TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_Aesthetician Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by The_Aesthetician on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

That quote didn't exist when I originally commented Who the charger technically belongs to doesn't really matter, as the girl is still responsible for it if it gets broken. Also, OP didn't have to get anyone's attention, he was just bothering someone who was displaying the universal sign of 'don't bother me' via wearing headphones. OP should first examine his self responsibility and charge his computer at home or not forget his charger.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:37 PM
-4

Invading someone's personal space just to ask to use their personal items (which aren't cheap, and can be very disruptive if lost or broken) and literally saving someone's life are not the same thing. It's not even close
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:03 PM
-5

That is a false equivalency
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:55 PM
-18

Or just don't touch people, just say out loud "excuse me, may I borrow your charger?" I'm a male who also hates being touched, and also I would never loan my personal affects out like that either
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:09 PM
-13

Or you could buy your own condoms
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:04 PM
-30

To be fair, men or man to refer to humans in general has basically lost all meaning. No one does it anymore, so it makes sense that they may change it. Could be X anything, it's a brand name, who cares what it's called?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:18 PM
2

I think the point of both is that they know people are watching. Why else would he wink after doing it? And she clearly looks behind to see through the door and then does the spray. What do you call the shot at 0:37? she looks pretty naked to me. Possibly she is wearing underwear though, it's not implied if she took those off or not. There's no double standard here, the only difference being the medium the onlookers could see through.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:03 PM
1

I am not talking about feminism. I'm talking strictly about the what I believe happened in the scene and whether or not it was ethically okay. it is a strawman when that's not what I'm talking about. I'm seriously annoyed that you can't even read what I'm saying to understand where I was leading the discussion. You just want to argue for no reason, and pretend that you're "vastly more schooled" and so knowledgeable. That's pretentious. I'm blocking you, because you annoy me, not because you disa…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 07:45 PM
1

So I'm not allowed to have an opinion then? I don't remember refuting any of that in what I said, so it appears you're creating strawman arguments against me. That's a fallacy. All I stated this whole time was that given the context of the movie, and reversing the genders of that scene even, there was nothing inherently wrong going on. Parker is an agent of the avengers, they expect him to act like one. Ignoring orders and asking a lot of questions is what led to the woman telling him to "strip"…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 07:14 PM
1

It is dismissal because I don't see this instance as an issue, guy. I was just adding to the original conversation since no one else wanted to argue this side. Males being raped and assaulted is a completely different issue entirely, which I do care about, so using that to discredit me is not logical Mr dogmatic. I'm done with this conversation though, I have other things to do, chief. Edit: Do you see how condescending those stupid names are? Stop using them, it's not nice.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:41 PM
1

Eh, I'll let you get worked up about it. I think the context was enough to warrant such a thing, but I guess it's a personal decision what to get outraged over. Hope you have a good day.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:22 PM
9

Okay, but I'll argue the other side of this I don't think she expected him to get naked. She clearly was not wanting to watch him in a sexual manner, so not pedo either. He is essentially a secret agent, being treated and acting like an adult as an Avenger. Changing into a uniform is not something crazy unexpected, yeah you could argue that separation of genders for changing rooms is appropriate, but not when under time constraints as suggested in the scene. And OP, is it really that bad that MJ…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:32 AM
1

I'm pretty sure he did
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:21 AM
5

Me(n)Too
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:13 PM
1

I hadn't seen this video for a few years. Still as emotional and powerful as before. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:13 PM
1

If you're 16-20 maybe
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:22 PM
1

So far you've called me communist multiple times, little commie, Cathy Newman, a simpleton, and less intelligent than a child. I've not called you anything, just described you as delusional once. The original questions was whether discrimination is something that should be allowed in the hiring process. You've drastically deviated from that and instead decided to dismiss my argument completely by insulted my intelligence on multiple occasions. Calling me a child for believing that all humans sho…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:53 PM
1

You really like the name calling thing, don't you?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:46 PM
1

I'm not saying that it doesn't exist. My original comment was just stating what our law actually says about discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:45 PM
4

Yeah, the whole job post doesn't really make much sense.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:44 PM
1

Are you honestly saying that minorities aren't and were never discriminated against? You are delusional. Why exactly does my argument lose merit? Because I think that discrimination is a bad thing? That I think all humans deserve equal opportunities? Frankly, I'm glad that I don't share the same nation as you.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:38 PM
1

The key point that you're making is that you have to be shady about it and do it illegally. So no, you can't. Eventually discrimination gets found out at some point.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:32 PM
1

The reason that these laws exists is because minorities were were obviously being discriminated against in whole. it's not just one business being taken into consideration when we say that you can't hire with discrimination, it's all of them as a whole. If you're too entitled to see how that's a bad thing, then I feel very sorry for you.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:29 PM
1

Running a business as you see fit means that you hire whoever you consider to be most qualified to fulfill that role. But, if it can be proven that you're hiring explicitly men for example, when there are plenty of women who have applied who are equally or even more qualified for that position, then you are discriminating and being unfair to a specific class. Any human with decency can see that what you are doing in that situation is wrong, and thus laws were created to prevent people like you f…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:20 PM
1

Running a business how you see fit, and explicitly discriminating against quality workers that are 'different' are not at all the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:02 PM
1

And that's how civil rights movements were started. Blaming Obama for laws that were created since the 50s is just stupid.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 03:38 PM
1

Her in the US, if you have fewer than 11 employees, you can discriminate as much as you want to.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter