TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_Final_DarkMage Archive

View 5 posts and 189 comments by The_Final_DarkMage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I cant give you any hard evidence. But I have seen too many "This isnt a men's rights issue" Comments when it's not appropriate. It's like a common phrase used to screw with people on this sub it seems.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:20 AM
1

...no? People always have reasons to be assholes. Just no good ones.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:37 AM
10

"This isn't a men's rights issue" although once in a while true, is a phrase used to concern troll and derail the topic at hand. It happens more often than most of us would like.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 04:14 PM
3

Then what is this? http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19853491
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:20 AM
-5

They're not this is a 4chan meme by /pol/. Just downvote and move on. We don't need /pol/ in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:20 AM
-1

Pretty sure SRS isn't endorsing it. I would likely say that this is a jab at SRS for pretty much stating the opposite of their beliefs. Or it's a sneaky PR campaign. Either way I don't buy that SRS believes what's posted here.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:14 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:35 PM
15

manhood academy pls go edit: Yay they left
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:54 PM
57

A link would be greatly appreciated, I think I might have missed it.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:46 PM
16

....wat
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:31 PM
18

Also what child-protective services looks like. Feminist theory may have driven them to this insanity, but they have their own corruption to blame as well. They LITERALLY get extra funding for each child they take away from their families. This encourages so much deception and corruption that shit like this happens. They just use feminist theory to support and justify their ridiculous actions.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:29 PM
8

It may be unintentional but it contrasts well with how horrible the situation actually is. It brings light to the fact that people don't take male rape seriously.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:32 PM
8

So is it coincidence that most people that hold that money are men? Yes, maybe due to social standards of the past and also the fact that men are more likely to take risks than women, which is what's needed in a capitalist economy in order to get rich. Just look at bill gates. Or even look a the richest women in the world, see what they did to get rich. I wouldn't be surprised if it were that they took many risks to get where they are. And is the reason women go into politics less due to coincid…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:01 PM
9

..Are you suggesting that isn't the case? What, you think it's a coincidence? It is the case. And no this isn't a coincidence. We are here talking about TODAY not the PAST. As I have said before that Patriarchy would have made sense in the early 20th century or earlier, but not today. The men you see in power are there because of the money they hold. And they hold money, not because they're men, but they've either earned it or inherited it. It's also argued that it's because women almost NEVER g…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:35 PM
14

Yeah...um. That doesn't mean anything. It's the equivalent of asking me to "study it out." Patriarchy Theory holds that the majority of power in the world is held by men "because they are men." And through this all men are at an advantage whilst systematically oppressing all women. First off I'd like to admit that, yes there are secret patriarchy meetings held by all men in the world. We all talk about the best ways to oppress women on a daily basis. We even have club jackets! Please look at the…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:14 PM
11

....Oh please enlighten us oh wise swami.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:53 PM
16

Yet the common man is the victim of the use of the issue of patriarchy. Men get less help than they need, these advantages are most often misconstrued as advantages that "men" have, when in fact it's most often the advantages the "rich" have. If we were in the early 20th century or earlier I would give patriarchy theory some merit, but in today's society it just doesn't hold water.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:17 PM
22

That the world is "run by men" and all the problems are "from men." Can't get any more correct than that. Just because you cover it up with technicalities and inference doesn't make it any less idiotic or misandrist.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:14 PM
40

patriarchy There's your problem. Feminist theory supports the idea that men are being hurt, but at the same time it's "all their fault." There is no "Patriarchy" here just a feminist belittling men and their legitimate problems.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:08 PM
92

It's also just straight up Misandry.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:50 PM
20

I really dislike how this person is trying to turn a negative stereotype into something that somehow benefits us. This post is rampant with assumptions that men are lazy and prefer to be called idiots to get out of doing tasks. Sickening. Posted this to /r/mensrants as well.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:49 AM
1

You may have no biological power over whether the child is born, but MRA's are fighting for the right for men to choose whether to raise the child or not. Since women already have so much choice in the realms of becoming a parent it's fair to say that men should have a the choice as well but in the form of Legal Paternal Surrender.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:05 PM
9

The new radfem hub will emerge in due time. For now let's just watch them scurry.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:33 PM
1

I'm almost sure they mean pre-teens to young adults. And within that range physical differences make no difference. Young boys get a lot of shit as well.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:44 PM
9

Fact is they already do have it. Valentine's day has always been a holiday centered around females. All they're doing now is shoving shit in our faces without even the courtesy of calling it chocolate.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:42 PM
1

I would relate it to something of an Evologarchy. Where our evolutionary gender roles become our predominant dispositions. Gender roles as we know them today were around well before civilization and only grew within culture. Our gender roles aren't a product of one gender over the other, they are a product of evolutionary efficiency. It is only recently that we have broken out of our comfort zones and decided to put away outdated things. Now that our gender roles are basically useless people see…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:35 AM
3

Certainly puts a dent in the Historical standings of the Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:01 AM
3

Yeah, but no one takes sexual assault and rape to the same connotation. Either we stop calling your definition of rape "rape" or we call them both "rape". This is why rape statistics for men are always wrong and are brushed under the rug by so many.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:58 PM
10

By not including this as a definition of rape it allows people to cite myriads of statistics on how men are almost never raped. God dammit what the hell is wrong with the CDC.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:52 AM
9

Well that could indicate some goods things. Like we're getting new members who have yet to see this content.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:46 PM
6

The actual fuck? It's like these people don't think at all. They just act instinctively with any sexist reaction that their mind places first.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:06 AM
0

Of course. I'm part of the representation of this subreddit. As are all contributors. So it's my responsibility to act civil and reasonable. You're gonna find plenty of parallels between radical feminism and the more angry MRA's. As you will with all radicals of any ideology. But the only difference I will present is that feminism has definitely had more time to mature and already has tons of political influence. So they do a lot more damage. While MRA is still young and we tend to appeal first …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:12 PM
7

I would argue differently. If anyone was hurt by women in some way here it would be in the realm of abuse and legal underrepresentation. This sub criticizes feminism for its actions and influences on western society. The only oppression is being done by ideology. You make it sound like males are a constant and changing influence on stereotypes and oppression. Fact is these stereotypes predate today's society and population. There is no dividing of male and female. It's only the tyrants and the r…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:49 PM
46

So you're saying that no girl. (In fact I might argue most) Ever wanted to look extremely attractive and end up with maybe the most attractive male counterpart? This effects both sides not just one. The only difference here would be the personality characteristics of the characters portrayed here, but there are plenty of both male and female characters with attractive personalities.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:03 PM
5

Did you just reply to yourself twice?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:23 PM
1

I'll play devil's advocate, but isn't the opposite in most known species? But humans are special so at this point I would think that it heavily depended on the context. Possibly both are shown equally. I dunno. If you'd cite the study it would be an interesting read.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:17 AM
1

Wouldn't being considered mentally ill or insane, even if it was only during the murder, prove that the individual is an even greater threat to society? Shouldn't that warrant even more security to be placed over them!? In my honest opinion the insanity plea shouldn't have mattered because only someone who is insane could murder a child in cold-blood like that. Yet somehow declaring that there is something fucked with her head, which is already apparent by her actions, makes it easier on her. I …
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:23 AM
-2

This is beyond infuriating. Not because she's woman who obviously got a "pussy pass", but because she was a human being (barely) who killed an innocent 3-year-old child. Drowned her in the bathtub. It doesn't fucking matter how much you regret it, or how much you fucking cry about it. YOU SHOULD BE ROTTING IN JAIL OR IN THE FUCKING ELECTRIC CHAIR! /endrant
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:17 AM
1

Why would you even post there. Giving them the time of day seems to be relatable to financial loss, except with brain cells and life span.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:05 AM
0

At least you're not snarky about it. Like SRS does with their "Shitthatneverhappened.txt" crap.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:23 AM
3

MRA AMA?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:19 AM
4

It's not just offensive, it's dangerous thinking altogether. These attitudes are what fuel this discrimination. And these posters do nothing but reinforce them.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:04 AM
-1

The point of my comment went over your head it seems. If you'll look again I have acknowledged "Innocent until proven guilty" But the sensationalism that is usually present isn't there with this headline, and they even have video evidence against the girl. To me it seems like the media in this case is trying their best to stay neutral because the assailant is 12 year old girl.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:52 AM
2

Did they really just put "allegedly" in the title!? I mean innocent until proven guilty and all that, but there was video evidence! It just looks like the media doesn't want to make sensational headlines unless it was a man who did the crime.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:27 AM
9

This is the only explanation that could ever make sense.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:08 AM
6

The actual thought process they must have is that these women must have been coerced into a job like this and somehow it is in no way of their own free will to do so. And they completely ignore the men because, let's face it, what man would turn down the opportunity to be "sexual" for money? That's right, we are in the 21st century. The time of freedom of choice and expression. This practice is an old Japanese custom, that was originally intended for only women to participate in, but they includ…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:27 PM
7

It's actually an old Japanese custom. Weird I know, I forget the actual name but gourmet food would be served on the body of women in the houses of nobles. They adapted this tradition nicely with the adding of male models.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:22 PM
33

Whoopi Goldberg is the only voice of reason in this gaggle of nutties. I have no idea why she allows herself to be subject to such hateful behavior by these women. But at the same time I'm glad she's there to keep them somewhat in check.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:19 PM
1

/s***
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:48 PM
1

/s***
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:47 PM
12

While "attempt at rape" probably still counts as sexual assault, correct me if I'm wrong though. There is so much leeway for exaggeration and misinterpretation of what "attempt at rape" can be it really shouldn't be included in these studies.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:08 AM
6

His argument was against /r/Feminism. From which the post was x-posted. Not all feminists.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:54 AM
14

Feminism has been trying to envelop themselves around the men's rights movement for years. We have none of it because the first thing they're going to do as soon as we agree to join them (like that will ever fucking happen) is stab us in the back like they have been doing for the past 20-30 years.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:52 AM
1

Not really actually. Nice "fallacy fallacy" by the way.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:49 PM
3

No, they really don't. Saying things like that is the same thing as saying that all those you perceive to be bigoted automatically have no opinion. That's a common leftist tactic used to silence people who have differing opinions. We support his claim because, despite its delivery, it pertains to a topic we discuss on hand. You don't understand the points of debate on a single topic. Your attempts to misrepresent and discredit us through your misguided explanations are very poor.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:46 AM
6

It's not part of the "rights of gay men" to not be offended. His use of the word "faggot" may not be supported or appreciated, but it doesn't in any way infringe on the rights of any gay person. Taking this too seriously just detracts from real discussion. Like I said before we are not here to discuss the delivery of the message, but the message itself.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:13 AM
3

Implying that we don't care FTFY This isn't a discussion on slurs this is a discussion on the criticism of feminist theory and the theory of patriarchy. If you want to discuss about how his use of homophobic slurs are so bad then go to another subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:00 AM
3

No wrong. To support a message does not imply support to its delivery.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:48 AM
4

What bearing does that have on us or his argument. None of us have explicitly said or even implied that we support its use. Hell we are the only set of comments that are talking about it. Which is pointless by the way, for reasons I have already explained. Or you think that his opinion is somehow invalid because of its use. Which I will have to strongly disagree.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:39 AM
1

No we are endorsing a statement which endorses the criticism of the patriarchy theory. His use of the word "faggot" or such has no bearing on the accuracy of his observation.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:30 AM
-1

Your strawman was that we are supporting homophobic slurs by upvoting a excerpt from a post with which such slurs are contained. You are misrepresenting us and trying to make us look like bigots and I don't appreciate it.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:22 AM
0

No...just no. If we turned down an intellectual discussion for the sake of imaginary PC then we would be giving only credit to how the message was relayed and not the content of the message itself. Your strawman is poor and you should feel poor.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:16 AM
10

BS, what do you think women were sat around doing for most of history, playing with their hair? Even if they were just caring for the house or kids, that's hard work! Being responsible as a provider and being responsible as a caregiver are two completely different things. Where as men were more likely to get killed in their lines of provision. And doesn't the patriarchy theory support the responsibility as caregiver to be something of oppression itself? Men were responsible for keeping society o…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:39 PM
9

Firstly, woo homophobic slurs, classy /mr! Irrelevant, regardless /mr didn't say anything of the sort, you're associating the mannerisms from someone entirely unassociated from this subreddit. Nice job on your shitty ad hominem. Secondly, women have harvested wheat throughout history, it's called subsistence farming. But you don't deny that men have done most of the work in the past as more responsibility was placed on them as providers. Thirdly, "Women wanted to be oppressed!" is clearly fuckin…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:13 PM
2

The real feminism in its early days was just as outnumbered as we are, maybe even more so. Dogmatic ideologies are never forever. We will gain the recognition and support we need for society to start to understand the male condition and the discrimination we face. But unlike feminism it is important that when we have achieved our goal of equality it is best that we disperse or mold into egalitarianism as to prevent ourselves from becoming tyrants as the feminist ideology has currently done.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 05:06 AM
13

This is a prime point for discretion of the identity of the accused. The accuser's identity get classified but not the accused nowadays. In perfectly legitimate situations where mistakes can and have been made before it is important that we protect everyone involved, but the laws do not reflect this idea.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:21 PM
11

Yeah you gotta show the thread replies. I counted like 20 rape ones out of the bunch of like maybe 50 as I scrolled.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:17 PM
5

Yeah, he was a kid. The fact that they charged him with rape through only a fingering and coupled with the fact that he was 15 is enough to be more suspicious about such an allegation.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:13 PM
26

Shouldn't the other woman be charged with drug possession and handing it off to a minor. It seems like everyone in this situation was in the wrong except for the kid's allegation of rape. Just another double standard it looks like.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:55 PM
43

I read through nearly all the comments about this, none of them fit that criteria.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:13 PM
11

A'ight cool. Was just hoping we weren't invaded or something.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:49 PM
13

How do you mean? Like are you saying that they were never accused or the shit they were accused of never happened.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:42 PM
3

Oh my god their faces. I couldn't even watch much more after that. And thanks, I'll find some use for this video I'm sure.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:03 AM
2

Could you give a specific time in the video where they say that. It's an hour and a half long and I'd rather not go searching for it. I would like to see and hear for myself their smug tone and satisfied faces after saying that.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:47 PM
3

That wont happen until we start removing alimony laws and unjustified child support, though. These are some things we fight against. But women are more than capable for fending for themselves, it's mostly the more extreme cases that get our goat (and just because they are extreme, doesn't mean they aren't common)
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:36 PM
4

Negligible racism aside, yes this child was clearly mortified by the hulking adult readying up to beat him down. I wouldn't be surprised if his parents tried suing for coverage of psychological treatment.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:03 PM
3

Is this person (I think?) for real?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:28 PM
4

Troll alert.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:25 PM
4

There's more to see too. It may be painful, but at least it'll open your eyes.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:12 PM
10

Just...my fucking hand was pressed against my face the whole time. Seriously, I know it's not new, but every time this happens I just cringe.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:06 PM
13

Yeah I get that. First sentence in my comment acknowledges that.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:03 PM
24

While the double standard isn't really appreciated I think it's best that we leave this alone. Like Ironlid said, we're not here to silence people's comedic tendencies, that's something that pro-censorship groups do.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:39 PM
-2

Wow, actually that was very good. We need more of these explanations to help stop ourselves from scaring everyone outside of the community away.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:35 AM
1

This issue with certain types of these people is that they expect special treatment for their self-diagnosed sexuality and identity. More often than not they exclaim their traits for attention and call shame to those who end up disagreeing with their asinine methods of trying to be an accepted part of society. If you're LGBT or some derivative of it then fine, but don't expect special treatment because of it.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:35 AM
1

Believe it or not they're often trolls.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:53 AM
122

"She said the snow penis follows a long line of public phallic symbols, including the Washington Monument and missiles" ~ 6:20 .......OK she's got to be fucking kidding me now. Washington Monument is shaped that way because it's an Obelisk, not a penis. And missiles are "penis shaped" because that's their engineered design for efficiency, no self respecting engineer would sacrifice efficiency for some statement. This lady is off her fucking rocker.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:15 PM
5

Yes she did.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:20 PM
4

Lumpy Space Princess
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:35 PM
1

To me it just seems like their trying to cover their tracks. They still only portray males as the perpetrators of rape, that's where the problem lies.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:36 PM
0

...balls? ~cringe~
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:33 PM
2

Brony MRAs unite! /]
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:01 PM
3

Of course you are welcome, but MR isn't about LGBT foremost. We are about shedding light on issues that males face. And gay males are still males that face problems that feminists choose not to address.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:57 PM
5

I've definitely heard it before, and it would be preferable. Saying "Shut up, no one wants to hear it." is a much easier thing to refute and discredit. Due to the heavily negative connotation the former argument had. It also makes anyone saying it sound voluntarily ignorant.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:36 PM
5

Poe's law... Although it does sound like what a genuine self-hating male would sound like. Poor guy is brainwashed, I actually feel sorry for him.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:29 PM
2

I'm not even a father, I guess the closest would have to be that I have a four-year-old younger brother. But just reading the title made me tear up. I sure hope the parents came to their senses after this happened.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:08 PM
2

DO YOU UNDERSTAND????????????? No, you understand you entitled bitch. I am not your slave. Anything that I do for you is earned by your respect to me. Marriage isn't a conditional agreement, it's one of love and acceptance. If you can't reciprocate this love on your own terms then all you're doing is buying my affections and vice versa.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:42 AM
1

Realistically "No True Scotsman" is to be used when referring to those of an official ideology or practice. Being male isn't something you practice, it's something you are, something you are born with and did not willingly choose to be.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:37 PM
5

Officially known as begging the question.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:33 PM
1

Passive Aggressiveness has never failed me yet. Haha
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:43 AM
0

OAG to the max.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:23 AM
18

What is it with women and public transportation in which they think that they are some kind of untouchable god who have some sort of right to harass people and not receive repercussions?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:41 PM
4

Fuck man if that was me in that situation I would have ended up having it and breaking her arm. I would have broken anyone's arm if they were doing that to me.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:05 PM
7

If feminists went by consistent logic (legitimacy of consent) they would consider drunken sex to not be actual rape. But we all know what they have to say about that.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:19 AM
-1

I wouldn't completely agree with that. Reason being that according to what you say you treat rapists like they are normal human beings. But that is not the case. Rapists know that what they do is wrong already, yet they still do it, and even if they have some sort mental deficiency in where they can find no wrong in raping, either way no amount of education or informative propaganda will stop them. The problem here is not telling men that they can't control themselves, but rather saying that men…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:30 AM
5

He said that he watched her take the positive paternity tests. She's most definitely pregnant, but your advice should still be taken. Keeping any physical or emotional ties with crazy is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:01 PM
0

That might be hard to peg 'em on it because the first thing they would do is lie and say "We're for equality of both genders."
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:15 PM
1

If you read it again you will see that I did.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:40 AM
2

This isn't even sociology. This is "homo-sapient zoology." This isn't appropriate to teach in any environment. In fact it's down right sexist. This is what I really hate about social sciences (some people might get mad if I call em "soft science") they're often full of biased and speculative bullshit and too often are they followed as if they are hard fact.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:06 AM
8

Whomever wrote this must have been high on some drugs I would like to call "misandrist propaganda."
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:03 AM
1

Then you haven't met many feminists and watched their behavior.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:55 PM
17

You do realize that this is a core principle of feminism, right? Although they have another name for it, they call it "the patriarchy."
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:20 PM
2

You're an idiot FTFY means "Fixed that for you" Please leave if you're going to be a moron.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:23 PM
2

The charge of misandery helps some avoid the necessity of looking at the unique and causative nature of misogyny. So only misogyny has cause and misandry doesn't? The charge of misogyny helps some avoid the necessity of looking at the unique and causative nature of misandry. FTFY
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:59 PM
52

"Grouping all men and all their actions together as one and claiming that all must take responsibility for a few"~ Modern Feminist 'Wisdom'
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:57 PM
3

Yeah, you're a fucking blind idiot. So hatred of men doesn't exist? Everyone who hates men must have good reason for it? No, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Modern invention my ass, thoughts and feelings aren't modern inventions. There has always been Misandry just like there has always been Misogyny.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:52 PM
4

Well I find his bluntness refreshing. His points are closely comparable to our ideologies. We need more people who shout for us, as long as it isn't crazy. TAA isn't crazy, he's angry and opinionated.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:50 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but your comment in the first place was basely off topic.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:32 PM
1

You do know that's not the definition of an abortion right? What you're describing is a vasectomy or tube tying. An abortion is the termination of pregnancy through the destruction (or killing, depends on your stance) of the fetus (or baby, again depends on your stance).
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:46 PM
2

Need more of this stuff. OP did you find any other pics like this. Or rather could you link its source?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:49 AM
9

Welcome to /r/MensRights where SuicideBanana is both famous and infamous.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:39 AM
2

Yeah a little over the edge, but he has half a point.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:55 AM
10

"1/2 are girls" Implying that the ratio should be less in comparison to boys. Implying that females are intrinsically more important than males. Implying that if it were even only "1/4 are females" this presentation wouldn't change except for the number.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:28 AM
1

I think the line to be drawn is what is called incapacitation, whether it's a knock out or a judo hold. Killing or intentional permanent bodily injury is what would be considered excessive force here. You grab someone, and spit in their face expect to be KTFO.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:00 AM
10

As far as I know VA has done nothing illegal. What he did may not have been delightful, but in no way did it warrant his doxxing. Shit like this needs to be made aware of.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:56 AM
3

Are you sure, cause I've seen plenty of users get warned for linking to them in comments.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:37 AM
5

You might wanna remove that, linking to SRS isn't allowed in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:19 AM
12

TIL that MRA's know more about actual women's history than most feminists
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:54 AM
4

" I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. -- I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. " -Be…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:44 PM
3

Man, I don't mean to be rude, I'm 18 also and I agree that the education system is biased towards the female student body, but I really doubt that it could have affected you that much. Currently most of this problem is found in the classes of younger students. Not really prominent in high school from your time frame, but it is currently on the rise as an issue. My advice is to just not blame the school for your poor grades, again I don't mean to be rude, but there's plenty you could have done to…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:46 PM
2

well then, get it out
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:53 AM
2

Yes, I think it would be pretty damn funny to watch the feminists writhe around in annoyance to the obvious ridiculousness of their argument.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:38 AM
2

Except in your version the jews wouldn't actually exist.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:25 AM
6

I actually prefer male teachers. I feel like they know how to teach boys which is especially good since current curricula are being catered to the female student body exclusively.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:22 AM
1

That's like, discrimination just for being straight. This feels like some sort of vendetta charge to me.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:47 AM
1

I can understand your viewpoint. Politics definitely plays a large part in it. But their mudslinging goes deeper than you think. As the public view of law enforcement gets worse, the actual enforcement starts to get just as bad. My only source that I know of right now is personal experience. And I like I said before I have seen a lot of good cops, but a poor economy also plays a role in affecting the attitudes of these cops. Ineffective or misguided enforcement is becoming more prominent as this…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:43 AM
2

That's always been an obvious issue. And it's getting worse as of recent.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:34 AM
3

Trust me I've seen plenty of bad cops. I've seen good ones too. And not really with the economy with the way it is. It's becoming increasingly likely that someone becomes a cop or public service employee because of their poor grades, which is a byproduct of a poor economy.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:32 AM
3

Well, when the public expects cops to be lazy by effect they tend to become lazy. It kind of hits home when this policy actually supports itself by siphoning from the views of the public.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:28 AM
2

I applaud all cops that feel this way. But to be fair your grandfather was part of a different time. I am unsure that many modern cops feel this way, from what I've seen anyway.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:27 AM
3

Well it is kind of a double whammy there.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:24 AM
2

Yeah seriously. When did the sense of duty and voluntary service to society and its citizens get fucked in the ass and flushed down the proverbial toilet of imaginary entitlement?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:09 PM
5

Ticket quotas themselves are ridiculous. The fact that we have to encourage our law enforcement to do their jobs even when they get paid is just sad.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:52 PM
3

Well this goes as far as what would be called slander outside of the minor age group. So regardless if she were a child or adult she could still file a report of harassment.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:06 PM
1

I completely agree, aside from the Obama part, but that's politics and I would rather not get into that. Your explanation is appreciated and I wish people at /r/bestof would feel the same way, but that's sadly the reputation of the sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:11 AM
0

People are free to imagine persecution and victimization between every word I simply refuse to be misrepresented. Nope, because I don't agree with anything you've said. You may not be affected by the propaganda, but that doesn't mean that you weren't tricked by it. It's saying "Hey you, you too can help stop killings by not shooting anyone today, OK?" You didn't read my explanation on it at all. If it were saying that then there would be a propaganda message. It doesn't say that, nor does it imp…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:59 PM
0

That works from an anthropological standpoint, but the public realistically only views things from an ethical or societal standpoint. That's the essence of double speak and propaganda. Using implied scientific ideas, that in of themselves are justified, in a different format to manipulate the perceptions of messages that given out to the public. This message isn't scientific. And it shouldn't be interpreted as such.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:09 PM
5

In japan the woman is given the responsibility of managing the house and finances. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of feminist article claiming that japanese women are "enslaved" because they have this responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:01 PM
0

No... you're reading WAY too much into everything. It simply means that you're in control of your actions. And if those actions don't include rape, then you're not a rapist because you haven't chosen to rape anyone. See, that's the issue here. My interpretation is not exclusive to just me. People read more than they think. This is the essence of propaganda. If you don't read into it then you get sucked in to its false message and become blind to the one it's actually giving, yet you still become…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:37 PM
0

You're not getting the message here. Can't you control yourself and manage to somehow avoid raping women? By saying that "I have to control myself." implies that I must remind myself to not rape, as if the other half of the time I want to rape everyone. I don't have to actively control myself from raping because I'm not a rapist and I don't look at every person I meet or walk by on the street and imagine raping them or have some sort of overwhelming urge to rape them. By saying that all men have…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:19 PM
-1

You're obviously reading a totally different comment than I wrote. No you're not reading mine So you think that all men are assholes? No you don't. I think we should start this over. I'm making this get out of hand. My reasoning behind this is that this poster implies that men already have the urges and mindset of a rapist by saying: "I am a person, I can goddamn control myself" This is the kind of propaganda that is unwanted. This is a public message to all men. Meaning it addresses all men and…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:32 PM
-1

Oh, so you think that any male who gets wasted and sees a drunken passed out girl has the first thought to have sex with her? If it's as you imply then the real culprit here is the alcohol. They're not sick, they're assholes. So you think that all men are assholes? No you don't. People make these kinds of decisions because they're dumbasses. What I'm trying to point out here is that this poster says all men are the same and have the mindset and urge to rape constantly, which is a crock of shit. …
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:38 PM
-4

Yeah uh huh. And WHY do they make these choices? You have never taken a course in criminal psychology have you?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:16 PM
1

I'm not. I'm comparing different mindsets and desires. Rapists are criminals of whom have no remorse or sympathy. This poster is basically saying that all men have the urge to rape, thus they all have this mindset. Which is wrong.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:13 PM
11

I am a person and I can goddamn control myself This implies that I would have to actively prevent myself from raping. As if I constantly have the urge to do so. This is wrong and this is the kind of discrimination we are trying to fight. A big part of the MRM is to eradicate fear of men. And all this poster does is contradict it's own message and hand out another underlying one. Fuck this poster and fuck its supposed message.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:59 PM
0

That's like saying gays have the choice of being gay or not. Rapists are a different kind of people. They are sociopathic criminals. What this poster does is equating such desire mindsets of rapists to all men. This is the kind of shit we are trying to avoid advertising.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:52 PM
-1

The problem with this argument is that we're not asking women to watch what they wear so MEN wont rape them, we're asking them to do that so RAPISTS wont rape them. Rapists aren't reasonable people, just telling them to not rape wont stop them. Men are reasonable people, society already tells us through norms that it isn't OK to rape, so we don't need to be publicly labeled as those who need to be taught and told over and over again not to rape. Grouping men and rapists together is gender stereo…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:32 PM
1

I worded that poorly
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:32 PM
7

Well yeah I think that we shouldn't organize for the sake of downvoting things. But that shouldn't stop us from contributing to the value of the popular opinion on a comment or post. Voting gets certain things heard by moving them up comment orders or page numbers. And it also keeps ignorance from rearing in its ugly head. EDIT: shouldn't organize***
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:53 PM
3

I can't tell how much rage I have right now because of these "protesters." I wish we were there to protect these kids from this atrocity. EDIT: That Matrix association was so spot on I almost cried.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:26 PM
1

Next time they ask that you should say, "Yeah, and are you over your maternity leave?"
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:48 PM
1

That's why true feminism is dead. All that remains is this husk of hypocritical, control hungry, illogical, dumbassery. People who call themselves the "true feminists" in the days of real battles for equality in the realm of women really mean that they are egalitarians, they just don't know that that is what they mean.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:49 PM
6

Wow had no idea what a hypocritical fucktard Dear Abby is.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:04 AM
1

What would you do if your daughter was raped by someone who was already under investigation? And what would you do if you could have protected her, if only you were warned. Those who are under investigation are always on watch. Merely telling someone that someone else is under investigation for supposed rape really does nothing. Realistically rapists don't rape during an investigation, not because they won't, but because they can't. If the accused turns up missing and his whereabouts are unknown…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:13 PM
1

I believe that it should also be agreed that both party's identities should be classified. Both the accuser and the accused. It's far too often that only the accuser's identity is held a secret while the other faces the full brunt of the press and attention.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 02:36 PM
1

Well would you agree that since the Misandrists use the "Men are evil/scary" tactic to employ Androphobics and manipulate them that if we move our attacks against the "fear of men" would do some kind of double whammy? Changing the minds of the Androphobics and thus the misandrists losing favor? I'm not saying we shouldn't use different tactics, I'm saying that the one I just talked about does more than you think.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 02:18 PM
1

i could show you many feminist sites too (not in english though. sorry), concerned about male issues as well Yeah, but we're not big on those kinds of things there. It's not that we don't appreciate it, but this has been used as a mask for a lot of the supremacy that the misandrists have been spreading. And we are cautious to a fault because of it. But, I forgot to say this, welcome and stay as long as you like.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:01 AM
2

Wait, now you just went full retard (that's just an expression). Give me this proof you speak of. These are the people who represent us http://www.avoiceformen.com/ And there are plenty others like them. They are not misogynist whatsoever. We are a relatively small group, we know how we are being represented. It's everyone else who are directly against MR who tell you we are lead by misogynists.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:29 AM
1

Well the problem with that is that it may be from your perspective, but by joining up with their title, and claiming that you hold these values you say, I'm not saying you don't hold these values, but you just indirectly help feminism mask its misandrist movement as an equality movement. Which really isnt helping anyone. So for the sake of yourself and others, please call yourself something else.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:09 AM
1

All the couples in china are like, "HA-WHAAAAAT???"
/r/MensRights15/09/12 04:59 AM
1

Let me know how yelling bomb on a plane in flight works for you. Shouting "FIRE" in a movie theatre, or "BOMB" in an airport isn't freedom of speech. That's freedom of instilling panic. Freedom of speech is there so everyone can convey their own ideas and opinions. Whether or not there is fire in a movie theater, or there is a bomb or not on the plane isn't an opinion, it's either factual or non-factual. Basically these people are arrested for shouting immediately harmful lies, rather than opini…
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:20 PM
1

Everybody get down with the sickness. :/
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:15 PM
2

I have been trying to find a concise definition of that for a long time. You have given it to me and I thank you for that.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:55 PM
2

Quite true, but you can make a big fuss about it. There need to be more men fighting against this kind of injustice directly. Even if the outcome is less than desirable, the more you fight the more you'll be noticed. Who knows maybe this could become somewhat big and the injustices of the judicial system come to light somewhat. Then again that's extremely unlikely. But there's never any harm in doing the best you can. From what I see there is substantial evidence against the woman. He can claim …
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:19 PM
2

Wait, so let me get this straight. She lied to you about being on birth control, she didn't stop you and at least warn you to wear a condom. It's just as much her responsibility to not get pregnant as it is yours. The sex was consensual, she was in her right frame of mind. Females carry around condoms just as much as males do, doesn't that suggest that they are also taking advocacy thus responsibility for their pregnancy? It takes two people to get pregnant. She hardly knows you I assume, yet sh…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:31 PM
1

I am really interested in buying this book. If what I'm hearing from the video is accurate then it seems that this text could be a go-to reference when combating feminists.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:36 PM
5

my bad, deleted it.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:38 PM
3

It's shit like this that really gets my blood boiling. I hope soon enough that this will get spread around enough that people start taking attention to what is happening nowadays. Crazy bitch should be locked up the same amount of time that rapists are, 10-15 years. See how she likes it.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:56 PM
1

Hate to disappoint you but this has already been posted/discussed. On phone so I cant post link, will do so in near future.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:56 AM
2

Now I have an argument on men's suffrage. You think your birth control is a pain in the ass? I had to have a needle through my dick and every time I climax it feels like its getting backed up.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:33 PM
2

You're misinterpreting what I'm saying. The feminists are doing what they try to do right. They try to forcefully pull rights away from men, and they are succeeding. We aren't doing anything to change their lives, but they are doing all that they can to change ours. This isn't retaliation, this is a defensive reaction. These people are either cruel, power-hungry, or misguided. You really don't get what we do here. So don't just take my word for it. Look at other posts and see what we, as a whole…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:38 PM
2

No that's quite the contrary. It shows that men have a problem with feminist propaganda. Women aren't feared a potential rapists or sexual predators as a default. The signs say that men are subjected to this. Are women? I don't think so; our problems are different. So we work against the source which is feminism. If we give the feminists, who disguise their hate march as equality, any leverage or weakness on our part they will uproot our cause. To combat this we must be separate and opposed. Peo…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:44 PM
2

What about these posters are antagonistic? These feminist women protested against them because they feel threatened by men proclaiming rights. If this is a case of antagonism then you might as well give up on trying to have a peaceful talk out, because there will always be someone who tries their best to be offended by your opinions and beliefs so they can cry "hate". I don't mean to sound angry or mean, but you really need to wake up. This is a war, we as men are continuously threatened by the …
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:52 PM
2

If you think that feminists, whom already have the favor of the majority, can be reasoned with in such a way then you haven't met many feminists. If we merely speak for equality then the hate crimes that feminists have imposed upon us will never be shown in the light. If we don't speak up that we as men object directly to their actions then we will likely get nowhere.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:27 PM
3

These posters are worded in such a way that they are made to combat and push back the anti-male feminist views that are already prevalent in America and suffocating men's rights as a whole. These statements must be bold in order to be heard. They must instill and impose a reaction upon people's thinking that are already gravitated towards the illusion of the equality that feminism flaunts. This is how activism works, you cant push back an opposing force by standing neutral. Sometimes you gotta b…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:36 AM
6

Wait, you call yourself a "Feminist", yet you claim for equality amongst genders. Well I'm not sure if you've been that well informed lately, but Feminism has now taken the persona of gynocentrism and misandry. If you really believe in gender equality then you would stop calling yourself a Feminist. Instead fight for both Women's and Men's rights which is what I often do. I'm here to gain insight on the inequalities against Men, but I'm also browse other subreddits for inequalities against women…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:58 AM
3

THANK YOU so much for posting that.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:57 PM
2

God dammit if only I had this article when I was doing my report on Meghan's Law. My stupid bitch of a teacher actually believed that every single person on the SO registry is either a pedophile or rapist. While I actually showed her proof of the violation of the 8th Amendment by Meghan's law. Men who have done nothing, or merely minor offenses (i.e. accidental indecent exposure) have been put on this list and have their lives ruined by this knee-jerk law. This article goes to show how stupid th…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:58 PM
8

I have a horrible condition that forces me to point out the obvious.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:14 PM
12

It's all because she was a woman. If a male had done this the charges would have been closer to life imprisonment. There's really something wrong with the double standard that has been placed in our judicial system through bias and stereotype.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter