? Isn't that pure discrimination? On women of all things?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:03 AM
3

Generally pro-life? Any pro-life statement I've seen here is downvoted. Any sources in this sub of exceptions?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:41 AM
3

What you posted is a classic case of not showing context. The topic was clearly about how horribly women are treated in a 3rd world country, not about 1st world mens rights. It would be like suddenly talking about modern slang in english when in an english class that is talking about Shakespeare's novels. Its only passively related and is out of focus to the conversation.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 06:28 PM
4

Uh huh. What a pitifully wrong set of thinking.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 08:48 PM
5

Are females who don't become biological mothers failures too in your mind? What about transgendered with no offspring?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 06:13 PM
-4

Wow, these comments and upvotes make me sad. It makes me glad that, as biased and corrupt as the courts can be at times, its still better than mobs of common people.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/19 11:51 PM
2

My favorite is Hitler. When a social issue comes up just say Hitler repeated and at some point you reach enlightenment.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/19 09:01 AM
-3

Yeah, this is a pretty early repost.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/19 08:17 PM
-2

Saying that there are no countries where women are less oppressed is clearly false. Men can have it bad too in those countries, such as killing gays, gang deaths, and so on, but the sheer limitations and vulnerability to laws as well as criminals clearly fucks (many times quite literally) women over as a standard. Even most enforced drafts to the military are a percentage, not a whole demographic. They are literal legal patriarchies where they decide all of what women are allowed to be, do, and …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:23 AM
-2

Major as in enough to be the gender which is far more dangerous and restricted to be as.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:19 AM
-7

What the fuck? There are still very serious restrictions for women in some countries where its clear males have direct authority over them. Such as Syria, Saudi Arabia, Libya, and so on.... Don't go from one idealistic extreme to another. They can't even show their face, drive, or travel without male escorts. That doesn't even count all the child marriages for girls and all the places where there are underground sex slavery where the police are bribed to let it continue. I definitely understand …
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:37 PM
0

So is the same with any source of pleasure until they feel the negatives. They ultimately hate the act that lead to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/18 06:13 AM
2

And he hated it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/18 03:00 AM
3

Someone already has you beat with being the victimist victim to ever be victimized. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/18 01:09 AM
6

How so? Young women are attractive to men, so from the girls' perspective it would be extremely easy. Women are also far more likely to have taken away their virginity compared to men. There is a reason only 1 in 3 men pass on their genes compared to the near guaranteed rate of women despite only having a limited window by age. Obviously the huge taboo and legal crimes prevent the man from accepting the offer so easily though.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/18 12:52 AM
6

???? Young women love older men even more.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/18 12:09 AM
0

Lots of threads like this prove just how much men are sexual lust machines. Whenever I see MRAs say men are logical wise beings I just laugh. Men love the thought of being virtually enslaved by woman if it means sex. It doesn't matter if it means having to pay child support or working their whole lives for alimony from women who intentionally get pregnant or become gold diggers, they will continue to do so. Whenever I see men committing suicide due to women's manipulations of them, much like thi…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/18 12:08 AM
1

Worthless straw-manning.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:01 AM
6

That's good advice that feminists are saying. No one should blindly trust people they just met. Preparing defensive measures, including mentally, to minimize risk is smart. It doesn't have to be full "build bunker in case of worldwide disaster" type of paranoia, but a general understanding that predators of all types take advantage of blind trust and assumptions should be in mind.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 06:44 PM
7

Yet another story to support why I won't ever legally marry.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:16 PM
10

That is utterly hilarious.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:37 PM
1

To be fair, insurance companies do it all the time, such as when calculating car insurance. Males pay more because they statistically get into more serious accidents.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:51 AM
2

Title is clickbait. Nearly no one helps either of them.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 10:53 AM
7

Definitely discouraged by society though. I don't think even this sub would be willing to allow a man do that.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:46 PM
2

While I sympathize with the situation, the title makes it seem like he went to literal prison with a permanent mark on their record, not a pseudo-equivalent.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:17 AM
1

I definitely can blame the guy here. What the fuck does he think when he sees an agreement like this showing $500 million? It should be the biggest red flag in the world. Its literally there for no other reason but to fuck him over.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:58 AM
8

First off, this is 100% perfect example of strawmanning. Two, it doesn't even stand on its own legs, considering how much liberals moan at how active pro-lifers are in introducing policies to stop abortions any way they can, including voting Trump in to get a pro-lifer in the Supreme Court. Three, what the hell does this even have to do with men's right besides some stupidity in logic? We could put nearly all of TIA in here if that was the case.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 01:23 AM
1

By the article, it was the sister.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:29 AM
1

What the fuck man.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 07:14 AM
4

Reading through that.... $120k I know bloodlines can be valuable to some, but holy fuck man.... I'd rather adopt for far less to save those who are already in need, then give the extra money to some efficient charities. Having biological children simply being birthed and still be in sole legal ownership is way too costly for the average male. I would think having the right to verify if our children are our own, and being able to both sign off on birth certificates, instead of mothers first, woul…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:23 PM
4

Doesn't this just make the experiment unscientific then? You have veteran male soldiers against fresh from school females with far lower standards....
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:20 AM
15

That moment when you see Milo and /pol/ on the front page of a site that is populated mostly by feminists.....
/r/MensRights14/04/16 11:00 PM
3

Those comments though.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:19 PM
2

That was definitely one of the more depressing stories I've heard of....
/r/MensRights26/03/16 10:14 AM
8

Ah, the extremely rare, token white boy.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:25 AM
2

That was a no holds barred beatdown.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:29 AM
12

I'd say the same of men too. I don't think its a gendered issue of who would hate MRAs more.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:51 AM
2

You say it sarcastically, but I actually agree. The more this happens, and it already is to a notable statistical degree in western countries, the more debates are forced to take place. Just look at the standard "Where have all the good men gone?" articles already up. Even if their standard argument is to shame men, it still laughably is making even the likes of Jezebel look at questions they otherwise ignore completely.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 08:05 AM
2

This is a repost. Not sure how long it has to be before acceptable to be posted again.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:59 AM
8

He's being sarcastic with the logic used. Obviously he does not expect women to automatically make him sandwiches.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 10:07 AM
3

Those facts are obviously transphobic then!!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:59 PM
4

You expect no self-hypocritical laws not following themselves? I've got bad news for you.... Here is the section in question: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/eoa2010250/s12.html
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:50 PM
3

If you have an argument refuting the above as the ignorant circlejerking nonsense you think it is, go ahead. If you're not willing you could have left silently. Instead you're showing angry disdain that can't be backed up in reason. All that does is rally people on the fence about these issues to go to the side you disagreed with, including my own about alimony.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:29 AM
1

It was not on google drive. They likely had another origin, such as http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/01/male-feminist-rules-to-follow/ Though its been years I believe it was linked as a pdf.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 06:56 PM
2

I looked for it in my history, but sadly after a long time I cannot find it. It was here in this subreddit though, so if you want go ahead and look. Its probably at least a year or two old now.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:24 AM
14

I remember someone satirizing that in opposite, with the MRA documents telling what female MRAs should do (with the exact same structure as those files). It was unironically criticized as extremely sexist and proof of MRAs being evil. Much lols were had.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 12:59 AM
19

Ahh, the wonders of marriage, children, the courts and police.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:02 AM
1

Stop stop stop. That statement is perfectly fine on its own. This isn't about pro-life or pro-choice, or abstinence or reproductive rights. Its not even about equality or responsibility. Nature does not give one shit about any of this. Its the FACT of sex leading to children, since the dawn of life making up the sexual system of reproduction. Sure we can get into technicalities of being infertile and/or having artificial pregnancies, but the act of sex for the vast majority will always involve t…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:31 AM
3

I really don't think this is /r/relationships specifically. Its more like the general disposition of everyone. The mother's emotional needs are paramount, even in legal fraud not being pursued as a possibility. Its always been this way for the majority of cases.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:07 PM
3

Well, for women. I don't know many men that regularly use make-up for everyday presentation, unless its like a huge scar or burn or something like that.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:58 AM
1

Lol, advocate?! I'm saying it exists and it is off this world. How is that advocating it?! You're so into your own mindset you're continuing off-topic about how bad Capitalism is, while typing on your computer bought with money, and saying how it is based on murder and theft. You've said nothing refuting capitalism as the reality. You want human's nature to be better than that. You want a society based on things that help others. But the truth is nature doesn't care. 99% of all species are extin…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:08 AM
1

I think I'm understanding your chain of logic. You want specific things to be, including success, to of course, fit to your mindset. I'm not talking about those things though, I'm talking reality. On that we agree, I've said that humans can be one or the other based on what they find themselves in, they are not good or evil by default. This conversation, you seem to think, is about saying how bad the flaws of capitalism are, when the truth is, I don't care about that. It could kill 1 billion peo…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:18 AM
1

You're right this isn't the place to discuss it, but I will say your insistence that humans are good, is far more like your quote in "You're free to think that, but there is no scientific evidence to support such a dogmatic assertion." than it is mine, where I state how creatures, including humans are for themselves, has far more evidence than yours, given you yourself state that even in our wealth, there are still many in extreme pain. My "only game in town" where "capitalism has been successfu…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:51 AM
1

It does so well it basically boosted us through the industrial revolutions of so many nations, where the innovations and mass production of products and good boosted the masses at an extreme rate compared feudal systems of parent to child, or caste to caste, or old barter trades, to the point even China is communist in economic structure, only in name, after it saw how well Hong Kong was doing. Compare South Korea to North Korea. Japan before and after foreigners came and forced them to moderniz…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:14 AM
1

Look, despite all of its flaws, there is a reason capitalism does so well. Humans are neutral, only colored by parenthood, family, friends, society and situation. I've no doubt in my mind in some disused parallel world it could be us born joining the White ISIL in out in America or Europe or where-ever willingly, but people don't like to think that our free agency is not powerful enough to limit that degree of evilness in all scenarios. Who and what we are born into, both internally as male or f…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:47 AM
1

No shit. No action would be taken, of anything, if it were so absolutely universally unacceptable. You might as well state x is x. If no one liked eating pizza universally, it would not be likely made, and never eaten. If people absolutely liked wearing purple on tuesday, then they would do so, even if that somehow meant them dying. Why? Cause its so absolute it doesn't matter if they die. Your statement is of itself. Obviously that is not the case though in murder, given targeted killings do ex…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:35 PM
1

That's because they're synonyms, lol. The only difference is neutrality in tone, and range of it possibly being accidental, and without intent. And of course murder is used in legal terms, just as rape and arson and burglary and so many others are. That does not stop it from wider usage, as if we cannot say "His government had him murdered to keep its secrets and own interests." such as with Boris Nemtsov, but hardly the only one where it is a strong possibility. Your total blind eye to my examp…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:16 PM
1

You line everything up with legality in definition, and therefore acts on outgroups in your mind don't exist. Do you seriously think when a soldier aims a gun at an enemy and pulls the trigger, that that is not a targeted killing? Why do you think there are terms like target-rich environment? Of course that is legal murder, trained for, to be as intentionally lethal to the enemy as possible and save as many allies as possible. To deny that is the very act of 'dehumanizing' opponents. This very s…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:52 AM
1

And with that I realize you have nothing to counter with.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:25 AM
1

No, murder is murder, legal or not. They're intentionally trying to kill the enemy, which are humans, sapients. The morality for most people about that is it needed to end the war, but of course people might argue the war isn't needed in the first place. Point is, murder, justified or not, lawful or not, is still an act that takes place in or out of war. The definition in a dictionary does not change by situation, though of course courts or the public might want to change the way they talk about…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:38 PM
0

Because rape isn't tied to legality. Its tied to the one not wanting sex, being forced to have sex. In the case of 7 year old girls being married to adult men without a choice, and then they are allowed to have sex with them legally for pleasure and bear him children. Legally its not rape in their definition since it is within marriage. The opposite happens sometimes in some countries where its ironically the male being forced to have sex with his wife or face prison, since it is their duty, in …
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:56 PM
-2

Well obviously, otherwise bullies/thugs/nations could not trust one another enough not to kill the other. Kizzan talked of recorded history's societies not being okay with rape, when there is tons of evidence there has been. Just because rape happens primarily toward an outgroup does not make it any less of a rape. Just to be clear though, most of those sex slaves were in their own community (though obviously some distance away from home so they could not easily escape or be found by family). An…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 03:51 AM
0

Never? I know quite a few that took glee in raping the women of conquered states as part of the prize. Quite a bit of Europe's population descended from them, along with parts of Asia. The most notable (as in mass militant) one being the Rape of Nanking in recent times. I doubt if they won they'd be considered criminals. There are many others in military-side ones, including for men, where its ironically the male victims who their society is not okay with. Then there is of course the technically…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:56 PM
3

Signing the contract helps against those pursuing lineage, but I have indeed heard stories (can't remember links, too long ago) where they have been overturned in court in the interest of the child or mother.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:59 AM
1

There are many reasons outside being gay, where a person does not have to deal with the process of marrying the other gender. For one, not wanting to marry.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:00 PM
2

Huh?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:03 AM
2

I am so glad I don't have to deal with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:28 PM
1

First time I've seen someone link to their own comment in the same comments section outside of AMAs as the host.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:11 AM
8

This is so laughable I don't know where to start....
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:02 AM
6

That's their choice of financial hardship, not the man's. The whole point for so much of abortion advocates is that it allows a woman that choice, and now they have it, responsibility and all. Except not. Its the man's responsibility somehow, as if conception is the trigger to their 16-21 years of accountability in funding the woman and the child. Not fetus or embryo, the CHILD. Pro-choice often give the argument that the value of a human life is at the very least, later in the pregnancy where t…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:12 AM
1

Apparently, if you want to attract women. They can't make you do it obviously, but doing what the other gender wants is usually a strong motivation to doing certain things.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:33 AM
7

I'm amazed someone from WP actually stated the reality of the situation. Reminds me of the love/hate relation I have with the Daily Mail's articles.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 06:58 PM
12

I disagree that the matter can be quickly resolved. Many companies and trollish individuals have shut down channels before, and it took quite a while to set them back up, if at all. I'm not saying it doesn't happen (being quickly resolved), but its not a guarantee at all.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 09:48 AM
3

You overestimate the morality of human beings.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:39 PM
1

What the shit....
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:37 PM
1

I don't know, I definitely have issues with this, but a lot of the same lines of logic they talk about, I've seen agreed with in unrelated issues.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:34 AM
1

Both have their heads up their asses at various points.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:35 AM
1

Ehh, I'd argue about this, but this isn't exactly the preferred arena to discuss logical chains in justifying some action. I will say though, that I've seen quite a few people, both here, and with many feminists, liberals, and even 'progressive' Christians who accept this "radical pro-choice" stance. They definitely seem quite sane, and their peers and allies consider them moral, at least to the point of standing up for them and continuing to do business and activities with them.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:26 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand, why is killing a 7lb baby in the womb (ignoring method) bad from a pro-choice point of view, if the mother wants it dead?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:08 AM
2

Heck, I remember meninists being laughed at here, since the earliest mention of it still supported feminism.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 08:30 PM
2

Actually, I've seen quite a few discussions here wanting women to be more of the breadwinners.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:46 AM
20

How dare men not trust me with their entire future.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:14 AM
1

So, what do you want to talk to me about then? I linked to other areas where its relevant, both in this subreddit, and to redpillschool's own comments relating to his beliefs. And you say no to them. I also explained why you'd be downvoted, regardless if you disagree with it or not. And I stated already why I think association by username and beliefs don't go by the standards of judging by comment content only, in there why I think you gave a potshot. So what is there to talk of, perhaps besides…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:26 AM
0

Nah, its just an opportunity you wanted to use to target TRP when it wasn't talked about. He could have supported stalin's communism for all I care, despite murdering literally dozens of millions of his own people, (more than the Holocaust!), and it still wouldn't matter. I've seen plenty of Hitler-did-nothing-wrong type usernames, which even in jest, is still in extremely poor taste if you think about it. Or how about Stormfront, or White Supremecy, which I've seen too? I really don't care what…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:11 AM
0

No, they likely downvote since you take such a strong stance of associating any posts content, like say, redpillschool talking of dinosaurs or sports cars, and linking those comments unrelated to his name, as okay to associate with thoughts you don't like, in his username, which you yourself seem to detest. You seem to do this again, with thinking people here who are downvoting you gives evidence that MensRights likes TRP. I've felt association shaming before, and so has near everyone else to so…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:48 AM
6

Definition of potshot: "a critical remark made in a random or sporadic manner." You not fleshing reason out basically makes it more so, when it competes with other extreme positions that I listed. The potshot was you saying its the worst ever in anti-intellectual thought, when what he was talking about was being downvoting based on username. Now that's random. Now if he was saying how great TRP is here, then you said something negatively about it, I wouldn't call it random.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:41 AM
7

A pot-shot if I've ever seen one. There are tons of other movements/parties/theories with far less intellectual reasoning. Even if a lot may think TRP is total crap, it still has a chain of logic that holds ground in their mind. Things like Flat Earth theory, tribal religions, prehistoric asexually reproducing human women, and whatever else, make TRP look positively sane.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:03 AM
4

As someone who's gotten the same type of experience, without even taking sides, I can confirm this is how it goes.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:03 AM
1

He said ignored except when its actually relevant. Calm down.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:51 AM
3

Its progress guys. Haven't seen an article this positive about dads in a long time.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:18 AM
4

Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:01 AM
1

Links? Just for proof's sake.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:48 AM
2

A phobia is not rational, and it is not something they can control. They could even like men. We may fear cats if we've never engaged with them for example, but that doesn't mean we hate them or want harm to come to them. No reason to attach this to either men or women. Or would you want to define phobias as rational, including around MGTOW's fear of women?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:02 AM
13

Well, at least he acknowledges he has some reading up to do, though his disabling of comments and ratings reeks of disallowing criticism.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:56 AM
3

Welp, I think Picard is going to have some competition today in the facepalm department...
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:31 PM
2

Segregation is still normal for genders. I doubt most of today's women would accept it. Its the same with public restrooms. Despite how successful family and unisex restrooms have been in other countries, its still an unacceptable alien concept in the U.S. (only seen two family restrooms accepted in crowded places) Even with same-sex orientations, and prisons in particular, having rape as a possibility in gay behavior for men, and at least considered sexual assault with woman on woman, is a norm…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:09 AM
2

Those comments.... Its as if her act of trying to run them off the road, very likely killing them, doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:59 AM
2

Did you not read how I said in general (not just the awards shelf) for most literature I look through? Heck, even my writing classes in college had a slight female majority. They had no sign of distress at their prospects over getting published over males. Not one of them complained, and all 3 classes were very open to these sorts of thoughts, as getting published is a big thing, and it was looked at closely. We had to buy a whole book simply to look at how huge the listings were, on where to go…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:55 AM
5

No, its you who doesn't recognize all the great women who write. I see so many books by women on award shelves, or just in general for most literature I both look through when buying, and personally read. I see no reason to claim bias, at least anymore than child care and elementary teachers who are mostly female or firefighters and police who are mostly male. Just because an outcome is slightly skewed in one direction does not mean bias. There are people who get murdered for writing yes, should…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:16 AM
4

Considering how many women win awards for their books, and the richest bookseller is a woman, I don't doubt there is little evidence for why this is needed on an international level. Perhaps in local areas that are culturally and legally unlikely to buy a book by a woman, it might make more sense. For people in this generation, that have nothing to do with the past, I'd understand them being pissed at being unable to win a traditionally equal award, suddenly being awarded to one gender, which th…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:42 AM
7

One of the few people who could probably call out everyone without anyone able to touch their reputation.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:01 AM
2

Wow, I'm actually surprised how many named "Other".
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:57 PM
1

Because what they've grown up with in terms of culture, to open themselves to a fact that so much of it is wrong, is like popping you've been in your whole life. Its very uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:45 PM
3

Is there a full version of this video?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:11 PM
2

Well lets not say that she's scum yet, lets assume she's going by her own logic first. if "Women have to tend to the family and make babies" perhaps she means she'd like women be forced to sign papers to be raped by men with good genes, to get pregnant for the good health and regrowth of the country. I'm sure all the dead soldiers would decrease the population a bit, especially when facing a country with an economy, military, and a stockpile of nuclear warheads many times their own. So perhaps i…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:40 AM
2

Yeah, title is misleading.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:32 AM
1

I actually was questioning if you were or not, but I went along with the logic, and did my own sarcastic response. I've learned quite a few times that even the most blatant sarcasm is not enough sometimes. It depends on the whim of the first up/downvoters. The circlejerk will follower in whatever direction afterwards.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:30 PM
5

There you go everyone, if you wanna do something stupid and illegal, just consume alcohol. Blame the bottle, not the accused. Maybe make alcohol illegal itself again. I'm sure that worked out last time!
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:38 PM
5

Yeah I always found it funny how such a huge term in their theories, patriarchy, is misused so badly. Then again, I've seen such misuse in a lot of core English words.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:05 AM
4

I agree, but most people value pain over death. When I say value, I don't mean in positive desire, but out of fear. Pain is constantly in people's minds to avoid, out of primal instinct. Most people would rather die than experience two years of torture/rape/etc..., even if it were somehow guarantee that they could live happy afterward.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:46 AM
13

Sorta, at least in the air and special forces, but most are tribes, iran, and iraq divisions.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:43 AM
1

Is it automatically given?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:20 AM
1

Doesn't matter if its not enforced. Affirmative action, family courts, restaurants and bars, insurance companies, have played with them for years.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:11 PM
1

The same damn one where the elderly, families, veterans, get discounts at theme parks and other resorts, where restrooms get uneven quality and quantity of toilets, sinks, and baby diaper changing stations, and where insurance routinely bases data by sex and age, and colleges issue affirmative action and mothers get default child support. Its also the same one where all these things would be flipping their shit at lawsuits for having higher prices for blacks or giving advantages to whites, or pa…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:38 AM
3

True, but it does minimize risk.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:22 AM
2

Never thought I'd see a fellow celibate here. Permanent, or the chastity until some event(eg.marriage) kind?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:21 AM
2

I am so glad I don't have to deal with this sort of stuff.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:10 AM
3

As you can see, the joys of the marriage system....
/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:15 AM
2

Say that to parents who cut boys foreskin haha. And something tells me feels would definitely still be involved should there be a way to prevent the death of an unborn child without getting body rights involved. (at least anymore than vaccines/medical exams/fitness tests/required pills/etc...) Theoretical example: Invention allows teleportation of child into artificial womb with no harm/pain to a woman (to the point she doesn't even know it is missing or that anything was done). Should a man use…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:26 AM
3

I don't know, I've personally been downvoted here long ago for saying abortions can hurt the father too.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:15 AM
1

That word cloud was amazing. I won't spoil it, but I'll clue by how it basically defines internet arguments.
/r/PussyPass07/02/15 11:14 AM
1

Not if it the editors have an agenda.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/15 08:59 AM
1

I'll agree with this once I see rates go down for ethnic minorities to amusement parks and so forth. They do it for the elderly already, or for families who have to pay less for children. Statistical realities and demand-side economics dictate they can get more money if they do this (because they already do this), but they don't for race or sex. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:11 AM
2

Because divorce lol. Its a statistical reality as much as the economic advantage built through vulnerability.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:05 AM
1

I don't know, band wagons happen everywhere, even here, and a few people have had circlejerking done against them. That said, that happens everywhere, especially with reddit's default voting systems encouraging it. Its just that people here are a bit more cautious of information, and a bit more ready to reveal inaccuracies in articles they would otherwise support by opinion.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:00 AM
3

Explain?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/14 01:51 AM
0

Not really. That's getting into the same vein as the patriarchy being ever present or internalized racism. PP is definitely there as a behavioral pattern in society (like male soldiers rescuing female ones in particular), but it is not a foundation so innate that it acts like seeking sexual partnership or laws based upon parenthood.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/14 12:39 AM
1

Its like she isn't a person, an adult, a parent, with responsibilities. She's just looked upon, by default, as a woman. How ironic.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/14 05:54 AM
1

She still damaged property. I'd like to see what the courts would say.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/14 04:11 AM
47

Such a justice boner right there. Just the little things can uplift people haha.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/14 03:00 AM
3

Perhaps she still has the right to define how smart a child has to be before being considered human?
/r/PussyPass10/11/14 05:47 AM
1

Stealing is acceptable, depending on what you are, it seems.
/r/PussyPass03/11/14 05:52 AM
12

I want to say /r/thathappened but I've seen similar things myself.
/r/PussyPass29/10/14 07:20 AM
3

I almost want to see his reaction if he saw both pregnant.
/r/PussyPass08/10/14 07:33 AM
3

That was incredible.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:15 AM
3

Basically imagine Nixon (Watergate) represented game journalism, who in private said really messed up crap, and to the public no one knows the truth, until someone tapes it. Well, it happened. And now someone like the person in the video, who's lost everything due to the shaming and corruption in the industry he wanted to work in, finally feels like he's not alone, and that people care about correcting it.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:33 AM
6

She was drinking. How could they charge her for something she had no control over? I see nothing wrong.^^^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/PussyPass17/09/14 07:57 AM
0

Him saying you were the biggest pussy isn't right, but I understand his intention behind it. This is needless drama being brought forth, and I'd delete it.
/r/PussyPass07/09/14 09:15 PM
6

Both parties overreacted. However, kicking while down is inexcusable, when he's clearly just trying to get away from them.
/r/PussyPass07/09/14 09:12 PM
2

It just depends on values. A child can be a demon to some parents. One story was of how a mother said her daughter was the worst mistake of her life. In other words, its not always the greatest thing in life, for some people, for all manner of reasons. My own is not related to the examples, but lets just say it makes it unlikely that it could be the greatest thing in life for me, be it already owning one or not.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:23 AM
6

I don't understand. How exactly were the kids even an issue when he was not attacking them?
/r/PussyPass30/08/14 04:39 AM
1

And this is why I don't even consider biological children an option.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:03 AM
2

The irony is like it reads like a manual to making a bomb. Its definitely satire, but these reasons could actually be used to manipulate people, which is sad, and the worst example was one where it might force their boyfriends into marrying. What the hell man.
/r/PussyPass29/08/14 12:07 AM
1

I didn't think the image was linked to TRP at all, but I wanted to make sure and see what the reaction would be. But I will make note of the few people here making assumptions of the questioner not knowing, simply for being inquisitive and thorough about this. (given the downvotes) For the record though, I've known and read about TRP years ago, including its general philosophy, and considered joining, so the assumption was wrong. Even if I was a totally ignorant person though, his comment had no…
/r/askTRP28/08/14 10:23 PM
1

Don't take TiA so seriously I don't, which is why I asked it here to make sure. I don't know why its apparent to you that I'm relying on strawman beliefs when I haven't even stated any beliefs of mine, and only claimed to have basic knowledge. It does make you seem hostile to me at least, which is kinda sad, considering I actually agree to all else you have said before coming here.
/r/askTRP28/08/14 10:10 PM
-2

You clearly make assumptions. Not that it matters regardless, since it doesn't help answer the topic at hand.
/r/askTRP28/08/14 06:26 AM
-1

What made it attributed to the TRP? Just a rogue poster or person who mistook it as a real TRP belief?
/r/askTRP28/08/14 06:25 AM
28

Its not the first time I've seen such from AskReddit, but at least it gives more material to link to for nay-sayers. Thank you for the link.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:26 AM
2

Not sure if I'm missing anything. Shouldn't this be pussypassdenied?
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 11:39 PM
3

Society: Don't worry too much, she shouldn't really be charged for murder. 12 years is just too much. Its just a couple of very late term abortions.
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 04:23 AM
1

Although rarer and less intense(usually), a very similar chemical situation happens for males. Its usually the state of mind when you hear about an infanticide by a father shortly after birth. Its not investigated as a mental illness or other condition though when in court though....
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 06:58 AM
1

You're skipping my point of all I've said in this chain up to now. Its not the scenarios, its the statistics. I was simply clarifying that person's position, yet you kept on making all these other hypothetical parallels to move the goal posts. I don't care either if you are downvoted, I was simply showing that there were reasons for the downvotes that I saw were linked to negative manipulation, such as the misdirection out of the core points of why the scenario was brought up. I'm neutral to how…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:09 PM
-1

Lol. I have to assume, because your question has only one word, and you followed it up with that stated position. Anything I say in reply to that has to follow some assumption because you don't give enough information about why you are saying "So?" followed by your position. This is not about what we think of incest, but of what AVFM position is by including it in a blanket statement when they have not talked about incest as far as I know. Your position has no bearing on that.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:42 PM
-1

I have not even said anything about my stance on incest. Please don't assume.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:08 PM
1

First you imply that that 40yr old guy doesn't deserve that responsible wife, but now you say the responsible man doesn't deserve the female. These are both extremes where the guy is painted badly by default, and when I counter with a gender reverse, you pull to the opposite extreme situation out of no where. It has little baring to our previous discussion and is called moving the goal post. Like I said, it has nothing to do with ideals not being found. Super rich guys marrying top attractive yo…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:10 AM
2

You are implying actually. I'm not that description, it was simply a mimic situation for a man, relative to a woman, in what they have to do to get such a goal, where another person is willing to give so much in terms of money and risk in divorce. Many women have been married by their personality and beliefs alone, and its seen as a success story, even if its a woman "who is unattractive, unaccomplished, and has little in the way of money…". Do they deserve a rich husband? You're going beyond th…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:28 AM
5

And maybe he could become the next Oprah as a female too, but that doesn't seem likely either. I think he was assuming though, that reality does not always go in people's favor. I'd like you to see what it would be like to be a fairly average looking guy in your 40s, who does not have much in accomplishments and has little in the way of money, somehow attract a women with enough income for two, who'd willingly share it with you by marrying. Its a daunting task. The truth is, this happened to a f…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:32 AM
5

Women don't usually marry a man for his looks and personality alone. They look at his financial situation. A man usually takes up the responsibility for the majority of income, especially for children. I don't care if its a social construct or biological motives. Its obviously there, for good or bad. If a women wants to go against this norm and be the sole or majority income provider for a stay-at-home husband/dad who would get alimony after divorce, they can go ahead, but its not likely to happ…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:31 AM
1

Your first part was unneeded. I was referring, obviously(I would hope) to adults consenting, since, incest or not, its illegal to have sex with a minor in the U.S. and most of the civilized world. And no, I have not even stated my stance on incest yet, so how can I play for an argument? I am simply showing what such words mean if taken seriously, which it should be, given these are specific target goals. And for the record, consenting adults have nothing to do with legal bestiality. That seemed …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:23 AM
13

Because a rich woman would be extremely unlikely to marry him in such a situation.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:22 AM
-1

"Prohibit state interference in any sexual relationship between consenting adults." Wow, I didn't know AVFM actually would use a blanket statement like that. I do hope they understand that includes incest, and I doubt they specifically support that.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:18 AM
3

Considering how many names are called out on reddit with accused rapists/abusers, compared to mass censorship like this.... Yeah.
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 09:57 PM
3

Wow, that's one heck of a counter.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:40 AM
3

Ah yes, the "justice" court system.
/r/PussyPass17/08/14 09:28 PM
1

I cried. Definitely saved.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:04 AM
3

The 54-year-old, who was said to have had “some form of relationship” with her lodger, delayed reporting the death because she needed to tidy up after finding the body. What the fuck? Try saying this same exact reason as a man.
/r/PussyPass17/08/14 01:14 AM
5

What? You mean that pretty rock and expensive family party with a kiss, all just to sign a piece of paper saying "We love each other" isn't needed?
/r/PussyPass16/08/14 09:24 AM
1

As dumb as golddiggers are, I doubt they are a fool for marrying a rich old guy. Same goes with just about anyone marrying millionaires while they have near nothing. So far as I'm concerned its a great plan. All they need to do is divorce a few months or a year later then call for alimony, or make a baby for child support. Very smart.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:18 AM
3

I sometimes wonder what it would be like to see a website or blog that fully dedicates itself to reversing stuff like that. More than that, I'd like to see what "people for equality" say about it.
/r/PussyPass14/08/14 07:17 AM
5

I'd like to see how movements that support equality would react to this, being that it should never be done by either or both are allowed in these sort of "friendly" situations.
/r/PussyPass14/08/14 07:11 AM
25

Its more about what happens when a man does relatively the same thing. Media berating/infamy, jailtime, etc.... She gets.... money donations.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 09:58 PM
1

I actually lol'd. Good job.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:59 AM
1

I laughed.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:49 PM
1

Source? I'd actually like to use this, but I can't remember.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:46 PM
1

While I agree with a case by case basis, the pitting men and women against each other, is more by what people see in courts, in terms of punishments and statistics, and then see an injustice or bias, and most on both sides want to correct that in some way.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:44 AM
1

Thank you for the view. Although I'd like to assume the following, since you said this isn't a gender issue, I'll say it just in case. If a father was manipulative and abusive, would you, or feminists in general agree he also needs that type of intervention (meds/therapy). In the past, I usually found some answers to be about how the abusive man needs to be taken out of the picture entirely, usually be legal release of the children (with child support of course still) and/or putting the father i…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:40 PM
1

In an ideal world, yes you should have been born, but your situation seems like nature at work, and is the norm of how it goes, especially today, where that ideal nuclear family gained traditionally, is incredibly rare. I would be grateful personally, that she didn't have her way in the end, both in pregnancy and in containing your mind. Regardless, I'd need more views from the various feminists themselves.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:45 AM
2

When I said that, I meant for me.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:03 AM
2

I do wonder how feminists would react to this. No, seriously. It would be great to have informed insight into what the majority treat cases like this as.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:01 AM
-5

Its not natural, and neither am I. Edit: It seems people don't like things that are not natural! I've definitely been a victim of that before, and have been laughed at, but I understand their stance. Its how things are I guess.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:05 AM
3

I've always wondered if this advice also translates to never calling the police. With a lot of policies that have been talked about here, it seems simply being bigger can get you arrested and questioned, even if the victim.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:43 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/PussyPass26/07/14 06:27 AM
1

The reality of politics aimed at a mainstream audience too indifferent to research the topics at hand.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:23 AM
1

Thank you, this does give perspective. Still, the latest one was aimed at children. Not exactly good.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:27 AM
1

Holy shit. I couldn't make this anymore sexist if I tried.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:10 AM
7

I'd suggest going to /r/FeMRADebates which despite the name, is not about female MRAs, but about Feminists, MRAs, Egalitarians, and other people discussing gender with supporting arguments. Its far more regulated (much to the criticism of some here), but it is far less aggressive in tone, in terms of opinions and statements.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:28 AM
2

The comments sure seem lighthearted at a domestic abuse victim that was shot by a person who's shot another partner before with no charges.
/r/PussyPass21/07/14 07:32 AM
1

I'd like to see a twin article on this by them, talking about being a women. And somewhere in there say "On what it means to be a woman: It think it can only be defined by two things..." I think the aim of the article is sympathetic and an introspection on what men are doing, but its still got a way to go to think outside the box they have lived in. At least they are trying.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:36 PM
1

The whole point of equal parenting is to directly take out assumptions like that on both sides. You are a good example to put forth in taking out these misconceptions. If you want to help, you have to give your voice out to not just the MRM, but more general egalitarian groups or parenting groups that fight injustices in divorce and family courts. Men's Rights is obviously going to focus on male issues, and it certainly does not claim to be a totalitarian justice movement that encompasses going …
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:08 AM
3

So what does the future look like for you, in terms of the mask at least? Become the mask or continue to wear it indefinitely? Nuke the library of insanity by suddenly sharing everything? Just one day delete everything silently? Use them for further trolling? Use them for 'donations'? Or are you doing that already?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:05 AM
1

Truth be told, I think you are right to a degree, but it won't stop. This is a very freedom-oriented sub that hates 'tone-shaming', as you have no doubt learned in the conversations here. In some way I think its just needed as stress relief, as these people have otherwise no where else to tell of their frustrations with these types of people(hypocritical/male-shaming/dismissive). The ironic is that the 'hate' (which is technically more anger to me, but that is for another discussion) actually ha…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:55 PM
7

The negatives of being objective and humble toward the arrogant and condescending....
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:54 AM
1

I'd like to see this problem up front. Even the most provocative posts about feminism here in this sub have not addressed them as specifically women that are online posting, at least, by what I've seen.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:35 AM
3

Those comments in the video. Holy moly.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:27 AM
2

Just to warn, there are a few provocative groups for MRAs, like AVFM, which do get the job done (in bringing the voice out as loud as they can) more than the rather low-key members, but do so in a way that incites hate and anger (or at least sarcasm and satire). It might be good in a way, considering how slaves and other minorities in the past have had to go through a similar process in order to be taken seriously, and to show their grievance out in the open. On the other hand, some think its th…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:17 AM
1

I think this is the 3rd repost of that buzzfeed post.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:53 PM
6

Those comments. It bleeds objectivity.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:09 AM
1

Nearly all of the middle east? They are stoned for showing their body and can be in basic slavery by being forced to marry at a very young age. In India many cops turn a blind eye to sex slaves abuse in exchange for 'compensation', be it monetary or their own free rides with the girls. I don't have the citations on hand, but it definitely does happen.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:21 PM
0

Ehh, it depends on culture, not time. In some states it is still acceptable today. Still, what this shows is that it was still viewed negatively to some degree for some western nations in the past.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:31 AM
2

Parents are naturally fearful of their children meeting the wrong person, and may be defensive at anything they do. For girlfriends, this is less of a problem, but it still happens. For this, I don't hold it against her, its just how nature intended many parents to be. Just tell her its your own right as an adult to decide who you associate with, and that its also your own responsibility, not her's, now.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:29 AM
4

Semantics. I'm pretty sure you know what he meant.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:08 PM
3

Dang, more history on this could be helpful.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:50 AM
6

Technically nothing bad about it, considering how MRAs here strive for more male specific resources. The inequality is simply the indirect share of funds to these campaigns, given the natural lack of empathy toward males. It is also why a lot of in-power positioned VAWA supporters think of male resources as a competitive threat, when the funds might not go to places like that womens' campaign.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 10:40 AM
2

An earnest question. How does it feel, not to be an MRA that is hated for all manner of unfounded reasons, but as someone who put a lot of trust into those groups, that are now attacking you? I myself have been through this, both in real life and online, but I'd like to see another person's perspective on it.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:55 PM
2

Its situations like this that make me laugh in sadness, when I see people berating others for practicing chastity, abstinence, and celibacy.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:12 PM
0

Overall its for parents and legal guardians only, so basically those who are legally single are disallowed from the park.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:37 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:56 PM
1

If its within their own funds, its totally fine by me. I just don't rate females above other groups. For example its about a 1 in 100 chance for asexuals, and who are constant bombarded with sexual messages, and they might want to hang out with there own to take off that stress, but that is unlikely since they are not recognized, and are fairly silent about their ordeals. Furries are also a constant laughing stock target of sexual deviance jokes, and they are definitely out there, but are unlike…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:22 PM
2

What I was referencing about 'more females play than males overall' was my counter to "Gaming is dominated by males". Nothing else specifically like FPSs or MMOs, just overall. Actually, for the starcraft community it is a legal region lock, not racial or specifically restricting one nation like Korea. Koreans, if living in other areas, do still participate and can often win. The truth is, I would normally not be against this at all and I agree with your reasoning, however in competitive gaming …
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:09 AM
1

Perhaps we should have black only events so they can do the same, considering how many asians and whites proliferate the scene. Ironically if you look at the statistics of various demographics, females actually outnumber males, as a whole, in playing video games, its just that its almost all casual facebook and cellphone and flash games. Regardless, I'm not sure why you need to specifically find gamers of your biological gender, or why you'd specifically need events for your group only, when its…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:56 AM
3

Despite her rather biased assumptions and lack of knowledge, she makes very good points that remind me of why I personally dislike AVFM, and why I think in the long term this sort of confrontational style of attention is horrible. I'll say it right now; while this conference was a step forward, it is not in a direction I like, and even then, I wouldn't consider it a success or a failure. Its a mixed bag. If it were in the style of a movie and review, I'd give it a 6-8/10 score or something like …
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:25 AM
1

That is an incredible story. Nice find.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:02 AM
0

I'd give you gold if I could haha.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:51 AM
3

Well, to be frank, I'm kinda new to reddit still, and do not know how to put a description with a title link. I thought about putting a comment right after, but I sorta wanted people to form their own opinions about the spread first before stating my own as a comment itself. But yeah I probably handled it incorrectly, and at this point I think deleting it would erase too much of the discussions going on. Sorry.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:49 PM
3

It was more a report of it catching on imgur, a popular website, rather than the content itself, which is fairly general info that has been known for a very long time here. This was actually made by a feminist who said the usual "this is why we need feminism" line. Its a pro vs con situation, where its obviously raising a ton of awareness surrounding male issues and the need for looking at both sexes equally, while in a way covering up a lot of the apathy of meaningful support to help solve male…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:38 PM
2

Male Privilege at its finest?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:08 PM
7

Why was his name publicly stated in the article? Is he not a minor?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:54 PM
1

I'll just start by saying no matter what is written, any lawyer, interest group, ideology, or culture can make it mean what they want it to mean if given enough power, or just not enforce it, or enforce it beyond its original means. This is why the spirit of a law is so important, but even that can be defiled by verbal manipulation of intention within what the lawmakers were doing in drafting it in.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:42 AM
1

May I ask why I'm being downvoted? Do people value the repetition of posts to get the issues out there above the spam-ish qualities of it?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:38 AM
3

Agreed. Thank you, it warms my heart to know a comment like this is on top.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:49 AM
1

Can I quote this? Haha. Its perfect signature material!
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:14 AM
4

Possible, but at 19 you don't think about that stuff, and the world would be against him anyway. Even if written in law, that does not necessarily equate to being enacted and enforced. Assuming he wins though, he would probably have a horrible time there do to the pressures.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:40 AM
1

Lower sense? Not sure what you mean by that. Also, if voicing dissent is like nails on chalkboard, how can you stand this subreddit, or any movement that fights viewed unjustified standards?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:50 AM
8

Just look at those comments below the article... Ouch.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:07 AM
1

What did your comment mean then?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:05 AM
10

That was rather uplifting, except for what makes a man is being a father. I guess I'm not a man in his eyes, and never will be.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:17 PM
20

Horrible article. I won't list the reasons, but I will summarize that it was not constructive text, but rather witty retorts to select phrases. Romano's words weren't any better, but at least they were her own thoughts, rather than a hit piece to an inherently subjective experience. You could state such criticism for most teenagers or others inexperienced with the dating game.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:47 AM
6

That is just a very saddening article. These feels. :(
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:39 AM
7

Sexuals. Usually. It ends up a deal breaker for a lot of committed relationships if one party does not give it (just ask asexuals, lifelong celibates, the genital amputated, etc...) And those that don't have sex at all are given lower social statues as virgins (mostly males, but even women are laughed at if it goes past 30 years) I could talk more about it, but it would end up an essay. The conclusion though is simple, most people need it like a bad itch that should be scratched eventually or ba…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:39 PM
1

I think these comments (among many others throughout the subreddit) shows how sided the demographics here are for men's rights regarding abortion, in being very pro-choice. I've yet to find one person who's thought that the act could be seen as murder of something of value, and something a woman should have the restriction be prevented from carrying out (and therefore an advantage that should never be legal). It would be like saying men are legally disadvantaged from killing their newborn before…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:22 AM
1

That Windows98
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:53 AM
2

It was more your words within your various comments, not your OP. There were some hardliner replies, and it seemed in general you replied with assumptions and sarcasm. Such as... Stop being a feminist. Be a women's rights activist. Good chat. and... Is women's activism what I've been doing, while feminism is the one where you join the evil cult and do male sacrifices to Gaia? I'm so embarrassed. Here is where you should have left Jester's conversation: I'm sure this works fantastically on non-ra…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:35 AM
1

I never said that was wrong. I said your statement is telling them to not to be a pussy. Its just badly worded. Perhaps a intellectually provocative statement like this would be better "To put it simply: men are neither supposed nor allowed to be dependent. They are expected to take care of others and themselves. And when they cannot or will not do it, then the assumption at the heart of the culture is that they are somehow less than men and therefore unworthy of help. An irony asserts itself: b…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:40 AM
1

Of course its preferred for a person to have happier feelings and attitudes, but its still there choice. It should not be statement that MRAs back if its, by its own words, saying to them that they have to a certain way, and in this case, to 'not be a pussy'. Those sort of words are needless. If they want empowering words, they can get that through personal advice that is much less hardline and inflammatory to who they are.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:30 AM
1

I'll say it as softly as I can, your words are just poorly made, and attract backlash like oil to a fire. If you want to be received more warmly, I suggest looking at all the other stated feminists that have been upvoted in the subreddit. Its not about disagreeing with what people say, as that happens all the time, it is after all the nature of argument and discussion. What matters is how you react. If you think of them as an enemy, it will likely be shown in kind with how you write your words b…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:21 AM
1

It wasn't just the word 'pussy'. It was the 'don't be a' part that is needless itself. Also, while anger does have its place, it shouldn't be for this type of statement that will contrast within itself, when its telling a person not to be specific type of person, so that they may be respected as the person they already are.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:42 AM
1

Then they have our full support as brothers in arms. They should find strength in the fact... No, the entire point is that they can be weak, and stay weak, and that may mean being in isolation or not finding enough strength even within a group. Some people have crippling fears or depression or a sense of failure all there lives, but they have come to live with it. They shouldn't need a group to force them to change just so they can be more assertive for a motto or statement that that group wants…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:40 AM
2

You're asking too many questions, and I don't want to turn this into an essay. You make it seem like I'm attacking him, when I'm not. I'm simply stating what I think his position is, and where he might go from there. I've said nothing about censoring him, or that his emotions are bad or that he is venting, or that MRM knowledge is required. The irony is that I agreed exactly with what you said in your second paragraph, and I thought of it as nothing more or less than what his talking was about. …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:27 AM
1

I think I know, that you might want this sort of motto to catch on, but its too self-contrasting, and to many, ironic. What if their weakness is their unwillingness to speak out? To be assertive? Giving a slur of "Don't be a pussy" is sexually charged, and hits them where they already hurt. If they don't do what you say, or don't have the strength to do what you say, are they now a 'pussy'? Its the same statement of 'be a man' but in a negative reverse of 'don't be a'.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:45 AM
-1

He seems like a person who has not studied in-depth gender-related issues, but is now scratching the surface, and feels emotionally charged with what he has found. Some of what he said seems a bit off-base or uninformed, but the thought is there, and I think that is what a movement needs. He cares and values what he has found. Although if he was directed to the MRM, I suspect he might find it a bit to big for him, and might reject it as too extreme a reaction, given how he's seen only one tunnel…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:41 AM
6

Its more likely the economic situation multiplied the unlikelihood of it happening.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:42 AM
9

Like CAFE?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:34 AM
1

I shed a tear. I hope you the best and show the world your love with children. Don't let the stereotypes and assumptions get you down. But as a realistic, I do have to caution that you should look out for paths that will lead to accusations in court. Until you are trusted with the parties at hand, mostly parents and caretakers, it is sadly all too easy to get arrested by some malicious person specially wanting to cause trouble, or a crusader that WANTS something bad to happen so they can take so…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:36 AM
21

To answer your question seriously, society in general does not care about the pain and forced positions men go through. Its rare to see people react in disgust or concern, so it is okay to show on TV, since there will rarely be outraged callers saying to take it down.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:04 PM
8

It will be interesting to see how others within her group react to this.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:43 PM
6

Finally something positive in a sea of depressing stories and arguments. Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:29 AM
2

Yeah you basically summarized the whole packaged deal.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:36 AM
3

The irony is astounding.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:31 AM
7

I agree with this near completely. For most sadly though, fear equals hate, which is why terms like homophobia is likened with hating gays. To a person who has not handled or been with a cat, it can be scary, as you think it will bite or scratch you, but it doesn't mean you hate or want harm to come to it. Your fear of men is completely natural do to your experience, and as long as it doesn't get oppressive, it is okay in my book. I myself have come to fear a lot of both men and women, and even …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:29 AM
4

From what I'm reading its more about a subjective fear the person had. Whether that fear is confirmed, I cannot say obviously, but to enact an entire school and police to be on the look out for one individual where no actual confirmed altercation happened seems a bit hysterical in overreach. In a perfect world I would be okay, as they could simply question what he's doing, and if innocent he'd apologize and be on his way, but given what we've seen in stories and our personal lives, assumed innoc…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:10 AM
1

By not replying. You might as well be talking to a wall.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:03 AM
3

It seems the Sha of Hatred found a new body.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:06 AM
1

Rants like these should be marked as rants btw. Regardless, you're lumping together an entire demographic. Its obvious by sheer numbers that at least some will be in any ideology.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:36 AM
9

I'd be cautious, many here do not like A Voice For Men, do to its intentionally 'assertive' language, to put it lightly. On the other hand, some like it for not being shy about opinions, and being fairly free of PC pandering, yet still deleting/banning any posts that go in favor of physical violence. I personally ended up disliking it immensely despite technically viewing a few of its issue in its favor. Its just too tense, angry, and inflammatory. I would not go there if I were you.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:24 AM
3

If you want to see how it goes, go to the /r/Feminism subreddit. For some topics such as this, are fairly civil and show that the members are fine people for the most part, but well, just try making a topic about males needing help (not do to patriarchy) from females hurting them, and well.... You'd have to experience it. If you see a good response, please link me it. After that, a lot of people here, and elsewhere on the internet have been weary of feminism in general for how they are hurt, usu…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:56 AM
1

FAQ all the way, its to your right.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:21 AM
1

Agreed. I've heard frightening stories of men who truly did become afraid of women, by what their mothers or other female figures did to them as children. Ironically, they were later blamed as misogynists for avoiding women. They were paranoid, it was a phobia where they felt they risked abuse, be it physical or emotional or through blackmail of what women could do to them. So they shied away. What they did not do though was call all women evil. They knew rationally that women by default aren't …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:38 AM
7

The word/title of "Nice Guy" is thrown around like the words mangina, femspeak and neckbeard and mansplaining. Its worthless aside from being used as a derogatory negative slur. As a nice person, who loves helping women and men, and as a fairly feminine and submissive personality out in public, I'd probably be fit to be labeled as a "Nice Guy". Does that make me some drivel product of feminism? That I think masculinity is destructive as you say? The irony is that label itself filters out people …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:42 AM
1

5k characters, NOT WORDS, to explain an entire movement? You'd best have the best summarization skills ever. That's not even getting into how you could word it in a way that would convince them of the validity of said movement, considering how it would probably be automatically laughed at.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:37 AM
10

Although I don't know that particular case, extremely crazy cases do happen. Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hfRM3NbzwI
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:46 PM
4

The dictionary definition of sexism is also, ironically, sexist, as it says it is often against women, as if that somehow helps define the word.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:01 AM
11

Glad to have another female around, especially with unique experiences that show just how bad some situations are, and can give accounts on both sides. :)
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:57 AM
5

Thank you, this is what everyone needs.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:58 PM
1

I would like to argue then that the most discriminated against group in the U.S. at least is Native Americans. Although they are not hated, only a rich few get any profit from casinos. The others just stay depressed and in poverty while getting drunk. Any statistical data points just to how bad they have it and no one cares at all.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:31 PM
5

http://www.usa.gov/Citizen/Topics/Education-Training/Finding-Jobs.shtml Its a start. The most essential part is to is get income self-made. There a plenty of programs that can help with that. Its not perfect, but its better than being jobless and homeless. Search around for local help centers. Don't be discouraged, keep pushing and trying. I'm glad you asked for help. I think that is the first true step.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:25 AM
1

You have a phobia. Its not strictly normal, but it is common, say with spiders or needles or blood or whatever. There are phobias of all kinds, and when you see yourself possibly arrested simply for being a parent, I can see how it could make someone paranoid. While normally I would say this is acceptable, as fearing something is not a crime, the reality is if you want to be the best parent you can be, you'll have to overcome it. Be a parent, completely, in private context, and in public context…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:51 AM
2

First thing first. Value yourself. You don't need a reason, just lay on a beach, watch a show you like, read a book with interest narratives, buy a nice meal, play a video game you earnestly love to engage in. Part of the reason so many people today feel down is that we feel we have to be human doings, with grand accomplishments and positions, such as being married and having a high paying job and a big house and expensive car. You don't. Just love who you are right now without reservation. No n…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:21 AM
2

I would honestly laugh if that was the case. I would have no idea. This is a fairly hidden community compared to most mainstream thoughts, interests, and hobbies, even with its 90k readers.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:05 AM
1

To note, that is an image that was photoshopped for parody purposes. No one wrote anything like that as far as I know, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:40 PM
1

Its emotionally abusive. End the friendship if she's not willing to accept who you are.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:45 PM
1

In other news, the sky is blue.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:44 PM
2

Objectively, despite its seriously, I could see how this could be funny to some people. People joke about rape, infanticide and other horrific crimes, in black comedy and other circles. This is especially true for acceptable targets. Them being hurt or mocked is definitely okay by a lot of people, even if they don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:53 PM
3

There is not much about male discrimination or issues here. The teacher was male and irrational retribution or strict policy isn't unheard of in the U.S. or other western countries that are paranoid. I do agree that the teacher might be less inclined to slap a girl student as hard though.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:40 PM
1

http://www.postpartumprogress.com/depression-in-men-a-dads-story-of-male-postpartum-depression http://www.postpartummen.com/ Its very common. And in some tragic cases, newborns are killed within months with dad's suffering from severe depression, some even commit suicide right after. However, there are rarely any media identification do to postpartum, simply because its not something they assume to relate to it as a male murderer. Lets say, just for the sake of argument that you are correct, and…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:34 PM
0

postpartum can occur in both genders.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:17 AM
1

Ahh, the wonderful world of sex and parenthood. Isn't it such a joy?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:10 PM
12

Lets stop for a second and think this through. I'm not for one side of her being in prison or being set free. What I want to know is if anyone can find a story of a father suffering postpartum depression allowed to avoid prison in much the same way, after killing his children.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:55 PM
4

Masculinity and femininity are not about male and female physical characteristics. They are behavioral categories with roots in stereotypical gender associations, but that does not mean adhering to them. I for example like cuddling, which is usually considered feminine, and when you commonly see cute pictures of cats, male posters will often have to say they need to punch a wall to get their manliness (masculinity) back. Sports in turn are often considered masculine when so dedicated to it, and …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:46 PM
1

We, and they, can talk the talk, but can they walk the walk? I've yet to see any real action that is towards men being helped in areas they suffer in, like age of death, homelessness, false accusations, high divorce taxes in alimony , family court bias, the boy learning crisis, fatherhood rights, inability to abort parent responsibilities, higher insurance costs, required military draft, higher victimhood rates, higher prison sentences, vast prison population imbalance, prison rape, male rape, s…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:40 PM
1

Finally, someone who stood up to an argument I deeply disagreed with, that was often upvoted like hell in the mra communities. Even if the result was considered fair, the reasoning was deeply wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:20 AM
2

That counter.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:12 PM
1

I wish I could think these up during such conversations.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:39 AM
3

I wish success stories in the face of a crisis, like this, happened more often. Its like winning an incredibly rare reward. Your motives were clean, unlike Jen's.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:40 AM
1

Take her through a stroll to MaleSurvivor.org
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:59 AM
1

I honestly have no idea what the joke is.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:54 AM
4

I'm personally against giving loosely connected groups, who do not work as a unified team (such as an army or sports team), credit for things that individual members are not responsible for. For example, I have not done most of the slavery or innovations or warring or fathering that men as a whole have done in the past. And I would reject any award or imprisonment for such actions that my demographic has done.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:56 AM
1

The title is misleading.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:46 AM
10

Its more of just befuddlement when you see a rather radical male feminist make an enemy of any issue men face, and then see something like this basically making them second class not just in society, but within their own movement.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:24 AM
3

If you want to see more fail in our society regarding how gender is treated, I suggest this. It really shows how much is ignored, or how really bigoted thoughts are accepted readily.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:16 AM
7

At least the comments know what's up.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:42 AM
1

Let me just say it all depends. I've seen horrible men's and women's restrooms, then right after see extremely clean in both. There are a lot of factors.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:50 PM
1

At least he isn't being banned from everything... yet.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:46 PM
66

This is true. Their sexual attraction to children is no more different than sexual attraction to same sex, or of a heterosexual man in a room full of women (should heterosexual men be disallowed from entering?). The only real difference is that children are more vulnerable, but so is the short/weak/elderly man or woman to a mugger or bully, and they could be anyone on the bus or car or sidewalks we pass. There is little difference though in charging and imprisoning the villain more for hurting o…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:41 PM
2

Any personal hardship you might suffer from this is no where near the potential for that child and Charlie's own hardships. Warn him privately, don't tell your cousin or friends or family. Just him, and ask him to keep your involvement private if you can. Give advice in protecting himself, such as vasectomy, lawyers, avoidance of sex, and so forth, until he knows he is safe.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:28 PM
2

For a larger issue, it is inherently emotional, and while that is good for personal subjective stories and tales, to show the trauma inflicted, for objective debates it only derails the conversation by encouraging opinions and statements without support. Even if anger is used effectively in the long-term, it would only lead to extreme positions in campaigns. Look at Rape Culture and Patriarchy's roots. They are incredible examples of just how powerful anger can be in stirring up the public, but …
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:20 AM
6

What they think of white males in some different context with roles reversed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:15 PM
1

Hit the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:00 PM
4

Haha. Look at that at the bottom. Don't distribute, and I think we know the reason.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:07 AM
3

Preference is discrimination. No seriously. It is. Discrimination used to be a neutral term, to compare apples to oranges, and saying you like or hate one over the other, but now its used for sexism, racism, and anything under the sun that is politically unequal in any way, shape, or form. I wouldn't doubt for a moment that you could be called racist for say preferring whites over blacks.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:16 PM
2

Please don't post what is already posted.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:11 PM
5

Thank you for voicing why I left that place.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:02 PM
4

The irony of this being criticized while not even inferring that that exact same logic could be applied to NAWALT is both baffling and extremely funny. They just cut themselves with a double-edged sword.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:48 PM
1

After looking it up more, they do have males in their statistics, from a report that has been used here positively (National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey)
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:39 AM
1

Yes, it does imply only women are victims, although they don't outright state it. The discrimination is the absence of males within so many videos, given ample opportunity for at least some presence. Heck, they could have gone to malesurvivor and gotten plenty of male victims far more than willing to be given as examples. If anyone can find if they have shown a male example, that would be great.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:26 AM
1

Given how this is your first post and you've only been a redditor for 11 minutes, that is the fastest stated transition break I've ever seen. I'd also suggest taking this to the diet and suicide-type subreddits. Unless you have some issue specifically relating to men's issues or rights, it doesn't belong here except to garner attention like an ad.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:51 PM
2

If anyone wants to try a true game of radical one chance choices, try this. If you want to try again, you can delete your cookies, but the first time is always the best. Its horrible with the art and movement, but the story is heartfelt.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:44 PM
4

I agree, while its a nice moment, it doesn't really show any specific issues to discuss regarding men. It is a good celebration though in this forum so filled with sad situations.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:34 PM
2

I'm not even sure why it matters. The job is what is important when on a mission. If you can do it without repercussion its gold. The irony is that those they keep are often the ones with mental problems after, so they obviously weren't fit for the mission and may commit crimes or be unstable and end their own life, yet a person who willing goes into it is shot of the chance? Right.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:37 PM
4

I'm so glad you are continuing!
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:16 PM
3

It could have gotten into a ton more detail, such as overtime, hours worked, household numbers, among others. Warren Farrell goes into far more depth, and I'd suggest your friend read up on his books to improve his article.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:15 AM
13

Damn, I never knew school was raping me all these years.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:22 AM
0

Basically avoid college students in general (although many can be okay, it is the center area and age-group for raising hate on the 'privileged') and don't talk politics. If someone talks about a group's discrimination or privilege, do not speak or respond to it, just ignore it or switch topics if you can.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:25 PM
2

Great answer, both in practicality and philosophy, for people out there with dreams clouding their heads in a world that does not conform to our personal ideals. You take what you can get, push as much as you want, and make our own little haven, with its own pros and cons. Not many people like to take personal responsibility for their own lives, and sadly lash out at any relationship or job or person they can for their own failures and lack of happiness.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:11 PM
0

I've made no conversation to them directly, but I have replied a bit within the topic already. This is more about how to enter and reply to what they have started, without it turning into a heated debate about how wrong they are, or how wrong I am. I've seen MRAs and Feminists interact before many times online, and nearly all of it was.... nonconstructive. I would at least like to lead them a bit more on the fence I guess, while still allowing free agency to do the rest. They obviously care abou…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:08 AM
7

I'm just waiting to count the amount of loaded questions.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:57 PM
3

Ahh, look, the reality and results of human nature's needs, in the modern world.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:24 AM
1

If you want a good start, here are some links explaining stuff http://www.cultural-misandry.com/mens-rights/ http://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Marriage-Fatherhood/product-reviews/1594036756/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?showViewpoints=1 A personal favorite: http://imgur.com/gallery/OutZX
/r/MensRights23/04/14 02:40 AM
2

The ones who luck out of the lottery. Even young men did not to to WWII if they 'lost' the lottery. We still needed society to continue, and although women took up the slack, they were far from the only ones doing jobs.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:49 AM
-6

I would just like to hi-jack this and say that lawyers are making a killing off of this place, with how many times its been said to go to them. They probably want more accusations from a lot of these types of women too. Its needed I know, but its like seeing a weapons factory profiting off a war from two countries, and all we can do to help fight against the aggressor, is to say to the innocent side, that they need weapons from that factory. No other option.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:18 PM
3

This is horrible. Even if it is a parody of how feminists treat male allies, it sends the wrong message.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:18 PM
1

I would earnestly love to see that. Please post photos OP of that, maybe get a friend or family member to help. I just want to see people's faces.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:21 AM
1

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:16 AM
18

That would not brighten his day when he sees the ending.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:59 AM
1

It probably would have helped to contact one of the many abused husbands/ex-husbands in canada to go along with the phone calls actually being true. It makes it less stressful to make a lie to get the truth out of people.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:58 AM
2

"Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article."
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:53 AM
1

I agree with this almost completely. Its why I stopped reading and going over there a few years ago. Although they outright take out violent comments that calls for the hanging of some women, its no doubt that their voices are usually one of intentional flaming language.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:29 AM
2

I really love the comments in this one. There is a lot of objective discussion back and forth.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:17 PM
6

This is a good post overall. Very insightful. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:45 AM
3

Great interview. We need more of these from any harassed victims do to corruption and radicals.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:34 PM
2

Who is this twitter person and why should we care? Although this doesn't link to twitter, it might as well. Its just another idiot out there; we shouldn't even honor her with attention.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:57 AM
3

They obviously haven't seen Deadliest Catch. Its rather extreme for how much they risk their lives, in horrible conditions for weeks on end, with little rest. But if they want to still think being a mom is hard, I'd suggest looking at Kangaroo Dundee, a BBC documentary, showing how hard it is specifically being a kangaroo mom, which is done, times three, by a man, who eventually has to bury one of them, as well as guard a whole mob in his sanctuary.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:43 AM
1

This is a complicated issue summarized in a one-sided way. You can't assume something so generalized with a loaded question.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:18 PM
2

This should be front page. Excellent neutral, objective but informed responses to arguments against showing FtM rape.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:52 AM
1

By that logic any rich person with money to throw around could accuse anyone of anything and never ever be called out for being a troll. Its a sick case of abuse of power. Its the same for any person that cries rape, or threatens by blackmail, or any person that falls outside of someone else's line of thought. Its how corrupt governments can throw accusations around without every having to show themselves in their own kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:02 AM
1

Its as if there is a majority who speak the majority of the time. And its like any minority is therefore a victim by default.... Better bring in... the EQUALIZER.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:48 PM
1

Wrong, if there is anything I've seen from what is posted here, and what is upvoted, its that most MRAs are Pro-Choice specifically. Most Pro-life statements are usually downvoted.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:36 PM
1

Just don't buy from them again if he is too much in discomfort. His statement could mean anything though, including that both are very comfortable but that that particular girl pyjama was better than the pyjamas he had. Go by what he says.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:31 PM
1

Probably just a bad designer for his particular brand. The whole point of pyjamas is for comfort, not fashion.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:12 PM
2

I'll admit that was a funny read, but lets be real here, its not objective at all. Reality shows pick hot women that don't know crap often, its all for ratings, so this can't check out. Not to mention a bigger sample-size would have to prove this a bit more statistically, which won't likely happen.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:58 PM
5

Okay, this movie has been previewed a lot already, and this subreddit already has talked about the balance and validity of such a thing, including how masculinity is something innately toxic, by authors with backgrounds that are questionable, and what its purpose ultimately is. Lets put that aside for a moment. What I'd like to question is what will result from this. I predict that feminists will point to it again and again as a sign of how much for equality they really are, and in doing so, wil…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:41 PM
3

What exactly was the discussion with the security director in-depth? I mean what possible reason could they argue for?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:28 AM
2

What does my history have to do with the logic of this spoken situation? You're basically attacking me now without talking about my statement itself. Do you have anything to add that is on the topic of many people needing sex? Or is saying its not good to think that, with no explanation, the extent of what you will say?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:52 AM
2

No, but they need to be sated at some point. There is a reason virginity is derogatory for men, and why they do care. Its not just social pressure. Please tell me how many men here are willing to stave off sex for the rest of their lives. Not many, so unless they want to marry, which carries its own huge risk, situations with these sort of women are going to happen. Its not a question of if, but when.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:25 PM
6

Let's take this to its logical conclusion. If she pay raises only the lazy, fires or forces quits from the workers that she requires to do all the hard work, and hires from a sample size that has been effectively cut in half, what do you think will happen when her own boss from Subway starts seeing profits and productivity falling? Now lets look at your position. They don't care how sexist she is, nor does most of the courts or society. You don't work there anymore either, so no personal damages…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:14 AM
3

How the heck did this even get big? There are thousands of people like this. Its drama for the sake of drama at this point. I'd leave it as soon as possible if I was somehow involved.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:58 AM
0

Ignore her? I mean you could fight the power, but it takes a lot of dedication and support against a force that has all the advantages, social power, and numbers. Just stay away from her kind and you should be fine. Don't engage with her at all. Its pointless. I'm actually glad she blocked you.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:18 AM
2

I know. I tried to explain that in my first two sentences.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:11 AM
2

Satire or not, that was a horrible article imo. I can't take crap like this objectively, nor will other media news sites. Its just begging to be a target of a hit piece.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:34 AM
10

Guys, look at the history page. Stop vandalizing it, it doesn't help. This is assuming it isn't a troll, but multiple edits were done from different addresses, so he's either committed, or some of you guys here are making a joke by replacing words https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Villa_M%C3%BCller&diff=603339154&oldid=602630860 or deleting the section entirely with no reason or discussion for such deletion.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:05 PM
6

This is all just turn ons and turn offs. Stop playing the game. But if you have to play, don't be an idiot, ask her. And do it with an active recorder in hand. That still likely won't be enough. Who cares if its a turn off? Will you? Probably not after.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:58 PM
-3

Unfortunately, for some, that is not an option. Sex is a need so instinctual and basal to them they cannot NOT have it. Because obviously putting something in another thing back and forth until some liquid comes out, is worth the risk of 18 years of extra huge taxes, STDs of all kinds, loss of entire reputation, job and college, several years in prison, and being raped in prison with no sympathy, just like the accused action upon them that everyone cares so much about, how ironic... Even better …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:56 PM
2

I can't speak for everyone else, but for me, I hate none at all. However, I am now cautious of them as a whole, not because of what they are, but because of the legal and social powers they wield. One accidental touch, could ultimately mean prison rape for me, for many years, or at least a ruined reputation that would put me out of many job opportunities, especially in colleges. Don't offend them at all, don't make eye contact, don't look at their body for any reason. Don't criticism them. Stay …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:17 AM
1

As cute as this is, it should be in another subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:55 AM
2

True, but to some people, they simply value money less than other things. If one option, say, has a better personality and belief system, but earns 10k less money per year than the other option, they may choose that lower earner. At some point too I would think that money doesn't matter. If someone makes 1 million per year, and another makes 950k, you'll start looking for other qualities about them, even if you value money a lot. Rarely is any person ever truly equal in all aspects compared to a…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:47 AM
23

Men? Some are quite idiotic enough to go by looks alone. To their surprise later, it often turns into nasty divorces, and since they earn more, they are even more likely to be forced into child support and alimony even in technically neutral cases.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:25 AM
2

I'd like these comments to stay, so we, all viewers, can see just how much downvotes it gets.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:28 AM
4

First, you seem to link women intimately needing feminism, which is false. Second, the gender war is basically from radical elements imposing undue power over the other. When one side over steps its message and starts censoring, bashing, and abusing, you don't argue with it. You either go to war with it politically, cause its forced, or you devalue and ignore it. Just because other people exist doesn't mean we have to interact or marry them. r/Childfree doesn't want kids, r/Atheists don't want r…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:16 AM
6

A freakin divorce lol.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:08 AM
0

As drama-inducing as this is. It doesn't directly have anything to do with MRAs as far as I see it. Liars and human trafficking are usually neutral terms, although obviously girls for sex trafficking will have a bigger impact. If there is a direct connection, feel free to correct.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:54 PM
10

I'm honestly curious how many people here actually wear a fedora. Its like thinking every feminist is going to wear a dress (or whatever other specific form of wear) when going out.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:51 PM
1

I would agree, but they would probably feel trolled and not want to help, sadly. The second he turns the table of it as a man's issue, I can't see the presentation being taken seriously. Its not right, but it is likely the truth imo....
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:45 PM
2

Before we get heated up, it is speculated that the op there is lying, and without proof, may just be stirring up hatred needlessly and is not good for the MRA public image. I'm not saying he is an actual liar either, what he's saying may be true, but we shouldn't judge so fast without more evidence.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:19 PM
2

I say keep this advice, and add to it the other studies collected here and elsewhere, just how screwed up marriage is for men. Its like hitting one bird with two stones. You know, just to make sure.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:09 PM
1

Then they are saying the right thing, along with getting a lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:20 AM
3

Great, now rape is like cooties.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:17 AM
6

I for one would like to see that that enacted as false though by the feminists that say they personally aren't like that. Some are truly for equality in their pure-motivated minds and don't understand the manipulation of the extremists, and if they are open enough to come here and discuss things civilly, I truly think MRAs could find common ground with those particular ones. Even better would them speaking on equality by bringing men's issue to their groups. If they are welcomed for it, we see f…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:33 PM
0

I'm so glad I don't want marriage.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:55 AM
2

Unfortunately I agree. Post birth abortions.... Yeah.... Those mothers are crazy. Whats even more crazy are the people that say she just needs counseling, not jail time. Wow.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:49 PM
1

You do know I said its free speech to do so. I never said you can't. Not sure why you're mad at me.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 10:45 PM
13

Well, one guy did move to Chile when he was forced to pay a sum in Canada that would literally cripple him financially and force him into jail. He had no other hope and his family and friends hated him for it, but it was his only choice without eventually getting raped in prison for life. So much for no debtors' prison.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:20 AM
1

Look as much "fun" as this seems, don't even argue. The moment they talk about you by sex and race is the time you should leave, let alone the berating. Its like an atheist going to a mosque to talk. Any chance of civil talk flies out the window the moment you speak an opinion they don't like. I know, the attraction to 'right' them in their logic is strong when its so obvious its hateful and wrong, but don't, just don't....
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:16 AM
0

There are true 'Casanovas' out there, that might as well be a slut to many cultures. This doesn't even get into male prostitutes for gays or boys as sex slaves or rape victims. I would say the perpetrator is a slut if they've had two or more victims. But then again, to many a slut is a submissive position, while to me it doesn't matter if they are dominate or submissive, they have lots of sex without much positive regard for the act, and that's the end of it for me.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:04 AM
1

This is a topic that deals with a non-gender issue. I'm not sure if it belongs here unless any issue with a man in it is allowable.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:53 AM
1

To the now deleted comment: Chill out. He's a good person who loves helping people. I like that personally. I was simply confirming what post you were referring instead of assuming anything about you. I agree it is kinda sad they didn't talk too much about the help he gave, but this subreddit is about men's issues specifically, which is why it was downvoted to zero. His actions had nothing to do with men's plights. And if a person that roams this reddit is going to comment about it, usually the …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:36 PM
3

Its kinda just apathy. Those who care about men are rare, those who don't care are the standard, and those who hate them, or at least, who think men don't deserve to be labelled as victims in any fashion at all, are numerous. Its also popular to hate more than love; people like to put others down more than uplift them as a whole. I won't get into why, but its why most things, even the most upvoted ones on reddit, when you see how many downvotes there are, you'll see the truth, at least here.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:24 PM
2

Are you talking about the post which presently sits at zero points with replies saying he is simply ignorant to the larger issue of domestic violence? Perhaps you should comment about it there instead of making a new post.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:17 PM
2

Like I said, they are like anyone else. I can understand losing respect for a person like that, but I don't think that the MRA needs to bring so much attention to them just because they are actors. A random angry extreme feminist on tumblr that tweets how much she wants all men to be killed, is as relevant to me as Wil Wheaton. I just ignore them. As fun as it can be (for some MRAs) to show these people's failures in logic and hate speech, it does nothing to help men's issues (or at least bring …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 10:30 PM
8

He's just doesn't know the full scoop. Nothing to lose respect over. Actors are ordinary people that just happen to be on screen as a mask a lot. Its their job, not their private life. They are no more moral or intelligent or informed as anyone else.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:04 PM
2

I just love how my audio player is also a recorder.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:01 PM
1

I agree, perhaps link it to men's issue articles and if its reverted, well then this person can show it in the edit history, and perhaps their reasoning for such an edit.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:51 PM
3

I agree to a point, but the video is more about specifically showing the discrimination to be extremely blatant. A video about him calling a representative isn't exactly interesting to watch, at least to say some black people getting hosed down, or those that show extreme feminists trying to ruin a meeting on male suicide by Warren are far more powerful in proving a point.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:49 PM
1

This is a repost, if you want to upvote the article go to the original.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:30 PM
4

The hate in those comments is staggering. I can understand disagreeing and then giving a counter argument, but its like the mere suggestion is enough to incite their unending anger at MRAs and make sweeping generalizations. I think thats why I always watch for that kinda thought process here. Feminists as an identified group seems to anger a lot of people here, justified or not, and it really steers up hate. I know its free speech to voice a strong disapproval of them, but at the same time it wo…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:29 PM
1

Nothing to be ashamed about for what you are born as on either side, its just extremism showing its face and civil discourse being the victim.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:09 PM
1

Its a private fundraiser aimed at women, nothing innately bad about it. Its dumb, considering just how many women are both developers and a huge demographic, but none the less it has nothing to do with affirmative action specifically setting quotas and the like.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:06 AM
3

This is victim blaming, but its true: don't have sex with women. Its the equal of going home alone late at night in a crime-heavy ghetto where you see several gangs scanning you, but you keep walking through, except instead of being raped or stolen from or killed physically, it happens legally, as you are now experiencing. A lot of men, even when they know about the MRA and its issues, seem to think they are invulnerable and that it won't happen to them. But the truth is, even if it should be a …
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:56 AM
3

She abused you. Reverse the story by gender, and try to think about what feminists would tell you as a female victim to abuse. For a rare point of intersecting interests, I would say that the MRA and Feminists agree here, in terms of its respective roles of abuser and abused. However, as a man, the logic is far more real, and resources are uncommon and hidden. You're basically backed into a corner, and so its critical you get out as soon as possible. Don't talk to her AT ALL, don't touch her or …
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:49 PM
1

He had me until he said rape culture.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:42 PM
6

How the heck is lack of motherly love and school indoctrination related to GMP-type concerns? And how do you know she'll end up at the GMP anyway? There are many other ways to seek help from other than them specifically to fight against cultural norms invalidating a parents beliefs on what should be taught to her son.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:40 PM
2

Lol, dang, look at those comments. Everyone's jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:11 PM
1

I've always wondered how feminist groups would react to policies like these. Its probably just indifference.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:39 PM
1

As funny or odd as this might be to some, its more of a preference and ideal for themselves, and I don't really think of it as sexist towards men, at least anymore than if we were to say we like MRA women and list their positive qualities. Its like atheists liking atheists, or pro-lifers liking pro-lifers. Its more of just of a list of those qualities, than it is to say all men MUST be like this... They will probably be disappointed though, but most self-ideal lists will have the same thing happ…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:39 AM
9

That was the most random advice I've seen yet.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:01 AM
3

Technically this is gender-neutral, so I, naively would say it doesn't belong here, more like lawyers should be outraged. But I think we all know what this is really aimed at.....
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:28 PM
3

I have never been so glad to be asocial and abstain from alcohol. Not that you can't enjoy those things in moderation, but it sure lessens the risk, given how many of those stories were at parties/friends/clubs/bars and got drunk.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:07 AM
3

This shows absolutely nothing about affirmative action itself, and may just be a cop unable to catch the thief herself. There are fat cops, lazy cops, bad cops.... No need to attach a social issue to one personal failure. And for the record, she, with the help of others (which is usually how it goes) accomplished the goal in catching the thief.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:39 AM
0

It was rhetorical, I didn't expect you to show your history. I was just making a point. You make it seem like I'm attacking you, when all I'm showing is why expecting others to feel what you want them to feel, or to help with an issue you're having isn't always fair or right. I'm unsure how I've done a straw man or twist of words though, but since you don't seem to want defend yourself I think I'll just accept that I won't know. It does seem you are edgy and a bit counter-offending ("So get off …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:15 AM
0

Fine, then please show your history with other various communities, such as some sub-reddits, that deal with issues that are serious and direct in killing and permanently handicapping people. Wars, disease, slave trade, genocidal dictators, third-world civil wars, etc.... If you don't care about some or most of these, then you're a part of the problem. I'm not actually saying this by my own judgement, I'm just following your own sense of logic beyond the MRA issues that people should not ignore …
/r/MensRights23/03/14 11:53 PM
-1

It's just not right and if you're not disgusted by it then you're a part of the problem. Ehh, that could be said about a ton of things, like starvation, which, statistically is 'easily' solvable given world food production/GDP relative to other world problems, but it doesn't happen because people don't care enough to help. That is because apathy is very much a default in human values. You must feel to care and protect something, for most people. So should we condemn nearly all the world for not …
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:03 AM
2

The second I saw it was the Young Turks I got the hell out of there.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:03 AM
4

Commenting on the crack controversy, a Magic representative pointed us toward their guidelines for events, where they write, “Disrespectful, harassing or bullying behavior, whether onsite or online, is not welcome at Magic events and violates Magic tournament floor rules.” Creep-shotting players definitely falls into the no-go category So why do you at Time think it a quality article to post it. Perhaps they should post child porn next when talking about a pedophile's pictures after they've been…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:35 AM
2

I'm glad the comments see the failure. It shows they understand the discrimination. Edit: Honest question, why the downvote? This should be a victory.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:14 AM
1

I truly believe she felt threatened by those images. They challenged her possible choices as morally unsound (assuming without the protestors knowing she was personally pregnant), and that a woman shouldn't have that power. The mere thought brought feelings of offense and helplessness at not being able to remove the protestors and their images. To not have that power is rage inducing when encouraged further by others close to her. It basically overcame her and made her a bit mental. Is it her fa…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:28 AM
2

This is a bit disproportionate and overtly emotional reaction. Its a dumb comment by that fearful guy, but its simply a part of society by this point, and so it is not rare to see them. By reacting like that, that person, and all who see Notathrow's comment will now be apprehensive of any MRA group, if not outright seeing it as an angerfest.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:16 AM
2

Assuming this is true, and that you made an account just for this single post within the Men's Rights Activists forum, I'd say to get a lawyer first and foremost. Being accused of rape is serious, and can spell large punishments if your college is truly being fair with Title IX among other standards, including but not limited to expulsion and imprisonment, as well as your entire career down the drain.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:07 AM
1

After seeing so much pain and anger around, I thought I'd break the ice a bit with a happy find. I was shocked to see a poster about this at my job, specifically welcoming men in addition to everyone too, at a daycare for children. Please search the whole site, it is happily gender-neutral in having the whole family and community help children and parents, but still addresses some issues with fathers being a part of it instead of absent or unneeded.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:10 AM
2

My whole post was how society views this, not my own ideals and rationalization. They think segregation is justified, and therefore it will continue.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:01 PM
2

There is nothing sexist towards men in this post at all. If they want to make a week for themselves, they can go ahead and do so. In fact, a local daycare made a children's week to inform parents about how important they are to a child's development, and take children on a field trip. Should its flier's be posted in some adult rights reddit or something? The content of that group, be it good or evil has nothing to do with its poster designs, which seem very neutral, and as a graphics design stud…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:43 AM
2

No, actually, its already done, 'fairly' successfully, in restrooms. Rarely any country has unisex restrooms even though it would lower lines for women and lower overall utility and equipment costs. The negatives are numerous in everyone's minds though, even men. Women complain it would smell, men would simply never have a true 'rest' room away from women, and it would give 'rapists' (men) access to going to the same restroom as little girls in public. This can apply to most any sector of societ…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:35 AM
-2

In all seriousness, infanticide can definitely be post birth abortion. The child still is a force in the life of a mother, and can be seen as something that is limiting her, and in her mind, may not be valuable enough to be seen as a human being worth an identity or rights yet. The difference of why it is seen as inhuman (in killing) to others is that post birth, the infant is given a legal ID, giving it a hardline value legally. It still does not have more intellect or 'consciousness' than most…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:34 AM
1

If you want to see examples, look no further
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:04 AM
10

Great post. Its a nice change from all the malice and hate this reddit gets, and in turn angers. What I'd like to ask that University is how they came to change their mindset in such a way, so that we might apply it more to other organizations.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:10 PM
1

Paragraphs. They have a purpose.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:10 AM
2

In all seriousness, Google Glasses should help abused men when showing evidence. It will also help remind would-be victims to use other forms such as recorders and so forth.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:41 AM
1

Normally I would agree, but then I'd have to criticize their lack of accounting for ethnic race and age. There is a reason barely any other race than africans win these by vast majority whenever they compete, all within a range of 18-35 years old. Its a blatant handicap for women only. Other group equality that a person's body cannot control in genes are not factored in aside from womanhood.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:33 AM
0

Calm down.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:06 AM
5

For one, don't attack them for the lack of logic. Show your logic in a non-aggressive way. You can be assertive in what you cite, but calling them an idiot does not help in anyway.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:35 PM
1

I can't say specifically, all I remember is one or two articles that made a joke about some feminist's extreme reactions to anything even remotely thought to them as sexist against women. These types of comments are very common to any acceptable target groups, even the ones they are an audience to, like gamers. Edit: I looked it over. Alright, you got me, they've turned on full-hate mode against MRAs. I never knew they went so far down.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:26 PM
1

Then give us an article to citation and we'll look into it. Telling us to go to another subreddit or we're evil otherwise does not help anyone. It makes you look like you have an anger issue if anything. Historically that doesn't help much for trying to get people to side with you. Some MRAs found that out the hard way when bringing men's issues in a feminist forum, and acted angry. It didn't help them at all. It made them look far worse in fact.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:14 PM
1

I'm just glad you came out. Stories like this are fairly taboo politically still, and bottling up inside is never good in the long-run.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:20 PM
9

Cracked does this to every group, including feminists. Don't take anything they say seriously. Its like 4chan saying people are moralfags or oldfags or whatever. Its obviously not to be taken in a objective manner, but rather as intentional ridicule. That said, I would say even in the 'manosphere' there have been a lot of posts shaming male virgins. Its a big problem that corrupts even here.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:12 PM
1

I look at the title, then the description, then the username, and how long they've been a member....... You serious?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:13 AM
1

Look, lets take for second that they're smart if it was intentional. Seriously, how good a strategy is it to play that card on the exact target that is trying to prevent said card from being played so casually. The results confirmed it instantly; taken off the board and stopped from doing his job. If it were not for the sadness of this actually being effective, we'd all laugh at how self-damaging such a strategy would be in framing themselves for blatant court manipulation.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 07:00 AM
2

I'm not sure I understand, why are the wealthy your enemy? Are you saying the wealthy should pay $2 or something for a donut?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:46 AM
3

Wow, expelled for filing a civil suit. The horrific irony.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:28 AM
1

Never seen a realistic outlook look so pessimistic.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:25 AM
1

Either a troll or a failure in logic. But at least you fail in a way that makes it blatant to us. Not that it would stop your comment from being quoted by hit-piece articles and reposts on MRA.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:44 AM
3

Holy shit. Look at the comments by best rated. What the hell man? Thats the craziest self-sexist stuff I've seen in a while, and you can't even say its wrong if they all agree so extremely strong with it. Its like looking at a board where all the men say other men think with their dick. Do women really do this to such a degree or are those stories just extreme cases?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:40 AM
11

What the fuck man.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:20 AM
4

Great blog. Its nice to see something like that in Huffington.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:56 PM
3

I'm glad it was taken down so fast. A victory for fair employment. Too bad its hollow at this point though. I'd like to see how many male workers are going to be there for the position regardless. Its not like someone looking for such a job could sue them if they turn them away unjustifiably. It used to happen with a ton of minority races, including Asians in California and blacks in southern states, among others.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:41 PM
1

Those comments on there bleed anger at the mere opinion of that article. Not that some on here are guilty of that too, but its pretty troubling to see on an article that is fairly non-aggressive in its statements and thoughts. Simply wanting equal Gender Studies seems utterly alien and irrational to them.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:35 PM
1

oral, anal, gay, tribal.... Probably not technically sex if defined as attempted or risking impregnation, but you get the point hopefully.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:16 AM
2

I'm going to go out on a limb and say this is sorta society's fault in general. Not that courts don't have their own problems that compound it, but the other side of the issue is something that people don't like to get into because it forces the fault on the victim Basically, if you marry, a social obligation that is meant ideally for a lifetime, and don't take it seriously, you're going to have problems when you reject it after the fact. Enemies are made, children's lives are destroyed, banks, …
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:26 AM
9

That's fucked up. Seriously, I hope they don't go all china and up killing and abandoning daughters simply for being female.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:56 AM
26

Actually, I would say to post more. It shows that subjects related to men's issues, can still be radical and that men's rights rejects it with sound judgement again and again when it crops up.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:54 AM
5

I would, non-seriously, like to see this opinion be taken into action. Imagine all intercourse sex between men and women being classified as rape and being banned. I'd like to see the reaction in statistics for that nation a decade in. NEWS: TEST TUBE BABIES BECOME NEW FAD. MEN MAKE NEW PROFIT IN SPERM DONORS. ELDERLY BECOME NEW AGE MAJORITY
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:37 AM
1

I can see the goodwill in this, and it has in the past, been used successfully, but its patient-side, not user-side. In other words, schools and other groups that use common 'trigger' material can still use it, but the student that has trauma episodes from such material can leave with no harm done to her per attendance. All they have to do is talk to the teacher, or even better, get a permission slip from a doctor or therapist, and it can be avoided if they so wish to leave for that video or dis…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:32 AM
1

Before we get all riled up, lets first say that the boundaries and subject matter is very loose and subjective. Co-author statues is just one aspect of cooperation, as is just one department of profession. I wouldn't take this too seriously in any way until data is more comprehensive and solid in its findings. Very little in the way of near proven causation, just speculation.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:35 AM
1

Its like if we're fighting against Hitler, we can commit genocide too. It would be unfair if we weren't able to.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:53 PM
3

I have never heard anyone here, or in any other 'manosphere' site say those words. Not even the extremist angry women-hater posts. That said, I do agree that bringing up feminists needlessly only leads to anger here. It should only be talked about if they as a group do something that obviously hurts men's rights, through their actions. There are a lot of posts that link to articles by obvious feminist radicals, and it makes this subreddit look like we are cherry-picking when that article isn't e…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:48 PM
1

Its as if things can be solved through constructive communication.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 05:27 AM
6

As much as I care about neutrality, Lego understood that different demographics like different things. Who knew? And as any graphic design student that actually pays attention, they would know that absolutely nothing is truly neutral, not even pure white. Everything is a different value to someone, and they all symbolize relative to their minds. It just so happened that Lego aesthetically attracted boys with its default colors and themes. It was never gender neutral. And why is it a goal here to…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:04 PM
5

Its as if alimony is unfair. Who knew? At least this judge is lawful neutral in his results it seems, given just how useless contracts are for divorced men too. If anything this just shows how marriage is a relic tied to religious partnership and survival. With both of those values no longer cared for, and the ease of divorce and birth control, it loses its purpose, becoming simply a shell as a romantic gesture, and financial/legal/culture statues. At least it retains its ability to trap fools a…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:26 AM
7

“Shame on the girls, shame on the men on the bus and shame on the bus driver for not doing anything.” Because you didn't need to do anything yourself huh? (if they were there) Only one person did anything to stop it, and aside from him, very small children, they should all be ashamed for not doing one damn thing. Bystander Effect is just an excuse, however legit, when something could have been done sooner. At the very least one girl video-taped it.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:47 AM
1

I agree with your points in general aside from never understanding one another. A huge part of being intelligent sapients is that we don't have to experience something to understand it. Its what makes our languages of words and voices and facial/body expressions so extremely powerful, far more than bee dances, bird calls, scent markers, or whatever else. Just from your experience, along with other rape stories I've heard, I understand a lot of the fear and confusion and embarrassment and hate th…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:14 AM
3

Affirmative Action. It is a doctrine of justification for things like this, despite being blatantly against its own root philosophy of equal rights and non-discriminatory practices. Its not just a fancy word, its a standard real life train of thought in all sorts of laws and culture, not just for sexism or racism, but for any victim-hood group that is not an acceptable target.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:05 AM
2

Why isn't this more popular? This is great news, they care about shared parenting. I'm not sure why this is being downvoted at all.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter