TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheYambag Archive

View 3 posts and 290 comments by TheYambag on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Then poop too, but maintain eye contact with her while you do it to assert your dominance.
/r/askTRP18/01/21 03:17 AM
21

Fucking other girls is degenerate. Raise you SMV and look for someone capable of long term commitment. If you can't find happiness without fucking random girls, then you're no better than someone who can't find happiness without alcohol or heroine.
/r/askTRP11/09/20 01:18 AM
30

Doesn't California have higher rates of incest than any other state. Its the state that makes pornhub, which is where all this brother/sister family porn is coming from
/r/askTRP17/04/20 11:09 PM
0

Worrying about paternity fraud is for insecure betas. Worrying that you cant keep a girl around is for insecure betas. The majority of men who get married stay married. If the majority can do it, why cant you? If all of your relationships keep failing, it is you who is the common thread. Stop pretending like its women when so many people dont share your problems. You are the reason why you have failed to secure a stable permanent relationship with all of your past relationships. You're either pi…
/r/askTRP26/02/20 01:27 PM
2

You're right, it's just a joke that your penis is small
/r/askTRP29/11/19 05:16 AM
3

Black cock is tiny. The idea that it's big is a porn myth meant to degrade other races. Stop watching porn
/r/askTRP28/11/19 12:42 PM
3

I've turned down offers for sex from 3 different women in the last year. I haven't had sex in about 9 years. I don't want to have sex with a woman that I either don't trust or that I can't see myself with long term. I would still have sex before marriage, but I am very very picky about it, because I do not believe that it is healthy for those of us whose long term goal is a healthy marriage with children. I also think the hook up culture is degenerate and super blue pilled. For a crowd that clai…
/r/askTRP29/11/18 01:34 PM
2

I've got a couple different ways that I can approach this. For one, a lot of these reasons seem a bit "ad hoc". The reason I think this is because you claim to know what you want so staunchly in the beginning, and then near the end you sort of wobble a bit and say "well, maybe I won't always feel this way". Do you think the blue pill wants people to have kids? From what I can see, every single time that I see kids in media, they are portrayed as annoying, life sucking, rotten little people. Preg…
/r/askTRP19/06/18 02:08 AM
-1

Sure, that's a valid point. I think the idea that automation is going to take all of the jobs is a bit idealized. To me it's like how in the 60's we thought we'd all have flying cars around by the 2000's. I do agree that it's coming, but I don't think it's going to be here in 30 years, honestly, I'd be surprised if we made "the singularity" within our lifetimes... we have a lot of technology that we need to make before we can get there, and I don't think that it will be spearheaded by the West, …
/r/askTRP18/06/18 11:54 PM
2

Actually he got an answer and we ended the conversation after some discussion about how each of us feel about the topic. I'd say we're both better for it. The fact that he didn't get all angry and offended, allowed us to both be pretty productive. You on the other hand... lol
/r/askTRP18/06/18 11:39 PM
7

I like this answer, and I don't think swinging is necessarily a bad idea for those who truly find monogamy unbearable. To me, "getting bored of monogamy" sounds like an excuse. In the red pill, we recognize the problems with easy dopamine. We talk about turning off porn and social media for the easy hits. I think swinging in many ways is similar. You should not be getting bored of sex even with the same person, and if you are, i think it's an indicator that something else in your life isn't squa…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 10:07 PM
3

That's honestly a tough question for me to answer. My gut tells me that most people who don't want children have some other issue in their life that is causing them to not want children, but I am not going to pretend like I have any strong evidence for that other than a few anecdotal examples. For me, I think it's important to ask reflect back on the first question that I asked, "Can your society sustain itself with no children?" Most people don't want to work out. Most people don't want to go t…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 10:01 PM
2

you can see it in animal behavior just as in human behavior I saw a dog chowing down on some shit it found on a park trail the other day. Should we adopt shit eating, since we see animals doing it? females want alphas too advance their genes If you trust what she tells you that “you’re the only man for me” bullshit and you are aware of he redpill then you are too dumb to use the internet. So in other words, you're too insecure in yourself or your mate selecting abilities to trust that a woman wi…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 09:54 PM
3

I have not. Do you mind giving me a quick summary of it?
/r/askTRP18/06/18 09:39 PM
4

There are people on the red pill who say "enjoy the fall", who subscribe to pretty much what you are saying. They don't believe that they have the tools/capabilities to fix society, and they would rather just do their best to enjoy what they can, given the circumstances. At the very least, I can sort of respect that. The problems that we face do seem awfully insurmountable without some major changes to how our leaders deal with some of our most serious problems. That being said, I stand by my or…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 09:00 PM
6

He posted on /r/asktrp. If he wants a blue pill answer, he can go post on /r/relationships I'm not going to shut up, you can learn to deal with it.
/r/askTRP18/06/18 08:52 PM
1

I hear you, but surely it's not in your best interest for society to fall apart, right? If society collapses, that means a lot of jobs will be wiped out, the price of things like food goes up. It could potentially mean war, bombings, terrorism. Even if you think the end of it will make a society of strong men, what will you have to show for it, and how will you compete with a society that is more "red pill" while you have been upholding this blue pill value for your whole life?
/r/askTRP18/06/18 08:34 PM
3

The longer one spins only plates, the more I believe he erodes his pair bonding ability This I agree with. ...and becomes more of a psychopath as he casualizes women down to sexual objects only to be used, manipulated and managed for as long as possible This seems a bit too hyperbolic for me. I think a lot of men come to the red pill because they don't trust women to some extent. There is an enormous amount of insecurity, even from some of our most highly revered members, in the red pill. A woma…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 07:53 PM
6

First off, don't apologize for it. I'm not trying to attack you bro, nor am I trying to condemn you for how you think. I just want some of the people here to understand that plates is not red pill, it's patently blue pill thinking. We're all a little blue pill in some ways, none of us are perfect, but we should always work towards what we think is perfection. Second, What did you do when you got bored of your job, or when you got bored of working out, or when you got bored of your hobby? Presuma…
/r/askTRP18/06/18 07:39 PM
1

Can your society sustain itself with no children, or with children who are raised by either beta's and single mothers? Do you think children are better off raised by single women? Would you rather your civilization be overrun by a different civilization? If the answer to this is "no", then what are you going to do to about it? Are you going to just hope and pray that other people raise children who will take care of you when you are older, or are you going to man up and create a child and raise …
/r/askTRP18/06/18 06:39 PM
0

If you can't keep a girl for life, you're not really blue pill. Any beta or chad can keep a girl for a short while. Only a real man can keep a girl for life. If you don't like society, work towards changing it.
/r/askTRP21/03/18 12:27 PM
2

You know how in the beginning of the story OP noticed that the girl was unable to acknowledge the gap between what she was and what she wanted to be? A lot of these guys want to be the guy who can lift 850, and are unable to recognize that sometimes things like biology are legitimately going to be barriers. Be the best you can be, and never stop trying. Your first limit is never your real limit, but that being said, this whole notion that "limits aren't real" is probably going to cause a lot of …
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 06:29 PM
1

You're projecting. lol, quit trying so hard bro. If you had taken the time to read the article them you would have read the exact quote from OP, which was "focus on them until you feel like shit."
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 06:22 PM
1

Failure to quote me will be counted as you admitting that you have nothing to back yourself up with. Thank you, I win!
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:24 PM
1

I don't want a gender to look bad; but if it is bad, then, let's have the truth. So you think women are bad? But "manspreading" is antimale propaganda, and I do think that is bad. Apparently, you'd like to suppress that. Where are you getting this from? Quote me. Seriously, quote me where I even began to say such a thing. Failure to quote me will be counted as you admitting that you have nothing to back yourself up with. Ignoring this will be treated the same. I'd like an apology for your absurd…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:19 AM
1

Earlier you said I suppressing discussion of a topic, but you haven't told me what topic (unless you mean the topic of women looking bad). Now you say I am suppressing women looking bad, even though you don't want them to look bad. I don't think you're arguing in good faith here. You're irrationally mad over the fact that I said that this doesn't help our cause.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 04:15 AM
1

Do you want a certain gender to "look bad"?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:05 AM
1

You're right, I should have said "What do you think I am suppressing?". Got an answer? You're not discussing this in good faith at all.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:49 AM
1

Do a search yourself. LOL! So basically, you're admitting that you don't even have evidence! haha! Okay, so what defines "viral"? I did a google analytics search for "manspreading", along with something I consider boring, which is "mandelbrot", then I also included "feminism", and "MRA" for some idea of consistency. Compared the terms for the past 5 years. My "boring" term of "mandelbrot" was only eclipsed 5 times by "manspreading", and only once in a meaningful way where I think we might have a…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:43 PM
1

The manspreading campaign has gone viral over the last few months and most people would recognize the similarity U sure, I think it's only "viral" in this community. I don't believe that anyone who isn't specifically interested in mens rights would draw a parallel here. Do you have any evidence, other than your feelings, to support your claim? But you did comment, so something about it bothers you. What is that? If you actually took the time to read my comment, you would know! I specifically sta…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:31 PM
1

it draws attention to the "manspreading" campaign, which you can then see, by contrast with this example, is sexist. How does it do that? I see nothing about manspreading in the article. Just because you infer draw parallels to manspreading doesn't mean that your inference is actually in the message. So doing, it reveals a generally held hidden assumption that everything really is men's fault; as does your question. Again, my question doesn't even begin to assume everything is mens fault... I am…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:34 PM
3

The women in your life are just trying to get you into a stable orbit. They want you to orbit them, so they pull you in, but then you get confident and too close, so they push you back out. You are their orbiter. Your best course of action is to do the following. Man up, and try to land on one... I don't mean sex if you're not yet comfortable yet, but at least make a move, kiss one, tell her that you like her, and see where you can go. As for the others, don't give them meaningless attention. A …
/r/askTRP06/07/17 06:02 PM
-5

How is this mens rights? This is like something a feminist would do. It doesn't give men any rights, and it's meant to attack the other gender. It's counterproductive.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 02:34 PM
–

the majority of women like cut dicks bc they look prettier to them. Honestly, that sounds like speculation. Let me put it this way, do you like it when other groups, like feminists, speak on your behalf? If not, then I would urge you not to speak on other groups behalf. If I want a woman's opinion, I'll ask a woman. So, feminists (women) not only are indifferent towards MGM but they also encourages it. If I want a feminists opinion, I'll ask a feminist. I don't like it when feminists speak on be…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:09 PM
–

Feminists and MRA are groups millions strong, with diverse opinions. Some feminists are pro-circumcision, some are not. Some MRA's are pro-circumcision, some are not. Personally, I experience no negatives from my circumcision, and I do enjoy the positive of lasting longer in bed, so I like the fact that my parents made the correct choice to circumcise me.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:48 PM
–

I'm circumcised, and I experience no negatives from it. For me, it's just free bonus sexy time.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:46 PM
1

I believe that having children is patriotic, and I want a woman whom I can reasonably trust to stick around and help me raise them. While I believe that it's important for us to know how to attract women, I view the obsession with getting your n-count up to be socially degenerate, and actually contributing to the problems that most of us complain about. I don't consider social promiscuity, even among men, to be truly red pill. Raising a family, and strengthening your group (city, state, and nati…
/r/askTRP20/06/17 02:44 PM
–

