That puts a new perspective on it for me, thanks. I thought it got the point across, but feeding your cat reads like the wrong type of metaphor for something that should be enjoyable. As far as biological urges go though, "he's gonna eat food today" or "he's gonna piss eventually, make sure you're the toilet for him!" aren't much better. Sleep then? "He needs to sleep every night, but it's up to you to make sure your bed is his best option." Yeah, I guess. Can't come up with many enjoyable biolo…
I think they are supposed to be the same thing, just different people reaching the same conclusions will find different names for things if they don't know there's already a term.
I mean fuck, at least give yourself over to the culture that you've already admitted is superior to the one you're escaping. Not 100% necessarily either, just don't be so vehemently different that it causes problems at the societal level.
Men didn't really "earn" that place either, it's just ours by virtue of first flag planted. It's actually interesting to men. Not really the same for women, and of course their reasons for wanting into any group are always suspect.
You have a really good perspective/outlook on the matter and I never meant to offend you if I did. I suppose I was, in simple terms, trying to get you to test your perspective for flaws or to have you reassure it. In broader terms, I'm interested in the things people can "go through" and the diversity of human perspective.
I have no idea, but I can't imagine that being favorable. Don't waste time thinking about could/would/should have happened - there is only happened and happening.
I mean, I love freedom as much as the next person, but this absolutely begs the question: Why the are they allowed to make these decisions for themselves if that's how they go about it?
Men have their own sort of abstract mental image of attractive, against which they compare real world options. Women only compare to other actual men they have seen.
Well, I wasn't specifically trying to help, just point out to others that a problem exists. I do, and everything I contribute is worthwhile so fuck yourself. No fuck yourself. No fuck yourself. I'll just be straightforward aggressive then if that's what you'd prefer, jackass.
It doesn't seem very rational at all though. Not every female can get the best man. That leaves a large % of females holding out for someone that's never coming when they can enjoy what they have in front of them.
I wonder why this isn't a bigger discussion in society: why do women, to their own devices, only seem to actively want a small % of men. What's more, why is this accepted on a societal women for them to be so choosy?
I'll try not to give a canned response like everyone else so far: In that case, a unicorn you have not. Think of it like this: should she be special just because she didn't swing away? I see that as being in a "zeroed out" position, rather than higher-value "unicorn" position. Yeah at the end of the day, connecting the idea of "special" and any female in your life will lead to trouble down the road.
Let's be real here for a moment on this fine April Fool's day: you really made that comment to mention your abs some more. ...nothin wrong with a good daydream mirin sesh, n-no homo.
It's like they're yelling at others as an outlet for their own frustrations, like they are the ones who want to stay at home and are mad at themselves for not. So they yell at others in a psychological attempt to convince themselves that they're doing the right things.
If I had been abusive and controlling, the bitches would still be with me because that is what they like Or because you wouldn't fucking let them, like someone actually controlling and abusive.
No, if there was it would have been the top comment. The only reason they're actually calling out the gasp! female is because there is absolutely no other way to see the situation.
get every guy to agree Bolder men have died for such. Technically, I'm participating though because I haven't logged onto okc in months now. Not too many valuables within driving distance.
If there's one thing the onion's good for, it's turning a 10-word-maximun joke into an entire article. Good thing there's just enough other comedy interspersed to hide the fact that it's the same joke for 12 paragraphs... wait no there isn't.
That has to be an oversight... right? Like some fuckup forgot to dot an "i" somewhere. How could anyone write the law as "you can offer sex for money but if they say yeeessss...." and go "it's good, law's good, it'sdone".
Holy fuck! You know that .gif of the fetish porn scene where it's somebody strapped in leather to a rascall scooter with the motor-dildo getting them from behind? Yeah, you know the one. I've never laughed harder than when someone posted that on 4chan with the filename: swedish_man_on_his_way_to_work.gif I hope someone can find that bad boy, oh the lols.
Like a duracell battery. Yeah my first comment was a joke but since you took the time all I can say is: good on you but never stop improving, everything can always be made to be better.
People can have serious reactions to things like that, I think a warning is fair. Besides, it's not directed to the 2dark4u edgyteens that love being unique with their "conditions", they just squeak the loudest about needing the warnings.
It's a difficult concept to grasp, but irresponsible behavior is on the person that commits it. I'm speaking more to the situations where the victim being drunk in the first place actually makes a difference, as in the rapist takes advantage of the situation. However, they take advantage of a situation created by the victim, thus making it a "two to tango" type of deal. I feel like this gives the impression that I have something against rape victims but that couldn't be further from the truth, I…
Objectively, to a certain degree they are at fault for not taking known preventative/precautionary measures. Also, if they get drunk they are 50% responsible for whatever bad happens to them.
It can be seen as an opportunity to teach others about how certain behaviors might lead to death. It's not that it's the victim's "fault", but they are responsible for their own behavior and well-being. If doing certain things are known to lead to death/robbery/any crime, it is then irresponsible to commit those behaviors. To reiterate: No the victim isn't "at fault", they're not 100% responsible, but sometimes they play a significant role in creating their own misfortune.
There will always be rapists, murderers, thieves, and criminals of all manner. Sure, it's much nicer to think "one day they'll all go away and nobody ever will have to worry about them", but that is not reality and never will be.