You're right, I should have just said "they last 10% longer compared to their uncircumcised counterparts"... idk why I worded it that way... I'll edit. Thank you.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:38 PM
1

I consider you an ambassador to our group. When you speak out in favor of chopping off the genitalia of people with whom you disagree, it reflects back poorly onto all of the other people that identify with your labels, including us. It's childish really, not at all the character that will merit respect from outside communities. You should consider how your actions impact the rest of us. It makes me wonder if you are secretly a feminist who is just posing here to make us all look bad.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:30 PM
–

Oh lol, no no no no, as a scientist I would NEVER trust anecdotal evidence. Circumcised penis's have slightly less sensitivity in the head of the penis. Numerous studies comparing circumcised and uncircumcised men have repeatedly demonstrated that circumcision is correlated to a rough 10% increase in ability to last longer.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:25 PM
8

A "mens rights" supporter who supports eugenics (like a Nazi) and chopping off the genitalia of people with whom they disagree (how barbaric!). LOL, way to positively represent your cause! Maybe you just let your anger get the best of you. It's okay little guy, I know that some people can have a hard time controlling their emotions at times.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:12 PM
–

I'm circumsized, I agree that it looks better, and I like that I can last longer. 10/10 would give my child the blessing of circumcision so he could last longer in bed.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:27 PM
3

If agree only of welfare promoted having kids and staying together. Right now, you get more welfare if you're single. We need to deincentivise that.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 01:47 AM
37

I would take this even further and say we are witnessing the complete destruction of human interaction because of Social Media, period. Social Media isn't the problem, there have always been whores since the dawn of time. The problem is that we have incentivized the breakdown of the nuclear family. The solution is to end entitlement spending, and yes, I'm 100% serious. The reality is that with welfare programs, and female ability to cuck society into paying for their children, there is now liter…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 04:47 PM
-3

when I tried to initiate sex she was very unresponsive. I contemplated taking her home as it was a sign of disrespect. I call bullshit. WTF does "unresponsive" mean in this situation, that she wasn't just following your lead? It sounds like she didn't want to suck your dick, and you're calling her disrespectful for it.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 01:54 PM
11

Zero STATE income tax. You can't avoid Uncle Sam's income tax. Also those states usually have other ways of collecting their "income". It's not quite as simple as the first guy made it seem.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 07:27 PM
3

There is a huge amount of middle ground between living in leftist hellhole, and living in a rural shithole. There are plenty of rural areas with economic opportunity, and millionaires. In fact, in a lot of cases, it can be easier to start up some services in less established semi-rural areas. Rural areas can be quite nice, don't make the mistake of thinking that the places you have been too, or maybe seen in the movies are the way they are everywhere. The U.S. is a large country. That being said…
/r/askTRP24/05/17 07:25 PM
8

It's more-so just the way we talk in here. Obviously, there are intelligent, hard working, and very driven women. However, due to the nature of social relationships, men should not expect this behavior because 19/20 times they encounter one of these "intelligent and self-respecting" woman, it's a facade which hides what OP is talking about.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 01:44 PM
5

What makes an 'unearned' drip of dopamine? It's unearned if you don't have to do any work to get it. Masturbation and drugs require no work. They are easy. "Time you enjoy wasting, is not wasted". Everything is fine in moderation. No one is saying that smoking some pot here and there is bad (actually, pot is for degenerates, but if you want to engage in it, whatever, I don't have a problem with it, but you should be aware that getting drunk and high are lower class activities). The real problem …
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 02:38 PM
2

If feminists had their way, we'd never be allowed to derive any pleasure of any kind Remember the book The DaVinci Code, that Catholic monk who practiced corporal mortification (self harm to sanitize themselves of their sins)? The more nutjob stuff I see like this, the more I start to conflate the left with doing this sort of self-harm on a social level. Gotta sanitize ourselves to be free of the social sins.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 02:10 PM
-10

This circumcision crap is so wierd to me. I'm circumcised and I'm fine. I also agree that it looks better and studies show that it helps me last longer in bed. Ya'll are complaining to make men's dicks dirtier, uglier, and less effective at sex.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:22 PM
5

Criticizing one aspect of a group doesn't mean that you are "anti-group". I criticized Obama all the time, but I still voted for him and was a registered democrat. Feminism, like political groups are wide diverse groups with often conflicting points of view. In fact, feminism has plenty of conflicting views within it, which means that all feminists will have criticism of at least some other members views.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:26 PM
2

Ask them to measure the oppression, and when they fail to produce a unit of measurement to be able to measure and compare different forms of oppression, then accuse them of having a faith based belief, and ask if we should also focus the class on other faith based beliefs. Accuse people of being anti-science if they continue to blindly spout that females are more oppressed, and ask them to contrast the high rates of male suicide with whatever form of oppression they are going on about. You need …
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 05:34 PM
1

"Negativity" is so subjective. I mean, at the risk of being anecdotal, the vast majority of people that I know irl who say that they are cutting out "negativity" are usually cutting out things that I generally would have thought are good for them to hear. They think that people pushing them to be a better person is "negative" because they aren't blindly supporting whatever degenerate decision the idiot is making, or even look at the recent presidential election, people cutting out long time frie…
/r/askTRP12/12/16 10:32 PM
-20

Yeah man, running away is totally the manly thing to do. All real men run away from their problems.
/r/askTRP11/12/16 06:55 PM
2

So, I guess you could say that he, he just lost "The Game".
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 01:33 PM
-1

I'm sick and tired of being told by women that I need to treat them equally, meanwhile they won't even give me the time of day unless I'm 6 inches taller.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:16 PM
3

Black men are far less likely to stick around in the event of pregnancy, especially in interracial relationships. A non-black girl fantasizing about black men is a signal that she's crazy enough to be considering trying to raise a child on her own, which we know to be detrimental to the child. The bluest pill is thinking that sex is more important than our duty to provide the best care possible for our own biological children. Additionally, falling for Hollywood bullshit like BBC is cringworthy.…
/r/askTRP06/10/16 01:11 PM
1

Thanks bro, if I do decide to get the jaw surgery I plan to do a lot of self documentation on myself throughout the process. I dunno if there will be much "red pill" stuff, but if there is ill post it.
/r/askTRP13/09/16 05:37 PM
0

I agree, but there actually is surgery to fix my face... it's just expensive (like $20k, even with health insurance) and means that I'll have numbness the rest of my life. I actually have the money for the surgery... but it's a big commitment. I'll have to wear braces for several years, and I'm in my late 20s. Also, spending that money is a huge burden. If I choose to put it towards an investment property, I can be making over 100k by the time I am 30. If I spend it to get a normal looking jawli…
/r/askTRP13/09/16 04:54 PM
2

Get the jaw surgery to get facial symmetry and beg my parents to get me growth hormones so that I could be a little bit taller. Being short isn't an end all be all, but it sucks that you can never do anything to change it.
/r/askTRP12/09/16 08:45 PM
13

Yeah, Richard Glossip admitted to committing robbery and destroying evidence of the murder. The only disputed fact is really what (if anything) he gave the murdered in exchange for the act. Regardless, Glossip was definitely in on it. He knew a man's life was about to end, and he did nothing to stop it... how can you call yourselves activists for men, and support a man who allows other men to die?
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:02 PM
2

Juries vote based on the evidence that they see. If they are voting "guilty" unanimously for an innocent person, chances are that it's not really their fault, but instead caused by the defense handling their case in a very below satisfactory way.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 04:59 PM
1

You can't control for a lifetime of social conditioning. Teaching people, especially women, how to respect others is dying in most of the country. Her behavior is normal for suburban girls raised by single mothers. Let me be clear, her behavior is unacceptable, but I also believe that a leader can push improvement.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 02:32 PM
1

That's the only thing I don't like about this sub. I think it's important to know what gives women the tingles, but a truly red pill society should openly condemn smuts, both male and female sluts. Promiscuous societies lead to divorce, which leads to kids being raised in single parent households, which leads to women voting to cuck the men via state entitlements (the state will pay for men's children instead of the actual father). Pair bonding ability also decreases with more sexual contacts, a…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 12:42 PM
16

Been doing that for years. Never even once did I get a girl asking to see my cock when I said it was big. When I started saying that it was small and/or that I had a "trifecta" (3 balls), I've had a few girls feign "curiosity" and even outright asking to see. It's hilarious. Also, when she asks "Are you really small?" The correct response is to not answer, just take it as a move opportunity to start making out or touching, then put her hand on your junk. The biggest mistake that I've seen was wh…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 08:13 PM
2

I was watching Vietnam War footage. One of the most common questions being asked was "what makes a man?". We're talking female reporters at bases with soldiers who were returning from battle and being asked if they felt like they were more of a man. Then I realized that whether or not you were a man was a common theme among older Hollywood films, and it was something you heard questioned in music (Bob Dylan anyone!?). It hit me, I had never been asked what it means to be a man, no one ever told …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/16 08:07 PM
1

I've been trying to cut back on alcohol and resturants (also saving for a real estate investment, I already own my home). I've approached girls at an ice cream shop with decent success (no one noticed that I never bought any ice cream). When I'm out shopping is also a good time, but aside from that, bars and drinking parties were always my go to. Seems like the logical conclusion is for me to join a club, but aside from that, do you folks have any good ideas.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/16 06:30 PM
2

Nothing anyone here says is going to help you magically feel attractive, and depending on how you personally define (physically) attractive, the reality is that you may never become physically attractive. You can, however, become mentally attractive, you can be a rock, someone that others can rely on and anchor onto if needed (just don't be beta bux). I have an asymmetrical face, the shape of my face leaves me looking like I have a slight lazy eye and my jawline is so crooked that if you drew a …
/r/askTRP14/07/16 09:46 PM
-1

Drugs are blue pill. You don't need them. Alcohol is fine in social situations only, and even then, you should always be in control. Strict moderation is plenty.
/r/askTRP14/07/16 09:27 PM
2

I did the same thing with Fuller House. Non-stop hamstering... I've been meaning to dl all the episodes and condense them in an abridged series where it makes them all look bad.
/r/askTRP29/06/16 08:08 PM
1

Exactly, now you get it! I am glad that I could you something.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 10:10 PM
5

I think you should have high aspirations, but realistic standards. If I haven't dated anyone in 6 years, calling myself "the prize" is not "high standards" it's delusional. Fancying yourself is great for confidence, but it has diminishing returns, which start to even turn negative if you're too far out of line with reality. Leave irrational self worth to the women, that's their trait. Men are creatures of rationality and logic, so it should stand that we should try to see ourselves in the truest…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 09:02 PM
21

That's a gynocentric way of putting it. Be the kind of men other men want to be, if you become that, women will follow.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 05:05 PM
5

I've literally considered doing this. If I were applying to colleges today, I would absolutely put on my application that I was a black female. It's not like they actually check you out to make sure.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:21 PM
11

Ah remember the gool ol' days of 1938, when Hitler introduced the "quota" system, which forced businesses to disclose how many jews were working in certain fields and mandated that companies which had too many jews would not be able to hire any more. There is a reason why the term "femnazi" sticks.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:20 PM
11

Do you think Trump looks much at what others have done? Trump has advisory boards, and yes, he follows their suggestions, so does the president, and any large company is made up of executive panels. The notion that great leaders are lone wolfs is childish.
/r/askTRP27/05/16 07:47 PM
-1

Spoken like a true feminist. Later
/r/askTRP24/05/16 08:44 PM
1

I would say that dogma is as beta as it gets. Feminism, for example, isn't a religion, but it is on par with religion because they each suffer from dogma.
/r/askTRP24/05/16 07:22 PM
-1

All the men except church leaders that I encountered were eyes at the ground, walk behind their wives, yes ma'am, refuse to walk away from a bitch betas. If you had said this from the beginning I wouldn't have called you illogical, but this is not what you said, instead you said "They are following all the rules, not being alpha." Man up, and take credit for your words. That's what makes them followers. How about you be logical? So are you a beta because you follow red pill ideology, or do you h…
/r/askTRP24/05/16 07:11 PM
-1

Stop being illogical. Probably half the reason we're atheists in the first place is because we've realized that they are not in fact following all of the rules, and rather that they are picking and choosing. Second, participating in an ideology does not make you a beta in the eyes of society. There is another reply to this where someone said that they noticed all of the guys willing to endure a disproportionately large amount of bullshit for the women in their life, which I would agree is beta. …
/r/askTRP24/05/16 06:00 PM
3

Atlanta is a pocket of liberalism in an ocean of conservatism. It's basically a northern area in the South, even the people in the city speak more like northerners than if you go 30 minutes outside of the city. I find it to be no different than living in the North, filled with coffee shops, art studios, hipsters, and yes, feminists/sjw.
/r/askTRP24/05/16 03:09 PM
1

the southern men are church going betas. I'm an atheist, but I don't think that going to church makes you a beta. Cultural unity is very important, and for some, that's all their really going for, instilling their values over others by culturally dominating them... in fact, I'm more tempted to call it alpha than beta.
/r/askTRP24/05/16 03:06 PM
3

Thanks. I hurt my shoulder working out, so instead of heavy lifting I am doing cardio and some stretching. I also built a veggie garden at the recommendation of my friend, I figure that it's still a hobby and it's something that a lot of people seem to enjoy talking about. You're right on everything, to be honest I don't think I could pull off the "Shame that I'm the one to teach you that" part, but I wish that I had said something. I admit it, I'm not here to hide from myself. I make excuses, I…
/r/askTRP09/05/16 07:47 PM
1

I said this needs to be done in order to answer said question. If you disagree, then that means that you think it does not need to be done. I don't think it's a valid answer to the question, so I don't mind if you do it. I think the answer would be interesting, but I don't think it would answer the question of "innate" violence, since you would be studying humans in an unnatural environment. The difference is that, in the comment you actually wrote, you are saying that the knowledge itself is us…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:03 PM
1

It is literally what needs to be done in order to answer the question we're talking about. I disagree, I think that equal societies are NOT natural for sexually dymorphic species, there-for examining the differences between men and women in an equal society would NOT measure the natural differences between men and woman. I know you disagree and think that one shouldn't try to understand unless you already see the benefits of the knowledge gained. And I already called that anti-scientific. lol, w…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:54 PM
1

Because you proposed a human experiment where men and women are equal to test the differences between men and women in an unnatural environment. I want to know what you think would be beneficial from that experiment, given that in reality women have much more on the line in terms of reproduction, and thus will always be choosier, meaning that men will always have to put in more effort to attain sex.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:06 PM
1

If you understand that men will always have to put in more effort, then can you explain what you think would be beneficial about a system where reproductive attempts are equal between men and women?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:48 PM
1

If you understand that men will always have to put in more effort, then can you explain what you think would be beneficial about a system where reproductive attempts are equal between men and women?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:30 PM
1

Everytime I asked you a question to try and understand if you truly understand Batemans principle, you avoid answering it by asking me another question. I feel like the entire time you've been talking with me, you haven't been willing to engage in the conversation that I have wanted to have, instead opting to talk about what you want, and I've let it make me dismissive of your desires in this conversation. I'm not willing to continue this conversation unless you meet me halfway and help me under…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:19 PM
1

If you understand that men will always have to put in more effort, then can you explain what you think would be beneficial about a system where reproductive attempts are equal between men and women?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:05 PM
1

You still don't seem to understand Bateman's principle. Do you understand that men will always have to put more effort into a relationship because females will naturally be more choosy since they have more on the line from a pregnancy?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:35 PM
1

You're doing the equivalent of saying men earn more than women therefore discrimination and when I suggest observing the earnings difference after taking out the variables that aren't discrimination, you say I'm trying to judge them on an unnatural state. Men earning more is natural though.... maybe not more for the same job, but it is natural for men to earn more, primarily because of Batemans Principle. Men need to offer more than women, and money is a good way to show it. And what is this "na…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:34 PM
1

You're saying that men and women should be judged based off of an unnatural state (equality), something that we don't observe anywhere in nature. Whatever violence is innate to men should be judges based on our natural, unequal state. Anything else wouldn't be helpful. I get that you just "want" to know what things would be like in a world where we were unnaturally equal. Can we move past that, because I've now acknowledged it twice, and I really see no benefits from it.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:26 PM
1

I still don't believe that you understand Bateman's Principle. I'm not a teacher, but I do have a minor in biology (I went to school to do bioinformatics) Carrying and giving birth is a circumstance around which mating behavior must adapt. I really an desperate to make sure that you understand this, because what you are writing keeps red flagging me that you haven't actually internalized what this means. Can you explain, what exactly you feel the implications of this should/would alter human beh…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:30 AM
1

And what makes you think circumstances aren't also affecting other species? Because when one species has more to lose from reproducing, their sexual value is inherently higher. If you can't understand why a female, who not only has to carry the child to birth, a psychically stressful process, but also is more likely to be on the line for taking care of a child (in nature and in humans) wouldn't be more choosy than the relatively consequence free males, then I don't really know how to help you. I…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:11 PM
1

Why would Bateman even be a phenomenon if circumstances weren't different to begin with. Because Bateman's Principle is a study based on all sexually dimorphic species, not just humans. Humans, being a sexually dimorphic species, follow the same rule that applies to all other animals. But we do not know that a relative tendency to violence cannot be caused by circumstances alone. Yes we do, sexual selection has caused men to be biologically programmed to form coalitions that aggress against neig…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:09 PM
1

we've never observed a society where those are even close to equal Which is exactly what we would expect thanks to Bateman's principle. This isn't just with humans, it's with all sexually dimorphic species. we cannot say definitively to what extent the propensity to commit violent crime is innate if. We also can't definitively say that gravity exists everywhere in the Universe, but so far, everything we have observed tells us that it is. Men are stronger than women thanks to tens of thousands of…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:33 PM
1

How do you know that your observations are accurate, and not due to biases, both in yourself and in your standard sources of information?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:22 PM
1

How about because of biology and Bateman's principle?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:21 PM
1

Yep, I would agree with that. What are the actual numbers?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 09:44 PM
1

So who do you define as "people"?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 09:22 PM
-2

So now that I know that you don't include yourself in the group "people", I would like to know who you believe IS included in that group. Essentially, you don't think you're a person, so who else isn't a person? You're anecdotal experiences are going to be very different from my anecdotal experiences, to the point where it's going to be difficult for us to organize and find an effective solution to the problems that we agree, are problems. Thank you for the downvote, lucky for you, I don't need …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 09:09 PM
0

People right now assume men = dangerous, evil and women = impossible-to-be-dangerous, cannot be evil by definition. At least with regards to pedophilia. Really, that's no good. Why do you feel this way?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:43 PM
2

Searching through my post history/inbox is proving to be an arduous task to find many a deleted comment but things like this You linked to a non-default sub, with a comment that has a score of -17, and is being directly challenged by the people who replied to it. I don't feel that it's fair of you to base "the culture of Reddit" on it's minority groups, especially when the only example that you could find had a negative score and was directly challenged. Not only that, but you even go farther, a…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:42 PM
1

Without a source, I don't agree with the 80% claim that you're making. However, I do agree that women should be held equal under the law, especially in regards to arrest and conviction rates, and prison sentences (provided the crimes are actually equal). I'm not sure how you expect people to measure "suspicion".
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:28 PM
0

It wouldn't be 93/7 though, it might be 66/34, but that's already more equal. So in other words, you agree with my statement that men are more physically aggressive than women? Again, I'm not saying that physical aggression has to be viewed as a bad thing. Let boys be boys, but also understand the limits to that saying. Look bro, we're a sexually dimorphic species. Batemans Principal, and the biological drives for men to act more physically aggressive in order to "win" the affection of women wil…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:02 PM
1

First off, I feel that I pretty directly claimed that social factors played a role in this, and that women play a valuable role in controlling the levels of violence in society when I said "I can't help but feel that if women were less interested in violent men, that violence among men would drop.". I don't feel that there was any reason for you to assume that my explanation of social factors playing a role for all men would not have also extended to black men, and to accuse me, and others, of b…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:32 PM
-6

Similar to 'driving while black', 'living while male' makes you more of a focus of police. If you're implying that the rate of violent crimes among men would be equal to women if men and women received the same level of police focus, then I think you are delusional. Men take more risks, we use aggression to secure romantic connections, and social respect. Women tend to use more passive techniques. You're trying to write off the reality that men are in fact more physically aggressive, and that wh…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:12 PM
0

To be fair, men commit far more violent crime than women, and black men (as a group) commit roughly 3 times the national average rate of violent crime. This is one of the areas where I'm honestly not sure where I come down on. On one hand, I do believe in "boys will be boys", that maybe minor physical confrontations between men should not involve the law under certain situations (for example, and this is up for discussion with me, but if you're being bullied, and you hit the bully after alerting…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:21 PM
1

our civilization is based on population growth No, our welfare state is based on it. Yes, my mistake, I should have said that it is really just our welfare state. We are more than wealthy enough to care for elderly without making such limited choices. Not if we don't change anything else, even you put the stipulation that we're only wealthy enough if we limit elderly healthcare spending. I don't think we need socialized healthcare, but I do think that some sort of public bargaining system is nee…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 06:19 PM
13

Basic income is a band aid to a larger problem, namely that our civilization is based on population growth, which is why you see the strong desire for immigrants. I'm not against basic income if it were given a terminating condition and a clear path towards reaching the terminating condition. Part of that terminating condition is going to have to be that we check our population growth, and modify our government programs, and propaganda to make a population with a higher percentage of elderly peo…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 01:39 PM
3

Your narrative is wrong. The data says that women are LESS happy now compared to 40 years ago. You can get as butthurt as you want about this data, but your feelings aren't going to change the numbers. Google for ten seconds and you'll find loads more data and publications on the topic. Here is another source that claims that all adults are less happy today than they used to be.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 02:52 AM
3

This is the bluest pill post I've seen on the front page in a long time. The author spits out talk like a textbook former feminist who still buys into the feminist rewritten narrative of what life used to be like, which has no basis in the reality of "old timey" life. Back in the “good ol’ days”, a lot of women weren’t happy. I've actually read that this isn't true. In fact a quick google search provides a cornucopia of results directly challenging this idea. "Women are less happy today than the…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 08:48 PM
0

Then do you think that employers don't "own" their jobs and can hire whoever they think is the best fit? To some extent, they don't have this though. Many industries, particularly educational facilities, are pressured to hire unqualified people or openly discriminate against white men in the name of diversity. I actually agree with what you're saying, I do think that we should be able to hire whoever we feel is the best fit, and if we're being discriminatory then those who feel that we're being …
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:02 PM
1

I agree that what you're saying is correct, but I feel that it's ideologically inconsistent with the notion that we also have to serve or hire whoever we want. Discrimination is an all or nothing thing with me, either you don't allow discrimination for anything, or you allow discrimination (allowing discrimination also means that it's okay to discriminate where you take your money, don't like that Mississippi allows people not to serve gay people, then don't do business with that state. Don't li…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:57 PM
6

I'm trying to decide if she was more racist or sexist. While I agree that she was both, I think it's to our advantage to erase these words from our vocabulary, and instead use "racially prejudice" and "sexually prejudice". This has two advantages, the first being that "racist" and "sexist" are words that have been dulled a bit by frequent use. I mean come on, when people are saying that asking an ethnic East Asian person what country they are from is racist, that to me means that the term has lo…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:10 PM
1

The problem with feminism is that it's based on dogma, and dogmatic beliefs stifle rational discourse. The problem with these "rights" groups is that they lack a clear leader, which is actually a defensive mechanism. If you have no leader then any potentially fucked up view that you hold can be dismissed by the rest of the group by using the No True Scottsman Fallacy. All groups should have a leader who can speak on behalf of the group members, and engage in debates with other "rights" leaders t…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 06:53 PM
0

Yes this! Although I have to admit, I have no idea how to actually promote this idea. I guess I could write a letter to the University, but otherwise, I feel like the only thing I can do is wait to hear about another case like this.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:36 PM
4

I'm trying to make sense of this, this is the summary as far as I can tell: Nungesser was found not responsible of sexual assualt to mattress girl, however mattress girl initiated a public shame campaign that will follow Nungesser around, probably for the rest of his life. This lawsuit was not against mattress girl, but rather against Columbia University, with Nungesser argued that this was gender-based harrassment and that Columbia was complicit. Under title IX, universities, public or private,…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:16 PM
1

No, reproduction is a right, but accepting state money should be a privilege, not a right. I don't support stuff like birthing permits or any crap like that, i just support the state being able to ask for something in return for "free money", in this case I support for the state asking for the mother and fathers fertility if they are not an in tact family unit in need of state funding to support their child.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:44 PM
1

I'm not going as far as /u/PM_ME_YOUR_NAUGHTIEZ, all I'm saying is that given that we know that single parenthood is bad for kids, that the children of single parenthood perform worse than their counterparts with in tact family units across all metrics, it's unfair to make the productive members of society pay for children that they neither helped to create, nor get a voice in how the child is raised. If you want money from the state to raise the child that you helped to create, then you should …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:42 PM
-6

No they won't, they'll just demand that more of the beta men give up more money to support their precious little darling since his "abusive" baby daddy doesn't stick around, except for the occasional hang outs and hook ups that mommy still has with him. Why should that guy have to pay anything when we can just get the nice boys to pay for the child?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:33 PM
-1

The USA does a less than stellar job of providing for the single parents that would be left from a legal parent surrender. I agree, but I have a big problem with having to pay for children that I didn't create, and don't get a say in how they are raised. We all want to help children, but we also shouldn't create a cycle of poverty, poor social values, and lost potential. Fine, take my money, but sterilize both parents in the process to restrict the expansion of people who support single parentho…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 09:29 PM
1

My son is writing down "female" on all of his scholarship applications. Worst case scenario, they think he is trans and he gets even more scholarships!
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:41 PM
5

Can't it be both? If a bunch of women were on an island without a man, I don't think they'd still be fighting over looks as much (inb4 the season of survivor where it was boys v girls, that's a reality show and boys and the nation were still watching). Women are essentially trying to be "alpha" to get the highest value man, while men try to be alpha for the women in some respects, but also for general respect from society.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 09:57 PM
94

it's weird seeing this kind of shit through the lens of knowing that male problems will be mitigates. You can tell just how hard they tried to keep the focus on women, and to avoid talking about men.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:55 PM
0

Political agenda and Third wave Feminism are destroying the culture. I never said anything that should lead you to believe that I disagree with this statement, and in fact, I do agree with it. What I'm curious to know is how you think the political agendas and feminism are destroying the culture. I am asserting that they are destroying the culture by supporting ideological platforms that, regardless of intent, make us less happy as a collective whole and that shatter the family unit. Promiscuity…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 07:37 PM
0

what motivation should any of us have to turn back this cycle when everything I can see seems to indicate that we've hit the point of no return. I have the mentality "If I'm not banging this girl, some other guy will.", and I imagine that I'm not alone. I feel like you're kneejerking and thinking that I'm telling people not to bang high numbers of other people, even though I clearly gave reason to support us doing it. At no point did I even try to tell you, or anyone else, that you couldn't do w…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 02:19 PM
3

You're not wrong but I think the point is that it doesn't have to be that way. Look, even TRP acknowledges that a strong family unit is what makes a nation strong, and slutting it up (male or female) helps to destroy the family unit (makes you less able to pair bond, less appreciative of your partner in the long term, people will marry later in life, which makes divorce an easier option when plenty of options are available later on in life). Yeah, being a man-whore makes you attractive to women,…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 07:54 PM
45

Just say you're a female and show up to the job interview, if they say anything about you not being a female, sue them for discrimination against transexuals. Problem solved
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:48 PM
1

I would say that all discrimination is unfair, however at the same time, everyone is discriminated against because unless you're treated the best, someone else is going to get better treatment. The word "discrimination" has really been devalued to me. We can all claim that it applies to us. I wouldn't say that I have a perfect method either, but I do think you can begin to apply logic to the situation to change what is an isn't okay. For example, we can't measure oppression, which means that we …
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:07 PM
1

Okay, I'm not trying to be dismissive here, but I can't help but shake this feeling that you don't know your own beliefs. "A vague one", sounds more to me like trying to dodge the question, which implies that you don't know the answer, and are operating on your feelings, rather than you logic, which, you know is perfectly fine, I don't have a problem with you doing it, but I just want to know if that's the case or not. I'm sorry if this got dragged out too long. I think what I've learned from yo…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:15 PM
3

The fact that he knew that he was intending to deceive people, and knew that the people that he was interacting with were being deceived, makes it a lie by omission. In this case, he knowingly communicated a misleading profile. The lie wasn't verbal, in the traditional sense, it was abstract, but it was still present. Let me put it slightly differently, I'm sure that you can agree that it's possible to speak a verbal lie. You probably also agree that it's possible to write a written lie. Now wha…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 08:09 PM
6

Celebrate it. It's beta's like this that champion for women to keep getting shit from the government. They're the people who are supporting the government stealing from us to fund the single single mothers. Without these beta providers and supporters, the state of hypergamy would not be able to function. Since these cucks love funding all of the social depravity so much, might as well take our turn getting a piece of the pie.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 07:38 PM
8

He intended to deceive by violating the trust that the profile picture would be of him. I would say that the clear and knowing deception (as in knowing that the people he was communicating with were being deceived) is a lie by omission. I'm not saying that he is a terrible person or anything, because hell, I'm considering doing this trick myself, but I am saying that a lie by omission is still a lie.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 07:33 PM
2

He knew that he was deceiving the people, and he knew what he was deceiving them about. He knew that his picture implied that he was a female, and he knew that other people were operating under the trust that the profile picture was a picture of him.The clear and knowing violation of trust, is a lie by omission.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 07:29 PM
1

Earlier you said "Being discriminatory is not bad. Being racist is bad, being sexist is bad, but being discriminatory of other things is fine.". So I'm still drawing off that, and what I'm asking is, what kind of measurement are we using to determine the threshold the must be crossed to make a form of discrimination cross into the bad/unfair territory?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:39 PM
1

Okay, thanks, I think I see what you're saying, except that I was sort of under the impression that we could measure and objectively analyze just about any thing between two groups. For example, height difference and salary. I guess what I'm saying is that everything that you've mentioned makes sense to me with the one exception being how we know when one group has reached the "bad enough" threshold for you to consider discrimination against them to be unfair.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:10 PM
1

Sounds pretty ambiguous, don't you think?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:57 PM
1

How is a third party to know the difference between fair discrimination and unfair discrimination?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:06 PM
2

Not the original guy, but it's widely accepted that a small rate of inflation (say 1%-3%) is healthy for an economy because it promotes investment instead of hoarding.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 08:12 PM
0

Dude, come to America... seriously, if you're not white it's very VERY easy for you to get in. You will be fucked at first (companies take advantage of the 5 year time limit that you need to stay here, you'll make peanuts during that time, but as soon as you have citizenship, you'll be able to make 6 figures) Also, racial relations are not bad for anyone unless you are Latino in the Mexican boarder states or black. Generally speaking, no one else seems to really have any significant problems wit…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 08:11 PM
58

That reminds me of the scene from Band Of Brothers, where the girls who slept with Nazi's were often killed, maimed, or dragged into the street for public humiliation after liberation. Nowadays most people see it as how terrible the men were, instead of seeing it as "Hey these girls were literally helping the people who were invading the nation."
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 07:49 PM
8

aaannnnnd this is why some people say that women shouldn't vote.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 07:42 PM
1

Okay thanks for answering. I guess one last question, is that I can't help but wonder if those two things are arbitrary or not. How did you arrive at the conclusion that only racism and sexism are bad enough that discrimination on those levels is bad, but other forms haven't reached the "bad enough" threshold? If the threshold is not arbitrary, would you be able to state the parameters for what it would take to reach the threshold so that a form of discrimination is no longer acceptable? If I ha…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:15 PM
1

I know that I might be digging into the weeds a bit here, but can I ask you if you agree the common phrase "Everyone is different/unique, that's what makes us all special"? If you do agree that we're all different/unique, how does that belief tie in with your claim that we're being discriminatory if we tell things apart?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:56 PM
3

The only problem that I have with that is the lack of agreed upon authority to establish what is and isn't discrimination. Some things may seem obvious, but other might not. Society is actually really really bad at determining sexism/racism, because we tend to rate benevolent forms of discrimination as LESS sexist/racist than equality. Without a formal institution to establish if something it traditionally sexist, equal, or benevolently sexist, it's difficult to establish a "true" guide for whic…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:27 PM
2

Depends on what you classify as "ignoring the discrimination". In my opinion, doing nothing does not equal "ignoring". As a quick example to support my logic, I don't really do much to help solve the problems in the region containing Israel and Palestine. It's not that I'm not aware of the problems, or that I don't care, it's just that I can only do so much in a day, and problems related to gender issues are more interesting to me. I'm not ignoring Israel/Palestine, I just don't really have the …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:45 PM
0

What I said: "70K is more enjoyable than minimum wage" You're reply: "HA HA YOU THINK YOU HAVE TO HAVE 70K TO HAVE AN ENJOYABLE LIFE!" ... uh, no, I just said that it's more enjoyable. Go take some logic classes bro.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 10:11 PM
1

lol. RemindMe! 20 years "/u/MuzakNinja claims that she has an 'action plan' that will instill 'real' cultural change. I want to laugh at how nothing she did will have caused any real change, and that she wasted the last 20 years of her life stressing out about taxes while feeling superior because she hasn't realized that everyone would change how they were spent if given the chance, but that playing with the system works out so much better and yields much higher rewards. Enjoy the dirt slug."
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 06:56 PM
1

Yeah man, fight the system! I don't work because I want to fight the system man. I'm not lazy. I just would rather have 100% of nothing than 60% of something, especially after factoring in cost of living. If you want to make a change, find a way to gather power, but here's a protip, money is power. If you want a change, but you're too lazy to do anything to achieve that goal except for bitching like a feminist, then proceed to act as you were.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 03:55 PM
0

Sounds like an excuse that a beta would use to explain why they can't get ahead.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 03:06 PM
1

Oh wow, you noticed that I was using a strawman, what gave it away, the sarcasm tag that I used? I'm using images of myself, you idiot. I'm single, earning about 75k/year and I still want to earn more. sure, for every dollar more I earn, I will lose about 35 cents to taxes, and yeah that pisses me off, but why would I want to earn, oh, say the national average of 47K a year just to not pay as much taxes? Look at it this way, for every $1K more I earn, I still get to take home $650. Do I wish tha…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 03:03 PM
0

Ha, I'm actually a socially and fiscally conservative. If you're so dense and foolish that you can't understand that a life working a part time minimum wage (which at just 34 hours is above the poverty line for a single-childless person) is far less enjoyable than a life making >70k, then I can't help you. You're doing mental gymnastics to read into this the way that you want to read into this, that's stupid of you. Everyone wants to be wealthy, and paying higher taxes isn't going to reduce our …
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 02:56 PM
16

Yeah man, living near poverty is so much better than living a wealthy life because those taxes sure are painful! /s
/r/TheRedPill26/01/16 10:18 PM
4

I think more herbivoremen are really just incels. I used to say I was an herbivoreman, but that's only because it was easier than admitting that I was so pathetic with my social life that women were basically running from me. It happens though. My dating live has historically been so much work for so little payout that eventually I just gave up and stopped trying. Only recently did I even begin to take steps to try and turn that around (Thanks Red Pill). But as of now, I haven't has sex in 7 yea…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 08:37 PM
1

Did you go through school in Germany?
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:19 PM
0

I disagree, multiculturalism will work even in places that don't assimilate, such as Chinatown, as long as the remain friendly to the dominant cultures around them. The family down the street can choose not to learn the language, as long as they can support themselves. It's when victim-culture perverts one of the cultures, and the balance becomes one sided, with one group of people setting themselves up as the "takers" while another is the "givers" that problems happen. Muslims fuel their cultur…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:14 PM
5

buuut thaaaats meeeaaannnn!
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:05 PM
3

Great work bro! One more thing you should learn is the difference between "than" and "then".
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 02:57 PM
1

Haha, but I am important enough to respond too, eh? :) We both know what's up here, you know you're incapable of quoting me saying that I support a feminism, because you know that I never said such a thing. You're goal is to post "radical" content to screen shot and post on other subreddits/websites in order to devalue the MRM. Genius idea really, but again, I'll gladly accept that I'm wrong if you could just post one quote... lol, I mean this can't be a difficult task, especially since I have y…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:44 PM
1

Haha, Exactly as I expected, you make claims, but can't back them up with a quote because you know you don't have one. The irony is that you're at the very least someone who does not support the MRM, and you're using a strawman account to try to make this movement look hate filled, childish and illegitimate. Truly masterfully done, you may not have fooled me, but I'm sure you're going to trick lots of people. Credit where credit is due, you're work is impressive. I am fully willing to concede to…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 02:21 PM
1

You are an SJW whose beliefs seem barely removed from the most rabid of feminists. This is what I don't understand... what exactly, did I say to make you think this? Like, quot eme directly, don't try and change what I said by "putting it in your own words", I want you to quote me exactly as I have written, because quite frankly I find you delusional and don't believe that you are able to comply with this request. Further, I think you'll refuse my request because that is the only way that you ca…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:33 PM
-1

Whoa there, that sounds like you're implying that we have to actually work to get to where we want to be... sounds like Red Pill bullshit to me. People here want to be "accepted for who they are", even if they're lazy leaches who want to be validated over nothing.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:57 PM
1

What do you expect me to do with your reply? Should I take you lack of an answer to my questions to mean that you don't have an answer? Because that is currently how I am taking it. What is your deal? Why is what I've done such a big issue for you?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:36 PM
1

I'm trying to be gentle because I can tell how sensitive you are, but I have no idea what you're talking about. What exactly did I do to ignite this pent up rage (and fear??) that you're expressing?
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:16 PM
1

I haven't got a clue as to what you're so enraged about. Again, what's your deal? Why is this such a big issue for you?
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:48 PM
1

Dude, what's your deal? Why is this such a big issue for you?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:18 PM
1

If you are suggesting that feminISM itself is about man-hating, why the fuck are you arguing with me? Uuggg, no, Jesus Christ, that's not what I am saying. As I said before, "hate" has to be something intentional. I'm saying that most feminists (I'll ballpark and say 90-95%) are ignorant, and gynocentric... and while those two things are bad, and a horrible basis for a movement, they aren't "hate". "Hate" is something active and conscious. You can't "unconsciously hate", but you can be bias, and…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:20 PM
1

haha, Quotes from my very first comment in this thread: an anti-feminist as I am... Feminism today is supported by brainwashed people who can't see the big picture, and that's why we fight it. From my second comment to you: feminism has harbored man-hating bigots... their reality is skewed, and the unbiased reality is that feminists are hurting themselves, men, and society with their propaganda... I'm openly claiming that they operate in a distorted reality, and that they hurt people... no reaso…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:41 PM
1

Ohhh okay, I get it now, you were posting that link because you were using a no true scotsman - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman: /u/GoHoMoThrow: All feminists hate men. Me: I know a male feminist who doesn't hate men. /u/GoHoMoThrow: No TRUE feminist would not hate men.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:21 PM
1

You arent 'trashing feminism' so far, though, now are you? Quotes from my very first comment in this thread: an anti-feminist as I am... Feminism today is supported by brainwashed people who can't see the big picture, and that's why we fight it. From my second comment to you: feminist perception and reality are not the same thing... feminist perspective is a very skewed reality... [feminists] legitimately don't understand the consequences of their actions... I don't believe that most of their [f…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:11 PM
2

I encourage you to read that article, there is no "No true Scotsman" being used here. Further, if you are going to declare that "feminism stands for something" I want you to back it up. What authority applies to all feminism? Man up, and just admit that you don't want to answer the question because you're smart enough to know that answering my question means admitting that feminism means different things to different people, and once you admit that, you will have to concede that not all feminist…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:58 PM
1

Which, to me, makes you a woefully naive feminist apologist who thinks his naivete denotes moral superiority. Exactly, in other words, I hit the nail on the head when I said that "I openly trash feminism, but just because I don't trash it the way you want me to trash it you throw a temper tantrum" Jesus Christ, I've met feminists that were more rational than you are being right now.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:49 PM
1

Oops, in all of your rambling you forgot to answer my question. What "authority" (using that term liberally here) defines the principles for all of feminism?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:30 PM
0

What "authority" (using that term liberally here) defines the principles for all of feminism?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:20 PM
0

Okay, clearly we disagree on a few parameters for what hate is. What percentage of a group must harbor hate for the group as a whole to harbor hate?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:13 PM
1

Okay, so I've figured out the issue here. What we really disagree on is the word "hate". To me, "hate" has to be a conscious action. I can accidently harm someone, but as long as it wasn't intentional, then I didn't do it out of "hatred", I just made a mistake. To me, 95% of feminists legitimately don't believe that they are harming men, and really do feel like they are universal victims. Now, all of them are wrong, but the catch is that I don't believe that they know that they are wrong... I si…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:09 PM
0

I don't think it's reality to suggest that the bulk of Klansmen hate blacks. If that's what you believe then you are a horrible racist. The KKK actively preaches racial superiority. You're trying to compare a group (feminism) that is claims to be shooting for equality, with a group (KKK) that is supposed to be shooting for inequality, so your racist comparison fails.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:03 PM
1

Dude, please read this unedited comment that I wrote a year ago about comparing feminism with religion. However, while individual members of feminism may harbor "hate", it ("hate") is not a platform of feminism. I don't believe that the majority of feminists are acting out of any sort of conscious hate (and to me, "hate" is only "hate" if it is conscious). Rather, I do believe that feminists are acting geocentrically, whether conscious or not, they are not generally being open or empathetic to m…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:56 PM
1

So, in absence of compelling, universal evidence to the contrary, you will choose to believe feminists to not be man hating. WTF does "universal evidence" mean anyway? I know some feminists who do clearly hold anti-male biases and I also know feminists who don't appear to hate men at all. Feminists are a group of millions of people, some of them men. Do the male feminists also hate men? You're acting as if you still haven't realized that feminists are more than one person yet. I have admitted ov…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:42 PM
-5

Now, like everybother feminist, you move the goalposts and demand proof literally every feminist hated men. Come now, that's not what I requested and you know it. You were provided with multiple examples supporting the argument that feminism is man hate, and always as been. You, on the other hand, simply handwave and supply apologist rhetoric. No, I just don't believe that even 100 quotes are necessarily representative of a movement that contained tens of thousands of people. Look, you need to u…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:44 PM
-3

Eh, okay, but see I think that I want to challenge your claims because the way I see it, from their perspective they're making things equal, which is different from hating men or as the original quote claimed "Early feminists are notorious for saying they want to stomp men like a pig with an apple in its mouth". Now I chose those words very carefully, so let me be clear: The feminists think that their making the world equal from their perspective, not necessarily in reality. The crux for us in t…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:19 PM
-1

As much of an anti-feminist as I am, I'm more against people using irrational logic. Don't be irrational, a few bad apples does not mean that the bunch as a whole is ruined. Most feminists were not bigots, and if you happened to be a feminist, you'd point out bigotive claims that men made against women to support your points, but surely you understand that just because one random man makes a sexist claim, that it doesn't make you a sexist. Cut this guilt by association crap. You were asked to pr…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:01 PM
6

I am pretty sure that I've heard /u/GirlWritesWhat talk about some feminist who got caught writing herself death/rape threats. Now, obviously I don't mean to say that all feminists do this, but I think it would be interesting to see how often these threats are serious.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:04 PM
9

In all seriousness, can we please stop perpetuating the idea idea that racists are all white. I don't mean to say that white people can't be racist, but I'd really like to see us promoting the idea that white skin is not what defines a racist.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:59 PM
0

Giving a guy head in high school and having sex with 8 guys by the time you are in your early 20s is not. I totally agree that the bj in highschool thing doesn't matter. If she was sleeping with multiple guys at a young age, that actually is a risk factor for LTR, but one bj means nothing to me. One bj is normal childhood curiosity, it's healthy. The catch is that most girls will not count things like one night stands, or guys that they didn't really like when they count the number of guys that …
/r/askTRP01/10/15 04:19 PM
1

I am reading a awful lot of comments about how education doesn't increase a woman's sex appeal... and maybe I am misunderstanding what all of you mean. If I'm looking for a girl to slam for the night, then sure, her education means nothing to me, but if I'm looking for a girl to wife, then I am interested in a college educated woman (or at the least, a woman who can take home close to the the US avg salary). Finances are a pretty damn big part of a long term relationship, and while I probably do…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 06:23 PM
0

They can't understand that men and women find different things attractive. I think it's funny how this used to be common knowledge before feminism. They used to train men how to be "men" (what women wanted) and women were trained how to be what men wanted. Now it's socially unacceptable to admit that different genders want different things from their S.O.. Thanks feminism!
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 05:57 PM
4

Women have an easier time in school because they don't have all the pressure on them to a constant provider. I'm the only male of 4 children. It's hard not to feel jealous of what they've received, that wasn't really offered to me (cars, rent, vacations, credit card bills paid off). Much of these "gifts" to my sisters were done in secret (the cars were pretty much the only public gifts that they got, while I had to pay for mine), but in the years since college, and with enough family parties wit…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 05:21 PM
14

I had an aunt who was doing amazing while she was alive. My cousin and I were pretty close, but we used to always hang out at his place because she had such nice stuff, lived in a huge house and had a pool and kick ass basement for us to play in. In a span of about 10 years my aunt went through 3 husbands, and eventually she hung herself. I was about 16 when that happened. I grew up pretty sheltered, and very very naive. Until my early 20's I was the type of guy who if you said "women use their …
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 03:30 PM
8

I don't feel that literally every false accusation that a women makes deserves a post here. This. This is exactly the problem, and it's why posts like this are made. The amount of posts here are no where near the amount of false allegations that are actually made. What you are saying is akin to saying that every story of rape appears on Tumblr. Just because we report a higher percentage of the cases of a certain story doesn't mean that we cover all of them. Your language makes it clear that you …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:33 PM
1

Highly educated people have to be some of the most stupid people I've known frankly lol, whatever helps you sleep at night.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:06 PM
7

I think it's about awareness, and keeping people informed so that they can apply pressure if needed. This case was handled properly, but if the allegation had not involved a business, then there is a chance that the man who was falsely accused may have not have the proper backing to defend himself against the claim. The same way that feminists want to make sure that people are "aware" of sexual misconduct, MRA's want people to be "aware" of false accusations. Essentially, the mens rights issue a…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:25 PM
14

What does this have to do with Men's Rights? I think it's about awareness, and keeping people informed so that they can apply pressure if needed. This case was handled properly, but if the allegation had not involved a business, then there is a chance that the man who was falsely accused may have not have the proper backing to defend himself against the claim. The same way that feminists want to make sure that people are "aware" of sexual misconduct, MRA's want people to be "aware" of false accu…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:24 PM
106

I think it's about awareness, and keeping people informed so that they can apply pressure if needed. This case was handled properly, but if the allegation had not involved a business, then there is a chance that the man who was falsely accused may have not have the proper backing to defend himself against the claim. The same way that feminists want to make sure that people are "aware" of sexual misconduct, MRA's want people to be "aware" of false accusations. Essentially, the mens rights issue a…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:20 PM
7

I remember the first time that I was unable to finish with my college gf. I was cleaning up after calling it quits, and I heard her whimper, I look over and she's crying because she felt bad that I didn't finish. I had to coddle her, and I remember thinking about how strange it was, because I didn't even really care that I didn't go off, I was actually feeling awesome for lasting over an hour of vigorous sex (I was, and still am in pretty good cardio shape). For the longest time, I figured that …
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 09:34 PM
12

Darn, I have been using that wrong. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:43 PM
71

It all begs the question, if the gender bias of words matters to feminists, and if feminism really helps everyone, then why don't they remove the gender bias of the word "feminism"? In my experience, reminding feminists about us having to change gender bias job titles such as the title of "policeman" to "police officer", and then calling that "the right thing to do", and asking the feminist if she is willing to change her ideological title from the gender-bias "feminism" to the non-gender bias t…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:17 PM
17

It's only really good for comparing proportions, which is occasionally useful (for example, when comparing the proportion of failed bolt attempts done by two types of automated factory screwdrivers, and all you want to compare is the success rates). When you want to know something like "how many men are murdered are work, compared to how many women are murdered at work?" this chart isn't really that useful because to a novice, especially someone unfamiliar with workplace mortality rates, might m…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:54 PM
1

damn, I had missed that... I feel like I'm taking crazypills, why are people so afraid to call this stuff out for the lies that it is?
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:40 PM
14

The most jaw dropping part of that summery was that they talked with the producers of the video, and found that they actually did check into sources that had the wage gap presented honestly and accurately, but they ignored it and produced the misleading video anyway. And people wonder why I banned buzzfeed from my facebook.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:42 PM
0

Eh, I wouldn't call it a "huge difference", and I don't think scholars would either. There is not much difference between the two terms as socialism is some how related to democracy. The end goals are essentially the same, and for the majority of citizens, there is little difference. In the west, the word "socialism" has been very much simplified down to any government or policy that employs some form of discrimination in order to make the society "more equal". That's why you hear a lot of peopl…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:28 PM
2

Is this technically illegal? Like I remember a story where a cake company had to make a cake that was in support of gay rights, even though they didn't agree that homosexuality was moral. So by that same logic, shouldn't this company be required to treat all customers equally, even though they may not agree with their viewpoints and political stances?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:56 PM
0

I got sloppy and didn't phrase it as a question... my mistake. What I should have said was "Would it be accurate for me to say that according to you, we have a difference of opinion?"
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:23 AM
1

So in other words, we have a different opinion.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:15 AM
1

That doesn't answer the question, the question is "who do YOU consider to be an authority on the English language?"
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:05 AM
1

So I consider dictionaries to be English authorities, but it sounds like you don't agree with that. Who do you consider to be an authority on the English language?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:42 AM
1

Again, it's propaganda, not "valid." lol, the word "left" (or "left-wing") listed here, here, and here as a term that could be used to reference the "congressional left" (traditionally liberal) party, in the case of the United States, meaning Democrats who sit on the left side of the congressional houses, as a commonly accepted usage of the word. Linguistically, the fact that people accept this usage, and that their acceptance has been recognized by these dictionaries, and the fact that English …
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:45 AM
0

"The issue isn't your personal endorsement, but your "reasoning" where you obediently regurgitate how one of the two capitalist parties is "the left." lol, who is "you" in that statement? If "you" is /u/theYambag, then you are saying that I personally would obediently regurgitate how one of the two capitalist parties is "the left." However, I never said that "I" would make this claim. I said that the claim is valid in the United States. Just because a definition is valid does not mean that I wou…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:51 PM
1

The issue isn't your personal endorsement, but your "reasoning" where you obediently regurgitate how one of the two capitalist parties is "the left." I never made one single claim about my own political beliefs or how I personally choose to label my own thoughts. I am not trying to tell you my thoughts, I am trying to explain to you how the word was used, and how the writings of /u/lethn earlier in our thread would be considered valid by many Americans. Trying to attack me, instead of the issue …
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:56 PM
1

The "two parties" could be running General Lee vs Stonewall Jackson, and people like you would think one of them was "the left." I've never made one single claim about my own political beliefs this entire thread. All I have done is explain to you how the words "left" and "right" in reference to politics are used in the United States. My desired purpose in this "discussion" was never to educate the way things "should be" or the traditional meanings of "left" or "right", it was only to explain tha…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:40 PM
0

Even if I said what you think (sigh) that is irrelevant. Oh I'm sorry, I thought that when I said "In the U.S. the left is used nearly synonymously with "Liberals/Democrats", while the right is used synonymously with "Conservative/Republicans".", and linked you to the wiki article on the topic, and then you challenged the article, saying that those definitions of the word were "how it's being used [by propagandists]", that you meant that those words were used that way by propagandists. You know …
/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:27 PM
3

I didn't say that. In this comment you said that my definitions for the words are how they are being used by "Propagandists". Tens of millions of people in the United States use the words the way that I described... I even cited an article supporting me. And the less popular one (eg the non-propaganda meaning) is not wrong because it's less popular. None of my comments are edited. I need to explicitly state that I did not ever make any sort of argument to suggest that the above argument is not t…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:04 PM
4

how it's being used [by propagandists] I think it's much more likely that some people misuse the term because they don't fully understand the difference, than it is for me to believe that all of the people who misuse the term are engaged in a massive conspiracy among tens of millions of people to smear the definition. I'll go with Occam's razor on this one, but you're free to disagree. Second, even if it was true that doesn't mean that what's popular is true. eg, in the 70s it was popular to def…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:31 PM
5

Dude, I linked you a source to show that that's how it's being used. English is fluid and changing, and definitions are defined by how people use them, not by /u/anticapitalist's personal opinion of how a word should be used. What if I said "No, "gay" means happy! Everyone who uses it in reference to homosexuality is lying!" Sorry bro, when the public accepts a word to mean something, even something that it traditionally never meant, because of the ability for the English Language to change, the…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:28 PM
8

In the U.S. the left is used nearly synonymously with "Liberals/Democrats", while the right is used synonymously with "Conservative/Republicans". In my experience and generally speaking, most people do seem understand that you can be a conservative democrat, but because the two tend to align so greatly in the U.S., it's lead to people using the words as synonyms. A quote from the wikipedia article on Left-Right Politics reads: The terms left-wing and right-wing are widely used in the United Stat…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:02 PM
-2

Totally agree. While I do feel that MRA's as a whole tend to be a lot more rational than other sjw subsets, I still consider MRA's to be a subset of sjw's. Many sjw's leach onto troll posts when it comes to some troll affirming what they want to believe.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:19 PM
4

I agree that revenge porn is bad, but I also sort of think that to make it illegal we need to talk about why (what ethical rule) we're feeling has been broken. So while I agree that revenge-porn is bad, I think I also have a burden to be able to explain it. Revenge-porn is viewed as scary and terrible because of how society will perceive the victim. It can also be rather embarrassing, and lead to loss of jobs. However, other things can be considered like this too. For example, if someone makes a…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:47 PM
1

Just an FYI. Jim Oliver is a comedian. Jon Oliver is a comedian, but he is also a new anchor. You're allowed to be both, those careers don't have to be mutually exclusive. His show relies on his audience being able to walk away more informed, and thus he presents his information in a way where it is meant to be taken seriously, not as a joke. The people who watch this segment aren't going to finish it and say "Wow, that sure was an elaborate joke about there being some pretty violent things on t…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:28 PM
3

A comedian on tv said some goofy shit as part of his comedy show, stop crying about it. You're not wrong that Oliver is a comedian, but that doesn't mean that he can't also be a new caster. Sure, Oliver does make jokes, but he also presents very clear stories that hinge on his viewers being able to watch the story and walk away feeling more informed. The point is that not everything in his show is presented as a joke, in fact the most powerful segments are presented as "truth", and innovative an…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:20 PM
2

And anyway why take comedians so damn seriously. I understand your point, and I am not an MRA, but I reject the notion that a comedian can't also be a newscaster. John Stewart hid behind this fallacy, and Jon Oliver is doing the same thing. Jon Olivers popularity is very much hinged on the fact that people walk away from his show feeling more informed than when they first turned it on. Now, does Oliver make jokes? Absolutely. Does Oliver use fallacies and sarcasm that are clearly not supposed to…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:45 PM
2

I don't care what names people call me, if they message me with my address and threaten to kill me I'm going to be very much afraid. That's a fair statement, except when the frame of the story is "Women are experiencing this, and if you don't experience it, congratulations on your white penis.", I think it's fair for us to ask, "How often does it happen to women compared to how often if happens to men?" I think the vast majority of people on this forum understand and believe that these kinds of …
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:33 PM
17

it doesn't look like he was making a gender-based contradiction. He says that "If you don't think it's a problem, then congratulations on your white penis". He shows no examples of white men being harassed. At best he's being intellectually dishonest. If Hillary Clinton publicly denounced online dissidents and trolls, I bet that Oliver would respond similarly. I actually strongly disagree, if Hilary Clinton denounced trolls, I don't think it would be noteworthy at all to Oliver, except that he m…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:22 PM
4

Ugh, but Feminism is TRYING to fix this if you'd shut up and just let us. Feminism means equal rights, and lots of feminists speak up for men. I'd list them, but it's not my job to educate you Mr. Entitled. If you want to know what feminism is doing for men, take a course on Feminism. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:47 PM
-2

Even better, stop having sex (with women). The only reason women get away with all this bullshit is because they control us with sex. If we stop putting out, they'll eventually get desperate enough to change things. The gender that controls the sexual market, also controls the world.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:56 PM
4

I do not recommend watching it, as that will give them ad revenue, but you should report it. The proper time code where the phrase "If we need to continue the human race, we don't really need men, but we definitely need women." comes up is a time code 2:23.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:04 PM
4

You disagree with my opinion? BANNED
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:36 PM
1

I could be wrong, but I think that more has to happen than simply living together for 6 months. From what I heard, you have to meet a couple criteria, (such as sharing a bank account) in order for it to be considered a common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:14 PM
1

Honestly, I don't know who those two people are, but I trust your claim that they are different, and I would bet that if I did study the two, that I would see what you are saying. However, what I disagree with is this statement: The fact that the "overwhelming majority of the population" would categorize both as "liberals" only speaks to their ignorance. There is a fallacy called the dictionary fallacy, which basically asserts that just because the dictionary is an authority, doesn't mean that i…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:12 PM
2

I disagree, and I think that the overwhelming majority of the population would disagree as well. If you're trying to suggest the widely accepted definition of "liberal" is wrong, that's fine, but imo because I am not on the left, I feel that you need to start this change from within the group of people who define themselves as liberals (which currently includes feminists/sjw/progressives), and you need to have your definition of the word publicly accepted by them before the concept is going to b…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:35 PM
10

Liberals want more open discussion between experts, while using facts to support their argument. Meh, I'm not so sure. Liberals are way more likely to support censorship of ideas that they don't like, or defriend a person over political disagreements. Liberals also are in control of most of the words of censorship "racist", "sexist", "misogynist", words that when played quickly silence the discussion. This all goes both ways, I am not trying to suggest that only liberals do this and conservative…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:21 PM
1

We have absolutely no reason to believe that gay couples would be any worse at raising children than straight couples. To start with that as a basic assumption is homophobic. So basically your position is that two people who were in an exclusive relationship, went through the process of pregnancy, planned for a baby and delivered a baby together, would not be better parents to that child than if a family adopted a baby. I disagree, I think that there are natural biological factors at play here t…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:08 PM
1

Why is there even a conversation happening about the unsubstantiated potential that gays are worse at raising children? Simple answer: Because curiosity, and freedom. More complex answer: Because like it or not, gender roles still exist, and don't show any signs of going away. Even if you don't like them, you have to acknowledge that despite what we say, I can safely say that 99.X% of the population still acts in ways that imply that they like gender roles. Our actions speak vastly different tha…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:08 PM
1

That is what I'm saying, the person getting the abortion must be present. Not because they are a woman, but because they are pregnant. I'm sure if a pregnant man came in they would be equally accomodating, and if not, then yes, they would be discriminatory. Okay so same deal with gay people and having children. If gay people would start having biological children, then we'd start giving them the tax breaks that other married couples enjoy, until then, I don't think that the main reason for the t…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:17 PM
1

The government doesn't provide women with money to get abortions. They provide people who get pregnant with money to get abortions. That is not true, part of being able to get the money for an abortion is to have a female present... you know, someone who can actually "have" the abortion. A guy who is alone will not be able to get money for an abortion. Are nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than entirely heterosexual I agree I hate when organizations put this in their stud…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:04 PM
1

children raised with their biological parents in the same home consistently outperform their counterpart children who are not raised by both biological parents in the same home. Yeah, I'm going to need some sources for that. Sure, there's hundreds of studies that continue to reach this same conclusion. And let's not pretend that it's jr hour at the high school science fair, many times the groups reaching these conclusions are professional organizations who know how to test out variables such as …
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:03 PM
1

I am trying to rebuttal your comment. You were the one who declared that we were breaking away from the topic, not me. I am not arguing about your tone, I was clear about this, I said: I have no issues with people taking a harsher tone, but it's cute that you assume that. You assumed that I care about your tone, when my whole comment was about you assuming how I feel, and you assuming my intentions. You are not a very logical arguer. lol
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:21 PM
1

Why do you fight for a particular religious group's right to own the government's use of a term, but not another. I never said that I fight for a particular religious group. If Episcopalians want to call it marriage if it's a same sex couple, then they should go for it. If Catholics don't, okay then Catholics don't have to. I am more-so saying that the word "marriage" is a term that I think has a tradition of being heavily associated with religion (across multiple cultures) and that I respect th…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:55 PM
1

You said: I will not calm down. Then you said that you didn't want to talk about the semantics of civil union VS marriage because it "distracts from the real topic" (which is gay marriage), then you proceeded to lecture me about how terrible the church is, with "logic", oh wait, no never-mind, you didn't use logic, you used ad hominems. lol Oh and now you're making claims about me, and telling me what I am doing. How am I supposed to debate with someone who is trying to tell me how I feel and wh…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:02 PM
1

Nice buzz word bro. But it's not going to scare me away. I'll ask you this, are interested in having an open minded conversation, and can your opinion possibly change, or are you close minded and will never change your opinion? If you are going to be open minded, like me, and are willing to possibly change your opinion, like me, then I will continue to engage in conversation. If all you want to do is use make unfounded statements and through buzzwords of censorship to shut down the conversation …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:05 PM
1

So infertile couples should not be allowed to marry? You put a question mark at the end of a statement, but I'll assume that you meant to ask a question. Also, you are changing the parameters of what we were talking about. At this point we aren't talking about marriage, we are talking about the benefits given to married couples. So you're question should have been "Should infertile couples be given state benefits." The short answer is "yes". As far as the state is concerned, opposite sex couples…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:41 PM
1

Okay, well you don't sound like you actually want to have a conversation. If you want to engage in meaningful, healthy, and open minded conversation let me know, I am interested in learning and changing my opinions, but I am not interest in responding to someone who wants to shout but doesn't want to also listen and learn.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:26 PM
1

Why do the religious get to be the police of language? They don't. For example, I am not religious, yet I am still fighting for it to be their term, as long as they don't say that it's one thing, then act as if it's another (in the way that feminists do) I have no problem "giving" the term away to religions. However, really I should be more clear and say that I'm nitpicking how the state defines it. For example, if Episcopalians want to allow gay marriage, and simply call it marriage, then that'…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:55 PM
1

Because the benefits are given by the state. By your logic, if the state should not be involved then that would mean that the state should also not be giving benefits. However, the state wants us to have kids, having a younger population is good for the economy, and good for the country. So the state assigns benefits for marriage between a man and a woman to help encourage people to marry and then have kids. There is very clear evidence that the best thing for a child is to be raised by their bi…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:15 PM
3

Dude, calm down, I never said anything about Christianity. I used the blanket term "religion" because across most cultures marriage tends to be tied in some way to the predominant religion in the area. I think that you jumped to the conclusion that I must be religious, which is odd to me, because my second sentence said this: I'm not religious at all However, I still view the traditional marriage as a religious affair. If Religious people wanted to ban me from getting married, I'd probably be on…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:15 PM
6

I swear, everytime I come to the subreddit, more stories come up that make me scorn Psuedo-Feminism more. FTFY, dictionary fallacy, just because feminists successfully convinced webster that the definition of feminism is that they support equal rights, doesn't mean that they actually do. It's a false definition. In practice, feminism has consistently proven that it does not care about equal rights, and that it just wants to see women put "on top" of society. The term for someone who wants equali…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:41 PM
1

I actually agree with this. I'm not religious at all, but I still don't understand why gay people couldn't just get all of the same benefits, responsibilities, and liabilities of marriage, but call it something different. To me, marriage is a religious term, and I think it was a bit out of step for gay people to try and invade their tradition, when really it wasn't hurting anyone the way it was. Like why can't gay marriage be called "civil union", and straight marriage just be called "marriage",…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:37 PM
1

While I reserve the right to change my assertion if presented with evidence that I am wrong, in response to your last statement, I am going to assert that you have not fully thought out that position yet. Clearly, in my opinion, we are significantly hindered by our own biology. Biology addicts us, physically and mentally to things. Biology can cripple us with disease, or disabilities. Biology has finite limits, and for the majority of the population, no amount of work will ever make them "the wo…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:29 PM
1

Eh, I mean, it's kind of biological dude, I don't really think that he's wrong. But we can stop thinking so gynocentrically, and we can stop pushing these bullshit "privilege" movements and victim culture. If we stop doing those two things, most people will generally be happier. Put in slightly different words, victim culture makes more people unhappy, while making a few slightly more happy, by eliminating victim culture, you will make a few people a little bit less happy, but the total net gain…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 09:17 PM
1

Dude, I am sorry, maybe it's me, but I am really getting a strong feeling that we are not on the same page. I said that because I did not believe that it would have been possible to have a throughput of humans at a rate of 5 minutes per sex session. I said this because I thought that 5 minutes is a short amount of time. This assumes that most people would want her to clean up a bit in between, and that it probably takes most guys longer than 5 minutes to "finish". The fact that she claims it was…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:40 AM
1

It doesn't really matter though, at least not in regards to what I said. Do you understand why I said what I said?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:02 PM
1

I can't tell if you are trying to have a point or not. Why did you reply with this to me?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 07:30 PM
2

This figure sounds highly suspect to me. 110 men in one night? I mean, even if each guy took only 5 minutes, it would take over 9 hours to get through all of them. Plus what time to eat and go to the bathroom and time to "freshen up"? Plus she would not have been of legal age, and I somewhat doubt that such a high throughput would not have lead to any kind of inquisition. Prostitution has a very scummy reputation, especially in places where it is illegal, but in places like Greece where it is le…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:42 PM
0

She broke herself away from feminism. There's a crucial distinction there. I suppose that I wasn't clear enough, I mean that Karen Straughan has been speaking for years now about bad parts of feminism and although she does deal with people are more-or-less "brick walls", she also has talked about meeting "on the fence" feminists, and talking those people away from feminism. It's been talked about a couple times, one that I remember most distinctly was at a public Q/A at some hall where she talke…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:03 PM
2

They have a set of irrational beliefs and there is nothing you can say in any language to make them abandon them. Don't be irrational, I've talked more than one girl away from believing that feminism is a be-all-end-all good, but that isn't much to prove my case to you. Luckily for me, if you are involved with this community then you might be aware of people like Karen Straughan, who are public proof that you can break women out of and away from feminism. I'm not going to disagree with the idea …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:51 PM
2

They just want to blame men for something. Not from their point of view. The thing about feminism, and most of humanity, is that the overwhelming majority is going to try and act virtuous. In other words, while we can sit here and nit pick a few outliers, the overwhelming majority really do have their hearts in the right place, even if the end result is actually discrimination and less equality than they started with. When you say things like "They just want to blame men for something." where yo…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:37 PM
3

idk man, women still seem to get preferential treatment in the engineering wing of my state college. 90% of the posters in that place seem to feature women smiling and working on some contraption. My female friend was an engineer and when she considered dropping out of engineering because of grades, she got tons and tons of support from most of the faculty to keep at it, and I don't think the men are really given support when they try and drop out, I think they just get their papers signed and t…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:20 PM
1

Is this "freedomprogramme.co.uk" in any way funded via taxpayer dollars?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:51 PM
1

This kind of talk does not help this subreddit gain legitimacy with other groups. You may not be violating the rules, but I do worry that posts like this will be the ones that are taken and shown off to other people as "representation" of the type of people that contribute to the Mens Rights movement. It's wrong of other people to mislead others about us, but it is reality.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:30 PM
1

Very insightful, and thought provoking. I do think that I disagree with one point. I'm not convinced that any significant majority of the population, even the ones in their 20's, are truly sacrificing everything for their job. I sort of feel like that is deep down, really just an excuse for "why I'm not dating". Given the right person, those people would probably date. Let me be perfectly clear, I am not trying to say that the above view applies to everybody by any means. I am positive that ther…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 08:51 PM
1

I have been on vacation, and didn't check my mailbox till now. I really liked your reply. I was curious to know if you had any ideas for how, if possible, we could fix the social problems that we are experiencing in regards to this.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:24 PM
6

I upvoted you just because I think that it is wrong for people to downvote you without giving you an explanation as to why. I think that your position is flawed. Although jobs may have had gender biases, women have always had them. I mean if you really don't believe me consider that prior to the 1900's, most people were just farmers. Women on farms work, even today. They'd be out there milking the cows, collecting the eggs, picking plants. that WAS work for most people historically. Even when fa…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:31 PM
0

I agree, most of these comments are just dogging women. It's not like we don't see the point, but I do think that it's important not to sink down to the level of feminists. We're better than that.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 02:38 PM
4

You aren't the free market, and although the free market is awesome, it's not without it's Achilles heels. The free market relies on all people being good natured, but in real life, that isn't always the case. The free market would allow for nuclear warheads to be sold to the general public, and other military grade equipment. The fact is, that limits to the free market are a good thing, and we all recognize this, that's one of the reasons why we have laws. Consider living in a city block where …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:40 PM
3

Meh, I can think of some areas in both red and blue states where that might actually still be an incredibly good business practice. A lot white people are still very afraid of black on white racism. Tensions are still pretty damn high for a lot of people. It would get insane negative press, but if it were legal, I can guarantee you it'd still be around.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:11 PM
1

Can confirm, I worked at a grocery store. Trying my best to be fair and not have bias, I honestly believe that 80% of the time the womens bathroom was dirtier. The times when the mens bathroom was dirtier was usually because of piss next to the urinal. For some reason, women were much more likely to have vomit or sprayed diarrhea on the inside (gulp and on the worst occasions... outside) of the toilet bowl. Again being fair, usually they were comparable dirtiness, but almost all of the horror st…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:06 PM
1

When I first started to get into politics in 208-2009 (I'm only 26) I initially rejected the entire Republican party for being so dogmatic and religious. I was very against the dogma, and the refusal to genuinely listen to and process arguments from an opposing side, and that they were in my government. That being said, I labelled myself a Democrat for my initial voting years. It wasn't until a feminist found her way into my circle of friends and started sharing her views on how oppressed women …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:21 PM
3

While I agree that at this current point in time your are more correct than incorrect, I do not think that the current state of the MRA will remain as it is for all time. I believe that feminism used to be much more based on more (valid) observations, facts, and very legitimate social imbalances than it is today. However, the larger the movement grows, the more people that get put on a payroll to it, the more it becomes necessary to prove victim status to maintain individual livelihood, the more…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:42 PM
47

The goal of the MRHM is to show that there are other sides of the "equation" also While I 100% agree that this is the main goal, and should be the main goal of the MHRM, I'm not sure that it's fair, or even correct to assert the claim as a matter of fact. The MHRM has one very unfortunate similarity with feminism in that it's a group with no core governing body and concrete beliefs. It's a group that can mean many different things to many different people, and some MRA's are going to be much mor…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:31 PM
1

By being effeminate and calling herself a man, she is breaking down my identity. Yes, she is. She's breaking down what it means to be a man. It may not seem like much to you, but to a lot of men, especially historically the question of what it means to be a man was a very important question. There are songs, movies, books, and plays all about youthful boys trying to find the answer. Further, I'm not sure that your logic is acceptable if we instead apply it to other cases. Unfortunately I'm going…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:20 PM
1

My feeling is that people get to dress how they want, play with the toys they want, write the blogs that they want, etc. No one is saying that she can't do these things, but, just like everyone else on the planet, including you and me, other people are going to think higher or lower of her depending on what they are looking for in their peers. You might be tempted to call this a problem with society, but if you did, then you'd be a hypocrite. You have qualities in friends and life partners that …
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:14 PM
1

My younger sister came out as gay last year and is now saying that she wants to be treated as a boy, but it's amazing how evident it is that she doesn't want to be treated like a boy. We have a mostly traditional gender role family, both my parents cook, but my mom does the house cleaning and laundry and my dad takes care of the vegetable garden and outdoor work, home repair and cars. My younger sister doesn't want to do the "women's work" because "it makes her uncomfortable", (not joking, those…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:23 PM
3

That is so offensive to retards. My uncle is a retard and he is not a feminist, and it's atrocious that you would group him with that horrible group of bigots.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:08 PM
1

Wait a second, am I reading this correctly. You are calling it sexist when men (humorously) point out that problems being billed as "just girl things" not only also impact men, but often impact them on an objectively harder scale. My problem with this is that I would readily bet my entire life savings on that if women complained about problems that were billed as "just guy things" the bulk of society would call the men sexist for not including women in the viewpoint in the firstplace. Can't you …
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:16 PM
2

By this standard nearly all kisses are sexual assault. It's kind of rare for guys to ask a girl if they want to be kissed. In this case the nurse saw the man kissing girls, she made eye contact with him, and he came up to her and kissed him. She knew what was going to happen because she saw him kissing other girls beforehand. Maybe the first kiss was assault if he just grabbed a girl and surprised the poop out of her, but in this case it was a big celebration and I think everyone was living in t…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:44 PM
0

ah, okay I think I see your point, and on some level I agree. I admittedly didn't listen to Watsons speech, but based on the comments that I've read, it sounds like it was only moderate due to a short blurb about "men have issues too", but otherwise not extremist either. Having not listened to it, I can not and will not try and judge the speech myself. Regardless, I think that the people expressing criticism are probably just bad at expressing their criticism. Not a good thing, but I believe tha…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:45 PM
1

@chocoboat, I don't understand why you're using the word "everyone" and "all" in your reply. The post that you replied to does not use the word "everyone" or "all", it instead uses the words "generally", "often", and "most". The op does not show any indication of thinking in absolutes, so why is your post is framed from that perspective?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:05 PM
3

I am not the guy who made the claim, but I believe that he is referring to an extreme minority of tumblr posts, some of which may very well just be trolls or some kind of inside jokes, rather than serious. He may just be spitting out things that he's heard Karen Straughn say (I think I've heard her, or one of the other honeybadgers make that claim almost word for word before). I found it difficult to find support for his claim, but I did find that article about the feminist who desires a non-mur…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:13 PM
5

I think that it's a legitimate criticism of her as she was acting as a representative of heforshe. If she's going to represent a group, then I think that it should be noted that she's also going to also be held accountable for the actions of the group that she is using her influence to empower.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:54 PM
6

That's not what an appeal to authority means. Appeal to authority would be if I rejected someones claim simply because they have a lack of experience (or that they do not possess a certain set of credentials). This is because the claim itself can be true, regardless of the arguers credentials. However, simply challenging the arguers credentials is a legitimate criticism. In this case, I think that it is highly likely that someone well educated in gender issues from either side (the MRA or femini…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:07 PM
1

That's because they rarely do speak for mens issues. It was the MRM that is adding gender neutrality to feminist laws, and the MRM that only puts out gender neutral law proposals. Feminists are the ones trying to create laws such as "the violence against women act", where-as the MRM wants to see a law titled "the violence against people act". There is a big difference in these viewpoints, one is equality, the other is skewed viewpoints to the point of bigotry.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:01 PM
9

Actually, I would say yes. I truly believe that the MRM, if allowed to thrive and get the same power that feminism currently has, will become a bigot movement. I think that any group that is made to tend to the needs of one specific group inevitably harbors bigots. There are without a doubt female hating men in the MRM right now. However, the important distinction is that harboring bigots is not unique to the MRM, it's fully true with feminism as well. Most MRM (but certainly not all) are really…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:29 PM
8

Hitler was wrong Well he was certainly wrong about the whole mass execution thing, but.... Not to fedora, but that's the kind of blanket statement that prevents people from growing, and tbh, indicates that you're not really open minded and willing to look at issues from a high level. What I mean is, I'm sure that if I could show you several things that Hitler did which liberal democrats and conservative republicans are doing today in 2014, in America. In 1933 Germans held anti-jewish business ra…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:43 PM
1

I feel like I was pretty clear about this before, particularly in my first sentence of the first response that I made to you. I'll quote myself: I'm actually not trying to re frame the issue as "men's rights", nor did I ever claim that it should be considered "men's rights". I am strongly opposed to labeling issues as gender issues in almost all cases. However, I do think that pointing out sympathy gaps is a great way to give some people a better perspective of what's going on and helps them bro…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:03 PM
2

You are one of the first people that I have ever heard vocalizing that "crazy isn't hiddne or secret". I have actually thought the same thing for a long time, and I've also though the same about other negative personality traits ("asshole" coming to mind in particular). I have always felt like most people usually just agree with people that they couldn't tell that someone was crazy or an asshole just to be nice to them after they were attacked or dumped or cheated on. It's always bothered me bec…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 08:17 PM
1

Ah, yes I forgot the word "probably" in my last post. I have edited it for clarity. I really cannot stress this enough, you seem very focused on the event itself. That is not the real point of this issue, the point is the trend of inequality concerning how topics related to male suffering and how topics related to female suffering are treated by the media. What are your thoughts about trying to have a conversation about the sympathy gap between genders.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:52 PM
1

I'm actually not trying to re frame the issue as "men's rights", nor did I ever claim that it should be considered "men's rights". Actually, reading the comments, I don't really see anyone claiming that it should be considered men's rights. The problem that we have with this is that if the victims had been women, it would probably have been labelled as women's rights. What we don't like is that the treatment of issues that disproportionately affect women are treated very differently from issues …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:25 PM
1

I believe that the article may have been edited, although I was focusing on two articles at the same time when I posted this, so it is possible that I may have accidently linked to the wrong one. My main point was that it's frustrating how any "human rights" issue that disproportionately affects females is called a "women's rights violation", but issues that disproportionately (or even entirely) affect men are just plain "human rights". It may seem petty, but I feel that it's part of a problem w…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter